Thesis Proposal
Thesis Proposal
Thesis Proposal
development)2.
1
Faq.ph/the-10-poorest-provinces-in-the-philippines/
2 Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago, Explanatory Note. The Constitution,
Article 2, Section 9, 15th Congress of the Republic of the Philippines First
regular Session, Senates No. 92
3 The comprehensive list of CCT programs are summarized by Fieszben et al
a. Sex
b. Age
c. Grade level
d. Class section
a. Sex
b. Age
c. Highest educational attainment
a. Learning
b. Socialization
c. Self perception
of:
c. Nutritional status
d. Vaccinations
students.
performance.
8. Find out if there was a significant relationship between
performance.
academic performance.
following:
the cash grants from the government in other expenses can have
future study.
performance.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
first6.
needs.
6
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow’s_hierarchy_of_needs
7 https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/xsoc530/attitudes.html
perception. Specifically it seeks to determine whether there was
which in this case the cash grants that they are receiving from
8
Tannahill, A. (2009). Health promotion: The Tannahill Model Revisited. Public
Health, 123 (5), 396-399.
protection sphere was represented by the conditionality that,
they are not only oriented on the proper spending of cash grants
behavior
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Attitudes
Academic Performance
Definition of Terms
p.352.
Level of Academic Performance. Conceptually and
the family.
refers to whether or not you are eating the correct amounts and
types of nutrients.
to the idea that you have about the kind of person you are18.
34664.com
18 Merriam-Webster Dictionary 2017, http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
19 The Webster Dictionary, p. 820.
Socialization. Conceptually and operationally, it means to
p.253.
Chapter II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Attitude
opportunities.
family members who are not feeling well. Also, the compulsory
classroom requirements.
Health Status
nutritious foods24.
6-14 years old should receive deworming pills twice a year and
from pupils’ responses that they eat their meals three (3) times
said that their food budget only partly covers 3 meals per day,
based on this, the DSWD said the 4Ps program is “on track in
Academic Performance
of the program. Since they are receiving the grants, they have
and day care centers, elementary school and secondary must have
29
Fernandez, L. & Olfindo, R. (2011). Overview of the Philippines' conditional
cash transfer program: The Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (Pantawid
Pamilya). Washington, DC: World Bank.
30
Dela Tore (2016), Financing Education through Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino
Program (4Ps), Vol 6. No.5, May 2016
continual reduction of poverty31. The conditionality on the
threshold per month. It has also been noted that because parents
classes.
no work in the farm and they have extra time, they will help and
31
Son, H. & Florentino, J. (2008). Ex-ante impact evaluation of conditional
cash transfer program on school attendance and poverty: The case of the
Philippines. Mandaluyong City, Manila: Asian Development Bank.
during meetings and programs were found to be helpful in their
32
Dela Tore (2016), Financing Education through Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino
Program (4Ps), Vol 6. No.5, May 2016
33
Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) DSWD, (2006) National Sector
Support for Social Welfare and Development Reform Project (NSS-SWDRP) from
Site resources.worldbank.org/ INTPHILIPPINES/Resources/4PsDSWD
conferences, concerts and other school events, helping to raise
school during the day)34. Thus, study shows that 4Ps beneficiary
that out of 11, 6 or 55% said that their pupils with 4Ps
34 Amico, Joe D’ (1995) Families and Schools Together Rural Audio Journal,Vol.
3, no. 3. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, 1995
35
Montilla et al.,Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps): Assistance to
Pupil’s Education, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences,
Vol.2 No.3, July 2015
study of Manasan,2011 that there is a significant improvement in
36
Manasan, Rosario G., (2011)Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program and School
Attendance: Early Indications of Success. Philippine Institute for
Development Studies Retrieved February 9, 2015
37
Montilla et al.,Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps): Assistance to
Pupil’s Education, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences,
Vol.2 No.3, July 2015
highlighting the program’s strengths and opportunities and
of the goal and the objectives of the 4Ps. Hence, one of the
them and they also were able to ask questions on the merit of
the guidelines and the dos and don’ts and what are expected of
(FDS) with their 4Ps Municipal Link. In that half day activity,
responsible; not to do things and acts that will make them break
(4Ps).
monitoring.
happen and they trust those above them to follow their pledge
sizeable farms and lands, who are professionals and have stable
and higher monthly income. They also added that even if the
they did not comprehend what was explained to them and they were
weaknesses.
high respect and regard for the system and if there is non-
which part they feel the program implementation has gone wrong,
file complaint for erring recipients, they said that they are
(4Ps)
school.
Improvement of recipients’ attitudes towards work, health
family members who are not feeling well. Also, the compulsory
classroom requirements.
they are helped a lot by this. They believed that the program
living conditions.
Pilipino Program (4Ps). The program’s cash grants are big help
they are living now. By the help of the program and their hard
work and perseverance, they will be able to break the chains of
poverty.
advantage.
children who are not in school and they are sending their
study hard and avoid absences if possible. They also noted that
and graduated from High School. Also, because of the 4Ps, they
school. They also added that they now can pay on time the
that could cause trouble and concern for the program. Threats to
the 4Ps are expressed in the following: (1) negative perception
funds by both the recipients and the 4Ps bureaucracy, and (5)
demands.
When asked why they are fearful that negative perceptions of the
hope that if this program was stopped, the government will have
living.
will cause the loss of funding for the program. Thus, loss of
They said that they are hurt by being looked down by non-
faces that 4Ps is useless and the recipients should work harder
that there are some who are not exerting efforts in finding and
staying in work because of the program. However, they, the
majority said that they are working harder because the cash
grants are only additional income and will never suffice to the
needs of their family. They also added that if they will be very
because the grants are not that sufficient for every family
confident and trust the 4Ps bureaucracy and its recipients that
are also doing this, since they are just a small number compared
do not want because the higher-ups want them to do it. They had
been members of the program for two elections now and even
national, that they should vote for whoever they think is better
to be in that position.
METHODOLOGY
Samar Island.
recipients.
Research Design
three variables.
The Variables
beneficiary students.
The Respondents
Research Instrument
score.
Male
Female
12-13
14-15
16-17
18-above
Grade 7
Grade 8
Grade 9
Grade 10
Section 1-5
Section 6-10
Section 11-15
1-3
4-7
8-11
12-above
Male
Female
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
` 45-49
50-54
55-59
60-above
Highest educational attainment of parent respondent
Elementary level
Elementary graduate
College level
College graduate
Vocational course
Farmer (rice/coconut)
Vendor
Businessman
Fisherman
Government employee
Others (Specify)
None
P 5,001 – P 10,000
P 10,001 – P 15,000
P 15,001 – P 20,000
P 20,001 – above
4Ps beneficiaries’ attitude reflecting learning, socialization
and self-perception
vaccinations.
Statistical Treatment
parents.
F
P = ------- x 100
N
Where:
P = percentage
F = frequency
N = number of class
Weighted Mean
WM = _WF_
follows:
Y = b0+b1+y1+b2+y2. . .+ by
Where: Y is the variable to the predicted academic
(STUDENT RESPONDENT)
School _____________________________________________________
5 – Always (A)
4 – Often (O)
3 – Sometimes (S)
2 – Seldom (SD)
1 – Never (N)
Statements A O S SD N
1. I believe in folk saying
about illnesses.
2. I visit health center not
only when I was sick.
3. I believe that our family
has adequate daily food
intake.
4. I have enough knowledge for
our family to have proper
nutrition and good health.
5. I believe that not having
illness is not enough to
conclude that a person is
healthy.
6. I worry about my family’s
nutritional status and
health.
7. I believe that my family is
poor because we lack
resources.
8. I believe that my family is
not well-known so that we
cannot enjoy the things we
ought to enjoy.
9. I believe that greed is
within the hearts of the
poor because of inequality
experienced by them and
this gives them the reason
to cheat and to do crime.
10. I believe that my
family will remain poor no
matter what.
11. I believe that the
government neglects the
poor so that they are
forced to do crimes.
12. I believe that the
resources of the community
are for the rich and famous
only.
13. My parents participate
in gambling activities.
14. A monthly budget was
allocated for alcohol or
cigarettes.
15.
5 – Always (A)
4 – Often (O)
3 – Sometimes (S)
2 – Seldom (SD)
1 – Never (N)
Statements A O S SD N
1. I was my hands before
eating.
2. I visit the Rural/Barangay
Health Unit regularly.
3. I receive deworming in
school yearly.
4. I attend Family Development
Sessions (FDS).
5. I eat green-leafy
vegetables.
6. I drink milk and eat foods
rich in calcium (dark-green
leafy vegetables).
7. I drink 8 glasses of water
a day.
8. I select foods with Sangkap
Pinoy Seal (fortified
foods).
9. I use iodized salt at home.
10. I drink coffee instead
of milk.
11. I eat junk food for
snacks.
12. I attend Family
Development Seminar (FDS)
once a month.
5 – Always (A)
4 – Often (O)
3 – Sometimes (S)
2 – Seldom (SD)
1 – Never (N)
Statements A O S SD N
1. I regularly attend school.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.