Organizational Conflict: Causes, Effects, and Remedies: Journal Review
Organizational Conflict: Causes, Effects, and Remedies: Journal Review
Organizational Conflict: Causes, Effects, and Remedies: Journal Review
Classification of conflict
1. Potential opposition
3. Intentions
4. Behavior and
5. Outcome
Sources of conflict
Internal source (inherent within the framework of an organization)
External source (outside the four walls of an organization. (third party intervention to
industrial dispute).
Causes of conflict:
Specialization: because they have little knowledge of each other job responsibilities.
Effects of conflict
Conflict tends to have negative consequences for both the individual and the
organization. These include a lack of interest in work, job dissatisfaction, work anxiety,
frustration. (psychological response) and excessive smoking, alcoholism, (behavior
response), hypertension, headaches (physiological responses).
Benefit of conflict
It motivates individuals to do better and work harder. One’s talents and abilities come to
the forefront in a conflict situation.
Facilitates an understanding of the problems, people have with one another and leads to
better coordination among individuals and departments.
Successful conflict resolution depends on the ability to regulate stress and emotions.
Resolve conflict
Manage stress quickly by staying calm
Control emotions and behavior
Pay attention to the feeling and work of other
Be aware of and respectful of differences by avoiding disrespectful words.
Conflict Management
The positives
Central concepts are okay, and all the major points are covered by the authors.
The point that I find interesting is in the narrative that conflict is not necessarily all bad.
Conflict can even lead to organizational performance improvement.
The points on conflict management and resolution are good. However, I would rather
discuss resolution first rather than later because most people expect all conflicts to be
resolved which is unrealistic in some cases.
The content of the illustrations in conflict process is accurately described by title, but some
points of the are repeating and the position of the discussed subject is confusing. The points
on conflicts are inevitable and sometimes overemphasized and repeated in several
contexts. Another example is on the positive aspects of conflicts. They are dispersed in
various paragraphs. Some of the words used by the author were too complicated to
understand by first hand readers, thus, it can be approved in a simpler way, not to mention
the paragraph indention can be improved as a minor issue.
There should be more case studies to validate the theories presented in the article rather
than a pure literature research work. A lot of bullet points were defined in the journal and
was too broad to relate each of the definitions. One sample is Section 2.3, 2.7 and section
2.2.2.2, these points can be merged as they have the same idea, plus, Section 2.2.2.3 has
contradicting points.
Conclusion
The authors have done a reasonable job in performing literature research and they cover most
of the key topics related to this subject. However, there are several improvements that would
make the paper more relevant for practical applications. There are a number of mistakes in the
formatting and confusing explanations in some paragraphs but the overall points can still be
understood. The lack of or simply the nonexistence reference to any real-life case studies
makes this article very theoretical and lack of real-life practical applications.