This pdf of your paper in Aegean Scripts, Proceedings of the 14th

International Colloquium on Mycenaean Studies belongs to the

publisher Istituto di Studi sul Mediterraneo Antico (Consiglio
Nazionale delle Ricerche) and it is its copyright.

As author you are licensed to make up to 50 offprints from it,

but beyond that you may not make it available on the Internet
until two years from publication (December 2017).
 I

CNR
ISTITUTO DI STUDI SUL MEDITERRANEO ANTICO
 II

INCUNABULA GRAECA
VOL. CV, 1

Direttori
Marco Bettelli · Maurizio Del Freo

coMitato scientiFico
John Bennet (Sheffield) · elisaBetta Borgna (Udine)
anDrea carDarelli (Roma) · anna lucia D’agata (Roma)
Pia De FiDio (Napoli) · Jan Driessen (Louvain-la-Neuve)
Birgitta eDer (Wien) · arteMis Karnava (Berlin)
John t. Killen (Cambridge) · JosePh Maran (Heidelberg)
Pietro Militello (Catania) · MassiMo Perna (Napoli)
Françoise rougeMont (Paris) · JereMy B. rutter (Dartmouth)
gert Jan van WiJngaarDen (Amsterdam) · carlos varias garcía (Barcelona)
Jörg Weilhartner (Salzburg) · Julien zurBach (Paris)

PUBBLICAZIONI DELL'ISTITUTO DI STUDI SUL MEDITERRANEO ANTICO

DEL CONSIGLIO NAZIONALE DELLE RICERCHE

DIRETTORE DELL'ISTITUTO: ALESSANDRO NASO

 III

AEGEAN SCRIPTS
Proceedings of the 14th International Colloquium on Mycenaean Studies
Copenhagen, 2-5 September 2015

Volume I
IV
 V

AEGEAN SCRIPTS

Proceedings of the 14th International Colloquium on

Mycenaean Studies, Copenhagen, 2-5 September 2015

Volume I

edited by

Marie-Louise Nosch
Hedvig Landenius Enegren

edizioni
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche

Istituto di Studi sul Mediterraneo Antico - ROMA 2017

 VI

Undertaken and published with the assistance and contribution

of the Lillian and Dan Fink Foundation, the Carlsberg Foundation,
the Danish National Research Foundation, the Institute of Aegean Prehistory,
the R. K. Rasks Legat Foundation and the University of Copenhagen.

The rights of translation, electronic storage, reproduction and total or

partial adaptation by any means (including microfilm and photostatic copies)
are reserved for all countries. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
distributed or transmitted in any form without the written permission of the
Publisher, with the exception of short citations incorporated into reviews
or other non-commercial uses permitted by copyright law.

ISSN 11267348
ISBN 9788880802754

© CNR edizioni, 2017

Piazzale Aldo Moro, 7 - 00185 Roma
 VII

CONTENTS

Volume I

Contents .........................................................................................................VII
Abbreviations ................................................................................................. XI
Preface and acknowledgements .............................................................. XXVII
List of participants .................................................................................... XXXI
Scripts, Palaeography and Research Tools
M. Del Freo, Rapport 2011-2015 sur les textes en écriture hiéroglyphique
crétoise, en linéaire A et en linéaire B ....................................................... 3
M. Egetmeyer, A. Karnava, H. Landenius Enegren and M. Perna,
2011-2015 Report on the Cypriot Syllabic Inscriptions .......................... 31
M. Egetmeyer, A. Karnava, H. Landenius Enegren and M. Perna,
IG XV 1, Inscriptiones Cypri Syllabicae: the completion of
Fasciculus I, Inscriptiones Amathuntis, Curii et Marii ............................ 45
R. Firth, The Find-spots of the Linear B Tablets from the Archives
Complex at Pylos ..................................................................................... 55
F. Aurora, pa-ro, da-mo. Studying the Mycenaean Case System through
DĀMOS (Database of Mycenaean at Oslo) ............................................ 83
T. Meißner and P. M. Steele, Linear A and Linear B: Structural and
Contextual Concerns ................................................................................ 99
H. Tomas, From Minoan to Mycenaean elongated tablets: defining the
shape of Aegean tablets ...........................................................................115
V. Petrakis, Figures of speech? Observations on the Non-phonographic
Component in the Linear B Writing System ...........................................127
J. Weilhartner, Les idéogrammes archéologiques: Does variation
matter? .....................................................................................................169
A. P. Judson, Palaeography, Administration, and Scribal Training:
A Case-study ...........................................................................................193
Y. Duhoux, Aides à la lecture à l’âge du Bronze : Égée, Chypre et
VIII Contents

Proche-Orient ......................................................................................... 209

A. M. Jasink, One-sided Hieroglyphic Seals ................................................ 229
F. Aura Jorro, The Supplement (‘Suplemento’) to the Diccionario
Micénico (DMic.) ...................................................................................253
M. Cultraro and A. Sacconi, Un fragment de vase inscrit en linéaire B
de Prinias ................................................................................................ 269
E. Hallager, LM IIIB Linear B from Knossos and Khania ........................... 275
D. Nakassis and K. Pluta, Vorsprung durch Technik: Imaging the
Linear B Tablets from Pylos................................................................... 285
Interpretations and Contexts
L. M. Bendall, Where was da-wo?................................................................ 301
S. Lupack, The Ea Series: It Takes A Village ................................................... 347
C. W. Shelmerdine, Exceptional Women: Female Roles and Power in
the Linear B Tablets ............................................................................... 363
J. T. Killen, Notes On Linear B Tablets Concerning Wool, Cloth and
Textile Workers ...................................................................................... 381
R. Palmer, Agrimia in the Knossos tablets .................................................... 391
C. Varias García, Mycenaean Terms with the Stem /xenwos/: ‘Foreigner,
Guest, Host’............................................................................................ 417
A. Leukart, A Note on ze-ne-si-wi-jo ............................................................ 429
E. R. Luján, J. Piquero and F. Díez Platas, What did Mycenaean sirens
look like? ................................................................................................ 435
J. Bennet, On Comparison in Linear B: Genetic, Historical or Analogical? ........ 461
N. Antonello Vittiglio, Testimonianze della presenza dei termini ἄλευρα
e ἄλφιτα nei testi micenei ....................................................................... 475
S. Nikoloudis, Tracking Eumedes, the Unguent-boiler: Mycenaean Textual
and Archaeological Clues ...................................................................... 489
E. Kyriakidis, Polity and Administrative Control in Mycenaean Pylos ............ 499

Volume II
Philology and Linguistics
O. Panagl, Einige Paradoxa und Paralipomena im Dialekt der Linear
B-Tafeln ................................................................................................. 517
A. Bernabé and R. Pierini, What, When, Why: Tablet Functions and
o-te Expressions in Context ................................................................... 523
J. M. Jiménez Delgado, The Particle ἄρα from the 2nd to the 1st Millennium ....... 537
I. Serrano Laguna, ma-ka .............................................................................. 549
 Contents IX

J. L. García Ramón, Del trabajo en una nueva gramática del Micénico:

algunos problemas de vocalismo, tu-ma-ko/to-ma-ko, da-ma/du-
ma y la continuidad micénica en Lesbio ................................................ 563
R. J. Thompson, The Mycenaean o-stem Genitive Singular in -o: A
Re-evaluation ......................................................................................... 575
E. Džukeska, Semantics of Mycenaean Genitive: A Tentative Analysis
of Genitive Singular Forms ending in -o, /-os ....................................... 591
D. Kölligan, Mycenaean Onomastics and Phraseology: wo-ro- qo-ta,
qe-ro(-)a-ta, qi-ri-ta-ko .......................................................................... 605
Comparative Studies between the Aegean
the Levant and the Ancient Near East
F. Rougemont and J. P. Vita, Les « gens du roi »» à Ougarit et dans le
monde mycénien .................................................................................... 625
J. Zurbach, Esclaves, dette, monnaie en Grèce mycénienne ........................ 659
J. Gulizio, di-u/wi-ja and po-si-da-e-ja: Examples of Indo-European
Female Consorts? ................................................................................... 673
A. Greco, From Middle Assyrian to Mycenaean archives: Some
Comparative and Theoretical Considerations on the Economic
and Political Elites of a Mycenaean Polity............................................. 683
W. E. Bibee and A. M. Wilson-Wright, A Laryngeal in Linear B: Evidence
from Egyptian and Ugaritic ................................................................... 713
Historiography
F. Carraro, The Signs of Linear B and their ‘Use’ during the Decipherment.
An Enquiry among the Decipherers as a Case Study ...............................751
T. G. Palaima, Emmett L. Bennett, Jr., Michael G. F. Ventris, Alice E.
Kober, Cryptanalysis, Decipherment and the Phaistos Disc ...................771
H. Landenius Enegren and M.-L. Nosch, Michael Ventris and
Mycenaean Studies in Sweden and Denmark .........................................789
Reports
Summary of the CIPEM meeting ...................................................................833
Resolutions of the Signary Committee .......................................................... 835
Resolutions of the Committee on scholarly tools ......................................... 839
Indexes
Index of Texts ................................................................................................ 843
Index of Words ............................................................................................... 861
X
 XI

Abbreviations
I. Journals

AA Archäologischer Anzeiger.
AAWW Anzeiger der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften in
Wien, Philos.-Hist. Klasse.
ABSA Annual of the British School at Athens.
AC Antiquité Classique
ACD Acta classica Universitatis Scientiarum Debreceniensis.
AD Αρχαιολογικόν Δελτίον
AE Αρχαιολογική Εφημερίς.
ΑΙΩΝ Annali dell’Istituto universitario orientale di Napoli.
AJA American Journal of Archaeology.
AOF Archiv für Orientforschung.
AR Archaeological Reports.
ArchAnAth Αρχαιολογικά Ανάλεκτα εξ Αθηνών.
ASAA Annuario della Scuola Archeologica di Atene e delle Missioni
Italiane in Oriente.
BCH Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique.
BIBR Bulletin de l’Institut historique Belge de Rome.
BICS Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of
London.
BSL Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris.
CArchJ Cambridge Archaeological Journal.
CPh Classical Philology.
CQ Classical Quarterly.
CRAI Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres.
Ergon Τό Eργον τής εν Αθήναις Αρχαιολογικής Εταιρείας.
G&R Greece and Rome.
IF Indogermanische Forschungen.
JHS Journal of Hellenic Studies.
XII Abbreviations

JNES Journal of Near Eastern Studies.

JPR Journal of Prehistoric Religion.
MDAI(A) Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts (Athenische
Abteilung).
MH Museum Helveticum.
MSS Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft.
OAth Opuscula Atheniensia.
OJA Oxford Journal of Archaeology.
PCPhS Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society.
PP La parola del passato.
PZ Prähistorische Zeitschrift.
RAL Rendiconti della Classe di Scienze morali, storiche e filologiche
dell’Accademia dei Lincei.
RCCM Rivista di Cultura Classica e Medioevale.
RDAC Report of the Department of Antiquities Cyprus.
REA Revue des études anciennes.
REG Revue des études grecques.
REL Revue des études latines.
RFIC Rivista di filologia e di istruzione classica.
RhM Rheinisches Museum für Philologie.
RPh Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes.
SCO Studi classici e orientali.
SMEA Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici.
SMSR Studi e materiali di storia delle religioni.
SPAW Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
SSL Studi e saggi linguistici.
TAPhS Transactions of the American Philosophical Society.
TPhS Transactions of the Philological Society.
ZAnt Živa Antika.
ZPE Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik.
II. Mycenological conferences
Acta Mycenaea M. S. Ruipérez (ed.), Acta Mycenaea. Actes du
cinquième Colloque international des études
mycéniennes, tenu à Salamanque, 30 mars - 3
avril 1970, 2 vol., Minos 11-12 (1972).
Aegean Scripts M.-L. Nosch & H. Landenius Enegren (eds),
Aegean Scripts. 14th International Colloquium on
Mycenaean Studies, Copenhagen, 2-5 September
 Abbreviations XIII

2015, Incunabula Graeca, Vol. CV:1-2 (2017).

Austin Colloquium Proceedings of the 11th Mycenological Colloquium,
Austin, 7-13 May 2000 (unpublished).
Cambridge Colloquium L. R. Palmer & J. Chadwick (eds),
Cambridge Colloquium. Proceedings of the
Cambridge Colloquium on Mycenaean Studies
(1966).
Colloquium Mycenaeum E. Risch, H. Mühlestein (ed.),
Colloquium Mycenaeum. Actes du sixième
Colloque international sur les textes mycéniens et
égéens tenu à Chaumont sur Neuchâtel du 7 au 13
septembre 1975 (1979).
Colloquium Romanum A. Sacconi, M. del Freo, L. Godart & M. Negri
(eds), Atti del XII Colloquio Internazionale di
Micenologia, Roma 20-25 febbraio 2006, Pasiphae
2 (2008).
Études Mycéniennes M. Lejeune (ed.), Études Mycéniennes. Actes du
Colloque international sur les textes mycéniens,
Gif-sur-Yvette, 3-7 avril 1956, (1956).
Études Mycéniennes 2010 P. Carlier, C. De Lamberterie, M. Egetmeyer, N.
Guilleux, F. Rougemont, J. Zurbach (eds), Actes
du XIII[e] colloque international sur les textes
égéens, Sèvres, Paris, Nanterre, 20-23 septembre
2010 (2012).
Floreant S. Deger-Jalkotzy, S. Hiller, O. Panagl
(eds), Floreant Studia Mycenaea. Akten des
X. Internationalen Mykenologischen Colloquiums
in Salzburg vom 1.-5. Mai 1995, Österreichische
Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-
historische Klasse, Denkschriften, 274 (1999).
Mycenaean Studies E. L. Bennett, Jr. (ed.), Mycenaean Studies:
Proceedings of the Third International Colloquium
for Mycenaean Studies Held at ‘Wingspread’, 4-8
September 1961 (1964).
Mykenaïka J.-P. Olivier (ed.), MYKENAÏKA. Actes du IXe
Colloque international sur les textes mycéniens
et égéens organisé par le Centre de l’Antiquité
Grecque et Romaine de la Fondation Hellénique
des Recherches Scientifiques et l’École française
XIV Abbreviations

d’Athènes, Athènes, 2-6 octobre 1990, BCH Suppl.

XXV (1992).
Res Mycenaeae A. Heubeck, G. Neumann (ed.), Res Mycenaeae.
Akten des VII. Internationalen Mykenologischen
Colloquiums in Nürnberg vom 6.-10. April 1981
(1983).
Tractata Mycenaea P. Hr. Ilievski, L. Crepajac (ed.), Tractata
Mycenaea. Proceedings of the Eight International
Colloquium on Mycenaean Studies, held in Ohrid,
15-20 September 1985 (1987).
III. Congresses
2nd Cretological CongressΠεπραγμένα B’ Διεθνούς Κρητολογικού Συνεδρίου
(1967).
8 Cretological Congress Πεπραγμένα H’ Διεθνούς Κρητολογικού Συνεδρίου,
th

Heraklion, 9-14 September 1996 (2000).

9 Cretological Congress Πεπραγμένα Θ’ Διεθνούς Κρητολογικού Συνεδρίου,
th

Elounda, 8-6 October 2001 (2006).

10 Cretological Congress I’ Διεθνές Κρητολογικό Συνέδριο, Khania, 1-8
th

October 2006 (2011).

Culti primordiali I culti primordiali della grecità alla luce delle
scoperte di Tebe, Roma, 24-25 febbraio 2000,
Contributi del Centro Linceo “Beniamino Segre”
109 (2004).
Economy and Politics S. Voutsaki & J.T. Killen (eds), Economy
and Politics in the Mycenaean Palace States,
Proceedings of a Conference held on 1-3 July
1999 in the Faculty of Classics, Cambridge, TPhS
Suppl. 27 (2001).
Emporia R. Laffineur & E. Greco (eds), EMPORIA. Aegeans
in Central and Eastern Mediterranean, Actes de
la 10e Rencontre égéenne internationale, Scuola
archeologica italiana di Atene, 14-18 Avril 2004,
Aegaeum 25 (2005).
Epi ponton plazomenoi V. La Rosa, D. Palermo, L. Vagnetti (eds), Ἐπὶ
πόντον πλαζόμενοι. Simposio italiano di Studi
Egei dedicato a Luigi Bernabò Brea e Giovanni
Pugliese Carratelli, Roma, 18-20 febbraio 1998
(1999).
 Abbreviations XV

Fiscality M. Perna (ed.), Fiscality in Mycenaean and Near

Eastern Archives, Proceedings of the Conference
held at Soprintendenza Archivistica per la
Campania, Naples 21-23 October 2004, Studi egei
e vicino-orientali 3 (2006).
Food, Cuisine and Society P. Halstead & J. Barrett (eds), Food, Cuisine and
Society in Prehistoric Greece, Proceedings of the
10th Aegean Round Table, University of Sheffield,
19-21 January 2001 (2004).
Kosmos M.-L. Nosch & R. Laffineur (eds), KOSMOS.
Jewellery, Adornment and Textiles in the Aegean
Bronze Age. 13th international Aegean conference
held at Copenhagen, April 2010/13eme rencontre
égéenne, Copenhague, avril 2010, Aegaeum 33
(2012).
La Crète mycénienne J. Driessen & A. Farnoux (eds), La Crète
mycénienne, Actes de la table ronde organisée par
l’École Française d’Athènes, 26-28 Mars 1991,
BCH Suppl. XXX (1997).
Linear B: A 1984 Survey A. Morpurgo Davies & Y. Duhoux (eds),
Linear B: A 1984 Survey. Proceedings of the
Mycenaean Colloquium of the VIIIth Congress of
the International Federation of the Societies of
Classical Studies, Dublin, 27 August-1st September
1984) (1985).
Metron K. P. Foster & R. Laffineur (eds), METRON.
Measuring the Aegean Bronze Age. Actes de la 9e
Rencontre égéenne internationale, New Haven,
Yale University, 18-21 Avril 2002, Aegaeum 24
(2003).
Monuments of Minos J. Driessen, I. Schoep, R. Laffineur (eds),
Monuments of Minos. Rethinking the Minoan
Palaces, Proceedings of the International
Workshop “Crete of the hundred palaces?”, held
at the Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-
la-Neuve, 14-15 December 2001 Aegaeum 23
(2002).
Polemos r. Laffineur (ed.), POLEMOS. Le contexte
guerrier en Egée à l’âge du Bronze. Actes de la 7e
XVI Abbreviations

Rencontre égéenne internationale, Université de

Liège, 14-17 avril 1998 Aegaeum 19 (1999).
Politeia R. Laffineur & W.-D. Niemeier (eds), POLITEIA.
Society and State in the Aegean Bronze Age.
Actes de la 5e Rencontre égéenne internationale,
University of Heidelberg, Archäologisches Institut,
10-13 April 1994, Aegaeum 12 (1995).
Potnia R. Hägg & R. Laffineur (eds), POTNIA. Deities
and Religion in the Aegean Bronze Age, Actes de
la 8e Rencontre égéenne internationale, Göteborg
University, 12-15 April 2000, Aegaeum 22 (2001).
Primo Congresso Atti e Memorie del 1° Congresso Internazionale di
Micenologia, Roma 27 settembre-3 ottobre 1967,
Incunabula Graeca XXV (1968).
Pylos Comes Alive c.W. Shelmerdine & T.G. Palaima (eds), Pylos
Comes Alive. Industry + Administration in a
Mycenaean Palace, May 4-5 1984, (1984).
Secondo Congresso E. De Miro, L. Godart, A. Sacconi (eds), Atti e
Memorie del Secondo Congresso Internazionale di
Micenologia, Roma-Napoli, 14-20 ottobre 1991,
Incunabula Graeca XCVIII:1-3 (1996).
SyllabeS 2000 IIèmes Journées d’Etudes Linguistiques, Nantes,
25-27 mars 1999 (2000).
Texte aus Theben s. Deger-Jalkotzy & O. Panagl (eds), Die neuen
Linear B Texte aus Theben: ihr Aufschlusswert
für die mykenische Sprache und Kultur. Akten des
internationalen Forschungskolloquiums an der
Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
5.-6. Dezember 2002, Österreichische Akademie
der Wissenschaften, Phil.-Hist. Klasse,
Denkschriften, 338. Band (2006).
Techne R. Laffineur & P.P. Betancourt (eds), TECHNE.
Craftsmen, Craftswomen and Craftsmanship in
the Aegean Bronze Age, Actes de la 6e Rencontre
égéenne internationale, Philadelphia, Temple
University, 18-21 April 1996, Aegaeum 16 (1997).
Thalassa R. Laffineur & L. Basch (ed.), THALASSA.
L’Égée préhistorique et la mer, Actes de la 3e
Rencontre égéenne internationale de l’Université
 Abbreviations XVII

de Liège, Station de recherches sous-marines

et océanographiques, Calvi, Corse, 23-25 avril
1990, Aegaeum 7 (1991).
The Role of the Ruler P. Rehak (ed.), The Role of the Ruler in the
Prehistoric Aegean. Proceedings of a Panel
Discussion presented at the Annual Meeting of
the Archaeological Institute of America, New
Orleans, Louisiana, 28 December 1992, Aegaeum
11 (1995).
IV. Festschrifts
Briciaka y. Duhoux (ed.), Briciaka. A Tribute to W.C. Brice,
Cretan Studies 9 (2003).
Festschrift Bartoněk I. Radová & K. Václavková-Petrovicová (eds),
Graeco-Latina Brunensia. Festschrift in honour
of A. Bartoněk, Sborník Prací Filozofické Fakulty
Brnenské Univerzity 6-7 (2001-2002).
Festschrift Panagl T. Krisch, T. Lindner, U. Müller (eds), Analecta
homini universali dicata. Arbeiten zur Indo-
germanistik, Linguistik, Philologie, Politik, Musik
und Dichtung. Festschrift für Oswald Panagl zum
65. Geburtstag (2004).
KE-RA-ME-JA D. Nakassis, J. Gulizio, S.A James (eds.), KE-RA-ME-
JA: Studies presented to Cynthia Shelmerdine (2014).
Meletemata P. P. Betancourt, V. Karageorghis, R. Laffineur, W.-D.
Niemeier (ed.), MELETEMATA. Studies in Aegean
Archaeology Presented to Malcolm H. Wiener as he
enters his 65th Year (1999).
Minoica E. Grumach (ed.), Minoica. Festschrift zum 80.
Geburtstag von Johannes Sundwall (1958).
O-o-pe-ro-si a. Etter (ed.), o-o-pe-ro-si. Festschrift für Ernst
Risch zum 75. Geburtstag (1986).
Studi Fiandra M. Perna (ed.), Studi in onore di Enrica Fiandra.
Contributi di archeologia egea e vicinorientale
(2005).
Studies Bennett J.-P. Olivier & T.G. Palaima (ed.), Texts, Tablets
and Scribes. Studies in Mycenaean Epigraphy and
Economy offered to Emmett L. Bennett, Jr. Minos
Supl. 10 (1988).
XVIII Abbreviations

Studies Chadwick J. T. Killen, J. L. Melena, J.-P. Olivier (eds), Studies

in Mycenaean and Classical Greek presented to
John Chadwick, Minos 20-22 (1987).
Studies Killen J. Bennet, J. Driessen (eds), A-NA-QO-TA. Studies
Presented to J. T. Killen, Minos 33-34 (1998-
1999).
Studies Palmer A. Morpurgo Davies, W. Meid (ed.), Studies
in Greek, Italic and Indo-European Linguistics
offered to Leonard R. Palmer on the Occasion of
his Seventieth Birthday, June 5, 1976, Innsbrucker
Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 16 (1976).
V. Editions
ADGS 2005 V. L. Aravantinos, M. Del Freo, L. Godart, A. Sacconi, Thèbes.
Fouilles de la Cadmée. IV. Les textes de Thèbes (1-433).
Translitération et tableaux des scribes, Biblioteca di “Pasiphae” 4
(2005).
AGS 2001 V. L. Aravantinos, L. Godart, A. Sacconi, Thèbes. Fouilles de
la Cadmée. I. Les tablettes en linéaire B de la Odos Pelopidou.
Édition et commentaire, Biblioteca di “Pasiphae” 1 (2001).
AGS 2002 V. L. Aravantinos, L. Godart, A. Sacconi, Thèbes. Fouilles de la
Cadmée. III. Corpus des documents d’archives en linéaire B de
Thèbes (1-433), Biblioteca di “Pasiphae” 3 (2002).
CHIC J.-P. Olivier & L. Godart, Corpus Hieroglyphicarum Inscriptionum
Cretae, Études Crétoises XXXI (1996).
CIM A. Sacconi, Corpus delle iscrizioni in lineare B di Micene,
Incunabula Graeca LVIII (1974).
CIV A. Sacconi, Corpus delle iscrizioni vascolari in lineare B,
Incunabula Graeca LVII (1974).
CoMIK J. Chadwick, L. Godart, J. T. Killen, J.-P. Olivier, A. Sacconi, I. A.
Sakellarakis, Corpus of Mycenaean Inscriptions from Knossos, 4
vol., Incunabula Graeca LXXXVIII, 1-4 (1986-1998).
GORILA L. Godart & J.-P. Olivier (ed.), Recueil des inscriptions en linéaire
A, 5 vol., Études Crétoises XXI:1-5 (1976-1985).
IC M. Guarducci, Inscriptiones Creticae opera et consilio Friderici
Halberr collectae, 4 vol., (1935-1950).
ICS O. Masson, Les inscriptions chypriotes syllabiques. Recueil
critique commenté, [réimpr. augmentée, Paris 1983] Études
Chypriotes I (1961).
 Abbreviations XIX

IG Inscriptiones Graecae.
IG2 Inscriptiones Graecae, editio minor.
KT1 E. L. Bennett, Jr., J. Chadwick, M. Ventris, The Knossos Tablets. A
Transliteration (1956).
KT3 J. Chadwick & J. T. Killen, The Knossos Tablets. A Transliteration.
Third Edition (1964).
KT4 J. Chadwick, J. T. Killen, J.-P. Olivier, The Knossos Tablets. A
Transliteration. Fourth Edition (1971).
KT5 J. T. Killen & J.-P. Olivier, The Knossos Tablets. Fifth Edition,
Minos Supl. 11 (1989).
MT II E.L. Bennett, Jr., The Mycenae Tablets II (with an introduction
by A.J.B. Wace & E.B. Wace; translation and commentary by
J. Chadwick), TAPhS 48:1 (1958).
MT III J. Chadwick, The Mycenae Tablets III (with contributions from
E.L. Bennett, Jr., E.B. French, W. Taylour, N.M. Verdelis &
Ch. K. Williams), TAPhS 52:7 (1962).
MT IV J.-P. Olivier, The Mycenae Tablets IV. A Revised Transliteration
(1969).
PTT I E. L. Bennett & Jr., J.-P. Olivier, The Pylos Tablets Transcribed.
Part I. Text and Notes, Incunabula Graeca LI (1973).
PTT II E. L. Bennett & Jr., J.-P. Olivier, The Pylos Tablets Tran-scribed.
Part II. Hands, Concordances, Indices, Incunabula Graeca LIX
(1976).
Schwyzer E. Schwyzer, Dialectorum Graecarum exempla epigraphica
potiora, (1923), 2nd ed. (1960).
SEG Supplementum Epigraphicum Graecum.
SM I A. J. Evans, Scripta Minoa I. The Hieroglyphic and Primitive
Linear Classes (1909).
SM II A. J. Evans, Scripta Minoa II. The Archives of Knossos. Clay
Tablets in Linear Script B, edited from notes and supplemented by
J. L. Myres (1952).
Syll.3 W. Dittemberger, Sylloge inscriptionum Graecarum, 3. ed. (1915-
1924).
TAM III.1 R. Heberdey, Tituli Asiae Minoris III. Tituli Pisidiae linguis Graeca
et Latina conscripti. 1. Tituli Termessi et agri Termessensis (1941).
TITHEMY J. L. Melena & J.-P. Olivier, TITHEMY. The Tablets and Nodules
in Linear B from Tiryns, Thebes and Mycenae. A Revised
Transliteration, Minos Supl. 12 (1991).
TMT C. Consani, M. Negri, Testi Minoici trascritti con interpretazione
XX Abbreviations

e glossario, Incunabula Graeca C (1999).

TT I J. Chadwick, Linear B Tablets from Thebes, Minos 10 (1970), 115-
137.
TT II Th. G. Spyropoulos & J. Chadwick, The Thebes Tablets II, Minos
Supl. 4 (1975).
VI. Other publications
Aspects Y. Duhoux, Aspects du vocabulaire économique
mycénien (cadastre - artisanat - fiscalité) (1976).
CMS I. Pini et al., Corpus der minoischen und
mykenischen Siegel (1964).
Companion Y. Duhoux & A. Morpurgo-Davies, Companion
to Linear B: Mycenaean Greek Texts and their
World. Vol. 1, Bibliothèque des cahiers de l’Institut
de Linguistique de Louvain 120 (2008); Vol. 2,
Bibliothèque des cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique
de Louvain 127 (2011); Vol. 3, Bibliothèque des
cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique de Louvain
133 (2014).
DGE Francisco R. Adrados & J. Rodríguez Somolinos
(ed.), Diccionario Griego-Español, (1980-).
DELG P. Chantraine, Dictionnaire étymologique de la
langue grecque. Histoire des mots (1968-1980).
Desservants J.-P. Olivier, À propos d’une «liste» de desservants
de sanctuaire dans les documents en linéaire B de
Pylos (1960).
DMic. F. Aura Jorro, Diccionario griego-micénico, 2 vol.,
(1985-1993).
Docs M. Ventris & J. Chadwick, Documents in
Mycenaean Greek (1956).
Docs2 M. Ventris & J. Chadwick, Documents in
Mycenaean Greek, 2nd ed., (1973).
Docs3 J.T. Killen & A. Morpurgo Davies (eds), Documents
in Mycenaean Greek, 3rd ed. (in preparation).
Dosmoi P. De Fidio, I dosmoi Pilii a Poseidon: una terra
sacra di età micenea, Incunabula Graeca LXV
(1977).
Early Destruction J. Driessen, An Early Destruction in the Mycenaean
Palace at Knossos: A New Interpretation of the
 Abbreviations XXI

Excavation Field-Notes of the South-East Area of

the West Wing (1990).
Études C. J. Ruijgh, Études sur la grammaire et le
vocabulaire du grec mycénien (1967).
EDG R. Beekes, Etymological Dictionary of Greek, 2
volumes (2010)
EWA M. Mayrhofer, Etymologisches Wörterbuch des
Altindoarischen (1986-2001).
Formation P. Chantraine, La formation des noms en grec
ancient (1933).
GEW H. Frisk, Griechisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch
(1954-1972).
Gr.Gr. E. Schwyzer, Griechische Grammatik (1934-
1953).
HGD I A. Thumb & E. Kieckers, Handbuch der
griechischen Dialekte I (1932).
HGD II A. Thumb & A. Scherer, Handbuch der griechischen
Dialekte II (1959).
HMG A. Bartoněk, Handbuch des mykenischen
Griechisch (2003).
HPN F. Bechtel, Die historischen Personennamen des
Griechischen bis zur Keiserzeit (1917).
IDA F. Vandenabeele & J.-P. Olivier, Les idéogrammes
archéologiques du linéaire B, Études Crétoises
XXIV (1979).
IEW J. Pokorny, Indogermanisches Etymologisches
Wörterbuch (1949/1959).
IGLB J.-P. Olivier, L. Godart, C. Seydel, C. Sourvinou,
Index généraux du linéaire B, Rome 1973
Incunabula Graeca, LIX (1973).
Interpretation L.R. Palmer, The Interpretation of Mycenaean
Greek Texts (1963).
Kühner-Gehrt R. Kühner, B. Gehrt, Ausführliche Grammatik der
griechischen Sprache (1890-1904).
LfgrE B. Snell, H. Erbse (ed.), Lexicon des
frühgriechischen Epos (1955).
LGPN I P. M. Frazer & E. Matthews, A Lexicon of Greek
Personal Names, vol. I: The Aegean Islands-
Cyprus-Cyrenaica (1987).
XXII Abbreviations

LGPN II M.J. Osborne & S.G. Byrne, A Lexicon of Greek

Personal Names, vol. II: Attica (1994).
LGPN III.A P.M. Frazer, E. Matthews, A Lexicon of Greek
Personal Names, vol. III.A: Peloponnese, Western
Greece, Sicily, and Magna Graecia, (1997).
LGPN III.B P.M. Frazer, E. Matthews, A Lexicon of Greek
Personal Names, vol. III.B: Central Greece: From
the Megarid to Thessaly (2000).
LGPN IV P. M. Frazer, E. Matthews, A Lexicon of Greek
Personal Names, vol. IV: Macedonia, Thrace,
Northern Regions of the Black Sea (2005).
LIMC Lexicon iconographicum mythologiae classicae
(1981-1999).
LIV H. Rix, Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben, 2
ed. (2001).
LSJ H.G. Liddell, R. Scott, H.S. Jones, A Greek-English
Lexicon, 9th ed. with a Supplement (1968).
LSJ-RS P.G.W. Glare, Greek-English Lexicon. Revised
Supplement (1996).
Manufacture and A. Michailidou (ed.), Manufacture and Measurement:
Measurement Counting, Measuring and Recording Craft Items in
Early Aegean Societies, Μελετήματα 33 (2001).
Mémoires I M. Lejeune, Mémoires de philologie mycénienne.
Première série (1955-1957) (1958).
Mémoires II M. Lejeune, Mémoires de philologie mycénienne.
Deuxième série (1958-1963) Incunabula Graeca
XLII (1971).
Mémoires III M. Lejeune, Mémoires de philologie mycénienne.
Troisième série (1964-1968) Incunabula Graeca
XLIII (1972).
Mémoires IV M. Lejeune, Mémoires de philologie mycénienne.
Quatrième série (1969-1996) Incunabula Graeca
XCIX (1997).
Mentions M. Gérard-Rousseau, Les mentions religieuses
dans les tablettes mycéniennes Incunabula Graeca
XXIX (1968).
MGL A. Morpurgo, Mycenaeae Graecitatis Lexicon,
Incunabula Graeca III (1963).
MGV J. Chadwick & L. Baumbach, The Mycenaean
 Abbreviations XXIII

Greek Vocabulary, Glotta 41 (1963), 157-271;

L. Baumbach, The Mycenaean Greek Vocabulary
II, Glotta 49 (1971), 151-190.
Minoan Roundel E. Hallager, The Minoan Roundel and other
Sealed Documents in the Neopalatial Linear A
Administration, Aegaeum 14 (1996).
MME W.A. McDonald & G.R. Rapp, Jr. (ed.), The
Minnesota Messenia Expedition. Reconstructing a
Bronze Age Regional Environment (1972).
Mochlos IB K.A. Barnard, Th.M. Brogan (ed.), Mochlos IB.
Period III. Neopalatial Settlement on the Coast:
The Artisan’s Quarter and the Farmhouse at
Chalinomouri. The Neopalatial Pottery, Prehistory
Monographs 8 (2003).
Mochlos IC J.S. Soles et al. (ed.), Mochlos IC. Period III. Neo-
palatial Settlement on the Coast: The Artisan’s
Quarter and the Farmhouse at Chalinomouri.The
Small Finds, Prehistory Monographs 9 (2004).
Mycenaean Feast J. Wright (ed.), The Mycenaean Feast, Hesperia
73:2 (2004).
OKTi L.R. Palmer, On the Knossos tablets: The Find-
places of the Knossos Tablets (1963).
OKTii J. Boardman, On the Knossos tablets: The Date of
the Knossos Tablets (1963).
Pape-Benseler W. Pape & G.E. Benseler, Wörterbuch der
griechischen Eigennamen (1884).
People M. Lindgren, The People of Pylos, prosopographical
and methodological studies in the Pylos archives. 2
vol., Boreas 3 (1973).
Perfume Industry C.W. Shelmerdine, The Perfume Industry in
Mycenaean Pylos, SIMA-PB 34 (1985).
Personennamen O. Landau, Mykenisch-griechische Personennamen
(1958).
Phonétique M. Lejeune, Phonétique historique du mycénien et
du grec ancien (1972).
PoM A.J. Evans, The Palace of Minos at Knossos, 4 vol.,
(1921-1935).
PoN I C. W. Blegen, M. Rawson, The Palace of Nestor
at Pylos in Western Messenia. I. The Buildings and
XXIV Abbreviations

their Contents (1966).

PoN II M. Lang, The Palace of Nestor at Pylos in Western
Messenia. II. The Frescoes (1969).
PoN III C.W. Blegen, M. Rawson, W. Taylour, W.P.
Donovan, The Palace of Nestor at Pylos in Western
Messenia. III. Acropolis and Lower Town, Tholoi
and Grave Circle, Chamber Tombs, Discoveries
outside the Citadel (1973).
Problems in Decipherment Y. Duhoux, T.G. Palaima, J. Bennet (eds), Problems
in Decipherment, BCILL 49 (1989).
RE Real-Encyclopädie der klassischen Altertums-
wissenschaft.
Rethinking Mycenaean M.L. Galaty & W.A. Parkinson (ed.), Rethinking
Palaces Mycenaean Palaces. New Interpretations of an Old
Idea, The Cotsen Institute of Archaeology UCLA,
Monograph 41 (1999).
Royauté P. Carlier, La royauté en Grèce avant Alexandre
(1984).
Sanctuaries and Cults R. Hägg & N. Marinatos (eds), Sanctuaries and
Cults in the Aegean Bronze Age, Proceedings of
the First International Symposium at the Swedish
Institute in Athens, 12-13 May, 1980, Skrifter
Utgivna av Svenska Institutet i Athen 4°, XXVIII
(1981).
Sandy Pylos J. L. Davis (ed.), Sandy Pylos: An Archaeological
History from Nestor to Navarino (1998).
Scribes Cnossos J.-P. Olivier, Les scribes de Cnossos. Essai de
classement des archives d’un palais mycénien,
Incunabula Graeca XVII (1967).
Scribes Pylos T.G. Palaima, The Scribes of Pylos, Incunabula
Graeca LXXXVII (1988).
Scribes RCT J. Driessen, The Scribes of the Room of the Chariot
Tablets at Knossos. Interdisciplinary Approach to
the Study of a Linear B Deposit, Minos Supl. 15
(2000).
Studia Mycenaea A. Bartoněk (ed.), Studia Mycenaea, Proceedings
of the Mycenaean Symposium, Brno, April 1966
(1968).
Studia Myceanea (1988) T.G. Palaima, C.W. Shelmerdine, P.Hr. Ilievski
 Abbreviations XXV

(eds), Studia Mycenaea 1988, Živa Antika

Monographies No. 7 (1989).
Textos J.L. Melena, Textos griegos micénicos comentados
(2001).
Thera IV S.N. Marinatos, Excavations at Thera IV (1970
Season) (1971).
Wortbildung E. Risch, Wortbildung der homerischen Sprache,
2. ed. (1974).
XXVI
 XXVII

PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Marie Louise Nosch and Hedvig Landenius Enegren

At the meeting of the Comité international permanent d’études mycéniennes

(CIPEM) in Sèvres in September 2010, the CIPEM accepted Marie-Louise
Nosch’s suggestion to host the 14th Mycenological colloquium in Copenhagen.
The first gathering took place in Gif-sur-Yvette near Paris in 1956. The spirit of
good humour and collaborative enthusiasm established at the first colloquium
became known within the field as l’ésprit de Gif.
The group of countries and scholars at the mycenological conferences still
reflect the correspondents and receivers of Ventris’s work notes, which he had
circulated to colleagues long before the internet made such a practice feasible.1
The Gif colloquium included participants from Britain, Bulgaria, France,
Greece, Italy, Spain, Switzerland and the USA.
Today mycenological studies are also an active field of research in Germany,
Canada, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Holland, the Czech Republic, Cyprus, and
Australia. It is still the founding members of CIPEM who represent the most
numerous scholars in the field of Aegean scripts since 1956, but new scholars join
the group, and the photographs from each mycenological colloquium illustrate
how the number of participants increases. We are an expanding discipline.
Another significant change is the increasing number of female scholars in the
field. John Chadwick, in his speech at Salzburg in 1995 noticed the few female
scholars,2 but this has also changed since then. In Nürnberg 1981, the hosts
graciously arranged for a parallel ‘spouse program’ during the colloquium. In
Copenhagen, 24 of 57 participating scholars were women. Since the publication
in 1954 of Documents in Mycenaean Greek, Ventris and Chadwick strived to
include other disciplines into the study of Aegean scripts, among others, the
disciplines exploring texts from the ancient Near East.
Pierre Carlier and his co-organisers of the 13th Mycenological Colloquium

1
Bennet 2014.
2
Chadwick 1999, 36.
XXVIII Marie Louise Nosch and Hedvig Landenius Enegren

in Sèvres in 2010 were the first to convene special events on comparative studies
of the Mycenaean palatial economy and Near Eastern palatial economies.3 We
believe this to be a particularly important yet challenging endeavour and we
are happy that several colleagues took up the challenge and publish stimulating
comparative studies in the present volume.
Since the Paris colloquium in 2010, we have lost colleagues who will be
missed for their scholarly contribution as well as for the friendship that unites
us: Pierre Carlier (1949-2011), Emmett L. Bennett Jr. (1918-2011), Petar Hr.
Ilievski (1920-2013), Martin S. Ruipérez (1923-2015), Anna Morpurgo-Davies
(1937-2014) and Margareta Lindgren (1936-2017). We would like to take this
opportunity to dedicate this volume to one our discipline’s first ladies, historical
linguist Anna Morpurgo-Davies, a world-leading figure in the study of ancient
Greek and Anatolian, and as such a role model for what it takes to conduct
comparative analyses. We corresponded with Anna Morpurgo-Davies until
a few months before she passed away in September 2014. She was trained
by Gallavotti and was editor of the first lexicon of Mycenaean, published in
1963. In Oxford, she worked closely with professor of Comparative Philology,
Leonard Palmer, and Hittitologist and epigraphist David Hawkins. In 1971, she
succeeded Palmer as chair at Oxford.
In this volume we also wish to remember the very first female scholar in
Aegean scripts, Alice Kober (1903-1950), and thus highlight her significant
contribution to the field of Mycenology. Alice Kober who received an MA and
PhD from Columbia University became assistant professor at Brooklyn College. It
was with a Guggenheim Fellowship that she was able to immerse herself full-time
to the study of Linear B.4 Her methodological approach to the study of the Linear
B signary, in which she established that the Mycenaean script shows an inflected
language, ultimately influenced Ventris’s final decipherment of the script.5
We also wish to commemorate our Scandinavian colleague, Margareta
Lindgren (1936–2017). A pupil of Arne Furumark, she continued the Linear
B scholarly tradition at Uppsala University with her publication on the
prosopography of Pylos, a fundamental work within Mycenaean Studies.
As head of the Department for Maps and Prints at the Uppsala University
Carolina Library for many years, she kept in close contact with the Department
of Archaeology and Ancient history as an immensely appreciated lecturer in
Aegean Scripts, who really knew how to engage her audience with her keen
sense of humour. On a personal note, she was the thesis advisor to the co-

3
Zurbach et al. forthcoming.
4
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Kober
5
https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/15875
 Preface and acknowledgements XXIX

editor of this volume (Hedvig Landenius Enegren). Her last participation in

a Mycenological Colloquium was in Rome in 2006 with a paper on Cypriot
Scripts. Many of us remember her vivid personality and her enthusiasm in a
wide range of interests that went beyond Linear B; these included in later years,
among others, pistol target shooting and the Harry Potter books!
It was an honour to host the 14th Mycenological Colloquium in Copenhagen,
2-5 September 2015. We thank friends and colleagues for joining us for this
event, and for their presentation and fruitful discussions. We are particularly
honoured to hear of l’esprit de Copenhague, uniting us all in a friendly
conversation on the advancement of knowledge in our field.
For hosting the conference on the exquisite premises of the Carlsberg
Academy, the former private villa of brewer Jacobsen and domicile of Niels
Bohr, we warmly thank the Carlsberg Foundation. For continued support and
trust, we thank the Danish National Research Foundation and the University
of Copenhagen. Egzona Haxha, Camilla Ebert and Louise Ludvigsen were our
efficient and kind coordination and organisation hostesses and assistants. We
warmly thank Maurizio Del Freo for all his help in editorial and other matters; for
the indexation Mikkel Nørtoft and for editorial assistance Peder Flemstad. We
warmly thank Lillian and Dan Finks Fond, the Institute for Aegean Prehistory
and the R.K. Rasks Legat foundation for generous support for this publication.
We are grateful to Alessandro Naso, Marco Bettelli and Maurizio Del Freo for
welcoming the conference proceedings in the Incunabula Graeca series.
Copenhagen and Brussels, Fall 2017

Bibliography
Bennet, J. 2014 ‘Literacies’ – 60+ Years of ‘Reading’ the Aegean Late Bronze
Age, BICS 57:2, 127-137.
Chadwick, J. 1999 Linear B: Past, Present and Future. In Floreant, 29-38
Carlier P. †, Joannès, Fr., Rougemont, Fr., Zurbach J. (eds), Palatial Economy
in the Ancient Near East and in the Aegean. First steps towards a
comprehensive study and analysis. Acts of the ESF Exploratory Workshop
held in Sèvres, 16-19 Sept. 2010, Pisa – Rome, F. Serra, 2017.
 XXXI

LIST OF AUTHORS

Francisco Aura-Jorro, Yves Duhoux

Universidad de Alicante, Spain Université Catholique de Louvain,
francisco.aura@ua.es Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
yves.duhoux@uclouvain.be
Federico Aurora
University of Oslo, Norway Elena Džukeska
federico.aurora@ub.uio.no University “Ss. Cyril and
Methodius”, Skopje, FYROM
Lisa M. Bendall
elena.dzukeska@gmail.com
Keble College, Oxford University, UK
lisa.bendall@arch.ox.ac.uk Markus Egetmeyer
Université de Paris IV-Sorbonne, France
John Bennet
markus.egetmeyer@paris-sorbonne.fr
British School at Athens, Greece
director@bsa.ac.uk Richard Firth
University of Bristol
Alberto Bernabé
firth827@btinternet.com
Universidad Complutense de Madrid,
Spain José Luis García Ramón
albernab@filol.ucm.es Universität zu Köln, Germany
garcia.ramon@uni-koeln.de
William Bibee
University of Texas at Austin, USA Alessandro Greco
willbibee@yahoo.com Sapienza, Università di Roma, Italy
a.greco@uniroma1.it
Flavia Carraro
University of Copenhagen, Denmark Joann Gulizio
fcarraro@yahoo.fr University of Texas at Austin, USA
gulizioj@austin.utexas.edu
Massimo Cultraro
CNR-IBAM, Catania, Italy Erik Hallager
massimo.cultraro@cnr.it University of Aarhus, Denmark
klaeh@cas.au.dk
Maurizio Del Freo
CNR-ISMA, Rome, Italy Margherita Jasink
maurizio.delfreo@isma.cnr.it Università di Firenze, Italy
annamargherita.jasink@unifi.it
Fatima Díez Platas
Universidad de Santiago de José Miguel Jiménez Delgado
Compostela, Spain Universidad de Sevilla, Spain
fatima.diez@usc.es jmjimdelg@us.es
XXXII List of authors

Anna Judson Dimiri Nakassis

Pembroke College, Cambridge University of Colorado Boulder,
University, UK USA
apj31@cam.ac.uk Dimitri.Nakassis@colorado.edu
Artemis Karnava Stavroula Nikoloudis
Inscriptiones Graecae, University of Melbourne, Australia
Brandenburgische Akademie der s.nikoloudis@unimelb.edu.au
Wissenschaften, Berlin, Germany
Marie-Louise Nosch
artemis.karnava@bbaw.de
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
John Killen nosch@hum.ku.dk
Jesus College, Cambridge
Thomas G. Palaima
University, UK
The University of Texas at Austin,
jandakillen@gmail.com
USA
Evangelos Kyriakidis tpalaima@austin.utexas.edu
University of Kent, UK
Ruth Palmer
ek47@kent.ac.uk
Ohio University, USA
Daniel Kölligan palmerr@ohio.edu
Universität zu Köln, Germany
Oswald Panagl
d.koelligan@uni-koeln.de
Universität Salzburg, Austria
Hedvig Landenius Enegren oswald.panagl@sbg.ac.at
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Massimo Perna
hedvigenegren@gmail.com
Università degli Studi Suor Orsola
Alex Leukart Benincasa, Naples, Italy
University of Geneva, Switzerland maxperna59@gmail.com
alex.leukart@gmail.com
Vassilis Petrakis
nakileukart@hotmail.com
Ministry of Education, Athens,
Eugenio R. Luján Greece
Univ. Complutense de Madrid, Spain vpetrakisrm@yahoo.gr
erlujan@filol.ucm.es
Rachele Pierini
Susan Lupack Università di Bologna, Italy
Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia rachele.pierini@gmail.com
susanlupack@mac.com
Juan Piquero
Torsten Meissner Universidad Complutense de Madrid,
Cambridge University UK Spain
tm10012@cam.ac.uk jpiquero15@gmail.com
 List of authors XXXIII

Kevin Pluta Culturas del Mediterráneo y Oriente

The University of Texas at Austin, Próximo, Madrid, Spain
USA juanpablo.vita@cchs.csic.es
kpluta@austin.utexas.edu
Nicola Antonello Vittiglio
Françoise Rougemont Universitat Autònoma de
CNRS, UMR 7041, Nanterre, France Barcelona, Spain
francoise.rougemont@mae.u-paris10.fr nicola.vittiglio@uab.cat
Anna Sacconi Jörg Weilhartner
Sapienza, Università di Roma, Italy Universität Wien, Austria
anna.sacconi@uniroma1.it joerg.weilhartner@oeaw.ac.at
Irene Serrano Aren Max Wilson-Wright
Universidad Complutense de Madrid, The University of Texas at Austin,
Spain USA
irene.serrano.laguna@filol.ucm.es wilsonwright@utexas.edu
Cynthia W. Sherlmerdine Julien Zurbach
The University of Texas at Austin, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris,
USA France
cwshelm@gmail.com julien.zurbach@gmail.com
Philippa Steele
Magdalene College, Cambridge
University, UK
pms45@cam.ac.uk
Rupert Thompson
Selwynn College, Cambridge
University, UK
rjet1@cam.ac.uk
Helena Tomas
University of Zagreb, Croatia
htomas@ffzg.hr
Carlos Varias García
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,
Spain
carlos.varias@uab.cat
Juan Pablo Vita
CSIC–Instituto de Lenguas y
XXXIV
 83

PA-RO , DA-MO. STUDYING THE MYCENAEAN CASE SYSTEM

THROUGH DAMOS (DATABASE OF MYCENAEAN AT OSLO)*
Federico Aurora

Introduction
DAMOS is an electronic database containing all the published Mycenaean
texts, together with rich metadata and epigraphic and linguistic annotation. It
was born as a tool to allow for a corpus linguistic study of the case system
and the expression of case functions and grammatical relations in Mycenaean,
a question central in Mycenaean linguistics with implications for the general
history of the Greek language.
During the work with the creation of the database, though, it quickly became
clear that it could, if made available online and developed in the right direction,
become a more broadly useful and versatile instrument for scholars (specialists
and not) and teachers, and for dissemination in general. This has, thus, become
the idea that informs the work with DAMOS.1
The main objectives of DAMOS can be summarized as follows:
- offer online, and freely accessible, a constantly updated version of
the Linear B texts
- offer a flexible tool for the palaeographic2 and linguistic analysis of
Mycenaean (for the present author, with a special focus on its case
system)
- facilitate the access to the Mycenaean material for non-specialists
by creating different “entry points” (translations, maps, etc.) to the

*
I thank Asgeir Nesøen, Damir Nedić, Heidi Løken and Andrea Bersi which are responsible for most of
the technical part of the database and Johann Tischler for providing me texts files of most of the Linear
B texts. I also would like to thank Francisco Aura Jorro, Antonin Bartoněk, Alberto Bernabé, Richard
Firth, Hedvig Landenius Enegren, Eugénio Luján and José Melena for their generous help.
1
A first version of the database has been online at https://www2.hf.uio.no/damos/ since February 2013,
allowing, at the time of writing this article, for browsing through the corpus or a subset of it, and for
complex word searches. For more details about the online version see Aurora 2015, 29-30.
2
Especially if properly combined – and linked to – an image database, see infra.
84 Federico Aurora

world of the Linear B documents.3

- contribute to better integrate Mycenaean scholarship within the rest
of classical scholarship, not least by the inclution of Mycenaean
data into major digital resources in the field.
The texts in DAMOS
DAMOS contains electronic versions of all the published Mycenaean texts
as they are reproduced in current standard editions, but updated with new finds,
joins and readings. This is particularly relevant for the Pylos tablets, the edition
of which (PTT I) goes back to 1973 and for which a high number of joins and
new readings have been published since then. I would like here to point out that
when the work started with the database, the draft of PoN IV circulated by José
L. Melena was not yet available to me, so that it has not been possible to take its
text as a basis.4 From my personal survey, though, the texts in DAMOS, updated
with all the new joins, do not substantially diverge from the texts in the draft of
PoN IV. However, whenever I have found differences between the two, these
are reported in the notes to the single texts.5 Regarding the Knossos documents,
it is important to underline that for tablets 1-1063 I have used KT5, which is
more updated than the first two volumes of CoMIK, while for the rest of the
Knossos documents CoMIK has been the reference edition (also this, of course,
integrated with the joins published after the publication of its last volume).6
The part of each text or its metadata (series and subseries classification,
scribal hand attribution, etc.) that has been changed, following a new publication,
from the standard edition, has been tagged and is therefore available for searches
so that one can, e.g., generate a list of the texts, which differ from standard
editions.7 The sources of the changes for each document are also recorded in
the “notes” field.8
Finally, as previously pointed out, DAMOS has as its first objective to offer
a constantly updated version of all the published Linear B texts, so as soon as
new texts – or joins – are published (either in canonical editions or in journal

3
For more technical details about the creation process see Aurora 2015, 24-29.
4
Furthermore, I am not sure that it would have been methodologically justifiable to use an edition not yet
published in its definitive form.
5
This should not, though, be regarded as a systematic comparison between the two texts. This will be
possible first when PoN IV is published in a definitive version.
6
For a complete bibliography of the editions used for the texts in DAMOS, see https://www2.hf.uio.no/
damos/index/about/page/texts.
7
In the current online version the changed parts can be visualized in bold by toggling the button
“Highlight changes.”
8
It has not been possible, though, to link the single changes to the single source, even though this has
been done for join sources, see infra.
 Database of Mycenaean at Oslo 85

articles) they will, of course, be incorporated in the database and in its online
version.
Epigraphic conventions
The texts in DAMOS follow the Wingspread convention,9 and generally
also follow occasional ad hoc solutions of the main editions – which the
Wingspread convention gives space for – for the sake of compatibility with
other resources (DicM.) and the rest of the literature. There is one point, though,
where we have decided to follow one single practice, namely in the case of
the line identification assigned to a line following an “.a” line. Here PTT I and
CoMIK/KT5 differ in their practices, since CoMIK/KT510 identify such lines as
“.b”, while PTT I leaves it without a further line identification, this resulting
in a certain ambiguity when the line is quoted: the second line of PY Aa 777,
for example (Fig.1), is then referred to (e.g. in DicM. or in its online indexes)11
simply as PY Aa 777, leaving it ambiguous if this is the only line of the tablet
or if it follows an ‘.a’ line. It must be added that the reason for the choice of
the authors of PTT I is that they, in fact, reserve ‘b.’ only for cases in which “in
an unruled space several lines of text are inscribed, obviously in the normal
order.”12 However, there are actually only two such cases13 in PTT I (and the
same holds for the draft of PoN IV), namely PY Ea 59 and PY La 626, so

Fig.1 Differences of practice in PTT I and CoMIK/KT5

exemplified by PY Aa 777 and KN Dq 42.

9
At the time of writing, there are still some minor differences between the conventions of DAMOS and
the Wingspread Convention, but this is only a temporary situation due to computational needs.
10
KT5, XIX
11
http://www.cervantesvirtual.com/bib/portal/diccionariomicenico/contenido/a.html
12
PTT I, 12.
13
There is, both in PTT I and in the draft of PoN IV, also one case of a line which is not identified as ‘.B’,
even though it follows an ‘.A’ line, namely PY Eo 160.3
86 Federico Aurora

we chose14 to follow the practice of CoMIK/KT5, identifying as “.b” all lines

following an “.a” line, and indicating the peculiarity of PY Ea 59 and PY La
626 in the notes.
Finally, a very small difference with standard editions is that we write the
indication of a sealing’s face above the first line of text and not on the same line
(see Fig. 2). This is in order to be coherent with the position of the corresponding
indications of tablet face, ‘r.’(recto), ‘v.’ (verso), ‘lat. inf.’, etc.
Fig.2 Example of the layout of the transcription
of a sealing (TH Wu 429) in DAMOS.

Metadata
Every text is connected to a set of metadata: site, classification (series and
subseries), find-place, state of preservation (<!>), place of preservation, writer,15
chronology, and notes. The joins are all registered in a separate table and
they are therefore also searchable, easily allowing, in this way, for constantly
updated concordance lists.16 The sources of the joins for each document are also
recorded17 in a separate field, so that it is possible to obtain concordances of
tablets, joins and relative publications.
A special remark has to be made here about the chronology of the texts.
Since there is no general consensus about the relative or absolute chronology

14
This choice was at the beginning of the work a forced one, because of computational needs of
unambiguity (Aurora 2015, 25).
15
This piece of information is actually linked to the texts through the annotation of hand attribution for
each sign occurrence, in order to account for those texts (and words) where different scribal hands are
responsible for different signs, see infra.
16
This is a feature already present in the online version.
17
This information is still being added at the time of writing.
 Database of Mycenaean at Oslo 87

of the archives,18 every relevant portion of the documents for which different
datings have been proposed, are assigned a corresponding number of different
chronological values in as many database posts. These various values are
further organized in coherent sets according to different scholars’ models. This
way of structuring the data is very useful to build (and vary when needed) a
chronological scenario against which to perform palaeographical or linguistic
searches.
Regarding the assignment of texts to scribal hands, given the few uncertain
cases of current reference studies, we have at the moment only given the
possibility to assign an ‘alternative writer’ to a given sign (and thus, word and
text), but a system similar to the one used for the different chronologies could
be implemented if needed.19
Lines, words and signs
The Linear B corpus is stored in the database at different levels, in order
to make searches as analytical and precise as possible. This means that the
database, in addition to the full text of each document, contains interconnected
lists of all Mycenaean lines, all Mycenaean words (a list of types and a list of
occurrences) all Mycenaean signs (a list of types and a list of occurrences).
Logograms, measure units, numerals and adjuncts have been stored both as
words and as signs, while specified and ligatured logograms and monograms
have been stored as words and broken into their constituent signs in the sign list.
Epigraphical annotation
For each of the levels mentioned above, detailed epigraphical information
is connected to each unit and can be searched for. The epigraphical attributes of
each line, word and sign are listed in Figs.3-5

FEATURE ANNOTATED EXAMPLE

type syllabogram-basic
sign number 08
uncertain reading ạ
damagedleft ]a
damagedright a[
reconstructed [a]
erasure [[a]]
written_under |a|

18
See for example Driessen 2008 and Hallager & Hallager 2015.
19
Cf. Godart 2012 and Olivier 2012.
88 Federico Aurora

written_over ‘a’
over registers possible underliyng sign(s)
omission <a>
supra_sigillum if written over a seal-impression
hand 1
hand_uncertain the attribution to a given hand is uncertain
writer_alternative if the attribution to another hand is possible
modern_expunction {a}
stylus 1
Fig.3 Searchable sign features

FEATURE ANNOTATED EXAMPLE

size -1 (if preceded by a “/”)
size_previous bigger (if preceded by a “/”)
size_next bigger (if followed by a “//”)
damagedleft ]da-mo
damageint pu-ru[ ]ta
damagedright da-mo[

Fig.4 Searchable word features

FEATURE ANNOTATED EXAMPLE

damagedleft ] , OLE Z 2 VIN V 1
damagedright qe-ra-si-ja OLE S 1[

Fig.5 Searchable line features

As one can see, this allows to query the database for, e.g., lines, words or
signs that are damaged at the beginning or at the end, or internally. Particularly
relevant for palaeographic research is, thus, the possibility to distinguish, in
searches and statistics, between signs and words, which are: a) well-preserved,
b) of difficult reading, c) erased, d) only conjectured (not physically present on
the tablet). Further, this can be crossed with the information about the scribal
hand – and stylus for Pylos20 – which has been connected directly to each sign,
so that one can look for signs written by a certain hand or group of hands.
Moreover, every line, word and sign is classified under a “type” (see Fig.6-
8), thus allowing for very fine-grained searches of specific categories of signs

20
These are based on Scribes Pylos. I am, of course, aware of the remarks by Olivier 2012 about the use
of the stylus category, but I thought it useful to include it anyway.
 Database of Mycenaean at Oslo 89

(uninterpreted syllabograms, or doublets and complex syllaborgams, gender

specifiers, etc.) words (monograms, logograms with ligatures or specifications,
etc.) or lines (ruled, unruled, etc.). Notice that the word list and sign type list
include also entities like traces of writing (“vestigia”), blank spaces (“vacat”),
indication of the presence of a seal-impression (“sigillum”). Here it is also
worth noticing that, following the practice of PTT I, DAMOS gives, for each
published seal, an indication of its CMS number in the tablet texts and this is
further linked (Fig.2) to the website of the digital CMS where pictures of the
seal-impression and detailed information about the seal are stored.21 The CMS
seal numbers are, obviously, also registered in an own list linked to the relevant
texts and can thus be crossed with other parameters in searches.

TYPE EXAMPLE
blank space vac.
check mark X
deest deest
dividing line :
graffito graffito
large dot ●
logogram OLE
logogram-uninterpreted *178
logogram-vases *211VAS
measure: dry T
measure: dry/liquid V
measure: liquid S
measure: weight M
missing sign •
number 1
quantum satis qs
question mark ?
seal sigillum
specification ;2
specification: gender :f
syllabogram used as logogram (or part of it) NI
syllabogram-basic de
syllabogram-special ra2
syllabogram-uninterpreted *47

21
http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/fakultaeten/philosophie/zaw/cms/
90 Federico Aurora

traces vest.
word-divider ,
Fig.6 Searchable sign types

TYPE EXAMPLE
abbreviation ki
check mark X
common word da-mo
logogram OLE
logogram: ligature: logogram + ? CYP[+?
logogram: ligature: logogram + logogram AROM+PYC
logogram: ligature: logogram + syllabogram *211VAS+PO
logogram: ligature: logogram + syllabogram + syllabogram *172+KE+ṚỌ2
logogram: ligature: logogram and syllabogram TELA+PA
logogram: monogram MERI
logogram: specified TELA;2
logogram: specified: gender OVIS:f
Fig.7 Searchable word types

TYPE EXAMPLE
inf. mut. inf. mut.
narrow line angustum
prior pars sine regulis prior pars sine regulis
reliqua pars sine regulis reliqua pars sine regulis
ruled .1
ruled: subdivision: no ruling .1a
ruled: subdivision: ruling .1A
single line ø
single line: subdivision: ruling: no ruling Aa
single line: subdivision: ruling .A
sup. mut. sup. mut.
top line .0
unruled .a

Fig.8 Searchable line types

Different readings, erasures, mistakes...

 Database of Mycenaean at Oslo 91

Different readings from the apparatuses of standard editions, DMic. or

individual publications are at the moment registered, but not systematically,
in the notes to the individual texts. We have now started the process of
systematically entering all alternative readings found in the apparatuses in a
dedicated list, directly connected to both the words and the signs (the latter to
facilitate palaeographical work) they refer to, so that all alternative readings
of a sign or a word will be directly available for searches. The same holds
for texts written over erasures and for supposed scribal mistakes: erased text
(when recoverable) and modern correction are being entered and linked to the
corresponding words.
...and different editions?
Since KT6, PoN IV and the “Corpus des inscriptions en linéair B de Pylos”22
might be published in the near future, the question will be posed of 1) how to
rapidly and efficiently update the texts in DAMOS, 2) how to deal with two
different standard editions. Regarding the first question: if the editors of the
new editions will make available text-files of their editions, it will not be too
difficult to detect the differences automatically, with the aid of the computer.
This would also have the advantage to allow the creation of an index of the
changes introduced in the new editions, which can be very useful, particularly
for the non-specialist researcher. The second point is more problematic, but a
structure will have to be provided similar to, but distinct from, the one which is
now linking alternative readings to corresponding words.
Normalization
In order for efficient searches to be performed, a list of ‘normalized’
forms of each word has been created. Normalization implies removing all the
epigraphical mark up signs that can distinguish various occurrences of a word,
e.g. da-ṃọ vs. ḍạ-mo[. By linking these two forms to a normalized form da-
mo, we are able to capture all the (epigraphically) different occurrences of this
word. Of course, if one wishes, she can still look for all the occurrences of a
given epigraphical form.
Epigraphically vs. linguistically annotated database
What I have so long described is the epigraphical part of the database, where
the interpretative component of the data is mostly confined to the not exceedingly
many uncertain readings (c. 5% of the total of logograms, syllabograms and
numerals, thus affecting c. 15% of all words) and their possible alternatives.
22
Olivier 2012, 108.
92 Federico Aurora

This epigraphical annotation is at the time of writing complete (with the

aforementioned exception of alternative readings, erasures and possible scribal
mistakes). Fig.9 is just an example of a possibly interesting query, just to give
an idea of the potential of the database.

Syllabogram Occurrences % Syllabogram Occurrences %

to 1974 4.0542 di 299 0.6141
jo 1890 3.8817 qa 288 0.5915
ko 1742 3.5777 pu 270 0.5545
e 1708 3.5079 tu 244 0.5011
o 1673 3.4360 se 240 0.4929
ro 1656 3.4011 je 202 0.4149
a 1466 3.0109 nu 192 0.3943
ja 1410 2.8959 zo 187 0.3841
ra 1376 2.8260 a2 184 0.3779
ke 1361 2.7952 su 165 0.3389
ta 1332 2.7357 du 142 0.2916
te 1216 2.4974 a3 117 0.2403
wo 1088 2.2345 qi 102 0.2095
we 1050 2.1565 za 99 0.2033
re 1041 2.1380 *56 97 0.1992
pa 1030 2.1154 *22 77 0.1581
ka 1021 2.0969 ra2 65 0.1335
na 1011 2.0764 pte 60 0.1232
u 983 2.0189 ze 60 0.1232
ri 887 1.8217 pu2 55 0.1130
si 811 1.6656 au 49 0.1006
no 799 1.6410 ro2 47 0.0965
so 789 1.6205 mu 42 0.0863
wa 789 1.6205 *34 31 0.0637
me 767 1.5753 *82 30 0.0616
i 761 1.5629 *65 28 0.0575
pe 728 1.4952 nwa 27 0.0555
da 699 1.4356 *83 26 0.0534
ti 672 1.3802 ta2 23 0.0472
pi 648 1.3309 ra3 22 0.0452
mo 645 1.3247 *47 21 0.0431
ki 602 1.2364 *63 21 0.0431
de 596 1.2220 dwe 17 0.0349
 Database of Mycenaean at Oslo 93

do 590 1.2117 dwo 11 0.0226

po 581 1.1933 *18 10 0.0205
qe 548 1.1255 *64 10 0.0205
ma 531 1.0906 *35 8 0.0164
ne 493 1.0125 *79 7 0.0144
ni 462 0.9489 twe 7 0.0144
wi 461 0.9468 *49 6 0.0123
ku 458 0.9406 *86 5 0.0103
ru 389 0.7989 two 4 0.0082
sa 388 0.7969 *19 3 0.0062
mi 330 0.6778 *89 1 0.0021
qo 314 0.6449 *92 1 0.0021

Fig. 9. Occurrences and frequency of syllabograms

(excluding their use as logograms and excluding conjectures).

The linguistic interpretation of the texts

Multiple analyses and their organization
Moving into the domain of linguistic interpretation, the degree of uncertainty
of the data, due to the well-known nature of the Mycenaean corpus, increases
dramatically. This implies having to deal with the (at times very) different
interpretations that a given form admits. It has therefore been necessary to
devise a system of annotation, which can reflect this complexity, but still be
manageable and heuristically useful. Thus, while allowing for more than one
possible value for each annotated feature was an inevitable choice, the final goal
of this kind of linguistic annotation is the organization of this variety in such a
way to be able to capture (and retrieve and, finally, when possible, test):
1) The different hypotheses formulated about a single word with no
further implications for other sets of words: these would typically
address lexical or semantic questions (word class attribution, lexical
meaning of a word, etc.).
2) The different structural hypotheses formulated about Mycenaean as
a system and therefore regarding whole sets of words: these would
typically address phonological, morphological and syntactic questions
(number and form of case endings, the realization of semantic rules and
grammatical relations through case or prepositional constructions, etc.).
These two groups of hypotheses are dealt with in two different ways. While,
for example, different lexical values for a given word (group 1 above) need
to result in two different analysis posts in the database, linked to the same
94 Federico Aurora

epigraphical word occurrence, different interpretations of the case form and

function expressed by an ending (e.g. of the syllabogram -e in 3rd declension
nouns), – this being a structural question (group 2) – are registered in different
cells (case1, case2, etc.) of the same analysis post. These cells correspond to
as many possible elements (pairs of form and function) of the case system,
which can then be subgrouped to test different hypothetical case systems. The
principles followed here are economy of representation (and annotation) and
systematization of the proposed interpretations into theory-coherent sets.
The resulting annotation structure is, clearly, a complex one and needs to be
adjusted and refined through concrete annotation practice according to the needs
progressively revealed by the close inspection of the single texts and related
analyses.23 What has, at the time of writing, been done is a first, semi-automatic
annotation24 (a sort of “distant reading”)25 of c. 11500 of the 15490 syllabic
words of the corpus. Currently we are starting the phase of ‘close reading’ and
refinement of the annotation structure.26
One could, of course, object that the Linear B corpus is after all not immense,
and is therefore quite manageable, so that many hypotheses can be tested also
without a database. This is, however, quite time consuming, while using a
database as the one here described allows hypotheses built by different scholars,
their textual basis and most of the other data they are grounded on, to be stored
and, consequently, reproduced (printed if one wants), tested and easily varied
whenever new data or new insights appear27 (new texts, revised readings, scribal
hands assignment or find-places, etc.). Furthermore, and most importantly, this
kind of database makes it possible to search for fine-grained metadata, epigraphic,
palaeographical and linguistic data, and at the same time cross them through
complex searches, this hopefully leading to new insights and hypotheses.

The linguistic annotation

The linguistic annotation comprises a semantic, morphological and

23
The possibility of operating with subsequent refinements of the annotation, and also other features of
DAMOS, benefit from its structure as a relational database (Aurora 2015, 24).
24
Aurora 2015, 27-28.
25
Moretti 2013
26
A ranking of analyses posts (group 1 above) according to scholarly consensus (mainly based on the
entries in DicM.) has also been entered (Aurora 2015, 28-29), but its efficiency and usefulness need to
be tested in the “close reading” process.
27
Cf., for example, the different scenarios considered by Rupert Thompson (Thompson 2014) for the
realization in Mycenaean of the subset of case functions ablative, dative, instrumental and locative,
in the light of some forms (pa-ro , te-qa-jo-ị q̣ạ-si-re-u-pi) appearing in the recently published TH Uq
434 (Aravantinos et al. 2008). This case underlines as well the importance of integrating also different
readings (here te-qa-jo, yielding a different morphological interpretation) in the annotation structure.
 Database of Mycenaean at Oslo 95

syntactic analysis of each word28 as well as a syntactic annotation of sentences.

Morphological and syntactical analysis of words (the main level of annotation,
given the concise nature of our texts) includes the categories shown in Fig.10-11.

ANNOTATION CATEGORY EXAMPLE

part of speech N (noun)
declension 3
stem -s
number sing.
gender m.
case 1 dative (form); position (function)
criterion-case 1 reason for the given interpretation
case 2 instrumental (form); source (function)
criterion-case 2 reason for the given interpretation
Fig.10 Annotation categories for nouns

ANNOTATION CATEGORY EXAMPLE

part of speech V
person 3
diathesis act
mood ind
tense/aspect pres
thematic/athematic them
stem formation -o

Fig.11 Annotation categories for verbs

The semantic annotation is an important feature for bringing Mycenaean

closer to the rest of classical scholarship, by providing more familiar forms
– or a more general category like “semantic class”29 – as “entry points” for
searches, at the same time facilitating the process of linking the data contained
in DAMOS to other digital resources in the field (see infra). Fig.12 shows the
various levels of lemmatization present in DAMOS.
Finally, a scheme for the syntactical annotation of sentences according to

28
In the case of Mycenaean words written as one single Linear B word, but that we interpret as being
more syntactic words put together (e.g. da-mo-de-mi), different analyses (tagged in such a way not to
be confused with competing analyses as described above) have been connected to the same epigraphical
word, while, conversely, in the case of compound forms which are written as two words in Linear B
(e.g. a-pu , ke-ka-u-me-no – at least in one of the possible interpretations of these forms), the same word
analysis has been connected to the two epigraphical word forms.
29
Based on Bartoněk 2003
96 Federico Aurora

dependency grammar (this in order to be compatible with the work being done
with the rest of the Ancient Greek corpus)30 is at the moment being developed.31

NORMALIZATION/SEMANTIC ANNOTATION EXAMPLE

Linear B form da-]ṃọ (or da-mo-de-mi etc.)
Normalized Linear B form da-mo-de

Linear B lemma da-mo

Mycenaen form dāmōi
Mycenaean lemma dāmos
Attic form δήμωι
Attic lemma δῆμος
Closest attested 1st millennium form δαμωι
Indo-European deh2-mo
Semantic Class people groups, collective
Fig.12 Normalization and semantic annotation

Further developments
Linked Data
As already mentioned above one of the aims of DAMOS is to contribute
Mycenaean data to other digital resources in the field. At the time of writing,
the online version of DAMOS has the already mentioned links between the
occurrences of seal-impressions and their pictures and related metadata in the
digital CMS, hosted at Arachne,32 as well as links to the high definition pictures
of the Knossos tablets hosted at the Ashmolean Museum, available on their
website. This permits to integrate online texts with online pictures. Further
important steps in this direction would be linking DAMOS with the searchable
database of photographs of the Linear B tablets from hosted at CaLIBRA,33 and
with the pictures of the documents from Midea, Mycenae and Tiryns contained
in LiBER34 – and, of course, when they will be ready, with the 3D pictures
which are being taken by Dimitri Nakassis and Kevin Pluta.35 This can further
lead to an integrated system, where signs and words are tagged on the pictures to

30
Bamman & Crane 2011
31
Aurora 2015, 26-27.
32
http://arachne.dainst.org
33
Judson et al. 2015.
34
http://www.liber.isma.cnr.it/cgi-bin/home.cgi, Del Freo & Di Filippo 2014.
35
See Nakassis & Pluta in this volume.
 Database of Mycenaean at Oslo 97

correspond to signs and words in the textual database.36 Finally, once lexical data
and linguistic annotation are entered, this will give the possibility to integrate
the material in DAMOS into resources like the online LGPN, Epigraphical
databases37 and the Ancient Greek and Latin Treebank.
Maps
Starting from spring/summer 2016 we will be working on adding to the
online version both maps of the individual sites and a general map of the
Mycenaean world where to plot our data (find-places of the documents, linguistic
annotations, etc.), with the aim to provide a (heuristically) useful visualization
of the data and one more entry point for non-specialists.

Bibliography
Aravantinos, V. L., Godart, L., Sacconi, A. 2008 La Tavoletta TH Uq 434. In
Colloquium Romanum, 23-33.
Aurora, F. 2015 DĀMOS (Database of Mycenaean at Oslo). Annotating a
fragmentarily attested language, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
198, 21-31.
Bamman, D. & Crane G. 2007 The Latin Dependency Treebank in a Cultural
Heritage Digital Library In Proceedings of the 2007 ACL Workshop on
Language Technology for Cultural Heritage Data, 33-40.
Barmpoutis, A., Bozia E., Wagman R. S. 2010 A novel framework for 3D
reconstruction and analysis of ancient inscriptions, Journal of Machine
Vision and Applications 21:6, 989-998.
Bartoněk, A. 2003 Handbuch des mykenischen Griechisch.
Del Freo, M. & Di Filippo, F. 2014 LiBER: un progetto di digitalizzazione dei
testi in scrittura lineare B, Archeologia e Calcolatori 25, 33-50.
Driessen, J. 2008 Chronology of the Linear B texts In: Y. Duhoux, & A.
Morpurgo Davies A companion to Linear B. Mycenaean Greek texts and
their world vol.1.
Godart, L. 2012 Du nouveau à l’horizon du Linéaire B. In Études Mycéniennes
2010, 79-106.
Hallager E. & Hallager B. 2015 “When the saints go marching in” In: D.
Panagiotopoulos, I. Kaiser, O. Kouka (eds), Ein Minoer im Exil. Festschrift
für Wolf-Dietrich Niemeier, Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen

36
Barmpoutis et al. 2010.
37
Cf. the newly started project “Integrating Digital Epigraphy” (Duke University) http://blogs.library.
duke.edu/dcthree/projects/
98 Federico Aurora

Archäologie 270, 99-124.

Judson, A. P., Meißner, T., Thompson, R. J. E. 2015 CaLiBRA — Cambridge
Linear B Research Archive.
Moretti, F. 2013 Distant Reading.
Nakassis, D. & Pluta, K. 2017 Vorsprung durch Technik: imaging the Linear B
tablets from Pylos In Aegean Scripts.
Olivier, J.-P. 2012 Πυλιακά παραφερνάλια. In Études Mycéniennes 2010, 107-
121.
Thompson, R. 2014 Mycenaean -pi and pa-ro in the light of TH Uq 434 In A.
Bernabé & E. R. Luján (eds), Donum Mycenologicum. Mycenaean Studies
in Honour of Francisco Aura Jorro, 163-178.