Money, Interest Rates, and Exchange Rates
Money, Interest Rates, and Exchange Rates
Money, Interest Rates, and Exchange Rates
Money
Characteristics:
1. Money as a Medium of Exchange
To act as a medium of exchange and eliminate the barter system, serves as an universally accepted means of
payment. Otherwise, a complex modern economy would cease functioning without some standardized and
convenient means of payment.
2. Money as a Unit of Account
That is, it is a widely recognized measure of value.
Further the exchange rates allow us to translate different countries’ money prices into comparable terms.
This further simplifies the economic calculations, by making it easier to compare the prices of different
commodities, and also of different countries.
3. Money as a Store of Value
That is money helps transfer purchasing power from the present into the future, and thus is also an asset, or
a store of value.
This attribute is essential for any medium of exchange because no one would be willing to accept it in
payment if its value in terms of goods and services evaporated immediately.
Hence money is also the most liquid of all assets (an asset is said to be liquid when it can be transformed
into goods and services rapidly and without high transaction costs, such as brokers’ fees.
Since money is readily acceptable as a means of payment, there is close to no transaction cost is attached
and thus is the standard against which the liquidity of other assets is judged.)
Money supply
Here refers to the monetary aggregate that the Federal Reserve calls M1, i.e. the total amount of currency
and checking deposits held by households and firms.
It is controlled by its central bank. It directly regulates the amount of currency in existence and also has
indirect control over the amount of checking deposits issued by private banks.
Money demand
Variants of individual’s demand for money
1. Expected return
Money in individuality pays no return; thus while holding money you sacrifice the interest you could get on it
had it been in a deposit. Hence higher the interest rate, the more you sacrifice by holding wealth in the form
of money. The theory of asset demand states that, other things equal, people prefer assets offering higher
expected returns. And thus, all else equal, a rise in the interest rate causes the demand for money to fall.
This also could be explained through the concept of opportunity cost, i.e. the cost of the next best
alternative. Therefore, an increase in interest rates increases the opportunity cost of holding money.
3. Liquidity
While liquidity plays no important role in determining the relative demands for assets traded in the foreign
exchange market, households and firms hold money only because of its liquidity.
>a rise in the average value of transactions carried out by a household or firm causes its demand for money
to rise, as the feature of liquidity of money relates to the ease of financing their everyday transactions.
1. Interest Rate: as increases, the opportunity cost of holding money increases, hence, causes MD to fall.
2. The price level: The price is that of a consumption basket of everyday goods;
If rises, individual households and firms must spend more money than to consume it.
To maintain the same level of liquidity as before the price level increase, they will therefore have to hold
more money.
3. Real national income: When real national income (GNP) rises, more goods and services are being sold in the
economy, thus raises the demand for money, given the price level.
Thus, Md = P * L(R, Y), where P is the price level, R is the interest rate, and Y is real GNP, the aggregate
demand for money. The value of L(R,Y) falls when R rises, and rises when Y rises. Md is proportional to the
price levels, as it affects the real value of it.
Hence can be written as Md/P = L(R, Y),The demand is actually a demand for holding a certain amount of real
purchasing power and not nominal currency.
The aggregate real money demand schedule intersects the real money supply schedule at point 1 to give an
equilibrium interest rate of R1.
The money supply schedule is vertical at because is set by the central bank while P is taken as given.
The changes in the equilibrium, if the market starts at point2 at an interest rateR2, which is above R1.
Vice versa for rate R3<R1, where people offer to start borrowing at higher rates, putting an upward pressure on the
rates and hence equilibrium is maintained.
#the market always moves toward an interest rate at which the real money supply equals aggregate real money
demand. If there is initially an excess supply of money, the interest rate falls, and if there is initially an excess
demand, it rises.
It leads to a new lower interest rate as an increase in money supply gets a situation of more lenders than borrowers,
driving the rates down.
The part2 shows how a country’s equilibrium interest rate is determined in its money market.
Money market equilibrium is shown at point 1, where the dollar interest rate induces people to demand real
balances equal to the U.S. real money supply.
Given the price levels and national incomes of the two countries, equilibrium in national money markets leads to the
dollar and euro interest rates. These interest rates feed into the foreign exchange market, where, given expectations
about the future dollar/euro exchange rate, the current rate is determined by the interest parity condition.
U.S. Money Supply and the Dollar/Euro Exchange Rate
1) Interest Rates
This makes excess supply of dollars at R1, which in turn shifts
interest rates downward at point R2.
3) Exchange rates
As people try to sell dollars for euros, the dollar depreciates
and exchange rate’s fall to E2 which causes a fall in the
dollar’s expected future depreciation rate sufficient to offset
the fall in the dollar interest rate.
The change in the European money supply does not disturb the
U.S. money market equilibrium, which remains at point 1.
Money, the Price Level, and the Exchange Rate in the Long Run
An economy’s long-run equilibrium is the position it would eventually reach if no new economic shocks occurred
during the adjustment to full employment;
The equilibrium that would be maintained after all wages and prices had had enough time to adjust to their market-
clearing levels, and the prices were perfectly flexible and always adjusted immediately to preserve full employment.
P= Ms/ L(R,Y)
Thus prices being a function of the interest rate, real output, and the domestic money supply.
Therefore, the long-run equilibrium price level is just the value of P that satisfies condition (15-5) when the interest
rate and output are at their long-run levels, that is, at levels consistent with full employment.
Also concluded that , all else equal, an increase in a country’s money supply causes a proportional increase in its
price level given int rates and output. As both are a part of real demand for money, they stay unaffected by the MS.
Hence to maintain equality, the prices alter.
A doubling of the money supply, for example, has the same long-run effect as a currency reform in which each unit
of currency is replaced by two units of “new” currency. If the economy is initially fully employed, every money price
in the economy eventually doubles, but real GNP, the interest rate, and all relative prices return to their long-run or
full-employment levels.
Output, determined by the economy’s endowments of labor and capital, so in the long run, real output does
not depend on the money supply.
Interest rates, independent of the money supply in the long run, as the proportional change remains the same.
That is if people were previously willing to exchange 1$=1.01$ for a year, would still be willing afterward to exchange
2$= 2.2$ , so the interest rate will remain at 10percent pa.
# a permanent change in the supply of money has no effect on the long-run values of the interest rate or real output
# A permanent increase in the money supply causes a proportional increase in the price level’s long-run value. In
particular, if the economy is initially at full employment, a permanent increase in the money supply eventually will be
followed by a proportional increase in the price level to maintain the equilibrium levels.
Looking at the effects of a currency reform, say the US govt replaced every 2$ with 1$, or say the MS is tightened;
the exchange rate was 1.20$=1€ and now will be 0.60$=1€.
Wouldn’t be true for some commodities, say agricultural products which are traded in markets wherein the
pp adjust sharply with the changes in dd and ss
Exchange rates affect the certain good traded in the international market.
But also in cases of wages quite relevant, as those are written in long term documents and seldom can be
changed. Although these do not affect the price level directly, they make up a huge part of the production
costs, redicting the price adjustments
A graph compares data on month-to-month percentage changes in the dollar/ yen exchange rate,
with data on month-to-month percentage changes in the ratio of money price levels in the United States and
Japan
we see that the exchange rate is much more variable than price levels, showcasing the price rigidity in the
short run.
Under extremely inflammatory conditions like the one in Latin America(1980s) long-term contracts
specifying domestic money payments may go out of use.
Automatic price level indexation of wage payments may also be widespread under highly inflationary
conditions.
Such developments make the price level much less rigid.
Subjective: Some price rigidity can remain, however, even in the face of inflation rates that would be
high by everyday industrial-country standards. For example, Turkey’s 30 percent inflation rate for 2002
seems high until it is compared with the 114 percent depreciation of the Turkish lira against the U.S. dollar
over the same year.
Although the price levels appear to display short-run stickiness in many countries, a change in the money
supply creates immediate demand and cost pressures that eventually lead to future increases in the price
level:
o Excess demand for output and labor. An increase in the money supply has an expansionary effect on
the economy, raising the total demand for goods and services. To meet this demand, producers of
goods and services must employ workers overtime and make new hires. Even if wages are given in
the short run, the additional demand for labor allows workers to ask for higher wages in the next
round of wage negotiations. Producers are willing to pay these higher wages, for they know that in a
booming economy, it will not be hard to pass higher wage costs on to consumers through higher
product prices.
o Inflationary expectations. If everyone expects the price level to rise in the future, their expectation
will increase the pace of inflation today. Workers bargaining over wage contracts will insist on higher
money wages to counteract the effect on their real wages of the anticipated general increase in
prices. Producers, once again, will give in to these wage demands if they expect product prices to rise
and cover the additional wage costs.
o Raw materials prices. Many raw materials used in the production of final goods, for example,
petroleum products and metals, are sold in markets where prices adjust sharply even in the short run.
By causing the prices of such materials to jump upward, a money supply increase raises production
costs in materials-using industries. Eventually, producers in those industries will raise product prices
to cover their higher costs.
Permanent Money Supply Changes and the Exchange Rate
We suppose that the economy starts with all variables at their long-run levels and that output remains constant as
the economy adjusts to the money supply change.
Thus the dollar dep in this case is greater relative to the one when MS inc had been temporary, as now will go to 2’
from 1 instead of 3. If the expectations didn’t change, the eq would be at 3’ instead of 2’.
The price level increases from P1 to P2 as in the LR the inc in price levels should be in proportion to the inc in MS.
Thus M2/P2 is at the same level as M1/P1 as both of them are proportional.
Also as the MS returns to original level and output is given, Interest rates rise back to R1 as price increases., this also
appreciates the dollar with respect, the foreign exchange market moves to its long-run position along the
downward-sloping schedule defining the dollar return on euro deposits.
The equilibrium exchange rateE3, is higher than at the original equilibrium, point 1’.
Like the price level, the dollar/ euro exchange rate has risen in proportion to the increase in the money supply.
Exchange Rate Overshooting
The exchange rate is said to overshoot when its immediate response to a disturbance is greater than its long-run
response. Exchange rate overshooting is an important phenomenon because it helps explain why exchange rates
move so sharply from day to day.
As we see also in the example above, the initial response is the exch rate moving from E1to E2 much larger than its
LR movt, at E3
The economic explanation of overshooting comes from the interest parity condition.
Given the interest rate, there is no change in exchange rate is expected. As the MS in US domestic economy reduces,
the interest rates fall below those of eu, until the prices in US adjust. To maintain equilibrium, the interest difference
must be offset by an expected appreciation of the dollar against the euro. Only if the dollar/euro exchange rate
overshoots E3initially will market participants expect a subsequent appreciation of the dollar against the euro.
Overshooting is a direct consequence of the short-run rigidity of the price level. In a hypothetical world where the
price level could adjust immediately to its new, long-run level after a money supply increase, the dollar interest rate
would not fall because prices would adjust immediately and prevent the real money supply from rising. Thus, there
would be no need for overshooting to maintain equilibrium in the foreign exchange market. The exchange rate would
maintain equilibrium simply by jumping to its new, long-run level right away