SOP Number 3

Correlations
Notes
Output Created 04-NOV-2019 15:33:35
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet1
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data
54
File
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated
as missing.
Cases Used Statistics for each pair of variables are
based on all the cases with valid data for
that pair.
Syntax CORRELATIONS
/VARIABLES=PAY SUPERVISION
REWARDS PROMOTION COWORKERS
TotSat POS
/PRINT=TWOTAIL NOSIG
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.01
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.00
[DataSet1]
 Correlations

PAY SUPERVISION REWARDS PROMOTION COWORKERS TotSat

PAY Pearson Correlation 1 .531** .473** .693** -.086 .744**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .537 .000

N 54 54 54 54 54 54
SUPERVISION Pearson Correlation .531** 1 .088 .423** -.452** .414**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .527 .001 .001 .002

N 54 54 54 54 54 54
REWARDS Pearson Correlation .473** .088 1 .679** .483** .855**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .527 .000 .000 .000

N 54 54 54 54 54 54
PROMOTION Pearson Correlation .693** .423** .679** 1 .020 .845**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .001 .000 .883 .000

N 54 54 54 54 54 54
COWORKERS Pearson Correlation -.086 -.452** .483** .020 1 .395**

Sig. (2-tailed) .537 .001 .000 .883 .003

N 54 54 54 54 54 54
TotSat Pearson Correlation .744** .414** .855** .845** .395** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .002 .000 .000 .003

N 54 54 54 54 54 54

POS Pearson Correlation .122 .092 .574** .553** .240 .508**

Sig. (2-tailed) .381 .508 .000 .000 .081 .000

N 54 54 54 54 54 54
 Correlations
POS
PAY Pearson Correlation .122
Sig. (2-tailed) .381
N 54
SUPERVISION Pearson Correlation .092
Sig. (2-tailed) .508
N 54
REWARDS Pearson Correlation .574**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 54
PROMOTION Pearson Correlation .553**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 54
COWORKERS Pearson Correlation .240
Sig. (2-tailed) .081
N 54
TotSat Pearson Correlation .508**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 54
POS Pearson Correlation 1
Sig. (2-tailed)
N 54

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

 Job Satisfaction vs LOS

Difference Scores Calculations

Treatment 1

N1: 46
df1 = N - 1 = 46 - 1 = 45
M1: 3.87
SS1: 4.91
s21 = SS1/(N - 1) = 4.91/(46-1) = 0.11

Treatment 2

N2: 8
df2 = N - 1 = 8 - 1 = 7
M2: 4.38
SS2: 0.55
s22 = SS2/(N - 1) = 0.55/(8-1) = 0.08

T-value Calculation

s2p = ((df1/(df1 + df2)) * s21) + ((df2/(df2 + df2)) * s22) = ((45/52) * 0.11) + ((7/52)
* 0.08) = 0.1

s2M1 = s2p/N1 = 0.1/46 = 0

s2M2 = s2p/N2 = 0.1/8 = 0.01

t = (M1 - M2)/√(s2M1 + s2M2) = -0.5/√0.02 = -4.06

The t-value is -4.06394. The p-value is .000164. The result is significant at p < .05.
 POS vs LOS

Difference Scores Calculations

Treatment 1

N1: 46
df1 = N - 1 = 46 - 1 = 45
M1: 3.37
SS1: 10.23
s21 = SS1/(N - 1) = 10.23/(46-1) = 0.23

Treatment 2

N2: 8
df2 = N - 1 = 8 - 1 = 7
M2: 4.39
SS2: 1.15
s22 = SS2/(N - 1) = 1.15/(8-1) = 0.16

T-value Calculation

s2p = ((df1/(df1 + df2)) * s21) + ((df2/(df2 + df2)) * s22) = ((45/52) * 0.23) + ((7/52)
* 0.16) = 0.22

s2M1 = s2p/N1 = 0.22/46 = 0

s2M2 = s2p/N2 = 0.22/8 = 0.03

t = (M1 - M2)/√(s2M1 + s2M2) = -1.02/√0.03 = -5.68

Significance Level:

.01
.05
.10

One-tailed or two-tailed hypothesis?:

One-tailed
Two-tailed

The t-value is -5.67602. The p-value is < .00001. The result is significant at p < .05.

JS vs Employment Status

Difference Scores Calculations

Treatment 1

N1: 51
df1 = N - 1 = 51 - 1 = 50
M1: 3.92
SS1: 5.39
s21 = SS1/(N - 1) = 5.39/(51-1) = 0.11

Treatment 2
N2: 3
df2 = N - 1 = 3 - 1 = 2
M2: 4.43
SS2: 1.05
s22 = SS2/(N - 1) = 1.05/(3-1) = 0.52

T-value Calculation

s2p = ((df1/(df1 + df2)) * s21) + ((df2/(df2 + df2)) * s22) = ((50/52) * 0.11) + ((2/52)
* 0.52) = 0.12

s2M1 = s2p/N1 = 0.12/51 = 0

s2M2 = s2p/N2 = 0.12/3 = 0.04

t = (M1 - M2)/√(s2M1 + s2M2) = -0.52/√0.04 = -2.47

Significance Level:

.01
.05
.10

One-tailed or two-tailed hypothesis?:

One-tailed
Two-tailed

The t-value is -2.47222. The p-value is .016737. The result is significant at p < .05.
 POS vs Classificaiton

Difference Scores Calculations

Treatment 1

N1: 51
df1 = N - 1 = 51 - 1 = 50
M1: 3.54
SS1: 18.04
s21 = SS1/(N - 1) = 18.04/(51-1) = 0.36

Treatment 2

N2: 3
df2 = N - 1 = 3 - 1 = 2
M2: 3.19
SS2: 0.03
s22 = SS2/(N - 1) = 0.03/(3-1) = 0.02

T-value Calculation

s2p = ((df1/(df1 + df2)) * s21) + ((df2/(df2 + df2)) * s22) = ((50/52) * 0.36) + ((2/52)
* 0.02) = 0.35

s2M1 = s2p/N1 = 0.35/51 = 0.01

s2M2 = s2p/N2 = 0.35/3 = 0.12

t = (M1 - M2)/√(s2M1 + s2M2) = 0.35/√0.12 = 1.01

Significance Level:
.01
.05
.10

One-tailed or two-tailed hypothesis?:

One-tailed
Two-tailed

The t-value is 1.00927. The p-value is .317521. The result is not significant at p < .05.

JSS vs Salary

Difference Scores Calculations

Treatment 1

N1: 44
df1 = N - 1 = 44 - 1 = 43
M1: 3.85
SS1: 4.52
s21 = SS1/(N - 1) = 4.52/(44-1) = 0.11

Treatment 2

N2: 10
df2 = N - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9
M2: 4.36
SS2: 0.56
s22 = SS2/(N - 1) = 0.56/(10-1) = 0.06

T-value Calculation

s2p = ((df1/(df1 + df2)) * s21) + ((df2/(df2 + df2)) * s22) = ((43/52) * 0.11) + ((9/52)
* 0.06) = 0.1

s2M1 = s2p/N1 = 0.1/44 = 0

s2M2 = s2p/N2 = 0.1/10 = 0.01

t = (M1 - M2)/√(s2M1 + s2M2) = -0.51/√0.01 = -4.65

Significance Level:

.01
.05
.10

One-tailed or two-tailed hypothesis?:

One-tailed
Two-tailed

The t-value is -4.64664. The p-value is .000023. The result is significant at p < .05.
 POS vs Salary

Difference Scores Calculations

Treatment 1

N1: 44
df1 = N - 1 = 44 - 1 = 43
M1: 3.32
SS1: 8.16
s21 = SS1/(N - 1) = 8.16/(44-1) = 0.19

Treatment 2

N2: 10
df2 = N - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9
M2: 4.38
SS2: 1.16
s22 = SS2/(N - 1) = 1.16/(10-1) = 0.13

T-value Calculation

s2p = ((df1/(df1 + df2)) * s21) + ((df2/(df2 + df2)) * s22) = ((43/52) * 0.19) + ((9/52)
* 0.13) = 0.18

s2M1 = s2p/N1 = 0.18/44 = 0

s2M2 = s2p/N2 = 0.18/10 = 0.02

t = (M1 - M2)/√(s2M1 + s2M2) = -1.06/√0.02 = -7.13

Significance Level:
.01
.05
.10

One-tailed or two-tailed hypothesis?:

One-tailed
Two-tailed

The t-value is -7.12976. The p-value is < .00001. The result is significant at p < .05.
 JSS vs Staff

Summary of Data

Treatments

1 2 3 4 5 Total

N 10 16 28 54

∑X 43.6 61 108.45 213.05

Mean 4.36 3.8125 3.8732 3.945

∑X2 190.66 233.515 423.5775 847.7525

Std.Dev. 0.2503 0.252 0.3614 0.3684

Result Details

Source SS df MS

Between-treatments 2.1474 2 1.0737 F = 10.85656

 Within-treatments 5.0439 51 0.0989

Total 7.1913 53

The f-ratio value is 10.85656. The p-value is .000118. The result is significant at p < .05.

Perceived Organization Support and Employment Classification Differences

Difference between Job Satisfaction

Treatments

Admin Sales Staff Total

N 10 16 28 54

∑X 43.81 60.02 86.19 190.02

Mean 4.381 3.752 3.078 3.736

∑X2 193.05 225.67 268.42 687.14

Std.Dev. 0.359 0.175 0.338 0.2907

 Result Details

Source SS df MS F

Between-
13.726 2 6.863 F = 74.445
treatments

Within-treatments 4.702 51 0.092 Decision: Reject Ho

Interpretation:
Total 18.427 53
Significant

The f-ratio value is 74.445. The p-value is 0.000. The result is significant
at p < .05.