Session 1+2 - Notes - Acceptance PDF
Session 1+2 - Notes - Acceptance PDF
Session 1+2 - Notes - Acceptance PDF
A. RULES
Mental acceptance, failure to answer or silence on part of the offeree is not acceptance, as
it is not communicated. However for a general offer, no acceptance is necessary, if it is
made by complying with the terms of the offer.(Carbolic Smoke Ball Case)
Eg- A offers to B to sell his house in a prime locality for Rs. 25 lakhs. B had made up his
mind to purchase it, but does not say anything to A. There is no acceptance as it is not
communicated.
Facts- Felthouse wrote a letter to his nephew, “I want to buy your horse. If I hear no
more from you, I shall assume the horse to be mine.” Nephew informed Bindley, an
auctioneer, to keep the horse out of sale. Bindley by mistake sold the horse to somebody.
When Felthouse came to know this, he brought an action against Bindley.
Facts- Powell was a candidate for headmastership of a school. The school managing
committee passed the resolution appointing Mr. Powell. Lee, who was one of the
members of the managing committee, happened to be a friend of Mr. Powell. He
informed Powell of his appointment. However, due to some external pressures, the
resolution was withdrawn.
Held- Lee had informed Powell in his friendly capacity and the communication was not
on behalf of the school authorities.
3. Acceptance must be communicated in the prescribed manner only else it
is not binding on the proposer.
If the offer prescribes a mode of acceptance, then it shall be made in that mode only. If
acceptance is communicated in some other manner and the offered remains silent, he is
deemed to have consented to the acceptance, even if it not in the prescribed manner.
When no mode is prescribed, it shall be made in some usual and reasonable manner.
E.g. - A sends a letter to B offering to sell his old carriage and asks B to reply by
telegram. B shall reply only by telegram and not otherwise. Even if B accepts otherwise,
A can insist on receiving a telegram. If A does not so insist within a reasonable time, he
is deemed to have assented to B’s acceptance in such mode as had been made by B.
If the person to whom an offer is made accepts the same subject to some conditions, it is
called qualified acceptance and is not binding on the person who makes the proposal.
In other words, a valid acceptance can be only for the exact terms of the offer as proposed
by the offered. Acceptance with a variation constitutes a counter offer and is not a valid
acceptance.
Illustrations
1) A prospective buyer offers to buy an article from a seller at a certain price to be paid
after three months. Seller accepts the offer provided cash is immediately paid. Such an
acceptance is not binding on the offerer.
2) J offers to sell his cow to K. K replies that he would buy it only if he gave the calf
along with it. This is not a valid acceptance as it is qualified.
Illustration
a) as against the proposer, when the letter of acceptance is put in the course
of transmission to him; and
b) as against the acceptor, when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer.
E.g. - H, in response to G’s offer dated April 1, 2018, communicates his acceptance on
April 5, 2018 by post which reached G on April 8, 2018. As regards G, communication of
acceptance is complete when the letter is posted by H i.e. April 5, 2018 and as regards H,
acceptance is said to be communicated when the letter reaches G i.e. April 8, 2018.
Note:- The proposer becomes bound only when a properly addressed and
adequately stamped letter is posted.
Section 6
COMMUNICATION OF REVOCATION
Section 4
i) as against the person who makes it, when it is put in the course of
transmission to the person to whom it is made so as to be out of the
power of the person who makes it;
ii) as against the person to whom it is made, when it comes to his
knowledge.
Illustrations-
1) A revokes his proposal by telegram. The revocation is complete as against A when the
telegram is dispatched. It is complete as against B, when B receives it.
2) Facts - M agreed on Monday to sell his property to N by a written agreement which
stated that “this offer to stay open till Saturday 10 a.m.” In the meantime on Wednesday,
M enters into a contract to sell the property to P. N, who was sitting in the next room at
that time, hears about the deal between M and P. On Friday, N accepts the offer and
delivers to M the letter of acceptance. Is N’s acceptance valid?
Held –
- Acceptance is made before the revocation of the offer by M and well within the
specified time limit set by M in his letter of offer.
- Overhearing by N does not amount to valid revocation by M.
- Hence, N’s acceptance is perfectly valid.
- The treatment would have been different if, before acceptance by N, M had formally
communicated his revocation to him.