Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 183 views

    Buayan National High School Senior High School Department

    Uploaded by

    Cha Gao-ay
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating video projects created by groups of students at Buayan National High School. The rubric assesses projects based on 4 criteria: content, quality, citations, and work ethics. Each criterion has descriptors for performance levels of very good, good, fair, and needs improvement. The document explains that groups will receive both a group grade based on the rubric and individual peer evaluation grades, which will be combined for a final individual grade. Late submission penalties are also outlined.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Buayan National High School Senior High School Department

    Uploaded by

    Cha Gao-ay
    183 views1 page
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating video projects created by groups of students at Buayan National High School. The rubric assesses projects based on 4 criteria: content, quality, citations, and work ethics. Each criterion has descriptors for performance levels of very good, good, fair, and needs improvement. The document explains that groups will receive both a group grade based on the rubric and individual peer evaluation grades, which will be combined for a final individual grade. Late submission penalties are also outlined.

    Original Description:

    ICT Grade 11

    Original Title

    Video Project Rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides a rubric for evaluating video projects created by groups of students at Buayan National High School. The rubric assesses projects based on 4 criteria: content, quality, citations, and work ethics. Each criterion has descriptors for performance levels of very good, good, fair, and needs improvement. The document explains that groups will receive both a group grade based on the rubric and individual peer evaluation grades, which will be combined for a final individual grade. Late submission penalties are also outlined.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    183 views1 page

    Buayan National High School Senior High School Department

    Uploaded by

    Cha Gao-ay
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating video projects created by groups of students at Buayan National High School. The rubric assesses projects based on 4 criteria: content, quality, citations, and work ethics. Each criterion has descriptors for performance levels of very good, good, fair, and needs improvement. The document explains that groups will receive both a group grade based on the rubric and individual peer evaluation grades, which will be combined for a final individual grade. Late submission penalties are also outlined.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    BUAYAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

    SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

    SHS Media and Information Literacy (MIL)


    Performance Task: Video Project (Cooperative Learning)
    RUBRIC (GROUP GRADE)
    Criteria Very Good Good Fair Needs Improvement
    Content The content includes a clear statement of Information is presented as a connected The content does not present a clearly stated Content lacks a central theme, clear point of
    purpose or theme and is creative, compelling theme with accurate, current supporting theme, is vague, and some of the supporting view and logical sequence of information.
    and clearly written. A rich variety of information that contributes to understanding information does not seem to fit the main Much of the supporting information is
    supporting information in the video the project’s main idea. Details are logical idea or appears as a disconnected series of irrelevant to the overall message. The viewer
    contributes to the understanding of the and persuasive information is effectively scenes with no unifying main idea. Includes is unsure what the message is because there
    project’s main idea. Events and messages are used. The content includes a clear point of few citations and few facts. is little persuasive information and only one
    presented in a logical order. Includes view with a progression of ideas and or two facts about the topic are articulated.
    properly cited sources. supporting information. Includes properly Information is incorrect, out of date, or
    cited sources. incomplete. No citations included.
    (15 Points) (12 Points) ( 8 Points) (5 Points)
    Quality Movie was completed and had all required Movie was completed and contained all Movie was made, but had very little if any The video was totally unedited with no
    elements. The video was well edited and required elements. Editing was not done as editing. Many poor shots remain. Video was transitions or audio support of any kind.
    moves smoothly from scene to scene with well as it should have been. Some poor shots very fragmented and choppy with little to no
    proper use of transitions. Audio and other remain. Movie is still somewhat choppy. audio reinforcement.
    enhancements were well used. Audio and other enhancements were utilized,
    but not for maximum effect.
    (15 Points) (12 Points) (8 Points) (5 Points)
    Citations All sources (information, graphics, music, 1-2 sources (information, graphics, music 3-4 sources (information, graphics, music, More than 5 sources (information, graphics,
    etc.) are properly cited using APA citations. etc.) are not identified and credited using etc.) are not identified and credited using music, etc.) are not identified and credited
    APA citations. APA citations. using APA citations or No citations are
    included.
    (15 Points) (12 Points) (8 points) (5 Points)
    Work Every individual in the group contributed to 1 member is not involved in the group 2-3 members are not involved in the group More than 3 members are not involved in the
    Ethics the creation of the video project. Team project. Team members mostly showed project. Team members fairly showed group project or group members are not
    members showed respect with each other. respect with each other. respect with each other. working during the designated time or low
    levels of respect were evident within the
    team.
    (15 Points) (12 Points) (8 Points) (5 Points)
    TOTAL 60 Points

    Computation of Grades: Group Grade + Peer Evaluation Average Score = Individual Grade (60 Points + 10 Points = 70 Points)

    Note: Group who submitted late will received deductions in their project grade. 5 points deductions if submitted late but within the day of deadline. 7 points deduction for 1 day late. 10 points
    deduction for 2-3 school days late and 15 points for 4-5 school days late. Late for more than 5 school days will not be accepted and will received a grade of 0.

    Some criteria were taken from https://lambenglishmontana.wikispaces.com/file/view/RubricVideo.doc and https://www2.uwstout.edu/content/profdev/rubrics/videorubric.html

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy