Vindman Testimony
Vindman Testimony
Vindman Testimony
Vindman
Mr. Chairman and Ranking Member , thank you for the opportunity to address the
Committees concerning the activities relating to Ukraine and my role in the events
under investigation .
Background
have dedicated my entire professional life to the United States of America . For
more than two decades, it has been myhonor to serve as an officer in the United
States Army. As an infantry officer , served multiple overseas tours, including
South Korea andGermany, and a deployment to Iraq for combat operations. In
Iraq, I was wounded in an IED attack and awarded a Purple Heart .
Since 2008 , Ihave been a Foreign Area Officer specializing in Eurasia . In this role ,
have served in the United States' embassies in Kiev , Ukraine and Moscow , Russia .
In Washington , D . C ., was a politico -military affairs officer for Russia for the
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs where authored the principle strategy for managing
competition with Russia . In July 2018 , Iwas asked to serve at the National Security
Council
The privilege of serving my country is not only rooted in mymilitary service, but
also in my personal history . I sit here, as a Lieutenant Colonel in the United States
Army, an immigrant. My family fled the Soviet Union when I was three and a half
years old. Upon arriving in New York City in 1979,my worked multiple jobs
to support us, all the while learning English at night. He stressed to us the
importance of fully integrating into our adopted country . For many years, life was
quite difficult . In spite of our challenging beginnings, myfamily worked to build its
own American dream . have a deep appreciation for American values and ideals
and the power of freedom . am a patriot, and it is mysacred duty and honor to
advance and defend OUR country , irrespective of party or politics.
For over twenty years as an activeduty United Statesmilitary officer and diplomat,
I have served this country in a nonpartisanmanner, and have done so with the
utmost respect and professionalism for both Republican and Democratic
administrations.
Introduction
I want the Committees to know I am not the whistleblowerwho brought this issue
to the CIA and the Committees' attention. I do notknow who thewhistleblower is
and would not feel comfortable to speculate as to the identity of the
whistleblower
Also , as will detail herein , I did convey certain concerns internally to National
Security officials in accordance with mydecades of experience and training, sense
of duty , and obligation to operate within the chain of command . As an active duty
military officer , the command structure is extremely important to me. On many
occasions I have been told I should express my views and share my concerns with
my chain of command and proper authorities . believe that any good military
officer should and would do the same, thus providing his or her best advice to
leadership.
The Geopolitical
ImportanceofUkraine
Since 2008, Russia has manifested an overtly aggressive foreign policy, leveraging
military power and employing hybrid warfare to achieve its objectives of regional
hegemony and global influence . Absent a deterrent to dissuade Russia from such
aggression , there is an increased risk of further confrontations with the West. In
this situation , a strong and independent Ukraine is critical to U . S . national security
interests because Ukraine is a frontline state and a bulwark against Russian
aggression
In spite of being under assault from Russia for more than five years, Ukraine has
taken major steps towards integrating with the West. The U .S . government policy
community' s view is that the election of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the
promise of reforms to eliminate corruption will lock in Ukraine' s Western -leaning
trajectory , and allow Ukraine to realize its dream of a vibrant democracy and
economic prosperity .
When joined the NSC in July 2018 , began implementing the administration' s
policy on Ukraine. In the Spring of 2019, became aware of outside influencers
promoting a false narrative of Ukraineinconsistentwith the consensus views of the
interagency. This narrative was harmful to U . S . government policy. While my
interagency colleagues and I were becoming increasingly optimistic on Ukraine' s
prospects, this alternative narrative undermined U . S. government efforts to
expand cooperation with Ukraine.
On May 21, 2019, I was directed by Ambassador Bolton and Dr. Hill to join the
delegation attending President Zelenkskyy' s inauguration. When the delegation
returned, they provided a debriefing to President Trump and explained their
positive assessment of President Zelenskyy and his team . did not participate in
the debriefing.
Oleksandr Danylyuk Visit July 10, 2019
On July 10, 2019 , Oleksandr Danylyuk , the Secretary of the National Security and
Defense Council for Ukraine, visited Washington , D . C . for a meeting with National
Security Advisor Bolton . Ambassadors Volker and Sondland also attended , along
with Energy Secretary Rick Perry.
The meeting proceededwell until the Ukrainians broached the subject ofa meeting
between the two presidents. The Ukrainians saw this meeting as critically
important in order to solidify the support of their most important international
partner . Amb. Sondland started to speak about Ukraine delivering specific
investigations in order to secure the meeting with the President, at which time
Ambassador Bolton cut the meeting short .
Following this meeting, there was a scheduled debriefing during which Amb.
Sondland emphasized the importance that Ukraine deliver the investigations into
the 2016 election , the Bidens, and Burisma. to Amb. Sondland that his
statements were inappropriate, that the request to investigate Biden and his son
had nothing to do with national security , and that such investigations were not
something the NSC was going to get involved in or push . Dr. Hill then entered the
room and asserted to Amb. Sondland that his statements were inappropriate.
On July 25 , 2019, the call occurred. listenedin on the callin the Situation Room
with colleaguesfrom theNSC andthe office of the Vice President. As the transcript
is in the public record, we are all aware of whatwas said .
I was concerned by the call. I did notthink it wasproper to demand that a foreign
governmentinvestigate a U . S . citizen , and I was worried aboutthe implicationsfor
the U .S . government' s support of Ukraine. realized that if Ukraine pursued an
investigation into the Bidens and Burisma, it would likely be interpreted as a
partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan
support ithas thus farmaintained. This would all undermineU . S. nationalsecurity .
Followingthe call, I again reportedmy concernsto NSC ' s lead counsel.
Conclusion
The United States and Ukraine are and must remain strategic partners, working
together to realize the shared vision of a stable , prosperous , and democratic
Ukraine that is integrated into the Euro - Atlantic community . Our partnership is
rooted in the idea that free citizens should be able to exercise their democratic
rights , choose their own destiny , and live in peace.
It hasbeen a great honor to serve the American people and a privilegeto work in
the WhiteHouseand on the NationalSecurity Council. I hope to continue to serve
and advance America' s nationalsecurity interests.
Thank you again for your consideration, and now I would behappy to answer your
questions.