The Theory of

Multidimensional
Reality

By

Douglas B. Vogt
Member of the Geological Society of America

Research Funded by
The Diehold Foundation, Inc.

Published by
Vector Associates
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
2015

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 1 1/8/2016 9:48:50 AM

 VECTOR ASSOCIATES
PO Box 19792
Jacksonville, Florida 32245

Copyright © 2015 by Douglas B. Vogt

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced by any mechani-
cal, photographic, or electronic process, or in the form of a sound recording,
nor may it be stored in a retrieval system, transmitted, or otherwise copied
for public or private use—other than “fair use”—without the written permis-
sion of the author or his assignees. Quote of less than 500 words are permis-
sible, with proper credit given.

First Printing 2015

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data

Names: Vogt, Douglas B., 1947- author.

Title: The theory of multidimensional reality / by Douglas B. Vogt,
Member of the Geological Society of America.
Description: Jacksonville, Florida : Vector Associates, 2015. | 2015 |
Includes bibliographical references
Identifiers: LCCN 2015044520 (print) | LCCN 2015045690 (ebook) |
ISBN 9780930808105 (alk. paper) | ISBN 093080810X (alk. paper) |
ISBN 9780930808112 ()

Subjects: LCSH: Science--Philosophy. | Reality. | String models. |

Quantum theory.
Classification: LCC Q175 .V6384 2015 | DDC 111--dc23 LC record
available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2015044520

ISDN 978-0-930808-10-5

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 2 1/8/2016 9:48:58 AM

 Table of Contents
Preface 1
Chapter 1
Defining the problem and recognizing there
is a problem 3
Science philosophy 5
The weakness of mathematics 12
Where did the error start 13
How our science philosophy was changed 15
The essence of the problem 15

Chapter 2
The Theory of Multidimensional Reality 17
The basic theory 17
Creating analogies to describe and
information theory of existence 18
The videotape analogy 18
Relationship between matter, energy,
information, and reality 20
What is light and what is time. 21
The computer analogy 22
The main clock cycle 23
Cooperating evidence 28
The synchronizing and resynchronizing
frequencies 28
Redefining dimensions 30
The first dimension 30
The second dimension, the transmission
dimension 31
The third dimension of matter 32
The fourth dimension 33
The fifth dimension 33
The sixth dimension 34
The seventh dimension 34
The eight dimension 36
Gravity 36
Gravity wave experiments that may prove
the universe is a hologram. 38

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 3 1/8/2016 9:48:58 AM

 Quasars and where the energy comes from 38
Kirilian photography and the phantom leaf effect 41
Multidimensional Reality explanation 42
Proof of the carrier wave of existence 46
Mysteries of the pyramid 46
The explanation of these mysteries 47
Chapter conclusion 49
Chapter 3
The Atom and how it is created 51
What we know about the Atom and the
light they produce 51
Atomic jumping beans 54
Subatomic Tracks 54
String theory verses quantum mechanics 56
Some basic physics terms 58
Planck’s constant 58
Planck’s length 58
Planck’s time 59
The natural logarithm e 59
The basics of the model 60
The carrier wave concept 62
Planck’s constant 63
The information for the elements 64
The Delay in the propagation of the information 66
Modeling the atom 67
Closed-end string theory 69
The electron 70
Black body radiation 70
Fine structure 71
Fine structure constant 71
Isotopes and error in the Universe 73
Atomic fusion and fission 75
Deja Vu 75
Chapter 4
Why was the Universe created? 77
In the Beginning 77
Summary of what we think we know 77
The answer is in Genesis 78
An advanced civilization—The Builders 79

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 4 1/8/2016 9:48:58 AM

 The simple reason 79
Man 81
The ultimate question: why was the
universe created? 81
The answer 82
How about us? 83
Conclusion 84
Appendix A Table of Stars 85
Appendix B The elements spectral lines 91
Appendix C Spectral lines of the Carbon Atom 97
Appendix D Unusual proof of the Carrier wave 99

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 5 1/8/2016 9:48:58 AM

 Dedication

To

I had to think hard about who I would give the most credit to
my ability to prove this information theory of existence. I came
up with the following scientists: Dr. Thomas Gold, Dr. Bart
J. Bok and the hundreds of other astronomers, astrophysicists,
mathematicians who work tireless hours late at night trying to
measure the distances, location and output of the stars in our
Galaxy. For their great work in producing catalogs of the stars
and trying to make sense of the great mystery, they see in the
heavens. Without their work, I would have had a much harder
time trying to prove the Theory of Multidimensional Reality.

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 6 1/8/2016 9:48:58 AM

 The Theory of Multidimensional Reality 1

Preface
This book is a pure philosophy of science book. The book
presents an information theory of existence that is totally dif-
ferent from what you were taught in college or universities.
Earlier versions of the theory were presented in three of my
previous books, which covered many other subjects besides
science philosophy. The first book Reality Revealed, The The-
ory of Multidimensional Reality dates back to 1977. That book
covered the beginning of this theory/philosophy and applied it
to some of the phonemes in science. Other authors have “bor-
rowed” this theory of existence and applied it to various sub-
jects. Some authors just changed the name but tried to describe
the same thing, but it was obvious they did not understand it.
Motion pictures also used parts of the Theory of Multidimen-
sional Reality in various ways. It appears I am the first to de-
scribe and apply an information theory of existence to many of
the toughest phenomena in the Universe. This current book rep-
resents about 45 years of research in most of the hard sciences
including astronomy, geophysics, electronics, physics, etc. In
my first book, I even had a chapter on psychic phenomena, by
which I explained many of the paranormal phenomena using
this information theory of existence. Even though there was
only one chapter out of twelve that was dedicated to explaining
parapsychology, the Library of Congress originally indexed the
book Psychical research, which I could never understand. In
mid April of 1994, I had the opportunity to visit the Library of
Congress in Washington D.C. I asked them why they indexed
it that way and requested the classification be changed. Much
to my surprise they told me that one of the intelligence agen-
cies in the U.S. Government reclassified my book on April 4th
just two weeks before, to Philosophy of Science (Q175.V638
1978).
The Theory of Multidimensional Reality answers the three
most difficult questions in the Universe: Why was the Universe
created? If God created the Universe then who created God?
And finally the big one: What is man’s purpose in the Uni-

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 7 1/8/2016 9:48:58 AM

 2 Preface

verse? This philosophy is the only one that can logically an-
swer all three of these eternal questions.
Some of you may think that a science philosophy book is
irrelevant to your everyday life. You cannot be more wrong.
The philosophy presented is what I call a Foundation Phi-
losophy. Such a philosophy is one that everything, including
all science observations and experiments, are built upon and
filtered through. All philosophies are derived from a founda-
tion philosophy. Currently, society’s foundation philosophy
is a matter-oriented theory of the Universe thanks to Aristotle
and the Church. You will learn where man made a terrible mis-
take. Such a philosophy prevents man from discovering how
the Universe works and that there are cycles in time that al-
most completely destroys everything we have created includ-
ing man.
“Let no one be slow to seek wisdom when he is young, nor
weary in the search of it when he has grown old. For no age
is too early or too late for the benefits of Philosophy.” Epicurus,
Letter to Menoeceus

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 8 1/8/2016 9:48:58 AM

 The Theory of Multidimensional Reality 3

Chapter 1
Defining the Problem
There are only two ways to explain how the Universe
works. The currently accepted teaching is that matter is the
dominant thing in the Universe, and everything could be
explained by understanding the relationship between matter and
energy. The only alternative explanation is that the Universe is
the product of information. The information creates the matter
world we live in, and it is transmitted from another time-space
relationship, into our time and space to create our reality. Only
one philosophy of these two philosophies can be correct.
Some thirty years after my first book Reality Revealed, the
Theory of Multidimensional Reality (1977), I expanded and
refined the theory in my third book God’s Day of Judgment,
the Real Cause of Global Warming (2007). The main purpose
of both books was to explain what caused the geomagnetic
reversals, the ice ages, mass extinctions and why they occur
together. The Theory of Multidimensional Reality is used as
the foundation philosophy that explains all of the phenomena
associated with these events and why they occur cyclically
through time. It has now been 39 years since I first presented
this information theory of existence. I felt it was time to dedicate
a book covering only the Theory of Multidimensional Reality
without the distractions of other subjects. The book will cover
how the theory explains all the major building blocks of our
Universe such as magnetism, gravity, light, mass, and time.
First let us define what is philosophy. The dictionary
definition is: The search for truth wisdom or knowledge through
logical reasoning rather than factual observation, an analysis of
the grounds of and concepts expressing fundamental beliefs.
Philosophy is the theory or logical analysis of the principles
underlying conduct, thought, knowledge, and the nature of the
Universe. I would disagree with this liberal arts definition and
add that a philosophy can also be proven right or wrong by
factual observation using the scientific process.

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 3 1/8/2016 9:48:58 AM

 4 Defining & Recognizing there is a the Problem

A philosophy enables us to recognize objects and ideas

and place them in coherent, understandable categories. A
foundation philosophy is one that all other ideas and scientific
models are built upon and filtered through. Everything starts
with an idea—even the Universe. An idea can develop into a
complete philosophy. In the fields of science, a philosophy will
create a model that would be tested against known observable
phenomena. Philosophers throughout history have dealt with
the question of existence. What is existence? What is being?
What is reality? Unfortunately, the people who have pondered
these great questions were limited by their scope of knowledge
and discoveries. The experiences and knowledge we have
accumulated throughout a lifetime are the limiting factors that
allow us to abstract, conceptualize, or analogize in this reality.
These experiences are the tools that enable us to develop a
foundation philosophy that will hopefully answer the three
most difficult questions in the Universe, which I listed in the
Preface. If your philosophy cannot answer these three ultimate
questions you better face the obvious—you have nothing, and
you better start from scratch. It is better to recognize the fact
you do not know then to continue with a dead-end philosophy.
A philosophy is a collection of ideas, which is supposed
to create a model to help you understand the Universe around
you. If your model of the Universe is incorrect, you have a
difficult time understanding the phenomena you see. I give you
this analogy to help you to understand the problem. Imagine
you have a 10,000 piece puzzle with random shapes and colors,
but collectively they form a larger recognizable picture. To
make matters more difficult, you do not have a finished picture
of what the puzzle looks like when put together. The picture is
analogous to a philosophy. If you do not have the finished picture
or if you have the wrong picture, then it is much harder to know
where the pieces fit together. Without the correct picture, you
will need thousands of people working endless hours to piece
the puzzle together. The Theory of Multidimensional Reality
is a better more accurate picture of how the Universe really
works. Some of the conclusions this theory is going to be ego

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 4 1/8/2016 9:48:58 AM

 The Theory of Multidimensional Reality 5

shattering for many of you so put your ego and your degrees
aside and think hard about what is presented. The way our
Universe was created there is a cyclical time limit for man to
understand how the Universe really works, and we are running
out of time.
Philosophies come in different forms. Some are religious
philosophies, and some are science philosophies. Today these
two philosophies are diametrically opposed to one another.
The majority of scientists and academicians believe there is
no God. The theologians believe God exists in spite of what
they may or may not know about Roman history. One would
assume that a science philosophy that could explain all known
phenomena in the Universe would also prove the existence of
God and explain His relationship to His creation. I contend the
Theory of Multidimensional Reality accomplishes that.
Science Philosophy
Determinism is the predominant philosophy in current day
science. This is the end result of a matter-oriented philosophy
of the Universe. It is the pragmatic viewpoint of an engineer
who needs to know the cause and effect of his environment
so outcomes can be predicted, and products can be built with
predictable results. The words science and physics are derived
from the word physical that denotes the study of the matter
world, the structure of matter and the Universe, including
its measurement. The scientific process is about performing
experiments and related fact-based theorizing that predicts
things that can be verified and repeated. This approach is fine
for producing products with consistent performance and results.
There is nothing wrong with this approach to science
but it fails when you try to explain the subatomic world or
explain the causes of magnetism, gravity, light and mass. What
eventually happens is when a scientist discovers a phenomenon
that cannot be explained, they just bypass it or come up with a
workaround. Many times they just ignore it because its solution
would represent too much of their time and money to find the
correct answer. The worst situation for the academic status quo

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 5 1/8/2016 9:48:58 AM

 6 Defining & Recognizing there is a the Problem

is the discovery of a phenomenon that cannot be explained

using the “accepted theories,” and that to acknowledge such
a phenomenon would mean the repudiation of “accepted
theories.” It could also result in the possible tarnishing of
a scientists’ reputation and/or the potential elimination of
any future government grant money. Besides, the science
philosophy they were taught in college gave a plausible answer
to many phenomena even if they only worked within a narrow
range of instances.
String theories of various approaches have made somewhat
of a departure from the quantum mechanics approach to
understanding gravity and light. So far experimental cooperation
is nonexistent and unprovable. Dr. Jeffrey Harvey of the
University of Chicago, who is a proponent of String theory,
was reported saying “What am I doing spending my whole
career on something that can’t be tested experimentally?” I
will cover this subject in Chapter Three.
Sir Karl R. Poppers’ philosophy on scientific theories
was that they can never be proven, only falsified. Therefore,
they should be used as calculation tools and not as religious
dogma. Admitting something is wrong or “I don’t know” is
the beginning of a discovery and the end of wasting time and
money on a dead-end theory.
There have been over 40 philosophers since the time of
the Hebrews and the classical Greeks to the modern age, that
have debated the importance between mind and matter. Was
mind the dominant force in the Universe or was there nothing
more than matter? It appears the atomists had won out. Maybe
because we are so attached to our physical bodies we find it
difficult to believe there could be anything else in the Universe.
Before I present the thoughts of some past scientist
philosophers, I want to give my observation as to whom I would
describe as a philosopher-scholar. I have observed that out of
100 rabbis, ministers, physicists, scientists, etc. only about one
to two percent are what I would call a real scholar. Most are
just practitioners or technicians of their field but do not delve
into the “why” and “how” of the most difficult questions. In

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 6 1/8/2016 9:48:58 AM

 The Theory of Multidimensional Reality 7

the modern era there have been a few very notable physicist-
philosophers who hinted that the Universe was something
other than what they were taught and that there was something
more than the traditional four dimensions (length, width, depth
and time). Some of these famous scientists knew there was
something wrong with the accepted philosophies and wrote
about their doubts to friends and in lectures. With that said, the
following are without question philosopher-scholars in their
fields even though I may not agree with everything they have
written and thought.
Sir Arthur Eddington, the outstanding scientist of Great
Britain in the Twentieth Century (The Nature of the Physical
World) stated:
“Not in the dim past but continuously by conscious
mind is the miracle of creation wrought. The idea of
a universal Mind or Logos would be, I think, a fairly
plausible inference from the present state of science
theory. ... To put the conclusions crudely, the stuff of
the world is mind-stuff ... consciousness is not sharply
defined but fades into sub-consciousness and beyond
that we must postulate something indefinite but yet
continuous with our mental nature ... it is difficult for
the matter of fact physicist to accept the view that the
substratum of everything is of mental character.”

Albert Einstein wrote:

“You will hardly find one among the profoundly
scientific minds without a peculiar religious feeling
of his own . . . his religious feelings takes the form
of a rapturous amazement at the harmony of natural
law, which reveals an intelligence of such superiority
that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking
and acting of human beings is an utter insignificant
reflection.”
The English Scientist, Sir James Jeans, from Cambridge

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 7 1/8/2016 9:48:59 AM

 8 Defining & Recognizing there is a the Problem

University, wrote:
“The Universe begins to look more like a great
thought than like a great machine. Mind no longer
appears as an accidental intruder into the realm of
matter; we are beginning to suspect that we ought
rather to hail it as the creator and governor of the
realm of matter.”
“we suspect it [the Universe] is all waves and
nothing but waves.”
“The old dualism of mind and matter, which was
mainly responsible for the supposed hostility, seems
likely to disappear, not through matter becoming
in any way more shadowy or insubstantial than
heretofore, or through minds becoming resolved
into a function of the working of matter, but through
substantial matter resolving itself into a creation and a
manifestation of mind.”
Richard Feynman commenting on the state of affairs
in quantum mechanics during his November 1964 Cornell
Lectures entitled the Character of Physical Law stated:
“It always bothers me that, according to the laws
as we understand them today, it takes a computing
machine an infinite number of logical operations to
figure out what goes on in no matter how tiny a region
of space, and no matter how tiny a region of time.
How can all that be going on in that tiny space? Why
should it take an infinite amount of logic to figure
out what one tiny piece of space/time is going to do?
So I have often made the hypothesis that ultimately
physics will not require a mathematical statement,
that in the end the machinery will be revealed, and the
laws will turn out to be simple, like the checker board
with all its apparent complexities.”
The only scientist-mathematician-cyberneticist that came
close to hinting that the Universe was the product of information

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 8 1/8/2016 9:48:59 AM

 The Theory of Multidimensional Reality 9

was David Foster in his 1975 book The Intelligent Universe.

He saw the similarity between the DNA and the principles
of computer cybernetic control of systems or processes.
The important principle he established was the controlling
computer that exercises the cybernetic control over something
must operate at a much faster processing speed than the process
it is controlling. In other words, whatever is controlling our
Universe must be operating at processing speeds faster than
what it is controlling.
As you can see, some of the most famous mathematician
and physicists intuitively knew something was wrong with
their matter oriented, scientific theories. I should also include
Schrödinger, who also hinted that he did not believe the
concept of matter as fundamental. All of these scientists had
given up the deterministic mechanical theories of the Universe.
Unfortunately, none of them ever took it to the next step by
asking themselves “What if the Universe was the product of
information? How would we explain what magnetism, gravity,
matter, and light are?” I cannot find any evidence where they
tried to create any philosophical models that would tackle these
weighty questions. They collectively continued to beat this
matter theory of existence into the ground.
Today we are faced with the problem of explaining what
mass is. For that reason we have two philosophical camps to
describe matter and gravity. On one side are the physicists that
prescribe to the Standard Model in quantum mechanics and the
other camp defend and promote the various String theories,
the latest being M-theory. I will later cover these different
philosophies, not with the intention of torturing the reader
with long explanations, but merely to show that both sides
have built a house of cards on talcum power. Both are partially
right and partially wrong. I should also note for the reader that
both camps had been and are currently dominated by armchair
mathematician.
The results of what we know or do not know about our
Universe are:

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 9 1/8/2016 9:48:59 AM

 10 Defining & Recognizing there is a the Problem

1. Space is curved by large massive celestial bodies.

2. There was a beginning of the Universe we call the Big
Bang. We do not know where it came from before the
Big Bang, but something cannot come from nothing;
there has to be a source.
3. We do not know what gravity is. Einstein analogized it
as a form of acceleration in four-dimensional time and
space. His formulas are workable but not the complete
answer. He did not explain what causes gravity. You
cannot know what gravity is unless you know what is
mass.
4. Objects get smaller in gravitational fields and time
slows down.
5. Whatever matter is, it is made up of waveforms.
6. Planck’s constant is the ultimate building block of
the energy of the Universe, but no one knows why. It
represents one electrical wave.
7. We do not know why the natural log e exists in our
Universe.
8. Mass and energy are the same, but we do not know
why.
9. We do not know what mass is, which is what causes
gravity. Without knowing what mass is, it is premature
stating what causes gravity.
10. What is electricity, the electron? Is it a black hole?
11. What is light? Is it a particle or a waveform?
12. What is magnetism?
13. What is time?
14. What is consciousness and life?
You would think that after several hundred years since
the birth of the scientific process, someone would have asked
the basic question: Something is wrong with our foundation
philosophy. Maybe matter is not the dominant ‘thing’ in the
Universe, and there is something else? Only after the last
eight years have some physicists come to the conclusion
that our reality is a hologram. The traditional theories are

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 10 1/8/2016 9:48:59 AM

 The Theory of Multidimensional Reality 11

currently workable only within a narrow framework. Many

scientists have found that their disciplines break down at the
limits. Than another scientist comes along to try to expand our
understanding based on the earlier work. However, no one has
been able to explain the total picture or even to define the most
basic definitions of their discipline. We should all try to use a
logical approach in science, but the logical approach can only
be used where our underlying principles are firmly understood
and are correct. Unfortunately, many of the phenomena in our
Universe, or reality, are not understood at all. Much of the
thought processes and assumptions we employ fail at the limits
of our reality.
The following quote mirrors what I am conveying. It comes
from the late Imre Lakatos who had a Ph.D. in Philosophy of
Mathematics and Science from the University of Cambridge.
He stated from his book Science and Pseudo-Science:

“Scientists have thick skins. They do not abandon

a theory merely because facts contradict it. They
normally either invent some rescue hypothesis to
explain what they than call a mere anomaly or, if
they cannot explain the anomaly, they ignore it and
direct their attention to other problems. Note that
scientists talk about anomalies, recalcitrant instances,
not refutations. History of science, of course, is full of
accounts of how crucial experiments allegedly killed
theories. But such accounts are fabricated long after
the theory had been abandoned. What really counts
are dramatic, unexpected, stunning predictions: a
few of them are enough to tilt the balance; where
theory lags behind the facts, we are dealing with
miserable degenerating research programs. Now,
how do scientific revolutions come about? If we have
two rival research programs, and one is progressing
while the other is degenerating, scientists tend to
join the progressive program. This is the rationale of
scientific revolutions… Criticism is not a Popperian

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 11 1/8/2016 9:48:59 AM

 12 Defining & Recognizing there is a the Problem

quick kill, by refutation. Important criticism is always

constructive: there is no refutation without a better
theory. Kuhn is wrong in thinking that scientific
revolutions are sudden, irrational changes in vision.
The history of science refutes both Popper and
Kuhn: on close inspection both Popperian crucial
experiments and Kuhnian revolutions turn out to be
myths: what normally happens is that progressive
research programs replace degenerating ones.” [Imre
Lakatos, Science and Pseudo-Science, Pages 96-102 of Godfrey
Vesey (editor), Philosophy in the Open, Open University Press,
Milton Keynes, 1974.]

The Weakness of Mathematics

For the last 130 years, mathematicians have dominated the
field of physics. As stated earlier, we still do not know what
magnetism, gravity, light and mass/matter are beside the other
phenomena listed previously.
Math is an invaluable tool to explain abstract ideas, but it
can be misused. In fact, many people who know the power of
mathematical description have misused it. However, the real
power of math is not in its descriptive application but in our
ability to use it to evolve to abstract concepts. This is math’s
real forté. When you work with numbers long enough they can
make anything fit your conceptual view of a problem. This
is where the weakness of the “tool” is most pronounced. The
final formula is the least important to the math process. The
thought process is the most important. If the logic is wrong, the
math will not show it. In fact, math can “prove” faulty logic is
correct.
The problem with the heavy reliance on mathematical
modeling to explain these phenomena is that the mathematician
seems not to appreciate fully the fact that higher math is only a
tool. The philosophy has to come first. I will explain with this
simple analogy. Let us take a building contractor. His tools are
saws, hammers, drills, planers, glue, paint brushes, etc. He uses
these tools to build a structure based on an architect’s plans,
but if the architects’ plans are flawed the builder will construct

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 12 1/8/2016 9:48:59 AM

 The Theory of Multidimensional Reality 13

a building that may fall or rot away in a few years. The point
being that the tools and their correct application cannot show a
faulty plan incorrect.
Math is similar. Math is just a tool that can express almost
any type of reality the skilled mathematician chooses to use.
That is the weakness of the tool. It cannot prove faulty logic
incorrect because it can describe almost any kind of reality.
An example of this is in General Relativity that concludes the
existence of black holes with infinite gravity. The first question
that should have been asked is: can black holes even exist
in our reality? Another example is with String theory. It is
entirely created out of a very complicated long math construct
and not from observed facts. With ten or more dimensions
and unobtainable experiments to prove it one way or another,
it borders on faith, not science. In science, unobserved
speculations do not disprove observed facts. An example of
such faulty logic is from Dirac, “It is more important to have
beauty in one’s equations, than to have them fit experiment.”2
The problem with his kind of thinking is that he forgot that the
math is merely a tool to understand the experimental results not
that the math is the end result.

Where Did the Error Start

The matter oriented theory of the existence is very old
in origin. They were first expressed by the Greek atomists,
Leucippus (440 B.C.E.) and Democritus (420 B.C.E.). They
taught that nothing exists, except atoms and the great void.
Plato’s book, The Sophist, says,
Some of them [the atomists] drag down
everything from heaven and the invisible to earth,
actually grasping rocks and trees with their hands; for
they lay their hands on all such things and maintain
stoutly that that alone exists which can be touched and
handled; for they define existence and body, or matter,
as identical, and if anyone says that anything else,
which has no body, exists, they despise him utterly,
and will not listen to any other theory than their own.3

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 13 1/8/2016 9:48:59 AM

 14 Defining & Recognizing there is a the Problem

This sounds exactly like what goes on in academia today.

Non-matter oriented theories of existence existed at the time of
Plato and long before him. The Jewish concept of the Universe
I would conclude is correct, which is “As long as God thinks
the Universe, it exists.” Implying the Universe is the product
of a thought form, which is correct. The problem the Jews had
at that time was that it was difficult finding analogies to help
describe their philosophy. Plato used a cave analogy to try to
explain existence and the Universe:
‘And now, I said, let me show in a figure how
far our nature is enlightened or unenlightened: —
Behold! Human beings living in an underground den,
which has a mouth open toward the light and reaching
all along the den; here they have been from their
childhood and have their legs and necks chained so
that they cannot move, and can only see before them,
being prevented by the chains from turning round
their heads. Above and behind them a fire is blazing
at a distance, and between the fire and the prisoners
there is a raised way, and you will see, if you look,
a low wall built along the way, like the screen which
marionette players have in front of them, over which
they show the puppets.’
‘I see.’
‘And do you see, I said, men passing along the
wall carrying all sorts of vessels, and statues and
figures of animals made of wood and stone and various
materials, which appear over the wall? Some of them
are talking, others silent.
You have shown me a strange image, and they are
strange prisoners.
Like ourselves, I replied; and they see only their
own shadows, or the shadows of one another, which
the fire throws on the opposite wall of the cave.’4
Plato is saying that what we perceive in this reality is
analogous to the shadows projected on the wall of the cave.

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 14 1/8/2016 9:48:59 AM

 The Theory of Multidimensional Reality 15

Man thinks reality is what he sees, but it is really something

else.
The philosophies and attitudes of the atomists most
closely resemble the philosophies and behavior of modern-
day scientists and academia. Solon, Plato, and the Jews fought
this kind of philosophy for hundreds of years. Today nobody
in academia even questions it. The atomists had won two
thousand years ago.
How Our Science Philosophy Was Changed.
I feel it is important people understand why the science
was changed after the second century and who did it. Only a
very few scholars in Roman history know this information but
it is time everyone know why and who.
The Catholic Church taught the philosophies of Aristotle
from the second to the eighteenth century. His works were
almost elevated to the status of holy. The writings attributed to
Aristotle are the origin for the current day matter oriented theory
of existence. The academic narrative for the history of Aristotle
was that he was a philosophy student of Plato and that he took
over Plato’s school after his death. In all of Plato’s writings
Aristotle is not mentioned once. His name is only inserted by
footnote by the translators usually stating that Aristotle wrote
also this. There was an Aristotle mentioned by other Greek
writers but as an admiral in Alexander the Great’s navy. The
Roman writer/geographer Strabo (his full name is better known
as Julius Creaser, Strabo was his family name) also mentions an
Aristotle but only as a geographer, most likely the hobby of the
Admiral while he was invading other countries with Alexander.
Another Roman writer who mentions Aristotle was Plutarch,
which was one of the pseudonyms of a very powerful Roman
aristocrat. Plutarch repeats the same story written by Strabo.
Neither writer mention Aristotle as a philosopher. At this point
real scholars of Roman history know exactly who to blame.

The Essence of the Problem

The essence of the problem we face is transitioning from
the finite to the infinite. For our finite minds to approach the

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 15 1/8/2016 9:48:59 AM

 16 Defining & Recognizing there is a the Problem

infinite, we have to use all of our resources. We have been taught

that infinity cannot be understood by the finite mind. We have
been taught that some concepts are beyond the minds of men.
I am going to show you why this is not true, that the perceived
complexity of the Universe results from an inaccurate picture
of reality. To understand infinity is to understand only what
the basic systems are. You cannot understand the basic systems
unless you have an understanding of the systems underlying
principle.
The best way to conclude this section is a quote from Dr.
Lee Smolin, research physicist at the Perimeter Institute in
Waterloo, Canada.
A successful unification of quantum theory
and relativity would necessarily be a theory of the
Universe as a whole. It would tell us, as Aristotle and
Newton did before, what space and time are, what the
cosmos is, what things are made of, and what kind of
laws those things obey. Such a theory will bring about
a radical shift—a revolution—in our understanding of
what nature is. It must also have wide repercussions,
and will likely bring about, or contribute to, a shift in
our understanding of ourselves and our relationship to
the rest of the Universe.5
I sincerely believe that the Theory of Multidimensional
Reality has fulfilled Dr. Smolin’s requirements and that it
shows that the Universe is the product of information.

Endnotes
1 New York Times article of December 7, 2004. String Theory, at 20, Explains It All
(or Not) b y Dennis Overbye.
2 Dirac, ‘The Evolution of the Physicist’s Picture of Nature’, Scientific American,
May 1963, 208, 47.
3 Plato, The Sophist, Vol. 7, pp. 371, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University
Press, 1967.
4 Plato, the Republic, Book VII. Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press.
5 Quote attributed to Dr. Smolin in 1977 and listed on the Open-Site Web page:
http://open-site.org/Science /Physics/Modern/Theory_of_Everything.

The Theory of Multidimensional Reality.indb 16 1/8/2016 9:48:59 AM