11 Chapter 4
11 Chapter 4
11 Chapter 4
Land alienation was one of the major problems affecting the tribal
economy. This has been the unique experience of tribals of all areas
scheduled areas, particularly. Tribals all over the country generally, inhabit
in the forest and hill areas and they are isolated from the rest of the people.
As many as 90 percent of the total tribals live in country-side and they are
worst among the exploited sections ofthe society. Most ofthem are landless.
According to Report of National Commission for Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes (April 1990). The percentage of landless ‘Adivasis’ has
grown and the same trend continued even in the next decades. According
to the Dhabar Commission Report, in respect of indebtedness, land
alienation, forced labour and illiteracy the tribals continued to be worst
among the exploited. Among the agricultural labourers, the tribals are the
most exploited class in India. A nation wide survey on bonded labour
revealed that about 25 percent of the bonded labourers are the tribals.
Indebtedness is considered as one of the major problems of tribals all over
India. Due to general poverty and unemployment in the tribal areas more
and more tribals are not only alienated from their lands and native places
but more and more people began to borrow ‘whatever’ available and
whereever available for the purposes of both consumption and production.
Consequently there is a high percentage of indebtedness among the tribal
families.
He further develops the idea in his other writings with a few different
connotations that explain the basic concept of alienation^ Alienation, in
Marx’s conception of man in the capitalist society, in the process which
facilitates the exploitation ofmany by a few3. Thus the application of concept
of alienation to the problem of land alienation in tribal areas is to be
understood in the light ofthe issues like the dawn ofprivate property relations,
Land commodisation of the means of production (land, labour and capital)
and the very process of penetration ofprivate and state capital in the concept
of alienation propounded by marx still holds good to India as far as tribal
communities and their land problems is concemed.Land, being the major
source of livelihood of the vast majority of the Indian peasantry, it assumes
1. Satya Deva, Alienation and Administration in Developing countries, Mainstream, Vol. X3X 0.40,
June 6,1981, P.19.
2 The denote on ‘young’ and ‘Mature’, Marx, or the distinction ofhis works as ‘early’ and ‘later’
writings is to find the difference in the personality ofMarx as a ‘humanist’ in his basic philosophy
rather than accepting him as communist, reproduced from B. Janardhana Rao, Land alienation in
Tribal areas, 1987.
3. TiLSharma, Karl Marx From Alienation to Exploitation. Indian Journal of political science,
Vol. 40, No. 3 Spt. 1979, P. 353; and also see, Aruna Tara A Telugu Monthly Feb. 1981, P. 34.
:: 170::
of the tribals live in the northern part of the state, demarcated by the river
Kumool and Prakasam Districts. The tribals lived in the hills and forests.
4. Agrarian stratification in India from the Report of the Agricultural Enquiry included in Rural
Sociology; ed A.R. Desai, popular Prakashan, 1978, R 271.
5. M.L.Patel, Changing Land problem of Tribal India; progress publishers, Bhopal, 1979, P. 8.
6. The committee on Tribal Economy in Forest Areas, 1967. Government of Indian, New Delhi.
7. Amarita Ranga Swamy And then there were none A report from Srikakulam, Economic and
political weekly,^Vol. VIII No. 46. Nov. 17, PP. 2041-2042.
:: 171
These areas were opened up to outsiders in the 19th century. On the whole,
the forest is a source of employment for all the tribals and their dependence
TRIBAL EXPLOITATION-TELANGANA:-
Gonds, Pardhans and the tribes of Khammam district Koyas, Hill Reddys
the four cultural zones, inhabited by the four dominant tribes. The volume
the most primitive tribes, inhabiting the northern portion of the Nallamala
Hills, The Koyas of Warangal throw a flood of light on the tribes inhabiting
the areas on the banks of Godavari. The Hill Reddys of the Bison-Hills
dealing with the Raj Gonds and the pardhans of the area.
When the British realised that the tempo ofNational movement against
threat and they started luring the Act (while Andhra Pradesh was in erstwhile
Madras) They passed many acts concerning to their land owing, land
transfer, land distribution and also about declaration ofAgency Area. Among
CONCEPTS:-
corporation in tribal areas, the tribals are acquainted with cash transactions.
Yet, the tribal is. not an ‘economic man’. His behaviour in the fields of
production, consumption, distribution and exchange of goods and services
is conditioned by apathy, shyness, inhibitions and superstitions.
wealth. The main features that differentiate the tribal economy are the
communities, their social setup, customs and traditions, their ideas of right
non-economic motives since the plans are to be drawn up for their amelioration.
Mental apathy, lack of ambition, absence of initiative and indolence are the
traits which will affect the very root of all economic efforts.
for economic growth which will take considerable time in its process. The
be made use of, by improving their skills and knowledge which can be
formation.
does not have any solid foundation in tribal economy in view of their
:: 176 ::
negligible savings. The low level of per capita income of a tribal makes it
difficult to “get over the hump”, to a desired level. According to W.A.
Lewis the central fact of economic development is rapid capital accumulation
(including knowledge and skills). Tt is imperative in a closed tribal economy
to have a minimum or critical effort or a ‘big push’ to capital formation to
pull the economy out of trap’.
extraneous to the society on which they do not have any control. Once
again this occurs due to two forces. Individuals migration or families coming
into the contact with the local society for trade etc., may initially help the
members of society by providing some of facilities like loans, goods etc.,
but ultimately usurp the resources of members of that society. The second
force is the state.
the tribals, alone can solve it but not of course, without sacrificing some of
the interests of ruling class. A reversal in the policy is, therefore, urgently
required. Otherwise, the gap between the provision of the constitution of
India in Art 46 and its implementation will widen further.
8. Pagadi Seethumadhava Rao; Among the Gonds of Adilabad; popular Book Depot, Bombay,
1952.
:: 182::
Whatever may be the reasons for this enormous immigration into the
area, the ultimate result was that the native tribes, the original inhabitants of
the area, a minority in their share in the forest resources, has almost come
to an end because of the competition from the non-tribal immigrates. Finally,
the tribes were adversely affected in the cultivation of forest areas also. As
long as the tribals alone were the cultivators in the forest, the forest
department did not bother much about it, but once the new immigrants also
made an attempt to clear reserve-forests for cultivation, the forest department
took a stiff attitude and was forced to act, the result, the tribals were thrown
out from the lands, which they have been cultivating for a long time.
legal sanction. As a result of it, prior to the land survey and settlement,
areas oftribal communities by and large remained almost unjuridical in their
nature. The far reaching implications of this revenue policy are many10. The
particularly Adilabad district, have been briefly mentioned here: survey was
not done in many areas. Where survey was completed, settlement was not
done. Names of non-tribal pattadars or influential tribal pattadars were
written against the names of innocent tribals. The problem of the tribal is
contributed not merely by the disputed forest boundaries but also because
of vast extent of unsurveyed land without proper survey records. Out of
nearly 11 lakh acres of unsurveyed lands, sofar only an extent of 3.37 lakh
acres have been surveyed through five special survey parties appointed for
purpose of updating land records of tribal areas besides assignment of
government lands to tribalsn.
10. P. Seta Madhava Rao, Among the Gonds of Adilabad.popular Book Depot, Bombay, 1952.
11. Brief Notes on the progress of work of special Survey Unit Utnoor; Submitted to the Director
settlement, Survey and Land Records; A.P. Hyderabad by Special Assistant Director, Utnoor,
Adilabad District ofA.P.
:: 185::
LAND ALIENATION
12. Office of the Sub-Collector Utnoor; Minutes of the Divisional level M.R.O.’s conference.
::186::
of the unsatisfactory state, of land records was that the tribals were never
legally recognised as owners of the lands which they cultivated as they
could simply occupy it till such time as a superior claim got enforced13.
Thus, this being the major draw back, it has effectively been misused
by the vested-interests among the non-tribal communities. The following
factors have been responsible for land alienation among tribals, Economic
poverty, ignorance, social customs, litigation in addiction to drinking, love
of ornaments, effect of outsiders and absence of alternative credit. Land
alienation in tribal areas is caused by rampant indebtedness among the
tribals and by their deep seated honesty in formal and in formal dealings14.
15. P.T. George; Access to land-An alternative Approach. National institute ofRural Development,
Hyderbad, P. 6.
16. Michael York; Gonds of Asifabad and Lakshettipet taluka, in Tribes of India-struggle for sur
vival, Von Furer Haimendorf, P. 236.
This is very much prevalent in other states too. Fictitious adoption
ofthe non-tribals by the tribal families also prevalent in a few parts of India.
Explaining this, ‘DhananT a tribal administrator, comments, acquisition of
lands in the names of non-tribal boys who become tribals over night after
the execution of the bogus adoption deeds in the name of a tribal, is
another impartent. method used by the non-tribals to grab tribal lands17.
17. B. Dhanam. Land alienation in Andhra Pradesh tribal areas, in Land Alienation in tribal communities
in India; S.N. Dubey Ralha Mudia. P. 14.
18 Rathna Murdia, Land Allotment and Alienation among scheduled tribes, P. 1208.
19. Correspondent; Bhil Movement E.F.W. 1972, June, P. 206.
20. Correspondent; Another Massacre of Tribals; Economic and political weekly, May 2, No. 18, Vol.
XVI., P.796.
:: 189::
It goes without saying that the declared policy ofthe Andhra Pradesh
Government is to protect the tribals from selling their lands to more dominant
and exploitative plains people. The land alienation cases unearthened in
Adilabad tribal areas by the concerned official agencies only touches the
tip of ‘iceberg’. In fact the official machinery became active in unearthing
land alienation cases21. only after the police firing incident
at Indervelli in 1981.
The Muslims, Hindus and other caste people occupied tribal lands
with connivance of Karnams or patwari and have secured the pattas. The
ignorant tribal little knowledge about, the market value of the land which
belonged to him, but illegally snatched away. Helpless tribals with no
political or proper Government support, bowing down to their misfortune
slowly and steadily, migrated to the deeper forests for the livelihood.
21. B. Venkata Naik; Land Transformation on Tribal Economy of Adilabad district (unpublished
M.Phil. These) Central University of Hyderbad, A.P. and BJanardhana Rao Land Alienation in
Tribal Areas; 1987, Warangal, A.P.
:: 190::
21(a). Andhra Prabha: Telugu Daily Paper: Series of Articles on Adilabad Tribal peasant struggle for
land on the name ofAuthor Panneshwarfrom9,10,13 Feb, 1990 to 18,19,28,29,30,31 August, 1991
and K. Balagopal Adilabad Tribal struggle: Srujana (Telugu) May, 1983.
:: 191::
the Telangana districts also from 1963 onwards, particularly to the land
transactions which took place after 1963 onwards. Till 1963 the Hyderabad
Tribal areas Regulation Act of 1950 was in force in the Adilabad Tribal
areas. The important aspect of the Hyderabad Tribal Areas Regulation of
1950 was that it prohibited the transfer of lands from a tribal to put an end
to all illegal transfers of land from a tribal to a non-tribal. Many non-tribals
whose lands have been transferred back to the rightful owners remained
because of courts non-implemented stay orders. But, as the operational
rules under the act were not formulated, this act remained as dead letter for
nearly a decade. This cumulative discontent of the tribals led to the
Srikakulam rebellion of late sixties, which jolted the Government to enact a
more stringent law in the form of REGULATION OF 1970. It totally
prohibited the transfer of a tribal or non-tribal and placed on the non-tribals
to prove whether their acquisition of land had been in conformity with the
laws. It is this regulation, which is now the target of attack by the non-tribal
land holders and which the government has chosen to repeal in the year
198922.
As the non-tribals have been for a long time in the scheduled areas,
no more freedom than the tribal, should be given to his land to a non-tribal
under the existing regulation. A poor non-tribal owing small plots of land to
dire necessities by which he reduces himself to the position of landless
labourer. It is better to the same non-tribal to retain the land and raise loans
by mortgaging them while the subsequent incorporation of 3a(l) into the
Regulation of 1970, the lands legally owned by non-tribals in scheduled
areas were made eligible for mortgage with financial institutions.
further amended in 1970 which came into effect from October 24, 1970,
21.08.1981 one such case held on that provisions of the Andhra Pradesh
1963 i.e., the date on which the said Act was extended to Telangana Area
ofthe State. The Government of Andhra Pmdesh filed a special level petition
in Supreme Court in January 1982 along with a request for stay of the
23. It is estimated that only abut 200 land alienation cases invol ving less ten 1000 acres of land were
registration in Utnoor taluk by the end of 1977.
:: 193::
operation of the Judgement of the High Court. The Supreme Court of India
passed as interim order in December, 1981 for maintaining the ‘ Status quo’
only on the particular individual cases on which the Andhra Pradesh High
Court has passed its judgement. The High Court also ordered that land
should be immediately restored back to the non-tribals. The Government
of Andhra Pradesh issued a Government order in 1979 (G.OJMs.No. 129)
exempting the non-tribal poor who are holding five acres of wet land and
10 acres of dry land from eviction “for the present” the G.O. virtually
makes the Land Transfer Regulations non-operative. Since 1 September,
1983, it means for four years till the High Court struck down (has set aside
this G.O.) the G.O., the Government actually had given protection to the
non-tribals who might have grabbed the land of the tribals.
The set back has created more discontentment among the tribals and.
loss of faith on governments ability to do justice to them. Many of the
tribals cannot understand why government voluntarily handed over their
lost land back to them without their specific request (Result of‘suo-moto5
action) and again after a lapse of few months the same government took it
back and handed it over to the non-tribals. They cannot understand the
legal implications of the problem. For example, a Gond tribal moved to
another village and managed to become share cropper.
For the entire population of scheduled tribes in the sub-plan area, the
forest is the veritable source of food, shelter, herbs and raw material for
pursuit of their traditional crafts and callings. The entire fabric of their
socio-economic life is inextricably woven round the forest. The tribal calender
is marked by various seasons for various edible tubers, nuts, fruits, leaves
and hunting of different species of game.
Apart from being the veritable food bowl the forest provides them
with various kinds of minor forest produce fire wood, timber, thatching
material and ‘Jeelugu’ (Caryota) and Palmyra which provide them with
cherished drinks of food value. It also provides them with Koperi, bamboo,
rattan, fibres and leaves for the pursuit of their traditional crafts. Collection
of other important items of minor forest produce like tamarind, adda leaf,
herbs, soap nut, sheekai, mohwa flower and seed, gum, nuxvomica, broom
grass, etc., and their sale to the Girijan Cooperative Corporation is the
:: 195::
major subsidiary source of income for the tribals in the sub-plan area.
Forest continues to be the largest single source of employment. Forest
Department is the largest employer and the forest labour and allied works
constitute the second most important source of employment and income
for the tribals.
Tribal religion is also linked up with forests as the religious rituals are
performed before the trees. It is interesting to note that many myths and
legends have their origin in the forest.
Forest Department came into being only in 1861, where as the tribals
used to live in and around forest even prior to this period. The Indian forest
Act for the first time came into force in 1973. The settlement of forests was
done in 1880 and forests were classified as reserved forests protected
forests and village forests.
24, Report ofthe Committee on Tribal Economy in forest areas as Government ofIndia Department
of Social Welfare, New Delhi, March 1967. P-12.
:: 196::
The National Forest Policy stated that “while, the needs of the local
population must be met to a reasonable extent, national interests should not
be sacrificed because they are not directly discemable, nor should the rights
and interests of future generations be subordinated to the improvement of
the present generation”.25
The National Forest Policy suggested that 1/3 oftotal land area should
be under forests. It recommended the classification of forests into four
divisions namely 1) Protection forests, 2) National forests, 3) Village forests
and 4) Free lands. As regards shifting cultivation, it recommended a
missionary and not an authoritative approach to wean the tribals from shifting
cultivation and the possibility ofregulating shifting cultivation by combining
it with forest regeneration. It further stated that “no forest policy, however
well intentioned and meticulously drawn up, has the slightest chance of the
people.26
The Andhra Pradesh Forest Act 1967 lays down the procedure for
declaration of any area as a reserved forest and prescribed the rules for
protection of these forests and penalties for infringement of the provisions
of the Act. The wild life (protection) Act 1972, a central Act was extended
25. The National ForestPolicy of India, Ministiy of Food and Agriculture, Govt, ofIndia, 1952. P.29.
26. Ibid(P.No. 32)
:: 197::
to A.P. from August’73 for the protection of wild life for declaration of
sanctuaries and national parks.
Subsequently, in 1976 the new Forest Act was put on the anvil and
organically linked with the forest policy. The symbolic relationship of the
tribe and the forest is borne out by the provisions of the new forest policy.
It was decided that there should be village forests to cater to the village
needs. The new policy extended one important concession, it admitted that
it was emphatically opposed to shifting cultivation, persuasion and not
coercive measures should be used in a sort of missionary rather than in
authoritarian manner to attempt to wean the tribals away from their
traditional axe cultivation.
action. The result is that, the autochthon is still regarded as an intruder and
restrictions on use of forest by the autochthon are on the increase. These
restrictions are often unnecessarily harsh and oppressive in their forest
conservation as well as tribal unless a radical change is brought about in the
outlook and attitude of forest, will not be of any substantial benefit. How a.
forest cooperative society with the purpose of improving the economic
conditions of forest living tribals, could not function successfully for long
due to non-cooperation of the forest department is vividly described by the
study team on Tribal Development programmes, Planning Commission in
its report on Andhra Pradesh.
27. Report of the stydy team on tribal development programmes, A.R Committee on projects,
planning commission, 1967.P.No.43-44
:: 199::
28. Dr. V.N.V.R.K. Sastry; Sanchara Sravanthi; ( Telugu Andhra Prabha, Telugu daily paper; (from
October 1989 to October, 1990) and Andhra Prabha Telugu daily paper; Series of Articles on
“Adilabad Tribal peasant Struggle for land” on the name of Parmesvar from 9,10,13 Feb. 1990;
18,19,28,29,30,31, August, 1991, and K. Balagopal;Adilabad Tribal Struggle; “Srujana” (Telugu)
May, 1983.
:: 201::
Since the forest produce is treated as nature’s gift the state stakes it full
claim over it. At the best, the tribal may be allowed a reasonable wage for
the labour which he may put in for the collection of minor forest produce
(MFP) or extraction of major produce. The defacto and conventional
command of the tribal over resources is completely denied and he is reduced
to the status of merely a casual wage eamer.29
It is a well known fact that since the very day of the implementation
of forest policy in the country during the British period, the discontentment
and a sense of insecurity was planted in the minds of tribal communities.
Conflict between the forest officials, and the tribals, who were misunderstood
as destroyers of the forest, became a common and day-to-day affair. As
the forest rules and regulations tightened tribal communities who were
suffocated and in many parts of the country reacted violently. The Indian
Forest Act was enacted in 1865. It was first All-India Legislation which
attempted to consolidate all existing laws on forests. It laid emphasis on
exploitation of forests for revenue purpose rather than for the values of
preservation conservation of wild life or the right of human beings, whose
homes were the forests before Government existed.
for building Railway sleepers and ships. The forests of Adilabad are
considered to be very old and ancient and even fossil fuel seems to exist in
these forests. At one time it was reported that the entire “Utnoor” areas
was covered by forest and almost all the tribal villages were located in
dense forests. The elderly Gonds and Kolams still remember the days of
dense forests. Kolams and Naikpods were till recently heavily depended
on forest for shifting cultivation as well as food collection were the worst
sufferers due to strict forest rules and regulation. The effect of the
reservation of large areas of forest on the Gonds was not quite as
catastrophic as it had been for Kolams and Naikpods, but it disrupted their
agricultural system by restricting the cultivation of light soils in rotation.
The demarcation of forest lines drawn round the villages did not take place
at the same time in the whole district, nor were the same principles every
where applied. There was little doubt that the demarcation of the forest
lines was done in a very haphazard way and depended to a large extent on
the amount of money the villagers were able to pay to the forest officials.
One of the reasons for the conflicts between the tribal population and the
forest officials is the uncertainty about the status of a considerable amount
of land allotted to tribal cultivators on pattas by the local revenue authorities
but claimed by the forest department as reserved forest. The sense of
injustice felt by Gonds and Kolams is all the greater as with in the past
many years thousands of acres of forest have been cleared and occupied
by affluent non-tribals, most of whom had only recently immigrated into
Adilabad district.
::203::
FOREST POLICIES:-
The forest department in the beginning did not even leave the minor
forest produce untouched. The excise department started auctioning the
Mohha flower which formed the only edible item for the tribals of the area
under the conditions of scarcity. The auction of minor forest produce like
Mohha, chiranje, bamboo and even thatching grass not only deprived the
local tribal of his means of subsistence but also opened the flood gates for
the exploitation ofthe tribals by the unscrupulous non-tribal traders, money
lenders and forest contractors.
building up between the tribals and the forest officials. The forest department
redemarcated the reserved forest area and many tribal villages once again
fell within this area or the boundaries of villages were drawn so tightly that
when they step outside their village they would be straight walking into the
area marked as reserved.
31. G.P. Reddy; Politics of Tribal Exploitation; 1987. Mithal Publication Delhi; See Andhara Pradesh
Economic Association Conference paper, ninth Annual Conference 16-17 Feb, 1991. Tribal
Economy of Andhara Pradesh.
The regularisation of illicit cultivation of pre-64 did not satisfy the
people. The action taken by the forest department for eviction of past-64
cultivation brought it indirect confrontation with the people. Firing
incident of Indervelly in April, 1981 in which large number of tribals were
killed brought a new. dimension to the existing problem. The sympathy of
the Government towards the tribals and support of the naxelite elements
made the tribal bold. The sporadic incident of illicit felling and encroachment
in forest took a turn into organised action. Large scale illicit felling and
encroachment into reserved forest took place. The maximum damage was
caused to the forest of Adilabad district. There was a total non-cooperation
from the villagers for any action of eviction from encroachment.
The presumtion under this was that the Minor Forest Produce (MFP)
such as Beedi-leaves; Haleela, Honey, Wax, Chiranje, etc., will be collected
even from all over the Forest areas. The beedi leaves which are an important
item of Minor Forest produce was prescribed to be collected even from
the patta lands also. The beedi-leaves are being extracted departmentally
from 1987 onwards. All the other minor forest produce items are being
leased out to state owned Girijan cooperative corporation (GCC) one year
to one year basis for collection of Minor Forest Production (M.F.P.) to
give their wages to tribals32>
Apart from the problem trible land claimed by the forest depertment,
which is frequent source of friction between tribals and forest officials,
there is also the continuious eviction of illegal fees collected by forest guards
from the tribal villagers. It is an old practice of forest guards to demand from
the cultivators annual contribution, usually calculated according to the
number of ploughs a man uses for cultivation (Dumoa patti) Though this
tax was abolished as part of the liberalisation of government policy vis-a-
vis the tribals, the forest guards continued to exert from the cultivators
annual fees which went into their own pockets. The amount of these illegal
fees varied from area to area and from forest guard. Any one who refused
to pay the illegal fees is
32. . Adilabad Forest; Regularisation of illicit cultivation and problem of forest protection; (1964 to
August 1988) issued by conservator of forest Adilabad Dt. 14.8.88.
::207::
to forest officials and other minor government servants. B.D. Sharma, who
suggests “that the local tribal community which provides the labour should
should not be taken merely as casual wage earners, whose services can be
Tribals live in the hilly and forest areas. Their economy in the past to
a great extent had been self-sufficient and non-specified. About 95 percent
ofthe tribals are living in rural India and are engaged as agricultural labourers,
tenants, and small peasants. One of the most peculiar problems faced by
the tribals is their indebtedness^. Indebtedness is a strong factor that begins
33. Government of A.P, forest department plan of Adilabad district, A.P. issued by office of the
conservator of Forest, Adilabad.
34. B.D.Sharma; Tribal Development; The concept and the frame; P. 14.
::208::
At this juncture, the peasant movement led by the left parties that
have chosen parliamentary path, were gathering some momentum. Around
the same period in the plain areas another left party groups, C.P.I. ( M. L )
P.W.G. have been organising the tribal peasants in the agency area.
The Agrarian relations that shaped the agrarian structure have been a
primary factor for the contradictions that developed later in various parts
of the country during the British period. The British occupation of India for
nearly two centuries brought about profound changes in almost all sectors
of the Indian society. The present concern is however confined to the
changes it produced in the agrarian class relations as well as the peasant
response to these changes.
were officially formulated for the first time in the first Five Year Plan and
their scope was broadened from one plan to another plan. The land reforms,
apart from the gaps between the legislation and its implementation, did not
envisages to abolish all forms of absentee landlordism and guarantee land
to the actual cultivator.
35. M.N.Roy’s: Political Memoris, Bombay, 1964 P.411-418 and D.N.Dube Soviet Russain and
Indian Communism New York 1959 P.23-26.
36. Mazaffer Ahmed: The communist party of India, years of formation 1921-33, Calcutta, 1958
P.14.
:: 215::
of the Congress (1922) S.A. Dange and S. Chettiar, two of the pioneers of
the C.P.I. proclaimed themselves to be communists and boldly presented
Roy’s programme for progressive economic reforms37.
37. See Report of the proceedings of the 37th session of the Indian National Congress. Gaya,
December 1922, Allahabad, 1923, P. 116-117.
38. William Son: Indian and communism, Indian reprint, Calcutta, 1976, P. 172-173.
:: 216::
ANTI-IMPERIALIST STRUGGLES:-
39. For the early History of the A.I.K.S. see N.G.Ranga, The All India Kesan Movement, The
Indian Annual Register, N.N.Mistra (Ed) July-Dec, 1936. Vol.n P.280-284
::217::
Despite the frictions in the peasant parties in the forties, the take over
ofthe A.I.K.S. by the C.P.I. was veiy largely successful, it was an achievement
of ‘United Front’ strategy. The A.I.K.S. remained the principal peasant
organisations in India Its influence spread fast in Andhra, Bengal and Punjab,
particularly among the poor peasants, tenants-at-will, share-croppers and
landless agricultural labourers. It was only when an attempt to change the
class basis of the party succeeded that the A.I.K.S. and C.P.I. staged the
first two left-wing peasant insurrections in India. The Tebhaga Struggle in
Bengal (1946-47) and the Telangana Peasant revolt (1946-51).
The first major struggle of the communists came in 1931 when they
organised a 1500 miles march from Ichapuram to Madras city to rouse the
peasants against the agrarian system. The march drew participants from
525 villages. It’s purpose was to create a new consciousness among the
peasants.
40. P.Sundaraiah Telangana People’s Streggfle and its lessons Calcutta, 1972 P.19-20.
::219::
CPI JN TELANGANA:-
The Telangana Communist leaders under the guidance of their Andhra
Counter part played an important role in radicalising Andhra Maha Sabha
came under spell of youthful communist leaders Ravi Narayana Reddy,
Baddam Yella Reddy. They succeeded in converting the Andhra Maha
Sabha (A.M.S.) into a front organisation, ultimately to launch an all out
struggle against Nizam’s regimes. It was utilized to build up a powerful
peasant movement, finally resulting into an armed uprising against the Nizam
and later as against the Union Government of Independent India41.
41. Walh James : Factria and Fronts a study of the party systems in South India, yound Asia Pub.
New Delhi, 1977, P.31.
42. Ravi Narayana Reddy: Heroic Telangana C.P.I. Publication, Hyderabad, A.P. 1972, P.31
43. Visalandra Daily News Paper, July 9th, 1956, Vijayawada, A.P.
::220::
After 1951 the communist party which led the Telangana Peasant -
armed struggle, entered in the parliamentary democracy. C.P.I. members
elected to the people’s bodies. In 1962 when there were a border conflict
between India and China within the C.P.I. there were two different opinions
on the stand of the Indian Government. In 1964 the communist party of
India split into two, on ideological differences. The majority members of
the Central council continued as C.P.I. and the remaining members formed
as C.P.I.(M). Further in 1968 C.P.I(M) split and formed C.P.I.(ML) under
the leadership ‘Mao’ ideology.
wanted the party to become active. Hence the C.P.I.(M) was borne out of
the first split in the Indian Communist movement44.
44. Ralph Relzalaff: The Communist Revolution in Asia 1969, P.336 and also and also Shanta Sinha
Mavoist in A.P. and Charu Mazumber: One year of Naxalberi. Liberation. June 1968 and Sept
1969,Vol.2No.5.
45. Open letter resolution of APCCRDt: 15-06-1968 P.32. In see Shanta Sinha Mavoists in A.P.
:: 222::
The peasants struggles against the feudal Nizam in Telangana and the
national movement, inspired the People of the district, to raise their political
voice against the feudalism.
It was in 1938, when the Nizam Government banned the singing of the
prayer “Vande Mataram”, it was the National Anthem of the Indian during
the Independence struggle. The students and democratic forces in the State,
opposed this move of the Government and condemned, the verdictive action
of the Government and demanded their right to sing their patriotic song. An
effort was made to organise the state Congress after this movement. But it
was banned. A Satyagraha struggle was launched by the State Congress, in
which many active leaders of the Andhra Maha Sabha also participated.
48. Resource: Daji Shankar Rao: Freedom Fighter & Ex. M.LA.; Adilabad.
::224::
49. Ravi Narayana Reddy - Heroic Telangana: C.P.I., Pub. Hyderabad, A.P. 1972.
:: 225::
for the remaining 6 months a bulk - share. In Mandamarri and some of the
parts of the district, the landlords treated their servants and agricultural
labourers worst than slaves. In Boath and Nirmal talukas the Ryotwari system
was prevailing. In 1941 the Andhra Maha Sabha launched a struggle opposing
the Begaar (no work) system. The movement was intensified against the
atrocities on women, Vetti Chakri, (work without any payment).
Godavari River. The district consists of mountains and dense forests. There
of the Godavari in the north. In the hilly and forest region the tribal people
lived. The landlords occupied the land in the plain areas. For example
owners of 10,000 - 20,000 acres of land. There were other big Velma and
Reddy castes landlords in this area, later period they had become important
peasants armed struggle and its spread in the district. It kept the vigil along
the river - belt and posted the Homeguards in the villages and propagated
in the parly programme. In 1950 the guerilla squads crossed Godavari river
belt of Bellampally and Sirpur. Another groups of squads enterd into the
district from the western side. In month of October, 1950 workers attacked
Rampuram village patwari, and destroyed all false records created by him
and distributed bags of grains to the poor people of the village. The party
programmes of the communist party and occupied the waste lands, forest
lands, anyakrantam (forcibly seized land) by the landlords of the poor and
tribal people. The party also took the programme of demanding the wage
increase, removal of Dalari (Middle men) system reasonable price for beedi
large number ofparty workers and killed many innocent people in die name
of encounter. Under this situation for the protection and shelter, some of
leaders and workers of the other districts shifted to Adilabad district forest
area. These leaders and workers of the party formed guerilla - squads and
attacked the landlords to end their atrocities. The local leaders are limited
to small groups and helped the guerilla squads only. No leader of the district
was killed because the communist party called off the armed struggle in
1951 and all the leaders and workers who came from other districts left for
their places in 1951. Meanwhile communist movement spread to many areas
such as Mandamarri and Asifabad taluks. Communist party and Kisan Sabha
:: 228::
organised agricultural workers and carried the struggles and achieved many
of their demands50.
52. Resource: Mr. Ganga Ram; Freedom fighter; chiefvice president, Singareni Colonies employees
union, Bellampally, Adilabad District, A.P. andG. Mallesh; Ex. M.L.A.; Asifabad, Adilabad Dist.
:: 230::
the same token. The naxalite held village - courts and threatened forest,
excise and revenue officials who are creating problems for tribals. The
landlords who grabbed tribal - land also got warnings.
The naxalites on the other hand are' reported to have purchased arms
like AK-47 assault riffle with (this money) the arrack contractors
contributed huge amounts. This has changed the very strategy of the
naxalites in these areas with the acquisition of sophisticated arms, their
‘striking power’, improved. Their earlier strategy of “hit and run” has
changed to “hit and stay” only to challenge to police on August 18,1987,
the naxalites ambushed and killed ten police men including two
sub-inspectors near Allampally village in Khanapur - Utnoor forests. The
active support of tribals to naxalites during this incident is another
important factor to be noted here. Once again the state wokeup as its
writ in those tribals, areas was at stake.
Twenty years later, the wheel has turned a full circle. The Communist
Party of India split into two in 1964. The Communist Party ofIndia (Marxist),
formed in 1964, rejected at its Eight Congress (December 1968) an
amendment to its political resolution, requiring it to accept Mao Tsetung’s
thought as the Marxism-Leninism of the present epoch. Later, in may 1969,
its Politbureau (CPI(m)) suggested that the analysis of the world situation
contained in the main document of the Eight Congress of the Communist
Party of China had nothing to do with Marxism-Leninism.
53. Mallikaijuna Rao, Indian Maoism, Two Shades - See in Naxalbari and after a frontier anthol
ogy, Vol.H, Kathashilpa, Calcutta, 1978.
::232::
But the differences between the CPI (ML) and the Andhra Maoists
relate primarily to the tactical line. The first difference is over the principal
contradictions in India. The second difference, obviously and off-shoot of
the first, relates to the form of struggle. More specifically, the third difference
is as follows. Is guerilla warfare the only form of struggle in the present
stage in India? Is there any need for mass organisation to carry on the
democratic struggle? Should a Maoist party be a secret organisation? These
are the issues being debated within and among the various Maoist groups
in India, including the Andhra Maoist group.
::234::
this had its share in accentuating the contradictions within the CPI (M). The
leadership of the CPI (M) disowned Naxalbari. And the U.F. Government
in West Bengal let loose severe police - repression.
With the Burdwan Plenum the breach was final. On May 14, 1968,
the AICCCR enlarged itself into the All India Coordination Committee of
Communist Revolutionaries [AICCCR], under the leadership of Charu
Muzamdar’s. On the same day, were issued the ‘Second Declaration’ and
a ‘Resolution on Elections’.
On the other hand, the AICCR had decided to form itself into a
party, and the CPI(ML) was bom on April 22, 1969. On that day, the
central committee of the C.P.I. (M.L) adopted the ‘political’ Resolution,
and the hitherto unpubublished document, ‘Resolution on party on party
organisation.’^
Telangana has become the center of activity for all the Naxalite groups
of India, besides a few pockets here and there in West Bengal. After the
death of Cham Mazumder, the leadership has concentrated in the hands of
Telangana Maoists. The movement bom among the peasants of Naxalbari
in West Bengal, has forced the tribals of Srikakulam and form workers of
Telangana region and gained momentum. The only Naxalites to be hanged
to far in the country - Bhoomaiah and Kista Goud were from Telangana of
Adilabad district. The movement under Cham Mazumdar, leadership
54, Mallikarjuna Rao, Indian Maoism, Two Shades - See in Naxalbari and after a frontier anthology,
Vol.n,Kathashilpa, Calcutta, 1978.
::237::
suffered a death blow by its terrorist path. His death brought the debate in
to open and his followers split in to various factions like :
55. Editorial: “Deshabrate” editorial of the March 1978, issue, the Bengali Organ of the Pro-charu
Mazumdar, and Pro - Linpiao group ofthe C.P.I. (M.L) led by Mahadeb Mukheijee.
:: 238::
56. Samersen, Debabrata Panda, Ashish Lahiri: Naxal ban and after afrontier anthology, Vol.II,
Kathashilpa, Calcutta, 1978.
57. A correspondent Andhra Pradesh Analysis of a split; Naxal bari and after afrontier anthol
ogy, VoLH, Kathashilpa, Calcutta, 1978.
:: 239::
Communist Party of Andhra Pradesh Split in 1970) later could note the
mistake they committed. T.Nagi Reddy and D.Venkateswara Rao in their
document ‘Left Deviation’ tried to defend the fixing of the date, saying that
when they formulated the ‘Immediate Programme’ there was an exodus of
party members into the Marxist-Lennist Party and to stop it and give
confidence to the rank and file of the party they had to fix a time! But later,
T.Nagi Reddy and D.Venkateswara Rao accused the Agency leadership
for starting the armed struggle in the name of self defence “before the
people were prepared for occupation and distribution of the land of
landlords”. The PC contested this line of thinking and explained that the
landlords and the government would not sit with hands tied till the people
were prepared to seize their lands. But at the same time, the PC did not
forget the importance of the preparedness of the people to come forward
to occupy the landlords’ lands5g.
When the people launch mass struggle on their own issues against
feudal exploitation, the landlords and the reactionary government come
down heavily on the movement using the armed police to suppress it. In
such a case, if the people, in defence of their movement, are prepared to
resist the armed repression of the government with arms, the communist
revolutionaries should lead such a struggle, and must strive to develop the
movement which had started on partial demands into agrarian revolution.
If and when people are not prepared to resist the brutal armed
suppression and repression to which the people’s movement is subjected
58. Samersen, Debabrata Panda, Ashish Lahiri: Naxal bari and after afrontier anthology, Vol.II,
Kathashilpa, Calcutta, 1978.
::240::
to, in the process of its development, they must adopt necessary tactics for
self-defence of the cadre and the mass movement to develop the movement
into agrarian revolution. They have to decide upon the forms of struggle
for self- defence taking into consideration the degree of the preparedness
of the people for armed struggle, their support, geographical conditions
(contiguity) of the area concerned etc.