Abu Naser, Icddr, B Bangladesh

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 25

Influence of groundwater iron and fecal

contamination on chlorination
Abu Naser, icddr,b
Bangladesh

1
Chlorine-based disinfectants
• Kill pathogens in water
• Total chlorine= Chlorine demand + Residual chlorine
• Residual chlorine depends on chlorine demand
• CDC recommends residual chlorine 0.2-2 mg/L
• Important point-of-use disinfectant

2
Point-of-use chlorination in
Bangladesh
• Earlier chlorination efforts were unsuccessful
−Calcium hypochlorite
−Sodium hypochlorite

• Chlorination with sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC)


−High user compliance
−Successful: 80% had residual chlorine
−Improved the microbiological quality
−Low diarrhea among children

3
Rationale
• icddr,b conducted a trial (Nov 11- Nov 12)
−Sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC)
−15%-20% wells had no residual chlorine
−Regular use of NaDCC reported
−Participants wanted to know the reason

• We hypothesized high chlorine demand may result in no


residual with:
−High levels of groundwater chemicals: iron
−High levels of groundwater contamination

4
Rationale of assessing iron
• Exists in two oxidation states
−Fe++ is soluble
−Fe+++ is insoluble
• In anaerobic conditions, iron is in Fe++ form

• Fe++ oxidation Fe+++ High chlorine demand


chlorine
• Ground water iron
−No health hazards even in high concentrations
−Bangladesh standard ≤ 1 mg/L
−WHO recommends 0.3 - 3 mg/L

5
Rationale of assessing fecal contamination

• Tube wells and latrines


are very close
• Open defecation
• 50% coverage of
improved sanitation

Tube well and latrine


6
Objectives
• To assess variation of
− Iron concentrations
− Fecal contamination
• To assess if NaDCC provides the recommended residual
− In groundwater with varying iron concentration
− In groundwater with varying fecal contamination

7
Study sites

• 9 sub-districts of
central Bangladesh
• low iron

8
Iron in Bangladesh (DPHE)
Study design
Cross-sectional (N=654)
Phase 1 Phase 2
3 sub-districts 6 sub-districts
22 rural unions 65 rural unions

Village (66) Village (390)

Tube well (264) Tube well (390)

9
Water testing of tube well

Phase 1 Phase 2

Iron
Iron Residual chlorine
Residual chlorine Fecal contamination

10
Iron concentration measurement
• Digital Hack pocket colorimeter
• 10 ml tube well water
• Add reagent
• Color change based on
concentration of iron

11
Residual free chlorine measurement
• 10 L water in a container
• Add 33 mg NaDCC
• Shake the container
• Hach chlorine colorimeter
• 10 ml water after 30 min
• Add reagent
• Observe color change

12
Assessing fecal contamination
• H2S testing
−Presence-absence test
−Field setting
−Low sensitivity
• Collect water in 20 ml bottle
• Observe color change after 24 hrs
−Black color: fecal contamination
−No color change: no contamination

13
Results
Iron, residual chlorine and fecal
contamination
• Iron concentration (N=654)
−Median: 0.91 mg/L
−48% tube wells had >1 mg/L (Bangladesh Standard)
−18% tube wells had >3 mg/L (WHO upper limit)

• Residual free chlorine (N=654)


−Median: 1.3 mg/L
−16% tube well had < 0.2 mg/L (CDC lower limit)

• 25% samples had 24 hours positive result (N=390)

15
Iron and chlorine interaction
Iron conc. residual chlorine conc.
5
4.5
4
Conc. (mg/L)

3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0

unions
Variation of median iron concentration and residual
chlorine 16
Iron and chlorine interaction
Fe > 3mg/L residual chlorine < 0.2 mg/L
9
Number of tube wells (N=12)

8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0

Unions

17
Factors influencing residual chlorine

18
Discussion

19
Geochemical explanations for iron
variation
• Groundwater iron depends on characteristics of aquifer
−Aquifer materials vary spatially
−Aquifer materials get dissolved in water
−Iron content of aquifer materials high near surface
−Ion exchange with sodium occurs as water flows down

20
Importance of recommended residual
chlorine
• Contamination during storage time
−unsafe storage containers
− poor water handling practices
• Recontamination
• Limitation
−Cross-sectional iron
measurement
−Seasonal variation

21
Conclusions
• High iron concentration lowered residual chlorine even in
a area where iron concentration was generally low
• Mass chlorination interventions need to consider iron
concentration to be successful
−Increase chlorine dose
−Reduce iron concentration

22
Recommendations
• Using other point-of-use disinfection method in
areas with high groundwater content
• Double the dose of NaDCC if iron is high
− unpleasant taste and smell
− taste and smell taste using different doses
• Pilot study to prevent interaction of iron
− household aeration process
− iron removal technique

23
Acknowledgements
• Leanne Unicomb
• Steve Luby
• Eilidh Higgins
• Sania Ashraf
• Mahbubur Rahman
• Shaila Arman
• Ayse Ercumen
• Carrie Read
• Study participants
• Medentech
24
Thank you
Question?

25

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy