Collective Bargaining
Collective Bargaining
Collective Bargaining
BARGAINING
SUBMITTED TO:
SUBMITTED BY:
Joweken Sunaz
Camelle Baldon
It is also asserted that “the terms of agreement serve as a code defining the rights
and obligations of each party in their employment relations with one another, if fixes large
number of detailed conditions of employees and during is validity none of the matters it
deals with internal circumstances give grounds for a dispute counseling and individual
workers”.
Collective Bargaining involves:
(i) Negotiations
(ii) Drafting
(iii) Administration
(iv) Interpretation of documents written by employers, employees and the union
representatives
(v) Organizational Trade Unions with open mind.
In the first place, bargaining may be between the single employer and the single
union, this is known as single plant bargaining. This form prevails in the United States as
well as in India.
Secondly, the bargaining may be between a single firm having several plants ad
workers employees in all those plants. This form is called multiple plants bargaining where
workers bargain with common employer through different unions.
Thirdly, instead of a separate union bargaining with separate employer, all the
union belonging to the same industry bargain through their federation with the employer’s
federation of that industry. This is known as multiple employer bargaining which is
possible both at the local and regional levels. Instances in India of this industry—wide
bargaining is found in the textile industry.
The common malady of union rivalry, small firms and existence of several political
parties has given rise to a small unit of collective bargaining. It has produced higher labor
cost, lack of appreciation, absence of sympathy and economic inefficiency in the realm of
industrial relationships. An industry-wide bargaining can be favorable to the economic
and social interest of both the employers and employees.
(i) Existence of a strong representative trade union in the industry the believes in
constitutional means for settling the disputes.
(ii) Existence of a fact-finding approach and willingness to use new methods and
tools for the solution of industrial problems. The negotiation should be based
on facts and figures and both the parties should adopt constructive approach.
(iii) Existence of strong and enlightened management which can integrate the
different parties, employees, owners, consumers, and society or government.
(iv) Agreement on basic objectives of the organization between the employer and
the employees and on mutual rights and liabilities should be there.
(v) In order that collective bargaining functions properly, unfair labor practices must
be avoided by both the parties.
(vi) Proper records for the problems should be maintained.
(vii) Collective bargaining should be best conducted at plant level. It means if there
are more than on plant of the firm, the local management should be delegated
proper authority to negotiated with the local trade union.
(viii) There must be change in the attitude of employers and employees. They
should realize that differences can be resolved peacefully on negotiating table
without the assistance of third party.
(ix) No party should take rigid attitude. They should enter into negotiating table
without the assistance of third party.
(x) When agreement is reached after negotiations, it must be in writing
incorporating all term of the contract.
1. It is a Group Action
Collective bargaining is a group action as opposed to individual action. Both the parties
of settlement are represented by their groups. Employer is represented by its delegates
and on the others side employees are represented by their trade union.
2. It is a Continuous Process
3. It is a Bipartite Process
There is no intervention of any third party. It is mutual give-and-take rather than take-it-
or-leave-it method of arriving at the settlement of a dispute.
4. It is a Process
The starting point is the presentation of charter of demands by the workers and the last
step is the reaching of an agreement or a contact which would serve as the basic law
governing labour-management relations over a period of time in an enterprise.
It has fluidity. There is no hard and fast rule for reaching an agreement. There is ample
scope for compromise. A spirit of give-and-take works unless final agreement acceptable
to both the parties is reached.
Industrial democracy is the government of labor with the consent of the governed-the
workers. The principle of arbitrary unilateralism has given way to self-government in
industry.
7. It is Dynamic
It is relatively a new concept, and is growing expanding and changing. In the past, it is
used emotional, turbulent and sentimental but now it is scientific, factual and systematic.
The behavioral scientists have made a good distinction between “distributive bargaining”
and “integrative bargaining”. The former is the process of dividing up the cake which
represents what has been produced by the joint efforts of management and labour.
9. It is an Art
Each of these steps has its particular character and aim, and therefore, each requires a
special kind of intellectual and moral activity and machinery.
The administrative process is the day-to-day application of the provisions of the contract
to the work situation. At the time of writing the contract, it is impossible to foresee all the
special problems which will arise in applying its provisions. Sometimes, it is a matter of
differing interpretations of specific clause in the contract, sometimes; it is a question of
whether the dispute is even covered by the contract. Nevertheless, each case must
somehow be settled. The spirit of the contract should not be violated.
Proper and timely enforcement of the contract is very essential for the success of
collective bargaining. If a contract is enforced in such way that it reduces or nullifies the
benefits expected by the parties, it will defeat basic purpose of collective bargaining. It
may give rise to fresh industrial disputes. Hence, in the enforcement of the contract the
spirit of the contract should not be violated.
The collective bargaining advances the mutual understanding between the two parties i.e., employees
and employers.
The role of collective bargaining may be evaluated from the following point of view:
The main object of the organisation is to get the work done by the employees at work at minimum cost
and thus earn a high rate of profits. Maximum utilization of workers is a must for the effective
management. For this purpose co-operation is required from the side of the employees and collective
bargaining is a device to get and promote co-operation. The labour disputes are mostly attributable to
certain direct or indirect causes and based on rumors, and misconceptions. Collective bargaining is the
best remedial measure for maintaining the cordial relations.
Labour has poor bargaining power. Individually a worker has no existence because labour is perishable
and therefore, the employers succeed in exploiting the labourers.
Collective bargaining can be made only through the trade unions. Trade unions are the bargaining agents
for the workers. The main function of the trade unions is to protect the economic and non- economic
interests of workers through constructive programmes and collective bargaining is one of the devices to
attain that objective through negotiations with the employers, Trade unions may negotiate with the
employer for better employment opportunities and job security through collective bargaining.
Government is also concerned with the process of collective bargaining. Government passes and
implements several labour legislations and desires it to be implemented in their true sense. If any person
violates the rules and laws, it enforces them by force.
Collective bargaining prevents the Government from using the force because an amicable agreement can
be reached between employer and employees for implementing the legislative provisions. Labour
problems shall be minimised through collective bargaining and industrial peace shall be promoted in the
country without any force.
There are three important concepts on collective bargaining which have been discussed
as follows:
The marketing concept views collective bargaining as a contract for the sale of
labour. It is a market or exchange relationship and is justified on the ground that it gives
assurance of voice on the part of the organized workers in the matter of sale. The same
objective rules which apply to the construction of all commercial contracts are invoked
since the union-management relationship is concerned as a commercial one.
According to this theory, employees sell their individual labour only on terms
collectively determined on the basis of contract which has been made through the process
of collective bargaining.
(1) Agreement arrived at after voluntary direct negotiations between the parties
concerned. Its implementation is purely voluntary;
(2) Agreements between the two parties, though voluntary in nature, are compulsory
when registered as settlement before a conciliator; and
(3) Agreement which have legal status negotiated after successful discussion between
the parties when the matter of dispute is under reference to industrial tribunal/courts.
The main objective of developing collective bargaining technique is to improve the workers-management
relations and thus maintain peace in industries. The technique has developed in India only after India got
independence and got momentum since then.
The success of collective bargaining lies in the attitude of both management and workers which is actually
not consistent with the spirit of collective bargaining in India. There are certain problems which hinder
the growth of collective bargaining in India.
Collective bargaining is generally becoming a competitive process, i.e., labour and management compete
each other at negotiation table. A situation arises where the attainment of one party’s goal appears to be
in conflict with the basic objectives of the other party.
Both the parties—management and workers—come to the negotiation table without doing their
homework. Both the parties start negotiations without being fully equipped with the information, which
can easily be collected from company’s records. To start with, there is often a kind of ritual, that of charges
and counter charges, generally initiated by the trade union representatives. In the absence of requisite
information, nothing concrete is achieved.
The immediate objective of the workers’ representatives is always some kind of monetary or other gains,
accrue when the economy is buoyant and the employer has capacity to pay. But in a period of recession,
when demand of the product and the profits are falling, it is very difficult for the employer to meet the
demands of the workers, he might even resort to retrenchment or even closure collective bargaining is
no answer to such a situation.
In industries, where the prices of products are fixed by the Government, it becomes very difficult for the
employer to meet the demands of workers which would inevitably lead to a rise in cost of the products
produced. Whereas the supply price to the consumers cannot be increased. It will either reduce the profits
of the firm or increase the loss. In other words, it will lead to closure of the works, which again is not in
the interest of the workers.
One great weakness of collective bargaining is the multiplicity of trade unions. In a multiple trade union
situation, even a well recognised, union with long standing, stable and generally positive relationship with
the management, adopts a militant attitude as its deliberate strategy.
In Indian situation, inter-union rivalries are also present. Even if the unions combine, as at times they do
for the purpose of bargaining with the employer they make conflicting demands, which actually confuse
employer and the employees.
One of the weaknesses of collective bargaining in India is that the management deputes a low-status
executive for bargaining with the employees. Such executive has no authority to commit anything on
behalf of the management. It clearly indicates that the management is not at all serious and the union
leaders adopt other ways of settling disputes.
The constraints are also imposed by the regulatory and participative provisions as contained in the
Payment of Wages Act, the Minimum Wages Act, and Payment of Bonus Act etc. Such provisions are
statutory and are not negotiable.
At the time when the old agreement is near expiry or well before that, workers representatives come up
with fresh demands. Such demands are pressed even when the industry is running into loss or even during
the period of depression. If management accepts the demand of higher wages and other benefits, it would
prefer to close down the works.
A study conducted by the Employer’s Federation of India revealed that out of 109
agreements, ‘wages’ was the most prominent issue in 96 cases (88 percent) followed by
dearness allowance (59 cases) retirement benefits (53 cases), bonus (50 cases) other
issues involved were annual leave, paid holidays, casual leave, job classification,
overtime, incentives, shift allowance, acting allowance, tiffin allowance, canteen and
medical benefits.
The Government of India under Industrial Disputes Act 1947 has created the following
seven different authorities for the prevention and settlement of disputes:
1. Workers Committees.
2. Conciliation Officer.
3. Board of Conciliation.
4. Court of Enquiry.
5. Labour Courts.
6. Industrial Tribunals.
7. National Tribunals.
The important characteristic of the above machinery for the prevention and settlement of
disputes is that, there is full scope for the settlement of dispute through collective
bargaining and if it is not settled by Works Committees, Conciliation Officer, Board of
Conciliation, only then, it is referred to Court of Enquiry and Labour Courts. The decision
of the Labour Courts, Industrial Tribunal and National Tribunal is binding on both the
parties.
based on the principle, “my gain is your loss, and your gain is my loss” i.e. one party wins
2. Co-operative or Integrative Bargaining: Both the employee and the employer sit
together and try to resolve the problems of their common interest and reach to an
amicable solution. In the case of economic crisis, such as recession, which is beyond the
control of either party, may enter into a mutual agreement with respect to the working
terms.
3. Productivity Bargaining: This type of bargaining is done by the management, where the
workers are given the incentives or the bonus for the increased productivity. The workers
get encouraged and work very hard to reach beyond the standard level of productivity to
gain the additional benefits.
4. Composite Bargaining: In this type of collective bargaining, along with the demand for
increased wages the workers also express their concern over the working conditions,
recruitment and training policies, environmental issues, mergers and amalgamations with
other firms, pricing policies, etc. with the intention to safeguard their interest and protect
the dilution of their powers.
Even though employers might need to back down a little, this strategy gives them
the benefit of being able to deal with just a small number of people at a time. This is very
practical in larger companies where the employer might have dozens, hundreds or even
thousands of workers on his payroll. Working with just a few representatives also can
make the issues at hand seem more personal.
A major drawback to using this type of negotiation system is that, even though
everyone gets a say in what happens, ultimately, the majority rules, with only a few people
determining what happens too many.
This means that a large number of people, particularly in the general workforce,
can be overshadowed and feel like their opinion doesn’t really matter. In the worst case
scenario, this can cause severe division and hostility in the group.
Secondly, it always requires at least two parties. Even though the system is
supposed to pull both parties together, during the process of trying to reach an agreement,
people can adopt us-versus-them mentality. When the negotiations are over, this way of
looking at each other can be hard to set aside, and unity in the company can suffer.
https://legaldictionary.net/collective-bargaining/
https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/collective-bargaining-labour-
relations/WCMS_244362/lang--en/index.htm
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/collective-bargaining.asp
https://businessjargons.com/types-of-collective-bargaining.html
http://www.economicsdiscussion.net/collective-bargaining/collective-bargaining-
definition-types-features-and-importance/31375
http://www.naukrihub.com/industrialrelations/chracterstics.html
https://study.com/academy/lesson/function-of-collective-bargaining.html
http://www.businessdictionary.com/article/393/collective-bargaining/
http://www.whatishumanresource.com/collective-bargaining
https://employment.findlaw.com/wages-and-benefits/what-is-collective-bargaining-.html