PHD Lecture23 24
PHD Lecture23 24
PHD Lecture23 24
David Vegh
(figures by Masaki Shigemori)
6 March 2019
1 Small Oscillations
• 2 DoFs
x1 = l1 sin φ1
y1 = l1 cos φ1
x2 = x1 + l2 sin φ2
y2 = y1 + l2 cos φ2
1 1 1 1
T = m1 (ẋ21 + ẏ12 ) + m2 (ẋ22 + ẏ22 ) = m1 l12 φ̇21 + m2 (l12 φ̇21 + l22 φ̇22 + 2l1 l2 φ̇1 φ̇2 cos(φ1 − φ2 ))
2 2 2 2
V = −m1 gy1 − m2 gy2 = −g(l1 (m1 + m2 ) cos φ1 + l2 m2 cos φ2 )
1
• Equilibrium positions are found by solving
∂V
∂φ1 = 2mgl sin φ1
⇒ φ1 = φ2 = 0
∂V
∂φ2 = mgl sin φ2
• The Hessian
∂2V
∂φ21
= 2mgl cos φ1
2 0
2
∂ V
∂φ22 = mgl cos φ 2 ⇒ Vij = mgl
0 1
∂2V
∂φ1 ∂φ2=0
• Kinetic energy
1 1
T = ml2 φ̇21 + ml2 φ̇22 + ml2 φ̇1 φ̇2 cos(φ1 − φ2 ) ≡ aij (φ1 , φ2 )φ̇i φ̇j
2 2
From this we can read off aij :
and finally,
2 2 1
Tij = aij (φ1 = 0, φ2 = 0) = ml
1 1
1
Note: be careful with the 2 when reading off aij !
det(ω 2 T − V) = 0
2 2 2 1 2 0
det ω ml − mgl =0
1 1 0 1
2(ω 2 − g/l) ω2
det =0
ω2 ω 2 − g/l
2(ω 2 − g/l)2 − ω 4 = 0
g g2
ω4 − 4 ω2 + 2 2 = 0
l l
g √
ω2 = (2 ± 2)
l
2
So the normal frequencies are √
2 g
ω(1) = (2 − 2)
l
2 g √
ω(2) = (2 + 2)
l
• Plug these back in to find amplitudes A
(ω 2 Tlj − Vlj )Aj = 0
2(ω 2 − g/l) ω2
A1
=0
ω2 ω 2 − g/l A2
Since the determinant of the matrix vanishes, the two equations are not independent. We only need to solve
one of them.
2
• Plug in ω(1)
g √g g √
2 2) −
(2 − A1 + (2 − 2)A2 = 0
l l l
√
2A1 − A2 =0
A1 1
=c √ , c∈C
A2 2
This is the first normal mode that we have found.
Solution
η1 = Re[ceiω(1) t ]
√
η2 = Re[ 2ceiω(1) t ]
2
• Plug in ω(2)
g √
g g √
2 2) −
(2 + A1 + (2 + 2)A2 = 0
l l l
√
2A1 + A2 = 0
A1 1
=c √ , c∈C
A2 − 2
This is the second normal mode that we have found.
Solution
η1 = Re[ceiω(2) t ]
√
η2 = Re[− 2ceiω(2) t ]
3
1.2 Example: Linear triatomic molecule in 1D
• 3 DoFs
• Modeled with spring forces (e.g. CO2 ).
1 2 2 1 2
T = 2 m(ẋ1 + ẋ3 ) + 2 M ẋ2
1 2 1
V = 2 k(x2 − x1 − l) + 2 k(x3 − x2 − l)2
where l is the rest length of the springs.
Equilibrium positions are found by solving
∂V
0 = ∂x 1
= −k(x2 − x1 − l)
∂V
0 = ∂x 2
= k(x2 − x1 − l) − k(x3 − x2 − l) = k(2x2 − x1 − x3 )
∂V
0 = ∂x = k(x3 − x2 − l)
3
Thus,
x2 − x1 = l, x 3 − x2 = l
Note that only relative positions are determined.
• Hessian:
∂2V ∂2V ∂2V
= k, = 2k, =k
∂x21 ∂x22 ∂x23
∂2V ∂2V ∂2V
= −k, = 0, = −k.
∂x1 ∂x2 ∂x1 ∂x3 ∂x2 ∂x3
Thus,
−1 0
1
Vij = k −1 2 −1
0 −1 1
The matrix is independent of the x’s.
m 0 0
Tij = 0 M 0
0 0 m
det(ω 2 T − V) = 0
4
mω 2 − k
k 0
2
det k M ω − 2k k =0
2
0 k mω − k
(mω − k) (M ω − 2k) − 2k (mω 2 − k) = 0
2 2 2 2
• Solutions:
2
ω(0) =0
2 k
ω(1) =
m
2 k 2m
ω(2) = 1+
m M
• The amplitudes:
mω 2 − k
k 0 A1
k M ω 2 − 2k k A2 = 0
2
0 k mω − k A3
2
• Plug in ω(0) =0
−1
1 0 A1
k −1 2 −1 A2 = 0
0 −1 1 A3
Thus,
A1 1
A2 = c 1
A3 1
η1 = η2 = η3 = Re[cei×0×t ] = const.
2 k
• Plug in ω(1) = m
0 1 0 A1
M
m −2
k 1 1 A2 = 0
0 1 0 A3
Thus,
A1 1
A2 = c 0
A3 −1
√k
η1 = −η3 = Re[cei mt ], η2 = 0
5
k 2m
2
• Plug in ω(1) = m 1+ M
2m
−k
k 1+ M k 0 A1
k 2m
k Mm 1+ k A2 = 0
M
2m
0 k k 1+ M −k A3
Thus,
A1 1
A2 = c − 2m
M
A3 1
2m
q
η1 = η3 = Re[ce
i k
m (1+ 2m
M )t
], η2 = − η1
M
• 2 DoFs
xM = x xm = x + l sin φ
yM = 0 ym = l cos φ
1 2 2
) + 12 m(ẋ2m + ẏm
2 M 2 m 2
+ l2 φ̇2 + 2lẋφ̇ cos φ)
T = 2 M (ẋM + ẏM )= 2 ẋ + 2 (ẋ
V = −mgym = −mgl cos φ
6
• Equilibrium positions
∂V ∂V
= 0, = mgl sin φ = 0
∂x ∂φ
This gives φ = 0 and x =arbitrary.
M + m ml
T =
ml ml2
0 0
V=
0 mgl
• secular equation
ω 2 (M + m) ω 2 ml
det =0
ω 2 ml ω 2 ml2 − mgl
2
ω(0) =0
This is again an overall translation.
2 g m
ω(1) = 1+
l M
ω 2 (M + m) ω 2 ml
A1
2 =0
ω ml ω ml2 − mgl
2
A2
ml
A1 = − A2
M +m
ml
q
i g 1+ m t
x(t) = xarbitrary − Re A2 e l ( M )
M +m
q
i gl (1+ M
m
) t
φ(t) = Re A2 e
7
2 Hamiltonian mechanics
So far w ehave been using the Lagrangian formalism of mechanics, in which the system is described by
generalized coordinates ~q and generalized velocities ~q˙.
We now want to introduce the Hamiltonian formalism, in which the system is described by generalized
coordinates ~q and generalized momenta p~.
This formalism is even more general: it treats ~q and p~ on equal footing.
q̇ = q̇(q, p, t)
H = pq̇ − L
The right hand side involves q̇ which we need to reexpress in terms of p. Then we get H = H(q, p, t).
Thus,
∂L ∂L
dH = q̇dp − dq − dt
∂q ∂t
On the other hand, H = H(q, p, t) gives
∂H ∂H ∂H
dH = dq + dp + dt
∂q ∂p ∂t
8
Since q, p, t are independent, comparing the coefficients gives
∂H ∂L ∂H ∂H ∂L
=− , = q̇, =− .
∂q ∂q ∂p ∂t ∂t
These simply followed from the definition of p and H.
∂L
Let us now also use the Euler-Lagrange equation ṗ = ∂q to get Hamilton’s equations
∂H
q̇ =
∂p
and
∂H
ṗ = −
∂q