The Ultimate PCP Rod Solution
The Ultimate PCP Rod Solution
©2011-2013 Exceed Oilfield Equipment Inc. All rights reserved Page 2 EHT - The Ultimate PCP Rod Solution. April, 2014
7/8” EHT® offers higher maximum
torque than competitor’s 1” PC Rod
When designing an artificial lift system with
a Progressive Cavity Pump (PCP), the Maxi-
mum Torque offered by the sucker rod is
the most import parameter to consider dur-
ing rod selection. Exceed Oilfield Equip-
ment’s EHT® rod dwarfs the competitions
when compared the torque value. Compar-
ing to competitor’s 1” PC rod, 1” EHT of-
fers 35% higher torque. The 7/8” EHT rod,
despite having a 24% smaller body size, still
delivers 10% higher maximum torque value Figure 1: EHT PC Pump rod with patented dove-tail connection
compared to 1” drive rod from competition.
This allows customers who are currently using 1” drive rod two alternative options, switch to 1” EHT for signifi-
cantly increased reliability or 7/8” EHT for much more efficient operation.
5000
25%
10%
Sting Overall
3000
Weight Load
2200
2000 1800
1627
1000
Pump Produc-
Improve
50%
Life tion
0
Time Efficiency
1-1/4" 1-1/8" 1" 7/8"
Figure 2: Maximum torque value comparison - EHT vs. DR97
EHT Parameters
Surface
Tensile Surface Center Maximum Maximum Torsion
Residual
Strength Hardness Hardness Torque Torque Strength
Compressive
(MPa) (HRC) (HB) (rod size) (Nm) (Nm / m2)
Stress (Mpa)
7/8" ≥1800
999-1290 ≥42 ≥224 ≤200 1" ≥2200 ≥1000
1-1/8" ≥4100
©2011-2013 Exceed Oilfield Equipment Inc. All rights reserved Page 3 EHT - The Ultimate PCP Rod Solution. April, 2014
In a PCP oil/liquid production system, instead of ax-
ial force, the rod string, which consist of sucker rod
and couplings, transfers circumferential torque from
surface motor to down-hole pump. This torque peaks dur-
ing surface motor starting, and reverses and valleys when
INSIDE EHT®
the motor stop. This flip-flopping circumferential torque
creates significant challenges to sucker rod with traditional
design, particularly to the thread connection between the Varying circumferential stress in PCP operation create
coupling and rod. In a traditional rod connection, com- challenges to the rod body too. When the driving surface
monly used by Exceed competitions, the thread between motor stops, the pump down-hold are still rotating at its
coupling and rod are designed mainly to withstand stress operating speed. The momentum “twist” the rod string
in axial direction. and often result in rod body failures. This is particularly a
problem for normalized and tempered rod which have
good elasticity.
To create a strong body, EHT rod underwent an special
additional heat treatment process - the induction case
Figure 3: Traditional design - circumferential and axial stress
Both apply to coupling threads
hardening. After the initial whole body heat treatment, the
rod body surface layer is heated up again by induction and
then quenched and tempered. In this secondary heat treat-
During PCP’s operation, the rod string works under cons
ment process, martensite transformation creates a hard
circumferential stress. This can cause the rod / coupling
case in the rod body. This significantly improves the ten-
connection to fail in two fashions. When the torque ex-
sile strength of the body while the softer core keeps the
ceeds the coupling torque in counter-clock direction, the
overall elasticity.
coupling start to over torque. When the torque is clock-
wise, the thread start to lose displacement. Coupling/rod
pin failure are common result in either case.
©2011-2013 Exceed Oilfield Equipment Inc. All rights reserved Page 4 EHT - The Ultimate PCP Rod Solution. April, 2014
E H T ® B E N E F I T S
USE 7/8” EHT TO REPLACE 1” CONVENTIONAL ROD
CASE STUDY – 1
C A S E
Well Name: PS-2735 Original EHT
PC Pump: GLB300 Configuration Configuration
Pump Depth: 951.05m Rod Size: 1” 7/8”
Rotor Speed: 100 rpm Rod Weight: 4083.04 kg 3103.36kg
Product Rate: 22 T/day Generator: 22KW/20A 15KW/11A
Before switched to 7/8” EHT, customer experienced frequent rod failures using 1” conventional de-
sign sucker rod. On average the rod need to be replaced every 6 month due to failure. After switched to
EHT on Aug 16th, 2011, this well has not experienced any rod failure since.
CASE STUDY – 2
Well Name: PS-2735 Original EHT
PC Pump: GLB400 Configuration Configuration
S T U D I E S
Pump Depth: 951.05m Rod Size: 1” 7/8”
Rotor Speed: 75 rpm Rod Weight: 3847.48 kg 2924.32 kg
Product Rate: 21 T/day Generator: 22KW/20A 15KW/11A
Before switched to 7/8” EHT, customer experienced frequent rod failures using 1” conventional de-
sign sucker rod. On average the rod need to be replaced every 6 month due to failure. After switched to
EHT on Dec 6th, 2010, this well has not experienced any rod failure since.
CASE STUDY – 3
Well Name: PS-2737 Original EHT
PC Pump: GLB300 Configuration Configuration
Pump Depth: 1121.89m Rod Size: 1” 7/8”
Rotor Speed: 100 rpm Rod Weight: 4828.98 kg 3103.36kg
Product Rate: 22 T/day Generator: 22KW/20A 15KW/11A
Before switched to 7/8” EHT, customer experienced frequent rod failures using 1” conventional de-
sign sucker rod. On average the rod need to be replaced every 6 month due to failure. After switched to
EHT on Aug 15th, 2012, this well has not experienced any rod failure since.
©2011-2013 Exceed Oilfield Equipment Inc. All rights reserved Page 5 EHT - The Ultimate PCP Rod Solution. April, 2014