0% found this document useful (0 votes)
111 views

Final - ST4238 1f6mnp9

1. The probability that a pure death process starting with N individuals is equal to 0 at time T, where T is exponentially distributed, is the product of the death rates divided by their sum plus the parameter of the exponential distribution. 2. The transition probabilities P00(t) and P33(t) for the sum of 3 independent Markov chains X1(t), X2(t), X3(t) are given by taking the product of the individual transition probabilities to the power of 3. 3. For a renewal process with interoccurrence times X1, X2,...: (a) the covariance of W2 and W4 is 2σ^2 + 8μ^2, (
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
111 views

Final - ST4238 1f6mnp9

1. The probability that a pure death process starting with N individuals is equal to 0 at time T, where T is exponentially distributed, is the product of the death rates divided by their sum plus the parameter of the exponential distribution. 2. The transition probabilities P00(t) and P33(t) for the sum of 3 independent Markov chains X1(t), X2(t), X3(t) are given by taking the product of the individual transition probabilities to the power of 3. 3. For a renewal process with interoccurrence times X1, X2,...: (a) the covariance of W2 and W4 is 2σ^2 + 8μ^2, (
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

1. (15%) Let X(t) be a pure death process starting from X(0) = N .

Assume that the death


parameters are µ1 , µ2 , · · · , µN . Let T be an exponentially distributed random variable
with parameter θ. Show that
N
Y µi
P (X(T ) = 0) = .
i=1 µi + θ

Solution

P (X(T ) = 0) = P (WN ≤ T )
= Ee−θWN
= Ee−θ(S1 +S2 +···+SN )
N
Y
= Ee−θSi
i=1
YN Z ∞
= e−θs µi e−µi s ds
i=1 0
YN
µi
= .
i=1 µi + θ

2. (15%) Let X1 (t), X2 (t) and X3 (t) be independent two-state Markov chains having the
infinitesimal matrix ° °
° −λ λ °
° °
A=° °.
° µ −µ °

Determine the transition probabilities P00 (t) and P33 (t) for X1 (t) + X2 (t) + X3 (t).
Solution: We have the transition probability matrix of X1 (t)(or X2 (t), X3 (t)),

X A n tn
P X (t) = I +
n=1 n!
A A −(λ+µ)t
= I+ − e ,
λ+µ λ+µ
that is,

X µ λ −(λ+µ)t
P00 (t) = + e ;
λ+µ λ+µ
X λ λ −(λ+µ)t
P01 (t) = − e ;
λ+µ λ+µ
X µ µ −(λ+µ)t
P10 (t) = − e ;
λ+µ λ+µ
X λ µ −(λ+µ)t
P11 (t) = + e ,
λ+µ λ+µ
So
Z
P00 (t) = P (Z(t) = 0|Z(0) = 0)
= P (X1 (t) = 0, X2 (t) = 0, X3 (t) = 0|X1 (0) = 0, X2 (0) = 0, X3 (0) = 0)
= P (X1 (t) = 0|X1 (0) = 0)P (X2 (t) = 0|X2 (0) = 0)P (X3 (t) = 0|X3 (0) = 0)
à !3
µ λ −(λ+µ)t
= + e
λ+µ λ+µ

2
and

P3Z (t) = P (Z(t) = 3|Z(0) = 3)


= P (X1 (t) = 1, X2 (t) = 1, X3 (t) = 1|X1 (0) = 1, X2 (0) = 1, X3 (0) = 1)
= P (X1 (t) = 1|X1 (0) = 1)P (X2 (t) = 1|X2 (0) = 1)P (X3 (t) = 1|X3 (0) = 1)
à !3
λ µ −(λ+µ)t
= + e .
λ+µ λ+µ

3. (15%) Suppose that N (t) is a renewal process with interoccurrence times X1 , X2 , · · ·.


Suppose EX1 = µ and V ar(X1 ) = σ 2 . Let Wn be the waiting time for the n-th renewal.

(a) Find E(W2 W4 ).


(b) Find limt→∞ EWN (t)+1 /t.
(c) Find limt→∞ Eγt /t, where γt is the excess life at t.

Solution:

(a)

E(W2 W4 ) = E[(X1 + X2 )(X1 + X2 + X3 + X4 )]


= E[X12 + X22 + 2X1 X2 + X1 X3 + X1 X4 + X2 X3 + X2 X4 ]
= 2σ 2 + 8µ2 .

(b) because
EWN (t)+1 = EX1 [1 + M (t)]
and
M (t) 1
lim =
t→∞ t EX1
Thus
EWN (t)+1 EX1 [1 + M (t)]
lim = lim = 1.
t→∞ t t→∞ t
(c)
Eγt EWN (t)+1 − t
lim = lim = 0.
t→∞ t t→∞ t
4. (15%) A machine can work for Xi days before it breaks down. When breakdown, it will
be repaired immediately. The repair will take Yi days. After the repair, a battery has to
be recharged. The time for recharging is zero. Suppose the distributions for Xi and Yi
are respectively
P (Xi = 2) = 0.4, P (Xi = 3) = 0.6,
and
P (Yi = 1) = 0.8, P (Yi = 2) = 0.2.
Assume that Xi and Yi are independent. What is the expected number of times that the
battery is recharged within 5 days?
Solution Let Zi be the duration between two successive times that the battery is recharged.
Then
Zi = Xi + Yi . (interoccurrence time)

3
The distribution is
P (Zi = 3) = 0.4 ∗ 0.8 = 0.32;
P (Zi = 4) = 0.8 ∗ 0.6 + 0.2 ∗ 0.4 = 0.56
P (Zi = 5) = 0.6 ∗ 0.2 = 0.12.

Let N (t) be the number of times that the battery is rechagred in time (0, t].
Let M (t) = E(N (t)). We have
M (1) = p1 = P (Zi = 1) = 0
M (2) = p1 + p2 + p1 ∗ M (1) = 0
M (3) = p1 + p2 + p3 + p1 ∗ M (2) + p2 ∗ M (1)
= 0.32
M (4) = p1 + p2 + p3 + p4
+p1 ∗ M (3) + p2 ∗ M (2) + p3 ∗ M (1)
= 0.88
M (5) = p1 + p2 + p3 + p4 + p5 + p1 ∗ M (4)
+p2 ∗ M (3) + p3 ∗ M (2) + p4 ∗ M (1)
= 1.

Method 2
P (N (5) = 1) = P (X1 = 2, Y1 = 1) + P (X1 = 2, Y1 = 2) + P (X1 = 3, Y1 = 2)
+P (X1 = 3, Y1 = 1)
= 0.4 × 0.8 + 0.4 × 0.2 + 0.6 × 0.8 + 0.6 × 0.2
= 1.
So EN (5) = 1 × 1 = 1.
5. (20%) Let {Zn : n = 1, 2, · · ·} be a Markov Chain with the transition probability matrix

0 1 2
0 0.2 0 0.8
P=1 0 1 0
2 0.8 0 0.2

We assume that the process begins in state Z0 = 0, and then the successive returns to
state 0 form a renewal process.

(a) Determine the mean duration of one of these renewal intervals, i.e. the expectation
of the interoccurrence time.
(b) Find P (W2 > 3|N (2) = 1), where W2 is the waiting time of the second renewal and
N (2) is the number of renewals up to time 2.

Solution:
(a) Let Xn be one of the duration of the renewal. Then
P (Xn = 1) = 0.2
P (Xn = 2) = 0.8 ∗ 0.8
P (Xn = k) = 0.8 ∗ 0.2k−2 ∗ 0.8, for k > 2

4
We have the mean duration
E(Xn ) = 2.
(b) Note that
[
{N (2) = 1} = (W1 = 1, W2 > 2) (W1 = 2)
[
= (X1 = 1, X2 > 1) (X1 = 2)

we have

P {N (2) = 1}
= P (X1 = 1, X2 > 1) + P (X1 = 2)
= P (X1 = 1)P (X2 > 1) + P (X1 = 2)
= 0.2(1 − 0.2) + 0.82 = 0.8.

Note

P (W2 > 3, N (2) = 1)


\ [
= P {(W2 > 3) [(W1 = 1, W2 > 2) (W1 = 2)]}
= P (W1 = 1, W2 > 3) + P (W1 = 2, W2 > 3)
= P (X1 = 1, X2 > 2) + P (X1 = 2, X2 > 1)
= P (X1 = 1)P (X2 > 2) + P (X1 = 2)P (X2 > 1)
= 0.544.

Therefore
0.544
P (W2 > 3|N (2) = 1) = = 0.68.
0.8

6. (20%) Suppose that B(t) is a Brownian Motion with diffusion coefficient σ 2 = 2 and
starting point B(0) = 0.

(a) Define Z(t) = B(t) − tB(1) for t ∈ [0, 1]. Then Z(t) is a Brownian bridge process.
Find the covariance Cov(Z(s), Z(t)) for s, t ∈ [0, 1].
(b) Find E[B(2)B(4)], E[B(2)B(4)|B(1) = 1] and P (B(5) < 3|B(1) = 2, B(2) = 3).

Solution: (a).

EZ(t) = 0. EZ(s) = 0

The covariance

Cov(Z(s), Z(t)) = E(Z(s)Z(t))


= E[(B(s) − sB(1))(B(t) − tB(1))]
= E[B(s)B(t) − tB(1)B(s) − sB(1)B(t) + tsB(1)2 ]
= min(s, t)σ 2 − tsσ 2 − stσ 2 + stσ 2
= min(s, t)σ 2 − tsσ 2
= 2(min(s, t) − st).

(b).

E[B(2)B(4)] = min(2, 4)σ 2 = 4.

5
Let N1 = B(2) − B(1) and N2 = B(4) − B(2). Then N1 , N2 and B(1) are independent.

E[B(2)B(4)|B(1) = 1]
= E{[N1 + B(1)][N2 + N1 + B(1)]|B(1) = 1}
= E{[N1 + 1][N2 + N1 + 1]}
= EN1 N2 + EN12 + EN1 + E(N1 + N2 ) + 1
= 3.

By the Markov property of the Brownian motion,

P (B(5) < 3|B(1) = 2, B(2) = 3)


= P (B(5) < 3|B(2) = 3)
= P (B(5) − B(2) < 0|B(2) = 3)
= P (B(5) − B(2) < 0)
= 0.5.

(END OF PAPER)

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy