Acca SBR

Strategic Business Reporting
Workbook
For exams in September 2018,
December 2018, March 2019
and June 2019
First edition 2018
ISBN 9781 5097 1648 7 A note about copyright

e-ISBN 9781 5097 1555 8
Dear Customer
ISBN (for internal use only): 9781 5097 1545 9
What does the little © mean and why does it matter?
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Your market-leading BPP books, course materials and e-
learning materials do not write and update themselves.
People write them on their own behalf or as employees of
Published by
an organisation that invests in this activity. Copyright law
BPP Learning Media Ltd protects their livelihoods. It does so by creating rights over
BPP House, Aldine Place the use of the content.
142-144 Uxbridge Road Breach of copyright is a form of theft – as well as being a
London W12 8AA criminal offence in some jurisdictions, it is potentially a
serious breach of professional ethics.
www.bpp.com/learningmedia
With current technology, things might seem a bit hazy but,
Printed in the United Kingdom
basically, without the express permission of BPP Learning
Media:
Your learning materials, published by BPP Learning Media
Ltd, are printed on paper obtained from traceable  Photocopying our materials is a breach of copyright
sustainable sources.
 Scanning, ripcasting or conversion of our digital
materials into different file formats, uploading them
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be to Facebook or e-mailing them to your friends is a
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any breach of copyright
form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,
You can, of course, sell your books, in the form in which
photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior
you have bought them – once you have finished with
written permission of BPP Learning Media.
them. (Is this fair to your fellow students? We update for a
The contents of this course material are intended as a guide reason.) Please note the e-products are sold on a single
and not professional advice. Although every effort has been user licence basis: we do not supply 'unlock' codes to
made to ensure that the contents of this course material are people who have bought them secondhand.
correct at the time of going to press, BPP Learning Media And what about outside the UK? BPP Learning Media
makes no warranty that the information in this course strives to make our materials available at prices students
material is accurate or complete and accept no liability for can afford by local printing arrangements, pricing policies
any loss or damage suffered by any person acting or and partnerships which are clearly listed on our website.
refraining from acting as a result of the material in this A tiny minority ignore this and indulge in criminal activity
course material. by illegally photocopying our material or supporting
organisations that do. If they act illegally and unethically
We are grateful to the Association of Chartered Certified in one area, can you really trust them?
Accountants for permission to reproduce past
examination questions. The suggested solutions in the Copyright © IFRS Foundation
practice answer bank have been prepared by BPP All rights reserved. Reproduction and use rights are strictly
Learning Media Ltd, except where otherwise stated. limited. No part of this publication may be translated,
reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form either in
BPP Learning Media is grateful to the IASB for permission to whole or in part or by any electronic, mechanical or other
reproduce extracts from the International Financial Reporting means, now known or hereafter invented, including
Standards including all International Accounting Standards, photocopying and recording, or in any information
SIC and IFRIC Interpretations (the Standards). The Standards storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in
together with their accompanying documents are issued by: writing from the IFRS Foundation. Contact the IFRS
Foundation for further details.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) 30
Cannon Street, London, EC4M 6XH, United Kingdom. The IFRS Foundation logo, the IASB logo, the IFRS for
SMEs logo, the “Hexagon Device”, “IFRS Foundation”,
Email: info@ifrs.org Web: www.ifrs.org “eIFRS”, “IAS”, “IASB”, “IFRS for SMEs”, “IASs”, “IFRS”,
Disclaimer: The IASB, the International Financial Reporting “IFRSs”, “International Accounting Standards” and
Standards (IFRS) Foundation, the authors and the publishers “International Financial Reporting Standards”, “IFRIC”
do not accept responsibility for any loss caused by acting or “SIC” and “IFRS Taxonomy” are Trade Marks of the
refraining from acting in reliance on the material in this IFRS Foundation.
publication, whether such loss is caused by negligence or Further details of the Trade Marks including details of
otherwise to the maximum extent permitted by law. countries where the Trade Marks are registered or applied
for are available from the Licensor on request.
©
BPP Learning Media Ltd
2018
ii
Contents
Contents
Page
Introduction to Strategic Business Reporting iv

Essential skills areas to be successful in Strategic Business Reporting viii
Introduction to the Supplementary Reading xv
Key to icons xvii
1 The financial reporting framework 1
2 Professional and ethical duty of the accountant 23
3 Non-current assets 45
4 Employee benefits 77
SKILLS CHECKPOINT 1: Approaching ethical issues 97
5 Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period 113
6 Income taxes 125
7 Financial instruments 147
8 Leases 177
9 Share-based payment 197
SKILLS CHECKPOINT 2: Resolving financial reporting issues 219
10 Basic groups 237
11 Changes in group structures: step acquisitions 263
12 Changes in group structures: disposals and group reorganisations 285
13 Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations 309
14 Joint arrangements and group disclosures 325
15 Foreign transactions and entities 335
16 Group statements of cash flows 355
SKILLS CHECKPOINT 3: Applying good consolidation techniques 381
17 Interpreting financial statements for different stakeholders 399
SKILLS CHECKPOINT 4: Performing financial analysis 435
18 Reporting requirements of small and medium-sized entities 451
19 The impact of changes and potential changes in accounting regulation 465
SKILLS CHECKPOINT 5: Creating effective discussion 487
Appendix 1 – Activity answers 505
Appendix 2 – Supplementary reading 571
Further question practice and solutions 783
Glossary 865
Bibliography 875
Mathematical tables 877
Index 879
iii iii
Introduction to Strategic Business Reporting (SBR)
This Workbook is based on International Financial Reporting Standards only. An online supplement
will be available at www.bpp.com/learning-media for those sitting the UK GAAP variant of the
Strategic Business Reporting exam. The UK GAAP supplement covers UK accounting standards and
provides relevant illustrations and examples.
Overall aim of the syllabus

To discuss, apply and evaluate the concepts, principles and practices that underpin the preparation
and interpretation of corporate reports in various contexts, including the ethical assessment of
managements’ stewardship and the information needs of a diverse group of stakeholders.
The syllabus
The broad syllabus headings are:
A Fundamental ethical and professional principles

B The financial reporting framework
C Reporting the financial performance of a range of entities
D Financial statements of groups of entities
E Interpreting financial statements for different stakeholders
F The impact of changes and potential changes in accounting regulation
Main capabilities
On successful completion of this exam, you should be able to:
A Apply fundamental ethical and professional principles to ethical dilemmas and discuss
the consequences of unethical behaviour
B Evaluate the appropriateness of the financial reporting framework and critically discuss
changes in accounting regulation
C Apply professional judgement in the reporting of the financial performance of a range
of entities
Note. The learning outcomes in Section C of the syllabus can apply to single entities,
groups, public sector entities and not-for-profit entities (where appropriate).
D Prepare the financial statements of groups of entities
E Interpret financial statements for different stakeholders
F Communicate the impact of changes and potential changes in accounting regulation on
financial reporting
Links with other exams
Strategic Business Advanced Audit

Reporting (SBR) and Assurance
(AAA)
Financial
Reporting (FR)
Financial
Accounting (FA)
iv
Introduction
The diagram shows where direct (solid line arrows) and indirect (dashed line arrows) links exist
between this exam and other exams preceding or following it.
The Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) syllabus assumes knowledge acquired in Financial Accounting
and Financial Reporting and develops and applies this further and in greater depth.
Achieving ACCA's Study Guide Learning Outcomes

This BPP Workbook covers all the SBR syllabus learning outcomes. The tables below show in which
chapter(s) each area of the syllabus is covered.
These materials are reviewed by the ACCA examining team. The objective of the review is to ensure
that the material properly covers the syllabus and study guide outcomes, used by the examining team
in setting the exams, in the appropriate breadth and depth. The review does not ensure that every
eventuality, combination or application of examinable topics is addressed by the ACCA Approved
Content. Nor does the review comprise a detailed technical check of the content as the Approved
Content Provider has its own quality assurance processes in place in this respect.
A1 Professional behaviour and compliance with accounting standards Chapter 2
A2 Ethical requirements of corporate reporting and the consequences of Chapter 2

unethical behaviour
B The financial reporting framework
B1 The applications, strengths and weaknesses of an accounting Chapter 1

framework
C Reporting the financial performance of a range of entities
C1 Revenue Chapter 1
C2 Non-current assets Chapter 3
C3 Financial instruments Chapter 7
C4 Leases Chapter 8
C5 Employee benefits Chapter 4
C6 Income taxes Chapter 6
C7 Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period Chapter 5
C8 Share-based payment Chapter 9
C9 Fair value measurement Chapters 3, 7
C10 Reporting requirements of small and medium-sized entities (SMEs) Chapter 18
C11 Other reporting issues Chapters 1, 3, 8,

17
v
D Financial statements of groups of entities
D1 Group accounting including statements of cash flows Chapters 10, 13–

16
D2 Associates and joint arrangements Chapters 10, 14
D3 Changes in group structures Chapters 11, 12
D4 Foreign transactions and entities Chapter 15
E Interpreting financial statements for different stakeholders
E1 Analysis and interpretation of financial information and measurement Chapter 17

of performance
F The impact of changes and potential changes in accounting regulation
F1 Discussion of solutions to current issues in financial reporting Chapter 19
Approach to examining the syllabus

The Strategic Business Reporting syllabus is assessed by a 3 hour 15 minute paper-based exam. The
pass mark is 50%. All questions in the exam are compulsory.
It examines professional competences within the business reporting environment. You will be
examined on concepts, theories and principles, and on your ability to question and comment on
proposed accounting treatments.
You should be capable of relating professional issues to relevant concepts and practical situations.
The evaluation of alternative accounting practices and the identification and
prioritisation of issues will be a key element of the exam.
You will need to exercise professional and ethical judgement, and integrate technical
knowledge when addressing business reporting issues in a business context.
You will be required to adopt either a stakeholder or an external focus in answering
questions and to demonstrate personal skills such as problem solving, dealing with
information and decision making. You will also have to demonstrate communication skills
appropriate to the scenario.
The paper also deals with specific professional knowledge appropriate to the preparation and
presentation of consolidated and other financial statements from accounting data, to
conform with accounting standards.
vi
Introduction
Format of the exam Marks
Section Two compulsory scenario-based questions, totalling 50 marks 50

A Question 1: (incl. two
 Based on the financial statements of group entities, or extracts professional
thereof (syllabus area D) marks)
 Also likely to require consideration of some financial reporting
issues (syllabus area C)
 Numerical aspects of group accounting will be a maximum of
25 marks
 Discussion and explanation of numerical aspects will be
required
Question 2:
 Consideration of the reporting implications and the ethical
implications of specific events in a given scenario
Two professional marks will be awarded to the ethical issues question.
Section Two compulsory 25-mark questions 50

B Questions: (incl 2
 May be scenario, case-study, or essay based professional
marks)
 Will contain both discursive and computational elements
 Could deal with any aspect of the syllabus
 Will always include either a full or part question that requires
the appraisal of financial and/or non-financial information
from either the preparer’s or another stakeholder’s perspective
Two professional marks will be awarded to the question that requires
analysis.
100
Current issues
The current issues element of the syllabus (Syllabus area F) may be examined in Section A or B but
will not be a full question. It is more likely to form part of another question.
vii
Essential skills areas to be successful in Strategic
Business Reporting
We think there are three areas you should develop in order to achieve exam success in Strategic
Business Reporting:
(1) Knowledge application These are shown in the diagram
(2) Specific Strategic Business Reporting skills below.
(3) Exam success skills
aging information
Man
An
sw
er
pl
t
en
manag ime
an
em
t
nin
Approaching Resolving financial Exam success skills
Good
g
ethical issues reporting issues
Specific SBR skills
Applying good
re q r p re t a t i o n
consolidation
Creating effective
m e nts
techniques
discussion
Eff d p
an
u ire
o f t i n te
e c re
Performing
ti v
e financial analysis
se w ri
c
r re
nt tin
Co
ati g
on
l
Efficient numerica
analysis
Specific SBR skills

These are the skills specific to SBR that we think you need to develop in order to pass the exam.
In this Workbook, there are five Skills Checkpoints which define each skill and show how it is
applied in answering a question. A brief summary of each skill is given below.
Skill 1: Approaching ethical issues

Question 2 in Section A of the exam will require you to consider the reporting implications and
the ethical implications of specific events in a given scenario. The two Section B questions could
deal with any aspect of the syllabus. Therefore, ethics could feature in this part of the exam too.
Given that ethics will feature in every exam, it is essential that you master the appropriate technique
for approaching ethical issues in order to maximise your mark.
BPP recommends a step-by-step technique for approaching questions on ethical issues:
STEP 1 Work out how many minutes you have to answer the question.
STEP 2 Read the requirement and analyse it.
STEP 3 Read the scenario, identify which IAS or IFRS may be relevant, whether the
proposed accounting treatment complies with that IAS or IFRS, and any threats to
the fundamental ethical principles.
STEP 4 Prepare an answer plan using key words from the requirements as headings.
STEP 5 Write up your answer using key words from the requirements as headings.
Skills Checkpoint 1 covers this technique in detail through application to an exam-standard question.
viii
Introduction
Skill 2: Resolving financial reporting issues

Financial reporting issues are highly likely to be tested in both sections of your SBR exam, so it is
essential that you master the skill for resolving financial reporting issues in order to maximise your
chance of passing the exam.
The basic approach BPP recommends for resolving financial reporting issues is very similar to the one
for ethical issues. This consistency is important because in Question 2 of the exam, both will be
tested together.
STEP 2 Read the requirement and analyse it, identifying sub-requirements.
STEP 3 Read the scenario, identifying relevant IFRSs and how they should be applied to
the scenario.
STEP 4 Prepare an answer plan ensuring that you cover each of the issues raised in the
scenario.
STEP 5 Write up your answer, using separate headings for each item in the scenario.
Skill 3: Applying good consolidation techniques

Question 1 of Section A of the exam will be based on the financial statements of group entities, or
extracts thereof. Section B of the exam could deal with any aspect of the syllabus so it is also
possible that groups feature in Question 3 or 4.
Good consolidation technique is therefore essential when answering both written and numerical
aspects of group questions.
Skills Checkpoint 3 focuses on the more challenging technique for correcting errors in group financial
statements that have already been prepared.
A step-by-step technique for applying good consolidation techniques is outlined below.
STEP 2 Read the requirement for each part of the question and analyse it, identifying
sub-requirements.
STEP 3 Read the scenario, identify exactly what information has been provided and what
you need to do with this information. Identify which consolidation
workings/adjustments may be required.
STEP 4 Draw up a group structure. Make notes in the margins of the question as to which
consolidation working, adjustment or correction to error is required. Do not
perform any detailed calculations at this stage.
STEP 5 Write up your answer using key words from the requirements as headings (if
preparing narrative). Perform calculations first, then explain. Remember that marks
will be available for a discussion of the principles underpinning any calculations.
ix
Skill 4: Performing financial analysis
Section B of the SBR exam will contain two questions, which may be scenario or case-study or essay
based and will contain both discursive and computational elements. Section B could deal with any
aspect of the syllabus but will always include either a full question, or part of a question that requires
appraisal of financial or non-financial information from either the preparer’s and/or another
stakeholder's perspective. Two professional marks will be awarded to the question in Section B that
requires analysis.
Given that appraisal of financial and non-financial information will feature in Section B of every
exam, it is essential that you have mastered the appropriate technique in order to maximise your
chance of passing the SBR exam.
A step-by-step technique for performing financial analysis is outlined below.
STEP 2 Read and analyse the requirement.
STEP 3 Read and analyse the scenario.
STEP 4 Prepare an answer plan.
STEP 5 Write up your answer.
Skill 5: Creating effective discussion

More marks in your SBR exam will relate to written answers than numerical answers. It is very
tempting to only practise numerical questions, as they are easy to mark because the answer is right
or wrong, whereas written questions are more subjective and a range of different answers will be
given credit. Even when attempting written questions, it is tempting to write a brief answer plan and
then look at the answer rather than writing a full answer to plan. Unless you practise written
questions in full to time, you will never acquire the necessary skills to tackle discussion questions.
The basic five steps adopted in Skills Checkpoint 4 should also be used in discussion questions.
Steps 2 and 4 are particularly important for discussion questions. You will definitely need to spend a
third of your time reading and planning. Generating ideas at the planning stage to create a
comprehensive answer plan will be the key to success in this style of question.
Exam success skills

Passing the SBR exam requires more than applying syllabus knowledge and demonstrating the
specific SBR skills; it also requires the development of excellent exam technique through question
practice.
We consider the following six skills to be vital for exam success. The Skills Checkpoints show how
each of these skills can be applied in the exam.
x
Introduction
Exam success skill 1
Managing information
Questions in the exam will present you with a lot of information. The skill is how you handle this
information to make the best use of your time. The key is determining how you will approach the
exam and then actively reading the questions.
Advice on developing Managing information

Approach
The exam is 3 hours 15 minutes long. There is no designated 'reading' time at the start of the exam,
however, one approach that can work well is to start the exam by spending 10–15 minutes carefully
reading through all of the questions to familiarise yourself with the exam paper.
Once you feel familiar with the exam paper consider the order in which you will attempt the
questions; always attempt them in your order of preference. For example, you may want to leave to
last the question you consider to be the most difficult.
If you do take this approach, remember to adjust the time available for each question appropriately –
see Exam success skill 6: Good time management.
If you find that this approach doesn’t work for you, don't worry – you can develop your own
technique.
Active reading
You must take an active approach to reading each question. Focus on the requirement first,
underlining key verbs such as 'prepare', 'comment', 'explain', 'discuss', to ensure you answer the
question properly. Then read the rest of the question, underlining and annotating important and
relevant information, and making notes of any relevant technical information you think you will need.
Correct interpretation of the requirements

The active verb used often dictates the approach that written answers should take (eg 'explain',
'discuss', 'evaluate'). It is important you identify and use the verb to define your approach. The
correct interpretation of the requirements skill means correctly producing only what is being
asked for by a requirement. Anything not required will not earn marks.
Advice on developing correct interpretation of the requirements

This skill can be developed by analysing question requirements and applying this process:
Step 1 Read the requirement
Firstly, read the requirement a couple of times slowly and carefully and highlight the
active verbs. Use the active verbs to define what you plan to do. Make sure you
identify any sub-requirements.
Step 2 Read the rest of the question

By reading the requirement first, you will have an idea of what you are looking out
for as you read through the case overview and exhibits. This is a great time saver
and means you don't end up having to read the whole question in full twice. You
should do this in an active way – see Exam success skill 1: Managing Information.
xi
Step 3 Read the requirement again
Read the requirement again to remind yourself of the exact wording before starting
your written answer. This will capture any misinterpretation of the requirements or
any missed requirements entirely. This should become a habit in your approach and,
with repeated practice, you will find the focus, relevance and depth of your answer
plan will improve.
Answer planning: Priorities, structure and logic

This skill requires the planning of the key aspects of an answer which accurately and completely
responds to the requirement.
Advice on developing Answer planning: Priorities, structure and logic

Everyone will have a preferred style for an answer plan. For example, it may be a mind map, bullet-
pointed lists or simply annotating the question paper. Choose the approach that you feel most
comfortable with, or, if you are not sure, try out different approaches for different questions until you
have found your preferred style.
For a discussion question, annotating the question paper is likely to be insufficient. It would be better
to draw up a separate answer plan in the format of your choosing (eg a mind map or bullet-pointed
lists). For a groups question, you will typically spend less time planning than for a discussion
question. You should aim to draw up the group structure. Then, rather than drawing up a formal
plan, the best use of your time is to annotate the question paper margins noting which group
working, adjustment or correction of error will be required.
Efficient numerical analysis

This skill aims to maximise the marks awarded by making clear to the marker the process of arriving
at your answer. This is achieved by laying out an answer such that, even if you make a few errors,
you can still score subsequent marks for follow-on calculations. It is vital that you do not lose marks
purely because the marker cannot follow what you have done.
Advice on developing Efficient numerical analysis

This skill can be developed by applying the following process:
Step 1 Use a standard proforma working where relevant
If answers can be laid out in a standard proforma then always plan to do so. This
will help the marker to understand your working and allocate the marks easily. It will
also help you to work through the figures in a methodical and time-efficient way.
Step 2 Show your workings

Keep your workings as clear and simple as possible and ensure they are cross-
referenced to the main part of your answer. Where it helps, provide brief narrative
explanations to help the marker understand the steps in the calculation. This means
that if a mistake is made you do not lose any subsequent marks for follow-on
calculations.
Step 3 Keep moving!

It is important to remember that, in an exam situation, it is difficult to get every
number 100% correct. The key is therefore ensuring you do not spend too long on
any single calculation. If you are struggling with a solution then make a sensible
assumption, state it and move on.
xii
Introduction
Effective writing and presentation

Written answers should be presented so that the marker can clearly see the points you are making,
presented in the format specified in the question. The skill is to provide efficient written answers with
sufficient breadth of points that answer the question, in the right depth, in the time available.
Advice on developing Effective writing and presentation

Step 1 Use headings
Using the headings and sub-headings from your answer plan will give your answer
structure, order and logic. This will ensure your answer links back to the requirement
and is clearly signposted, making it easier for the marker to understand the different
points you are making. Underlining your headings will also help the marker.
Step 2 Write your answer in short, but full, sentences

Use short, punchy sentences with the aim that every sentence should say something
different and generate marks. Write in full sentences, ensuring your style is
professional.
Step 3 Do your calculations first and explanation second

Questions often ask for an explanation with suitable calculations. The best approach
is to prepare the calculation first but present it on the bottom half of the page of your
answer, or on the next page. Then add the explanation before the calculation.
Performing the calculation first should enable you to explain what you have done.
Good time management

This skill means planning your time across all the requirements so that all tasks have been attempted
at the end of the 3 hours 15 minutes available and actively checking on time during your exam. This
is so that you can flex your approach and prioritise requirements which, in your judgement, will
generate the maximum marks in the available time remaining.
Advice on developing Good time management

The exam is 3 hours 15 minutes long, which translates to 1.95 minutes per mark. Therefore a
10-mark requirement should be allocated a maximum of 20 minutes to complete your answer before
you move on to the next task. At the beginning of a question, work out the amount of time you should
be spending on each requirement and write the finishing time next to each requirement on your
exam paper. If you take the approach of spending 10–15 minutes reading and planning at the start
of the exam, adjust the time allocated to each question accordingly; eg if you allocate 15 minutes to
reading, then you will have 3 hours remaining, which is 1.8 minutes per mark.
Keep an eye on the clock
Aim to attempt all requirements, but be ready to be ruthless and move on if your answer is not going
as planned. The challenge for many is sticking to planned timings. Be aware this is difficult to
achieve in the early stages of your studies and be ready to let this skill develop over time.
If you find yourself running short on time and know that a full answer is not possible in the time you
have, consider recreating your plan in overview form and then add key terms and details as time
allows. Remember, some marks may be available, for example, simply stating a conclusion which
you don't have time to justify in full.
xiii
Question practice
Question practice is a core part of learning new topic areas. When you practice questions, you
should focus on improving the Exam success skills – personal to your needs – by obtaining feedback
or through a process of self-assessment.
xiv
Introduction
Introduction to the Supplementary Reading

This additional content, available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook, has been
selected to enhance your studies and consists of revision materials and revision activities,
background reading to aid your understanding of topics, and additional activities and further
illustrations of complex areas. A summary of the content is given below.
Chapter Summary of Supplementary Reading content

1 The financial  IFRS examinable documents
reporting  Conceptual Framework – importance of a conceptual framework;
framework the IASB Conceptual Framework including fundamental/enhancing
qualitative characteristics, underlying assumptions, elements of the
financial statements and measurement bases; Exposure Draft
ED/2015/3
 IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements illustrative guidance and
discussion on presentation and other aspects of IAS 1
 IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers illustrative
examples and activity
2 Professional and  Influences on ethics; ethical theory
ethical duty of  Social responsibility and businesses
the accountant  Managing ethics within organisations: compliance based and
integrity based
 Activity on ethical issues
3 Non-current  IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment revision activities
assets  IAS 36 Impairment revision activities
 IAS 38 Intangible Assets revision and activity
 IAS 40 Investment Property revision and activity
4 Employee  Concepts and principles of employee benefits costs
benefits  Explanation and comparison of defined benefit, defined
contribution and multi-employer benefits plans
 Illustration of how to apply the asset ceiling test
5 Provisions,  Provisions recognition and measurement revision and activities
contingencies  IAS 10 Events After the Reporting Period examples
and events after  Exam-standard activity
the reporting
period
6 Income taxes  Current tax revision activities
 Deferred tax: tax base revision activities
 Deferred tax liabilities revision including revalued assets,
development costs, impairment and taxable temporary differences
in business combinations
 Further explanation on:
– Deferred tax assets
– Recognition of deferred tax
– Measurement of deferred tax
7 Financial  Clarification of financial instruments definitions
instruments  Further explanation on derecognition, classification and
measurement of financial assets and liabilities.
8 Leases  Lessee accounting, including lease identification examples,
separating lease components, remeasurement and sale and
leaseback
xv
Chapter Summary of Supplementary Reading content
9 Share-based  Background to IFRS 2 Share-based Payment
payment  Further detail on share-based payments amongst group entities
 Activities on vesting conditions for further practice
10 Basic groups  Revision: measuring non-controlling interest at acquisition
 Revision: BPP's standard approach to consolidation
 Fair value practice activity
11 Changes in  Investment to associate step acquisitions
group structures:
acquisitions
12 Changes in  Group profit or loss on disposal where significant influence is lost
group structures:  Deemed disposals
disposals and  Group reorganisations
group
reorganisations
13 Non-current  Discontinued operations comprehensive activity
assets held for
sale and
discontinued
operations
14 Joint  Joint arrangements – contractual arrangements
arrangements
and group
disclosures
15 Foreign  Changes in an entity’s functional currency
transactions and
entities
16 Group statements  Revision of single entity statement of cash flows
of cash flows  Foreign currency translation
 Further activity involving the disposal of a subsidiary
 Summary of disclosure requirements
17 Interpreting  Revision of ratio calculations and explanations
financial  Revision of basic and diluted earnings per share, presentation and
statements for significance
different  Problems with financial performance indicators
stakeholders  Further detail on the Global Reporting Initiative guidelines
18 Reporting  Background to the IFRS for SMEs
requirements of  Consequences of the IFRS for SMEs
small and
medium-sized
entities
19 The impact of  Practical issues regarding managing the transition to IFRS
changes and  Disclosure Initiative – amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 7
potential  Classification issues
changes in  Definition of a business and accounting for previously held interests
accounting
regulation
xvi
Introduction
Key to icons
The following icons appear in this Workbook.
Key term
Key terms are definitions of important concepts.
Key term
Illustration
Illustrations demonstrate how to apply key knowledge and techniques.
Activity
Activities give you essential practice of techniques covered in the chapter.
Supplementary Reading
Links to the Supplementary Reading are given throughout the chapter.
Knowledge diagnostic
Summary of the key learning points from the chapter.
xvii
xviii
The financial
reporting framework
Learning objectives
On completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
Syllabus
reference no.
Discuss the importance of a conceptual framework in underpinning the production B1(a)

of accounting standards.
Discuss the objectives of financial reporting, including disclosure of information, B1(b)

that can be used to help assess management's stewardship of the entity's
resources and the limitations of financial reporting.
Discuss the nature of the qualitative characteristics of useful financial information. B1(c)
Explain the roles of prudence and substance over form in financial reporting. B1(d)
Discuss the high level of measurement uncertainty that can make financial B1(e)
information less relevant.
Evaluate the decisions made by management on recognition, derecognition and B1(f)

measurement.
Critically discuss and apply the definitions of the elements of financial statements B1(g)
and the reporting of items in the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income.
Discuss and apply the criteria that must be met before an entity can apply the C1(a)
revenue recognition model.
Discuss and apply the five step model relating to revenue earned from a contract C1(b)
with a customer.
Apply the criteria for recognition of contract costs as an asset. C1(c)
Discuss and apply the recognition and measurement of revenue including C1(d)
performance obligations satisfied over time, sale with a right of return, warranties,
variable consideration, principal versus agent considerations and non-refundable
upfront fees.
Outline the principles behind the application of accounting policies and C11(c)
measurement in interim reports.
1
Discuss the impact of current issues in corporate reporting including. The F1(c)
following examples are relevant to the current syllabus:
1. The revision of the Conceptual Framework
2. The IASB's Principles of Disclosure Initiative
3. Materiality in the context of financial reporting
4. Primary financial statements
5. Management commentary
6. Developments in sustainability reporting
Note. Only item (1) is covered in this chapter. The remaining items are covered
in Chapter 17 and Chapter 19.
Exam context
This chapter begins with revision of the IASB's Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting which
you saw in Financial Reporting. In Strategic Business Reporting (SBR), you are expected to apply the
underlying concepts in the Conceptual Framework to complicated transactions, as well as discussing
its usefulness. The IASB's proposed revisions to the Conceptual Framework are also examinable. You
need to be able to identify the effects of the proposed changes on accounting standards.
Linked with the Conceptual Framework topics are related issues such as revenue recognition and
other areas driven by the recognition criteria and substance over form. You have seen IFRS 15
Revenue from Contracts with Customers in Financial Reporting; however, it will be examined in more
depth in SBR.
Interim financial reporting is an area you have not seen before, although only overview knowledge is
expected to be examined here.
2
1: The financial reporting framework
Chapter overview
The financial reporting

framework
2. Revenue
1. The accounting
recognition
framework
(IFRS 15)
3. Interim financial
reporting (IAS 34)
Current
developments
3
1 The accounting framework
1.1 Fair presentation and compliance with IFRSs
'Fair presentation' is the term used in IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements equivalent to the
concept of 'true and fair view'.
In order to achieve fair presentation, an entity must comply with (IAS 1: para. 15):
 International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). These comprise (IAS 1 para. 7):
– International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs)
– International Accounting Standards (IASs)
– Interpretations of Standards; and
 The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting.
Supplementary reading
Chapter 1 Section 1 of the Supplementary Reading, available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of
the Workbook, contains a full reference list of the examinable documents. These will each be
covered in turn through these materials.
1.2 The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
This topic is revision. Chapter 1 Section 2 of the Supplementary Reading, available in Appendix 2 of
the digital edition of the Workbook, contains a full revision of the Conceptual Framework.
The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting is divided into chapters:

(1) The objective of general purpose financial reporting
Objective, usefulness and limitations of general purpose financial reporting
'The objective of general purpose financial reporting is to provide financial information
about the reporting entity that is useful to existing and potential investors, lenders and
other creditors in making decisions about providing resources to the entity. Those
decisions involve buying, selling or holding equity and debt instruments, and providing or
settling loans and other forms of credit.' (IASB Conceptual Framework (CF): para. OB2)
Information about a reporting entity's economic resources, claims against the entity and
changes in resources and claims
Three aspects are relevant to the user of the financial statements here (CF: paras. OB17–21):
 Financial performance reflected by accrual accounting
 Financial performance reflected by past cash flows
 Changes in economic resources and claims not resulting from financial
performance, eg a share issue.
(2) The reporting entity
This section is to be added by the IASB at a later date.
4
(3) Qualitative characteristics of useful financial information
Fundamental Enhancing qualitative The cost constraint

qualitative characteristics on useful financial
characteristics reporting
 Relevance  Comparability  Benefits of reporting

 Faithful representation  Verifiability information should
justify the costs
(CF: paras. QC5–16)  Timeliness
(CF: para. QC35)
 Understandability
(CF: paras. QC19–32)
(4) The 1989 Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial
Statements: remaining text
These sections will be replaced as the IASB develops the new Conceptual Framework.
(i) Underlying assumption
Financial statements are normally prepared on the assumption that an entity is a going
concern and will continue in operation for the foreseeable future (CF: para. 4.1).
(ii) The elements of financial statements
ASSET INCOME
A resource controlled by the entity Increases in economic benefits
as a result of past events and from during the accounting period in the
which future economic benefits form of inflows or enhancements
are expected to flow to the entity. of assets or decreases of
liabilities that result in increases in
equity, other than those relating to
LIABILITY contributions from equity
participants.
A present obligation of the entity
arising from past events, the
settlement of which is expected to
EXPENSE
result in an outflow from the entity
of resources embodying economic Decreases in economic benefits
benefits. during the accounting period in the
form of outflows or depletions of
assets or incurrences of
EQUITY
liabilities that result in decreases in
The residual interest in the assets equity, other than those relating to
of the entity after deducting all its distributions to equity
liabilities. participants.
(CF: para 4.4) (CF: para 4.25)
5
(iii) Recognition of the elements of financial statements
An item that meets the definition of an element is recognised if (CF: para. 4.38):
 It is probable that any future economic benefit associated with the item will
flow to or from the entity; and
 The item has a cost or value that can be measured with reliability.
(iv) Measurement of the elements of financial statements

Different bases of measurement of the elements of financial statements can be used
including (CF: para. 4.55):
 Historical cost;
 Current cost;
 Realisable (settlement) value; and
 Present value.
(v) Concepts of capital and capital maintenance
This section discusses alternative capital maintenance concepts and determination of
profit (CF: paras. 4.59–4.65).
Tutorial note
The Conceptual Framework, and the impact of the revised Conceptual Framework (discussed in
Section 1.4 below) on existing IFRSs, is referred to in various chapters throughout this Workbook.
1.3 IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements
the Workbook, contains a revision of the principles of IAS 1.
1.4 Current developments

In May 2015 the IASB issued an Exposure Draft (ED/2015/3) of the revised Conceptual Framework
for Financial Reporting with three objectives:
(a) To fill gaps in the existing Conceptual Framework
(b) To update existing guidance where appropriate
(c) To clarify particular areas where more guidance would be helpful.
This follows a Discussion Paper issued in July 2013, after the project had been put on hold in 2010
so the IASB could deal with more urgent matters arising from the financial crisis.
The Exposure Draft covers the following areas.
Chapter Title Summary of issues addressed
1 The objective of  Originally issued in 2010

general purpose  Largely unchanged – emphasis on need for information to
financial reporting assess management's stewardship of the entity's resources so
new section added on efficiency and effectiveness of the use
of the entity's resources (ED/2015/3: paras. 1.22–1.23)
2 Qualitative  Originally issued in 2010

characteristics of  Largely unchanged, but prudence explicitly stated and
useful financial substance over form added to 'faithful representation'
information (ED/2015/3: para. 2.18)
6
3 Financial statements  Discusses the role of financial statements

and the reporting  Includes the going concern assumption
entity
 New definition of what constitutes a reporting entity: 'an
entity that chooses, or is required, to prepare general
purpose financial statements'. Need not be a legal entity
(ED/2015/3: paras. 3.11–3.12)
 Boundary of reporting entity:
– Direct control: 'unconsolidated' financial statements –
investments in subsidiaries reported as assets
(ED/2015/3: paras. 3.19–3.20)
– Both direct control and indirect control: 'consolidated'
financial statements (ED/2015/3: para. 3.21)
4 The elements of  Revised asset definition: 'a present economic resource

financial controlled by the entity as a result of past events'
statements (ED/2015/3: para. 4.5)
 Revised liability definition: 'a present obligation of the entity
to transfer an economic resource as a result of past events'
(ED/2015/3: para. 4.24)
 Economic resource: 'a right that has the potential to produce
economic benefits' (ED/2015/3: para. 4.6)
 Current definitions of income, expenses and equity retained
 Clarification:
– More focus that an asset is a resource and a liability
is an obligation
– That resources and obligations are not certain to result
in inflows and outflows of economic benefits, but have
the potential to do so (ED/2015/3: para. 4.13)
 Consideration of role of uncertainty in definitions
(ED/2015/3: paras. 5.15–5.16):
– Notion that inflow/outflow of resources 'expected'
removed
– No probability threshold
– Probability removed from recognition criteria
 Inclusion of definition of 'unit of account' for measurement:
'the group of rights, the group of obligations or the group of
rights and obligations, to which recognition and
measurement requirements are applied', but determination
left to individual standards (ED/2015/3: para. 4.57)
5 Recognition and  Recognise all assets and liabilities (and related income,
derecognition expenses and equity) if such recognition provides users with
(ED/2015/3: para. 5.9):
– Relevant information about the element
– A faithful representation of the element
– Information that results in benefits exceeding the costs
of providing it
7
 Derecognition (not covered by existing Conceptual

Framework)
General approach (ED/2015/3: para. 5.27):
– Derecognise any assets or liabilities that have been
transferred, consumed, collected or fulfilled, or have
expired and recognise any resulting income or
expense; and
– Continue to recognise any assets or liabilities retained
(the retained component), which become a separate
unit of account
If the retained component contains a disproportionate
exposure to economic benefits – three possibilities
(ED/2015/3: paras. 5.31-32):
– Derecognition supported by separate presentation of
retained component
– Derecognition supported by explanatory disclosure of
retained component
– Continue to recognise transferred component and
retained component (if separate presentation/disclosure
insufficient to faithfully represent the effect of the
transaction/event)
 Explicit linkage concept added (ED/2015/3: para. 5.5):
Opening statement of financial position (SOFP)
(assets – liabilities = equity)
+ Income less expenses (from statement of financial
performance)
+ Contributions from holders of equity claims less
distributions to equity claims
= Closing SOFP (assets – liabilities = equity)
6 Measurement  Little guidance in existing Conceptual Framework

 Revised measurement bases (ED/2015/3: para. 6.4):
There are several areas

– Historical cost
of debate about – Current value (ED/2015/3: para. 6.20):
measurement. For
discussion of this please (i) Fair value (market participant perspective)
see the technical article
'Measurement' written (ii) Value in use for assets and fulfilment value for
by the SBR examining liabilities (entity-specific)
team, available in the
P2 Exam Resources  Factors to consider in selecting a measurement basis
section of the ACCA (ED/2015/3: paras. 6.48–6.65):
website.
– Cost constraint
– Relevance
– Faithful representation
– Enhancing qualitative characteristics
– Factors specific to initial measurement
 Recognises that more than one measurement basis may
sometimes be relevant (ED/2015/3: para. 6.74)
8
7 Presentation and  Information provided in the notes to the financial statements

disclosure (ED/2015/3: para. 7.3):
– Information about the nature of both recognised and
unrecognised elements and risks arising from them
– Methods, assumptions and judgements (and changes in
them) that affect amounts presented or disclosed
 Use of presentation and disclosure as communication tools
includes (ED/2015/3: para. 7.8):
– Classifying information in a structured manner
– Aggregating information so that it is not obscured by
unnecessary detail
– Using presentation and disclosure objectives and
principles rather than mechanistic rules
 Purpose of statement of profit or loss (P/L) (primary source of
information about performance) is to (ED/2015/3: para.
7.20):
– Depict the return that an entity has made on its
economic resources during the period; and
– Provide information that is helpful in assessing
prospects for future cash flows and in assessing
management's stewardship of the entity's resources.
The view expressed by some
investors/users of financial  New principles for splitting information about financial
statements is that the current IFRS performance into P/L and other comprehensive income
guidance on OCI is inconsistent,
(OCI): rebuttable presumption all items of income and
complex and difficult to understand.
The IASB has been asked to define expenses are reported in P/L (ED/2015/3: para. 7.23)
what financial performance is,
clarify the meaning and importance
 Can only be rebutted (and recognised in OCI) if
of OCI and how the distinction (ED/2015/3: para. 7.24):
between P/L and OCI should be
made in practice. – The income or expenses (or components of them) relate
Although the ED does not provide to assets or liabilities measured at current values and
definitive guidance on what should are not separately identifiable components that would
be reported in OCI, it is a step
forward compared to the current still arise if the asset/liability was measured at historical
Conceptual Framework .
1
cost (eg interest); and
– Excluding those income or expenses (or components)
from P/L would enhance the relevance of the
information for the period
 Rebuttable presumption that income and expenses reported
in OCI will be reclassified to P/L in a future period
providing doing so would enhance the information included
in P/L in the future period (ED/2015/3: para. 7.26)
8 Concepts of capital  Capital maintenance concepts retained as before

and capital
maintenance
1
Summary Report of the Joint Outreach Investor Event, p3, 5
9
Chapter 1 Section 2.3 of the Supplementary Reading, available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition
of the Workbook, contains further detail on current developments.
2 Revenue recognition (IFRS 15)

2.1 Introduction
The core principle of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers is that an entity recognises
revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount
that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for
those goods or services (IFRS 15: para. IN7).
2.2 Key terms

There are a number of key terms defined in IFRS 15 which you need to be aware of. It is not
necessary to read through all of these immediately, but you should refer back to them as you work
through this chapter.
Income: increases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form of inflows or
enhancements of assets or decreases of liabilities that result in an increase in equity, other than those
Key term
relating to contributions from equity participants.
Revenue: income arising in the course of an entity's ordinary activities.
Contract: an agreement between two or more parties that creates enforceable rights and
obligations.
Contract asset: an entity's right to consideration in exchange for goods or services that the entity
has transferred to a customer when that right is conditioned on something other than the passage of
time (for example the entity's future performance).
Receivable: an entity's right to consideration that is unconditional – ie only the passage of time is
required before payment is due.
Contract liability: an entity's obligation to transfer goods or services to a customer for which the
entity has received consideration (or the amount is due) from the customer.
Customer: a party that has contracted with an entity to obtain goods or services that are an output
of the entity's ordinary activities in exchange for consideration.
Performance obligation: a promise in a contract with a customer to transfer to the customer
either:
(a) A good or service (or a bundle of goods or services) that is distinct; or
(b) A series of distinct goods or services that are substantially the same and that have the same
pattern of transfer to the customer.
Stand-alone selling price: the price at which an entity would sell a promised good or service
separately to a customer.
Transaction price: the amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in
exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer, excluding amounts collected on
behalf of third parties.
(IFRS 15: Appendix A)
10
2.3 Approach to revenue recognition

IFRS 15 requires an entity to recognise revenue by applying the five steps below (IFRS 15:
para. IN7):
(1) Identify contract The model applies where a contract (an agreement between two or
with the more parties that creates enforceable rights and obligations)
customer exists (IFRS 15: para. 10) and all of the following criteria are met
(IFRS 15: para. 9):
 The parties have approved the contract (in writing, orally or
implied by the entity's customary business practices)
 The entity can identify each party's rights
 The entity can identify payment terms
 The contract has commercial substance (risk, timing or amount of
future cash flows expected to change as result of contract)
 It is probable that entity will collect the consideration (customer's
ability and intention to pay that amount of consideration when it is
due).
(2) Identify At contract inception, an entity shall assess the goods and services
performance promised in a contract with a customer and shall identify as a
obligation(s) performance obligation each promise to transfer to the customer
either (IFRS 15: para. 22):
 A good or service (or a bundle of goods or services) that is
distinct (ie the customer can benefit from good or service on its
own or together with other readily available resources and the
entity's promise is separately identifiable from other promises in the
contract); or
 A series of distinct goods or services that are substantially
the same and that have the same pattern of transfer to the customer.
Note. If a promised good or service is not distinct, an entity shall
combine that good or service with other promised goods and services
until it identifies a bundle of goods or services that is distinct. (IFRS 15:
para. 30)
(3) Determine The amount to which the entity expects to be 'entitled' (IFRS 15:
transaction para. 47).
price Includes variable consideration if highly probable that significant
reversal of cumulative revenue will not occur (IFRS 15: para. 56).
Measure variable consideration at (IFRS 15: para. 53):
 Probability-weighted expected value (eg if large number of
contracts with similar characteristics); or
 Most likely amount (eg if only two possible outcomes).
Discounting is not required where consideration is due in less than one
year (where discounting is applied, present interest separately from
revenue) (IFRS 15: para. 63).
(4) Allocate Multiple deliverables: transaction price allocated to each separate

transaction performance obligation in proportion to the stand-alone selling
price to price at contract inception of each performance obligation. (IFRS 15:
performance para. 73–75)
obligations
11
(5) Recognise revenue A performance obligation is satisfied when the entity transfers a
when (or as) promised good or service (ie an asset) to a customer (IFRS 15: para 31).
performance An asset is considered transferred when (or as) the customer obtains
obligation control of that asset (IFRS 15: para 31).
satisfied
Control of an asset refers to the ability to direct the use of, and
obtain substantially all of the remaining benefits from, the asset
(IFRS 15: para 33).
Illustration 1
Allocating transaction price to multiple deliverables
A company sells a car including servicing for 2 years for $21,000. The car is sold without servicing
for $20,520 and annual servicing is sold for $540.
Required
How is the transaction price split over the different performance obligations?
Ignore discounting.
Solution
Performance obligation Stand-alone selling price % of total Revenue allocated
Car $20,520 95% $19,950 (21,000 × 95%)
Servicing ($540 × 2) $1,080 5% $1,050 (21,000 × 5%)
Total $21,600 100% $21,000
Activity 1: Revenue recognition

Jost operates in the telecommunications sector. On 1 January 20X1, Claire, a new customer,
telephones the customer services department of Jost to enter into a new 24 month contract for a
mobile phone. The terms and conditions are agreed by telephone (after a credit check is carried out
on Claire) and a written copy is then emailed and posted to Claire. Under the contract, Claire
receives a 'free' handset at the inception of the plan (ie no upfront cost) and then pays a monthly fee
of $49 for 24 months for unlimited calls, texts and data. The handset is due to be delivered by
courier within 24 hours (by evening of 2 January 20X1).
Jost also sells the same high-end smartphone handsets for $700 each and the same monthly payment
plans without the handset for $25 per month. Jost does not offer call-only contracts, texts-only
contracts or data-only contracts – customers must buy the three services combined.
Required
Discuss, with suitable calculations, for the year ended 31 December 20X1, how Jost should account
for the revenue from the contract with Claire in accordance with the five steps of IFRS 15 Revenue
from Contracts with Customers.
Note. The time value of money can be ignored in any calculations.
12
2.4 Transfer of control of a good or service

Satisfaction of a performance obligation over time
An entity transfers control of a good or service over time and, therefore, satisfies a performance
obligation and recognises revenue over time if one of the following criteria is met (IFRS 15:
para. 35):
(a) The customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by the
entity's performance as the entity performs;
(b) The entity's performance creates or enhances an asset (eg work in progress) that the
customer controls as the asset is created or enhanced; or
(c) The entity's performance does not create an asset with an alternative use to the
entity and the entity has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to
date.
For each performance obligation satisfied over time, revenue should be recognised by measuring
progress towards complete satisfaction of that performance obligation (IFRS 15: para. 39).
Satisfaction of a performance obligation at a point in time
To determine the point in time when a customer obtains control of a promised asset and an entity
satisfies a performance obligation, the entity would consider indicators of the transfer of control that
include, but are not limited to, the following (IFRS 15: para. 38):
(a) The entity has a present right to payment for the asset;
(b) The customer has legal title to the asset;
(c) The entity has transferred physical possession of the asset;
(d) The customer has the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the asset; and
(e) The customer has accepted the asset.
2.5 Contract costs

Costs of obtaining a contract
Incremental costs of obtaining a contract are recognised as an asset if the entity expects to
recover them (IFRS 15: para. 91).
Costs to fulfil a contract
If the costs to fulfil a contract are not within the scope of another standard (eg IAS 2 Inventories,
IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment or IAS 38 Intangible Assets), they should be recognised as an
asset only if they meet all of the following (IFRS 15: para. 95):
(a) The costs relate directly to a contract or an anticipated contract that the entity can specifically
identify;
(b) The costs generate or enhance resources of the entity that will be used in satisfying (or in
continuing to satisfy) performance obligations in the future; and
(c) The costs are expected to be recovered.
Amortisation and impairment of costs recognised as an asset
The asset should be amortised (to profit or loss) on a systematic basis consistent with the pattern of
transfer of the goods or services to which the asset relates (IFRS 15: para. 99).
For the costs of obtaining a contract, if the amortisation period is estimated to be one year or less,
the costs may (as a practical expedient) be recognised as an expense when incurred (IFRS 15:
para. 94).
13
An impairment loss should be recognised in profit or loss to the extent that the carrying amount
exceeds (IFRS 15: para. 101):
(a) The remaining amount of consideration that the entity expects to receive in exchange for the
goods or services to which the asset relates; less
(b) The costs that relate directly to providing those goods or services that have not yet been
recognised as expenses.
2.6 Presentation
When either party to a contract has performed, an entity shall present the contract in the statement of
financial position as a contract asset (eg if entity transfers goods or services before customer pays)
or as a contract liability (eg if customer pays before entity transfers goods or services) (IFRS 15:
para. 105).
Any unconditional rights to consideration should be shown separately as a receivable (IFRS 15:
para. 105).
2.7 Specific guidance
Type Guidance
Sale with right of  Recognise all of (IFRS 15: para. B21):

return (a) Revenue for the transferred products in the amount of
consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled (ie
revenue not recognised for products expected to be returned);
(b) A refund liability; and
(c) An asset (and corresponding adjustment to cost of sales) for its
right to recover products from customers on settling the refund
liability.
Warranties  If customer has the option to purchase a warranty separately, treat

as separate performance obligation under IFRS 15 (IFRS 15:
para. B29).
 If customer does not have the option to purchase a warranty
separately, account for the warranty in accordance with IAS 37
Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets (IFRS 15:
para. B30).
 If a warranty provides the customer with a service in addition to the
assurance that the product complies with agreed-upon specifications,
the promised service is a performance obligation (IFRS 15:
para. B32).
14
Type Guidance
Principal versus  If the entity controls the specified goods or service before transfer to a
agent customer, it is a principal (IFRS 15: para. B35)
Revenue = gross amount of consideration
 If the entity arranges for goods or services to be provided by
the other party, it is an agent (IFRS 15: para. B36)
Revenue = fee or commission
 Indicators that an entity controls the goods or services before transfer and
therefore is a principal include (IFRS 15: para. B37):
(a) The entity is primarily responsible for fulfilling the promise to provide
the specified good or service;
(b) The entity has inventory risk;
(c) The entity has discretion in establishing the price for the specified
good or service.
Non-refundable  If it is an advance payment for future goods and services, recognise

upfront fees revenue when future goods and services provided (IFRS 15:
para. B49)
the Workbook, contains further examples of the application of IFRS 15.
3 IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting

3.1 Interim financial report
Interim financial report (IAS 34): a financial report containing either a complete set of
financial statements (as described in IAS 1) or a set of condensed financial statements (as
Key term
described in IAS 34) for an interim period.
The minimum components of an interim financial report prepared in accordance with IAS 34 are:
 A condensed statement of financial position;
 A condensed statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income;
 A condensed statement of cash flows;
 A condensed statement of changes in equity; and
 Selected explanatory notes.
Condensed financial statements must include at least each of the headings and subtotals included in
the entity's most recent annual financial statements and limited explanatory notes required by the
standard.
Interim reports are voluntary as far as IAS 34 is concerned; however IAS 34 applies where an
interim report is described as complying with IFRSs, and publicly traded entities are encouraged to
provide at least half yearly interim reports. Regulators in a particular regime may require interim
reports to be published by certain companies, eg companies listed on a regulated stock exchange.
15
Reporting period and comparative figures
Interim statement Current period Comparative
Statement of financial At end of current interim At end of immediately preceding

position period financial year
Statement of profit or loss Current interim period Comparable interim period of

and other comprehensive and immediately preceding financial year
income Comparable year-to-date period of
Cumulatively for current
financial year to date immediately preceding financial year
Statement of changes in Cumulatively for current Comparable year-to-date period of

equity financial year to date immediately preceding financial year
Statement of cash flows Cumulatively for current Comparable year-to-date period of

financial year to date immediately preceding financial year
Notes to the interim financial statements

Limited notes to the interim financial statements are required. They should include an explanation of
events and transactions that are significant to an understanding of the changes in
financial position and financial performance since the end of the last annual reporting period, eg
inventory write-downs, litigation settlements, etc.
Other disclosures are required (in the notes to the interim financial statements or cross-referenced to
another statement such as management commentary) such as comments about seasonality of
interim operations, nature and amount of estimates and unusual items (due to their nature, size
or incidence), capital changes and limited segment data (for entities that apply IFRS 8).
Recognition and measurement principles
Area IAS 34 treatment
Accounting policies Same as annual financial statements, except for accounting policy
changes made since the date of the most recent financial
statements
Revenues received seasonally, Not anticipated or deferred if anticipation or deferral would not be
cyclically, or occasionally appropriate at the year end
Costs incurred unevenly Anticipated or deferred if, and only if, it is also appropriate to
anticipate or defer that type of cost at the year end
Estimates Measurement principles must be designed to ensure that the

resulting information is reliable and that all relevant material
financial information is disclosed
Interim reports generally require greater use of estimation methods
than annual reports
16
Ethics note
Ethics is a key aspect of the syllabus for this paper. Ethical issues can be examined in any part of the
paper and at least one question will include ethical issues for discussion. A revision of ethical
principles from ACCA's Code of Ethics and Conduct is covered in Chapter 2 – Professional and
ethical duty of the accountant. You need to be alert for accounting treatments that may be being used
to achieve a particular accounting effect (such as overstating revenue, profit or assets).
In terms of this topic area, some potential ethical issues that could come up include:
 Misuse of 'true and fair override' when it is not appropriate to use it
 Application of Conceptual Framework principles which result in a different accounting
treatment to that required by an IFRS (the IFRS treatment always takes precedence where there
is one)
 Application of Exposure Draft principles before they become effective where they contradict
current rules (they can only be applied from a new/revised standard's effective date, or earlier
if the new/revised standard transition rules allow)
 Manipulation of the revenue figure (and profit) through misapplication of the IFRS 15
principles.
17
Chapter summary
The financial reporting

framework
1. The accounting framework 2. Revenue recognition (IFRS 15)

IASB Conceptual Framework (1) Identify contract with customer
Chapter 1: Objective of general purpose FR Contract = an agreement that creates
 'To provide financial information about the reporting enforceable rights and obligations
entity that is useful to existing and potential (2) Identify performance obligation(s)
investors, lenders and other creditors in making For distinct goods or services (ie can benefit on
decisions about providing resources to the entity. Those own or with other readily available resources)
decisions involve buying, selling or holding equity (3) Determine transaction price
and debt instruments, and providing or settling loans and Amount to which entity expects to be entitled
other forms of credit.' – Discount to PV (not required if < 1 year)
Chapter 2: The reporting entity – Include variable consideration if highly
 Not yet finalised by IASB probable significant reversal will not arise
Chapter 3: Qualitative characteristics of useful financial (probability-weighted expected value or
most likely amount)
information
 Fundamental: (4) Allocate transaction price to
– Relevance performance obligations
– Faithful representation Based on stand-alone selling prices
 Enhancing: (5) Recognise revenue when (or as)
– Comparability – Timeliness performance obligation satisfied
– Verifiability – Understandability When good/service transferred (= when/as
 The cost constraint of FR customer obtains control)
Chapter 4: 1989 Framework 
 Underlying assumption
Satisfaction of a performance obligation over time:
– Going concern
(a) The customer simultaneously receives and
 The elements of FS
consumes the benefits provided; or
– Asset
(b) The performance creates/enhances an asset
'A resource controlled by the entity as a result of
that the customer controls as it is
past events and from which future economic created/enhanced; or
benefits are expected to flow to the entity' (c) The performance does not create an asset with
– Liability an alternative use and the entity has an
'A present obligation of the entity arising from enforceable right to payment for performance
past events, the settlement of which is expected to completed.
result in an outflow from the entity of resources Satisfaction of a performance obligation at a point
embodying economic benefits' in time:
– Income
Indicators of transfer of control of an asset:
'Increases in economic benefits during the accounting
(a) Entity has a present right to payment
period in the form of inflows or enhancements of
(b) Customer has legal title to the asset
assets or decreases of liabilities that result in
(c) Entity has transferred physical possession
increases in equity, other than those relating to (d) Customer has the significant risks and rewards
contributions from equity participants' of ownership
– Expense (e) The customer has accepted the asset
'Decreases in economic benefits during the
accounting period in the form of outflows or 
depletions of assets or incurrences of liabilities Incremental costs of obtaining a contract:
that result in decreases in equity, other than those
 Recognised as asset if expected to be
relating to distributions to equity participants'
recovered
– Equity
'The residual interest in the assets of the entity Costs to fulfil a contract:
after deducting all its liabilities'  Recognised as an asset and amortised if costs:
 Recognition in FS – Can be specifically identified,
– Probable future economic benefits – Generate/enhance resources used to satisfy
– Value/cost measured reliably performance obligation, and
– Are expected to be recovered.
 Measurement in FS
 Capital/capital maintenance
18
Current developments
ED/2015/3: Conceptual Framework for Financial 6. Measurement
Reporting (May 2015)  Revised measurement bases:
Objectives: – Historical cost
(1) To fill gaps in the existing Conceptual Framework – Current value:
(2) To update existing guidance where appropriate (i) Fair value (market participant perspective)
(3) To clarify particular areas where more guidance would be (ii) Value in use (assets) and fulfilment value
helpful. (liabilities) (entity-specific)
The Exposure Draft covers the following main Factors to consider in selecting a measurement
areas: basis/bases:
1. The objective of general purpose financial reporting  Cost constraint
 Largely unchanged  Relevance
 New section added on information about the  Faithful representation
efficiency and effectiveness of the use of the entity's  Enhancing qualitative characteristics
resources  Factors specific to initial measurement
2. Qualitative characteristics of useful financial information 7. Presentation and disclosure
 Largely unchanged, but prudence explicitly stated  Information provided in the notes to the FS:
and substance over form added to 'faithful
– Information about the nature of both recognised
representation'
and unrecognised elements and risks arising
3. Financial statements and the reporting entity
from them
 New definition of reporting entity: 'an entity that
chooses, or is required, to prepare general purpose – Methods, assumptions and judgements (and
financial statements'. Need not be a legal entity changes in them) that affect amounts presented
or disclosed
 Boundary of reporting entity:
– Direct control: 'unconsolidated' financial  Use of presentation and disclosure as
statements – investments in subsidiaries communication tools includes:
reported as assets – Classifying information in a structured manner
– Both direct control and indirect control: – Aggregating information so that it is not
'consolidated' financial statements obscured by unnecessary detail
4. The elements of financial statements – Using presentation and disclosure objectives
 Revised definitions: and principles rather than mechanistic rules
– Asset: 'a present economic resource controlled  Purpose of P/L (primary source of information about
by the entity as a result of past events' performance) is to:
– Liability: 'a present obligation of the entity to (a) Depict the return that an entity has made on its
transfer an economic resource as a result of economic resources during the period; and
past events'
(b) Provide information that is helpful in assessing
– Economic resource: 'a right that has the
prospects for future cash flows and in assessing
potential to produce economic benefits'
management's stewardship of the entity's
 Definition of 'unit of account' for measurement resources.
added:
 Rebuttable presumption all items of income and
– 'The group of rights, the group of obligations or
expenses are reported in P/L and only rebutted
the group of rights and obligations, to which
(and recognised in OCI) if:
recognition and measurement requirements are
applied', but determination left to individual (a) The income or expenses (or components of
standards them) relate to assets or liabilities measured at
current values and are not separately
5. Recognition and derecognition
identifiable components that would still arise if
 Recognise all assets and liabilities (and related the asset/liability was measured at historical
income, expenses and equity) if provide users with: cost (eg interest); and
(a) Relevant information about the element
(b) Excluding those income or expenses (or
(b) A faithful representation of the element
components) from P/L would enhance the
(c) Information that results in benefits exceeding
relevance of the information for the period
the costs of providing it
 Rebuttable presumption that income and expenses
 Derecognition principles added:
reported in OCI will be reclassified to P/L in a
– Derecognise assets/liabilities that have been
future period (providing doing so would enhance
transferred, consumed, collected or fulfilled, or
the information included in P/L)
have expired and recognise any resulting
income or expense, and 8. Concepts of capital and capital maintenance
– Continue to recognise assets/liabilities  Capital maintenance concepts retained as before
retained, which become a separate unit of
account
19
3. Interim financial reporting
(IAS 34)
 Interim reports are voluntary, but must
comply with IAS 34 if described as
complying with IFRSs
 Minimum components:
– Condensed SOFP, SPLOCI,
SOCF, SOCIE
– Selected explanatory notes
 Accounting policies same as annual FS
 Seasonal/cyclical revenue/costs only
anticipated/deferred if also
appropriate at year end
20
1. The accounting framework

The Conceptual Framework establishes the objectives and principles underlying financial
statements and underlies the development of new standards.
The IASB is developing a new Conceptual Framework which will underlie future standard
development.
2. Revenue recognition (IFRS 15)
IFRS 15 requires the following 5 steps to be applied:
(i) Identify contract with customer
(ii) Identify performance obligation(s)
(iii) Determine transaction price
(iv) Allocate transaction price to performance obligations
(v) Recognise revenue when (or as) performance obligation satisfied.
21
Further study guidance
Question practice
Now try the question below from the Further question practice bank:
Q1 Conceptual Framework
Further reading
There are articles on the ACCA website written by members of the SBR examining team which are
relevant to the topics covered in this chapter and which would be useful to read:
Measurement
Revenue revisited – Parts 1 and 2
What differentiates profit or loss from other comprehensive income?
Bin the clutter (Reducing disclosures)
www.accaglobal.com/uk/en/student/exam-support-resources/professional-exams-study-
resources/p2/technical-articles.html
22
Professional and
ethical duty of the
accountant
Learning objectives
Syllabus
reference no.
Appraise and discuss the ethical and professional issues in advising on corporate A1(a)
reporting.
Assess the relevance and importance of ethical and professional issues in A1(b)
complying with accounting standards.
Appraise the potential ethical implications of professional and managerial A2(a)

decisions in the preparation of corporate reports.
Assess the consequences of not upholding ethical principles in the preparation of A2(b)
corporate reports.
Identify related parties and assess the implications of related party relationships in A2(c)
the preparation of corporate reports.
Discuss and apply the judgements required in selecting and applying accounting C11(d)
policies, accounting for changes in estimates and reflecting corrections of prior
period errors.
Exam context
Ethics are most likely to be considered in the context of the accountant's role as adviser to the
directors. For example, you could be asked why a deliberate misrepresentation in the financial
statements was unethical or why directors might have acted unethically in adopting accounting
policies specifically to boost earnings. Ethical issues will be tested in Section A Question 2, which
will cover a number of scenarios. Two professional marks are allocated to this question. However,
ethics could also feature in any question in the exam.
IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures aims to improve the quality of information provided by published
accounts and also to strengthen their stewardship roles. Related parties could also come up outside
the context of ethics as part of a Section B scenario question.
IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors was covered in your earlier
studies. However, given the importance of ethics to the Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) exam, we
set it in the context of ethical dilemmas in financial reporting.
23
Chapter overview
Professional and ethical

duty of the accountant
3. Accounting
1. Professional and policies, estimates
2. Related parties
ethical issues and prior period
errors
24
2: Professional and ethical duty of the accountant
1 Professional and ethical issues

1.1 What are ethics?
Ethics are a code of moral principles that people follow with respect to what is right or wrong.
Ethical principles are not necessarily enforced by law, although the law incorporates moral
judgements. (Murder is wrong ethically, and is also punishable legally.)
1.2 Ethical principles in corporate reporting

ACCA's Code of Ethics and Conduct identifies the fundamental principles most relevant to
accountants in business involved in corporate reporting (ACCA Rulebook, 2017: p.278).
Principle Explanation
Integrity To be straightforward and honest in all professional and business relationships
Objectivity Not to allow bias, conflict of interest or undue influence of others to override
professional or business judgements
Professional To maintain professional knowledge and skill at the level required to ensure
competence and that a client or employer receives competent professional service based on
due care current developments in practice, legislation and techniques and act diligently
and in accordance with applicable technical and professional standards
Confidentiality To respect the confidentiality of information acquired as a result of

professional and business relationships and, therefore, not disclose any
such information to third parties without proper and specific authority, unless
there is a legal or professional right or duty to disclose, nor use the information
for the personal advantage of the professional accountant or third parties
Professional To comply with relevant laws and regulations and avoid any action that
behaviour discredits the profession
1.3 Threats to the fundamental principles

ACCA's Code of Ethics and Conduct identifies the following categories of threats to the fundamental
principles (ACCA Rulebook, 2017: p.280).
Threat Explanation
Self-interest A financial or other interest may inappropriately influence the accountant's

judgement or behaviour.
Self-review The accountant may not appropriately evaluate the results of a previous judgement
made or activity or service performed by themselves or others within their firm.
Advocacy A threat that the accountant promotes the client's or employer's position to the
point that their objectivity is compromised.
Familiarity Due to a long or close relationship with a client or employer, the accountant may
be too sympathetic to their interests or too accepting of their work.
Intimidation The accountant may not act objectively due to actual or perceived pressures.
25
Where the above threats exist, appropriate safeguards must be put in place to eliminate or reduce
them to an acceptable level. Safeguards against breach of compliance with the ACCA Code include:
(a) Safeguards created by the profession, legislation or regulation (eg corporate governance)
(b) Safeguards within the client/the accountancy firm's own systems and procedures
(c) Educational training and experience requirements for entry into the profession, together with
continuing professional development.
1.4 Ethical considerations in financial reporting

In preparing financial statements or advising on corporate reporting, a variety of ethical problems
may arise:
(a) Professional competence is clearly a key issue when decisions are made about
accounting treatments and disclosures. Company directors and their advisers have a duty to
keep up to date with developments in IFRSs and other relevant regulations.
Circumstances that may threaten the ability of accountants in these roles to perform their duties
with the appropriate degree of professional competence and due care include:
 Insufficient time
 Incomplete, restricted or inadequate information
 Insufficient experience, training or education
 Inadequate resources
(b) Objectivity and integrity may be threatened in a number of ways:
 Financial interests, such as profit-related bonuses or share options
 Inducements to encourage unethical behaviour
(c) ACCA's Code of Ethics and Conduct identifies that accountants may be pressurised, either
externally or by the possibility of personal gain, to become associated with misleading
information. The Code clearly states that members should not be associated with reports,
returns, communications or other information where they believe that the information:
 Contains a materially misleading statement;
 Contains statements or information furnished recklessly;
 Has been prepared with bias; or
 Omits or obscures information required to be included where such omission or obscurity
would be misleading.
IAS 1 and fair presentation
ACCA's Code of Ethics and Conduct forbids members from being associated with 'misleading'
information, but IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements goes further, and requires that an entity
must 'present fairly' its financial position, financial performance and cash flows. 'Present fairly' is
explained as representing faithfully the effects of transactions. In general terms this will be the case if
IFRS is adhered to. IAS 1 states that departures from international standards are only allowed:
 In extremely rare cases; or
 Where compliance with IFRS would be so misleading as to conflict with the objectives of
financial statements as set out in the Conceptual Framework, that is, to provide information
about financial position, performance and changes in financial position that is useful to a wide
range of users.
26
IAS 1 expands on this principle as follows:
 Compliance with IFRS should be disclosed.

 Financial statements can only be described as complying with IFRS if they comply with all the
requirements of IFRS.
 Use of inappropriate accounting policies cannot be rectified either by disclosure or
explanatory material.
'Compliance' is necessary, but not sufficient for fair presentation. 'Fairness' is an ethical concept,
directed at giving the users of financial statements the opportunity to see the full picture of an entity's
position and performance.
1.5 Framework for decisions

ACCA has developed an overall framework to help its members make ethical decisions in a wide
range of circumstances:
What is the real issue?
Are there threats to compliance with

the fundamental principles?
Non-material
items would not
be significant.
Are the threats clearly significant?
Are there safeguards that will

eliminate the threats or reduce them
to an acceptable level?
Can you face yourself in the mirror?
Illustration 1
Ethical issues
(a) ACCA's Code of Ethics and Conduct identifies a number of threats to its fundamental ethical
principles.
Jake has been put under significant pressure by his manager to change the conclusion of a
report he has written which reflects badly on the manager's performance.
Required
Which ethical threat is Jake facing?
(b) Which of the following might (or might be thought to) affect the objectivity of providers of
professional accounting services?
27

Failure to keep up to date with continuing professional development (CPD)
A personal financial interest in the client's affairs
Being negligent or reckless with the accuracy of the information provided to

the client
Solution
(a) The answer is intimidation, as indicated by 'significant pressure'.
(b)

Failure to keep up to date with CPD
A personal financial interest in the client's affairs 
Being negligent or reckless with the accuracy of the information provided to

the client
A personal financial interest in the client's affairs will affect objectivity. Failure to keep up to
date on continuing professional development is an issue of professional competence, while
providing inaccurate information reflects upon professional integrity.
1.6 Exam scenarios

The exam may present you with a scenario, typically containing an array of detail much of which is
potentially relevant. The problem, however, will be one or other of two basic types.
(a) A manager/superior has requested an employee/subordinate to perform an action which is
not justified by accounting standards or is not morally acceptable.
For example, the Managing Director (A) wants the Financial Accountant (B) to make a change in
accounting policy (C), where this is not justified by IAS 8 (D).
(b) Alternatively, the problem may be that the Managing Director has already performed an
action which is not justified by accounting standards or is not morally acceptable, an
employee or external auditor has discovered this action and is now required to respond
appropriately to the issue.
Illustration 2
Takeover
Your Finance Director has asked you to join a team that is planning a takeover of one of your
company's suppliers. An old school friend works as an accountant for the supplier. The Finance
Director knows this, and has asked you to try and find out 'anything that might help the takeover
succeed, but it must remain secret'.
Solution
There are three issues here.
First, you have a conflict of interest as the Finance Director wants you to keep the takeover a secret,
but you probably feel that you should tell your friend what is happening as it may affect their job.
28
Second, the Finance Director is asking you to deceive your friend. Deception is unprofessional
behaviour and is in breach of your ethical guidelines. The situation is presenting you with two
conflicting demands. It is worth remembering that no employer can ask you to break your ethical
rules.
Finally, the request to break your own ethical guidelines constitutes unprofessional behaviour by the
Finance Director. You should weigh up whether blowing the whistle internally would prove effective;
if not, consider reporting them to their relevant professional body.
Activity 1: Ethical issues

Kelshall is a public limited company. The current year end is 31 December 20X5. The Finance
Director is remunerated with a profit-related bonus and share appreciation rights. (Share
appreciation rights mean that the director will become entitled to a future cash payment based on the
increase in the entity's share price from a specified level over a specified period of time.)
Kelshall owns a significant number of owner-occupied properties which historically have been held
under the revaluation model. Recently, due to an economic downturn, property prices have been
falling. The Finance Director is proposing to switch from the revaluation model to the cost model.
Shortly before the year end, the CEO of Kelshall, who holds a large number of share options,
mentioned to the Finance Director that he was hoping to retire within the next year and was hoping
to maximise Kelshall's share price by his retirement date.
Required
(a) Discuss the view that the board of directors should be remunerated with profit-related pay and
share-based payment to align directors' and stakeholders' interests.
(b) Discuss whether the Finance Director of Kelshall would be acting ethically if he revised the
accounting policy for its properties from the revaluation model to the cost model.
(c) Discuss whether the CEO's comment to the Finance Director is ethical and what action, if any,
the Finance Director should take.
Mention the theories

1.7 The role of moral philosophy and theory in ethics only if relevant in the
context of a practical
Ethical theories answer.
(a) Do ethics change over time and place?

• Ethical relativism = YES (ethics vary between different ages & different communities)
• Ethical absolutism = NO (some courses of action are always right, others are always
wrong)
For example, a total ban on meat-eating would be ethically absolutist, while allowing it where the
animal has been reared in a 'cruelty-free' environment would be ethically relativist.
(b) Lawrence Kohlberg's thought processes people use when making ethical decisions
From less 'ethically developed' individuals to more 'ethically developed' individuals:
(i) You should act ethically because you'll be punished if you don't.
(ii) You should act ethically because your country's laws say you should.
(iii) You should act ethically because it's always right to do so, no matter what the
consequences and costs are to you personally.
(Kohlberg, 1981)
29
Influences on ethics
(a) Individual factors
 Age and gender
 National and cultural beliefs
 Education and employment
 Psychological factors
 How much influence individuals believe they have
 Personal integrity
 Moral imagination (level of awareness of variety of moral consequences of actions)
(b) Situational factors
 Issue-related factors – nature of issue and how it is viewed in the organisation
 Context-related factors – expectations and demands that will be placed on people
working in an organisation (eg systems of reward, authority, bureaucracy, work roles,
organisational culture).
See Chapter 2 Section 1 of the Supplementary Reading, available in Appendix 2 of the digital
edition of the Workbook, for more detail on influences on ethics.
Social responsibility and businesses

Some argue that the only social responsibility of a business is to maximise shareholder wealth
because:
 If the business is owned by the shareholders the assets of the company are, ultimately, the
shareholders' property. It is for the shareholders to determine how their assets should be used,
and they would generally wish it to be used to maximise their returns.
 Maximising wealth is the best way that society can benefit from a business's activities, eg,
increasing tax revenue.
On the other hand, good corporate citizenship may be good for business performance because of
the attitude of other stakeholders:
 Customers may prefer to buy from a company that is perceived as being socially responsible.
 Employees may prefer to work for such a company.
 Investors may prefer such a company, as shown by the existence of ethical funds.
 Constructive engagement with the community/country in which a business operates may result
in it being seen as a good long-term investment.
edition of the Workbook, for more detail on social responsibility and businesses.
Ethics in organisations
Organisations contain a variety of ethical systems:
 Personal ethics (eg from upbringing, religious beliefs, political opinions, personality)
 Professional ethics (eg ACCA's Code of Ethics and Conduct)
 Organisational culture (eg 'customer first')
 Organisation systems (eg ethics may be contained in a formal code reinforced by 'values'
statement)
30
Approaches to managing ethics within organisations Compliance-based is

becoming more common.
(a) Compliance-based approach
This ensures that the company acts within the letter of the law and that violations are
prevented, detected and punished.
(b) Integrity-based approach
Wider remit than compliance based approach. This combines concern for the law with
emphasis on managerial responsibility for ethical behaviour.
edition of the Workbook, for more detail on managing ethics within organisations and an additional
question on ethical issues.
2 Related parties
2.1 Related parties
Related party relationships and transactions are a normal feature of business. However, there is a
general presumption that transactions reflected in financial statements have been carried out on an
arm's length basis, unless disclosed otherwise.
Arm's length means on the same terms as could have been negotiated with an external party, in
which each side bargained knowledgeably and freely, unaffected by any relationship between them.
Even if a transaction with a related party is at market value, the shareholders need to know if it is not
at arm's length, because the relationship could influence future transactions.
Identifying the related party relationship will be more important in your exam
than long lists of disclosures, so there is no shortcut to learning the definition
of related party.
Related party (IAS 24): a person or entity that is related to the entity that is preparing its
financial statements (the 'reporting entity').
Key term
(a) A person or a close member of that person's family is related to a reporting entity if that
person:
(i) Has control or joint control over the reporting entity;
(ii) Has significant influence over the reporting entity; or
(iii) Is a member of the key management personnel of the reporting entity or of a
parent of the reporting entity.
(b) An entity is related to a reporting entity if any of the following conditions apply:
(i) The entity and the reporting entity are members of the same group (which means
that each parent, subsidiary and fellow subsidiary is related to the others).
(ii) One entity is an associate* or joint venture* of the other entity (or an associate or
joint venture of a member of a group of which the other entity is a member).
(iii) Both entities are joint ventures* of the same third party.
(iv) One entity is a joint venture* of a third entity and the other entity is an
associate of the third entity.
31
(v) The entity is a post-employment benefit plan for the benefit of employees of either
the reporting entity or an entity related to the reporting entity.
(vi) The entity is controlled or jointly controlled by a person identified in (a).
(vii) A person identified in (a)(i) has significant influence over the entity or is a member
of the key management personnel of the entity (or of a parent of the entity).
(viii) The entity, or any member of a group of which it is a part, provides key
management personnel services to the reporting entity or the parent of the
reporting entity.
*including subsidiaries of the associate or joint venture
(IAS 24: para. 9)
Close members of the family of a person are defined (IAS 24: para. 9) as 'those family
members who may be expected to influence, or be influenced by, that person in their dealings with
the entity and include:
 That person's children and spouse or domestic partner;
 Children of that person's spouse or domestic partner; and
 Dependants of that person or that person's spouse or domestic partner.'
In considering each possible related party relationship, attention is directed to the substance of the
relationship, and not merely the legal form.
Is there control or influence
in practice?
2.2 Not related parties
The following are not related parties (IAS 24: para. 11):
(a) Two entities simply because they have a director or other member of key management
personnel in common, or because a member of key management personnel of one entity has
significant influence over the other entity;
(b) Two venturers simply because they share joint control over a joint venture:
(c) (i) Providers of finance;
(ii) Trade unions;
(iii) Public utilities; and
(iv) Departments and agencies of a government;
simply by virtue of their normal dealings with an entity (even though they may affect the
freedom of action of an entity or participate in its decision-making process); and
(d) A customer, supplier, franchisor, distributor, or general agent with whom an entity transacts a
significant volume of business, simply by virtue of the resulting economic dependence.
2.3 Disclosure
IAS 24 requires an entity to disclose the following:
(a) The name of its parent and, if different, the ultimate controlling party irrespective of
whether there have been any transactions.
(b) Total key management personnel compensation (broken down by category)
(c) If the entity has had related party transactions:
(i) Nature of the related party relationship
(ii) Information about the transactions and outstanding balances, including
commitments and bad and doubtful debts necessary for users to understand
the potential effect of the relationship on the financial statements.
No disclosure is required of intragroup related party transactions in the consolidated financial
statements.
32
Items of a similar nature may be disclosed in aggregate except where separate disclosure is
necessary for understanding purposes.
2.4 Government-related entities

If the reporting entity is a government-related entity (ie a government has control, joint control
or significant influence over the entity), an exemption is available from full disclosure of
transactions, outstanding balances and commitments with the government or with other entities
related to the same government.
However, if the exemption is applied, disclosure is required of:
(a) The name of the government and nature of the relationship
(b) The nature and amount of each individually significant transaction (plus a qualitative or
quantitative indication of the extent of other transactions which are collectively, but not
individually, significant).
(IAS 24: paras. 24–26)
Illustration 3
Related party issues
Fancy Feet Co is a UK company which supplies handmade leather shoes to a chain of high street
shoe shops. The company is also the sole importer of some famous high quality Greek stoneware
which is supplied to an upmarket shop in London's West End.
Fancy Feet Co was set up 30 years ago by Georgios Kostades. The company is owned and run by
Mr Kostades and his three children.
The shoes are purchased from a French company, the shares of which are owned by the Kostades
Family Trust (Monaco).
Required
Identify the financial accounting issues arising out of the above scenario.
Solution
Issues
(a) The basis on which Fancy Feet trades with the Greek supplier and the French company owned
by the Kostades family trust.
(b) Whether the overseas companies trade on commercial terms with the UK company or whether
the foreign entities control the UK company.
(c) Who owns the Greek company: is this a related party under the provisions of IAS 24?
(d) If the nature of trade suggests a related party controls Fancy Feet Co, detailed disclosures will
be required in the accounts.
Activity 2: Related parties (1)

Leoval is a private manufacturing company that makes car parts. It is 90% owned by Cavelli, a listed
entity. Cavelli is a long-established company controlled by the Grassi family through an agreement
which pools their voting rights.
Leoval regularly provides parts at market price to another company in which Francesca Cincetti has
a minority (23%) holding. Francesca Cincetti is the wife of Roberto Grassi, one of the key Grassi
family shareholders that controls Cavelli.
33
Leoval advances interest-free loans to its employees in order for them to purchase annual season
tickets to get to work. The loan repayment is deducted in 12 instalments from the employees'
salaries.
Cavelli charges Leoval an annual management services fee of 20% of profit before tax (before
accounting for the fee).
30% of Leoval's revenue comes from transactions with a major car maker, Piat.
Leoval provides a defined benefit pension plan for its employees based on 2% of final salary for
each year worked. The plan is currently overfunded and so Leoval has not made any contributions
during the current year.
Required
Explain whether disclosures are required for each of the above pieces of information by IAS 24
Related Party Disclosures.

Discuss whether the following events would require disclosure in the financial statements of the
RP Group, a public limited company, under IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures.
The RP Group, merchant bankers, has a number of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures in its
group structure. During the financial year to 31 October 20X9 the following events occurred:
(a) RP agreed to finance a management buyout of a group company, AB, a limited company. In
addition to providing loan finance, RP has retained a 25% equity holding in AB and has a
main board director on the board of AB. RP received management fees, interest payments and
dividends from AB.
(b) On 1 July 20X9, RP sold a wholly owned subsidiary, X, a limited company, to Z, a public
limited company. During the year RP supplied X with second-hand office equipment and X
leased its factory from RP. The transactions were all contracted for at market rates.
(c) The retirement benefit scheme of the RP is managed by another merchant bank. An investment
manager of the RP retirement benefit scheme is also a non-executive director of the RP Group
and received an annual fee for his services of $25,000 which is not material in the group
context. RP pays $16m per annum into the scheme and occasionally transfers assets into the
scheme. In 20X9, property, plant and equipment of $10m were transferred into the scheme
and a recharge of administrative costs of $3m was made.
3 Accounting policies, estimates and prior period errors

3.1 Accounting policies
Accounting policies (IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors): the
specific principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices applied by an entity in preparing and
Key term
presenting financial statements (IAS 8: para. 5).
IAS 8 requires that an entity selects its accounting policies by applying the relevant IFRS (IAS 8:
para. 7).
Some standards permit a choice of accounting policies (eg cost and revaluation models).
In the absence of an IFRS covering a specific transaction, other event or condition,
management uses its judgement to develop an accounting policy which results in
34
information that is relevant to the economic decision-making needs of users and

reliable, considering in the following order:
(a) IFRSs dealing with similar and related issues;
(b) The Conceptual Framework definitions of elements of the financial statements and recognition
criteria; and
(c) The most recent pronouncements of other national GAAPs based on a similar conceptual
framework and accepted industry practice (providing the treatment does not conflict with
extant IFRSs or the Conceptual Framework).
(IAS 8: para. 10)
A change in accounting policy is only permitted if the change (IAS 18: para. 14):
 Is required by an IFRS; or
 Results in financial statements providing reliable and more relevant information.
The accounting treatment for a change in accounting policy is (IAS 18: para. 19, 22):
Prior period adjustment • Adjust opening balance

(apply new policy of each affected
retrospectively unless component of equity
transitional provision of
IFRS specifies otherwise) • Restate comparatives
3.2 Accounting estimates

As a result of the uncertainties inherent in business activities, many items in financial statements
cannot be measured with precision but can only be estimated. Estimation involves judgements based
on the latest reliable information. (IAS 8: para. 32)
For example, estimates may be required of (IAS 8: para. 32):
 Bad debts;
 Inventory obsolescence;
 The fair value of financial assets or financial liabilities;
 The useful lives of, or expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefits
embodied in, depreciable assets; and
 Warranty obligations.
Change in accounting estimate (IAS 8): an adjustment of the carrying amount of an asset or a
liability, or the amount of periodic consumption of an asset, that results from the assessment of the
Key term
present status of, and expected future benefits and obligations associated with assets and liabilities.
(IAS 8: para. 5)
'An estimate may need revision if changes occur in the circumstances on which the estimate
was based or as a result of new information or more experience. By its nature, the revision of an
estimate does not relate to prior periods and is not the correction of an error.' (IAS 8: para. 34)
The accounting treatment for a change in accounting estimate is (IAS 8: para. 36–38):
35
• Adjust in the period of
Apply the change change (and in future
prospectively periods if the change
affects both)
• Restate comparatives
3.3 Prior period errors
Prior period errors (IAS 8): omissions from, and misstatements in, the entity's financial
statements for one or more prior periods arising from a failure to use, or misuse of, reliable
Key term
information that:
(a) Was available when the financial statements for those periods were authorised for issue; and
(b) Could reasonably be expected to have been obtained and taken into account in the
preparation and presentation of those financial statements.
(IAS 8: para. 5)
They may arise from:

(a) Mathematical mistakes
(b) Mistakes in applying accounting policies
(c) Oversights
(d) Misinterpretation of facts
(e) Fraud
Accounting treatment
An entity corrects material prior period errors retrospectively in the first set of financial statements
authorised for issue after their discovery by:
(a) Restating comparative amounts for each prior period presented in which the error occurred;
(b) (If the error occurred before the earliest prior period presented) restating the opening balances
of assets, liabilities and equity for the earliest prior period presented; and
(c) Including any adjustment to opening equity as the second line of the statement of changes in
equity.
Where it is impracticable to determine the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the error,
the entity corrects the error from the earliest period/date practicable (and discloses that fact).
36
3.4 Creative accounting

Whilst still following international financial reporting standards, there is scope in choice of
accounting policy and use of judgement in accounting estimates to select the accounting treatment
that presents the financial statements in the best light rather than focusing on the most relevant and
reliable accounting policy or estimate.
 Timing of transactions may be delayed/speeded up to improve results
 Profit smoothing through choice of accounting policy eg inventory valuation
 Classification of items eg expenses versus non-current assets
 Off balance sheet financing to improve gearing and return on capital employed eg
operating lease
 Revenue recognition policies eg through adopting an aggressive accounting policy of
early recognition.
When the directors select and adopt the accounting policies and estimates of an entity, they need to
apply the principles in ACCA's Code of Ethics and Conduct.
Activity 4: Revising accounting policies and estimates

Required
Which of the following could be considered unethical reasons for revising accounting policies or
estimates?
Tick the options which could be perceived to be unethical, giving reasons for your choice.
Unethical? Revision to accounting policy or estimate and reason

(Tick)
Increasing the useful life of an asset because large profits on disposal in recent
years indicate that the previous estimated life was too short
Reducing the allowance for doubtful debts from 5% to 3% of trade receivables to

meet forecast profit targets
Not equity accounting for an associate in the current year because the Finance
Director failed to realise a relationship of significant influence in the prior year
Classifying redeemable preference shares as equity to meet the gearing and

interest cover loan covenants
Reclassifying an expense from cost of sales to administrative expenses to align

the entity's accounting policy to other entities operating in the same industry
37
Ethics note
This chapter introduced the concept of ethical principles and illustrated some of the ethical dilemmas
you could come across in your exam and in practice. You are likely to meet ethics in the context of
manipulation of financial statements. Whereas in this chapter the issues were mainly limited to topics
you have covered in your earlier studies, you will come across ethical issues in connection with more
advanced topics, such as foreign subsidiaries.
The common thread running through each ethical dilemma is generally that someone with power, for
example a company director, wants you to deviate from IFRS in order to present the financial
statements in a more favourable light. The answer will always be that this should be resisted, but in
each case it must be argued with reference to the detail of the IFRS in question, not just in terms of
general principles.
38
Chapter summary
Professional and ethical

duty of the accountant
1. Professional and
2. Related parties
ethical issues
 Related parties  Disclosure

 Not related (see next page)
parties
Ethical principles in Complying with accounting Morality and ethics

corporate reporting standards  Ethical theory:
ACCA Code of Ethics and Ethical problems on preparing FS/ Ethical relativism vs ethical absolutism
Conduct advising on corporate reporting: – Ethics does vs does not change
 Objectivity  Duty of professional competence: over time
– Insufficient time Kohlberg's ethical thought process:
 Integrity
(1) Act ethically because punished
 Professional – Incomplete/ if do not
competence and due inadequate information (2) Act ethically because law says so
care – Insufficient training/experience (3) Act ethically because it is right to
 Confidentiality – Inadequate resources do so
 Influences on ethics:
 Professional behaviour  Threats to fundamental principles: – Individual factors, eg age, education
– Self-interest – Situational factors, eg entity culture
– Self-review
– Advocacy
Framework for  Social responsibility
– Familiarity
decisions – Only focus on maximising
– Intimidation
What is the real issue? shareholder wealth for
  Prohibition of association with reports both shareholders and
Are there threats to that: other stakeholders.
compliance with – Are materially misleading – Alternative view: business
fundamental principles? – performance can be
Contain reckless information
 enhanced by good
– Are biased
Are the threats significant? corporate citizenship
 – Omit/obscure information  Ethical systems in
Are there safeguards that organisations:
will eliminate them/ – Personal ethics
reduce them to an – Professional ethics
acceptable level? – Organisational culture
 – Organisation's systems
Can you face yourself in  Managing ethics in
the mirror? organisations:
– Compliance-based
approach
– Integrity-based approach
39
2. Related parties
Related party Disclosure
A person (or close family member) if that Reasons for disclosure, to identify:
person:  Controlling party
(i) Has control or joint control (over the  Transactions with directors
reporting entity);  Group transactions that would not otherwise
(ii) Has significant influence; or occur
(iii) Is key management personnel of the  Artificially high/low prices
entity or of its direct or indirect parents  'Hidden' costs (free services provided)
An entity if:
(i) A member of the same group (each
parent, subsidiary and fellow subsidiary is  Name of parent (and
related) ultimate controlling  Key management
(ii) One entity is an associate*/joint party) (irrespective of personnel
venture* of the other whether transactions compensation
(iii) Both entities are joint ventures* of the have occurred)
same third party
(iv) One entity is a joint venture* of a third  For transactions:
entity and the other entity is an
– Nature of relationship
associate of the third entity.
– Amount
(v) It is a post-employment benefit plan – Outstanding balance (including
for employees of the reporting commitments)
entity/related entity – Bad & doubtful debts
(vi) It is controlled or jointly controlled by
 Similar items may be disclosed in
any person identified above
aggregate except where separate
(vii) A person with control/joint control has
disclosure is necessary for
significant influence over or is key
understanding
management personnel of the entity
(or of a parent of the entity)  No disclosure req'd of intragroup
(viii) It (or another member of its group) provides transactions in consolidated FS (as are
key management personnel eliminated)
services to the reporting entity (or to its  Government related entities (ie where a
parent) gov't has control/joint control or
* including subs of the associate/joint venture significant influence), for transactions
with the government/ entities related to
same government, only need to
disclose:
– Name of government
Not related parties – Nature of relationship
– Nature and amount of each
(a) Two entities simply because they have a individually significant transaction
director/key manager in common
(b) Two venturers simply because they share joint
control over a joint venture;
(c) (i) Providers of finance;
(ii) Trade unions;
(iii) Public utilities;
(iv) Government departments and agencies;
simply by virtue of their normal dealings
with the entity.
(d) A customer, supplier, franchisor, distributor or
general agent with whom an entity transacts a
significant volume of business, simply by virtue
of the resulting economic dependence
40
3. Accounting
policies, estimates
and prior period
errors
Accounting policies
Specific principles, bases, conventions
applied by an entity in
preparing/presenting financial
statements
To choose:
(1) Apply relevant IFRS (choice within
IFRS is a matter of accounting
policy)
(2) Consult IFRS dealing with similar
issues
(3) Conceptual Framework
(4) Other national GAAP
Change in policy:
Apply retrospectively unless
transitional provision of IFRS specifies
otherwise
Accounting estimates
Judgements based on latest reliable
information
Change in estimate
Apply prospectively ie adjust current and
future periods
Errors
Omissions and misstatements in for one or
more prior periods arising from a failure
to use, or misuse of, reliable information
Correct by restating the comparative
figures, or, if they occurred in an earlier
period, by adjusting opening reserves
41
1. Professional and ethical issues

 In all areas of professional work, whether in practice or in business, ACCA members and
students must carry out their work with regard to the fundamental principles of professional
ethics.
 A person's moral standing, which can be influenced by a number of factors may be
relevant to their ethical behaviour.
 Two important ethical theories are ethical relativism (ethics change over time and place)
and ethical absolutism (some actions are always right, others always wrong).
 Ethical systems include: personal ethics, professional ethics (eg ACCA Code),
organisational culture and organisation systems
 The ACCA's fundamental ethical principles are:
– Integrity
– Objectivity
– Professional competence
– Confidentiality
– Professional behaviour
2. Related parties
 Related parties
– IAS 24 identifies persons or entities as related where there is a close personal
relationship to the entity or a control, joint control or significant influence
relationship.
– In any case, the substance of the relationship is considered when deciding
whether parties are related.
 Not related parties
– IAS 24 identifies parties which are not related in their normal dealings with the
entity.
 Disclosure
– Disclosure is important so the user can estimate the effects of related party
transactions. IAS 24 requires disclosure of the entity's parent/ultimate parent,
benefits earned by key management personnel and transactions with
related parties.
3. Accounting policies, estimates and prior period errors

 Accounting policies:
– Specific principles, bases, conventions applied by an entity in preparing/presenting
financial statements
– Change in policy: apply retrospectively unless transitional provision of IFRS specifies
otherwise
 Accounting estimates
– Accounting estimates are judgements based on latest reliable information
– Change in accounting estimate: prospectively ie adjust current and future periods
42
 Prior period errors

– Omissions from, and misstatements in, the entity's financial statements for one or more
prior periods arising from a failure to use, or misuse of, reliable information
– Material prior period errors are corrected by restating the comparative figures, or, if
they occurred in an earlier period, by adjusting opening reserves
43
Question practice
Now try the questions below from the Further question practice bank.
Q2 Fundamental Principles
Q3 Ace
Further reading
The examining team for ACCA P2, the forerunner of SBR, have written an article about tackling ethics
questions in the exam, which gives some useful tips and examples, and, apart from references to the
number of marks, is still useful for SBR.
resources/p2/technical-articles/ethics.html
On the broader issue of ethical dilemmas, the following article gives some useful insights in the context of
digitisation:
www.accaglobal.com/uk/en/member/discover/cpd-articles/business-management/ethics-pathcpd.html
On related party disclosures, BPP recommends the following article in Accounting and Business
magazine. While it is written for Continuing Professional Development purposes, it is still useful for your
exam:
www.accaglobal.com/uk/en/member/discover/cpd-articles/corporate-reporting/holt-jul16.html
44
Non-current assets
Learning objectives
Syllabus
reference no.
Discuss and apply the recognition, derecognition and measurement of C2(a)

non-current assets including impairments and revaluations.
Discuss and apply the accounting treatment of investment properties including C2(c)
classification, recognition, measurement and change of use.
Discuss and apply the accounting treatment of intangible assets including the C2(d)
criteria for recognition and measurement subsequent to acquisition.
Discuss and apply the accounting treatment for borrowing costs. C2(e)
Discuss and apply the definitions of 'fair value' measurement and 'active C9(a)
market'.
Discuss and apply the 'fair value hierarchy'. C9(b)
Discuss and apply the principles of highest and best use, most advantageous C9(c)
and principal market.
Explain the circumstances where an entity may use a valuation technique. C9(d)
Discuss and apply the accounting for, and disclosure of, government grants and C11(a)
other forms of government assistance.
Discuss and apply the principles behind the initial recognition and subsequent C11(b)
measurement of a biological asset or agricultural produce.
Exam context
Non-current assets could be tested in any part of the Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) exam, either
as part of a question in Section A or B, or as a whole question in Section B. This chapter builds on
the knowledge of the standards relevant to non-current assets that you have already seen in your
earlier studies. However, questions on non-current assets in the SBR exam will be much more
challenging than those seen in your earlier studies and you will need to think critically and in-depth
about the application of the standards to the scenario.
45
Chapter overview
Non-current assets
1. Property, plant 2. Impairment of 3. Fair value

and equipment assets (IAS 36) measurement
(IAS 16) (IFRS 13)
4. Intangible assets 5. Investment property 6. Government

(IAS 38) (IAS 40) grants (IAS 20))
7. Borrowing costs (IAS 23) 8. Agriculture (IAS 41)
46
3: Non-current assets
1 Property, plant and equipment (IAS 16)

Property, plant and equipment are tangible assets with the following properties (IAS 16:
para. 6):
(a) Held by an entity for use in the production or supply of goods or services, for rental to others,
or for administrative purposes
(b) Expected to be used during more than one period
1.1 Recognition
As with all assets, recognition depends on two criteria (IAS 16: para. 7):
(a) It is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the entity
(b) The cost of the item can be measured reliably
These recognition criteria apply to subsequent expenditure as well as costs incurred initially.
IAS 16 provides additional guidance as follows (IAS 16: paras. 12–14):
• Smaller items such as tools may be classified as consumables and expensed
For further discussion rather than capitalised. Where they are capitalised, they are usually aggregated
on this, refer to and treated as one.
ACCA's article 'IAS 16
and componentisation'. • Large and complex assets should be broken down into composite parts and
See Further Study
Guidance at the end of each depreciated separately, if the parts have differing patterns of benefits
this chapter. and the cost of each is significant. Expenditure to renew individual parts can then
be capitalised.
edition of the Workbook, for further discussion of the requirements in IAS 16 relating to
componentisation and reconditioning of assets.
1.2 Measurement at recognition

Property, plant and equipment should initially be measured at cost, which includes (IAS 16:
para. 15):
Directly attributable costs

Finance costs:
Purchase price, less trade of bringing the asset to
discount/rebate
+ working condition for
+ capitalised for
qualifying assets (IAS 23)
intended use
Including: Including: See Section 7

• Import duties • Employee benefit costs
• Non-refundable • Site preparation
purchase taxes
• Initial delivery and handling
costs
• Installation and assembly
costs
• Professional fees
• Costs of testing
• Site restoration provision
(IAS 37), where not included
in cost of inventories produced
47
1.3 Measurement after recognition
After recognition, entities can chose between two models, the revaluation model and the cost model
(IAS 16: paras. 30–31):
Cost model Carry asset at cost less depreciation and any accumulated impairment
losses
Revaluation model Carry asset at revalued amount, ie fair value less subsequent
accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses
1.4 Revaluations
If the revaluation model is applied (IAS 16: para. 36):
(a) Revaluations must be carried out regularly, depending on volatility.
(b) The asset should be revalued to fair value, using the fair value hierarchy in IFRS 13.
(c) If one asset is revalued, so must be the whole of the rest of the class of assets at the same time.
(d) An increase in value is credited to other comprehensive income (OCI) (and the revaluation
surplus in equity).
(e) A decrease is an expense in profit or loss after cancelling a previous revaluation surplus.
1.5 Depreciation
An item of property, plant or equipment should be depreciated (IAS 16: para. 42).
(a) Depreciation is based on the carrying amount in the statement of financial position. It must be
determined separately for each significant part of an item.
(b) Excess over historical cost depreciation can be transferred to realised earnings through
reserves.
(c) The residual value and useful life of an asset, as well as the depreciation method, must be
reviewed at least at each financial year end. Changes are treated as changes in accounting
estimates and are accounted for prospectively as adjustments to future depreciation.
(d) Depreciation of an item does not cease when it becomes temporarily idle or is retired from
active use and held for disposal, unless it is classified as held for sale under IFRS 5.
edition of the Workbook, for further discussion of the requirements in IAS 16 relating to residual
value.
1.6 Retirements and disposals

Gains or losses are calculated by comparing net proceeds with the carrying amount of the asset and
are recognised as income/expense in profit or loss (IAS 16: para. 67).
When a revalued asset is disposed of, any revaluation surplus may be transferred directly to retained
earnings. Alternatively, it may be left in equity under the heading revaluation surplus.
1.7 Exchanges of assets

Exchanges of items of property, plant and equipment, regardless of whether the assets are similar,
are measured at fair value (IAS 16: para. 24), unless the exchange transaction lacks commercial
substance or the fair value of neither of the assets exchanged can be measured reliably.
48
If the acquired item is not measured at fair value, its cost is measured at the carrying amount of the
asset given up.
edition of the Workbook, for revision activities to test your knowledge of this topic.
2 Impairment of assets (IAS 36)

The basic principle underlying IAS 36 Impairment of Assets is relatively straightforward. If an asset's
value in the financial statements is higher than its realistic value, measured as its 'recoverable
amount', the asset is judged to have suffered an impairment loss. It should therefore be reduced in
value, by the amount of the impairment loss. The amount of the impairment loss should be
written off against profit immediately.
The main accounting issues to consider are:
(a) How is it possible to identify when an impairment loss may have occurred?
(b) How should the recoverable amount of the asset be measured?
(c) How should an impairment loss be reported in the financial statements?
2.1 Scope
IAS 36 applies to impairment of all assets other than (IAS 36: para. 2):
 Inventories
 Deferred tax assets
 Employee benefit assets
 Financial assets
 Investment property held under the fair value model
 Biological assets held at fair value less costs to sell
 Non-current assets held for sale
2.2 Identifying a potentially impaired asset

The entity should look for evidence of impairment at the end of each period and conduct an
impairment review on any asset where there is evidence of impairment. The following are
indicators of impairment (IAS 36: para. 12):
External Internal
(a) Observable indications that the (a) Evidence of obsolescence or
asset's value has declined during physical damage
the period significantly more than
(b) Significant changes with an
expected due to the passage of
adverse effect on the entity*:
time or normal use
(i) the asset becomes idle
(b) Significant changes with an
adverse effect on the entity in the (ii) plans to
technological or market discontinue/restructure the
environment, or in the economic or operation to which the asset
legal environment belongs
(c) Increased market interest rates or (iii) plans to dispose of an asset
other market rates of return before the previously
affecting discount rates and thus expected date
reducing value in use (iv) reassessing an asset's useful
(d) Carrying amount of net assets of life as finite rather than
the entity exceeds market indefinite
capitalisation. (c) Internal evidence available that
asset performance will be worse
than expected
49
*Once the asset meets the criteria to be classified as 'held for sale', it is excluded from the scope of
IAS 36 and accounted for under IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued
Operations.
Annual impairment tests, irrespective of whether there are indications of impairment, are
required for:
 Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life/not yet available for use
 Goodwill acquired in a business combination.
2.3 Measuring the recoverable amount of the asset

Assets must be carried at no more than their recoverable amount.
Recoverable Amount
= Higher of
Fair value less costs

Value in Use
of disposal
(IAS 36: para. 6)
If the carrying amount of an asset is higher that its recoverable amount, the asset is impaired and
should be written down to its recoverable amount. The difference between the carrying amount of the
impaired asset and its recoverable amount is known as an impairment loss.
Fair value less costs of disposal: the price that would be received to sell the asset in an
Key term
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (IFRS 13 definition of fair
value), less the direct incremental costs attributable to the disposal of the asset (IAS 36:
para. 6).
Examples of costs of disposal are legal costs, stamp duty and similar transaction taxes, costs of
removing the asset, and direct incremental costs to bring an asset into condition for its sale. They
exclude finance costs and income tax expense.
Value in use of an asset: measured as the present value of estimated future cash flows (inflows
Key term
minus outflows) generated by the asset, including its estimated net disposal value (if any) at the end
of its expected useful life.
(IAS 36: para. 6)
Cash flow projections are based on the most recent management-approved budgets/forecasts. They
should cover a maximum period of five years, unless a longer period can be justified. (IAS 36:
paras. 33–35).
The cash flows should include (IAS 36: para. 50):
(a) Projections of cash inflows from continuing use of the asset
(b) Projections of cash outflows necessarily incurred to generate the cash inflows from continuing
use of the asset
(c) Net cash flows, if any, for the disposal of the asset at the end of its useful life
(d) Future overheads that can be directly attributed, or allocated on a reasonable and consistent
basis
50
The cash flows should exclude:

(a) Cash outflows relating to obligations already recognised as liabilities (to avoid double
counting) (IAS 36: para 43)
(b) The effects of any future restructuring to which the entity is not yet committed (IAS 36:
para. 44)
(c) Cash flows from financing activities or income tax receipts and payments (IAS 36: para. 50)
Discount rate
The discount rate (or rates) should be a pre-tax rate (or rates) that reflect(s) current market
assessments of:
(a) The time value of money; and
(b) The risks specific to the asset for which future cash flow estimates have not been adjusted.
(IAS 36: para. 55)
Illustration 1
Impairment loss
A company that extracts natural gas and oil has a drilling platform in the Caspian Sea. It is required
by legislation of the country concerned to remove and dismantle the platform at the end of its useful
life. Accordingly, the company has included an amount in its accounts for removal and dismantling
costs, and is depreciating this amount over the platform's expected life.
The company is carrying out an exercise to establish whether there has been an impairment of the
platform.
(a) Its carrying amount in the statement of financial position is $3m.
(b) The company has received an offer of $2.8m for the platform from another oil company. The
bidder would take over the responsibility (and costs) for dismantling and removing the platform
at the end of its life.
(c) The present value of the estimated cash flows from the platform's continued use is $3.3m.
(d) The carrying amount in the statement of financial position for the provision for dismantling and
removal is currently $0.6m.
Required
What should be the value of the drilling platform in the statement of financial position, and what, if
anything, is the impairment loss?
Solution
Fair value less costs of disposal = $2.8m

Value in use = Present value of cash flows from use less the
carrying amount of the provision/liability = $3.3m –
$0.6m = $2.7m
Recoverable amount = Higher of these two amounts, ie $2.8m
Carrying value = $3m
Impairment loss = $0.2m
The carrying amount should be reduced to $2.8m.
51
Activity 1: Impairment
Shiplake is preparing its financial statements for the year ended 31 March 20X2. Shiplake has
undertaken an impairment review which has identified an issue with an item of earth-moving plant,
which is hired out to companies on short-term contracts. The plant's carrying amount is $400,000.
The estimated selling price of the plant is only $250,000, with associated selling expenses of
$5,000. A recent review of its value in use based on forecast future cash flows was estimated at
$500,000. Since this review was undertaken there has been a dramatic increase in interest rates
that has significantly increased the cost of capital used by Shiplake to discount the future cash flows
of the plant.
Required
Explain the effect of the above information on Shiplake's financial statements to 31 March 20X2.
2.4 Cash-generating units

Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the entity
estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which it belongs.
Cash-generating unit (IAS 36): the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates cash
Key term
inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets (IAS 36:
para. 6).
2.5 Allocating goodwill to cash-generating units

Goodwill does not generate independent cash flows and therefore its recoverable amount as an
individual asset cannot be determined. It is therefore allocated to the cash-generating unit (CGU) to
which it belongs and the CGU tested for impairment.
Goodwill that cannot be allocated to a CGU on a non-arbitrary basis is allocated to the group of
CGUs to which it relates.
Illustration 2
Allocating goodwill to CGUs
Goodwill on P Goodwill on
acquisition acquisition
= $60m = $50m
'Group of
S1 S2 CGUs'
CGU1 CGU2 CGU3 CGU4 CGU5
Carrying amount $140m $160m $180m $220m $260m
Allocated $17.5m $20m $22.5m

goodwill at
acquisition
52
On acquisition of S1 the goodwill can be allocated on a non-arbitrary basis to the three acquired
CGUs (in this case based on carrying amount of the acquired assets). Each CGU is tested for
impairment including the allocated goodwill.
On acquisition of S2, the nature of the CGUs and their risks is different such that the goodwill cannot
be allocated on a non-arbitrary basis. Instead, it is allocated to the group of CGUs to which it relates
and is tested for impairment as part of that group of CGUs (here, S2).
2.6 Corporate assets

Corporate assets are group or divisional assets such as a head office building or a research
centre. Corporate assets do not generate cash inflows independently from other assets; hence their
carrying amount cannot be fully attributed to a cash-generating unit under review.
Corporate assets are treated in a similar way to goodwill.
The CGU includes corporate assets (or a portion of them) that can be allocated to it on a 'reasonable
and consistent basis' (IAS 36: para. 77). Where this is not possible, the assets (or unallocated
portion) are tested for impairment as part of the group of CGUs to which they can be allocated on a
reasonable and consistent basis.
2.7 Recognition of impairment losses in financial statements

An impairment loss should be recognised immediately.
The asset's carrying amount should be reduced to its recoverable amount, and for:
Assets carried at historical cost: The impairment loss is charged to profit or loss.
Revalued assets: The impairment loss should be treated under the
appropriate rules of the applicable IFRS.
For example, property, plant and equipment (in
accordance with IAS 16), first to OCI in respect of any
revaluation surplus relating to the asset and then to profit
or loss.
2.8 Allocation of impairment losses with a CGU

General rule
The impairment loss is allocated in the following order (IAS 36: paras. 59–63):
1 Goodwill allocated to the CGU

2 Other assets on a pro-rata basis based on carrying amount
The carrying amount of an asset cannot be reduced below the higher of its recoverable amount (if
determinable) and zero.
The amount of the impairment loss that would otherwise have been allocated to the asset is allocated
to the other assets on a pro rata basis.
53
Allocation of loss with unallocated corporate assets or goodwill
Where not all assets or goodwill will have been allocated to an individual CGU then different levels
of impairment tests are performed to ensure the unallocated assets are tested.
(a) Test of individual CGUs

Test the individual CGUs (including allocated goodwill and any portion of the carrying
amount of corporate assets that can be allocated on a reasonable and consistent basis).
(b) Test of group of CGUs
Test the smallest group of CGUs that includes the CGU under review and to which the
goodwill can be allocated/a portion of the carrying amount of corporate assets can be
allocated on a reasonable and consistent basis.
Activity 2: Impairment of CGU
The Satchell Group is made up of two cash-generating units (as a result of a combination of various
past 100% acquisitions), plus a head office, which was not allocated to any given cash-generating
unit as it supports both divisions.
Due to falling sales as a result of an economic crisis, an impairment test was conducted at the year
end. The consolidated statement of financial position showed the following net assets at that date.
Division Division Head Unallocated Total
A B office goodwill
$m $m $m $m $m
Property, plant & equipment (PPE) 780 620 90 – 1,490
Goodwill 60 30 – 10 100
Net current assets 180 110 20 – 310
1,020 760 110 10 1,900
The recoverable amounts (including net current assets) at the year end were as follows:
£m
Division A 1,000
Division B 720
Group as a whole 1,825 (including head office PPE at fair value less costs of disposal
of $85m)
The recoverable amounts of the two divisions were based on value in use. The fair value less costs of
disposal of any individual item was substantially below this.
No impairment losses had previously been necessary.
Required
Discuss, with suitable computations showing the allocation of any impairment losses, the accounting
treatment of the impairment test. Use the proforma below to help you with your answer.
54
Solution
Discussion:
Carrying amounts after impairment test:

A B office goodwill
$m $m $m $m $m
Property, plant & equipment
Goodwill
Net current assets
Workings
1 Test of individual CGUs:

Division A Division B
$m $m
Carrying amount
Recoverable amount
Impairment loss
Allocated to:
Goodwill
Other assets in the scope of IAS 36
55
2 Test of group of CGUs:
$m
Revised carrying amount
Recoverable amount
Impairment loss
Allocated to:
Unallocated goodwill
Other unallocated assets
2.9 Impairment loss and non-controlling interest
Tutorial note
This section requires knowledge of basic groups which was covered in your earlier studies. If you are
unsure, work through the revision of basic groups in Chapter 10, or look back to your earlier study
material.
Where non-controlling interests are measured at the date of acquisition at the proportionate share of
the fair value of the acquiree's identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed (ie not at fair
value), part of the calculation of the recoverable amount of the CGU relates to the unrecognised
non-controlling interest share of the goodwill.
For the purpose of calculating an impairment loss, the carrying amount of the CGU is therefore
notionally adjusted to include the non-controlling interests in the goodwill by grossing it up.
The resulting impairment loss calculated is only recognised to the extent of the parent's share.
This adjustment is not required where non-controlling interests are measured at fair value at
acquisition.
Illustration 3
Impairment loss and non-controlling interest

The Acetone Company is testing for impairment two subsidiaries which have been identified as
separate cash-generating units.
Some years ago Acetone acquired 80% of The Dushanbe Company for $600,000 when the fair
value of Dushanbe's identifiable assets was $400,000. As Dushanbe's policy is to distribute all
profits by way of dividend, the fair value of its identifiable net assets remained at $400,000 on
31 December 20X7. The impairment review indicated Dushanbe's recoverable amount at
31 December 20X7 to be $520,000.
56
Some years ago Acetone acquired 85% of The Maclulich Company for $800,000 when the fair
value of Maclulich's identifiable net assets was $700,000. Goodwill of $205,000 ($800,000 –
($700,000 × 85%)) was recognised. As Maclulich's policy is to distribute all profits by way of
dividend, the fair value of its identifiable net assets remained at $700,000 on 31 December 20X7.
The impairment review indicated Maclulich's recoverable amount at 31 December 20X7 to be
$660,000.
It is Acetone group policy to value the non-controlling interest using the proportion of net assets
method.
Required
Determine the following amounts in respect of Acetone's consolidated financial statements at
31 December 20X7 according to IAS 36 Impairment of Assets.
(a) The carrying amount of Dushanbe's assets to be compared with its recoverable amount for
impairment testing purposes
(b) The carrying amount of goodwill in respect of Dushanbe after the recognition of any
impairment loss
(c) The carrying amount of the non-controlling interest in Maclulich after recognition of any
impairment loss
Solution
(a) $750,000
(b) $96,000
(c) $99,000
57
Workings
(a) $
Carrying amount of Dushanbe's net assets 400,000
Goodwill recognised on acquisition
$600,000 – (80% × $400,000) 280,000
Notional goodwill ($280,000 × 20/80) 70,000
750,000
(b) The impairment loss is the total $750,000 less the recoverable amount of $520,000 =
$230,000. Under IAS 36 this is firstly allocated against the $350,000 goodwill. (As the
impairment loss is less than the goodwill, none is allocated against identifiable net assets.) As
only the goodwill relating to Acetone is recognised, only its 80% share of the impairment loss
is recognised:
$
Carrying value of goodwill 280,000
Impairment (80% × 230,000) (184,000)
Revised carrying amount of goodwill 96,000
(c)
$
Carrying amount of Maclulich's net assets 700,000
Recognised goodwill 205,000
Notional goodwill (15/85 × $205,000) 36,176
941,176
Recoverable amount (660,000)
Impairment loss 281,176
Allocated to:
Recognised and notional goodwill 241,176
Other net assets 40,000
Therefore the non-controlling interest is ($700,000 – $40,000) × 15% = $99,000.

As the non-controlling interests do not include goodwill, only the impairment allocated to other
net assets is included here.
2.10 After the impairment review

The depreciation/amortisation is adjusted in future periods to allocate the asset's revised carrying
amount less its residual value on a systematic basis over its remaining useful life (IAS 36: para. 63).
2.11 Reversal of past impairments

A reversal for a CGU is allocated to the assets of the CGU, except for goodwill, pro rata with the
carrying amounts of those assets.
However, the carrying amount of an asset is not increased above the lower of:
(a) Its recoverable amount (if determinable); and
(b) Its depreciated carrying amount had no impairment loss originally been recognised.
(IAS 36: para. 117)
58
Any amounts left unallocated are allocated to the other assets (except goodwill) pro rata.
The reversal is recognised in profit or loss, except where reversing a loss recognised on assets
carried at revalued amounts, which are treated in accordance with the applicable IFRS.
For example, an impairment loss reversal on revalued property, plant and equipment reverses the
loss recorded in profit or loss and any remainder is credited to OCI (reinstating the revaluation
surplus) (IAS 36: para. 120).
Goodwill
Once recognised, impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed (IAS 36: para. 124).
edition of the Workbook, for more activities to test your knowledge of this topic.
3 Fair value measurement (IFRS 13)

IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement defines fair value and sets out a framework for measuring the fair
value of assets, liabilities and an entity's own equity instruments in a single IFRS.
It applies to all IFRSs where a fair value measurement is required except (IFRS 13: para. 6):
 Share-based payment transactions (IFRS 2)

 Leasing transactions (IFRS 16)
 Measurements which are similar to, but not the same as, fair value, eg:
– Net realisable value of inventories (IAS 2)
– Value in use (IAS 36).
Fair value (IFRS 13): the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
Key term
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
(IFRS 13: para. 9)
Fair value measurements are based on an asset or a liability's unit of account, which is specified
by each IFRS where a fair value measurement is required. For most assets and liabilities, the unit of
account is the individual asset or liability, but in some instances may be a group of assets or
liabilities (IFRS 13: para. 13).
Illustration 4
Fair value
A premium or discount on a large holding of the same shares (because the market's normal daily
trading volume is not sufficient to absorb the quantity held by the entity) is not considered when
measuring fair value: the quoted price per share in an active market is used.
However, a control premium is considered when measuring the fair value of a controlling interest,
because the unit of account is the controlling interest. Similarly, any non-controlling interest discount
is considered where measuring a non-controlling interest.
59
3.1 Measurement
Fair value is a market-based measure, not an entity-specific one. Therefore, valuation
techniques used to measure fair value maximise the use of relevant observable inputs and minimise
the use of unobservable inputs.
To increase consistency and compatibility in fair value measurements and related disclosures,
IFRS 13 establishes a fair value hierarchy that categorises the inputs to valuation
techniques into three levels:
Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 1 inputs that the entity can access at the measurement date (IFRS 13: para. 76).
Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable
for the asset or liability, either directly (ie prices) or indirectly (ie derived
Level 2 inputs from prices). For example quoted prices for similar assets in active markets
or for identical or similar assets in non-active markets or use of quoted
interest rates for valuation purposes (IFRS 13: para. 81–82).
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, eg discounting estimates of

future cash flows (IFRS 13: para. 86).
Level 3 inputs Level 3 inputs are only used where relevant observable inputs are not
available or where the entity determines that transaction price or quoted
price does not represent fair value.
Active market: a market in which transactions for the asset or liability take place with sufficient
Key term
frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction takes place either:
(a) In the principal market for the asset or liability, or
(b) In the most advantageous market (in the absence of a principal market).
The most advantageous market is assessed after taking into account transaction costs and
transport costs to the market. Fair value also takes into account transport costs, but excludes
transaction costs.
The fair value should be measured using the assumptions that market participants would
use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their best economic
interest.
Illustration 5
Principal market v most advantageous market
An asset is sold in two different active markets at the following prices per item:
European market North American market
$ $
Selling price 53 54
Transport costs to market (3) (6)
50 48
Transaction costs (3) (2)
47 46
60
The principal market (the one with the greatest volume and level of activity) is the North American
market. The company normally trades in the European market, but it can access both markets.
The fair value of the asset is therefore $48 per item, ie the price after taking into account transport
costs in the principal market for the asset.
If, however, neither market were the principal market, the fair value would be measured
using the price in the most advantageous market. The most advantageous market is the
European market after considering both transaction and transport costs ($47 in European market v
$46 in the North American market) and so the fair value measure would be $50 per item (as fair
value is measured before transaction costs).
For non-financial assets, the fair value measurement is the value for using the asset in its
highest and best use (the use that would maximise its value) or by selling it to another market
participant that would use it in its highest and best use (IFRS 13: paras. 27–29).
The highest and best use of a non-financial asset takes into account the use that is physically
possible, legally permissible and financially feasible.
Illustration 6
Highest and best use

An entity acquires control of another entity which owns land. The land is currently used as a factory
site.
The local government zoning rules also now permit construction of residential properties in this area,
subject to planning permission being granted. Apartment buildings have recently been constructed in
the area with the support of the local government.
Market values are as follows:
$m
Value in its current use 20
Value as a development site (including uncertainty 30
over whether planning permission would be granted)
Demolition costs to convert the land to a vacant site 2
The fair value of the land is $28m ($30m – $2m) as this is its highest and best use because market
participants would take into account the site's development potential when pricing the land.
The measurement of the fair value of a liability assumes that the liability remains
outstanding and the market participant transferee would be required to fulfil the obligation, rather
than it being extinguished (IFRS 13: para. 34). The fair value of a liability also reflects the effect of
non-performance risk (the risk that an entity will not fulfil an obligation), which includes, but may
not be limited to, an entity's own credit risk (ie risk of non-payment) (IFRS 13: para. 42).
Illustration 7
Fair value of a liability

Energy Co assumed a contractual decommissioning liability when it acquired a power plant from a
competitor.
The plant will be decommissioned in 10 years' time.
61
Assumptions made by Energy Co equivalent to those that would be used by market participants,
assuming Energy Co was allowed to transfer the liability, are:
Estimated labour, material

and overhead cost Estimated probability
$6m 40%
$8m 50%
$10m 10%
Third party contractors typically add a 20% mark-up in the industry and expect a premium of 5% of
the expected cash flows (after including the effect of inflation) to take into account risk that cash flows
may be more than expected.
Inflation is expected to be 3% annually on average over the 10 years.
The risk-free interest rate for a 10 year maturity is 4%.
An appropriate adjustment to the risk-free rate for Energy Co's non-performance risk is 2% (giving an
entity-specific discount rate of 4% + 2% = 6%).
Calculation of the fair value of the decommissioning liability:
$m
Expected cash flow [(6 × 40%) + (8 × 50%) + (10 × 10%)] 7.400
Third party contractor mark-up (7.4 × 20%) 1.480
8.880
Inflation adjustment ((8.88 × 1.0310) – 8.88) 3.054
11.934
Risk premium (11.934 × 5%) 0.597
12.531
Fair value (present value of expected cash flow
adjusted for market risk 12.531 × 1/1.0610) 6.997
4 Intangible assets (IAS 38)
Intangible asset: an identifiable non-monetary asset without physical substance. The asset must
Key term
be:
(a) Controlled by the entity as a result of events in the past; and

(b) Something from which the entity expects future economic benefits to flow.
(IAS 38: para. 8)
An asset is identifiable if:
(a) It is separable, or
(b) It arises from contractual/legal rights.
For revision of the detail of the definition of intangible assets, refer to Chapter 3 Section 3.1 of the
Supplementary Reading, available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
62
4.1 Recognition
As with all assets, recognition depends on two criteria (IAS 38: para. 18):
(a) It is probable that future economic benefits that are attributable to the asset will flow to the
entity.
(b) The cost of the asset can be measured reliably.

Measurement at recognition depends on how the intangible asset was acquired or generated:
Acquired as Internally
Internally generated Acquired by
Separate part of a
generated intangible government
acquisition business
goodwill asset grant
combination
Cost, which is Fair value as per Not recognised Recognised when Asset and grant
purchase price IFRS 3 Business 'PIRATE' criteria at fair value, or
Combinations met (see Section nominal amount
4.3) plus expenditure
directly attributable
to preparation for use
4.3 Internally generated intangible assets

Research and development
To assess whether an internally generated intangible assets meets the criteria for recognition, an
entity classifies the generation of the asset into a research phase and a development phase
(IAS 36: para. 52).
(a) During the research phase, all expenditure is recognised as an expense.
(IAS 36: para. 54)
(b) During the development phase, internally generated intangible assets that meet all of the
following criteria must be capitalised:
• Probable future economic benefits
• Intention to complete and use/sell asset
• Resources adequate and available to complete and use/sell asset
• Ability to use/sell the asset
• Technical feasibility of completing asset for use/sale
• Expenditure can be measured reliably
Expenditure not meeting all six criteria is treated as an expense.
63
The costs allocated to an internally generated intangible asset should be only costs that can be
directly attributed or allocated on a reasonable and consistent basis to creating,
producing or preparing the asset for its intended use. The cost of an internally generated
intangible asset is the sum of the expenditure incurred from the date when the intangible asset first
meets the recognition criteria.
Other internally generated intangible assets

Expenditure on internally generated brands, mastheads, publishing titles, customer lists and items
similar in substance are not recognised as intangible assets. These all fail to meet one or more (in
some cases all) the definition and recognition criteria and in some cases are probably
indistinguishable from internally generated goodwill (IAS 38: para. 63).
Similarly, start-up, training, advertising, promotional, relocation and reorganisation costs are all
recognised as expenses.

After recognition, entities can choose between two models, the cost model and the revaluation
model.
Cost model Carry asset at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses
(IAS 38: para. 74)
Revaluation model Carry asset at revalued amount, fair value amount less subsequent
accumulated amortisation and impairment losses (IAS 38: para. 75)
If the revaluation model is used:
(a) Fair value must be able to be measured reliably with reference to an active market.
(b) The entire class of intangible assets of that type must be revalued at the same time.
(c) If an intangible asset in a class of revalued intangible assets cannot be revalued because there
is no active market for this asset, the asset should be carried at its cost less any
accumulated amortisation and impairment losses.
(d) Revaluations should be made with such regularity that the carrying amount does not differ
from that which would be determined using fair value at the year end.
There will not usually be an active market in an intangible asset; therefore the revaluation
model will usually not be available (IAS 38: para. 78). A fair value might be obtainable however for
assets such as fishing rights or quotas or taxi cab licences.
For revision of the detail of the accounting required under the revaluation model, refer to Chapter 3
Section 3.2 of the Supplementary Reading, available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the
Workbook.
4.5 Amortisation
An intangible asset with a finite useful life should be amortised over its expected useful life.
(a) The depreciable amount (cost/revalued amount – residual value) is allocated on a systematic
basis over the useful life.
(b) The residual value is normally assumed to be zero.
64
(c) Amortisation begins when the asset is available for use (ie when it is in the location and
condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management).
(d) The useful life and amortisation method must be reviewed at least at each financial year
end and adjusted where necessary.
An intangible asset with an indefinite useful life should not be amortised. IAS 36 requires
that such an asset is tested for impairment at least annually.
For revision of the detail of determining an intangible asset's useful life and further detail on
acceptable amortisation methods, refer to Chapter 3 Sections 3.3 and 3.4 of the Supplementary
Reading. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
Activity 3: Intangible assets
Lambda is a listed entity that prepares consolidated financial statements. Lambda measures assets
using the revaluation model wherever this is possible under IFRS. During its financial year ended
31 March 20X9 Lambda entered into the following transactions:
(a) On 1 October 20X7 Lambda began a project to investigate a more efficient production
process. Expenses relating to the project of $2m were charged in the statement of profit or loss
and other comprehensive income in the year ended 31 March 20X8. Further costs of $1.5m
were incurred in the three-month period to 30 June 20X8. On that date it became apparent
that the project was technically feasible and commercially viable. Further expenditure of $3m
was incurred in the six-month period from 1 July 20X8 to 31 December 20X8. The new
process, which began on 1 January 20X9, was expected to generate cost savings of at least
$600,000 per annum over the 10-year period commencing 1 January 20X9.
(b) On 1 April 20X8 Lambda acquired a new subsidiary, Omicron. The directors of Lambda
carried out a fair value exercise as required by IFRS 3 Business Combinations and concluded
that the brand name of Omicron had a fair value of $10m and would be likely to generate
economic benefits for a ten-year period from 1 April 20X8. They further concluded that the
expertise of the employees of Omicron contributed $5m to the overall value of Omicron. The
estimated average remaining service lives of the Omicron employees was eight years from
1 April 20X8.
(c) On 1 October 20X8 Lambda renewed its licence to extract minerals that are needed as part
of its production process. The cost of renewal of the licence was $200,000 and the licence is
for a five-year period starting on 1 October 20X8. There is no active market for this type of
licence. However, the directors of Lambda estimated that at 31 March 20X9 the fair value less
costs to sell of the licence was $175,000. They further estimated that over the remaining
54 months of its duration the licence would generate net cash flows for Lambda that had a
present value at 31 March 20X9 of $185,000.
Required
Explain how Lambda should treat the above transactions in its consolidated financial statements for
the year to 31 March 20X9. (You are not required to discuss the goodwill arising on acquisition of
Omicron.)
65
Activity 4: Intangible assets and impairment
Kalesh is preparing its financial statements for the year to 31 March 20X2. Kalesh is engaged in a
research and development project which it hopes will generate a new product. In the year to
31 March 20X1 the company spent $120,000 on research that concluded there were sufficient
grounds to carry the project on to its development stage and a further $75,000 was spent on
development. At 31 March 20X1, management had decided that they were not sufficiently confident
in the ultimate profitability of the project and wrote off all the expenditure to date to the statement of
profit or loss. In the current year further development costs have been incurred of $80,000 and it is
estimated than an additional $10,000 of development costs will be incurred in the future. Production
is expected to commence within the next few months. Unfortunately the total trading profit from sales
of the new product is not expected to be as good as market research data originally forecast and is
estimated at only $150,000. As the future benefits are greater than the remaining future costs, the
project will be completed but, due to the overall deficit expected, the directors have again decided to
write off all the development expenditure.
Required
Explain how Kalesh should treat the above transaction in its financial statements for the year to
31 March 20X2.
5 Investment property (IAS 40)
Investment property (IAS 40): property (land or building – or part of a building – or both) held
Key term
(by the owner or by the lessee as a right-of-use asset) to earn rentals or for capital appreciation
or both, rather than for:
(a) Use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative purposes; or
(b) Sale in the ordinary course of business.
(IAS 40: para. 5)
The following are not investment property (IAS 40: para. 9):
(a) Property held for sale in the ordinary course of business or in the process of construction or
development for such sale
(b) Owner-occupied property, including property held for future use as owner-occupied property,
property held for future development and subsequent use as owner-occupied property,
property occupied by employees and owner-occupied property awaiting disposal
(c) Property leased to another entity under a finance lease
5.1 Recognition
Investment property is recognised when it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the
entity and the cost can be measured reliably.

Investment property should be measured initially at cost, including directly attributable expenditure
and transaction costs (IAS 40: para. 21).
66

After recognition, entities can choose between two models, the fair value model and the cost model.
Whatever policy an entity chooses should be applied to all of its investment property (IAS 40:
para. 30).
Fair value model Any change in fair value reported in profit or loss, not depreciated
Cost model As cost model of IAS 16 – unless held for sale (IFRS 5) or leased
(IFRS 16)
5.4 Transfers to or from investment property

Transfers to or from investment property should only be made when there is a change in use
(IFRS 40: para. 57).
A change in use occurs when the property meets, or ceases to meet, the definition of investment
property and there is evidence of the change in use (IAS 40: para. 57). For example, owner
occupation commences so the investment property will be treated under IAS 16 as an owner-
occupied property.
In isolation, a change in management's intentions for the use of a property does not provide
evidence of a change in use (IAS 40: para. 57).
Transfer from investment Transfer from

property to owner-occupied owner-occupied to
or inventories investment property
• Cost for subsequent accounting is • Apply IAS 16 or IFRS 16 (for

fair value at date of change of property held by a lessee as
use right-of-use asset) up to date of
change of use
• Apply IAS 16, IAS 2 or IFRS 16
as appropriate after date of • At date of change, property
change of use revalued to fair value
• At date of change, any difference
between the carrying amount
under IAS 16 or IFRS 16 and its
fair value is treated as a
revaluation under IAS 16
5.5 Disposals
Any gain or loss on disposal of investment property is the difference between the net disposal
proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset. It should be recognised as income or expense
in profit or loss (unless IFRS 16 requires otherwise on a sale and leaseback).
67
Activity 5: Investment property
Burdock, a public limited company, operates in the fashion industry and has a financial year end of
31 May 20X6. Burdock owns a number of prestigious apartments which it leases to famous persons
who are under a contract of employment to promote its fashion clothing. The apartments are let at
below the market rate. The lease terms are short and are normally for six months. The leases
terminate when the contracts for promoting the clothing terminate. Burdock wishes to account for the
apartments as investment properties with the difference between the market rate and actual rental
charged to be recognised as an employee benefit expense.
Required
Discuss how the above should be dealt with in the financial statements of Burdock for the year ended
31 May 20X6.
For a decision tree summarising the treatment of property plus an additional practice activity on
IAS 40, see Chapter 3 Section 4 of the Supplementary Reading. This is available in Appendix 2 of
the digital edition of the Workbook.
6 Government grants (IAS 20)
Tutorial note
IAS 20 Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance is a fairly
straightforward standard that you have seen before. The main points are summarised below.
(a) Grants are not recognised until there is reasonable assurance that the conditions will be
complied with and the grant will be received (IAS 20: para. 7).
(b) Government grants are recognised in profit or loss so as to match them with the related costs
they are intended to compensate on a systematic basis (IAS 20: para. 12).
(c) Government grants relating to assets can be presented either as deferred income or by
deducting the grant in calculating the carrying amount of the asset (IAS 20:
para. 25).
(d) Grants relating to income may either be shown separately or as part of 'other income' or
alternatively deducted from the related expense (IAS 20: para. 29).
(e) A government grant that becomes repayable is accounted for as a change in accounting
estimate in accordance with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and
Errors (IAS 20: para. 32).
(i) Repayments of grants relating to income are applied first against any unamortised
deferred credit and then in profit or loss.
(ii) Repayments of grants relating to assets are recorded by increasing the carrying amount
of the asset or reducing the deferred income balance. Any resultant cumulative extra
depreciation is recognised in profit or loss immediately.
68
Activity 6: Government grant
On 1 June 20X8 Epsilon opened a new factory in an area designated by the Government as an
economic development area. On that day the Government provided Epsilon with a grant of $30m to
assist it in the development of the factory. This grant was in three parts:
(a) $6m of the grant was a payment by the Government as an inducement to Epsilon to begin
developing the factory. No conditions were attached to this part of the grant.
(b) $15m of the grant related to the construction of the factory at a cost of $60m. The land was
leased so the whole of the $60m is depreciable over the estimated 40 year useful life of the
factory.
(c) The remaining $9m was received subject to keeping at least 200 employees working at the
factory for a period of at least five years. If the number drops below 200 at any time in any
financial year in this five year period then 20% of the grant is repayable in that year. From
1 June 20X8 220 workers were employed at the factory and estimates are that this number is
unlikely to fall below 200 over the relevant five year period.
Required
Explain how the grant of $30m should be reported in the financial statements of Epsilon for the year
ended 30 September 20X8. Where IFRSs allow alternative treatments of any part of the grant you
should explain both treatments.
7 Borrowing costs (IAS 23)

Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying
asset are capitalised as part of the cost of that asset. (IAS 23: para. 26)
A qualifying asset is one that necessarily takes a substantial period of time to get ready for its
intended use or sale. (IAS 23: para. 5)
(a) Borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation:

(i) Funds borrowed specifically for a qualifying asset – capitalise actual
borrowing costs incurred less investment income on temporary investment of the funds
(IAS 23: para. 12)
(ii) Funds borrowed generally – weighted average of borrowing costs outstanding
during the period (excluding borrowings specifically for a qualifying asset) multiplied by
expenditure on qualifying asset. The amount capitalised should not exceed total
borrowing costs incurred in the period (IAS 23: para. 14).
(b) Commencement of capitalisation begins when (IAS 23: para. 17):
(i) Expenditures for the asset are being incurred;
(ii) Borrowing costs are being incurred; and
(iii) Activities that are necessary to prepare the asset for its intended use or sale are in
progress.
(c) Capitalisation is suspended during extended periods when development is interrupted
(IAS 23: para. 20).
(d) Capitalisation ceases when substantially all the activities necessary to prepare the asset for its
intended use or sale are complete (IAS 23: para. 22).
69
The financial statements disclose (IAS 23: para. 26):
 The amount of borrowing costs capitalised during the period; and

 The capitalisation rate used to determine the amount of borrowing costs eligible for
capitalisation.
Activity 7: Borrowing costs
Zenzi Co had the following loans in place at the beginning and end of 20X8.
1 January 31 December
20X8 20X8
$m $m
10.0% Bank loan repayable 20Y3 120 120
9.5% Bank loan repayable 20Y1 80 80
On 1 January 20X8, Zenzi Co began construction of a qualifying asset, a piece of machinery for a
hydro-electric plant, using existing borrowings. Expenditure drawn down for the construction was:
$30m on 1 January 20X8, $20m on 1 October 20X8.
Required
Calculate the borrowing costs to be capitalised for the machinery.
8 Agriculture (IAS 41)

IAS 41 Agriculture covers the accounting treatment of biological assets (except bearer plants) and
agricultural produce at the point of harvest. After harvest IAS 2 Inventories applies to the agricultural
produce, as illustrated in the time line below.
IAS 41 IAS 2
Time
Biological transformation
Planting/ Harvest/ Sale

birth slaughter
Bearer plants, which are plants that are used to grow crops but are not themselves consumed (eg
grapevines), are excluded from the scope of IAS 41. Instead they are accounted for under IAS 16
using either the cost or revaluation model.
Agricultural produce: the harvested product of an entity's biological assets.

Key terms Biological assets: living animals or plants.
Biological transformation: the processes of growth, degeneration, production and procreation

that cause qualitative and quantitative changes in a biological asset.
(IAS 41: para. 5)
70
8.1 Recognition
As with other non-financial assets under the Conceptual Framework, a biological asset or agricultural
produce is recognised when (IAS 41: para. 10):
(a) The entity controls the asset as a result of past events;

(b) It is probable that future economic benefits associated with the asset will flow to the
entity; and
(c) The fair value or cost of the asset can be measured reliably.
8.2 Measurement
Biological assets are measured both on initial recognition and at the end of each reporting period
at fair value less costs to sell (IAS 41: para. 12).
Agricultural produce at the point of harvest is also measured at fair value less costs to
sell (IAS 41: para. 13).
The fair value less costs to sell of agricultural produce harvested becomes its cost under IAS 2. After
harvest, the agricultural produce is measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value in
accordance with IAS 2.
Changes in fair value less costs to sell are recognised in profit or loss (IAS 41: para. 26).
Where fair value cannot be measured reliably, biological assets are measured at cost less
accumulated depreciation and impairment losses (IAS 41: para. 30).
Ethics note
Although ethics will certainly feature in the second question of Section A, ethical issues could feature
in any question in the SBR exam. Therefore you need to be alert to any threats to the fundamental
principles of ACCA's Code of Ethics and Conduct when approaching every question.
For example, pressure to achieve a particular profit figure could lead to deliberate attempts to
improve profits through:
 Incorrect capitalisation of development expenditure when it does not meet the IAS 38 criteria
in order to reduce development costs charged to profit or loss
 Incorrect capitalisation of more interest than permitted by IAS 23 in order to reduce finance
costs
 Inappropriate classification of property as investment property in order to avoid depreciation

and to recognise revaluation gains in profit or loss
 Manipulation of the estimation of recoverable amount to avoid impairment losses
Time pressure at the year end or inexperience/lack of training of the reporting accountant could lead
to errors when complex procedures are required, for example in testing CGUs for impairment, or
where significant judgement is required, for example in the capitalisation of intangible assets.
71
Chapter summary
Non-current assets
1. Property, plant and 2. Impairment of assets 3. Fair value

equipment (IAS 16) (IAS 36) measurement
Tangible items that are held by the  Impairment indicators:
(IFRS 13)
entity for use in the production or External  'The price that would be received to
supply of goods or services, for – Significant fall in market value sell an asset or paid to transfer a
rental to others, or for liability in an orderly transaction
– Significant external adverse
administrative purposes and are between market participants at the
expected to be used during more changes
measurement date'
than one period – Increase in market interest rates
 Fair value is after transport costs,
– Net assets > market
Recognise when: but before transaction costs
capitalisation
 Probable that future economic  Market-based measure (ie use
benefits will flow to the entity Internal
assumptions market participants
– Obsolescence/damage would use), not entity specific
 The cost of the asset can be
– Significant internal adverse
measured reliably  Hierarchy for inputs to valuation
changes techniques:
Initial recognition at cost – Performance worse than (1) Unadjusted quoted prices
Components of assets should be expected (active market) for identical
recognised separately if they are  Impairment loss where: items
expected to generate different recoverable amount (RA) < carrying (2) Inputs other than quoted prices
patterns of benefits amount that can be observed directly
Subsequent measurement, choice of  RA = higher of: (prices) or indirectly (derived
from prices)
FV less costs Value in use
Cost model: Cost less of disposal CF DF PV (3) Unobservable inputs
accumulated depreciation/
 Multiple markets, use FV in:
impairment losses X
1
/(1+r) X (1) Principal market (if there is one)
Revaluation model: Revalued X 1
/(1+r)2 X
(2) Most advantageous market (ie
amount less subsequent etc
the best one after both
accumulated depreciation/ X
transaction and transport costs)
impairment losses (entire class), fair  CGUs:
value (FV) (using FV hierarchy in (1) Test individual CGUs  Non-financial assets: highest and
IFRS 13) (2) Test group of CGUs including: best use that is physically possible,
– Unallocated goodwill legally permissible and financially
Depreciate on a systematic basis
feasible
over the useful life – Unallocated corporate assets
 FV of a liability (example):
Review useful life/depreciation Before Imp After
method and residual value at least Expected value of cash flows
loss
each financial year end Third-party contractor mark-up X
Goodwill X (X) X X
Impairment: charge first to OCI Other assets X (X) X Inflation adjustment X
(for any revaluation surplus) then X (X) X X
profit or loss (P/L) Risk premium (re diff cash flows) X
Exchanges of items of PPE are X
measured at fair value Discount to PV X
72
4. Intangible assets 5. Investment 6. Government grants

(IAS 38) property (IAS 40) (IAS 20)
Identifiable non-monetary assets Property held to earn rentals or for  Recognised when 'reasonably certain'
without physical substance capital appreciation or both rather condition met
An asset is identifiable if: than for: (NB: different to Conceptual
 Use in the production or supply Framework)
(a) It is separable, or
of goods or services or for  Grants re assets:
(b) It arises from administrative purposes; or – Deferred income, or
contractual/legal rights –
 Sale in the ordinary course of Reduce carrying amount
Recognise when: business  Grants re income:
 Probable that future economic – In P/L when expense recognised
Recognise when:
benefits will flow to the entity (i) Other income, or
 Probable that future economic
 The cost of the asset can be (ii) Reduce related expense
benefits will flow to the entity
measured reliably Annual impairment tests required for:
 The cost of the asset can be  Goodwill
Initial measurement: measured reliably
 Intangibles not yet ready for use
Purchased: Initial measurement:  Intangibles with indefinite useful life
 Cost (as IAS 16)  Cost Impairment loss:
Internally generated: – Purchase price DR OCI (& Revaluation surplus) (First if
 Capitalise if revalued)
– Directly attributable
DR P/L
P robable future economic bens expenditure
CR Goodwill of CGU (First)
I ntention to complete & After recognition, choice of CR Other assets pro-rata
use/sell asset  Cost model: as IAS 16 unless Impairment loss reversals:
R esources adequate and held for sale (IFRS 5) or leased  Permitted where RA increases
available to complete & (IFRS 16)
 Opposite double entry
use/sell  Fair value model: Market  Cannot reverse above lower of:
A bility to use/sell value at year end, gain/loss in – RA
P/L, not depreciated
T echnical feasibility – Carrying amount if no impairment
Impairment: charge to P/L occurred
E xpenditure can be measured
reliably – Goodwill never reversed
Never capitalised:
 Internally generated brands,
mastheads, publishing titles &
customer lists, start-up costs,
training, advertising,
7. Borrowing costs 8. Agriculture (IAS 41)
relocations/reorganisations (IAS 23) Biological asset: A living animal or plant
After recognition, choice of  Capitalise: Agricultural produce: The harvested
– Cost model: as IAS 16 – Funds borrowed specifically: product of the entity's biological assets
– Revaluation model: actual borrowing costs less (Bearer plants accounted for under IAS 16)
revaluation only by income on temporary investment Recognise when:
reference to an active of funds
 Controlled as a result of past events
market – Funds borrowed generally:
 Probable future economic benefits,
Amortisation: weighted average borrowing and
 Finite useful life: Systematic costs (excl specific borrowing
 Fair value or cost can be measured
basis over useful life (UL) costs)  weighted average
reliably
expenditure
 Indefinite UL: at least annual
Measurement:
impairment tests  Cease capitalisation when ready for
intended use Biological assets: FV less costs to sell
Impairment: charge first to OCI
(for any revaluation surplus)  Suspend if development interrupted Agricultural produce:
then P/L (for an extended period) At the point of harvest: FV less costs to sell
(becomes IAS 2 cost)
Thereafter – as inventories
73
1. Property, plant and equipment (IAS 16)
Property, plant and equipment can be accounted for under the cost model (depreciated) or
revaluation model (depreciated revalued amounts, gains recognised in other
comprehensive income).
2. Impairment of assets (IAS 36)
Impairment losses occur where the carrying amount of an asset is above its recoverable
amount.
Impairment losses are charged first to other comprehensive income (re any revaluation
surplus relating to the asset) and then to profit or loss.
Where cash flows cannot be measured separately, the impairment losses are calculated by
reference to the cash-generating unit. Resulting impairment losses are allocated first
against any goodwill and then pro-rata to other assets.
3. Fair value measurement (IFRS 13)
IFRS 13 treats all assets, liabilities and an entity's own equity instruments in a
consistent way. A fair value hierarchy is used to establish fair value, using observable
inputs as far as possible as fair value is a market-based measure.
4. Intangible assets (IAS 38)
Intangible assets can also be accounted for under the cost model or revaluation model,
but only intangibles with an active market can be revalued.
Intangible assets are amortised over their useful lives (normally to a zero residual value)
unless they have an indefinite useful life (annual impairment tests required).
5. Investment property (IAS 40)
Investment property can be accounted for under the cost model or the fair value model
(not depreciated, gains and losses recognised in profit or loss).
6. Government grants (IAS 20)

Government grants are recognised when there is reasonable assurance that the conditions will
be satisfied and the grant will be received. Grants are normally presented as deferred income
and recognised in profit or loss to match against related costs. Grants relating to assets can
either be presented in deferred income or deducted from the carrying amount of the asset.
7. Borrowing costs (IAS 23)
Borrowing costs relating to qualifying assets (those which necessarily take a substantial
period of time to be ready for use/sale) must be capitalised. This includes both specific and
general borrowings of the company.
8. Agriculture (IAS 41)
Biological assets and agricultural produce at the point of harvest are measured at fair value
less costs to sell, with changes reported in profit or loss.
74
Question practice
Now try the questions below from the Further question practice bank:
Q4 Camel Telecom
Q5 Acquirer
Further reading
There are articles on the ACCA website, written by the SBR examining team, which are relevant
to the topics studied in this Chapter and which are useful reading:
IAS 36 impairment of assets (2009)

IAS 16 property plant and equipment (2009)
IAS 16 and componentisation (2011)
How do changes to IAS 16, 38 and IFRS 11 impact you? (2014)
How to measure fair value (2011)
www.accaglobal.com/uk/en/member/ab/cpd-ab.html
IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement

The IAS plus website has a summary of IFRS 13 and links to guidance (IFRS in Focus) and a
podcast produced by Deloitte.
www.iasplus.com/en/standards/ifrs/ifrs13
75
76
Employee benefits
Learning objectives
Syllabus
reference no.
Discuss and apply the accounting treatment of short-term and long-term employee C5(a)
benefits and defined contribution and defined benefit plans.
Account for gains and losses on settlements and curtailments. C5(b)
Account for the 'Asset Ceiling' test and the reporting of actuarial (remeasurement) C5(c)
gains and losses.
Exam context
Employee benefits include short-term benefits such as salaries, and long-term benefits such as
pensions. This topic is not covered in Financial Reporting and so will be new to you at this level.
In the Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) exam, employee benefits could feature in any section, and
may be a whole or part-question.
77
Chapter overview
1. Short-term 6. Current
Employee benefits
benefits developments
Post-employment
benefits
2. Defined contribution plans 3. Defined benefit plans
4. Settlements
5. Asset ceiling test
78
4: Employee benefits
1 Short-term benefits
1.1 Introduction to employee benefits
Employee
Benefits
Short-term Post-employment Other long-term Termination

benefits benefits benefits benefits
IAS 19 Employee Benefits covers four distinct types of employee benefit. However, only short-term
and post-employment benefits are examinable.
Accounting for short-term employee benefit costs tends to be quite straightforward, because
they are simply recognised as an expense in the employer's financial statements of the current
period. Accounting for the cost of deferred employee benefits is much more difficult because of
the large amounts involved, as well as the long time scale, complicated estimates and uncertainties.
See Chapter 4 Section 1 of the Supplementary Reading for background reading on the conceptual
nature of employee benefit costs and the principles underlining the accounting. This is available in
Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
1.2 Short-term benefits
Employee benefits: All forms of consideration given by an entity in exchange for service
rendered by employees or for the termination of employment.
Key term
Short-term benefits: Employee benefits (other than termination benefits) that are expected to be
settled wholly before 12 months after the end of the annual reporting period in which the employees
render the related service.
(IAS 19: para. 8)
Short-term benefits include items such as (IAS 19: para. 9):

(a) Wages, salaries and social security contributions
(b) Paid annual leave and paid sick leave
(c) Profit-sharing and bonuses
(d) Non-monetary benefits (eg medical care, housing, cars and free or subsidised goods or
services).
Short-term employee benefits are recognised as a liability and an expense when an employee has
rendered service during an accounting period, ie on an accruals basis.
Short-term benefits are not discounted to present value.
79
1.3 Short-term paid absences We are concerned with
payment by the company, not
Accumulating paid absences the government.
Accumulating paid absences are those that can be carried forward for use in future periods if the
current period's entitlement is not used in full (eg holiday pay).
The expected cost of any unused entitlement that can be carried forward or paid in lieu of holidays is
recognised as an accrual at the year end.
You've worked more than you should
on full pay, but next year you will
work less than you should on full pay.
Non-accumulating paid absences
Non-accumulating absences cannot be carried forward (eg maternity leave or military service).
Therefore they are only recognised as an expense when the absence occurs (IAS 19: para. 11).
Activity 1: Short-term benefits (1)

Plyman Co has 100 employees. Each is entitled to five working days' of paid sick leave for each
year, and unused sick leave can be carried forward for one year. Sick leave is taken on a LIFO basis
(ie first out of the current year's entitlement and then out of any balance brought forward).
As at 31 December 20X8, the average unused entitlement is two days per employee. Plyman Co
expects (based on past experience which is expected to continue) that 92 employees will take five
days or fewer sick leave in 20X9 and the remaining eight employees will take an average of six and
a half days each.
Required
State the required accounting for sick leave.

The salaried employees of an entity are entitled to 20 days' paid leave each year. The entitlement
accrues evenly over the year and unused leave may be carried forward for one year. The holiday
year is the same as the financial year. At 31 December 20X4, the entity had 2,200 salaried
employees and the average unused holiday entitlement was 4 days per employee. Approximately
6% of employees leave without taking their entitlement and there is no cash payment when an
employee leaves in respect of holiday entitlement. There are 255 working days in the year and the
total annual salary cost is $42 million. No adjustment has been made in the financial statements for
the above and there was no opening accrual required for holiday entitlement.
Required
Discuss, with suitable computations, how the leave that may be carried forward is treated in the
financial statements for the year ended 31 December 20X4.
1.4 Profit-sharing and bonus plans

An entity recognises the expected cost of profit-sharing and bonus payments when, and only when
(IAS 19: para. 19–24):
(a) The entity has a present legal or constructive obligation to make such payments as a
result of past events; and
(b) A reliable estimate of the obligation can be made.
80
A present obligation exists when and only when the entity has no realistic alternative but to make
payments.
Illustration 1
Profit-sharing plan
Mooro Co runs a profit sharing plan under which it pays 3% of its net profit for the year to its
employees if none have left during the year. Mooro Co estimates that this will be reduced by staff
turnover to 2.5% in 20X9.
Required
Which costs should be recognised by Mooro Co for the profit share?
Solution
Mooro Co should recognise a liability and an expense of 2.5% of net profit.
1.5 Post-employment benefits

Post-employment benefits are employee benefits which are payable after the completion of
employment.
Post-employment
benefits
Defined contribution Defined benefit

plans plans
(a) Defined contribution plans

 Eg annual contribution = 5% salary
 Future pension depends on the value of the fund Employer bears the
risk; employee knows
(b) Defined benefit plans what their pension
will be.
Final salary
 Eg annual pension = × years worked
60
 Future pension depends on final salary and years worked
The accounting for the two different types of plan are very different. It is important that you decide on
the nature of the plan before attempting to account for it.
A pension plan will normally be held in a form of trust separate from the sponsoring employer.
Although the directors of the sponsoring company may also be trustees of the pension plan, the
sponsoring company and the pension plan are separate legal entities that are accounted for
separately.
81
Sponsoring
employer
Pays contributions
The pension scheme

Pension plan/ (or plan/trust) is a
scheme separate fund from
the company itself.
Pays pensions in
future in accordance
with the plan's rules
Pensioners
See Chapter 4 Section 2 of the Supplementary Reading for a further exploration of the conceptual
differences between defined contribution and defined benefit plans, further definitions, and for a
discussion of multi-employer plans. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the
Workbook.
2 Defined contribution plans

Defined contribution plans: post-employment benefit plans under which an entity pays fixed
contributions into a separate entity (a fund) and will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay
Key term
further contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employee benefits relating to
employee service in the current and prior periods.
(IAS 19: para. 8)
2.1 Accounting treatment

The obligation for each year is shown as an expense for the period (disclosed in a note) and in the
statement of financial position to the extent that it has not been paid. These are easy to account for,
as the cost of the pension contribution is always made under the control of the sponsoring employer
(IAS 19: paras. 51–52).
Activity 3: Defined contribution plans

Mouse, a public limited company, agrees to contribute 5% of employees' total remuneration into a
post-employment plan each period.
In the year ended 31 December 20X9, the company paid total salaries of $10.5 million. A bonus of
$3 million based on the income for the period was paid to the employees in March 20Y0.
The company had paid $510,000 into the plan by 31 December 20X9.
Required
Calculate the total profit or loss expense for post-employment benefits for the year and the accrual
which will appear in the statement of financial position at 31 December 20X9.
82
3 Defined benefit plans
Defined benefit plans: post-employment benefit plans other than defined contribution plans.
Key term (IAS 19: para. 8)
3.1 Introduction
Typically, a separate plan is established into which the company makes regular payments, as
advised by an actuary. This fund needs to ensure that it has enough assets to pay future pensions to
pensioners. The entity records the pension plan assets (at fair value) and liabilities (at present value)
in its own books as it bears the pension plan's risks and benefits, so in substance, if not in legal form,
it owns the assets and owes the liabilities.
3.2 Complexity
Accounting for defined benefit plans is much more complex than for defined contribution plans
because:
(a) The future benefits (arising from employee service in the current or prior years) cannot be
measured exactly, but whatever they are, the employer will have to pay them, and the liability
should therefore be recognised now. To measure these future obligations, it is necessary to use
actuarial assumptions.
(b) The obligations payable in future years should be valued, by discounting, on a present value
basis. This is because the obligations may be settled in many years' time.
(c) If actuarial assumptions change, the amount of required contributions to the fund will change,
and there may be actuarial (remeasurement) gains or losses. A contribution into a fund in any
period will not equal the expense for that period, due to remeasurement gains or losses.
3.3 Measurement of plan obligation

Projected unit credit method
IAS 19 requires the use of the projected unit credit method which sees each period of service as
giving rise to an additional unit of benefit entitlement and measures each unit separately to
build up the final liability (obligation). The accumulated present value of (discounted) future benefits
will incur interest over time, and an interest expense should be recognised.
These calculations are complex and would normally be carried out by an actuary. In the exam, you
will be given the figures.
The actuary helps calculate the
Actuarial assumptions present value of the plan obligation.
Actuarial assumptions are needed to estimate the size of the future (post-employment)
benefits that will be payable under a defined benefits scheme. The main categories of actuarial
assumptions are:
 Demographic assumptions, eg mortality rates before and after retirement, the rate of
employee turnover, early retirement
 Financial assumptions, eg future salary rises
Actuarial assumptions made should be unbiased and based on market expectations.
(IAS 19: paras. 75–76)
Discounting – current service cost
The benefits earned must be discounted to arrive at the present value of the defined benefit
obligation. The increase during the year in this obligation is called the current service cost which is
shown as an expense in profit or loss.
83
In effect, the current service cost is the increase in total pensions payable as a result of continuing to
employ your staff for another year.
The discount rate used is determined by reference to market yields at the end of the reporting
period on high quality corporate bonds (or government bonds for currencies for which no deep
market in high quality corporate bonds exists). The term of the bonds should be consistent with that of
the post-employment benefit obligations.
(IAS 19: para. 120)
Compounding – interest cost
The obligation must be compounded back up each year reflecting the fact that the benefits are
one period closer to settlement. This increase in the obligation is called interest cost and is also
shown as an expense in profit or loss.
Discount
Current Increase in
service cost annual pension
Service
performed DEBIT Current service cost (P/L) payments
CREDIT Present value of obligation
Year
Now Retirement Death
end
Compound:
DEBIT Net interest cost (P/L)

CREDIT Present value of obligation
Remeasurements of plan obligation

Remeasurement gains or losses may arise due to differences between the year end
actuarial valuation of the defined benefit obligation and its accounting value.
They are made up of changes in the present value of the obligation resulting from:
 Experience adjustments (the effects of differences between the previous actuarial assumptions
and what has actually occurred); and
IAS 19 views them a bit like a
revaluation, so they go to OCI.
 The effects of changes in actuarial assumptions.
Remeasurement gains and losses are recognised in other comprehensive income ('Items that
will not be reclassified to profit or loss') in the period in which they occur.
3.4 Measurement of plan assets

The sponsoring employer needs to set aside investments during the accounting period to cover the
pension liability. To meet the IAS 19 criteria (and protect the pensioners!) they must be held by an
entity legally separate from the reporting entity.
Plan assets are (IAS 19: paras. 113–115):
 Assets such as stocks and shares, held by a fund that is legally separate from the reporting
entity, which exists solely to pay employee benefits
 Insurance policies, issued by an insurer that is not a related party, the proceeds of which can
only be used to pay employee benefits
84
Interest income is applied to the asset and netted against the interest cost on the defined
benefit obligation. The resulting net interest cost (or income) on the net defined benefit
liability (or asset) is recognised in profit or loss and represents the financing effect of paying for
benefits in advance or in arrears.
Difference between actual return and amounts

in net interest
Compound: = remeasurement recognised in OCI
DEBIT Fair value plan assets
CREDIT Net interest cost (or income) (P/L)
Increase in
Service annual pension
performed payments
Now Year Contributions: Retirement Death

end DEBIT Fair value plan assets
CREDIT Company cash
Remeasurements of plan assets

The value of the investments will increase over time. This is called the return on plan assets and
is defined as interest, dividends and other income derived from the plan assets together with
realised and unrealised gains or losses on the plan assets, less any costs of managing plan
assets and tax payable by the plan itself.
The difference between the return on plan assets and the interest income referred to above
included in net interest on the net defined benefit liability (or asset) is a remeasurement and is
recognised in other comprehensive income ('Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss').
3.5 Past service cost

Past service cost is the increase or decrease in the present value of the defined benefit obligation for
employee service in prior periods, resulting from:
(a) A plan amendment (the introduction or withdrawal of, or changes to, a defined benefit Eg
plan); or reducing
the number
(b) A curtailment (a significant reduction by the entity in the number of employees covered by by which
the years
the plan). worked is
divided to
Past service cost is recognised as an adjustment to the obligation and as an expense (or income) at increase
the earlier of the following dates: pension
payable.
(a) When the plan amendment or curtailment occurs; or
(b) When the entity recognises related restructuring costs (in accordance with IAS 37) or
termination benefits. (IAS 19: para. 99)
For example:
(a) An amendment is made to the plan which improves benefits for plan members.
An increase to the obligation (and expense) is recognised when the amendment occurs:
DEBIT Profit or loss X

CREDIT Present value of defined benefit obligation X
85
(b) Discontinuance of an operation, so that employees' services are terminated earlier than
expected.
A reduction in the obligation (and income) is recognised at the same time as the termination
benefits are recognised:
DEBIT Present value of defined benefit obligation X

CREDIT Profit or loss X
3.6 Approach
The suggested approach to defined benefit plans is to deal with the change in the obligation and
asset in the following order, building up the disclosure notes. However, as long as all the steps are
followed they can be done in a different order.
Refer back
to this table
Step Item Recognition when
doing
(1) Record opening figures: questions.
 Obligation
 Asset
(2) Net interest cost

 Interest applied to b/d obligation
and assets (and netted in profit or
loss). DEBIT Net interest cost (P/L) (x% × b/d
 Should also reflect any changes in obligation)
obligation during period, eg past CREDIT PV defined benefit obligation
service cost (SOFP)
 The interest on assets is time and
apportioned for contributions less DEBIT Plan assets (SOFP) (x% × b/d assets)
benefits paid in the period (if they
occur throughout the year rather than CREDIT Net interest cost (P/L)
at the start or end of the year). The
interest on obligations is also time
apportioned for benefits paid
(3) Current service cost

 Increase in the present value of the DEBIT Current service cost (P/L)
obligation resulting from employee CREDIT PV defined benefit obligation (SOFP)
service in the current period
(4) Past service cost Increase in obligation:

 Change in PV obligation for DEBIT Past service cost (P/L)
employee service in prior periods, CREDIT PV defined benefit obligation (SOFP)
resulting from a plan amendment or
curtailment Decrease in obligation:
 Charged or credited immediately to DEBIT PV defined benefit obligation (SOFP)

profit or loss CREDIT Past service cost (P/L)
(5) Contributions
 Into the plan by the company DEBIT Plan assets (SOFP)
 As advised by actuary CREDIT Company cash
(6) Benefits DEBIT PV defined benefit obligation (SOFP)

 Actual pension payments made CREDIT Plan assets (SOFP)
86
Step Item Recognition
(7) Remeasurements
 Arising from annual valuations of
obligation and assets
 On obligation, differences between
actuarial assumptions and actual Recognise all changes due to remeasurements
experience during the period, or in other comprehensive income
changes in actuarial assumptions
 On assets, differences between actual
return on plan assets and amounts
included in net interest
(8) Disclose deficit or surplus in accordance

See Activity 4
with the Standard
Illustration 2
Defined benefit plan
Angus operates a defined benefit scheme for its employees but has yet to record anything for the
current year except to expense the cash contributions which were $18 million. The opening position
was a net liability of $45 million which is included in the non-current liabilities of Angus in its draft
financial statements. Current service costs for the year were $15 million and interest rates on good
quality corporate bonds fell from 8% at the start of the year to 6% by 31 March 20X8. In addition,
a payment of $9 million was made out of the cash of the pension scheme in relation to employees
who left the scheme. The reduction in the pension scheme liability as a result of the curtailment
was $12 million. The actuary has assessed that the scheme is in deficit by $51 million as at
31 March 20X8.
Required
Calculate the gain/loss on remeasurement of the defined benefit pension net liability of Angus as at
31 March 20X8, and state how this should be treated.
Solution
The loss on remeasurement is calculated as $8.4 million (W) and should be recognised in other
comprehensive income for the year.
Working: Net liability
$m
Opening net liability 45.0
Net interest cost ($45m × 8%) 3.6
Current service cost 15.0
Gain on curtailment ($12m – $9m) (3.0)
Cash contributions into the scheme (18.0)
42.6
Loss on remeasurement () 8.4
Closing net liability 51.0
87
Activity 4: Defined benefit plans
Lewis, a public limited company, has a defined benefit plan for its employees. The present value of
the future benefit obligations at 1 January 20X7 was $1,120 million and the fair value of the plan
assets was $1,040 million.
Further data concerning the year ended 31 December 20X7 is as follows:
$m
Current service cost 76
Benefits paid to former employees 88
Contributions paid to plan 94
Present value of benefit obligations at 31 December 1,222 As valued by

Fair value of plan assets at 31 December 1,132 professional actuaries
Interest cost (gross yield on 'blue chip' corporate bonds): 5%

On 1 January 20X7 the plan was amended to provide additional benefits with effect from that date.
The present value of the additional benefits at 1 January 20X7 was calculated by actuaries at
$40 million.
Required
Prepare the required notes to the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income and
statement of financial position for the year ended 31 December 20X7.
Assume the contributions and benefits were paid on 31 December 20X7.
Solution
Notes to the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
Defined benefit expense recognised in profit or loss
$m
Current service cost
Past service cost
Net interest costs
Other comprehensive income (items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss):
Remeasurements of defined benefit plans
$m
Remeasurement gain/(loss) on defined benefit obligation
Return on plan assets (excluding amounts in net interest)
Notes to the statement of financial position

Net defined benefit liability recognised in the statement of financial position
31.12.X7 31.12.X6
$m $m
Present value of defined benefit obligation
Fair value of plan assets
Net liability
88
Changes in the present value of the defined benefit obligation

$m
Opening defined benefit obligation
Closing defined benefit obligation
Changes in the fair value of plan assets

$m
Opening fair value of plan assets
Closing fair value of plan assets
Although questions frequently ask you to assume that contributions and benefits are paid at the year
end, this is not invariably the case. See Chapter 4 Section 4 of the Supplementary Reading for a
comprehensive example in which contributions are paid at the start of the period and benefits paid
in two instalments across the period. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the
Workbook.
4 Settlements
A settlement is a transaction that eliminates all further legal or constructive obligations
for part or all of the benefits provided under a defined benefit plan (other than a payment of benefits
to, or on behalf of, employees that is set out in the terms of the plan and included in the actuarial
assumptions).
Example: a lump-sum cash payment made in exchange for rights to receive post-employment benefits.
The gain or loss on a settlement is recognised in profit or loss when the settlement occurs:
DEBIT PV obligation (as advised by actuary) X

CREDIT FV plan assets (any assets transferred) X
CREDIT Cash (paid directly by the entity) X
CREDIT/DEBIT Profit or loss (difference) X
(IAS 19: para. 99)
89
5 The 'Asset Ceiling' test
Amounts recognised as a net pension asset in the statement of financial position must not be stated at
more than their recoverable amount. Consequently, IAS 19 (IAS 19: paras. 64 and 65) requires any
net pension asset to be measured at the lower of:
 Net reported asset; or
 The present value of any refunds/reduction of future contributions available from the pension
plan
Any impairment loss is charged immediately to other comprehensive income.
(IAS 19: para. 8)
See Chapter 4 Section 3 of the Supplementary Reading for an illustration of the 'Asset Ceiling' test.
This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
6 Current developments and other issues
6.1 General issues around IAS 19

IAS 19 was last revised in 2011. In the longer term, the IASB intends to undertake a more
fundamental review and produce a revised standard to address other issues, but recognises that
this will take some years to complete.
Some of the key issues are:
(a) Definitions of the types of plan
(b) Interest rate used for discounting
(c) Measurement of plan liabilities
(d) Treatment of more unusual plans:
(i) 'Hybrid' plans (part defined contribution, part defined benefit)
(ii) 'Higher of' plans (where the employee's pension is defined benefit, but can be higher if
the funds invested perform well)
(iii) Company 'top-ups' or guaranteed returns on defined contribution plans
The scenarios in (d) are all currently accounted for as defined benefit plans as, given that the
contributions are not fixed, they do not meet the definition of a defined contribution plan.
However, it may be more appropriate to have a different form of accounting, eg a separate
liability measured at fair value for the 'top-up' in scenario (d)(iii) or to revise the definitions of the
types of plan.
The presentation and recognition requirements of IAS 19 may not be consistent with the
Conceptual Framework. For example the interest element is recognised in profit or loss while the
'correction' (difference between actual return and interest applied) is recognised in other
comprehensive income. The logic for this split is that the interest element shows the financing effect of
paying for benefits in advance or arrears. However, under the Conceptual Framework, there is no
conceptual basis for this split.
The Exposure Draft Conceptual Framework (ED/2015/3: paras. 7.19–7.27) addresses this issue to
some extent by providing guidance on whether to present income and expenses in profit or loss or in
other comprehensive income. The ED proposes that all items of income and expense should be
shown in profit or loss unless relating to the remeasurement of assets and liabilities – these would
normally be shown in other comprehensive income. The ED is therefore consistent with the approach
already adopted in IAS 19.
90
IAS 19 could also be criticised for reporting estimated figures in profit or loss, while reporting the
difference to arrive at the actual return in other comprehensive income.
IAS 19 uses the 'projected unit credit method' for recognition of pension obligations, which means
that future anticipated increases in salary (and therefore future pension liabilities) based on years
worked to date are included. It could be argued that this approach does not comply with the
Conceptual Framework (or the ED) because those increases have not been earned yet and therefore
do not relate to the period. Indeed, they may never be earned (or payable) if the employee does not
work for the same company for his or her whole working life.
6.2 Plan amendment, curtailment or settlement/availability of a

refund
The IASB issued proposed narrow scope amendments to IAS 19 in 2015. The proposed amendments
clarify two issues relating to defined benefit schemes:
(a) The current service cost in a period before a plan amendment, settlement of curtailment is not
affected by, or included in, the resulting past service cost or gain or loss on settlement.
(b) When a plan amendment, settlement or curtailment occurs and the net defined benefit liability
or asset is remeasured:
(i) Net interest for the remaining period is determined based on the remeasured net
defined benefit liability or asset
(ii) Current service cost and interest for the period after the remeasurement are determined
using assumptions used for the remeasurement
(IASB, 2015)
6.3 Pension accounting and risk

IAS 19 requires risk-based disclosures, including detail on the choice of investments, future cash
requirements and information about risks to which the scheme exposes the company.
The IAS 19 disclosure requirements were generally seen as an opportunity for entities to explain their
pension scheme risks and, crucially, how such risks are being managed. The entity should:
 Explain the characteristics of, and risks associated with, the entity's defined benefit plans,
focusing on unusual, entity-specific or plan-specific risks, or risks that arise from a
concentration of investments in one particular area;
 Identify and explain the amounts in the entity's financial statements arising from its defined
benefit plans; and
 Explain how the defined benefit plans may affect the entity's future cash flows, including a
sensitivity analysis which shows the potential impact of changes in actuarial assumptions.
Disclosure is required as to the funding arrangements and commitments from the company to
make contributions to the plan.
These disclosures provide an opportunity for the entity to demonstrate that it is aware of the risks
associated with its defined benefit plans and how it is managing its risks, so that users will draw the
correct conclusions. As with all disclosure, there needs to be a balance between providing enough
relevant information to allow users to understand the risks, without disclosing so much information
that they cannot see what is relevant.
Possible risks to which a defined benefit pension plan exposes an entity include:
 Investment risk
 Interest risk
 Salary risk
 Longevity risk
91
6.4 Stakeholder perspectives
The growing cost of providing defined benefit pension plans to employees has been a concern to
companies for a number of years. Due to increasing life expectancies and economic conditions,
companies report increasing pension liabilities on the statement of financial positon and, more
importantly, have to make large cash contributions in order to fund pension deficits. From the
employees' perspective, defined benefit pension plans are generally preferred as they provide a
guaranteed income on retirement.
There have, however, been a number of cases in recent years in which the ability of a company to
continue as a going concern is put in doubt as a result of its pension plan commitments. In such
situations, employees lose their job security and, if the company is liquidated, employees potentially
do not receive the full amount of benefits due to them under the pension plan as there are insufficient
assets to cover the pension liabilities of the company. Investors may receive reduced dividends from
companies that need to use surplus cash to make deficit contributions and will be concerned about
the value of their investment if the company is not able to continue as a going concern. Other lenders
and creditors will also be concerned about whether the company has sufficient resources to settle any
debts as they fall due.
Most companies have now closed their defined benefit pension plans to new joiners in an effort to
reduce pension costs and avoid increasing liabilities further, but the existing liabilities in respect of
benefits already accrued will remain an issue for a number of years to come.
Exercise 1: Pension disclosure

The financial statements of Sainsbury's plc include disclosures relating to its defined benefit
obligation. Sainsbury's is a listed company in the UK which has been subject to media attention in
respect of its significant pension deficit.
Take a look at the pension disclosure in Sainsbury's Annual Report available at:
www.about.sainsburys.co.uk/investors
Then, using companies that you are familiar with, research the pension disclosures given in their
financial statements.
Ethics note
In general, the ethical dilemmas that are likely to be tested in the Strategic Business Reporting (SBR)
exam occur in the context of manipulation of financial statements, with someone in authority, such as
a managing director, wishing to present the financial statements in a more favourable light.
The SBR exam will be the first time you will be tested on employee benefits. It could form the basis of
part of an ethical question. One area such a question might focus on could be the difference
between defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans. The main difference between the
two types of plans lies in who bears the risk: if the employer bears the risk, even in a small way by
guaranteeing or specifying the return, the plan is a defined benefit plan. A defined contribution
scheme must give a benefit formula based solely on the amount of the contributions, and therefore no
guarantee is offered by the employer.
A defined benefit scheme may be created even if there is no legal obligation, if an employer has a
practice of guaranteeing the benefits payable.
There could, in consequence, be an incentive for a company director to argue that a plan is a
defined contribution plan, especially where the legal position is in conflict with the substance. That
way, assets and liabilities are not shown in the statement of financial position, and in particular, a
net liability, which could affect loan covenants, is not shown.
92
Chapter summary
Short-term benefits
 Recognised as a liability as employee
1. Employee benefits renders service (ie accruals basis)
(IAS 19)
 Not discounted
 Accrue for short-term compensated
absences (eg holiday pay) that can
Post-employment
be carried forwards
benefits
2. Defined contribution 3. Defined benefit plans

plans  Definition
 Definition Post-employment plans other than defined contribution
An entity pays fixed contributions plans
into a separate entity (a fund) and  Company guarantees pension
will have no legal or constructive
Final salary
obligation to pay further Eg x years worked
contributions if the fund does not 60
hold sufficient assets to pay all  Projected unit credit method:
employee benefits relating to (1) Opening asset and obligation
employee service in the current or
(2) Net interest cost: Dr Net interest cost (P/L)
prior periods
Cr PV obligation (x% x b/d)
 Company's only obligation is
Dr Plan assets (x% x b/d)
agreed contribution, eg 5%  Cr Net interest cost (P/L)
salary
(3) Current service Dr CSC (P/L)
 Accounted for on accruals basis cost: Cr PV obligation
(4) Past service Dr/Cr PSC (P/L)
cost: Cr/Dr PV obligation
6. Current developments (amendment/ curtailment)
Outstanding issues: (5) Contributions: Dr Plan assets
(a) Definitions of the types of plan Cr Company cash
(b) Interest rate used for discounting (6) Benefits: Dr PV obligation
(c) Measurement of plan liabilities Cr Plan assets
(d) Treatment of more unusual plans: (7) Remeasurements:
(i) 'hybrid' plans (part defined – recognise immediately in OCI
contribution, part defined (8) Disclosure
benefit)
(ii) 'higher of' plans (where
pension is defined benefit, but 4. Settlements
can be higher if the funds
 A transaction that eliminates all further
invested perform well)
legal/constructive obligation for part/all benefits
(iii) company 'top-ups' or
 Any gain/loss recognised in P/L
guaranteed returns on defined
contribution plans
(e) Defined benefit schemes are 5. Asset ceiling test
increasingly costly and risky, and
Net asset measured at lower of:
many have been closed to new
entrants.  Net reported asset
 PV refunds available from plan/ reductions in future
contributions
93
1. Short-term benefits
 Short-term benefits are accounted for on an accruals basis and not discounted.
 Post-employment benefits are arrangements that provide for pensions on retirement.
They can be divided into defined contribution and defined benefit plans.
2. Defined contribution plans
 Also known as 'money purchase' schemes. The employer accounts for the agreed cost to
the company on an accruals basis. The employee bears the risk of the pension's value.
3. Defined benefit plans
 Also known as 'final salary' schemes. The employer guarantees the employee an annual
pension based on final salary and number of years worked.
 The projected unit credit method is used to accrue costs. These include current
service cost and net interest cost (or income) on the net defined benefit liability (or
asset). Remeasurement differences between the year-end values of the assets and
obligation and the book amounts are recognised in other comprehensive income.
 Past service costs on plan amendments or curtailments are recognised in profit or
loss.
4. Settlements
 The effects of settlements are recognised in profit or loss.
5. 'Asset ceiling' test
 Defined benefit pension assets are limited to the lower of the net reported asset and
the present value of any refunds/contribution reductions available.
6. Current developments
 IAS 19 was revised in 2011, however, there are other key issues that still need addressing,
such as definitions and accounting for different types of plan.
94
Question practice
Q6 Radost
Further reading
There are articles on the ACCA website, written by the SBR examining team, which are relevant to the
topics studied in this Chapter and which are useful reading:
Pension posers (2015)
IAS 19 Employee Benefits (2010)
PwC have produced an informative guide to the practical aspects of applying IAS 19.
https://inform.pwc.com/show?action=applyInformContentTerritory&id=1344034701155349&tid=1
95
96
SKILLS CHECKPOINT 1
Approaching ethical issues
aging information
Man
aging information
Man
An
sw
er
Approaching pl
t
en
manag ime
ethical issues Resolving
an
em
t
nin
Approaching financial Exam success skills
Good
reporting issues
g
ethical issues
uirereq rpretation
Specific SBR skills
e m e nts
Applying good
req of rprineteation
consolidation
Creating effective
m eunirts
techniques
discussion
Eff d p
of t inteect
an
e c re
c rr
Performing
r re Co
ti v
se w ri
nt tin
Co
ati g
on
l
Efficient numerica
analysis
Introduction
Section A of the Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) exam will consist of two scenario based
questions that will total 50 marks. The second of these questions will require candidates to
consider the reporting implications and the ethical implications of specific events in a given
scenario.
The two Section B questions could deal with any aspect of the syllabus. Therefore, ethics could
feature in this part of the exam too.
Given that ethics will feature in every exam, it is essential that you have mastered the
appropriate technique for approaching ethical issues in order to maximise your marks in the
exam.
As a reminder, the detailed syllabus learning outcomes for ethics are:
1. Professional behaviour and compliance with accounting standards.
2. Ethical requirements of corporate reporting and the consequences of unethical behaviours.
97
Skills Checkpoint 1: Approaching ethical issues
SBR Skill: Approaching ethical issues

A step by step technique for approaching ethical issues has been outlined below. Each
step will be explained in more detail in the following sections as the question 'Range'
is answered in stages.
STEP 1:
Look at the mark allocation of the question
and work out how many minutes you have to
answer the question (based on 1.95 minutes
a mark).
STEP 2:
Read the requirement and analyse it. Highlight
each sub-requirement separately, identify the verb(s)
and ask yourself what each sub-requirement means.
STEP 3:
Read the scenario, asking yourself for each
paragraph which IAS or IFRS may be relevant and
whether the proposed accounting treatment
complies with that IAS or IFRS. Identify which
fundamental principles from the ACCA Code of
Ethics and Conduct (the ACCA Code) are relevant
and whether there are any threats to these
principles.
STEP 4:
Prepare an answer plan using key words from the
requirements as headings. You could use a mind
map, a bullet-pointed list or simply annotate the
question. Try and come up with separate points for
each paragraph in the scenario. Make sure you
generate enough points for the marks available –
the ACCA marking guides typically allocate 1 mark
per relevant well-explained point.
STEP 5:
Write up your answer using key words from the
requirements as headings. Create a separate sub-
heading for each key paragraph in the scenario.
Write in full sentences and clearly explain each
point.
98
Skills Checkpoint 1
Exam success skills

For this question, we will focus on the following exam success skills and in particular:
 Good time management. The exam will be time-pressured and you will
need to manage your time carefully to ensure that you can make a good attempt
at every part of every question. You will have 3 hours and 15 minutes in the
exam, which works out at 1.95 minutes a mark. The following question is worth
20 marks so you should allow 39 minutes. You should allocate approximately a
quarter to a third of your time to reading (first the requirement and then the
scenario) and preparing an answer plan. In this question, this equates to
approximately 10 minutes which should be broken down into 5 minutes for
reading and 5 minutes for planning. The remaining 29 minutes should then be
allocated to writing up the answer and split between the issues raised by the
different paragraphs in the question.
 Managing information. This type of case study style question typically
contains four or five paragraphs of information and each paragraph is likely to
revolve around a different IAS or IFRS. This is a lot of information to absorb and
the best approach is effective planning. As you read each paragraph, you
should think about which IAS or IFRS may be relevant (there could be more than
one relevant for each paragraph) and if you cannot think of a relevant IAS or
IFRS, you can fall back on the principles of the Conceptual Framework for
Financial Reporting (the Conceptual Framework). Also ask yourself which of the
ACCA Code's fundamental principles are relevant and whether there are any
threats to these principles in the scenario. It is really important to identify the
ethical issues as there is a danger that you only focus on the accounting
treatment and you will not pass the question.
 Correct interpretation of requirements. At first glance, it looks like the
following question just contains one requirement. However, on closer
examination you will discover that it contains two sub-requirements. Once you
have identified the requirements, by focusing on the verb and each sub-
requirement, you need to analyse them to determine exactly what your answer
should address.
 Answer planning. Everyone will have a preferred style for an answer plan.
For example, it may be a mind map, bullet-pointed lists or simply annotating the
question paper. Choose the approach that you feel most comfortable with or if
you are not sure, try out different approaches for different questions until you
have found your preferred style.
 Effective writing and presentation. It is often helpful to use key words
from the requirement as headings in your answer. You may also wish to use
sub-headings in your answer – you could use a separate sub-heading for each
paragraph from the scenario in the question which contains an issue for
discussion. Underline your headings and sub-headings with a ruler and write in
full sentences, ensuring your style is professional. Two professional marks will be
awarded to the ethical issues question in Section A of the SBR exam. The use of
headings, sub-headings and full sentences as well as clear explanations and
ensuring that all sub-requirements are met and all issues in the scenario are
addressed will help you obtain these two marks.
99
Skill Activity
STEP 1 Look at the mark allocation of the following question and work out
how many minutes you have to answer the question. It is a 20 mark
question and at 1.95 minutes a mark, it should take 39 minutes. On
the basis of spending approximately a third to a quarter of your time
reading and planning, this time should be split approximately as
follows:
 Reading the question – 5 minutes
 Planning your answer – 5 minutes
 Writing up your answer – 29 minutes
Within each of these phases, your time should be split roughly equally
between the two sub-requirements (ethical implications and accounting
implications).
Required
Discuss the ethical and accounting implications of the above situations from the
perspective of the Finance Director. (18 marks)
Professional marks will be awarded in question 2 for application of ethical principles.

(2 marks)
(Total = 20 marks)
STEP 2 Read the requirement for the following question and analyse it.
Highlight each sub-requirement, identify the verb(s) and ask yourself
what each sub-requirement means.
Verb – refer to Sub-requirement 1

Sub-requirement 2
ACCA definition
Required
Discuss the ethical and accounting implications of the above situations from the
perspective of the Finance Director. (20 marks)
Note whose
viewpoint your
answer should be
from
Your verb is 'discuss'. This is defined by the ACCA as 'Consider and debate/argue
about the pros and cons of an issue. Examine in detail by using arguments in favour or
against'.
100
Skills Checkpoint 1
There are two sub-requirements to discuss:

(1) The ethical implications
(2) The accounting implications
In this context, the verb 'discuss' is asking you to examine each of the proposed
changes in accounting policies and estimates and assess arguments in favour and
against adopting.
For the ethical implications, you need to consider the fundamental principles of the
ACCA Code and whether there are any threats to these principles in the scenario.
For the accounting implications, you need to assess whether the proposed treatment
complies with the relevant IAS or IFRS.
STEP 3 Now read the scenario.

Accounting implications
Ask yourself for each paragraph which IAS or IFRS may be relevant
(remember you do not need to know the IAS or IFRS number) and whether
the proposed accounting treatment complies with that IAS or IFRS. If you
cannot think of a relevant IAS or IFRS, then refer to the Conceptual
Framework for Financial Reporting (Conceptual Framework).
To identify the issues, you might want to consider whether one or more of
the following are relevant in the scenario:
Potential issue What does it mean?
Recognition When should the item be recorded in the financial

statements?
Initial measurement What amount should be recorded when the item is

first recognised?
Subsequent Once the item has been recognised, how should

measurement the amount change year on year?
Presentation What heading should the amount appear under in

the statement of financial position or statement of
profit or loss and other comprehensive income?
Disclosure Is a note to the accounts required in relation to the

transaction or balance?
Ethical implications
Consider the ACCA Code. The fundamental principle of professional
competence is going to be the most important in an SBR question because
an ACCA accountant must prepare financial statements in accordance with
IAS and IFRS. Therefore, if the accountant is associated with any accounting
treatment that does not comply with IAS or IFRS, they will be breaching the
principle of professional competence. Other fundamental principles may
also be relevant (objectivity, integrity, confidentiality, professional
behaviour). Watch out for threats in the questions to any of these principles.
Reminders of these threats have been included below:
101
Threat Explanation
Self-interest A financial or other interest may

inappropriately influence the accountant's
judgement or behaviour
Self-review Where the accountant may not appropriately

evaluate the results of a previous judgement
made or activity or service performed by
themselves or others within their firm
Advocacy Threat that the accountant promotes a client's

or employer's position to the point that their
objectivity is compromised
Familiarity Due to a long or close relationship with a

client or employer, the accountant may be
too sympathetic to their interests or too
accepting of their work
Intimidation The accountant may not act objectively due to

actual or perceived pressures
Note the company's main business activities –

this could be important for revenue recognition
and the fact that it in the manufacturing
industry means that inventory and non-current
assets may be relevant. (Accounting)
Question – Range (20 marks)
Range is a privately-owned furniture design and manufacturing
company which prepares its accounts in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards. Range manufactures and The Managing
Director still owns
Managing Director is
installs high quality office furniture for a wide range of 100% of the
unlikely to be a shares. There
qualified accountant so
corporate clients. The company was founded 30 years ago and is still could be a conflict
unlikely to be familiar of interest here.
with IAS/IFRS.
100% owned by its founder who is also the Managing (Ethics)
(Accounting and
Ethics)
Director of the company.
At the planning meeting for the next accounting period, the

Bound by ACCA
Managing Director suggested to the Finance Director (an Code (Ethics)
IAS 8 Accounting ACCA-qualified accountant) that a number of changes be made

Policies, Changes in
Accounting Estimates to Range's accounting policies and estimates. The proposed
and Errors
(Accounting) changes are outlined below.
IAS 16 Property, Plant
and Equipment.
Range's manufacturing machinery is currently being depreciated on a
(Accounting)
Reduces depreciation,
straight line basis over 5 years. The Managing Director would like to
increases profits.
Does this evidence
(Ethics)
support the proposed extend the useful life of this plant to 10 years. Historically,
change? (Accounting
and Ethics) profits or losses on disposal of machinery have been
minimal.
102
Skills Checkpoint 1
IFRS 15 Revenue from

Contracts with Customers
(Accounting)
Range has two main revenue streams. Firstly, the company earns
When is the
revenue from the sale of office furniture to corporate performance
obligation satisfied?
clients. Secondly, the company offers an installation service in (Accounting)
exchange for a fee. The Managing Director would like to revise the
Recognise revenue revenue recognition policy so that revenue is recognised when the
and profit earlier.
(Accounting and customer signs the contract rather than on delivery and over the
Ethics)
period of installation of the furniture respectively.
Finally, the Managing Director has noticed that in the past year,
Does this evidence
there has been a decrease in the percentage of furniture support the proposed
change? (Accounting
returned by customers for repair under warranty. He would and Ethics)
IAS 37 Provisions,
Contingent Liabilities like to reduce the provision for warranties in the forthcoming year.
and Contingent Assets
(Accounting)
As the Managing Director was leaving the meeting, he mentioned to
the Finance Director that now he had reached the age of 65, he
would like to retire and sell the business in one year's time.
Required
Incentive to change
accounting policies and
estimates to increase Discuss the ethical and accounting implications of the above situations
profits and maximise the
price he could sell his from the perspective of the Finance Director. (18 marks)
shares for on retirement
(Ethics)
Professional marks will be awarded in this question for the application
of ethical principles. (2 marks)
(Total = 20 marks)
103
STEP 4 Prepare an answer plan using key words from the requirements as
headings (accounting implications). You could use a mind map
similar to the one shown below. Alternatively you could use a
bullet-pointed list or simply annotate the question.
Try and come up with separate points for each of the three
proposed changes in accounting policies or estimates in the
scenario.
Make sure you generate enough points for the marks available –
there are 18 marks available, so on the basis of 1 mark per
relevant well-explained point, to achieve a comfortable pass, you
should aim to generate 14–15 points for this 18-mark question.
Accounting
implications
Change in accounting policy

or estimate
 Change in policy: when
required by IFRS or results
in more relevant/reliable
information
 Change in estimate: when
change in circumstances or
new information
Extending useful life (UL) of Change in revenue Decreasing warranty

machinery recognition provision
(Change in accounting estimate) (Change in accounting policy) (Change in accounting
 Separate performance estimate)
 Review required annually
 No evidence for increase obligations  Only if costs of repair
 Revenue for furniture on under warranty likely
delivery to decrease
 Revenue for installation  Possible evidence as
as service performed less furniture returned
 Proposed change not
permitted
104
Skills Checkpoint 1
Ethical
implications
FD = ACCA qualified so Reject changes to useful life

Professional competence =
bound by ACCA Code of machinery and revenue
compliance with IAS/IFRS
recognition
Threat to principles of Proposed changes to UL of

If MD disagrees, seek advice
professional competence, machinery and revenue
from ACCA and/or legal
objectivity and integrity as recognition would result in
advice. Consider resigning.
MD motivated to maximise non-compliance with IAS 16
profit and sales price and IFRS 15
STEP 5 Write up your answer using key words from the requirements as
headings. Create a separate sub-heading for each key paragraph
in the scenario. Write in full sentences and clearly explain each
point, ensuring that you use professional language. For the
accounting implications, structure your answer for each of the three
items as follows:
 Rule/principle per IAS or IFRS (state briefly)
 Apply rule/principle to the scenario (correct accounting
treatment and why)
 Conclude
For the ethical implications, take the following approach:
 Should the FD accept the proposed change? Why/why not?
 Would the change result in a breach of any of the ethical
principles? If so, which and why?
 Are there any additional threats to the ethical principles?
 What action should the FD take next?
From the point of view of
the Finance Director as
this was asked for in the
Suggested solution requirement.
Make sure you write in As an ACCA qualified accountant, the Finance Director (FD) is bound
full sentences. This will
help you to obtain the by the ACCA Code of Ethics and Conduct (the ACCA Code). This
two professional skills With the verb ‘discuss' in
marks. means adhering to its fundamental principles, one of which is the requirement, it is
useful to have a short
professional competence. This requires the FD to ensure the accounts opening paragraph
explaining the basis of
comply with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). your discussion.
Therefore, the FD should only accept the proposed changes if they

comply with IFRS.
105
In ethics questions, you
should also look out for
The FD should also be aware of threats to the ACCA Code's threats to the ACCA
Code's fundamental
fundamental principles. Here the self-interest threat is that the principles in the scenario
and mention them in your
Managing Director (MD) wishes to retire and sell his shares in one answer.
year's time which may incentivise him to increase profit in order to

maximise his exit price from the business. Use key words for the
requirement to structure
your answer and help
Accounting implications you to obtain the two
professional skills marks
Changes in accounting policies and estimates
Underlined sub-headings IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and

will help you structure
your answer and help Errors only permits a change in accounting policy if the change:
you to obtain the two
professional skills marks.  Is required by an IFRS; and
 Results in information that is more relevant and reliable.
A change in accounting estimate is only required when changes occur State relevant
rule/principle from
in the circumstances on which the estimate was based or as a result of IAS or IFRS very briefly
(you do not need to
new information or more experience. state IAS/IFRS number)
Changing an accounting policy or estimate purely to boost profits and

share price would contravene IAS 8 and be considered unethical.
Apply rule/principle
Extending the useful life of manufacturing machinery to scenario.
IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment requires the useful life of an
asset to be reviewed at least each financial year end, and, if
Rule/principle
expectations differ from previous estimates, the change should be
accounted for prospectively as a change in accounting estimate.
The MD wishes to double the useful life of the machinery. This would
Apply reduce the amount of depreciation charged each year on machinery
significantly, thereby increasing profit.
However, there does not appear to be any evidence that the useful life
of machinery should be increased given there have been minimal
Apply profits or losses on disposal in the past which suggests that the current
useful life of 5 years is appropriate. If the useful life of the machinery
were underestimated to the extent the MD is suggesting, this would
have resulted in substantial profits on disposal.
The useful life of the machinery should remain at 5 years in the

Conclude with your
absence of any evidence to suggest that its utility to Range will
opinion
increase to 10 years.
106
Skills Checkpoint 1
Recognising revenue when the customer signs the contract
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers requires the entity to

identify the performance obligations in a contract.
Rule/principle
Here, there appear to be two performance obligations in a typical

contract with a customer. Firstly, the promise to transfer goods in the
form of office furniture, and secondly, the promise to transfer a service
Apply
in the form of installation of the office furniture. The MD's proposal to
revise the revenue recognition policy fails to split the performance
obligations as both revenue streams would be recognised when the
customer signs the contract.
Revenue should be recognised when each performance obligation is

satisfied. This occurs when the promised good or service is transferred
Rule/principle
to a customer. The sale of office furniture results in satisfaction of a
performance obligation at a point in time. IFRS 15 indicators of the
transfer of control include transfer of physical possession of the asset Apply
and the customer having the significant risks and rewards of

ownership. In the case of Range's office furniture, the transfer of
control appears to take place at the point of delivery of the furniture to
the customer rather than when the customer signs the contract.
Therefore, the existing revenue recognition policy is correct and the
MD's proposed change would contravene IFRS 15.
Conclude with your
opinion
The installation service results in satisfaction of a performance
obligation over time. IFRS 15 requires revenue to be recognised by
Apply
measuring progress towards complete satisfaction of the performance
obligation. Therefore the current policy of recognising revenue over
the period of installation is correct and the MD's proposed change to
Conclude with your recognise it when the customer signs the contract would contravene
opinion
IFRS 15 and not be permitted.
It is worth noting that the MD's proposed changes would both result in
earlier recognition of revenue and therefore profit.
Reducing the warranty provision
Under IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets,

where there is a present obligation, probable outflow and a reliable Rule/principle
107
estimate, a provision should be made for the best estimate of the
expenditure required to settle the obligation.
Here, there seems to be evidence to suggest that expected expenditure

has fallen as fewer customers are returning furniture under warranty.
Therefore, there may be some justification in reducing the provision Apply
which would result in a decrease in expenses and increase in profit.
This would be a change in accounting estimate given that the

proportion of returns and likely repair costs involve management
Conclude with your
opinion judgement. As such, it should be accounted for prospectively.
Ethical implications
Issue (1): Should the FD

The proposed increase of the machinery's useful life appears to be
accept the proposed
change? Why/why
unjustified because the evidence indicates that the current useful life is
not?
still appropriate.
Issue (2): Should the FD
accept the proposed
The change to revenue recognition is not permitted because it would
change? Why/why
not?
contravene IFRS 15.
In ethics questions, you There are possible advocacy and intimidation threats here if the FD
should also look out for
threats to the ACCA feels pressured to act in the MD's best interests. There is also a
Code's fundamental
principles in the familiarity threat if the FD were inclined to accept the changes out of
scenario and mention
them in your answer. friendship. Either way, if the FD were to accept the change to the Issues (1)(2): Would
there be a breach of
useful life of the machinery and the change in revenue recognition, any ethical principles?
If so, which and why?
this would be a breach of the ACCA Code's fundamental principles of
professional competence (due to non-compliance with IFRS),
objectivity (giving in to pressure from the FD) and integrity (if they did
so knowingly, with the sole motivation of maximising the exit price for
the MD).
Issue (3): Should the FD The proposed decrease in the warranty provision appears potentially
accept the proposed
change? Why/why justifiable due to the decrease in furniture returned under warranty.
not?
However, if on further investigation there is insufficient evidence to
Issue (3): Would there
be a breach of any
justify the decrease in provision and the sole motivation is to boost
ethical principles? If so,
which and why?
profits and maximise the MD's exit price, this change would not be
permitted.
Conclude any ethical

The FD should explain to the MD why the proposed changes to the
issues question with
advice on what the
useful life of the machinery and revenue recognition are not permitted.
person should do next.
If the MD refuses to accept this, as the MD is the founder, sole
108
Skills Checkpoint 1
shareholder and most senior director, external advice would be

required. It would be appropriate to seek professional advice from the
ACCA. Legal advice should be also be considered. Finally,
resignation should be considered if the matters cannot be resolved.
Other points to note:

 This is a comprehensive, detailed answer. You could still have
scored a strong pass with a shorter answer as long as it
addressed all three issues and came to a justified conclusion for
each.
 Both sub-requirements (accounting implications and ethical
implications) have been addressed, each with their own heading.
 All three of the proposed changes in accounting policies or
estimates have been addressed, each with their own sub-
heading.
 The length of answer for each of the three changes is not the
same – there is more to say about revenue recognition as there
are two revenue streams and more detailed rules to apply.
 The answer correctly addresses the issues from the perspective of
the finance director.
 The answer involves 'discussion' – for each of the three proposed
changes, it explains under what circumstances a change would
be permitted and whether the change is permissible in each
case.
 The professional marks have been obtained through answering
both sub-requirements, addressing all three of the proposed
changes, using headings and sub-headings and writing from the
perspective of the Finance Director in full sentences which are
clearly explained in professional language.
109
Exam success skills diagnostic
Every time you complete a question, use the diagnostic below to assess how effectively you
demonstrated the exam success skills in answering the question. The table has been
completed below for the Range activity to give you an idea of how to complete the
diagnostic.
Exam success skills Your reflections/observations
Good time Did you spend approximately a quarter to a third of your

management time reading and planning?
Did you allow yourself time to address both sub-
requirements (ethical and accounting implications) and all
three of the proposed changes in accounting policies and
estimates in the scenario?
Your writing time should have been split between these
three proposed changes but it does not necessarily have to
be spread evenly – there is more to say about some issues
(eg revenue) than others.
Managing information Did you identify the relevant IAS or IFRS for each proposed
change in accounting policy or estimate?
Did you spot that the Finance Director is ACCA qualified so
is bound by the ACCA's Code but the Managing Director is
unlikely to have detailed knowledge of accounting
standards?
Did you identify the threat to the ACCA Code's ethical
principles in the scenario from the Managing Director
planning to retire and sell his shares in one year's time?
Correct interpretation Did you understand what was meant by the verb 'discuss'?
of requirements
Did you spot the two sub-requirements (ethical implications
and accounting implications)?
Did you understand what each sub-requirement meant?
Answer planning Did you draw up an answer plan using your preferred
approach (eg mind map, bullet-pointed list or annotated
question paper)?
Did your plan address both the ethical and accounting
implications?
Did your plan address each of the three proposed changes
to accounting policies and estimates in the question?
110
Skills Checkpoint 1
Effective writing and Did you use underlined headings (key words from
presentation requirements) and sub-headings (one for each proposed
change in accounting policy or estimate)?
Did you address both sub-requirements and all three
proposed changes in accounting policy or estimate?
Did you use full sentences?
Did you explain why the proposed accounting treatment
was correct or incorrect?
Did you explain why key facts in the scenario proposed a
threat to the ACCA Code's ethical principles?
Most important action points to apply to your next question
Summary
In the SBR exam, the ethical issues will typically be closely linked with accounting
issues – whether following a certain accounting treatment would have any ethical
implications. Remember that an ACCA accountant must demonstrate the fundamental
principle of professional competence through financial statements that comply with IAS
and IFRS. Therefore, the first step in question is to consider whether the accounting
treatment in the scenario complies with IAS and IFRS and, if not, identify what the
ethical implications may be by identifying the relevant ethical principles and any
threats to them. Your answer should conclude with practical advice on next steps to be
taken by the individual concerned.
111
112
Provisions, contingencies
and events after the
reporting period
Learning objectives
Syllabus
reference no.
Discuss and apply the recognition, de-recognition and measurement of provisions, C7(a)
contingent liabilities and contingent assets including environmental provisions and
restructuring provisions.
Discuss and apply the accounting for events after the reporting date. C7(b)
Exam context
This chapter is almost entirely revision as you have encountered provisions and events after the
reporting period in Financial Reporting. However, both topics are highly examinable, and questions
are likely to be more technically challenging than those you met in Financial Reporting.
In the Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) exam, both topics are likely to feature as parts of questions,
rather than as a whole question itself. For example, in Section A, you may be required to spot that
an issue has occurred after the reporting date, and then work out the effect of the issue on the
113
Chapter overview
Provisions, contingencies and

events after the reporting period
1. Provisions
(IAS 37)
5. Events after the

reporting period
(IAS 10)
3. Contingent 4. Contingent assets

liabilities (IAS 37) (IAS 37)
2. Specific types
of provision
Future operating Onerous Restructuring Environmental

losses contracts provisions
114
5: Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period
1 Provisions (IAS 37)

Tutorial note
You have studied IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets in your earlier
studies and so should be familiar with much of this section. However, the questions about IAS 37 that
feature in the SBR exam will be much more technically challenging, so it is important to make sure
you can discuss and apply the requirements of the standard given here. You also need to be able to
discuss the consistency of IAS 37 with the Conceptual Framework.
A provision: a liability of uncertain timing or amount.

1.1 Recognition
A provision is recognised when (IAS 37: para. 14):
(a) An entity has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event;
(b) It is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be
required to settle the obligation; and
(c) A reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
Is IAS 37 consistent with the Conceptual Framework?

IAS 37 requires recognition of a liability only if it is probable that the obligation will result in an
outflow of resources from the entity. This is inconsistent with other standards such as IFRS 3 Business
Combinations and IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, which do not apply the probability criterion to
liabilities. In addition, probability is not part of the current Conceptual Framework definition of a
liability. Although Exposure Draft 2015/3: Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting changes
the definition of a liability, it does not refer to probability and therefore the inconsistency will remain.
The IASB has acknowledged this inconsistency, however as the Conceptual Framework does not
override the requirements of individual standards, the recognition requirements of IAS 37 will
remain.
See Chapter 5 Section 1 of the Supplementary Reading for revision of the detail of the recognition of
provisions. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
1.2 Measurement
General rule
The amount recognised is the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present
obligation at the end of the reporting period (IAS 37: para. 36).
Allowing for uncertainties
(a) Where the provision being measured involves a large population of items
 use expected values.
(b) Where a single obligation is being measured
 The individual most likely outcome may be the best estimate.
115
See Chapter 5 Section 1 of the Supplementary Reading for revision activities on the recognition and
measurement of provisions. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
Discounting of provisions
Where the time value of money is material, the provision is discounted. The discount rate should:
 Be a pre-tax rate
 Appropriately reflect the risk associated with the cash flows
The unwinding of the discount is recognised in profit or loss.
1.3 Reimbursements
Some or all of the expenditure needed to settle a provision may be expected to be recovered from a
third party, eg an insurer. This reimbursement should be recognised only when it is virtually
certain that reimbursement will be received if the entity settles the obligation (IAS 37: para. 53).
1.4 Recognising an asset when creating a provision

An asset can only be recognised where the present obligation recognised as a provision gives
access to future economic benefits (eg decommissioning costs could be an IAS 16 component of
cost).
1.5 Derecognition
If it is no longer probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required
to settle the obligation, the provision should be reversed (IAS 37: para. 59).
2 Specific types of provision

2.1 Future operating losses
Provisions are not recognised for future operating losses. They do not meet the definition of a
liability and the general recognition criteria set out in the standard (IAS 37: para. 63).
2.2 Onerous contracts

IAS 37 defines an onerous contract as one in which unavoidable costs of completing the contract
exceed the benefits expected to be received under it (IAS 37: para. 10).
Unavoidable costs of meeting an

obligation are the lower of:
Cost of fulfilling Penalties from failure

the contract to fulfil the contract
An example may be a fixed price supply contract related to a particular product that, due to
inflation, now costs more to manufacture than the fixed sale price agreed in the contract.
If an entity has a contract that is onerous, the present obligation under the contract must be
recognised and measured as a provision (IAS 37: para. 66).
116
A lease agreement that becomes onerous is only within the scope of IAS 37, and therefore results
in the creation of a provision, if simplified accounting is applied, so that no lease liability has been
recognised. This is only the case where a lease is short-term or for an asset with a low value.
2.3 Restructuring
Restructuring is a programme that is planned and is controlled by management and materially
changes either the scope of a business undertaken by an entity, or the manner in which that
business is conducted (IAS 37: para. 10).
Examples of restructuring include (IAS 37: para. 70):
 The sale or termination of a line of business
 The closure of business locations or the relocation of business activities
 Changes in management structure
 Fundamental reorganisations that have a material effect on the nature and focus of the entity's
operations
One of the main purposes of IAS 37 was to target abuses of provisions for restructuring by
introducing strict criteria about when such a provision can be made.
A provision for restructuring is recognised only when the entity has a constructive obligation to
restructure. Such an obligation only arises where an entity:
(a) Has a detailed formal plan for the restructuring; and
(b) Has raised a valid expectation in those affected that it will carry out the restructuring by
starting to implement that plan or announcing its main features to those affected by it.
Where the restructuring involves the sale of an operation, no obligation arises until the entity has
entered into a binding sale agreement.
Restructuring costs
A restructuring provision includes only the direct expenditures arising from the restructuring,
which are those that are both (IAS 37: para. 80):
(a) Necessarily entailed by the restructuring; and
(b) Not associated with the ongoing activities of the entity.
The provision should not include (IAS 37: para. 81):
 Retraining or relocating continuing staff
 Marketing
 Investment in new systems and distribution networks
Activity 1: Restructuring
Trailer, a public limited company, operates in the manufacturing sector. During the year ended
31 May 20X5, Trailer announced two major restructuring plans. The first plan is to reduce its
capacity by the closure of some of its smaller factories, which have already been identified. This will
lead to the redundancy of 500 employees, who have all individually been selected and
communicated with. The costs of this plan are $9 million in redundancy costs, $4 million in retraining
costs and $5 million in lease termination costs. The second plan is to re-organise the finance and
information technology department over a one-year period but it does not commence for two years.
The plan results in 20% of finance staff losing their jobs during the restructuring. The costs of this plan
are $10 million in redundancy costs, $6 million in retraining costs and $7 million in equipment lease
termination costs.
117
Required
Discuss the treatment of each of the above restructuring plans in the financial statements of Trailer for
the year ended 31 May 20X5.
Activity 2: Environmental provisions

A company was awarded a licence to quarry limestone in an area of outstanding natural beauty.
As part of the agreement, the company was required to build access roads as well as the structures
necessary for the extraction process. The total cost of these was $50 million. The quarry came into
operation on 31 December 20X3 and the operating licence was for 20 years from that date. Under
the terms of the operating licence, the company is obliged to remove the access roads and
structures and restore the natural environmental habitat at the end of the quarry's 20-year life. At
31 December 20X3, the estimated cost of the restoration work was $10 million, and this estimate did
not change by 31 December 20X4. An additional cost of $500,000 per annum the quarry is
operated (at 31 December 20X4 prices) will also be incurred at the end of the licence period to
clean up further progressive environmental damage that will arise through the extraction of the
limestone.
An appropriate discount rate reflecting market assessments of the time value of money and risks
specific to the operation is 8%.
Required
Explain the treatment of the cost of the assets and associated obligation relating to the quarry:
(a) As at 31 December 20X3
(b) For the year ended 31 December 20X4.
Work to the nearest $1,000.
3 Contingent liabilities (IAS 37)

Contingent liability (IAS 37)
Key term A contingent liability is either:
(a) A possible obligation arising from past events whose existence will be confirmed only by
the occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the
entity; or
(b) A present obligation that arises from past events but is not recognised because:
(i) It is not probable that an outflow of economic benefit will be required to settle the
obligation; or
(ii) The amount of the obligation cannot be measured with sufficient reliability.
(IAS 37: para. 10)
Contingent liabilities should not be recognised in financial statements, but should be disclosed
unless the possibility of an outflow of economic benefits is remote (IAS 37: paras. 27–28).
118
For each class of contingent liability, an entity must disclose the following (IAS 37: para. 86):
(a) The nature of the contingent liability
(b) An estimate of its financial effect
(c) An indication of the uncertainties relating to the amount or timing of any outflow
(d) The possibility of any reimbursement.
See Chapter 5 Section 1.3 of the Supplementary Reading for a decision tree summarising the
recognition criteria of IAS 37 for provisions and contingent liabilities. This is available in Appendix 2
of the digital edition of the Workbook.
4 Contingent assets (IAS 37)

Contingent asset (IAS 37): a possible asset that arises from past events and whose existence
will be confirmed by the occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the
Key term
entity's control.
(IAS 37: para. 10)
A contingent asset should not be recognised, but should be disclosed where an inflow of
economic benefits is probable (IAS 37: para 34).
A brief description of the contingent asset should be provided along with an estimate of its likely
financial effect (IAS 37: para. 89).
5 Events after the reporting period (IAS 10)

Tutorial note
You have studied IAS 10 as part of Financial Reporting. This section contains a summary of the key
points of the standard, but, if you are unsure, return to your Financial Reporting study material and
re-read it.
Events after the reporting period are those events, both favourable and unfavourable, that
occur between the year end and the date on which the financial statements are authorised for issue
(IAS 10: para. 3).
Two types of events can be identified (IAS 10: para. 3):
Adjusting events Non-adjusting events

Provide evidence of conditions Indicative of conditions that
that existed at the end of the arose after the end of the
reporting period reporting period
Financial statements should be Not adjusted for in financial

adjusted statements, but are disclosed
Going concern
If management determines after the reporting period that the reporting entity will be liquidated or
cease trading, the financial statements are adjusted so that they are not prepared on the going
concern basis.
119
See Chapter 5 Section 2 of the Supplementary Reading for examples of adjusting and non-adjusting
events. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
5.1 Disclosure
(a) An entity discloses the date when the financial statements were authorised for issue and who
gave the authorisation (IAS 10: para 17).
(b) If non-adjusting events after the reporting period are material, non-disclosure could influence
the decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements. Accordingly, the following
is disclosed for each material category of non-adjusting event after the reporting period:
(i) The nature of the event; and
(ii) An estimate of its financial effect, or statement that such an estimate cannot be
made. (IAS 10: para 21)
Activity 3: IAS 37 and IAS 10

Delta is an entity that prepares financial statements to 31 March each year. During the year ended
31 March 20X2 the following events occurred:
(a) At 31 March 20X2, Delta was engaged in a legal dispute with a customer who alleged that
Delta had supplied faulty products that caused the customer actual financial loss. The directors
of Delta consider that the customer has a 75% chance of succeeding in this action and that the
likely outcome should the customer succeed is that the customer would be awarded damages
of $1m. The directors of Delta further believe that the fault in the products was caused by the
supply of defective components by one of Delta's suppliers. Delta has initiated legal action
against the supplier and considers there is a 70% chance Delta will receive damages of
$800,000 from the supplier. Ignore discounting.
(b) On 10 April 20X2, a water leak at one of Delta's warehouses damaged a consignment of
inventory. This inventory had been manufactured prior to 31 March 20X2 at a total cost of
$800,000. The net realisable value of the inventory prior to the damage was estimated at
$960,000. Because of the damage Delta was required to spend a further $150,000 on
repairing and re-packaging the inventory. The inventory was sold on 15 May 20X2 for
proceeds of $900,000. Any adjustment in respect of this event would be regarded by Delta
as material.
Required
Discuss how these events would be reported in the financial statements of Delta for the year ended
31 March 20X2.
See Chapter 5 Section 3 of the Supplementary Reading for an exam standard question involving
provisions and events after the reporting period. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition
of the Workbook.
120
Ethics note
principles of the ACCA's Code of Ethics and Conduct when approaching every question.
For example, pressure to achieve a particular profit figure could lead to deliberate attempts to
manipulate profits through making provisions that are not necessary in years of high profits, in order
to release those provisions in future periods when profits are lower. Although the rules in IAS 37 are
meant to prevent this situation, the Standard is not perfect and manipulation is possible.
Another example that could arise is pressure to obtain financing, which requires the presentation of a
healthy financial position. This could, for example, lead directors to ignore information received after
the reporting date that should result in a write down of receivables.
121
Chapter summary
Provisions, contingencies and

events after the reporting period
1. Provisions (IAS 37) 5. Events after the reporting

'A liability of uncertain timing or amount'
period (IAS 10)
 Recognise liability: Adjusting:
– Present obligation (as a result of a past event)  Evidence of conditions at year end
(i) Legal obligation, or Non-adjusting:
(ii) Constructive obligation
 Other  disclose
– Probable outflow of resources embodying economic
benefits
Going concern implications  adjust
– Reliable estimate
 Large population  expected values
 Single obligation  most likely outcome
 Discount if material
3. Contingent liabilities 4. Contingent assets

Possible obligation, or
Present obligation where: Possible asset
 Outflow of resources not probable, or
 Cannot make reliable estimate. Inflow
Disclose (unless outflow of resources is remote)

Virtually Probable Not
certain probable
 Brief description of nature
 Estimate of financial effect where
RECOGNISE DISCLOSE DO
 Indication of uncertainties practicable
– nature NOTHING
 Possibility of reimbursement
– estimate
2. Specific types of
provision
Future Restructuring Environmental

operating Only provide if: provisions
losses  Detailed formal plan; and Make a provision where there
 Valid expectation raised by is a legal or constructive obligation to
Do not provide
starting to implement clean up/decommission
it or by announcing main features
 Provision is discounted to present
Includes only direct expenditures: value
Onerous contracts (a) Necessarily entailed by the  DR Asset (depreciate over UL)
Provide for unavoidable cost: restructuring; and
CR Provision
(b) Not associated with the ongoing
Lower of
activities of the entity:
(i) Retraining/relocating staff
net cost penalties from (ii) Marketing
of fulfilling failure to (iii) Investment in new
fulfil systems/distribution networks
122
1. Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Conceptual Framework definition of a liability and
recognition criteria are met.
2. Specific types of provision
Provisions are not made for future operating losses as there is no obligation to incur
them.
Where a contract is onerous a provision is made for the unavoidable cost. Restructuring
provisions are only recognised when certain criteria are met.
3. Contingent liabilities
Contingent liabilities are not recognised because they are possible rather than present
obligations, the outflow is not probable or the liability cannot be reliably measured.
Contingent liabilities are disclosed.
4. Contingent assets
Contingent assets are disclosed, but only where an inflow of economic benefits is probable.
5. Events after the reporting period (IAS 10)
Adjusting events are adjusted in the financial statements as they provide evidence of
conditions existing at the end of the reporting period.
Non-adjusting events are disclosed if material, as, while important, they do not affect the
financial statement figures.
123
Question practice
Now try the following question from the Further question practice bank:
Q7 Cleanex
Further reading
There are articles on the ACCA website, which have been written by the SBR examining team, and are
relevant to the topics covered in this chapter:
The shortcomings of IAS 37 (2016)
124
Income taxes
Learning objectives
Syllabus
reference no.
Discuss and apply the recognition and measurement of deferred tax liabilities and C6(a)
deferred tax assets.
Discuss and apply the recognition of current and deferred tax as income or C6(b)
expense.
Discuss and apply the treatment of deferred taxation on a business combination. C6(c)
Exam context
You have encountered income taxes in your earlier studies in Financial Reporting; however, in
Strategic Business Reporting (SBR), this topic is examined at a much higher level. Deferred tax is most
likely to feature as part of a consolidation question in Section A, but it could also be tested as a
whole question in Section B.
125
Chapter overview
1. Current tax Income taxes 6. Deferred tax: other

temporary differences
3. Deferred tax:
recognition
2. Deferred tax
principles: revision
4. Deferred tax:
measurement
7. Deferred tax:
presentation
5. Deferred tax: group

126
6: Income taxes
1 Current tax
Current tax is the amount of income taxes payable (or recoverable) in respect of taxable profit (or
loss) for a period.
Key term
(IAS 12: para. 5)
Current tax unpaid for current and prior periods is recognised as a liability (IAS 12: para. 12).
Amounts paid in excess of amounts due are shown as an asset (IAS 12: para. 12).
The benefit relating to a tax loss that can be carried back to recover current tax of a previous period
is recognised as an asset (IAS 12: para. 13).
See Chapter 6 Section 1 of the Supplementary Reading for further revision of current tax and
activities to test your brought forward knowledge. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital
edition of the Workbook.
1.1 Disclosure
Tax is a significant cost to businesses, with corporation tax rates of over 30% of profits in some
countries. However, the tax expense shown in the financial statements is rarely equal to the current tax
rate applied to accounting profit. Investors need to know why this is the case so that they can
understand historical tax cash flows and liabilities, as well as predict future tax cash flows and
liabilities.
IAS 12 therefore requires entities to explain the relationship between the tax expense and the tax that
would be expected by applying the current tax rate to accounting profit. This explanation can be
presented as a reconciliation of amounts of tax or a reconciliation of the rate of tax, as shown in
Illustration 1 below.
Illustration 1
Extract from Virgin Atlantic Annual Report March 2016 – note 10: Tax
(Virgin Atlantic Annual Report 2016: p. 65)
127
2 Deferred tax principles: revision
2.1 Basic principles
IAS 12 Income Taxes covers both current tax and deferred tax.
Current tax is the amount Deferred tax is an accounting

actually payable to the tax measure, used to match the tax
authorities in relation to the trading effects of transactions with their
activities of the entity during the accounting effect.
period.
Issue
When a company recognises an asset or liability, it expects to recover or settle the carrying amount
of that asset or liability. In other words, it expects to sell or use up assets, and to pay off liabilities.
What happens if that recovery or settlement is likely to make future tax payments larger (or smaller)
than they would otherwise have been if the recovery or settlement had no tax consequences?
Similarly, some items of income or expense are included in accounting profit in one period, but
included in taxable profit in a different period (IAS 12: para. 17). This is because the accounting
profit is determined by applying the principles of IFRS, whereas taxable profit is determined by
applying the tax rules established by the tax authorities. Without some form of adjustment, this
difference may cause the tax charge in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive
income to be misleading.
In both of these circumstances, IAS 12 requires companies to recognise a deferred tax liability (or
deferred tax asset) (IAS 12: paras. 15 and 24).
Concepts underlying deferred tax
Conceptual As a result of a past transaction or event, an entity has an obligation to

Framework – pay tax or a right to future tax relief. Therefore, the entity has met the
definition of asset Conceptual Framework definition of a liability or asset and so needs to
and liability record a deferred tax liability or asset.
Conceptual To achieve 'matching' in the statement of profit or loss and other

Framework – comprehensive income, the entity should record tax in the accounts in
accruals concept the same period as the item that the tax relates to is recorded. If the tax
is paid in a different period to that in which the item is accounted for, a
deferred tax adjustment is needed.
Tax base
The tax base of an asset or liability is the amount attributed to that asset or liability for tax purposes.
Tax payable by an entity is calculated by the tax authorities using a tax computation. A tax
computation is similar to a statement of profit or loss, except that it is constructed using tax rules
instead of IFRS. Now imagine the tax authorities drawing up a statement of financial position for the
same entity, but using tax rules instead of IFRS. In these 'tax accounts', assets and liabilities will be
stated at their carrying amount for tax purposes, which is their tax base.
Different tax jurisdictions may have different tax rules. The tax rules determine the tax base.
In the SBR exam, the question will state the tax rules in a jurisdiction, or the tax base of certain assets
or liabilities in that jurisdiction.
128
6: Income taxes
The table below gives some examples of tax rules and the resulting tax base.
Item Carrying amount Tax rule Tax base (amount in

in the statement of 'tax accounts')
financial position Remember
this is the
carrying
Tax written down
Item of property, Carrying amount = value in the
Attracts tax relief in the value = cost – tax accounts.
plant and cost – accumulated
form of tax depreciation accumulated tax As the cash
equipment depreciation
depreciation has not been
received, the
Chargeable for tax on a income is not
yet included
Included in financial cash basis, ie when Nil in the tax
statements on an received accounts, so
Accrued income the tax base
accruals basis ie when Chargeable for tax on Same as carrying amount is nil.
receivable an accruals basis, ie in statement of financial
when receivable position
Attracts tax relief on a Nil For revenue

Included in financial cash basis, ie when received in
Accrued expenses statements on an paid advance, the

tax base of
and provisions accruals basis ie when Attracts tax relief on an Same as carrying amount the resulting
payable accruals basis, ie when in statement of financial liability is its
carrying
payable position amount, less
any amount
When the cash is of the
received, it will be revenue that
Chargeable for tax on a
Income received in included in the will not be
cash basis, ie when Nil taxable in
advance financial statements as
received future
deferred income ie a
periods.
liability
See Chapter 6 Section 2.1 of the Supplementary Reading for further revision on tax bases. This is
available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
Illustration 2
Concepts underlying deferred tax
Suppose Barton, a supplier of gas and electricity, recorded accrued income of $100,000 in its
financial statements for the year ended 31 December 20X5. The accrued income related to gas and
electricity supplied but not yet invoiced during December 20X5. In January 20X6, Barton invoiced its
customers and was paid $100,000 in relation to the accrued income. In the jurisdiction in which
Barton operates, income is taxed on a cash receipts basis and the rate of tax is 20%.
129
Extracts from Barton's tax computation and financial statements are shown below.
Tax computation
20X5 20X6
$'000 $'000
Income 0 100
Tax payable at 20% 0 (20)
STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

20X5 20X6
$'000 $'000
Accrued income (in revenue) 100 0
Mismatch Mismatch
Current tax (tax computation) 0 (20)
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION (EXTRACT)

20X5 20X6
$'000 $'000
Accrued income 100 0
Income is taxed on a cash receipts basis, so there is no tax to pay in 20X5 and $20,000 to pay in
20X6. This creates a mismatch in the financial statements as the income and the related tax payable
are recorded in different periods. To resolve this mismatch, a deferred tax adjustment is calculated
and recorded in the financial statements, as follows.
Deferred tax calculation 20X5 The tax base will

20X6
always be zero if
$'000 $'000
the item is taxed on
a cash receipts
Carrying amount of accrued income 100 0
basis.
(statement of financial position)
Notice how the
Tax base of accrued income (0) (0)
actual tax payable
in 20X6 is equal to
Temporary difference 100 the deferred tax
0
calculated for
Deferred tax at 20% (20) 20X5. 0
130
6: Income taxes
STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (EXTRACT)

20X5 20X6
$'000 $'000
Accrued income (in revenue) 100 0
Matching Matching
Current tax (tax computation) 0 (20)
Deferred tax (20) 20
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION (EXTRACT)

20X5 20X6
$'000 $'000
Accrued income 100 0
Deferred tax liability (20) 0
In 20X5, the double entry to record the deferred tax is:

DEBIT deferred tax (statement of profit or loss) $20,000
CREDIT deferred tax liability (statement of financial position) $20,000
In 20X6, the entry is reversed:
DEBIT deferred tax liability (statement of financial position) $20,000
CREDIT deferred tax (statement of profit or loss) $20,000
The end result is that the tax is recorded in the same period as the transaction it relates to. This is the
aim of deferred tax (the accruals concept). Also, in 20X5, as a result of a past transaction (Barton
has earned $100,000 of income), Barton has an obligation to pay tax. Therefore, the Conceptual
Framework definition of a liability has been met which is why a deferred tax liability must be
recognised.
2.2 Calculating deferred tax
Deferred tax calculation The tax base will always

be zero if the item is
$ taxed on a cash receipts
basis or tax relief is
Carrying amount of asset/liability (statement of financial position) X/(X) granted on a cash paid
basis.
If the temporary
Tax base (X)/X
difference is positive,
Temporary difference deferred tax is negative, X/(X)
so a deferred tax liability, Calculated as temporary
difference × tax rate
Deferred tax (liability)/asset and vice versa. (X)/X
Deferred tax is the tax attributable to temporary differences.
Temporary differences: differences between the carrying amount of an asset or liability in the
statement of financial position (eg value from an accounting perspective) and its tax base (eg value
Key term
from a tax perspective).
(IAS 12: para. 5)
131
If an item is never taxable or tax deductible, its tax base is deemed to be its carrying amount so there
is no temporary difference and no related deferred tax.
There are two types of temporary difference (IAS 12: paras. 15, 24).
Taxable temporary difference

For example, the entity has
recognised accrued income, but the Tax to pay in the future Deferred tax liability
accrued income is not chargeable for
tax until the entity receives the cash
Deductible temporary difference

For example, the entity has recorded a Tax saving in the future
provision, but the provision does not Deferred tax asset
attract tax relief until the entity actually
spends the cash
2.3 Revision of temporary differences seen in Financial Reporting

The following tables summarise the temporary differences you saw in Financial Reporting. Remember
that the tax rule determines the tax base. In the exam, make sure you apply the tax rule given in the
question.
Property, plant and equipment
Financial statements treatment The asset is depreciated over its useful life as per IAS 16 and
is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation.
Tax rule Tax depreciation is granted on the asset. The tax

depreciation is accelerated (ie it is more rapid than
accounting depreciation).
Tax base Tax written down value = cost – cumulative tax depreciation
Temporary difference A temporary difference arises because accounting

depreciation and tax depreciation are charged at different
rates. In this example, the tax depreciation is at a quicker
rate than the accounting depreciation. This results in a
taxable temporary difference (and so a deferred tax liability)
because the carrying amount of the asset will be higher than
its tax written down value. If the tax depreciation was at a
slower rate than the accounting depreciation, a deductible
temporary difference arises and results in a deferred tax
asset (IAS 12: para. 17b).
132
6: Income taxes
Accrued income/accrued expense
Financial statements treatment The accrued income or accrued expense is included in the
financial statements when the item is accrued.
Tax rule Income and expenses are taxed on a cash receipts/cash

paid basis, ie they are chargeable to tax/attract tax relief
when they are actually received/paid.
Tax base Nil.
Temporary difference The temporary difference is the amount of the accrued

income or expense.
If it is accrued income, it will result in a deferred tax liability,
as tax will be paid in the future when the income is actually
received.
If it is an accrued expense, it will result in a deferred tax
asset, as the entity will get tax relief in the future when the
expense is actually paid.
Provisions and allowances for doubtful debts
Financial statements treatment A provision is included in the financial statements when the
criteria in IAS 37 are met.
A doubtful debt allowance is recognised in accordance with
IFRS 9.
Tax treatment Expenses related to provisions attract tax relief on a cash

paid basis; ie they attract tax relief when they are actually
paid.
Expenses related to doubtful debts attract tax relief when the
debts become irrecoverable and are written off.
Tax base Nil.
Temporary difference The temporary difference is the amount of the provision or

allowance. This will result in a deferred tax asset as the entity
will get tax relief in the future when the related expense is
actually paid/debts become irrecoverable and are written off.
133
Illustration 3
Revision of deferred tax
The information given below has been extracted from the financial statements of Carlton at
31 December:
20X2 20X1
$ $
Property, plant & equipment (cost $100,000 on 1 Jan 20X1)
– carrying amount 80,000 90,000
Accrued income 25,000 –
Provision (5,000) –
Profit before depreciation, accrued income and provision 100,000 90,000
Carlton recognised a deferred tax liability of $6,000 at 31 December 20X1.

The tax written down value of the property, plant and equipment is as follows:
20X2 20X1
$ $
Property, plant & equipment – tax written down value 49,000 70,000
The provision is allowed for tax when the associated expense is paid. Tax is charged on the accrued
income when that income is received. The rate of tax is 30%.
Calculation of deferred tax temporary differences and deferred tax liability at
31.12.X2
Item Accounting Tax base Temporary
carrying amount difference
The tax base
$ $ $ will always be
Property, plant & equipment (PPE) 80,000 49,000 31,000 zero if the item
is taxed on a
Accrued income 25,000 0 25,000 cash receipts
Provision (5,000) 0 (5,000) basis. The tax
base of PPE is
51,000 its tax written
down value.
Deferred tax liability (net) at 30% (15,300)
The deferred tax liability represents net tax that will be payable on these items in the future. The
deferred tax charge to profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 20X2 is the movement on
the deferred tax liability:
$
Deferred tax liability at 31 December 20X1 6,000
Charge to profit or loss 9,300
Deferred tax liability at 31 December 20X2 15,300
134
6: Income taxes
Effect on Carlton's profit or loss in 20X2

$ Tax rate applied
Profit before adjustments 100,000 to accounting
= $79,000 = taxable profit. profit is
Depreciation (10,000) $110,000 ×
Accrued income/provision not
Accrued income included in tax computation 25,000 30% = $33,000
until received/paid
Provision (5,000)
Current tax +
Profit before tax 110,000
Deferred tax =
Current tax [(100,000 – 21,000 tax dep'n) × 30%] (23,700) $23,700 +
$9,300 =
Deferred tax (9,300)
$33,000
Profit for the year 77,000
See Chapter 6 Section 2.2 of the Supplementary Reading for further revision of other temporary
differences covered in Financial Reporting and activities to test your brought forward knowledge. This
is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
3 Deferred tax: recognition

Under IAS 12, a deferred tax liability or asset is recognised for all taxable and deductible
temporary differences, unless they arise from:
(a) The initial recognition of goodwill; or
(b) The initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction which
(i) Is not a business combination
(ii) At the time of the transaction, affects neither accounting profit nor taxable
profit. (IAS 12: paras. 15, 24)
Deferred tax assets are only recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be
available against which the deductible temporary difference can be utilised (IAS 12: para. 24).
See Chapter 6 Section 3 of the Supplementary Reading for further detail on the recognition of
deferred tax liabilities and assets. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the
Workbook.
Deferred tax is recognised in the same section of the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income as the transaction was recognised (IAS 12: paras. 58, 61a).
Illustration 4
Recognition of deferred tax
Charlton revalued a property from a carrying amount of $2 million to its fair value of $2.5 million
during the reporting period. The property cost $2.2 million and its tax base is $1.8 million. The tax
rate is 30%.
Required
Explain the deferred tax implications of the above information in Charlton's financial statements at
the end of the reporting period.
135
Solution
The tax base is $1.8 million and the carrying amount is $2.5 million (being the historical carrying
amount of $2 million plus a revaluation surplus of $500,000).
Therefore a taxable temporary difference of $700,000 exists, giving rise to a deferred tax liability of
$210,000 (30% × $700,000).
Of the taxable temporary difference:
 $200,000 ($2m – $1.8m) arises due to the accelerated tax depreciation granted on the asset;
and
 $500,000 arises due to the revaluation.
Therefore deferred tax of $150,000 (30% × $500,000) should be charged to other comprehensive
income, as this is where the revaluation gain is recognised, and the remainder should be charged to
profit or loss.
4 Deferred tax: measurement

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates expected to apply to the period when
the asset is realised or liability settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted
(or substantively enacted) by the end of the reporting period (IAS 12: para. 47). This is
inconsistent
If tax rates change, the tax rate expected when the temporary difference will reverse is used with IAS 37
(IAS 12: para. 47). which requires
discounting if
Deferred tax assets and liabilities should not be discounted because the complexities and the effect is
difficulties involved will affect reliability (IAS 12: paras. 53, 54). material.
See Chapter 6 Section 4 of the Supplementary Reading for further detail on the measurement of
deferred tax. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
5 Deferred tax: group financial statements

You must appreciate the deferred tax aspects of business combinations as these are likely to be
examined in the SBR exam.
There are some temporary differences which only arise in a business combination. This is because,
on consolidation, adjustments are made to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that are not
always reflected in the tax base of those assets and liabilities.
The tax bases of assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements are determined by
reference to the applicable tax rules. Usually tax authorities calculate tax on the profits of the
individual entities, so the relevant tax bases to use will be those of the individual entities (IAS 12:
para. 11).
Deferred tax calculation Carrying amount in
consolidated
$ statement of financial
position
Carrying amount of asset/liability X/(X)
(consolidated statement of financial position) Tax base depends on tax
Tax base (usually subsidiary's tax base) (X)/X rules. Usually tax is
charged on individual
Temporary difference X/(X) entity profits, not
group profits.
Deferred tax (liability)/asset (X)/X
136
6: Income taxes
In the SBR exam, the question will state the tax rules in a jurisdiction, or the tax base of certain assets
or liabilities in that jurisdiction.
5.1 Fair value adjustments on consolidation

IFRS 3 requires assets acquired and liabilities assumed on acquisition of a subsidiary to be brought
into the consolidated financial statements at their fair value rather than their carrying amount.
However, this change in fair value is not usually reflected in the tax base, and so a temporary
difference arises (IAS 12: para. 19).
The accounting entries to record the resulting deferred tax are:
(a) Deferred tax liability due to fair value gain: reduces the fair value of the net assets of the
subsidiary and therefore increases goodwill:
DEBIT Goodwill X
CREDIT Deferred tax liability X
(b) Deferred tax asset due to fair value loss: increases the fair value of the net assets of the
subsidiary and therefore reduces goodwill:
DEBIT Deferred tax asset X
CREDIT Goodwill X
Activity 1: Fair value adjustments

On 1 April 20X5 Alpha purchased 100% of the ordinary shares of Beta. The fair values of the assets
and liabilities acquired were considered to be equal to their carrying amounts, with the exception of
equipment, which had a fair value of $54 million. The tax base of the equipment on 1 April 20X5
was $50 million.
The tax rate is 25% and the fair value adjustment does not affect the tax base of the equipment.
Required
Discuss how the above will affect the accounting for deferred tax under IAS 12 Income Taxes in the
group financial statements of Alpha.
5.2 Undistributed profits of subsidiaries, branches, associates and

joint ventures
A subsidiary's profits (or share of associate's/joint venture's profits) are recognised in the
consolidated financial statements. If they are not taxable in the parent's tax regime until they are
remitted to the parent as dividend income, a temporary difference arises (IAS 12: para. 38).
Under IAS 12, a resulting deferred tax liability is recognised unless:
(a) The parent, investor or venturer is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary
difference (eg by determining dividend policy); and
(b) It is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
(IAS 12: para. 39)
137
Illustration 5
Undistributed profits of subsidiary
Carrol has one subsidiary, Anchor. The retained earnings of Anchor at acquisition were $2 million.
The directors of Carrol have decided that over the next three years, they will realise earnings through
future dividend payments from Anchor amounting to $500,000 per year.
Tax is payable on any remittance of dividends and no dividends have been declared for the current
year.
Required
Discuss the deferred tax implications of the above information for the Carrol Group.
Solution
Deferred tax should be recognised on the unremitted earnings of subsidiaries unless the parent is
able to control the timing of dividend payments and it is unlikely that dividends will be paid for the
foreseeable future. Carrol controls the dividend policy of Anchor and this means that there would
normally be no need to recognise a deferred tax liability in respect of unremitted profits. However,
the profits of Anchor will be distributed to Carrol over the next few years and tax will be payable on
the dividends received. Therefore a deferred tax liability should be shown.
5.3 Unrealised profits on intragroup trading

When a group entity sells goods to another group entity, the selling entity recognises the profit made
in its individual financial statements. If the related inventories are still held by the group at the year
end, the profit is unrealised from the group perspective and adjustments are made in the group
accounts to eliminate it. The same adjustment is not usually made to the tax base of the inventories
(as tax is usually calculated on the individual entity profits, and not group profits) and a temporary
difference arises.
Illustration 6
Unrealised profits on intragroup trading
P sells goods costing $150 to its overseas subsidiary S for $200. At the year end, S still holds the
inventories. In the jurisdictions in which P and S operate, tax is charged on individual entity profits.
P's rate of tax is 40%, whereas S's rate of tax is 50%.
P pays tax of $20 ($50 × 40%) on the profit generated by the sale.
S is entitled to a future tax deduction for the $200 paid for the inventories. The tax base of the
inventories is therefore $200 from S's perspective.
From the perspective of the P group, the profit of $50 generated by the sale is unrealised. In the
consolidated financial statements, the unrealised profit is eliminated, so the carrying amount of the
inventories from the group perspective is $150.
Deferred tax is calculated as:
$
Carrying amount (in the group financial statements) 150
Tax base (cost of inventories to S) (200)
Temporary difference (group unrealised profit) (50)
Deferred tax asset (50 × 50% (S's tax rate)) 25
138
6: Income taxes
S's tax rate is used to calculate the deferred tax asset because S will receive the future tax deduction
related to the inventories.
In the consolidated financial statements a deferred tax asset of $25 should be recognised:
DEBIT Deferred tax asset (in consolidated statement of financial position) $25
CREDIT Deferred tax (in consolidated statement of profit or loss) $25
Activity 2: Unrealised profit on intragroup trading

Kappa prepares consolidated financial statements to 30 September each year. On 1 August 20X3,
Kappa sold products to Omega, a wholly owned subsidiary, for $80,000. The goods had cost
Kappa $64,000. All of these goods remained in Omega's inventories at the year end. The rate of
income tax in the jurisdiction in which Omega operates is 25% and tax is calculated on the profits of
the individual entities.
Required
Explain the deferred tax treatment of this transaction in the consolidated financial statements of
Kappa for the year ended 30 September 20X3.
6 Deferred tax: other temporary differences

Tutorial note
The temporary differences discussed in this section are those that are introduced in the Strategic
Business Reporting syllabus and that haven't been covered in Financial Reporting. However, this is
not an exhaustive list of temporary differences that could be encountered in the Strategic Business
Reporting exam. You could be examined on deferred tax relating to any area of the syllabus.
6.1 Gains or losses on financial assets

Gains on financial assets held at fair value are either recognised in profit or loss or in other
comprehensive income (covered in Chapter 7 Financial instruments).
If the gain is not taxable until the financial asset is sold, the gain is ignored for tax purposes until the
sale and the tax base of the asset does not change. A taxable temporary difference arises generating
a deferred tax liability (IAS 12: para. 20).
Similarly, losses on financial assets that are not tax deductible until they are sold generate a deferred
tax asset (IAS 12: para. 20).
The deferred tax is recognised in the same section of the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income as the gain/loss on the financial asset.
Illustration 7
Gains or losses on financial assets
On 1 October 20X2, Kalle purchased an equity investment for $200,000. Kalle has made the
irrevocable election to carry the investment at fair value through other comprehensive income.
On 30 September 20X3, the fair value of the investment was $240,000. In the tax jurisdiction in
which Kalle operates, unrealised gains and losses arising on the revaluation of investments of this
nature are not taxable unless the investment is sold. The rate of income tax in the jurisdiction in which
Kalle operates is 25%.
139
Required
Explain how the deferred tax consequences of this transaction would be reported in the financial
statements of Kalle for the year ended 30 September 20X3.
Solution
Since the unrealised fair value gain on the equity investment is not taxable until the investment is sold,
the tax base of the investment is unchanged by the fair value gain and remains as $200,000.
The fair value gain creates a taxable temporary difference of $40,000 (carrying amount $240,000
– tax base $200,000).
This results in a deferred tax liability of $10,000 ($40,000 × 25%).
Because the unrealised gain is reported in other comprehensive income, the related deferred tax
expense is also reported in other comprehensive income.
6.2 Unused tax losses and unused tax credits

Tax losses and tax credits may result in a tax saving if they can be carried forward to reduce future
tax payments.
A deferred tax asset is recognised for the carry forward of unused tax losses or credits to the extent
that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the unused tax losses
and credits can be used (IAS 12: para. 34).
See Chapter 6 Section 3.1.1 of the Supplementary Reading for further detail on the recognition of
deferred tax assets relating to tax losses. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the
Workbook.
Illustration 8
Tax losses
Lambda, a wholly owned subsidiary of Epsilon, made a loss adjusted for tax purposes of $3m in the
year ended 31 March 20X4. Lambda is unable to utilise this loss against previous tax liabilities and
local tax legislation does not allow Lambda to transfer the tax loss to other group companies. Local
legislation does allow Lambda to carry the loss forward and utilise it against its own future taxable
profits. The directors of Epsilon do not consider that Lambda will make taxable profits in the
foreseeable future.
Required
Explain the deferred tax implications of the above in the consolidated statement of financial position
of the Epsilon group at 31 March 20X4.
Solution
The tax loss creates a potential deferred tax asset for the Epsilon group since its carrying amount is
nil and its tax base is $3m.
However, no deferred tax asset can be recognised because there is no prospect of being able to
reduce tax liabilities in the foreseeable future as no taxable profits are anticipated.
140
6: Income taxes
Activity 3: Tax losses

The Baller Group incurred $38m of tax losses in the year ended 31 December 20X4. Local tax
legislation allows tax losses to be carried forward for two years only. The taxable profits were
anticipated to be $21m in 20X5 and $24m in 20X6. Uncertainty exists around the expected profits
for 20X6 as they are dependent on the successful completion of a service contract in 20X5 in order
for the contract to continue into 20X6. It is anticipated that there will be no future reversals of existing
taxable temporary differences until after 31 December 20X6. The rate of tax is 20%.
Required
Explain the deferred tax implications of the above in the consolidated financial statements of the
Baller Group at 31 December 20X4.
6.3 Share-based payment

Deferred tax related to share-based payments is covered in Chapter 9 Share-based payment.
6.4 Leases
Deferred tax related to leases is covered in Chapter 8 Leases.
Activity 4: Deferred tax comprehensive question
Nyman, a public limited company, has three 100% owned subsidiaries, Glass, Waddesdon, and
Winsten SA, a foreign subsidiary.
(a) The following details relate to Glass:
(i) Nyman acquired its interest in Glass on 1 January 20X3. The fair values of the assets
and liabilities acquired were considered to be equal to their carrying amounts, with the
exception of freehold property which had a fair value of $32 million and a tax base of
$31 million. The directors have no intention of selling the property.
(ii) Glass has sold goods at a price of $6 million to Nyman since acquisition and made a
profit of $2 million on the transaction. The inventories of these goods recorded in
Nyman's statement of financial position at the year end, 30 September 20X3, was
$3.6 million.
(b) Waddesdon undertakes various projects from debt factoring to investing in property and
commodities. The following details relate to Waddesdon for the year ended 30 September
20X3:
(i) Waddesdon has a portfolio of readily marketable government securities which are held
as current assets for financial trading purposes. These investments are stated at market
value in the statement of financial position with any gain or loss taken to profit or loss.
These gains and losses are taxed when the investments are sold. Currently the
accumulated unrealised gains are $8 million.
(ii) Waddesdon has calculated it requires an allowance for credit losses of $2 million
against its total loan portfolio. Tax relief is available when the specific loan is written
off.
(c) Winsten SA has unremitted earnings of €20 million which would give rise to additional tax
payable of $2 million if remitted to Nyman's tax regime. Nyman intends to leave the earnings
within Winsten for reinvestment.
(d) Nyman has unrelieved trading losses as at 30 September 20X3 of $10 million.
141
Current tax is calculated based on the individual company's financial statements (adjusted for tax
purposes) in the tax regime in which Nyman operates. Assume an income tax rate of 30% for
Nyman and 25% for its subsidiaries.
Required
Explain the deferred tax implications of the above information for the Nyman group of companies for
the year ended 30 September 20X3.
7 Deferred tax: presentation

Deferred tax assets and liabilities can only be offset if (IAS 12: para. 74):
(a) The entity has a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against
current tax liabilities; and
(b) The deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation
authority.
Ethics note
Ethical issues could feature in any question in the SBR exam. You need to be alert to any threats to
the fundamental principles of ACCA's Code of Ethics and Conduct when approaching every
question.
Deferred tax is difficult to understand and therefore a threat arises if the reporting accountant is not
adequately trained or experienced in this area. This could result in errors being made in the
recognition or measurement of deferred tax assets or liabilities.
Recognising deferred tax assets for the carry forward of unused tax losses requires judgment of
whether it is probable that future taxable profit will be available for offset. As such, a director under
pressure may be tempted to say that future taxable profits are probable, when in fact they are not, in
order to recognise a deferred tax asset.
142
6: Income taxes
Chapter summary
1. Current tax Income taxes 4. Deferred tax:

 Tax charged by tax authority measurement
 Unpaid tax recognised as a  Tax rates expected to apply when
liability asset realised/liability settled,
based on tax rates/laws:
 Benefits of tax losses that can be 3. Deferred tax: –
carried back recognised as an Enacted, or
recognition – Substantively enacted
asset
 DT is recognised for all temporary by end of reporting period
 Explanation required as to
differences, except:  Cannot be discounted
difference between expected and
actual tax expense – Initial recognition of goodwill (inconsistency with IAS 37 which
– requires discounting if material)
Initial recognition in a transaction
(i) Not a business combination,
and
2. Deferred tax principles:
(ii) At that time, does not affect
revision accounting nor taxable profit 6. Deferred tax: other
A/c CA X  DT recognised in same section of
Less: tax base (X)
SPLOCI as transaction
Taxable/(deductible) TD X/(X)  Development costs
x % = (DTL)/DTA (X)/X – DTL on A/c CA if fully tax
 Accelerated tax depreciation deductible as incurred (tax
base = 0)
– A/c CA > tax WDV 5. Deferred tax: group
– Tax base = tax WDV  Impairment (& inventory) losses
– => DTL – DTA on loss if not tax
 Revaluations not recognised for tax  Fair value adjustments deductible until later (as tax
– A/c CA > tax WDV – DTL on FV increases base does not change)
– Tax base = tax WDV (& higher goodwill)  Financial assets
– DTL always recognised even if no – DTL on gains not taxable until
– DTA on FV decreases
intention to sell, as revalued amount sale
(& lower goodwill)
recoverable through use generating
 Undistributed profits of – DTA on losses not tax
taxable income
subsidiary/associate/joint venture deductible until sale
 Accrued income/expense taxed on a cash – recognised in same section of
basis – DTL recognised unless:
SPLOCI as gain/loss
– Accrual in SOFP, but no accrual for (i) Parent is able to control timing
tax  Unused tax losses/credits
of reversal, and
– Tax base = 0 – DT asset only if probable
(ii) probable will not reverse in
future taxable profit available
 Provisions tax deductible when paid foreseeable future for offset
– Accrual in SOFP, but no accrual for
 Unrealised profit on intragroup trading  Share-based payment
tax
– Tax base = 0 – DTA recognised at receiving – See SBP chapter
– DTA based on prov'n company's tax rate
 Leases
 Accrued income/expense taxed on an – See Leases chapter
accruals basis
– Tax base = accrual
–  No DT effect
 Never taxable/ tax deductible 7. Deferred tax:
– No DT effect
presentation
 DT assets/liabilities must be
Calculation of charge/(credit) to P/L: offset, but only if:
DTL (net) b/d X – Legal right to set off current
OCI (re rev'n or investment in equity instruments) X tax assets/liabilities, and
Goodwill (re FV increases) X – DT assets/liabilities relate
P/L charge/(credit)  X/(X)
to same tax authority
DTL (net) c/d X
Key
A/c CA = accounting carrying amount
DT = deferred tax
DTA = deferred tax asset
DTL = deferred tax liability
FV = fair value
OCI = other comprehensive income
SOFP = statement of financial position
SPLOCI = statement of profit or loss and
other comprehensive income
Tax WDV = tax written down value 143
1. Current tax
 Current tax is the tax charged by the tax authority.
 Unpaid amounts are shown as a liability. Any tax losses that can be carried back
are shown as an asset.
 An explanation, in the form of a reconciliation, is required as to the difference
between the expected tax expense and the actual tax expense for the period.
2. Deferred tax principles: revision
 Deferred tax is the tax attributable to temporary differences, ie temporary differences
in timing of recognition of income and expense between IFRSs accounting and tax
calculations.
 They are measured as the difference between the accounting carrying amount of
an asset or liability and its tax base (ie tax value).
 Temporary differences are used to measure deferred tax from a statement of financial
position angle (consistent with the Conceptual Framework).
 Taxable temporary differences arise where the accounting carrying amount exceeds
the tax base. They result in deferred tax liabilities, representing the fact that current
tax will not be charged until the future, and so an accrual is made.
 Deductible temporary differences arise when the accounting carrying amount is less
than the tax base. They result in deferred tax assets, representing the fact that the
tax authorities will only give a tax deduction in the future (eg when a provision is paid). A
deferred tax credit reduces the tax charge as the item has already been deducted for
accounting purposes.
3. Deferred tax: recognition
 Deferred tax is provided for under IAS 12 for all temporary differences (with limited
exceptions).
 Deferred tax is recognised in the same section of statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income as the related transaction.
4. Deferred tax: measurement
 Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates expected to apply when the asset is realised
or liability settled (based on rates enacted/substantively enacted by the end of
the reporting period).
5. Deferred tax: group financial statements
 In group financial statements, deferred tax may arise on fair value adjustments,
undistributed profits of subsidiaries and unrealised profits.
A deferred tax asset is created for unused tax losses and credits, providing it is probable
that there will be future taxable profit against which they can be used.
6. Deferred tax: other temporary differences
 Development costs: tax base is nil if costs are fully tax deductible as incurred
 Impairment (and inventory) losses: tax base does not change if loss not tax deductible until
sold
 Financial assets: if gains or losses are not taxable/deductible until the instrument is sold, a
temporary difference arises
144
6: Income taxes
 Unused tax losses/credits: deferred tax asset is recognised only if probable future taxable
profit is available for offset.
7. Deferred tax: presentation
 Deferred tax assets and liabilities are shown separately from each other (consistent
with the IAS 1 'no offset' principle) unless the entity has a legally enforceable right to
offset current tax assets and liabilities and the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate
to the same taxation authority.
145
Question practice
Q8 DT Group
Further reading
topics studied in this chapter and are useful reading:
IAS 12 Income Taxes (2011)
Recovery Position (2015)
146
Financial instruments
Learning objectives
Syllabus
reference no.
Discuss and apply the initial recognition and measurement of financial instruments. C3(a)
Discuss and apply the subsequent measurement of financial assets and financial C3(b)
liabilities.
Discuss and apply the derecognition of financial assets and financial liabilities. C3(c)
Discuss and apply the reclassification of financial assets. C3(d)
Account for derivative financial instruments, and simple embedded derivatives. C3(e)
Outline and apply the qualifying criteria for hedge accounting and account for C3(f)
fair value hedges and cash flow hedges including hedge effectiveness.
Discuss and apply the general approach to impairment of financial instruments C3(g)
including the basis for estimating expected credit losses.
Discuss the implications of a significant increase in credit risk. C3(h)
Discuss and apply the treatment of purchased or originated credit impaired C3(i)
financial assets.
Exam context
Financial instruments is a very important topic for Strategic Business Reporting (SBR), and is likely to
be examined often and in depth. It is also one of the more challenging areas of the syllabus, so it is
an area to which you need to dedicate a fair amount of time.
147
Chapter overview
Financial assets Financial liabilities
4. Derecognition
(IFRS 9)
3. Recognition 9. Disclosures
2. Classification
(IFRS 9) (IFRS 7)
(IAS 32)
5. Classification and
Financial instruments measurement
1. Standards (IFRS 9)
Initial Subsequent
measurement measurement
8. Hedging
(IFRS 9)
Financial
Financial assets
liabilities
7. Impairment of
financial assets
(IFRS 9)
6. Embedded derivatives
(IFRS 9)
148
7: Financial instruments
1 Standards
The dynamic nature of international financial markets has resulted in the widespread use of a variety
of financial instruments. Prior to the issue of IAS 32 and IAS 39 (the forerunner of IFRS 9), many
financial instruments were 'off balance sheet', being neither recognised nor disclosed in the financial
statements while still exposing the shareholders to significant risks.
The IASB has developed the following standards in relation to financial instruments:
Accounting for
financial
instruments
IAS 32 IFRS 9 IFRS 7

Financial Instruments: Financial Instruments Financial Instruments:
Presentation (first issued 2009) Disclosures
(first issued 2005) (first issued 2005)
2 Classification (IAS 32)

2.1 Definitions
In order to decide whether a transaction is a financial instrument (and how to classify it if it is a
financial instrument), it is important to have a good understanding of the instruments as defined by
IAS 32:
Financial
instruments
Financial assets Financial liabilities Equity instruments
Compound instruments
149
(1) Financial instrument: any contract that gives rise to both a financial asset of one entity and
a financial liability or equity instrument of another entity (IAS 32: para. 11).
Key terms
(2) Financial asset (IAS 32: para. 11)
Any asset that is:
(a) Cash;
(b) An equity instrument of another entity;
(c) A contractual right:
(i) To receive cash or another financial asset from another entity; or
(ii) To exchange financial assets or financial liabilities with another entity under
conditions that are potentially favourable to the entity; or
(d) A contract that will or may be settled in the entity's own equity instruments.
Examples: Although technically financial instruments,
IFRS 9 does not change the treatment of
 Trade receivables basic instruments such as trade
 Options receivables
 Shares (as an investment)
(3) Financial liability (IAS 32: para. 11)
Any liability that is:
(a) A contractual obligation:
(i) To deliver cash or another financial asset to another entity; or
(ii) To exchange financial assets or financial liabilities with another entity under
conditions that are potentially unfavourable to the entity; or
(b) A contract that will or may be settled in an entity's own equity instruments.
Examples:
 Trade payables
 Debenture loans (payable)
 Mandatorily redeemable preference shares
 Forward contracts standing at a loss
(4) Equity instrument: any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of an entity
after deducting all of its liabilities (IAS 32: para. 11).
Examples:
 An entity's own ordinary shares
 Warrants
 Non-cumulative irredeemable preference shares
(5) Derivative. A derivative has three characteristics (IFRS 9: Appendix A):
(a) Its value changes in response to an underlying variable (eg share price, commodity
price, foreign exchange rate or interest rate);
(b) It requires no initial net investment or an initial net investment that is smaller than would
be required for other types of contracts that would be expected to have a similar
response to changes in market factors;
(c) It is settled at a future date.
Examples:
 Foreign currency forward contracts
 Interest rate swaps
 Options
150
Chapter 7 Section 1 of the Supplementary Reading contains further details on these definitions. This
Classification as liability vs equity

IAS 32 clarifies that an instrument is only an equity instrument if neither (a) nor (b) in the definition of
a financial liability are met. (IAS 32: para. 16)
The critical feature of a financial liability is the contractual obligation to deliver cash or another
financial asset.
ED/2015/3: Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting has been widely criticised for not
addressing the distinction between debt and equity, which is considered a significant issue in
financial reporting. The IASB is undertaking a separate research project Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of Equity to consider the matter further.
Illustration 1 (revision)
Many entities issue preference shares which must be redeemed by the issuer for a fixed (or
determinable) amount at a fixed (or determinable) future date.
In such cases, the issuer has a contractual obligation to deliver cash. Therefore, the instrument is a
financial liability and should be classified as a liability in the statement of financial position.
2.2 Compound instruments

Where a financial instrument contains some characteristics of equity and some of financial liability
then its separate components need to be classified separately (IAS 32: para. 28).
A common example is convertible debt (convertible loan notes).
Method for separating the components (IAS 32: para. 32):
(1) Determine the carrying amount of the liability component (by measuring the fair value of a
similar liability that does not have an associated equity component);
(2) Assign the residual amount to the equity component.
Illustration 2 (revision)
Karaiskos SA issues 1,000 convertible bonds on 1 January 20X1 at par. Each bond is redeemable
in three years' time at its par value of $2,000 per bond. Alternatively, each bond can be converted
at the maturity date into 125 $1 shares.
The bonds pay interest annually in arrears at an interest rate (based on nominal value) of 6%.
The prevailing market interest rate for 3-year bonds that have no right of conversion is 9%.
Required
Show the presentation of the compound instrument in the financial statements at inception.
3-year discount factors: Simple Cumulative
6% 0.840 2.673
9% 0.772 2.531
151
Solution
The convertible bonds are compound financial instruments and must be split into two components:
(a) A financial liability (measured first), representing the contractual obligation to make a cash
payment at a future date;
(b) An equity component (measured as a residual), representing what has been received by the
company for the option to convert the instrument into shares at a future date. This is sometimes
called a 'warrant'.
Presentation
Non-current liabilities $
Financial liability component of convertible bond (Working) 1,847,720
Equity
Equity component of convertible bond (2,000,000 – (Working) 1,847,720) 152,280
Working – value of liability component

Market rate (9%) for $
equivalent non-convertible
Present value of principal payable at end of 3 years bonds used for discounting
1,544,000
(1,000 × $2,000 = $2m × 0.772) in both cases
303,720
Present value of interest annuity payable annually in arrears
for 3 years [(6% × $2m) × 2.531]
1,847,720
2.3 Treasury shares

If an entity reacquires its own equity instruments ('treasury shares'), the amount paid is
presented as a deduction from equity (IAS 32: para. 33) rather than as an asset (as an
investment by the entity in itself, by acquiring its own shares, cannot be shown as an asset).
No gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss on the purchase, sale, issue or cancellation of an entity's
own equity instruments (IAS 32: para. 33). Any premium or discount is recognised in reserves.
Illustration 3
An entity acquired 10,000 of its own $1 shares, which had previously been issued at $1.50 each,
for $1.80 each. The entity is undecided as to whether to cancel the shares or reissue them at a later
date.
Analysis
These are treasury shares and are presented as a deduction from equity:
Equity $
Share capital X
Share premium X
Treasury shares (10,000 × $1.80) (18,000)
If the shares are subsequently cancelled, the $1.50 will be debited to share capital ($1) and share
premium ($0.50), and the excess ($0.30) recognised in retained earnings rather than in profit or
loss, as it is a transaction with the owners of the business in their capacity as owners.
152
3 Recognition (IFRS 9)
Financial assets and liabilities are required to be recognised in the statement of financial position
when the entity becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument (IFRS 9:
para. 3.1.1).
Illustration 4
Derivatives (eg a forward contract) are recognised in the financial statements at inception even
though there may have been no cash flow, and disclosures about them are made in accordance with
IFRS 7.
The recognition criteria for financial instruments differ from those in the Conceptual Framework which
requires items to be recognised when there is a probable inflow or outflow of resources and the item
has a cost or value that can be measured reliably (Conceptual Framework: para. 4.38).
Financial contracts vs executory contracts
IFRS 9 applies to those contracts to buy or sell a non-financial item that can be settled net in
cash or another financial instrument, or by exchanging financial instruments as if the contracts were
financial instruments (IFRS 9: para. 2.4). These are considered financial contracts.
However, contracts that were entered into (and continue to be held) for the entity's expected
purchase, sale or usage requirements of non-financial items are outside the scope of
IFRS 9 (IFRS 9: para. 2.4).
These are executory contracts. Executory contracts are contracts under which neither party has
performed any of its obligations (or both parties have partially performed their obligations to an
equal extent) (IAS 37: para. 3). For example, an unfulfilled order for the purchase of goods, where
at the end of the reporting period, the goods have neither been delivered nor paid for.
Illustration 5
A forward contract to purchase cocoa beans for use in making chocolate is an executory contract
which is outside the scope of IFRS 9.
The purchase is not accounted for until the cocoa beans are actually delivered.
4 Derecognition (IFRS 9)
Derecognition is the removal of a previously recognised financial instrument from an entity's
statement of financial position. Derecognition happens:
Financial assets: – When the contractual rights to the cash flows expire (eg because a
customer has paid their debt or an option has expired worthless)
(IFRS 9: para. 3.2.3(a)); or
– The financial asset is transferred (eg sold), based on whether the
entity has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of
ownership of the financial asset (IFRS 9: para. 3.2.3(b)).
Financial liabilities: – When it is extinguished, ie when the obligation is discharged (eg
paid off), cancelled or expires (IFRS 9: para. 3.3.1).
Where a part of a financial instrument (or group of similar financial instruments) meets the criteria
above, that part is derecognised (IFRS 9: para. 3.2.2(a)).
For example, if an entity holds a bond it has the right to two separate sets of cash inflows: those
relating to the principal and those relating to the interest. It could sell the right to receive the interest
to another party while retaining the right to receive the principal.
153
Chapter 7 Section 2 of the Supplementary Reading contains further details on derecognition. This is
Activity 1: Derecognition
Required
Discuss whether the following financial instruments would be derecognised.
(a) AB sells an investment in shares, but retains a call option to repurchase those shares at any
time at a price equal to their current market value at the date of repurchase.
(b) EF enters into a stocklending agreement where an investment is lent to a third party for a fixed
period of time for a fee. At the end of the period of time the investment (or an identical one) is
returned to EF.
5 Classification and measurement (IFRS 9)
5.1 Definitions
The following definitions are relevant in understanding this section, and you should refer back to
them when studying this material.
Amortised cost: the amount at which the financial asset or financial liability is measured at initial
recognition minus the principal repayments, plus or minus the cumulative amortisation using the
Key terms
effective interest method of any difference between that initial amount and the maturity amount and,
for financial assets, adjusted for any loss allowance.
Effective interest rate: the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts
through the expected life of the financial asset or financial liability to the gross carrying amount of a
financial asset or to the amortised cost of a financial liability.
Held for trading: a financial asset or financial liability that:
(a) Is acquired or incurred principally for the purpose of selling or repurchasing it in the near term;
(b) On initial recognition is part of a portfolio of identified financial instruments that are managed
together and for which there is evidence of a recent actual pattern of short-term profit-taking; or
(c) Is a derivative (except for a derivative that is a financial guarantee contract or a designated and
effective hedging instrument).
Financial guarantee contract: a contract that requires the issuer to make specified payments to
reimburse the holder for a loss it incurs because a specified debtor fails to make payment when due
in accordance with the original or modified terms of the debt instrument.
154
5.2 Financial assets

Initial measurement Subsequent
(IFRS 9: para. 5.1.1) measurement
(IFRS 9: paras. 4.1.2–4.1.5,
5.7.5)
1 Investments in debt
instruments
Business model approach (Note 1): Fair value + transaction Amortised cost
(a) Held to collect contractual cash costs
flows; and cash flows are solely
principal and interest
(b) Held to collect contractual cash Fair value + transaction Fair value through other
flows and to sell; and cash costs comprehensive income (with
flows are solely principal and reclassification to profit or loss
interest (P/L) on derecognition)
NB: interest revenue calculated
on amortised cost basis
recognised in P/L
2 Investments in equity Fair value + transaction Fair value through other
instruments not 'held for costs comprehensive income (no
trading' reclassification to P/L on
(optional irrevocable election on derecognition)
initial recognition) NB: dividend income
recognised in P/L
3 All other financial assets Fair value (transaction Fair value through profit or loss
(and any financial asset if this would costs expensed in P/L)
eliminate or significantly reduce an
'accounting mismatch' (Note 2))
Notes
1 The business model approach relates to groups of debt instrument assets and the
accounting treatment depends on the entity's intention for that group of assets.
(a) If the intention is to hold the group of debt instruments until they are redeemed, ie
receive ('collect') the interest and capital ('principal') cash flows, then changes in fair
value are not relevant, and the difference between initial and maturity value is
recognised using the amortised cost method.
(b) If the intention is principally to hold the group of debt instruments until they are
redeemed, but they may be sold if certain criteria are met (eg to meet regulatory
solvency requirements), then their fair value is now relevant as they may be sold and so
they are measured at fair value. Changes in fair value are recognised in other
comprehensive income, but interest is still recognised in profit or loss on the same basis
as if the intention was not to sell if certain criteria are met.
2 An 'accounting mismatch' is a measurement or recognition inconsistency that would otherwise
arise from measuring assets or liabilities or recognising gains or losses on them on different
bases. Any financial asset can be designated at fair value through profit or loss if this would
eliminate the mismatch.
155
Illustration 6
Fair value of debt on initial recognition
A $5,000 3-year interest-free loan is made to a director. If market interest charged on a similar loan
1
would be, say, 4%, the fair value of the loan at inception is $5,000 × = $4,445 and the loan
3
1.04
is recorded at that value.
Illustration 7
Amortised cost revision
A company purchases loan notes (nominal value $100,000) for $96,394 on 1 January 20X3,
incurring transaction costs of $350. The loan notes carry interest paid annually on 31 December of
4% of nominal value ($4,000 pa). The loan notes will be redeemed at par on 31 December 20X5.
The effective interest rate is 5.2%.
Required
Show the amortised cost of the loan notes from 1 January 20X3 to 31 December 20X5 (before
redemption).
Solution
$ $ $
1 January b/d (96,394 + 350) 96,744 97,775 98,859
Effective interest at 5.2% of b/d (interest in P/L) 5,031 5,084 5,141
'Coupon' interest received (4,000) (4,000) (4,000)
31 December c/d 97,775 98,859 100,000
Activity 2: Measurement of financial assets

Wharton, a public limited company, has requested your advice on accounting for the following
financial instrument transactions:
(a) On 1 January 20X1, Wharton made a $10,000 interest-free loan to an employee to be paid
back on 31 December 20X2. The market rate on an equivalent loan would have been 5%.
(b) Wharton anticipates capital expenditure in a few years and so invests its excess cash into
short- and long-term financial assets so it can fund the expenditure when the need arises.
Wharton will hold these assets to collect the contractual cash flows, and, when an opportunity
arises, the entity will sell financial assets to re-invest the cash in financial assets with a higher
return. The managers responsible for this portfolio are remunerated on the overall return
generated by the portfolio.
As part of this policy, Wharton purchased $50,000 par value of loan notes at a 10% discount
on their issue on 1 January 20X1. The redemption date of these loan notes is 31 December
20X4. An interest coupon of 3% of par value is paid annually on 31 December. Transaction
costs of $450 were incurred on the purchase. The annual internal rate of return on the loan
notes is 5.6%.
At 31 December 20X1, due to a decrease in market interest rates, the fair value of these loan
notes increased to $51,000.
Required
Discuss, with suitable calculations, how the above financial instruments should be accounted for in
the financial statements of Wharton for the year ended 31 December 20X1.
156
5.3 Reclassification of financial assets

Financial assets are reclassified under IFRS 9 when, and only when, an entity changes
its business model for managing financial assets (IFRS 9: para. 4.4.1). The reclassification should
be applied prospectively from the reclassification date (IFRS 9: para. 5.6.1).
These rules only apply to investments in debt instruments as investments in equity
instruments are always held at fair value and any election to measure them at fair value through
other comprehensive income is an irrevocable one.
5.4 Treatment of gain or loss on derecognition

On derecognition of a financial asset in its entirety, the difference between:
(a) The carrying amount (measured at the date of derecognition); and
(b) The consideration received
is recognised in profit or loss (IFRS 9: para. 3.2.12).
Applying this rule, in the case of investments in equity instruments not held for trading where
the irrevocable election has been made to report changes in fair value in other comprehensive
income, all changes in fair value up to the point of derecognition are reported in other
Therefore, a gain or loss in profit or loss will only arise if the investments in equity instruments are
not sold at their fair value and for any transaction costs on derecognition. Gains or losses
previously reported in other comprehensive income are not reclassified to profit or loss on
derecognition.
For investments in debt held at fair value through other comprehensive income, on
derecognition, the cumulative revaluation gain or loss previously recognised in other
comprehensive income is reclassified to profit or loss (IFRS 9: para. 5.7.10).
5.5 Financial liabilities
Initial measurement Subsequent measurement

(IFRS 9: para. 5.1.1) (IFRS 9: para. 4.2.1)
1 Most financial liabilities Fair value less Amortised cost

(eg trade payables, loans, transaction costs
preference shares classified as a
liability)
2 Financial liabilities at fair Fair value (transaction Fair value through profit or
value through profit or loss costs expensed in P/L) loss*
(Note 1)
– 'Held for trading' (short-term
profit making)
– Derivatives that are liabilities
– Designated on initial
recognition at 'fair value
through profit or loss' to
eliminate/significantly reduce
an 'accounting mismatch'
(Note 2)
157
– A group of financial liabilities
(or financial assets and
financial liabilities) managed
and performance evaluated on
a fair value basis in
accordance with a
documented risk management
or investment strategy
3 Financial liabilities arising Consideration received Measure financial liability on

when transfer of financial same basis as transferred asset
asset does not qualify for (amortised cost or fair value)
derecognition
4 Financial guarantee Fair value less Higher of:

contracts (Note 3) and transaction costs – Impairment loss allowance
commitments to provide a
– Amount initially recognised
loan at a below-market
less amounts amortised to
interest rate (Note 4)
P/L (IFRS 15)
*Changes in fair value due to changes in the liability's credit risk are recognised separately in other
comprehensive income (unless doing so would create or enlarge an 'accounting mismatch') (IFRS 9:
para. 5.7.7).
Notes
1 Most financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost.
However, some financial liabilities are measured at fair value through profit or loss if
fair value information is relevant to the user of the financial statements. This includes where a
company is 'trading' in financial liabilities, ie taking on liabilities hoping to settle them for less
in the short term to make a profit, and derivatives standing at a loss which are financial
liabilities rather than financial assets.
2 As with financial assets, financial liabilities can be designated at fair value through profit or
loss if doing so would eliminate an 'accounting mismatch', ie a measurement or
recognition inconsistency that would otherwise arise from measuring assets or liabilities or
recognising gains or losses on them on different bases.
3 Financial guarantee contracts are a form of financial insurance. The entity guarantees it
will make a payment to another party if a specified debtor does not pay that other party. On
initial recognition the fair value of the 'premiums' received (less any transaction costs) are
recognised as a liability. This is then amortised as income to profit or loss over the period of
the guarantee, representing the revenue earned as the performance obligation (ie providing
the guarantee) is satisfied, thereby reducing the liability to zero over the period of cover if no
compensation payments are actually made. However, if, at the year end, the expected
impairment loss that would be payable on the guarantee exceeds the remaining liability, the
liability is increased to this amount.
4 Commitments to provide a loan at below-market interest rate arise where an
entity has committed itself to make a loan to another party at an interest rate which is lower
than the rate the entity itself would pay to borrow the money. These are accounted for in the
same way as financial guarantee contracts. The impairment loss in this case would be the
present value of the expected interest receipts from the other party less the expected (higher)
interest payments the entity would pay.
158
Activity 3: Measurement of financial liabilities

Johnson, an investment property company, adopts the fair value model to measure its investment
properties. The fair value of the investment properties is highly dependent on interest rates.
The Finance Director of Johnson has requested your advice on accounting for the following financial
instrument transactions which took place in the year ended 31 December 20X1:
(a) On 31 December 20X1, Johnson took out a $9,000,000 bank loan specifically to finance the
purchase of some new investment properties. Fixed interest at the market rate of 5% is charged
for the 10-year term of the loan. Transaction costs of $150,000 were incurred.
(b) On 1 November 20X1 Johnson took out a speculative forward contract to buy coffee beans
for delivery on 30 April 20X2 at an agreed price of $6,000 intending to settle net in cash.
Due to a surge in expected supply, a forward contract for delivery on 30 April 20X2 would
have cost $5,000 on 31 December 20X1.
Required
Discuss, with suitable calculations, how the above financial instruments should be accounted for in
the financial statements of Johnson for the year ended 31 December 20X1.
5.6 Offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities (IAS 32)

A financial asset and a financial liability are required to be offset (ie presented as a single net
amount) when the entity:
(a) Has a legally enforceable right to set-off the recognised amounts, and
(b) Intends either to settle on a net basis or to realise the asset and settle the liability
simultaneously.
Otherwise, financial assets and financial liabilities are presented separately.
In this way, the amount recognised in the statement of financial position reflects an entity's
expected cash flows from settling two or more separate financial instruments, providing useful
information about the entity's ability to generate cash, claims against the entity and the entity's
liquidity and solvency.
Disclosure of the gross and net amounts offset is required by IFRS 7 as well as information
about right of set-off arrangements and similar agreements (eg collateral agreements).
Chapter 7 Section 3 of the Supplementary Reading contains further explanation and practice on
classification and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities. This is available in
6 Embedded derivatives (IFRS 9)

Some contracts (that may or may not be financial instruments themselves) may have derivatives
embedded in them. Ordinarily, derivatives not used for hedging are treated as 'held for trading' and
measured at fair value through profit or loss.
With limited exceptions, IFRS 9 requires embedded derivatives that would meet the definition of a
separate derivative instrument to be separated from the host contract (and therefore be measured
at fair value through profit or loss like other derivatives) (IFRS 9: paras. 4.3.3–4.3.5).
159
Illustration 8
An entity may issue a bond which is redeemable in five years' time with part of the redemption price
being based on the increase in the FTSE 100 index.
Bond Accounted for as normal

'Host' contract
(amortised cost)
Embedded Option on Treat as derivative, ie remeasured

derivative equities to fair value with changes
recognised in P/L
However, IFRS 9 does not requires embedded derivatives to be separated from the host contract if:
Exception Reason
(a) The economic characteristics and risks of Eg an oil contract between two companies
the embedded derivative are closely reporting in €, but priced in $.
related to those of the host contract; or The 'derivative' element ($ risk) is a normal
feature of the contract (as oil is priced in $) so
not really derivative
(b) The hybrid (combined) instrument is Both parts would be at fair value through profit
measured at fair value through profit or loss anyway, so no need to split
or loss; or
(c) The host contract is a financial asset The measurement rules for financial assets
within the scope of IFRS 9; or require the whole instrument to be measured at
fair value through profit or loss anyway, so no
need to split
(d) The embedded derivative significantly If the derivative element changes the cash flows
modifies the cash flows of the contract. so much, then the whole instrument should be
measured at fair value through profit or loss
due to the risk involved (which is the
measurement category that would apply
without these rules, being derivative)
(IFRS 9: paras. 4.3.3–4.3.5)
7 Impairment of financial assets (IFRS 9)

7.1 Scope
IFRS 9's impairment rules apply to (IFRS 9: paras. 5.5.1–5.5.2):
 Investments in debt instruments measured at amortised cost (business model: objective – to
collect contractual cash flows of principal and interest)
 Investments in debt instruments measured at fair value through other comprehensive income
(OCI) (business model: objective – to collect contractual cash flows of principal and interest
and to sell financial assets)
 Lease receivables within the scope of IFRS 16 Leases
 Contract assets within the scope of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
160
 Financial guarantee contracts (see Section 5.5)

 Commitments to provide loans at below-market interest rate (see Section 5.5)
7.2 Definitions
The following definitions are important in understanding this section, and you should refer back to
them when studying this material.
Credit loss: the difference between all contractual cash flows that are due to an entity…and all the
cash flows that the entity expects to receive, discounted.
Key terms
Expected credit losses: the weighted average of credit losses with the respective risks of a default
occurring as the weights.
Lifetime expected credit losses: the expected credit losses that result from all possible default
events over the expected life of a financial instrument.
Past due: a financial asset is past due when a counterparty has failed to make a payment when
that payment was contractually due.
12-month expected credit losses: the portion of the lifetime expected credit losses that
represent the expected credit losses that result from default events on a financial instrument that are
possible within the 12 months after the reporting date.
7.3 Approach
IFRS 9's approach uses an 'expected loss' model (IFRS 9: para 5.5.1).
This means that the financial statements should reflect the general pattern of deterioration or
improvement in the credit quality of financial assets from the date of initial recognition, based
on changes in expectations (eg re performance of the borrower or external credit rating), recognising
an allowance even before a credit loss (bad/doubtful debt) has objectively arisen. This is a
forward-looking impairment model.
Credit losses should be recognised in three stages (IFRS 9: para. 5.5.3–5.5.11):
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
When? Initial recognition Credit risk Objective

(and subsequently increases evidence of
if no significant significantly impairment exists
deterioration in (rebuttable at the reporting
credit risk) presumption if date
> 30 days past
due)
Credit losses 12-month Lifetime expected Lifetime expected

recognised expected credit credit losses credit losses
losses
Calculation On gross carrying On gross carrying On carrying

of effective amount amount amount net of
interest allowance for
credit losses (see
below) after date
evidence exists
161
7.4 Presentation
Credit losses are treated as follows:
Type of asset Treatment of credit loss
All investments in debt  Recognised in profit or loss

instruments except those  Credit losses held in a separate allowance
measured at fair value through other account offset against the carrying amount of
comprehensive income the asset:
Financial asset X
Allowance for credit losses (X)
Carrying amount (net of allowance for credit losses) X
Investments in debt instruments  Portion of the fall in fair value relating to credit
measured at fair value through losses recognised in profit or loss
other comprehensive income  Remainder recognised in other comprehensive
income
 No allowance account necessary because already
carried at fair value (which is automatically reduced for
any fall in value, including credit losses)
(IFRS 9: paras. 5.5.8 and 5.5.2)
7.5 Recognition
Stage 1
The 12-month expected credit losses are recognised at Stage 1 (ie on initial recognition of a
financial asset).
These are the portion of lifetime expected credit losses that result from default events on a
financial instrument that are possible within the 12 months after the reporting date (IFRS 9:
Appendix A). They are calculated by multiplying the probability of default in the next 12 months by
the present value of the lifetime expected credit losses that would result from the default (IFRS 9:
para. B5.5.43).
Stage 2 and Stage 3
Lifetime expected credit losses are recognised at Stage 2 (ie when credit risk increases
'significantly', which is assumed if more than 30 days past due).
These are the expected credit losses that result from all possible default events over the
expected life of the financial instrument (IFRS 9: Appendix A).
The credit losses continue to be measured on the same basis at Stage 3, when there is actual
objective evidence of impairment (eg default in payment, bankruptcy of customer etc).
Illustration 9
A company has a portfolio of loan assets. All loan assets have an effective interest rate 7.5%. The
portfolio was initially recognised at $840,000 with a separate allowance of $5,000 for 12-month
expected credit losses (lifetime expected credit losses of $100,000 at present value × 5% chance of
default within 12 months). No repayments are due in the first year.
At the end of the first year, credit risk deteriorates significantly. The expectation of lifetime expected
credit losses remains the same.
162
Required
Explain the accounting treatment of the portfolio of loan assets, with suitable calculations.
Solution
The loan assets are initially recognised as follows:
$
Loan assets 840,000
Allowance for credit losses (5,000)
Carrying amount (net of allowance for credit losses) 835,000
Effective interest income of $63,000 ($840,000 × 7.5%) is recognised on the loan assets. Interest
cost of $375 ($5,000 × 7.5%) is recognised on the allowance for credit losses, increasing it to
$5,375.
As there has been a significant deterioration in credit risk (Stage 2), the allowance for credit losses is
adjusted to lifetime expected credit losses (measured at the end of the first year) of $107,500
($100,000 × 1.075).
This requires a charge to profit or loss of $102,125 ($107,500 – $5,375).
At the end of the first year the situation is therefore:
$
Loan assets 840,000
Allowance for credit losses (102,120)
Carrying amount (net of allowance for credit losses) 737,880
In the second year, effective interest income and interest cost will be calculated on the gross figures
of $840,000 and $102,120 respectively, or (if there is objective evidence of actual impairment) on
the net figure of $737,180.
7.6 Measurement
The measurement of expected credit losses should reflect (IFRS 9: para. 5.5.17):
(a) An unbiased and probability-weighted amount that is determined by evaluating a
range of possible outcomes;
(b) The time value of money; and
(c) Reasonable and supportable information that is available without undue cost and
effort at the reporting date about past events, current conditions and forecasts of future
economic conditions.
Impairment loss reversal
If an entity has measured the loss allowance at an amount equal to lifetime expected credit losses
in the previous reporting period, but determines that the conditions are no longer met, it
should revert to measuring the loss allowance at an amount equal to 12-month expected credit
losses (IFRS 9: para. 5.5.7).
The resulting impairment gain is recognised in profit or loss (IFRS 9: para. 5.5.8).
7.7 Trade receivables, contract assets and lease receivables

A simplified approach is permitted for trade receivables, contract assets and lease receivables.
For trade receivables or contract assets that do not have a significant IFRS 15 financing
element, the loss allowance is measured at the lifetime expected credit losses, from initial
recognition (IFRS 9: para. 5.5.15).
163
For other trade receivables and contract assets and for lease receivables, the entity can choose (as
a separate accounting policy for trade receivables, contract assets and for lease receivables) to
apply the three stage approach or to recognise an allowance for lifetime expected credit
losses from initial recognition (IFRS 9: para. 5.5.15).
7.8 Purchased or originated credit-impaired financial assets

A financial asset may already be credit-impaired when it is purchased. In this case it is originally
recognised as a single figure with no separate allowance for credit losses. However, any
subsequent changes in lifetime expected credit losses are recognised as a separate allowance
(IFRS 9: para. 5.5.13).
Activity 4: Impairment of financial assets

On 1 January 20X5, ABC Bank made loans of $10 million to a group of customers with similar
credit risk. Interest payable by the customers on these loans is LIBOR + 2%, reset annually. On
1 January 20X5, the initial present value of expected losses over the life of the loans was $500,000
(using a discount factor of 3%). The probability of default over the next 12 months was estimated at
1 January 20X5 to be 15%. Customers pay instalments annually in arrears. Cash of $400,000
(including interest) was received from customers during the year ended 31 December 20X5. The
LIBOR rate for the year ended 31 December 20X5 was 1.8%.
After the loans were advanced, the country entered into an economic recession. By 31 December
20X5, the directors believed that there was objective evidence of impairment due to the late payment
of some of the customers. The present value of lifetime expected credit losses was revised to
$800,000.
Required
Discuss, with suitable calculations, the accounting treatment of the loans for the year ended
31 December 20X5.
8 Hedging (IFRS 9)
Companies enter into hedging transactions in order to reduce business risk. Where an item in the
statement of financial position or future cash flow is subject to potential fluctuations in value that
could be detrimental to the business, a hedging transaction may be entered into. The aim is that
where the item hedged makes a financial loss, the hedging instrument would make a gain and vice
versa, reducing overall risk.
164
Illustration 10
Pumpkin acquired inventories of coffee beans at 30 November 20X6 for their fair value of
$1.3 million. It is worried that the fair value will fall so has entered into a futures contract to
sell the coffee for its current fair value in 3 months' time.
At the year ended 31 December 20X6, the fair value of the coffee is $1.2 million.
At the reporting date:
Inventories Futures
With no hedging With no hedging
• Assuming net realisable value is • N/A
equal to fair value, a loss of
With hedging
$0.1m would be recognised in
profit or loss • The gain on the futures contract
Offsets is $0.1m as the contract allows
With hedging
the holder to sell at $0.1m more
• The loss on the inventories of than market value ($1.2m)
$0.1m would be recognised
• The gain would be reported in
whether or not their fair value
profit or loss
has been hedged
• The loss would be reported in
profit or loss
Adopting the hedge accounting provisions of IFRS 9 is mandatory where the hedging relationship
meets all of the following criteria (IFRS 9: para. 6.4.1):
(a) The hedging relationship consists only of eligible hedging instruments and eligible
hedged items;
(b) It was designated at its inception as a hedge with full documentation of how this
hedge fits into the company's strategy;
(c) The hedging relationship meets all of the following hedge effectiveness requirements:
(i) There is an economic relationship between the hedged item and the hedging
instrument; ie the hedging instrument and the hedged item have values that generally
move in the opposite direction because of the same risk, which is the hedged risk;
(ii) The effect of credit risk does not dominate the value changes that result from
that economic relationship; ie the gain or loss from credit risk does not frustrate the
effect of changes in the underlyings on the value of the hedging instrument or the
hedged item, even if those changes were significant; and
(iii) The hedge ratio of the hedging relationship (quantity of hedging instrument vs
quantity of hedged item) is the same as that resulting from the quantity of the hedged
item that the entity actually hedges and the quantity of the hedging instrument that
the entity actually uses to hedge that quantity of hedged item.
Practically however, hedge accounting is effectively optional in that an entity can choose whether
to set up the hedge documentation at inception or not.
An entity discontinues hedge accounting when the hedging relationship ceases to meet the
qualifying criteria, which also arises when the hedging instrument expires or is sold, transferred
or exercised (IFRS 9: para. 6.5.6).
165
8.1 Types of hedges
IFRS 9 identifies different types of hedges which determines their accounting treatment. The hedges
examinable are:
(a) Fair value hedges; and
(b) Cash flow hedges.
Fair value hedges
These hedge the change in value of a recognised asset or liability (or unrecognised firm commitment)
that could affect profit or loss (IFRS 9: para. 6.5.2), eg hedging the fair value of fixed rate loan notes
due to changes in interest rates.
All gains and losses on both the hedged item and hedging instrument are recognised as follows
(IFRS 9: para. 6.5.8):
(a) Immediately in profit or loss (except for hedges of investments in equity instruments held at
fair value through other comprehensive income).
(b) Immediately in other comprehensive income if the hedged item is an investment in
an equity instrument held at fair value through other comprehensive income.
This ensures that hedges of investments of equity instruments held at fair value through other
comprehensive income can be accounted for as hedges.
In both cases, the gain or loss on the hedged item adjusts the carrying amount of the hedged item.
Cash flow hedges
These hedge the risk of change in value of future cash flows from a recognised asset or liability (or
highly probable forecast transaction) that could affect profit or loss (IFRS 9: para. 6.5.2), eg hedging
a variable rate interest income stream. The hedging instrument is accounted for as follows (IFRS 9:
para. 6.5.11):
(a) The portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument that is effective (ie up to the value
of the loss or gain on cash flow hedged) is recognised in other comprehensive income
('items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss') and the cash flow hedge
reserve.
(b) Any excess is recognised immediately in profit or loss.
The amount that has been accumulated in the cash flow hedge reserve is then accounted for as
follows (IFRS 9: para. 6.5.11):
(a) If a hedged forecast transaction subsequently results in the recognition of a non-financial
asset or non-financial liability, the amount shall be removed from the cash flow
reserve and be included directly in the initial cost or carrying amount of the asset or
liability.
(b) For all other cash flow hedges, the amount shall be reclassified from other
comprehensive income to profit or loss in the same period(s) that the hedged
expected future cash flows affect profit or loss.
166
Illustration 11
Fair value hedge
On 1 July 20X6 Joules acquired 10,000 ounces of a material which it held in its inventories. This
cost $220 per ounce, so a total of $2.2 million. Joules was concerned that the price of these
inventories would fall, so on 1 July 20X6 it sold 10,000 ounces in the futures market for $215
per ounce for delivery on 30 June 20X7; ie the contract gives Joules the right (and obligation) to sell
10,000 ounces at $215 on 30 June 20X7 whatever the market price on that date.
On 1 July 20X6 the IFRS 9 conditions for hedge accounting were all met, and these continued to be
met throughout the hedging period.
At 31 December 20X6, the end of Joules's reporting period, the fair value of the inventories was
$200 per ounce while the futures price for 30 June 20X7 delivery was $198 per ounce. On 30 June
20X7 the trader sold the inventories and closed out the futures position at the then spot price of $190
per ounce.
Required
Explain the accounting treatment in respect of the above transactions.
Solution
This is a fair value hedge as Joules is hedging the fair value of its inventories. The IFRS 9 hedge
accounting criteria have been met, so hedge accounting was permitted.
At 31 December 20X6
The decrease in the fair value of the inventories (a loss) was $200,000 (10,000 × ($200 – $220)).
The increase in the futures contract asset (a gain) was $170,000 (10,000 × ($215 – $198)). These
are offset in profit or loss:
$ $
DEBIT Profit or loss 200,000
CREDIT Inventories 200,000
(To record the decrease in the fair value of the inventories)
DEBIT Futures contract asset 170,000
CREDIT Profit or loss 170,000
(To record the gain on the futures contract)
At 30 June 20X7
The decrease in the fair value of the inventories (a further loss) was another $100,000 (10,000 ×
($190 – $200)). The increase in the futures contract asset (a further gain) was another $80,000
(10,000 × ($198 – $190)).
Again, these are offset in profit or loss. The gain on the futures contract compensates the loss on the
inventories in profit or loss, mitigating the profit or loss effect of the changes in fair value.
$ $
DEBIT Profit or loss 100,000
CREDIT Inventories 100,000
(To record the decrease in the fair value of the inventories)
DEBIT Futures contract asset 80,000
CREDIT Profit or loss 80,000
(To record the gain on the futures contract)
167
The inventories are sold on 30 June 20X7, so they are transferred to cost of sales at their carrying
amount of $1.9 million ($2.2m – $200,000 – $100,000). Revenue of the same amount is
recognised (as the inventories have been remeasured to their fair value of $190 per ounce, which is
the selling price).
$ $
Profit or loss (cost of sales) 1,900,000
Inventories (2,200,000 – 200,000 – 100,000) 1,900,000
(To record the inventories now sold)
DEBIT Cash 1,900,000
CREDIT Revenue (10,000 × 190) 1,900,000
(To record the revenue from the sale of inventories)
The inventories are being sold at $1.9 million which is $300,000 less than their original cost of
$2.2 million on 1 July 20X6.
However, this fall in value is mitigated by selling the futures contract asset for its fair value of
$250,000, as a third party would now be willing to pay $250,000 for the right to sell 10,000
ounces of material at the agreed futures contract price of $215 rather than the market price of $190
per ounce. A futures contract is an exchange-traded contract so this is settled net in cash on the
market:
$ $
DEBIT Cash 250,000
CREDIT Futures contract asset (170,000 + 80,000) 250,000
(To record the settlement of the net balance due on closing the futures contract)
Consequently, Joules made an overall loss of only $50,000 ($300,000 loss on inventories, net of the
$250,000 gain on the futures contract). The purpose of hedging is to eliminate risk, but because
futures prices move differently to spot prices it cannot always be a perfect match, so a smaller loss of
$50,000 did still arise.
Activity 5: Cash flow hedge

OneAir is a successful international airline. A key factor affecting OneAir's cash flows and profits is
the price of jet fuel.
On 1 October 20X1, OneAir entered into a forward contract to hedge its expected fuel requirements
for the second quarter of 20X9 for delivery of 28m gallons of jet fuel on 31 March 20X2 at a price
of $2.04 per gallon.
The airline intended to settle the contract net in cash and purchase the actual required quantity of jet
fuel in the open market on 31 March 20X2.
At the company's year end the forward price for delivery on 31 March 20X2 had risen to $2.16 per
gallon of fuel.
All necessary documentation was set up at inception for the contract to be accounted for as a hedge.
You should assume that the hedge was fully effective.
On 31 March the company settled the forward contract net in cash and purchased 30m gallons of
jet fuel at the spot price on that day of $2.19.
Required
Discuss, with suitable computations, how the above transactions would be accounted for in the
financial statements for the year ended 31 December 20X1 and on the date of settlement.
168
9 Disclosures (IFRS 7)
9.1 Objective
The objective of IFRS 7 is to provide disclosures that enable users of financial statements to evaluate:
(a) The significance of financial instruments for the entity's financial position and performance;
and
(b) The nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments to which the entity is exposed,
and how the entity manages those risks (IFRS 7: para. 1).
9.2 Key disclosures

Significance of financial instruments for financial position and performance
These include (IFRS 7: paras. 8–30):
 Breakdown of carrying amount by class of financial instrument
 Details of any financial assets reclassified
 Details of any financial assets and liabilities offset
 Financial assets pledged as collateral
 The allowance account for investments in debt measured at fair value through
OCI (as not offset against the carrying amount in the statement of financial position)
 Details of any default in payment of principal or interest on loans payable during the
period or breaches of terms
 Effect of financial instruments on profit or loss line items
 Summary of significant accounting policies regarding financial instruments
 Hedging – risk management strategy and numerical table showing effect on financial
position and financial performance
 Methods used to measure fair value
Nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments
Qualitative disclosures include (IFRS 7: para. 33):
(a) Exposure to risk
(b) Policies for risk management
Quantitative disclosures relate to (IFRS 7: paras. 34–42):
(a) Credit risk – The risk that one party to a financial instrument will cause a financial loss for the
other party by failing to discharge an obligation.
(b) Liquidity risk – The risk that an entity will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated
with financial liabilities that are settled by delivering cash or another financial asset.
(c) Market risk – The risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will
fluctuate because of changes in market prices. Market risk comprises three types of
risk: currency risk, interest rate risk and other price risk.
169
Ethics note
Financial instruments involve a lot of complexity. This means that they are a higher risk area in terms
of incorrect accounting either due to a lack of competence or due to a lack of integrity.
In terms of this topic area, some potential ethical issues to consider include:
 Misclassification of financial assets and financial liabilities to achieve a desired accounting
effect
 Manipulation of profits using the estimations in the allowance for expected credit losses
 Accounting for certain financial instruments as hedges (and reducing losses, by offsetting
'hedging' gains against them) when they do not meet the criteria to be classified as hedging
instruments
170
Chapter summary
Financial assets
When:
 The contractual rights to cash flows
2. Classification (IAS 32) expire; or
 The FA is transferred (based on Financial liabilities
whether substantially all risks &
Financial asset (FA): Equity instrument: rewards of ownership transferred) When obligation:
(a) Cash  Any contract that  Is discharged;
Recognise in P/L:
(b) Contractual right to: evidences a residual  Cancelled; or
 Consideration received less CA
(i) Receive cash/FA interest in the assets of  Expires
(measured at date of derecognition)
(ii) Exchange FA/FL under an entity after deducting
potentially favourable all its liabilities
conditions  Only equity if neither
(c) Equity instrument of (a) nor (b) of FL def'n
another entity met
(d) Contract that will/may be
Compound instrument:
settled in entity's own
equity instruments
 Separate debt/equity components: 4. Derecognition
PV principal (X x 1/(1 + r) n) X (IFRS 9)
PV interest flows:
Financial liability (FL): (Nominal interest x 1/(1 + r) 1) X
(a) Contractual obligation to (Nominal interest x 1/(1 + r) 2) X
(i) Deliver cash/FA (Nominal interest x 1/(1 + r) 3) X
(ii) Exchange FA/FL under
...etc X
3. Recognition (IFRS 9)
potentially
Debt component X
unfavourable  When party to contractual provisions of
conditions
Equity component X
instrument
(b) Contract that will/may be Cash received X
 Outside scope: contracts to buy/sell non-
settled in entity's own  Discount using rate financial items in accordance with entity's
equity instruments for non-convertible debt expected purchase/sale/usage req'ments
5. Measurement
Financial instruments (IFRS 9)
1. Standards
IAS 32: Presentation
IFRS 7: Disclosures
IFRS 9: Recognition & Measurement
9. Disclosures (IFRS 7) See next page

 Significance of financial instruments for financial
position and performance
 Nature and extent of risks arising from financial
instruments Offsetting
– Qualitative: risk exposure and risk management
policies Only permitted when the entity:
– Quantitative: credit risk, liquidity risk, market risk
 Has a legally enforceable right to set-
off, and
 Intends either to settle on a net basis
or to realise the FA and settle the FL
simultaneously
8. Hedging
(IFRS 9)
 See next page 7. Impairment 6. Embedded
(IFRS 9) derivatives
(IFRS 9)
 See next page
 See next page
171
5. Classification and
measurement
(IFRS 9)
INITIAL MEASUREMENT INITIAL MEASUREMENT

 Fair value + transaction costs (TC)  Fair value – transactions cost (TC)
(except FA @ FV through P/L, TC  P/L) (except FL @ FV through P/L, TC  P/L)
SUBSEQUENT MEASUREMENT SUBSEQUENT MEASUREMENT
(1) Investments in debt instruments (1) Most financial liabilities
 Business model approach:  Amortised cost
– held to collect or collect & sell cash
(2) FL at FV through P/L
flows, and
 Held for trading (short-term profit making)
– cash flows solely principal and interest
 Derivatives
 Held to collect (only) – amortised cost Amortised cost calculation:
 Designated at FV through P/L to
 Held to collect & sell – FV through OCI Initial value b/d (incl trans costs) X
eliminate/significantly reduce an 'accounting
with interest in P/L (calculated as per Interest at effective % x b/d X
mismatch'
amortised cost) Coupon at nominal % x par value (X)  Portfolios managed and performance evaluated
(2) Investments in equity instruments Amortised cost c/d X on a FV basis
not 'held for trading'
(3) FL arising when transfer of FA does not
 Fair value through OCI (optional qualify for derecognition
irrevocable election)  FL = consideration received not yet recognised
 No reclassification on derecognition in P/L
(3) All other FA (or designated at FV  Measured on same basis as transferred FA (FV
through P/L to or amortised cost)
eliminate/significantly reduce an (4) Financial guarantee contracts and
'accounting mismatch') commitments to provide a loan at below
 Fair value through P/L market interest rate
Reclassification:  Higher of:
 Permitted only for debt instruments where entity – IAS 37 valuation, and
changes its business model – Amount initially recognised less amounts
amortised to P/L
6. Embedded
derivatives (IFRS 9)
 Derivative characteristics:
– Settled at a future date
– Value changes in response to an
underlying variable
– No/little initial net investment vs
contracts for similar market response
 Embedded derivative: an item meeting

definition of a derivative within a FL 'host'
contract
 Separate from 'host' contract unless:
– Economic characteristics and risks
closely related, or
– Combined instrument held at FVTP/L, or
– Host is an IFRS 9 FA, or
– Embedded derivative significantly
modifies cash flows
172
7. Impairment (IFRS 9) 8. Hedging (IFRS 9)
 Applies to investments in debt and other receivables (unless held at FV through P/L)  Objective-based (rather than quantitative) assessment
 No test required for FA at FV through P/L (as impairment automatically dealt with) of whether hedge relationship exists
 Follows an 'expected loss' model:  Accounted for as a hedge if hedging relationship:

– Only includes eligible items,
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 – Designated at inception, and
– Is effective
When? Initial recognition Credit risk increases Objective evidence of (i) Economic relationship between hedged item
(and subsequently if significantly (rebuttable impairment exists at and hedging instrument exists
no significant presumption if > 30 the reporting date (ii) Change in FV due to credit risk does not
deterioration in credit days past due) distort hedge, and
risk) (iii) Quantity of hedging instrument vs quantity of
hedged item ('hedge ratio') designated as
Credit 12-month expected Lifetime expected Lifetime expected the hedge is same as actually used
losses credit losses (= % of credit losses credit losses
 Fair value hedge:
recognised lifetime losses
– Hedges changes in value of recognised
resulting from a
asset/liability
default within 12 – All gains/losses  P/L (but  OCI if re an
months) investment in equity instruments measured at FV
through OCI)
Calculation On gross carrying On gross carrying On carrying amount
 Cash flow hedge:
of effective amount amount net of allowance for
– Hedges changes in value of future cash flows:
interest credit losses after
gain/loss on effective portion  OCI until CF
date evidence exists
occurs
 Credit losses (and loss reversals) recognised in P/L excess  P/L
– Reclassified from OCI to P/L when cash flow
 For investments in debt held at FV through OCI, change in FV not due to credit losses still occurs (unless results in recognition of non-
recognised in OCI financial item  include in initial CA instead)
 For investments in debt not held at FV through OCI a separate allowance account is used:  Hedge of net investment in foreign operation:
Gross carrying amount X – Hedges changes in value of foreign subsidiary's
Allowance for impairment losses (X) net assets
Net carrying amount X – Accounted for similarly to CF hedges
 Single hedging disclosure note (or section) shows all
 Permitted simplified approaches: the effects of hedging in one place
– Trade receivables and contract assets (with no financing element):
 lifetime expected credit losses on initial recognition
– Lease receivables (and trade receivables and contract assets with a financing element):
 lifetime expected credit losses on initial recognition or Stage 3 approach
173
1. Standards
Three standards are now in issue:
IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation
IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
2. Classification (IAS 32)
Financial instruments are classified as financial assets, financial liabilities or equity.
Compound financial instruments are split into their financial liability and equity
components.
3. Recognition (IFRS 9)
Financial instruments are recognised in the statement of financial position when the entity
becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
4. Derecognition (IFRS 9)
Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to the cash flow expire or are
transferred (considering the risks and rewards of ownership).
Financial liabilities are derecognised when the obligation is discharged, cancelled or
expires.
5. Measurement (IFRS 9)
Financial instruments are initially measured at fair value.
Subsequent measurement is at amortised cost or fair value depending on the instrument's
classification.
6. Embedded derivatives (IFRS 9)
Embedded derivatives are divided into their component parts unless certain criteria are
met.
7. Impairment of financial assets (IFRS 9)
Stage 1: Initial recognition – recognise allowance for 12 month expected credit losses
(EIR calculated on gross carrying amount)
Stage 2: Credit risk increases significantly – recognise allowance for lifetime credit
losses (EIR calculated on gross carrying amount)
Stage 3: Objective evidence of impairment exists – recognise allowance for lifetime
credit losses (EIR calculated on carrying amount net of allowance)
Recognise credit losses in profit or loss.
8. Hedging (IFRS 9)
There are two examinable types of hedge:
 Fair value hedge
 Cash flow hedge
Each has different accounting rules.
174
9. Disclosure (IFRS 7)
Disclosures regarding:
 Significance of financial instruments for financial position and performance; and
 Nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments (qualitative and quantitative
disclosures).
175
Question practice
Q9 PQR
Q10 Sirus
Further reading
There are articles on the ACCA website written by members of the SBR examining team that are relevant
to the topics covered in this chapter and would be useful to read:
Giving investors what they need (Financial capital)
The definition and disclosure of capital
When does debt seem to be equity?
176
Leases
Learning objectives
Syllabus
reference no.
Discuss and apply the lessee accounting requirements for leases including the C4(a)
identification of a lease and the measurement of the right-of-use asset and liability.
Discuss and apply the accounting for leases by lessors. C4(b)
Discuss and apply the circumstances where there may be re-measurement of the C4(c)
lease liability.
Discuss and apply the reasons behind the separation of the components of a C4(d)
lease contract into lease and non-lease elements.
Discuss the recognition exemptions under the current leasing standard. C4(e)
Discuss and apply the principles behind accounting for sale and leaseback C4(f)
transactions.
Exam context
In Financial Reporting, you studied leases from the point of view of the lessee. The Strategic Business
Reporting (SBR) syllabus introduces the accounting for leases in the lessor's financial statements. It is
an area which could form a major part of a question and is likely to be tested often, particularly as
IFRS 16 is a recent standard.
177
Chapter overview
4. Current
Leases
developments
1. Lessee accounting 2. Lessor accounting 3. Sale and leaseback

transactions
Definitions
Finance leases
Operating leases
Deferred tax
implications
178
8: Leases
1 Lessee accounting
1.1 Introduction
IFRS 16 Leases requires lessees and lessors to provide relevant information in a manner that faithfully
represents those transactions.
The accounting treatment in the lessee's books is driven by the Conceptual Framework's definitions of
assets and liabilities rather than the legal form of the lease. The legal form of a lease is that the title
to the underlying asset remains with the lessor during the period of the lease.
ED/2015/3 Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting proposes to change the definition of a
liability to place emphasis on an entity's obligation, at the reporting date, to transfer economic
resources. The obligation in this case arises from past events and is one which the entity has no
practical ability to avoid. The change in definition does not impact on how lease obligations are
recognised or measured.
Stakeholder perspective
Companies generally use leasing arrangements as a means of obtaining assets. Consequently,
IFRS 16 requires the majority of leased assets and the associated obligations to be recognised in the
financial statements. This is a significant change from the previous standard, IAS 17 Leases, which
was criticised for allowing 'off balance sheet' financing (see Section 4 for further detail).
While IFRS 16 has benefits for the users of financial statements in terms of transparency and
comparability, it has had a significant impact on the most commonly used financial ratios, such as:
• Gearing, because debt has increased
• Asset turnover, because assets have increased
• Profit margin ratios, because rent expenses are removed and replaced with depreciation and
finance costs.
This in turn affects the way in which users interpret and analyse the financial statements. For
example, banks often impose loan covenants when making loans to companies. These covenants
may need renegotiating if applying IFRS 16 causes a company's liabilities to increase significantly.
1.2 Definitions
Lease: a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to use an asset (the underlying
Key terms
asset) for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
A lease arises where the customer obtains the right to use the asset. Where it is the supplier that
controls the asset used, a service rather than a lease arises.
Identifying a lease
An entity must identify whether a contract contains a lease, which is the case if the contract conveys
the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for
consideration (IFRS 16: para. 9).
The right to control an asset arises where, throughout the period of use, the customer has
(IFRS 16: para. B9):
(a) The right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from use of the identified
asset; and
(b) The right to direct the use of the identified asset.
179
The identified asset is typically explicitly specified in a contract. However, an asset can also be
identified by being implicitly specified at the time that the asset is made available for use by the
customer (IFRS 16: para. B13).
Even if an asset is specified, a customer does not have the right to use an identified asset if the
supplier has the substantive right to substitute the asset throughout the period of use
(IFRS 16: para. B14).
Where a contract contains multiple components, the consideration is allocated to each lease
and non-lease component based on relative stand-alone prices (the price the lessor or similar supplier
would charge for the component, or a similar component, separately) (IFRS 16: paras. 13-14).
Illustration 1
Under a four year agreement a car seat wholesaler (CarSeat) buys its seats from a manufacturer
(ManuFac).
Under the terms of the agreement, CarSeat licenses its know-how to ManuFac royalty-free to allow it
to construct a machine capable of manufacturing the car seats to CarSeat's specifications.
Ownership of the know-how remains with CarSeat and the machine has an economic life of four
years.
CarSeat pays an amount per car seat produced to ManuFac; however, the agreement states that a
minimum payment will be guaranteed each year to allow ManuFac to recover the cost of its
investment in the machinery.
The agreement states that the machinery cannot be used to make seats for other customers of
ManuFac and that CarSeat can purchase the machinery at any time (at a price equivalent to the
minimum guaranteed payments not yet paid).
Required
How should CarSeat account for this arrangement?
Solution
The agreement is a contract containing a lease component (for the use of the machinery, the
'identified asset' in the contract) and a non-lease component (the purchase of inventories).
CarSeat will obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from the use of the machinery over the
period of the agreement as it will be able to sell on all the car seat output for its own cash flow
benefit, and has the right to direct its use, as it cannot be used to make seats for other customers.
The payments that CarSeat makes will need to be split into amounts covering the purchase of car
seat inventories, and amounts which represent lease payments for use of the machine. The allocation
will be based on relative stand-alone prices for hiring the machine and buying the inventories (or for
a similar machine and inventories).
Chapter 8 Sections 1.1–1.2 of the Supplementary Reading contain further examples of identifying
lease components of a contract and separating multiple components of a contract. This is available in
180
8: Leases
Lease term
Lease term: 'the non-cancellable period for which a lessee has the right to use an
Key terms
underlying asset, together with both:
(a) Periods covered by an option to extend the lease if the lessee is reasonably certain to
exercise that option; and
(b) Periods covered by an option to terminate the lease if the lessee is reasonably certain
not to exercise that option.'
The lease term is relevant when determining the period over which a leased asset should be
depreciated (see below).
Illustration 2
A lease contract is for 5 years with lease payments of $10,000 per annum. The lease contract
contains a clause which allows the lessee to extend the lease for a further period of 3 years for a
lease payment of $5 per annum (as it is unlikely the lessor would be able to lease the asset to
another party). The economic life of the asset is estimated to be approximately 8 years.
The lessee assesses it is highly likely the lease extension would be taken. The lease term is therefore
8 years.

Recognition
At the commencement date (the date the lessor makes the underlying asset available for use by the
lessee), the lessee recognises (IFRS 16: para. 22):
 A lease liability
 A right-of-use asset.
Lease liability
The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of lease payments not paid at
the commencement date, discounted at the interest rate implicit in the lease (or the
lessee's incremental borrowing rate* if not readily determinable) (IFRS 16: para. 26).
*the rate to borrow over a similar term, with similar security, to obtain an asset of similar value in a
similar economic environment (IFRS 16: Appendix A)
The lease liability cash flows to be discounted include the following (IFRS 16: para. 27):
 Fixed payments
 Variable payments that depend on an index (eg CPI) or rate (eg market rent)
 Amounts expected to be payable under residual value guarantees (eg where a lessee
guarantees to the lessor that an asset will be worth a specified amount at the end of the lease)
 Purchase options (if reasonably certain to be exercised).
Other variable payments (eg payments that arise due to level of use of the asset) are accounted for
as period costs in profit or loss as incurred (IFRS 16: para. 38).
The lease liability is subsequently measured by (IFRS 16: para. 36):
 Increasing it by interest on the lease liability
 Reducing it by lease payments made.
181
Right-of-use asset
The right-of-use asset is initially measured at its cost (IFRS 16: para. 23), which includes (IFRS 16:
para. 24):
 The amount of the initial measurement of the lease liability (the present value of lease
payments not paid at the commencement date)
 Payments made at/before the lease commencement date (less any lease incentives received)
 Initial direct costs (eg legal costs) incurred by the lessee
 An estimate of dismantling and restoration costs (where an obligation exists).
The right-of-use asset is normally measured subsequently at cost less accumulated depreciation
and impairment losses in accordance with the cost model of IAS 16 Property, Plant and
Equipment (IFRS 16: para. 29).
The right-of-use asset is depreciated from the commencement date to the earlier of the end of
its useful life or end of the lease term (end of its useful life if ownership is expected to be
transferred) (IFRS 16: paras. 31–32).
Alternatively the right-of-use asset is accounted for in accordance with:
(a) The revaluation model of IAS 16 (optional where the right-of-use asset relates to a class
of property, plant and equipment measured under the revaluation model, and where elected,
must apply to all right-of-use assets relating to that class) (IFRS 16: para. 35)
(b) The fair value model of IAS 40 Investment Property (compulsory if the right-of-use
asset meets the definition of investment property and the lessee uses the fair value model for its
investment property) (IFRS 16: para. 34).
Right-of-use assets are presented either as a separate line item in the statement of financial position or
by disclosing which line items include right-of-use assets (IFRS 16: para. 47).
Illustration 3
Lessee accounting revision
A company enters into a 4-year lease commencing on 1 January 20X1 (and intends to use the asset
for 4 years). The terms are 4 payments of $50,000, commencing on 1 January 20X1, and annually
thereafter. The interest rate implicit in the lease is 7.5% and the present value of lease payments not
paid at 1 January 20X1 (ie 3 payments of $50,000) discounted at that rate is $130,026.
Legal costs to set up the lease incurred by the company were $402.
Required
Show the lease liability from 1 January 20X1 to 31 December 20X4 and explain the treatment of the
right-of-use asset.
Solution
20X1 20X2 20X3 20X4
$ $ $ $
1 January b/d 130,026 139,778 96,512 50,000
Lease payments (0) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000)
130,026 89,778 46,512 0
Interest at 7.5% (interest in P/L) 9,752 6,734 3,488 0
31 December c/d 139,778 96,512 50,000 0
182
8: Leases
The right-of-use asset is recognised (at the lease commencement date, 1 January 20X1) at:
$
Present value of lease payments not paid at the commencement date 130,026
Payments made at the lease commencement date 50,000
Initial direct costs 402
180,428
This is depreciated over 4 years (as lease term and useful life are both 4 years) at $45,107
($180,428/4 years) per annum.
Optional recognition exemptions

IFRS 16 provides an optional exemption from the full requirements of the standard for (IFRS 16:
para. 5):
 Short-term leases (leases with a lease term of 12 months or fewer) (IFRS 16: Appendix A)
 Leases for which the underlying asset is low value (eg tablet and personal computers,
small items of office furniture and telephones) (IFRS 16: para. B8).
If the entity elects to take the exemption, lease payments are recognised as an expense on a
straight-line basis over the lease term or another systematic basis (if more representative of
the pattern of the lessee's benefits) (IFRS 16: para. 6).
The assessment of whether an underlying asset is of low value is performed on an absolute basis
based on the value if the asset when it is new. It is not a question of materiality: different lessees
should come to the same conclusion about whether assets are low value, regardless of the entity's
size (IFRS 16: para. B4).
Illustration 4
An entity leases a second-hand car which has a market value of $2,000. When new it would have
cost $15,000.
The lease would not qualify as a lease of a low-value asset because the car would not have been low
value when new.
Remeasurement
The lease liability is remeasured (if necessary) for any reassessment of amounts payable (IFRS 16:
para. 39).
The revised lease payments are discounted using the original discount interest rate where the
change relates to an expected payment on a residual value guarantee or payments linked
to an index or rate (and a revised discount rate where there is a change in lease term,
purchase option or payments linked to a floating interest rate) (IFRS 16: paras. 40–43).
The change in the lease liability is recognised as an adjustment to the right-of-use asset (or
in profit or loss if the right-of-use asset is reduced to zero) (IFRS 16: para. 39).
Chapter 8 Section 1.3 of the Supplementary Reading contains an example of remeasurement of the
lease liability. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
183
Activity 1: Lessee accounting
Lassie plc leased an item of equipment on the following terms:
Commencement date 1 January 20X1
Lease term 5 years
Annual lease payments (commencing $200,000 (rising annually by CPI as at
1 January 20X1) 31 December)
Interest rate implicit in the lease 6.2%
The present value of lease payments not paid at 1 January 20X1 was $690,000. The price to
purchase the asset outright would have been $1,200,000.
Inflation measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the year ending 31 December 20X1 was
2%. As a result the lease payments commencing 1 January 20X2 rose to $204,000. The present
value of lease payments for the remaining 4 years of the lease becomes approximately $747,300
using the original discount rate of 6.2%.
Required
Discuss how Lassie plc should account for the lease and remeasurement in the year ended
31 December 20X1.
1.4 Deferred tax implications

Issue
Under a lease, the lessee recognises a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability. This net
figure represents the carrying amount.
If an entity is granted tax relief as lease rentals are paid, a temporary difference arises, as the tax
base of the lease is zero.
This results in a deferred tax asset. Tax deductions are allowed on the lease rental payment
made, which, at the beginning of the lease, is lower than the combined depreciation expense and
finance cost recognised for accounting. Therefore, the future tax saving on the additional accounting
deduction is recognised now in order to apply the accruals concept.
Measurement
The deferred tax asset temporary difference is measured as:
Carrying amount:
Right-of-use asset (carrying amount) X Tax base is $0 as
lease payments are tax
Lease liability (X) deductible when paid
(X)
Tax base 0
Temporary difference (X)
Deferred tax asset at x% X
184
8: Leases
Activity 2: Deferred tax

On 1 January 20X1, Heggie leased a machine under a five year lease. The useful life of the asset to
Heggie was four years and there is no residual value.
The annual lease payments are $6 million payable in arrears each year on 31 December. The
present value of the lease payments was $24 million using the interest rate implicit in the lease of
approximately 8% per annum. At the end of the lease term legal title remains with the lessor. Heggie
incurred $0.4 million of direct costs of setting up the lease.
The directors have not leased an asset before and are unsure how to account for it and whether there
are any deferred tax implications.
The company can claim a tax deduction for the annual lease payments and lease set-up costs.
Assume a tax rate of 20%.
Required
Discuss, with suitable computations, the accounting treatment of the above transaction in Heggie's
financial statements for the year ended 31 December 20X1. Work to the nearest $0.1 million.
2 Lessor accounting
2.1 Classification of leases for lessor accounting
The approach to lessor accounting classifies leases into two types (IFRS 16: para. 61):
 Finance leases (where a lease receivable is recognised in the statement of financial
position); and
 Operating leases (which are accounted for as rental income).
Finance lease: a lease that transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to
ownership of an underlying asset.
Key terms
Operating lease: a lease that does not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards
incidental to ownership of an underlying asset.
IFRS 16 identifies five examples of situations which would normally lead to a lease being
classified as a finance lease (IFRS 16: para. 63):
(a) The lease transfers ownership of the underlying asset to the lessee by the end of the lease
term.
(b) The lessee has the option to purchase the underlying asset at a price expected to be
sufficiently lower than fair value at the exercise date, that it is reasonably certain, at
the inception date, that the option will be exercised.
(c) The lease term is for a major part of the economic life of the underlying asset even if title
is not transferred.
(d) The present value of the lease payments at the inception date amounts to at least
substantially all of the fair value of the underlying asset.
(e) The underlying asset is of such specialised nature that only the lessee can use it without
major modifications.
185
Additionally the following situations which could lead to a lease being classified as a finance lease
(IFRS 16: para. 64):
(a) Any losses on cancellation are borne by the lessee.
(b) Gains/losses on changes in residual value accrue to the lessee.
(c) The lessee can continue to lease for a secondary term at a rent substantially lower
than market rent.
2.2 Finance leases

Recognition and measurement
At the commencement date (the date the lessor makes the underlying asset available for use by the
lessee), the lessor derecognises the underlying asset and recognises a receivable at an amount equal
to the net investment in the lease (IFRS 16: para. 67).
The net investment in the lease (IFRS 16: Appendix A) is the sum of:
Present value of lease payments receivable by the lessor X

Present value of any unguaranteed residual value accruing to the lessor X
X
The unguaranteed residual value is that portion of the residual value of the underlying asset,
the realisation of which by a lessor is not assured or is guaranteed solely by a party related to the
lessor (IFRS 16: Appendix A).
Tutorial note
Essentially, an unguaranteed residual value arises where a lessor expects to be able to sell an asset
at the end of the lease term for more than any minimum amount guaranteed by the lessee in the lease
contract. Amounts guaranteed by the lessee are included in the 'present value of lease payments
receivable by the lessor' as they will always be received, so only the unguaranteed amount needs to
be added on, which accrues to the lessor because it owns the underlying asset.
Finance income is recognised over the lease term based on a pattern reflecting a constant
periodic rate of return on the lessor's net investment in the lease (IFRS 16: para. 75).
The derecognition and impairment requirements of IFRS 9 Financial Instruments are applied to
the net investment in the lease (IFRS 16: para. 77).
Illustration 5
A lessor enters into a 3 year leasing arrangement commencing on 1 January 20X3. Under the terms
of the lease, the lessee commits to pay $80,000 per annum commencing on 31 December 20X3.
A residual guarantee clause requires the lessee to pay $40,000 (or $40,000 less the asset's residual
value, if lower) at the end of the lease term if the lessor is unable to sell the asset for more than
$40,000.
The lessor expects to sell the asset based on current expectations for $50,000 at the end of the lease.
The interest rate implicit in the lease is 9.2%. The present value of lease payments receivable by the
lessor discounted at this rate is $232,502.
Required
Show the net investment in the lease from 1 January 20X3 to 31 December 20X5 and explain what
happens to the residual value guarantee on 31 December 20X5.
186
8: Leases
Solution
The net investment in the lease (lease receivable) on 1 January 20X3 is:
$
Present value of lease payments receivable by the lessor 232,502
Present value of unguaranteed residual value (50,000 – 40,000 = 10,000 × 1/1.092 )
3
7,679
240,181
The net investment in the lease (lease receivable) is as follows:
20X3 20X4 20X5
$ $ $
1 January b/d 240,181 182,278 119,048
Interest at 9.2% (interest income in P/L) 22,097 16,770 10,952
Lease instalments (80,000) (80,000) (80,000)
31 December c/d 182,278 119,048 50,000
On 31 December 20X5, the remaining $50,000 will be realised by selling the asset for $50,000 or
above, or selling it for less than $50,000 and claiming up to $40,000 from the lessee under the
residual value guarantee.
An allowance for impairment losses is recognised in accordance with the IFRS 9 principles, either
applying the three stage approach or by recognising an allowance for lifetime expected credit losses
from initial recognition (as an accounting policy choice for lease receivables) – see Chapter 7
Financial instruments.
Activity 3: Lessor accounting

Able Leasing Co arranges financing arrangements for its customers for bespoke equipment acquired
from manufacturers. Able Leasing leased an item of equipment to a customer commencing on
1 January 20X5. The expected economic life of the asset is eight years.
The terms of the lease were 8 annual payments of $4 million, commencing on 31 December 20X5.
The lessee guarantees that the residual value of the assets at the end of the lease will be $2 million
(although Able Leasing expects to be able to sell it for its parts for $3 million). The present value of
the lease payments including the residual value guarantee (discounted at the interest rate implicit in
the lease of 6.2%) was $25.9 million. This was equivalent to the purchase price.
Required
Discuss the accounting treatment of the above lease in the financial statements of Able Leasing Co for
the year ended 31 December 20X5, including relevant calculations.
Work to the nearest $0.1 million.
Manufacturer or dealer lessors

A lessor which is a manufacturer or dealer of the underlying asset needs to recognise entries for
finance leases in a similar way to items sold outright (as well as the lease receivable) (IFRS 16:
para. 71):
Revenue – fair value of underlying asset (or present value of lease payments if lower) X
Cost of sales – cost (or carrying amount) of the underlying asset less present value of
the unguaranteed residual value (X)
Gross profit X
187
Illustration 6
A manufacturer lessor leases out equipment under a 10 year finance lease. The equipment cost
$32 million to manufacture. The normal selling price of the leased asset is $42 million and the
present value of lease payments is $38 million. The present value of the unguaranteed residual value
at the end of the lease is $2.2 million.
The manufacturer recognises revenue of $38 million, cost of sales of $29.8 million ($32 million –
$2.2 million), and therefore a gross profit of $8.2 million.
The lease receivable is $40.2 million ($38 million + $2.2 million). The lease receivable is increased
by interest and reduced by lease instalments received (in the same way as for a standard finance
lease).
2.3 Operating leases

Lease payments from operating leases are recognised as income on either a straight-line basis
or another systematic basis (if more representative of the pattern in which benefit from use of
the underlying asset is diminished) (IFRS 16: para. 81).
Any initial direct costs incurred in obtaining the lease are added to the carrying amount of the
underlying asset. IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment or IAS 38 Intangible Assets then applies to
the depreciation or amortisation of the underlying asset as appropriate (IFRS 16: paras. 83–84).
Illustration 7
A lessor leases a property to a lessee under an operating lease for 5 years at an annual rate of
$100,000. However, the contract states that the first 6 months are 'rent-free'.
Solution
The benefit received from the asset is earned over the 5 years. However, in the first year, the lessor
only receives $100,000 × 6/12 = $50,000. Lease rentals of $450,000 ($50,000 + ($100,000 ×
4 years)) are received over the 5 year lease term.
Therefore, the lessor recognises income of $90,000 per year ($450,000/5 years).
A receivable of $40,000 is recognised at the end of year 1 ($90,000 – $50,000 cash received).
3 Sale and leaseback transactions

A sale and leaseback transaction arises where an entity (the seller-lessee) transfers ('sells') an asset to
another entity (the buyer-lessor) and then leases it back.
The entity applies the requirements of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers to determine
whether in substance a sale occurs (ie whether a performance obligation is satisfied or not)
(IFRS 16: para. 99).
3.1 Transfer of the asset is in substance a sale

Seller-lessee
As a sale has occurred, in the seller-lessee's books, the carrying amount of the asset must be
derecognised.
The seller-lessee recognises a right-of-use asset measured at the proportion of the previous carrying
amount that relates to the right of use retained (IFRS 16: para. 100).
188
8: Leases
A gain/loss is recognised in the seller-lessee's financial statements in relation to the rights transferred
to the buyer-lessor (IFRS 16: para. 100).
If the consideration received for the sale of the asset does not equal that asset's fair
value (or if lease payments are not at market rates), the sale proceeds are adjusted to fair value as
follows (IFRS 16: para. 101):
(a) Below-market terms
The difference is accounted for as a prepayment of lease payments and so is added to
the right-of-use asset as per the normal IFRS 16 treatment for initial measurement of a
right-of-use asset.
(b) Above-market terms
The difference is treated as additional financing provided by the buyer-lessor to the seller-
lessee.
The lease liability is originally recorded at the present value of lease payments. This amount
is then split between:
 The present value of lease payments at market rates; and
 The additional financing (the difference) which is in substance a loan.
Buyer-lessor
The buyer-lessor accounts for the purchase as a normal purchase and for the lease in
accordance with IFRS 16 (IFRS 16: para. 100).
3.2 Transfer of the asset is NOT in substance a sale

Seller-lessee
The seller-lessee continues to recognise the transferred asset and recognises a financial liability equal
to the transfer proceeds (and accounts for it in accordance with IFRS 9 Financial Instruments)
(IFRS 16: para. 103).
Buyer-lessor
The buyer-lessor does not recognise the transferred asset and recognises a financial asset
equal to the transfer proceeds (and accounts for it in accordance with IFRS 9) (IFRS 16: para. 103).
Illustration 8
Fradin, an international hotel chain, is currently finalising its financial statements for the year ended
30 June 20X8 and is unsure how to account for the following transaction.
On 1 July 20X7, it sold one of its hotels to a third party institution and is leasing it back under a
10 year lease. The sale price is $57 million and the fair value of the asset is $60 million.
The lease payment is $2.8 million per annum in arrears commencing on 30 June 20X8 (below
market rate for this kind of lease). The present value of lease payments is $20 million and the implicit
interest rate in the lease is 6.6%. The purchaser can cancel the lease agreement and take full control
of the hotel with 6 months' notice.
The hotel had a remaining economic life of 30 years at 1 July 20X7 and a carrying amount (under
the cost model) of $48 million.
Required
Discuss how the above transaction should be dealt with in the financial statements of Fradin for the
year ended 30 June 20X8. Work to the nearest $0.1 million.
189
Solution
In substance, this transaction is a sale. A performance obligation is satisfied (IFRS 15) as control of
the hotel is transferred as the significant risks and rewards of ownership have passed to the
purchaser, who can cancel the lease agreement and take full control of the hotel with six months'
notice. Additionally, the lease is only for 10 years of the hotel's remaining economic life of 30 years.
However, Fradin does retain an interest in the hotel, as it does expect to continue to operate it for the
next 10 years. Fradin was the legal owner and is now the lessee.
As a sale has occurred, the carrying amount of the hotel asset of $48 million must be derecognised.
Per IFRS 16, a right-of-use asset should then be recognised at the proportion of the previous carrying
amount that relates to the right of use retained. This amounts to $16 million ($48m carrying amount
× $20m present value of lease payments/$60m fair value).
As the fair value of $60 million is in excess of the proceeds of $57 million, IFRS 16 requires the
excess of $3 million ($60m – $57m) to be treated as a prepayment of the lease rentals. Therefore,
the $3 million prepayment must be added to the right-of-use asset (like a payment made at/before
lease commencement date), bringing the right-of-use asset to $19 million ($16m + $3m).
A lease liability must also be recorded at the present value of lease payments of $20 million.
A gain on sale is recognised in relation to the rights transferred to the buyer-lessor.
The total gain would be $12 million ($60m fair value – $48m carrying amount). As fair value ($60m)
The portion recognised as a gain relating to the rights transferred is $8 million exceeds sale proceeds
($57m), excess is a
($12m gain × ($60m – $20m)/$60m portion of fair value transferred). prepayment of lease
rentals
On 1 July 20X7, the double entry to record the sale is:
DR Cash $57m
DR Right-of-use asset ($48m × $20m/$60m = $16m + $3m prepayment) $19m
CR Hotel asset Proportion of carrying amount $48m
re rights retained
CR Lease liability $20m
CR Gain on sale (P/L) (balancing figure or ($60m – $48m) × ($60m – $20m)/$60m) $8m
Interest on the lease liability is then accrued for the year:
Proportion of
DR Finance costs (W) $1.3m profit re rights
CR Lease liability $1.3m sold
The lease payment on 30 June 20X8 reduces the lease liability by $2.8m:
DR Lease liability $2.8m
CR Cash $2.8m
The carrying amount of the lease liability at 30 June 20X8 is therefore $18.5 million (see Working
below).
The proportion of the carrying amount of the hotel asset relating to the right of use retained of
$19 million (including the $3 million lease prepayment) remains as a right-of-use asset in the
statement of financial position and is depreciated over the lease term:
DR P/L ($19m/10 years) $1.9m
CR Right-of-use asset $1.9m
This results in a net credit to profit or loss for the year ended 30 June 20X8 of $4.8 million ($8m –
$1.3m – $1.9m).
190
8: Leases
Working: Lease liability for the year ending 30 June 20X8

$m
b/d at 1 July 20X7 20
Interest (20 × 6.6%) 1.3
Lease payment (2.8)
c/d at 30 June 20X8 18.5
Chapter 8 Section 1.4 of the Supplementary Reading contains a further example of accounting for a
sale and leaseback transaction. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the
Workbook.
4 Current developments
IFRS 16 replaces IAS 17 Leases effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January
2019 (with earlier application permitted for entities that apply IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with
Customers).
4.1 The issue

IAS 17 Leases classified leases into operating leases and finance leases for lessees, similar to
the approach used for lessor accounting in IFRS 16 (IAS 17: para. 8).
In the lessee's books, operating leases were not recognised as liabilities in the statement of
financial position and instead the lease rentals were recorded as an expense in profit or loss
(IAS 17: para. 33).
However, finance leases were recorded in the lessee's books as an asset and a corresponding
liability (IAS 17: para. 20).
Therefore the classification of a lease as an operating or finance lease had a considerable impact
on the financial statements, most notably on indebtedness, gearing ratios, ROCE and interest cover.
It was argued that the IAS 17 accounting treatment of operating leases was inconsistent with the
definition of assets and liabilities in the IASB's Conceptual Framework. Therefore all leases (with
limited exceptions) have been brought onto the statement of financial position, following two
Exposure Drafts issued in May 2013 and August 2010 and an earlier Discussion Paper issued in
March 2009.
In the event it was decided not to alter the accounting treatment for lessors, where a distinction is still
made between operating leases and finance leases.
191
Ethics note
Leases have traditionally been an area where ethical application of the Standard is essential to give
a true and fair view. Indeed, the accounting for leases in the financial statements of lessees was
revised in IFRS 16 to avoid the issue of 'off balance sheet financing' that previously arose by not
recognising all leases as a liability in the financial statements of lessees.
In terms of this topic area, some potential ethical issues to watch out for include:
 Contracts which in substance contain a lease, where the lease element may not have been
accounted for correctly
 Material amounts of leases accounted for as short-term with no liability shown in the financial
statements (eg by writing contracts which expire every year)
 Use of sale and leaseback arrangements to improve an entity's cash position and alter
accounting ratios, as finance costs are generally shown below operating profit (profit before
interest and tax) whereas depreciation is shown above that line
 In lessor financial statements, manipulation of the accounting for leases as operating leases or
finance leases to achieve a particular accounting effect. For example, classification of a lease
as an operating leases since operating lease income is shown as rental income (and included
in operating profit) while finance lease income is shown as finance income, which could be
below a company's operating profit line if being a lessor is not their main business.
192
8: Leases
Chapter summary
Leases (IFRS 16)
1. Lessee accounting 2. Lessor accounting 3. Sale and leaseback

transactions
Definitions Finance leases Transfer is in substance

 A contract, or part of a contract, that  A lease that transfers substantially all a sale
conveys the right to use an asset (the the risks and rewards incidental to  Seller/lessee:
underlying asset) for a period of time in ownership of an underlying asset – Derecognises asset transferred
exchange for consideration  Indicators of a finance lease: – Recognises a right-of-use asset at
 Contract contains a lease if the contract – Transfer of ownership by end of term proportion of previous CA re right
conveys the right to control an asset for – Option to purchase at bargain price of use retained
a period of time for consideration, – Leased for major part of economic life – Recognises gain/loss in relation
where, throughout the period of use, the – PVLP is substantially all of FV to rights transferred
customer has: – Asset very specialised
 If consideration received is not
(a) Right to obtain substantially all of – Cancellation losses borne by lessee
equal to asset's FV (or lease
the economic benefits from use, – Gain/loss on RV accrue to lessee
payments not at market rates):
– Secondary term at bargain rent
and  Below-market terms:
(b) Right to direct use of identified  Derecognise underlying asset and
prepayment of lease payments
asset recognise lease receivable:
(add to right-of-use asset)
PV lease payments X
PV unguaranteed residual value X  Above-market terms:
= 'Net investment in the lease' X additional financing (split PV
Accounting treatment  Unguaranteed residual value (UGRV)
lease liability between loan and
lease payments at market rates)
 Lease liability:  That portion of the residual value of
 Buyer-lessor accounts for:
the underlying asset, the realisation
PVLP not paid at commence. date X – The purchase as normal purchase
of which by a lessor is not assured
Interest at implicit % X – The lease per IFRS 16
or is guaranteed solely by a party
Payment in arrears (X)
related to the lessor
Liability c/d (split NCL & CL) X
 Recognise finance income on lessor's
 Right-of-use asset: net investment outstanding
PVLP not paid at commence. date X  Manufacturer/dealer lessor:
Payments on/before comm. date X Transfer is NOT in
Revenue (lower of FV & PVLP) X
Initial direct costs X
Cost of sales (CA – UGRV) (X) substance a sale
Dismantling/restoration costs X  Seller-lessee:
Gross profit X
X – Continues to recognise transferred
Depreciate to earlier of end of useful life asset
(UL) and lease term (UL if ownership – Recognises financial liability
expected to transfer) equal to transfer proceeds (and
 Optional exemptions (expense in P/L): accounts for it per IFRS 9)
 Buyer-lessor:
 Short-term leases (lease term < 12 Operating leases – Does not recognise transferred
months)
 Underlying asset is low value (eg  A lease that does not transfer asset
tablet PCs, small office furniture, substantially all the risks and – Recognises financial asset equal
telephones) rewards incidental to ownership of to transfer proceeds (and accounts
 Remeasurement: an underlying asset for it per IFRS 9)
 Revised lease payments discounted  Asset retained in books of lessor &
at original rate where re residual depreciated over UL
value guarantee or payments linked
 Credit rentals to P/L straight line
to index or rate (and revised rate
over lease term unless another
otherwise)
 Adjust right-of-use asset
systematic basis is more Deferred tax implications
representative
Accounting CA: Right-of-use asset X
Lease liability (X)
(X)
Tax base: 0
193
1. Lessee accounting
Where a contract contains a lease, a right-of-use asset and a liability for the
present value of lease payments are recognised in the lessee's books.
An optional exemption is available for short-term leases (lease term of 12 months or
less) and leases of low value assets, which can be accounted for as an expense over the
lease term.
Deferred tax arises on leases where lease payments are tax deductible when paid:
Carrying amount:
Right-of-use asset X
Lease liability (X)
X
Tax base (0)
Temporary difference X
Deferred tax asset x% X
2. Lessor accounting
Assets leased out under finance leases are derecognised from the lessor's books and
replaced with a receivable, the 'net investment in the lease'.
Assets leased under an operating lease remain in the lessor's books and rental income is
recognised on a straight line basis (or another systematic basis if more representative of the
pattern in which benefit from the underlying asset is diminished).
3. Sale and leaseback transactions
Accounting for sale and leaseback transactions depends on whether in substance a sale has
occurred (ie a performance obligation is satisfied) in accordance with IFRS 15 Revenue from
Contracts with Customers.
Where the transfer is in substance a sale, the seller-lessee derecognises the asset
sold, and recognises a right-of-use asset and lease liability relating to the right of use
retained and a gain/loss in relation to the rights transferred. The buyer-lessor accounts for
the transaction as a normal purchase and a lease.
Where the transfer is in substance not a sale, the seller-lessee accounts for the
proceeds as a financial liability (in accordance with IFRS 9). The buyer-lessor
recognises a financial asset.
4. Current developments
IFRS 16 replaces IAS 17 Leases, effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1
January 2019 (with earlier application permitted for entities that apply IFRS 15).
IFRS 16 brings all leases onto the statement of financial position of lessees (with
limited exceptions for short-term leases and leases of low value assets).
194
8: Leases
Further reading
There are articles on the ACCA website which are relevant to the topics covered in this chapter and
would be useful to read:
All change for accounting for leases (2016)
195
196
Share-based payment
Learning objectives
Syllabus
reference no.
Discuss and apply the recognition and measurement criteria for share-based C8(a)
payment transactions.
Account for modifications, cancellations and settlements of share-based payment C8(b)

transactions.
Exam context
Share-based payment is a very important topic for Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) and could be
tested as a full 25-mark question in Section B of the exam or as part of a question in either Section A
or Section B. Questions could include the more challenging parts of IFRS 2, such as performance
conditions, settlements and curtailments of share-based payment arrangements. Ethical issues related
to share-based payments could also be tested in any part of the exam.
197
Chapter overview
1. Types of share-
based payment
2. Recognition
Share-based
4. Vesting payment
conditions
3. Measurement
6. Deferred tax
implications
5. Modifications,
cancellations and
settlements
Equity-settled Cash-settled Choice of

settlement
198
9: Share-based payment
1 Types of share-based payment

1.1 Introduction
The use of share-based payment has increased in recent years. Until the issue of IFRS 2 Share-based
Payment there was no IFRS on this topic, other than disclosures formerly required for 'equity
compensation benefits' under IAS 19 Employee Benefits.
Improvements in accounting treatment were called for. In particular, the omission of expenses arising
from share-based payment transactions with employees was believed to cause economic distortions
and corporate governance concerns.
See Chapter 9 Section 1 of the Supplementary Reading for background reading on the reasons
IFRS 2 was required and Section 2 on the scope of IFRS 2. This is available in Appendix 2 of the
digital edition of the Workbook.
1.2 Definitions
There are a number of definitions in IFRS 2 which you need to be aware of. It isn't necessary to read
through all of these immediately, but you should refer back to them as you work through this chapter.
Share-based payment transaction: a transaction in which the entity receives goods or services
as consideration for equity instruments of the entity (including shares or share options), or acquires
Key term
goods or services by incurring liabilities to the supplier of those goods or services for amounts that
are based on the price of the entity's shares or other equity instruments of the entity.
Share-based payment arrangement: an agreement between the entity and another party
(including an employee) to enter into a share-based payment transaction.
Equity instrument granted: the right (conditional or unconditional) to an equity instrument of the
entity conferred by the entity on another party, under a share-based payment arrangement.
Share option: a contract that gives the holder the right, but not the obligation, to subscribe to the
entity's shares at a fixed or determinable price for a specified period of time.
Fair value: the amount for which an asset could be exchanged, a liability settled, or an equity
instrument granted could be exchanged between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's length
transaction.
Grant date: the date at which the entity and another party (including an employee) agree
to a share-based payment arrangement. At grant date the entity confers on the other party (the
counterparty) the right to cash, other assets, or equity instruments of the entity, provided the
specified vesting conditions, if any, are met.
Vest: to become an entitlement. Under a share-based payment arrangement, a counterparty's right
to receive cash, other assets, or equity instruments of the entity vests upon satisfaction of any
specified vesting conditions.
Vesting conditions: the conditions that must be satisfied for the counterparty to become entitled to
receive cash, other assets or equity instruments of the entity, under a share-based payment arrangement.
Vesting period: the period during which all the specified vesting conditions of a share-based
payment arrangement are to be satisfied.
199
1.3 Types of transaction
IFRS 2 applies to all share-based payment transactions (IFRS 2: para. 2). There are three types
(IFRS 2: Appendix A):
Equity-settled share- The entity receives goods or services as consideration for equity
based payment instruments of the entity (including shares or share options).
Cash-settled share- The entity acquires goods or services by incurring liabilities to the
based payment supplier of those goods or services for amounts that are based on the
price (or value) of the entity's shares or other equity instruments.
Transactions with a The entity receives or acquires goods or services and the terms of the
choice of settlement arrangement provide either the entity or the supplier with a choice of
whether the entity settles the transaction in cash or by issuing equity
instruments.
1.4 Share-based payments among group entities

Payment for goods or services by a subsidiary company may be made by granting equity instruments
of its parent company or of another group company. These transactions are within the scope of
IFRS 2.
See Chapter 9 Section 2 of the Supplementary Reading for further detail on the scope of IFRS 2 and
share-based payments in groups. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the
Workbook.
2 Recognition
An entity should recognise goods or services received or acquired in a share-based payment
transaction when it obtains the goods or as the services are received.
Goods or services received or acquired in a share-based payment transaction should be recognised
as expenses (unless they qualify for recognition as assets).
The corresponding entry in the accounting records depends on whether the transaction is equity-
settled or cash-settled (IFRS 2: paras. 7 and 8).
If equity-settled, recognise a If cash-settled, recognise a

corresponding increase in equity corresponding liability
DEBIT Expense X DEBIT Expense X

CREDIT Equity* X CREDIT Liability X
*IFRS 2 does not specify where in the equity section the credit entry should be presented. Some
entities present a separate component of equity (eg 'Share-based payment reserve'); other entities
may include the credit in retained earnings.
This section contains

some terms that you
2.1 Recognising transactions in which services are received may not be familiar
with, eg 'vest'. Refer
If the granted equity instruments vest immediately, it is presumed that the services back to the 'Key terms'
have already been received and the full expense is recognised on the grant date at the start of the
chapter for their
(IFRS 2: para. 14)
definitions.
200
If, however, there are vesting conditions attached to the equity instruments granted, the expense
should be spread over the vesting period.
For example, an employee may be required to complete three years of service before becoming
unconditionally entitled to a share-based payment. The expense is spread over this three year vesting
period as the services are received.
3 Measurement
The entity measures the expense using the method that provides the most reliable information:
(a) Direct method ⇒ Use the fair value of goods

or services received Equity-settled ⇒ Use the fair value at
grant date and do not update for
Eg for employee subsequent changes in fair value
services as it is (b) Indirect method ⇒ By reference to the fair value
not normally of the equity instruments (eg
possible to share options) granted
measure directly Cash-settled ⇒ Update the fair value
the services at each year end with changes
received. recognised in profit or loss
The fair value of equity instruments should be based on market prices, taking into account the
terms and conditions upon which the equity instruments were granted (IFRS 2: para. 16).
Any changes in estimates of the expected number of employees being entitled to receive share-based
payment are treated as a change in accounting estimate and recognised in the period of the
change.
3.1 Transactions with employees

It is very common for entities to reward employees by granting them a share-based payment if they
remain in employment for a certain period (the vesting period).
In this case, the share-based payment expense should be spread over the vesting period and
measured using the indirect method. In the first year of the share-based payment, the expense is
equal to the equity or liability balance at the year end:
Share-based Estimated Number of Fair Proportion of

payment equity = number of × instruments × value* per × vesting period
or liability employees per instrument elapsed at year
value at year entitled to employee end
end benefits*
*Remove expected leavers *Equity-settled: at grant

over whole vesting period date
Cash-settled: at year end
For subsequent years, the expense is calculated as the movement in the equity or liability balance:
The share-
Equity/liability
based payment
Balance b/d X expense is the
Cash paid (cash-settled only) (X) balancing
figure, and is
Expense (balancing figure) X charged to
Balance c/d X profit or loss
201
3.2 Accounting for equity-settled share-based payment transactions
Examples of equity-settled share-based payments include shares or share options issued to employees
as part of their remuneration.
Illustration 1
Accounting for equity-settled share-based payment transactions
On 1 January 20X1 an entity granted 100 share options to each of its 400 employees. Each grant is
conditional upon the employee working for the entity until 31 December 20X3. The fair value of each
share option is $20.
On the basis of a weighted average probability, the entity estimates on 1 January that 18% of
employees will leave during the 3-year period and therefore forfeit their rights to share options.
During 20X1, 20 employees leave and the estimate of total employee departures over the 3-year
period is revised to 20% (80 employees).
During 20X2, a further 25 employees leave and the entity now estimates that 25% (100) of its
employees will leave during the 3-year period.
During 20X3, a further 10 employees leave.
Required
Show the accounting entries which will be required over the 3-year period in respect of the share-
based payment transaction.
Solution
IFRS 2 requires the entity to recognise the remuneration expense, based on the fair value of the share
options granted, as the services are received during the 3-year vesting period.
In 20X1 and 20X2 the entity estimates the number of options expected to vest (by estimating the
number of employees likely to leave) and bases the amount that it recognises for the year on this
estimate.
In 20X3 the entity recognises an amount based on the number of options that actually vest. A total of
55 employees actually left during the 3-year period and therefore 34,500 options ((400 – 55) ×
100) vested.
The accounting entries are calculated as follows:
1. Calculate
Year to 31 December 20X1 $
2. Then work out
equity Equity b/d the expense 0
carried as the
down  Profit or loss expense balancing 213,333
1 figure 213,333
Equity c/d ((400 – 80) × 100 × $20 × )
3
The required accounting entries are:

DEBIT Expenses $213,333
CREDIT Equity $213,333

Equity b/d of the total 213,333
 Profit or loss expense expense has been 186,667
recognised at the end
2 of year 2 400,000
Equity c/d ((400 – 100) × 100 × $20 × )
3
202


Equity b/d 400,000
 Profit or loss expense 290,000
Equity c/d ((400 – 55) × 100 × $20) 690,000
Actual number of employees entitled Cumulative proportion of vesting period

to benefits at the vesting date 3
elapsed is = 1, hence not shown here
3

Activity 1: Equity-settled share-based payment

An entity grants 100 share options on its $1 shares to each of its 500 employees on 1 January
20X5. Each grant is conditional upon the employee working for the entity over the next three years.
The fair value of each share option as at 1 January 20X5 is $15.
On the basis of a weighted average probability, the entity estimates on 1 January that 20% of
employees will leave during the 3-year period and therefore forfeit their rights to share options.
Required
Show the accounting entries which will be required over the three-year period in the event of the
following:
 20 employees leave during 20X5 and the estimate of total employee departures over the
3-year period is revised to 15% (75 employees)
 22 employees leave during 20X6 and the estimate of total employee departures over the
3-year period is revised to 12% (60 employees)
 15 employees leave during 20X7, so a total of 57 employees left and forfeited their rights to
share options. A total of 44,300 share options (443 employees × 100 options) are vested at
the end of 20X7.
See Chapter 9 Section 3 of the Supplementary Reading for more practice questions on equity-settled
share-based payments. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
3.3 Accounting for cash-settled share-based payment transactions

Examples of this type of transaction include:
(a) Share appreciation rights granted to employees: the employees become entitled to a
future cash payment based on the increase in the entity's share price from a specified level
over a specified period of time
(b) A right to shares that are redeemable. An entity might grant to its employees a right to
receive a future cash payment by granting to them a right to shares that are redeemable.
203
Illustration 2
Cash-settled share-based payment transaction
On 1 January 20X1 an entity grants 100 cash share appreciation rights (SARs) to each of its 500
employees, on condition that the employees continue to work for the entity until 31 December 20X3.
During 20X1, 35 employees leave. The entity estimates that a further 60 will leave during 20X2 and
20X3.
During 20X2, 40 employees leave and the entity estimates that a further 25 will leave during 20X3.
During 20X3, 22 employees leave.
There is an 'exercise period' between 31 December 20X3 and 31 December 20X5 during which the
employees can choose when to exercise their SARs. At 31 December 20X3, 150 employees exercise
their SARs. Another 140 employees exercise their SARs at 31 December 20X4 and the remaining
113 employees exercise their SARs at the end of 20X5.
The fair values of the SARs for each year in which a liability exists are shown below, together with
the intrinsic values at the dates of exercise. The intrinsic value is
Fair value Intrinsic the difference
value between the fair value
and the 'exercise
$ $ price' of the SARs.
20X1 14.40 When the SARs are
20X2 15.50 exercised, the
increase in share
20X3 18.20 15.00 price above the
20X4 21.40 20.00 exercise price is paid
20X5 25.00 to the employees.
Required
Calculate the amount to be recognised in the profit or loss for each of the five years ended
31 December 20X5 and the liability to be recognised in the statement of financial position at
31 December for each of the five years.
Solution
For the three years to the vesting date of 31 December 20X3 the expense is based on the entity's
estimate of the number of SARs that will actually vest (as for an equity-settled transaction). However,
the fair value of the liability is remeasured at each year-end. The fair value of the SARs at the
grant date is irrelevant. The intrinsic value of the SARs at the date of exercise is the amount of cash
actually paid to the employees.
$
Year ended 31 December 20X1
Fair value of the
Liability b/d SARs at 31.12.X1 0
1 194,400
Liability c/d ((500 – 60 – 35) × 100 × $14.40 × )
3
204
$
Year ended 31 December 20X2 Fair value of the
SARs at 31.12.X2
Liability b/d 194,400
2 413,333
Liability c/d ((500 – 35 – 40 – 25) × 100 × $15.50 × )
3
Intrinsic value of
150 employees
the SARs at $
exercise their SARs
Year ended 31 December 20X3 31.12.X3 = cash
Liability b/d paid out 413,333
SARs vest
on
31.12.X3
Less cash paid on exercise of SARs by employees (150 × 100 × $15.00) (225,000)
Liability c/d ((500 – 35 – 40 – 22 – 150) × 100 × $18.20) 460,460
$
Liability c/d ((500 – 35 – 40 – 22 – 150 – 140) × 100 × $21.40) 241,820
$
Remaining
employees 241,820
who have $
not
exercised
their SARs Liability b/d 241,820
 Profit or loss credit (40,680)
Liability c/d –
Activity 2: Cash-settled share-based payment

On 1 January 20X4 an entity grants 100 cash share appreciation rights (SARs) to each of its 500
employees on condition that the employees remain in its employ for the next two years. The SARs
vest on 31 December 20X5 and may be exercised at any time up to 31 December 20X6. The fair
value of each SAR at the grant date is $7.40.
No. of
employees Estimated Intrinsic
exercising Outstanding further Fair value value (ie
Year ended Leavers rights SARs leavers of SARs cash paid)
$ $
31 December 20X4 50 – 450 60 8.00
31 December 20X5 50 100 300 – 8.50 8.10
31 December 20X6 – 300 – – – 9.00
Required
Show the expense and liability which will appear in the financial statements in each of the three
years.
205
See Chapter 9 Section 4 of the Supplementary Reading for an illustration showing the difference
between equity-settled and cash-settled share-based payment transactions. This is available in
3.4 Share-based payment with a choice of settlement

Entity has the choice
If the entity has the choice of whether to settle the share-based payment in cash or by issuing shares,
the accounting treatment depends on whether there is a present obligation to settle the
transaction in cash.
Is there a present
obligation to settle in cash?
Yes No
Treat as cash-settled share-based Treat as equity-settled share-based

payment transaction payment transaction
A present obligation exists if the entity has a stated policy of settling such transactions in cash or past
practice of settling in cash, because this creates an expectation, and so a constructive obligation, to
settle future such transactions in cash.
Counterparty has the choice
If instead the counterparty (eg employee or supplier) has the right to choose whether the share-based
payment is settled in cash or shares, the entity has granted a compound financial instrument (IFRS 2:
para. 34).
The entity has issued a

compound financial instrument
Debt component Equity component
As for cash-settled transaction Measured as the residual fair value at grant date
Fair value of shares alternative at grant date X
Fair value cash alternative at grant date (X)
Equity component X
206
Activity 3: Choice of settlement

On 30 September 20X3, Saddler granted one of its directors the right to choose either 24,000
shares in Saddler or 20,000 'phantom' shares (a cash payment equal to the value of 20,000 shares)
on the settlement date, 30 September 20X4. This right is not conditional on future employment. The
company estimates that the fair value of the share alternative is $4.50 per share at 30 September
20X3 (taking into account a condition that they must be held for 2 years). Saddler's market share
price was $5.20 per share on 30 September 20X3, and this rose to $5.40 by the date the financial
statements were authorised for issue.
Required
Explain the accounting treatment of the above transaction for the year ended 30 September 20X3.
4 Vesting conditions
Vesting conditions are the conditions that must be satisfied for the counterparty to become
unconditionally entitled to receive payment under a share-based payment agreement (IFRS 2:
Appendix A).
Vesting conditions include service conditions and performance conditions. Other features,
such as a requirement for employees to make regular contributions into a savings scheme, are not
vesting conditions.
4.1 Service conditions

Service conditions are where the counterparty is required to complete a specified period of service
(IFRS 2: Appendix A). This is the typical scenario covered in Illustrations 1 and 2 above, in which an
employee is required to complete a specified period of service.
The share-based payment is recognised over the required period of service.
4.2 Performance conditions (other than market conditions)

There may be performance conditions that must be satisfied before share-based payment vests, such
as achieving a specific growth in profit or earnings per share.
The amount recognised as share-based payment is based on the best available estimate of the
number of equity instruments expected to vest (ie expectation of whether the profit target will be met),
revised as necessary at each period end (IFRS 2: para. 20).
A vesting period may vary in length depending on whether a performance condition is satisfied; for
example where different growth targets are set for different years, and if the first target is met, the
instruments vest at the end of the first year, and if not the next target for the following year comes into
play.
In such circumstances, the share-based payment equity figure is accrued over the period based on
the most likely outcome of which target will be met, revised at each period end.
4.3 Market conditions

Market conditions, such as vesting dependent on achieving a target share price, are not taken
into consideration when calculating the number of equity instruments expected to vest.
This is because market conditions are already taken into consideration when estimating the fair value
of the share-based payment (at the grant date if equity-settled and at the year end if cash-settled).
Therefore an entity recognises share-based payment from a counterparty who satisfies all other
vesting conditions (eg employee service period) irrespective of whether a target share price has been
achieved.
207
Activity 4: Performance conditions (other than market conditions)
At the beginning of year 1, Kingsley grants 100 shares each to 500 employees, conditional upon
the employees remaining in the entity's employ during the vesting period. The shares will vest at the
end of year 1 if the entity's earnings increase by more than 18%; at the end of year 2 if the entity's
earnings increase by more than an average of 13% per year over the 2-year period; and at the end
of year 3 if the entity's earnings increase by more than an average of 10% per year over the 3-year
period. The shares have a fair value of $30 per share at the start of year 1, which equals the share
price at grant date. No dividends are expected to be paid over the 3-year period.
By the end of year 1, the entity's earnings have increased by 14%, and 30 employees have left. The
entity expects that earnings will continue to increase at a similar rate in year 2, and therefore expects
that the shares will vest at the end of year 2. The entity expects, on the basis of a weighted average
probability, that a further 30 employees will leave during year 2, and therefore expects that 440
employees will vest in 100 shares at the end of year 2.
By the end of year 2, the entity's earnings have increased by only 10% and therefore the shares do
not vest at the end of year 2. 28 employees have left during the year. The entity expects that a
further 25 employees will leave during year 3, and that the entity's earnings will increase by at least
6%, thereby achieving the average of 10% per year.
By the end of year 3, 23 employees have left and the entity's earnings had increased by 8%,
resulting in an average increase of 10.67% per year. Therefore 419 employees received 100 shares
at the end of year 3.
Required
Show the expense and equity figures which will appear in the financial statements in each of the
3 years.
See Chapter 9 Section 5 of the Supplementary Reading for a practice activity on vesting conditions.
5 Modifications, cancellations and settlements

The entity might:
(a) Modify share options, eg by repricing or by changing from cash-settled to equity-settled; or
(b) Cancel or settle the options.
Repricing of share options might occur, for example, where the share price has fallen. The entity may
then reduce the exercise price of the share options, which increases the fair value of those options
(IFRS 2: para. 26).
5.1 Modifications
General rule
At the date of the modification, the entity must recognise, as a minimum, the services already
received measured at the grant date fair value of the equity instruments granted (IFRS 2:
para. 27); ie the normal IFRS 2 approach is followed up to the date of the modification.
Any modifications that increase the total fair value of the share-based payment must be recognised
over the remaining vesting period (ie as a change in accounting estimate). This increase is
recognised in addition to the amount based on the grant date fair value of the original equity
instruments (which is recognised over the remainder of the original vesting period) (IFRS 2:
para. B43).
208
For equity-settled share-based payment, the increase in total fair value is measured as:
Fair value of modified equity instruments at the date of modification X
Less fair value of original equity instruments at the date of modification (X)
X
This ensures that only the differential between the original and modified instrument is measured,
rather than any increase in the fair value of the original instruments (which would be inconsistent with
the principle of measuring equity-settled share-based payment at grant date fair values).
Illustration 3
Grant of share options that are subsequently repriced
Background
At the beginning of year 1, an entity grants 100 share options to each of its 500 employees. Each
grant is conditional upon the employee remaining in service over the next three years. The entity
estimates that the fair value of each option is $15. On the basis of a weighted average probability,
the entity estimates that 100 employees will leave during the 3-year period and therefore forfeit their
rights to the share options.
Suppose that 40 employees leave during year 1. Also suppose that by the end of year 1, the entity's
share price has dropped, and the entity reprices its share options, and that the repriced share
options vest at the end of year 3. The entity estimates that a further 70 employees will leave during
years 2 and 3, and hence the total expected employee departures over the 3-year vesting period is
110 employees.
During year 2 a further 35 employees leave, and the entity estimates that a further 30 employees will
leave during year 3, to bring the total expected employee departures over the 3-year vesting period
to 105 employees.
During year 3, a total of 28 employees leave, and hence a total of 103 employees ceased
employment during the vesting period. For the remaining 397 employees, the share options vested at
the end of year 3.
The entity estimates that, at the date of repricing, the fair value of each of the original share options
granted (ie before taking into account the repricing) is $5 and that the fair value of each repriced
share option is $8.
Application
The incremental value at the date of repricing is $3 per share option ($8–$5). This amount is
recognised over the remaining 2 years of the vesting period, along with remuneration expense
based on the original option value of $15.
The amounts recognised in years 1–3 are as follows:
Year 1
This is the usual
calculation for an equity- $
settled transaction
Equity b/d 0
P/L charge 195,000
Equity c/d [(500 – 110) × 100 × $15 × 1/3] 195,000
At the end of year 1, the shares options are repriced. Because this modification happens at the end
of year 1, the effect of it is not shown in the financial statements until year 2.
209
Year 2 Continue to spread the Add on the effect of the
original IFRS 2 charge repricing, spread over the
over the vesting period remaining vesting period $
Equity b/d 195,000
Equity c/d [(500 – 105) × 100 × (($15 × 2/3) + ($3 × ½))] 454,250
DEBIT Expenses $259,250 So in effect the repricing is

CREDIT Equity $259,250 like having a new grant of
share options in the middle
of the vesting period
Year 3
$
Equity b/d 454,250
2 714,600
Equity c/d [(500 – 103) × 100 × (($15 × 3/3) + ($3 × ))]
2
This is the total IFRS 2
equity reserve
Accounting for modifications of share-based payment transactions from

cash-settled to equity-settled
If a share-based payment arrangement is modified so that it is now equity-settled rather than cash-
settled, the accounting treatment is as follows (IFRS 2: paras. 33A–33D):
(a) The original liability recognised in respect of the cash-settled share-based payment should
be derecognised and the equity-settled share-based payment should be
recognised at the modification date fair value to the extent services have
been rendered up to the modification date.
(b) The difference, if any, between the carrying amount of the liability as at the modification
date and the amount recognised in equity at the same date would be recognised in profit
or loss immediately.
5.2 Cancellation or settlement during the vesting period

Cancellation
Early cancellation, whether by the entity, counterparty (eg employee) or third party (eg shareholder)
is treated as an acceleration of vesting, meaning that the full amount that would have been
recognised for services received over the remainder of the vesting period is recognised immediately
(IFRS 2: para. 28(a)).
Settlement
If a payment (ie a settlement) is made to the employee on cancellation, it is treated as a deduction
from (repurchase of) equity or extinguishment of a liability (depending on whether the
share-based payment was equity- or cash-settled) (IFRS 2: para. 28(b)).
For equity-settled share-based payment settlements, any excess of the payment over the fair
value of equity instruments granted measured at the repurchase date is recognised as an
expense (IFRS 2: para. 28(b)).
210
A liability is first remeasured to fair value at the date of cancellation/settlement and any
payment made is treated as an extinguishment of the liability (IFRS 2: para. 28(b)).
Replacement
If equity instruments are granted to the employee as a replacement for the cancelled instruments (and
specifically identified as a replacement) this is treated as a modification of the original grant (IFRS 2:
para. 28(c)).
Applying this, the incremental fair value is measured as:

Fair value of replacement instruments X
Less net fair value of cancelled instruments* (X)
X
*Fair value immediately before cancellation less any payments to employee on cancellation
Activity 5: Cancellation of share options

On 1 January 20X1, Piper made an award of 3,000 share options to each of its 1,000 employees.
The employees had to remain in Piper's employ until 31 December 20X3 in order to be entitled to
the share options. At the date of the award and at 31 December 20X1, management estimated that
100 employees would leave the company before the vesting date. Piper accounted for the options
correctly in its financial statements for the year ended 31 December 20X1. The fair value of each
option on 1 January 20X1 was $5.
The share price of Piper fell substantially during 20X1. On 1 January 20X2 the fair value of the share
options had fallen to $1 each and 975 of the employees who were awarded options remained in
the company's employ. During the year ended 31 December 20X2 35 of those employees left and
the company estimated that a further 40 would leave each year before 31 December 20X4.
Required
Discuss, with suitable calculations, the accounting treatment of the share options in Piper's financial
statements for the year ended 31 December 20X2 if on 1 January 20X2:
(a) The original options were cancelled and $4 million is paid to employees as compensation.
(b) Piper's management cancelled the share options and replaced them with new share options,
vesting on 31 December 20X4, the fair value of each replacement option on 1 January 20X2
being $7. No compensation would be paid.
6 Deferred tax implications

6.1 Issue
An entity may receive a tax deduction that differs from related cumulative remuneration expense
which may arise in a later accounting period.
For example, an entity recognises an expense for share options granted under IFRS 2, but does not
receive a tax deduction until the options are exercised and receives the tax deduction based on the
share price on the exercise date.
211
6.2 Measurement
The deferred tax asset temporary difference is measured as:
Carrying amount of share-based payment expense 0

Less tax base of share-based payment expense
(estimated amount tax authorities will permit as a deduction
in future periods, based on year end information) (X)
If the amount of the tax deduction (or estimated future tax deduction) exceeds the amount of the
related cumulative remuneration expense, this indicates that the tax deduction relates also to an
equity item.
The excess is therefore recognised directly in equity (note it is not reported in other comprehensive
income) (IAS 12: paras. 68A–68C).
Illustration 4
Deferred tax implications of share-based payment
On 1 June 20X5, Farrow grants 16,000 share options to one of its employees. At the grant date, the
fair value of each option is $4. The share options vest 2 years later on 1 June 20X7.
Tax allowances arise when the options are exercised and the tax allowance is based on the option's
intrinsic value at the exercise date. The intrinsic value of the share options is $2.25 at 31 May 20X6
and $4.50 at 31 May 20X7 on which date the options are exercised.
Required
Show the deferred tax accounting treatment of the above transaction at 31 May 20X6, 31 May
20X7 (before exercise), and on exercise.
Solution
31.5.X6 31.5.X7
Before
This is always nil exercise
$ $
Carrying amount of share-based payment expense 0 0
(16,000 × $2.25 × ½)/(16,000 × $4.50) (18,000) (72,000)
Use intrinsic value at Year 1 of 2-year

date of calculation vesting period
Temporary difference (18,000) (72,000)
Deferred tax asset at 30% 5,400 21,600
To determine where to record the deferred tax, we must first compare the cumulative accounting
expense with the cumulative tax deduction for each year. Where the tax deduction is greater than
the accounting expense recognised, the excess is taken directly to equity.
212
Year 1 Year 2
$ $
Accounting expense recognised (16,000 × $4 × ½)/(16,000 × $4) 32,000 64,000
Tax deduction (18,000) (72,000)
Excess temporary difference 0 (8,000)
Excess deferred tax asset to equity at 30% 0 2,400
In year 1, the accounting expense is greater than the tax deduction, so the double entry to record the
deferred tax asset is:
DEBIT Deferred tax asset $5,400
CREDIT Deferred tax (P/L) $5,400
In year 2, the tax deduction is $8,000 greater than the accounting expense, therefore the excess
deferred tax asset of $2,400 is credited to equity:
Credit profit or loss
DEBIT Deferred tax asset $16,200 with the increase in
CREDIT Deferred tax (P/L) $13,800 the deferred tax asset
(21,600 – 5,400 – 2,400) less the amount
credited to equity
CREDIT Deferred tax (equity) $2,400
On exercise, the deferred tax asset is replaced by a current tax asset. The double entry is:
DEBIT Deferred tax (P/L) $19,200
Reversal of
DEBIT Deferred tax (equity) $2,400 deferred tax asset
CREDIT Deferred tax asset $21,600
DEBIT Current tax asset $21,600
CREDIT Current tax (P/L) $19,200
CREDIT Current tax (equity) $2,400
Activity 6: Deferred tax implications of share-based payment

On 1 January 20X2, an entity granted 5,000 share options to an employee vesting 2 years later on
31 December 20X3. The fair value of each option measured at the grant date was $3.
Tax law in the jurisdiction in which the entity operates allows a tax deduction of the intrinsic value
of the options on exercise. The intrinsic value of the share options was $1.20 at 31 December 20X2
and $3.40 at 31 December 20X3 on which date the options were exercised.
Required
Show the deferred tax accounting treatment of the above transaction at 31 December 20X2,
31 December 20X3 (before exercise), and on exercise.
213
Ethics note
principles of the ACCA's Code of Ethics and Conduct when approaching every question.
In relation to share-based payments granted to directors, one key threat that could arise is that of
self-interest if the vesting conditions are based on performance measures. There is a danger that
strategies and accounting policies are manipulated to obtain maximum return on exercise of
share-based payments. For example, if vesting conditions are based on achieving a certain profit
figure, a director may be tempted to improve profits by suggesting that, for example:
 The useful lives of assets are extended (reducing depreciation or amortisation)
 A policy of revaluing property is changed to the cost model
 Development costs are capitalised when they should be expensed
 The revenue recognition policy is changed to recognise revenue earlier
 Some other form of 'creative accounting' is undertaken
A change in accounting policy to provide more reliable and relevant information is of course
permitted by IAS 8. But to change a policy purely to boost profits to maximise share-based payments
is unethical.
214
Chapter summary
1. Types of share- 2. Recognition

based payment
 Over vesting period
Equity-settled:
 Goods/services for shares/share
options
Cash-settled:
 Goods/services for cash based on
value of shares/share options
Choice of settlement:
 Entity chooses or counterparty chooses
4. Vesting conditions
Share-based payment
Period of service:
 Over period (IFRS 2)
Performance conditions (other than 3. Measurement
market):
 Estimate at y/e instruments expected
to vest
 Where vesting period varies (eg 6. Deferred tax implications
target) accrue over most likely period Deferred tax asset:
at y/e A/c carrying amount of SBP expense 0
Market conditions: Less tax base
 Ignore (already considered in FV) (future tax ded'n estimated at y/e) (X)
5. Modifications, DT asset  X% X
cancellations and If tax ded'n > SBP expense, excess DT  equity not
SPLOCI
settlements
 Modifications:
Recognise (as a minimum) services
already received measured at grant
date FV of equity instrument granted
Equity-settled Cash-settled Choice of
 Increases in FV due to modification:
Recognise (FV of modified less FV settlement
Dr Expense (/asset) Dr Expense (/asset)
original, both at modification date)
over remaining vesting period Cr Equity  Recognise at FV If counterparty has the choice:
 Cancellation:  Treat as a compound instrument
Expense amount remaining  Measure equity component at
(acceleration of vesting) Measure at: grant date FV:
Cr Liability
 Settlement: FV shares alternative X
 FV goods/services rec'd, or
– Treat as a repurchase of  Adjust for changes in FV FV cash (debt) alternative (X)
 FV of equity instruments at until date of settlement Equity component X
equity/extinguishment of liability
grant date
– First remeasure liability to FV (if
If entity has the choice:
cash-settled)
– Dr SBP reserve/liability (with  Treat as equity-settled unless
For employee services not
present obligation to settle in
FV of instrument measured vesting immediately, recognise
cash
at repurchase date) change in equity over vesting
Dr P/L (any excess) period
Cr Cash
Equity/liability b/d X
Movement (bal)  P/L X
Cash paid (liab only) (X) Estimated no. x Estimated no. x FV per x Cumulative
X of employees of instruments instrument* proportion of
Equity/liability c/d
entitled to per employee vesting period
benefits at elapsed
vesting date
* Equity-settled: grant date

Cash-settled: year end
215
1. Types of share-based payment

There are three types of share-based payment
 Equity-settled, eg share options
 Cash-settled, eg share appreciation rights
 Choice of settlement, by entity or by counterparty
2. Recognition
The expense associated with share-based payment is recognised over the vesting period (ie
the period during which the counterparty becomes entitled to receive the payment).
3. Measurement
The expense is measured based on the expected fair value of the payment, using year-
end estimates of instruments expected to vest and fair values of instruments at grant date
(equity-settled) and at year end (cash-settled).
4. Vesting conditions
Vesting conditions are the conditions that must be satisfied for the counterparty to become
unconditionally entitled to receive payment under a share-based payment agreement.
Vesting conditions include service conditions and performance conditions.
Where there are performance conditions (other than market conditions which are already
factored into the fair value of the instrument), an estimate is made of the number of
instruments expected to vest, and revised at each year end.
5. Modifications, cancellations and settlements
The fair value of modifications is recognised over the remaining vesting period.
When a cancellation/settlement occurs, the remaining share-based payment charge is
immediately expensed (acceleration of vesting).
6. Deferred tax implications
Since the accounting value of share-based payment is zero (it is expensed), any future tax
deductions (eg if there is no tax deduction until the share-based payment vests) will generate a
deferred tax asset.
216
Question practice
Q11 Lambda
Further reading
There are articles on the ACCA website which are relevant to the topics covered in this chapter and
Get to grips with IFRS 2 (2017)
IFRS 2, Share-based Payment
Ernst & Young has produced a more detailed guide to IFRS 2 which can be found by visiting the Ernst &
Young website at the link below and navigating to the 'Applying IFRS' tab:
www.ey.com/uk/en/issues/ifrs/issues_gl_ifrs_nav_publications
217
218
SKILLS CHECKPOINT 2
Resolving financial reporting issues
aging information
Man
aging information
Man
An
sw
Resolving financial
er
pl
t
en
manag ime
reporting issues
an
em
t
nin
Good
g
r p re t ati o n
Specific SBR skills
e nts
Applying good
req f rrprneteation
consolidation
re m
Creating effective
i ts
techniques
discussion
m eun
of t inotect i
uireeq
Eff d p
an
c re
e c re
Performing
r re o r
C
ti v
se w ri
nt tin
Co
ati g
on
Efficient numerical
analysis
Introduction
questions that will total 50 marks. The first question will be based on the financial statements of
group entities, or extracts thereof (syllabus area D), and is also likely to require consideration of
some financial reporting issues (syllabus area C). The second question will require
candidates to consider the reporting implications and the ethical implications of specific
events in a given scenario.
Section B will contain two further questions which may be scenario or case-study or essay based
and will contain both discursive and numerical elements. Section B could deal with any
aspect of the syllabus.
As financial reporting issues are highly likely to be tested in both sections of your SBR exam, it is
essential that you have mastered the skill for resolving financial reporting issues in order to
maximise your chance of passing the SBR exam.
219
Skills Checkpoint 2: Resolving financial reporting issues
SBR Skill: Resolving financial reporting issues

The basic approach to resolving financial reporting issues is very similar to the one for
ethical issues. This consistency is important because in Question 2 of the SBR exam,
both will be tested together.
STEP 1:
Look at the mark allocation of the question and
work out how many minutes you have to
answer the question (based on 1.95 minutes a
mark).
STEP 2:
Read the requirement and analyse it. Highlight each
sub-requirement separately, identify the verb(s) and
ask yourelf what each sub-requirement means.
STEP 3:
Read the scenario, asking yourself for each
paragraph which IAS or IFRS may be relevant and
apply that acccounting standard to each paragraph
of the question.
STEP 4:
Prepare an answer plan ensuring that you cover
each of the issues raised in the scenario. Choose
your preferred format (eg mind map, bullet pointed
list, annotating the question paper).
STEP 5:
Write up your answer with a separate underlined
heading for each of the items in the scenario. Write
in full sentences and clearly explain each point.
220
Skills Checkpoint 2
However, how you write up your answer in Step 5 depends on whether in the
scenario:
(a) The items have not yet been accounted for; or
(b) The items have already been accounted for.
The diagram below summaries how you should write up your answer in each of the
above circumstances:
Item not yet accounted for Item already accounted for
(a) Identify what the

(a) Identify the correct
company did or what it
accounting standard
is proposing (accounting
treatment in SOFP and
SPLOCI)
(b) State the relevant rule or

principle per the (b) Identify the correct
accounting standard (very accounting treatment:
briefly) (i) Identify correct IAS or
IFRS
(ii) State relevant
(c) Apply the rule/principle to rule/principle per
the scenario eg: IAS/IFRS
 Recognition (when to (iii) Apply rule/principle to
record it, impact on SOFP scenario
and SPLOCI, and why)
 Initial measurement (on
recognition: what number (c) State the adjustment
and why) required where necessary
 Subsequent measurement (impact on SOFP and
(what number and why) SPLOCI)
 Presentation (heading in
SOFP or SPLOCI)
 Disclosure (notes to the
accounts)
221
Exam success skills
 Good time management. Remember that as the exam is 3 hours and
15 minutes long, you have 1.95 minutes a mark. The following question is
worth 15 marks so you should allow approximately 29 minutes. Approximately
a quarter to a third of your time (7–10 minutes) should be allocated to analysis
of the requirement, active reading of the scenario and an answer plan. The
remaining time should be used to write up your answer.
 Managing information. This type of case study style question typically
contains several paragraphs of information and each paragraph is likely to
revolve around a different IAS or IFRS. This is a lot of information to absorb and
the best approach is effective planning. As you read each paragraph, you
should think about which IAS or IFRS may be relevant (there could be more than
one relevant for each paragraph) and if you cannot think of a relevant IAS or
IFRS, you can fall back on the principles of the Conceptual Framework for
Financial Reporting (the Conceptual Framework).
 Correct interpretation of requirements. Firstly, you should identify the
verb in the requirement. You should then read the rest of the requirement and
analyse it to determine exactly what your answer needs to address.
 Answer planning. After Skills Checkpoint 1, you should have practised some
questions which will have allowed you to identify your preferred format for an
answer plan. It may be simply annotating the question paper or you might
prefer to write out your own bullet-pointed list or even draw up a mind map.
 Effective writing and presentation. Each paragraph of the question will
usually relate to its own standalone transaction with its own related IAS or IFRS.
It is useful to set up separate headings in your answer for each paragraph in the
question. As for ethical issues questions, underline your headings and sub-
headings with a ruler and write in full sentences, ensuring your style is
professional. For Question 2 (where both financial reporting and ethical issues
are tested), there will be two professional skills marks available and if reporting
issues are tested in the Section B analysis question, there will also be two
professional skills marks available in this question. You must do your best to
earn these marks. It could end up being the difference between a pass and a
fail. The use of headings, sub-headings and full sentences as well as clear
explanations and ensuring that all sub-requirements are met and all issues in the
scenario are addressed will help you obtain these two marks.
222
Skills Checkpoint 2
Skill Activity
how many minutes you have to answer the question. Just the
requirement and mark allocation have been reproduced here. It is a
15 mark question and at 1.95 minutes a mark, it should take
29 minutes. This time should be split approximately as follows:
 Reading the question – 4 minutes
 Planning your answer – 4 minutes
 Writing up your answer – 21 minutes
Within each of these phases, your time should be split equally
between the three issues in the scenario as you can see from the
question that they are worth the same number of marks each (five
marks).
Required
Advise Cate on the matters set out above (in (a), (b) and (c)) with reference to relevant
International Financial Reporting Standards. (15 marks)
Highlight each sub-requirement, identify the verb(s) and ask yourself
what each sub-requirement means.
There is just a
single
Verb – what
requirement
does this mean?
here
Required
Advise Cate on the matters set out above (in (a), (b) and (c)) with reference to relevant
International Financial Reporting Standards. (15 marks)
For each paragraph in the

question, try to find the
relevant IAS or IFRS
Your verb is 'advise'. This is not one of the common question verbs defined by the
ACCA but it was used in the SBR specimen paper. Given that there is no ACCA
definition, we will instead refer to the dictionary definition of 'advise': 'offer
suggestions about the best course of action to someone' (English Oxford Living
Dictionaries).
In the context of this question, the type of 'suggestions' required relate to the
appropriate accounting treatment to follow for each issue in the question according to
the relevant accounting standard. The 'someone' you need to advise here is the
company, Cate, and presumably more specifically, the board of directors.
223
STEP 3 Now read the scenario. For each paragraph, ask yourself which IAS
or IFRS may be relevant (remember you do not need to know the IAS
or IFRS number). Then think about which specific rules or principles
from that IAS or IFRS are relevant to the particular transaction or
balance in the paragraph. Then you need to decide whether the
proposed accounting treatment complies with the relevant IAS or IFRS.
If you cannot think of a relevant IAS or IFRS, then refer to the
Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting (Conceptual
Framework).
To identify the issues, you might want to consider whether one or more
of the following are relevant in the scenario:
Potential issue What does it mean?
Recognition When should the item be recorded in the

financial statements?
Initial What amount should be recorded when the

measurement item is first recognised?
Subsequent Once the item has been recognised, how

measurement should the amount change year on year?
Presentation What heading should the amount appear

under in the statement of financial position or
statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income?
Disclosure Is a note to the accounts required in relation to

the transaction or balance?
224
Skills Checkpoint 2
Note the industry Cate operates

in – this will help you to identify
the types of assets, liabilities,
income and expenses the The company has made losses
company is likely to have and for six consecutive years. There
which IASs or IFRSs may be may be going concern issues.
relevant. This could also be an
impairment indicator.
However, there is a small profit
in the current year.
Question – Cate (15 marks)

(a) Cate is an entity in the software industry. Cate had incurred
substantial losses in the financial years 31 May 20X0 to
Likely to recur? 31 May 20X5. In the financial year to 31 May 20X6 Cate made Relevant accounting
standard = IAS 12
a small profit before tax. This included significant non-operating Income Taxes.
Is the deferred tax asset
gains. In 20X5, Cate recognised a material deferred tax asset in recoverable? Indicators
of recoverability
respect of carried forward losses, which will expire during (IAS 12: para. 36)
Can only carry forward

20X8. Cate again recognised the deferred tax asset in 20X6
the losses for another
two years. Will there be
on the basis of anticipated performance in the years from 20X6 to 20X8,
sufficient taxable profits
to offset them against? based on budgets prepared in 20X6. The budgets included high
At 31 May 20X6, have
unused losses from growth rates in profitability. Cate argued that the budgets were
20X0–20X3 which will
never be used because realistic as there were positive indications from customers about future
the carry forward period
has expired. IAS 12 orders. Cate also had plans to expand sales to new markets and to sell
states existence of
new products whose development would be completed soon. Cate was Are budgets realistic?
unused tax losses =
strong evidence that
future taxable profits taking measures to increase sales, implementing new programs to
might not be available
(IAS 12: para. 35) improve both productivity and profitability. Deferred tax assets less
deferred tax liabilities represent 25% of shareholders' equity at 31 May
20X6. There are no tax planning opportunities available to
Cate that would create taxable profit in the near future.
(5 marks)
Assess deferred tax asset recoverability from IAS 12 (para. 36) indicators:
 Sufficient taxable temporary differences which will result in taxable
amounts against which unused losses can be utilised before they expire
 Probable taxable profits before unused tax losses expire
 Losses result from identifiable causes which are unlikely to recur
 Tax planning opportunities are available that will create taxable profit in
the period in which unused tax losses can be utilised
225
Relevant accounting
standard = IAS 28
Investments in Associates
and Joint Ventures
(b) At 31 May 20X6 Cate held an investment in and had a significant Question is helpful
as mentions another
influence over Bates, a public limited company. Cate had carried out
relevant accounting
an impairment test in respect of its investment in accordance with the standard (IAS 36,
Impairment of assets)
Another relevant
accounting procedures prescribed in IAS 36 Impairment of Assets. Cate
standard = IFRS
13 Fair Value argued that fair value was the only measure applicable in this case as
Acceptable
Measurement
value-in-use was not determinable as cash flow estimates reason to not
identify value in
had not been produced. Cate stated that there were no plans to use?
dispose of the shareholding and hence there was no binding sale
IFRS 13 definition
agreement. Cate also stated that the quoted share price was not an
of fair value
appropriate measure when considering the fair value of Cate's
significant influence on Bates. Therefore, Cate measured the fair value of
Acceptable fair
its interest in Bates through application of two measurement
value measures
This should arouse under IFRS 13?
techniques; one based on earnings multiples and the other
your suspicions – is
Cate deliberately based on an option-pricing model. Neither of these methods
avoiding recording
an impairment loss? supported the existence of an impairment loss as of 31 May
20X6. (5 marks)
Relevant accounting
standard = IAS 19
(c) In its 20X6 financial statements, Cate disclosed the existence of a Employee Benefits
Who has the risks voluntary fund established in order to provide a post-retirement
and rewards
associated with the benefit plan (Plan) to employees. Cate considers its contributions to
pension plan? Is this accounting
Employees = defined the Plan to be voluntary, and has not recorded any related liability treatment correct?
contribution;
employers = defined in its consolidated financial statements. Cate has a history of paying
benefit
benefits to its former employees, even increasing them to Creates a valid
expectation in
keep pace with inflation since the commencement of the Plan. employees that they
will receive pension
Cate guaranteeing The main characteristics of the Plan are as follows: payments =
constructive obligation
pensions = defined
benefit (i) The Plan is totally funded by Cate.
(ii) The contributions for the Plan are made periodically.

Contributions are not
fixed so not defined Sounds like
contribution
(iii) The post retirement benefit is calculated based on a defined benefit
percentage of the final salaries of Plan participants

dependent on the years of service.
Contributions are
not fixed as % of
(iv) The annual contributions to the Plan are determined as a
salary so not
defined
function of the fair value of the assets less the liability
contribution
arising from past services.
226
Skills Checkpoint 2
Cate argues that it should not have to recognise the Plan because,
according to the underlying contract, it can terminate its
contributions to the Plan, if and when it wishes. The termination Cate has obligation to
pay promised pension
clauses of the contract establish that Cate must immediately either directly or via
purchasing an annuity
purchase lifetime annuities from an insurance company for all the = defined benefit
retired employees who are already receiving benefit when the

termination of the contribution is communicated. (5 marks)
Required
Advise Cate on the matters set out above (in (a), (b) and (c)) with
reference to relevant International Financial Reporting Standards.
(15 marks)
227
STEP 4 Prepare an answer plan using a separate heading for each of the three issues in the
scenario ((a), (b) and (c)). Ask yourself:
(1) What is the proposed accounting treatment in the scenario?
(2) What is the correct accounting treatment (per relevant rules/principles from IAS or IFRS)
and why (apply the rules/principles per the IAS/IFRS to the scenario)?
(3) What adjustment (if any) is required?
As this is a 15-mark question, you should aim to generate 12–13 points to achieve a
comfortable pass.
Deferred tax asset Impairment Pension plan
 Proposed accounting  Proposed accounting  Proposed accounting

treatment = recognise treatment = no treatment = no liability
deferred tax asset for impairment of  Correct accounting
carry forward (c/f) investment in treatment = treat as
losses associate defined benefit
 Correct accounting  Correct accounting pension plan
treatment = no deferred treatment = repeat (recognise plan assets
tax asset as not impairment review at fair value and plan
recoverable: recalculating liabilities at present
(a) Future taxable profits recoverable amount value) because:
– positive indications as higher of fair value (a) Constructive
are insufficient (number of shares × obligation (created
evidence: no [share price + valid expectation
confirmed order premium for in employees that
significant influence]) Cate will pay
(b) Losses likely to recur and value in use
as they are pension)
amount (present value
operating losses (b) Pension not linked
of future cash flows of
(profits that have solely to
associate and
arisen are due to dividends receivable contributions
non-operating gains from associate) (c) If Cate terminates
so non-recurring) contributions, still
 Adjustment –
(c) No tax planning contractually
recognise impairment
opportunities to obliged to
loss if necessary
create taxable profits discharge liability
in the loss c/f period (by purchasing
 Adjustment – reverse lifetime annuities)
deferred tax asset  Adjustment – treat as
defined benefit plan
228
Skills Checkpoint 2
STEP 5 Write up your answer with a separate underlined heading for each
of the three items in the scenario. Write in full sentences and
clearly explain each point in professional language. Structure your
answer for each of the three items as follows:
 Rule/principle per IAS or IFRS (state briefly)
 Apply rule/principle to the scenario (correct accounting
treatment and why)
 Conclude
Underlined heading
Suggested solution (one for each of the 3
items in the scenario)
(a) Deferred tax
In principle, IAS 12 Income Taxes allows recognition of deferred tax
assets, if material, for deductible temporary differences, unused tax
losses and unused tax credits. However, IAS 12 states that deferred
tax assets should only be recognised to the extent that they
Rule/principle (per
are regarded as recoverable. They should be regarded as accounting standard)
recoverable to the extent that on the basis of all the evidence available it
is probable that there will be suitable taxable profits against
which the losses can be recovered. There is evidence that this is
not the case for Cate:
(i) While Cate has made a small profit before tax in the year to
31 May 20X6, this includes significant non-operating gains.
In other words the profit is not due to ordinary business activities.
(ii) In contrast, Cate's losses were due to ordinary business

activities, not from identifiable causes unlikely to recur (IAS 12).
(iii) The fact that there are unused tax losses is strong evidence,
according to IAS 12, that future taxable profits may not be
Apply
available against which to offset the losses.
(iv) When considering the likelihood of future taxable profits, Cate's

forecast cannot be considered as sufficient evidence. These are
estimates which cannot be objectively verified, and are
based on possible customer interest rather than confirmed contracts
or orders.
(v) Cate does not have available any tax planning

opportunities which might give rise to taxable profits.
229
In conclusion, Cate should not recognise deferred tax assets on Conclude
losses carried forward, as there is insufficient evidence that future

taxable profits can be generated against which to offset the losses.
Underlined heading
(one for each of the
3 items in the
scenario)
(b) Investment in Bates
Cate's approach to the valuation of the investment in Bates is open to

question, and shows that Cate may wish to avoid showing an
impairment loss.
Rule/principle
(per accounting
There is an established principle that an asset should not be carried
standard)
at more than its recoverable amount. If the carrying value is not
recoverable in full, the asset must be written down to the recoverable
amount. It is said to be impaired. The recoverable amount is the highest
value to the business in terms of the cash flows that the asset can
generate, and is the higher of:
(1) The asset's fair value less costs of disposal; and

(2) The asset's value in use.
Cate appears to be raising difficulties about both of these measures Apply
in respect of Bates.
(i) Fair value less costs of disposal

Rule/principle
An asset's fair value less costs of disposal is the amount net of (per accounting
standard)
incremental costs directly attributable to the disposal of an asset
(excluding finance costs and income tax expense). Costs of disposal
include transaction costs such as legal expenses.
Cate argues that there is no binding sale agreement and that the quoted
share price is not an appropriate measure of the fair value or its
significant influence over Bates. IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement defines
fair value as 'the price that would be received to sell an asset…in an
Apply
orderly transaction between market participants'. Just because there is no
binding sale agreement does not mean that Cate cannot measure fair
value. IFRS 13 has a three-level hierarchy in measuring fair value:
230
Skills Checkpoint 2
 Level 1 inputs = quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for

identical assets
Rule/principle
 Level 2 inputs = inputs other than quoted prices included within (per accounting
standard)
Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly
or indirectly (eg quoted prices for similar assets)
 Level 3 inputs = unobservable inputs for the asset
The measurement techniques proposed by Cate (earnings multiple and

option-pricing model) are both Level 3 inputs. Therefore, if better Level 1
or 2 inputs are available, they should be used instead. A Level 1 input is
available – ie the quoted share price of Bates. Paragraph 69 of IFRS 13
requires a premium or discount to be considered when measuring fair Apply
value when it is a characteristic of the asset that market participants

would take into account in a transaction. Therefore, the premium
attributable to significant influence should be taken into account and this
adjusted share price used as fair value (rather than the earnings multiple
or option pricing model).
Costs of disposal will be fairly easy to estimate. Accordingly, it should

Conclude
be possible to arrive at a figure for fair value less costs of
disposal.
(ii) Value in use
IAS 36 states that the value in use of an asset is measured as the present
value of estimated future cash flows (inflows minus outflows) generated by
the asset, including its estimated net disposal value (if any). IAS 28
Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures gives some more specific
guidance on investments where there is significant influence. In
determining the value in use of these investments an entity should Rule/principle
(per accounting
estimate: standard)
(1) Its share of the present value of the estimated future cash flows
expected to be generated by the associate (including disposal
proceeds); and
(2) The present value of future cash flows expected to arise from
dividends to be received from the investment.
231
Cate has not produced any cash flow estimates, but it could, Apply
and should do so.
Conclusion
Cate is able to produce figures for fair value less cost to sell and for value
in use, and it should do so. If the carrying amount exceeds the higher of Conclude
these two, then the asset is impaired and must be written down to its
recoverable amount.
Underlined heading
(one for each of the 3
(c) 'Voluntary' post-retirement benefit plan items in the scenario)
Cate emphasises that the fund to provide post-retirement benefits is

voluntary, and perhaps wishes to avoid accounting for the liability.
However, there is evidence that in fact the scheme should be
accounted for as a defined benefit plan:
(i) While the plan is voluntary, IAS 19 Employee Benefits says that an Rule/principle
(per accounting
entity must account for constructive as well as legal standard)
obligations. These may arise from informal practices, where an

entity has no realistic alternative but to pay employee benefits,
because employees have a valid expectation that they will be
Apply
paid.
(ii) The plan is not a defined contribution plan, because if the

fund does not have sufficient assets to pay employee benefits
Apply
relating to service in the current or prior periods, Cate has a legal
or constructive obligation to make good the deficit by paying
further contributions.
(iii) The post-retirement benefit is based on final salaries and years of

service. In other words it is not linked solely to the amount Apply
that Cate agrees to contribute to the fund. This is what

'defined benefit' means.
(iv) Should Cate decide to terminate its contributions to the plan, it is

contractually obliged to discharge the liability created by Apply
the plan by purchasing lifetime annuities from an insurance

company.
232
Skills Checkpoint 2
Cate must account for the scheme as a defined benefit plan and
Conclude
recognise, as a minimum, its net present obligation for the benefits to be
paid.

 This is a comprehensive, detailed answer. You could still have
scored a strong pass with a shorter answer as long as it addressed
all three issues and came to a justified conclusion for each.
 All three issues in the scenario have been addressed, each with
their own heading.
 The length of answer for each of the three changes is not the same
– there is more to say about the impairment because there are
three different accounting standards to apply here.
 This is a technically challenging question which required
application of detailed knowledge from several accounting
standards. Do not panic if you were not aware of all of the
technical points. View this question as an opportunity to improve
your knowledge and understanding of accounting standards.
233
completed below for the Cate activity to go you an idea of how to complete the diagnostic.
Good time Did you spend approximately a quarter to a third of your time
management reading and planning?
Did you allow yourself time to address all three of the issues in
the scenario?
Your writing time should be split between these three issues but
it does not necessarily have to be spread evenly – there is more
to say about some issues (eg impairment) than others.
Managing Did you identify which IASs or IFRSs were relevant for each
information paragraph of the scenario?
Did you ask yourself whether the proposed accounting treatment
complies with that IAS or IFRS or the Conceptual Framework?
Correct Did you understand what we meant by the verb ‘advise'?

interpretation of Did you understand what the requirement meant and therefore
requirements what your answer should focus on?
Answer planning Did you draw up an answer plan using your preferred
approach (eg mind map, bullet-pointed list or annotated
question paper)?
Did your plan address all three of the issues in the scenario?
Did you take the following approach in your plan?
(a) What is the proposed accounting treatment in the scenario?
(b) What is the correct accounting treatment (per the relevant
rules/principles) and why (apply the rules/principles per the
IAS/IFRS to the scenario)?
(c) What adjustment (if any) is required?
Effective writing and Did you use full sentences and professional language with clear
presentation explanations?
Did you structure your answer with underlined headings (one for
each of (a), (b) and (c)?
When stating the relevant rule or principle, was your answer
concise (remember most of the marks are for application of that
rule or principle)?
Did you structure your answer as follows?
(a) State relevant rule or principle briefly
(b) Apply the rule or principle to the scenario
(c) Conclude whether the proposed accounting treatment is
correct
234
Skills Checkpoint 2
Summary
To answer a financial reporting issues question well in the SBR exam, you need to be
familiar with the key rules and principles of accounting standards so that you can
identify the relevant ones to apply in a question. The following website has very useful
summaries for IAS and IFRS:
www.iasplus.com/en-gb/standards
But do not panic if you cannot identify a relevant accounting standard, because a
sensible discussion in the context of the Conceptual Framework will be given credit.
The key is to explain why you are proposing a certain accounting treatment.
Remember the best way to write up your answer is:
 State the relevant rule or principle per IAS or IFRS (state briefly)
 Apply the rule or principle to the scenario (correct accounting treatment and why)
 Conclude
235
236
Basic groups
Learning objectives
Syllabus
reference no.
Discuss and apply the principles behind determining whether a business D1(a)
combination has occurred.
Discuss and apply the method of accounting for a business combination including D1(b)
identifying an acquirer and the principles in determining the cost of a business
combination.
Apply the recognition and measurement criteria for identifiable acquired assets D1(c)
and liabilities including contingent amounts and intangible assets.
Discuss and apply the accounting for goodwill and non-controlling interest. D1(d)
Discuss and apply the application of the control principle. D1(f)
Identify and outline: D1(k)

 The circumstances in which a group is required to prepare consolidated
 The circumstances when a group may claim an exemption from the
preparation of consolidated financial statements.
 Why directors may not wish to consolidate a subsidiary and where this is
permitted.
Determine and apply appropriate procedures to be used in preparing D1(g)

consolidated financial statements
Identify associate entities. D2(a)
Discuss and apply the equity method of accounting for associates. D2(b)
Apply the method of accounting for associates. D2(c)
237
Exam context
Group accounting is extremely important for the Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) exam. Question 1
of the exam will be based on the financial statements of group entities, or extracts from them. Group
accounting could also feature in a Section B question. A lot of this chapter is revision as it has been
covered in your earlier studies in Financial Reporting. However, ensure you study it carefully, as not
only does it form the basis for the more complex chapters that follow, some basic group accounting
techniques will usually be required in group accounting questions in the exam.
238
10: Basic groups
Chapter overview
1. Consolidated
financial Basic groups
statements
2. Subsidiaries
3. Approach to
consolidation
4. Associates 5. Fair values
239
1 Consolidated financial statements
The three types of investment in the consolidated financial statements are each governed by an IFRS:
 Subsidiaries (IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements)
 Associates (IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures)
 Joint ventures (IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures)
1.1 Preparing consolidated financial statements

IFRS 10 requires a parent to present consolidated financial statements in which the accounts of the
parent and subsidiary (or subsidiaries) are combined and presented as a single economic entity
(IFRS 10: para. 4).
The individual financial statements of parents, subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures should be
prepared to the same reporting date.
Where this is impracticable, the most recent financial statements are used, and:
 The difference must be no greater than three months;
 Adjustments are made for the effects of significant transactions in the intervening period; and
 The length of the reporting periods and any difference in the reporting dates must be the same
from period to period.
(IFRS 10: para. B92–93)
Uniform accounting policies should be used. Adjustments must be made where members of a group
use different accounting policies, so that their financial statements are suitable for consolidation.
(IFRS 10: para. B87)
ED/2015/3 Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting has introduced the concept of the
reporting entity for the first time. A reporting entity is an entity that chooses, or is required, to prepare
general purpose financial statements. In the context of group accounts, ED/2015/3 proposes to
determine the boundary of a reporting entity that has one or more subsidiaries on the basis of
control. Consolidated financial statements, according to the ED, are generally more likely to provide
useful information to users than unconsolidated financial statements. ED/2015/3 is not expected to
have a significant impact on the requirements of IFRS 3 or IFRS 10.
1.2 Exemption from presenting consolidated financial statements

A parent need not present consolidated financial statements providing (IFRS 10: para. 4):
(a) It is itself a wholly-owned subsidiary, or is partially-owned with the consent of the non-
controlling interests; and
(b) Its debt or equity instruments are not publicly traded; and
(c) It did not file or is not in the process of filing its financial statements with a regulatory
organisation for the purpose of publicly issuing financial instruments; and
(d) The ultimate or any intermediate parent produces financial statements available for public use
that comply with IFRSs including all subsidiaries (consolidated or, if they are investment
entities, measured at fair value through profit or loss).
1.3 Accounting treatment in the separate financial statements of the

investor
Under IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements the investment in a subsidiary, associate or joint venture
can be carried in the investor's separate financial statements either:
 At cost; or
 At fair value (as a financial asset under IFRS 9 Financial Instruments); or
 Using the equity method as described in IAS 28. (IAS 27: para. 10)
240
10: Basic groups
The equity method will apply in the individual financial statements of the investor when the
entity has investments in associates and joint ventures but does not prepare consolidated financial
statements as it has no investments in subsidiaries.
If the investment is carried at fair value under IFRS 9, both the investment (at fair value) and the
revaluation gains or losses on the investment must be cancelled on consolidation.
2 Subsidiaries
Subsidiary: an entity that is controlled by another entity.
Key term Control: the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain
benefits from its activities.
Power: existing rights that give the current ability to direct the relevant activities of the investee.
The key point in the definition of a subsidiary is control. An investor controls an investee if, and only
if, the investor has all of the following (IFRS 10: paras. 10–12):
Power over the Exposure or rights to The ability to use its

investee to direct the variable returns from power over the investee
relevant activities
+ its involvement with the
+ to affect the amount of
investee the investor's returns
Examples of power Examples of variable returns An investor can have the current
(IFRS 10: para. B15): (IFRS 10: paras. 15, B57): ability to direct the activities of
an investee even if it does not
• Voting rights • Dividends
actively direct the activities
• Rights to appoint, • Interest from debt of the investee
reassign or remove
• Changes in value of
key management Only the principal (not an agent)
investment
personnel may control an investee when
• Remuneration for exercising its decision-making
• Rights to appoint or
servicing investee's assets powers
remove another entity
or liabilities
that directs relevant
activities • Fees/exposure to loss from
providing credit/liquidity
• Management contract
support
Examples of relevant • Residual interest in assets
activities: and liabilities on liquidation
• Sell and purchase • Tax benefits
goods/services
• Access to future liquidity
• Manage financial assets
• Returns not available to
• Select, acquire, dispose other interest holders,
of assets eg cost savings
• Research & develop new
products/processes
• Determine funding
structure/obtain funding
241
Activity 1: Control
Edwards, a public limited company, acquires 40% of the voting rights of Hope. The remaining
investors each hold 5% of the voting rights of Hope. A shareholder agreement grants Edwards the
right to appoint, remove and set the remuneration of management responsible for key business
decisions of Hope. To change this agreement, a two-thirds majority vote of the shareholders is
required.
Required
Discuss, using the IFRS 10 definition of control, whether Edwards controls Hope.
2.1 Exclusion of a subsidiary from the consolidated financial

statements
IFRS 10 does not permit entities meeting the definition of a subsidiary to be Manipulating
results raises
excluded from the consolidated financial statements.
ethical issues.
The rules on exclusion of subsidiaries from consolidation are necessarily strict, Look out for this
in the exam.
because this is a common method used by entities to manipulate their results.
The reasons directors may not want to consolidate a subsidiary and why that
would not be appropriate under IFRS are given below.
Reasons directors may not want to IFRS treatment

consolidate a subsidiary
 The subsidiary's activities are not Subsidiary should be consolidated: adequate

similar to the rest of the group disaggregated information is provided by disclosures
under IFRS 8 Operating Segments (see Chapter 17)
 Control is temporary as the subsidiary Subsidiary should be consolidated: the

was purchased for re-sale principles in IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale
and Discontinued Operations should be applied (see
Chapter 13)
 To reduce apparent gearing by not Subsidiary should be consolidated: excluding

consolidating the subsidiary's loans the subsidiary would be manipulating the group's
 The subsidiary is loss-making results and would not give a true and fair view
 Severe long-term restrictions limit the Consider parent's ability to control the subsidiary; if
parent's ability to run the subsidiary it is not controlled, it should not be
consolidated (because the definition of a subsidiary
is not met)
Investment entities
An exception to the 'no exclusion from consolidation' principle is made where the parent is an
investment entity. Investments in subsidiaries are not consolidated, and instead are held at
fair value through profit or loss.
This allows an investment entity to account for all of its investments, whatever interest is held, at
fair value through profit or loss. The IASB believes this approach provides more relevant
information to users of financial statements of investment entities.
242
10: Basic groups
The accounting treatment is mandatory for entities meeting the definition of an investment entity, ie
an entity that (IFRS 10: para. 27):
(a) Obtains funds from one or more investors for the purpose of providing those investor(s)
with investment management services;
(b) Commits to its investor(s) that its business purpose is to invest funds solely for
returns from capital appreciation, investment income, or both; and
(c) Measures and evaluates the performance of substantially all of its investments on a
fair value basis.
Typical characteristics of an investment entity are (IFRS 10: para. 28):
 It has more than one investment;
 It has more than one investor;
 It has investors that are not related parties of the entity; and
 It has ownership interests in the form of equity or similar interests.
2.2 Adjustments for intragroup transactions with subsidiaries

On consolidation, the financial statements of a parent and its subsidiaries are combined and treated
as a single entity. As a single entity cannot trade with itself, the effect of any intragroup transactions
must be eliminated:
 All intragroup assets, liabilities, equity, income, expenses and cash flows are eliminated in full.
 Unrealised profits on intragroup transactions are eliminated in full.
The accounting entries to eliminate intragroup transactions seen in Financial Reporting are as follows.
Cancellation of intragroup sales/purchases Elimination of unrealised profit on

inventories or property, plant and equipment
DEBIT Group revenue X
(PPE)
CREDIT Group cost of sales X
Sales by parent (P) to subsidiary (S)
DEBIT Cost of sales/retained X
Cancellation of intragroup balances earnings of P
DEBIT Payables X CREDIT Group inventories/PPE X
CREDIT Receivables X
Sale by S to P^
DEBIT Cost of sales/retained X
earnings of S
Goods in transit*
CREDIT Group inventories/PPE X
DEBIT Inventories X
CREDIT Payables X ^Adjustment affects the non-controlling
interest (NCI) balance because S made the
sale, some of the unrealised profit 'belongs'
Cash in transit* to the NCI.
DEBIT Cash X
CREDIT Receivables X
*The convention is to make this adjustment in the accounts of the receiving company.
3 Approach to consolidation
3.1 Consolidation
Consolidation is the process of adjusting and combining financial information from the separate
financial statements of a parent and its subsidiaries to prepare consolidated financial statements that
present financial information for the group as a single economic entity.
243
3.2 Acquisition method
All business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method in IFRS 3. This requires
(IFRS 3: paras. 4–5):
(a) Identifying the acquirer. This is generally the party that obtains control (ie the parent).
(b) Determining the acquisition date. This is generally the date the consideration is legally
transferred, but it may be another date if control is obtained on that date.
(c) Recognising and measuring the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed
(see Section 5.2) and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree (ie the subsidiary) (see
Section 3.1).
(d) Recognising and measuring goodwill or a gain from a bargain purchase (see Section 5.1).
3.3 Measuring non-controlling interests at acquisition

IFRS 3 allows the non-controlling interests in a subsidiary to be measured at the acquisition date in
one of two ways (IFRS 3: para. 19):
 At proportionate share of fair value of net assets ('partial goodwill method')
 At fair value ('full goodwill method')
For revision of these methods, including worked examples, see Chapter 10 Section 1 of the
Supplementary Reading. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
3.4 Consolidated statement of financial position

Below is an overview of the major, but basic, rules of consolidation for the consolidated statement of
financial position.
Purpose To show the assets and liabilities which the parent (P) controls and the
ownership of those assets and liabilities
Assets and Always 100% of P plus 100% of the subsidiary (S) providing P controls S
liabilities
Goodwill Consideration transferred plus non-controlling interests (NCI) less fair value
(FV) of net assets at acquisition
Reason: shows the value of the reputation etc of the company acquired at
acquisition date
Share capital P only

Reason: consolidated financial statements are simply reporting to the
parent's shareholders in another form
Reserves 100% of P plus group share of post-acquisition retained earnings of S, plus

consolidation adjustments
Reason: to show the extent to which the group actually owns the assets and
liabilities included in the consolidated statement of financial position
Non-controlling NCI at acquisition plus NCI share of post-acquisition changes in equity

interests Reason: to show the extent to which other parties own net assets under the
control of the parent
244
10: Basic groups
Consolidation technique
Below is a brief recap of the consolidation technique covered in Financial Reporting. The SBR
syllabus introduces a range of extra complications in consolidations, but the basics will always form
part of any question.
Step 1 Draw up the group structure.
Step 2 Draw up a proforma.
Step 3 Work methodically down the statement of financial position, transferring figures to
the proforma or workings.
Step 4 Read through the additional notes and attempt the adjustments showing workings for
all calculations.
Step 5 Complete the goodwill calculation:
Consideration transferred X
Non-controlling interests (at FV or at share of FV of net assets) X
Less: net fair value of identifiable assets acquired and
liabilities assumed:
Share capital X
Share premium X
Retained earnings at acquisition X
Other reserves at acquisition X
Fair value adjustments at acquisition X
(X)
X
Less impairment losses on goodwill to date (X)
X
Step 6 Complete the consolidated retained earnings calculation:
Parent Subsidiary Associate/

joint venture
At year end X X X
Adjustments X(X) X(X) X(X)
Fair value adjustments movement X/(X) X/(X)
Pre-acquisition retained earnings (X) (X)
Y Z
Group share of post-acquisition retained
earnings:
Subsidiary (Y × group share) X
Associate/Joint venture (Z × group X
share)
Less group share of impairment losses to (X)
date
X
Step 7 Complete 'Investment in associate/joint venture' calculation (if appropriate – see Section 4).
245
Step 8 Complete the non-controlling interests calculation:
NCI at acquisition (from goodwill working) X

NCI share of post-acquisition reserves (from reserves working Y × NCI
X
share)
Less NCI share of impairment losses (only if NCI at FV at acquisition) (X)
X
See Chapter 10 Section 2 of the Supplementary Reading for more detail on this technique. This is
Activity 2: Consolidated statement of financial position

The statements of financial position for two entities for the year ended 31 December 20X9 are
presented below:
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 DECEMBER 20X9
Brown Harris
$'000 $'000
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 2,300 1,900
Investment in subsidiary (Note 1) 720 –
3,220 1,900
Current assets 3,340 1,790
6,360 3,690
Equity
Share capital 1,000 500
Retained earnings 3,430 1,800
4,430 2,300
Non-current liabilities 350 290
Current liabilities 1,580 1,100
6,360 3,690
Additional information:
(1) Brown acquired a 60% investment in Harris on 1 January 20X6 for $720,000 when the
retained earnings of Harris were $300,000.
(2) On 30 November 20X9, Harris sold goods to Brown for $200,000, one-quarter of which
remain in Brown's inventories at 31 December. Harris earns 25% mark-up on all items sold.
(3) An impairment review was conducted at 31 December 20X9 and it was decided that the
goodwill on acquisition of Harris was impaired by 10%.
Required
Prepare the consolidated statement of financial position for the Brown group as at 31 December
20X9 under the following assumptions:
(a) It is group policy to value non-controlling interest at fair value at the date of acquisition. The
fair value of the non-controlling interest at 1 January 20X6 was $480,000.
(b) It is group policy to value non-controlling interest at the proportionate share of the fair value of
the net assets at acquisition.
246
10: Basic groups
3.5 Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive

income
Overview
The consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income shows a true and fair
view of the group's activities since acquisition of any subsidiaries.
(a) The top part of the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
shows the income, expenses, profit and other comprehensive income controlled by the group.
(b) The reconciliation at the bottom of the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income shows the ownership of those profits and total comprehensive income.
Consolidation technique
Below is a brief recap of the consolidation technique covered in Financial Reporting.
Step 1 Draw up the group structure, and timeline (if helpful).
Step 2 Draw up a proforma.
Step 3 Work methodically down the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive
income, transferring figures to the proforma or workings.
Step 4 Go through the question, calculating the necessary adjustments, showing workings for
all calculations. Transfer the numbers to your proforma and make the adjustments in the
NCI working where the subsidiary's profit is affected.
Step 5 Calculate 'Share of profit of associate/joint venture' and 'Share of other comprehensive
income of associate/joint venture' (where appropriate – see Section 4).
Step 6 Complete NCI's share of subsidiary's profit for the year (PFY) and total comprehensive
income (TCI) calculation:
PFY TCI (if req'd)

PFY/TCI per question (time-apportioned × x/12 if X X
appropriate)
Adjustments, eg unrealised profit on sales made by S (X)/X (X)/X
Impairment losses (if NCI held at fair value) (X) (X)
X X
× NCI share X X
See Chapter 10 Section 2 of the Supplementary Reading for more detail on this technique. This is
247
Activity 3: Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income
The statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for two entities for the year ended
31 December 20X5 are presented below.
STATEMENTS OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X5
Constance Spicer
$'000 $'000
Revenue 5,000 4,200
Cost of sales (4,100) (3,500)
Gross profit 900 700
Distribution and administrative expenses (320) (180)
Profit before tax 580 520
Income tax expense (190) (160)
Profit for the year 390 360
Other comprehensive income
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss
Gain on revaluation of property (net of deferred tax) 60 40
Total comprehensive income for the year 450 400
Additional information:
(a) Constance acquired an 80% investment in Spicer on 1 April 20X5. It is group policy to
measure non-controlling interests at fair value at acquisition. Goodwill of $100,000 arose on
acquisition. The fair value of the net assets was deemed to be the same as the carrying
amount of net assets at acquisition.
(b) An impairment review was conducted on 31 December 20X5 and it was decided that the
goodwill on the acquisition of Spicer was impaired by 10%.
(c) On 31 October 20X5, Spicer sold goods to Constance for $300,000. Two-thirds of these
goods remain in Constance's inventories at the year end. Spicer charges a mark-up of 25% on
cost.
(d) Assume that the profits and other comprehensive income of Spicer accrue evenly over the
year.
Required
Prepare the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the
Constance group for the year ended 31 December 20X5.
4 Associates
Associate: an entity over which the investor has significant influence.
(IAS 28: para. 3)
Key term
Significant influence is the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of
the investee but is not control or joint control over those policies (IAS 28: para. 3). This could be
shown by:
(a) Representation on the board of directors
(b) Participation in policy-making processes
(c) Material transactions between the entity and investee
(d) Interchange of managerial personnel
(e) Provision of essential technical information
248
10: Basic groups
If an investor holds 20% or more of the voting power of the investee, it can be presumed that the
investor has significant influence over the investee, unless it can be clearly shown that this is not the
case (IAS 28: para. 5).
Significant influence can be presumed not to exist if the investor holds less than 20% of the voting
power of the investee, unless it can be demonstrated otherwise.
4.1 Equity method

An investment in an associate is accounted for in consolidated financial statements using the equity
method.
Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
The basic principle is that the investing company (P Co) should take account of its share of the
earnings of the associate, A Co, whether or not A Co distributes the earnings as dividends. P Co
achieves this by adding to consolidated profit the group's share of A Co's profit after tax.
The associate's sales revenue, cost of sales and so on are not amalgamated with those of the
group. Instead, only the group share of the associate's profit after tax and other
comprehensive income for the year is included in the relevant sections of the statement of profit
or loss and other comprehensive income.
Consolidated statement of financial position
The consolidated statement of financial position should show a non-current asset, investments in
associates, which is calculated as:
Cost of investment in associate X

Share of post-acquisition retained earnings (and other reserves) of
X This amount is
associate
calculated in the
Less impairment losses on associate to date (X) consolidated
X retained earnings
working
Intragroup transactions
Intragroup transactions and balances are not eliminated. However, the investor's share of
unrealised profits or losses on transfer of assets that do not constitute a 'business' is eliminated
(IAS 28: para. 28).
The adjustments required depend on whether the parent or the associate made the sale.
Sale by parent (P) to the associate (A), where A still holds the inventories, where A% is the
parent's holding in the associate and PUP is the unrealised profit
DEBIT Cost of sales/Retained earnings of P PUP × A%
CREDIT Investment in associate PUP × A%
Sale by associate (A) to parent (P), where P still holds the inventories, A% is the parent's holding
in the associate and PUP is the unrealised profit
DEBIT Share of associate's profit/Retained earnings of P PUP × A%
CREDIT Group inventories PUP × A%
249
Illustration 1
Associate
P purchased a 60% holding in S on 1 January 20X0 for $6.1m when the retained earnings of S
were $3.6m. The retained earnings of S at 31 December 20X4 were $10.6m. Since acquisition,
there has been no impairment of the goodwill in S.
P also has a 30% holding in A which it acquired on 1 July 20X1 for $4.1m when the retained
earnings of A were $6.2m. The retained earnings of A at 31 December 20X4 were $9.2m.
An impairment test conducted at the year end revealed that the investment in associate was impaired
by $500,000.
During the year A sold goods to P for $3m at a profit margin of 20%. One-third of these goods
remained in P's inventories at the year end. The retained earnings of P at 31 December 20X4 were
$41.6m.
Required
(a) What accounting adjustment in relation to unrealised profit is required in the consolidated
financial statements of P for the year ended 31 December 20X4?
(b) Calculate the following amounts for inclusion in the consolidated statement of financial position
of the P group as at 31 December 20X4:
(i) Investment in associate
(ii) Consolidated retained earnings
Solution
(a) As the associate is the seller, the share of the profit of associate (rather than cost of sales) must
be reduced.
Accounting adjustment
DEBIT Share of profit of associate $60,000
CREDIT Inventories $60,000
Calculation:
Unrealised profit
20% 1
adjustment = $3,000,000 × margin × in inventory × 30% group share
100% 3
= $60,000
(b) (i) Investment in associate

$'000
Cost of associate 4,100
Share of post-acquisition retained earnings (9,200 – 6,200) × 30% 900
5,000
Less impairment losses on associate to date (500)
4,500
250
10: Basic groups

P S A
$'000 $'000 $'000
At the year end 41,600 10,600 9,200
Unrealised profit (part (a)) (60)
Pre-acquisition retained earnings (3,600) (6,200)
7,000 3,000
S – share of post-acq'n earnings (7,000 × 60%) 4,200
A – share of post-acq'n earnings (3,000 × 30%) 900
Less impairment losses on associate to date (500)
46,140
Tutorial note.
Even though the associate was the seller for the intragroup trading, unrealised profit is
adjusted in the parent's column so as not to multiply it by the group share twice.
Working: Group structure
P
1.1.X0 60% 1.7.X1 30%
S A
Pre-acquisition retained earnings: $3.6m $6.2m
Where a parent transfers a 'business' to its associate (or joint venture), the full gain or loss is
recognised (as it is similar to losing control of a subsidiary – covered in Chapter 12).
A 'business' is defined as 'an integrated set of activities and assets that is capable of being
conducted and managed for the purpose of providing a return in the form of dividends, lower costs
or other economic benefits directly to investors or other owners, members or participants' (IFRS 3:
Appendix A).
5 Fair values
5.1 Goodwill
To understand the importance of fair values in the acquisition of a subsidiary consider again the
calculation of goodwill.
Goodwill $
Non-controlling interests at acquisition (at FV or at % FV of net assets) X
Fair value of acquirer's previously held equity interest
(for business combinations achieved in stages – covered in Chapter 11) X
X
Less net acquisition- date fair value of identifiable assets acquired
and liabilities assumed (X)
X
251
Both the consideration transferred and the net assets at acquisition must be measured at fair value
to arrive at true goodwill.
Normally goodwill is a positive balance which is recorded as an intangible non-current
asset. Occasionally it is negative and arises as a result of a 'bargain purchase'. In this instance,
IFRS 3 requires reassessment of the calculations to ensure that they are accurate and then any
remaining negative goodwill should be recognised as a gain in profit or loss and therefore also
recorded in group retained earnings (IFRS 3: paras. 34, 36).
Measurement period
If the initial accounting for a business combination is incomplete by the end of the reporting period in
which the combination occurs, provisional figures for the consideration transferred, assets
acquired and liabilities assumed are used (IFRS 3: para. 45).
Adjustments to the provisional figures may be made up to the point the acquirer receives all the
necessary information (or learns that it is not obtainable), with a corresponding adjustment to
goodwill, but the measurement period cannot exceed one year from the acquisition date
(IFRS 3: para. 45).
Thereafter, goodwill is only adjusted for the correction of errors (IFRS 3: para. 50).
5.2 Fair value of consideration transferred

The consideration transferred is measured at fair value (in accordance with IFRS 13), calculated as
the acquisition date fair values of:
 The assets transferred by the acquirer;
 The liabilities incurred by the acquirer (to former owners of the acquiree); and
 Equity interests issued by the acquirer (IFRS 3: paras. 37–40).
Specifically:
Item Treatment
Deferred consideration Discounted to present value to measure its fair value
Contingent Measured at fair value at the acquisition date

consideration (to be Subsequent measurement (IFRS 3: para. 58):
settled in cash or
(a) If the change is due to additional information obtained that affects the
shares)
position at the acquisition date, goodwill should be remeasured (if
within the measurement period)
(b) If the change is due to any other change, eg meeting earnings targets:
(i) Consideration is equity instruments – not remeasured
(ii) Consideration is cash – remeasure to fair value with gains or
losses through profit or loss
(iii) Consideration is a financial instrument – account for under IFRS 9
Costs involved in the transaction are charged to profit or loss.

However, costs to issue debt or equity instruments are treated in accordance with IFRS 9/IAS 32, so
are deducted from the financial liability or equity (IFRS 3: para. 53).
252
10: Basic groups
Activity 4: Fair value of consideration transferred

Pau, a public company, purchases a 60% interest of another company, Pol, on 1 January 20X1.
Scheduled payments comprised:
 $160m payable immediately in cash
 $120m payable on 31 December 20X2
 An amount equivalent to three times the profit after tax of Pol for the year ended 31 December
20X1, payable on 31 March 20X2
 $5m of fees paid for due diligence work to a firm of accountants.
On 1 January 20X1, the fair value attributed to the consideration based on profit was $54m. By
31 December 20X1, the fair value was considered $65m. The change arose as a result of a change
in expected profits.
An appropriate discount rate for use where necessary is 5%.
Required
Explain the treatment of the payments for the acquisition of Pol in the financial statements of the Pau
Group for the year ended 31 December 20X1.
See Chapter 10 Section 3 of the Supplementary Reading for more practice on calculating the fair
value of consideration. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
5.3 Fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities

assumed
The general rule under IFRS 3 is that, on acquisition, the subsidiary's assets and liabilities must be
recognised and measured at their acquisition date fair value except in limited, stated
cases.
To be recognised in applying the acquisition method the assets and liabilities must:
(a) Meet the definitions of assets and liabilities in the Conceptual Framework; and
(b) Be part of what the acquirer and the acquiree (or its former owners) exchanged in the business
combination rather than the result of separate transactions.
This includes intangible assets that may not have been recognised in the subsidiary's separate
financial statements, such as brands, licences, trade names, domain names, customer relationships
and so on.
IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement (see Chapter 3) provides extensive guidance on how the fair value
of assets and liabilities should be established.
253
Exceptions to the recognition and/or measurement principles in IFRS 3 are as follows.
Item Valuation basis This is a

departure from
Contingent liabilities Can be recognised providing: the normal rules
in IAS 37;
 It is a present obligation; and contingent
 Its fair value can be measured reliably liabilities are
not normally
recognised, but
Deferred tax assets/liabilities Measurement based on IAS 12 values (not IFRS 13)
only disclosed
Employee benefit assets/ Measurement based on IAS 19 values (not IFRS 13)
liabilities
Indemnification assets Valuation is the same as the valuation of contingent

(amounts recoverable relating liability indemnified less an allowance for any
to a contingent liability) uncollectable amounts
Reacquired rights (eg a licence Fair value is based on the remaining term, ignoring
granted to the subsidiary the likelihood of renewal
before it became a subsidiary)
Share-based payment Measurement based on IFRS 2 values (not IFRS 13)
Assets held for sale Measurement at fair value less costs to sell per
IFRS 5
See Chapter 10 Section 3 of the Supplementary Reading for further detail on the application of
IFRS 3 to the valuation of a subsidiary's assets and liabilities in a business combination. This is
Activity 5: Consolidation with associate

Bailey, a public limited company, has acquired shares in two companies. The details of the
acquisitions are as follows:
Company Date of Ordinary Retained Fair value of Cost of Ordinary
acquisition share capital earnings at net assets at investment share capital
of $1 acquisition acquisition of $1
acquired
$m $m $m $m $m
Hill 1 January 20X6 500 440 1,040 720 300
Campbell 1 May 20X9 240 270 510 225 72
The draft financial statements for the year ended 31 December 20X9 are:
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 DECEMBER 20X9
Bailey Hill Campbell
Non-current assets $m $m $m
Property, plant and equipment 2,300 1,900 700
Investment in Hill 72720 – –
Investment in Campbell 225 – –
3,245 1,900 700
254
10: Basic groups

Current assets 3,115 1,790 1,050
6,360 3,690 1,750
Equity
Share capital 1,000 500 240
Retained earnings 3,430 1,800 330
4,430 2,300 570
Non-current liabilities 350 290 220
Current liabilities 1,580 1,100 960
66,360 3,690 1,750
STATEMENTS OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR
ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X9
$m $m $m
Revenue 5,000 4,200 2,000
Cost of sales (4,100) (3,500) (1,800)
Gross profit 900 700 200
Distribution and administrative expenses (320) (175) (40)
Dividend income from Hill and Campbell 36 – –
Profit before tax 616 525 160
Income tax expense (240) (170) (50)
Profit for the year 376 355 110

Items not reclassified to profit or loss
Gains on property revaluation (net of deferred tax) 50 20 10
Total comprehensive income for the year 426 375 120
Dividends paid in the year (from post-acquisition profits) 250 50 20

The following information is relevant to the preparation of the group financial statements of the Bailey
group:
(a) The fair value difference in Hill relates to property, plant and equipment being depreciated
through cost of sales over a remaining useful life of 10 years from the acquisition date.
(b) During the year ended 31 December 20X9, Hill sold $200 million of goods to Bailey. Three-
quarters of these goods had been sold to third parties by the year end. The profit on these
goods was 40% of sales price. There were no opening inventories of intragroup goods nor
any intragroup balances at the year end.
(c) Bailey elected to measure the non-controlling interests in Hill at fair value at the date of
acquisition. The fair value of the non-controlling interests in Hill at 1 January 20X6 was
$450 million.
(d) Cumulative impairment losses on recognised goodwill in Hill at 31 December 20X9 amounted
to $20 million, of which $15 million arose during the year. It is the group's policy to recognise
impairment losses on positive goodwill in administrative expenses. No impairment losses have
been necessary on the investment in Campbell.
Required
Using the proformas below to help you, prepare the consolidated statement of financial position for
the Bailey Group as at 31 December 20X9 and the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income for the year then ended.
255
Solution
Bailey Group
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 DECEMBER 20X9
$m
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment (2,300 + 1,900)
Goodwill (W2)
Investment in associate (W3)
Current assets (3,115 + 1,790)
Equity attributable to owners of the parent

Share capital 1,000
Retained earnings (W4)
Non-controlling interests (W5)
Non-current liabilities (350 + 290)

Current liabilities (1,580 + 1,100)
Bailey Group
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR
THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X9
$m
Revenue (5,000 + 4,200)
Cost of sales (4,100 + 3,500)
Gross profit
Distribution costs and administrative expenses (320 + 175)
Share of profit of associate
Profit before tax
Income tax expense (240 + 170)
Profit for the year
Items not reclassified to profit or loss
Gains on property revaluation (net of deferred tax) (50 + 20)
Share of gain on property revaluation of associate
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Total comprehensive income for the year
Profit attributable to:
Owners of the parent
Total comprehensive income attributable to:

256
10: Basic groups
Workings
1 Group structure
Bailey
1.1.X6 (4 years ago) 1.5.X9 (current year)
300 72
= 60% = 30%
500 240
Hill Campbell
2 Goodwill
$m $m
Consideration transferred 720
Non-controlling interests (at fair value)
Fair value of net assets at acquisition:
Share capital
Retained earnings
Fair value adjustment
Less impairment losses to date
3 Investment in associate
$m
Cost of associate 225
Share of post-acquisition retained earnings
Less impairment losses to date
4 Retained earnings
$m $m $m
At year end 3,430 1,800 330
Group share of post-acquisition retained earnings:

Hill
Campbell
Less impairment losses:
Hill
Campbell
257
5 Non-controlling interests (statement of financial position)
$m
NCI at acquisition
NCI share of post-acquisition retained earnings
NCI share of impairment losses
6 Non-controlling interests (statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income)
Profit for Total

year comprehensive
income
$m $m
Hill's PFY/TCI per question 355 375
× NCI share
7 Fair value adjustment – Hill

At acquisition Movement Year end
1.1.X6 31.12.X9
$m $m $m
8 Intragroup trading
Ethics note
Ethics could feature as part of any question in the SBR exam so you need to be alert to any possible
threats to the fundamental principles in the ACCA Code of Ethics and Conduct in question scenarios.
For example, in terms of group accounting, if there is pressure on the directors to keep gearing
below a certain level, directors may be tempted to keep loan liabilities out of the group accounts by
putting those liabilities into a new subsidiary and then creating reasons as to why that subsidiary
should not be consolidated.
258
10: Basic groups
Chapter summary
1. Consolidated financial
statements Basic groups
Exemption: consolidated FS not necessary if:
 P is wholly owned subsidiary
(or NCI agrees)
 Debt/equity not publicly traded
 Ultimate or any intermediate P publishes 2. Subsidiaries
IFRS FS including all subs Definition: Key intragroup adjustments
 An entity that is controlled by (a) Cancellation of intragroup
another entity (known as the parent) sales/purchases:
 Control: when an investor has all DR Group revenue X
3. Approach to consolidation the following: CR Group cost of sales X
(a) power over the investee; (b) Elimination of unrealised profit on
Step 1 Group structure or timeline (for a
SPLOCI) (b) exposure, or rights, to variable inventories/PPE:
returns from its involvement with Sales by P to S:
Step 2 Proforma
the investee; and
Step 3 Transfer figures to face or working DR Cost of sales/ ret'd earnings of P X
(c) the ability to use its power CR Group inventories/PPE X
Step 4 Adjustments & add across over the investee to affect the
Sale by S to P:
Step 5 Goodwill (for a SOFP) amount of the investor's returns
DR Cost of sales/ ret'd earnings of S X
Step 6 Retained earnings (for a SOFP) Accounting treatment (IFRS 3, IFRS 10): CR Group inventories/PPE X
Step 7 Associate/joint venture (SOFP,  Consolidation (purchase method) of (affects NCI)
share of P/L, share of OCI items) 100% of assets, liabilities, income &
(c) Cancellation of intragroup balances:
Step 8 Non-controlling interests (in net expenses
DR Payables X
assets (SOFP), P/L and TCI)  Cancellation of intragroup items CR Receivables X
 NCI shown separately
(d) Cash in transit:
 Uniform accounting policies DR Cash X
 Adjustments to fair value CR Receivables X
 Goodwill arises (tested annually for (e) Goods in transit:
impairment)
DR Inventories X
CR Payables X
Exclusion: not possible under IFRSs unless no control or parent is an investment entity:
Dissimilar activities consolidated + IFRS 8 disclosures
Held for re-sale consolidated under IFRS 5 principles (held for sale in CA/CL)
Severe LT restrictions no control  not a sub
Investment entities subs held at FVTP/L
 Purpose is investment management services
 Invest solely for returns from capital appreciation and/or investment income
 Performance measured & evaluated on FV basis
259
4. Associates
Definition:
 An entity over which the investor has significant influence
 Significant influence: the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the
investee but not control or joint control over those policies
Accounting treatment (IAS 28):

 Equity method
SOFP: Cost + share of post acq´n retained reserves
less: impairment losses to date
SPLOCI: Share of profit for the year (shown before group profit before tax)
Share of other comprehensive income
 Eliminate investor's share of any unrealised profit/loss on transactions with associate (unless a 'business' is
transferred to the associate – profit/loss not eliminated as similar to loss of control of a subsidiary)
5. Fair values
Consideration transferred Fair value (FV) of assets and liabilities

Measuring consideration: Exceptions to FV recognition/measurement:
 Transaction costs – expensed to P/L  Contingent liabilities – recognised if present
– but to equity if re SC (IAS 32) obligation exists & FV can be measured
 Deferred – Present value reliably
 Contingent – Fair value at acq'n date
 Indemnification assets – same val'n as
– Subsequent measurement:
contingent liability less allowance if
(i) Equity instruments – not remeasured uncollectable
(ii) Cash – remeasure to FV, gains or losses through  Reacquired rights – FV based on remaining
profit or loss term (ignore renewal)
(iii) Financial instrument – IFRS 9  Use normal IFRS values for deferred tax,
employee bens, share-based payment &
assets held for sale
260
10: Basic groups
1. Consolidated financial statements

 Investments in subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures are accounted for in the investor's
own books at cost or at fair value (as a financial asset under IFRS 9) or using the
equity method.
 A parent may be exempt from preparing consolidated financial statements if
not quoted and is part of a larger group.
2. Subsidiaries
 The definition of a subsidiary is based on a control relationship. Subsidiaries are
consolidated in full, but intragroup transactions, balances and unrealised profits are
eliminated in full.
 A parent cannot exclude an entity that meets the definition of a subsidiary from the
consolidation unless the parent meets the definition of an investment entity (in which
case the subsidiary is measured at fair value through profit or loss).
3. Approach to consolidation
BPP recommends a methodical step by step approach to the consolidated statement of
financial position and consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
4. Associates
Associates arise where the investor has significant influence. They are accounted for using
the equity method as one line in the statement of financial position, one line in profit or loss and
one line in other comprehensive income. Intragroup transactions are not eliminated other than
the investor's share of unrealised profits on transfer of assets which do not constitute a
'business'.
5. Fair values
IFRS 3 contains detailed rules on how to determine the consideration transferred and the
fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed to ensure the goodwill
figure is accurate.
261
Question practice
Q12 Highland
Q13 Investor
Further reading
The ACCA website includes an article on IFRS 3 which was written for the Financial Reporting exam and
provides useful revision:
www.accaglobal.com/uk/en/student/exam-support-resources/fundamentals-exams-study-
resources/f7/technical-articles/combinations.html
262
Changes in group
structures: step
acquisitions
Learning objectives
Syllabus
reference no.
Apply the accounting principles relating to a business combination achieved in D1(e)

stages.
Discuss and apply the implications of changes in ownership interest and loss of D1(h)
control. (Loss of control covered in Chapter 12)
Prepare group financial statements where activities have been discontinued, or D1(i)
have been acquired or disposed of in the period.
Note. Only acquisitions are covered in this chapter. Disposals are covered in
Chapter 12 and discontinued operations in Chapter 13.
Exam context
Changes in group structures are likely to feature regularly in the Strategic Business Reporting (SBR)
exam. The most likely part of the exam for this topic to be tested in is the first Section A question
which will be based on the financial statements of group entities, or extracts thereof. This question
could require you to prepare a full consolidated primary statement (statement of financial position,
statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income or statement of cash flows) or an extract
incorporating an increase in a shareholding in an existing investment (sometimes referred to as a
step acquisition, a piecemeal acquisition or a business combination achieved in stages).
Alternatively, part (b) of this question could ask for a written explanation of the accounting treatment
of a change in group structure.
Part of the second question in Section A on reporting and ethical implications of specific events could
also test changes in group structures. This topic could also feature as part of either of the two Section
B questions which could deal with any aspect of the syllabus.
263
Chapter overview
1. Step acquisitions 2. Step acquisitions where

where significant Changes in group structures
control is retained
influence or control is
achieved
Group financial Group financial

statements statements
Subsidiary to subsidiary
Investment to Investment to Associate to
associate subsidiary subsidiary
NCI (SOFP)
Control achieved in stages Adjustment to parent's equity

Goodwill calculation
264
11: Changes in group structures: step acquisitions
1 Step acquisitions where significant influence or control is

achieved
A parent company may build up its shareholding with several successive share purchases
rather than purchasing the shares all on the same day.
Where a controlling interest in a subsidiary is built up over a period of time, IFRS 3 Business
Combinations refers to this as 'business combination achieved in stages'. This may be also
Key term
be known as a 'step acquisition' or 'piecemeal acquisition'.
(IFRS 3: para. 41)
It is also possible for a parent to increase its controlling shareholding in a subsidiary; this will be
covered in Section 2.
1.1 Scenarios
There are three possible scenarios where significant influence or control is achieved in stages. This is
referred to by the Deloitte guide Business combinations and changes in ownership interests as
'crossing an accounting boundary' as illustrated by the diagram below (adapted from the
Deloitte guide, 2008: p.7):
IFRS 9 IAS 28 IFRS 10

0% (20%) (50%) 100%
S
I
G
N
10% 40% (a) Investment to associate
I
F
I
C C
A O
N
T N
10% T (b) Investment to subsidiary
80%
I R
N O
F
L L
U
E
N
C 30% (c) Associate to subsidiary
80%
E
For any change in group structure:
 The entity's status (investment, subsidiary, associate) during the year will determine the
accounting treatment in the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income (SPLOCI) (pro-rate accordingly).
 The entity's status at the year end will determine the accounting treatment in the
consolidated statement of financial position (SOFP) (never pro-rate).
The accounting treatment for each of the scenarios in the diagram is explained in the following
section.
265
1.2 Accounting treatment in group financial statements
Significant influence achieved in stages
(a) Investment to associate (eg 10% to 40%)
Where an investment in equity instruments becomes an associate, the investment (measured
either at cost or at fair value) is treated as part of the cost of the associate.
Statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
 Equity account as an associate from the date of significant influence
Statement of financial position
 Equity account as an associate
See Chapter 11 Section 1 of the Supplementary Reading for a further explanation and an illustration
of investment to associate step acquisitions. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of
the Workbook.
Control achieved in stages

(b) Investment to subsidiary (eg 10% to 80%)
 Remeasure the investment to fair value at the date the parent achieves control
 Consolidate as a subsidiary from the date the parent achieves control
 Calculate goodwill at the date the parent achieves control
 Consolidate as a subsidiary at the year end
(c) Associate to subsidiary (eg 30% to 80%)
 Equity account as an associate to the date the parent achieves control
 Remeasure the associate to fair value at the date the parent obtains control
 Consolidate as a subsidiary from the date the parent obtains control
 Calculate goodwill at the date the parent obtains control
 Consolidate as a subsidiary at the year end
Accounting concept
Items (b) and (c) are accounted for in the same way. The concept of substance over form drives the
accounting treatment. The legal form is that some shares have been purchased. However, the
substance, which should be reflected in the group accounts, is that because the control boundary has
been crossed:
(1) An investment (b) or associate (c) has been 'sold' – the investment previously held is
remeasured to fair value at the date of control (and a gain or loss reported*); and
266
(2) A subsidiary has been 'purchased' – goodwill is calculated including the fair value of the
investment previously held (eg where 35% was held originally then an additional 40% was
purchased giving the parent control):
$
Consideration transferred (for 40% purchased) X
Fair value of previously held investment (35%) X
Non-controlling interests (at fair value or at NCI share of fair value of net assets) (25%) X
Less fair value of identifiable net assets at acquisition (X)
X
*The gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss unless the investment previously held was an
investment in equity instruments and the election was made to hold the investment at fair
value through other comprehensive income.
(IFRS 3: paras. 41–42)
Illustration 1: Investment to subsidiary acquisition

Alpha acquired a 15% investment in Beta in 1 January 20X6 for $360,000 when Beta's retained
earnings were $100,000. At that date, Alpha had neither significant influence nor control of Beta.
The fair value of the investment at 31 December 20X8 was $480,000 and at 1 July 20X9 was
$500,000.
On 1 July 20X9, Alpha acquired an additional 65% of the 2 million $1 equity shares in Beta for
$2,210,000. The retained earnings of Beta at that date were $1,100,000. Beta has no other
reserves. Alpha elected to measure non-controlling interest at fair value at the date of acquisition.
The non-controlling interest had a fair value of $680,000 at 1 July 20X9.
There has been no impairment in the goodwill of Beta to date.
Required
(a) Explain how the investment in Beta would be accounted for in Alpha's group accounts for the
year ended 31 December 20X9.
(b) Calculate the gain or loss on remeasurement of the 15% investment at 1 July 20X9 (on the
assumption that the investment was still carried at its 31 December 20X8 fair value at that
date).
(c) Calculate the goodwill in Beta for inclusion in the consolidated statement of financial position
of the Alpha group as at 31 December 20X9.
Solution
(a) Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
On acquisition of an additional 65% in Beta on 1 July 20X9, Alpha's total shareholding
amounted to 80% (15% + 65%), giving Alpha control of Beta. In the consolidated statement of
profit or loss and other comprehensive income, Alpha should consolidate Beta for the
6 months that Beta was a subsidiary, pro-rating Beta's income and expenses accordingly
(assuming profits accrue evenly).
Since, in substance, Alpha has sold a 15% investment, the investment should be remeasured to
fair value on 1 July 20X9 and a gain or loss should be recognised either in profit or loss (if the
investment had been measured at fair value through profit or loss) or other comprehensive
income (if the election had been made to hold the investment at fair value through other
comprehensive income).
267
Consolidated statement of financial position
In substance, on 1 July 20X9, Alpha purchased an 80% subsidiary. Therefore, goodwill
should be calculated on the full 80% shareholding, and, in the consolidated statement of
financial position, Beta should be consolidated as a subsidiary.
(b) Gain or loss on remeasurement
$’000
Fair value at date control achieved (1.7.X9) 500
Carrying amount of investment (fair value at previous year end: 31.12.X8) (480)
Gain on remeasurement 20
Record in profit or loss if no
irrevocable election or in OCI if
irrevocable election made
(c) Goodwill
$’000 $’000
Consideration transferred (for 65% on 1 July 20X9) 2,210
Relates to the
Fair value of previously held investment (15%) 20% not owned 500
Fair value at by the group on
date control Non-controlling interests (at fair value) 1 July 20X9 680
is achieved
(1 July 20X9)
Fair value of identifiable net assets at acquisition:
Share capital 2,000
Retained earnings (1 July 20X9) 1,100
At the date (3,100)
control is
achieved 290
1.3 Approach to questions requiring full consolidated primary

statement(s)
Step 1 Group structure and timeline
Draw up the group structure (including all acquisitions, percentages acquired,
acquisition dates and pre-acquisition reserves).
Draw up a timeline for the current accounting period. The status of the investment
during the year (investment, associate or subsidiary) will dictate the treatment in
the consolidated SPLOCI – pro-rate as necessary. The status of the investment at
the year end will dictate the treatment in the SOFP – never pro-rate!
268
Step 2 Proforma
Draw up the proforma(s) for the consolidated SOFP and consolidated SPLOCI (as
required). Remember to add in the extra headings as follows:
Consolidated SOFP:
 Goodwill
 Non-controlling interests (NCI)
Consolidated SPLOCI:
 Gain or loss on remeasurement of the previously held investment (where
control is achieved)
 Share of profit of associate (where investment was an associate before
becoming a subsidiary)
 Share of other comprehensive income of associate (where investment was an
associate before becoming a subsidiary)
 Ownership reconciliation (splitting the profit for the year and total
comprehensive income between the owners of the parent and the NCI)
Step 3 Transfer figures to face or working

Work down the SOFP and SPLOCI, transferring figures to the relevant proforma or
working:
(a) Aggregate 100% of assets/liabilities controlled at the year end in brackets on
the face of the SOFP proforma, ready for adjustments.
(b) Post the share capital and share premium of the parent company to the SOFP
proforma.
(c) Post reserves to the consolidated reserves workings.
(d) Aggregate 100% of income/expenses (time apportioned  /12 if appropriate)
x
in brackets on the face of the SPLOCI proforma, ready for adjustments.

(e) Post the subsidiary's profit for the year (PFY) and total comprehensive income
(TCI) (time apportioned  /12 if only subsidiary for part of the year) to the NCI
x
(SPLOCI) working.
(f) Post the associate's profit for the year and other comprehensive income (time
apportioned  /12 if only associate for part of the year) to face of SPLOCI
x
proforma then multiply by group share.
Step 4 Adjustments
Read through all the information in the question to identify any adjustments
required. Attempt the adjustments showing workings for all calculations.
Post the double entries for your adjustments to the SOFP, SPLOCI and/or group
workings as appropriate. Then close the brackets and add across entering the total
for each line into your SOFP and/or SPLOCI proforma.
269
Step 5 Complete group workings
Complete the following group workings as appropriate:
Consolidated SOFP:
 Goodwill
 Consolidated reserves (where an associate has become a subsidiary part-way
through the year, two columns for that entity will be required – one for the
percentage owned before the step acquisition and one for the percentage
owned after the acquisition)
 NCI
Consolidated SPLOCI:
 NCI
 Gain or loss on remeasurement of the previously held investment (for step
acquisition where control achieved)
Activity 1: Associate to subsidiary acquisition

Peace acquired 25% of Miel on 1 January 20X1 for $2,020,000 and exercised significant influence
over the financial and operating policy decisions of Miel. The fair value of Miel's identifiable assets
and liabilities at that date was equivalent to their book value, and Miel's retained earnings stood at
$5,800,000. Miel does not have any other reserves.
A further 35% stake in Miel was acquired on 30 September 20X2 for $4,200,000 (paying a
premium over Miel's market share price to achieve control). The fair value of Miel's identifiable
assets and liabilities at that date was $9,200,000, and Miel's retained earnings stood at
$7,800,000. The investment in Miel is held at cost in Peace's separate financial statements.
At 30 September 20X2, Miel's share price was $14.50.
SUMMARISED STATEMENTS OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR
Peace Miel
$'000 $'000
Revenue 10,200 4,000
Cost of sales and expenses (9,000) (3,600)
Profit before tax 1,200 400
Gain on property valuation, net of tax 240 80
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax 240 80
Total comprehensive income for the year 1,080 400
270
SUMMARISED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AT 31 DECEMBER 20X2

Peace Miel
$'000 $'000
Non-current assets
Investment in Miel (cost) 6,220 –
44,870 7,600
57,570 9,800
Equity
Share capital ($1 shares) 10,200 800
50,120 8,700
Liabilities 7,450 1,100
57,570 9,800
The difference between the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of Miel and their book
value relates to Miel's brands. The brands were estimated to have an average remaining useful life
of 5 years from 30 September 20X2.
Income and expenses are assumed to accrue evenly over the year. Neither company paid dividends
during the year.
Peace elected to measure non-controlling interest at fair value at the date of acquisition. No
impairment losses on recognised goodwill have been necessary to date.
Required
(a) Prepare the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income of the
Peace Group for the year ended 31 December 20X2.
(b) Prepare the consolidated statement of financial position for the Peace Group as at 31 December
20X2.
Solution
(a) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
$'000
Revenue
Cost of sales and expenses
Gain on remeasurement of associate (W4)
Profit before tax
Income tax expense
Profit for the year
Gains on property revaluation, net of tax
Share of gain on property revaluation of associate
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax
271
$'000
Owners of parent

Owners of parent
(b) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 DECEMBER 20X2

$'000
Non-current assets
Goodwill (W5)
Other intangible assets (W3)
Current assets

Share capital
Liabilities
Workings
1 Group structure and timeline
1.1.X2 30.9.X2 31.12.X2
2 Non-controlling interests (SPLOCI)
PFY TCI
$'000 $'000
Per question
Adjustments:
× NCI%
272
3 Fair value adjustments
At Movement At year end

acquisition
30.9.X2 31.12.X2
$'000 $'000 $'000
4 Gain on remeasurement of 25% associate

$'000
Fair value at date control obtained
Carrying amount of associate
5 Goodwill
$'000 $'000
Consideration transferred
FV of previously held investment
Non-controlling interests
Share capital
Retained earnings
Fair value adjustments (W3)
6 Consolidated retained earnings

Peace Miel Miel
25% 60%
$'000 $'000 $'000
At year end/date control obtained
Fair value movement (W3)
Gain on remeasurement of associate (W4)
At acquisition

Miel – 25%
– 60%
7 Non-controlling interests (SOFP)
$'000
NCI at acquisition
NCI share of reserves post control:
Miel – 40%
273
2 Step acquisitions where control is retained
A step acquisition where control is retained: this occurs when there is an increase in the
parent's shareholding in an existing subsidiary through the purchase of additional shares. It is
Key term
sometimes known as 'an increase in a controlling interest'.
No accounting boundary is crossed as illustrated by the diagram below (adapted from the
Deloitte guide: Business combinations and changes in ownership interests (2008: p.6):
0% (20%) (50%) 100%
S
I
G
N
I
F
C
I O
C N 60% 70%
A T (NCI 40%) (NCI 30%)
N
R
T
O
I
L
N
F
L
U
E
N
C
E
As for step acquisitions where control is achieved, the accounting treatment is driven by the concept
of substance over form.
In substance, there has been no acquisition because the entity is still a subsidiary.
Instead this is a transaction between group shareholders (ie the parent is buying 10% from the non-
controlling interests). Therefore, it is recorded in equity as follows:
(a) Decrease non-controlling interests (NCI) in the consolidated SOFP
(b) Recognise the difference between the consideration paid and the decrease in NCI as an
adjustment to equity (post to the parent's column in the consolidated retained earnings
working). (IFRS 10: paras. 23, B96)

(a) Consolidate as a subsidiary in full for the whole period – no time apportioning.
(b) Time apportion non-controlling interests based on percentage before and after acquisition.
274

(a) Consolidate as a subsidiary at the year end
(b) Calculate non-controlling interests as follows (using the 60% to 70% scenario as an example):
$
NCI at acquisition (when control achieved – NCI held 40%) X
NCI share (40%) of post-acquisition reserves to date of step acquisition X
NCI at date of step acquisition A
Decrease in NCI on date of step acquisition (A × 10%/40%)* (X)
NCI after step acquisition X
Next two lines only required if step acquisition is partway through year:
NCI share (30%) of post-acquisition reserves to year end X
NCI at year end X
(c) Calculate the adjustment to equity (post to the parent's column in the consolidated
retained earnings working):
$
Fair value of consideration paid (X)
Decrease in NCI (A  10%/40%)* X
Adjustment to parent's equity (X)/X
% purchased
*Calculated as: NCI at date of step acquisition ×
NCI % before step acquisitio n
The double entry to record this adjustment is:

DEBIT (↓) Non-controlling interests X
DEBIT (↓)/CREDIT (↑) Consolidated retained earnings (with adjustment to equity) X
CREDIT (↓) Cash X
When there is an increase in a shareholding in a subsidiary, an adjustment to equity is

Key term
calculated as the difference between the consideration paid and the decrease in non-
controlling interests. The entity shall recognise this adjustment directly in equity and attribute it to
the owners of the parent.
Illustration 2: Adjustment to equity

Stow owned 70% of Needham's equity shares on 31 December 20X2. Stow purchased another
20% of Needham's equity shares on 30 June 20X3 for $900,000 when the existing non-controlling
interests in Needham were measured at $1,200,000.
Required
Calculate the adjustment to equity to be recorded in the group accounts on acquisition of the
additional 20% in Needham.
Solution
$
Fair value of consideration paid NCI at date of step (900,000)
acquisition 
Decrease in NCI (1,200,000  20%/30%) NCI % purchased
800,000
Adjustment to equity NCI% before step (100,000)
acquisition
275
Activity 2: Subsidiary to subsidiary acquisition (SOFP)
On 1 January 20X2, Denning acquired 60% of the equity interests of Heggie. The purchase
consideration comprised cash of $300 million. At acquisition, the fair value of the non-controlling
interest in Heggie was $200 million. Denning wishes to measure the non-controlling interest at fair
value at the date acquisition. On 1 January 20X2, the fair value of the identifiable net assets
acquired was $460 million. The fair value of the net assets was equivalent to their book value.
On 31 December 20X3, Denning acquired a further 20% interest in Heggie for cash consideration
of $130 million.
The retained earnings of Heggie at 1 January 20X2 and 31 December 20X3 respectively were
$180 million and $240 million. Heggie had no other reserves. The retained earnings of Denning on
31 December 20X3 were $530 million.
There has been no impairment of the goodwill in Heggie.
Required
Calculate the following figures for inclusion in consolidated statement of financial position for the
Denning Group as at 31 December 20X3:
(a) Goodwill
(b) Consolidated retained earnings
(c) Non-controlling interests
Solution
(a) Goodwill
$m
Consideration transferred (for 60%)
Non-controlling interests (at fair value)
Fair value of identifiable net assets at acquisition

Denning Heggie
$m $m
At year end
Adjustment to equity
At acquisition

$m
NCI at acquisition
NCI share of post-acquisition reserves up to step acquisition
NCI at date of step acquisition

Decrease in NCI on date of step acquisition
NCI at year end
276
Workings
1 Group structure
2 Adjustment to equity on acquisition of additional 20% of Heggie
$m
Fair value of consideration paid
Decrease in NCI
277
Activity 3: Subsidiary to subsidiary acquisition (SPLOCI)
Gaze acquired 60% of the equity interests of Trek on 1 January 20X3.
On 1 May 20X5, Gaze acquired a further 10% interest in Trek.
There has been no impairment of goodwill since acquisition.
Profits of both entities can be assumed to accrue evenly throughout the year.
SUMMARISED STATEMENTS OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Gaze Trek
$m $m
Revenue 2,500 1,500
Cost of sales and expenses (1,900) (1,200)
Gain on property valuation, net of tax 80 30
Required
Prepare the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income of the Gaze
Solution
$m
Revenue
Cost of sales and expenses
Profit before tax
Income tax expense
Profit for the year
Gains on property revaluation, net of tax

Owners of parent

Owners of parent
278
Workings
1 Group structure
2 Non-controlling interests
Profit for the year

1.1.X5 1.5.X5
–30.4.X5 –31.12.X5
$m $m
Per question
× NCI%
Total comprehensive
income
1.1.X5 1.5.X5
–30.4.X5 –31.12.X5
$m $m
Per question
× NCI%
Activity 4
On 1 June 20X6, Robe acquired 80% of the equity interests of Dock. Robe elected to measure the
non-controlling interests in Dock at fair value at acquisition.
On 31 May 20X9, Robe purchased an additional 5% interest in Dock for $10 million. The carrying
value of Dock's identifiable net assets other than goodwill was $140 million at the date of sale. On
31 May 20X9, prior to this acquisition, non-controlling interests in Dock amounted to $32 million.
In the group financial statements for the year ended 31 May 20X9, the group accountant recorded a
decrease in non-controlling interests of $7 million, being the group share of net assets purchased
($140 million × 5%). He then recognised the difference between the cash consideration paid for the
5% interest and the decrease in non-controlling interests in profit or loss.
279
Required
Explain to the directors of Robe, with suitable calculations, whether the group accountant's treatment
of the purchase of an additional 5% in Dock is correct, showing the adjustment which needs to be
made to the consolidated financial statements to correct any errors by the group accountant.
Solution
Explanation:
Calculations:
Correcting entry:
280
Ethics note
Step acquisitions are very complex. Watch out for threats to the fundamental principles of ACCA's
Code of Ethics and Conduct in groups questions. For example, time pressure around year end
reporting or inexperience of the reporting accountant could lead to errors in the calculation of:
 Goodwill on step acquisitions where control is achieved (eg failing to remeasure the existing
investment to fair value at the date of control)
 The adjustment to equity or the change to non-controlling interests (NCI) where there is an
increase in a controlling interest (eg reporting the adjustment in profit or loss instead of equity,
recording additional goodwill instead of an adjustment to equity, ignoring the NCI's share of
goodwill when calculating the decrease in NCI under the full goodwill method, failing to pro-
rate the NCI in the consolidated SPLOCI for a mid-year acquisition).
Alternatively, there could be a fundamental misunderstanding of the principles involved (eg reporting
the legal form rather than the substance).
It is also possible that a specific accounting policy is chosen (eg full goodwill method versus partial
goodwill method) to create a particular financial effect (eg to increase profit to maximise a profit-
related bonus or share-based payment).
281
Chapter summary
1. Step acquisitions 2. Step acquisitions where

where significant Changes in group structures control is retained
influence or control is
achieved
Group financial Group financial

statements statements
SPLOCI:
Investment to Investment to Associate to  Consolidate results for
associate subsidiary subsidiary whole period
SPLOCI: SPLOCI: SPLOCI:  Time apportion NCI
 Equity account from  Remeasure investment SOFP:
 Equity account to date of
date of significant to fair value  Consolidate
control
influence  Consolidate from date  Record decrease in NCI
 Remeasure associate to
SOFP: of control fair value  Calculate and record adjustment
 Equity account SOFP:  Consolidate from date of to equity (in parent's column in
(original investment is  Calculate goodwill at control consolidated retained earnings
treated as part of date of control working)
SOFP:
cost of associate  Consolidate  Calculate goodwill at
measured either at
cost or fair value)
date of control NCI (SOFP)
 Consolidate NCI at acquisition (date of control) X
NCI share of post acq'n reserves to
date of step acquisition X
NCI at date of step acquisition X
Decrease in NCI * (X)
Control achieved in stages NCI after step acquisition X
Goodwill calculation (at date control achieved): Next 2 lines only required if step acquisition is
partway through year:
NCI share of post-acquisition reserves
NCI (at FV or at %FVNA) X
to year end X
FV of previously held investment X
NCI at year end X
FV of net assets at acquisition (X)
X
FV of consideration paid (X)
Decrease in NCI * X
Adjustment to equity (X)/X
* NCI at date of step acquisition  % purchased

NCI % before step acq'n
Consolidated retained earnings if step acquisition partway through year (associate to subsidiary
and subsidiary to subsidiary):
P S S
% before step acq'n % after step acq'n
At year end/date of step acq'n X X X
Group or loss on remeasurement/
adjustment to parent's equity X/(X)
At acquisition/date of control (X) (X)
Y Z
Group share:
(Y x % before step acq'n) X
(Z x % after step acq'n) X
X
282
1. Step acquisitions where significant influence or control is achieved

The accounting treatment in the group financial statements is driven by the concept of substance
over form.
For step acquisitions where significant influence or control is achieved, in substance, as one or
more accounting boundary has been crossed:
 An investment (for investment to associate or investment to subsidiary acquisitions) or an
associate (for associate to subsidiary acquisitions) has been 'sold' so the investment or
associate must be remeasured to fair value and gain or loss recognised
 An associate (for investment to associate acquisition) or subsidiary (for investment to
subsidiary or associate to subsidiary acquisitions) has been 'purchased' so must be equity
accounted or consolidated from date of significant influence or control
2. Step acquisitions where control is retained

In substance, there has been no acquisition because the entity is still a subsidiary and no
accounting boundary has been crossed.
This is a transaction between group shareholders which is recorded in equity:
 Reduce non-controlling interests in consolidated SOFP
 Recognise an adjustment to equity (post to the parent's column in the consolidated retained
earnings working)
3. Summary of approach
283
Question practice
Q14 ROB Group
Further reading
 The examining team have written an article entitled 'Business combinations – IFRS 3 revised'. Read
through Examples 3 and 4 which are on step acquisitions:
 Deloitte has a useful website with summaries of IAS and IFRS. Read the section entitled 'Business
combinations achieved in stages (step acquisitions)' in the summary of IFRS 3 and the section entitled
'Changes in ownership interests' in the summary of IFRS 10:
www.iasplus.com/en/standards
284
Changes in group
structures: disposals
and group
reorganisations
Learning objectives
Syllabus
reference no.
Discuss and apply the implications of changes in ownership interest and loss of D1(h)
control.
Note. Only disposals are covered in this chapter. Acquisitions are covered in
Chapter 11 and discontinued operations in Chapter 13.
Discuss and apply accounting for group companies in the separate financial D3(a)
statements of the parent company.
Apply the accounting principles where the parent reorganises the structure of the D3(b)
group by establishing a new entity or changing the parent.
Exam context
Changes in group structures incorporates three topics:
(a) Step acquisitions – covered in the previous chapter
(b) Disposals – covered in this chapter
(c) Group reorganisations – covered in this chapter.
In the Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) exam disposals are likely to be tested in a similar way to
step acquisitions – primarily as part of the Section A question on groups. However, they could also
feature as part of a Section B question. Questions on group reorganisations are more likely to focus
on the principles behind the numbers rather than on the numbers themselves.
285
Chapter overview
4. Group
reorganisations
1. Disposals where Changes in group structures

significant influence
or control is lost
3. Deemed disposals
Group financial
statements
2. Disposals where
control is retained
Parent's separate
Group financial
statements
Subsidiary to Subsidiary to Associate to
Full disposal
associate investment investment
Subsidiary to
subsidiary
Calculation of profit or loss on

disposal
Adjustment to
equity
286
12: Changes in group structures: disposals and group reorganisations
1 Disposals where control or significant influence is lost

Disposals: these occur when the parent company sells some or all of its shareholding in a
group company. When the full shareholding is sold, this is known as a full disposal. When
Key term
only some of the shareholding is sold, this is referred to as a partial disposal.
This section will focus on disposals where control or significant influence is lost. It is also possible for
a parent to decrease its controlling shareholding in a subsidiary but this will be covered in the next
section.
1.1 Scenarios
There are four possible scenarios where control or significant influence is lost. This is referred to by
the Deloitte guide Business combinations and change in ownership interests as 'crossing an
accounting boundary' as illustrated by the diagram below (adapted from the Deloitte guide p.8).
This is revisiting the same concept seen in the previous chapter for step acquisitions where significant
influence or control is achieved. The accounting boundary is just crossed in the opposite direction.

0% (20%) (50%) 100%
S
I
G
N
80% (a) Full disposal
0% I
F
I C
C O
A
N (b) Subsidiary to associate
N 30% 80%
T T
R
I O
N
F L
L 80%
(c) Subsidiary to investment
U
E
10% N
C
40%
E
(d) Associate to investment
For any change in group structure (step acquisition or disposal):
287
Accounting concept
With a partial disposal ((b), (c), (d)), the accounting treatment in the group accounts is driven by the
concept of substance over form. While the legal form is that the parent company has sold some
shares, the table below shows the substance of each transaction and the consequent accounting
treatment.
Type of partial disposal Substance
Subsidiary to associate 'Sold' a subsidiary – 'Purchased' an associate –

deconsolidate the subsidiary remeasure the investment
(goodwill, NCI and 100% of retained to fair value
net assets) and recognise a
group profit or loss on disposal
Subsidiary to investment 'Sold' a subsidiary – 'Purchased' an investment –

deconsolidate the subsidiary remeasure the investment
(goodwill, NCI and 100% of retained to fair value
net assets) and recognise a
group profit or loss on disposal
Associate to investment 'Sold' an associate – recognise 'Purchased' an investment –

a group profit or loss on remeasure the investment
disposal retained to fair value
(IFRS 10: para. 25, B98)

The accounting treatment for each of the scenarios in the diagram is explained further in the
following section.
Control lost
(a) Full disposal
 Consolidate the results and non-controlling interests to the date of disposal.
 Show a group profit or loss on disposal.
 No consolidation (and no non-controlling interests) as there is no subsidiary at the year
end.
(b) Subsidiary to associate
 Treat as a subsidiary to the date of disposal; ie consolidate for correct number of
months and show non-controlling interests for that period.
 Treat as an associate thereafter (ie equity account).
 Remeasure the investment retained to fair value at the date of disposal.
 Equity account (fair value at date of control lost = cost of associate) thereafter.
288
(c) Subsidiary to investment

 Consolidate as a subsidiary to the date of disposal.
 Show fair value changes (and any dividend income) thereafter.
 Remeasure the investment retained to fair value at the date of disposal.
 Investment in equity instruments (IFRS 9) thereafter.
Calculation of group profit or loss on disposal
$ $
Fair value of consideration received X
Fair value of any investment retained X
Less: share of consolidated carrying amount at date control lost: (X)
net assets at date control lost X
goodwill at date control lost X
Less non-controlling interests at date control lost (X)
(X)
Group profit/(loss) (recognise in SPL) X/(X)
(IFRS 10: para. 25, B97–B98)
Where significant, the profit or loss should be disclosed separately (IAS 1: para. 85).
Significant influence lost
(d) Associate to investment
 Equity account as an associate to date of disposal.
 Show fair value changes (and any dividend income) thereafter.
 Remeasure the investment remaining to fair value at the date of disposal.
 Investment in equity instruments (IFRS 9) thereafter.
See Chapter 12 Section 1 of the Supplementary Reading for the calculation of group profit or loss on
disposal for an associate to investment disposal and for treatment on disposal of amounts previously
recognised in other comprehensive income by the subsidiary or associate. This is available in
1.3 Profit or loss on disposal in parent's separate financial

statements
Income tax is normally payable by reference to the gain in the parent's separate financial statements.
This should only be accounted for in exams if specifically requested.
In the parent's separate financial statements, investments in subsidiaries are held at cost or at fair
value under IFRS 9 (IAS 27: para. 10).
289
Consequently the profit or loss on disposal is different from the group profit or loss on disposal:
$
Less carrying amount of investment disposed of (X)
Profit/(loss) X/(X)
Tutorial note
This calculation would be the same for any disposal of shares in a subsidiary (regardless of whether
control is lost) as the treatment in the parent's separate financial statements follows the legal form
(shares have been sold) rather than the substance.
Illustration 1: Subsidiary to investment disposal

The summarised statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income of Mart, Oat and Pipe
are shown below.
SUMMARISED STATEMENTS OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 APRIL 20X4
Mart Oat Pipe

$m $m $m
Revenue 800 140 230
Cost of sales and expenses (680) (90) (170)
Other comprehensive income for the year (net of tax)
Gains on property revaluation 20 5 10
Additional information
(a) Mart has owned 60% of the equity interest in Oat for several years.
(b) On 1 May 20X2, Mart acquired 80% of the equity interests of Pipe. The purchase
consideration comprised cash of $250 million and the fair value of the identifiable net assets
acquired was $300 million at that date.
(c) Mart wishes to use the 'partial goodwill' method for all acquisitions. There has been no
impairment of goodwill in either Oat or Pipe since acquisition.
(d) Mart disposed of a 70% equity interest in Pipe on 31 October 20X3 for $290 million. At that
date Pipe's identifiable net assets were $370 million. The remaining equity interest of Pipe
held by Mart was fair valued at $40 million.
(e) ST wishes to measure non-controlling interest at its proportionate share of net assets at the date
of acquisition.
Required
(a) Calculate the group profit on disposal of the shares in Pipe.
(b) Prepare the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the
year ended 30 April 20X4 for the Mart Group.
290
Solution
(a) Group profit on disposal of the shares in Pipe
Step 1 Group structure

Mart
1.5.X2 80% Subsidiary
31.10.X3 (70%)
60%
10% Investment
Oat Pipe
Step 2 Calculate goodwill in Pipe (for inclusion in the group profit on

disposal calculation)
Goodwill
$m
Non-controlling interests (20% × 300) 60
Fair value of identifiable net assets (300)
10
Step 3 Calculate non-controlling interests at the disposal date (for inclusion

in the group profit on disposal calculation)
Non-controlling interests (SOFP)
$m
NCI at acquisition (20% × 300) 60
NCI share of post-acquisition reserves to disposal (20% × [370 – 300]) 14
74
In this question reserves were not provided. However, net
assets at acquisition and disposal were given. As net assets
= equity, the movement in net assets will be the movement
in reserves (as there has been no share issue by Pipe).
291
In substance, as the accounting
boundary has been crossed, Mart has
'purchased' a 10% investment in Pipe so
the investment must be remeasured to
fair value at the date control was lost
(31.10.20X3)
Step 4 Calculate the group profit on disposal

$m $m
Fair value of consideration received (for 70% sold) 290
In substance, as the Fair value of any investment retained (10%) 40
accounting boundary has Less share of consolidated carrying amount at date control lost
been crossed, Mart has
'sold' an 80% subsidiary Net assets 370
so Pipe must be Goodwill (from Step 2) 10
deconsolidated (remove
Less non-controlling interests (from Step 3) (74)
goodwill, NCI and 100%
of net assets). (306)
Group profit on disposal 24
(b) Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended
30 April 20X4
Step 5 Draw up a timeline to work out the treatment in the consolidated

statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income (SPLOCI)
Oat was a subsidiary for the full year so should be consolidated for a full year.
However, there was a change in the shareholding in Pipe in the year as shown
below.
1.5.X3 31.10.X3 30.4.X4
SPLOCI
Consolidate for 6/12
NCI 20% for 6/12
Had 80% of Pipe Sold 70% of Pipe

so 10%
remaining =
investment
292
Pro-rate as Pipe only a

Step 6 subsidiary for 6 months
Calculate non-controlling interests (NCI) in the year (1.5.X3 –
31.10.X3)
In profit for the year:
Oat Pipe
$m $m
Per question (40 × 6/12) 35 20
NCI share × 40% × 20%
= 14 =4
18
Pro-rate as Pipe only a
subsidiary for 6 months in
the year (1.5.X3 –
31.10.X3)
In total comprehensive income:
Oat Pipe
$m $m
Per question (50 × 6/12) 40 25
NCI share × 40% × 20%
= 16 =5
21
Step 7 Prepare the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other

$m
Revenue (800 + 140 + [6/12 × 230]) 1,055
Cost of sales and expenses (680 + 90 + [6/12 × 170]) (855)
Profit on disposal of share in subsidiary (from Step 4) 24
Profit before tax 224
Income tax expense (30 + 15 + [6/12 × 20]) (55)
Profit for the year 169
Other comprehensive income for the year (net of tax)
Gains on property revaluation (20 + 5 + [6/12 × 10]) 30
Total comprehensive income for the year 199

Owners of the parent (169 – 18) 151
Non-controlling interests (see Step 6) 18
169
Non-controlling interests (see Step 6) 21
199
293
Activity 1: Subsidiary to associate disposal
On 1 January 20X6, Amber, a public listed company, owned 320,000 shares in Byrne, a public
listed company. Amber had acquired the shares in Byrne on 1 January 20X2 for $1,200,000 when
the balance on Byrne's reserves stood at $760,000. The fair value of the identifiable assets acquired
and liabilities assumed was equivalent to book value.
The summarised statements of financial position as at 31 December 20X6 are given below.
SUMMARISED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
Amber Byrne
$'000 $'000
Non-current assets
Investment in equity instrument (Byrne) (fair value at 30 Sept 20X6) 2,000 –
11,600 1,600
Current assets 2,800 620
14,400 2,220
Equity
Share capital ($1 ordinary shares) 2,800 400
Reserves 9,800 1,280
12,600 1,680
Liabilities 1,800 540
14,400 2,220
Profit or loss and revaluations accrued evenly over the year. Amber holds Byrne in its own books at
fair value based on the share price multiplied by the number of shares held. Reserves include a fair
value gain on the investment in Byrne of $800,000 from 1 January 20X2 to 30 September 20X6,
which is tax exempt. There were no fair value changes between then and 31 December.
To date no impairment losses at a group level have been necessary. No dividends were paid by
either company in 20X6.
Amber sold 200,000 of its shares in Byrne for $1,250,000 on 30 September 20X6. The sale has
not yet been paid for or accounted for. At that date Byrne has reserves of $1,240,000.
Amber chose to measure the non-controlling interests at fair value at the date of acquisition. The fair
value of the non-controlling interests in Byrne on 1 January 20X2 was $300,000.
Byrne's total comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 20X6 amounted to $160,000.
Required
(a) Explain the accounting treatment for the investment in Byrne in the consolidated financial
statements of the Amber Group for the year ended 31 December 20X6.
(b) Calculate the group profit on disposal of the shares in Byrne for inclusion in the consolidated
statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the Amber Group for the year
ended 31 December 20X6.
Ignore income tax on the disposal.
(c) Show the investment in associate for inclusion in the consolidated statement of financial
position of the Amber Group as at 31 December 20X6.
294
Solution
(a) Explanation of accounting treatment
(b) Group profit on disposal

$'000 $'000
Fair value of consideration received
Fair value of 30% investment retained
Less: share of consolidated carrying amount when control lost:
net assets
goodwill
Less non-controlling interests
Workings
1 Group structure & timeline
1.1.X6 30.9.X6 31.12.X6
2 Goodwill
$'000 $'000
Less: fair value of identifiable net assets at acquisition:
share capital
reserves
295
3 Non-controlling interests (SOFP) at date of loss of control
$'000
NCI at acquisition
NCI share of post-acquisition reserves
(c) Investment in associate as at 31 December 20X6

Investment in associate
$'000
Cost = Fair value at date control lost
Share of post-acquisition retained reserves
296
Activity 2
Vail purchased a 60% interest in Nest for $80 million on 1 January 20X4 when the fair value of
identifiable net assets was $100 million. Vail elected to measure the non-controlling interest in Nest
at the proportionate share of the fair value of identifiable net assets. An impairment of $4 million
arose on the goodwill in Nest in the year ended 31 December 20X5. Vail sold a 50% stake in Nest
for $75 million on 31 December 20X5. The fair value of the Vail's remaining investment in Nest was
$15 million at that date. The carrying value of Nest's identifiable net assets other than goodwill was
$130 million at the date of sale. Vail had carried the investment at cost. The Finance Director
calculated that a gain of $10 million arose on the sale of Nest in the group financial statements,
being the sales proceeds of $75 million less $65 million, being the percentage of identifiable net
assets sold (50% × $130 million).
Required
Explain to the directors of Vail, with suitable calculations, how the group profit on disposal of the
shareholding in Nest should have been accounted for.
Solution
Explanation:
Calculation:
Group profit or loss on disposal
Workings
1 Group structure
297
2 Goodwill
2 Disposals where control is retained

Disposal where control is retained: this occurs when there is a decrease in the parent's
shareholding in an existing subsidiary through the sale of shares. It is sometimes known as 'a
Key term
decrease in a controlling interest'.
As for acquisitions where control is retained, no accounting boundary is crossed as illustrated

by the diagram below (adapted from the Deloitte guide: Business combinations and changes in
ownership interests, 2008: p.6):
0% (20%) (50%) 100%
S
I
G
N
I
F C
I
O
C
N
A
N T 55% 70%
T R (NCI 45%) (NCI 30%)
O
I
L
N
F
L
U
E
N
C
E
298
The treatment in the group accounts is driven by the concept of substance over form. In substance,
there has been no disposal because the entity is still a subsidiary so no profit on disposal should
be recognised.
Instead this is a transaction between group shareholders (eg the parent is selling 15% to the non-
controlling interests). Therefore, it is recorded in equity as follows:
(a) Increase non-controlling interests (NCI) in the consolidated SOFP
(b) Recognise the difference between the consideration received and the increase in NCI as an
adjustment to equity (post to the parent's column in the consolidated retained earnings
working).
(IFRS 10: para. 23, B96)

 Consolidate as a subsidiary in full for the whole period.
 Time apportion non-controlling interests based on percentage before and after acquisition.
 Consolidate as a subsidiary at the year end.
 Calculate non-controlling interests as follows (using the 70% to 55% scenario as an example):
$
NCI at acquisition (when control achieved – 30%) X
NCI share (30%) of post-acquisition reserves to date of disposal X
NCI at date of disposal A
Increase in NCI on date of disposal (A × 15%/30%)* (X)
NCI after disposal X
Next two lines only required if disposal is partway through year:
NCI share (45%) of post-acquisition reserves to year end X
NCI at year end X
 Calculate the adjustment to equity (post to the parent's column in the consolidated
retained earnings working):
$
Increase in NCI (A × 15%/30%)* (X)
Adjustment to parent's equity X/(X)
% sold
* Calculated as: NCI at date of disposal ×
NCI % before disposal
The accounting entry to record this adjustment to equity is:

DEBIT (↑) Cash X
CREDIT (↑) Non-controlling interests X
CREDIT (↑)/DEBIT (↓) Consolidated retained earnings (with adjustment to equity) X
299
Activity 3: Subsidiary to subsidiary disposal
On 1 December 20X0, Trail acquired 80% of the Dial's 600 million $1 shares for a cash
consideration of $800 million. At acquisition, the fair value of the non-controlling interest in Dial was
$190 million. Trail wishes to measure the non-controlling interest at fair value at the date of
acquisition. On 1 December 20X0, the retained earnings of Dial were $300 million and other
components of equity were $20 million. The fair value of Dial's net assets was equivalent to their
book value.
On 30 November 20X1, Trail sold a 5% shareholding in Dial for $60 million. At 30 November
20X1, Dial had retained earnings of $450 million and other components of equity of $30 million.
Required
Calculate the following figures in relation to Dial for inclusion in the consolidated statement of
financial position of the Trail group as at 30 November 20X1:
(a) Non-controlling interests
(b) Adjustment to equity
Solution
(a) Non-controlling interest
$m
NCI at acquisition
NCI share of post-acquisition retained earnings to disposal
NCI share of post-acquisition other components of equity to disposal
NCI at date of disposal

Increase in NCI on date of disposal
NCI at year end
$m
Fair value of consideration received
Increase in NCI
300
3 Deemed disposals
'Deemed' disposal: this occurs when a subsidiary issues new shares and the parent does not
Key term
take up all of its rights such that its holding is reduced.
In substance this is a disposal and is therefore accounted for as such.
See Chapter 12 Section 2 of the Supplementary Reading for an illustration of a deemed disposal.
4 Group reorganisations
4.1 Internal group reorganisations
A group may restructure itself internally to achieve a desired effect. Companies move around within
the group but typically:
• The ultimate shareholders remain the same.
• No cash leaves the group.
• There is no change in non-controlling interests.
In substance, the group has remained the same so there is no impact on the consolidated financial
statements. However, the accounts of the individual entities within the group will be affected.
Questions on group reorganisations are more likely to focus on the principles behind the numbers
rather than the numbers themselves.
Various examples of group reorganisations follow.
4.2 Sub-subsidiary moved up
Before After
Shareholders Shareholders
P P
S1 S1 S2
S2
Analysis
Methods
P could buy S2 for cash or other assets
S1 could pay a dividend to P in the form of the shares in S2
301
Possible reasons for this type of reorganisation include:
S1 can be sold off

Divisionalisation so that S1
(perhaps to reduce Potential tax advantages
and S2 report
group gearing) without (eg loss relief)
independently to P
selling off S2
4.3 Sub-subsidiary moved across
Before After
P P
S1 S2 S1 S2
S3 S3
Analysis
Method
S2 could buy S3 for cash or other assets
To be able to sell S1 For divisionalisation (so S3

To create a tax group
without selling S3 reports to S2)
4.4 Sub-subsidiary moved down
Before After
P P
S1 S2 S1
S2
302
Analysis
Method
S1 could buy S2 for cash or other assets
S1 could issue additional shares in itself to P to pay for S2
For divisionalisation (so S2

To create a tax group
reports to S1)

Such reorganisations (known as 'entities under common control') are excluded from the scope of
IFRS 3 Business Combinations at the present time and there are therefore no specific accounting
requirements. (IFRS 3: para. 2(c))
The substance of the transaction from the shareholders' point of view is that no sale has occurred
as they own the same assets before and after the transaction (assuming ownership of each subsidiary
is 100%).
However, a gain or loss may be made in the separate financial statements of S1. This is unrealised
from the group point of view and would need to be eliminated in the consolidated financial
statements.
See Chapter 12 Section 3 of the Supplementary Reading for an illustration of a group reorganisation.
4.6 New parent

A group may restructure itself by adding a new parent to the group:
Before After
New P
Original P Original P
S S
Where an entity (an individual entity or an existing parent) does this, if the new parent chooses to
measure the investment in the original parent at cost per IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements
(para. 10(a)), cost is measured at its share of the carrying amount of the original entity's equity
(shown in the separate financial statements of the original parent at the date of reorganisation),
providing all of the following criteria are met:
303
(a) The new parent obtains control of the original entity by issuing equity instruments in
exchange for existing equity instruments of the original entity;
(b) The assets and liabilities of the new and original group are the same immediately before and
after the reorganisation; and
(c) The owners of the original entity before the reorganisation have the same absolute and
relative interests in the net assets of the original and new group immediately before and
after the reorganisation.
(IAS 27: para. 13)
Ethics note
Disposals and group reorganisations are technically challenging topics and therefore there is
significant scope for error and manipulation. At least one question in the SBR exam will involve
ethical issues. Therefore, when reading a scenario involving groups, you need to look out for threats
to the fundamental principles of ACCA's Code of Ethics and Conduct. For example, there may be
pressure from the CEO on the reporting accountant to achieve a certain effect (eg meet a loan
covenant ratio, maximise share price) which might tempt the accountant to overstate the group profit
on disposal (on loss of control) or where a controlling interest is reduced, report the adjustment in
profit or loss rather than equity.
Alternatively, time pressure around year end reporting or inexperience of the reporting accountant
could lead to errors such as:
 Not remeasuring any remaining investment to fair value on loss of control
 Incorrect treatment of the shareholding in the group accounts – this is a particular risk for
disposals (eg not equity accounting for the period the entity was an associate, not
consolidating for the period the entity was a subsidiary)
 Miscalculation of the calculation of the group profit or loss on disposal or the adjustment to
equity
 Not recording the increase in non-controlling interests for diposals where control is retained
 Not eliminating a gain or loss on disposal of an investment in the group accounts in the
context of a group reorganisation.
304
Chapter summary
1. Disposals where Changes in group structures 3. Deemed disposals

significant influence  Where a subsidiary issues new
or control is lost shares and parent does not take
up its proportionate share (ie %
falls)
 Treat as normal disposal
Group financial 2. Disposals where

statements control is retained
Parent's separate financial

statements
Calculation of gain/(loss) on disposal:
Group financial
FV consideration received X
statements
Less carrying amount of investment (X)
X/(X)
SPLOCI:
 Consolidate results for
whole period
Subsidiary to
Subsidiary to Associate to  Time apportion NCI
Full disposal associate
investment investment SOFP:
SPLOCI: SPLOCI:
SPLOCI: SPLOCI:  Consolidate
 Consolidate/time  Consolidate to  Record increase in NCI
 Consolidate to  Equity account to
apportion disposal then
disposal (time disposal (time  Calculate and record adjustment
results/NCI to equity account
apportion) then apportion) then to equity (in parent's column in
date of disposal (time apportion)
recognise recognise consolidated retained earnings
 Nothing after SOFP: changes in FV changes in FV working)
SOFP:  Equity account and dividend and dividend
(fair value at income income
No subsidiary to NCI (SOFP)
consolidate date control lost SOFP: SOFP: NCI at acquisition (date of control) X
= cost of
 Treat per IFRS 9  Treat per IFRS 9 NCI share of post-acquisition reserves to
associate)
date of disposal X
NCI at date of disposal X
Increase in NCI * X
NCI after disposal X
Next 2 lines only required if step acquisition
Consolidated retained earnings (if is partway through year:
Group profit or loss on disposal disposal partway through year) NCI share of post-acquisition reserves
FV consideration received X (eg 80% subsidiary to 30% associate): to year end X
FV any investment retained X NCI at year end X
P S S
Less share of consol carrying amount 80% 30%
at date control lost: At year end/date of disposal X X X
Net assets X Group profit on disposal X Adjustment to equity
Goodwill X At acquisition/date control lost (X) (X) FV of consideration paid (X)
Less NCI (X) Y Z Increase in NCI * X
(X) Group share: Adjustment to equity (X)/X
(Y × 80%) X
X/(X) * NCI at date of disposal ×
(Z × 30%) X % sold
X NCI %
before
disposal
305
Chapter summary
Changes in group structures
4. Group reorganisations
Internal group reorganisations
 A group may restructure itself
internally:
– To sell off a subsidiary
– For divisionalisation
– To save tax
 Types:
– Sub-subsidiary moves up
– Sub-subsidiary moves across
– Sub-subsidiary moves down
– New parent
 Outside the scope of IFRS 3
 In substance, the group remains the
same – no impact on group
accounts
 Accounts of individual companies
affected but any profits made in
the separate books of each
company are unrealised from the
group point of view so eliminated
on consolidation
New parent company

 If new parent chooses to measure
investment in old parent at cost, cost
= carrying amount of its share of
the equity items in old parent's
SOFP at date of reorganisation if:
(a) New parent obtains control through
exchange of equity instruments with
old parent
(b) Assets and liabilities of new and
original group are the same before
and after the reorganisation
(c) Owners of the original parent
before the reorganisation have the
same absolute and relative interest
in net assets of original and new
group
306
1. Disposals where significant influence or control is lost

The accounting treatment in the group financial statements is driven by the concept of substance
over form.
Where significant influence or control is lost, in substance, as one or more accounting boundary
has been crossed:
 An associate (for associate to investment disposals) or a subsidiary (for subsidiary to
associate disposals, subsidiary to investment disposals and full disposals) has been 'sold'
so a group profit or loss on disposal must be recognised.
 An investment (for associate to investment and subsidiary to investment disposals) or
associate (for subsidiary to associate disposals) has been 'purchased' so the remaining
investment must be remeasured to fair value.
2. Disposals where control is retained
In substance, there has been no disposal because the entity is still a subsidiary and no
accounting boundary has been crossed.
This is a transaction between group shareholders which is recorded in equity:
 Increase non-controlling interests in the consolidated SOFP
 Recognise an adjustment to equity (post to the parent's column in the consolidated retained
earnings working)
Summary of approach for all disposals:
3. Deemed disposals
 When a subsidiary issues shares and the parent does not take up all of its rights, its
shareholding is reduced. This is accounted for as a normal disposal.
 The percentages owned by the parent before and after the subsidiary issues shares must be
calculated and where control is lost, a group profit on disposal must be recognised.
4. Group reorganisations
 When a group restructures itself internally, the individual books are updated for changes in
ownership of investments.
 However, in substance, it is still the same group because typically the ultimate shareholders
are the same, no cash has left and group. Therefore, there is no impact on the group
accounts.
307
Question practice
Q15 Holmes and Deakin
Further reading
 Deloitte has a useful website with summaries of IAS and IFRS. Read the section entitled 'Changes in
ownership interests' in the summary of IFRS 10:
www.iasplus.com/en/standards
308
Non-current assets held
for sale and
discontinued operations
Learning objectives
Syllabus
reference no.
Discuss and apply the accounting requirements for the classification and C2(b)
measurement of non-current assets held for sale.
Note. Only discontinued operations are covered in this chapter. Acquisitions are
covered in Chapter 11 and disposals in Chapter 12.
Discuss and apply the treatment of a subsidiary which has been acquired D1(j)
exclusively with a view to subsequent disposal.
Exam context
You studied non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations in your previous studies so
both areas are revision; however, the topic can be examined in more detail in Strategic Business
Reporting (SBR). These topics could form the basis of part of a written question, with relevant
calculations. Both areas could also be examined in the context of consolidated financial statements at
this level.
309
Chapter overview
Non-current assets held for

sale and discontinued
operations
1. Non-current 3. Discontinued
assets/disposal groups operations
held for sale
2. Non-current
assets/disposal groups to
be abandoned
310
13: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations
1 IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued

Operations
1.1 Introduction
IFRS 5 covers:
 Measurement, presentation and disclosure of non-current assets and disposal groups of an
entity; and
 The presentation and disclosure of discontinued operations.
It was the first IFRS to be issued as a result of the Norwalk Agreement working towards the
harmonisation of international and US GAAP.
1.2 Scope
IFRS 5 applies to all of an entity's recognised non-current assets and disposal groups (as defined
below) with the following exceptions (IFRS 5: para. 5):
 Deferred tax assets;
 Assets arising from employee benefits;
 Financial assets within the scope of IFRS 9;
 Investment properties accounted for under the fair value model;
 Biological assets measured at fair value; and
 Contractual rights under insurance contracts.
1.3 Disposal groups
Disposal group: a group of assets to be disposed of, by sale or otherwise, together as a group in
a single transaction, and liabilities directly associated with those assets that will be transferred in the
Key term
transaction.
The disposal group may be a group of CGUs (cash-generating units), a single CGU, or part of a
CGU.
1.4 Classification of non-current assets (or disposal groups) as held

for sale
An entity shall classify a non-current asset (or disposal group) as held for sale if its carrying
amount will be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use
(IFRS 5: para. 6).
To be classified as 'held for sale', the following criteria must be met (IFRS 5: paras. 7–8):
(a) The asset (or disposal group) must be available for immediate sale in its present
condition, subject only to usual and customary sales terms; and
(b) The sale must be highly probable. For this to be the case:
– Price at which the asset (or disposal group) is actively marketed for sale must be
reasonable in relation to its current fair value;
– Unlikely that significant changes will be made to the plan or the plan withdrawn
(indicated by actions required to complete the plan);
– Management (at the appropriate level) must be committed to a plan to sell;
– Active programme to locate a buyer and complete the plan must have been initiated;
– Sale expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year from the
date of classification as held for sale (subject to limited specified exceptions).
311
1.5 Measurement and presentation of non-current assets (or disposal
groups) classified as held for sale
1.5.1 Approach
Immediately before initial classification as held for sale, the asset (or disposal group) is
Step 1 measured in accordance with the applicable IFRS (eg property, plant and
equipment held under the IAS 16 revaluation model is revalued).
On classification of the non-current asset (or disposal group) as held for sale, it is written
down to fair value less costs to sell (if less than carrying amount).
Step 2 Any impairment loss arising under IFRS 5 is charged to profit or loss (and the credit
allocated to assets of a disposal group using the IAS 36 rules, ie first to goodwill then to
other assets pro rata based on carrying amount).
Non-current assets/disposal groups classified as held for sale are not

Step 3 depreciated/amortised.
Any subsequent changes in fair value less costs to sell are recognised as a
further impairment loss (or reversal of an imapairment loss).
Step 4
However, gains recognised cannot exceed cumulative impairment losses to date (whether
under IAS 36 or IFRS 5).
Presented:
• As single amounts (of assets and liabilities);
Step 5 • On the face of the statement of financial position;
• Separately from other assets and liabilities; and
• Normally as current assets and liabilities (not offset).
(IFRS 5: paras. 15, 18, 20–22, 25, 38)

Similar principles apply if an asset (or disposal group) is held for distribution to owners when the
entity is committed to do so (ie when the assets are available for immediate distribution and the
distribution is highly probable). The write down in that case is to fair value less costs to distribute
(IFRS 5: para. 15A).
Illustration 1
An item of property, plant and equipment measured under the revaluation model has a revalued
carrying amount of $76m at 1 January 20X1 and a remaining useful life of 20 years (and a zero
residual value). On 1 July 20X1 the asset met the criteria to be classified as held for sale. Its fair
value was $80m and costs to sell were $1m on that date.
Analysis
The asset is depreciated to 1 July 20X1 reducing its carrying amount by $1.9m ($76m/ 20 years ×
6/12) to $74.1m. The asset is revalued (under IAS 16) to $80m on that date and a gain of $5.9m
($80m – $74.1m) is recognised in other comprehensive income.
On classification as held for sale, the asset is remeasured to fair value less costs to sell of $79m
($80m – $1m) as this is lower than its carrying amount ($80m). The loss of $1m is recognised in
profit or loss.
The asset is no longer depreciated and is presented as a separate line item 'Non-current assets held
for sale' at $79m within current assets.
312
1.5.2 Disclosure
As well as separate presentation of non-current assets held for sale, and liabilities
directly associated with assets held for sale in the statement of financial position, any
cumulative income or expense recognised in other comprehensive income relating to
a non-current asset held for sale is presented separately in the reserves section of the statement of
financial position (IFRS 5: para. 38).
The following is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements in respect of non-current
assets/disposal groups held for sale or sold (IFRS 5: para. 41):
(a) A description of the non-current asset (or disposal group);
(b) A description of the facts and circumstances of the sale, or leading to the expected disposal,
and the expected manner and timing of the disposal;
(c) The gain or loss recognised on assets classified as held for sale, and (if not presented
separately on the face of the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income) the
caption which includes it;
(d) If applicable, the operating segment in which the non-current asset is presented in accordance
with IFRS 8 Operating Segments.
1.5.3 Proforma presentation
Non-current assets held for sale (adapted from IFRS 5: IG Example 12 and IAS 1: IG)
XYZ GROUP
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 DECEMBER 20X3
20X3 20X2
$'000 $'000
Assets
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment X X
Goodwill X X
Other intangible assets X X
Financial assets X X
X X
Current assets
Inventories X X
Trade and other receivables X X
Cash and cash equivalents X X
X X
Non-current assets held for sale X X
X X
Total assets X X
313
20X3 20X2
$'000 $'000
Equity and liabilities
Share capital X X
Retained earnings X X
Other components of equity X X
Amounts recognised in other comprehensive income and
accumulated in equity relating to non-current assets held for sale X X
X X
Non-controlling interests X X
Total equity X X
Non-current liabilities
Long-term financial liabilities X X
Deferred tax X X
Long-term provisions X X
X X
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables X X
Short-term financial liabilities X X
Current tax payable X X
X X
Liabilities directly associated with non-current assets classified as
held for sale X X
X X
Total equity and liabilities X X
2 Non-current assets to be abandoned

Non-current assets (or disposal groups) to be abandoned are not classified as held for sale, since
their carrying amount will be recovered principally through continuing use (IFRS 5: para. 13).
This includes non-current assets (or disposal groups) that are to be (IFRS 5: para 13):
 Used to the end of their economic life; or
 Closed rather than sold.
However, if the disposal group meets the definition of a discontinued operation (see below), it is
presented as such at the date it ceases to be used (IFRS 5: para. 13).
Illustration 2
On 20 October 20X3 the directors of a parent company made a public announcement of plans to
close a steel works owned by a subsidiary. The closure means that the group will no longer carry out
this type of operation, which until recently has represented about 10% of its total turnover. The works
will be gradually shut down over a period of several months, with complete closure expected in July
20X4. At 31 December output had been significantly reduced and some redundancies had already
taken place. The cash flows, revenues and expenses relating to the steel works can be clearly
distinguished from those of the subsidiary's other operations.
Required
How should the closure be treated in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended
31 December 20X3?
314
Solution
Because the steel works is being closed rather than sold, it cannot be classified as 'held for sale'. In
addition, the steel works is not a discontinued operation. Although at 31 December 20X3 the group
was firmly committed to the closure, this has not yet taken place and therefore the steel works must
be included in continuing operations. Information about the planned closure could be disclosed in the
notes to the financial statements.
3 Discontinued operations
Discontinued operation: a component of an entity that either has been disposed of or is
classified as held for sale and:
Key term
(a) Represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations;
(b) Is part of a single coordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of business or
geographical area of operations; or
(c) Is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale.
Component of an entity: a part that has operations and cash flows that can be clearly
distinguished, operationally and for financial reporting purposes, from the rest of the entity.
3.1 Presentation and disclosure

The general requirement is that an entity shall present and disclose information that enables users of
financial statements to evaluate the financial effects of discontinued operations and disposals of non-
current assets and disposal groups (IFRS 5: para. 30).
The following presentation and disclosure requirements apply:
Discontinued operations (IFRS 5: para. 33)
(a) On the face of the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
(i) A single amount comprising the total of:
(1) The post-tax profit or loss of discontinued operations; and
(2) The post-tax gain or loss recognised on the remeasurement to fair value less
costs to sell or on the disposal of assets/disposal groups comprising the
discontinued operation.
(b) On the face of the financial statements or in the notes
(i) The revenue, expenses, and pre-tax profit or loss of discontinued operations,
and the related income tax expense;
(ii) The gain or loss recognised on the measurement to fair value less costs to sell or on
the disposal of assets/disposal groups comprising the discontinued operation, and the
related income tax expense;
(iii) The net cash flows attributable to the operating, investing, and financing activities of
discontinued operations.
315
Illustration 3
A 70% subsidiary of a group with a 31 December year end meets the definition of a discontinued
operation, through being classified as held for sale, on 1 September 20X1.
The subsidiary's profit for the year ended 31 December 20X1 is $36m. The carrying amount of the
consolidated net assets on 1 September 20X1 is $220m and goodwill $21m. The non-controlling
interests were measured at the proportionate share of the fair value of the net assets at acquisition; ie
the goodwill is partial goodwill. The fair value less costs to sell of the subsidiary on 1 September
20X1 was $245m.
Analysis
In the consolidated statement of profit or loss, the subsidiary is consolidated line-by-line for 8/12 of
the year ($36m × 8/12 = $24m).
The profit for the other 4 months ($36m × 4/12 = $12m) must be shown as a discontinued
operation as a single line item combined with any loss on remeasurement.
The loss on remeasurement as held for sale is calculated as:
As only partial goodwill is recognised, it
$m must be grossed up for the impairment
'Notional' goodwill (21 × 100%/70%) 30 test to compare correctly fair value less
Consolidated net assets 220 costs to sell (which is 100%) with 100%
of the subsidiary
Consolidated carrying amount of subsidiary 250
Less fair value less costs to sell (245)
Impairment loss (gross) 5
However, as only the group share of the goodwill is recognised in the financial statements, only the
group share of the impairment loss – 70% × $5m = $3.5m – is recognised.
The single amount recognised as a separate line item in the statement of profit or loss as profit on the
discontinued operation is:
$m
Profit or loss of discontinued operations ($36m × 4/12) 12
Loss on remeasurement to fair value less costs to sell (ignoring any tax effect) (3.5)
8.5
3.2 Proforma presentation

Discontinued operations (IFRS 5: IG Example 11)
XYZ GROUP
STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR
ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X3
20X3 20X2
$'000 $'000
Continuing operations
Revenue X X
Cost of sales (X) (X)
Gross profit X X
Other income X X
Distribution costs (X) (X)
Administrative expenses (X) (X)
Other expenses (X) (X)
Finance costs (X) (X)
Share of profit of associates X X
Profit before tax X X
Income tax expense (X) (X)
Profit for the year from continuing operations X X
316
20X3 20X2
$'000 $'000
Discontinued operations
Profit for the year from discontinued operations X X
Profit for the year X X
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax X X

Total comprehensive income for the year X X
Profit for the year attributable to owners of the parent X X
Profit for the year attributable to non-controlling interests X X
X X
Owners of the parent X X
Non-controlling interests X X
X X
Activity 1: Discontinued operation

Titan is the parent entity of a group of companies with two subsidiaries, Cronus and Rhea. Cronus is
100% owned and Rhea is 80% owned. Both subsidiaries have been owned for a number of years.
Titan Cronus Rhea
$m $m $m
Revenue 450 265 182
Cost of sales (288) (152) (106)
Gross profit 162 113 76
Operating expenses (71) (45) (22)
Finance costs (5) (3) (2)
Gain on property revaluation, net of tax 16 9 6
The consolidated carrying amount of the net assets of Rhea on 1 January 20X5 was $320m. The
goodwill of Rhea was $38m on that date. The non-controlling interests were measured at the
proportionate share of the fair value of the net assets at acquisition.
Titan decided to sell its investment in Rhea and on 1 October 20X5 the investment in Rhea met the
criteria to be classified as held for sale. The fair value less costs to sell of Rhea on that date was
$395m. No further adjustment was required at the year end.
317
Required
Prepare the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the Titan
The profit and total comprehensive income figures attributable to owners of the parent and
attributable to non-controlling interests need not be subdivided into continuing and discontinued
operations. Ignore the tax effects of any impairment loss.
Work to the nearest $0.1m.
Solution
TITAN GROUP
$m
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Operating expenses
Finance costs
Profit before tax
Income tax expense
Profit for the year from continuing operations
Profit for the year from discontinued operations
Profit for the year
Gain on property revaluation, net of tax


318
Workings
3.3 Subsidiaries held for sale

Where an entity is committed to a sale plan involving loss of control, but a retention of a
non-controlling interest (see Chapter 12 Changes in group structures: disposals and group
reorganisations), the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary are still classified as held for sale
and disclosed as a discontinued operation, when the respective criteria are met
(IFRS 5: para. 36A).
319
Chapter 13 Section 1 of the Supplementary Reading contains a comprehensive activity of a
subsidiary held for sale. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
Ethics note
Classification of assets as held for sale or treatment of an operation as discontinued means that the
user of the financial statements will view that data in a different way. For example, a user will expect
the value of non-current assets held for sale to be replaced with cash resources within a year, and
that any losses relating to a discontinued operation will cease to arise.
It is therefore important for management to behave ethically when applying these principles to ensure
the financial statements give a true and fair view.
It is also worth noting that assets classified as held for sale are not depreciated which could result in
an increase in profits as a result, so there is an incentive for management to classify assets in that
way.
320
Chapter summary
Continuing and discontinued

interests (IFRS 5)
1. Non-current 3. Discontinued operations

assets/disposal groups A component of an entity (ie operations
held for sale and cash flows can be clearly
distinguished operationally and for
Only when at year end: financial reporting purposes) that either:
 Available for immediate sale in  Has been disposed of, or
present condition, subject to usual and  Is classified as held for sale
customary sales terms, and
and
 Sale is highly probable: (a) Represents a separate major line of
P rice actively marketed at is business or geographical area of
reasonable vs FV operations,
U nlikely that significant changes (b) Is part of a single co-ordinated plan to
made to plan dispose of a separate major line of
M anagement committed to plan to sell business or geographical area of
A ctive programme to locate buyer operations, or
S ale expected to be completed
(c) Is a subsidiary acquired exclusively
within one year of classification
with a view to resale
Presentation/disclosure
On face of SPLOCI
Accounting treatment Presentation
Single amount comprising:
(1) Depreciate & (if  Single amount
 Post-tax profit/loss of
previously held at FV)  On face of SOFP
revalue  Separate
 Post-tax gain or loss on
 Normally current
remeasurement to FV – CTS
(2) Reclassify as 'held for assets/liabilities
or on disposal
sale' & write down to fair (not offset)
value less costs to sell* On face or in notes
(if < carrying amount)  Revenue X
 Expenses (X)
(3) Any loss recognised  Profit before tax X
in P/L  Income tax expense (X)
X
 Gain/loss on remeasurement/
(4) Do not depreciate disposal X
 Tax thereon (X)
(5) Subsequent changes X
– Impairment loss/loss X
reversal (reversals  Net cash flows
capped at losses to – Operating X/(X)
date) – Investing X/(X)
– Financing X/(X)
* 'Costs to distribute' if the
asset is held for distribution to
owners
2. Non-current
assets/disposal groups to
be abandoned
 Not classified as held for sale
 Show results and cash flows as
discontinued operation if meets
definition
321
1. Non-current assets/disposal groups held for sale

Non-current assets or disposal groups of assets (and associated liabilities) are
classified as held for sale when certain criteria are met. Such assets and liabilities are
presented as separate line items in the statement of financial position and the assets are
not depreciated.
2. Non-current assets/disposal groups to be abandoned
Non-current assets or disposal groups being abandoned are not classified as held for
sale as they are not being sold. However, if they represent a big enough component to
meet the discontinued operation definition, they are classified as such, but not until the
period of discontinuance.
3. Discontinued operations
Discontinued operations are also presented as a separate line item in the statement of
profit or loss and other comprehensive income. The minimum disclosure on the face of the
statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income is a single figure comprising the
profit/loss on the discontinued operations and any gains or losses on sale or
remeasurement if classified as held for sale.
322
Further reading
There are articles on the ACCA website which are relevant to the topics covered in this chapter and which
The challenge of implementing IFRS 5 (2017)
323
324
Joint arrangements
and group disclosures
Learning objectives
Syllabus
reference no.
Discuss and apply the application of the joint control principle. D2(d)
Discuss and apply the classification of joint arrangements. D2(e)
Prepare the financial statements of parties to the joint arrangement. D2(f)
Exam context
Joint arrangements could feature in the Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) exam either as an
adjustment in a consolidation question or as a separate part of a written question discussing their
accounting treatment. You need an overview of the key disclosures relating to consolidated financial
statements required by IFRS 12.
325
Chapter overview
Joint arrangements and

group disclosures
1. Joint 2. IFRS 12: Disclosure of

arrangements interests in other
entities
Definitions
Joint operations
Joint ventures
326
14: Joint arrangements and group disclosures
1 Joint arrangements
1.1 Definitions
Joint arrangement: an arrangement of which two or more parties have joint control.
Key terms Joint control: the contractually agreed sharing of control of an arrangement, which exists only
when decisions about the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing
control.
A joint arrangement has the following characteristics (IFRS 11: para. 5):
(a) The parties are bound by a contractual arrangement
(b) The contractual arrangement gives two or more of those parties joint control of the
arrangement.
Chapter 14 Section 1 of the Supplementary Reading contains more detail about what constitutes a
contractual arrangement and how this distinguishes between joint operations and joint ventures. This
Types of joint arrangement
There are two types of joint arrangement:
Key terms Joint operation: a joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the
arrangement have rights to the assets, and obligations for the liabilities, relating to the
arrangement.
Joint venture: a joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement
have rights to the net assets of the arrangement.
Under these definitions, accounting treatment is determined based on whether or not the investor has
direct rights to assets and obligations for liabilities that should be recognised separately in its
financial statements, rather than merely following the legal form of the joint arrangement:
Not structured
through a JOINT OPERATION
separate vehicle (line by line
Entity considers: accounting)
 Legal form
 Terms of the contractual
Structured through arrangement
JOINT VENTURE
a separate vehicle  (Where relevant) other
(equity accounting)
facts and circumstances
327
1.2 Accounting for joint operations
In its separate financial statements a joint operator recognises (IFRS 11: para. 20):
 Its own assets, liabilities and expenses
 Its share of assets held and expenses and liabilities incurred jointly
 Its revenue from the sale of its share of the output arising from the joint operation
 Its share of revenue from the sale of output by the joint operation itself.
No adjustments are necessary on consolidation as the figures are already incorporated correctly
into the separate financial statements of the joint operator.
Activity 1: Joint arrangement

ABM Mining entered into an arrangement with another entity, Delta Extractive Industries, and the
national Government to extract coal from a surface mine. Under the terms of the agreement, each of
the two entities is entitled to 40% of the income from selling the coal with the remainder allocated to
the government. Machinery is purchased by each investor as necessary and all costs (including
depreciation in the case of the machinery which remains the property of each entity) are shared in
the same proportions as the income. Coal inventories on hand at any point in time belong to the
three parties in the same proportions. All decisions must be made unanimously by the three parties.
During the first accounting period where the arrangement existed, 460,000 tons of coal were
extracted by ABM and sold at an average market price of $120 per ton. 540,000 tons were
extracted and sold by Delta at an average price of $118 per ton. All coal extracted was sold before
the year end. The price of coal at the year end was $124 per ton.
Required
Discuss, with suitable computations, the accounting treatment of the above arrangement in ABM
Mining's financial statements during the first accounting period.
1.3 Accounting for joint ventures

Parent's separate financial statements
Investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures are carried in the investor's separate
financial statements (IAS 27: para. 10):
 At cost;
 At fair value (as a financial asset under IFRS 9 Financial Instruments); or
 Using the equity method as described in IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint
Ventures.
Where a joint venturer has no subsidiaries, the equity method must be used.
(IFRS 11: para. 24)
328
Consolidated financial statements

Joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method in the consolidated financial statements
in exactly the same way as for associates (covered earlier) (IFRS 11: para. 24).
Illustration 1
XYZ Group has a 50% share in a joint venture, acquired a number of years ago. XYZ's accounting
policy is to measure investments in joint ventures using the equity method in both its separate and its
consolidated financial statements.
Details relating to the joint venture for the year ended 31 December 20X7 are:
$m
Cost of the 50% share 11
Reserves at 31 December 20X7 44
Reserves at the date of acquisition of the joint venture 18
Profit for the year ended 31 December 20X7 6
Other comprehensive income (gain on property 2
revaluations) for the year ended 31 December 20X7
Analysis
In the statement of financial position, the investment is shown using the equity method:
$m
Cost of 50% share 11
Share of post acquisition reserves ((44 – 18) × 50%) 13
24
In the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income the following are shown as
separate line items:
$m
Share of profit of joint venture (6 × 50%) 3
Share of other comprehensive income of joint venture (2  50%) 1
Presentation
XYZ GROUP
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AT 31 DECEMBER (Extract)
20X7 20X6
Assets $m $m
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment X X
Goodwill X X
Other intangible assets X X
Investment in joint venture 24 X
Investment in equity instruments X X
X X
329
XYZ GROUP
ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X7 (Extract)
20X7 20X6
$m $m
Revenue X X
Gross profit X X
Other income X X
Distribution costs (X) (X)
Administrative expenses (X) (X)
Finance costs (X) (X)
Share of profit of joint venture 3 X
Profit before tax X X
Gains on property revaluation X X
Investments in equity instruments (X) (X)
Share of other comprehensive income of joint venture 1 X
Income tax relating to items that will not be reclassified X X
X X
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax (X) (X)
Total comprehensive income for the year X X
2 IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities

2.1 Objective
The objective of the standard is to require a reporting entity to disclose information that enables the
user of the financial statements to evaluate the nature of, and risks associated with, interests in
other entities, and the effects of those interests on its financial position, financial performance and
cash flows (IFRS 12: para. 1).
This is particularly relevant in light of the financial crisis and recent accounting scandals. The IASB
believes that better information about interests in other entities is necessary to help users to identify
the profit or loss and cash flows available to the reporting entity, and to determine the value of a
current or future investment in the reporting entity.
IFRS 12 covers disclosures for entities which have interests in (IFRS 12: para. 5):
 Subsidiaries
 Joint arrangements (ie joint operations and joint ventures)
 Associates
 Unconsolidated structured entities.
330
2.2 Structured entities
Structured entity: an entity that has been designed so that voting or similar rights are not
the dominant factor in deciding who controls the entity, such as when any voting rights
Key term
relate to administrative tasks only and the relevant activities are directed by means of contractual
arrangements.
Disclosures are required for structured entities due to their sensitive nature (see below).
2.3 Disclosures
The main disclosures required by IFRS 12 for an entity that has investments in other entities are:
(a) The significant judgements and assumptions made in determining whether the entity
has control, joint control or significant influence over the other entities, and in determining the
type of joint arrangement (IFRS 12: para. 7)
(b) Information to understand the composition of the group and the interest that non-
controlling interests have in the group's activities and cash flows (IFRS 12: para. 10)
(c) The nature, extent and financial effects of interests in joint arrangements and
associates, including the nature and effects of the entity's contractual relationship with other
investors (IFRS 12: para. 20)
(d) The nature and extent of interests in unconsolidated structured entities (IFRS 12:
para. 24)
(e) The nature and extent of significant restrictions on the entity's ability to access or use
assets and settle liabilities of the group (IFRS 12: para. 10)
(f) The nature of, and changes in, the risks associated with the entity's interests in
consolidated structured entities, joint ventures, associates and unconsolidated structured
entities (eg commitments and contingent liabilities) (IFRS 12: paras. 10, 20, 24)
(g) The consequences of changes in the entity's ownership interest in a subsidiary that
do not result in loss of control (ie the effects on the equity attributable to owners of the
parent) (IFRS 12: paras. 10, 18)
(h) The consequences of losing control of a subsidiary during the reporting period (ie the
gain or loss, and the portion of it that relates to measuring any remaining investment at fair
value, and the line item(s) in profit or loss in which the gain or loss is recognised if not
presented separately (IFRS 12: paras. 10, 19).
Ethics note
You should be alert for evidence of directors classifying a joint arrangement as a joint venture when
it may be a joint operation. The reasons for doing this could be ethically dubious. For example, joint
ventures are equity accounted, which means the liabilities of the joint venture are not visible in the
joint operator's financial statements. However, in accounting for a joint operation, the assets and
liabilities are presented 'gross', separate from each other in the joint operator's statement of financial
position. IFRS 11 focuses on the substance of the arrangement, not just the legal form, to ensure that
this does not happen, but this does not prevent directors from acting unethically.
Structured entities are another way of achieving 'off balance sheet finance' if they are not
consolidated. For this reason, IFRS 12 requires substantial disclosures relating to the decision-making
process of the treatment of investments in other entities and disclosures where they are not
consolidated or equity accounted in the financial statements.
331
Chapter summary
Joint arrangements and

group disclosures
1. Joint arrangements 2. IFRS 12: Disclosure of

interests in other entities
 Disclosures to evaluate the nature of,
Definitions and risks associated with, interests in
other entities:
 Joint arrangement: an
arrangement of which two or more – The significant judgements and
parties have joint control assumptions in determining control,
 Joint control: the contractually joint control or significant influence
agreed sharing of control of an – Composition of the group
arrangement, which exists only when – The nature, extent and financial
decisions about the relevant activities effects of interests in joint
require unanimous consent arrangements and associates
– The nature and extent of interests
in unconsolidated structured
Joint operations entities*
Definition: – The nature and extent of significant
 The parties that have joint control of restrictions on the entity's ability to
the arrangement have rights to access or use assets and settle
the assets, and obligations for liabilities
the liabilities, relating to the – The nature of, and changes in, the
arrangement risks associated with the
Accounting treatment: entity's interests in consolidated
 In investor's separate financial structured entities, joint ventures,
statements, show: associates and unconsolidated
– Own assets, liabilities and structured entities
expenses
– Consequences of changes in the
– Share of assets held and
entity's ownership of a subsidiary
expenses and liabilities incurred
jointly that do not result in loss of
– Revenue from the sale of its share control
of the output arising from the joint – Consequences of losing control
operation of a subsidiary
– Share of revenue from the sale of
output by the joint operation itself. * Structured entity (IFRS 12)
'An entity that has been designed so that
 No adjustments required on
voting or similar rights are not the
consolidation
dominant factor in deciding who
controls the entity, such as when any
voting rights relate to administrative tasks
Joint ventures only and the relevant activities are
Definition directed by means of contractual
 The parties that have joint control of arrangements'
the arrangement have rights to the
net assets of the arrangement
Accounting treatment:
 Parent's separate financial statements
– Cost; or
– Fair value; or
– Equity method (required if no
subs)
 Consolidated financial statements
– Equity method (as associates)
332
1. Joint arrangements
There are two types of joint arrangement. Joint ventures (where the venturers have rights to
the net assets) are accounted for using the equity method in the consolidated financial
statements. Joint operations (where the operators have rights to the assets and
obligations for the liabilities) are accounted for based on the relevant share in the joint
operator's own financial statements.
2. IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities
An entity must make disclosures relating to the nature and extent of, and risks associated
with, investments in subsidiaries, associates, joint arrangements and both consolidated and
unconsolidated structured entities.
333
Question practice
Q16 Burley
Further reading
There are articles on the ACCA website which are relevant to the topics covered in this chapter and which
Vexed Concept (2014) (Equity accounting current issues)
334
Foreign transactions
and entities
Learning objectives
Syllabus
reference no.
Outline and apply the translation of foreign currency amounts and transactions D4(a)
into the functional currency and the presentation currency.
Account for the consolidation of foreign operations and their disposal. D4(b)
Exam context
Foreign currency transactions could feature as part of a groups question in the Strategic Business
Reporting (SBR) exam, where the entity has a foreign subsidiary or investment. You therefore need to
be comfortable with the treatment of foreign currency in both the individual financial statements of an
entity and consolidated financial statements including a foreign operation. You need to be able to
explain the accounting treatment, and not just calculate the numbers.
335
Chapter overview
Foreign transactions and

entities
1. Currency
concepts
3. Presentation
2. Functional currency currency
4. Foreign operations
5. Monetary items
forming part of net
investment in foreign
operation
336
15: Foreign transactions and entities
1 Currency concepts
1.1 Objective
The translation of foreign currency transactions and financial statements should:
(a) Produce results which are generally compatible with the effects of rate changes on a
company's cash flows and its equity; and
(b) Ensure that the financial statements present a true and fair view of the results of
management actions.
IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates covers this area.
Two currency concepts
FUNCTIONAL PRESENTATION
CURRENCY CURRENCY
 Currency of the primary  Currency in which the financial

economic environment statements are presented
in which the entity operates (IAS 21: para. 8)
(IAS 21: para. 8)  Can be any currency
 The currency used for  Special rules apply to translation
measurement in the from functional currency to
financial statements presentation currency
 Other currencies treated as a  Same rules used for translating
foreign currency foreign operations
2 Functional currency
Functional currency: the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity
operates.
Key term
Monetary items: units of currency held and assets and liabilities to be received or
paid in a fixed or determinable number of units of currency.
Spot exchange rate: the exchange rate for immediate delivery.
Closing rate: the spot exchange rate at the end of the reporting period.
(IAS 21: para. 8)
Functional currency is the currency in which the financial statement transactions are measured.
2.1 Determining an entity's functional currency

An entity considers the following factors in determining its functional currency (IAS 21: para. 9):
(a) The currency:
(i) That mainly influences sales prices for goods and services (this will often be the
currency in which sales prices for its goods and services are denominated and settled);
and
(ii) Of the country whose competitive forces and regulations mainly determine the
sales prices of its goods and services.
337
(b) The currency that mainly influences labour, material and other costs of providing goods
or services (this will often be the currency in which such costs are denominated and settled).
The following factors may also provide evidence of an entity's functional currency (IAS 21:
para. 10):
(a) The currency in which funds from financing activities are generated
(b) The currency in which receipts from operating activities are usually retained.
2.2 Reporting foreign currency transactions in the functional currency

Initial recognition
Translate each transaction by applying the spot exchange rate between the functional currency
and the foreign currency at the date of transaction. An average rate for a period may be used
as an approximation if rates do not fluctuate significantly (IAS 21: paras. 21–22).
At the end of the reporting period
At the end of the reporting period foreign currency assets and liabilities are treated as follows
(IAS 21: para. 23):
Monetary assets and liabilities Restated at the closing rate

Non-monetary assets measured in terms of Not restated (ie they remain at historical rate at
historical cost (eg non-current assets) the date of the original transaction)
Translated using the exchange rate at the date
Non-monetary assets measured at fair value
when the fair value was measured
Recognition of exchange differences

Exchange differences are recognised in profit or loss for the period in which they arise.
However, if fair value changes for a non-monetary asset measured at fair value are recognised in
other comprehensive income, eg property, plant and equipment held under the revaluation model,
the exchange difference component of the change in fair value is also recognised in other
comprehensive income, ie it need not be separated out (IAS 21: para. 30).
Illustration 1
An entity whose functional currency is the dollar ($) sold goods to a customer on credit for 100,000
antons on 1 November 20X1. The anton is a foreign currency. Exchanges rates were:
1 November 20X1 $1 = 5.8 antons
31 December 20X1 $1 = 6.3 antons
The entity's year end is 31 December 20X1.
Required
Show the accounting treatment at the date of the transaction and at the year end (to the nearest $).
Solution Spot exchange rate at
1 November 20X1
At 1 November 20X1:
DEBIT Trade receivables (100,000/5.8) $17,241
CREDIT Revenue $17,241
338
At 31 December 20X1:
As it is a monetary item, the trade receivable must be retranslated to $15,873 (100,000/6.3).
An exchange loss is reported in profit or loss as follows: At closing (year end)
exchange rate
DEBIT Profit or loss $1,368
CREDIT Trade receivables (17,241 – 15,873) $1,368
Activity 1: Functional currency principles

San Francisco, a company whose functional currency is the dollar, entered into the following foreign
currency transactions:
31.10.X8 Purchased goods on credit from Mexico SA for 129,000 Mexican pesos
31.12.X8 Payables have not yet been paid
31.1.X9 San Francisco paid its payables.
The exchange rates are as follows:
Pesos to $1
31.10.X8 9.5
31.12.X8 10
31.1.X9 9.7
Required
How would these transactions be recorded in the books of San Francisco for the years ended
31 December 20X8 and 20X9?
Chapter 15 Section 1 of the Supplementary Reading contains notes about changes in an entity's
functional currency. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
3 Presentation currency
Presentation currency: the currency in which the financial statements are presented.
(IAS 21: para. 8)
Key term
An entity may present its financial statements in any currency (or currencies) (IAS 21: para. 38).
3.1 Translation rules

The results and financial position of an entity whose functional currency is not the currency of a
hyperinflationary economy are translated into a different presentation currency as follows (IAS 21:
para. 39):
(a) Assets and liabilities for each statement of financial position presented (ie including
comparatives)
 translated at the closing rate at the date of that statement of financial position;
(b) Income and expenses for each statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
(ie including comparatives)
 translated at actual exchange rates at the dates of the transactions (an average rate
for the period may be used if exchange rates do not fluctuate significantly)
339
(c) All resulting exchange differences
 recognised in other comprehensive income (and, as a separate component of
equity, the translation reserve).
4 Foreign operations
Foreign operation: an entity that is a subsidiary, associate, joint arrangement or branch of a
reporting entity, the activities of which are based or conducted in a country or currency other than
Key term
those of the reporting entity.
(IAS 21: para. 8)
4.1 Translation method

The foreign operation determines its own functional currency and prepares its financial statements in
that currency.
Where different from the parent's functional currency, the financial statements need to be translated
before consolidation.
The financial statements are translated into the presentation currency (functional currency of the
reporting entity) using the presentation currency rules outlined above (and adapted for foreign
operations below).
4.2 Determining a foreign operation's functional currency

The following additional factors are considered in determining the functional currency of a foreign
operation, and whether its functional currency is the same as that of the reporting entity (IAS 21:
para. 11):
(a) Whether the activities of the foreign operation are carried out as an extension of the
reporting entity, rather than being carried out with a significant degree of
autonomy.
An example of the former is when the foreign operation only sells goods imported from the
reporting entity and remits the proceeds to it.
An example of the latter is when the operation accumulates cash and other monetary items,
incurs expenses, generates income and arranges borrowings all substantially in its local
currency.
(b) Whether transactions with the reporting entity are a high or a low proportion of
the foreign operation's activities.
(c) Whether cash flows from the activities of the foreign operation directly affect the cash
flows of the reporting entity and are readily available for remittance to it.
(d) Whether cash flows from the activities of the foreign operation are sufficient to service
existing and normally expected debt obligations without funds being made
available by the reporting entity.
4.3 Exchange rates

Where a foreign operation has a different functional currency to the parent, the financial
statements of the operation must be translated prior to consolidation.
340
In practical terms the following approach is used when translating the financial statements of a
foreign operation for exam purposes (IAS 21: para. 39):
(a) STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
All assets and liabilities – Closing rate (CR)
Share capital and pre-acquisition reserves – Historical rate (HR) at date of control
(for exam purposes)
Post-acquisition reserves:
Profit for each year – Actual (or average) rate (AR) for each year
Dividends – Actual rate at date of payment
Exchange differences on net assets – Balancing figure ()
Functional Rate Presentation
currency currency
Assets X CR X
X X
Share capital X HR X
Share premium X HR X
Pre acq'n retained earnings X HR X
X X
Post-acq'n retained earnings
Profit for year 1 X AR X
Dividend (year 1) (X) actual (X)
Profit for year 2 X AR X
Dividend (year 2) (X) actual (X)
etc
Exchange differences on net assets –  X
X X
Liabilities X CR X
X X
(b) STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

All items are translated at actual rate at date of the transaction (or average rate as an
approximation) (AR)
Functional Rate Presentation
currency currency
Revenue X X
Gross profit X X
Profit before tax X AR X
Other comprehensive income X X
Total comprehensive income X X
(c) Exchange differences

All exchange differences on translation of a foreign operation are recognised in other
341
4.4 Calculation of exchange differences
The exchange differences result from (IAS 21: para. 41):
(a) Translating income and expenses at the exchange rates at the dates of the transactions and
assets and liabilities at the closing rate;
(b) Translating the opening net assets at a closing rate that differs from the previous closing rate;
and
(c) Translating goodwill on consolidation at the closing rate at each year end.
You may be required to calculate exchange differences for the year in order to recognise them in
other comprehensive income. The exam approach is as follows:
$
Exchange differences in the year
On translation of net assets
Closing net assets as translated (at closing rate) X
Less opening net assets as translated at the time (at opening rate) (X)
X
Less retained profit as translated at the time (profit at average rate less dividends at actual rate) (X)
X/(X)
On goodwill – see standard working below X/(X)

X/(X)
4.5 Calculation of goodwill for a foreign operation

Any goodwill and fair value adjustments are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign
operation and are translated at each year end at the closing rate (IAS 21: para. 47).
However, the goodwill must first be calculated at the date of control. Practically, this can be achieved
by adding two additional columns to the standard goodwill calculation:
Functional Functional Rate Presentation
currency currency currency ($)
Consideration transferred X X
Non-controlling interests (at FV or at %FVNA) X X

HR at date of
Share capital X
control
Share premium X (eg 1.1.X1)
Reserves X
Fair value adjustments X
(X) (X)
At acquisition (1.1.20X1) X X
Impairment losses 20X1 (X) AR/CR* 20X1 (X)
Exchange differences 20X1 – – 
At 31.12.X1 X CR 20X1 X Cumulative FX
Impairment losses 20X2 (X) AR/CR* 20X2 (X) differences
Exchange differences 20X2 (post to OCI) – – 
At 31.12.X2 X CR 20X2 X
*There is no explicit rule on which rate to use for impairment losses, therefore use of an average rate
or the closing rate is acceptable.
342
Illustration 2
Hood, a public limited company whose functional currency is the dollar ($) has recently purchased a
foreign subsidiary, Robin. The functional currency of Robin is the crown.
Hood purchased 80% of the ordinary share capital of Robin on 1 September 20X5 for 86 million
crowns. The carrying amount of the net assets of Robin at that date was 90 million crowns (share
capital: 5m crowns, share premium: 12m crowns, other reserves: 73m crowns). The fair value of the
net assets at that date was 100m crowns. At the year end of 31 December 20X5, the goodwill was
tested for impairment and this review indicated that it had been impaired by 1.8 million crowns.
The exchange rates were as follows:
Crowns to $
1 September 20X5 2.5
31 December 20X5 2.0
Average rate for 20X5 2.25
Hood elected to measure the non-controlling interests in Robin at fair value at the date of acquisition.
The fair value of the non-controlling interests in Robin on 1 September 20X5 was 20 million crowns.
The management of Hood is unsure how to account for the goodwill so has measured it at the
exchange rate at 1 September 20X5 in the consolidated financial statements. No adjustment has
been made since that date.
Required
Explain the correct accounting treatment of the goodwill, showing any relevant calculations and any
adjustments necessary to correct the consolidated financial statements.
Solution
Goodwill
The goodwill should be calculated in the functional currency of Robin (the crown). It is initially
translated into $ at the exchange rate at the date control is achieved (1 September 20X5), but then
needs to be retranslated at the closing rate at each year end.
Crowns m Crowns m Rate $m
Consideration transferred 86.0
Non-controlling interests (at fair value) 20.0
Less: fair value of net assets at acquisition

share capital 5.0
share premium 12.0
other reserves 73.0
fair value adjustments (100 – 90) 10.0
(100.0)
Goodwill at acquisition (1 September 20X5) 6.0 2.5 2.4
Impairment losses (1.8) 2.25 (0.8)
Exchange difference (balancing figure) – β 0.5
Goodwill at year end (31 December 20X5) 4.2 2.0 2.1
The goodwill should be shown at $2.1m in the consolidated statement of financial position.
Management have recorded it at $2.4m using the exchange rate on 1 September 20X5.
The impairment loss should be recognised in consolidated profit or loss (translated at either the
average rate or the closing rate). In this case the average rate has been used giving an impairment
loss of $0.8m, but there is no fixed rule, so the closing rate could alternatively have been used.
343
An adjustment is also required to record the exchange gain on the goodwill of $0.5m in other
comprehensive income. In the consolidated statement of financial position, as non-controlling interests
are measured at fair value at acquisition (‘full goodwill’ method), this is reported in the translation
reserve ($0.4m, 80% group share) and non-controlling interests ($0.1m, 20% non-controlling share),
similar to the treatment of exchanges differences on the translation of the net assets. If non-controlling
interests had been measured at the proportionate share of net assets at acquisition ('partial goodwill'
method), the exchange difference on goodwill would only be the group share ($0.4m), all of which
would be reported in the translation reserve with no impact on non-controlling interests.
Activity 2: Foreign operation

Bennie, a public limited company whose functional currency is the dollar ($), acquired 80% of
Jennie, a limited company, for $993,000 on 1 January 20X1. Jennie is a foreign operation whose
functional currency is the jen (J).
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AT 31 DECEMBER 20X2
Bennie Jennie
$'000 J'000

Cost of investment in Jennie 993 –
6,698 7,280

8,920 12,880
Share capital 1,700 1,200

Pre-acquisition retained earnings 5,280
Post-acquisition retained earnings 5,185 2,400
6,885 8,880

8,920 12,880
STATEMENTS OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR YEAR ENDED
31 DECEMBER 20X2
Bennie Jennie
$'000 J'000
Revenue 9,840 14,620
Cost of sales (5,870) (8,160)
Gross profit 3,970 6,460
Operating expenses (2,380) (3,570)
Dividend from Jennie 112
Profit before tax 1,702 2,890
Profit/total comprehensive income for the year 1,172 2,040
344
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR THE YEAR (Extract for retained earnings)
Bennie Jennie
$'000 J'000
Balance at 1 January 20X2 4,623 6,760
Dividends paid (610) (1,120)
Total profit/comprehensive income for the year 1,172 2,040
Balance at 31 December 20X2 5,185 7,680
Jennie pays its dividends on 31 December. Jennie's profit for 20X1 was 2,860,000 jens and a
dividend of 1,380,000 Jens was paid on 31 December 20X1.
Jennie's statements of financial position at acquisition and at 31 December 20X1 were as follows.
JENNIE
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT:
1.1.X1 31.12.X1
J'000 J'000

9,070 11,840

6,480 7,960
9,070 11,840
Exchange rates were as follows

1 January 20X1 $1: 12 Jens
31 December 20X1 $1: 10 Jens
31 December 20X2 $1: 8 Jens
Weighted average rate for 20X1 $1: 11 Jens
Weighted average rate for 20X2 $1: 8.5 Jens
The fair values of the identifiable net assets of Jennie were equivalent to their book values at the
acquisition date. Bennie chose to measure the non-controlling interests in Jennie at fair value at the
date of acquisition. The fair value of the non-controlling interests in Jennie was measured at
2,676,000 Jens on 1 January 20X1.
An impairment test conducted at the year end 31 December 20X2 revealed impairment losses of
1,870,000 Jens on recognised goodwill. No impairment losses were necessary in the year ended
31 December 20X1.
Ignore deferred tax on translation differences.
Required
Prepare the consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 20X2 and consolidated
statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the Bennie Group for the year then
ended.
345
Solution
BENNIE GROUP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AT 31 DECEMBER 20X2
$'000
Property, plant and equipment (5,705 + (W2))
Goodwill (W4)
Current assets (2,222 + (W2))
Share capital 1,700

Other components of equity – translation reserve (W8)
Current liabilities (2,035 + (W2))

YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X2
$'000
Revenue (9,840 + (W3))
Cost of sales (5,870 + (W3))
Gross profit
Operating expenses (2,380 + (W3))
Goodwill impairment loss (W4)
Profit before tax
Income tax expense (530 + (W3))
Profit for the year
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:
Exchange differences on translating foreign operations (W9)


Workings
1 Group structure
346
2 Translation of Jennie – Statement of financial position

J'000 Rate $'000
Property, plant and equipment 7,280
Current assets 5,600
12,880
Share capital 1,200

Pre-acquisition ret'd earnings 5,280
Post-acquisition ret'd earnings – 20X1 profit 2,860
– 20X1 dividend (1,380)
– 20X2 profit 2,040
– 20X2 dividend (1,120)
Exchange differences on net assets balance
8,880
Current liabilities 4,000
12,880
3 Translation of Jennie – Statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income

J'000 Rate $'000
Revenue 14,620
Cost of sales (8,160)
Gross profit 6,460
Operating expenses (3,570)
Income tax expense (850)
4 Goodwill
J'000 J'000 Rate $'000
Consideration transferred (993
Less: FV of net assets at acquisition
share capital
retained earnings
Goodwill at acquisition
Impairment losses 20X1
Exchange gain/(loss) 20X1 –
Goodwill at 31 December 20X1
Impairment losses 20X2
Exchange gain/(loss) 20X2 –
Goodwill at year end
347
Bennie Jennie
$'000 $'000
Retained earnings at year end (W2) 5,185
Retained earnings at acquisition (W2)
Group share of post-acquisition retained earnings ( × %)

Less group share of impairment losses to date ((W4) ( × %)

$'000
NCI at acquisition (W4)
NCI share of post-acquisition retained earnings ((W5) × %)
NCI share of exchange differences on net assets ((W2) × %)
NCI share of exchange differences on goodwill [((W4) + ) × %]
Less: NCI share of impairment losses to date ((W4) ( × %)

PFY TCI
$'000 $'000
Profit for the year (W3)
Impairment losses (W4)
Other comprehensive income: exchange differences (W9) –
× % × %
8 Consolidated translation reserve

$'000
Exchange differences on net assets ((W2) × %)
Exchange differences on goodwill [((W4) + ) × %]
9 Exchange differences arising during the year

$'000
On translation of net assets of Jennie:
Closing net assets as translated (at CR) (W2)
Less opening net assets as translated at the time (at OR)
Less retained profit as translated at the time

(profit at average rate less dividends at actual rate)
On goodwill (W4)
348
4.6 Disposal of foreign operations

On disposal, the cumulative amount of the exchange differences accumulated in equity (and
previously reported in other comprehensive income) relating to the foreign operation are
reclassified to profit or loss (as a reclassification adjustment) at the same time as the disposal
gain/loss is recognised (IAS 21: para. 48).
5 Monetary items forming part of a net investment in a

foreign operation
Net investment in a foreign operation: the amount of the reporting entity's interest in the net
Key term
assets of a foreign operation.
(IAS 21: para. 8)
An entity may have a monetary item that is receivable from or payable to a foreign operation for
which settlement is neither planned nor likely to occur in the foreseeable future. This may include a
long-term receivable or loan. They do not include trade receivables or trade payables. (IAS 21:
para. 15)
In substance such items are part of the entity's net investment in a foreign operation.
The amount could be due between the parent and the foreign operation, or a subsidiary and the
foreign operation.
Separate financial statements
(a) Where denominated in the functional currency of the reporting entity or foreign operation any
exchange differences are recognised in profit or loss in the separate financial statements of
the reporting entity or foreign operation as appropriate (as normal) (IAS 21: para. 33).
(b) Where denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the reporting entity or
foreign operation, exchange differences will be recognised in profit or loss in the separate
financial statements of both parties (as normal) (IAS 21: para. 33).
Consolidated financial statements
(a) Any exchange differences are recognised initially in (ie moved to) other comprehensive
income (IAS 21: para. 32); and
(b) Are reclassified from equity to profit or loss on disposal of the net investment (IAS 21:
para. 32).
Illustration 3
On 1 January 20X8, Gabby, a company whose functional currency is the dollar ($), bought a 100%
interest in a Japanese company for ¥ 75,000,000. The company is run as an autonomous
subsidiary. On the day of purchase a long-term loan was advanced to the subsidiary – value ¥
5,000,000 (repayable in yen).
On 1 January 20X8 the exchange rate was $1: 150 ¥; on 31 December 20X8, $1: 130 ¥.
Required
(a) Explain the accounting treatment of the investment and loan in Gabby's separate financial
statements at 31 December 20X8.
(b) Explain the effect in Gabby's consolidated financial statements at 31 December 20X8.
349
(c) Show the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income effect in Gabby's
consolidated financial statements if the subsidiary was sold on 30 June 20X9 for $720,000
when the exchange rate was 120 ¥ to the dollar and the value of the Japanese subsidiary's
net assets and goodwill in the consolidated books was $660,000.
Assume that the investment is held in Gabby's separate financial statements using the cost option in
IAS 27 and that cumulative exchange gains on translation of the financial statements of the foreign
operation of $128,900 were recognised in the consolidated financial statements up to 31 December
20X8.
Solution
(a) Separate financial statements of Gabby
The accounting treatment is as follows:
At recognition:
Both at the historical exchange
¥75,000,000 rate (150) at the date of initial
Investment = $500,000. recognition
150
¥5,000,000
Loan asset = $33,333.
150
At the year end: At closing exchange rate
(130) because the loan is a
The investment in the subsidiary remains at cost (Gabby's accounting policy). monetary item
¥5,000,000
The loan asset is retranslated to = $38,462 at the closing rate.
130
Therefore, a gain of $5,129 ($38,462 – $33,333) on the loan receivable is recognised in
profit or loss.
(b) Consolidated financial statements
The subsidiary will be consolidated and shown at the translated value of its net assets and
goodwill (both at the closing exchange rate). Exchange differences on the translation are
recognised in other comprehensive income. No exchange gain or loss on the loan payable
occurs in the individual financial statements of the Japanese company as the loan is
denominated in yen.
IAS 21 requires the exchange difference on the retranslation of the loan in Gabby's books to
be taken in full (moved) to other comprehensive income on consolidation (ie it is reported in
the same section of the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income as the
exchange difference on translation of the subsidiary).
Therefore the $5,129 gain on the loan is reported in other comprehensive income rather than
profit or loss.
350
(c) Consolidated financial statements

STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Extracts)
Gain on sale of subsidiary
$
Sale proceeds 720,000
Less net assets and goodwill of Japanese company (660,000)
Add: cumulative gain on retranslation of net assets and goodwill 128,900

reclassified from other comprehensive income to profit or loss
Add: gain on retranslation of loan:
in period (Working) 3,205
reclassified from other comprehensive income to profit or loss 5,129
197,234
Working
Further gain on the loan in the period 31 December 20X8 to 30 June 20X9:
¥5,000,000 ¥5,000,000
= $3,205
120 130
Activity 3: Ethics
Rankin owns 60% of Jenkin. The directors of Rankin are thinking of acquiring further foreign
investments in the near future, but the entity currently lacks sufficient cash to exploit such
opportunities. They would prefer to raise finance from an equity issue as Rankin already has
significant loans within non-current liabilities and they do not wish to increase Rankin’s gearing any
further. They are therefore keen to maximise the balance on the group retained earnings in order to
attract the maximum level of investment possible. One proposal is that they may sell 5% of the equity
interest in Jenkin during 20X6. This will improve the cash position but will enable Rankin to maintain
control over Jenkin. In addition, the directors believe that the shares can be sold profitably to boost
the retained earnings of Rankin and of the group. The directors intend to transfer the relevant
proportion of the exchange differences on translation of the subsidiary to group retained earnings,
knowing that this is contrary to accounting standards.
Required
Discuss why the proposed treatment of the exchange differences by the directors is not in compliance
with International Financial Reporting Standards, explaining any ethical issues which may arise.
Ethics note
Foreign currency translation adds additional complexity to the financial statements. It also makes the
financial statements less transparent, because the translation itself is not visible to the user of the
financial statements. The choice of exchange rate and need for consistent application of the
translation principles are areas where manipulation of the financial statements could arise.
Similarly, the choice of presentation currency (which is a free choice under IAS 21) could affect the
image the financial statements give depending on which currency is chosen and the volatility of
exchange rates with that currency.
351
Chapter summary
Foreign transactions and

entities (IAS 21)
1. Currency
concepts
2. Functional currency 3. Presentation currency

'The currency of the primary economic 'The currency in which the financial
environment in which the entity operates' statements are presented'
 Transactions are measured in this  Can be any currency
currency  Translation from functional
 Translated at spot rate at date of currency:
transaction (or average for period) – Presentation currency
 At year end: method (see below)
– Restate monetary items  CR  Exchange differences  other
– Non-monetary items  not restated comprehensive income
– Items held at FV  use rate when FV
determined 4. Foreign operations
 Exchange differences  P/L  Use presentation currency rules: 5. Monetary items
SOFP: forming part of net
 Considerations in determining functional
FC PC investment in
currency: Assets X CR X foreign operation
– Currency that mainly influences sales X X
prices Receivable/payable and
SC X HR X settlement neither planned
– Currency of the country whose
SP X HR X nor likely to occur in
regulations mainly determine sales
Pre acq'n RE X HR X foreseeable future
prices
X X
– Currency that mainly influences
Post-acq'n:
labour, material and other costs PFY year 1 X AR X Separate FS of Co:
Also:  FX differences
Dividend (X) actual (X)
 P/L
– Currency in which financing PFY year 2 X AR X
generated Dividend (X) actual (X) Consolidated FS:
– Currency in which operating receipts Trans res –  X  FX differences  OCI (&
usually retained reserves)
X X
Also for a foreign operation: Liabilities X CR X  Reclassified from OCI to
– Degree of autonomy X X P/L on disposal of net
– Volume of transactions with parent investment
SPLOCI:
– Whether cash flows directly impact
FC PC
the parent Revenue X X
– Dependence on parent finance .. X X
.. X X
PFY X AR X
OCI X X
TCI X X
 Calculate goodwill (see earlier)
 Calculate FX differences for
352
year (see earlier)
1. Currency concepts
IAS 21 introduces functional currency and presentation currency concepts.
2. Functional currency
The functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment that the
entity faces. This is based on an entity's circumstances. It is not a free choice.
The measurement of the financial statements is made in this currency.
Transactions in foreign currency are translated at the spot exchange rate at the date of
the transaction.
At the period end, monetary assets and liabilities are retranslated at the closing
rate, and the exchange difference is recognised in profit or loss.
Non-monetary assets and liabilities are not retranslated (unless they are measured
at fair value, in which case they are translated at the exchange rate at the date of the fair
value measurement).
3. Presentation currency
The presentation currency is the currency in which the financial statements are
presented. An entity can choose any currency as its presentation currency.
There are specific translation rules to translate from the functional currency to a different
presentation currency.
Assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate. Income and expenses are
translated at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction (or an average rate
for the period if exchange rates do not fluctuate significantly).
Any resulting exchange differences are recognised in other comprehensive income.
4. Foreign operations
Foreign operations are translated using the presentation currency rules where their
functional currency is different to that of the parent.
5. Monetary items forming part of a net investment in a foreign operation
Exchange differences arising on monetary items forming part of a net investment in
a foreign operation are recognised in profit or loss in the individual entity's financial
statements under the normal functional currency rules. However, they are reclassified as
other comprehensive income in the consolidated financial statements (so that they are
recognised in the same location as the re-translation of the foreign operation itself).
353
Question practice
Q17 Harvard
Further reading
IAS 21 – Does it need amending? (2017)
www.accaglobal.com/us/en/student/exam-support-resources/professional-exams-study-
resources/p2/technical-articles/ias21.html
354
Group statements of
cash flows
Learning objectives
Syllabus
reference no.
Prepare and discuss group statements of cash flows. D1(l)
Exam content
Group statements of cash flows could be examined in either Section A or B of the Strategic Business
Reporting (SBR) exam. The first question in Section A of the exam will be based on the financial
statements of groups and could therefore be entirely focused on the group statement of cash flows.
Questions may require the preparation of extracts from the group statement of cash flows, and will
require discussion and explanation of any calculations performed. Threats to ethical principles in
preparing the group statement of cash flows could also be examined, either in the ethics question in
Section A, or as a part of a question in Section B. Analysis and interpretation of a group statement of
cash flows could also be examined in Section B.
355
Chapter overview
Group statements
of cash flows
2. Consolidated 3. Approach to
1. Definitions and preparing a group
format statements of cash
statement of cash
flows
flows
4. Analysis and
interpretation of
group statements of
cash flow
356
16: Group statements of cash flows
1 Definitions and format

1.1 Definitions
A consolidated statement of cash flows explains the movement in a group’s cash and cash
equivalents balance during a period. IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows is the relevant standard to
apply.
Cash: comprises cash on hand and demand deposits.

Key term Cash equivalents: these are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible into
known amounts of cash and are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
Cash flows: these are inflows and outflows of cash and cash equivalents.
(IAS 7: para. 6)
1.2 Format
You should be familiar with the usefulness of cash flow information and with the format and
preparation of single entity statements of cash flows from your earlier studies in Financial Reporting.
Chapter 16 Section 1 of the Supplementary Reading revises the detail if you are unsure. This is
The format of a consolidated statement of cash flows is consistent with that for a single entity. Both
the direct and indirect methods of preparing the group statements of cash flows are acceptable
(IAS 7: para. 18).
Illustration 1
Indirect method: illustrative consolidated statement of cash flows
Note. New entries for a consolidated statement of cash flows are shaded in grey.
31.12.X1
$'000 $'000
Cash flows from operating activities
Profit before taxation 3,350
Adjustment for:
Depreciation 520
Profit on sale of property, plant and equipment (10)
Share of profit of associate/joint venture (60)
Foreign exchange loss 40
Investment income (500)
Interest expense 400
3,740
Decrease in inventories 1,050
Increase in trade and other receivables (500)
Decrease in trade payables (1,740)
Cash generated from operations 2,550
Interest paid (270)
Income taxes paid (900)
Net cash from operating activities 1,380
357
Cash flows from investing activities
Acquisition of subsidiary X net of cash acquired (550)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (350)
Proceeds from sale of equipment 20
Interest received 200
Dividends received (from associates/JVs and other investments) 200
Net cash used in investing activities (480)
Cash flows from financing activities

Proceeds from issue of share capital 250
Proceeds from long-term borrowings 250
Payments of finance lease liabilities (90)
Dividends paid* (to owners of parent and NCI) (1,200)
Net cash used in financing activities (790)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 110

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period 120
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period 230
*This could also be shown as an operating cash flow.
(IAS 7: Illustrative Examples para. 3)
Illustration 2
Indirect method: illustrative consolidated statement of cash flows
Note. New entries for a consolidated statement of cash flows are shaded in grey.
31.12.X1
$'000 $'000
Cash receipts from customers 30,150
Cash paid to suppliers and employees (27,600)
Interest paid (270)

Acquisition of subsidiary X, net of cash acquired (550)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (250)
Purchase of intangible assets (100)
Dividends received (from associates/JVs and other investments) 200
358

Proceeds from issue of share capital 250
Proceeds from long-term borrowings 250
Payments of lease liabilities (90)
Dividends paid* (to owners of parent and NCI) (1,200)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 120
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 230
*This could also be shown as an operating cash flow.

(IAS 7: Illustrative Examples para. 3)
The direct method is encouraged where the necessary information is not too costly to obtain, but
IAS 7 does not require it. In practice the direct method is rarely used because the indirect method is
much easier to prepare. However, it could be argued that companies ought to monitor their cash
flows carefully enough on an ongoing basis to be able to use the direct method at minimal extra cost.
Tutorial note
A question in the exam on the direct method is more likely to be a written discussion question, rather
than requiring lots of calculations. Consider the illustration below.
Illustration 3
During December 20X5, the Smith Group obtained a new bank loan which will be used to purchase
assets in the first quarter of 20X6. The interest paid on the loan will be included as an operating cash
outflow in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended 31 December 20X5. The
directors of the Smith Group also want to include the loan proceeds as an operating cash inflow
because they suggest that presenting the loan proceeds and loan interest together will be more useful
for users of the accounts. The directors also wish to present the consolidated statement of cash flows
using the indirect method because they believe that the indirect method is more useful and
informative to users of financial statements than the direct method. The directors of Smith will each
receive a bonus if the Smith Group's operating cash flow for the year exceeds a certain amount.
Required
Comment on the directors' view that the indirect method of preparing statements of cash flow is more
useful and informative to users than the direct method, providing specific reference to the treatment of
the loan proceeds.
Solution
The direct method of preparing cash flow statements discloses major classes of gross cash
receipts and gross cash payments. It shows the items that affected cash flow and the size of
those cash flows. Cash received from, and cash paid to, specific sources such as customers and
suppliers are presented. This contrasts with the indirect method, where accrual-basis net income (loss)
is converted to cash flow information by means of add-backs and deductions.
For users of the accounts an important advantage of the direct method is that the users can see and
understand the actual cash flows, and how they relate to items of income or expense. In this way, the
user is able to better understand the cash receipts and payments for the period. It is also arguably
more understandable as under the direct method all items in the statement of cash flows are actual
cash inflows and outflows. From the point of view of the user, the direct method is preferable,
because it discloses information not available elsewhere in the financial statements, which could be
of use in estimating future cash flow.
359
The indirect method involves adjusting the net profit or loss for the period for:
(a) Changes during the period in inventories, operating receivables and payables
(b) Non-cash items, eg depreciation, provisions, profits/losses on the sales of assets
(c) Other items, the cash flows from which should be classified under investing or financing
activities
From the point of view of the preparer of accounts, the indirect method is easier to
prepare, and nearly all companies use it in practice. The main argument companies have for using
the indirect method is that the direct method is too costly. The disadvantage of the indirect
method is that users find it difficult to understand and it is therefore more open to manipulation.
This is particularly true with regard to classification of cash flows.
The directors wish to inappropriately classify the loan proceeds as an operating cash inflow
(rather than a financing cash inflow as required by IAS 7) on the basis that this will be more useful to
users. This may be due to a misunderstanding of the requirements of IAS 7. Alternatively, it may be
an attempt by the directors to manipulate the statement of cash flows by improving the net cash from
operating activities which will improve their bonus prospects. Although this misclassification could
also take place using the direct method, it is arguably easier to 'hide' when using the indirect
method, because users find it more difficult to understand.
Therefore the indirect method would not, as is claimed by the directors, be more useful and
informative to users than the direct method. IAS 7 allows both methods, however, so the indirect
method would still be permissible.
2 Consolidated statement of cash flows

A group's statement of cash flows should only deal with flows of Group
cash external to the group. Cash flows that are internal to Cash out P
the group should be eliminated (IAS 7: para. 37).
Additional considerations for a group statement of cash flows
include: Cash in
S1 S2
 Dividends paid to the non-controlling interests
 Dividends received from associates and joint ventures
 Cash flows on acquisition or disposal of associates and joint ventures
 Removing the group share of the profit or loss of associates and joint ventures from group
profit before tax in the 'cash flows from operating activities' section (indirect method only)
 Cash flows on acquisition or disposal of subsidiaries
 The effect of assets and liabilities of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of on the calculation of
working capital adjustments and cash flows
 Impairment losses on goodwill.
We will cover these issues in the rest of this section.
360
2.1 Dividends paid to non-controlling interests

Actual cash payments made in the form of dividends paid to non-controlling interests are shown in
the consolidated statement of cash flows.
The dividend paid to the non-controlling interests (NCI) during the reporting period can be calculated
from the NCI figures in the consolidated financial statements:
Non-controlling
interests
$'000
Opening balance (b/d) X

NCI share of total comprehensive income X
Acquisition of subsidiary (NCI at fair value or share of net assets) X
Disposal of subsidiary (X)
Non-cash (eg exchange loss on foreign operation) (X)
Dividends paid to NCI (balancing figure (β)) (X)
Closing balance (c/d) X
Illustration 4
Dividends paid to non-controlling interests
Woody Group has owned a number of subsidiaries for several years. It acquired a new subsidiary,
Hamm Co, during the year ended 31 December 20X7. The fair value of the non-controlling interests
in Hamm Co at the date of acquisition was $1,200,000. The statement of financial position of
Woody Group shows non-controlling interest of $5,150,000 at the start of the year and
$6,040,000 at the end of the year. The non-controlling interest's share of total comprehensive
income for the year is $1,680,000.
Required
Calculate the cash dividend paid to the non-controlling interests (NCI) in the year.
Solution
Non-controlling
interests
$'000
Dividends paid
Opening balance (b/d) 5,150 to NCI included
NCI share of total comprehensive income 1,680 as an outflow in
'cash flow from
Acquisition of subsidiary (NCI at fair value) 1,200 financing
activities'
Cash (dividends paid to NCI) β (1,990)
Closing balance (c/d) 6,040
361
Activity 1: Dividend paid to non-controlling interests
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
$'000
Gains on property revaluation 12
Income tax expense relating to gain on property revaluation (4)

Owners of the parent 15
Non-controlling interests 5
20
28
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 DECEMBER

20X2 20X1
$'000 $'000
Non-controlling interests 102 99
Required
Calculate the dividend paid to non-controlling interests, using the proforma below to help you.
Solution
$'000
Opening balance (b/d)
NCI share of total comprehensive income
Dividends paid to NCI (balancing figure)

Closing balance (c/d)
362
2.2 Dividends received from associates and joint ventures

Dividends received from associates or joint ventures can be calculated from the investment in
associate or investment joint venture figures in the consolidated financial statements.
Investment in
associate/
joint venture
$'000
Opening balance (b/d) X

Group share of associate's/joint venture's profit for the year X
Group share of associate's/joint venture's OCI X
Acquisition of associate/joint venture X Dividends received
Disposal of associate/joint venture (X) from associates or
joint ventures
Non-cash items (eg exchange loss on associate/joint venture) (X) included as an
inflow in 'cash flow
Cash (dividends received from associate/joint venture) β (X) from investing
Closing balance (c/d) X activities'
2.3 Acquisitions and disposals of associates and joint ventures

When an associate or joint venture is purchased or sold, the cash paid to acquire the shares or the
cash received from selling the shares must be recorded in the 'cash flows from investing activities'
section.
2.4 Adjustment required under indirect method for associates and

joint ventures
Under the indirect method of preparing a group statement of cash flows, the group share of the
associate's/joint venture's profit or loss for the year must be removed from the group profit before tax
figure as an adjustment in the 'cash flows from operating activities' section.
Activity 2: Dividend received from associate

Shown below are extracts of Pull Group's consolidated statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income and consolidated statement of financial position.
THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X2 (Extracts)
$'000
Profit before interest and tax 60
Share of profit of associates 7
363
$'000
Share of gain on property revaluation of associate 3
Income tax relating to items that will not be reclassified (5)
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax 13
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 DECEMBER (Extracts)

20X2 20X1
$'000 $'000
Investment in associates 94 88
During the year, the Pull Group purchased 25% of the equity shares of Acton for $12,000. The
investment has been appropriately accounted for using the equity method in the group's consolidated
Required
Calculate the dividend received from associates and complete the profit before tax and associate
lines in the extract from the operating section of the group statement of cash flows below.
Solution
Investment in associates
$'000
Group share of associate's profit for the year
Group share of associate's OCI (gain on property revaluation)
Acquisition of associate
Dividends received from associates (balancing figure)
EXTRACT FROM STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (OPERATING ACTIVITIES)
$'000
Profit before taxation
Adjustment for:
364
2.5 Cash flows on acquisition or disposal of a subsidiary

There are two cash flows associated with the acquisition or disposal of a subsidiary:
Acquisition
(1) The cash paid to buy the shares
(for an acquisition) or the cash
Group Cash received from selling the shares
P (1) (for a disposal).
New subsidiary (2) The cash or overdraft balance

consolidated for the first time
Cash (for an acquisitions) or
S1 S2
(2) deconsolidated (for a disposal).
These two cash flows should be netted off and shown as a single line in the consolidated
statement of cash flows under 'cash flows from investing activities' (IAS 7: paras. 39, 42).
Acquisition of subsidiary Disposal of subsidiary
Cash consideration (X) Cash proceeds X
Subsidiary's cash and cash Subsidiary's cash and cash

equivalents at acquisition date X equivalents at disposal date (X)
Cash to acquire subsidiary (X) Proceeds of sale of subsidiary X
Illustration 5
Disposal of subsidiary
Darth Group disposed of its 100% owned subsidiary Jynn during the year ended 31 August 20X5.
Darth Group received $52m cash proceeds from the acquirer. Jynn had a cash balance of $14m at
the date of disposal.
Required
Show how the disposal of Jynn should be presented in the 'cash flows from investing activities'
section of the consolidated statement of cash flows of the Darth Group.
Solution
DARTH GROUP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Extract)
$m
Net cash received on disposal of subsidiary (W) 38
Working
$m
Cash proceeds from acquirer 52
Less cash disposed of in the subsidiary (14)
Net cash received on disposal of subsidiary 38
365
2.6 The effect on assets and liabilities if subsidiaries are acquired or
disposed of
The parent has not

purchased When calculating cash flows (eg as balancing figures) in asset and liability workings, the
individually each workings need to be adjusted for assets and liabilities acquired (or disposed of) as a
asset/liability of the
result of the acquisition (or disposal) of a subsidiary.
subsidiary, it has
purchased shares,
so the statement of This is dealt with simply by showing the increase or decrease due to the acquisition or
cash flows reflects
disposal on a separate line in each affected working, as follows.
that fact.
Subsidiary The subsidiary’s property, plant Reason: the new susbsidiary's assets
acquired in the and equipment, inventories, and liablities have been consolidated
period payables, receivables etc at the for the first time in the period. We need to
date of acquisition should be take account of that when we look at the
added in the relevant cash flow movement in group assets and liabilities
working. in the relevant cash flow working.
Subsidiary The subsidiary’s property, plant and Reason: the assets and liabilities
disposed of in equipment, inventories, payables, of the sold subsidiary have been
the period receivables etc at the date of deconsolidated in the period.
disposal should be deducted in We need to take account of that when
the relevant cash flow working. we look at the movement in group assets
and liabilities in the relevant cash flow
working.
Illustration 6
Acquisition of a subsidiary – effect on cash flow workings
Below is an extract from the consolidated statement of financial position of Chip Group for the year
ended 31 December:
20X6 20X5
$'000 $'000
Chip Group acquired 100% of the equity shares of Potts on 1 August 20X6. At the date of
acquisition, Potts had property, plant and equipment with a carrying amount of $3,980,000.
During the year, Chip Group charged depreciation of $3,420,000 and acquired new equipment
under lease agreements totalling $4,450,000.
Required
Calculate the cash purchase of property, plant and equipment for the Chip Group for the year ended
31 December 20X6.
366
Solution
You should approach this in the same way as for a single entity, but remember to add the assets on
acquisition of Potts.
$'000
Opening balance (b/d) 27,400 Add amounts
Add acquired with subsidiary 3,980 acquired from Potts
Add acquired under lease agreements 4,450
Less depreciation (3,420)
32,410 Balancing figure is
Acquired for cash β 2,390 the cash outflow
Closing balance (c/d) 34,800
The cash outflow of $2,390 is shown in the consolidated statement of cash flows under the 'cash
from investing activities' section.
2.7 Impairment losses under the indirect method

Impairment losses (for example on goodwill, investment in associate or investment in joint venture),
like depreciation and amortisation, are accounting expenses rather than cash outflows and therefore
must be added back to profit before tax when calculating cash generated from operations.
2.8 Disclosure
Chapter 16 Section 3 of the Supplementary Reading considers the additional disclosure requirements
for group statements of cash flows and amendments made to IAS 7 disclosure requirements as a
result of the IASB's Disclosure Initiative. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the
Workbook.
3 Approach to preparing a group statement of cash flows

Tutorial note
Question 1 of the exam could require the preparation of a full group statement of cash flows, or,
more likely, extracts from it. You need to be able to prepare the full statement in order to gain a
good understanding of how the figures within it are generated, so that you can interpret a group
statement of cash flows as well as prepare extracts from it. BPP recommends the following approach
to questions requiring the preparation of a full group statement of cash flows, which you can practise
in the activity below.
Step 1 Read the question and set up a proforma, including operating, investing and financing
sections.
Step 2 Work through the consolidated statement of financial position figures, transferring the
opening and closing balances to workings for assets, equity, liabilities and working
capital adjustments, or to the face of the statement of cash flows, eg for the cash and
cash equivalents balances.
Step 3 Work through the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive
income, transferring the relevant figures to the face of the statement of cash flows (eg
profit before tax) or to workings (eg income tax).
367
Step 4 Deal with any additional information, remembering to focus on the cash implication of
the information, particularly if there has been an acquisition or disposal of members of
the group during the period. Include the additional information in the workings.
Step 5 Complete the workings (using the missing figure approach to calculate the cash inflow
or outflow). Transfer the figures to the statement of cash flows and cross-reference to the
working, remembering to show inflows as positive figures and outflows as negative
figures.
Step 6 If the direct method is required, do any additional workings needed (eg calculate cash
received from customers, cash paid to suppliers and employees). If required to prepare
a full statement in the
Step 7 Finish off the statement of cash flows by adding up each section. exam, only do this step
if you have spare time
– it is not usually worth
many marks.
Chapter 16 Section 2 of the Supplementary Reading contains an illustration showing the preparation
of a group statement of cash flows. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the
Workbook.
Activity 3: Group statement of cash flows

The consolidated statements of financial position of P Group as at 31 December were as follows.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 DECEMBER:
20X8 20X7
$'000 $'000
Non-current assets
Goodwill 1,940 1,400
Investment in associate 3,820 3,100
50,630 46,200
Current assets
Inventories 9,600 8,100
Trade receivables 8,500 7,600
Cash and cash equivalents 2,800 1,500
20,900 17,200
71,530 63,400
Share capital ($1 ordinary shares) 5,300 5,000
Share premium account 11,340 9,000
Revaluation surplus 6,900 6,000
56,320 49,700
Non-controlling interests 2,160 1,700
58,480 51,400
368
20X8 20X7
$'000 $'000
Deferred tax 2,350 2,100
Current liabilities
Trade payables 10,100 9,400
Current tax 600 500
10,700 9,900
71,530 63,400
The consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended
31 December 20X8 was as follows.
$'000
Revenue 60,800
Gross profit 12,200
Expenses (8,320)
Other operating income 120
Share of profit of associate 800
Income tax expense (1,200)
Gains on property revaluation 1,000
Share of gain on property revaluation of associates 180
Total comprehensive income for the year 4,530

Owners of the parent 3,440
3,600
4,530
The following information is also relevant:

(a) On 1 April 20X8, P, a public limited company, acquired 90% of S, a limited company,
obtaining control of the company, by issuing 200,000 shares at an agreed value of $8.50
per share and $1,300,000 in cash.
369
At that time the statement of financial position of S (equivalent to the fair values of the assets
and liabilities) was as follows:
$'000
Property, plant and equipment 1,900
Inventories 700
Trade receivables 300
Cash and cash equivalents 100
Trade payables (400)
2,600
P elected to measure the non-controlling interests in S at the date of acquisition at their fair
value of $320,000.
(b) Depreciation charged to consolidated profit or loss amounted to $2,200,000.
(c) Part of the additions to property, plant and equipment during the year were imports made by P
from a foreign supplier on 30 September 20X8 for 1,080,000 corona. This was paid in full
on 30 November 20X8.
Exchange gains and losses are included in other operating income or expenses. Relevant
exchange rates were as follows:
Corona to $1
30 September 20X8 4.0
30 November 20X8 4.5
(d) There were no disposals of property, plant and equipment during the year.
Required
Prepare the consolidated statement of cash flows for P Group for the year ended 31 December 20X8
under the indirect method in accordance with IAS 7, using the proforma below to help you.
Notes to the statement of cash flows are not required.
Solution
P GROUP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X8
$'000 $'000
Profit before taxation
Adjustments for:
Depreciation
Impairment loss
Foreign exchange gain
in inventories
Increase or
decrease
in trade and other receivables
in trade payables
Cash generated from operations

Income taxes paid
370
Net cash from operating activities

Acquisition of subsidiary, net of cash acquired
Purchase of property, plant & equipment
Dividends received from associate
Net cash used in investing activities

Proceeds from issue of share capital
Dividends paid to owners of the parent
Dividends paid to non-controlling interests
Net cash from financing activities
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year
Workings
1 Assets
Property, plant Goodwill Associate
& equipment
$'000 $'000 $'000
Statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income (SPLOCI)
Depreciation
Impairment
Acquisition of subsidiary
Non-cash additions
Cash paid/(rec'd) β
2 Equity
Share capital/ Retained NCI
share premium earnings
$'000 $'000 $'000

SPLOCI
Cash (paid)/rec'd β
371
3 Liabilities
Tax payable
$'000
SPLOCI
Cash (paid)/rec'd β
4 Working capital changes

Inventories Trade receivables Trade
payables
$'000 $'000 $'000
Increase/(decrease) β
5 Foreign transaction
Chapter 16 Section 2.1 of the Supplementary Reading includes an activity requiring the preparation
of a consolidated statement of cash flows including the disposal of a subsidiary during the year. This
372
4 Analysis and interpretation of group statements of cash

flow
Tutorial note
You will be expected to go beyond the preparation of group statements of cash flows (or extracts
thereof) and be able to discuss and interpret the information they contain. It is advisable to break the
statement of cash flows down into its component parts (operating, investing and financing activities)
and consider the reasons for movements and the business implications of significant cash flows. You
should always consider the perspective of the user when analysing cash flow information.
4.1 Areas to consider

Asking the following questions will help you to analyse and interpret a group's statement of cash
flows.
Gives an
Cash balance Is there an overall increase or decrease in cash? indication of
how good the
Companies that are seen as cash rich can often come under pressure from entity is at
investors to either invest the cash within the business or distribute it in the turning profit
form of dividends paid. Not all stakeholders view increases in cash into cash.
positively. A lender, such as a bank, may consider it more likely that a
company with a positive cash balance will repay its debts early or not
require future finance, which has a negative impact on the bank’s profits. If profit made,
but no cash
generated, has
Cash flows from  Is there a cash inflow or outflow? profit been
operating activities manipulated?
 Is the operation profit or loss making?
 Depreciation – is there a likely increase or decrease of depreciation in the Or is this due to
movement in
future? Has property, plant and equipment (PPE) been purchased or sold in
working
the year (see 'investing activities')? capital?
 Is there any profit or loss on the sale of PPE? Why has the entity sold PPE?
 Is there a gain or loss on investments and any investment income? Are
investments generating a strong return? Does the entity have weak or
strong treasury management?
 Are there increases or decreases in trade receivables, inventories and
trade payables? Does this show weak or strong management of working
capital? Different stakeholders may have alternate views on a company's
working capital position. A supplier who provides goods on credit will be
concerned that poor working capital management may indicate that the
company is a credit risk and so may impose strict credit terms on the
company. A bank or other lender may, however, see an opportunity to
provide the company with a loan or overdraft to help with any working
capital deficits.
Note that the consolidated information is often not that meaningful to

creditors, who are interested in the ability to pay its debts of the individual
company which owes them money. One of the group companies could be
insolvent or have a declining working capital position, but that cannot be
seen from the consolidated statement of cash flows.
The degree to which the consolidated statement of cash flows gives a faithful
representation of the cash position of the individual group companies
depends on the degree of deviation of the individual statements of cash flow
from the group statement.
 Has any interest been paid in the year? Have any borrowings been repaid
or taken out in the year (see 'financing activities')?
373
Cash flows from  Is there a cash inflow or outflow? Generally, a
cash outflow
investing activities
 Are there any acquisitions of PPE and/or investments in the year? How from investing
were they funded (operating or financing)? What could be the impact of activities implies
this in the future (eg increased operational capacity)? a growing
business.
 Are there any disposals of PPE and/or investments in the year? Were they
at a profit or loss (see 'operating activities')? Why were they sold? Impact
Has PPE been
on future? sold to
 Have any interest or dividends been received? Assess the return on manipulate
cash flows?
investment and treasury management. Or old PPE
replaced with
The employees of the company or group will be encouraged by cash
new?
outflows from investing activities as this indicates job security and
potentially expanded operations going forward. They may, however, put
the company or group under pressure to also invest in its employees by
paying increased wages or bonuses to match any investment in
operations. As noted above, the consolidated statement of cash flows
may not reveal important information regarding the underlying individual
company position.
Cash flows from  Is there a cash inflow or outflow?

financing activities
 Has new finance been raised in the year? Debt or equity? Why has it
Eg if new
been raised? What are the future implications? Lenders will be interested
finance used for
in this as they will be able to assess whether finance has been obtained working capital
from alternative sources and what the implications of this are on management
covenants, security of finance and the group's risk profile. Again though, could indicate
the individual statement of cash flow of the company to which it has liquidity issues
provided finance is likely to be more useful.
 Has any finance been repaid in the year? How has the entity afforded to Eg, if cash used
repay it? to pay off a
lease or loan, it
 Have any dividends been paid in the year? What proportion of profit will have
before tax has been paid out compared to the proportion reinvested? positive impact
Assess the generosity of the directors' dividend policy. on future profit
& cash flow
Ratio analysis
You might find it helpful to your analysis to calculate some or all of these ratios:
Cash return on capital employed

= × 100%
Capital employed
Cash generated from operations to total debt

=
Long - term borrowings
Net cash from operating activities to capital expenditure
Net cash from operating activities

= × 100%
Net capital expenditure
374
Activity 4: Analysis
The Horwich Group has been trading for a number of years and is currently going through a period
of expansion of its core business area.
The statement of cash flows for the year ended 31 December 20X0 for the Horwich Group is
presented below.
Cash flows from operating activities $'000 $'000
Adjustments for:
Depreciation 380
Gain on sale of investments (50)
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment 45
Interest costs 420
2,815
Increase in trade receivables (400)
Increase in inventories (390)
Increase in payables 550
Interest paid (400)

Acquisition of subsidiary (net of cash acquired) (800)
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment (340)
Proceeds from sale of investments 150
Dividends received 80

Proceeds from share issue 300
Proceeds from long term borrowings 300
Dividend paid to owners of the parent (1,000)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period 110
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period 385
Required
Analyse the above statement of cash flows for the Horwich Group, highlighting the key features of
each category of cash flows.
375
Exercise 1: Cash flow analysis
Go online and look up the annual report of a company you are familiar with. Have a go at
analysing the statement of cash flows for that company, then review the narrative material in the front
of the annual report to see what the company has said about its cash flows.
Ethics note
At least one question in the SBR exam will involve ethical issues, so you need to be alert to any
threats to the fundamental principles of ACCA's Code of Ethics and Conduct when approaching
statement of cash flow questions. For example, there may be pressure on the reporting accountant to
achieve a certain level of cash flows from operating activities, which might tempt the accountant to
manipulate how certain cash flows are presented (this could be a self-interest or intimidation threat,
depending on the reasons for the pressure).
It is possible to manipulate cash flows by, for example, delaying paying suppliers until after the year
end, or perhaps by selling assets and then repurchasing them immediately after the year end in order
to show an improved cash position at the year end.
It is also possible to manipulate how cash flows are classified. Most entities opt to present 'cash flows
from operating activities' using the indirect method. This is usually because gathering the information
required to use the direct method is deemed too costly. However, the indirect method requires
complicated adjustments to get from profit before tax to cash from operations. These adjustments are
difficult to understand and confusing to users of the financial statements, and therefore provide
opportunities for manipulation by preparers.
There may be a temptation to misclassify cash flows between operating, investing and financing
activities in order to improve, say, cash from operations. The lack of understanding of the indirect
method may make it easier to hide the misclassification. If the classification of a cash flow is
motivated by say, self-interest on behalf of the reporting accountant, rather than by the most
appropriate application of IAS 7, the behaviour of the accountant would be unethical.
Time pressure at the year end may also lead to errors, especially when preparing the statement of
cash flows using the indirect method where some of the adjustments are not straightforward.
376
Chapter summary
Group statements
of cash flows (IAS 7)
2. Consolidated statements 3. Approach to preparing

1. Definitions and
of cash flows a group statement of
formats
Additional considerations: cash flows
 Cash flows are cash and
 Cash paid/received to acquire/sell 1 Proforma
'cash equivalents' subsidiaries (net of cash acq'd/disposed)
(short term highly liquid 2 Transfer SOFP info to
 Cash paid/received to acquire/sell face/working
investments
associates/joint ventures
– Readily convertible 3 Transfer SPLOCI info
 Adjust workings for assets/liabilities of
into cash 4 Additional info inc
subsidiaries acquired/disposed
– Insignificant risk of acquisition/disposals
 Dividends paid to NCI:
changes in value) 5 Complete workings and transfer
NCI
Formats: figures
b/d – SOFP X
SPLOCI (NCI in TCI) X 6 (Additional workings if direct
 Indirect method
method)
Acquisition of S (NCI at FV X
 Direct method
or %FVNA) 7 Add up SOCF
Disposal of S (X)
Non-cash (X)
(eg FX loss foreign S)
Cash (dividends paid (X)
to NCI) 
c/d – SOFP X 4. Analysis and
interpretation of
 Dividends rec'd from associates/JVs:
group statements of
Inv in
A/JV
cash flow
b/d X  Components of cash flows
SPLOCI (%PFY + %OCI) X  Overall change in cash
Acquisition of A/JV X  Cash flows vs expectations,
Disposal of A/JV (X) eg operating activities should
Non-cash (eg FX loss (X) be a key inflow, investing
foreign A/JV) activities a key outflow
Cash (dividends (X)
rec'd) 
c/d X
Foreign currency transactions:
 Eliminate FX differences that are not cash
flows:
Adjustment for:
Depreciation 450
Foreign
exchange loss 40
Interest expense 400
3,740
 Adjust in workings (see examples above)
377
1. Definitions and formats
The format of a consolidated statement of cash flows is consistent with that for a single entity.
Both the direct and indirect methods of preparation are acceptable.
 The preferred method under IAS 7 is the direct method (as it shows information not
available elsewhere in the financial statements). However, the indirect method is more
common in practice as it is easier to prepare.
 The indirect method is more difficult for users to understand and is therefore open to
manipulation.
2. Consolidated statements of cash flows
 Additional considerations include:
– Dividends paid to non-controlling shareholders
– Dividends received from associates
– Cash flows on acquisition/disposal of group entities
3. Approach to preparing a group statement of cash flows
 BPP recommends a methodical approach of working through the statement of financial
position, statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income then notes, thinking
'each figure goes somewhere: face or working (or both)'.
4. Analysis and interpretation of group statements of cash flows
 The statement of cash flows itself can tell us useful information about the business' ability
to generate cash and the source/use of cash. Ratio analysis can also assist in
interpretation.
378
Question practice
Q18 Porter
Further reading
topics studied in this chapter and which are useful reading:
Cashflow statements (2010)
Cash equivalents or not cash... (2013)
Reconciliation? (2015)
379
380
SKILLS CHECKPOINT 3
Applying good consolidation techniques
aging information
Man
aging information
Man
An
sw
er
pl
t
en
manag ime
an
em
t
nin
Good
g
Applying good
r p re t ati o n
consolidation Specific SBR skills
e nts
techniques
Applying good
req f rrprneteation
consolidation
re m
Creating effective
i ts
techniques
discussion
m eun
of t inotect i
uireeq
Eff d p
an
c re
e c re
Performing
r re o r
C
ti v
se w ri
nt tin rical
Co
ati g Efficient nume

on analysis
Efficient numerical
analysis
Introduction
questions that will total 50 marks. The first question will be based on the financial
statements of group entities, or extracts thereof. ACCA's approach to examining the
syllabus states that 'candidates should understand that in addition to the consideration of the
numerical aspects of group accounting (max. 25 marks), a discussion and explanation
of these numbers will also be required' (Strategic Business Reporting Syllabus and Study Guide,
p11).
This Skills Checkpoint is designed to demonstrate application of good consolidation techniques
when answering both written and numerical aspects of Question 1 of your SBR exam.
Note that Section B of the exam could deal with any aspect of the syllabus so it is also
possible that groups feature in Question 3 or 4. The technique that you learn in this Skills
Checkpoint will also prepare you for answering a Section B question featuring group
accounting.
In the Workbook groups chapters (Chapters 10–16), the techniques for preparing a full
consolidated primary statement have been explained. Therefore, this Skills Checkpoint will
focus on the more challenging technique for correcting errors in group financial
statements that have already been prepared.
381
Skills Checkpoint 3: Applying good consolidation techniques
SBR Skill: Applying good consolidation techniques

A step by step technique for applying good consolidation techniques has been
outlined below. Each step will be explained further as the question in this Skills
Checkpoint is attempted in stages.
STEP 1:
Look at the mark allocation of the question and
work out how many minutes you have to
answer each part of the question (based on
1.95 minutes a mark).
STEP 2:
Read the requirement for each part of the question
and analyse it. Highlight each sub-requirement
separately, identify the verb(s) and ask yourself what
each sub-requirement means.
STEP 3:
Read the scenario. Identify exactly what information
has been provided (eg individual company financial
statements, group financial statements, extracts thereof
and/or narrative information). Ask yourself what you
need to do with this information (eg prepare a full
group primary statement or an extract thereof or
correct existing group financial statements). Identify
which group workings or consolidation adjustments
may be required.
STEP 4:
Draw up a group structure (incorporating %
acquired, acquisition date and reserves at
acquisition). Make notes in the margins of the
question as to which consolidation working,
adjustment or correction to error is required. Do not
perform any detailed calculations at this stage.
STEP 5:
Write up your answer using key words from the
requirements as headings (if preparing narrative).
When correcting errors, it is easier to perform the
calculations first then explain them. Be careful not to
overrun on time with your calculations – they will
typically be worth only approximately 40% of the
marks.
382
Skills Checkpoint 3
Tutorial note
Steps 1–3 apply to all types of groups questions (preparation of a full group primary
statement or extract thereof or correction of errors in existing group financial
statements). However, Steps 4 and 5 focus more specifically on correction of errors as
this is the most challenging type of groups question, and the question in this Skills
Checkpoint will focus on this.
Exam success skills

 Good time management. The groups question is likely to be the most time-
pressured in the SBR exam. You need to divide your time between the
requirements based on 1.95 minutes a mark. Write the finishing time for each
requirement on your question paper and make sure that you do not overrun.
The temptation will be to ensure that every single number in your answer is
exactly right but there will not be time for this. Remember that the pass mark is
50% so you should be aiming for at least a 65% answer to give yourself margin
for error. Focus on the easy marks and do not worry if you are unable to
address all of the more complex marks.
 Managing information. The most important skill here is active reading. A lot
of information (both numerical and narrative) is typically provided in the groups
question. For each piece of information, you should be asking yourself 'what
should I do with this?' In other words, you need to identify which consolidation
working, adjustment or correction is required and jot this down in the margin of
the question next to the relevant piece of information.
 Correct interpretation of requirements. For the groups question, you
need to ascertain whether your answer should be narrative, numerical or both.
You should establish whether it is a preparation style question (of a group
financial statement or extract thereof) or a correction of errors style question (of
pre-prepared group financial statements). The requirement will be clear – make
sure you produce what you are asked for.
 Answer planning. For a groups question, you will typically spend less time
planning than for a discussion type question. You should aim to draw up the
group structure (including the percentage acquired, date of acquisition and
reserves at acquisition). Then, rather than drawing up a formal plan, the best
use of your time is to annotate the question paper margins noting which group
working, adjustment or correction of error will be required.
 Efficient numerical analysis. The key to success here is knowing the
proformas for typical consolidation workings. For example, for a consolidated
statement of financial position, you need to be familiar with the proformas for:
– Goodwill
– Investment in associate
– Consolidated reserves (one working for each type of reserve where
applicable – retained earnings, other components of equity, revaluation
surplus)
– Non-controlling interests.
For a consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
(SPLOCI), the key working is for non-controlling interests (share of profit for year
and total comprehensive income).
383
Make sure you know how to calculate and adjust for a provision for unrealised
profit and that you can draw up the fair value adjustment table where required.
 Effective writing and presentation. When asked for an explanation with
suitable calculations, the best approach is to prepare the calculation first as this
should enable you to then explain what you have done. Be careful not to
overrun on your calculations – with a question like this, calculations are only
likely to be worth about 40% of your marks with the remaining 60% being
awarded to the written explanation.
Where a question involves correcting errors in group financial statements, the
explanation should be written up as follows:
(1) Identify the incorrect accounting treatment in the question
(2) Explain why that accounting treatment is incorrect
(3) Explain what the correct accounting treatment should be
(4) Explain the adjustment required to correct the errors in the question – it is
useful to include the correcting journal(s) here.
384
Skills Checkpoint 3
Skill Activity
how many minutes you have to answer each part of the question.
Based on 1.95 minutes a mark, you have approximately 29 minutes
to answer part (a) and approximately 10 minutes to answer part (b).
You should write the finishing time for each part on your question
paper, ensuring that you do not overrun.
Required
(a) Explain, with suitable workings, how the following figures should have been
calculated for inclusion in the consolidated statement of financial position of the
Grape Group as at 30 November 20X9, showing the adjustments required to
correct any errors:
(i) Goodwill on acquisition of Pear
(ii) Non-controlling interests in Pear. (15 marks)
(b) Show how the goodwill in Fraise should have been calculated and explain the
adjustment required to correct any errors. (5 marks)
(Total = 20 marks)
STEP 2 Read the requirement for each part of the following question and
analyse it. Highlight each sub-requirement, identify the verb(s) and ask
yourself what each sub-requirement means.
Sub-requirement 1
Required
(a) Explain, with suitable workings, how the following figures should have been
calculated for inclusion in the consolidated statement of financial position of the
Grape Group as at 30 November 20X9, showing the adjustments required to
correct any errors: Sub-requirement 2
(ii) Non-controlling interests in Pear. Note the two consolidated (15 marks)
SOFP workings required
Sub-requirement 1
(b) Show how the goodwill in Fraise should have been calculated and explain the
adjustment required to correct any errors. (5 marks)
Sub-requirement 2
(Total = 20 marks)
385
Note the three verbs used in the requirements. Two of them have been defined by the
ACCA in their list of common question verbs ('explain' and 'calculate'). A dictionary
definition can be used for the third ('show'). These definitions are shown below:
Verb Definition Tip for answering this

question
Explain To make an idea clear; to show Identify the error and explain
logically how a concept is why it is an error. State the
developed; to give the reason for correct accounting treatment
an event. and explain why it is correct.
Conclude with the adjustment
required to correct the error.
Calculate To ascertain by computation, to Provide a narrative description

make an estimate of; evaluation, to for each line in your
perform a mathematical process. calculation. Use the standard
consolidation working
proforma to structure your
calculation.
Show 'To explain something to someone Complete the following

by doing it or giving instructions' calculations:
(Cambridge English Dictionary).  Goodwill in Pear
 NCI in Pear
 Goodwill in Fraise
STEP 3 Read the scenario. Identify exactly what information has been
provided (eg individual company financial statements, group financial
statements, extracts thereof and/or narrative information). Ask yourself
what you need to do with this information (eg prepare a full group
primary statement or an extract thereof, or correct existing group
financial statements). Identify which group workings or consolidation
adjustments may be required.
386
Skills Checkpoint 3
Consolidated
SOFP has
Question – Grape (20 marks) Three group
companies –
already been
prepared –
The following group statement of financial position relates to the Grape you will need
to prepare a
you will need
to correct
Group which comprises Grape, Pear and Fraise. group structure
errors
GROUP STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 30 NOVEMBER 20X9
$m
Assets
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 690
Goodwill 45
Positive goodwill
Intangible assets in subsidiaries 30
765
Current assets 420
1,185
Share capital 250
Retained earnings 300
Other components of equity 60
Non-controlling interests Partly owned 195
subsidiaries 805
Non-current liabilities 220
Current liabilities 160
1,185
The following information was relevant to the preparation of the group

financial statements for the year ended 30 November 20X9.
Pear is a
6 months ago – a subsidiary
mid-year acquisition
(i) On 1 June 20X9, Grape acquired 60% of the 220 million $1

Consideration Fair value of
transferred for equity shares of Pear, a public limited company. The purchase identifiable net
goodwill assets for
working consideration comprised cash of $240 million. goodwill
working but is
Excluding the franchise referred to below, the fair value of this figure
correct? Should
the identifiable net assets was $350 million. The excess the franchise
have been
of the fair value of the net assets is due to an increase in the value included?
of non-depreciable land. No subsequent depreciation

of fair value adjustment to
include in consolidated
retained earnings and NCI
workings
387
Pear held a franchise right, which at 1 June 20X9 had a fair
IFRS 3 requires
value of $10 million. This had not been recognised in the separate
recognition of
financial statements of Park. The franchise agreement had a identifiable
Amortise
franchise right intangible assets
remaining term of five years to run at that date and is not
for 6 months
post-acquisition renewable. Pear still holds this franchise at the year-end.
Measure NCI
Grape wishes to use the 'full goodwill' method for all
at acquisition
Post to 2nd line of at fair value
acquisitions. The fair value of the non-controlling interest in Pear
goodwill working and
1st line of NCI working
was $155 million on 1 June 20X9. The retained earnings
and other components of equity of Pear were
Use to work out NCI $115 million and $10 million at the date of acquisition Permitted under
share of post-
IFRS 3 but
acquisition reserves in and $170 million and $15 million at 30 November group wishes
NCI working
to use full
20X9. goodwill
method – need
The accountant accidentally used the 'partial goodwill' method to amend NCI
from % of net
Add franchise to calculate the goodwill in Pear and used the fair value of net assets to fair
right to fair value value (in
of net assets in assets of $350 million excluding the franchise right. This goodwill and
goodwill NCI workings)
calculation valuation of goodwill $30 million calculated as the consideration
transferred of $240 million plus non-controlling interests (NCI) of
Revise to fair
value of $155 $140 million ($350 million × 40%) less net assets of
million in Add franchise
goodwill and $350 million has been included in the group statement of right to fair
NCI workings value of net
(full goodwill financial position above. There has been no impairment of assets in
method) goodwill
goodwill since acquisition. calculation
Also need to The accountant has calculated NCI in Pear at 30 November 20X9 as
deduct
Revise to fair
amortisation on $164 million being NCI of $140 million at acquisition plus NCI
value
franchise rights
(fair value share of post-acquisition retaining earnings (($170
adjustment)
million – $115 million) × 40%) and post-acquisition other
Correct – no
adjustment
components of equity (($15 million – $10 million) × 40%). needed
388
Skills Checkpoint 3
On the first day of

Fraise is a subsidiary
the current
accounting period
(ii) On 1 December 20X8, Grape acquired 70% of the equity

Foreign
subsidiary – interests of Fraise. Fraise operates in a foreign country and the Consideration
will need to transferred for
translate from functional currency of Fraise is the crown. The purchase goodwill
crowns into $ working
for the group consideration comprised cash of 370 million crowns. The fair
accounts
value of the identifiable net assets of Fraise on 1 December 20X8
was 430 million crowns. The fair value of the non-controlling NCI for goodwill
Fair value of
identifiable net working
interest in Fraise at 1 December 20X8 was 150 million
assets for
goodwill working
crowns. Goodwill has been calculated correctly using the 'full
goodwill' method. However, the accountant translated it at IAS 21 requires
goodwill to be
the exchange rate at the acquisition date of 1 December translated at the
closing rate
20X8 for inclusion in the consolidated statement of financial
position as at 30 November 20X9.
Goodwill
incorrectly
There has been no impairment of the goodwill in Fraise. included in
consolidated
The following exchange rates are relevant: SOFP at this
acquisition date
rate
Crowns to $
1 December 20X8 6
This rate is not
30 November 20X9 5 Retranslate
required for this
question goodwill using
Average for the year to 30 November 20X9 5.5 this closing rate
Required
(a) Explain, with suitable workings, how the following figures should
have been calculated for inclusion in the consolidated statement of
financial position of the Grape Group as at 30 November 20X9,
showing the adjustments required to correct any errors:
(ii) Non-controlling interests in Pear.
(15 marks)
(b) Show how the goodwill in Fraise should have been calculated and
explain the adjustment required to correct any errors. (5 marks)
(Total = 20 marks)
389
STEP 4 Draw up a group structure (incorporating the percentage acquired,
acquisition date and reserves at acquisition). Make notes in the
margins of the question as to which consolidation working,
adjustment or correction to error is required. Do not perform any
detailed calculations at this stage.
Group structure
Grape ($)
1.6.X9 60% 1.12.X8 70%

(mid-year acquisition) (on first day of year)
Pear ($) Fraise (crowns)

Reserves at acquisition: Reserves at acquisition not given
Retained earnings = $115 million but fair value of identifiable net
Other components of equity = assets = 430 million crowns
$10 million
The remainder of your planning should be in the form of annotations in the margin of
the question paper. This has been demonstrated for you in Step 3.
headings. When correcting errors, it is easier to perform the
calculations first then explain them. Be careful not to overrun on
time with your calculations – you can see from the marking guide
below that they are only worth 40% of the marks. Therefore, you
need to leave 60% of your writing time for the explanations. You
will not be able to pass the question with calculations alone. For
the explanation, you might find it helpful to write up your answer
using the following structure:
(1) Identify the incorrect accounting treatment in the question
(2) Explain why that accounting treatment is incorrect
(3) Explain what the correct accounting treatment should be
(4) Explain the adjustment required to correct the errors in the
question.
390
Skills Checkpoint 3
Marking guide
Marks
(a)(i) Explanation of goodwill calculation and adjustments – 1 mark per

point to a maximum of: 5
Calculation of goodwill 3
(a)(ii) Explanation of non-controlling interests' calculation and adjustment –

1 mark per point to a maximum of: 4
Calculation of non-controlling interests 3
(b) Explain adjustment to goodwill – 1 mark per point to a maximum of: 3

Calculation of goodwill 2
20
The answers to (a)(i) and (ii) have

been combined because converting
from partial to full goodwill methods
affects the same numbers in both the
goodwill and NCI workings so
combining answers avoids repetition
Suggested solution of points and saves time.
(a) Goodwill and non-controlling interests in Pear
(1) Explain the

The junior accountant has used the 'partial goodwill' method
incorrect
accounting
to account for the acquisition, which means that non-controlling
treatment.
interest (NCI) at acquisition was measured at the proportionate
share of identifiable net assets of $140 million (net assets of
$350 million  NCI share of 40%). However, the group has
(2) Explain why the
elected to use the 'full goodwill' method for all acquisitions accounting
treatment is
(although IFRS 3 Business Combinations allows the entity to choose incorrect.
on a transaction by transaction basis) (IFRS 3: para. 19). This

requires non-controlling interests (NCI) at acquisition
(3) Explain what the to be measured at fair value which is
correct accounting
treatment should $155 million for Pear on 1 June 20X9. Therefore the NCI figure
be.
needs adjusting in the goodwill working and the NCI
working. (4) Explain the
adjustment
required.
391
A second error has been made because the fair value of
(1) Explain the
incorrect identifiable net assets used in the goodwill calculation excludes
accounting
treatment. (2) Explain why
the franchise right. IFRS 3 requires the parent to recognise the accounting
treatment is
goodwill separately from the identifiable intangible assets incorrect.
acquired in a business combination even if they have not been

recognised in the subsidiary's individual financial statements
(IFRS 3: para. 13, B31). An intangible asset is identifiable if it
meets either the separability criterion (capable of being separated
or divided from the subsidiary and sold, transferred, licensed,
(3) Explain what
rented or exchanged) or the contractual-legal criterion (arises from
the correct
accounting
contractual or legal rights) (IFRS 3: para. B31, B33). The franchise
treatment
should be
right arises for contractual arrangements; therefore they should be
(initial
measurement).
recognised as a separate intangible asset in the consolidated
(4) Explain the statement of financial position of the Grape Group. This
adjustment
required increases the fair value of identifiable net assets at
(initial
measurement). acquisition and decreases goodwill as shown by the corrected
goodwill calculation below. Note that the fair value adjustment
required for the land has already been included in the fair value of
identifiable net assets of $350 million given in the question.
Goodwill in Pear
$m $m
Consideration transferred 240 Calculation:
Non-controlling interests (at fair value) 155  Use

standard
proforma
Less: fair value of identifiable net assets
 Complete
at acquisition before
per question 350 explanation
but show after
fair value adjustment 10
(360)
Goodwill (under 'full goodwill' method) 35
The correcting entry for goodwill is:

$m $m
DEBIT Goodwill 5
Show correcting
entry for DEBIT Intangible assets 10
adjustment
CREDIT Non-controlling interests 15
392
Skills Checkpoint 3
Once the franchise right has been recognised as a separate

(3) Explain what
intangible asset, it must be amortised over its useful life the correct
accounting
which is its remaining term of five years, given that it is not treatment
should be
renewable at the end of its term. Since the acquisition occurred (subsequent
measurement)
six months into the year, only six months' amortisation should be
charged in the year ended 30 November 20X9, which amounts to
$1 million ($10 million × 1/5 × 6/12). The amortisation should
(4) Explain the
adjustment be included in expenses in the consolidated statement of profit or
required
(subsequent loss and the group share (60%) deducted from retained earnings in
measurement)
the consolidated statement of financial position with the NCI share
(40%) being deducted in the NCI working. The remaining
intangible asset of $9 million ($10 million less $1 million
amortisation) should be included in the consolidated statement of
financial position as at 30 November 20X9.
Non-controlling interest in Pear

$m
Calculation:
NCI at acquisition (at fair value) 155.0
 Use standard
NCI share of post-acquisition: proforma
Retained earnings
 Complete
(170 – 115 – 1 amortisation)  40% 21.6 before
Other components of equity explanation
but show
(15 – 10)  40% 2.0 after
NCI at 30.11.X9 178.6
As the NCI at acquisition figure has already been corrected from

share of net assets to fair value in the correcting entry for goodwill
– the only remaining correction required is to record the
amortisation of the franchise right:
$m $m
DEBIT Non-controlling interests 0.4
Show correcting
entry for DEBIT Consolidated retained earnings 0.6
adjustment
CREDIT Intangible assets 1
The end result is a corrected NCI figure of $178.6 million
(calculated as: original NCI $164m + adjustment to bring NCI at
acquisition up to fair value $15m – NCI share of amortisation of
franchise right $0.4m).
393
Tutorial note
You might have found it helpful to prepare a fair value adjustments table to
assist your understanding but this was not required.
Fair value adjustments
At acq'n Movement Year-end
(1.6.X9) (30.11.X9)
$m $m $m
Land [350 – (220 + 115 + 10)] 5 – 5
Franchise at 1.6.X8 10 (1) 9
15 (3) 14
(b) Goodwill in Fraise

(2) Explain why the
The junior accountant has translated the goodwill of Fraise at the accounting
(1) Explain the treatment is
incorrect acquisition date rate (crowns 6: $1). However, IAS 21 The incorrect
accounting
treatment Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates requires goodwill in
Fraise to be translated at the closing rate each year end as (3) Explain what the
correct accounting
required by (IAS 21: para. 47). Therefore, goodwill will need to treatment should
be
be retranslated and since the 'full goodwill' method has been used,
(4) Explain the
adjustment the group share of the exchange gain should be recognised
required
(subsequent in the translation reserve and the NCI share in NCI in the
measurement)
consolidated statement of financial position.
Goodwill in Fraise
Calculation: Crown (m) Rate $m
 Use Consideration transferred 370
standard
proforma Non-controlling interests (at fair value) 150
 Complete Less fair value of identifiable net assets (430)
before
Goodwill at 1 December 20X8 90 6 15
explanation
but show Exchange gain (balancing figure) – 3
after
Goodwill at 30 November 20X9 90 5 18
394
Skills Checkpoint 3
The correcting entry in the group statement of financial position is:

$m $m
DEBIT Goodwill 3
Show correcting
entry for CREDIT Translation reserve (70% × $3m) 2.1
adjustment
CREDIT Non-controlling interests (30% × $3m) 0.9
 It would be very easy in a question like this to spend most or all of

your time on the calculations and to write little or nothing in terms
of explanations. However, as you can see from the marking
guide, 60% of the marks are for narrative explanation and 40%
for the calculations so you really needed to tackle the narrative
explanation in order to pass.
 Both parts of the questions ((a) and (b)) have been answered and
the relative length of the answers is in proportion to the mark
allocations.
 All three of the verbs in the requirements have been addressed –
'explain', 'calculate' and 'show'.
 There is a narrative for each number in the calculations to ensure
that they are clear to follow.
395
completed below for the Grape activity to give you an idea of the type of points that you
should be considering when assessing your answer. Complete the section entitled 'most
important action points to apply to your next question'.
Exam success sills Your reflections/observations

Good time Did you split your time according to the mark allocations so
management that approximately three-quarters of your time was spent
answering part (a) and one-quarter on part (b)?
When writing up your answer, did you leave 60% of your
time for written explanations?
Managing information Did you spot all of the errors by the junior accountant in the
scenario?
Did you know how to correct these errors?
Answer planning Did you draw up a group structure?
Did you then complete your planning by annotating the
margin of the question paper? It is useful to circle a number
in the question and make a note of which consolidation
working it should be included in or which consolidation
adjustment is required.
Correct interpretation Did you spot the two sub-requirements in each of part (a)
of requirements and part (b)?
Did you understand what was meant by the two key verbs
'explain' and 'show'?
Effective numerical Did you know and use the standard consolidation workings
analysis for goodwill and non-controlling interests?
Were you able to extract the numbers required from the
scenario?
Did you manage to identify the adjustments required to
correct the errors?
Effective writing and Did you use underlined headings in your answer?
presentation Did your answer contain both written explanations and
calculations?
Were all of the numbers in your calculations clearly
labelled?
Did you answer both part (a) and part (b)?
Did you clearly explain the adjustments required to correct
the errors?
Did you use full sentences?
Did you explain why the junior accountant's treatment was
incorrect and did you justify the correct accounting
treatment?
396
Skills Checkpoint 3
Summary
Groups are very important in your SBR exam as they are guaranteed to be tested in
Question 1. Therefore, applying good consolidation techniques will have an important
part to play in you passing the exam.
The activity in this Skills Checkpoint demonstrated the approach to correcting errors in
consolidated financial statements. With this type of question, the key to success is not
spending all your time on the calculations. Sufficient time must be allocated to the
narrative explanation or you will not pass the question. Make sure that when your
practise further questions on groups that you attempt all written requirements rather
than just focusing on the calculations.
397
398
Interpreting financial
statements for different
stakeholders
Learning objectives
Syllabus
reference no.
Discuss and apply relevant indicators of financial and non-financial performance E1(a)
including earnings per share and additional performance measures.
Discuss the increased demand for transparency in corporate reports and the E1(b)
emergence of non-financial reporting standards.
Appraise the impact of environmental, social and ethical factors on performance E1(c)
measurement.
Discuss the current framework for integrated reporting (IR) including the E1(d)
objectives, concepts, guiding principles and content of an integrated report.
Determine the nature and extent of reportable segments. E1(e)
Discuss the nature of segment information to be disclosed and how segmental E1(f)
information enhances the quality and sustainability of performance.
Discuss the impact of current issues in corporate reporting. The following F1(c)
examples are relevant to the current syllabus:
1. The revision of the Conceptual Framework
2. The IASB's Principles of Disclosure Initiative
3. Materiality in the context of financial reporting
4. Primary financial statements
5. Management commentary
6. Developments in sustainability reporting
Note. Only items (5) and (6) are covered in this chapter. The remaining items
are covered in Chapter 19.
Discuss developments in devising a structure for corporate reporting that F1(d)

addresses the needs of stakeholders.
399
Exam context
The Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) syllabus requires students to examine financial statements from
a number of different stakeholder perspectives. Section B of the exam will always include a full
question or a part of a question that requires the analysis and interpretation of financial and/or non-
financial information from the preparer's or another stakeholder's perspective. This takes you beyond
simply preparing financial statements to understanding how the financial statements provide
information to end users.
400
17: Interpreting financial statements for different stakeholders
Chapter overview
Non-
Financial Alternative Reportable
Financial Disclosures
segments
1. Stakeholders 2. Performance measures 5. Segment reporting
Interpreting financial statements for

different stakeholders
3. Non-financial 4. Integrated
reporting reporting
Demand for Current Environmental Management

transparency reporting and social commentary
401
1 Stakeholders
Stakeholder: anyone with an interest in a business; they can either affect or be affected by the
business.
Key term
Interpretation and analysis of financial statements and other elements of corporate reports is often
performed by stakeholders for decision making. Not all stakeholders are interested in the financial
performance of a business, and the SBR exam is likely to test you on a range of different stakeholder
groups, often with competing interests.
The most common stakeholders, and one reason for their interest in an entity, are provided in
Activity 1 below. The table is not exhaustive and you should use the space provided to include other
reasons and stakeholders.
Activity 1: Stakeholders
Required
Complete the table below by including an additional reason why each of the given stakeholders may
be interested in the financial statements prepared by an entity, and identify two further stakeholders
with reasons.
Group Reason Further reason

Try to
Management Management are often set think of
some non-
performance targets and use the financial
financial statements to compare reasons
company performance to the targets
set, often with a view to achieving
bonuses.
Employees Employees are concerned with job

stability and may use corporate
reports to better understand the future
prospects of their employer.
Present and Existing investors will assess whether

potential their investment is sound and
investors generates acceptable returns.
Potential investors will use the
financial statements to help them
decide whether or not to buy shares
in that company.
Lenders and Lenders and suppliers are concerned

suppliers with the credit worthiness of an entity
and the likelihood that they will be
repaid amounts owing.
Customers Customers may want to know that

products and services provided by an
entity are consistent with their ethical
and moral expectations.
402
2 Performance measures
'Performance' can mean different things to different stakeholders. Traditional financial performance
measures preferred by shareholders remain important, but there is an increasing focus on non-
financial and alternative performance measures such as employee well-being and the environmental
impact that an entity has.
Preparers of financial statements need to carefully balance the demand for a wide range of
information against the cost of preparing it and the risk of publishing information that is potentially
commercially sensitive.
It is important to put yourself in the shoes of the stakeholder in a question in order to perform the
appropriate type of analysis.
2.1 Financial performance measures

Financial indicators of performance are useful for comparing the results of an entity to:
 Prior year(s)
 Other companies operating in the same industry
 Industry averages
 Benchmarks
 Budgets or forecasts
Financial performance analysis can take many forms. These are explained in the following sections.
2.1.1 Ratio analysis

The broad categories of ratios
You should be familiar with how to calculate the common ratios. Chapter 17 Section 1 of the
Supplementary Reading provides revision of the calculations and the basic definitions of ratios
and Section 2 explains common problems with ratio analysis. This is available in Appendix 2 of the
digital edition of the Workbook.
Ratio analysis involves comparing one figure against another to produce a ratio, and
assessing whether that ratio indicates a weakness or strength in the company's affairs.
You are unlikely to be asked to calculate many ratios in the SBR exam, or not directly at any rate. If,
say, you were asked to comment on a company's past or potential future performance, you would be
expected to select your own ratios in order to do so. The skill here is picking appropriate ratios in
the context of the question. For example, non-current asset turnover will be more relevant to a
company in the manufacturing sector than the services sector.
A question could also ask for the impact on a specified ratio of certain accounting
treatments or you may be required to correct errors then recalculate the specified ratio.
403
Ratios are commonly categorised into the following types.
Financial performance
Profitability Efficiency Investor

Gross profit margin Asset turnover Earnings per share (EPS)*
Net profit margin Non-current asset turnover Price/Earnings (P/E ratio)
Return on capital employed Profit retention ratio
Return on equity Dividend payout rate
Dividend yield
Dividend cover
Financial position
Liquidity Working capital Financial leverage

management
Current ratio Gearing
Acid-test ratio Current ratio Interest cover
Acid-test ratio
Inventory holding period
Receivables collection period
Payables payment period
*EPS will be covered further in Section 2.1.2

In the context of interpreting the financial statements, it is important that you consider the following
points relating to ratio analysis:
(a) Calculations are not analysis.
(b) Explaining what the ratio tells you is a starting point to analysis but is unlikely to score
much credit.
(c) Analysis often involves comparison (eg to prior periods or industry averages) – you have to
interpret what the movement/difference is telling you. You should use information you are
given in the scenario or have formed in other parts of the question to suggest reasons for the
outcome of the ratio. Also consider if there are any non-financial consequences.
Eg: Profitability has deteriorated because the entity has used a new higher priced supplier in
the period. Consider whether there are any non-financial consequences – does the new
supplier have a higher ethical standard or does it offer a higher quality product that is more
reliable for customers?
(d) You should consider the implication of ratios on the entity and other stakeholders.
Eg: What is the impact of the payables period increasing?

From the entity's perspective, this has a positive impact on working capital management
but is it planned or necessary due to a shortage of cash flow? What are the non-financial
implications of this? Does it impact the entity's ability to obtain future credit from a supplier?
Will the entity's reputation be adversely affected?
From the supplier's perspective, there might be concern as to whether they will receive
amounts owed, or if there will be repeat orders and the resulting implications for the amount of
inventory held.
404
(e) Consider whether the entity has undertaken any transactions/events in the year that
have a significant impact on ratios.
Eg: An issue of debt in the year will impact gearing and interest cover ratios. Why did the
entity issue the debt – is it restructuring? Is it investing in assets? Don't just assume that an
increase in gearing is necessarily a 'bad' thing if there will be other benefits for the entity.
(f) Consider the impact of different accounting policies on ratios, particularly if comparing
to other entities.
Eg: An entity that revalues its land and buildings regularly might have a lower return on assets
than a very similar entity that holds its land and buildings at historical cost.
The following three step approach is recommended in ratio analysis:

Step 1 If comparing two years, state whether the ratio has improved or deteriorated (don't just
say 'increased' or 'decreased' – you need to demonstrate your understanding is not just
numerical). If comparing two companies, state which company's ratio is better (rather
than 'higher'). This adds value.
Step 2 State why the ratio has increased/decreased or is better/worse – avoid generic
reasons; use reasons in the scenario (link numbers together and use narrative
information).
Step 3 Conclude – explain the longer term impact on the company and make a
recommendation for action where appropriate.
Activity 2: Liquidity analysis

The following is an extract from the financial statements of Wheels for the year ended 31 August
20X7.
STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS

20X7 20X6
$'000 $'000
Revenue 32,785 31,390
Profit for the year 3,300 2,700
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

Current assets
Inventory 430 445
Receivables 3,860 2,510
Cash 12 37
Current liabilities
Payables (4,660) (2,890)
Bank overdraft (280) (40)
Wheels secured a large new contract to supply goods to a large department store across a two year
period from 1 April 20X7. Wheels normally offers wholesale customers 30 days' credit, but the
department store would only agree to the contract with 90 days credit terms. The directors of Wheels
agreed to this as they believed it was worth it to have their products placed with this department
405
store. Wheels has an average 45 day credit from its suppliers. The bank overdraft is used to fund
working capital and currently has a limit of $300,000.
Required
(a) Analyse the liquidity of Wheels from the entity's perspective.
(b) Discuss the other stakeholders who may be interested in the liquidity of Wheels.
Activity 3: Ratio analysis

LOP operates in the construction industry and prepares its financial statements in accordance with
IFRS. It is listed on its local exchange. LOP is looking to expand its overseas operations by acquiring
a new subsidiary. Two geographical areas have been targeted, Frontland and Sideland. Entity A
operates in Frontland and entity B operates in Sideland. Both entities are listed on their local
exchanges.
The financial highlights for entities A, B and LOP are provided below for the last trading period.
A B LOP
Revenue $160m $300m $500m
Gross profit margin 26% 17% 28%
Net profit 9% 11% 16%
Gearing 65% 30% 38%
Average rate of interest available in the 5% 9% 8%
respective markets
P/E ratio 11.6 15.9 16.3
Required
Analyse the information provided by the key financial indicators above and explain the impact that
each entity would have on the financial indicators of LOP.
The problems with financial performance measures are explained in Chapter 17 Section 4 of the
Supplementary Reading. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
2.1.2 IAS 33 Earnings Per Share (EPS)
You should be familiar with the definitions used in IAS 33 and with how to calculate basic EPS and
diluted EPS from your previous studies. Chapter 17 Section 3 of the Supplementary Reading provides
further detail on the definitions, calculations, presentation and significance of EPS. This is available in
2.1.3 Calculation and use of EPS

Earnings per share is one of the most widely used investor ratios. EPS is presented within the
The objective of IAS 33 is to improve the comparison of the performance of different entities in the
same period and of the same entity in different accounting periods. It is a measure of the amount of
profits (after tax, non-controlling interests and preference dividends) earned by a company for each
ordinary share (IAS 33: para. 1).
406
There are two EPS figures which must be disclosed – basic EPS and diluted EPS:
Basic EPS Diluted EPS
Calculated by dividing the net profit Calculated by adjusting the net

or loss for the period attributable to profit or loss and weighted
ordinary equity holders of the parent average number of ordinary
by the weighted average number shares that are used in the basic
of ordinary shares outstanding EPS calculation to reflect the
during the period (IAS 33: para. 10). impact of potential ordinary
shares.
EPS is an important factor in assessing the stewardship and management role performed by
company directors and managers. Remuneration packages might be linked to EPS growth, thereby
increasing the pressure on management to improve EPS. The danger of this, however, is that
management effort may go into distorting results to produce a favourable EPS.
Tutorial note
You are unlikely to have to deal with complicated EPS calculations in the SBR exam. You should
however be alert to situations in which EPS is subject to manipulation by the directors of an
entity, particularly in respect of the earnings figure.
You should also be able to explain and calculate the impact on EPS of certain
accounting treatments. A question could ask you to correct accounting treatments and calculate
a revised EPS figure.
Illustration 1
EPS Earnings manipulation
Vero manufactures furniture and is heavily capitalised. The depreciation expense is significant to the
financial statements, marking up around 40% of the operating expenses of the company for the last
3 years. For unrelated reasons, the EPS of the company has been declining across the same period.
The Finance Director of Vero is considering extending the remaining useful lives of its property, plant
and equipment by an average of 5 years, which will reduce the depreciation expense by around
$4m per annum, and in turn help to increase EPS.
Required
Comment on any ethical issues associated with the proposed change in useful life of Vero's assets.
Remember that
ethics will be
tested in
Question 2 of
the SBR exam
but could also
be tested in
other questions
407
Solution
Step 1 State the relevant rule or principle per the accounting standard(s)
IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment requires an entity to review the useful life of
its assets at least every financial year end, and, if expectations differ from previous
estimates, the change should be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate
(IAS 16: para. 51).
IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors only
permits revisions of accounting estimates if changes occur in the circumstances on
which the estimate was based or as a result of new information or more
experience (IAS 8: para. 34).
Step 2 Apply the rule or principle to the scenario

Therefore, Vero would only be able to extend the useful life of its assets if the
proposed revised useful life is a better reflection of the period across which the
company expects to extract benefits from the assets. Evidence to justify this could
include large profits on disposals of assets as a result of too short a useful life.
An increase to the useful life would reduce expenses, increase earnings and
therefore result in a more favourable EPS figure.
Step 3 Explain the ethical issues (threats to the ethical principles of the
ACCA Code of Ethics and Conduct)
However, it appears that the aim of the Director is to use the change in useful life
as a means to manipulate earnings. We are told that EPS has been declining and
this appears to be an attempt to cover up the reason for the decline.
Therefore, there is a threat to the fundamental principles of integrity and objectivity
if the Finance Director deliberately changes an accounting estimate to increase
earnings and EPS. Furthermore, an unjustified change would result in non-
compliance with IAS 16 and therefore, contravene the fundamental principle of
professional competence.
From an ethical perspective, the Director should not actively take steps to
manipulate earnings and attempt to mislead stakeholders.
408
Activity 4: EPS manipulation

IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors requires prior period errors
to be adjusted by restating prior year comparatives as if the error had never taken place. The impact
of the error is adjusted for through retained earnings meaning the correction of errors does not
impact reported profit or loss in the current period.
Required
Discuss, giving a relevant example, how the requirements of IAS 8 could be used as a method for
manipulating earnings and explain the implications this may have for using EPS as a performance
indicator.
Ethics note
This section has discussed manipulation of earnings, which is one of a number of potential ethical
issues you may be required to comment on in the SBR exam. Other examples could include a
company that makes significant sales to related parties and the directors not wanting to disclose
details of the transactions, directors trying to window dress revenue by offering large incentives to
make sales to un-creditworthy customers (although IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
makes this difficult), or manipulating estimates to achieve required results.
2.2 Alternative performance measures

Entities are increasingly reporting alternative performance measures (APMs) rather than 'text book'
ratios.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has issued Guidelines on Alternative
Performance Measures for listed issuers. The aim of the guidelines is to promote the usefulness and
transparency of APMs. In those guidelines, ESMA defines an APM as follows.
Alternative performance measure (APM): an APM is understood as a financial measure of

historical or future financial performance, financial position, or cash flows, other than a financial
Key term
measure defined or specified in the applicable financial reporting framework.
(ESMA Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures, 2015: para. 17)
409
Examples of commonly reported APMs
EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation)
Description Advantages Disadvantages
EBITDA is considered an EBITDA is often used It is subject to manipulation

indicator of the earnings internally by by the directors as entities have
potential of a business. It can management as it discretion as to what is included
be used to analyse and represents the earnings in the calculation and can
compare profitability of a business that management change what is included from
between companies because it has most control over. one reporting period to the next.
eliminates the effects of Reporting this measure gives There is a common
financing and accounting stakeholders an indication misconception that EBITDA
decisions. of management represents cash earnings.
performance. EBITDA is a Stakeholders using EBITDA as
good metric to evaluate a performance measure should
profitability (but not cash flow). be aware of its weaknesses
and should use it in conjunction
with other performance measures
to make sure EBITDA is consistent.
EVA® (Economic Value Added)
EVA® is a measure of a Maximisation of EVA® will EVA® can encourage managers

company's financial create real wealth for the to focus on short-term
performance based on its shareholders. performance.
residual wealth by EVA® may be less distorted EVA® is based on historical
deducting its costs of capital accounts which may be of
by the accounting policies
from its operating profit, selected as the measure is limited use as a guide to the
adjusted for taxes on a cash based on figures that are future.
basis. closer to cash flows than A large number of
It shows the amount by accounting profits. adjustments are required to
which earnings exceed or EVA® recognises costs such calculate net operating profit
fall short of the minimum as advertising and after taxes (NOPAT) and the
rate of return that investors development as investments economic value of net assets.
could get by investing for the future and thus they Allowance for relative size
elsewhere. do not immediately reduce the must be made when comparing
EVA® in the year of the relative performance of
expenditure. investment centres.
EVA® focuses on efficient
use of capital.
410
Benchmarking
Benchmarking involves an Benchmarking uses realistic There is no consistency in

entity setting best practice performance targets for what is reported – an entity
or industry standards as a the operations of a business could report only those
target. The business then and allows stakeholders to benchmarks that it has success in
attempts to improve its own understand what an entity has and elect not to report others.
performance by being as good focused on in a period. They focus on past
as, or better than, targets in It is useful in not-for-profit performance and do
the most important areas of organisations in which not look forward to the future
operation. earning profit is not the aims of the entity.
Some entities report primary focus.
benchmarking metrics within
It helps to highlight the
their financial statements.
importance of non-
financial performance
measures (see Section 2.3).
Advantages and disadvantages of APMs
Advantages Disadvantages
Clearer story of how Scepticism from

the business has investors about
performed quality and reliability
More freedom and

flexibility to tailor Scope for
measures to company manipulation
APMs can enhance a user's understanding of the performance of a business, but they can also be
misleading. APMs may be subject to management bias in their calculation because management can
choose to report certain APMs and not others, or they could manipulate calculations to present the
entity in a more favourable light. Comparability is an issue as there can be inconsistency in the
calculation of APMs from year to year and in which particular APMs are reported. Unless an APM is
appropriately described, there may be a lack of transparency about what information is included in
the calculation of it. Furthermore, APMs are often described using terminology that is not defined in
accounting standards and therefore users cannot easily understand what the APM is reporting.
The IASB has started to look at the issues arising from the use of APMs as part of its Disclosure
Initiative, focusing particularly on IAS 1. The users of financial statements have suggested that APMs
provide useful information only if they are fairly presented.
Improving the usefulness of APMs to investors

ESMA believes that adhering to its guidelines will improve the comparability, reliability and/or
comprehensibility of APMs.
411
Exercise 1: APMs
Go online and have a look at ESMA's Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures. They are
available at www.esma.europa.eu in the Rules, Databases & Library tab.
Then do some research on the types of APMs disclosed by companies you are familiar with.
2.3 Non-financial performance indicators

Non-financial performance indicators (NFPIs) are measures of performance based on non-
financial information which may originate in, and be used by, operating departments to monitor and
control their activities without any accounting input.
The most effective NFPIs will be both specific and measurable. There is an increasing focus on
non-financial performance measures, and entities are reporting key non-financial indicators alongside
the primary financial statements.
Entities have different 'success measures'– some of the more common ones include:
Area assessed Examples of performance measures
Employees  Employee satisfaction scores from company surveys

 Employee turnover rates
 Absence rates
 Remuneration gap between upper and lower earning
employees
 Working conditions, particularly if an entity has overseas
operations
 Gender pay gap and gender equality measures
Customers  Average delivery times

 Average product/service reviews (from eg TripAdvisor)
 After care policies including return policies and
warranties
 Number of repeat customer orders received
 Number of new accounts gained or lost
 Number of visits by representatives to customer premises
Productivity  Capacity utilisation of facilities and personnel

 Number of units produced per day
 Average set-up time for new production run
Social  Brand awareness and marketing

 Reputation of the entity, particularly if there has been
negative press relating to the industry
 Charitable work undertaken by staff such as 'giving
something back' days and entity-sponsored donations
 Tax and involvement in tax avoidance schemes
Environmental  Levels of emissions and commitments to reduce emissions

 Energy usage and investment in renewable sources
 Resource usage (eg water, gas, oil, metals, coal,
minerals, forestry)
 Impact of business activities on biodiversity
 Environmental fines and expenditures
412
Balanced scorecard
Entities often use the 'balanced scorecard' to assess its performance because it focuses on both
financial and non-financial perspectives (customer, internal, innovation and training):
Perspective Question Explanation
Customer What do existing and new Gives rise to targets that matter
customers value about us? to customers (eg cost, quality,
delivery, inspection, handling)
Internal What processes must we excel Aims to improve internal

at to achieve our financial and processes and decision
customer objectives? making
Innovation and learning Can we continue to improve Considers the business's

and create future value? capacity to maintain its
competitive position through
the acquisition of new skills
and the development of new
products
Financial How do we create value for Covers traditional measures

our shareholders? such as growth, profitability
and shareholder value but set
through talking to the
shareholder(s) directly
Activity 5: Non-financial measures

ZJET is an airline company that operates both domestically and internationally using a fleet of 20
aircraft. Passengers book flights using the internet or by telephone and pay for their flights at the time
of booking using a debit or credit card.
The airline has also entered into profit sharing arrangements with hotels and local car hire
companies that allow rooms and cars to be booked by the airline's passengers through the airline's
website.
ZJET currently measures its performance using financial ratios. The new Managing Director has
suggested that other measures are equally important as financial measures and has suggested using
the balanced scorecard.
Required
Identify three non-financial performance measures (one from each of three non-financial perspectives
of the balanced scorecard) that ZJET could use as part of its performance measurement process.
413
Solution
Perspective Measure Why?
Customer
Internal
Innovation & learning
3 Non-financial reporting
Non-financial reporting enables entities to be more transparent in communicating non-financial
elements of their business to their stakeholders. Non-financial reporting can have significant
benefits to an entity in terms of its reputation and positive stakeholder engagement.
3.1 Demand for transparency

Entities, particularly large multi-nationals, are an integral part of society. They provide us with
products and services, they employ us, they pay taxes that support our economies, and they get
involved in political discussions and agendas. As such, it has become increasingly important that we
understand how an entity does business.
There are some principles (such as those published in the Global Reporting Initiative Standards) of
non-financial reporting that have helped develop a generally accepted concept as to what non-
financial reporting should achieve:
Stakeholder Completeness
inclusiveness
Materiality Sustainability
context
(GRI 101: Foundation, p7)

These principles have helped to shape the types of non-financial report we see today.
414
3.2 Current reporting requirements

3.2.1 IFRS requirements
Under IFRSs there are no required disclosure requirements for environmental and social matters.
However, environmental matters may be disclosed where they fall under specific accounting
principles:
 Provisions for environmental damage are recognised and contingent liabilities are disclosed
under IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets.
 IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements requires disclosure of facts material to a proper
understanding of financial statements.
3.2.2 National requirements
Some countries require disclosure of environmental performance under national law. For example,
the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway and Sweden have had required environmental reporting for a
number of years.
The European Union's Business Review under the Accounts Modernisation Directive, which came into
effect (through implementation in national law) in 2005 encourages the disclosure of key
performance indicators (KPIs) on environmental and employee matters.
3.2.3 Voluntary disclosure
Voluntary disclosure and the publication of environmental reports has now become the norm for
quoted companies in certain countries as a result of pressure from stakeholder groups to give
information about their environmental and social 'footprint'.
The creation of ethical indices has added to this pressure – for example the FTSE4Good index in the
UK, and the Dow Jones Sustainability Group Index in the US.
Sustainability reporting
The initial disclosure of environmental matters has now expanded into sustainability reporting which
integrates environmental, social and economic performance data and measures (including the
economic element of sustainability such as wages, taxes and core financial statistics).
A number of guidelines and standards for sustainability disclosure are available, but the most well-
known is the Global Reporting Initiative.
The Global Reporting Initiative
The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (www.globalreporting.org) is a long-term, multi-
stakeholder, international not-for-profit organisation whose mission is to develop and disseminate
globally applicable GRI Standards on sustainability reporting for voluntary use by organisations.
Further detail on the GRI Standards can be found in Chapter 17 Section 5 of the Supplementary
Reading. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
3.3 Environmental and social reporting

3.3.1 Environmental reporting
The aim of environmental reporting is the disclosure of an organisation's corporate
environmental responsibilities and the effects of its activities on its environment.
The growing awareness within the general population of environmental issues plus pressure from
non-governmental organisations (NGOs) has led to the expectation that quoted organisations
will make these disclosures.
415
External reporting of social and environmental issues is now seen as a key part of a company's
dialogue with its stakeholders. The issues reported often vary due to trends being reported in
media or by governments in a given period.
General public Regulators and

and future policy makers
population
Core values of a sustainable

business
Banks and Economic viability Local

shareholders Environmental responsibility communities
Social accountability
Employees Customers and

suppliers
3.3.2 Social reporting

The aim of social reporting is to measure and disclose the social impact of a business's activities:
Examples of social measures include:
 Philanthropic donations, whether of corporate resources, profit based donations or allowing
employees time to support charitable causes;
 Employee satisfaction levels and remuneration issues;
 Community support; and
 Stakeholder consultation information.
The benefits of environmental and social reporting and the concept of human capital accounting are
explained in Chapter 17 Section 6 of the Supplementary Reading. This is available in Appendix 2 of
the digital edition of the Workbook.
416
3.4 Management commentary

3.4.1 Definition of management commentary
Management commentary: a narrative report that relates to financial statements that have
been prepared in accordance with IFRSs. Management commentary provides users with
Key term
historical explanations of the amounts presented in the financial statements, specifically the
entity's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. It also provides commentary on an
entity's prospects and other information not presented in the financial statements. Management
commentary also serves as a basis for understanding management's objectives and its
strategies for achieving those objectives.
(IFRS Practice Statement: Appendix)
3.4.2 IFRS Practice Statement

The IFRS Practice Statement is a non-binding guidance document rather than an IFRS.
It is intended to be applied by entities that present management commentary that relates to financial
statements prepared in accordance with IFRSs. It is designed for publicly traded entities, but it is left
to regulators to decide which entities are required to publish management commentary and how
frequently they should report.
This approach avoids the adoption hurdle, ie that the perceived cost of applying IFRSs increases.
This perceived extra cost could dissuade jurisdictions/countries that have not already adopted IFRS
from requiring its adoption, especially where IFRS requirements differ significantly from existing
national requirements.
Principles for the preparation of management commentary
Management should present commentary that is consistent with the following principles from the
IFRS Practice Statement:
(a) To provide management's view of the entity's performance, position and progress; and
(b) To supplement and complement information presented in the financial statements.
(IFRS Practice Statement: para. 12)
In aligning with these principles, management commentary should include:
(a) Forward-looking information (including prospective results); and
(b) Information that possesses the qualitative characteristics described in the Conceptual
Framework for Financial Reporting.
Presentation
The form and content of management commentary will vary between entities, reflecting the
nature of their business, the strategies adopted by management and the regulatory environment in
which they operate (IFRS Practice Statement: para. 22).
Therefore, the Practice Statement does not require a fixed format, nor does it provide application
guidance or illustrative examples, as this could be interpreted as a floor or ceiling for disclosures.
Elements of management commentary
The particular focus of management commentary will depend on the facts and circumstances
of the entity.
417
However, the Practice Statement requires a management commentary to include information that is
essential to an understanding of:
(a) The nature of the business
(b) Management's objectives and its strategies for meeting those objectives
(c) The entity's most significant resources, risks and relationships
(d) The results of operations and prospects
(e) The critical performance measures and indicators that management uses to evaluate
the entity's performance against stated objectives.
These elements are explained further in Chapter 17 Section 7 of the Supplementary Reading. The
advantages and disadvantages of a compulsory management commentary are covered in the same
section. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
4 Integrated reporting
4.1 International Integrated Reporting <IR> Framework
Integrated reporting is a relatively new concept that urges entities to focus on the value creators
within their business, with view on the longer term success of a business rather than the short
term focus on results that arises from other types of reporting.
4.1.1 Definitions
Integrated reporting <IR>: a process founded on integrated thinking that results in a periodic
integrated report by an organisation about value creation over time and related communications
Key term
regarding aspects of value creation.
(International <IR> Framework, Glossary)
Integrated report: a concise communication about how an organisation's strategy,
governance, performance and prospects, in the context of its external environment, lead to the
creation of value over the short, medium and long term.
(International <IR> Framework, Part I, 1A, 1.1)
4.1.2 Objectives of <IR>

The International <IR> Framework was published by the International Integrated Reporting Council
(IIRC), a global coalition of regulators, investors, companies, standard setters, the accounting
profession and NGOs.
The stated aims of <IR> are to:
 'Improve the quality of information available to providers of financial capital to enable
a more efficient and productive allocation of capital;
 Promote a more cohesive and efficient approach to corporate reporting that draws on
different reporting strands and communicates the full range of factors that materially affect
the ability of an organisation to create value over time;
 Enhance accountability and stewardship with respect to the broad base of capitals
(financial, manufactured, intellectual, human, social and relationship, and natural) and
promote understanding of their interdependencies;
418
 Support integrated thinking, decision-making and actions that focus on the creation
of value over the short, medium and long term.'
(International <IR> Framework, About Integrated Reporting)
4.1.3 Fundamental concepts
There are three elements to the fundamental concepts:
Value creation Value created by an organisation over time manifests itself in

(International <IR> increases, decreases or transformations of the capitals caused
Framework, Part I, 2B) by the organisation's business activities and outputs. That value
has two interrelated aspects – value created for:
 The organisation itself (enabling financial returns to
providers of financial capital); and
 Others (ie stakeholders and society at large).
The capitals Stocks of value that are increased, decreased or transformed

(International <IR> through the activities and outputs of the organisation. Includes:
Framework, Part I, 2C)  Financial capital
 Manufactured capital
 Intellectual capital
 Human capital
 Social and relationship capital
 Natural capital.
The value creation At the core of the organisation is its business model, which
process draws on various capitals as inputs and, through its business
(International <IR> activities, converts them to outputs (products, services, by-
Framework, Part I, 2D) products and waste).
4.1.4 Guiding principles

<IR> has a number of guiding principles which provide the foundations for what an integrated report
should be focused on:
An integrated report should:
A Strategic focus  Provide insight into the organisation's strategy, and how it
and future relates to its ability to create value in the short, medium
orientation and long term, and to its use of and effects on the
capitals.
B Connectivity of  Show a holistic picture of the combination,

information interrelatedness and dependencies between the factors
that affect the organisation's ability to create value over
time.
C Stakeholder  Provide insight into the nature and quality of the

relationships organisation's relationships with its key stakeholders and
how and to what extent the organisation understands,
takes into account and responds to their legitimate needs
and interests.
419
An integrated report should:
D Materiality  Disclose information about matters that substantively affect

the organisation's ability to create value over the short,
medium and long term.
E Conciseness  Include sufficient context to understand the organisation's

strategy, governance, performance and prospects without
being burdened with less relevant information.
F Reliability and  Include all material matters, both positive and negative, in
completeness a balanced way and without material error.
G Consistency and  Present information on a basis that is consistent over time

comparability and in a way that enables comparison with other
organisations to the extent it is material to the
organisation's own ability to create value over time.
(International <IR> Framework: Part II, p16–23)
4.1.5 Content elements

<IR> also provides guidance as to what an integrated report should include:
Question that should be answered by an

integrated report:
A Organisational overview What does the organisation do and what are the
and external environment circumstances under which it operates?
B Governance How does the organisation's governance structure
support its ability to create value in the short, medium and
long term?
C Business model What is the organisation's business model?
D Risks and opportunities What are the specific risks and opportunities that affect
the organisation's ability to create value over the short,
medium and long term, and how is the organisation
dealing with them?
E Strategy and resource Where does the organisation want to go and how does it
allocation intend to get there?
F Performance To what extent has the organisation achieved its strategic
objectives and what are its outcomes in terms of effects
on the capitals?
G Outlook What challenges and uncertainties is the organisation
likely to encounter in pursuing its strategy, and what are
the potential implications for its business model and future
performance?
H Basis of preparation and How does the organisation determine what matters to
presentation include in the integrated report and how are such matters
quantified or evaluated?
(International <IR> Framework: part II, p24–32)
420
4.1.6 General reporting guidance
Disclosure of material matters  Taking the nature of a material matter into

(International <IR> Framework, consideration, consider providing:
Part II, p30) (a) Key information (eg explanation of matter and
effect on strategy/business model/capitals, relevant
interactions/interdependencies, actions to manage
the matter, extent of organisation's control over the
matter, quantitative and qualitative disclosures)
(b) Disclosures about any uncertainty surrounding a
matter (eg explanation, range of possible outcomes
and assumptions, volatility)
(c) If information is indeterminable, disclose this fact
and reason for it
(d) If significant loss of competitive advantage would
result, make disclosures of a general nature
 May be appropriate to present matter in its own
integrated report
 Care is needed to avoid generic disclosures
 Quantitative disclosures (eg KPIs) can help increase
comparability and are helpful in reporting against
targets
Disclosures about the capitals  Determined by effects on the organisation's ability
(International <IR> Framework, to create value over time (include factors affecting
Part II, p31) availability, quality, affordability, organisation's
ability to produce flows from them to meet demand)
 Where not practical to quantify, make qualitative
disclosures
 Disclose interdependencies considered in
determining reporting boundary and important
trade-offs influencing value creation over time
Time frames for short, medium  Typically longer than for some other forms of
and long term reporting (refer to business, investment cycles,
(International <IR> Framework, strategies, stakeholders' needs)
Part II, p32)  Time frames differ by industry or sector and nature
of outcomes
 Length of each reporting time frame and reason for
length might affect nature of disclosure.
Aggregation and disaggregation  Level of aggregation (eg by country, division, site)
(International <IR> Framework, appropriate to circumstances of organisation
Part II, p32)  Aggregation could result in loss of meaning and
failure to highlight strong or poor performance but
unnecessary disaggregation can result in clutter
 Disaggregate (or aggregate) based on how senior
management oversees operations
421
Illustration 2
Materiality and integrated reporting
Materiality is an issue in preparing financial statements and is cited as one of the reasons why
financial statements often contain too much irrelevant information ('clutter') and not enough relevant
information upon which stakeholders can take decisions. The IAS 1 Presentation of Financial
Statements definition of material is not wholly consistent with the integrated reporting definition of
materiality.
Required
Discuss whether the concept of materiality in IAS 1 is appropriate for use in an integrated report.
Solution
In traditional financial reporting, materiality refers to whether the inclusion or not of an item gives rise
to the potential for misstatement in the financial statements. IAS 1 defines material omissions or
misstatements as being 'material if they could, individually or collectively, influence the economic
decisions that users make on the basis of the financial statements' (IAS 1: para. 7).
Integrated reporting considers transactions and events to be material if they impact an entity's ability
to create value for its owners in the short, medium and long term.
The IAS 1 definition of materiality is too narrow to be applied to an integrated report as its sole
focus is the financial statements. The Integrated Reporting framework takes a wider view that items
considered material under IAS 1 would only also be material to an integrated report if they influence
those who may provide capital (in its many different forms) with regards to the organisation's ability
to create value. Additional matters may, however, be deemed material in integrated reporting if the
matter could influence the assessments of the report's users.
The Integrated Reporting framework would also consider an item material if it helped to demonstrate
that senior management was discharging its responsibilities, regardless of the financial value of that
item.
Activity 6: Integrated reporting

Integrated reporting is focused on how an entity creates value for its owners in the short, medium and
long term. Stakeholders are unlikely, however, to rely only on an integrated report when making
decisions about an entity.
Required
Discuss any concerns that stakeholders may have in considering whether integrated reporting is
suitable for helping to evaluate a company.
Exercise 2: Non-financial reporting

The annual report of UK listed company, Marks & Spencer plc, is a good example of an annual
report that contains non-financial performance measures and non-financial reporting. You can take a
look at the report here: http://annualreport.marksandspencer.com/
Take some time to research the annual reports of some companies that you are familiar with and
review the non-financial disclosures and alternative performance measures that they have presented.
422
5 Segment reporting
5.1 Introduction
Financial statements are highly aggregated which can make them of limited use for stakeholders
who want to understand more about how an entity has arrived at its financial performance and
position for a period.
Large entities in particular often have a wide range of products or services and operate in
a diverse range of locations, all of which contribute to the results of the entity as a whole.
In order to allow shareholders to fully understand the development of the company's business, certain
entities are required to provide segment information which discloses revenues, profits and
assets (amongst other items) by major business area.
IFRS 8 Operating Segments is only compulsory for entities whose debt or equity instruments are
traded in a public market (or entities filing or in the process of filing financial statements for the
purpose of issuing instruments) (IFRS 8: para. 2).
It is key that you understand:
what a reportable what information

segment is should be disclosed
5.2 Definition
An operating segment is a component of an entity:

(a) That engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses
Key term
(including revenues and expenses relating to transactions with other components of the same
entity);
(b) Whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the entity's chief operating decision maker
to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance;
and
(c) For which discrete financial information is available.
5.3 Reportable segments

An operating segment should be reported on separately in the financial statements if any of the
following criteria are met (IFRS 8: para.13):
(a) Its revenue (internal and external) is 10% or more of total revenue;
(b) Its reported profit or loss is 10% or more of all segments in profit (or all segments in loss if
greater); or
(c) Its assets are 10% or more of total assets.
Segments should be reported until at least 75% of the entity's external revenue has been
disclosed.
If all segments satisfying the 10% criteria have been disclosed and they do not amount to 75% of
total external revenue, additional operating segments should be disclosed (even if they do not meet
the above criteria) until the 75% level is reached (IFRS 8: para.15).
423
Operating segments that do not meet any of the quantitative thresholds may be reported separately if
management believes that information about the segment would be useful to users of the financial
statements (IFRS 8: para. 14).
Illustration 3: Identifying reportable segments

Jesmond, a retail and leisure group, has three businesses operating in different parts of the world.
Jesmond reports to management on the basis of region. The results of the regional segments for the
year ended 31 December 20X9 are as follows.
Revenue Segment results Segment
Region External Internal profit/(loss) assets
$m $m $m $m
Europe 140 5 (10) 300
North America 300 280 60 800
Asia 300 475 105 2,000
There were no significant intra-group balances in the segment assets and liabilities. Due to the
disappointing performance of Europe in the year, the management of Jesmond would prefer not to
include Europe as a reportable segment. They believe reporting North America and the other regions
will provide the stakeholders with sufficient information.
Required
Advise the management of Jesmond on the principles for determining reportable segments under
IFRS 8 and comment on whether Europe can be omitted as a reportable segment.
Solution
IFRS 8 requires a business to determine its operating segments on the basis of its internal
management reporting. As Jesmond reports to management on the basis of geographical reasons,
this is how Jesmond determines its segments.
IFRS 8 requires an entity to report separate information about each operating segment that:
(a) Has been identified as meeting the definition of an operating segment; and
(b) Has a segment total that is 10% or more of total:
(i) Revenue (internal and external); or
(ii) All segments not reporting a loss (or all segments in loss if greater); or
(iii) Assets.
424
The quantitative 10% criteria have been applied to Europe in the following table:
Category Criteria Jesmond Europe

reportable
Revenue Reported revenue is 10% or more Total revenue = $140m No

the combined revenue of all + $300m + $300m +
operating segments (external and $5m + $280m +
intersegment) $475m = $1,500m
10% = $150m
Profit or loss The absolute amount of its reported Total of all segments in No
profit or loss is 10% or more of profit = $60m +
the greater of, in absolute $105m = $165m
amount, all operating segments Total of all segments in
not reporting a loss, and all loss = $(10)m
operating segments reporting
10% of greater =
a loss
$16.5m
Assets Its assets are 10% or more of Total assets = $300m No

the total assets of all operating + $800m + $2,000m
segments = $3,100m
10% = $310m
Therefore Europe is not a reportable segment.

However, IFRS 8 also requires that at least 75% of total external revenue must be reported by
operating segments. Reporting North America and Asia accounts for 81% of external revenue Remember the
($600m/$740m) and therefore the test is satisfied. There is no requirement for Jesmond to include importance of
Europe as a reportable segment under the IFRS 8 criteria. ethics in your
SBR exam.
Nevertheless, it could be perceived as being unethical not to report Europe separately if the sole Watch out for
threats to the
motivation were to hide losses. Given that IFRS 8 allows management to choose to report fundamental
segments that do not meet any of the qualitative thresholds, Jesmond might like to consider disclosing principles of
ACCA's Code
Europe as a separate reportable segment.
of Ethics and
Conduct
Activity 7: Identifying reportable segments

Endeavour, a public limited company, trades in six business areas which are reported separately in
its internal accounts provided to the chief operating decision maker. The operating segments have
historically been Chemicals, Pharmaceuticals wholesale, Pharmaceuticals retail, Cosmetics, Hair care
and Body care. Each operating segment constituted a 100% owned sub-group except for the
Chemicals market which is made up of two sub-groups. The results of these segments for the year
ended 31 December 20X5 before taking account of the information below are as follows.
425
Operating segment information as at 31 December 20X5 before the sale of the
body care operations
Revenue Segment Segment Segment
External Internal Total profit/(loss) assets liabilities
$m $m $m $m $m $m
Chemicals: Europe 14 7 21 1 31 14
Rest of world 56 3 59 13 778 34
Pharmaceuticals wholesale 59 8 67 9 104 35
Pharmaceuticals retail 17 5 22 (2) 30 12
Cosmetics 12 3 15 2 18 10
Hair care 11 1 12 4 21 8
Body care 18 24 42 (6) 54 19
187 51 238 21 336 132
There were no significant intragroup balances in the segment assets and liabilities. All companies
were originally set up by the Endeavour Group. Endeavour decided to sell off its Body care
operations and the sale was completed on 31 December 20X5. On the same date the group
acquired another group in the Hair care area. The fair values of the assets and liabilities of the new
Hair care group were $32 million and $13 million respectively. The purpose of the purchase was to
expand the group's presence by entering the Chinese market, with a subsidiary providing lower cost
products for the mass retail markets. Until then, Hair care products had been 'high end' products sold
mainly wholesale to hairdressing chains. The directors plan to report the new purchase as part of the
Hair care segment.
Required
Discuss which of the operating segments of Endeavour constitute a 'reportable' operating segment
under IFRS 8 Operating Segments for the year ended 31 December 20X5.
5.4 Disclosures
Disclosures required by IFRS 8 are extensive. Chapter 17 Section 8 of the Supplementary Reading
includes an illustrative example of an IFRS 8 disclosure. You are more likely to be asked to determine
reportable segments or to interpret or critique disclosures than prepare them. This is available in
This section also includes advantages and disadvantages of the IFRS 8 requirements for segment
reporting.
Key items to be disclosed are:

(a) Factors used to identify the entity's reportable segments
(b) Types of products and services from which each reportable segment derives its revenues
(c) Reportable segment revenues, profit or loss, assets, liabilities and other material items
426
External
Revenue
Inter segment
Interest revenue
Interest expense
Depreciation and amortisation
Other material non-cash items
Material income/expense (IAS 1)

Profit, assets
Share of profit of associates/joint ventures equity accounted
& liabilities
Profit/loss (as reported to chief operating decision maker)
Income tax expense
Segment assets
Investments in associates/jointly controlled entities
Expenditures for non-current assets

(1)
Segment liabilities
A reconciliation of each of the above material items to the entity's reported figures is required.
Reporting of a measure of profit or loss by segment is compulsory. Other items are
disclosed if included in the figures reviewed by or regularly provided to the chief operating
decision maker.
(d) External revenue by each product and service (if reported basis is not products and services)
(e) Geographical information:
External revenue
(2)
by:
Geographical
 Entity's country of domicile
areas
Non-current assets
(1)
 All foreign countries (subdivided if material)
(f) Information about reliance on major customers (ie those who represent > 10% external
revenue)
1 Excludes financial instruments, deferred tax assets, post-employment benefit assets, and
rights under insurance contracts
2 Allocated based on customer's location
427
5.5 Interpreting reportable segment disclosures
The following points may be relevant when analysing segment data:
 Growing segments versus declining segments
 Loss-making segments
 Return (and other key indicators) analysed by segment
 The proportion of costs or assets etc that have remained unallocated
 Any additional segment information required.
Activity 8: IFRS 8 disclosures

The core principle of IFRS 8 Operating Segments is to 'disclose information to enable users of its
financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business activities in which it
engages and the economic environment in which it operates'.
For a publicly traded company which is required to prepare a segment report, the key users of this
report are likely to be existing and potential investors (in debt and equity instruments).
Below is an example of a segment report for JH, one of the world's leading suppliers in fast-moving
consumer goods:
JH'S SEGMENT REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 20X3 (Extracts)
Information about reportable segment profit or loss, assets and liabilities
Personal All
Food care Home care others Total
$m $m $m $m $m
Revenue from external customers 190 100 60 10 360
Intersegment revenues – – – 2 2
Interest revenue 20 16 9 – 45
Interest expense 16 14 8 – 38
Depreciation and amortisation 7 5 6 – 18
Reportable segment profit 15 3 4 1 23
Other material non-cash items
Impairment of assets – 10 – – 10
Reportable segment assets 80 20 40 5 145
Expenditure on non-current assets 9 4 5 – 18
Reportable liabilities 60 15 35 3 113
Reconciliations of reportable segment revenues, profit or loss, assets and liabilities
Total for Elimination
reportable of inter- Unallocated
segments Other segment amounts Group
$m $m $m $m $m
Revenue 352 10 (2) – 360
Profit or loss 22 1 (0.5) (5) 17.5
Assets 140 5 (2) 8 151
Liabilities 110 3 (2) 20 131
428
Required
Discuss the usefulness of the disclosure requirements of IFRS 8 for investors, illustrating your answer
where applicable with JH's segment report. (13 marks)
Professional marks will be awarded for clarity and quality of presentation. (2 marks)
(Total = 15 marks)
429
Chapter summary
Reportable Disclosure
Alternative segments requirements
Financial Non- Financial
EBITDA '10%' test for Revenue, profit or
Ratios Staff
EVA identifying loss, assets
EPS Customers
Benchmarking reportable segments mandatory
Scope for manipulation Productivity
Balanced scorecard 75% external Geographical
Environmental
revenue reported segments
1. Stakeholders 2. Performance
5. Segment reporting
measurement
Interpretation of financial 4. Integrated

statements Reporting
(see over)
3. Non-financial
reporting
Demand for transparency

 Increased role of business Social and environmental
in society Current reporting requirements Improved investor
relations/confidence
 Want to understand how  No IFRS requirements
 Competitive advantage
entities do business
 Some national requirements ('First mover' effect)
 Public recognition
 Many companies chose
 Improved risk management
voluntary disclosure:
 Access to 'preferred
Global Reporting Initiative suppliers' lists
(GRI)  Cost savings/improved
Universal disclosures profitability
GRI 101: Foundation … but
GRI 102: General disclosures  Market comes to expect it
GRI 103: Management  Negative impact if only
commentary Topic specific partial disclosures
standards
Management commentary
 Explains corporate performance
 Looks forward to future financial

position
 IFRS practise statement – non

binding IFRS sets out principles
for preparation of management
commentary
430
4. Integrated reporting
Integrated reporting <IR> focuses on value creation
An integrated report is a concise report focusing on
value creation in short, medium and long term.
Fundamental concepts: value creation, the

capitals, value creation process
Guiding principles: Strategic focus and future
orientation; Connectivity of information; Stakeholder
relationships; materiality; conciseness; reliability and
completeness; consistency and comparability
Report content: Organisational overview and
external environment; governance; business model;
risks and opportunities; strategy and resource;
performance; future outlook; basis of preparation and
presentation
General disclosure requirements: material
matters; disclosure about the capitals; time frame for
short, medium and long-term; aggregation and
disaggregation
431
1. Stakeholders
A stakeholder is anyone with an interest in a business, and can either affect or be affected by
the business. There are many different stakeholder groups. Not all stakeholders are interested in
the financial performance of a business and the SBR exam is likely to test you on a range of
different stakeholder groups, often with competing interests.
2. Performance measurement
Financial. Mainly ratio analysis. Make sure that you can define all the ratios. Look out for
variations in definitions of ratios which might appear in questions. Always remember that 'profit'
and 'net assets' are fairly arbitrary figures, affected by different accounting policies and
manipulation
EPS is a measure of the amount of profits earned by a company for each ordinary share.
Earnings are profits after tax and preferred dividends. Accounting policies may be adopted for
the purpose of manipulation. Changes in accounting standards can have a significant
impact on the financial statements and therefore EPS.
Alternative performance measures such as EBITDA, EVA®, benchmarking and balanced
scorecard help management disclosure information that is relevant for that entity, but there is a
lack of consistency in reporting and APMs are subject to manipulation.
Non-financial measures such as employee wellbeing, customer satisfaction, productivity
levels, social and environmental are increasingly important.
3. Non-financial reporting
There is an increased demand for transparency as companies become ever more
important in our society.
Current reporting requirements – there are no requirements under IFRS but some
countries have local requirements. Many companies make voluntary disclosures. The
Global Reporting Initiative has helped to establish principles of good reporting. It arose
from the need to address the failure of the current governance structures to
respond to changes in the global economy
Environmental and social reporting disclosures information about the impact of an entity.
Some of the limitations of financial statements may be addressed by a management
commentary. The IASB has issued a practice statement on a management commentary
to supplement and complement the financial statements
4. Integrated reporting
Integrated reporting is concerned with conveying a wider message on organisational
performance. It is fundamentally concerned with reporting on the value created by the
organisation's resources. Resources are referred to as 'capitals'. Value is created or lost when
capitals interact with one another. It is intended that integrated reporting should lead to a
holistic view when assessing organisational performance.
432
5. Segment reporting
Operating segments are parts of a business that engage in revenue earnings activities,
management review and for which financial information is available.
Reportable segments are operating segments or aggregation of operating segments that
meet specified criteria.
IFRS 8 disclosures are of:
 Operating segment profit or loss
 Segment assets
 Segment liabilities
 Certain income and expense items
Disclosures are also required about the revenues derived from products or services and about
the countries in which revenues are earned or assets held, even if that information is not used by
management in making decisions.
433
Question practice
Q19 Grow by acquisition
Q20 Ghorse
Q21 German competitor
Q22 Peter Holdings
Q23 Jay
Further reading
topics studied in this chapter and which are useful reading:
Changing face of additional performance measures in the UK (2014)
Giving investors what they need
The definition and disclosure of capital
The Integrated report framework
Bin the clutter
www.accaglobal.com/uk/en/student/exam-support-resources/fundamentals-exams-study-
resources/f7/technical-articles.html
For further information on <IR> and GRI:

http://integratedreporting.org/
www.pwc.com/my/en/services/sustainability/gri-index.html
www.globalreporting.org/Pages/default.aspx
434
SKILLS CHECKPOINT 4
Performing financial analysis
aging information
Man
aging information
Man
An
sw
er
pl
t
en
manag ime
an
em
t
nin
Good
g
r p re t ati o n
Specific SBR skills
e nts
Applying good
req f rrprneteation
consolidation
re m
Creating effective
i ts
discussion Performingtechniques
m eun
financial analysis
of t inotect i
uireeq
Eff d p
an
c re
e c re
Performing
r re o r
C
ti v
se w ri
nt tin rical
Co
ati g Efficient nume

on analysis
Efficient numerical
analysis
Introduction
Section B of the Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) exam will contain two questions, which may
be scenario or case-study or essay based and will contain both discursive and computational
elements. Section B could deal with any aspect of the syllabus but will always include either a
full question, or part of a question that requires appraisal of financial or non-
financial information from either the preparer's and/or another stakeholder's
perspective. Two professional marks will be awarded to the question in Section B that requires
analysis.
Given that financial analysis will feature in Section B of every exam, it is essential that you have
mastered the appropriate technique for financial analysis in order to maximise your chance of
passing the SBR exam.
As a reminder, the detailed syllabus learning outcomes for financial analysis are:
E Interpret financial statements for different stakeholders
(a) Discuss and apply relevant indicators of financial and non-financial performance including
earnings per share and additional performance measures.
(b) Discuss the increased demand for transparency in corporate reports, and the emergence of
non-financial reporting standards.
(c) Appraise the impact of environmental, social and ethical factors on performance
measurement.
(d) Discuss the current framework for integrated reporting (IR) including the objectives,
concepts, guiding principles and content of an integrated report.
(e) Determine the nature and extent of reportable segments.
(f) Discuss the nature of segment information to be disclosed and how segmental information
enhances quality and sustainability of performance.
435
Skills Checkpoint 4: Performing financial analysis
SBR Skill: Performing financial analysis

There are many possible types of financial analysis questions. This Skills Checkpoint
will focus on the analysis of the impact of accounting treatment on ratios.
The basic five steps adopted in Skills Checkpoints 1–3 should also be used in financial
analysis questions (you should be familiar with these steps now, but if not refer back to
Skills Checkpoints 1–3).
STEP 1:
Work out the time per requirement (1.95 minutes a
mark).
STEP 2:
Read and analyse the requirement.
STEP 3:
Read and analyse the scenario.
STEP 4:
Prepare an answer plan.
STEP 5:
Write up your answer.
436
Skills Checkpoint 4
Exam success skills

In this question, we will focus on the following exam success skills and in particular:
 Good time management. The exam will be time-pressured and you will
need to manage it carefully to ensure that you can make a good attempt at
every part of every question. You will have 3 hours and 15 minutes in the exam,
which works out at 1.95 minutes a mark. The following question is worth 17
marks so you should allow 33 minutes. For the other syllabus areas, our advice
has been to allow a third to a quarter of your time for reading and planning.
However, financial analysis questions require deep thinking at the planning time
so it is recommended that you dedicate a third of your time to reading and
planning (here, 11 minutes) and the remainder for writing up your answer
(here, 22 minutes).
 Managing information. There is a lot of information to absorb in this
question and the best approach is active reading. Firstly you should identify any
specific ratio mentioned in the requirement – in this question, it is earnings per
share. You need to think of the formula and, as you read each paragraph of the
question, you should assess whether the accounting treatment in the scenario
complies with the relevant IAS or IFRS. Where the accounting treatment is
incorrect, you need to work out the impact on the numerator and/or
denominator of the ratio in question. Also look out for threats to the fundamental
principles from the ACCA Code of Ethics and Conduct. It can be helpful to jot
down your ideas in the margins of the question paper.
 Correct interpretation of the requirements. There are two parts to the
following question and the first part has two sub-requirements. Make sure you
identify the verbs and analyse the requirement carefully so you understand how
to approach your answer.
 Answer planning. Everyone will have a preferred style for an answer plan.
For example, it may be a mind map, bullet-pointed lists or simply annotating the
question paper. Choose the approach that you feel most comfortable with or, if
you are not sure, try out different approaches for different questions until you
have found your preferred style. You will typically be awarded 1 mark per
relevant, well explained point so you should aim to generate sufficient points to
score a comfortable pass.
 Efficient numerical analysis. The most effective way to approach this part
of the question is to draw up a proforma to correct the original earnings per
share (EPS) calculation – you will need a working for earnings and a separate
working for the number of shares. You should start off with the figures per the
question then correct each of the errors to arrive at the revised figures. Clearly
label each number in your working.
 Effective writing and presentation. Use headings and sub-headings in
your answer, underlined with a ruler, and write in full sentences, ensuring your
style is professional. Two professional marks will be awarded to the analysis
question in Section B of the SBR exam. The use of headings, sub-headings and
full sentences as well as clear explanations and ensuring that all sub-
requirements are answered and that all issues in the scenario are addressed will
help you obtain these two marks.
437
Skill Activity
question and, at 1.95 minutes a mark, it should take 33 minutes, of
which a third should be spent reading and planning (11 minutes) and
the remainder writing up your answer (22 minutes). You then divide
your writing time between the two parts of the question in accordance
with the mark allocation – so two-thirds of your time on (a) (15
minutes) and one-third on (b) (8 minutes).
Required
(a) Advise Mr Low as to whether earnings per share has been accurately
calculated by the directors and show a revised calculation of earnings
per share if necessary. (10 marks)
(b) Discuss whether the directors may have acted unethically in the way they
have calculated earnings per share. (5 marks)
Professional marks will be awarded for clarity and quality of presentation. (2 marks)
(Total = 17 marks)
STEP 2 Read the requirements for the following question and analyse them.
Watch out for hidden sub-requirements! Underline and number each
sub-requirement or highlight them in different colours. Identify the
verb(s) and ask yourself what each sub-requirement means.
Verb – refer to Sub-

dictionary requirement 1
definition (written)
Sub-
Required requirement 2
(numerical)
(a) Advise Mr Low as to whether earnings per share has been accurately
calculated by the directors and show a revised calculation of earnings
per share if necessary. (10 marks)
Single requirement (written)
(b) Discuss whether the directors may have acted unethically in the way they
have calculated earnings per share. (5 marks)
Verb – refer to
dictionary
definition Professional marks will be awarded for clarity and quality of presentation. (2 marks)
(Total = 17 marks)
Part (a) of this question tests financial analysis skills (covered in this Skills Checkpoint 4).
Part (b) tests approaching ethical issues (covered in more detail in Skills Checkpoint 1).
438
Skills Checkpoint 4
Note the three verbs used in the requirements. One of them has been defined by the
ACCA in their list of common question verbs ('discuss'). As 'advise' and 'show' are not
defined by the ACCA, dictionary definitions can be used instead. These definitions are
shown below:
Verb Definition Tip for answering this

question
Advise 'To offer suggestions about Think about who the advice is for
the best course of action to (Mr Low) and what you are advising
someone' (English Oxford him about (earnings per share).
Living Dictionaries). Then break down the earnings per
share (EPS) ratio into its numerator
(profit attributable to the ordinary
equity holders of the parent entity)
and denominator (the weighted
average number of ordinary shares
outstanding during the period).
You will then need to assess the
accounting treatments in the
question, how they have affected the
numerator and/or denominator of
the EPS and what if any correction
is required.
Show 'To explain something to Set up two proformas:

someone by doing it or  Earnings
giving instructions.'
 Number of shares
(Cambridge English
Dictionary). Enter the original figures per the
question then a line for each
adjustment, totalling the amounts to
arrive at the revised figures. Then
recalculate EPS. Make sure that
every number in your working has a
narrative label so it is easy to
follow.
Discuss To consider and Ethical issues are rarely black and

debate/argue about the pros white. Any incorrect accounting
and cons of an issue. treatment could be due to genuine
Examine in detail by using error or deliberate misstatement –
arguments in favour or you need to consider both positive
against. and negative aspects in your
answer. Watch out for threats to the
ACCA Code's ethical principles.
439
STEP 3 Now read the scenario. For the advice on calculation of EPS,
keep in mind the IAS 33 Earnings per Share formula and for each of
the three paragraphs in the question, ask yourself which IAS or IFRS
may be relevant (remember you do not need to know the IAS or IFRS
number), whether the accounting treatment complies with that IAS or
IFRS and the impact any correction would have on the numerator and
denominator of EPS.
For the ethical implications, consider the ACCA Code. Identify
any of the fundamental principles that may be relevant (integrity,
objectivity, professional competence and due care, confidentiality,
professional behaviour) and any threats (self-interest, self-review,
advocacy, familiarity, intimidation) to these principles. For more detail
on the approach to ethical requirements, please refer back to Skills
Checkpoint 1.
Mr Low =
Question – Low Paints (17 marks) recipient of our
First day of
answer to part (a)
current On 1 October 20X0, the Chief Executive of Low Paints, Mr – former CEO and
accounting
majority
period Low, retired from the company. The ordinary share capital at the time shareholder
of his retirement was six million shares of $1. Mr Low owns 52% of
Denominator of
the ordinary shares of Low Paints and the remainder is owned by
Self-interest threat
EPS (but at start to principles of
of year – watch
employees. As an incentive to the new management, Mr Low agreed to a
integrity,
out for any objectivity and
share issues in
new executive compensation plan which commenced after his retirement.
professional
the year) competence –
The plan provides cash bonuses to the board of directors when the
incentive to
overstate profit to
company's earnings per share exceeds the 'normal' earnings
maximise bonus
(Ethics)
per share which has been agreed at $0.50 per share. The cash
bonuses are calculated as being 20% of the profit generated in excess of
that required to give an earnings per share figure of $0.50.
The new board of directors has reported that the compensation to be

paid is $360,000 based on earnings per share of $0.80 for the year
Hint that EPS
ended 30 September 20X1. However, Mr Low is surprised at the is overstated
size of the compensation as other companies in the same

industry were either breaking even or making losses in the
period. He was anticipating that no bonus would be paid during the
year as he felt that the company would not be able to earn the equivalent
of the normal earnings per share figure of $0.50. Mr Low is now
a non-executive
Mr Low, who had taken no active part in management decisions, director (and
majority
decided to take advantage of his role as non-executive director and shareholder)
demanded an explanation of how the earnings per share figure of $0.80
440
Skills Checkpoint 4
Relevant IAS = IAS
20 Accounting for
had been calculated. His investigations revealed the following Government
Grants and
information. Disclosure of
Government
Assistance
(i) On 1 October 20X0, the company received a grant from the
Two possible
First day of
Government of $5 million towards the cost of purchasing a treatments for grants
accounting related to asset under
period
non-current asset of $15 million. The grant had been credited IAS 20:
(1) Record as deferred
to the statement of profit or loss in total and the non-current income and release
Incorrect
to P/L over useful
treatment per asset had been recognised at $15 million in the statement of life of asset
IAS 20 – need
(2) Net off cost of
to correct (will financial position and depreciated at a rate of 10% per asset
decrease
earnings and annum on the straight line basis. The directors believed that neither
EPS).
of the approaches for grants related to assets under IAS 20 Apply to asset
Genuine error
and grant
or deliberate to
Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government
maximise
bonus? (Ethics)
Assistance were appropriate because deferred income does
not meet the definition of a liability under the IASB's
Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting and
Justifiable
reasons not to netting the grant off the related asset would hide the
apply IAS 20?
(Ethics) asset's true cost.
(ii) Shortly after Mr Low had retired from the company, Low Paints
made an initial public offering of its shares. The sponsor of
Relevant IAS =
IAS 32 the issue charged a cash fee of $300,000. The directors had
Financial
Incorrect – per
Instruments: charged the cash paid as an expense in the statement of IAS 32 should
Presentation
deduct from
profit or loss. The public offering was made on 1 January equity. Need to
reverse from
20X1 and involved vesting four million ordinary shares of $1 at a earnings in EPS
3 months into calculation.
the year so market price of $1.20. Mr Low and other current shareholders Adjustment will
only multiply increase EPS so
the new shares decided to sell three million of their shares as part of the offer, does not look
by 9/12 in deliberate –
EPS calculation leaving one million new shares to be issued. genuine error?
(Ethics)
Check if included in
denominator in EPS
calculation
(multiplied by 9/12
to give weighted
average)
441
(iii) The directors had calculated earnings per share for the year ended
30 September 20X1 as follows:
Adjust for grant and
Recalculate and issue costs
Profit for the year $4.8 million
check if still hits the
$0.50 bonus
Ordinary shares of $1 6,000,000 Number of shares at
threshold
start of year so add in
Earnings per share $0.80 new share issue
Mr Low was concerned over the way that earnings per share had
been calculated by the directors and he also felt that the
In part (b), will
need to advise above accounting practices were at best unethical and
Mr Low on what
to do next at worst fraudulent. He therefore asked your technical and
ethical advice on the practices of the directors.
Required
(a) Advise Mr Low as to whether earnings per share has been
accurately calculated by the directors and show a revised
calculation of earnings per share if necessary. (10 marks)
(b) Discuss whether the directors may have acted unethically in the
way they have calculated earnings per share. (5 marks)
Professional marks will be awarded for clarity and quality of
presentation. (2 marks)
(Total = 17 marks)
STEP 4 Prepare an answer plan for each part of the question. For part (a),
identify whether the accounting treatment in the question is correct
per the relevant IAS or IFRS and where it is incorrect, think about
how the adjustment will impact the numerator and/or denominator of
the EPS ratio.
For part (b), be very careful to give a balanced answer. Try and think
of genuine reasons why the directors might have come up with the
accounting treatment in the question but also look out for threats to
the ACCA Code's ethical principles. Consider each of the accounting
treatments mentioned in the question. Make sure you conclude with
advice on what Mr Low should do next.
442
Skills Checkpoint 4
Advice on EPS calculation
EPS =
Government grant Share issue

Issue costs
Reverse from P/L Include 1 million new
Reverse expense from P/L
Treat as deferred income or shares for 9 months in
Deduct from equity number of shares in EPS
deduct from cost of asset then
depreciate/amortise for 1 year calculation
Increase earnings
Reduce earnings
Discuss whether directors

have acted unethically
Deliberate or due to genuine error?

Bonus based on EPS = incentive to
manipulate profit
Issue costs
Government grant Share issue
Likely to be lack of knowledge
Well-intentioned or Very basic error which has
as complex area and directors'
deliberate? Contravenes increased EPS – deliberate?
error has decreased EPS
IAS 20 – breach of
Contravenes IAS 33
professional competence Contravenes IAS 32
443
STEP 5 Write up your answer using separate underlined headings for each
of parts (a) and (b). Then use sub-headings for items (i), (ii) and (iii)
where appropriate. Ensure that you use full sentences and explain
your points clearly.
For part (a), the following approach is recommended:
 What is the correct accounting treatment per the IAS or IFRS?
 Is the directors' accounting treatment allowed? If not, why not?
 What adjustment is required in the revised EPS working?
For part (b):
 Examine the motive behind each of the accounting treatments
 Identify relevant ethical principles and threats to them
 Conclude with advice on what Mr Low should do next
Suggested solution Underlined heading

using key words
(a) Calculation of earnings per share from requirements
Earnings per share is a widely used measure of financial

performance. Detailed guidance on its calculation and on
presentation and disclosure issues is given in IAS 33 Earnings per
Share.
You do not IAS 33 does not address the issue of manipulation of the
need to know
Introductory
the accounting numerator in the calculation, the profit attributable to ordinary paragraph
standard
recommended
number, you shareholders. The directors may manipulate it by selecting in discussion
just need to be
questions –
able to apply accounting policies designed generally to boost the earnings introduces
the relevant
formula for
rules or figure, and hence the earnings per share. EPS ratio
principles of
and how it
the IAS or
IFRS. The denominator in the calculation is the number of shares by could be
manipulated
which the earnings figure is divided. It is defined as the weighted through
unethical
average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period behaviour
and is more difficult to manipulate, although the directors

may try, as explained below.
(i) Government grant
IAS 20 Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of

Government Assistance allows two methods of accounting
for government grants.
444
Skills Checkpoint 4
Identify the (1) Set up the grant as deferred income and release it
correct
accounting to profit or loss over the useful life of the asset to offset
treatment per
the IAS or the depreciation charge; or
IFRS.
(2) Deduct the grant in arriving at the carrying amount of
the asset and depreciate the net figure.
Is the The directors justify their treatment by stating that deferred

directors'
accounting income would not meet the IASB's Conceptual Framework
treatment
allowed? If for Financial Reporting's definition of a liability and netting
not, why not?
the grant off the related asset would hide the true cost. Here,
they are letting their own personal view override the
accounting treatment prescribed by IAS 20. This justification
could be an attempt to hide their true motivation to increase
profit in order to earn their bonus.
To comply with IAS 20, the grant should therefore be
What removed from the statement of profit or loss and deducted

adjustment is
required in the from earnings in the revised EPS calculation. Only
revised EPS
working? $500,000 ($5m ÷ 10 years) should be credited to income
and added to earnings in the revised EPS calculation; the
balance of $4.5 million should be shown as a deferred
income or deducted from the cost of the asset.
(ii) Share issue
In the calculation of EPS, the directors have used the number

Is the
directors' of shares in issue when Mr Low retired from the company
accounting
treatment (6 million). They have not taken into account the new
allowed? If
not, why not? issue of shares made at the initial public offering.
Identify the The number of new shares issued is 1 million. This What
correct adjustment is
accounting needs to be time apportioned (the shares were in issue required in
treatment per the revised
the IAS or for 10 months) and added to the denominator of the EPS working?
IFRS.
EPS calculation.
Is the
directors' The treatment of the issue costs is also incorrect.
accounting
treatment IAS 32 states that transaction costs, defined as
allowed? If
not, why not? incremental external costs directly attributable to an
equity transaction, should be accounted for as a
445
Identify the deduction from equity. It was therefore incorrect to
correct
accounting credit the issue costs to the statement of profit or loss. Instead What
treatment per adjustment is
the IAS or they should have been deducted from equity. In the revised required in
IFRS. the revised
EPS calculation, the issue costs must be added back to the EPS working?
earnings in the EPS calculation.

Logical approach and all
Revised EPS calculation numbers in working
clearly labelled so easy to
Revised earnings mark.
$'000
Earnings per directors 4,800
(i) Government grant taken to deferred income (5,000)
Credited to income in year 500
(ii) Issue costs incorrectly expensed 300
Revised earnings 600
Revised number of shares
Number of shares per directors 6,000,000

Additional shares issued
9 750,000
1,000,000 ×
12
Revised number of shares 6,750,000
600, 000
 Revised EPS = = $0.09
6, 750, 000
Underlined heading
summarising in tactful
professional language
(b) Ethical matters what the answer will cover
Introductory It is not always easy to determine whether creative accounting of

paragraph
required for this kind is deliberate or whether it arises from ignorance
discussion
questions and or oversight. The assessment of whether directors have acted
takes the
balanced ethically is often a matter of the exercise of professional
approach
needed for the judgement. In practice, it is important to act fairly and tactfully
verb 'discuss'
and not jump to unwarranted conclusions.
In factual terms when the correct accounting treatment is used, an

EPS of 80 cents is converted into an EPS of 9 cents per
446
Skills Checkpoint 4
share. Since the directors are entitled to a cash bonus for an

Clearly explains
threats and EPS of above 50 cents, there would appear to be a strong
fundamental
principles from incentive for them to select accounting policies designed to
the ACCA
Code which are boost it. There is definitely a self-interest threat here to the
relevant to this
scenario fundamental principles of integrity and objectivity in the
ACCA Code of Ethics and Conduct (the ACCA Code).
Each of the
accounting treatments
covered separately
because each has its
own distinct ethical
Government grant issues
The directors' attempt to improve on the IAS 20 treatment

for grants, even if it is well-intentioned and founded on the
principles of the IASB's Conceptual Framework is not permitted
Examines because it contravenes the required treatment of IAS 20. The
motive behind
directors' apparent justification could be a mask to hide a deliberate attempt
accounting
Identifies the
treatment to increase the profit to meet the EPS target for their cash bonus. relevant
ethical
Non-compliance with IAS 20 would result in a breach of the principle and
the threat to it
principle of professional competence from the ACCA in this
scenario
Code which requires the directors to prepare financial statements
in accordance with accounting standards.
Share issue
Examines
motive behind The treatment of the issue costs of the shares may simply
directors'
accounting reflect lack of knowledge on the part of directors, rather than
treatment
unethical accounting and the error actually reduces profit and EPS,
suggesting it was not a deliberate action to increase profit to meet
their bonus target. When corrected, the earnings figure is
actually increased.
The omission of the new shares issued from the denominator

Examines
motive behind of EPS seems to be a very basic error and does have the
directors'
accounting advantage to the directors of making EPS seem higher than it
treatment
should be which suggests it may have been a deliberate action
rather than a genuine mistake.
Unless the treatment of the share issue costs is made and the new
shares added to the EPS denominator, IAS 32 and IAS 33
447
would be contravened and the directors would not be Identifies the
relevant
demonstrating professional competence. ethical
principle and
the threat to
Conclusion it in this
scenario
In practice unethical intent is difficult to prove. The best approach
should be a proactive, preventative one, rather than letting matters
get out of hand.
On the facts of the case, accounting standards have not

been followed. The likely result of not following the required
standards is that EPS will improve.
Accusations of fraud should not be made hastily without taking

legal advice. The best approach would be to discuss an
Conclude
ethical issues appropriate action plan with the chairman and other non-executive
questions with
what the directors. This is likely to involve explaining to the directors why the
person (here,
Mr Low) accounting treatments and EPS calculation are incorrect and
should do next
reminding them of their responsibility for the accuracy and
fairness of the financial statements and their obligation to
apply accounting standards.

 Both parts of the question ((a) and (b)) and both sub-requirements
in part (a) (advice on EPS calculation and revised EPS calculation)
have been addressed, each with their own heading.
 All of the accounting treatments in the scenario have been
covered (government grant, issue costs, share issue).
 The answer to part (a) is approximately twice as long as the
answer to part (b) reflecting their relative mark allocations.
 The answer to part (b) involves 'discussion' – for each accounting
treatment proposed by the directors, it considers both genuine
reasons for the error and deliberate manipulation.
 The professional marks have been obtained through answering
both parts of the question and all sub-requirements, addressing all
of the accounting treatments in the scenario, using headings and
sub-headings, and writing a balanced answer to part (b).
448
Skills Checkpoint 4
completed below for the Low Paints activity to give you an idea of how to complete the
diagnostic.
Good time Did you spend a third of your time reading and planning?
management Do you spend two-thirds of your writing time on part (a) and
one-third on part (b)?
Did you spread your time to cover each of the accounting
treatments in the scenario (government grant, issue costs
and share issue)?
Managing information Did you identify the relevant IAS or IFRS for each issue in
the scenario?
Did you highlight or underline useful information and make
notes in the margins where appropriate?
Did you think about the impact of correcting each
accounting treatment on both the numerator and
denominator of EPS?
Did you remember to look out for threats to the ethical
principles?
Answer planning Did your plan cover both parts of the question?
Did you generate enough points to score a pass?
Correct interpretation Did you understand the verbs in the requirements?

of the requirements Did you analyse the requirements and address all aspects in
your answer?
Efficient numerical Did you draw up a proforma for the revised EPS
analysis calculation?
Did you have separate workings for earnings and the
number of shares?
Did you start with the figures per the question then post the
relevant adjustments?
Were all your numbers clearly labelled?
Effective writing and Did you use underlined headings and sub-headings?
presentation Did you write in full sentences and use professional
language?
Did you answer all the requirements?
Did you structure your answer as follows?
For part (a):
 What is the correct accounting treatment per the IAS or
IFRS?
449
 Is the directors' accounting treatment allowed? If not,
why not?
 What adjustment is requirement in the revised EPS
working?
For part (b):
 Examine the motive behind each of the accounting
treatments
 Identify relevant ethical principles and threats to them
 Conclude with advice on what Mr Low should do next
Summary
For a financial analysis question requiring you to explain the impact on a specified
ratio, the key to success is to think of the formula of the ratio. Then you need to think
about the double entry and the impact it has on the numerator and/or denominator
and therefore the overall ratio.
However, this is a very broad syllabus area which could generate many different types
of questions so the approach in this Skills Checkpoint will have to be adapted to suit
the specific requirements and scenario in the exam. The basic five steps for answering
any SBR question will always be a good starting point:
(1) Time (1.95 minutes per mark)
(2) Read and analyse the requirement(s)
(3) Read and analyse the scenario
(4) Prepare an answer plan
(5) Write up your answer
450
Reporting requirements
of small and medium-
sized entities
Learning objectives
Syllabus
reference no.
Discuss the key differences in accounting treatment between full IFRS and IFRS for C10(a)
SMEs.
Discuss and apply the simplifications introduced by the IFRS for SMEs. C10(b)
Exam context
You should be aware that smaller entities have different accounting needs from larger entities and
that the IFRS for Small and Medium-Sized Entities (IFRS for SMEs) helps to meet these needs. It is
important that you understand the key differences between full IFRS and the IFRS for SMEs. This topic
is in syllabus area C and could therefore be examined in either Section A or Section B of the
Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) exam. It is likely to form part of a larger question.
451
Chapter overview
Reporting requirements of
small and
medium-sized entities
1. Background to IFRS for 2. Differences in 3. Simplifications

SMEs accounting treatment introduced by IFRS for
between full IFRS and SMEs
the IFRS for SMEs
Accounting treatments not

Omissions under IFRS for SMEs
allowable under IFRS for SMEs
452
18: Reporting requirements of small and medium-sized entities
1 IFRS for Small and Medium-sized Entities

1.1 Background to IFRS for Small and Medium-sized Entities (IFRS for
SMEs)
1.1.1 Small and medium-sized entities
Full IFRSs are designed for entities quoted on the world's capital markets. However, most entities
are small or medium-sized.
Small or medium-sized entities often have the following characteristics:
Owner-managed with a Relatively small number

Less subject to external
small, close shareholder of employees and other
attention and scrutiny
base key stakeholders
Generate less revenue,

Undertake less complex
control fewer assets and
transactions
have smaller liabilities
These characteristics mean there are some issues with trying to apply full IFRS to small and medium-
sized entities such as:
Some IFRSs are not relevant to small and medium-sized company accounts; for
Relevance example, a company with equity that is not quoted on a stock exchange has no
need to comply with IAS 33 Earnings per Share.
One of the underlying principles of financial reporting is that the cost and effort
Cost to
required to prepare financial statements should not exceed the benefits to
prepare
users. This applies to all reporting entities, not just smaller ones. However, smaller
entities are more likely to make use of this as a reason not to comply with full IFRS.
IFRSs apply to material items. In the case of smaller entities, the amount that is
material may be very small in monetary terms. However, the effect of not reporting
that item may be material by nature in that it would mislead users of the financial
Materiality
statements. Consider, for example, IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures. Smaller
entities may well rely on trade with relatives of the directors/shareholders which are
relatively small in value, but essential to the operations of the entity and should
therefore be disclosed.
1.1.2 Issue and scope of IFRS for SMEs

IASB issued the IFRS for Small and Medium-sized Entities (IFRS for SMEs) in July 2009 and last
revised it in 2015. There is no specific effective date as this depends on national law, but IFRS
for SMEs contains transitional rules for entities moving from full IFRSs or previous national GAAP.
IFRS for SMEs is a single self-contained standard, with sections for each topic. These sections
are not numbered in the order of current IFRSs, but have been re-ordered into a logical format.
The IASB followed an approach of extracting the core principles of existing IFRSs for inclusion in
IFRS for SMEs with a 'rebuttable presumption' of no changes being made to recognition and
measurement principles.
453
The range of users of the financial statements of small and medium-sized entities is generally
narrower than that of large companies. The shareholders generally form part of the management
group and the biggest external stakeholder group is lenders and others who provide credit to the
entity. The IASB states that the IFRS for SMEs is focused on the information needs of lenders and
creditors and any other stakeholders interested in information relating to cash flow, solvency and
liquidity. Having a single standard that applies to small and medium-sized entities helps to promote
transparency and comparability between entities, allowing the providers of finance to make more
informed judgements about the performance and position of the entity.
Chapter 18 Section 1 of the Supplementary Reading provides further information on the background
to the development of the IFRS for SMEs. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the
Workbook.
1.2 Scope
The standard is intended for small and medium-sized entities, defined as those that:
do not have public

accountability
(ie do not issue debt do publish general
or equity instruments and purpose financial
in a public market or statements for
hold assets in a external users
fiduciary capacity
for others)
There is no size test, as this would be difficult to apply to companies operating under different legal
frameworks.
1.3 Transition to the IFRS for SMEs

Transition to the IFRS for SMEs from previous GAAP is made retrospectively as a prior period
adjustment at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. The standard allows all
of the exemptions in IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of IFRSs. It also contains 'impracticability'
exemptions for comparative information and the restatement of the opening statement of financial
position.
2 Key differences in accounting treatment between full IFRS

and the IFRS for SMEs
2.1 Key omissions from the IFRS for SMEs
Some accounting standards have been omitted completely from IFRS for SMEs, mainly due to the
standards not being relevant or the cost of reporting exceeding the perceived benefits.
Earnings per Full IFRS requires IAS 33 Earnings per Share to be applied for listed
share (EPS) companies. IAS 33 requires calculation and presentation of EPS and diluted
EPS for all reported periods. The concept of EPS is not relevant to SMEs as they
are not listed.
454
Interim reporting IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting applies when an entity prepares interim
reports. SMEs are highly unlikely to prepare such reports. Interim reporting is
omitted from the IFRS for SMEs.
Segmental IFRS 8 Operating Segments requires listed entities to report information on the
reporting different types of operations they are involved in, different geographical areas
etc. SMEs are not listed and therefore IFRS 8 does not apply. The IFRS for
SMEs does not require any other segmental reporting as SMEs are unlikely to
have such diverse operations and the cost of reporting such information would
be prohibitive for such entities.
Assets held for IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations contains
sale specific accounting requirements for assets classified as held for sale. The cost
of reporting in this way is expected to exceed the benefits for SMEs and it is
therefore omitted from the IFRS for SMEs (instead, holding assets for sale is an
impairment indicator).
2.2 Different accounting treatments under the IFRS for SMEs
There are a number of differences between the accounting treatment required under full IFRS and
that under the IFRS for SMEs.
Area IFRS for SMEs Full IFRSs

Go back to
Investment Fair value through profit or loss Permitted to make a choice between the relevant
property must be used (if fair value can be fair value model, or cost model chapter if
you need a
measured without undue cost or (accounting policy choice)
reminder of full
effort); otherwise the cost model is IFRS approach
applied (IFRS for SMEs: para. 16.7)
Intangible assets The revaluation model is not Revaluations permitted where active
permitted. Intangible assets must be market
held at cost less accumulated
amortisation (IFRS for SMEs: para.
18.18)
Government No specified future performance Grants relating to income

grants conditions: recognised in profit or loss over
→ recognise as income when the period to match to related costs
grant is receivable Grants relating to assets either:
Otherwise:  Presented as deferred income;
→ recognise as income when or
performance conditions met  Deducted in arriving at the
(IFRS for SMEs: para. 24.4) carrying amount of the asset
Borrowing costs Expensed when incurred Capitalised (when relate to

(IFRS for SMEs: para. 25.2) construction of a qualifying asset)
Development All internally generated research Development expenditure

costs and development expenditure capitalised when the IAS 38
expensed (IFRS for SMEs: para. 18.4) Intangible Assets criteria are met
455
Pension actuarial Actuarial gains and losses can be Remeasurements in OCI only
gains and losses recognised immediately in profit or
loss or other comprehensive
income (OCI)
(IFRS for SMEs: para. 28.24)
Simplified calculation of defined Projected unit credit method must be
benefit obligations (ignoring future used
service/salary rises) permitted if not
able to use projected unit credit
method without undue cost/effort
Financial All classified at either cost or FINANCIAL ASSETS

instruments amortised cost or fair value Investments in debt instruments
through profit or loss
Business model: held to collect
'Basic' debt instruments contractual cash flows
 Amortised cost  Amortised cost
Investments in shares (excluding Business model: held to collect
convertible preference shares and contractual cash flows and sell
puttable shares)
 Fair value through OCI
 Fair value through profit or loss
Investments in equity
 Cost less impairment (where fair instruments not held for
value cannot be measured reliably trading
without undue cost/effort)
 Fair value through OCI (if
Other financial instruments irrevocable election made)
 Fair value through profit or loss All other financial assets
(IFRS for SMEs: para. 11.14)  Fair value through profit or loss
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
(main categories only)
Most financial labilities
 Amortised cost
Financial liabilities at fair value
through profit or loss
 Held for trading
 Derivatives that are liabilities
 Accounting mismatch
 Group managed and evaluated on
FV basis
456
Illustration 1
Borrowing costs – full IFRS v IFRS for SMEs
Harold Co completed the construction of a new warehouse facility during the year ended
31 December 20X6. Harold incurred borrowing costs totalling $1,680,000 in the year. Of this,
$980,000 was incurred before the warehouse was complete on 1 August 20X6 and $700,000 was
incurred between completion and the year end date. The warehouse facility was available for use
and brought into use on 1 October 20X6 and has an estimated useful life of 20 years.
Required
Briefly discuss the difference in accounting treatment in respect of the borrowing costs incurred under
full IFRS and IFRS for SMEs and consider the impact on the reported profit of Harold Co for the year
Solution
Under full IFRS
Borrowing costs incurred up to 1 August 20X6 should be capitalised as part of the cost of the asset.
Those incurred after the asset is completed should be expensed to profit or loss. The asset should be
depreciated from the date it is first brought into use. The amount charged to profit or loss in respect
of the borrowing costs would be:
$
Expensed borrowing costs 700,000 Remember
Depreciation on capitalised costs 12,250 depreciation starts
when asset is
(980,000 / 20 yrs  3/12) available for use
Total expense 712,250
Under the IFRS for SMEs

The whole borrowing cost of $1,680,000 would be expensed to profit or loss in the current year.
Impact on reported profit
The reported profit for the period would be lower under the IFRS for SMEs. This has a negative
impact on profitability ratios.
Activity 1: Intangible assets – full IFRS v IFRS for SMEs

Diamond Co is preparing its financial statements for the year ended 31 March 20X5. It acquired a
licence to operate a train service in the region of Southland. The licence cost Diamond Co $2.6m on
1 April 20X4 and has a useful life of 10 years from that date. There is an active market for the
licence and the fair value of the licence at 31 March 20X5 has been assessed as $2.8m.
Required
(a) Briefly discuss, using calculations to illustrate your answer, how the licence would be
accounted for in the year to 31 March 20X5 using:
(i) Full IFRS
(ii) IFRS for SMEs
(b) Explain the impact of the above on Diamond Co's return on assets ratio.
457
3 Simplifications introduced by the IFRS for SMEs
Simplifications under IFRS for SMEs
There are several accounting and reporting standards that have been simplified before inclusion in
IFRS for SMEs.
Area IFRS for SMEs Full IFRSs
Presentation and Disclosure
Presentation and Combined statement of profit or loss Not permitted

disclosure (SPL) and other comprehensive income
(OCI) and statement of changes in
equity (SOCIE) permitted (where no
OCI nor equity movements other than
profit or loss, dividends and/or prior
period adjustments (PPA)).
Segment disclosures and Required (as full IFRSs apply to
earnings per share not publicly quoted companies)
required. Other disclosures reduced
by 90% versus full IFRSs
Revenue Goods: when significant risks and When performance obligation

rewards of ownership satisfied (IFRS 15 Revenue from
transferred (and no continuing Contracts with Customers five step
managerial involvement nor effective approach)
control)
Services: stage of completion
Intangible assets All intangibles (including goodwill) Only amortised if finite useful life
are amortised
Useful life cannot exceed 10 No specific limit on useful lives
years if cannot be established
reliably
(IFRS for SMEs: paras. 18.19, 18.20)
An impairment test is required An annual impairment test is
only if there is an indication of required for goodwill, for intangible
impairment assets with an indefinite useful life, and
for an intangible asset not yet available
for use
Separate Investments in subsidiaries, associates Cost or under IFRS 9 Financial

financial and joint ventures can be held at cost Instruments (fair value through profit
statements of (less any impairment) or fair value or loss, or fair value through other
investor through profit or loss or using comprehensive income if an
the equity method. election was made on purchase) or
(IFRS for SMEs: para. 9.26) using the equity method
458
Consolidated Investments in associates and joint Associates and joint ventures

financial ventures can remain at the same equity accounted
statements value as in the separate
Only partial goodwill allowed, ie Choice of full or partial goodwill
non-controlling interests cannot be method. Compulsory annual test for
measured at full fair value. Goodwill impairment, not amortised
is amortised as for intangible assets
Exchange differences on translating a Recognised in other comprehensive
foreign operation are recognised in income and reclassified to profit
other comprehensive income or loss on disposal of the foreign
and not subsequently operation.
reclassified to profit or loss
Subsidiaries acquired and held with Consolidated, but using IFRS 5
the intention of selling/disposing principles (held for sale).
within one year are not
consolidated
Illustration 2
Goodwill – full IFRS v IFRS for SMEs
Poppy Co acquired 70% of the ordinary shares of Branch Co on 1 August 20X3. Poppy Co paid
$3.45m to acquire the investment in Branch Co. The fair value of Branch Co’s identifiable net assets
was assessed as $4.5m at the date of acquisition. The fair value of the non-controlling interest (NCI)
in Branch Co was assessed to be $1.7m.
Required
(a) Calculate the amount that would be recognised as goodwill using
(i) Full IFRS, assuming NCI is valued at fair value
(ii) IFRS for SMEs.
(b) Briefly discuss the reason for the difference between the two methods.
Solution
(a)(i) Full IFRS $m (a)(ii) IFRS for SMEs $m

Consideration 3.45 Consideration 3.45
NCI at share of net
NCI at fair value 1.7 assets (30%) 1.35
5.15 4.8
Fair value of assets less Fair value of assets less
liabilities 4.5 liabilities 4.5
Goodwill 0.65 Goodwill 0.3
(b) Under full IFRS, the non-controlling interest can be valued either at its share of net assets or its
fair value whereas the IFRS for SMEs does not permit fair value to be used. In the given
example the fair value of the NCI is higher than its share of net assets, which gives rise to a
higher amount of goodwill being recognised.
459
Activity 2: Goodwill – full IFRS v IFRS for SMEs
Kion Co acquired 70% of the ordinary shares and 30% of the preference shares of Piger Co on
1 September 20X6. Kion Co paid $3,460,000 to acquire the total investment in Piger Co, of which
$2,950,000 related to the ordinary shares. The fair value of Piger Co’s identifiable net assets was
assessed as $3,100,000 at the date of acquisition. The fair value of the non-controlling interest in
Piger Co was assessed to be $1,000,000. The goodwill is expected to have an indefinite useful life.
Required
Explain, using calculations to illustrate your answer, how the goodwill in Piger Co would be
calculated if Kion Co prepares its financial statements for the year to 31 December 20X6 using the
IFRS for SMEs.
Chapter 18 Section 2 of the Supplementary Reading includes discussion on the likely consequences
of adopting the IFRS for SMEs. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the
Workbook.
Activity 3: Accounting under the IFRS for SMEs

Smerk is a private pharmaceuticals company that meets the definition of an SME under national
legislation and wishes to comply with the IFRS for SMEs for the year ended 31 December 20X6 (with
one year of comparative data). The directors are seeking advice on how to address the following
accounting issues. The entity currently prepares its financial statements under full IFRSs.
(a) Smerk has significant amounts of capitalised development expenditure in its financial
statements, $3.2m at 31 December 20X5 ($2.8m at 31 December 20X4), relating to
investigation of new pharmaceutical products. The amount has continued to rise during the
current year even after the amortisation commenced relating to some products that began
commercial production.
(b) Smerk purchased a controlling interest (60%) of the shares of a quoted company in a similar
line of business, Rock, on 1 July 20X6. Smerk paid $7.7m to acquire the investment in Rock
and the fair value of Rock's identifiable net assets has been calculated as $9.5m at the date of
acquisition. The value on the stock market of the non-controlling interests that Smerk did not
purchase was $4.9m. The directors do not feel in a position to estimate reliably the useful life
of the goodwill due to the nature of the business acquired, but expect it to be at least
15–20 years.
(c) Smerk purchased some properties for $1.7m on 1 January 20X6 and designated them as
investment properties under the cost model. No depreciation was charged as a real estate
agent valued the properties at $1.9m at the year end.
Required
Discuss how the above transactions should be dealt with in the financial statements of Smerk for the
year ended 31 December 20X6, with reference to the IFRS for SMEs.
460
Chapter summary
Reporting requirements of
small and
medium-sized entities
1. IFRS for small and

medium-sized entities 3. Simplifications under the IFRS for
 Applies to SMEs that: SMEs
– Do not have public Presentation:
accountability, and  Combined SPL and SOCIE permitted (if
– Publish general purpose no OCI and no equity changes other
financial statements than dividends & PPA)
 No size test Revenue recognition:
 Practical exemptions available on  Goods: when risks and rewards
transition to the IFRS for SMEs transferred
 Services: stage of completion basis
 Intangibles & goodwill always amortised
2. Omissions and differences from full IFRS under (useful life cannot exceed 10 years if
the IFRS for SMEs cannot be established reliably)
Financial instruments: Separate financial statements of
 'Basic' debt instruments: parent:
– Returns fixed, variable or combination of positive fixed  Investment in subsidiary, associate or
and variable joint venture at cost or FVTP/L or equity
– No contractual provision to lose principal/interest method
– Prepayment not contingent on future events
Group financial statements:
– Returns not conditional (other than re variable
 Investment in associate or joint venture at
rate/prepayment option above)
cost or FVTP/L or equity method
 Amortised cost
 NCI in goodwill at % net assets not FV
 Investments in shares (excl convertible pref shares and
puttable shares):
 Fair value (FV) through P/L (or cost less impairment if FV
cannot be measured reliably)
 All other financial instruments:
 FV through P/L
Non-current assets:
 Revaluation model not permitted for intangibles
 Internally generated research & development expensed
 Investment property held at FV through P/L
 Government grants recognised in P/L when conditions met, or
(if no conditions) when receivable
 Borrowing costs expensed
Defined benefit pension plans:
 Simplified calculation of defined benefit obligations permitted
 Actuarial gains/losses on defined benefit pension plans
recognised in P/L or OCI
461
1. IFRS for small and medium-sized entities

 The IFRS for SMEs applies to small and medium-sized entities. It was developed to address
the issues in trying to apply full IFRS to these entities.
 The IFRS for SMEs is intended to apply to entities that do not have public
accountability and publish general purpose financial statements for external
users.
 It retains the core principles of 'full' IFRSs
2. Key differences in accounting treatment between full IFRS and the IFRS for
SMEs
Omissions and differences in accounting treatments allowable under the IFRS for SMEs:
 Omissions – EPS, interim financial reporting, segmental reporting and assets held for sale
are omitted due to a lack of relevance or the cost of applying the requirements exceeding
the benefits. Additionally, EPS and segmental reporting only apply to listed companies,
which precludes SMEs.
 Differences in accounting treatment – accounting policy choices relating to investment
property, intangible assets, government grants, borrowing costs, development costs, pension
scheme actuarial gains and losses and financial instruments are not available under the IFRS
for SMEs
3. Simplifications introduced by the IFRS for SMEs
 There are several standards which have been simplified before being included in the IFRS
for SMEs in order to reduce the reporting burden.
 The simplifications are in the areas: presentation and disclosure; revenue, intangible assets,
separate financial statements of investors and consolidated financial statements
462
Question practice
Q24 Small and Medium-sized entities
Further reading
ACCA issued detailed guidance in the form of a technical article on the IFRS for SMEs
resources/p2/technical-articles/ifrs-for-smes.html
and also:
www.accaglobal.com/uk/en/member/discover/cpd-articles/corporate-reporting/holt-apr16.html
Deloitte issued concise guidance in addition to its usual IAS Plus summaries:
www.iasplus.com/en/binary/iasplus/0907ifrsforsmes.pdf
463
464
The impact of changes
and potential changes
in accounting
regulation
Learning objectives
Syllabus
reference no.
Discuss and apply the accounting implications of the first time adoption of new F1(a)
accounting standards.
Identify issues and deficiencies which have led to proposed changes to an F1(b)
accounting standard.
Discuss the impact of current issues in corporate reporting including: F1(c)

(i) The revision of the Conceptual Framework
(ii) The IASB’s Principles of Disclosure Initiative
(iii) Materiality in the context of financial reporting
(iv) Primary financial statements
(v) Management commentary
(vi) Developments in sustainability reporting
Exam context
The Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) exam doesn't just test financial reporting standards as they
are, but how and why they are changing, particularly in discussion questions.
Current issues may come up in the context of a question requiring advice. For example, in the
scenario question involving groups, you might have to explain the difference that the proposed
changes will make.
The current issues element of the syllabus (syllabus area F) may be examined in Section A or B
but will not be a full question; it is more likely to form part of another question.
465
Chapter overview
The impact of changes and

potential changes in
accounting regulation
1. International 4. First-time
convergence adoption of a
and national body of new
influences accounting
standards
2. Current projects 3. Other issues
466
19: The impact of changes and potential changes in accounting regulation
1 International convergence and national influences

1.1 The global move towards IFRSs
The International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) was originally set up in 1973 and
restructured as the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in 2001.
Key developments in the adoption of IFRSs globally include:
(a) European Union regulation (effective from January 2005): requires all EU companies listed on
a regulated market to prepare their consolidated financial statements in accordance with
IFRSs. It also gives each member state the option to require or permit the use of IFRSs for the
separate financial statements of listed companies and for the separate and consolidated
financial statements of non-listed companies.
(b) US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (November 2007): allows non-US companies
listed on a US stock exchange to report under IFRSs without the need to prepare a
reconciliation to US GAAP.
(c) International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) (2000, 2013 and 2016):
IOSCO recommends the use of IFRSs to its membership of over 120 securities regulators, and
cooperates in the development and consistent application of IFRSs to promote and facilitate
transparency within capital markets.
1.2 Dialogue with other key standard setters

The IASB maintains a policy of dialogue with other key standard setters around the world, in the
interest of harmonising standards across the globe.
Past projects have seen significant convergence of standards with regimes not using IFRSs such as the
USA and China.
1.3 Influence of national regulators

The IASB cannot mandate the use of IFRSs. It is up to national or regional regulators to require or
permit the use of IFRSs.
Alternatively some regimes (eg the USA) elect to converge with IFRSs without full adoption.
For some regimes, particularly those without a major stock exchange, the IFRS for SMEs has been
adopted as the national financial reporting system.
1.4 Convergence in the UK

The current financial reporting framework came into effect in 2015 in the UK and Ireland. The UK's
Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has published six standards:
 FRS 100 Application of Financial Reporting Requirements which sets out the overall reporting
framework
 FRS 101 Reduced Disclosure Framework which permits disclosure exemptions from the
requirements of EU-adopted IFRSs for certain qualifying entities
 FRS 102 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland
which ultimately replaced all existing FRSs, SSAPs and UITF abstracts
 FRS 103 Insurance Contracts which consolidates existing financial reporting requirements for
insurance contracts
 FRS 104 Interim Financial Reporting which specifies the requirements (adapted from IAS 34)
for interim financial reports
 FRS 105 The Financial Reporting Standard applicable to the Micro-entities Regime which is
applicable to the smallest entities.
467
The options available for preparing financial statements are summarised below.
FRS 102 FRS 102 EU-

Section (and FRS adopted
Type FRS 105 1A 103) FRS 101 IFRS
Entities eligible for micro-

    
entities regime
Entities eligible for small

   
companies regime
Entities not micro or small

and not required to apply   
EU-adopted IFRS
The most important of these is FRS 102, which introduces a single standard based on IFRS for Small
and Medium-sized Entities (see above). The IFRS for SMEs was covered in Chapter 18.
2 Current projects
The following examinable current projects are being undertaken by the IASB, although bear in mind
that current issues could be examined in the context of any examinable topic.
New and revised standards
(a) IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Better fit with IFRS 15 introduced a five step approach to revenue recognition. Revenue is recognised when
Framework (or as) a performance obligation is satisfied.
See Chapter 1 The financial reporting framework.
(b) IFRS 16 Leases
IFRS 16 brings all leases onto the statement of financial position of lessees (with limited
Less arbitrary/
subjective exceptions for short-term leases and leases of low value assets).
See Chapter 8 Leases.
(c) IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements
More scope for

Amended as a result of the IASB's Disclosure Initiative.
judgement
See below. Of these EDs and Discussion Papers, only the
EDs on the Conceptual Framework and
(d) IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows materiality are specifically mentioned in the
Examinable Documents list. Learning outcome
Amended as a result of the IASB's Disclosure Initiative. F1(c)(ii) also mentions principles of disclosure
More
as an examinable current issue. The other EDs
transparent See below. are included for completeness.
Exposure Drafts (ED), Discussion Papers and other current issues

(a) ED/2017/2 Improvements to IFRS 8 Operating Segments (Proposed amendments
to IFRS 8 and IAS 34)
In March 2017, the IASB published an ED Improvements to IFRS 8 Operating Segments
(Proposed amendments to IFRS 8 and IAS 34). This was driven by a post-implementation
review which concluded that, while IFRS 8 was working satisfactorily in general, certain
improvements were needed. These related to:
 Description of the chief operating decision maker
 Identification of reportable segments
 Additional segment information
 Description of reconciling items
 Change in the composition of an entity's reportable segments
468
(b) ED/2017/4 Property, Plant and Equipment — Proceeds before Intended Use
(Proposed amendments to IAS 16)
The IASB issued an ED of proposed changes to IAS 16 in June 2017. The changes would
prohibit entities from deducting proceeds from selling items produced while bringing an item
of PPE to normal operating manner from the cost of the item; instead, these amounts should be
recognised in profit or loss.
(c) ED/2016/1 Definition of a Business and Accounting for Previously Held
Interests (Proposed amendments to IFRS 3 and IFRS 11)
This ED proposes amendments to IFRS 3 and IFRS 11 to clarify:
(i) The definition of a business
(ii) The accounting for previously held interests in the assets and liabilities of a joint
operation in transactions in which an investor obtains control or joint control of a joint
operation that meets the definition of a business.
See Chapter 19 Section 4 of the Supplementary Reading for more detail on this ED. This is available
in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
(d) ED/2015/1 Classification of Liabilities – Proposed amendments to IAS 1

See below.
(e) ED/2015/3 Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
This covers proposed revisions to the Conceptual Framework to fill gaps, update guidance and
clarify areas. Key changes include new recognition and derecognition principles and
principles for recognition in profit or loss vs other comprehensive income.
See Chapter 1 The financial reporting framework.
Tutorial note
The Conceptual Framework is mentioned on many occasions during this course, and the SBR
examining team see it an important topic. Many IASs and IFRSs were based on the Conceptual
Framework but some are inconsistent with it, as has been discussed in various chapters in the SBR
Workbook. In the context of current developments, the Conceptual Framework is now a current issue,
as is shown by the publication of an ED.
(f) ED/2015/8 Draft IFRS Practice Statement: Application of Materiality to

Financial Statements
See below.
(g) DP/2017/1 Disclosure Initiative – Principles of Disclosure
See below.
2.1 ED/2015/1 Classification of Liabilities – Proposed amendments to

IAS 1
This ED aims to clarify that the classification of liabilities as current or non-current should be based on
the entity's rights at the end of the reporting period.
Under the proposals, an entity classifies a liability as current when:
(a) It expects to settle the liability in its normal operating cycle;
(b) It holds the liability primarily for the purpose of trading;
(c) The liability is due to be settled within 12 months after the reporting date; or
469
(d) It does not have a right at the end of the reporting period to defer settlement of the
liability for at least 12 months after the reporting date.'
Used to say 'unconditional
All other liabilities are then classified as non-current. right'
Prior to the ED, an unconditional right to defer settlement for at least 12 months was required in
order to classify a liability as non-current; however, in the real world such rights are rarely
unconditional because they often depend on compliance in the future with loan covenants.
The ED also clarifies that 'settlement' of a liability refers to 'the transfer to the counterparty of cash,
equity instruments, other assets or services that results in the extinguishment of the liability.'
(ED/2015/1: para. 69(d), 73)
2.2 ED/2015/8 Draft IFRS Practice Statement: Application of

Materiality to Financial Statements (October 2015)
This draft practice statement was issued as part of the Disclosure Initiative (see below).
The statement was developed in response to concerns with the level of uncertainty over the
application of the concept of materiality, which can result in excessive disclosure of immaterial
information while important information can be obscured or even missed out of the financial
statements.
It provides non-mandatory guidance to assist with the application of the concept of
materiality to financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRSs.
Material (IAS 1): omissions or misstatements of items are material if they could, individually
or collectively, influence the economic decisions that users make on the basis of financial
Key term
statements. Materiality depends on the size and nature of the omission or misstatement judged in
the surrounding circumstances. The size or nature of the item, or a combination of both, could be the
determining factor.
(IAS 1: para. 7)
The statement is divided into the following key areas:

(a) General characteristics of materiality, including:
(i) The pervasiveness of the concept in IFRSs;
(ii) The importance of management's use of judgement;
(iii) Who the primary users of the financial statements are and the type of decisions they
make based on those financial statements;
(iv) The need for a quantitative and qualitative assessment when applying the concept; and
(v) The need to assess whether information is material, both individually and collectively
with other information.
(b) Application of materiality when making decisions about presenting and disclosing
information, in particular:
(i) The objective of the financial statements and how it relates to materiality decisions;
(ii) How to deal with immaterial information;
(iii) When to aggregate and disaggregate information; and
(iv) Making judgements about materiality in the context of the face of the financial
statements, notes to the financial statements, the complete set of financial statements (ie
the financial statements as a whole) and interim reports.
470
(c) Application of materiality when recognising and measuring information. Guidance is

given on:
(i) Consideration of materiality in internal record keeping; and
(ii) Use of rounding (eg to the nearest $1,000) in the financial statements.
(d) Assessment of whether omissions and misstatements of information are material to
the financial statements. Guidance is given on:
(i) Assessing whether misstatements are material;
(ii) Current period misstatements versus prior period errors; and
(iii) Dealing with misstatements made intentionally to mislead.
Tutorial note
Note that the practice statement was published in final form as Making Materiality Judgements in
September 2017, but as this is after the cut-off date for examinable documents for the SBR exam, the
ED is still examinable from September 2018.
2.3 DP/2017/1 Disclosure Initiative – Principles of Disclosure

This Discussion Paper was published in March 2017 as part of the Disclosure Initiative (see below).
3 Other issues Both the management commentary and the International <IR>
Framework are ways of addressing areas that traditional financial
3.1 Management commentary statements do not cover.
Some of the limitations of financial statements may be addressed by a management commentary. The
IASB has issued a practice statement on a management commentary to supplement and complement
the financial statements. This is covered in Chapter 17 Interpreting financial statements for different
stakeholders.
3.2 Developments in sustainability reporting

The main document addressing sustainability reporting is the International <IR> Framework
(International Integrated Reporting Framework). Integrated reporting is concerned with conveying a
wider message on organisational performance. It is fundamentally concerned with reporting on the
value created by the organisation's resources. This is also covered in Chapter 17 Interpreting
financial statements for different stakeholders.
3.3 Disclosure Initiative

The IASB's Disclosure Initiative, which began in 2013, is a series of short and medium term projects
and ongoing activities to explore how presentation and disclosure principles in existing
standards can be improved.
The Disclosure Initiative is intended to complement the work being done on the
Conceptual Framework project (covered in Chapter 1 The financial reporting framework).
The Disclosure Initiative project is made up of a number of separate topics.
Amendments to IAS 1
These 2014 amendments aim to ensure that entities are able to use judgement when presenting their
financial reports, as the wording of some of the requirements in IAS 1 had in some cases been read
to prevent the use of judgement. They cover:
(a) Materiality
(b) Statement of financial position and statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
(c) Notes
471
Amendments to IAS 7
In 2016, the IASB published amendments to IAS 7 intended to improve information provided to users
of financial statements about an entity's financing activities. The amendments require disclosure of
changes in liabilities arising from financing activities and recommend a reconciliation of liabilities
relating to financing activities.
See Chapter 19 Section 2 of the Supplementary Reading for more detail on the amendments to IAS 1
and IAS 7. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the Workbook.
Materiality
Although Discussion Papers are not usually
See above. tested in detail, this one is specifically listed
in learning outcome F1(c).
Principles of Disclosure
In March 2017, the IASB published a Discussion Paper Disclosure Initiative – Principles of Disclosure.
This sets out the IASB's preliminary views on disclosure principles that should be included in a
general disclosure standard or in non-mandatory guidance on the topic.
The Discussion Paper is divided into eight sections.
Section Topic
1 Overview of the 'disclosure problem' and the objective of this project

The IASB identified three main aspects to the 'disclosure problem':
 Not enough relevant information, resulting in inappropriate investing/lending
decisions
 Irrelevant information, obscuring relevant information and hindering
understandability
 Ineffective communication, also reducing understandability
(IASB, 2017: para. IN 9)
2 Principles of effective communication

There are seven principles:
 Entity specific
 Clear and simple
 Organised to highlight important matters
 Linked to related information
 Free from unnecessary duplication
 Comparable
 In an appropriate format
(IASB, 2017: para. 2.6)
472
Section Topic
3 Roles of the primary financial statements and the notes

Primary financial statements are statements of:
 Financial position Role: to provide a structured and
comparable summary of an entity’s
 Financial performance recognised assets, liabilities, equity,
 Changes in equity income and expenses.
 Cash flows
Notes Role: to explain and supplement
the primary financial statements.
(IASB, 2017: para. 3.20 – 3.26)
4 Location of information
Information needed to comply with IFRS can be provided outside the financial
statements, but within the annual report, provided that:
 The annual report is more understandable
 The financial statements are understandable
 The information is faithfully represented, clearly identified and cross-referenced
Information labelled as 'non-IFRS' can be placed inside the financial statements if it is:
 Listed, together with a statement of compliance with IFRSs
 Identified as not in accordance with IFRSs and, if applicable, as unaudited
 Accompanied by an explanation of why it is useful
(IASB, 2017: para. 4.5 to 4.25)
5 Use of performance measures in the financial statements

Many entities use 'non-IFRS' performance measures.
The IASB's view is that the presentation of an EBITDA subtotal using the nature of
expense method and the presentation of an EBIT subtotal under both a nature of
expense method and a function of expense method comply with IFRSs if such subtotals
are relevant to an understanding of the financial statements.
Performance measures should be fairly presented, that is:
 No more prominent than IFRS information
 Reconciled to IFRS measures
 Clearly labelled, and relevance explained
 Neutral and consistently measured and presented over time
 Accompanied by comparatives
(IASB, 2017: para. 5.21)
473
Section Topic
6 Disclosure of accounting policies

There are three categories of accounting policies, and the level of disclosure depends
on the category. Only accounting policies in Categories 1 and 2 must be disclosed,
but those in Category 3 may be disclosed.
Category 1 — always necessary to understand the financial statements
This is the case when the accounting policy:
 Relates to material items, transactions or events;
 Is selected from alternatives in IFRSs;
 Reflects a change from a previous period;
 Is developed by the entity in the absence of specific requirements; and/or
 Requires use of significant judgements or assumptions.
Category 2 — not in Category 1 but necessary to understand the
financial statements. This is the case when the accounting policy is not in
Category 1 but relates to material items, transactions or events.
Category 3 — not in Categories 1 and 2 but is used in preparing the
financial statements. This is the case for all other accounting policies used in
preparing the financial statements.
(IASB, 2017: para. 6.12)
7 Centralised disclosure objectives

This section proposes developing a central set of disclosure objectives that consider the
objective of financial statements and the role of the notes. These would be used by the
IASB as a basis for developing disclosure objectives and requirements in standards that
are more unified and better linked to the overall objective.
 Method A would focus on the different types of information disclosed about an
entity’s assets, liabilities, equity, income and expenses
 Method B would focus on information about an entity’s activities
(IASB, 2017: para. 7.9, 7.22)
8 New Zealand Accounting Standards Board staff's approach to drafting

disclosure requirements in IFRSs
The main features of this approach are:
 An overall disclosure objective for each standard with sub-objectives for each
type of information required
 A two-tier approach that would see the amount of information provided depend
on the relative importance of an item or transaction to the reporting entity
 Greater emphasis on the need to exercise judgement, and less prescriptive
wording in disclosure requirements
(IASB, 2017: para. 7.19)
(DP/2017/1 Disclosure Initiative – Principles of Disclosure)
474
Activity 1: Disclosure
(a) Red Co discloses the following information relating to employees in its financial statements:
(i) Its full commitment to equal opportunities
(ii) Its investment in the training of staff
(iii) The number of employees injured at work each year
The company wishes to enhance disclosure in these areas, but is unsure as to what the benefits
would be. The directors are particularly concerned that the disclosures on management of the
workforce have no current value to the stakeholders of the company.
Required
Discuss the general nature of the current information disclosed by companies concerning their
employees and how the link between the company performance and its employees could be
made more visible. (6 marks)
(b) Briefly explain, with reference to the IASB's Disclosure Initiative – Principles of Disclosure
Discussion Paper, whether the information in part (a) could be disclosed within the financial
statements. (2 marks)
Professional marks will be awarded in this activity for the clarity and quality of the presentation and
discussion. (2 marks)
3.4 Profit or loss versus other comprehensive income

There has been disagreement as to which items should appear in profit or loss, and which in other
comprehensive income (OCI). The issue of reclassification has also been controversial.
Key points:
(a) Changes resulting from primary performance are reported in profit or loss.
(b) Investors focus on profit or loss rather than OCI.
(c) It is not true that only realised gains are included in profit or loss and that only unrealised
gains and losses are included in OCI.
(d) OCI has been used as a 'dumping ground'.
(e) The Conceptual Framework ED proposes a profit or loss total or subtotal that also results, or
could result, in some items of income or expense being recycled and limiting the use of OCI.
3.5 Debt versus equity distinction

The distinction between debt and equity is not always easy to make.
Key points:
(a) Classification is based on principles not perceptions of users.
(b) If dividends are non-discretionary, redemption is at the option of the holder and the instrument
has a limited life, generally the instrument is a liability.
(c) If dividends are discretionary, the shares are non-redeemable or there is no liquidation date,
generally this is an equity instrument.
(d) It must first be established that the instrument is not a liability before it can be classified as
equity.
475
(e) A financial instrument can be classified as an equity instrument only if there is no obligation to
deliver cash or other financial assets.
(f) A contract that will be settled by the entity delivering (or receiving) a fixed number of its own
equity instruments in exchange for a fixed amount of cash or other financial asset is an equity
instrument.
(g) Classification as a liability increases gearing, whereas classification as equity reduces it.
(h) Loan covenants may be affected.
(IAS 32: paras. 11, AG 27)
The debt versus equity distinction is discussed in the context of the Conceptual Framework ED in
Chapter 7 Financial instruments.
See Chapter 19 Section 3 of the Supplementary Reading for more detail on the profit or loss/OCI
split and the debt/equity distinction. This is available in Appendix 2 of the digital edition of the
Workbook.
Activity 2: Debt versus equity

The directors of Scott, on becoming directors, are required to invest a fixed agreed sum of money in
a special class of $1 ordinary shares that only directors hold. Dividend payments on the shares are
discretionary and are ratified at the annual general meeting of the company. When a director's
service contract expires, Scott is required to repurchase the shares at their nominal value.
Required
Explain how the above item should be classified in the financial statements of Scott.
Activity 3: Discussion question

(a) A key element of the preparation of financial statements is the development of an entity’s
accounting policies under IFRSs and the use of estimation techniques where the measurement
basis warrants it. An entity can choose its accounting policies on initial adoption of IFRSs, but
changes in accounting policies can only be made where required by an IFRS or where the
changes result in reliable and more relevant information. Accounting elections are also
permitted for certain individual items. Estimation techniques are often used as part of the
year end accounting process and can also have a significant effect on the financial statements.
The financial statements of stock market listed entities come under closer scrutiny than those of
private companies and more reliance may be placed on the figures included in them.
Required
Discuss how accounting policies, elections and estimation techniques may be used to achieve
particular accounting effects in the financial statements of stock market listed entities.
(b) Herron plc, a stock market listed company in the retail industry, has decided to change its
accounting policy with respect to inventories. Its previous policy until 31 December 20X2 was
to measure inventories on the first-in first-out basis; however, due to a change in circumstances
(higher turnover of inventories), Herron's management has decided to measure them on the
weighted average basis effective from the year ended 31 December 20X3.
476
The effects on inventory valuation are as follows:

31.12.X1 31.12.X2 31.12.X3
$m $m $m
Weighted average valuation 27 32 30
First-in first-out valuation 31 37 33
Required
Discuss the effect of the above change in the financial statements for the year ended
31 December 20X3 as well as the validity of the change.
4 First-time adoption of a body of new accounting standards

The adoption of a new body of accounting standards will inevitably have a significant effect on the
accounting treatments used by an entity and on the related systems and procedures. In 2005
many countries adopted IFRSs for the first time and over the next few years other countries are likely
to do the same.
IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards was issued to ensure that an
entity's first IFRS financial statements contain high quality information that:
(a) Is transparent for users and comparable over all periods presented;
(b) Provides a suitable starting point for accounting under IFRSs; and
(c) Can be generated at a cost that does not exceed the benefits to users.
4.1 IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting

Standards
General principles
An entity applies IFRS 1 in its first IFRS financial statements.
An entity's first IFRS financial statements are the first annual financial statements in which the entity
adopts IFRSs by an explicit and unreserved statement of compliance with IFRSs.
Any other financial statements (including fully compliant financial statements that did not state so) are
not the first set of financial statements under IFRSs.
Opening IFRS statement of financial position
An entity prepares and presents an opening IFRS statement of financial position at the date of
transition to IFRSs as a starting point for IFRS accounting.
Generally, this will be the beginning of the earliest comparative period shown (ie full
retrospective application). Given that the entity is applying a change in accounting policy on adoption
of IFRSs, IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements requires the presentation of at least three
statements of financial position (and two of each of the other statements) (IFRS 1: para. 21).
477
Illustration 1
Comparative year First year of adoption
1.1.X0 31.12.X0 31.12.X1
Transition
date
Preparation of an opening IFRS statement of financial position typically involves adjusting the
amounts reported at the same date under previous GAAP.
All adjustments are recognised directly in retained earnings (or, if appropriate, another
category of equity) not in profit or loss.
Estimates
Estimates in the opening IFRS statement of financial position must be consistent with estimates made
at the same date under previous GAAP even if further information is now available (in order
to comply with IAS 10) (IFRS 1: para. IG 3).
Transition process
(a) Accounting policies
The entity should select accounting policies that comply with IFRSs effective at the end of
the first IFRS reporting period.
These accounting policies are used in the opening IFRS statement of financial position and
throughout all periods presented. The entity does not apply different versions of IFRSs effective
at earlier dates.
(b) Derecognition of assets and liabilities
Previous GAAP statement of financial position may contain items that do not qualify for
recognition under IFRSs.
For example, IFRSs do not permit capitalisation of research, staff training and relocation costs.
(c) Recognition of new assets and liabilities
New assets and liabilities may need to be recognised.
For example, deferred tax balances and certain provisions such as environmental and
decommissioning costs.
(d) Reclassification of assets and liabilities
For example, compound financial instruments need to be split into their liability and equity
components.
(e) Measurement
Value at which asset or liability is measured may differ under IFRSs.
For example, discounting of deferred tax assets/liabilities not allowed under IFRSs.
(IFRS 1: para. 7–10)
478
Main exemptions from applying IFRSs in the opening IFRS statement of financial
position
(a) Deemed cost
Fair value may be used as deemed cost at date of transition to IFRSs for:
(i) Property, plant and equipment
(ii) Investment properties (where using the cost model)
(iii) Intangible assets (which meet the IAS 38 recognition and revaluation criteria)
A previous GAAP revaluation (at or before the date of transition to IFRSs) may also be used
as deemed cost at the date of the revaluation.
Further, an entity may use an 'event-driven' valuation (eg a valuation for an initial public
offering) before or after the date of transition to IFRSs (providing it is before the first IFRS
year end) as deemed cost at the date of measurement (with a corresponding adjustment
to equity).
(b) Business combinations
For business combinations prior to the date of transition to IFRSs:
(i) The same classification (acquisition or uniting of interests) is retained as under previous
GAAP.
(ii) For items requiring a cost measure for IFRSs, the carrying amount at the date of the
business combination is treated as deemed cost and IFRS rules are applied from
thereon.
(iii) Items requiring a fair value measure for IFRSs are revalued at the date of transition to
IFRSs.
(iv) The carrying amount of goodwill at the date of transition to IFRSs is the amount as
reported under previous GAAP.
However, if any business combination prior to the date of transition to IFRSs is restated to
comply with IFRS 3, all later acquisitions must be restated as well.
(c) Borrowing costs
(i) Borrowing costs need only be capitalised for assets where the commencement date for
capitalisation is on or after the date of transition to IFRSs.
(d) Cumulative translation differences on foreign operations
(i) Translation differences (which must be included in a separate translation reserve under
IFRSs) may be deemed zero at the date of transition to IFRSs. IAS 21 is applied from
then on.
(e) Adoption of IFRSs by subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures
If a subsidiary, associate or joint venture adopts IFRSs later than its parent, it measures its
assets and liabilities:
(i) Either: At the amount that would be included in the parent's financial statements, based
on the parent's date of transition;
(ii) Or: At the amount based on the subsidiary (associate or joint venture's) date of
transition.
(IFRS 1: Appendix B)
479
Disclosure
(a) A reconciliation of previous GAAP equity to IFRS equity is required at the date of
transition to IFRSs and for the most recent financial statements presented under previous
GAAP.
(b) A reconciliation of total comprehensive income under previous GAAP to total
comprehensive income using IFRS is required for the most recent financial statements presented
under previous GAAP.
(IFRS 1: para. 24)
4.2 Practical issues

The implementation of the change to IFRS is likely to entail careful management in most companies.
Here are some of the change management considerations that should be addressed:
 Accurate assessment of the task involved
 Proper planning
 Human resource management
 Training
 Monitoring and accountability
 Physical resourcing
 Process review
 Follow up
See Chapter 19 Section 1 of the Supplementary Reading for more detail on these practical issues.
Activity 4: First-time adoption of IFRS

Europa is a listed company incorporated in Molvania. It will adopt International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRSs) for the first time in its financial statements for the year ended 31 December 20X8.
The directors of Europa are unclear as to the impact of IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International
Financial Reporting Standards.
In its previous financial statements for 31 December 20X6 and 20X7, which were prepared under
local GAAP, the company:
(a) Made a number of routine accounting estimates, including accrued expenses and provisions;
and
(b) Did not recognise a provision for a court case arising from events that occurred in September
20X7. When the court case was concluded on 30 June 20X8, Europa was required to pay
$10 million and paid this on 10 July 20X8, after the 20X7 financial statements were
authorised for issue.
In the opinion of the directors, the company's estimates of accrued expenses and provisions under
local GAAP were made on a basis consistent with IFRSs.
Required
(a) Advise the directors of Europa on the procedure for preparing IFRS financial statements for the
first time (as required by IFRS 1).
(b) Discuss how the matters above should be dealt with in the financial statements of Europa for
the year ended 31 December 20X8.
480
Tutorial note
Skills Checkpoint 5 looks at the skill of creating effective discussion, which is particularly relevant to
the topics covered in this chapter.
Ethics note
Current issues are a key part of the SBR exam, and will be tested at every sitting. The ethical
dilemma tested will clearly depend on the current issue itself. However, it can safely be assumed that
it will frequently concern someone in authority, such as a managing director wishing to present the
financial statements in a more favourable light.
The IASB often makes changes to IFRSs precisely to avoid the ethical dilemmas that result from
manipulation of ambiguities. The predecessor of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
was less precise and so the key figure of revenue was subject to manipulation.
Some of the topics in this chapter that could give rise to ethical dilemmas include debt versus equity
(a financial instrument with characteristics of both could be classified as equity for a favourable
impact on gearing) and 'hiding' items in other comprehensive income (although scope for this is
narrower than formerly). Disclosure could also give rise to ethical issues; too little disclosure can
mislead, but so can too much, because important items are buried in the clutter. The IASB's
Disclosure Initiative aims to address this very issue.
481
Chapter summary

1. International 2. Current projects 3. Other issues

convergence and Main current issues (see relevant
 Management commentary
national influences chapter):
aims to supplement and
International Accounting Standards  Leases (IFRS 16) complement the financial
Board (IASB) (restructured 2001)  Conceptual framework (ED) statements. Covered in
 Revenue recognition (IFRS 15) interpretation chapter.
 European Union Regulation
(2005): IFRSs required for Other current issues:  Sustainability: in
consolidated FS of listed entities  ED/2015/1 Classification of interpretation chapter.
in EU liabilities:  Disclosure Initiative: short
 US Securities and Exchange Current liability (all others non- and medium term projects
Commission (SEC) (2007): current) when entity: to improve presentation
allows non-US companies listed and disclosure principles
(a) Expects to settle the liability in its
on a US stock exchange to use in existing standards
normal operating cycle;
IFRSs Covers (so far):
(b) Holds the liability primarily for
 International Organization of the purpose of trading; – Principles of disclosure
Securities Commissions – Materiality
(c) Is due to settle the liability within
(IOSCO)): recommends use of – Amendments to IAS 1
12 months of the period end; or
IFRSs to member exchanges and – Amendments to IAS 7
cooperates in development of (d) Does not have a right at the
IFRSs end of the reporting
period* to defer settlement
Dialogue with other key standard
beyond 12 months
setters not using IFRSs
* no longer 'unconditional' right
 USA as such rights are rare in real
 China life
 Japan
 ED/2015/8 Draft IFRS Practice
Influence of national regulators Statement: Application of Materiality
 IASB cannot mandate use of to FS:
IFRSs Non-mandatory guidance on
 Adoption depends on application of materiality concept
national/regional regulators Covers:
 Some regimes have adopted the – Characteristics of materiality
IFRS for SMEs as national – Application of materiality in
financial reporting system (often presentation and disclosure
where no major stock exchange)
– Application of materiality in
recognition and measurement
– Assessment of whether omissions
and misstatements are material
482

4. IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of IFRSs Transition process
 Definition – Select accounting

– First IFRS financial statements are the first annual financial statements in
policies under IFRSs
which the entity adopts IFRSs by an explicit and unreserved statement of – Derecognise
compliance with IFRSs assets/liabilities not
 Apply IFRSs from beginning of earliest comparative period shown = date of recognised under IFRSs
transition to IFRSs – Recognise IFRSs
 Prepare opening IFRSs SOFP at date of transition  assets/liabilities not
all adjustments from previous GAAP recognised in equity first year of adoption recognised under
1.1.X1 31.12.X1 31.12.X2 previous GAAP
date of reporting – Reclassify assets and
transition date liabilities (eg compound
financial instruments)
 Use IFRSs effective at reporting date for all periods
presented – Remeasure to IFRSs
 Estimates are made as at same date as under previous GAAP even if more value (where necessary)
information is now available
 Reconciliations required:
– equity at date of transition and last previous GAAP year end
– TCI for last annual financial statements
Main exemptions
Deemed cost
 Fair value/previous GAAP/'event-driven' valuation can be used as deemed
cost for:
– PPE
– Investment properties
– Intangible assets
Business combinations
 For business combinations prior to date of transition to IFRSs:
– Same classification (acquisition/uniting of interests) as previous GAAP
– Items requiring cost measure under IFRSs  use previous GAAP value at
date of business combination and apply IFRSs thereafter
– Items requiring FV measure under IFRSs  revalue at date of transition to
IFRSs
– Goodwill  use previous GAAP figure
 If any business combination is restated all later acquisitions must be restated as
well
Borrowing costs
 Can capitalise for projects only commencing on/after date of transition to
IFRSs
Cumulative translation differences of foreign operations
 Can be deemed to be zero
Assets/liabilities of subsidiaries, associates and JVs
 If adopt IFRSs later than parent, can use values based
on parent's or own date of transition
* all exemptions apply at date of transition to IFRSs only except where stated
483
1. International convergence and national influences

 International convergence has gained pace recently with a number of countries switching
or having switched to IFRSs. The EU adopted IFRSs for the consolidated financial
statements of quoted companies in 2005.
 Now the IASB is working with other major accounting standard setters to work
towards a harmonised global GAAP.
 It is up to national or regional regulators to require or permit use of IFRSs. Some
regimes choose convergence over full adoption and others adopt the IFRS for Small and
Medium-sized Entities as the national reporting system.
2. Current projects
 The IASB has a number of projects underway. These could form the basis of a discussion
question or part of a question in the exam.
484
Question practice
Q25 Taupe
Further reading
A useful article on integrated reporting, focusing on a company's relationship with stakeholders, can be
found here.
Deloitte's IAS Plus Projects page contains a good summary of the latest current developments. Once you
have an overview of the proposed/recent changes, you can drill down for more detail and follow the
relevant links to the IASB's website
www.iasplus.com/en/projects
A good source of information about current issues is PwC's IFRS News, which manages to provide a
good amount of detail in a user-friendly format.
www.pwc.com/us/en/cfodirect/publications/ifrs-news.html
485
486
SKILLS CHECKPOINT 5
Creating effective discussion
aging information
Man
An
sw
er
pl
t
en
manag ime
Resolving
an
em
Approaching
t
nin
ethical issues Exam success skills
Good
reporting issues
uirereq rpretation
SBR skills
e m e nts
discussion Applying good
req of rprineteation
consolidation
m eunirts
techniques
discussion
E
of t inteect
an
e c p re
c rr
Performing
r re Co
d
ti v
e
se w ri
nt tin
Co
ati g
on
l
E cient numerica
analysis
Introduction
More marks in your Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) exam will relate to written answers than
numerical answers. It is very tempting to only practise numerical questions as they are easy to
mark because the answer is right or wrong whereas written questions are more subjective and
a range of different answers will be given credit. Even when attempting written questions, it is
tempting to write a brief answer plan and then look at the answer rather than writing a full
answer to plan. Unless you practise written questions in full to time, you will never
acquire the necessary skills to tackle discussion questions.
You will not pass the SBR exam on calculations alone. Therefore, it is essential to be
armed with the skills required to answer written requirements. This is what Skills Checkpoint 5
will focus on, with a particular emphasis on Section B of the exam which could feature an
essay-based question from any aspect of the syllabus.
487
Skills Checkpoint 5: Creating effective discussion
SBR Skill: Creative effective discussion

The basic five steps adopted in Skills Checkpoints 1–4 should also be used in
discussion questions. These steps will be tailored more specifically to discussion
questions as the question is tackled.
Note that Steps 2 and 4 are particularly important for discussion questions. You will
definitely need to spend a third of your time reading and planning. Brainstorming
ideas at the planning stage to create a comprehensive answer plan will be the key to
success in this style of question.
STEP 1:
Work out the time per requirement (1.95 minutes a mark).
STEP 2:
Read and analyse the requirement(s).
STEP 3:
Read and analyse the scenario.
STEP 4:
Prepare an answer plan.
STEP 5:
Write up your answer.
488
Skills Checkpoint 5
Exam success skills

In this question, we will focus on the following exam success skills and in particular:
 Good time management. The exam will be time pressured and you will
need to manage it carefully to ensure that you can make a good attempt at
every part of every question. You will have 3 hours and 15 minutes in the exam,
which works out at 1.95 minutes a mark. The following question is worth 20
marks so you should allow 39 minutes. In Skills Checkpoints 1–3, our advice
was to allow a third to a quarter of your time for reading and planning.
However, discussion questions require deep thinking at the planning stage to
generate sufficient points to score a pass so it is recommended that you
dedicate a third of your time to reading and planning (here, 13 minutes) and
the remainder for writing up your answer (here, 26 minutes).
 Correct interpretation of the requirements. The likely verb in this type of
question is 'discuss'. This is defined by the ACCA as 'Consider and
debate/argue about the pros and cons of an issue. Examine in detail by using
arguments in favour or against'. With this type of requirement, the key is to
produce a balanced answer beginning with a brief introduction and ending
with a conclusion containing your opinion which should be supported by the
points in the main body of your answer.
 Answer planning. By now you are likely to have a preferred style for your
answer plan. For a discussion question, annotating the question paper is likely
to be insufficient. It would be better to draw up a separate answer plan in the
format of your choosing (eg a mind map or bullet-pointed lists).
 Effective writing and presentation. This is particularly important in
discussion questions. Use headings and sub-headings in your answer,
underlined with a ruler, and write in full sentences, ensuring your style is
professional. To achieve the necessary depth of discussion and to explain your
points, it is recommended that you include illustrative examples in your answer.
489
Skill Activity
question, so at 1.95 minutes a mark, it should take 39 minutes.
Approximately a third of your time should be spent reading
(requirement then scenario) and planning (13 minutes) and two-thirds
of your time writing up the answer (26 minutes). Then the planning
and writing time should be split in proportion to the mark allocation of
the two parts of the question (65% on part (a) and 35% on part (b)).
Required
(a) Discuss how the changes in accounting practices on transition to IFRSs and
choice in the application of individual IFRSs could lead to inconsistency between
the financial statements of companies. (13 marks)
(b) Discuss how management's judgement and the financial reporting infrastructure
of a country can have a significant impact on financial statements prepared
under IFRS. (7 marks)
(Total = 20 marks)
Highlight or number up each sub-requirement, identify the verb(s) and
ask yourself what each sub-requirement means.
Verb – refer
to ACCA Sub-requirement 1
definition
Required
(a) Discuss how the changes in accounting practices on transition to IFRSs and
choice in the application of individual IFRSs could lead to inconsistency between
the financial statements of companies. (13 marks)
Sub-requirement 2 Sub-requirement 1 Sub-requirement 2
(b) Discuss how management's judgement and the financial reporting infrastructure
of a country can have a significant impact on financial statements prepared
under IFRS. (7 marks)
(Total = 20 marks)
Verb – refer
to ACCA
definition
490
Skills Checkpoint 5
Your verb is 'discuss'. This is defined by the ACCA as 'Consider and debate/argue
about the pros and cons of an issue. Examine in detail by using arguments in favour or
against'.
Here is a table to help you understand each sub-requirement:
Part of Sub-requirement What does it mean?

question
(a) (1) Discuss how This is a very practical requirement. You need to
changes in view this requirement from the point of view of a
accounting company adopting IFRS for the first time and
practices on come up with the challenges it would face – but
transition to IFRSs be careful not to just list generic problems of first
could lead to time adoption as your points must be specifically
inconsistency tailored to issues causing inconsistency between
between financial financial statements of different companies.
statements of Remember that IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of
companies. International Financial Reporting Standards
provides guidance to companies adopting IFRS
for the first time.
(2) Discuss how The key here is to mentally run through the SBR
choice in the syllabus trying to identify IASs or IFRSs with
application of choices in accounting treatments. You do not
individual IFRSs need to know the IAS or IFRS number, just the
could lead to accounting treatment within them. No specific
inconsistency marks will be available for the IAS or IFRS
between financial number in the ACCA marking guide; however, if
statements of you happen to remember it, add it into your
companies. answer for increased credibility.
Including examples of areas of choice from
examinable IFRSs is key to passing this sub-
requirement but make sure you explain why
choice leads to inconsistency.
(b) (1) Discuss how The approach here is similar to areas of choice in
management's sub-requirement 2 of part (a). You should
judgement can consider the examinable documents for SBR to
have a significant identify subjective areas of an IAS or IFRS that
impact on financial require management judgement. Including these
statements prepared examples will help you generate enough points
under IFRS. to pass. You should also assess the level of
impact these areas have on financial statements
prepared under IFRS. As well as specific
examples of IAS or IFRS, you should address
the general characteristics of IFRS leading to the
need for judgement.
491
(2) Discuss how the Think about how an infrastructure could vary from
financial reporting country to country. Consider the regulatory
infrastructure of a framework, the staff involved in preparing
company can have a financial statements, the existence of an active
significant impact on market and standards of corporate governance
financial statements and audit.
prepared under IFRS.
Now read the scenario. You will notice that the scenario for an essay-
STEP 3 style question is typically shorter than it is for a case-study style
question. However, read it carefully, as it is likely to provide some
inspiration for you to generate points in your answer.
Challenge of
adopting more
Question – Implementing IFRS (20 marks) complex
accounting
The transition to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) standards than
local GAAP
involves major change for companies as IFRSs introduce significant (a) Sub-
requirement (1)
changes in accounting practices that were often not required
by national generally accepted accounting practice. It is
important that the interpretation and application of IFRSs is consistent
from country to country. IFRSs are partly based on rules, and partly on
principles and management's judgement. Judgement is more likely
Ability of to be better used when it is based on experience of IFRSs
preparers of
accounts within within a sound financial reporting infrastructure. It is hoped that national
financial reporting
infrastructure will differences in accounting will be eliminated and financial statements will
have significant
impact be consistent and comparable worldwide.
(b) Sub-
requirement (2)
Required
(a) Discuss how the changes in accounting practices on transition to
IFRSs and choice in the application of individual IFRSs could lead
to inconsistency between the financial statements of companies. (13 marks)
(b) Discuss how management's judgement and the financial reporting

infrastructure of a country can have a significant impact on
financial statements prepared under IFRS. (7 marks)
(Total = 20 marks)
492
Skills Checkpoint 5
STEP 4 Prepare an answer plan using key words from the requirements as
headings. Try and come up with separate points for each sub-
requirement. You will be awarded 1 mark per point so in order to
achieve a comfortable pass, you should aim to generate at least
10 points for part (a) (spread across the two sub-requirements) and
at least 5 points for part (b) (again spread across the two sub-
requirements).
Plan for part (a)

How changes in accounting practices and choice of application in
individual IFRSs on transition to IFRS could lead to inconsistency
between companies
Changes in accounting practices Choice of application in

individual IFRSs
 Challenge for preparers and users  Inventory: FIFO or weighted

 Legislation regarding presentation average
 Concepts and interpretation of IFRS  PPE/intangibles: cost or

compared to local GAAP revaluation model
 Inconsistency of timing  PPE: depreciation method
 Different exemptions taken  Investment property: cost or fair

value model
 Grants related to assets: deferred
income or net off cost of asset
 Full or partial goodwill method
 Investment to associate step
acquistion: measure original
investment at cost or fair value
 Translate impairment of goodwill
in foreign subsidiary at average
or closing rate
 Cash flows: direct or indirect
method of cash flows; choice of
heading for some items
493
Plan for part (b)
How management judgement and financial reporting infrastructure can
have significant impact on financial statements prepared under IFRS
Management judgement Financial reporting

infrastructure
 Revenue: identify separate  Need for robust regulatory

performance obligations, allocate framework
transaction price, determining  Trained and qualified staff
when satisfied
 Availability and transparency of
 Determining useful life of non- market information
current assets
 High standards of corporate
 Determining whether pension plan governance and audit
is defined benefit or defined
contribution
 Provisions: whether an obligation
exists, likelihood of outflow and
best estimate of amount
 Classification of financial
instruments for measurement
purposes
 Whether an investment is a
financial asset, associate, joint
venture or subsidiary
 Whether the IFRS 5 'held for sale'
or 'discontinued operation' criteria
have been met
 Determining the functional currency
 General issues: volume of rules,
issues addressed for first time,
complexity of IFRS, choice in IFRS,
selection of valuation method
494
Skills Checkpoint 5
headings and sub-requirements as sub-headings. Create a separate
sub-heading for each key paragraph in the scenario.
In a discussion style question, the structure should be as follows:
(a) A brief introduction
(b) The main body of your answer – this should be balanced,
bringing out both positive and negative aspects, with all points
fully explained, using examples to illustrate your points
(c) A conclusion with your opinion that is supported by the
arguments in the main body of your answer
The approach for part (a) sub-requirement 1 should be:
 Identify a problem
 Explain the problem in the context of consistency between
 Illustrate your point with an example
The approach for part (a) sub-requirement 2 should be:
 Give examples of areas of choice within IFRSs
 You do not need to name the IAS or IFRS but you do need to
explain the choice in accounting treatment
 Cover general characteristics of IFRS (as well as specific
examples above)
The approach for part (b) sub-requirement 1 should be:
 Give examples of areas of judgement within IFRSs
 You do not need to name the IAS or IFRS but you do need to
explain the area of judgement
 Cover general characteristics of IFRS (as well as specific
examples above)
Finally, for part (b) sub-requirement 2:
 Think about the financial reporting infrastructure of your
country to generate ideas
 Your points should be practical
495
Use of key words
in requirement as
Suggested solution heading
(a) How changes in accounting practices on transition to

IFRSs and choice in application of individual IFRSs could
lead to inconsistency between companies
Adoption of IFRS for the first time is like to result in inconsistency

Need a short
introduction for a
between financial statements of different companies. This is
discussion question
explained further below.
Sub-heading for each
Change in accounting practices sub-requirement
The challenge
Implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards

entails a great deal of work for many companies, particularly
Identify problem those in countries where local GAAP has not been so onerous. For
example, many jurisdictions will not have had such detailed rules Illustrate your
point with an
about recognition, measurement and presentation of financial example
instruments, and many will have had no rules at all about share-
based payment.
A challenge for preparers of financial statements is also a

challenge for users. When financial statements become far
Explain problem in
context of consistency more complex under IFRS than they were under local GAAP, users
of financial statements
may find them hard to understand, and consequently of little
relevance.
Presentation
Many developed countries have legislation requiring set formats

Identify problem
and layouts for financial statements. For example, in the UK there
Illustrate your
is the Companies Act 2006. IFRS demands that presentation is in point with an
example
accordance with IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements, but
this standard allows alternative forms of presentation. In choosing
Explain problem in
context of consistency between alternatives, countries tend to adopt the format
of financial
statements that is closest to local GAAP, even if this is not necessarily the
best format. For example, UK companies are likely to adopt the
two-statement format for the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income, because this is closest to the old profit and
loss account and statement of total recognised gains and losses.
496
Skills Checkpoint 5
Concepts and interpretation
Although later IASs and IFRSs are based to an extent on the IASB
Conceptual Framework, there is no consistent set of
principles underlying them. The Conceptual Framework itself is
Identify problem
being revised, and there is controversy over the direction the Explain problem
in context of
revision should take. Consequently, preparers of accounts are consistency of
financial
likely to think in terms of the conceptual frameworks – if any – that statements
they have used in developing local GAAP, and these may be

different from that of the IASB. German accounts, for example,
Illustrate your
have traditionally been aimed at the tax authorities. point with an
example
Where IFRSs themselves give clear guidance, this may not matter,
but where there is uncertainty, preparers of accounts will fall back
on their traditional conceptual thinking.
Inconsistency of timing and exemptions taken
IFRSs have provision for early adoption, and this can affect
Identify problem
comparability, although impact of a new standard must be
disclosed under IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting
Estimates and Errors. Further, IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of
International Financial Reporting Standards permits a number of
Explain
exemptions during the periods of transition to IFRS. This gives problem in
context of
scope for manipulation if exemptions are 'cherry-picked' to consistency of
financial
produce a favourable picture. statements
Choice of application of individual IFRSs

A comprehensive list of
examples has been
included here but you Although many so-called 'allowed alternatives' have been
only need about six
A discussion
points to be awarded eliminated from IFRS in recent years, choice of treatment remains. question requires
the marks available,
a balanced
and fewer to score a An example of the elimination of allowed alternatives was the answer – positive
strong pass
aspects brought
introduction of IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements which required joint out here
ventures to be equity-accounted, whereas previously there was a

choice between equity accounting and proportional consolidation.
You do not need to

Examples where choices remain include:
know the IAS or IFRS
number but just the  IAS 2 Inventories allows different cost formulae for large
rules or principles
within the accounting numbers of inventory that are largely interchangeable (for
standards. Note that
even though bullet- example, first-in first-out or weighted average).
points have been used,
the answer is still in full
sentences
497
 IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment gives a choice of
either the cost model or the revaluation model for a class of
property, plant or equipment as well as a choice of
depreciation method (for example, straight-line, diminishing
balance or units of production method).
 IAS 38 Intangible Assets also offers a choice between the

cost and fair value models.
 IAS 40 Investment Property similarly requires users to make

a choice between the cost model and the fair value model
when measuring investment property.
 IAS 20 Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of

Government Assistance allows grants related to assets to be
presented in the statement of financial position either as
deferred income or deducted in arriving at the carrying
amount of the asset.
 IFRS 3 Business Combinations allows non-controlling interests

at acquisition to be measured either at fair value (the full
goodwill method) or at the proportionate share of the fair
value of identifiable net assets (the partial goodwill method).
 IFRS 9 Financial Instruments provides an option, in certain

circumstances (to eliminate or reduce an accounting
mismatch), to designate a financial asset that would
otherwise be categorised as fair value through other
comprehensive income or amortised cost as fair value
through profit or loss. In the case of investments in equity
instruments that are not held for trading, an irrevocable
election may be made to treat as fair value through other
comprehensive income where they would otherwise be
categorised as fair value through profit or loss.
 Neither IFRS 3 Business Combinations nor IAS 28

Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures specifically
cover an investment to associate step acquisition. Therefore,
in measuring the 'cost of the associate' in the 'investment in
associate' working, an entity effectively has the choice of
following the IFRS 3 principles to remeasure the original
498
Skills Checkpoint 5
investment to fair value at the date significant influence is

achieved or of following the IAS 28 principles to record the
original investment at cost.
 Under IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange

Rates, impairment of goodwill in a foreign subsidiary may
be translated either at the average rate or the closing rate.
 IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows allows the use of the direct

or the indirect method in the preparation of a cash flow from
operations figure. Also, there is a choice over where certain
items may be presented in the statement of cash flows (for
example, dividends paid may be classified as an 'operating'
or 'financing' cash flow).
Your discussion
should end with a It could be argued that choice is a good thing, as companies
conclusion
summarising the should be able to select the treatment that most fairly reflects the
points in the main
body of your underlying reality. However, in the context of change to IFRS, there
answer
is a danger that companies will choose the alternative that
closely matches the approach followed under local
GAAP, or the one that is easier to implement, regardless
of whether this is the best choice.
(b) Impact of management judgement and the financial

reporting infrastructure on IFRS financial statements
Management judgement and the financial reporting infrastructure Start your

discussion
can have a significant impact on IFRS financial statements, as with a brief
introduction
explained below.
Impact on management judgement
In recent standards, areas of judgement leading to inconsistency A discussion

question
between entities have been reduced. An example of this is IFRS 16 requires a
balanced
Leases removing the judgement required in its predecessor, IAS 17 answer –
positive
Leases, of whether a lease should be classified as an operating aspects
brought out
lease (and not recorded in the lessee's statement of financial here
position) or a finance lease (and recorded in the lessee's statement

of financial position). Under IFRS 16, this area of judgement has
been eliminated, all leases (with limited exemptions) now being
required to be recorded in the lessee's statement of financial
position.
499
However, management judgement is still required in many
accounting standards which makes the financial statements more
vulnerable to manipulation and reduces comparability between
entities. Examples include:
You do not need  IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers involves
to know the IAS or
IFRS number but judgement in identifying the separate performance
just the rules or
principles within obligations in a contract, allocating the transaction price to
the accounting
standards. Note those performance obligations and determining when the
that even though
bullet-points have performance obligations have been satisfied.
been used, the
answer is still in
full sentences  IAS 16 and IAS 38 both require judgement in determining
the useful life of non-current assets.
 IAS 19 Employee Benefits requires judgement in determining

when a pension plan is a defined contribution or defined
benefit plan – some plans are complicated and effectively a
hybrid of the two so this can be hard to classify.
 IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent

Asset contains many areas of management judgement in
determining whether an obligation exists, the likelihood for
the outflow or inflow and the best estimate of the amount.
 IFRS 9 Financial Instruments requires judgement in

classifying financial assets and liabilities for measurement
purposes.
 IAS 12 Income Taxes requires judgement in assessing the

recoverability of deferred tax assets.
 When a parent company invests in another entity,

judgement is required to determine whether it is an
investment, associate, joint venture or subsidiary.
 IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued

Operations requires judgement in determining whether the
held for sale and discontinued operations criteria have been
met.
 IAS 21 requires judgement in determining the functional

currency of an overseas subsidiary.
500
Skills Checkpoint 5
The extent of the impact of judgement will vary on transition to

IFRS, depending on how developed local GAAP was before the
transition. However, in general it is likely that management
judgement will have a greater impact on financial
statements prepared under IFRS than under local GAAP. The main
Be careful that your reasons for this are as follows:
answer is not just a
long list of specific
examples. You need (a) The volume of rules and number of areas addressed by
to make some
general points too IFRS is likely to be greater than that under local GAAP.
which are applicable
to all IFRSs (b) Many issues are perhaps addressed for the first time,
for example share-based payment.
(c) IFRSs are likely to be more complex than local standards.
(d) IFRSs allow choice in many cases, which leads to

subjectivity.
(e) Selection of valuation method requires judgement, and

many IFRSs leave the choice of method open. This affects
areas such as pensions, impairment, intangible assets
acquired in business combinations, onerous contracts and
share-based payment.
Financial reporting infrastructure
As well as sound management judgement, implementation of IFRS

requires a sound financial reporting infrastructure. Key aspects of
this include the following:
(a) A robust regulatory framework. For IFRSs to be

Each point has its
own heading successful, they must be rigorously enforced.
followed by a full
sentence
containing an (b) Trained and qualified staff. Many preparers of
explanation
financial statements will have been trained in local GAAP
and not be familiar with the principles underlying IFRS, let
alone the detail. Some professional bodies provide
conversion qualifications – for example, the ACCA's
Diploma in International Financial Reporting – but the
availability of such qualifications and courses may vary from
country to country.
501
(c) Availability and transparency of market
information. This is particularly important in the
determination of fair values, which are such a key
component of many IFRSs.
(d) High standards of corporate governance and

audit. This is all the more important in the transition period,
especially where there is resistance to change.
Overall, there are significant advantages to the widespread

adoption of IFRS, but if the transition is to continue to go well, there
must be a realistic assessment of potential challenges.

 Both parts of the question ((a) and (b)) have been addressed, each
with their own heading.
 Each sub-requirement has been answered, with its own sub-heading.
 There are at least 20 points in the answer to score the full 20 marks
available – however, you only need 50% to pass so it is
recommended that you aim for at least a 65% answer to allow for
a margin of error.
 This answer is longer than required and would not be achievable
in the time available. This is because it contains comprehensive
lists of examples of accounting standards where choice or
judgement exist – the aim of this is to be a learning exercise and
for you to be able to determine whether points you had generated
would be awarded marks. However, you only need about five
examples of each to score strong marks.
 The answer involves 'discussion' – each part starts with a brief
introduction, followed by a balanced argument and finishing with
a conclusion with an opinion supported by the main body of the
answer.
502
Skills Checkpoint 5
completed below for the Implementing IFRS activity to give you an idea of how to complete
the diagnostic.
Good time Did you spend approximately a third of your time reading
management and planning?
Did you spend approximately 65% of your time on part (a)
and 35% on part (b), per the split of marks in the question?
Did you answer both parts of the question and all four
sub-requirements?
Answer planning Did you draw up a separate answer plan rather than just
annotating the question paper?
Did your answer plan address all sub-requirements?
Did you generate enough points to pass based on 1 mark
per point (you needed 50% × 20 marks = 10 points to pass
but should have aimed for at least 13 points [a 65%
answer] to allow a margin of safety)?
Correct interpretation Did you understand what was meant by the verb 'discuss'?
of requirements Did you spot all four sub-requirements?
Did you understand what each sub-requirement was asking
for?
Effective writing and Was your answer in discussion format (an introduction, the
presentation main body of answer with a balanced approach covering
positive and negative aspects, a conclusion with your
opinion)?
Did you use the requirements and sub-requirements as
headings and sub-headings?
Did you add your own examples to illustrate your points?
Did your answer contain enough points to pass (based on
one point per mark)?
503
Summary
In the SBR exam, discussion will feature across the paper with the majority of the
marks being available for written rather than numerical analysis. This Skills Checkpoint
should help with your approach to all narrative requirements, and in particular, an
essay-style question, should it feature in Section B. Make sure you practice discussion
questions in full, to time. The most important aspects to take away are:
 Spend a third of your time planning and generate an answer plan containing
sufficient points for a strong point (on the basis of one mark per point).
 Structure your answer with an introduction, the main body of your answer with a
balanced argument, finishing with a conclusion with your opinion supported by
the arguments in the main body of your answer.
 Use examples to illustrate your points.
 Do not overlook the scenario in the question – it is likely to provide you with some
ideas for your answer.
504
Appendix 1 – Activity answers
Chapter 1 The financial reporting framework

Step 1: Identify the contract
Here there is a contract between two parties (Jost and Claire) and the IFRS 15 Revenue from
Contracts with Customers criteria have been met:
(a) Both parties have approved the contract orally (by telephone) as permitted by IFRS 15, with a
written copy passed on to the customer.
(b) Jost can identify each party's rights, as they are clearly agreed in the contract:
 Claire has right to the handset and 24 months of unlimited calls, texts and data
 Jost has right to receive $49 a month for 24 months
(c) Jost can also identify the payment terms ($49 a month for 24 months).
(d) The contract has commercial substance as Jost's cash flows will change as a result of the
contract in the form of income from the customer and costs of fulfilling the contract (providing
the handset, calls, texts and data).
(e) It is probable that Jost will collect the consideration as Claire has successfully passed the
requisite credit check.
Step 2: Identify the performance obligation(s)
Here there are two distinct performance obligations in the form of promises to transfer to the
customer (Claire):
 A good (in the form of the handset); and
 A service (in the form of the unlimited minutes of calls, texts and data).
The unlimited minutes of calls, texts and data are bundled into one as in their own right, they are not
distinct; ie Jost does not sell the calls, texts and data as separate products.
Step 3: Determine the transaction price
The transaction price is the amount to which Jost expects to be entitled. Here this is $1,176
(ie 24 months  $49).
Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations
The transaction price must be allocated to each performance obligation in proportion to the
standalone selling price at the contract inception of each performance obligation:
Performance obligation Standalone selling price % of total Revenue
Handset $700 53.8% $633
Calls, texts and data 24  $25 = $600 46.2% $543
Total $1,300 100.0% $1,176
Step 5: Recognise revenue when (or as) the performance obligations are satisfied
The performance obligation in relation to the handset is its delivery to the customer, Claire.
Therefore, Jost should recognise the $633 revenue for the handset when it is delivered to Claire on
2 January 20X1.
The performance obligation for the calls, texts and data is the provision of this service to Claire
which takes place over the 24 months of the contract. Therefore, this revenue of $543 should be
spread over the 24 months at $22.625 a month, with $271.50 being recognised in the year ended
31 December 20X1.
505
Chapter 2 Professional and ethical duty of the accountant
(a) Directors' remuneration
There is an argument that, as the directors should be acting as the agent for the stakeholders,
their interests should be aligned. The key stakeholder, the shareholder, is interested in
profitability and returns. By linking the remuneration of directors to profits and share price, it
will incentivise directors to try to maximise profits and share price, thus aligning their interests
with those of the stakeholders.
However, bonuses based on short-term profits could encourage directors to adopt strategies
and accounting policies which maximise profits in the short term but are detrimental to the
company's profitability, liquidity and solvency in the long term.
Share-based payment with vesting periods and vesting conditions based on performance and
share price would be preferable to bonuses based on short-term profits, as they would ensure
that directors act with a longer term goal. However, there is still a danger that strategies and
accounting policies are manipulated to obtain maximum return on exercise.
On the other hand, if remuneration was purely cash with no link to the company's
performance, there would be a danger that the board of directors would not act in the best of
their ability to maximise return for the stakeholders.
(b) Accounting policy for properties
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements requires financial statements to present fairly the
financial position, financial performance and cash flows of an entity. This fair presentation is
assumed if an entity complies with accounting standards and the IASB's Conceptual
Framework.
IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors only allows a change
in accounting policy where required by a standard or if it results in financial statements
providing reliable and more relevant information.
The ACCA Code of Ethics and Conduct requires directors to act with integrity and professional
competence. Professional competence includes complying with accounting standards and the
Conceptual Framework.
If the Finance Director of Kelshall is revising the accounting policy to maximise his
remuneration rather than provide reliable and more relevant financial information, then he
could be considered to be acting unethically due to non-compliance with IAS 1 and IAS 8. In
fact, though, the cost model would not necessarily lead to improved profits (and improved
remuneration) because under the revaluation model, losses are first written off to the
revaluation surplus (and reported in other comprehensive income) then profit or loss so might
not impact profits at all. Also, even under the cost model, assets need to be written down
where there is evidence of an impairment.
If the motivation of the Finance Director is that the economic downturn is causing volatility in
market value of properties and the more stable cost model would provide a truer and fairer
view, then he could possibly be considered to have acted ethically.
(c) CEO's comment to the Finance Director
The CEO and the Finance Director are both bound by the principles of the ACCA Code of
Ethics and Conduct. As directors, they should be acting in the best interests of the
shareholders.
However, it appears as though the CEO is more concerned with self-interest and maximising
the gains on his share options by manipulating the share price.
506
This pressure from the CEO is a threat to the integrity and objectivity of the Finance Director.
The Finance Director is in a difficult position ethically as he reports directly to the CEO and the
CEO has direct influence over his job security and remuneration.
The Finance Director could speak directly to the CEO and seek clarification of the intent of his
comments, explaining that he is unable to change Kelshall's accounting policies just to
maximise Kelshall's share price in the short term and that he is bound by the ACCA Code of
Ethics and Conduct to act with professional competence. However, if he felt under too much
pressure from the CEO to speak to him directly, he could raise his concerns with the non-
executive directors and/or the audit committee.
The problem here is that the threats to both the CEO's and the Finance Director's objectivity
and integrity are similar so there is a danger that the Finance Director reacts to the CEO's
comments by changing accounting policies to maximise profits and share price rather than
acting in the company's and stakeholders' best long-term interests. This would definitely
constitute unethical behaviour.

Leoval must disclose its parent (Cavelli) and ultimate controlling party (the Grassi family). This is
irrespective of whether transactions have occurred with these related parties during the period.
The company in which Francesca Cincetti has a 23% shareholding is related to Leoval as it is
significantly influenced by close family of a person that controls Leoval. Consequently the sales, any
outstanding balances and any bad or doubtful debts must be disclosed even though they are at
market prices: Leoval might lose this business if Francesca's husband was not a shareholder and
investors need to be aware of this.
The interest-free loans, although a benefit, are not a related party transaction in themselves; they are
part of the remuneration package of the employees and would be accounted for under IAS 19
Employee Benefits. However, if the employees include key management personnel, the transaction
and its cost must be disclosed as a related party transaction for them.
The management service fee is a transaction with the controlling party, and must be disclosed in
Leoval's own financial statements (but will be eliminated and therefore not require disclosure in the
group accounts); it will be particularly important information for the 10% non-controlling interest
shareholders in Leoval.
Leoval is dependent on Piat in that it is a major customer, but this in itself, in the absence of any other
information suggesting otherwise, is not a related party issue.
Post-employment benefit plans are related parties under IAS 24. Leoval has had no transactions with
the plan in the period requiring disclosure under IAS 24, but recognises other income and expenses
relating to the plan in its financial statements. These are disclosed under IAS 19 Employee Benefits.

(a) IAS 24 does not require disclosure of transactions between companies and providers of
finance in the ordinary course of business. As RP is a merchant bank, no disclosure is needed
in respect of the transaction between RP and AB. However, RP owns 25% of the equity of AB
and it would seem significant influence exists (according to IAS 28 Investments in Associates
and Joint Ventures, greater than 20% existing holding means significant influence
is presumed) and therefore AB could be an associate of RP. IAS 24 regards associates as
related parties.
The decision as to associate status depends upon the ability of RP to exercise significant
influence especially as the other 75% of votes are owned by the management of AB.
Merchant banks tend to regard companies which would qualify for associate status as trade
investments since the relationship is designed to provide finance.
507
IAS 28 presumes that a party owning or able to exercise control over 20% of
voting rights is a related party. So an investor with a 25% holding and a director on
the board would be expected to have significant influence over operating and financial
policies in such a way as to inhibit the pursuit of separate interests. If it can be shown that this
is not the case, there is no related party relationship.
If it is decided that there is a related party situation then all material transactions should
be disclosed including management fees, interest, dividends and the terms of the
loan.
(b) IAS 24 does not require intragroup transactions and balances eliminated on
consolidation to be disclosed. IAS 24 does not deal with the situation where an
undertaking becomes, or ceases to be, a subsidiary during the year.
Best practice indicates that related party transactions should be disclosed for the period when
X was not part of the group. Transactions between RP and X should be disclosed between
1 July 20X9 and 31 October 20X9 but transactions prior to 1 July will have been eliminated
on consolidation.
There is no related party relationship between RP and Z since it is a normal business
transaction unless either party's interests have been influenced or controlled in some way by
the other party.
(c) Employee retirement benefit schemes of the reporting entity are included in the IAS 24
definition of related parties.
The contributions paid, the non-current asset transfer ($10m) and the charge of administrative
costs ($3m) must be disclosed.
The pension investment manager would not normally be considered a related
party. However, the manager is key management personnel by virtue of his non-
executive directorship.
Directors are deemed to be related parties by IAS 24, and the manager receives a $25,000
fee. IAS 24 requires the disclosure of compensation paid to key management
personnel and the fee falls within the definition of compensation. Therefore, it must be
disclosed.
508
Activity 4: Revising accounting policies and estimates
Unethical? Revision to accounting policy or estimate and reason
Increasing the useful life of an asset because large profits on disposal in recent
years indicate that the previous estimated life was too short
IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment requires the useful life of an
asset to be reviewed at least every financial year end (IAS 16:
para. 51) and, if expectations differ from previous estimates, the
change should be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate.
Here the previous profits on disposal indicate that depreciation in
prior years was too high and the useful life of the asset too short.
Therefore, the extension of the useful life of the asset is valid under
IAS 16 and is considered ethical.
Reducing the allowance for doubtful debts from 5% to 3% of trade receivables to

meet forecast profit targets
There is a self-interest threat here. A change in accounting estimate
 is only permitted where changes occur in the circumstances on
which the estimate is based. Here, there is no evidence that trade
receivables payment history has improved. Simply reducing the
allowance to meet profit targets would be considered unethical
behaviour.
Not equity accounting for an associate in the current year because the Finance
Director failed to realise a relationship of significant influence in the prior year
There is a self-review threat here because the Director appears not
 to be correcting the accounting treatment of the associate for fear of
flagging up his previous mistake. Also, not equity accounting an
associate contravenes the requirements of IAS 28 and brings into
question the Director's professional competence. This proposed
accounting treatment is therefore considered unethical.
Classifying redeemable preference shares as equity to meet the gearing and

interest cover loan covenants
This contravenes IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation which
requires redeemable preference shares to be classified as a financial
 liability not equity as they contain an obligation to repay the
principal (IAS 32: para. 18). Therefore this proposed policy would
not demonstrate professional competence. Furthermore, the aim of
an accounting policy should be to present financial information that
is relevant and reliable (IAS 8: para. 10), not to meet loan
covenants. Therefore, this policy can be considered unethical.
Reclassifying an expense from cost of sales to administrative expenses to align the

entity's accounting policy to other entities operating in the same industry
Under IAS 8, it is valid for an entity to change its accounting policy
to make it consistent with accepted industry practice (as long as it
still complies with the relevant IFRS) (IAS 8: para. 12). Therefore, this
is an ethical proposal.
509
Chapter 3 Non-current assets
Activity 1: Impairment
On the basis of the original estimates, Shiplake's earth-moving plant was not impaired, the value in
use of $500,000 being greater than its carrying amount. However due to the 'dramatic' increase in
interest rates causing Shiplake's cost of capital, and therefore the discount rate, to increase, the value
in use of the plant will fall. There is insufficient information to be able to quantify this fall. If the new
discounted value is above the carrying amount $400,000 there is still no impairment. If it is between
$245,000 and $400,000, this will be the recoverable amount of the plant and it should be written
down to this value. As the plant can be sold for $250,000 less selling costs of $5,000, $245,000 is
the lowest amount that the plant should be written down to even if its revised value in use is below
this figure.
Activity 2: Impairment of CGU

Where there are multiple cash-generating units, IAS 36 requires two levels of tests to be performed to
ensure that all impairment losses are identified and fairly allocated. First Divisions A and B are tested
individually for impairment. In this instance, both are impaired and the impairment losses are
allocated first to any goodwill allocated to that unit and secondly to other non-current assets (within
the scope of IAS 36) on a pro-rata basis. This results in an impairment of the goodwill of both
divisions and an impairment of the property, plant and equipment in Division B only.
A second test is then performed over the whole business including unallocated goodwill and
unallocated corporate assets (the head office) to identify if those items which are not a cash-
generating unit in their own right (and therefore cannot be tested individually) have been impaired.
The additional impairment loss of $15m (W2) is allocated first against the unallocated goodwill of
$10m, eliminating it, and then to the unallocated head office assets reducing them to $85m.
Divisions A and B have already been tested for impairment so no further impairment loss is allocated
to them or their goodwill as that would result in reporting them at below their recoverable amount.
Carrying amounts after impairment test
A B office goodwill
$m $m $m $m $m
PPE 780/(620 – 10)/(90 – 5) 780 610 85 – 1,475
Goodwill (60 – 20)/(30 – 30)/(10 – 10) 40 0 – 0 40
Net current assets 180 110 20 – 310
1,000 720 105 0 1,825
Workings
1 Test of individual CGUs
Division A Division B
$m $m
Carrying amount 1,020 760
Recoverable amount (1,000) (720)
Impairment loss 20 40
Allocated to:
Goodwill 20 30
Other assets in the scope of IAS 36 – 10
20 40
510
2 Test of group of CGUs

$m
Revised carrying amount (1,000 + 720 + 110 + 10) 1,840
Impairment loss 15
Allocated to:
Unallocated goodwill 10
Other unallocated assets 5
15

(a) Costs are capitalised from 30 June 20X8 onwards (when commercial feasibility and
technical viability were demonstrated). Hence the $3.5m incurred before this point is
expensed.
The $3m incurred from 1 July to 31 December 20X8 is capitalised. Amortisation is charged
over the ten-year useful life, giving an annual charge of $300,000.
Amortisation is charged from when the process begins to be exploited commercially; here this
is 1 January 20X9. Amortisation charged in the year-ended 20X9 is $300,000  3/12 =
$75,000.
The carrying amount is thus:
Cost 3,000,000
Amortisation (75,000)
Carrying amount 2,925,000
(b) The brand name is capitalised at its fair value of $10m. It is amortised over its useful life
of 10 years, resulting in an expense of $1m. The carrying amount at the year end is thus
$9m.
In accordance with IAS 38, no asset may be recognised in respect of the employees'
expertise, as Lambda/Omicron does not exercise 'control' over them – they could leave
their jobs. The amount will be recognised as part of any goodwill on acquisition of
Omicron.
(c) The licence is initially recognised at its cost of $200,000. Its useful life is five years, so
amortisation is charged of $200,000 ÷ 5  6 months = $20,000. The carrying amount is then
$180,000.
The asset is then reviewed for impairment. It is impaired if its carrying amount is higher than its
recoverable amount. This is the higher of value in use ($185,000) and fair value less costs to
sell ($175,000) – the higher being $185,000. Since the carrying amount is lower than this, it
is not impaired.
Activity 4: Intangible assets and impairment

The treatment of the research and development costs in the year to 31 March 20X1 was correct due
to the element of uncertainty at the date. The development costs of $75,000 written off in that same
period should not be capitalised at a later date even if the uncertainties leading to its original
write off are favourably resolved. The treatment of the development costs in the year to 31 March
20X2 is incorrect. The directors' decision to continue the development is logical as (at the time of the
decision) the future costs are estimated at only $10,000 and the future revenues are expected to be
$150,000. However, at 31 March 20X2 the unexpensed development costs of $80,000 are
expected to be recovered. Provided the other criteria in IAS 38 Intangible Assets are met, these costs
511
of $80,000 should be recognised as an asset in the statement of financial position and amortised
across the expected life of the product in order to 'match' the development costs to the future
earnings of the new product. Thus the directors' logic of writing off the $80,000 development cost at
31 March 20X2 because of an expected overall loss is flawed. The directors do not have the choice
to write off the development expenditure.

The apartments are leased to persons who are under contract to the company. Therefore they
cannot be classified as investment property. IAS 40 Investment Property specifically states
that property occupied by employees is not investment property. The apartments must be
treated as property, plant and equipment, carried at cost or fair value and depreciated over
their useful lives.
Although the rent is below the market rate, the difference between the actual rent and the market rate
is simply income foregone (or an opportunity cost). In order to recognise the difference as an
employee benefit cost it would also be necessary to gross up rental income to the market rate.
The financial statements would not present fairly the financial performance of the company.
Therefore the company cannot recognise the difference as an employee benefit cost.
Activity 6: Government grant

The basic principle of IAS 20 is that grants should be recognised as income in whichever periods the
costs they are intended to compensate occur.
(a) There are no conditions attached to the $6m, so there are no costs to match the money to.
Hence the $6m should be recognised as income straight away.
(b) The $15m relates to the costs of the factory and should be matched to them. The costs occur
over the 40 year useful life, and IAS 20 allows the grant to be matched to them in two ways:
(i) The grant could be used to reduce the cost of the asset and subsequent depreciation
charges. The cost would have been $60m with $0.5m depreciation (= $60m/40 years
 4/12 months), but this would be reduced by the grant to $45m cost less $0.375m
depreciation (= $45m/40 years  4/12 months) to a carrying amount of $44.625m.
(ii) The other treatment would be to show the grant separately as deferred income,
matching the income to the depreciation of the factory. The factory would remain at
$60m cost with $0.5m depreciation. Income of $0.125m (= $15m/40 years 
4/12 months) would be recognised in the statement of profit or loss, with the remaining
$14.875m being shown as deferred in the statement of financial position. Of this,
$0.375m would be shown within current liabilities as it would be released during the
next year (= $15m/40 years), and the remaining $14.5m (= $14.875m – $0.375m)
would be in non-current liabilities.
(c) The question here is how likely it is that the grant will have to be repaid. In this case, it is
possible but unlikely, so no liability needs to be recognised for it being repaid. The grant
should therefore be treated as deferred income over the five years, of which $0.6m (= $9m/
5 years  4/12 months) is recognised as income this year. The doubt over possible repayment
of the grant in future should then be disclosed as a contingent liability in line with IAS 37, as
repayment is possible but not probable.
If it had been probable that the $9m would have to be repaid, then no income would have
been recognised in the statement of profit or loss and the full amount would be shown as a
separate liability in the statement of financial position, reducing the amount of deferred
income. If there was not enough deferred income to make up the amount of the liability (eg if
some had already been recognised in the statement of profit or loss), then the deficit should be
charged to the statement of profit or loss as an expense.
512
Activity 7: Borrowing costs

120 80
Capitalisation rate = weighted average rate = (10%  ) + (9.5%  ) = 9.8%
120 + 80 120 + 80
Borrowing costs = ($30m  9.8%) + ($20m  9.8%  3/12)
= $3.43m
Chapter 4 Employee benefits

Plyman Co expects to pay an additional 12 days of sick pay as a result of the unused entitlement that
has accumulated at 31 December 20X8, ie 1½ days  8 employees. Plyman Co should recognise a
liability equal to 12 days of sick pay.

An accrual should be made under IAS 19 Employee Benefits for the holiday entitlement that can be
carried forward to the following year. This is because the employees have worked additional days in
the current period (generating additional economic benefits for the company), but will work fewer
days in the following period when the salary for those days is paid. An accrual is therefore required
to match costs and revenues and apply the accruals concept.
DEBIT P/L ($42m  94%  4 days/255 days) $619,294
CREDIT Accruals $619,294
Activity 3: Defined contribution plans

Salaries $10,500,000
Bonus $ 3,000,000
$13,500,000  5% = $675,000
DEBIT P/L $675,000

CREDIT Cash $510,000
CREDIT Accruals $165,000
Activity 4: Defined benefit plans

Notes to the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
1 Defined benefit expense recognised in profit or loss
$m
Past service cost 40
Net interest cost (from SOFP obligation and asset notes: 58 – 52) 6
122
2 Other comprehensive income (items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss):
$m
Actuarial gain/(loss) on defined benefit obligation (16)
Return on plan assets (excluding amounts in net interest) 34
18
513
1 Net defined benefit liability recognised in the statement of financial position
31.12.X7 31.12.X6
$m $m
Present value of defined benefit obligation 1,222 1,120
Fair value of plan assets (1,132) (1,040)
Net liability 90 80
2 Changes in the present value of the defined benefit obligation

$m
Opening defined benefit obligation 1,120
Interest on obligation [(1,120  5%) + (40  5%)] 58
Past service cost 40
Benefits paid (88)
(Gain)/loss on remeasurement recognised in OCI 16
(balancing figure)
Closing defined benefit obligation 1,222
3 Changes in the fair value of plan assets

$m
Opening fair value of plan assets 1,040
Interest on plan assets (1,040  5%) 52
Contributions 94
Benefits paid (88)
Gain/(loss) on remeasurement recognised in OCI 34
(balancing figure)
Closing fair value of plan assets 1,132
Chapter 5 Provisions, contingencies and events after the

reporting period
Activity 1: Restructuring
Plan 1:
A provision for restructuring should be recognised in respect of the closure of the factories in
accordance with IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets. The plan has been
communicated to the relevant employees (those who will be made redundant) and factories have
already been identified. A provision should only be recognised for directly attributable
costs that will not benefit ongoing activities of the entity. Thus, a provision should be recognised for
the redundancy costs and the lease termination costs, but none for the retraining costs:
$m
Redundancy costs 9
Retraining –
Lease termination costs 5
Liability 14
DEBIT Profit or loss (retained earnings) $14m

CREDIT Current liabilities $14m
514
Plan 2:
No provision should be recognised for the reorganisation of the finance and IT
department. Since the reorganisation is not due to start for two years, the plan may change, and
so a valid expectation that management is committed to the plan has not been
raised. As regards any provision for redundancy, individuals have not been identified and
communicated with, and so no provision should be made at 31 May 20X3 for redundancy costs.
Activity 2: Environmental provisions

(a) At 31 December 20X3
At 31 December 20X3, a provision should be recognised for the dismantling costs of the
structures already built and restoration of the environment where access roads to the site have
been built. This is because the construction of the access roads and structures, combined with
the requirement under the operating licence to restore the site and remove the access roads,
create an obligating event at the end of the period. As the time value of money is material, the
20
amount must be discounted resulting in a provision of $2.145 million ($10m  1/1.08 ).
As undertaking this obligation gives rise to future economic benefits (from selling limestone),
the amount of the provision should be included in the initial measurement of the assets relating
to the quarry as at 31 December 20X3:
Non-current assets $m
Quarry structures and access roads at cost
Construction cost 50.0
Provision for dismantling and restoration costs ($10m  1/1.08 )
20
2.145
52.145
(b) Year ended 31 December 20X4
The overall cost of the quarry structures and access roads (including the discounted provision)
would be depreciated over the quarry's 20 year life resulting in a charge for the year of
$52.145m/20 = $2.607m recognised in profit or loss and a carrying amount of $52.145m –
$2.607m = $49.538m.
The provision would begin to be compounded resulting in an interest charge of $2.145m 
8% = $0.172m in profit or loss.
The obligation to rectify damage to the environment incurred through extraction of limestone
arises as the quarry is operated, requiring a new provision and a charge to profit or loss of
19
$0.116m ($500,000  1/1.08 ) in 20X4.
Therefore the outstanding provision in the statement of financial position as at 31 December
20X4 is made up as follows:
$m
Provision for dismantling and restoration costs b/d 2.145
Interest ($2.145m  8%) 0.172
New provision for restoration costs at year end prices ($500,000  1/1.08 )
19
0.116
Provision for dismantling and restoration costs c/d at 31 December 20X4 2.433
The overall charge to profit or loss for the year is:
$m
Depreciation 2.607
New provision for restoration costs 0.116
Finance costs 0.172
Provision for dismantling and restoration costs c/d at 31 December 20X4 2.895
515
Any change in the expected present value of the provision would be made as an adjustment to
the provision and to the asset value (affecting future depreciation charges).
Activity 3: IAS 37 and IAS 10

(a) Under the principles of IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, a provision
should be made for the probable damages payable to the customer.
The amount provided should be the amount Delta would rationally pay to settle the obligation
at the end of the reporting period. Ignoring discounting, this is $1m. This amount should be
credited to liabilities and debited to profit or loss.
Under the principles of IAS 37 the potential amount receivable from the supplier is a
contingent asset. Contingent assets should not be recognised but should be disclosed where
there is a probable future receipt of economic benefits – this is the case for the $800,000
potentially receivable from the supplier.
(b) The event causing the damage to the inventory occurred after the end of the reporting period.
Under the principles of IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period this is a non-adjusting event as
it does not affect conditions at the end of the reporting period.
Non-adjusting events are not recognised in the financial statements, but are disclosed where
their effect is material.
Chapter 6 Income taxes

Activity 1: Fair value adjustments
A taxable temporary difference arises for the group because on consolidation the carrying amount of
the equipment has increased (to its fair value), but its tax base has not changed. The deferred tax on
the fair value adjustment is calculated as:
$m
Carrying amount (in group financial statements) 54
Tax base (50)
Temporary difference 4
Deferred tax liability (4  25%) (1)
The deferred tax of $1m is debited to goodwill, reducing the fair value adjustment (and net assets at
acquisition) and increasing goodwill.
Activity 2: Unrealised profit on intragroup trading

The transaction generated unrealised group profits of $16,000 ($80,000 – $64,000), which are
eliminated on consolidation. In the consolidated financial statements the carrying amount of the
unsold inventory is $64,000 ($80,000 carrying amount – $16,000 unrealised profit).
The tax base of the unsold inventory is $80,000, being the cost of the inventories to Omega.
Deferred tax calculation

$
Use Omega's tax
Carrying amount (in the group financial statements) 64,000 rate as Omega will
get the tax relief in
Tax base (cost of inventories to Omega) (80,000) the future when the
Temporary difference (group unrealised profit) (16,000) inventories are sold
outside of the group
Deferred tax asset (16,000  25% (Omega's tax rate)) 4,000
516
In the consolidated financial statements a deferred tax asset of $4,000 should be recognised:
DEBIT Deferred tax asset (in consolidated statement of financial position) $4,000
CREDIT Deferred tax (in consolidated statement of profit or loss) $4,000
Activity 3: Tax losses

Baller Group has unrelieved tax losses of $38m. This amount will be available for offset against
profits for the year ending 31 December 20X5 ($21m). Because of the uncertainty about the
availability of taxable profits in 20X6, no deferred tax asset can be recognised for any losses which
may be offset against this amount. Therefore, a deferred tax asset may be recognised for the losses
to be offset against taxable profits in 20X5 only: $21  20% = $4.2m.
Activity 4: Deferred tax comprehensive question

(a) (i) Fair value adjustments are treated in a similar way to temporary differences on
revaluations in the entity's own accounts. A deferred tax liability is recognised under
IAS 12 even though the directors have no intention of selling the property as it will
generate taxable income in excess of depreciation allowed for tax purposes. The
temporary difference is $1m ($32m – $31m), resulting in a deferred tax liability of
$0.25m ($1m  25%). This is debited to goodwill, reducing the fair value adjustment
(and net assets at acquisition) and increasing goodwill.
(ii) Provisions for unrealised profits are temporary differences which create deferred tax
assets and the deferred tax is provided at the receiving company's rate of tax. A
deferred tax asset would arise of (3.6 × 2/6 ) × 30% = $360,000.
(b) (i) The unrealised gains are temporary differences which will reverse when the investments
are sold. Therefore a deferred tax liability needs to be created of ($8m  25%) = $2m.
(ii) The allowance is a temporary difference which will reverse when the currently
unidentified loans go bad. The entity will then be entitled to tax relief. A deferred tax
asset of ($2m at 25%) = $500,000 should be created.
(c) No deferred tax liability is required for the additional tax payable of $2m as Nyman controls
the dividend policy of Winsten and does not intend to remit the earnings to its own tax regime
in the foreseeable future.
(d) Nyman's unrelieved trading losses can only be recognised as a deferred tax asset to the
extent they are considered to be recoverable. In assessing the recoverability there needs to be
evidence that there will be suitable taxable profits from which the losses can be deducted in
the future. To the extent Nyman itself has a deferred tax liability for future taxable trading
profits (eg accelerated tax depreciation) then an asset could be recognised.
Chapter 7 Financial instruments
Activity 1: Derecognition
(a) AB should derecognise the asset as it only has an option (rather than an obligation) to
purchase.
(b) EF should not derecognise the asset as it has retained substantially all the risks and rewards of
ownership. The stock should be retained in its books even though the legal title is temporarily
transferred.
517
Activity 2: Measurement of financial assets
(a) Loan to employee
This is an investment in debt where the business model is to collect the contractual cash flows.
It should be initially measured at fair value plus transaction costs (none here). However, as this
is an interest free loan, the cash paid is not equivalent to the initial fair value. Therefore, the
initial fair value is calculated as the present value of future cash flows discounted at the market
rate on interest of an equivalent loan:
1
$10,000  = $9,070
2
1.05
The loan should be subsequently measured at amortised cost:
$
Fair value on 1 January 20X1 9,070
Effective interest income (9,070  5%) 454
Coupon received (10,000  0%) (0)
Amortised cost at 31 December 20X1 9,524
Finance income of $454 should be recorded in profit or loss for the year ended 31 December
20X1 and the amortised cost of $9,524 in the statement of financial position as at
31 December 20X1.
(b) Loan notes
These loan notes are an investment in debt instruments where the business model is to collect
the contractual cash flows (which are solely principal and interest) and to sell financial assets.
This is because Wharton will make decisions on an ongoing basis about whether collecting
contractual cash flows or selling financial assets will maximise the return on the portfolio until
the need arises for the invested cash.
Therefore, they should be measured initially at fair value plus transaction costs: $45,450
([$50,000  90%] + $450).
Subsequently, the loan notes should be held at fair value through other comprehensive income
under IFRS 9. However, the interest revenue must still be shown in profit or loss.
$
Fair value on 1 January 20X1 ((50,000  90%) + 450)) 45,450
Effective interest income (45,450  5.6%) 2,545
Coupon received (50,000  3%) (1,500)
46,495
Revaluation gain (to other comprehensive income) [bal. figure] 4,505
Fair value at 31 December 20X1 51,000
Consequently, $2,545 of finance income will be recognised in profit or loss for the year,
$4,505 revaluation gain recognised in other comprehensive income and there will be a
$51,000 loan note asset in the statement of financial position.
518
Activity 3: Measurement of financial liabilities

(a) Bank Loan
A bank loan would normally be initially measured at fair value less transaction costs and
subsequently at amortised cost.
In the case of Johnson, the initial measurement at fair value less transaction costs on
31 December 20X1 would result in a financial liability $8,850,000 ($9,000,000 –
$150,000).
Subsequent measurement would then be at amortised cost. An effective interest rate would
then need to be calculated to incorporate the 5% interest and the $150,000 transaction costs.
This effective interest would be recognised as an expense in profit or loss from the year ended
31 December 20X2.
However, IFRS 9 offers an option to designate a financial liability on initial recognition as 'at
fair value through profit or loss' in order to eliminate or significantly reduce a measurement or
recognition inconsistency (an 'accounting mismatch').
This option is available to Johnson here because the bank loan is being used specifically to
finance the purchase of investment properties. Under the accounting policy of Johnson, these
investment properties will be measured at fair value with gains or losses recognised in profit or
loss. Therefore, if the loan were measured at amortised cost, there would be a measurement
inconsistency. To eliminate this accounting mismatch, Johnson may choose to designate the
bank loan on initial recognition on 31 December 20X1 as 'at fair value through profit or loss'.
If this option is chosen, the loan will be initially recognised at its fair value of $9,000,000 and
the transaction costs of $150,000 will be expensed through profit or loss. Subsequently, the
loan will be measured at fair value with any gains or losses being recognised in profit or loss,
in line with the accounting treatment of the investment properties it was used to finance.
(b) Forward contract
A forward contract not held for delivery of the entity's expected physical purchase, sale or
usage requirements (which would be outside the scope of IFRS 9) and not held for hedging
purposes is accounted for at fair value through profit or loss.
The fair value of a forward contract at inception is zero.
The fair value of the contract at the year end is:
$
Market price of forward contract at year end for delivery on 30 April 5,000
Johnson's forward price (6,000)
Loss (1,000)
A financial liability of $1,000 is therefore recognised with a corresponding charge of $1,000

to profit or loss.
Activity 4: Impairment of financial assets

On 1 January 20X5, ABC Bank should recognise an allowance for credit losses of $75,000 (15% 
$500,000), being the 12 month expected credit losses. Per IFRS 9, this is calculated by multiplying
the probability of default in the next 12 months (15%) by the lifetime credit losses that would result
from the default ($500,000). A corresponding expense of $75,000 should be recognised in profit or
loss. The allowance will be presented set off against the loan assets in the statement of financial
positon.
519
During the year ended 31 December 20X5, an interest cost of $2,250 ($75,000  3%) must be
recognised on the brought forward allowance with a corresponding increase in the allowance to
unwind one year of discounting.
Interest revenue of $380,000 ($10,000,000  3.8%) should also be recognised in profit or loss for
the year ended 31 December 20X5. This is calculated on the gross carrying amount of
$10,000,000. The interest rate of 3.8% is the LIBOR of 1.8% plus 2% per the loan agreement.
The gross carrying amount of the loans at 31 December 20X5 is:
$
1 January 20X5 10,000,000
Interest (3.8%  $10,000,000) 380,000
Cash received (400,000)
31 December 20X5 gross carrying amount 9,980,000
However, by 31 December 20X5, due to the economic recession and the existence of objective
evidence of impairment in the form of late payment by customers, Stage 3 has now been reached.
Therefore, the revised lifetime expected credit losses of $800,000 should now be recognised in full.
The allowance must be increased from $77,250 ($75,000 + interest of $2,250) to $800,000 which
will result in an extra charge of $722,750 to profit or loss.
In the year ended 31 December 20X6, as Stage 3 has been reached, interest revenue will be
calculated on the carrying amount net of the allowance for credit losses of $9,180,000
($9,980,000 – $800,000). Conversely, if the loans were still at Stage 1 or Stage 2, interest income
and interest cost would have been calculated on the gross carrying amounts of $9,980,000 and
$800,000 respectively.
Activity 5: Cash flow hedge

Given that OneAir is hedging the volatility of the future cash outflow to purchase fuel, the forward
contract is accounted for as a cash flow hedge, assuming all the criteria for hedge accounting are
met (ie hedging relationship consists of eligible items, designation and documentation at inception as
a cash flow hedge and hedge effectiveness criteria are met).
At inception, no entries are required as the fair value of a forward contract at inception is zero.
However, the existence of the hedge is disclosed under IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures.
31 December 20X1
At the year end the forward contract must be valued at its fair value as follows:
$m
Market price of forward contract for delivery on 31 March (28m  $2.16) 60.48
OneAir's forward price (28m  $2.04) (57.12)
Cumulative gain 3.36
The gain is recognised in other comprehensive income ('items that may be reclassified subsequently
to profit or loss') as the cash flow has not yet occurred:
$m $m
DEBIT Forward contract (Financial asset in SOFP) 3.36
CREDIT Other comprehensive income 3.36
520
31 March 20X2
At 31 March 20X2, the purchase of 30m gallons of fuel at the market price of $2.19 per gallon
results in a charge to cost of sales of (30m  $2.19) $65.70m.
At this point the forward contract is settled net in cash at its fair value on that date, calculated in the
same way as before:
$m
Market price of forward contract for delivery on 31 March (28m  $2.19 spot rate) 61.32
OneAir's forward price (28m  $2.04) (57.12)
Cumulative gain = cash settlement 4.20
This results in a further gain of $0.84m ($4.2m – $3.36m) in 20X2 which is credited to profit or loss
as it is a realised profit:
$m $m
DEBIT Cash 4.20
CREDIT Forward contract at carrying amount 3.36
CREDIT Profit or loss (4.20 – 3.36) 0.84
The overall gain of $4.20m on the forward contract has compensated for (hedged) the increase in
price of fuel.
The gain of $3.36m previously recognised in other comprehensive income is transferred to profit or
loss as the cash flow has now affected profit or loss:
$m $m
DEBIT Other comprehensive income 3.36
CREDIT Profit or loss 3.36
The overall effect on profit or loss is:
$m
Profit or loss (extract)
Cost of sales (65.70)
Profit on forward contract: 0.84
In current period 3.36
Reclassified from other comprehensive income (61.50)
Without hedging the company would have suffered the cost at market rates on 31 March 20X2 of
$65.70m.
Chapter 8 Leases
Activity 1: Lessee accounting

On the commencement date, Lassie plc recognises a lease liability of $690,000 for the present value
of lease payments not paid at the 1 January 20X1 commencement date.
A right-of-use asset of $890,000 is recognised comprising the amount initially recognised as the
lease liability $690,000 plus $200,000 payment made on the commencement date.
The right-of-use asset is depreciated over 5 years. Its carrying amount at 31 December 20X1 (before
adjustment for reassessment of the lease liability is $712,000 ($890,000 – ($890,000/5 years)).
The carrying amount of the lease liability at the end of the first year (before reassessment of the lease
liability) is (Working) $732,780. On that date, the future lease payments are revised by 2%. The
lease liability is therefore revised to $747,300.
The difference of $14,520 adjusts the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset, increasing it to
$726,520. This will be depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset of 4 years from 20X2.
521
Working: Lease liability
$
b/d at 1 January 20X1 690,000
Interest (690,000  6.2%) 42,780
c/d at 31 December 20X1 (before remeasurement) 732,780
Remeasurement 14,520
c/d at 31 December 20X1 747,300
Activity 2: Deferred tax

Lease accounting
A right-of-use asset of $24.4m should be recognised in Heggie's financial statements. This comprises
the $24m present value of lease payments not paid at the 1 January 20X1 commencement date plus
the 'initial direct costs' incurred in setting up the lease of $0.4m.
The asset should be depreciated from the commencement date (1 January 20X1) to the earlier of the
end of the asset's useful life (4 years) and the end of the lease term (5 years) unless the legal title
reverts to the lessee at the end of the lease term. Here, as the legal title remains with the lessor, the
asset should be depreciated over 4 years, giving an annual depreciation charge of $6.1m
($24.4m/4 years) and a carrying amount of $18.3m at 31 December 20X1.
A lease liability should initially be recognised on 1 January 20X1 at the present value of lease
payments not paid at the commencement date. This amounts to $24m. An annual finance cost of
8% of the carrying amount should be recognised in profit or loss and added to the liability. The first
lease instalment on 31 December 20X1 is then deducted from the liability, giving a carrying amount
of (Working) $19.9m at 31 December 20X1.
Deferred tax
The carrying amount in the financial statements will be the net of the right-of-use asset and lease
liability.
As tax relief is granted on a cash basis, ie when lease payments and set-up costs are paid, the tax
base is zero, giving rise to a temporary difference.
This results in a deferred tax asset and additional credit to tax in profit or loss of $0.3m (see below).
The tax deduction is based on the lease rental and set-up costs which is lower than the combined
depreciation expense and finance cost. The future tax saving of $0.3m on the additional accounting
deduction is recognised now in order to apply the accruals concept.
Computation
$m $m
Carrying amount:
Right-of-use asset ($24.4m – ($24.4m/4 years)) 18.3
Lease liability (W1) (19.9)
(1.6)
Tax base 0.0
Temporary difference (1.6)
Deferred tax asset (20%) 0.3
522
Working: Lease liability

$m
b/d at 1 January 20X1 24
Interest (24  8%) 1.9
Instalment in arrears (6.0)
c/d at 31 December 20X1 19.9
Activity 3: Lessor accounting

The arrangement is a finance lease, as the lessee uses the asset for all of its economic life and the
present value of lease payments is substantially all of the fair value of the asset of $25.9 million.
Able Leasing Co recognises a lease receivable on 1 January 20X5, the commencement date of the
lease, equal to:
$m
Present value of lease payments receivable 25.9
Present value of unguaranteed residual value (3m – 2m = 1m  1/1.062 )
8
0.6
26.5
In the year ended 31 December 20X5, Able Leasing Co recognises interest income of (Working)
$1.6 million and a lease receivable of (Working) $24.1 million at 31 December 20X5.
Working: Lease receivable
$m
b/d at 1 January 20X5 26.5
Interest at 6.2% (26.5  6.2%) 1.6
Lease payment (4.0)
c/d at 31 December 20X5 24.1
Chapter 9 Share-based payment
Activity 1: Equity-settled share-based payment
20X5 $
Equity b/d 0
Equity c/d ((500 – 75)  100  $15  1/3) 212,500

20X6 $
Equity b/d 212,500
Equity c/d ((500 – 60)  100  $15  2/3) 440,000

523
20X7 $
Equity b/d 440,000
Equity c/d (443  100  $15) 664,500

Activity 2: Cash-settled share-based payment
$
Liability b/d 0
Liability c/d ((500 – 110)  100  $8.00  ½) 156,000
$
Less cash paid on exercise of SARs by employees (100  100  $8.10) (81,000)
Liability c/d (300  100  $8.50) 255,000
$
Less cash paid on exercise of SARs by employees (300  100  $9.00) (270,000)
Liability c/d – –
Activity 3: Choice of settlement

The right granted to the director represents a share-based payment with a choice of settlement where
the counterparty has the choice. Consequently, a compound financial instrument has in substance
been issued and it needs to be broken down into its equity (equity-settled) and liability (cash-settled)
components. The equity-settled component is measured as a residual, consistent with the definition of
equity, by comparing, at grant date, the fair value of the shares alternative and the cash alternative.
The accounting entry on the grant date (30 September 20X3) would therefore be as follows (all
figures from (Working)):
DEBIT Profit or loss – remuneration expense $108,000
CREDIT Liability $104,000
The equity component is not subsequently revalued (consistent with the treatment of equity-settled
share-based payment), but the liability component will need to be adjusted for any changes in the
fair value of the cash alternative up to the settlement date (30 September 20X4).
The post-year end change in the share price (which will affect the cash-settled share-based payment)
is a non-adjusting event after the reporting period, as it relates to conditions that arose after the year
end. The liability is not therefore adjusted for this, but the difference (20,000  $0.20 = $4,000)
524
would be disclosed if considered material. This is unlikely here, but may be considered material due
to the fact that it is a transaction with a member of key management personnel.
At the settlement date the liability element of the share-based payment will be re-measured to its fair
value at that date and the method of settlement chosen by the director will then determine the
accounting treatment (payment of the liability or transfer to share capital/share premium).
Working: Fair value of equity component $
Fair value of the shares alternative at grant date (24,000 shares
 $4.50) 108,000
Fair value of the cash alternative at grant date (20,000 phantom
shares  $5.20) (104,000)
Fair value of the equity component of the compound instrument 4,000
It can be seen that where the right to the shares alternative is more valuable than the right to a cash
alternative, at the grant date the equity component then has a value of the residual amount, not the
full amount of the shares alternative, as the director must surrender the cash alternative in order to
accept the shares alternative; he cannot accept both.
Activity 4: Performance conditions (other than market conditions)

Kingsley has granted an equity-settled share-based payment with attached performance conditions
(that are not market conditions). The performance conditions mean that the vesting period is variable,
so calculations should be based on on the most likely outcome expected at each year end.
Year 1
In the first year, Kingsley's earnings increased by 14% and so the performance condition for year 1
(an increase of 18%) was not met. Therefore the shares do not vest in year 1. Kingsley expects the
earnings will continue to increase at a similar rate in year 2, and so expects the shares to vest at the
end of year 2. Therefore at the end of year 1, we can assume a vesting period of 2 years.
$
2. Then work out the
Equity b/d expense as the 0
balancing figure
Equity c/d [(500 – 30 – 30)  100  $30  ½] 660,000
Assuming a 2 year
1. Calculate
vesting period
equity carried
down
Year 2
At the end of year 2, the earnings only increased by 10%, which gives an average earnings rate of
12% ((14% + 10%)/2 years). Therefore the shares do not vest. Kingsley expects the growth rate to
be at least 6% in year 3 giving an average of at least 10% over 3 years, and therefore expects the
vesting condition to be met at the end of year 3. The vesting period is now assumed to be three
years.
Year 2 of 3 year
(revised) vesting
period $
Equity b/d 660,000
Equity c/d [(500 – 30 – 28 – 25)  100  $30  2/3] 834,000
525
Year 3
In year 3, the average increase in earnings is 10.67% per year, so the performance condition is met
and the shares vest.
$
Equity b/d 834,000
Equity c/d [(500 – 30 – 28 – 23)  100  $30] 1,257,000
Actual number of employees

who received shares
The equity balance of $1,257,000 can be transferred to share capital and share premium on issue
of the shares.
Summary of expense and equity balance
Expense Equity
(per SOFP)
$ $
Year 1 660,000 660,000
Year 2 174,000 834,000
Year 3 423,000 1,257,000
Activity 5: Cancellation of share options

(a) Original options were cancelled and compensation paid
At 1 January 20X2, the original equity instruments are one-third vested so $4.5m ((1,000 –
100)  3,000  $5  1/3) of the grant date fair value has already been charged to profit or
loss and recognised in equity.
Cancellation is treated as an acceleration of vesting so the amount that would have been
charged over the remaining two year vesting period is recognised immediately in profit or
loss:
$m
Equity b/d at 1 January 20X2 4.5
 P/L charge 9.0
Equity c/d at 1 January 20X2 ((1,000 – 100 = 900*)  3,000  $5) 13.5
DEBIT Profit or loss $9.0m

CREDIT Equity $9.0m
The settlement made is treated as a repurchase of an equity interest. The amount representing
the repurchase of equity instruments granted (measured at the date of the cancellation) is
charged directly to equity and the excess to profit or loss:
DEBIT Equity (900  3,000  $1) $2.7m
DEBIT Profit or loss (remainder) $1.3m
CREDIT Cash $4m
Note:
*IFRS 2 paragraph 28(a) is unclear as to the number of employees that should be used in this
calculation. Interpretative guidance issued by Ernst & Young (Accounting for share-based
payments under IFRS 2 – the essential guide, April 2015: p. 17) indicates that actual number
of employees in service at the date of the cancellation (ie 975 employees here) could be used
in the calculation instead.
526
(b) Original options cancelled and replaced with new options

The replacement share options are treated as a modification of the original grant. Therefore
the excess of the fair value of the new options over the fair value of the cancelled options is
charged to profit or loss over the new vesting period.
This amount is calculated as follows:
$
Fair value of replacement equity instruments at 1 January 20X2 7
Less: net fair value of cancelled equity instruments at 1 January 20X2
($1 fair value as no payment made to employees on cancellation) (1)
6
The original fair value continues to be charged over the remainder of the original vesting
period, consistent with the treatment of modified instruments in IFRS 2 para. B43(a).
The charge recognised in profit or loss in 20X2 is calculated as follows:
$m
Equity b/d at 1 January 20X2 (see (a)) 4.5
 P/L charge 9.26
Equity c/d at 31 December 20X2
[((975 – 35 – 40 – 40 = 860**)  3,000  $5  2/3) + 13.76
(860**  3,000  $6  1/3)]
DEBIT Profit or loss $9.26m
CREDIT Equity $9.26m
Note:
** Based on the number of employees whose awards are finally expected to vest for both
elements
Activity 6: Deferred tax implications of share-based payment

31.12.X2 31.12.X3
$ $
Carrying amount of share-based payment expense 0 0
(5,000  $1.2  ½)/(5,000  $3.40) (3,000) (3,000)
Temporary difference (3,000) (17,000)
Deferred tax asset @ 30% 900 5,100
Deferred tax (CR P/L) (5,100 – 900 – (Working) 600) 900 3,600
Deferred tax (CR Equity) (Working) 0 600
On exercise, the deferred tax asset is replaced by a current tax one. The double entry is:
DEBIT Deferred tax (P/L) 4,500

DEBIT Deferred tax (equity) 600 reversal
CREDIT Deferred tax asset 5,100
DEBIT Current tax asset 5,100
CREDIT Current tax (P/L) 4,500
CREDIT Current tax (equity) 600
Working: Excess deferred tax asset
$ $
Accounting expense recognised (5,000  $3  ½)/(5,000  $3) 7,500 15,000
Tax deduction (3,000) (3,000)
Excess temporary difference 0 (2,000)
Excess deferred tax asset to equity @ 30% 0 600
527
Chapter 10 Basic groups
Activity 1: Control
Power over the investee to direct relevant activities
The absolute size of Edwards' shareholding in Hope (40%) and the relative size of the other
shareholdings alone are not conclusive in determining whether Edwards has rights sufficient to give it
power.
However, the shareholder agreement which grants Edwards the right to appoint, remove and set the
remuneration of management responsible for the key business decisions of Hope gives Edwards
power to direct the relevant activities of Hope.
This is supported by the fact that a two-thirds majority is required to change the shareholder
agreement and, as Edwards owns more than one-third of the voting rights, the other shareholders will
be unable to change the agreement whilst Edwards owns 40%.
Exposure or rights to variable returns of the investee
As Edwards owns a 40% shareholding in Hope, it will be entitled to receive a dividend. The amount
of this dividend will vary according to Hope's performance and Hope's dividend policy. Therefore,
Edwards has exposure to the variable returns of Hope.
Ability to use power over the investee
The fact that Edwards might not exercise the right to appoint, remove and set the remuneration of
Hope's management should not be considered when determining whether Edwards has power over
Hope. It is just the ability to use the power which is required and this ability comes from the
shareholder agreement.
Conclusion
The IFRS 10 definition of control has been met. Edwards controls Hope and therefore Edwards
should consolidate Hope as a subsidiary in its group financial statements.
528
Activity 2: Consolidated statement of financial position

BROWN GROUP
(a) (b)
$'000 $'000
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment (2,300 + 1,900) 4,200 4,200
Goodwill (W2) 360 216
4,560 4,416
Current assets (3,340 + 1,790 – 10 (W5)) 5,120 5,120
9,680 9,536
Retained earnings (W3) 4,300 4,300
5,300 5,300
Non-controlling interests (W4) 1,060 916
6,360 6,216
Non-current liabilities (350 + 290) 640 640
Current liabilities (1,580 + 1,100) 2,680 2,680
9,680 9,536
Workings
1 Group structure
Brown
1.1.X6 60%
Harris Pre-acquisition retained earnings = $300,000
2 Goodwill
Part (a) Part (b)
$'000 $'000 $'000 $'000
Consideration transferred 720 720
Non-controlling interests 480 (800  40%) 320
Share capital 500 500
Retained earnings 300 300
(800) (800)
400 240
Less impairment losses to date (10%) (40) (24)
360 216
529
3 Retained earnings
Brown Harris
$'000 $'000
At the year end 3,430 1,800
Provision for unrealised profit (W5) (10)
At acquisition (300)
1,490
Share of Harris's post-acquisition retained earnings:
(1,490  60%) 894
Less impairment loss on goodwill:
Part (a) (40 (W2)  60%)/Part (b) (24 (W2)) (24)
4,300
4 Non-controlling interests (NCI)
Part (a) Part (b)
$'000 $'000
NCI at acquisition (fair value)([500 + 300]  40%) 480 320
NCI share of post-acquisition retained earnings 596 596
(1,490 (W3)  40%)
NCI share of impairment losses (40 (W2)  40%) (16) –
1,060 916
5 Provision for unrealised profit (PUP)
Harris sells to Brown
PUP = $200,000  ¼ in inventory  25/125 mark-up = $10,000
DEBIT Harris's retained earnings $10,000
CREDIT Inventories $10,000
Activity 3: Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other

CONSTANCE GROUP
$'000
Revenue (5,000 + [4,200  9/12] – 300 (W4)) 7,850
Cost of sales (4,100 + [3,500  9/12] – 300 (W4) + 40 (W4)) (6,465)
Gross profit 1,385
Distribution and administration expenses (320 + [180  9/12] + 10 (W2)) (465)
Income tax expense (190 + [160  9/12]) (310)
PROFIT FOR THE YEAR 610
Gains on property revaluation (net of tax) (60 + [40  9/12]) 90
530
$'000
Non-controlling interests (W2) 44
610
700
Workings
1 Group structure
Constance
1.4.X5* 80%
Spicer
*This is a mid-year acquisition – Spicer should be consolidated for 9 months

PFY TCI
$'000 $'000
Per question (360  9/12)/(400  9/12) 270 300
Impairment loss on goodwill (W3) (10) (10)
PUP (W4) (40) (40)
220 250
NCI share  20%  20%
44 50
3 Impairment of goodwill
Impairment of goodwill for the year = $100,000 goodwill  10% impairment = $10,000
Add $10,000 to 'administration expenses' and deduct from PFY/TCI in NCI working (as full
goodwill method adopted here)
4 Intra-group trading
Spicer sells to Constance
 Intra-group revenue and cost of sales:
Cancel $300,000 out of revenue and cost of sales
 PUP = $300,000  2/3 in inventories  25/125 mark-up = $40,000
Increase cost of sales by $40,000 and reduce PFY/TCI in NCI working (as subsidiary is the
seller)
531
Activity 4: Fair value of consideration transferred
The following amount will be recognised as 'consideration transferred' for the purposes of calculating
goodwill on the purchase of Pol on 1 January 20X1:
$m
Cash 160.0
Deferred consideration (120  1/1.052) 108.8
Contingent consideration (at fair value) 54.0
322.8
The $5m due diligence fees are transaction costs which are expensed in the books of Pau under
IFRS 3 so as not to distort the fair values used in the goodwill calculation.
The deferred consideration is initially measured at present value. Interest is then applied over the
period to payment (31 December 20X2). This results in an interest charge of $5.4m ($108.8m  5%)
in the year to 31 December 20X1 which is charged to profit or loss.
The contingent consideration is measured at its fair value, and as it is a liability, it must be
remeasured at each year end and at the date of payment. By 31 December 20X1, the fair value of
the consideration has risen to $65m. The increase of $11m is charged to profit or loss. This is
because, even though the change is within the measurement period (one year from acquisition date),
it is a result of a change in expected profits, which is a post-acquisition event, rather than additional
information regarding fair value at the date of acquisition.
Activity 5: Consolidation with associate

BAILEY GROUP
$m
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment (2,300 + 1,900 + (W7) 60) 4,260
Goodwill (W2) 110
Investment in associate (W3) 243
4,613
Current assets (3,115 + 1,790 – (W8) 20) 4,885
Total assets 9,498
Share capital 1,000
Reserves (W4) 4,216
5,216
6,178
Non-current liabilities (350 + 290) 640
Current liabilities (1,580 + 1,100) 2,680
Total equity and liabilities 9,498
532
BAILEY GROUP
$m
Revenue (5,000 + 4,200 – (W8) 200) 9,000
Cost of sales (4,100 + 3,500 + (W7) 10 – (W8) 200 + (W8) 20) (7,430)
Gross profit 1,570
Distribution costs and administrative expenses (320 + 175 + (W2) 15) (510)
Share of profit of associate (110 × 30% × 8/12) 22
Income tax expense (240 + 170) (410)
Gains on property revaluation (net of deferred tax) (50 + 20) 70
Share of gain on property revaluation of associate (10 × 30% × 8/12) 2
Other comprehensive income, net of tax 72

Owners of the parent (β) 548
672

744
Workings
1 Group structure
Bailey
1.1.X6 (4 years ago) 1.5.X9 (current year)
300 72
= 60% = 30%
500 240
Hill Campbell
Pre-acq'n reserves $440m $270m
533
2 Goodwill (Hill)
$m $m
Non-controlling interests (at fair value) 450
Fair value of net assets at acquisition

Share capital 500
Reserves 440
Fair value adjustment (W7) 100
(1,040)
130
Impairment losses to date (20)
110
Note: add impairment loss for year of $15m to administrative expenses

3 Investment in associate (Campbell)
$m
Cost of associate 225
Share of post acquisition reserves (W4) 18
Less impairment losses to date (0)
243
4 Reserves
$m $m $m
At year end 3,430 1,800 330
Fair value movement (W7) (40)
Provision for unrealised profit (W8) (20)
Pre-acquisition (440) (270)
1,300 60
Group share post acquisition reserves:
Hill (1,300 × 60%) 780
Campbell (60 × 30%) 18
Impairment losses:
Hill ((W2) 20 × 60%) (12)
Campbell (W3) (0)
4,216
$m
NCI at acquisition (W2) 450
NCI share of post acquisition reserves ((W4) 1,300 × 40%) 520
NCI share of impairment losses ((W2) 20 × 40%) (8)
962
534

PFY TCI
$m $m
Hill's PFY/TCI per question 355 375
Fair value adjustment movement (W7) (10) (10)
Provision for unrealised profit (W8) (20) (20)
Impairment loss on goodwill for year (W2) (15) (15)
310 330
× NCI share × 40% × 40%
= 124 = 132
7 Fair value adjustment (Hill)
At acquisition Movement Year end
1.1.X6 X6, X7, X8, X9 31.12.X9
$m $m $m
Property, plant and equipment 100 *(40) 60
(W2) (1,040 – 500 – 440)
Goodwill (W2) Reserves (W4) Add to PPE

Add 1 year to
cost of sales
* additional depreciation = 100  4/10 = 40
8 Intragroup trading (Hill sells to Bailey)
Cancel intragroup revenue and cost of sales:
DEBIT Revenue $200m
CREDIT Cost of sales $200m
Cancel unrealised profit on goods left in inventories at year end:
= $200m × 1/4 in inventories × 40%/100% margin = $20m
DEBIT Hill's reserves/Hill's cost of sales $20m (affects NCI in SPLOCI)
CREDIT Inventories $20m
535
Chapter 11 Changes in group structures: step acquisitions
Activity 1: Associate to subsidiary acquisition

(a) PEACE GROUP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X2
$'000
Revenue (10,200 + (4,000  3/12)) 11,200
Cost of sales and expenses (9,000 + (3,600  3/12) + (W6) 30) (9,930)
Gain on remeasurement of associate (W4) 380
Share of profit of associate (320  9/12  25%) 60
Income tax expense (360 + (80  3/12)) (380)
Gains on property revaluation, net of tax (240 + (80  3/12)) 260
Share of gain on property revaluation of associate (80  9/12  25%) 15
Total comprehensive income for the year 1,605

1,330
1,605
(b) PEACE GROUP
$'000
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment (38,650 + 7,600) 46,250
Goodwill (W5) 2,540
Other intangible assets (W3) 570
49,360
Current assets (12,700 + 2,200) 14,900
64,260
Share capital 10,200
Retained earnings (W6) 40,842
51,042
Non-controlling interests (W7) 4,668
55,710
Liabilities (7,450 + 1,100) 8,550
64,260
536
Workings
Peace
1.1.X1 25% (Retained earnings = $5.8m)

30.9.X2 35% (Retained earnings = $7.8m)
60%
Miel
Timeline
1.1.X2 30.9.X2 31.12.X2
SPLOCI
Associate – Equity account  9/12 Consolidate
 3/12
Had 25% associate Acquired 35% Consol. in

25% + 35% SOFP with
= 60% subsidiary 40% NCI

PFY TCI
$'000 $'000
Per question (PFY 320  3/12) (TCI 400  3/12) 80 100
Fair value movement in year (W3) (30) (30)
50 70
 40% 20 28
3 Fair value adjustments
Measured at date control achieved (only)
At acquisition Movement At year end
30.9.X2 31.12.X2
$'000 $'000 $'000
Brands (9,200 – (800 + 7,800)) 600 (30)* 570
*$600,000/5 years  3/12 Goodwill (W5) Expenses Intangibles

/reserves (W6)
4 Gain on remeasurement of 25% associate
$'000
Fair value at date control obtained (800,000  25%  $14.50) 2,900
Carrying amount of associate
(2,020 cost + ([7,800 – 5,800] × 25%) share of post-acquisition reserves) (2,520)
380
537
5 Goodwill
$'000 $'000
Consideration transferred (for 35%) 4,200
FV of previously held investment (800,000  25%  $14.50) 2,900
Non-controlling interests (800,000  40%  $14.50) 4,640
Share capital 800
Retained earnings 7,800
Fair value adjustments (W3) 600
(9,200)
2,540

Peace Miel Miel
25% 60%
$'000 $'000 $'000
At year end/date control obtained 39,920 7,800 7,900
Gain on remeasurement of associate (W4) 380
At acquisition (5,800) (7,800)
2,000 70
Miel – 25% (2,000  25%) 500
– 60% (70  60%) 42
40,842

$'000
NCI at acquisition (W2) 4,640
NCI share of reserves post control:
Miel – 40% ((W6) 70  40%) 28
4,668
Activity 2: Subsidiary to subsidiary acquisition (SOFP)

(a) Goodwill
$m
Consideration transferred (for 60%) 300
Fair value of identifiable net assets at acquisition (460)
40
538

Denning Heggie
$m $m
At year end 530 240
Adjustment to equity (W2) (18)
At acquisition (180)
60
(60  60%) 36
548

$m
NCI at acquisition 200
NCI share of post-acquisition reserves up to step acquisition
(40%  60 (part (b)) 24
NCI at date of step acquisition 224
Decrease in NCI on date of step acquisition (224  20%/40%) ((112)
NCI at year end 112
Workings
1 Group structure
Denning
1.1.X2 60% (Retained earnings = $180m)

31.12.X3 20% (Retained earnings = $240m)
80%
Heggie
2 Adjustment to equity on acquisition of additional 20% of Heggie
$m
Fair value of consideration paid (130)
Decrease in NCI (224 (part (c))  20%/40%) 112
(18)
Tutorial note
Goodwill is only calculated once, on the date control is achieved. Here this is on 1 January 20X2
when Denning acquired 60% of Heggie. In the goodwill working, you did not need to break the net
assets down into share capital and reserves as the fair value of net assets was given. No additional
goodwill is calculated on the acquisition of the extra 20% because in substance there has been no
acquisition, since Heggie remains a subsidiary.
In the consolidated retained earnings working, 60% has been used to calculate the group share of
Heggie's post-acquisition reserves because the additional 20% was not acquired until the last day of
the year (31 December 20X3).
539
Activity 3: Subsidiary to subsidiary acquisition (SPLOCI)
$m
Revenue (2,500 + 1,500) 4,000
Cost of sales and expenses (1,900 + 1,200) (3,100)
Gains on property revaluation, net of tax (80 + 30) 110

630
740
Workings
1 Group structure
Gaze
1.1.X3 60%
1.5.X5 10%
80%
Trek
Profit for the year
1.1.X5 1.5.X5
– 30.4.X5 – 31.12.X5
$m $m
Per question (PFY 210  4/12) (TCI 210  8/12) 70 140
 NCI%  40%  30%
= 28 = 42
70
540
Total comprehensive income

1.1.X5 1.5.X5
– 30.4.X5 – 31.12.X5
$m $m
$m $m
Per question (PFY 240 × 4/12) (TCI 240 × 8/12) 80 160
 NCI%  40%  30%
= 32 = 48
80
Tutorial note
As Trek was a subsidiary for the full year, no pro-rating is required and a full year of Trek's income
and expenses have been consolidated on a line by line basis.
However, as the group shareholding in the subsidiary changed partway through the year, the
non-controlling interest (NCI) percentage also changed. Therefore, profit for the year and total
comprehensive income must be pro-rated then the relevant percentages applied when calculating
NCI.
Note that there is no gain or loss on remeasurement of the previously held investment because no
accounting boundary has been crossed. Instead an adjustment to equity would be recorded in the
consolidated statement of financial position.
Activity 4: Exam standard (part of a question worth 10 marks)

Explanation
Prior to the acquisition of the additional 5% stake, Robe controlled Dock through its 80%
shareholding, making Dock a subsidiary of Robe, with a 20% non-controlling interest (NCI). On the
purchase of the additional 5%, Robe's controlling interest in its subsidiary increased to 85% whilst
NCI fell to 15%. As Dock remains a subsidiary, no 'accounting boundary' has been crossed and, in
substance, no acquisition has taken place. Therefore, the group accountant was wrong to record the
difference between the consideration paid and the decrease in NCI in profit or loss. This means that
this difference of $3 million ($10 million – $7 million) needs to be reversed from profit or loss.
Instead, since Robe is buying shares from the NCI, this should be treated as a transaction between
group shareholders and recorded in equity. The difference between the consideration paid for the
additional 5% and the decrease in non-controlling interests should be recorded in group equity and
attributed to the parent.
The group accountant has correctly recorded a decrease in non-controlling interests but at the wrong
amount, as he has calculated the decrease as the percentage of net assets purchased. This does not
take into account the fact that the full goodwill method has been selected for Dock; therefore, the NCI
at disposal will also include an element of goodwill. The decrease in NCI must be adjusted to take
into account the goodwill attributable to the NCI. This results in a further decrease in NCI of
$1 million (being the $8 million decrease in NCI that the group accountant should have recorded
less the $7 million he actually recognised).
Since the decrease in equity was incorrect, the difference between the consideration paid and
decrease in NCI was also incorrect. An adjustment to equity of $2 million rather than a loss of
$3 million in profit or loss should have been recorded.
541
Calculations
Decrease in NCI
% purchased
NCI at date of step acquisition 
NCI% before step acquisition
5%
= $32 million 
20%
= $8 million
$m
Fair value of consideration paid (10)
Decrease in NCI ($32m × 5%/20%) 8
Adjustment to equity (2)
Correcting entry
The correcting entry to record the further decrease in NCI, reverse the original entry in profit or loss
and record the correct adjustment to equity is as follows:
DEBIT Group retained earnings $2 million
DEBIT Non-controlling interests $1 million
CREDIT Profit or loss $3 million
Robe
1.6.X6 80%
31.5.X9 5%
85%
Dock
Chapter 12 Changes in group structures: disposals and

group reorganisations
Activity 1: Subsidiary to associate disposal

(a) Explanation of accounting treatment
On 1 January 20X2, Amber purchased an 80% stake in Byrne, giving Amber control and
making Byrne a subsidiary. However, on 30 September 20X6, Amber sold a 50% stake in
Byrne (200,000/400,000 shares), leaving a 30% stake remaining, giving Amber only
significant influence and resulting in Byrne becoming an associate. As the control boundary
was crossed, in substance, Amber 'sold' an 80% subsidiary and 'purchased' a 30% associate.
This means that Amber must deconsolidate the 80% subsidiary (net assets, goodwill and non-
controlling interests), a group profit on disposal be recognised and the remaining 30%
investment in Byrne must be remeasured to its fair value on the date control was lost (30
September 20X6).
In the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, Byrne should
be consolidated and non-controlling interests of 20% recognised for the nine months that it
was a subsidiary (1 January 20X6–30 September 20X6), pro-rating income and expenses
accordingly. For the three months it was an associate, Byrne should be equity accounted for
542
(3/12  profit for year  30% and 3/12  other comprehensive income  30%). The group
profit or loss on disposal should be reported in profit or loss above the tax line.
In the consolidated statement of financial position, Byrne should be equity accounted for with
the fair value of the remaining 30% investment at the date control was lost (30 September
20X6) becoming the 'cost of the associate' in the 'investment in associate' working.
(b) Group profit on disposal
$'000 $'000
Fair value of consideration received 1,250
Fair value of 30% investment retained (2,000  30%/80%) 750
Less: share of consolidated carrying amount when control lost
net assets [1,680 – (160  3/12)] 1,640
Goodwill (W4) 340
Less non-controlling interests (W5) (396)
(1,584)
416
Workings
Amber
1.1.X2 Purchased 320,000/400,000 shares = 80%

30.9.X6 Sold 200,000/400,000 shares = (50%)
30%
Byrne Pre-acquisition reserves $760,000
1.1.X6 30.9.X6 31.12.X6
SPLOCI
Subsidiary – 9/12 Associate – 3/12
Held 320,000 Sells 200,000 shares Equity

shares = 50% of Byrne account in
= 80% of Byrne SOFP
Group gain on disposal
(30% left)
Re-measure 30% remaining to
fair value
2 Goodwill
$'000 $'000
Consideration transferred (2,000 – 800) 1,200
Less: fair value of identifiable net assets at acquisition
share capital 400
reserves 760
(1,160)
340
543
$'000
NCI share of post-acquisition reserves ([1,240* – 760]  20%) 96
396
(c) Investment in associate as at 31 December 20X6

Working: Investment in associate
$'000
Cost = Fair value at date control lost (W3) 750
Share of post-acquisition retained reserves ([1,280 – 1,240*]  30%) 12
762
* Reserves at the date of loss of control (30 September 20X6) were given in the question but
they could also have been calculated as follows:
$'000
Reserves at year end (per Byrne's SOFP) 1,280
Less share of total comprehensive income from 1.10.X6–31.12.X6
(160  3/12) (40)
Reserves at date of loss of control 1,240
Activity 2: Exam standard (part of a question worth 10 marks)

Explanation
The Finance Director has calculated the group profit on disposal incorrectly. Prior to the disposal,
Nest was a 60% subsidiary. After selling a 50% stake, Vail is left with a 10% simple investment in
Nest with no significant influence or control. In substance, Vail has 'sold' a 60% subsidiary, so Nest
should be deconsolidated and a group profit or loss on disposal recognised. On the same date, in
substance, Nest has 'purchased' a 10% investment, so this remaining investment should be
remeasured to its fair value at the date control was lost (31 December 20X5).
The Finance Director was correct to calculate a group profit on disposal but he made three errors in
his calculation. Firstly, he has deconsolidated the portion of net assets sold (50%) rather than 100%
of net assets and a 40% non-controlling interest. As Nest is no longer a subsidiary, it should have
been fully deconsolidated. Secondly, he has forgotten to deconsolidate goodwill. Thirdly, he did not
remeasure the remaining 10% investment to fair value.
The corrected group loss on disposal calculation is shown below. The correction results in the
Finance Director's profit of $10 million becoming a loss of $4 million.
Calculation
Group profit or loss on disposal
$m $m
Fair value of consideration received (for 50% sold) 75
Fair value of 10% investment retained 15
Less: share of consolidated carrying amount when control lost
net assets V 130
Goodwill (W2) 16
Less non-controlling interests (W3) (52)
(94)
Group loss on disposal (4)
544
Workings
1 Group structure
Vail
1.1.X5 60% Subsidiary

31.12.X5 Sell (50%)
10% Investment
Nest
2 Goodwill
$m
Non-controlling interests (100  40%) 40
Less fair value of identifiable net assets at acquisition (100)
20
Impairment (4)
16
$m
NCI at acquisition (100  40%) 40
NCI share of post-acquisition reserves ((130 – 100)*  40%) 12
52
*Post-acquisition reserves can be calculated as the difference between net assets at disposal and net
assets at acquisition. This is because net assets equal equity and, provided there has been no share
issue since acquisition, the movement in equity and net assets is solely due to the movement in
reserves.
Activity 3: Subsidiary to subsidiary disposal

(a) Non-controlling interest
$m
NCI at acquisition 190
NCI share of post-acquisition retained earnings to disposal
(20%  [450 – 300]) 30
NCI share of post-acquisition other components of equity to disposal
(20%  [30 – 10]) 4
NCI at date of disposal 224
Increase in NCI on date of disposal (224  5%/20%) 56
NCI at year end 280
545
$m
Fair value of consideration received 60
Increase in NCI (56)
4
Workings
1 Group structure
Trail
1.12.X0 80%
30.11.X1 Sell (5%)
75%
Dial
Chapter 13 Non-current assets held for sale and

Activity 1: Discontinued operation
TITAN GROUP
$m
Revenue (450 + 265 + (182  9/12)) 6851.5
Cost of sales (288 + 152 + (106  9/12)) (519.5)
Gross profit 332.0
Operating expenses (71 + 45 + (22  9/12)) (132.5)
Finance costs (5 + 3 + (2  9/12)) (9.5)
Profit before tax 190.0
Income tax expense (17 + 13 + (10  9/12)) (37.5)
Profit for the year from continuing operations 152.5
Profit for the year from discontinued operations ((42  3/12) – (W3) 6.8) 3.7
Profit for the year 156.2

Gain on property revaluation, net of tax (16 + 9 + (6  9/12)) 29.5
Total comprehensive income for the year 185.7

Owners of the parent (β) 149.9
Non-controlling interests (W2) 6.3
546
$m
156.2
Owners of the parent (β) 178.5
185.7
Workings
1 Group structure
Titan
100% 80%
Cronus Rhea
Timeline
1.1.X5 1.10.X5 31.12.X5
SPLOCI
Titan (parent) – all year
Cronus – all year
Rhea  3/12
(discontinued)
2 Non-controlling interests (Rhea)
PFY TCI
$m $m
Per question (42  9/12)/(48  9/12) 31.5 36.0
 20%  20%
6.3 7.2
3 Impairment losses (Rhea)

$m
'Notional'* goodwill (38  100%/80%) 47.5
Carrying amount of net assets (320 + (48  9/12)) 356.0
403.5
Fair value less costs to sell (395.0)
Impairment loss: gross 8.5
Impairment loss recognised: all allocated to goodwill

(8.5  80%) 6.8
547
*Where the partial goodwill method is used part of the calculation of the recoverable amount
of the CGU relates to the unrecognised non-controlling interest share of the goodwill.
For the purpose of calculating the impairment loss, the carrying amount of the CGU is
therefore notionally adjusted to include the non-controlling interests in the goodwill by
grossing it up.
The resulting impairment loss calculated is only recognised to the extent of the parent's
share.
This adjustment is not required where non-controlling interests are measured at fair value at
acquisition.
Chapter 14 Joint arrangements and group disclosures

Activity 1: Joint arrangement
The relationship between the three parties qualifies as a joint arrangement as decisions have to be
made unanimously. It appears that each party has direct rights to the assets of the arrangement,
illustrated by the ownership of coal inventories. Similarly, each party has obligations for the liabilities
as all costs are shared in the same proportions as the income. Consequently, the arrangement should
be accounted for as a joint operation.
Total revenue earned by the operation in the period is $118.92m ((460,000  $120) + (540,000 
$118)). ABM's share of this revenue recognised in its own financial statements is 40%, ie
$47,568,000. The remainder of the revenue ABM collects of $7,632,000 ((460,000  $120) –
$47,568,000) is recognised as a liability (in the joint operation account), representing amounts
owed to the national government.
ABM will record the machinery it purchased in full in its own financial statements. 40% of the
depreciation will be charged to cost of sales and the remainder recognised as a receivable balance
(in the joint operation account). The same treatment will apply to other joint costs incurred by ABM.
ABM is also required to recognise a 40% share of costs incurred by the other operators and a
corresponding liability (in the joint operation account).
Chapter 15 Foreign transactions and entities

Activity 1: Functional currency principles
DEBIT CREDIT
$ $
31.10.X8 Purchases (129,000 @ 9.50) 13,579
Payables 13,579
31.12.X8 Payables (Working) 679

Profit or loss – exchange gains 679
31.01.X9 Payables 12,900

Profit or loss – exchange losses 399
Cash (129,000 @ 9.7) 13,299
Working: Exchange difference on payables
$
Payables as at 31.12.X8 (129,000 @10) 12,900
Payables as previously recorded 13,579
Exchange gain 679
548
Activity 2: Foreign operation

BENNIE GROUP
$'000
Property, plant and equipment (5,705 + (W2) 910) 6,615.0
Goodwill (W4) 780.3
7,395.3
Current assets (2,222 + (W2) 700) 2,922.0
10,317.3
Share capital 1,700.0

Retained earnings (W5) 5,186.6
Other components of equity – translation reserve (W8) 537.8
7,424.4
7,782.3
Current liabilities (2,035 + (W2) 500) 2,535.0
10,317.3

FOR YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X2
$'000
Revenue (9,840 + (W3) 1,720) 11,560
Cost of sales (5,870 + (W3) 960) (6,830)
Gross profit 4,730
Operating expenses (2,380 + (W3) 420) (2,800)
Goodwill impairment loss (W4) (220)
Income tax expense (530 + (W3) 100) (630)
Items that may subsequently be reclassified to profit or loss
Exchange differences on translating foreign operations (W9) 403.1
Total comprehensive income for the year 1,483.1

Owners of the parent (β) 1,076
1,080
Owners of the parent (β) 1,398.5
1,483.1
549
Workings
1 Group structure
Bennie
1.1.X1 80%
Pre-acquisition ret'd earnings 5,280,000 Jens

Jennie
2 Translation of Jennie – Statement of financial position
J'000 Rate $'000
Property, plant and equipment 7,280 8 910
Current assets 5,600 8 700
12,880 1,610
Share capital 1,200 12 100

Pre-acq'n ret'd earnings 5,280 12 440
Post-acq'n ret'd earnings – 20X1 profit 2,860 11 260
– 20X1 dividends (1,380) 10 (138) 662
– 20X2 profit 2,040 8.5 240
– 20X2 dividends (1,120) 8 (140)
Exchange differences on net assets BAL 348
8,880 1,110
Current liabilities 4,000 8 500
12,880 1,610
3 Translation of Jennie – Statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
J'000 Rate $'000
Revenue 14,620 8.5 1,720
Cost of sales (8,160) 8.5 (960)
Gross profit 6,460 760
Operating expenses (3,570) 8.5 (420)
Profit before tax 2,890 340
Income tax expense (850) 8.5 (100)
Profit for the year 2,040 240
550
4 Goodwill
J'000 J'000 Rate $'000
Consideration transferred (993  12) 11,916 12 993.0
Non-controlling interests (at fair value) 2,676 12 223.0
Less: fair value of net assets at acquisition

share capital 1,200
retained earnings 5,280
(6,480) 12 (540.0)
Goodwill at acquisition 8,112 12 676.0
Impairment losses 20X1 (0) (0)
Exchange gain/(loss) 20X1 – β 135.2
Goodwill at 31 December 20X1 8,112 10 811.2
Impairment losses 20X2 (1,870) 8.5* (220.0)
Exchange gain/(loss) 20X2 – β 189.1
Goodwill at year end 6,242 8 780.3
*As there is no explicit rule, either average rate (as here) or closing rate could be used
Bennie Jennie
$'000 $'000
Retained earnings at year end (W2) 5,185.0 662
Retained earnings at acquisition (W2) (440)
222
Group share of post-acquisition retained earnings (222  80%) 177.6
Less group share of impairment losses to date (W4) (220  80%) (176.0)
5,186.6

$'000
NCI at acquisition (W4) 223.0
NCI share of post-acquisition retained earnings of Jennie ((W5) 222  20%) 44.4
NCI share of exchange differences on net assets ((W2) 348  20%) 69.6
NCI share of exchange differences on goodwill [((W4) 135.2 + 189.1)  20%] 64.9
Less NCI share of impairment losses (W4) (220  20%) (44.0)
357.9

PFY TCI
$'000 $'000
Profit for the year (W3) 240 240.0
Impairment losses (W4) (220) (220.0)
Other comprehensive income: exchange differences (W9) – 403.1
20 423.1
 20%  20%
4 84.6
551
8 Consolidated translation reserve
$'000
Exchange differences on net assets ((W2) 348  80%) 278.4
Exchange differences on goodwill [((W4) 135.2 + 189.1)  80%] 259.4
537.8

$'000
On translation of net assets of Jennie
Closing net assets as translated (at CR) (W2) 1,110.0
Opening net assets as translated at the time (at OR) (7,960/10) (796.0)
314.0
Less retained profit as translated (PFY – dividends) ((W3) 240 – J1,120/8) (100.0)
214.0
On goodwill (W4) 189.1
403.1
Activity 3: Ethics
If Jenkin were to sell the shares profitably a gain would arise in its individual financial statements
which would boost retained earnings. However, if only 5% of the equity shares in Rankin were sold,
it would still hold 55% of the equity and presumably control would not be lost. The IASB views this as
an equity transaction (ie transactions with owners in their capacity as owners) (IFRS 10: para. 23).
This means that the relevant proportion of the exchange differences should be re-attributed to the
non-controlling interest rather than to the retained earnings (IAS 21: para. 48C) (and not reclassified
to profit or loss because control has not been lost). The directors appear to be motivated by their
desire to maximise the balance on the group retained earnings. It would appear that the directors'
actions are unethical by overstating the group's interest in Rankin at the expense of the non-
controlling interest.
The purpose of financial statements is to present a fair representation of the company's financial
position, financial performance and cash flows (IAS 1: para. 15) and if the financial statements are
deliberately falsified, then this could be deemed unethical. Accountants have a social and ethical
responsibility to issue financial statements which do not mislead the public.
Any manipulation of the accounts will harm the credibility of the profession since the public assume
that professional accountants will act in an ethical capacity. The directors should be reminded that
professional ethics are an integral part of the profession and that they must adhere to ethical
guidelines such as ACCA's Code of Ethics and Conduct. Deliberate falsification of the financial
statements would contravene the guiding principles of integrity, objectivity and professional
behaviour. The directors' intended action appears to be in direct conflict with the code by
deliberating overstating the parent company's ownership interest in the group in order to maximise
potential investment in Jenkin.
Stakeholders are becoming increasingly reactive to the ethical stance of an entity. Deliberate
falsification would potentially harm the reputation of Jenkin and could lead to severe, long-term
disadvantages in the market place. The directors' intended action will therefore not be in the best
interests of the stakeholders in the business. There can be no justification for the deliberate
falsification of an entity's financial statements.
552
Chapter 16 Group statements of cash flows
Activity 1: Dividend paid to non-controlling interests

$'000
b/d 99
NCI share of total comprehensive income 6
105
Dividends paid to NCI (balancing figure) (3)
c/d 102
Activity 2: Dividend received from associate

Investment in associate
$'000
b/d 88
Group share of associate's profit for the year 7
Group share of associate's OCI (gain on property revaluation) 3
Acquisition of associate 12
110
Dividends received from associate (balancing figure) (16)
c/d 94
EXTRACT FROM STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW (OPERATING ACTIVITIES)

$'000
Adjustment for:
Share of profit of associate (7)
Activity 3: Consolidated statement of cash flows

P GROUP
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X8
$'000 $'000
Adjustments for:
Depreciation 2,200
Impairment loss (W1) 180
Share of profit of associate (800)
Foreign exchange gain (W5) (30)
6,350
Increase in inventories (W4) (800)
Increase in trade receivables (W4) (600)
Increase in trade payables (W4) 300
Income taxes paid (W3) (1,100)
553
$'000 $'000
Acquisition of subsidiary net of cash acquired (1,300 – 100) (1,200)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (W1) (2,440)
Dividends received from associate (W1) 260
Net cash used in investing activities (3,380)

Proceeds from issuance of share capital (W2) 940
Dividends paid to owners of the parent (W2) (360)
Dividends paid to non-controlling interests (W2) (50)
Net cash from financing activities 530
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 1,300

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year 1,500
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year 2,800
Workings
1 Assets
PPE Goodwill Associate
$'000 $'000 $'000
b/d 41,700 1,400 3,100
SPLOCI 1,000 980 (800 + 180)
Depreciation (2,200)
Impairment (180) β
Acquisition of subsidiary 1,900 720*
Non-cash additions (W5) 30
Cash paid/(rec'd) β 2,440 (260)
c/d 44,870 1,940 3,820
*Goodwill on acquisition of subsidiary:

$'000
Consideration transferred ((200  $8.50) + 3,000
1,300)
NCI 320
Less fair value of net assets at acquisition (2,600)
720
2 Equity
Share capital/ Retained NCI
premium earnings
$'000 $'000 $'000
b/d (5,000 + 9,000) 29,700 1,700
14,000
SPLOCI 3,440 190
Acquisition of subsidiary (W1) 1,700 320
Cash (paid)/rec'd β 940 (360) (50)

c/d (5,300 + 11,340) 32,780 2,160
16,640
554
3 Liabilities
Tax payable
$'000
b/d (2,100 + 500) 2,600
SPLOCI (1,200 + 250) 1,450
Cash (paid)/rec'd β (1,100)

c/d (2,350 + 600) 2,950

Inventories Trade Trade
receivables payables
$'000 $'000 $'000
b/d 8,100 7,600 9,400
Acquisition of subsidiary 700 300 400
Increase/(decrease) β 800 600 300
c/d 9,600 8,500 10,100
5 Foreign transaction
Transactions recorded on: $'000 $'000
(1) 30 Sep DEBIT Property, plant & equipment (1,080/4) 270
CREDIT Payables 270
(2) 30 Nov DEBIT Payables (1,080/4) 270
CREDIT Cash (1,080/4.5) 240
CREDIT P/L 30
The exchange gain created a cash saving on settlement that reduced the actual cash paid to
acquire property, plant and equipment and it is therefore shown separately in Working 1 as a
non-cash increase in property, plant and equipment.
Activity 4: Analysis
Cash from operating activities
The operating activities section of Horwich's statement of cash flows shows that the business is not
only profitable, but is generating healthy inflows of cash from its main operations.
A significant proportion of the cash generated from operations is utilised in paying tax and paying
interest on borrowings. The amount needed to pay interest in future may increase as the company
appears to be increasing its borrowings to fund its expansion.
The adjustments to profit show that receivables, inventories and payables are all increasing. This
trend may reflect the expansion of the business but working capital management must be reviewed
carefully to ensure that cash is collected promptly from receivables so that the company is able to
meet its obligations to pay its suppliers and maintain good trading relationships.
Cash from investing activities
The two main investing outflows in the year were the net cash payment of $800,000 to acquire a
new subsidiary and the payment of $340,000 to acquire new property, plant and equipment. These
are a clear reflection of the strategy of expansion and may lead to increased profits and cash flows
from operations in future years. This section also reflects cash received from the sale of equipment of
$70,000 and the operating cash flows section shows that this equipment was sold at a loss. This
suggests that the company may have acquired the new equipment to replace assets that were old
and inefficient.
555
Another significant inflow in this section is an amount of $150,000 from the sale of investments. It is
likely that this was done to help finance the acquisition and expansion. This type of cash flow is
unlikely to recur in future and also means that the other inflows in this section, the interest and
dividends received, are likely to cease or be reduced in future.
Cash from financing activities
The company has raised new finance totalling $600,000, which has probably been applied to the
acquisition and expansion. The new finance may have had a detrimental effect on the company's
gearing. The increased borrowings will mean that future interest expenses will increase which could
threaten profitability in the future if the expansion does not create immediate increases in operating
profits.
This section also includes the largest single cash flow, a dividend payment of $1,000,000. This
appears to be a very high payout (70% of the cash generated from operating activities) and raises
the question as to why the company has taken on additional borrowings rather than retaining more
profits to invest in the expansion. On the other hand, it may indicate that management are very
confident that the expanded business will generate returns that will easily cover the additional interest
costs and allow this level of dividend payment to continue in future.
Conclusion
The expansion appears to have been very successful both in terms of profitability and cash flow.
Management must just be careful not to pay excessive dividends in the future at the cost of
reinvesting in the business.
556
Chapter 17 Interpret financial statements for different (there are many
stakeholders reasons you could

have chosen – these
are just examples)
Activity 1: Stakeholders
Group Reason Further reason
Management Management are often set Management may use financial

performance targets and use the statements to aid them in important
financial statements to compare strategic decisions.
company performance to the targets
set, with a view to achieving bonuses.
Employees Employees are concerned with job Employees want to feel proud of the
stability and may use corporate company that they work for and
reports to better understand the future positive financial statements can
prospects of their employer. indicate a job well done.
Present and Existing investors will assess whether Investors will want to understand
potential their investment is sound and more about the types of products the
investors generates acceptable returns. company is involved in (the segment
Potential investors will use the report will help with this) and the
financial statements to help them way in which the company does
decide whether or not to buy shares business, which will help them make
in that company. ethical investment decisions.
Lenders and Lenders and suppliers are concerned Lenders and suppliers will be
suppliers with the credit worthiness of an entity interested in the future direction of a
and the likelihood that they will be business to help them plan whether
repaid amounts owing. it is likely that they will continue to
be a business partner of the entity
going forward.
Customers Consumers may want to know that Customers typically want to feel that
products and services provided by an they are getting good value for
entity are consistent with their ethical money in the products and services
and moral expectations. they buy.
Two further examples of stakeholders are shown below (these are just two
examples of many different stakeholder groups that could have been selected)
Government The government often uses financial The government uses financial
statements to ensure that the company statements to collect information and
is paying a reasonable amount of tax statistics on different industries to
relative to the profits that it earns. help inform policy making.
The local The local community may wish to The local community may be
community know about local employment interested in the company's social
opportunities. and environmental credentials such
as how well employees are treated
and the company's environmental
footprint.
557
Activity 2: Liquidity analysis
(a) Relevant liquidity ratios:
20X7 20X6
Current ratio 430 + 3,860 +12 445 + 2,510 + 37
= = 0.87:1 = = 1.02:1
4,660 + 280 2,890 + 40
Acid test ratio 3,860 +12 2,510 + 37
= = 0.78:1 = = 0.87:1
4,660 + 280 2,890 + 40
Receivables collection = 3,860/32,785  365 = 43 = 2,510/31,390  365 = 29
period days days
(b) Analysis from Wheels's perspective
Has liquidity improved or deteriorated?

STEP 1
The liquidity position has deteriorated in the current year. The entity has a
net current liability position in the current year, mainly due to the increase in
payables being greater than the increase in receivables. The current and
acid test ratios both indicate insufficient current assets to cover current
liabilities and the fact that the entity is funding working capital using a bank
overdraft which is nearing its limit is of concern.
Why has the liquidity improved or deteriorated?

STEP 2
The new contract with the department store is likely to be at least part of the
cause of the increase in the receivables collection period. The increase from
29 to 43 days is the equivalent of approximately $1,258,000 of cash
([43 days – 29 days]/365 days × revenue of $32,785,000) being tied up
in receivables which is likely to be the reason for declining liquidity.
The contract also appears to be having a knock-on effect on the payables
balance which has increased significantly in the period, presumably due to
increased purchases to satisfy the demand on this contract and perhaps due
to a delay in making payments due to the increased receivables collection
period. Wheels should be careful not to significantly exceed credit terms
offered by suppliers as this may impact on the continuity of supply.
Conclusion
STEP 3
It is recommended that Wheels contacts its bank to renegotiate the
bank overdraft as it is likely to breach the overdraft limit in the near
future. It should also consider renegotiating credit terms with key suppliers.

Analysis
Size
The revenue figures indicate the respective size of the companies. Both of the potential targets are
smaller than LOP. Entity B is larger than entity A.
Margins
Both of the potential target entities appear to be less efficient than LOP in respect of generating
profits.
558
Entity A has a much stronger gross profit margin than entity B. There may be less competitive
pressure on pricing in its markets, or it may face lower costs for materials and labour.
Comparing their net profit margins, entity B appears stronger. This could be due to the effect of
interest charges on the profits of entity A, which has higher gearing, but could also be due to the
fixed elements of operating expenses having less impact on the profits of the larger company. The
larger company is in a better position to benefit from economies of scale.
Gearing
Entity A has significantly higher gearing than either entity B or LOP. This is probably because of the
low rate of interest available in Frontland (5%). High gearing is quite usual in the construction
industry as debt finance is needed to fund heavy investment in assets. These assets then provide
security for the entity's borrowings, making it easier to raise finance.
The higher gearing makes entity A a riskier investment than entity B. Interest commitments must be
paid irrespective of trading conditions and profitability, unlike equity dividends which are
discretionary. Also, if the borrowings are at variable rates, there is a risk that increases in the interest
rates could damage profits in future.
P/E ratio
The higher P/E ratio of entity B suggests that investors have more confidence in entity B than entity A.
However, both entities have lower P/E ratios than LOP so if LOP wishes to maintain or improve its
P/E ratio, it might wish to seek an alternative target.
Impact on indicators of LOP
Revenue
Entity B would have the more significant effect on LOP's revenue, increasing it by 60%.
Gross margin
Both entities would decrease the overall gross margin of LOP. Entity A would have only a marginal
effect, but in combination with entity B it would result in a gross margin of 24% (the total gross
margins of LOP and B ((28% × 500) + (17% × 300)) over the combined revenue of $800m).
Net margin
Both entities would have an adverse effect on LOP's net profit margin. Here entity A would have the
more significant effect, reducing the net margin to 14% (the total net margins of LOP and A ((16% ×
500) + (9%  160)) over the combined revenue of $660m).
Gearing
Entity A would increase LOP's gearing and risk exposure. Entity B would decrease LOP's gearing
and risk exposure.
However, investing in entity A would decrease the average rates of interest suffered by the group as
a whole.
P/E ratio
It would appear that both entities would be likely to decrease the P/E ratio of LOP although this
would depend on the market's view of the benefits of the respective purchases and the consequent
change in price post purchase.
Conclusion
Both entities would have an adverse effect on the financial indicators of LOP, so it may be wiser not
to invest in either of them.
If LOP wishes to expand in size, is most interested in profitability in terms of the 'bottom line' net
profit, and is risk averse, then entity B is the more attractive proposition.
559
Activity 4: EPS manipulation
Management could use the treatment of prior period errors to purposefully manipulate
earnings. For example, management could understate a warranty provision by $1m in the current
year in order to meet profit targets. They know that when the matter is corrected next year (as a
prior period error), it will be 'hidden' in retained earnings rather than being reflected in
reported profit or loss of that period.
Although comparatives must be restated with the correct provision and expense, the focus of
stakeholders is likely to be on the current year rather than the prior year.
Management do have to disclose information about the prior period error (including the nature
and amount) but this will feature in a note to the accounts and it might go unnoticed by users of the
Adjustments to the financial statements due to correction or errors and inconsistencies would not be
favourably viewed by investors who would be concerned about the quality of earnings.
Unless the notes to the accounts are carefully scrutinised, investors may be unaware that an error
took place.
Any earnings manipulation will have an impact on EPS, and managers will normally want to
positively impact earnings in order to report better EPS to boost investor confidence, increase the
share price and achieve bonus targets. The potential for manipulation means the EPS ratio needs to
be viewed with caution.
Activity 5: Non-financial measures
Perspective Measure Why?
Customer Number of times customer fails Indicates potential loss of

to make a booking due to customers
website crash or busy phone
lines
Internal Number of take-offs on time Measures efficiency of process
Innovation & learning Number of new destinations Attracts more customers to

airline
Activity 6: Integrated reporting

User's perspective
The International <IR> Framework does not define value creation from one user's perspective. This
has the advantage of creating a broad report but may be of limited value to stakeholders who often
have a fairly narrow focus eg investors who want to maximise their wealth.
Credibility
The International <IR> Framework does not require those charged with governance to state their
responsibilities which may potentially undermine the credibility of the integrated report and impair
the reliance that can be placed on the report.
Disclosures
It can be hard to quantify the different capitals and <IR> permits qualitative disclosures where it is not
possible to make quantitative disclosures. This can reduce comparability of integrated reports
between entities.
560
Format of the report

Whilst there are recommended content elements and guiding principles, the exact format of an
integrated report will vary, making it difficult to for stakeholders compare reports of different entities
or across periods.
Information about the future
Disclosing information about the future inevitably involves uncertainties that cannot be eliminated
which means that stakeholder decisions may be based on future events, which might turn out
differently from what was expected.
Aggregation and disaggregation
The levels of aggregation should be appropriate to the circumstances of the organisation. Whilst that
improves the relevance of the information for that particular company, for a stakeholder trying to
choose between different entities, this significantly reduces comparability.
Time frames
The time frames for short, medium and long term will tend to differ by industry or sector. Consistency
within the industry will assist stakeholders choosing between companies in the same industry but will
make comparison of entities from different industries more challenging.
Materiality
The International <IR> Framework requires disclosure of material matters. Assessing materiality
requires significant judgement and is likely to vary between entities making comparability more
difficult for stakeholders.
Activity 7: Identifying reportable segments

At 31 December 20X5 four of the six operating segments are reportable operating segments:
 The Chemicals (which comprises the two sub-groups of Europe and the rest of the world) and
Pharmaceuticals wholesale segments meet the definition on all size criteria.
 The Hair care segment is separately reported due to its profitability being greater than 10% of
total segments in profit (4/29).
 The Body care segment also meets the size criteria (both revenue and profits exceed the size
criteria) and requires disclosure under IFRS 8 despite being disposed of during the period.
Also note that the fact that it does not make a majority of its sales externally does not prevent
separate disclosure under IFRS 8. The sale of the operations may meet the criteria to be
reported as a discontinued operation under IFRS 5 which will require additional disclosures.
Reporting the above four operating segments accounts for 84% of external revenue being
reported; hence the requirement to report at least 75% of external revenue has been satisfied.
The Pharmaceuticals retail segment represents 9.2% of revenue; the loss is 6.9% of the 'control
number' of – in this case – operating segments in profit (2/29) and 8.9% of total assets
(30/336) (before the addition of the new Hair care operations/sale of the Body care
segment, and 9.6% (30/(336 – 54 + 32 = 314)) after). Consequently, it is not separately
reportable. Although it falls below the 10% thresholds it can still be reported as a separate
operating segment if management believe that information about the segment would be useful
to users of the financial statements. Otherwise it would be disclosed in an 'All other segments'
column.
The Cosmetics segment represents 6.3% of revenue, 6.9% of operating segments in profit
(2/29) and 5.4% (18/336) of total assets (before the addition of the new Hair care
operations/sale of the Body care segment, and 5.7% (18/(336 – 54 + 32 = 314)) after). It
can also be reported separately if management believe the information would be useful to
users. Otherwise it would also be disclosed in an 'All other segments' column.
561
After the sale of the Body care segment, the new Chinese business increases the size of the
Hair care segment which still remains reportable. However, the business itself represents
10.2% of revised total operating segment assets (32/(336 – 54 + 32 = 314)), and may justify
separate reporting as a different operating segment if management considers that the nature
of its product type (mass market rather than 'high end') and distribution (retail versus
wholesale) differ sufficiently from the 'traditional' Hair care products the group manufactures.
Activity 8: IFRS 8 disclosures

A segment report can be useful in providing information to investors to assist them in decision-making
(to buy or sell shares). However, there are some limitations to its usefulness. The benefits and
limitations, using JH's segment report as an illustration, are outlined below.
Benefits
Risk and return
Large publicly traded entities typically offer many different types of products or services to their
customer, each of which results in very different types of risks and returns. In the case of JH, the three
main markets are food, personal care and home care. For example, as food has a short shelf-life,
inventory obsolescence is going to be a much more significant risk than for personal care and home
care products.
Informed investment decision
If an investor were only able to view the full financial statements of JH, they would not be able to
make an assessment of how the different parts of the business are performing and so could not make
a fully informed investment decision. For example, they would not know that personal care products
are making a profit margin of under half that of food (3% versus 7.8%).
Assess management strategy and different prospects of each segment
Disaggregation into operating segments allows investors to use the segment report to:
 Assess management's strategy and effectiveness – for example, whether the most profitable
product accounts for the largest proportion of sales, (in JH, food has the highest margin at
7.8% and accounts for more than half of sales, demonstrating sound management judgement);
 Assess the different rates of profitability, opportunities for growth, future prospects and degrees
of risk of each different business activity. For example, whether the segment has recently
invested in assets for future growth (in JH, all three segments have invested in assets in the year
and, overall, home care has the highest asset to revenue ratio, either implying a more capital-
intensive manufacturing process or the greatest potential for future growth and perhaps newer,
more efficient assets).
Limitations
Comparability with other entities
Segments are determined under IFRS 8 on the basis of internal reporting to the chief operating
decision maker. JH's three segments are food, personal care and home care. However, JH's
competitors are unlikely to structure their business or report to the board in exactly the same way as
JH. This could make the investment decision very difficult due to the lack of comparability of
reportable segments between entities.
Unallocated amounts
Where it is not possible to allocate an expense, asset or liability to a specific segment, the amounts
are reported as unallocated in the reconciliation of reportable segments to the entity's full financial
statements.
Here JH has $5m of unallocated expenses. If these were allocated to specific segments, they could
turn personal care or home care's reported profit into a loss or reduce food's profit by a third.
562
Therefore, comparison of the different segments without taking into account these unallocated items
would be misleading.
Equally 15% of JH's group liabilities are unallocated. If these had been allocated to a specific
segment, they would more than double personal care's liabilities and significantly increase the other
two segments' liabilities. There is a danger that users believe that the total reported segment liabilities
show the complete liabilities of the JH group.
Therefore, where these unallocated amounts are significant, the figures by segment could be
misleading and could result in an ill-informed investment decision.
Reconciliations
IFRS 8 Operating Segments only requires reconciliation of segment revenues, profit or loss, assets
and liabilities (and for any material items separately disclosed) to the total entity's figures.
Therefore, it is not possible to see all the reasons for the differences in the statement of profit or loss
and other comprehensive income and statement of financial position between the reported segment
figures and the total entity figures.
In JH's case, it is not possible to see any unallocated expenses, interest or depreciation. Therefore
investors are not presented with the full picture.
Allocation between segments
Management judgement is required in allocating income, expenses, assets and liabilities to the
different segments. In some instances, such as interest revenue and interest expense where treasury
and financing decisions are likely to be made centrally rather than by division, it could be very
difficult to allocate these items. Equally, central expenses, assets and liabilities (such as those relating
to head office) could be hard to allocate. This leaves scope for errors, manipulation and bias.
In JH's case, both interest revenue and interest expense are individually greater than total segment
profit so incorrect allocation could mislead an investor into making an ill-informed decision.
Intersegment items
The cancellation of intersegment revenue, assets and liabilities is clearly shown in the reconciliation
of the segment revenue, profit or loss, assets and liabilities to the total entity's. However, it is not
possible to see the cancellation of intersegment expenses or interest.
This could confuse investors as they cannot see the full impact of intersegment cancellations on the
group accounts. For example, in JH's segment report, the cancellation of $2m intersegment revenue
is clearly shown but the corresponding cancellation of intersegment expense is not disclosed.
Understandability
The disclosure requirements of IFRS 8 Operating Segments are quite onerous as illustrated by the
level of detail in JH's segment report. There is a danger of 'information overload', overwhelming the
investor with the end result of the segment report being ignored altogether.
Disclosure requirements
The nature and quantify of information required to be disclosed by IFRS 8 depends on the content of
internal management reports reviewed by the chief operating decision maker. This will vary from
company to company, making it hard for an investor to compare the performance of different
entities.
In the case of JH, a significant amount of information is reported internally and therefore disclosed.
However, IFRS 8 only requires as a minimum for an entity to report a measure of profit or loss for
each reportable segment. If this were the only disclosure, it would be very hard to make an
investment decision.
563
Reportable segments
IFRS 8 only requires segments to be reported on separately if they meet certain criteria (at least 10%
of revenue; or at least 10% of the higher of the combined reported profit or loss; or at least 10% of
assets). As long as at least 75% of external revenue is reported on, the remaining segments may be
aggregated.
Here, JH has combined the segments that have not met the 10% threshold into 'All others' which is
not helpful to investors as they will not know which products or services are included in this category.
Chapter 18 Reporting requirements of small and medium-

sized entities
Activity 1: Intangible assets – IFRS for SMEs v full IFRS

(a) (i) Under full IFRS, Diamond Co has an accounting policy choice. It could account for the
licence at cost less accumulated amortisation which would give a carrying amount of
($2.6m – ($2.6m/10)) $2.34m at the end of the year. Or, as the licence has an active
market, it could account for it at fair value of $2.8m at the end of the year which would
generate a revaluation surplus of ($2.8m – $2.34m) $0.46m.
(ii) Under IFRS for SMEs, intangible assets must be carried at cost less accumulated
amortisation, hence there is no accounting policy choice and the carrying value of the
licence would be $2.34m as calculated above.
(b) Diamond Co's assets would have a higher value under the fair value method permitted under
IAS 38. As such, Diamond Co would report a lower return on assets than if the cost less
accumulated amortisation method is applied.
Activity 2: Goodwill – full IFRS v IFRS for SMEs
Tutorial note.
You need to remember the following when accounting for goodwill under IFRS for SMEs:
(a) NCI must be valued based on its share of net assets
(b) If management are unable to estimate reliably the useful life of goodwill, then it should be
amortised over a maximum life of 10 years
Goodwill at the date of acquisition would be calculated as follows:
IFRS for SMEs

$'000 Ignore preference
Consideration 2,950 share info
NCI at share of net assets

(30%  $3,100 net) 930 NCI has to be at share of
net assets
3,880
Fair value of net assets and liabilities 3,100
Goodwill 780
The assessment that goodwill has an indefinite useful life is not relevant as all intangible assets must
be amortised. The maximum amortisation period of 10 years is applied in this case (pro-rata).
Amortisation = $780k/10  4/12 = $26k for the period expensed to profit or loss
The carrying value of goodwill at 31 December 20X6 is ($780k – $26k) $754k.
564
Activity 3: Accounting under IFRS for SMEs

(a) Development expenditure
IFRS for SMEs requires small and medium-sized entities that adopt it to expense all internal
research and development costs as incurred (unless they form part of the cost of another asset
that meets the recognition criteria in the IFRS). The adjustment on transition to the IFRS for
SMEs must be made at the beginning of the comparable period (1 January 20X5) as a prior
period adjustment. Thus the expenditure of $2.8m on research and development should all be
written off directly to retained earnings. Any amounts incurred during 20X5 and 20X6 must be
expensed in those years' financial statements and any amortisation charged to profit or loss in
those years will need to be eliminated.
(b) Acquisition of Rock
IFRS for SMEs requires goodwill to be recognised as an asset at its cost, being the excess of
the cost of the business combination over the acquirer's interest in the net fair value of the
identifiable assets less liabilities and contingent liabilities. Non-controlling interests at the date
of acquisition must therefore be measured at the proportionate share of the fair value of the
identifiable net assets of the subsidiary acquired (ie the 'partial' goodwill method).
After initial recognition the acquirer is required to amortise goodwill over its useful life under
IFRS for SMEs. If the useful life of goodwill cannot be established reliably, then it cannot
exceed ten years (ten years used here as the directors anticipate a longer period).
Goodwill will be calculated as:
$m
Consideration transferred 7.7
Non-controlling interests (at %FVNA: 9.5  40%) 3.8
Fair value of identifiable net assets at acquisition (9.5)

2.0
Amortisation (2.0/10 years  6/12) (0.1)
1.9
The amortisation of $0.1m must be charged to profit or loss in 20X6.
(c) Investment properties
Investment properties must be held at fair value through profit or loss under IFRS for SMEs
provided the fair value can be measured without undue cost or effort. This appears to be the
case here, given that an estate agent valuation is available. Consequently a gain of $0.2m
($1.9m – $1.7m) will be reported in Smerk's profit or loss for the year.
Chapter 19 The impact of changes and potential changes in

accounting regulation This is an open ended question, so
credit would be given for a variety
Activity 1: Disclosure of valid, clearly argued points.
(a) Although many large companies disclose information about their employees, the type and
level of disclosure varies. In some countries there are legal requirements to disclose
information such as employee numbers, policies relating to equal opportunities, information on
disabled employees and staff remuneration. Companies often adopt a 'checklist' approach,
often disclosing only the minimum amount of information required. Other companies may be
more proactive. In practice, publishing information about how companies' human capital is
managed can enhance the reputation of a company and help it to recruit and retain high
quality staff.
565
The company wishes to help stakeholders understand the link between its performance and the
way that it manages its employees. As well as information on equal opportunities and health
and safety at work it could disclose the following:
(i) A description of the company's policies relating to the recruitment, retention and
motivation of employees;
(ii) Employee numbers and other appropriate information about the composition of the
workforce;
(iii) Details of staff remuneration;
(iv) Details of amounts invested in training and developing employees and also descriptions
of the company's policies and practices in this area; and
(v) A description of the way in which the company ensures management succession.
Information should be provided consistently from period to period and should be comparable
with previous periods. This means that the company will need to develop key performance
indicators.
The most obvious vehicle for these disclosures is the management commentary as this is
management's analysis of the key factors and risks affecting the company's performance.
Many companies also publish separate social or employee reports, which can be targeted at
particular stakeholder groups, such as investors or current and potential employees and the
general public.
(b) The Discussion Paper Disclosure Initiative – Principles of Disclosure sets out the IASB's view that
information labelled as 'non-IFRS' can be placed inside the financial statements, but only under
certain conditions:
 It is listed, together with a statement of compliance with IFRSs
 It is identified as not in accordance with IFRSs and, if applicable, as unaudited
 It is accompanied by explanation of why it is useful
(IASB, 2017: para. 4.25)
The information could certainly be useful, but it is too far removed from financial reporting to
meet the other conditions. The management commentary would be a more appropriate place
for such disclosures.
Activity 2: Debt vs equity

Most ordinary shares are treated as equity as they do not contain a contractual obligation to deliver
cash.
However, in the case of the directors' shares, a contractual obligation to deliver cash exists on a
specific date as the shares are redeemable at the end of the service contract.
The redemption is not discretionary, and Scott has no right to avoid it. The mandatory nature of the
repayment makes this capital a financial liability. The financial liability will initially be recognised at
its fair value, ie the present value of the payment at the end of the service contract. It will be
subsequently measured at amortised cost and effective interest will be applied over the period of the
service contract.
Dividend payments on the shares are discretionary as they must be ratified at the annual general
meeting. Therefore, no liability should be recognised for any dividend until it is ratified. When
recognised, the classification of the dividend should be consistent with the classification of the shares
and therefore any dividends are classified as a finance cost rather than as a deduction from retained
earnings.
(IAS 32: paras. 11, AG 27)
566
Activity 3: Discussion question

(a) Accounting policies
Accounting policies are defined by IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting
Estimates and Errors as 'the specific principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices applied
by an entity in preparing and presenting financial statements' (IAS 8: para. 5).
The selection of accounting policies is important in providing consistency and comparability in
the financial statements. IAS 8 allows an entity to choose the most appropriate accounting
policy from a limited range of scenarios such as the cost model or revaluation model for
tangible and intangible assets, the cost model or fair value model for investment properties or
the cost of interchangeable inventories.
Judgement in the development of accounting policies is permitted by IAS 8 where an IFRS
does not cover a particular transaction, providing management considers the requirements of
similar and related issues in other IFRSs and the Conceptual Framework for Financial
Reporting's definitions of elements of the financial statements, recognition criteria and
measurement concepts.
The choice of accounting policies can have a very significant effect on the financial statements.
For example, an entity which chooses to revalue its non-current assets generally has a lower
return on capital employed versus a similar entity which does not, due to the diluting effect of
higher capital employed on the ratio.
Elections
In addition to the use of accounting policies, an entity is permitted to make certain elections on
application of certain standards to individual items.
For example, under IFRS 3 Business Combinations an entity can choose whether to measure
the non-controlling interests in an acquired subsidiary at the date of acquisition at fair value or
at the proportionate share of the fair value of the acquiree's identifiable net assets (IFRS 3:
para. 19). The former will result in a higher goodwill figure, boosting the value of the group
statement of financial position, but also higher recognised impairment losses should an
impairment arise in the annual impairment tests required for goodwill.
Another example is the election permitted in IFRS 9 Financial Instruments which allows an
entity to choose whether to measure investments in equity instruments not held for trading at
fair value through other comprehensive income rather than the default fair value through profit
or loss (IFRS 9: para. 5.7.5). This may increase or reduce profit or loss depending on whether
those instruments have subsequent losses or gains, but, perhaps more importantly, reduces the
volatility of profit or loss by recognising those gains and losses in other comprehensive
income.
Estimation techniques
Estimation techniques differ from accounting policies and elections in that there is not a limited
range of techniques permitted, but, rather, an entity develops an appropriate estimation
technique relevant to the different figures in its financial statements which are affected by
uncertainty.
Examples of estimation techniques that can affect the view given by the financial statements
include:
 Measurement of provisions
 Measurement of inventory write-downs to net realisable value
 Estimation of the useful life and method of depreciation of non-current assets
 The discount rate used in an impairment test affecting value in use and recoverable
amount (and therefore impairment losses recognised)
 Inconsistent application from period to period of any of the above
567
Accounting effects
Achieving an 'accounting effect' can refer to all manner of effects in the financial statements.
Often this is considered management specifically of profit or revenues. However, achieving an
accounting effect could include maintaining desired ratios, such as those required to meet
return or liquidity expectations, to meet loan covenant restrictions, or simply eliminating
volatility from profits.
Achieving an accounting effect is not necessarily unethical or unwise. A key issue is whether
achieving a particular accounting effect is considered manipulation of the financial statements
rather than reflecting valid business decisions, and this depends on its objective.
For example, entering into a hedging arrangement removes volatility from profit, and is a
sound business decision; there is no ethical issue in doing so, and the entity's accounting
merely needs to ensure that the substance of the business arrangement is reflected in the
On the other hand, a change in accounting policy or estimation technique applied simply with
the objective of boosting profits (such as switching to the fair value model of investment
properties when market values start to rise) could be considered unethical if the entity cannot
adequately justify why it did not use that model before when prices were falling.
The financial statements of stock market listed entities come under closer scrutiny than those of
private entities, particularly from large powerful institutional investors. They are also audited.
This makes it more difficult for management to knowingly manipulate the financial statements.
Nevertheless, more complex ways have been developed over the years to achieve accounting
effects. A famous example is the Enron case where the company had many unconsolidated
structured entities such that the level of gearing of the group was not apparent. When this
became apparent, it led to the ultimate downfall of not only the company itself, but also a
global auditing firm, Arthur Andersen. The IASB is responsive to such events and issued
IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities, which explicitly requires disclosures of
unconsolidated structured entities and of the decision-making process that resulted in them not
being consolidated (IFRS 12: para. 24).
Another example is the Tesco scandal of 2014 where Tesco's interim profits were overstated
by £263 million as a result of early overzealous recognition of commissions from suppliers.
The issue of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts from Customers, whilst already issued (but not yet
effective) when this scandal arose, tightens up the approach to revenue recognition.
(b) Inventory valuation
The effect of the change to inventory valuation is to increase profits for the year ended
31 December 20X3:
20X3 20X2
$m $m
Change to opening inventories (32 – 37) 5 4 (27 – 31)
Change to closing inventories (30 – 33) (3) (5) (32 – 37)
2 (1)
The effect on profits for 20X3 is mitigated to only $2 million because it is the difference
between the opening and closing balances on inventories that affects profit. Inventories in the
statement of financial position will reduce by $3 million as a result of the change.
The effect on the comparative period 20X2 is to reduce profits by $1 million (and closing
inventories by $5 million). The change in accounting policy would also be reflected in a prior
period adjustment to opening retained earnings at 1 January 20X2 of $4 million in the
statement of changes in equity.
568
As there has been no change to the standard for inventories (IAS 2), IAS 8 only permits such a
change to be made where it provides reliable and more relevant information. In this case, any
change should represent a change to the underlying circumstances.
Management have stated that the change is due to 'high turnover of inventories' which is not
necessarily a valid reason for a change. A change should only be made if it is more reflective
of the reality of the current asset valuations in the statement of financial position. Also,
inventories need to be measured on a line-by-line basis, and it may be that a different cost
formula for inventories is relevant for different lines, such as a first-in first-out approach for
perishable items and weighted average approach for other items.
If the change can be justified, disclosure of the effect of the change on the financial statements
for 20X3 and 20X2 will need to be made, as well as the reason why management believes
the changes to be appropriate.
Activity 4: First-time adoption of IFRS

(a) Europa's first IFRS financial statements will be for the year ended 31 December 20X8. IFRS 1
requires that at least one year's comparative figures are presented and therefore the date of
transition to IFRSs is the beginning of business on 1 January 20X7 (or close of business on
31 December 20X6).
Therefore the procedure for adopting IFRSs will be as follows (IFRS 1: para. 10):
(i) Identify accounting policies that comply with IFRSs effective at 31 December 20X8 (the
reporting date for the first IFRS financial statements).
(ii) Restate the opening statement of financial position at 1 January 20X7 (the date of
transition) using these IFRSs retrospectively, by:
(1) Recognising all assets and liabilities whose recognition is required by IFRSs
(2) Not recognising items as assets or liabilities if IFRSs do not permit such
recognition
(3) Reclassifying items that were recognised under previous GAAP as one type of
asset, liability or component of equity, but are a different type of asset, liability or
component of equity under IFRSs
(4) Measuring all recognised assets and liabilities in accordance with IFRSs.
The company will almost certainly need to change some of its accounting policies and
adjust some of the amounts that it reported previously at the same dates using previous
GAAP. It should recognise these adjustments directly in retained earnings (ie in equity).
(iii) Explain the effect of the transition from previous GAAP to IFRSs, by disclosing:
(1) A reconciliation of equity reported under previous GAAP to equity under IFRSs at
the date of transition (1 January 20X7) and at the last previous GAAP reporting
date (31 December 20X7); and
(2) A reconciliation of the total comprehensive income reported under previous
GAAP (or profit or loss if total comprehensive income was not previously
reported) to total comprehensive income reported under IFRSs for the last period
presented under previous GAAP.
If Europa presented a statement of cash flows under previous GAAP, it should also explain any
material adjustments to the statement of cash flows.
Although the general rule is that all IFRSs should be applied retrospectively, a number of
exemptions are available. These are intended to cover cases in which the cost of complying
fully with a particular requirement would outweigh the benefits to users of the financial
statements. Europa may choose to take advantage of any or all of the exemptions.
569
(b) (i) Accounting estimates
Estimates under IFRSs at the date of transition must be consistent with those made at the
same date under previous GAAP (after adjustments to reflect any difference in
accounting policies). The only exception to this is if the company has subsequently
discovered that these estimates were in error. This is not the case here and therefore the
estimates are not adjusted in the first IFRS financial statements.
(ii) Court case
The treatment of this depends on the reason that Europa did not recognise a provision
under previous GAAP at 31 December 20X7.
If the requirements of previous GAAP were consistent with IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent
Liabilities and Contingent Assets, presumably the directors concluded that an outflow of
economic benefit was not probable and that the recognition criteria were not met. In this
case, Europa's assumptions under IFRSs are consistent with its previous assumptions under
previous GAAP. Europa does not recognise a provision at 31 December 20X7 and
accounts for the payment in the year ended 31 December 20X8.
If the requirements of previous GAAP were not consistent with IAS 37, Europa must
determine whether it had a present obligation at 31 December 20X7. The directors
should take account of all available evidence, including any additional evidence
provided by events after the reporting period up to the date the 20X7 financial
statements were authorised for issue in accordance with IAS 10 Events after the
Reporting Period.
The outcome of the court case confirms that Europa had a liability in September 20X7 (when
the events that resulted in the case occurred), but this event occurred after the 20X7 financial
statements were authorised for issue. Based on this alone, the company would not recognise a
provision at 31 December 20X7 and the $10m cost of the court case would be recognised in
the 20X8 financial statements. If the company's lawyers had advised Europa that it was
probable that they would be found guilty and suggested the expected settlement amount
before the financial statements were authorised for issue, the provision would be recognised in
the 20X7 financial statements reporting under IFRSs for that amount.
570
The financial
reporting framework
571
Appendix 2 – Supplementary reading
1 International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs)

1.1 Current examinable documents
The documents listed as being examinable are the latest that were issued before 1 September 2017,
and will be examinable from September 2018 to June 2019.
The ACCA Study Guide offers more detailed guidance on the depth and level at which the
examinable documents will be examined. The relevant learning outcomes are reproduced at the
beginning of each Workbook chapter.
Title
IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements
IAS 2 Inventories
IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows
IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors
IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period
IAS 12 Income Taxes
IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment
IAS 19 Employee Benefits
IAS 20 Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance
IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates
IAS 23 Borrowing Costs
IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures
IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements
IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures
IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation
IAS 33 Earnings per Share
IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting
IAS 36 Impairment of Assets
IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
IAS 38 Intangible Assets
IAS 40 Investment Property
IAS 41 Agriculture
IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards
IFRS 2 Share-based Payment
IFRS 3 Business Combinations
IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
572
Title
IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures
IFRS 8 Operating Segments
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements
IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements
IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities
IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
IFRS 16 Leases
IFRS for SMEs IFRS for Small and Medium-sized Entities
Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
IFRS Practice Management Commentary

Statement
ED/2015/3 Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
ED/2015/8 Draft IFRS Practice Statement – Application of Materiality to Financial Statements
2 Conceptual framework
2.1 The importance of a conceptual framework

A conceptual framework, in the field we are concerned with, is a statement of generally
accepted theoretical principles which form the frame of reference for financial reporting. These
theoretical principles provide the basis for the development of new accounting standards and the
evaluation of those already in existence.
The financial reporting process is concerned with providing information that is useful in the business
and economic decision-making process. Therefore a conceptual framework will form the theoretical
basis for determining which events should be accounted for, how they should be measured and how
they should be communicated to the user.
Although it is theoretical in nature, a conceptual framework for financial reporting has highly
practical final aims.
The danger of not having a conceptual framework is demonstrated in the way some
countries' standards have developed over recent years; standards tend to be produced in a
haphazard and fire-fighting approach. Where an agreed framework exists, the standard-
setting body acts as an architect or designer, rather than a fire-fighter, building accounting rules on
the foundation of sound, agreed basic principles.
The lack of a conceptual framework also means that fundamental principles are tackled more than
once in different standards, thereby producing contradictions and inconsistencies in basic concepts,
such as those of prudence and matching. This leads to ambiguity and it affects the true and fair
concept of financial reporting.
Another problem with the lack of a conceptual framework has become apparent in the USA. The
large number of highly detailed standards produced by the Financial Accounting Standards Board
573
(FASB) created a financial reporting environment governed by specific rules rather than general
principles. The FASB is in the early deliberations of moving towards a more principles based
approach (FASB, 2017).
A conceptual framework can also bolster standard setters against political pressure from various
'lobby groups' and interested parties. Such pressure would only prevail if it was acceptable under
the conceptual framework.
2.1.1 Advantages of a conceptual framework
The advantages arising from using a conceptual framework may be summarised as follows:
(a) The situation is avoided whereby standards are being developed on a piecemeal basis,
where a particular accounting problem is recognised as having emerged, and resources were
then channelled into standardising accounting practice in that area, without regard to whether
that particular issue was necessarily the most important issue remaining at that time without
standardisation.
(b) As stated above, the development of certain standards (particularly national standards) has
been subject to considerable political interference from interested parties. Where there is a
conflict of interest between user groups on which policies to choose, policies deriving from a
conceptual framework will be less open to criticism that the standard-setter buckled to
external pressure.
2.1.2 Disadvantages of a conceptual framework
A counter-argument might be as follows:
(a) Financial statements are intended for a variety of users, and it is not certain that a single
conceptual framework can be devised which will suit all users.
(b) Given the diversity of user requirements, there may be a need for a variety of accounting
standards, each produced for a different purpose (and with different concepts as a basis).
(c) It is not clear that a conceptual framework makes the task of preparing and then implementing
standards any easier than without a framework.
2.2 The IASB Conceptual Framework

The original IASB Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements was
produced in 1989 and is gradually being replaced by the new Conceptual Framework for Financial
Reporting. This is the result of an IASB/FASB joint project and is being carried out in phases. The first
phase, comprising Chapters 1 and 3, was published in September 2010. Chapter 2 entitled 'The
reporting entity' has not yet been published. The current version of the Conceptual Framework
includes the remaining chapters of the 1989 Framework as Chapter 4.
The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting is currently as follows:
Chapter 1: The objective of general purpose financial reporting
Chapter 2: The reporting entity (to be issued)
Chapter 3: Qualitative characteristics of useful financial information
Chapter 4: Remaining text of the 1989 Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial
Statements:
 Underlying assumption
 The elements of financial statements
 Recognition of the elements of financial statements
 Measurement of the elements of financial statements
 Concepts of capital and capital maintenance
We will now look at some of these sections in more detail.
574
2.2.1 Introduction to the Conceptual Framework

The Introduction provides a list of the purposes of the Conceptual Framework:
(a) To assist the Board in the development of future IFRSs and in its review of existing IFRSs.
(b) To assist the Board in promoting harmonisation of regulations, accounting standards and
procedures relating to the presentation of financial statements by providing a basis for
reducing the number of alternative accounting treatments permitted by IFRSs.
(c) To assist national standard-setting bodies in developing national standards.
(d) To assist preparers of financial statements in applying IFRSs and in dealing with topics
that have yet to form the subject of an IFRS.
(e) To assist auditors in forming an opinion as to whether financial statements comply with
IFRSs.
(f) To assist users of financial statements in interpreting the information contained in
financial statements prepared in compliance with IFRSs.
(g) To provide those who are interested in the work of the IASB with information about its
approach to the formulation of IFRSs.
The Conceptual Framework is not an IFRS and so does not overrule any individual IFRS. In the (rare)
case of conflict between an IFRS and the Conceptual Framework, the IFRS will prevail.
(Conceptual Framework: Introduction)
2.2.2 Chapter 1: The objective of general purpose financial reporting
The Conceptual Framework states that:
'The objective of general purpose financial reporting is to provide financial information about the
reporting entity that is useful to existing and potential investors, lenders and other creditors in making
decisions about providing resources to the entity.' (Conceptual Framework: para. OB2)
These users need information about:
 The economic resources of the entity;
 The claims against the entity; and
 Changes in the entity's economic resources and claims.
Information about the entity's economic resources and the claims against it helps users to
assess the entity's liquidity and solvency and its likely needs for additional financing.
Information about a reporting entity's financial performance (the changes in its economic
resources and claims) helps users to understand the return that the entity has produced on its
economic resources. This is an indicator of how efficiently and effectively management has used the
resources of the entity and is helpful in predicting future returns.
The Conceptual Framework makes it clear that this information should be prepared on an accruals
basis. (Conceptual Framework: para. OB17)
Information about a reporting entity's cash flows during a period also helps users assess the entity's
ability to generate future net cash inflows and gives users a better understanding of its operations.
2.2.3 Chapter 3: Qualitative characteristics of useful financial information

Qualitative characteristics are attributes that make financial information useful to users.
Chapter 3 distinguishes between fundamental and enhancing qualitative characteristics, for
analysis purposes. Fundamental qualitative characteristics distinguish useful financial reporting
information from information that is not useful or is misleading. Enhancing qualitative characteristics
distinguish more useful information from less useful information.
575
Fundamental qualitative characteristics

The two fundamental qualitative characteristics are:
(a) Relevance: Relevant information has predictive value or confirmatory value, or both. It is
capable of making a difference in the decisions made by users.
The relevance of information is affected by its nature and its materiality.
(b) Faithful representation: Information must be complete, neutral and free from error
(replacing 'reliability').
Financial reports represent economic phenomena in words and numbers. To be useful,
financial information must not only represent relevant phenomena but must faithfully
represent the phenomena that it purports to represent.
A complete depiction includes all information necessary for a user to understand the phenomenon
being depicted, including all necessary descriptions and explanations.
A neutral depiction is without bias in the selection or presentation of financial information. This
means that information must not be manipulated in any way in order to influence the decisions of
users.
Free from error means there are no errors or omissions in the description of the phenomenon and
no errors made in the process by which the financial information was produced. It does not mean
that no inaccuracies can arise, particularly where estimates have to be made.
(Conceptual Framework: paras. QC 5–18)
Substance over form
This is not a separate qualitative characteristic under the Conceptual Framework. The IASB
says that to do so would be redundant because it is implied in faithful representation. Faithful
representation of a transaction is only possible if it is accounted for according to its substance and
economic reality (Conceptual Framework: para. BC3.19).
Materiality
IFRSs apply to material items.
Material: information is material if omitting it or misstating it could influence decisions that users
make on the basis of financial information about a specific reporting entity. (Conceptual Framework:
Key term
para. QC11)
Materiality is an entity-specific aspect of relevance based on the nature or magnitude (or both) of the
items to which the information relates in the context of an individual entity's financial report.
Information may be judged relevant simply because of its nature (eg remuneration of management).
In other cases, both the nature and materiality of the information are important. Materiality is not a
qualitative characteristic itself (like relevance or faithful representation) because it is merely a
threshold or cut-off point.
The IASB is working on materiality in a current project and in 2017 issued a draft practice statement.
This is discussed in Chapter 19. The IASB is focusing on how materiality is applied in practice.
Enhancing qualitative characteristics
These are found in Conceptual Framework: paras. QC19–QC32.
Comparability
'Comparability is the qualitative characteristic that enables users to identify and understand
similarities in, and differences among, items' (Conceptual Framework: QC21). 'Information about a
reporting entity is more useful if it can be compared with similar information about other entities and
576
with similar information about the same entity for another period or another date.' (Conceptual
Framework: para. QC20)
'Consistency, although related to comparability, is not the same. [It] refers to the use of the
same methods for the same items [ie consistency of treatment] either from period to period within a
reporting entity or in a single period across entities.' (Conceptual Framework: para. QC22)
The disclosure of accounting policies is particularly important here. Users must be able to
distinguish between different accounting policies in order to be able to make a valid comparison of
similar items in the accounts of different entities.
'Comparability is not [the same as] uniformity' (Conceptual Framework: para. QC23). Entities
should change accounting policies if those policies become inappropriate.
Corresponding information for preceding periods should be shown to enable comparison over
time.
Verifiability
'Verifiability helps assure users that information faithfully represents the economic phenomena it
purports to represent. [It] means that different knowledgeable and independent observers could reach
consensus […] that a particular depiction is a faithful representation.' (Conceptual Framework: para.
QC26)
Timeliness
Information may become less useful if there is a delay in reporting it. There is a balance between
timeliness and the provision of reliable information.
If information is reported on a timely basis when not all aspects of the transaction are known, it may
not be complete or free from error.
Conversely, if every detail of a transaction is known, it may be too late to publish the information
because it has become irrelevant. The overriding consideration is how best to satisfy the economic
decision-making needs of the users (Conceptual Framework: para. QC29).
Understandability
'Financial reports are prepared for users who have a reasonable knowledge of business and
economic activities and who review and analyse the information diligently.' (Conceptual
Framework: para. QC32) Some phenomena are inherently complex and cannot be made easy to
understand. Excluding information on those phenomena might make the information easier to
understand, but without it those reports would be incomplete and therefore misleading. Therefore
matters should not be left out of financial statements simply due to their difficulty as: 'Even well-
informed and diligent users may sometimes need the aid of an adviser to understand information
about complex economic phenomena.' (Conceptual Framework: para. QC32)
The cost constraint on useful financial reporting

This is a 'pervasive constraint', not a qualitative characteristic (Conceptual Framework: para. QC35).
When information is provided, its benefits must exceed the costs of obtaining and presenting it. This
is a subjective area and there are other difficulties: others, not the intended users, may gain a
benefit; also the cost may be paid by someone other than the users. It is therefore difficult to apply a
cost–benefit analysis, but preparers and users should be aware of the constraint.
2.2.4 Underlying assumption

The Conceptual Framework identifies one underlying assumption – going concern.
The financial statements are normally prepared on the assumption that an entity is a going concern
and will continue in operation for the foreseeable future. Hence, it is assumed that the entity has
577
neither the intention nor the need to liquidate or curtail materially the scale of its operations; if such
an intention or need exists, the financial statements may have to be prepared on a different basis
and, if so, the basis used is disclosed (Conceptual Framework: para. 4.1).
When preparing the financial statements, management is required to make an assessment
of the entity's ability to continue as a going concern, taking into account all available information
about the future. This assessment must cover at least 12 months from the end of the reporting
period (IAS 1: para. 26).
Not a going concern
An entity may no longer be a going concern for various reasons; for example:
 Recurring operating losses
 Negative cash flow from operating activities
 Default on loan agreements
 Loss of key management personnel, customers or suppliers
 Non-compliance with regulatory requirements
 Emergence of dominant competition
 Technological changes
 Uninsured natural disasters
Where management believes that the entity is not a going concern (ie it intends to liquidate the
entity or to cease trading, or has no realistic alternative but to do so), IAS 1 Presentation of Financial
Statements requires the financial statements to be prepared on a non-going concern basis with
disclosure of the basis on which the financial statements have been prepared (IAS 1: para. 25).
Practically, if the entity will not be a going concern, IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and
Discontinued Operations would need to be applied and an entity's assets written down to their fair
values less costs to sell if lower than carrying amount (IFRS 5: para. 15).
Material uncertainties
There may be material uncertainties over an entity's ability to continue as a going concern; for
example:
 Uncertainty over future finance
 Uncertainty over the outcome of a court case against the company
IAS 1 requires an entity to disclose material uncertainties that may cast doubt upon the entity's
ability to continue as a going concern (IAS 1: para. 25).
2.2.5 The elements of financial statements

The Conceptual Framework lays out these elements as follows.
Elements of
Measurement of Measurement of
financial position in performance in
Statement of financial position Statement of profit or loss
and other comprehensive
income
Assets
Liabilities
Income
Equity
Expenses
578
A process of sub-classification then takes place for presentation in the financial statements, eg
assets are classified by their nature or function in the business to show information in the best way for
users to take economic decisions.
Financial position
 Asset: a resource controlled by the entity as a result of past events and from which future
economic benefits are expected to flow to the entity.
Key term
 Liability: a present obligation of the entity arising from past events, the settlement of which is
expected to result in an outflow from the entity of resources embodying economic benefits.
 Equity: the residual interest in the assets of the entity after deducting all its liabilities.
(Conceptual Framework: para. 4.4)
These definitions are important, but they do not cover the criteria for recognition of any of these
items, which are discussed in the next section of this chapter. This means that the definitions may
include items which would not actually be recognised in the statement of financial position because
they fail to satisfy recognition criteria, particularly the probable flow of any economic benefit
to or from the business.
Whether an item satisfies any of the definitions above will depend on the substance and
economic reality of the transaction, not merely its legal form.
Assets
Future economic benefit: the potential to contribute, directly or indirectly, to the flow of cash and
cash equivalents to the entity. The potential may be a productive one that is part of the operating
Key term
activities of the entity. It may also take the form of convertibility into cash or cash equivalents or a
capability to reduce cash outflows, such as when an alternative manufacturing process lowers the
cost of production.
Assets are usually employed to produce goods or services for customers; customers will then pay for
these. Cash itself renders a service to the entity due to its command over other resources.
The existence of an asset, particularly in terms of control, is not reliant on (Conceptual Framework:
para. 4.11–4.12):
(a) Physical form (hence patents and copyrights); nor
(b) Legal rights (hence leases).
Transactions or events in the past give rise to assets; those expected to occur in the future do not in
themselves give rise to assets. For example, an intention to purchase a non-current asset does not, in
itself, meet the definition of an asset (Conceptual Framework: para. 4.13).
Liabilities
An essential characteristic of a liability is that the entity has a present obligation.
Obligation: a duty or responsibility to act or perform in a certain way. Obligations may be legally
enforceable as a consequence of a binding contract or statutory requirement […] Obligations also
Key term
arise, however, from normal business practice, custom and a desire to maintain good business
relations or act in an equitable manner.
579
It is important to distinguish between a present obligation and a future commitment. A

management decision to purchase assets in the future does not, in itself, give rise to a present
obligation (Conceptual Framework: para 4.16).
Settlement of a present obligation will involve the entity giving up resources embodying economic
benefits in order to satisfy the claim of the other party. This may be done in various ways, not just by
payment of cash (Conceptual Framework: para 4.17).
Liabilities must arise from past transactions or events. In the case of, say, recognition of future
rebates to customers based on annual purchases, the sale of goods in the past is the transaction that
gives rise to the liability (Conceptual Framework: para. 4.18).
Equity
Equity is defined above as a residual, but it may be sub-classified in the statement of financial
position. This will indicate legal or other restrictions on the ability of the entity to distribute or
otherwise apply its equity. Some reserves are required by statute or other law, eg for the future
protection of creditors. The amount shown for equity depends on the measurement of assets
and liabilities. It has nothing to do with the market value of the entity's shares. (Conceptual
Framework: para. 4.20)
Performance
Profit is used as a measure of performance, or as a basis for other measures (eg earnings per
share). It depends directly on the measurement of income and expenses, which in turn depend (in
part) on the concepts of capital and capital maintenance adopted. (Conceptual Framework: para.
4.24)
The elements of income and expense are therefore defined as follows:
 Income: increases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form of inflows or
enhancements of assets or decreases of liabilities that result in increases in equity, other than
Key term
those relating to contributions from equity participants.
 Expenses: decreases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form of
outflows or depletions of assets or incurrences of liabilities that result in decreases in equity,
other than those relating to distributions to equity participants.
Income and expenses can be presented in different ways in the statement of profit or loss and
other comprehensive income, to provide information relevant for economic decision-making. For
example, income and expenses which relate to continuing operations are distinguished from the
results of discontinued operations (Conceptual Framework: para 4.27).
Income
Both revenue and gains are included in the definition of income. Revenue arises in the course of
ordinary activities of an entity (Conceptual Framework: para. 4.29).
Gains: increases in economic benefits. As such they are no different in nature from revenue.
Key term (Conceptual Framework: para. 4.30)
For example, gains arise on the disposal of non-current assets and on the revaluation of marketable
securities (unrealised gain) (Conceptual Framework: para. 4.31).
580
Expenses
Expenses are include those incurred in the ordinary course of business. They also include losses,
such as those that may arise on the disposal of non-current assets or the fall in value of an investment
(unrealised losses) (Conceptual Framework: para. 4.35).
Losses: decreases in economic benefits. As such they are no different in nature from other expenses.
Key term (Conceptual Framework: para. 4.34)
2.2.6 Recognition of the elements of financial statements
Recognition: the process of incorporating in the statement of financial position or statement of profit or
loss and other comprehensive income an item that meets the definition of an element and satisfies the
Key term
following criteria for recognition:
(a) It is probable that any future economic benefit associated with the item will flow to or from the
entity; and
(b) The item has a cost or value that can be measured with reliability.
(Conceptual Framework: paras. 4.37–4.38)
Probability of future economic benefits

Probability here means the degree of uncertainty that the future economic benefits associated
with an item will flow to or from the entity. This must be judged on the basis of the characteristics
of the entity's environment and the evidence available when the financial statements are
prepared (Conceptual Framework: para. 4.40).
Reliability of measurement
The cost or value of an item, in many cases, must be estimated. The Conceptual Framework
states, however, that 'the use of reasonable estimates is an essential part of the preparation of
financial statements and does not undermine their reliability'. Where no reasonable estimate can be
made, the item should not be recognised, although its existence should be disclosed in the notes, or
other explanatory material (Conceptual Framework: para. 4.41).
Items may still qualify for recognition at a later date due to changes in circumstances or
subsequent events (Conceptual Framework: para. 4.42).
2.2.7 Measurement of the elements of financial statements
Measurement: the process of determining the monetary amounts at which the elements of the
financial statements are to be recognised and carried in the statement of financial position and
Key term
statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
To measure the elements in the financial statements, the entity should select an appropriate
measurement basis. There are four measurement bases defined in the Conceptual Framework.
Historical cost: assets are recorded at the amount of cash or cash equivalents paid or the fair
value of the consideration given to acquire them at the time of their acquisition. Liabilities are
Key term
recorded at the amount of proceeds received in exchange for the obligation, or in some
circumstances (for example, income taxes), at the amounts of cash or cash equivalents expected to
be paid to satisfy the liability in the normal course of business.
Current cost: assets are carried at the amount of cash or cash equivalents that would have to be
paid if the same or an equivalent asset was acquired currently.
581
Liabilities are carried at the undiscounted amount of cash or cash equivalents that would be required
to settle the obligation currently.
Realisable (settlement) value: the amount of cash or cash equivalents that could currently be
obtained by selling an asset in an orderly disposal.
Liabilities are carried at the undiscounted amount of cash or cash equivalents expected to be paid to
satisfy the liabilities in the normal course of business.
Present value: a current estimate of the present discounted value of the future net cash flows in the
normal course of business.
Historical cost is the most commonly adopted measurement basis, but this is usually combined with
other bases, eg inventories are carried at the lower of cost and net realisable value (Conceptual
Framework: para. 4.56).
Recent standards use the concept of fair value, which is defined by IFRS 13 Fair Value
Measurement as 'the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date' (IFRS 13: Appendix A).
2.2.8 Concepts of capital and capital maintenance
What is profit?
Capital at end of year X
Add back: distributions during the year X
Less: capital injected during the year (X)
capital at beginning of year (X)
= Excess capital (ie profit) X
The concept of 'profit' earned will therefore vary depending on the capital maintenance concept
adopted (ie opening capital must be maintained and any excess by the end of the period represents
profit).
Capital maintenance
The concept of capital maintenance is concerned with how an entity defines the capital that it seeks
to maintain. It provides the linkage between the concepts of capital and the concepts of profit
because it provides the point of reference by which profit is measured (Conceptual Framework: para.
4.59).
There are two views of capital.
(a) Financial capital – a fund attributable to shareholders, represented by share capital and
reserves.
The objective of financial capital maintenance is to maintain shareholders' wealth either
in nominal terms or in real terms, ie maintaining the monetary value of capital and reserves.
Profit is only earned if, after excluding dividends and owner-contributions, the financial value
of closing net assets is greater than the financial value of opening net assets (Conceptual
Framework: para. 4.59).
(b) Operating/physical capital – operating capital is represented by non-current assets plus
inventories plus monetary working capital.
The objective of operating/physical capital maintenance is to maintain the operating
capacity of the business in terms of the assets available to it, including both physical
assets and monetary working capital (monetary current assets less monetary current liabilities).
582
Profit is only earned if, after excluding dividends and owner-contributions, the physical
productive capacity of the entity at the end of the reporting period is greater than it was at the
beginning of the reporting period (Conceptual Framework: para. 4.59).
2.3 Exposure Draft ED/2015/3: Conceptual Framework for Financial

Reporting
In May 2015, the IASB issued an exposure draft: Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting.
The exposure draft (ED) is the latest document in a project that has been ongoing since 2004. The
ED proposes comprehensive changes to the Conceptual Framework, notably:
 Revisions to the definitions of elements in the financial statements
 Guidance on derecognition
 Discussions on measurement bases
 Principles for including items in other comprehensive income (OCI)
 High-level concepts for presentation and disclosure
The ED follows a 2013 discussion paper covering all aspects of the framework project, and was
published at the same time as another ED covering references to the Conceptual Framework in other
IASB pronouncements (not on your examinable documents list).
2.3.1 Background and approach

While the existing Conceptual Framework was found to be useful in helping the IASB with its stated
mission to 'develop Standards that bring transparency, accountability and efficiency to financial
markets around the world', it was also found to be lacking in the following respects (ED/2015/3:
Summary):
Problem Solution
There are some gaps in the current Conceptual Framework, such as Fill gaps
insufficient guidance on presentation and disclosure.
Parts of the existing Conceptual Framework are out of date. An example is Update
the guidance on when assets and liabilities should be recognised.
Some of the guidance is unclear; for example regarding the role of Clarify
measurement uncertainty in deciding how to measure assets, liabilities, income
or expenses.
2.3.2 Structure
The ED proposes that the revised Conceptual Framework is structured as follows:
Chapter Topic
Introduction
1 The objective of general purpose financial reporting
2 Qualitative characteristics of useful financial information
3 Financial statements and the reporting entity
4 The elements of financial statements
5 Recognition and derecognition
6 Measurement
583
Chapter Topic
7 Presentation and disclosure
8 Concepts of capital and capital maintenance
Appendix A Cash-flow-based measurement techniques
Appendix B Glossary
2.3.3 Introduction
The ED's introduction to the Conceptual Framework states that its purpose is to:
(a) Assist the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to develop standards that
are based on consistent concepts;
(b) Assist preparers to develop consistent accounting policies when no standard
applies to a particular transaction or event, or when a standard allows a choice of
accounting policy; and
(c) Assist others [all parties] to understand and interpret the standards.
(ED/2015/3: para. IN1)
The Conceptual Framework is not an IFRS, nor does it override any specific IFRS. If the
IASB decides to issue a new or revised pronouncement that is in conflict with the Conceptual
Framework, the IASB will highlight the fact and explain the reasons for the departure.
2.3.4 Chapter 1: The objective of general purpose financial reporting
This chapter (ED/2015/3: paras. 1.2, 1.12), together with Chapter 2, was finalised in the 2010
version of the Conceptual Framework, and so there are only limited changes from that version.
The main change is that more emphasis is placed on the importance of providing information needed
to assess management's stewardship of an entity's resources.
2.3.5 Chapter 2: Qualitative characteristics of useful financial information
This Chapter, together with Chapter 1, was finalised in the 2010 version of the Conceptual
Framework, and so there are generally only limited changes from that version. However, one change
that could be regarded as important is the introduction of an explicit reference to the idea of
prudence. Prudence is described as 'the exercise of caution when making judgements
under conditions of uncertainty' (ED/2015/3: para. 2.18). It is explicitly stated that prudence
is important in achieving neutrality, and therefore in achieving faithful representation
(ED/2015/3: para. 2.18). Prudence had been removed from the Conceptual Framework in 2010.
The IASB has further clarified that prudence works both ways: assets and liabilities should be neither
overstated nor understated.
Another key change is to the explanation of faithful representation (ED/2015/3: para. 2.19). The
chapter contains a proposed addition that would clarify that faithful representation means
representation of the substance of an economic phenomenon instead of
representation of merely its legal form.
2.3.6 Chapter 3: Financial statements and the reporting entity
This chapter is not in the current version of the Conceptual Framework, and is based on the feedback
received on a 2010 Exposure Draft on the topic.
The ED states the objective of financial statements as being to provide information about an entity's
assets, liabilities, equity, income and expenses that is useful to financial statements users in assessing
the prospects for future net cash inflows to the entity and in assessing management's stewardship of
584
the entity's resources. It then sets out the going concern assumption, which is unchanged from the
current version.
Definition of the reporting entity
A reporting entity is 'an entity that chooses, or is required, to prepare general purpose financial
statements' (ED/2015/3: para. 3.11). However, the definition is not confined to legal entities only.
A reporting entity could be a group of entities, or it could be just a part of an entity (ED/2015/3:
para. 3.12).
Boundary of the reporting entity
The ED proposes to determine the boundary of a reporting entity that has one or more subsidiaries
on the basis of control. The boundary can be determined by either direct control, which results in
unconsolidated or individual financial statements or by direct and indirect control, which
results in consolidated financial statements (ED/2015/3: paras. 3.13–3.16).
The IASB has produced the following diagram (IASB, Snapshot: Conceptual Framework for Financial
Reporting, p10), to show the approach:
Reporting entity
direct
direct and Parent
control
indirect
control
Subsidiary
consolidated financial statements unconsolidated financial statements

Consolidated financial statements, according to the ED, are generally more likely to provide useful
information to users than unconsolidated financial statements. If an entity prepares both, the
unconsolidated financial statements must disclose how users may obtain the consolidated financial
statements.
2.3.7 Chapter 4: The elements of financial statements
The elements of financial statements are, as in the existing Conceptual Framework, assets, liabilities,
equity, income and expenses. However, the definitions have been modified.
The current definitions of assets and liabilities require a probable expectation of future economic
benefits or resource inflow/outflow. The IASB argues that the definitions of assets and liabilities
should not require an expected or probable inflow or outflow as it should be sufficient
that a resource or obligation can produce or result in a transfer of economic benefits. The new
definitions place more emphasis on the fact that an asset is a resource and a liability is an obligation
(IASB, Snapshot: Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting, p5). In addition, the notion of
probability will be removed from the definitions.
The proposed definitions are
 'An asset is a present economic resource controlled by the entity as a result of past events.'
(ED/2015/3: para. 4.4)
 'A liability is a present obligation of the entity to transfer an economic resource as a result of
past events.' (ED/2015/3: para. 4.4)
 'An economic resource is a right that has the potential to produce economic benefits.'
(ED/2015/3: para. 4.4)
 '[A] present obligation [is an obligation] to transfer economic resources [that]:
(a) The entity has no practical ability to avoid …; and
585
(b) …has arisen from [a] past event… [(ie economic benefits already received or activities
already conducted).] (ED/2015/3: para. 4.31)
For the definitions of both assets and liabilities, the IASB decided not to retain the notion of an
'expected inflow or outflow of resources' in acknowledgement of concerns about varied
interpretations of the term 'expected' and the notion of a threshold level of probability.
Equity continues to be defined as 'the residual interest in the assets of the entity after deducting all
its liabilities' (ED/2015/3: para. 4.4). It should be noted that while the 2013 Discussion
Paper addressed problems that arise in classifying instruments with characteristics
of both liabilities and equity, the ED does not do so. Exploring those problems has been
transferred to the IASB's research project on financial instruments with the characteristics of equity.
Income and expenses are defined in the ED as follows:
'Income is increases in assets or decreases in liabilities that result in increases in equity, other than
those relating to contributions from holders of equity claims' (ED/2015/3: para. 4.4).
'Expenses are decreases in assets or increases in liabilities that result in decreases in equity, other
than those relating to distributions to holders of equity claims' (ED/2015/3: para. 4.4).
2.3.8 Chapter 5: Recognition and derecognition
Recognition
Recognition is the process of capturing an element for inclusion in the statement of financial
position or statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income (ED/2015/3: para. 5.2). The
ED states that 'only items that meet the definition of an asset, a liability or equity are recognised in
the statement of financial position, and only items that meet the definition of income or expenses are
to be recognised in the statement(s) of financial performance' (ED/2015/3: para. 5.7).
The ED requires that recognition criteria, based on the qualitative characteristics of useful
financial information, must be met. The recognition criteria are as follows
'An entity recognises an asset or liability … if such recognition provides users of the financial
statements with:
(a) Relevant information about the asset or liability…;
(b) A faithful representation of the asset or liability and of any income and
expenses…; and
(c) Information that results in benefits exceeding the cost of providing that
information…'
(ED/2015/3: para. 5.9)
If it is not certain whether an asset or liability exists, or there is only a low probability of
inflows/outflows associated with the asset/liability, then these criteria may not be met. Additionally,
sometimes the level of uncertainty in measuring the asset/liability means that the information
provided will not be relevant to users, in which case the asset or liability will not be recognised
(ED/2015/3: para. 5.13).
Whether the information provided is useful to users depends on the item and the specific facts and
circumstances. Entities may also be required to exercise judgement, and recognition may vary,
depending on the IFRS being applied (ED/2015/3: para. 5.14).
Derecognition
Guidance on derecognition is new to this proposed version of the Conceptual Framework. The
guidance is driven by the requirement of faithful representation. A faithful
representation must be provided of:
586
'(a) The assets and liabilities retained after a transaction or other event that led to
derecognition; and
(b) The change in the entity's assets and liabilities as a result of that
transaction or other event.' (ED/2015/3: para. 5.26).
Decisions about derecognition are generally straightforward. However, in some cases the two aims
described above conflict with each other, making the decisions more difficult. The discussion in the
Exposure Draft focuses on these cases.
2.3.9 Chapter 6: Measurement
The guidance on measurement is an example of filling in gaps present in the existing Conceptual
Framework. While developing the ED, the IASB considered whether the Conceptual Framework
should advocate the use of a single measurement basis. Considering the different assets and
liabilities being measured, relevance and the cost constraint, the Board eventually concluded that a
multiple measurement approach is more appropriate.
The ED covers the following (ED/2015/3: paras. 6.4–6.47):
(a) A description of various measurement bases, the information that these measurement
bases provide and their advantages and disadvantages. The measurement bases are historical
cost and current value measures (fair value and value in use/fulfilment value);
(b) Factors to consider when selecting a measurement basis (cost constraint, relevance, faithful
representation, enhancing qualitative characteristics, and factors specific to initial
measurement);
(c) Situations when more than one measurement basis provides relevant information.
Consideration of the objective of financial reporting, the qualitative characteristics of useful
financial information and the cost constraint are likely to result in the selection of different
measurement bases for different assets, liabilities and items of income and expense; and
(d) Measurement of equity.
Appendix A of the ED supplements this chapter, and describes cash-flow-based measurement
techniques for cases when a measure determined using a measurement basis cannot be observed
(ED/2015/3: paras. A1–A10).
2.3.10 Chapter 7: Presentation and disclosure
This chapter discusses concepts that determine what information is included in the financial
statements and how that information should be presented and disclosed. These concepts are
intended to guide the IASB in setting presentation and disclosure requirements in individual standards
and to guide entities in providing information in financial statements.
Concepts and principles discussed in the ED
The ED discusses the following issues (ED/2015/3: paras. 7.16–7.18):
(a) The balance between entities' flexibility to provide relevant information that faithfully
represents the entity's assets and liabilities and the transactions and other events of the period,
and comparability among entities and across reporting periods.
(b) Entity-specific information is more useful than boilerplate language for efficient and effective
communication.
(c) Duplication of information in various sections of the financial statements is unnecessary and
makes financial statements less understandable.
Profit or loss and OCI
This part of the ED (ED/2015/3: paras. 7.19–7.27) discusses presentation disclosure in the
statement of financial performance, and provides conceptual guidance on whether to present income
and expenses in profit or loss or in OCI.
587
Both profit or loss and other comprehensive income would be retained and marked by subtotals or
totals.
The ED states that 'the purpose of the statement of profit or loss is to depict the return an entity has
made on its economic resources during the period and to provide information that is helpful in
assessing future cash flows and … management's stewardship of the entity's resources' (ED/2015/3
para. 7.20). By default, therefore, all income and expense will be shown in profit or loss
unless relating to the remeasurement of assets and liabilities – these would normally be
shown in OCI.
The ED presumes that items recognised in OCI will be reclassified to profit or loss in a later period.
The 'later period' is based on when that reclassification will provide relevant information to users. If it
isn't clear when this 'later period' should be, then that is an indication that perhaps the item shouldn't
be included in OCI in the first place (ED/2015/3 paras. 7.27–7.27).
2.3.11 Chapter 8: Concepts of capital and capital maintenance

This chapter comprises material carried forward from Chapter 4 of the existing Conceptual
Framework with minor changes for consistency of terminology.
3 IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements

Below are current IAS 1 formats for the statement of financial position, statement of changes in equity
and statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income (IAS 1: Illustrative Guidance Part 1).
3.1 Format of the statement of financial position

XYZ GROUP
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AT 31 DECEMBER
20X7 20X6
Assets $'000 $'000
Non-current assets
Goodwill 80,800 91,200
Other intangible assets 227,470 227,470
Investments in associates 100,150 110,770
Investments in equity instruments 142,500 156,000
901,620 945,460
Current assets
Other current assets 25,650 12,540
Cash and cash equivalents 312,400 322,900
564,880 578,740
Total assets 1,466,500 1,524,200

Other components of equity 10,200 21,200
903,700 782,900
Total equity 973,750 831,500
588
20X7 20X6
Long-term borrowings 120,000 160,000
Deferred tax 28,800 26,040
Long-term provisions 28,850 52,240
Total non-current liabilities 177,650 238,280
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 115,100 187,620
Short-term borrowings 150,000 200,000
Current portion of long-term borrowings 10,000 20,000
Current tax payable 35,000 42,000
Short-term provisions 5,000 4,800
Total current liabilities 315,100 454,420
Total liabilities 492,750 692,700
Total equity and liabilities 1,466,500 1,524,200
3.2 Format of the statement of changes in equity

XYZ GROUP
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X7
Translation Investments Cash
Share Retained of foreign in equity flow Revaluation Total
capital earnings operations instruments hedges surplus Total NCI equity
Balance at $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000
1 January 600,000 118,100 (4,000) 1,600 2,000 – 717,700 29,800 747,500
20X6
Changes in
accounting
policy – 400 – – – – 400 100 500
Restated
balance 600,000 118,500 (4,000) 1,600 2,000 – 718,100 29,900 748,000
Changes
in equity
for 20X6
Dividends – (10,000) – – – – (10,000) – (10,000)
Total
comprehensive
income for the
year – 53,200 6,400 16,000 (2,400) 1,600 74,800 18,700 93,500
Balance at
31 December
20X6 600,000 161,700 2,400 17,600 (400) 1,600 782,900 48,600 831,500
Changes in
equity for
20X7
Issue of share
capital 50,000 – – – – – 50,000 – 50,000
Dividends – (15,000) – – – – (15,000) – (15,000)
Total
comprehensive
income for the
year – 96,600 3,200 (14,400) (400) 800 85,800 21,450 107,250
Transfer to
retained
earnings – 200 – – – (200) – – –
Balance at
31 December
20X7 650,000 243,500 5,600 3,200 (800) 2,200 903,700 70,050 973,750
589
3.3 Format of the statement of profit or loss and other

Note. This example illustrates the classification of expenses within profit or loss by function. The
important aspect to focus on is the treatment of other comprehensive income (IAS 1: IG).
XYZ GROUP
20X7 20X6
$'000 $'000
Revenue 390,000 355,000
Cost of sales (245,000) (230,000)
Gross profit 145,000 125,000
Other income 20,667 11,300
Distribution costs (9,000) (8,700)
Administrative expenses (20,000) (21,000)
Other expenses (2,100) (1,200)
Finance costs (8,000) (7,500)
Share of profit of associates 35,100 30,100
Income tax expense (40,417) (32,000)
Profit for the year from continuing operations 121,250 96,000
Loss for the year from discontinued operations – (30,500)

Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss:
Gains on property revaluation 933 3,367
Investments in equity instruments (24,000) 26,667
Remeasurements of defined benefit pension plans (667) 1,333
Share of other comprehensive income of associates 400 (700)
Income tax relating to items that will not be reclassified 5,834 (7,667)
(17,500) 23,000
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:
Exchange differences on translating foreign operations 5,334 10,667
Cash flow hedges (667) (4,000)
Income tax relating to items that may be reclassified (1,167) (1,667)
3,500 5,000
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax (14,000) 28,000
Total comprehensive income for the year 107,250 93,500

Owners of the parent 97,000 52,400
121,250 65,500
590
20X7 20X6
$'000 $'000
Owners of the parent 85,800 74,800
107,250 93,500
Earnings per share ($)

Basic and diluted 0.46 0.30
Alternatively, items could be presented in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive
income net of tax (with the breakdown disclosed in a note).
3.4 Presentation of items of OCI

IAS 1 para. 82A deals with the presentation of items contained in OCI and their classification within
OCI.
3.4.1 The issue
The blurring of distinctions between different items in OCI is the result of an underlying general
lack of agreement among users and preparers about which items should be presented in
OCI and which should be part of the profit or loss section. For instance, a common misunderstanding
is that the split between profit or loss and OCI is on the basis of realised versus unrealised gains. This
is not, and has never been, the case.
This lack of a consistent basis for determining how items should be presented led to the somewhat
inconsistent use of OCI in financial statements.
3.4.2 Current rules
Entities are required to group items presented in OCI on the basis of whether they would be
reclassified to (recycled through) profit or loss at a later date, when specified conditions are met
(IAS 1: para. 82A).
3.5 Other aspects of IAS 1

You should note the following further aspects of IAS 1.
3.5.1 Fair presentation
Guidance is provided on the meaning of present fairly: '[represent faithfully] …the effects of
transactions and other events…in accordance with the definitions and recognition criteria for assets,
liabilities, income and expenses as set out in the [Conceptual] Framework' (IAS 1: para. 15).
Fair presentation is achieved if IFRSs are appropriately applied and additional disclosure is given
when it is necessary (IAS 1: para. 15).
However, very rarely, management may come to the conclusion that complying with an IFRS
requirement would be 'so misleading that it would conflict with the objective of financial statements
set out in the Framework' (IAS 1: para. 19). If so, and if local laws and regulations permit, the entity
can depart from that IFRS requirement, as long it 'disclos[es]:
(a) That management has concluded that the financial statements present fairly the entity's
financial position, financial performance and cash flows;
(b) That it has complied with applicable IFRSs except that it has departed from a particular
requirement to achieve a fair presentation;
(c) [Full details of the departure]; and
591
(d) … the financial effect of the departure on each item in the financial statements that would have
been reported in complying with the requirement.'
(IAS 1: para. 20)
However, when local law prohibits departure from the requirement, then the entity should make
disclosures which will reduce the perceived misleading effects of complying. These include the details
of why management believe it to be misleading and adjustments showing what they believe is
necessary to fairly present the information (IAS 1: para. 23).
3.5.2 Non-current vs current

An entity must present current and non-current assets, and current and non-current
liabilities, as separate classifications in the statement of financial position. A presentation
based on liquidity should only be used where it provides more relevant and reliable information, in
which case, all assets and liabilities shall be presented broadly in order of liquidity (IAS 1:
para. 60).
A financial liability due to be settled within 12 months of the year end date should be
classified as a current liability, even if the original term was for more than 12 months, and an
agreement to refinance, or to reschedule payments, on a long-term basis is completed after the
reporting period and before the financial statements are authorised for issue (IAS 1: para. 72).
Year end Agreement to Date financial Settlement date

refinance on long- statements <12 months after
term basis authorised for issue year end
A long-term loan that becomes payable on demand because the entity breached a
condition of its loan agreement should be classified as current at the year end even if the lender
has agreed after the year end, and before the financial statements are authorised for issue,
not to demand payment as a consequence of the breach (IAS 1: para. 74).
Condition of loan Year end Lender agrees not to Date financial

agreement enforce payment statements approved
breached. Long-term resulting from for issue
liability becomes breach
payable on demand
However, if the lender has agreed by the year end to provide a period of grace ending at
least 12 months after the year end within which the entity can rectify the breach and during
that time the lender cannot demand immediate repayment, the liability is classified as non-current
(IAS 1: para. 75).
3.5.3 Judgements made and measurement uncertainty
An entity must disclose, in the summary of significant accounting policies and/or other notes, the
judgements made by management in applying the accounting policies that have the most
significant effect on the amounts of items recognised in the financial statements (IAS 1:
para. 117).
An entity must disclose in the notes information regarding key assumptions about the future,
and other major sources of measurement (estimation) uncertainty, that have a significant
risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the
next financial year (IAS 1: para. 125).
592
4 IFRS 15 examples
Illustration 1
Identifying separate performance obligations
Office Solutions, a limited company, has developed a communications software package called
CommSoft. Office Solutions has entered into a contract with Logisticity to supply the following:
(a) Licence to use CommSoft
(b) Installation service – this may require an upgrade to the computer operating system, but the
software package does not need to be customised
(c) Technical support for three years
(d) Three years of updates for CommSoft
Office Solutions is not the only company able to install CommSoft, and the technical support can also
be provided by other companies. The software can function without the updates and technical
support.
Required
Explain whether the goods or services provided to Logisticity are distinct in accordance with IFRS 15
Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
Solution
CommSoft was delivered before the other goods or services and remains functional without the
updates and the technical support. It may be concluded that Logisticity can benefit from each of the
goods and services either on their own or together with the other goods and services that are readily
available.
The promises to transfer each good and service to the customer are separately identifiable. In
particular, the installation service does not significantly modify the software itself and, as such, the
software and the installation service are separate outputs promised by Office Solutions rather than
inputs used to produce a combined output.
In conclusion, the goods and services are distinct and amount to four performance obligations in the
contract under IFRS 15, and revenue from each would be recognised as each performance
obligation is satisfied.
Illustration 2
Determining transaction price
Taplop supplies laptop computers to large businesses. On 1 October 20X5, Taplop entered into a
contract with TrillCo, under which TrillCo was to purchase laptops at $500 per unit. The contract
states that if TrillCo purchases more than 500 laptops in 12 months of the contract, the price per unit
is reduced retrospectively to $450 per unit. Taplop's year end is 31 December.
(a) As at 31 December 20X5, TrillCo had bought 70 laptops from Taplop. Taplop therefore
estimated that TrillCo's purchases would not exceed 500 in the 12 months to 30 September
20X6, and would therefore not be entitled to the volume discount.
(b) During the quarter ended 31 March 20X6, TrillCo expanded rapidly, and purchased an
additional 250 laptops from Taplop. Taplop then estimated that TrillCo's purchases would
exceed the threshold for the volume discount for the 12 months to 30 September 20X6.
593
Required
Calculate the revenue Taplop would recognise in:
(a) The quarter ended 31 December 20X5
(b) The quarter ended 31 March 20X6.
Solution
(a) Applying the requirements of IFRS 15 to TrillCo's purchasing pattern at 31 December 20X5,
Taplop should conclude that it was highly probable that a significant reversal in the cumulative
amount of revenue recognised ($500 per laptop) would not occur when the uncertainty was
resolved, that is when the total amount of purchases was known. Consequently, Taplop should
recognise revenue of 70 × $500 = $35,000 for the first quarter ended 31 December 20X5.
(b) In the quarter ended 31 March 20X6, TrillCo's purchasing pattern changed such that it
would be legitimate for Taplop to conclude that TrillCo's purchases would exceed the
threshold for the volume discount in 12 months to 30 September 20X6, and therefore that it
was appropriate to reduce the price to $450 per laptop. Taplop should therefore recognise
revenue of $109,000 for the quarter ended 31 March 20X6. The amount is calculated
as from $112,500 (250 laptops × $450) less the change in transaction price of $3,500
(70 laptops × $50 price reduction) for the reduction of the price of the laptops sold in the
quarter ended 31 December 20X5.
Illustration 3
Principal vs agent considerations
This example is adapted from the standard (IFRS 15: illustrative example 45)
Fancy Goods Co (FG) operates a website that enables customers to purchase goods from a range of
suppliers. The suppliers set the price that is to be charged and deliver directly to the customers, who
have paid in advance. FG's website facilitates payment by customers and the entity is entitled to
commission of 5% of the sales price.
FG has no further obligation to the customer after arranging for the products to be supplied.
Required
Discuss whether FG is a principal or an agent.
Solution
The following points are relevant:
 The supplier is primarily responsible for fulfilling a customer order rather than FG; FG is not
obliged to provide goods if the supplier fails to deliver to the customer.
 FG does not have inventory risk at any time, as it does not deal with inventories at all.
 FG does not establish prices.
FG is therefore acting as an agent and should recognise revenue equal to the amounts received as
commission.

Caravans Deluxe is a retailer of caravans, dormer vans and mobile homes, with a year end of
31 July. It is having trouble selling one model – the $30,000 Mini-Lux – and so is offering incentives
for customers who buy this model before 31 May 20X7:
594
(a) Customers buying this model before 31 May 20X7 will receive a period of interest free credit,
provided they pay a non-refundable deposit of $3,000, an instalment of $15,000 on
1 August 20X7 and the balance of $12,000 on 31 July 20X9.
(b) A year's service plan for the caravan, normally worth $1,500, is included free in the price of
the caravan.
On 1 May 20X7, a customer agrees to buy a Mini-Lux caravan, paying the deposit of $3,000.
Delivery is arranged for 1 August 20X7.
As the sale has now been made, the Managing Director of Caravans Deluxe wishes to recognise the
full sale price of the caravan, $30,000, in the accounts for the year ended 31 July 20X7.
Required
Show how the transaction is treated for the years ended 31 July 20X7 and 31 July 20X8. Assume a
10% discount rate. Show the journal entries for this treatment.
Solution
595
Activity answers

The Managing Director wishes to recognise the sale as early as possible. However, following
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers, revenue from the sale should only be recognised
when the performance obligations in the contract have been satisfied.
Performance obligations in the contract
The contract contains a promise to deliver the caravan and a promise to deliver additional services
free of charge. These are distinct promises and therefore the contract contains two performance
obligations.
Transaction price
The transaction price is made up of three elements.
A significant financing component must be considered where consideration is received more than
12 months before or after the date on which revenue is recognised (being the delivery date,
1 August 20X7). Therefore, the payment on 31 July 20X9 must be discounted to present value at
1 August 20X7.
$
Deposit 3,000
Payment on 1 August 20X7 (the delivery date) 15,000
Payment on 31 July 20X9 ($12,000/1.1 )
2
9,917
27,917
Allocation to performance obligations

The transaction price is allocated based on stand-alone selling prices:
Caravan $27,917  30,000/31,500 $26,588
Free servicing $27,917  1,500/31,500 $1,329
Recognition of revenue
The two performance obligations are satisfied at different points in time: the delivery of the caravan
on 1 August 20X7, and the servicing over the year to 31 July 20X8. Therefore, the revenue for the
caravan is recognised on 1 August 20X7, and the revenue for the servicing recognised over the
following year.
Year ended 31 July 20X7
Journal entries are as follows:
1 May 20X7
The receipt of cash in the form of the $3,000 deposit is recognised on receipt as a contract liability
(deferred income) in the statement of financial position by:
DEBIT Bank $3,000
CREDIT Contract liability (deferred income) $3,000
596

Journal entries are as follows:
1 August 20X7
Revenue is recognised together with payment of the $15,000. The contract liability is transferred to
revenue:
DEBIT Bank $15,000
DEBIT Contract liability $3,000
DEBIT Receivable $8,588
Interest accrued on receivable for period 1 August 20X7 – 31 July 20X8:
DEBIT Receivable (8,588  10%) $859
CREDIT Interest income $859
Satisfaction of performance obligation for servicing on 31 July 20X8:
DEBIT Receivable (1,329  1.1) $1,462
(needs to be recognised compounded up one year as was previously measured at 1 August 20X7)
Tutorial note
Here are the entries for the final year of the contract (proving that the receivable is fully eliminated).

Interest accrued on receivable for period 1 August 20X8 – 31 July 20X9:
DEBIT Receivable
((8,588 + 859 + 1,462 = 10,909)  10%) $1,091
CREDIT Interest income $1,091
Cash receipt on 31 July 20X9:
DEBIT Bank $12,000
CREDIT Receivable $12,000
This eliminates the remaining receivable of $12,000 (10,909 + 1,091)
597
598
Professional and
ethical duty of the
accountant
599
1 Influences on ethics
1.1 Individual influences
1.1.1 Age and gender
Although some evidence suggests that the ways in which men and women respond to ethical
dilemmas may differ, empirical studies do not clearly show whether men or women can be
considered as more ethical. Similarly, although different age groups have been influenced by
different experiences, again empirical evidence does not suggest that certain age groups are more
moral than others.
1.1.2 National and cultural beliefs

By contrast national and cultural beliefs seem to have a significant effect on ethical beliefs, shaping
what individuals regard as acceptable business issues.
1.1.3 Education and employment

There does appear to be some differences in ethical decision-making between those with different
educational and professional experiences.
1.1.4 Psychological factors

Psychological factors are concerned with the ways in which people think, and hence decide what
is the morally right or wrong course of action. Discussion has centred on cognitive
moral development (see 1.2.2) and locus of control.
1.1.5 Locus of control

The locus of control is how much influence individuals believe they have over the course of
their own lives. Individuals with a high internal locus believe that they can shape their own lives
significantly, whereas those with external locus believe that their lives will be shaped by
circumstances or luck.
1.1.6 Personal integrity

Integrity can be defined as adhering to moral principles or values. Its ethical consequences are
potentially very significant, for example in deciding whether to whistleblow on questionable
practice at work, despite pressure from colleagues or superiors or negative consequences of doing
so. However, evidence of its importance is limited because strangely it has not been included in
many ethical decision models.
1.1.7 Moral imagination

Moral imagination is the level of awareness individuals have about the variety of moral
consequences of what they do, how creatively they reflect on ethical dilemmas. The consequences of
having a wide moral imagination could be an ability to see beyond the conventional organisational
responses to moral difficulties, and formulate different solutions. Again, there is little research on this
subject, but differing levels of moral imagination would seem to be a plausible reason why
individuals with the same work background view moral problems in different ways.
600
1.2 Situational influences

The reason for considering situational influences on moral decision-making is that individuals appear
to have 'multiple ethical selves' – they make different decisions in different circumstances. These
circumstances might include:
(a) Issue-related factors – nature of issue and how it is viewed in the organisation
(b) Context-related factors – expectations & demands that will be placed on people working in an
organisation (eg systems of reward, authority, bureaucracy, work roles, organisational
culture).
1.2.1 Should you consider the consequences of your actions when making ethical
decisions?
One view is that society is best served by everyone following certain ethical rules, and obeying them
no matter what the results are. The argument is that people will undermine society if they disobey the
ethical rules, even if they do so with the intention of avoiding adverse consequences. This viewpoint,
known as deontological ethics, was developed by Kant.
The opposing viewpoint is that you cannot divorce an action from its consequences, and when taking
ethical decisions you must take account of what the consequences will be. This viewpoint is known as
teleological ethics. If you take this viewpoint, that implies that you have to define what the best
possible consequences are. The different variations of the teleological viewpoint try to do this.
1.2.2 What thought processes do people use when making ethical decisions?
What the theories are aiming to do is to complete the following sentence:
'You should act ethically because …'
Kohlberg (1981) supplied various examples of thought processes, depending on the degree of
ethical development of the individual.
 People who are less ethically developed may think: 'You should act ethically because you'll be
punished if you don't.'
 People who have more advanced ethical development may think: 'You should act ethically
because your country's laws say you should.'
 People at the highest level of ethical development may think: 'You should act ethically because
it's always right to do so, no matter what the consequences and costs are to you personally.'
2 Social responsibility and businesses

Arguably, institutions like hospitals, schools and so forth exist because health care and education are
seen to be desirable social objectives by government at large, if they can be afforded.
However, where does this leave businesses? How far is it reasonable, or even appropriate, for
businesses to exercise 'social responsibility' by giving to charities, voluntarily imposing strict
environmental objectives on themselves and so forth?
One school of thought would argue that the management of a business has only one
social responsibility, which is to maximise wealth for its shareholders. There are two
reasons to support this argument.
(a) If the business is owned by the shareholders the assets of the company are, ultimately, the
shareholders' property. Management has no moral right to dispose of business assets (like
cash) on non-business objectives, as this has the effect of reducing the return available to
shareholders. The shareholders might, for example, disagree with management's choice of
beneficiary. Anyhow, it is for the shareholders to determine how their money should be spent.
601
(b) A second justification for this view is that management's job is to maximise wealth, as this is
the best way that society can benefit from a business's activities.
(i) Maximising wealth has the effect of increasing the tax revenues available to the State to
disburse on socially desirable objectives.
(ii) Maximising wealth for the few is sometimes held to have a 'trickle down' effect on the
disadvantaged members of society.
(iii) Many company shares are owned by pension funds, whose ultimate beneficiaries may
not be the wealthy anyway.
This argument rests on certain assumptions.
(a) The first assumption is, in effect, the opposite of the stakeholder view. In other words, it is held
that the rights of legal ownership are paramount over all other interests in a business: while
other stakeholders have an interest, they have few legal or moral rights over the wealth
created.
(b) The second assumption is that a business's only relationship with the wider social environment
is an economic one. After all, that is what businesses exist for, and any other activities are the
role of the State.
(c) The defining purpose of business organisations is the maximisation of the wealth of their
owners.
3 Managing ethics within organisations

Two possible approaches can be identified with regard to managing ethics within organisation.
3.1 Compliance-based approach

A compliance-based approach is primarily designed to ensure that the company acts within the letter
of the law, and that violations are prevented, detected and punished. Some organisations, faced
with the legal consequences of unethical behaviour take legal precautions such as those below:
 Compliance procedures
 Audits of contracts
 Systems for employees to inform superiors about criminal misconduct without fear of retribution
 Disciplinary procedures
Corporate compliance is limited in that it refers only to the law, but legal compliance is not an
adequate means for addressing the full range of ethical issues that arise every day (Paine, 1994).
An example of the difference between the legality and ethicality of a practice is the sale in some
countries of defective products without appropriate warnings. Paine (1994) highlights that
'companies engaged in international business often discover that conduct that infringes on
recognised standards of human rights and decency is legally permissible in some jurisdictions.'
The compliance approach also overemphasises the threat of detection and punishment in order to
channel appropriate behaviour. Arguably, some employers view compliance programmes as an
insurance policy for senior management, who can cover the tracks of their arbitrary management
practices. After all, some performance targets are impossible to achieve without cutting corners:
managers can escape responsibility by blaming the employee for not following the compliance
programme, when to do so would have meant a failure to reach target.
Furthermore, mere compliance with the law is no guide to exemplary behaviour.
3.2 Integrity-based programmes

It should be clear to you from the following quotation that an integrity-based approach to ethics treats
ethics as an issue of organisation culture.
602
'An integrity-based approach combines a concern for the law with an emphasis on
managerial responsibility for ethical behaviour. Integrity strategies strive to define
companies' guiding values, aspirations and patterns of thought and conduct. When integrated
into the day-to-day operations of an organisation, such strategies can help prevent damaging
ethical lapses, while tapping into powerful human impulses for moral thought and action.'
(Paine, 1994)
Ethics management therefore has several tasks:
 To define and give life to an organisation's defining values
 To create an environment that supports ethically sound behaviour
 To instil a sense of shared accountability amongst employees

Briefly explain the main ethical issues that are involved in the following situations.
(a) Dealing with a repressive authoritarian government abroad
(b) An aggressive advertising campaign
(c) Employee redundancies
(d) Payments or gifts to officials who have the power to help or hinder the payees' operations
603
Activity answer
(a) Dealing with repressive authoritarian governments can be supported on the grounds that it
contributes to economic growth and prosperity and all the benefits they bring to
society in both countries concerned. This is a consequentialist argument. It can also be
opposed on consequentialist grounds as contributing to the continuation of the
regime, and on deontological grounds as fundamentally repugnant.
(b) Honesty in advertising is an important problem. Many products are promoted exclusively on
image. Deliberately creating the impression that purchasing a particular product will enhance
the happiness, success and appeal of the buyer can be attacked as dishonest. It can be
defended on the grounds that the supplier is actually selling a fantasy or dream rather
than a physical article.
(c) Dealings with employees are coloured by the opposing views of corporate
responsibility and individual rights. The idea of a job as property to be defended has
now disappeared from labour relations in many countries, but corporate decisions that lead to
redundancies are still deplored. This is because of the obvious impact of sudden
unemployment on aspirations and living standards, even when the employment
market is buoyant. Nevertheless businesses have to consider the cost of employing labour as
well as its productive capacity.
(d) The main problems with payments or gifts to officials are making distinction between those that
should never be made, and those that can be made in certain cultural circumstances.
(i) Extortion. Foreign officials have been known to threaten companies with the complete
closure of their local operations unless suitable payments are made.
(ii) Bribery. This is payments for services to which a company is not legally entitled. There
are some fine distinctions to be drawn; for example, some managers regard political
contributions as bribery.
(iii) Grease money. Multinational companies are sometimes unable to obtain services to
which they are legally entitled because of deliberate stalling by local officials. Cash
payments to the right people may then be enough to oil the machinery of bureaucracy.
(iv) Gifts. In some cultures (such as Japan) gifts are regarded as an essential part of
civilised negotiation, even in circumstances where to other cultures they might appear
ethically dubious. Managers operating in such a culture may feel at liberty to adopt the
local customs.
604
Non-current assets
605
1 Property, plant and equipment (IAS 16)

1.1 Revision activities
Use these revision activities to test your knowledge of IAS 16.
Activity 1: Revaluation surplus

Binkie Co has an item of land carried in its books at $13,000. Two years ago a slump in land
values led the company to reduce the carrying value from $15,000. This was taken as an expense in
profit or loss for the year. There has been a surge in land prices in the current year, however, and
the land is now worth $20,000.
Required
What is the double entry to account for the revaluation?
Activity 2: Revaluation decrease

Binkie Co has an item of land carried in its books. The original cost was $15,000, revalued
upwards to $20,000 two years ago. The value has now fallen to $13,000.
Required
What is the double entry to account for the revaluation decrease?
Activity 3: Revaluation and depreciation

Crinckle Co bought an asset for $10,000 at the beginning of 20X6. It had a useful life of five years.
On 1 January 20X8 the asset was revalued to $12,000. The expected useful life has remained
unchanged (ie three years remain). Crinckle Co has an accounting policy to transfer permitted
amounts from the revaluation surplus to retained earnings in accordance with IAS 16.
Required
Explain how Crinckle Co should account for the asset for the remainder of its useful life.
Activity 4: Self-constructed asset

Omega is a listed company which prepares financial statements in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
On 1 October 20X2, Omega purchased some land for $10m (including legal costs of $1m) in order
to construct a new factory. Construction work commenced on 1 November 20X2. Omega incurred
the following costs in connection with its construction:
 Preparation and levelling of the land – $300,000
 Purchase of materials for the construction – $6.08m in total
 Employment costs of the construction workers – $200,000 per month
 Overhead costs incurred directly on the construction of the factory – $100,000 per month
606
 Ongoing overhead costs allocated to the construction project using Omega's normal overhead
allocation model – $50,000 per month
 Income received during the temporary use of the factory premises as a car park during the
construction period – $50,000
 Costs of relocating employees to work at the new factory – $300,000
 Costs of the opening ceremony on 31 July 20X3 – $150,000
The factory was completed on 31 May 20X3 and production began on 1 August 20X3. The overall
useful life of the factory building was estimated at 40 years from the date of completion. However, it
is estimated that the roof will need to be replaced 20 years after the date of completion and that the
cost of replacing the roof at current prices would be 30% of the total cost of the building. At the end
of the 40-year period Omega has a legally enforceable obligation to demolish the factory and
restore the site to its original condition. The directors estimate that the cost of demolition in 40 years'
time (based on prices prevailing at that time) will be $20m. An annual risk adjusted discount rate
which is appropriate to this project is 8%. The present value of $1 payable in 40 years' time at an
annual discount rate of 8% is 4.6 cents.
The construction of the factory was partly financed by a loan of $17.5m taken out on 1 October
20X2. The loan was at an annual rate of interest of 6%. During the period 1 October 20X2 to
28 February 20X3 (when the loan proceeds had been fully utilised to finance the construction),
Omega received investment income of $100,000 on the temporary investment of the proceeds.
Required
Compute the carrying amount of the factory in the statement of financial position of Omega at
30 September 20X3. You should explain your treatment of all the amounts referred to in your
answer.
1.2 Componentisation of assets

Large and complex assets are often made up of a number of components of smaller assets which
each have different useful lives and wear out at different rates. For example a building may have a
useful life of 50 years but the lift within that building may be expected to last for 15 years. IAS 16
requires that the component parts of such assets are capitalised and depreciated separately.
Parts of some items of property, plant and equipment may require replacement at regular intervals,
often as a legal requirement. IAS 16 gives examples of a furnace which may require relining after a
specified number of hours or aircraft interiors which may require replacement several times during
the life of the aircraft.
The cost of the replacement parts should be recognised in full when it is incurred and added to the
carrying amount of the asset. It should be depreciated over its useful life, which may be different from
the useful life of the other components of the asset. The carrying amount of the item being replaced,
such as the old furnace lining, should be derecognised when the replacement takes place (IAS 16:
para. 13).
607
Illustration 1
Componentisation of complex assets
An aircraft is considered to have the following components.
Cost Useful life
$'000
Fuselage 20,000 20 years
Undercarriage 5,000 500 landings
Engines 8,000 1,600 flying hours
Depreciation at the end of the first year, in which 150 flights totalling 400 hours were made,
would then be:
$'000
Fuselage 1,000
Undercarriage (5,000  150/500) 1,500
Engines (8,000  400/1,600) 2,000
4,500
1.3 Reconditioning/overhauls
Where an asset requires regular reconditioning/overhauls in order to continue to operate, the cost of
the overhaul is treated as an additional component and depreciated over the period to the next
overhaul (IAS 16: para. 14).
For example, assume that in the case of the aircraft in Illustration 1 above, an overhaul was required
at the end of year 3 and every third year thereafter at a cost of $1.2m per overhaul. The $1.2m
would be capitalised as a separate component and depreciated over the useful life of 3 years
($400,000 per annum).
1.4 Residual value
Residual value: the estimated amount that an entity would currently obtain from disposal of the
asset, after deducting the estimated costs of disposal, if the asset were already of the age and in the
Key term
condition expected at the end of its useful life.
The residual value of an asset must be reviewed at least at each financial year end (IAS 16:
para. 51). The revised estimate should be based on the market price of the asset at that date. If the
revised residual value is significantly different, the change should be accounted for prospectively as
an adjustment to future depreciation (IAS 16: para. 51).
The residual value is based on the current amount that could be obtained for the disposal of the
asset, not the amount that is expected to be obtained at the end of its useful life. This means that
future expected increases or decreases in the residual value, other than for wear and tear, will not be
taken into account.
2 Impairment of assets (IAS 36)

Use these revision activities to test your knowledge of IAS 36.
608
Activity 5: Impairment loss (1)

A company has acquired another business for $4.5m: tangible assets are valued at $4.0m and
goodwill at $0.5m.
An asset with a carrying value of $1m is destroyed in a terrorist attack. The asset was not insured.
The loss of the asset, without insurance, has prompted the company to estimate whether there has
been an impairment of assets in the acquired business and what the amount of any such loss is. The
recoverable amount of the business is measured at $3.1m.
Discuss how the impairment loss should be treated in the financial statements.

The Antimony Company acquired its head office on 1 January 20W8 at a cost of $5 million
(excluding land). Antimony's policy is to depreciate property on a straight-line basis over 50 years
with a zero residual value.
On 31 December 20X2 (after five years of ownership) Antimony revalued the non-land element of its
head office to $8 million. Antimony does not transfer annual amounts out of revaluation reserves as
assets are used: this is in accordance with the permitted treatment in IAS 16 Property, Plant and
Equipment.
In January 20X8 localised flooding occurred and the recoverable amount of the non-land element of
the head office property fell to $2.9 million.
Required
What impairment charge should be recognised in the profit or loss of Antimony arising from the
impairment review in January 20X8 according to IAS 36 Impairment of Assets?

An entity has a single manufacturing plant which has a carrying amount of $749,000. A new
government elected in the country passes legislation significantly restricting exports of the product
produced by the plant. As a result, and for the foreseeable future, the entity's production will be cut
by 40%. Cash flow forecasts have been prepared derived from the most recent financial
budgets/forecasts for the next five years approved by management (excluding the effects of general
price inflation):
Year 1 2 3 4 5
$'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000
Future cash flows 230 211 157 104 233
(including
disposal
proceeds)
If the plant was sold now it would realise $550,000, net of selling costs.
The entity estimates the pre-tax discount rate specific to the plant to be 15%, excluding the effects of
general price inflation.
609
Required
Calculate the recoverable amount of the plant and any impairment loss.
Note. Present value (PV) factors at 15% are as follows.
Year PV factor @ 15%
1 0.86957
2 0.75614
3 0.65752
4 0.57175
5 0.49718
Activity 8: Reversal of impairment loss

A cash generating unit comprising a factory, plant and equipment etc and associated purchased
goodwill becomes impaired because the product it makes is overtaken by a technologically more
advanced model produced by a competitor. The recoverable amount of the cash generating unit falls
to $60m, resulting in an impairment loss of $80m, allocated as follows:
Carrying amounts Carrying amounts
before impairment after impairment
$m $m
Goodwill 40 –
Patent (with no market value) 20 –
Tangible long-term assets 80 60
Total 140 60
After three years, the entity makes a technological breakthrough of its own, and the recoverable
amount of the cash generating unit increases to $90m. The carrying amount of the tangible long-term
assets had the impairment not occurred would have been $70m.
Required
Calculate the reversal of the impairment loss and explain how it should be treated in the financial
statements.
3 Intangible assets (IAS 38)

3.1 Revision of the detail of the definition of intangible assets
An intangible asset is an identifiable non-monetary asset without physical substance. The asset must
be:
(a) Controlled by the entity as a result of events in the past; and
(IAS 38: para. 8)
3.1.1 Intangible asset: must be identifiable
An intangible asset must be identifiable in order to distinguish it from goodwill. With non-physical
items, there may be a problem with 'identifiability' (IAS 38: para. 12):
(a) If an intangible asset is acquired separately through purchase, there may be a transfer
of a legal right that would help to make an asset identifiable.
610
(b) An intangible asset may be identifiable if it is separable, ie if it could be rented or sold

separately. However, 'separability' is not an essential feature of an intangible asset.
3.1.2 Intangible asset: control by the entity

Another element of the definition of an intangible asset is that it must be under the control of the
entity as a result of a past event. The entity must therefore be able to enjoy the future economic
benefits from the asset, and prevent the access of others to those benefits. A legally enforceable
right is evidence of such control, but is not always a necessary condition (IAS 38: paras. 13–19).
(a) Control over technical knowledge or know-how only exists if it is protected by a legal
right.
(b) The skill of employees, arising out of the benefits of training costs, are most unlikely to be
recognisable as an intangible asset, because an entity does not control the future actions of its
staff.
(c) Similarly, market share and customer loyalty cannot normally be intangible assets,
since an entity cannot control the actions of its customers.
3.2 Revision: accounting under the revaluation model

Where an intangible asset is revalued upwards to a fair value, the amount of the revaluation should
be credited directly to equity under the heading of a revaluation surplus (IAS 38: para. 85).
However, if a revaluation surplus is a reversal of a revaluation decrease that was previously
charged against income, the increase can be recognised as income.
Where the carrying amount of an intangible asset is revalued downwards, the amount of the
downward revaluation should be charged as an expense against income, unless the asset has
previously been revalued upwards. A revaluation decrease should be first charged against any
previous revaluation surplus in respect of that asset (IAS 38: para. 86).
Illustration 2
Downward valuation
An intangible asset is measured by a company at fair value. The asset was revalued upwards by
$400 in 20X3, and there is a revaluation surplus of $400 in the statement of financial position. At
the end of 20X4, the asset is revalued again, and a revaluation deficit of $500 arises.
The revaluation deficit of $500 can first be set against the revaluation surplus of $400. The
revaluation surplus will be reduced to 0 and a charge of $100 made as an expense in 20X4.
When the revaluation model is used, and an intangible asset is revalued upwards, the cumulative
revaluation surplus may be transferred to retained earnings when the surplus is eventually
realised. The surplus would be realised when the asset is disposed of. However, the surplus may also
be realised over time as the asset is used by the entity. The amount of the surplus realised each
year is the difference between the amortisation charge for the asset based on the revalued amount of
the asset, and the amortisation that would be charged on the basis of the asset's historical cost. The
realised surplus in such case should be transferred from revaluation surplus directly to retained
earnings, and should not be taken through profit or loss for the year.
3.3 Revision of useful life of intangible assets

An entity should assess the useful life of an intangible asset, which may be finite or indefinite.
An intangible asset has an indefinite useful life when there is no foreseeable limit to the period
over which the asset is expected to generate net cash inflows for the entity (IAS 38: para. 88).
Many factors are considered in determining the useful life of an intangible asset, including: expected
usage; typical product life cycles; technical, technological, commercial or other types of
611
obsolescence; the stability of the industry; expected actions by competitors; the level of maintenance
expenditure required; and legal or similar limits on the use of the asset, such as the expiry dates of
related leases. Computer software and many other intangible assets normally have short lives
because they are susceptible to technological obsolescence. However, uncertainty does not justify
choosing a life that is unrealistically short.
The useful life of an intangible asset that arises from contractual or other legal rights should
not exceed the period of the rights, but may be shorter depending on the period over which the
entity expects to use the asset.
3.4 Further detail: acceptable methods of amortisation

There is a rebuttable presumption that amortisation methods that are based on
revenue generated by an activity that includes the use of an intangible asset are
inappropriate. The revenue generated by an activity that includes the use of an asset generally
reflects factors other than the consumption of the economic benefits of the
intangible asset. For example, revenue is affected by other inputs and processes, selling activities
and changes in sales volumes and prices. The price component of revenue may be affected by
inflation, which has no bearing upon the way in which an asset is consumed.
The presumption may be rebutted under the following conditions.
(a) Where the intangible asset is expressed as a measure of revenue, that is the
predominant limiting factor that is inherent in an intangible asset is the achievement of a
revenue threshold; or
(b) When it can be demonstrated that revenue and the consumption of the economic
benefits of the intangible asset are highly correlated.
An example of (a) might be the right to operate a toll road, if this right were based on a fixed total
amount of revenue to be generated from cumulative tolls charged. A contract could, for example
allow operation of the toll road until the cumulative amount of tolls generated from operating the
road reaches $100 million. Revenue would in this case be established as the predominant limiting
factor in the contract for the use of the intangible asset, so the revenue that is to be generated might
be an appropriate basis for amortising the intangible asset, provided that the contract specifies a
fixed total amount of revenue to be generated on which amortisation is to be determined.
Activity 9: Intangible asset

Prochain, a public limited company, operates in the fashion industry and has a financial year end of
31 May 20X6. Prochain started developing its own sports clothing brand 'Pro'. The expenditure in
the period to 31 May 20X6 was as follows:
Period from Expenditure type $m
1 June 20X5 – 31 August 20X5 Research as to the extent of the market 3
1 September 20X5 – 30 November Prototype clothing and goods design 4
20X5
1 December 20X5 – 31 January Employee costs in refinement of products 2
20X6
1 February 20X6 – 30 April 20X6 Development work undertaken to finalise design of 5
product
1 May 20X6 – 31 May 20X6 Production and launch of products 6
20
The costs of the production and launch of the products include the cost of upgrading the existing
machinery ($3 million), market research costs ($2 million) and staff training costs ($1 million).
Currently an intangible asset of $20 million is shown in the financial statements for the year ended
31 May 20X6.
612
Required
Discuss how the above item should be dealt with in the financial statements of Prochain for the year
ended 31 May 20X6 under International Financial Reporting Standards.
4 Investment property
4.1 Decision tree
The decision tree below summarises which IFRS/IAS apply to various kinds of property. Learn this
decision tree – it will help you tackle most of the property problems you are likely to meet in the
exam.
Start
Is the property Yes

held for sale in
Use IAS 2
the ordinary course
of business?
No
Use IAS 16 or
Is the property IFRS 16
Yes
(cost model
owner-occupied? or revaluation
model)
No
The property
is an
investment
property
Use IAS 16 or
IFRS 16
(cost model)
Which model is Cost model
with disclosure
chosen for all from IAS 40
investment
properties?
Fair value model
Use IAS 40
(Amended and updated from IAS 40 (issued in 2000): Appendix A)
Try the following activity to consolidate your knowledge.

You have been asked to assist the Financial Accountant of Myriad in preparing the company's
financial statements for the year to 30 September 20X3. The Financial Accountant has asked for your
advice in the following matters:
Myriad owns several properties which are revalued each year. Three of its properties are rented out
under annual contracts. Details of these properties and their valuations are:
Market value @ Market value @
Property type/life Cost 30 September 20X2 30 September 20X3
$'000 $'000 $'000
A freehold 50 years 150 240 200
B freehold 50 years 120 180 145
C freehold 15 years 120 140 150
All three properties were acquired on 1 October 20X1. Myriad's policy is to carry all non-investment
properties at cost. Annual amortisation, where appropriate, is based on the carrying amount of
613
assets at the beginning of the relevant period. Property A is let to a subsidiary of Myriad on normal
commercial terms. The other properties are let on normal commercial terms to companies not related
to Myriad.
Myriad adopts the fair value model of accounting for investment properties in IAS 40 Investment
Property, and the cost model for owner-occupied properties in IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment.
Required
(a) Describe the possible accounting treatments for investment properties under IAS 40 and
explain why they may require a different accounting treatment to owner-occupied properties.
(b) Prepare extracts of the consolidated financial statements of Myriad for the year to
30 September 20X3 in respect of the above properties assuming the company adopts the fair
value method in IAS 40.
614
Activity answers
Activity 1: Revaluation surplus

The double entry to account for the revaluation is:
DEBIT Asset value (statement of financial position) $7,000
CREDIT Profit or loss for the year $2,000
CREDIT Revaluation surplus $5,000
Activity 2: Revaluation decrease

The double entry to account for the revaluation decrease is:
DEBIT Revaluation surplus $5,000
DEBIT Profit or loss for the year $2,000
CREDIT Asset value (statement of financial position) $7,000
Activity 3: revaluation and depreciation

On 1 January 20X8 the carrying value of the asset is $10,000 – (2  $10,000  5) = $6,000.
For the revaluation:
DEBIT Asset value (statement of financial position) $6,000
CREDIT Revaluation surplus $6,000
The depreciation for the next three years will be $12,000  3 = $4,000, compared to depreciation
on cost of $10,000  5 = $2,000. So each year, the extra $2,000 can be treated as part of the
surplus which has become realised:
DEBIT Revaluation surplus $2,000
CREDIT Retained earnings $2,000
This is a movement on owners' equity only, not through profit or loss.
Activity 4: Self-constructed asset

Computation of the cost of the factory
Description Included in PPE Explanation
$'000
Purchase of land 10,000 Both the purchase of the land and the
associated legal costs are direct costs
of constructing the factory
Preparation and levelling 300 A direct cost of constructing the factory
Materials 6,080 A direct cost of constructing the factory
Employment costs of construction 1,400 A direct cost of constructing the factory
workers for a seven-month period
Direct overhead costs 700 A direct cost of constructing the factory
for a seven-month period
Allocated overhead costs Nil Not a direct cost of construction
Income from use as a car park Nil Not essential to the construction so
recognised directly in profit or loss
Relocation costs Nil Not a direct cost of construction
Opening ceremony Nil Not a direct cost of construction
Finance costs 700 Capitalise the interest cost incurred in an
eight-month period (purchase of land
would trigger off capitalisation)
615
Investment income on temporary

investment of the loan proceeds (100) Must offset against the amount
capitalised
Demolition cost recognised as a 920 Where an obligation must recognise as
provision part of the initial cost
Total 20,000
Computation of accumulated
depreciation
Total depreciable amount 10,000 All of the net finance cost of 600 (700 –
100) has been allocated to the
depreciable amount. Also acceptable to
reduce by allocating a portion to the
non-depreciable land element
Depreciation must be in two parts Principle
Depreciation of roof component 50 10,000 × 30% × 1/20 × 4/12
Depreciation of remainder 58 10,000 × 70% × 1/40 × 4/12
Total depreciation 108
Computation of carrying
amount
19,892 20,000 – 108
Activity 5: Impairment loss

The recoverable amount of the business (a single cash generating unit) is measured as $3.1m. There
has consequently been an impairment loss of $1.4m ($4.5m – $3.1m).
The impairment loss will be recognised in profit or loss. The loss will be allocated between the assets
in the cash generating unit as follows:
(a) A loss of $1m can be attributed directly to the uninsured asset that has been destroyed.
(b) The remaining loss of $0.4m should be allocated to goodwill.
The carrying value of the assets will now be $3m for tangible assets and $0.1m for goodwill.

$0.7 million
IAS 36: paras. 60 and 61 (also IAS 16: para. 40) require that an impairment that reverses a
previous revaluation should be recognised through other comprehensive income to the extent of the
amount in the revaluation surplus for that same asset. Any remaining amount is recognised through
profit or loss. Thus:
(a) The carrying amount at 31 December 20X2 is 45/50  $5.0m = $4.5m.
(b) The revaluation reserve created is $3.5m (ie $8.0m – $4.5m).
(c) The carrying amount at 31 December 20X7 is 40/45  $8.0m = $7.1m.
(d) The recoverable amount at 31 December 20X7 is $2.9m.
(e) The total impairment charge is $4.2m (ie $7.1m – $2.9m).
(f) Of this, $3.5m is a reversal of the revaluation reserve, so only $0.7 million is recognised
through profit or loss.
616

The fair value less costs of disposal of the plant is below its carrying amount so it may be impaired. It
is now necessary to find the value in use in order to determine whether an impairment has occurred
and to quantify any impairment loss.
Year Future cash flows PV factor at Discounted future
15% cash flows
$'000 $'000
1 230 0.86957 200
2 211 0.75614 160
3 157 0.65752 103
4 104 0.57175 59
5 233 0.49718 116
638
To calculate the impairment loss, compare the carrying amount of $749,000 with the higher of value
in use ($638,000) and fair value less costs of disposal ($550,000). The impairment loss is therefore
$749,000 – $638,000 = $111,000.
Activity 8: Reversal of impairment loss

The reversal of the impairment loss is recognised to the extent that it increases the carrying amount of
the tangible non-current assets to what it would have been had the impairment not taken place; ie a
reversal of the impairment loss of $10m is recognised and the tangible non-current assets written
back to $70m. Reversal of the impairment is not recognised in relation to the goodwill and patent
because the effect of the external event that caused the original impairment has not reversed – the
original product is still overtaken by a more advanced model.

IAS 38 Intangible Assets divides a development project into a research phase and a development
phase. In the research phase of a project, an entity cannot yet demonstrate that the expenditure will
generate probable future economic benefits. Therefore expenditure on research must be
recognised as an expense when it occurs.
Development expenditure is capitalised when an entity demonstrates all the following.
(a) The technical feasibility of completing the project
(b) Its intention to complete the asset and use or sell it
(c) Its ability to use or sell the asset
(d) That the asset will generate probable future economic benefits
(e) The availability of adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the
development and to use or sell it
(f) Its ability to reliably measure the expenditure attributable to the asset.
Assuming that all these criteria are met, the cost of the development should comprise all directly
attributable costs necessary to create the asset and to make it capable of operating in
the manner intended by management. Directly attributable costs do not include selling
or administrative costs, or training costs or market research. The cost of upgrading
existing machinery can be recognised as property, plant and equipment. Therefore the
expenditure on the project should be treated as follows:
617
Recognised in statement
of financial position
Property,
Intangible plant and
Expense (P/L) assets equipment
$m $m $m
Research 3
Prototype design 4
Employee costs 2
Development work 5
Upgrading machinery 3
Market research 2
Training 1
6 11 3
Prochain should recognise $11 million as an intangible asset.

(a) An entity may own land or a building as an investment rather than for use in the business;
in other words, to earn rentals or capital appreciation or both. Such properties are
not used in the production or supply of goods and services, or for administrative purposes, nor
are they held for sale in the ordinary course of business. As they are held for investment for
eventual disposal, it is often considered that the current values of the investments and the
changes in them are more important than their original costs.
IAS 40 Investment Property governs their accounting treatment. With regard to measurement
subsequent to initial recognition, it requires an entity to choose between two models, the cost
model and the fair value model. Whatever policy it chooses should be applied to all
of its investment property.
Cost model
The cost model is the same as the cost model in IAS 16. Investment property should be
measured at depreciated cost, less any accumulated impairment losses. An entity that chooses
the cost model should disclose the fair value of its investment property.
Fair value model
After initial recognition, an entity that chooses the fair value model should measure all of its
investment property at fair value (determined in accordance with IFRS 13 Fair Value
Measurement), except in the extremely rare cases where this cannot be measured reliably.
In such cases it should apply the cost model from the beginning. If the property has been
revalued at one point in time the revaluation model should always be used, even if market
transactions become less frequent or market prices become less readily available.
A gain or loss arising from a change in the fair value of an investment property should be
included in net profit or loss for the period in which it arises. The fair value of investment
property should reflect the actual market state and circumstances as at the reporting date, not
at either a past or future date.
618
(b) MYRIAD
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 20X3
(Extracts)
Cost/ Accumulated Carrying
valuation depreciation value
$'000 $'000 $'000
Non-current assets
Property, plant & equipment: A cost (2 years 150 6 144
dep'n)
Investment properties: B revaluation 145 – 145
C revaluation 150 – 150
MYRIAD
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS FOR THE YEAR TO 30 SEPTEMBER 20X3
(Extract)
$'000
Depreciation: Property A (150/5 years) 3
Deficit in fair value of Property B (180 – 145) (35)
Surplus in fair value of Property C (140 – 150) 10
The question asks for the consolidated financial statements of Myriad. Property A is let to a
subsidiary of Myriad, so in the consolidated financial treatments it would be treated as an
owner-occupied property using the cost model. Its fair value ($200,000) would be shown in
the entity financial statements, where it would be treated as an investment property.
619
620
Employee benefits
621
1 Concepts and principles

1.1 The conceptual nature of employee benefit costs
When a company or other entity employs a new worker, that worker will be offered a package of
pay and benefits. Some of these will be short-term and the employee will receive the benefit at
about the same time as they earn it; for example basic pay, overtime and so on. Other employee
benefits are deferred, however, the main example being retirement benefits (ie a pension).
The cost of these deferred employee benefits to the employer can be viewed in various ways. They
could be described as deferred salary to the employee. Alternatively, they are a deduction from
the employee's true gross salary, used as a tax-efficient means of saving. In some countries, tax
efficiency arises on retirement benefit contributions because they are not taxed on the employee, but
they are allowed as a deduction from taxable profits of the employer.
1.2 Accounting for employee benefit costs

Accounting for short-term employee benefit costs tends to be quite straightforward, because
they are simply recognised as an expense in the employer's financial statements of the current
period.
Accounting for the cost of deferred employee benefits is much more difficult. This is because of
the large amounts involved, as well as the long time scale, complicated estimates and uncertainties.
In the past, entities accounted for these benefits simply by charging profit or loss (the income
statements) of the employing entity on the basis of actual payments made. This led to substantial
variations in reported profits of these entities and disclosure of information on these costs was usually
sparse.
2 Defined benefit, defined contribution and multi-employer

plans
2.1 Defined benefit and defined contribution plans
IAS 19 para. 8 sets out the following definitions relating to classification of plans.
Defined contribution plans: post-employment benefit plans under which an entity pays fixed
Key term
Defined benefit plans: post-employment benefit plans other than defined contribution plans.
There are two types or categories of post-employment benefit plan, as given in the definitions above
(IAS 19: paras. 26–30).
(a) Defined contribution plans. With such plans, the employer (and possibly current
employees too) pay regular contributions into the plan of a given or 'defined' amount each
year. The contributions are invested, and the size of the post-employment benefits paid to
former employees depends on how well or how badly the plan's investments perform. If the
investments perform well, the plan will be able to afford higher benefits than if the investments
performed less well.
(b) Defined benefit plans. With these plans, the size of the post-employment benefits is
determined in advance; ie the benefits are 'defined'. The employer (and possibly current
employees too) pay contributions into the plan, and the contributions are invested. The size of
the contributions is set at an amount that is expected to earn enough investment returns to meet
the obligation to pay the post-employment benefits. If, however, it becomes apparent that the
assets in the fund are insufficient, the employer will be required to make additional
622
contributions into the plan to make up the expected shortfall. On the other hand, if the fund's
assets appear to be larger than they need to be, and in excess of what is required to pay the
post-employment benefits, the employer may be allowed to take a 'contribution holiday' (ie
stop paying in contributions for a while).
It is important to make a clear distinction between the following.
 Funding a defined benefit plan, ie paying contributions into the plan
 Accounting for the cost of funding a defined benefit plan
The key difference between the two types of plan is the nature of the 'promise' made by the entity to
the employees in the plan:
(a) Under a defined contribution plan, the 'promise' is to pay the agreed amount of
contributions. Once this is done, the entity has no further liability and no exposure to risks
related to the performance of the assets held in the plan.
(b) Under a defined benefit plan, the 'promise' is to pay the amount of benefits agreed under
the plan. The entity is taking on a far more uncertain liability that may change in the future as
a result of many variables and has continuing exposure to risks related to the performance of
assets held in the plan. In simple terms, if the plan assets are insufficient to meet the plan
liabilities to pay pensions in future, the entity will have to make up any deficit.
2.2 Multi-employer plans
Multi-employer plans are defined contribution plans (other than State plans) or defined benefit
plans (other than State plans) that:
Key term
(a) Pool the assets contributed by various entities that are not under common control; and
(b) Use those assets to provide benefits to employees of more than one entity, on the basis that
contribution and benefit levels are determined without regard to the identity of the entity that
employs the employees concerned.
(IAS 19: para. 8)
IAS 19 (IAS 19: paras. 32–39) requires an entity to classify such a plan as a defined contribution
plan or a defined benefit plan, depending on its terms (including any constructive obligation beyond
those terms).
For a multi-employer plan that is a defined benefit plan, the entity should account for its
proportionate share of the defined benefit obligation, plan assets and cost associated with the plan
in the same way as for any other defined benefit plan and make full disclosure.
When there is insufficient information to use defined benefit accounting, then the multi-employer
plan should be accounted for as a defined contribution plan and additional disclosures made (that
the plan is in fact a defined benefit plan and information about any known surplus or deficit).
3 'Asset Ceiling' test

The following illustration shows how the 'Asset Ceiling' test is performed.
Illustration 1
Defined benefit plan calculations
Clement operates a defined benefit pension scheme for its employees. At 1 January 20X1 the present
value of the defined benefit obligation was $5 million and the fair value of the plan assets was
$5.7 million. Equivalent values at 31 December 20X1 were $5.94 million and $7.1 million.
623
For the year ended 31 December 20X1:

 Current service cost was $1.5 million
 The interest rate applicable to the net defined benefit asset was 3%
 Contributions of $2 million were made to the plan
 $800,000 was paid out to former employees of Clement
The present value of future economic benefits in relation to the plan is $1.1 million.
Required
Calculate the amount of remeasurement to be recognised in other comprehensive income in the year
Solution
Net defined
Obligation Assets benefit asset
$'000 $'000 $'000
At 1 January 20X1 5,000 5,700 700
Current service cost 1,500
Contributions 2,000
Payments (800) (800)
Interest (3%  5m)/(3%  5.7m) 150 171
5,850 7,071
Remeasurements (β) 90 29
At 31 December 20X1 5,940 7,100 1,160
Remeasurement due to asset ceiling (60)
Asset ceiling 1,100
Therefore, the total remeasurement amount recognised in other comprehensive income is:
$'000
Remeasurement loss on obligation 90
Remeasurement gain on assets (29)
Remeasurement loss due to asset ceiling 60
Net remeasurement loss 121
4 Contributions and benefits paid other than at the end of

the period
In most exam questions you will be told that contributions and benefits will be paid at the end of the
accounting period. Occasionally this may not be the case. The following illustration shows how to
deal with a situation where the payments are made at different times.
624
Illustration 2
Contributions and benefits paid other than at the end of the period
Jett Co has a defined benefit pension plan.
Required
Using the information below, prepare extracts from the statement of financial position and the
statement of comprehensive income of Jett Co, together with a reconciliation of plan movements for
the year ended 31 January 20X8. Ignore taxation.
(a) The plan assets were $4.1m on 1 February 20X7 and plan liabilities at this date were
$4.8m.
(b) The company paid a contribution of $680,000 in a lump sum on 1 February 20X7.
(c) Benefits paid to former employees, which amounted to $440,000, were paid in two equal
amounts on 31 July 20X7 and 31 January 20X8.
(d) The yield on high quality corporate bonds was 6% and the actual return on plan assets was
$282,000.
(e) Current service cost can be calculated as 4.2% of wages and salaries in the current year.
The wages and salaries expense is $5,900,000.
(f) The actuary valued the plan liabilities at 31 January 20X8 as $4.95.
(6 marks)
Solution
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION (Extract)
$'000
Defined benefit pension obligations (4,950 – 4,622) 328
STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Extract)

$'000
Charged to profit or loss
Net interest on net defined benefit liability (281 – 280) 11
249
Loss on remeasurement of obligation (61)
Gain on remeasurement of plan assets (excluding amounts in net 2
interest)
$'000
Reconciliation of pension plan movement
Plan deficit at 1 Feb 20X7 (4,100 – 4,800) (700)
Company contributions 680
Profit or loss total (249)
Other comprehensive income total (61 – 2) (59)
Plan deficit at 31 Jan 20X8 (4,950 – 4,622) (328)
625
$'000

Defined benefit obligation at 1 Feb 20X7 4,800
Interest cost (4,800 × 6% × 6/12) + ((4,800 – 220) × 6% × 6/12) 281
Pensions paid (440)
Current service cost ($5,900 × 4.2%) 248
Remeasurement loss through OCI (bal. fig.) 61
Defined benefit obligation at 31 Jan 20X8 4,950
Tutorial note: Interest cost

As benefits are paid in two equal payments, we must pro-rate the interest cost calculation
to take account of the timing of the payment on 31 July 20X7. (The benefits paid on the
last day of the year do not impact on the interest cost)
$'000
Fair value of plan assets at 1 Feb 20X7 4,100
Contributions 680
Pensions paid (440)
Interest income on plan assets ((4,100 + 680) × 6% × 6/12) + 280
(4,100 + 680 – 220) × 6% × 6/12)
Remeasurement gain through OCI (282 – 280) 2
Fair value of plan assets at 31 Jan 20X8 (bal. fig.) 4,622
Tutorial note: Interest income

Interest income on plan assets must be adjusted for:
Contributions – paid at the beginning of the year so added to the opening asset balance
Benefits – paid in equal instalments, so we must pro-rate to take account of the timing of
the payment on 31 July 20X7
626
Provisions, contingencies
and events after the
reporting period
627
1 Provisions
1.1 Revision of the detail of the recognition and measurement of
provisions
You have covered the detail of IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets in
your earlier studies in Financial Reporting. However, the detail is examinable in the Strategic
Business Reporting (SBR) examination so you should make sure you revise it. Attempting the activities
below will help you to consolidate your knowledge.
1.1.1 Recognition
A provision is recognised when:
(a) An entity has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event;
(b) It is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be
required to settle the obligation; and
(c) A reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
1.1.2 Present obligation

An obligation can either be legal or constructive.
A legal obligation is one that derives from a contract, legislation or any other operation of law.
A constructive obligation is an obligation that derives from an entity's actions where:
 By an established pattern of past practice, published policies or a sufficiently specific current
statement the entity has indicated to other parties that it will accept certain responsibilities; and
 As a result, the entity has created a valid expectation on the part of those other parties that it
will discharge those responsibilities. (IAS 37: para. 10)
Activity 1: Obligation
Explain in which of the following circumstances an obligation exists.
(a) On 13 December 20X9 the board of an entity decided to close down a division. The reporting
date of the company is 31 December. Before 31 December 20X9 the decision was not
communicated to any of those affected and no other steps were taken to implement the
decision.
(b) The details are as above; however the board agreed a detailed closure plan on 20 December
20X9 and details were given to customers and employees immediately.
(c) At its reporting date a company is obliged to incur clean-up costs for environmental damage
that has already been caused.
(d) At its reporting date, a company intends to carry out future expenditure to operate in a
particular way in the future.
1.1.3 Probable transfer of economic benefits

A transfer of economic benefits is regarded as 'probable' if the event is more likely than not to
occur (IAS 37: para. 23–24). This appears to indicate a probability of more than 50%. However,
where there is a number of similar obligations the probability should be based on a consideration of
the population as a whole, rather than one single item.
628
Illustration 1
Transfer of economic benefits
If a company has entered into a warranty obligation then the probability of an outflow of resources
embodying economic benefits (transfer of economic benefits) may well be extremely small in respect
of one specific item. However, when considering the population as a whole the probability of some
transfer of economic benefits is quite likely to be much higher. If there is a greater than 50%
probability of some transfer of economic benefits then a provision should be made for the
expected amount.
1.2 Disclosure 'let out'

IAS 37 permits reporting entities to avoid disclosure requirements relating to provisions, contingent
liabilities and contingent assets if they would be expected to seriously prejudice the position of
the entity in dispute with other parties (IAS 37: para. 92). However, this should only be employed in
extremely rare cases. Details of the general nature of the provision/contingencies must still be
provided, together with an explanation of why it has not been disclosed.
1.3 IAS 37 decision tree

The decision tree below summarises the main recognition requirements of IAS 37 for provisions and
contingent liabilities.
l
l l
l
l
l
l l
l l
(IAS 37: Imple mentation guidance B)
629
Activity 2: Recognition of provisions

Warren Co gives warranties at the time of sale to purchasers of its products. Under the terms of the
warranty the manufacturer undertakes to make good, by repair or replacement, manufacturing
defects that become apparent within a period of three years from the year end. Should a provision
be recognised?
Activity 3: Recognition and measurement of provisions (1)

After a wedding in 20X8 ten people died, possibly as a result of food poisoning from products sold
by Callow Co. Legal proceedings are started seeking damages from Callow but it disputes liability.
Up to the date of approval of the financial statements for the year to 31 December 20X8, Callow's
lawyers advise that it is probable that it will not be found liable. However, when Callow prepares the
financial statements for the year to 31 December 20X9 its lawyers advise that, owing to
developments in the case, it is probable that it will be found liable.
What is the required accounting treatment:
(a) At 31 December 20X8?
(b) At 31 December 20X9?
(1) Proviso Co (Proviso) issued a one year guarantee for faulty workmanship on an item of
specialist equipment that it delivered to its customer. During the year, the customer began
taking legal action against Proviso for refusing to replace or repair the item of equipment
within the guarantee period. Proviso believes the fault is not covered by the guarantee, but
instead has arisen because the customer has not followed the operating instructions.
At the end of the reporting period, the company's lawyer advised Proviso that it is more likely
than not that it will be found liable. This would result in Proviso being forced to replace or
repair the equipment as well as pay a $10,000 fine.
Based on past experience with similar items of equipment, Proviso estimates that there is a
70% chance that the central core of the equipment would need to be replaced at a cost of
$40,000 and a 30% chance that the core could instead be repaired at a cost of $15,000.
(2) Proviso also manufactures small items of equipment which are sold with a one year warranty
guarantee. 12,000 items of this type were sold during the year. Based on past experience,
5% of items sold are returned for repair or replacement. One-third of the items returned are
able to be repaired at a cost of $50, while the remaining two-thirds are scrapped and
replaced at a cost of $150.
Required
Discuss the accounting treatment of these issues in the financial statements of Proviso at the end of the
reporting period.
630
2 IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period

2.1 Examples of events after the reporting period
The table below provides examples of adjusting and non-adjusting events. Look out for these events
in your SBR exam.
Adjusting events Non-adjusting events
The settlement of a court case that was ongoing Acquisitions or disposals of subsidiaries
at the reporting date Announcement of a plan to discontinue an
The receipt of information indicating that an operation or restructure operations
asset was impaired at the reporting date The purchase or disposal of assets
The determination of the proceeds of assets sold The destruction of an asset through accident
or cost of assets bought before the reporting date
Ordinary share transactions including the issue
The determination of a bonus payment if there of shares
was a constructive obligation to pay it at the
Changes in asset prices, foreign exchange rates
reporting date
or tax rates
The discovery of fraud or errors resulting in
The commencement of litigation arising from an
incorrect financial statements
event after the reporting period
Declaration of dividends after the end of the
reporting period
3 Exam standard activity

The next activity is similar to what you could expect to feature on provisions in the SBR exam as part
of a scenario question. Attempt the activity on your own, then review your answer against the answer
at the end of the chapter.
Activity 5
Omega is an entity that prepares financial statements to 31 March each year. On 1 July 20X9 the
directors decided to terminate production at one of the company's divisions. This decision was
publicly announced on 31 July 20X9. The activities of the division were gradually reduced from
1 October 20X9 and closure is expected to be complete by 31 March 20Y0. At 31 July 20X9 the
directors prepared the following estimates of the financial implications of the closure as follows:
(i) Redundancy costs were initially estimated at $2m. Further expenditure of $800,000 will be
necessary to retrain employees who will be affected by the closure but will remain with
Omega in different divisions. This retraining will begin in early January 20Y0. The latest
estimates are that redundancy costs will be $1.9m, with retraining costs of $850,000.
(ii) Plant and equipment having an expected carrying amount at 30 September 20X9 of $8m will
have a recoverable amount $1.5m. These estimates remain valid.
(iii) The division is under contract to supply a customer for the next three years at a pre-determined
price. It will be necessary to pay compensation of $600,000 to this customer. The
compensation actually paid, on 30 November 20X9, was $550,000.
(iv) The division will make operating losses of $300,000 per month in the last three months of
20X9 and $200,000 per month in the first three months of 20Y0. This estimate proved
accurate for October and November 20X9.
631
Required
Compute and discuss the amounts that will be included in the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income for the year ended 30 September 20X9 in respect of the decision to close the
division. Where financial information provided above does not result in a charge to profit or loss,
you should explain why this is so.
632
Activity answers
Activity 1: Obligation
(a) There is no obligation at the reporting date as the decision has not been communicated.
(b) A constructive obligation exists at the reporting date and therefore a provision is made in the
20X9 financial statements assuming that the other recognition criteria are met.
(c) A legal obligation exists and therefore a provision for clean-up costs is made providing that
the other recognition criteria are met.
(d) No present obligation exists and under IAS 37 no provision can therefore be made. This is
because the entity could avoid the future expenditure by its future actions, maybe by changing
its method of operation.
Activity 2: Recognition of provisions

Warren Co cannot avoid the cost of repairing or replacing all items of product that manifest
manufacturing defects in respect of which warranties are given before the end of the reporting
period, and a provision for the cost of this should therefore be made.
Warren Co is obliged to repair or replace items that fail within the entire warranty period. Therefore,
in respect of this year's sales, the obligation provided for at the year end should be the cost of
making good items for which defects have been notified but not yet processed, plus an estimate of
costs in respect of the other items sold for which there is sufficient evidence that manufacturing
defects will manifest themselves during their remaining periods of warranty cover.

(a) At 31 December 20X8
On the basis of the evidence available when the financial statements were approved, there is
no obligation as a result of past events. No provision is recognised. The matter is disclosed as
a contingent liability unless the probability of any transfer is regarded as remote.
(b) At 31 December 20X9
On the basis of the evidence available, there is a present obligation. A transfer of economic
benefits in settlement is probable.
A provision is recognised for the best estimate of the amount needed to settle the present
obligation

Issue 1
At the end of the reporting period, Proviso Co disputes liability and therefore whether a present
obligation exists. However, given that it is more likely than not that Proviso will be found liable, a
present obligation is assumed to exist.
Given that a single obligation is being measured, a provision of $50,000 is made in the financial
statements for the most likely outcome, which is the payment of the fine ($10,000) and replacement
of the central core ($40,000).
633
Issue 2
A present obligation exists at the end of the reporting period based on historical evidence of items
being repaired or replaced under the warranty guarantee agreement.
A large population of items is involved so expected values are used to determine the provision. A
provision of $70,000 (12,000  5%  1/3  $50) + (12,000  5%  2/3  $150) should be
recognised in the financial statements at the end of the reporting period.
Activity 5: Restructuring provision (exam standard for 8 marks)

IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets states that a provision can be created
for restructuring where the entity:
 Has a detailed formal plan
 Has raised a valid expectation in those affected that it will carry out the restructuring
Omega clearly has a detailed formal plan, and has publicly announced its decision. A provision
should therefore be created. The following amounts will be included in its statement of profit or loss
for 20X9:
(i) Redundancy costs are provided for as they are necessarily entailed by the restructuring and do
not relate to Omega's ongoing activities. IAS 37 requires provisions to be measured at the
best estimate of the expenditure required. This would qualify as an adjusting even in line with
IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period. Profit is therefore reduced by $1.9m.
The $800,000 required to retrain employees will not be provided for and will not affect profit,
as it relates to Omega's ongoing activities.
(ii) Although not part of the restructuring, plant and equipment with a carrying amount of $8m but
a recoverable amount of $1.5m are clearly impaired. IAS 36 Impairment of Assets requires
that they be restated at recoverable amount of $1.5m, resulting in the recognition of an
impairment loss of $6.5m in profit and loss.
(iii) The statement of profit or loss will recognise an expense of $550,000. In line with IAS 10, this
would qualify as an adjusting even after the reporting period, which the financial statements
should reflect.
(iv) IAS 37 does not permit a provision to include amounts in respect of future operating losses, as
they relate to the ongoing activities of the entity. There will be no charge to the statement of
profit or loss in respect of these losses for the year ended 30 September 20X9. Provisions
should only be made for events that took place in the past, whereas these expected losses take
place in the future.
634
Income taxes
635
1 Current tax
Activity 1: Current tax

In 20X8 Darton Co had taxable profits of $120,000. In the previous year (20X7) income tax on
20X7 profits had been estimated as $30,000. The tax rate is 33%.
Required
Calculate tax payable and the charge for 20X8 if the tax due on 20X7 profits was subsequently
agreed with the tax authorities as:
(a) $35,000
(b) $25,000
Any under- or over-payments are not settled until the following year's tax payment is due.
Activity 2: Tax losses carried back

In 20X7 Eramu Co paid $50,000 in tax on its profits. In 20X8 the company made tax losses of
$24,000. The local tax authority rules allow losses to be carried back to offset against current tax of
prior years. The tax rate is 30%.
Required
Show the double entry required for tax in the 20X8 financial statements.
1.2 Revision: measurement of current tax

Measurement of current tax liabilities (assets) for the current and prior periods is very simple. They
are measured at the amount expected to be paid to (recovered from) the tax
authorities. The tax rates (and tax laws) used should be those enacted (or substantively enacted)
by the year end.
1.3 Revision: recognition of current tax

Normally, current tax is recognised as income or expense and included in the net profit or loss for
the period, except in two cases (IAS 12: paras. 58, 61A):
(a) Tax arising from a business combination which is an acquisition is treated differently
(b) Tax arising from a transaction or event recognised in other comprehensive income or
which is recognised directly in equity (in the same or a different period).
The rule in (b) is logical. If a transaction or event is charged or credited directly to equity, rather than
to profit or loss, then the related tax should be also. An example of such a situation is where, under
IAS 8, an adjustment is made to the opening balance of retained earnings due to either a
change in accounting policy that is applied retrospectively, or to the correction of a fundamental
error.
636
6: Income taxes
1.4 Revision: presentation

In the statement of financial position, tax assets and liabilities should be shown separately from
other assets and liabilities.
Current tax assets and liabilities can be offset, but this should happen only when certain conditions
apply (IAS 12: para. 71):
(a) The entity has a legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts; and
(b) The entity intends to settle the amounts on a net basis, or to realise the asset and settle the
liability at the same time.
The tax expense (income) related to the profit or loss for the year should be shown in the profit
or loss section of the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
2 Deferred tax
2.1 Tax base – revision
The tax base of an asset or liability: the amount attributed to that asset or liability for tax purposes.
(IAS 12: para. 5)
Key term
We can expand on the definition given above by stating that the tax base of an asset is the
amount that will be deductible for tax purposes against any taxable economic benefits that will flow
to the entity when it recovers the carrying value of the asset. Where those economic benefits are not
taxable, the tax base of the asset is the same as its carrying amount.
Activity 3: Tax base of assets

State the tax base of each of the following assets:
(a) A machine cost $10,000. For tax purposes, depreciation of $3,000 has already been
deducted in the current and prior periods and the remaining cost will be deductible in future
periods, either as depreciation or through a deduction on disposal. Revenue generated by
using the machine is taxable, any gain on disposal of the machine will be taxable and any
loss on disposal will be deductible for tax purposes.
(b) Interest receivable has a carrying amount of $1,000. The related interest revenue will be
taxed on a cash basis.
(c) Trade receivables have a carrying amount of $10,000. The related revenue has already been
included in taxable profit (tax loss).
(d) A loan receivable has a carrying amount of $1m. The repayment of the loan will have no tax
consequences.
(e) Dividends receivable from a subsidiary have a carrying amount of $5,000. The dividends are not
taxable.
In the case of a liability, the tax base will be its carrying amount, less any amount that will be
deducted for tax purposes in relation to the liability in future periods. For revenue received in
advance, the tax base of the resulting liability is its carrying amount, less any amount of the revenue
that will not be taxable in future periods.
637
Activity 4: Tax base of liabilities

State the tax base of each of the following liabilities:
(a) Current liabilities include accrued expenses with a carrying amount of $1,000. The related
expense will be deducted for tax purposes on a cash basis.
(b) Current liabilities include interest revenue received in advance, with a carrying amount of
$10,000. The related interest revenue was taxed on a cash basis.
(c) Current liabilities include accrued fines and penalties with a carrying amount of $100. Fines
and penalties are not deductible for tax purposes.
(d) A loan payable has a carrying amount of $1m. The repayment of the loan will have no tax
consequences.
2.2 Deferred tax liabilities

Taxable temporary differences (amounts taxable in the future) generate a deferred tax
liability.
The following are examples of circumstances that give rise to taxable temporary differences.
Transactions that affect the statement of Transactions that affect the statement
profit or loss and other comprehensive of financial position
income
 Depreciation of an asset is not
 Interest revenue received in arrears and deductible for tax purposes. No deduction
included in accounting profit on the basis of will be available for tax purposes when the
time apportionment. It is included in taxable asset is sold/scrapped.
profit, however, on a cash basis.
 A borrower records a loan at proceeds
 Sale of goods revenue is included in received (amount due at maturity) less
accounting profit when the goods are transaction costs. The carrying amount of the
delivered, but only included in taxable profit loan is subsequently increased by
when cash is received. amortisation of the transaction costs against
accounting profit. The transaction costs were,
 Depreciation of an asset may be
however, deducted for tax purposes in the
accelerated for tax purposes. When new
period when the loan was first recognised.
assets are purchased, allowances may be
available against taxable profits which  A loan payable is measured on initial
exceed the amount of depreciation recognition at net proceeds (net of
chargeable on the assets in the financial transaction costs). The transaction costs are
accounts for the year of purchase. amortised to accounting profit over the life
of the loan. Those transaction costs are not
 Development costs which have been deductible in determining the taxable profit
capitalised and will be amortised to profit or
of future, current or prior periods.
loss but were deducted in determining
taxable profit in the period in which they  The liability component of a compound
were incurred. financial instrument (eg a convertible
bond) is measured at a discount to the
 Prepaid expenses have already been
amount repayable on maturity, after
deducted on a cash basis in determining the
assigning a portion of the cash proceeds to
taxable profit of the loss, but they were
the equity component (see IAS 32). The
deducted in full from taxable profit in the
discount is not deductible in determining
period in which they were incurred.
taxable profit.
(IAS 12: Illustrative Examples, paras. 1–5)
(IAS 12: Illustrative Examples, paras. 6–9)
638
6: Income taxes
Fair value adjustments and revaluations

 Current investments or financial instruments are carried at fair value. This exceeds cost, but no
equivalent adjustment is made for tax purposes.
 Property, plant and equipment is revalued by an entity (under IAS 16), but no equivalent adjustment
is made for tax purposes. This also applies to long-term investments.
(IAS 12: para. 20)
2.2.1 Reasoning behind the recognition of deferred tax liabilities on taxable

(a) When an asset is recognised, it is expected that its carrying amount will be recovered in
the form of economic benefits that flow to the entity in future periods.
(b) If the carrying amount of the asset is greater than its tax base, then taxable economic
benefits will also be greater than the amount that will be allowed as a deduction for tax
purposes.
(c) The difference is therefore a taxable temporary difference and the obligation to pay the
resulting income taxes in future periods is a deferred tax liability.
(d) As the entity recovers the carrying amount of the asset, the taxable temporary difference will
reverse and the entity will have taxable profit.
(e) It is then probable that economic benefits will flow from the entity in the form of tax
payments, and so the recognition of all deferred tax liabilities (except those excluded
above) is required by IAS 12.
Activity 5: Property, plant and equipment

A company buys an item of equipment on 1 January 20X1 for $1,000,000. It has a useful life of
10 years and an estimated residual value of $100,000. The equipment is depreciated on a straight-
line basis. For tax purposes, a tax expense can be claimed on a 20% reducing balance basis.
The rate of income tax can be taken as 30%.
Required
In respect of the above item of equipment, calculate the deferred tax charge/credit in the company's
profit or loss for the year to 31 December 20X2 and the deferred tax balance in the statement of
financial position at that date.
2.2.2 Revaluation of assets

Under IAS 16 assets may be revalued. If the revaluation does not affect current taxable profits, the
tax base of the asset is not adjusted. Consequently, the taxable flow of economic benefits to the
entity as the carrying value of the asset is recovered will differ from the amount that will be
deductible for tax purposes. The gain (or loss) between the carrying amount of a revalued asset and
its tax base is a temporary difference and gives rise to a deferred tax liability (or deferred
tax asset) (IAS 12: para. 20).
639
Activity 6: Revaluation of property, plant and equipment

A company purchased some land on 1 January 20X7 for $400,000. On 31 December 20X8 the
land was revalued to $500,000. In the tax regime in which the company operates revaluations do
not affect either the tax base of the asset or taxable profits.
The income tax rate is 30%.
Required
Prepare the accounting entry to record the deferred tax in relation to this revaluation for the year
2.2.3 Development costs

Development costs are capitalised when the criteria in IAS 38 are met and are then amortised over
their useful life.
For tax purposes, development costs are often tax deductible on a cash paid basis, ie in the period
incurred. In such cases, the tax base is nil because the costs have already been deducted from
taxable profits.
A taxable temporary difference arises equal to the full carrying amount of the development costs,
resulting in a deferred tax liability.
Illustration 1
Development costs
During the year ended 31 March 20X4, Epsilon correctly capitalised development costs of $1.6m in
accordance with IAS 38. The development project began to generate economic benefits for Epsilon
from 1 January 20X4. The directors of Epsilon estimated that the project would generate economic
benefits for five years from that date. Amortisation is charged on a monthly pro-rata basis. The
development expenditure was fully deductible against taxable profits for the year ended 31 March
20X4 and the rate of tax applicable is 25%.
Required
Discuss the deferred tax implications of the above in the financial statements of Epsilon for the year
ended 31 March 20X4.
Solution
Amortisation of the development costs over their useful life of 5 years should commence on 1 January
20X4. Therefore at 31 March 20X4, the development costs have a carrying amount of $1.52m
($1.6m – ($1.6m × 1/5 × 3/12)) in the financial statements.
The tax base of the development costs is nil since the relevant tax deduction has already been
claimed.
The deferred tax liability will be $380,000 ($1.52m × 25%).
640
6: Income taxes
Activity 7: Development costs

Xander spent $500,000 on development activities in the reporting period. This expenditure met the
recognition criteria of IAS 38 and has been capitalised. The capitalised costs have not been
amortised to date. For tax purposes, 100% tax relief is provided for expenditure on research and
development activities when the expenditure is incurred. The tax rate is 30%.
Required
Explain the deferred tax implications of the above information in Xander's financial statements at the
end of the reporting period.
2.2.4 Impairment losses and inventory losses

If an item of property, plant or equipment suffers an impairment loss, the carrying amount of that
asset is reduced.
If tax relief on the loss is only granted when the asset is sold, the reduction in value of the asset is
ignored for tax purposes until the sale. The tax base of the asset does not change, resulting in a
deductible temporary difference and a deferred tax asset.
Similarly, losses on inventory that are not tax deductible until the inventory is sold generate a
deferred tax asset.
2.2.5 Taxable temporary differences arising in business combinations

IAS 12 gives examples of circumstances that give rise to taxable temporary differences in a business
combination (IAS 12: IE, paras. 12–17).
 The carrying amount of an asset is increased to fair value in a business combination

and no equivalent adjustment is made for tax purposes.
 Unrealised losses resulting from intragroup transactions are eliminated by
inclusion in the carrying amount of inventory or property, plant and equipment.
 Retained earnings of subsidiaries, branches, associates and joint ventures are
included in consolidated retained earnings, but income taxes will be payable if the
profits are distributed to the reporting parent.
 Investments in foreign subsidiaries, branches or associates or interests in foreign joint
ventures are affected by changes in foreign exchange rates.
 An entity accounts in its own currency for the cost of the non-monetary assets of a
foreign operation that is integral to the reporting entity's operations but the
taxable profit or tax loss of the foreign operation is determined in the foreign currency.
(Here there may be either a taxable temporary difference or a deductible temporary
difference. Where there is a taxable temporary difference, the resulting deferred tax
liability is recognised, because it relates to the foreign operation's own assets and
liabilities, rather than to the reporting entity's investment in that foreign operation. The
deferred tax is charged to profit or loss.)
641
2.3 Deferred tax assets

A deferred tax asset should be recognised for all deductible temporary differences to the
extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which it can be
utilised. This is an application of prudence. Examples of deductible temporary differences given in
IAS 12 are shown below.
Transactions that affect profit or loss

 Retirement benefit costs (pension costs) are deducted from accounting profit as
service is provided by the employee. They are not deducted in determining taxable profit
until the entity pays either retirement benefits or contributions to a fund. (This may also
apply to similar expenses.)
 Accumulated depreciation of an asset in the financial statements is greater than the
accumulated depreciation allowed for tax purposes up to the year end.
 The cost of inventories sold before the year end is deducted from accounting profit
when goods/services are delivered, but is deducted from taxable profit when the cash is
received.
 The net realisable value of inventory, or the recoverable amount of an item of
property, plant and equipment falls and the carrying value is therefore reduced, but that
reduction is ignored for tax purposes until the asset is sold.
 Research costs (or organisation/other start-up costs) are recognised as an expense for
accounting purposes but are not deductible against taxable profits until a later period.
 Income is deferred in the statement of financial position, but has already been included
in taxable profit in current/prior periods.
 A government grant is included in the statement of financial position as deferred
income, but it will not be taxable in future periods.
(IAS 12: IE, B, paras. 1–7)
Fair value adjustments and revaluations

Current investments or financial instruments may be carried at fair value which is less than cost,
but no equivalent adjustment is made for tax purposes.
(IAS 12: IE, B, para. 8)
2.3.1 Reasoning behind the recognition of deferred tax assets on deductible

(a) When a liability is recognised, it is assumed that its carrying amount will be settled in the
form of outflows of economic benefits from the entity in future periods.
(b) When these resources flow from the entity, part or all may be deductible in determining
taxable profits of a period later than that in which the liability is recognised.
(c) A temporary tax difference then exists between the carrying amount of the liability and
its tax base.
642
6: Income taxes
(d) A deferred tax asset therefore arises, representing the income taxes that will be
recoverable in future periods when that part of the liability is allowed as a deduction from
taxable profit.
(e) Similarly, when the carrying amount of an asset is less than its tax base, the difference
gives rise to a deferred tax asset in respect of the income taxes that will be recoverable in
future periods.
(IAS 12: paras. 27–30)
Activity 8: Deductible temporary differences

Pargatha Co recognises a liability of $10,000 for accrued product warranty costs on 31 December
20X7. These product warranty costs will not be deductible for tax purposes until the entity pays
claims. The tax rate is 25%.
Required
State the deferred tax implications of this situation.
2.3.2 Deductible temporary differences arising in business combinations

IAS 12 gives examples of circumstances that give rise to taxable temporary differences in a business
combination (IAS 12: IE, paras. 12–17).
 A liability is recognised at its fair value in a business combination, but none of

the related expense is deducted in determining taxable profit until a later period
 Unrealised profits resulting from intragroup transactions are eliminated from
the carrying amount of assets, such as inventory or property, plant or equipment, but no
equivalent adjustment is made for tax purposes
 Investments in foreign subsidiaries, branches or associates or interests in foreign joint
ventures are affected by changes in foreign exchange rates
 A foreign operation accounts for its non-monetary assets in its own (functional) currency.
If its taxable profit or loss is determined in a different currency (under the presentation
currency method) changes in the exchange rate result in temporary differences. The
resulting deferred tax is charged or credited to profit or loss.
(IAS 12: IE paras. 9–13)
3 Recognition of deferred tax

Under IAS 12, a deferred tax liability or asset is recognised for all taxable and deductible temporary
differences, unless they 'arise from:
(a) The initial recognition of goodwill; or
(b) The initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction which
(i) Is not a business combination
(ii) At the time of the transaction, affects neither accounting profit nor taxable
profit (taxable loss).' (IAS 12: para. 15)
643
3.1 Recognising deferred tax assets

Deferred tax assets are only recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be
available against which the deductible temporary difference can be utilised.
It is assumed that enough taxable profit will be available if there are sufficient taxable
temporary differences which can be offset, in accordance with tax regulation, against the
available deductible temporary difference (IAS 12: para. 28).
If an entity has a history of recent losses, then this is evidence that future taxable profit may not
be available (see below).
3.1.1 Unused tax losses and unused tax credits

An entity may have unused tax losses or credits (ie which it can offset against taxable profits) at the
end of a period. Should a deferred tax asset be recognised in relation to such amounts? IAS 12
states that a deferred tax asset may be recognised in such circumstances 'to the extent that it is
probable future taxable profit will be available against which the unused tax
losses/credits can be utilised' (IAS 12: para. 34).
3.1.2 Reassessment of unrecognised deferred tax assets

For all unrecognised deferred tax assets, at each year end an entity should reassess the
availability of future taxable profits and whether part or all of any unrecognised deferred tax
assets should now be recognised. This may be due to an improvement in trading conditions which is
expected to continue (IAS 12: para. 37).
3.1.3 Recognition of deferred tax assets for unrealised losses

An amendment to IAS 12 was issued in January 2016 in order to clarify when a deferred tax asset
should be recognised for unrealised losses.
The IASB clarified that unrealised losses on debt instruments measured at fair value
and measured at cost for tax purposes give rise to a deductible temporary
difference regardless of whether the debt instrument's holder expects to recover the carrying
amount of the debt instrument by sale or by use.
This may seem to contradict the key requirement that an entity recognises deferred tax assets only if it
is probable that it will have future taxable profits. However, the amendment also addresses the issue
of what constitutes future taxable profits, and clarifies that:
(a) The carrying amount of an asset does not limit the estimation of probable future taxable
profits.
(b) Estimates for future taxable profits exclude tax deductions resulting from the reversal of
deductible temporary differences.
(c) An entity assesses a deferred tax asset in combination with other deferred tax assets. Where
tax law restricts the utilisation of tax losses, an entity would assess a deferred tax asset in
combination with other deferred tax assets of the same type.
(IAS 12: para. 29–29A)
Illustration 2
Deferred tax assets on unrealised losses
(Adapted from IAS 12: Illustrative Example 7)
Humbert has a debt instrument with a nominal value of $2,000,000. The fair value of the financial
instrument at the company's year end of 30 June 20X4 is $1,800,000. Humbert has determined that
there is a deductible temporary difference of $200,000. Humbert intends to hold the instrument until
maturity on 30 June 20X5, and expects that the $2,000,000 will be paid in full. This means that the
deductible temporary difference will reverse in full.
644
6: Income taxes
Humbert has, in addition, $60,000 of taxable temporary differences that will also reverse in full in
20X5. The company expects the bottom line of its tax return to show a tax loss of $40,000.
Required
Discuss, with calculations, whether Humbert can recognise a deferred tax asset under IAS 12 Income
Taxes.
Solution
The first stage is to use the reversal of the taxable temporary difference to arrive at the amount to be
tested for recognition.
Under IAS 12 Humbert will first consider whether it has a tax liability from a taxable temporary
difference that will support the recognition of the tax asset:
$'000
Deductible temporary difference 200
Reversing taxable temporary difference (60)
Remaining amount (recognition to be determined) 140
At least $60,000 may be recognised as a deferred tax asset.

The next stage is to calculate the future taxable profit. Following the amendment, this is done using
a formula, the aim of which is to derive the amount of tax profit or loss before the reversal of any
temporary difference:
$'000
Expected tax loss (per bottom line of tax return) (40)
Less reversing taxable temporary difference (60)
Add reversing deductible temporary difference 200
Taxable profit for recognition test 100
Finally, the results of the above two steps should be added, and the tax calculated:
Humbert would recognise a deferred tax asset of ($60,000 + $100,000) × 20% = $32,000. This
deferred tax asset would be recognised even though the company has an expected loss on its tax
return.
3.1.4 Deferred tax assets of an acquired subsidiary

Deferred tax assets of a subsidiary may not satisfy the criteria for recognition when a business
combination is initially accounted for but may be realised subsequently (IAS 12: para. 68).
These should be recognised as follows:
 If recognised within 12 months of the acquisition date and resulting from new information
about circumstances existing at the acquisition date, the credit entry should be made to
goodwill. If the carrying amount of goodwill is reduced to zero, any further amounts should be
recognised in profit or loss.
 If recognised outside the 12 month 'measurement period', or not resulting from new
information about circumstances existing at the acquisition date, the credit entry should be
made to profit or loss.
645
Illustration 3
Deferred tax assets of subsidiary
In 20X2 Jacko Co acquired a subsidiary, Jilly Co, which had deductible temporary differences of
$3m. The tax rate at the date of acquisition was 30%. The resulting deferred tax asset of $0.9m
was not recognised as an identifiable asset in determining the goodwill of $5m resulting from the
business combination. Two years after the acquisition, Jacko Co decided that future taxable profit
would probably be sufficient for the entity to recover the benefit of all the deductible temporary
differences.
Required
(a) State the accounting treatment of the subsequent recognition of the deferred tax asset in
20X4.
(b) What would happen if the tax rate had risen to 40% by 20X4 or decreased to 20%?
Solution
(a) The entity recognises a deferred tax asset of $0.9m ($3m × 30%) and, in profit or loss,
deferred tax income of $0.9m. Goodwill is not adjusted as the recognition does not arise
within the measurement period (ie within the 12 months following the acquisition).
(b) If the tax rate rises to 40%, the entity should recognise a deferred tax asset of $1.2m
($3m × 40%) and, in profit or loss, deferred tax income of $1.2m.
If the tax rate falls to 20%, the entity should recognise a deferred tax asset of $0.6m
($3m × 20%) and deferred tax income of $0.6m.
In both cases, the entity will also reduce the cost of goodwill by $0.9m and recognise an expense for
that amount in profit or loss.
3.1.5 Deferred tax on the initial recognition of assets or liabilities

A temporary difference can arise on initial recognition of an asset or liability, eg if part or all of the
cost of an asset will not be deductible for tax purposes. The nature of the transaction which led
to the initial recognition of the asset is important in determining the method of accounting for such
temporary differences.
If the transaction affects either accounting profit or taxable profit, an entity will recognise any
deferred tax liability or asset. The resulting deferred tax expense or income will be recognised
in profit or loss.
Where a transaction affects neither accounting profit nor taxable profit, IAS 12 does not
permit recognition of a deferred tax asset or liability as it would make the financial statements less
transparent.
Illustration 4
Initial recognition
Petros Co intends to use an asset which cost $10,000 in 20X7 through its useful life of five years.
Its residual value will then be nil. The tax rate is 40%. Any capital gain on disposal would not be
taxable (and any capital loss not deductible). Depreciation of the asset is not deductible for tax
purposes.
Required
State the deferred tax consequences in each of years 20X7 and 20X8.
646
6: Income taxes
Solution
In 20X7, as it recovers the carrying amount of the asset, Petros Co will earn taxable income of
$10,000 and pay tax of $4,000. The resulting deferred tax liability of $4,000 would not be
recognised because it results from the initial recognition of the asset.
As at 20X8, the carrying value of the asset is now $8,000. In earning taxable income of $8,000,
the entity will pay tax of $3,200. Again, the resulting deferred tax liability of $3,200 is not
recognised, because it results from the initial recognition of the asset.
4 Measurement of deferred tax

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates expected to apply to the period when
the asset is realised or liability settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted
(or substantively enacted) by the end of the reporting period (IAS 12: para. 47).
4.1 Change in tax rates

Where the corporate rate of income tax fluctuates from one year to another, a problem
arises in respect of the amount of deferred tax to be credited (debited) to profit or loss in later years.
IAS 12 requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be measured at the tax rates expected to apply
in the period when the asset is realised or liability settled, based on tax rates and laws
enacted (or substantively enacted) at the year end. In other words, IAS 12 requires the liability
method to be used. The liability method assumes that the tax effects of temporary differences
should be regarded as amounts of tax ultimately due by or to the company. Therefore deferred tax
provisions are calculated at the rate at which it is estimated that tax will be paid (or recovered) when
the temporary differences reverse.
4.2 Different rates of tax

In some countries different tax rates apply to different levels of taxable income. In such cases,
deferred tax assets and liabilities should be measured using the average rates that are expected
to apply to the taxable profit (loss) of the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to
reverse (IAS 12: para. 49).
4.3 Manner of recovery or settlement

In some jurisdictions, the way in which an entity recovers or settles the carrying amount of an
asset or liability may affect the tax base or the tax rate applying when the carrying amount of the
asset/liability is recovered/settled.
In such cases, the entity must consider the expected manner of recovery or settlement and measure
deferred tax using an appropriate tax rate and tax base (IAS 12: para. 51–51A).
647
Illustration 5
Manner of recovery or settlement
Richcard Co has an asset with a carrying amount of $10,000 and a tax base of $6,000. If the asset
were sold, a tax rate of 20% would apply. A tax rate of 30% would apply to other income.
Required
State the deferred tax consequences if the entity:
(a) Expects to sell the asset without further use.
(b) Expects to retain the asset and recover its carrying amount through use.
Solution
(a) A deferred tax liability is recognised of $(10,000 – 6,000) × 20% = $800.
(b) A deferred tax liability is recognised of $(10,000 – 6,000) × 30% = $1,200.
648
6: Income taxes
Activity answers
Activity 1: Current tax

(a)
$
Tax due on 20X8 profits ($120,000  33%) 39,600
Underpayment for 20X7 5,000
Tax charge and liability 44,600
(b)
$
Tax due on 20X8 profits (as above) 39,600
Overpayment for 20X7 (5,000)
Tax charge and liability 34,600
Alternatively, the rebate due could be shown separately as income in the statement of profit or loss
and other comprehensive income and as an asset in the statement of financial position. An offset
approach like the above is, however, most likely.
Activity 2: Tax losses carried back

Tax repayment due on tax losses = 30%  $24,000 = $7,200.
The double entry will be:
DEBIT Tax receivable (statement of financial position) $7,200
CREDIT Tax repayment (statement of profit or loss and other $7,200
comprehensive income)
The tax receivable will be shown as an asset until the repayment is received from the tax authorities.
Activity 3: Tax base of assets

(a) The tax base of the machine is $7,000 ($10,000 – $3,000).
(b) The tax base of the interest receivable is nil.
(c) The tax base of the trade receivables is $10,000.
(d) The tax base of the loan is $1m.
(e) The tax base of the dividend is $5,000.
In the case of (e), in substance the entire carrying amount of the asset is deductible against the
economic benefits. There is no taxable temporary difference. An alternative analysis is that the
accrued dividends receivable have a tax base of nil and a tax rate of nil is applied to the resulting
taxable temporary difference ($5,000). Under both analyses, there is no deferred tax liability.
Activity 4: Tax base of liabilities

(a) The tax base of the accrued expenses is nil.
(b) The tax base of the interest received in advance is nil.
(c) The tax base of the accrued fines and penalties is $100.
(d) The tax base of the loan is $1m.
649
Activity 5: Property, plant and equipment

Movement in the deferred tax liability for the year ended 31 December 20X2
$'000
Deferred tax liability b/d 33
Profit or loss charge 21
Deferred tax liability c/d 54
Workings
1 Deferred tax liability
Deferred tax
Carrying Temporary liability @
amount Tax base differences 30%
$'000 $'000 $'000 $'000
20X1
Cost 1,000 1,000 – –
Depreciation (W2) (90) (W3) (200)
c/d 910 800 110 (33)
20X2
b/d 910 800
Depreciation (90) (W3) (160)
c/d 820 640 180 (54)
2 Depreciation
$1,000,000 cost – $100,000 residual value / 10 years = $90,000 per annum.
3 Tax depreciation
20X1: $1,000,000  20% = $200,000
20X2: $800,000 Carrying amount b/d  20% = $160,000
Activity 6: Revaluation of property, plant and equipment

DEBIT Other comprehensive income (and revaluation surplus) $30,000
CREDIT Deferred tax liability $30,000
Working: Deferred tax
$
Carrying amount of asset 500,000
Less tax base (400,000)
Temporary difference 100,000
Deferred tax (liability) (30%  100,000) (30,000)
650
6: Income taxes
Activity 7: Development costs

The tax base of the asset is nil because the research and development expenditure has already been
fully relieved.
The carrying amount of the asset is $500,000.
This exceeds tax base and therefore there is a taxable temporary difference of $500,000.
This results in a deferred tax liability of $150,000 (500,000 × 30%).
(In other words, in order to recover the carrying amount of $500,000 the entity must earn taxable
income of $500,000, but it will not be able to deduct any further amounts as a taxable expense.)
Activity 8: Deductible temporary differences

The tax base of the liability is nil (carrying amount of $10,000 less the amount that will be
deductible for tax purposes in respect of the liability in future periods).
When the liability is settled for its carrying amount, the entity's future taxable profit will be reduced
by $10,000 and so its future tax payments by $10,000  25% = $2,500.
The difference of $10,000 between the carrying amount ($10,000) and the tax base (nil) is a
deductible temporary difference. The entity should therefore recognise a deferred tax asset of
$10,000  25% = $2,500 provided that it is probable that the entity will earn sufficient taxable
profits in future periods to benefit from a reduction in tax payments.
651
652
Financial instruments
653
1 Definitions
We should clarify some points arising from the financial instruments definitions:
(a) A 'contract' need not be in writing, but it must comprise an agreement that has 'clear
economic consequences' and which the parties to it cannot avoid, usually because the
agreement is enforceable in law.
(b) Financial instruments include both of the following:
(i) Primary instruments: eg receivables, payables and equity securities; and
(ii) Derivative instruments: eg financial options, futures and forwards, interest rate
swaps and currency swaps.
IAS 32 makes it clear that the following items are not financial instruments (IAS 32: paras. AG9–12):
(a) Physical assets, eg inventories, property, plant and equipment, leased assets and
intangible assets (patents, trademarks etc);
(b) Prepaid expenses, deferred revenue and most warranty obligations, because
they result in the receipt/delivery of goods and services, rather than cash or financial assets
or liabilities;
(c) Liabilities or assets that are not contractual in nature, eg income tax payable; and
(d) Contractual rights/obligations that do not involve recognition of a financial asset,
eg operating leases for lessors as no receivable is recognised.
2 Derecognition of financial assets and financial liabilities

The existing Conceptual Framework does not provide any guidance on derecognition and as a
result, there are inconsistent approaches to derecognition in different standards. ED/2015/3
Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting does provide guidance relating to derecognition,
based around faithful representation. The accounting requirements for derecognition aim to faithfully
represent the assets and liabilities retained after the transfer and the change in assets and liabilities
as a result of the transfer and detail is provided in the ED as to how these aims are achieved. There
are no planned amendments to IFRS 9 as a result of the ED and therefore it appears that the
derecognition criteria in respect of financial assets and liabilities discussed below are consistent with
the ED.
2.1 Derecognition of financial assets

Derecognition is the removal of a previously recognised financial instrument from an entity's statement
of financial position.
An entity should derecognise a financial asset when (IFRS 9: para. 3.2.3):
(a) The contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial asset expire; or
(b) The entity transfers the financial asset based on whether the entity transfers
substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset to
another party.
IFRS 9 gives examples of where an entity has transferred substantially all the risks
and rewards of ownership. These include (IFRS 9: para. B3.2.4):
(a) An unconditional sale of a financial asset; and
(b) A sale of a financial asset together with an option to repurchase the financial asset at its fair
value at the time of repurchase.
654
The standard also provides examples of situations where the risks and rewards of
ownership have not been transferred (IFRS 9: para. B3.2.5):
(a) A sale and repurchase transaction where the repurchase price is a fixed price or the sale price
plus a lender's return;
(b) A sale of a financial asset together with a total return swap that transfers the market risk
exposure back to the entity; and
(c) A sale of short-term receivables in which the entity guarantees to compensate the transferee for
credit losses that are likely to occur.
It is possible for only part of a financial asset or liability to be derecognised. This is allowed if the
part comprises:
(a) Only specifically identified cash flows; or
(b) Only a fully proportionate (pro rata) share of the total or specifically identified cash flows.
For example, if an entity holds a bond it has the right to two separate sets of cash inflows: those
relating to the principal and those relating to the interest. It could sell the right to receive the interest
to another party while retaining the right to receive the principal.
On derecognition, the amount to be included in profit or loss for the period is calculated as follows
(IFRS 9: para. 3.2.13):
$ $
Carrying amount (measured at the date of derecognition) allocated to the
part derecognised X
Less consideration received for the part derecognised (including any
new asset obtained less any new liability assumed) X
(X)
Difference to profit or loss X
The following flowchart, taken from the appendix to the standard (IFRS 9: Appendix B, para.
B3.2.1), will help you decide whether, and to what extent, a financial asset is derecognised.
655
Source: IFRS 9 Application Guidance
2.2 Derecognition of financial liabilities

A financial liability is derecognised when it is extinguished – ie when the obligation specified in
the contract is discharged or cancelled or expires (IFRS 9: para. 3.3.1).
(a) Where an existing borrower and lender of debt instruments exchange one financial instrument
for another with substantially different terms, this is accounted for as an extinguishment of the
original financial liability and the recognition of a new financial liability (IFRS 9: para. 3.3.2).
(b) Similarly, a substantial modification of the terms of an existing financial liability or a part of it
is accounted for as an extinguishment of the original financial liability and the recognition of a
new financial liability (IFRS 9: para. 3.3.2).
656
For this purpose, a 'substantial modification' of the terms arises where the discounted present
value of cash flows under the new terms, discounted using the original effective interest rate, is
at least 10% different from the discounted present value of the remaining cash flows of the
original financial liability (IFRS 9: para. B3.3.6).
The difference between the carrying amount of a financial liability (or part of a financial liability)
extinguished or transferred to another party and the consideration paid, including any non-cash
assets transferred or liabilities assumed, is recognised in profit or loss (IFRS 9: para. 3.3.3).
3 Classification and measurement

3.1 Classification and measurement of financial assets
3.1.1 Initial measurement of financial assets
Financial instruments are initially measured at the transaction price; that is, the fair value of the
consideration given (IFRS 9: para. 5.1.1).
An exception is where part of the consideration given is for something other than the financial
asset. In this case the financial asset is initially measured at fair value evidenced by a quoted price in
an active market for an identical asset (ie an IFRS 13 level 1 input) or based on a valuation
technique that uses only data from observable markets. The difference between the fair value at
initial recognition and the transaction price is recognised as a gain or loss.
In the case of financial assets classified as measured at amortised cost or at fair value
through other comprehensive income, transaction costs directly attributable to the
acquisition of the financial asset are added to this amount.
3.1.2 Subsequent measurement of financial assets

Under IFRS 9, financial assets are measured subsequent to recognition either:
 At amortised cost, using the effective interest method;
 At fair value through other comprehensive income;
 At fair value through profit or loss.
Amortised cost of a financial asset or financial liability: the amount at which the financial asset or
liability is measured at initial recognition minus principal repayments, plus or minus the cumulative
Key term
amortisation using the effective interest method of any difference between that initial amount
and the maturity amount and, for financial assets, adjusted for any loss allowance.
Effective interest method: a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial instrument
and of allocating the interest income or interest expense over the relevant period.
Effective interest rate: the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts
through the expected life of the financial instrument to the net carrying amount of the financial asset
or liability.
657
SUBSEQUENT MEASUREMENT – FINANCIAL ASSETS
Amortised cost Fair value through Fair value through

other comprehensive income profit or loss
 Investments in debt  Investments in debt instruments  All other financial assets

instruments held within a held within a business model to (and any financial asset
business model to collect both collect contractual cash if this would eliminate or
contractual cash flows flows (solely principal & interest) significantly reduce an
(solely principal & and sell 'accounting mismatch')
interest)  Investments in equity instruments
not held for trading (optional
irrevocable election on initial
recognition)
Basis of classification
The IFRS 9 classification is made on the basis of both (IFRS 9: para. 4.1.2):
(a) The entity's business model for managing the financial assets; and
(b) The contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial asset.
Investments in debt instruments at amortised cost
An investment in a debt instrument is classified as measured at amortised cost where (IFRS 9:
para 4.1.2):
(a) The objective of the business model within which the asset is held is to hold assets in order to
collect contractual cash flows; and
(b) The contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are
solely payments of principal and interest on the principal outstanding.
Investments in debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income
An investment in a debt instrument is classified and measured at fair value through other
comprehensive income if it meets both the following criteria (IFRS 9: para. 4.1.2A):
(a) The financial asset is held within a business model whose objective is achieved by both
collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets; and
solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.
Investments in equity instruments
Investments in equity instruments may not be classified as measured at amortised cost and must be
measured at fair value. This is because contractual cash flows on specified dates are not a
characteristic of equity instruments. However, if an investment in an equity instrument is not held
for trading, an entity can make an irrevocable election at initial recognition to measure it at
658
fair value through other comprehensive income with only dividend income recognised in
profit or loss (IFRS 9: para. 5.7.5).
This is different from the treatment of investments in debt instruments, where the fair
value through other comprehensive income classification is mandatory for assets
meeting the criteria, unless the fair value option through profit or loss option is chosen.
Fair value through profit or loss
All other financial assets must be measured at fair value through profit or loss (IFRS 9:
para. 4.1.4).
Fair value through profit or loss option to avoid an 'accounting mismatch'
Even if an instrument meets the above criteria for measurement at amortised cost or fair value through
other comprehensive income, IFRS 9 allows such financial assets to be designated, at initial
recognition, as being measured at fair value through profit or loss if a recognition
or measurement inconsistency (an 'accounting mismatch') would otherwise arise from
measuring assets or liabilities or recognising the gains and losses on them on different bases
(IFRS 9: para. 4.1.5).
Illustration 1
On 1 January 20X1 Abacus Co purchases a debt instrument for its fair value of $1,000. The debt
instrument is due to mature on 31 December 20X5. The instrument has a principal amount of $1,250
and the instrument carries fixed interest at 4.72% that is paid annually. (The effective interest rate is
10%.)
Abacus holds the investment in a portfolio of financial assets held to collect the contractual cash flows.
Required
How should Abacus Co account for the debt instrument over its five year term?
Solution
The debt instrument is measured at amortised cost as the business model is to collect the contractual
cash flows and the cash flows are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount
outstanding.
Abacus Co will receive interest of $59 (1,250 × 4.72%) each year and $1,250 when the instrument
matures.
Abacus must allocate the discount of $250 and the interest receivable over the five year term at a
constant rate on the carrying amount of the debt. To do this, it must apply the effective interest rate of
10%.
The following table shows the allocation over the years:
Year 20X1 20X2 20X3 20X4 20X5
$ $ $ $ $
b/d 1,000 1,041 1,086 1,136 1,190
Effective
interest 100 104 109 113 119
Cash
received (59) (59) (59) (59) (1,309) (1,250 + 59)
c/d 1,041 1,086 1,136 1,190 –
Each year the carrying amount of the financial asset is increased by the interest income for the year
and reduced by the interest actually received during the year.
659
3.1.3 Financial assets measured at fair value

Where a financial asset is classified as measured at fair value, fair value is established at each
period end in accordance with IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement. That standard requires that a fair
value hierarchy is applied with three levels of input (IFRS 13: paras. 76, 81, 86):
Level 1 inputs. Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
entity can access at the measurement date.
Level 2 inputs. Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the
asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These may include quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, or quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets
that are not active.
Level 3 inputs. Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
Any changes in fair value are normally recognised in profit or loss.
There are three exceptions to this rule (IFRS 9: para 5.7.1):
(a) The asset is part of a hedging relationship.
(b) The financial asset is an investment in an equity instrument not held for trading. In this
case the entity can make an irrevocable election to recognise changes in the fair value in
other comprehensive income.
(c) It is a financial asset measured at fair value through other comprehensive
income because it is a financial asset held within a business model whose objective is
achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets.
Note that direct costs of acquisition are capitalised only in the case of a financial asset or financial
liability not held at fair value through profit or loss. If the asset or liability is held at fair value
through profit or loss, the costs of acquisition are expensed. This means that in the case of financial
assets held at amortised cost, costs of acquisition are capitalised. They would be added
to the asset and deducted from the liability amount. Similarly, if an irrevocable election has been
made to take gains and losses on the financial asset to other comprehensive income, costs
of acquisition should be added to the purchase cost.
Illustration 2
On 8 February 20X8 Orange Co acquires a quoted investment in the shares of Lemon Co with the
intention of holding it in the long term. The investment cost $850,000. At Orange Co's year end of
31 March 20X8, the market price of an identical investment is $900,000. How is the asset initially
and subsequently measured?
Orange Co has elected to recognise changes in the fair value of the equity investment in other
Solution
 The asset is initially recognised at the fair value of the consideration, being $850,000.
 At the period end it is re-measured to $900,000.
 This results in the recognition of $50,000 in other comprehensive income.
Activity 1: Investments in equity instruments

In January 20X6 Wolf purchased 10 million $1 listed equity shares in Hall at a price of $5 per
share. Transaction costs were $3m. Wolf's year end is 30 November.
At 30 November 20X6, the shares in Hall were trading at $6.50. On 31 October 20X6 Wolf
received a dividend from Hall of 20c per share.
660
Required
Show the financial statement extracts of Wolf at 30 November 20X6 relating to the investment in
Hall on the basis that:
(a) The shares were bought for trading.
(b) The shares were bought as a source of dividend income and were the subject of an
irrevocable election at initial recognition to recognise them at fair value through other
3.2 Re-classification of financial assets

Although on initial recognition financial instruments must be classified in accordance with the
requirements of IFRS 9, in some cases they may be subsequently reclassified. IFRS 9 requires that
when an entity changes its business model for managing financial assets, it should
reclassify all affected financial assets (IFRS 9: para. 4.4.1).
This reclassification applies only to investments in debt instruments, as investments in equity
instruments must be classified as measured at fair value (IFRS 9: para. 4.1.4).
Similarly, reclassification of financial liabilities is not permitted (IFRS 9: para. 4.4.2).
3.2.1 Examples: Reclassification permitted

Reclassification is permitted in the following circumstances, because a change in the
business model has taken place (IFRS 9: para. B4.4.1):
(a) An entity has a portfolio of commercial loans that it holds to sell in the short term. The entity
acquires a company that manages commercial loans and has a business model that holds the
loans in order to collect the contractual cash flows. The portfolio of commercial loans is no
longer for sale, and the portfolio is now managed together with the acquired commercial
loans and all are held to collect the contractual cash flows.
(b) A financial services firm decides to shut down its retail mortgage business. That business no
longer accepts new business and the financial services firm is actively marketing its mortgage
loan portfolio for sale.
3.2.2 Examples: Reclassification not permitted

Reclassification is not permitted in the following circumstances, because a change in the
business model has not taken place (IFRS 9: para. B4.4.3):
(a) A change in intention related to particular financial assets (even in circumstances of significant
changes in market conditions);
(b) A temporary disappearance of a particular market for financial assets; or
(c) A transfer of financial assets between parts of the entity with different business models.
3.2.3 Gains and losses on reclassification of financial assets

If a financial asset is reclassified from amortised cost to fair value, any gain or loss arising
from a difference between the previous carrying amount and fair value is recognised in profit or
loss (IFRS 9: para. 5.6.2).
If a financial asset is reclassified from fair value to amortised cost, fair value at the date of
reclassification becomes the new carrying amount (IFRS 9: para. 5.6.3).
661
3.3 Classification and measurement of financial liabilities

3.3.1 Initial measurement of financial liabilities
IFRS 9 requires that financial liabilities are initially measured at transaction price, ie the fair value of
consideration received except where part of the consideration received is for something other than
the financial liability. In this case the financial liability is initially measured at fair value measured as
for financial assets (see above). Transaction costs are deducted from this amount for financial
liabilities classified as measured at amortised cost (IFRS 9: para. 5.5.1).
3.3.2 Subsequent measurement of financial liabilities

After initial recognition, all financial liabilities should be measured at amortised cost, with the
exception of (IFRS 9: para. 4.2.1):
 Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss (including most derivatives);
 Financial liabilities arising when transfer of financial asset does not qualify for derecognition;
and
 Financial guarantee contracts and commitments to provide a loan at a below-market interest
rate.
SUBSEQUENT MEASUREMENT – FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
Amortised cost Fair value through Other basis

profit or loss
 Most financial  Financial liabilities  Financial liability arising when

liabilities 'held for trading' transfer of a financial asset does
 Designated at fair value not qualify for derecognition
through profit or loss on – measure on same basis as
initial recognition transferred financial asset (ie
amortised cost or fair value)
 Financial guarantee contracts and
commitments to provide a loan at
below-market interest rate,
measured at higher of:
– impairment loss allowance; and
– amount initially recognised less
amounts amortised to P/L
(IFRS 15)
A financial liability is classified at fair value through profit or loss if (IFRS 9: Appendix B):
(a) It is held for trading, ie:
(i) Is acquired or incurred principally for the purpose of selling or repurchasing it in the
near term;
(ii) On initial recognition is part of a portfolio of identified financial instruments that are
managed together and for which there is evidence of a recent actual pattern of short-
term profit-taking; or
(iii) Is a derivative (except for a derivative that is a financial guarantee contract or a
designated and effective hedging instrument).
662
Or:
(b) Upon initial recognition it is irrevocably designated at fair value through profit or
loss. This is permitted when it results in more relevant information because (IFRS 9:
para. 4.2.2):
(i) It eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency
('accounting mismatch') that would otherwise arise from measuring assets or liabilities
or recognising the gains and losses on them on different bases; or
(ii) It is a group of financial liabilities or financial assets and liabilities and its performance
is evaluated on a fair value basis, in accordance with a documented risk management
or investment strategy.
Note. Derivatives are always measured at fair value through profit or loss.
Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost
The definitions of amortised cost, effective interest method and effective interest rate that are used for
measurement of financial assets are also used for financial liabilities.
Illustration 3
Galaxy Co issues a bond for $503,778 on 1 January 20X2. No interest is payable on the bond,
but it will be redeemed on 31 December 20X4 for $600,000. The effective interest rate of the
bond is 6%.
Required
Calculate the charge to profit or loss of Galaxy Co for the year ended 31 December 20X2 and the
balance outstanding at 31 December 20X2.
Solution
The bond is a 'deep discount' bond and is a financial liability of Galaxy Co. It is measured at
amortised cost. Although there is no interest as such, the difference between the initial cost of the
bond and the price at which it will be redeemed is a finance cost. This must be allocated over the
term of the bond at a constant rate on the carrying amount.
The effective interest rate is 6%.
The charge to profit or loss for the year is $30,226 (503,778 × 6%).
The balance outstanding at 31 December 20X2 is $534,004 (503,778 + 30,226).
Activity 2: Financial liability at amortised cost

On 1 January 20X3 Deferred issued $600,000 loan notes. Issue costs were $200. The loan notes
do not carry interest, but are redeemable at a premium of $152,389 on 31 December 20X4. The
effective finance cost of the loan notes is 12%.
Required
Show the amortised cost for the two years ending 31 December 20X4.
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss

Financial liabilities which are held for trading are re-measured to fair value each year in accordance
with IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement with any gain or loss recognised in profit or loss.
663
Exceptions
The exceptions to the above treatment of financial liabilities occur if (IFRS 9: para. 5.7.1):
(a) It is part of a hedging arrangement.
(b) It is a financial liability designated as at fair value through profit or loss and the entity is
required to present the effects of changes in the liability's credit risk in other comprehensive
income (see below).
Credit risk re financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss
IFRS 9 requires that financial liabilities which are designated as measured at fair value
through profit or loss are treated differently. In this case the gain or loss in a period must
be classified into (IFRS 9: para 5.7.7):
 Gain or loss resulting from credit risk; and
 Remaining gain or loss.
This provision of IFRS 9 was in response to an anomaly regarding changes in the credit risk of a
financial liability.
Changes in a financial liability's credit risk affect the fair value of that financial
liability. This means that when an entity's creditworthiness deteriorates, the fair value of its issued
debt will decrease (and vice versa). For financial liabilities measured using the fair value option, this
would cause a gain (or loss) to be recognised in profit or loss for the year. For example:
PROFIT OR LOSS FOR THE YEAR
Liabilities at fair value (except derivatives and liabilities held for trading) $'000
Change in fair value 100
Profit (loss) for the year 100
Many users of financial statements found this result to be counter-intuitive and confusing.
Accordingly, IFRS 9 requires the gain or loss as a result of credit risk to be recognised in other
comprehensive income (IFRS 9: para. 5.7.7).
The remaining gain or loss (ie not the result of credit risk) is recognised in profit or loss (IFRS 9:
para. 5.7.7).
On derecognition any gains or losses recognised in other comprehensive income are not transferred
to profit or loss, although the cumulative gain or loss may be transferred within equity.
Example of IFRS 9 presentation
PROFIT OR LOSS FOR THE YEAR
Liabilities at fair value (except derivatives and liabilities held for trading) $'000
Change in fair value not attributable to credit risk 90
Profit (loss) for the year 90
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (NOT RECLASSIFIED TO PROFIT OR LOSS)

Fair value loss on financial liability attributable to change in credit risk 10
Total comprehensive income 100
664
Accounting mismatch
There is an exception to the above rule. If recognising the gain or loss resulting from a change in
credit risk in other comprehensive income would create or enlarge an accounting
mismatch, the gain or loss is still recognised in profit or loss (IFRS 9: para. 5.7.8).
An accounting mismatch is a measurement or recognition inconsistency that would otherwise arise
from measuring assets or liabilities or recognising the gains and losses on them on different bases.
That determination is made at initial recognition and is not reassessed (IFRS 9: para. 4.1.5).
665
Activity answers
Chapter 7
Activity 1: Investments in equity instruments

(i) STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Extract)
$m
Profit or loss for the year
Investment income (10m × (6.5 – 5.0)) 12
Dividend income (10m × 20c) 2
Transaction costs (3)

Investments in equity instruments (10m × 6.5) 65
(ii) STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Extract)
$m
Profit or loss for the year
Dividend income 2

Gain on investment in equity instruments (65 – 50 + 3) 12
Investments in equity instruments
(10m × 6.5) 65
Activity 2: Financial liability at amortised cost

The premium on redemption of the loan notes represents a finance cost. The effective rate of interest
must be applied so that the debt is measured at amortised cost.
At the time of issue, the loan notes are recognised at their net proceeds of $599,800 (600,000 – 200).
The amortised cost is calculated as follows:
Year 20X3 20X4
$ $
b/d (600,000 – 200) 599,800 671,776
Effective interest (b/d × 12%) 71,976 80,613
Cash received (0) (0)
c/d 671,776 752,389 = 600,000 + 152,389 premium
666
Leases
667
1 Lessee accounting
1.1 Identifying a lease: examples
The following flowchart may assist you in determining whether a lease may be identified in the
examples that follow:
No
Is there an identified asset?
Consider paragraphs B13−B20.
Yes
Does the customer have the right to

obtain substantially all of the economic No
benefits from use of the asset throughout
the period of use?
Consider paragraphs B21–B23.
Yes
Does the customer, the supplier or

Customer neither party have the right to direct how Supplier
and for what purpose the asset is used
throughout the period of use?
Consider paragraphs B25–B30.
Neither; how and for what

purpose the asset will be
used is predetermined
Does the customer have the right to

Yes operate the asset throughout the period of
use, without the supplier having the right
to change those operating instructions?
Consider paragraph B24(b)(i).
No
Does the customer design the asset in a way

No
that predetermines how and for what
purpose the asset will be used throughout
the period of use?
Consider paragraph B24(b)(ii).
Yes
The contract does not

The contract contains a lease
contain a lease
(IFRS 16: Appendix B, para. B31)
Illustration 1
Coketown Council has entered into a five-year contract with Carefleet Co, under which Carefleet Co
supplies the council with ten vehicles for the purposes of community transport. Carefleet Co owns the
relevant vehicles, all ten of which are specified in the contract. Coketown Council determines the
routes taken for community transport and the charges and eligibility for discounts. The council can
choose to use the vehicles for purposes other than community transport. When the vehicles are not
being used, they are kept at the council's offices and cannot be retrieved by Carefleet unless
Coketown Council defaults on payment. If a vehicle needs to be serviced or repaired, Carefleet is
obliged to provide a temporary replacement vehicle of the same type.
668
8: Leases
Analysis
Conclusion: this is a lease. There is an identifiable asset, the ten vehicles specified in the contract.
The council has a right to use the vehicles for the period of the contract. Carefleet Co does not have
the right to substitute any of the vehicles unless they are being serviced or repaired. Therefore
Coketown Council would need to recognise an asset and liability in its statement of financial position.
Illustration 2
Broketown Council has recently made substantial cuts to its community transport service. It will now
provide such services only in cases of great need, assessed on a case by case basis. It has entered
into a two-year contract with Fleetcar Co for the use of one of its minibuses for this purpose. The
minibus must seat ten people, but Fleetcar Co can use any of its ten-seater minibuses when required.
Analysis
Conclusion: this is not a lease. There is no identifiable asset. Fleetcar can exchange one minibus for
another. Therefore Broketown Council should account for the rental payments as an expense in profit
or loss.
Illustration 3
This example is taken from IFRS 16 Illustrative Example 3.
Kabal enters into a ten-year contract with a utilities company (Telenew) for the right to use three
specified, physically distinct dark fibres within a larger cable connecting North Town to South Town.
Kabal makes the decisions about the use of the fibres by connecting each end of the fibres to its
electronic equipment (ie Kabal 'lights' the fibres and decides what data, and how much data,
those fibres will transport). If the fibres are damaged, Telenew is responsible for the repairs and
maintenance. Telenew owns extra fibres, but can substitute those for Kabal's fibres only for reasons
of repairs, maintenance or malfunction (and is obliged to substitute the fibres in these cases).
Analysis
Conclusion: this is a lease. The contract contains a lease of dark fibres. Kabal has the right to use the
three dark fibres for ten years.
There are three identified fibres. The fibres are explicitly specified in the contract and are physically
distinct from other fibres within the cable. Telenew cannot substitute the fibres other than for reasons
of repairs, maintenance or malfunction (IFRS 16: para. B18).
Kabal has the right to control the use of the fibres throughout the ten-year period of use because:
(a) Kabal has the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from use of the fibres
over the ten-year period of use and Kabal has exclusive use of the fibres throughout the period
of use.
(b) Kabal has the right to direct the use of the fibres because IFRS 16: para. B24 applies:
(i) The customer has the right to direct how and for what purpose the asset is used during
the whole of its period of use; or
(ii) The relevant decisions about use are pre-determined and the customer can operate the
asset without the supplier having the right to change those operating instructions.
Kabal makes the relevant decisions about how and for what purpose the fibres are used by deciding
(i) when and whether to light the fibres and (ii) when and how much output the fibres will produce
(ie what data, and how much data, those fibres will transport). Kabal has the right to change these
decisions during the ten-year period of use.
669
Although Telenew's decisions about repairing and maintaining the fibres are essential to their
efficient use, those decisions do not give Telenew the right to direct how and for what purpose the
fibres are used. Consequently, Telenew does not control the use of the fibres during the period of use.
1.2 Separating multiple components of a lease contract

A contract may contain both a lease component and a non-lease component. In other words it may
include an amount payable by the lessee for activities and costs that do not transfer goods or
services to the lessee (IFRS 16: para. B33). These activities and costs might, for example, include
maintenance, repairs or cleaning.
IFRS 16 requires entities to account for the lease component of the contract separately
from the non-lease component. The entity must split the rental or lease payment and:
 Account for the lease component under IFRS 16; and
 Account for the service element separately, generally as an expense in profit or loss.
The consideration in the contract is allocated on the basis of the stand-alone prices of the
lease component(s) and the non-lease component(s).
Illustration 4
Livery Co leases a delivery van from Bettalease Co for three years at $12,000 per year. This
payment includes servicing costs.
Livery could lease the same make and model of van for $11,000 per year and would need to pay
$2,000 a year for servicing.
Solution
Livery Co would allocate $10,154 ($12,000 × $11,000 ÷ $(11,000 + 2,000)) to the lease
component and account for that as a lease under IFRS 16.
Livery Co would allocate $1,846 ($12,000 × $2,000 ÷ $(11,000 + 2,000)) to the servicing
component and recognise it in profit or loss as an expense.
1.3 Remeasurement example
Illustration 5
Remeasurement: revision of lease term
(Adapted from IFRS 16 Illustrative Example 13)
Lester enters into a ten-year lease of a floor of a building, with an option to extend for five years.
Lease payments are $50,000 per year during the initial term and $55,000 per year during the
optional period, all payable at the beginning of each year. The interest rate implicit in the lease was
not readily determinable. Lester's incremental borrowing rate was 5 per cent per annum.
Lester is now in the sixth year of the ten-year lease, with its option to renew for another five years.
The optional period has not been included in the initial assessment of the lease term. Lester acquires
Wester, which has been leasing a floor in another building. The lease entered into by Wester
contains a termination option that is exercisable by Wester. Following the acquisition of Wester,
Lester needs two floors in a building suitable for the increased workforce of the combined companies.
To minimise costs, Lester (a) enters into a separate eight-year lease of another floor in the building it
currently occupies that will be available for use at the end of Year 7 and (b) terminates early the
lease entered into by Wester with effect from the beginning of Year 8. Wester will then move into the
new floor leased by Lester.
Lester's incremental borrowing rate at the end of Year 6 is 6 per cent per annum.
670
8: Leases
Solution
Moving Wester's staff to the same building occupied by Lester creates an economic incentive for
Lester to extend its original lease at the end of the non-cancellable period of ten years. The
acquisition of Wester and the relocation of Wester's staff is a significant event that is within the
control of Lester and affects whether Lester is reasonably certain to exercise the extension option
not previously included in its determination of the lease term. This is because the original floor has
greater utility (and thus provides greater benefits) to Lester than alternative assets that could be
leased for a similar amount to the lease payments for the optional period – Lester would incur
additional costs if it were to lease a similar floor in a different building because the workforce
would be located in different buildings. Consequently, at the end of Year 6, Lester concludes that
it is now reasonably certain to exercise the option to extend its original lease as a result of its
acquisition and planned relocation of Wester.
Lester remeasures the lease liability at the present value of four payments of $50,000 followed by
five payments of $55,000, all discounted at the revised discount rate of 6 per cent per annum.
1.4 Sale and leaseback example
Illustration 6
Sale and leaseback: Selling price greater than fair value (additional financing)
(Adapted from IFRS 16 Illustrative Example 24)
Selleasy Co sells a building to Buylesser for $800,000 cash. The carrying amount of the building
prior to the sale was $600,000. Selleasy arranges to lease the building back for five years at
$120,000 per annum, payable in arrears. The remaining economic life of the building is 15 years.
The transaction satisfies the performance obligations in IFRS 15, so will be accounted for as a sale
and leaseback.
At the date of the sale the fair value of the building was $750,000, so the excess $50,000 paid by
the buyer is recognised as additional financing provided by Buylesser.
The interest rate implicit in the lease is 4.5% and the present value of the annual payments is:
$
120,000/1.045 114,833
120,000/1.0452 109,888
120,000/1.0453 105,155
120,000/1.0454 100,627
120,000/1.0455 96,294
526,797
Of this, $476,797 relates to the lease and $50,000 relates to the additional financing.
At the commencement date, the seller-lessee measures the right-of-use asset arising from the
leaseback of the building at the proportion of the previous carrying amount of the building that
relates to the right of use retained. This is calculated as carrying amount × discounted lease
payments/fair value.
In this example: $600,000 × $476,797/$750,000 = $381,437
Selleasy only recognises the amount of gain that relates to the rights transferred. The gain on sale of
the building is $150,000 (750,000 – 600,000), of which:
(a) $150,000 × $476,797/$750,000 = $95,360 – relates to the rights retained
(b) The balance: $150,000 – $95,360 = $54,640 – relates to the rights transferred to the buyer.
At the commencement date the lessee accounts for the transaction as follows:
671
$ $
DEBIT Cash 800,000
DEBIT Right-of-use asset 381,437
CREDIT Building 600,000
CREDIT Financial liability 526,797
CREDIT Gain on rights transferred 54,640
The right-of-use asset will be depreciated over five years; the gain will be recognised in profit or loss
and the financial liability will be increased each year by the interest charge and reduced by the
lease payments.
672
Share-based payment
673
1 Background to IFRS 2
It has become increasingly common for entities to pay for goods or services by issuing shares or
share options. Share schemes are a common feature of director and executive remuneration.
Companies whose shares or share options are regarded as a valuable 'currency' commonly use
share-based payments to obtain employee and professional services.
The increasing use of share-based payments raised questions about the accounting treatment of such
transactions in the financial statements.
Share options are often granted to employees at an exercise price that is equal to or higher than the
market price of the shares at the date the option is granted. Consequently, the options have no
intrinsic value and so prior to IFRS 2 Share-based Payment, no transaction was recorded in the
That led to an anomaly: if a company pays its employees in cash, an expense is recognised in profit
or loss, but if the payment is in share options, no expense is recognised. The omission of expenses
arising from share-based payment transactions with employees was believed to cause economic
distortions and corporate governance concerns.
IFRS 2 was issued to address these issues and requires an entity to reflect the effects of share-based
payment transactions in its financial statements.
1.1 Arguments against recognition of share-based payment in the

There are a number of arguments against recognition of share-based payments in the financial
statements. The IASB has considered and rejected the arguments below.
(a) No cost therefore no charge
There is no cost to the entity because the granting of shares or options does not require the
entity to sacrifice cash or other assets. Therefore, a charge should not be recognised.
This argument is unsound because it ignores the fact that a transaction has occurred. The
employees have provided valuable services to the entity in return for valuable shares or
options.
(b) Earnings per share is hit twice
It is argued that the charge to profit or loss for the employee services consumed reduces the
entity's earnings, while at the same time there is an increase in the number of shares issued.
However, the dual impact on earnings per share simply reflects the two economic events that
have occurred.
(i) The entity has issued shares or options, thus increasing the denominator of the earnings
per share calculation.
(ii) It has also consumed the resources it received for those shares or options, thus reducing
the numerator.
(c) Adverse economic consequences
It could be argued that entities might be discouraged from introducing or continuing employee
share plans if they were required to recognise them on the financial statements. However, if
this happened, it might be because the requirement for entities to account properly for
employee share plans had revealed the economic consequences of such plans.
A situation where entities are able to obtain and consume resources by issuing valuable shares
or options without having to account for such transactions could be perceived as a distortion.
674
2 Scope of IFRS 2
IFRS 2 applies to all share-based payment transactions (IFRS 2: para. 2).
IFRS 2 was amended in June 2009 to address situations in those parts of the world where, for public
policy or other reasons, companies give their shares or rights to shares to individuals, organisations
or groups that have not provided goods or services to the company. An example is the issue of
shares to a charitable organisation for less than fair value, where the benefits are less tangible than
usual goods or services.
(IFRS 2: paras. 1–6)
2.1 Share-based payment among group entities

Payment for goods or services received by an entity within a group may be made in the form of
granting equity instruments of the parent company, or equity instruments of another group company.
IFRS 2 states that this type of transaction qualifies as a share-based payment transaction within the
scope of IFRS 2.
In 2009, the standard was amended to clarify that it applies to the following arrangements:
(a) Where the entity's suppliers (including employees) will receive cash payments that are linked
to the price of the equity instruments of the entity.
(b) Where the entity's suppliers (including employees) will receive cash payments that are linked
to the price of the equity instruments of the entity's parent.
Under either arrangement, the entity's parent had an obligation to make the required cash payments
to the entity's suppliers. The entity itself did not have any obligation to make such payments. IFRS 2
applies to arrangements such as those described above even if the entity that receives goods or
services from its suppliers has no obligation to make the required share-based cash payments.
2.2 Transactions outside the scope of IFRS 2

Certain transactions are outside the scope of the IFRS:
(a) Transactions with employees and others in their capacity as a holder of equity instruments of
the entity (for example, where an employee receives additional shares in a rights issue to all
shareholders)
(b) The issue of equity instruments in exchange for control of another entity in a business
combination
3 Equity-settled share-based payment – further practice
Activity 1: Share options

During its financial year ended 31 January 20X6, an entity issued share options to several of its
senior employees. The options vest immediately upon issue.
What is the double entry required to recognise the options?
675
Activity 2: Share-based payment

On 1 January 20X3 an entity grants 250 share options to each of its 200 employees. The only
condition attached to the grant is that the employees should continue to work for the entity until
31 December 20X6. Five employees leave during the year and management estimates that a total of
20 employees will leave during the 4 year vesting period.
The market price of each option was $12 at 1 January 20X3 and $15 at 31 December 20X3.
Required
Explain how this transaction will be reflected in the financial statements for the year ended
31 December 20X3.
4 Equity-settled compared to cash-settled share-based

payment
The following illustration shows the differences in accounting for an equity-settled transaction and a
cash-settled transaction.
Illustration 1
Share-based payment
J&B granted 200 options on its $1 ordinary shares to each of its 800 employees on 1 January
20X1. Each grant is conditional upon the employee being employed by J&B until 31 December 20X3.
J&B estimated at 1 January 20X1 that:
(i) The fair value of each option was $4 (before adjustment for the possibility of forfeiture).
(ii) Approximately 50 employees would leave during 20X1, 40 during 20X2 and 30 during 20X3
thereby forfeiting their rights to receive the options. The departures were expected to be evenly
spread within each year.
The exercise price of the options was $1.50 and the market value of a J&B share on 1 January 20X1
was $3.
In the event, only 40 employees left during 20X1 (and the estimate of total departures was revised
down to 95 at 31 December 20X1), 20 during 20X2 (and the estimate of total departures was
revised to 70 at 31 December 20X2) and none during 20X3, spread evenly during each year.
Required
The directors of J&B have asked you to illustrate how the scheme is accounted for under IFRS 2
Share-based Payment.
(a) Show the double entries for the charge to profit or loss for employee services over the three
years and for the share issue, assuming all employees entitled to benefit from the scheme
exercised their rights and the shares were issued on 31 December 20X3.
(b) Explain how your solution would differ had J&B offered its employees cash based on the share
value rather than share options.
676
Solution
(a) Accounting entries
31.12.X1 $ $
DEBIT Profit or loss (staff costs) 188,000
CREDIT Equity reserve ((800 – 95)  200  $4  1/3) 188,000
31.12.X2
DEBIT Profit or loss (staff costs) (W1) 201,333
CREDIT Equity reserve 201,333
31.12.X3
DEBIT Profit or loss (staff costs) (W2) 202,667
CREDIT Equity reserve 202,667
Issue of shares
DEBIT Cash (740  200  $1.50) 222,000
DEBIT Equity reserve 592,000
CREDIT Share capital (740  200  $1) 148,000
CREDIT Share premium (balancing figure) 666,000
Workings
1 Equity reserve at 31.12.X2
£$
Equity b/d 188,000
 P/L charge 201,333
Equity c/d ((800 – 70)  200  $4  2/3) 389,333
2 Equity reserve at 31.12.X3

Equity b/d 389,333
 P/L charge 202,667
Equity c/d ((800 – 40 – 20)  200  $4  3/3) 592,000
(b) Cash-settled share-based payment

If J&B had offered cash payments based on the value of the shares at vesting date rather than
options, in each of the three years an accrual would be shown in the statement of financial
position representing the expected amount payable based on the following:
No of  Number of  Fair value of  Cumulative
employees rights each each right at proportion of
estimated at year end vesting period
the year end elapsed
to be entitled
to rights at the
vesting date
The movement in the accrual would be charged to profit or loss representing further entitlements
received during the year and adjustments to expectations accrued in previous years.
The accrual would continue to be adjusted (resulting in a profit or loss charge) for changes in
the fair value of the right over the period between when the rights become fully vested and are
subsequently exercised. It would then be reduced for cash payments as the rights are exercised.
677
5 Vesting conditions – further practice
Activity 3: Vesting conditions

On 1 October 20X1 Omega granted share options to 200 senior executives. The options will vest on
30 September 20X4 subject to the following conditions:
 Each executive will be entitled to 1,000 options if the cumulative profit in the three-year period
from 1 October 20X1 to 30 September 20X4 exceeds $30m. If the cumulative profit for this
period is between $35m and $40m, then 1,500 options will vest. If the cumulative profit for
the period exceeds $40m, then 2,000 options will vest.
 If an executive leaves during the three-year vesting period, then that executive would forfeit
any rights to share options.
 Notwithstanding the above, no options will vest unless the share price at 30 September 20X4
exceeds $5.
Details of the fair values of the shares and share options at relevant dates are as follows:
Fair value of
Date Omega share Option
$ $
1 October 20X1 4.00 0.50
30 September 20X2 4.40 0.60
30 September 20X3 4.60 0.75
The estimate of the cumulative profit for the three-year period ending 30 September 20X4 was
revised each year as follows:
Expected profit
for the three-year period
Date $m
1 October 20X1 32
30 September 20X2 39
30 September 20X3 45
On 1 October 20X1, none of the relevant executives were expected to leave in the three-year period
from 1 October 20X1 to 30 September 20X4 and none left in the year ended 30 September 20X2.
However, ten executives left unexpectedly on 30 June 20X3. None of the other executives are
expected to leave before 30 September 20X4.
Required
Prepare relevant extracts from the statement of financial position of Omega at 30 September 20X3
and its statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended 30 September
20X3. You should give appropriate explanations to support your extracts.
678
Activity answers
Activity 1: Share options

DEBIT Profit or loss
CREDIT Equity
Under IFRS 2 a charge must be made to profit or loss.
Activity 2: Share-based payment 1

The remuneration expense for the year is based on the fair value of the options granted at the grant
date (1 January 20X3). Management estimates that 20 employees will leave during the 4 year
vesting period and that therefore 45,000 options (250 × 180) will actually vest.
Therefore, at 31 December 20X3 the entity recognises a remuneration expense of $135,000
(45,000 × 12 × ¼) in profit or loss and a corresponding increase in equity of the same amount.
Activity 3: Vesting conditions

ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 20X3 (Extract)
Employee expense $76,667
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AT 30 SEPTEMBER 20X3 (Extract)
Equity (IFRS 2 reserve) $126,667
Explanation
The impact of the expected share price is a market-based vesting condition and is ignored in
calculating the IFRS 2 expense. The grant date fair value of the options is used in the calculation. The
number of options vesting for each executive is dependent on the expected cumulative profit over the
three year period. This is a non-market based performance condition and is taken into account in the
calculation of the IFRS 2 expense. At 30 September 20X2, the expected cumulative profit is $39m,
so 1,500 options per director are expected to vest. At 30 September 20X3, the expected cumulative
profit is increased to $45m, so 2,000 options per director are expected to vest. The expense should
be spread over the 3 year vesting period and be based on the latest estimate of the number of
directors expected to be in employment on the vesting date.
The calculations are as follows:
At 30 September 20X2 (year 1) $

Equity b/d 0
Equity c/d (200  1,500  $0.50  1/3) 50,000
At 30 September 20X3 (year 2) $

Equity b/d 50,000
Equity c/d (190  2,000  $0.50  2/3) 126,667
679
680
Basic groups
681
Exam context
Group accounting is extremely important for the Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) exam. Question 1
of the exam will be based on the financial statements of group entities, or extracts from them. Group
accounting could also feature in a Section B question. A lot of this chapter is revision as it has been
covered in your earlier studies in Financial Reporting. However, ensure you study it carefully, as not
only does it form the basis for the more complex chapters that follow, some basic group accounting
techniques will usually be required in group accounting questions in the exam.
682
10: Basic groups
1 Measuring non-controlling interests at acquisition

IFRS 3 views the group as an economic entity. This means that it treats all providers of equity –
including non-controlling interests – as shareholders in the group, even if they are not
shareholders of the parent. Thus goodwill will arise on the non-controlling interest. Goodwill is
calculated as:
Less: Net fair value of identifiable assets acquired and
Share capital X
Share premium X
(X)
X
Less: Impairment losses on goodwill to date (X)
X
The non-controlling interest forms part of the calculation of goodwill.
IFRS 3 allows the non-controlling interests in a subsidiary to be measured at the acquisition date in
one of two ways (IFRS 3: para. 19):
 At proportionate share of fair value of net assets ('partial goodwill method')
 At fair value ('full goodwill method')
The closest approximation to fair value will be the market price of the shares held by the non-
controlling shareholders just before the acquisition by the parent.
Non-controlling interest at fair value will be different from non-controlling interest at proportionate
share of the acquiree's net assets. The difference is goodwill attributable to non-controlling interest,
which may be, but often is not, proportionate to goodwill attributable to the parent.
1.1 Simple examples

(a) Partial goodwill method
On 31 December 20X8, Penn acquired four million of the five million $1 ordinary shares of
Sylvania, paying $10m in cash. On that date, the fair value of Sylvania's net assets was
$7.5m.
It is the group's policy to value the non-controlling interest at its proportionate share of the fair
value of the subsidiary's identifiable net assets.
Goodwill on the acquisition is calculated as:
$'000
Consideration transferred 10,000
Non-controlling interest: 20%  $7.5m 1,500
11,500
Net fair value of identifiable assets acquired and (7,500)
liabilities assumed
Goodwill 4,000
683
(b) Full goodwill method

On 31 December 20X8, Penn acquired four million of the five million $1 ordinary shares of
Sylvania, paying $10m in cash. On that date, the fair value of Sylvania's net assets was
$7.5m.
It is the group's policy to value the non-controlling interest at fair value. The market price of the
shares held by the non-controlling shareholders just before the acquisition was $2.00.
Goodwill on the acquisition is calculated as:
$'000
Non-controlling interest: 1m  $2 2,000
12,000
Net fair value of identifiable assets acquired and (7,500)
liabilities assumed
Goodwill 4,500
1.2 Non-controlling interest at the year end (fair value method)

Where the option is used to value non-controlling interest at fair value, this applies only to non-
controlling interest at acquisition. At the year end, the non-controlling interest will have
increased by its share of the subsidiary's post-acquisition retained earnings.
Illustration 1
Goodwill and non-controlling interest
P acquired 75% of the shares in S on 1 January 2007 when S had retained earnings of $15,000.
The market price of S's shares at the date of acquisition was $1.60. P values non-controlling interest
at fair value at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is not impaired.
The statements of financial position of P and S at 31 December 20X7 were as follows.
P S
$ $
Shares in S 68,000 –
128,000 50,000
180,000 85,000
Share capital – $1 shares 100,000 50,000

170,000 75,000
180,000 85,000
Prepare the consolidated statement of financial position of the P Group.
684
10: Basic groups
Solution
P GROUP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
$
Assets
Property plant and equipment (60,000 + 50,000) 110,000
Goodwill (W1) 23,000
Current assets (52,000 + 35,000) 87,000
Total assets 220,000
Equity attributable to the owners of P
177,500
Non-controlling interest (W3) 22,500
Total equity 200,000
220,000
Workings
1 Goodwill
$ $
Non-controlling interests (12,500  $1.60) 20,000
Net fair value of identifiable assets acquired and
liabilities assumed
Retained earnings at acquisition 15,000
(65,000)
Goodwill 23,000
2 Retained earnings
P S
$ $
Per statement of financial position 70,000 25,000
Pre-acquisition retained earnings (15,000)
10,000
Group share of post-acquisition retained earnings of
S (10,000 × 75%) 7,500
Group retained earnings 77,500
685
3 Non-controlling interest at year end

$
NCI share of S's post-acquisition retained earnings (25%  10,000(W2)) 2,500
22,500
1.3 Effect on non-controlling interest of full goodwill method

You can see from the above example that the use of the full goodwill method increases goodwill and
non-controlling interest by the same amount. That amount represents goodwill attributable to the
shares held by non-controlling shareholders. It is not necessarily proportionate to the goodwill
attributed to the parent. The parent may have paid more to acquire a controlling interest. If non-
controlling interest was valued under the partial goodwill method, goodwill and non-controlling
interest in the illustration above would be as follows:
W1 Goodwill
$
Considered transferred 68,000
Non-controlling interest ((50,000 + 15,000) × 25%) 16,250
Net fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed
(50,000 + 15,000) (65,000)
Goodwill 19,250
W3 Non-controlling interest at year end
$
NCI share of S's post-acquisition retained earnings (25% × 10,000) 2,500
18,750
Compare these with goodwill and non-controlling interest in the solution above and you will see that
both have been reduced by $3,750 – the goodwill attributable to the non-controlling interest. So
whether non-controlling interest is valued at share of net assets or at fair value, the statement of
financial position will still balance.
In the SBR exam, both the partial goodwill and the full goodwill methods are
examinable.
686
10: Basic groups
2 Approach to consolidation
The next section is a recap of the techniques you should remember from Financial Reporting. The SBR
syllabus introduces a range of extra complications in consolidations, but the basics will always form
part of any question.
2.1 Consolidated statement of financial position

Step 1 Read the question and draw up the group structure (as Working 1), highlighting
useful information:
 The percentage owned
 Acquisition date
 Pre-acquisition reserves
Step 2 Draw up a proforma taking into account the group structure identified:
 Leave out cost of investment
 Put in a line for goodwill
 Put in a line for investment in associate (where appropriate)
 Remember to include non-controlling interests
 Leave lines in case of any additions
Step 3 Work methodically down the statement of financial position, transferring figures to
the proforma or workings:
 100% of all assets/liabilities controlled at the year end aggregated in brackets
on face of proforma, ready for adjustments
 Cost of subsidiary/associate and reserves to group workings, setting them up
as you work down the statement of financial position
 Share capital and share premium (parent only) to the proforma
 Open up a (blank) working for non-controlling interests
Step 4 Read through the additional notes to the question and attempt the adjustments,
showing workings for all calculations.
Do the double entry for the adjustments on your proforma answer and on your group
workings (where the group workings are affected by one side of the double entry).
Examples:
 Cancel any intragroup items eg intra-group current account balances,
intragroup loans
 Adjust for unrealised profits:
Unrealised profit on intragroup sales X

Amount held in inventories at year end %
= Provision for unrealised profit (PUP) X DEBIT Retained earnings
(adjust in company selling goods) CREDIT Group inventories
687
 Make fair value adjustments:

Acquisition date Movement Year end
Inventories X (X) X
Depreciable non- X (X) X
current assets
Non-depreciable X (X) X
non-current assets
Other fair value X/(X) (X)/X X/(X)
adjustments
X (X) X
This total This total is used to The individual

appears in the adjust the figures here are
goodwill subsidiary's reserves used to adjust the
working in the reserves relevant balances
working on the
consolidated
statement of
financial position
Step 5 Complete goodwill calculation:

Less: Net fair value of identifiable assets acquired and
Share capital X
Share premium X
(X)
X
Less: Impairment losses on goodwill to date (X)
X
688
10: Basic groups
Step 6 Complete the consolidated retained earnings calculation:

Parent Subsidiary Associate/
joint venture
Per question X X X
Adjustments X(X) X(X) X(X)
Fair value adjustments movement X/(X) X/(X)
Pre-acquisition retained earnings (X) (X)
Y Z
Group share of post-acquisition retained
earnings:
Subsidiary (Y  group share) X
Associate/Joint venture (Z  group share) X
Less group share of impairment losses to date (X)
X
Note. Other reserves are treated in a similar way.

Step 7 Complete 'Investment in associate/joint venture' calculation (if appropriate):
Cost of associate/joint venture X
Share of post-acquisition retained reserves (from reserves working
X
Z  group share)
Less group impairment losses on associate/joint venture to date (X)
X
Step 8 Complete the non-controlling interests (NCI) calculation:

NCI at acquisition (from goodwill working) X
NCI share of post-acquisition reserves (from reserves working
X
Y  NCI share)
Less NCI share of impairment losses (only if NCI at FV at acquisition) (X)
X
2.2 Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive

income
Step 1 Read the question and draw up the group structure and, where subsidiaries
/associates/joint ventures are acquired in the year, identify the proportion to
consolidate. A timeline may be useful.
Step 2 Draw up a pro-forma:
 Remember the non-controlling interests reconciliation at the foot of the
statement.
Step 3 Work methodically down the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive
income, transferring figures to proforma or workings:
 100% of all income/expenses (time apportioned  /12 if appropriate) in
x
brackets on face of proforma, ready for adjustments

 Exclude dividends receivable from subsidiary
 Subsidiary's profit for the year (PFY) and total comprehensive income (TCI) to
face of proforma in brackets (or to a working if many adjustments)
 Associate's/joint venture's PFY and other comprehensive income (OCI) to face
of proforma in brackets
689
Step 4 Go through the question, calculating the necessary adjustments and showing workings
for all calculations, transfer the numbers to your proforma and make the adjustments
in the non-controlling interests working where the subsidiary's profit is affected.
Step 5 Calculate 'Share of profit of associate (A)/joint venture (JV)' and 'Share of other
comprehensive income of associate/joint venture' (where appropriate):
A/JV's PFY  group % X
Any group impairment loss recognised on A/JV during the period (X)
X
Shown before group profit before tax.

A/JV's OCI  group % X
Both the profit or loss and other comprehensive income are calculated based on after
tax figures.
Step 6 Complete the non-controlling interests in subsidiary's PFY and TCI calculation:
PFY TCI (if req'd)
PFY/TCI per question (time-apportioned  x/12 if X X
appropriate)
Adjustments, eg unrealised profit on sales made by (X)/X (X)/X
subsidiary
Impairment losses (if NCI held at fair value) (X) (X)
X X
 NCI% X X
3 Fair values
3.1 Fair value of consideration practice question
Activity 1: Fair value of consideration

Berry acquired all of Goose's 400,000 ordinary shares during the year ended 28 February 20X5.
Goose was purchased from its directors who will remain directors of the business. Berry incurred
legal and professional fees as a result of the acquisition of $75,000.
The purchase consideration comprised:
 $250,000 in cash payable at acquisition
 $100,000 payable 1 year after acquisition
 $100,000 payable in 2 years' time if profits exceed $2m
 New shares issued in Berry on a 1 for 4 basis
The consideration payable in 2 years after acquisition is a tough target for the directors of Goose
and so its fair value (taking into account the time value of money) has been measured at only
$30,750.
The market value of Berry's shares on the acquisition date was $7.35.
An appropriate discount rate for use where relevant is 7% and the 1 year 7% discount factor is
0.935.
Required
Calculate the consideration transferred to acquire Goose at the date of acquisition.
690
10: Basic groups
3.2 Fair value of assets and liabilities

The general rule under IFRS 3 is that, on acquisition, the subsidiary's assets and liabilities must be
recognised and measured at their acquisition date fair value except in limited, stated
cases.
To be recognised as part of applying the acquisition method, the assets and liabilities; must:
(a) Meet the definitions of assets and liabilities in the Conceptual Framework; and
(b) Be part of what the acquirer and the acquiree (or its former owners) exchanged in the business
combination rather than the result of separate transactions.
IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement provides extensive guidance on how the fair value of assets and
liabilities should be established.
This standard requires that the following are considered in measuring fair value (IFRS 13: para. 23):
(a) The asset or liability being measured;
(b) The principal market (ie that where the most activity takes place) or, where there is no
principal market, the most advantageous market (ie that in which the best price could be
achieved) in which an orderly transaction would take place for the asset or liability;
(c) The highest and best use of the asset or liability and whether it is used on a standalone basis
or in conjunction with other assets or liabilities; and
(d) Assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability.
Having considered these factors, IFRS 13 provides a hierarchy of inputs for arriving at fair value. It
requires that Level 1 inputs are used where possible (IFRS 13: para. 72):
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets that the entity can access at the
measurement date
Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for the asset
3.2.1 Examples of fair value and business combinations

For non-financial assets, fair value is decided based on the highest and best use of the asset as
determined by a market participant. The following illustrations, adapted from the illustrative examples
to IFRS 13, demonstrate what is meant by this.
Illustration 2
Land
Anscome Co has acquired land in a business combination. The land is currently developed for
industrial use as a site for a factory. The current use of land is presumed to be its highest and best
use unless market or other factors suggest a different use. Nearby sites have recently been developed
for residential use as sites for high-rise apartment buildings. On the basis of that development and
recent zoning and other changes to facilitate that development, Anscome determines that the land
currently used as a site for a factory could be developed as a site for residential use (ie for high-rise
apartment buildings) because market participants would take into account the potential to develop
the site for residential use when pricing the land.
How would the highest and best use of the land be determined?
691
Solution
The highest and best use of the land would be determined by comparing both of the following:
(a) The value of the land as currently developed for industrial use (ie the land would be used in
combination with other assets, such as the factory, or with other assets and liabilities); and
(b) The value of the land as a vacant site for residential use, taking into account the costs of
demolishing the factory and other costs (including the uncertainty about whether the entity
would be able to convert the asset to the alternative use) necessary to convert the land to a
vacant site (ie the land is to be used by market participants on a stand-alone basis).
The highest and best use of the land would be determined on the basis of the higher of those values.
Illustration 3
Research and development project
Searcher Co has a research and development (R & D) project in a business combination. Searcher
Co does not intend to complete the project. If completed, the project would compete with one of its
own projects (to provide the next generation of the entity's commercialised technology). Instead, the
entity intends to hold (ie lock up) the project to prevent its competitors from obtaining access to the
technology. In doing this the project is expected to provide defensive value, principally by improving
the prospects for the entity's own competing technology.
If it could purchase the R & D project, Developer Co would continue to develop the project and that
use would maximise the value of the group of assets or of assets and liabilities in which the project
would be used (ie the asset would be used in combination with other assets or with other assets and
liabilities). Developer Co does not have similar technology.
How would the fair value of the project be measured?
Solution
The fair value of the project would be measured on the basis of the price that would be received in a
current transaction to sell the project, assuming that the R & D would be used with its complementary
assets and the associated liabilities, and that those assets and liabilities would be available to
Developer Co.
Illustration 4
Decommissioning liability
Deacon assumes a decommissioning liability in a business combination. It is legally required to
dismantle a power station at the end of its useful life, which is estimated to be twenty years.
How would the decommissioning liability be measured?
Solution
Because this is a business combination, Deacon must measure the liability at fair value in accordance
with IFRS 13, rather than using the best estimate measurement required by IAS 37 Provisions,
Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets.
Deacon will use the expected present value technique to measure the fair value of the
decommissioning liability. If Deacon were contractually committed to transfer its decommissioning
liability to a market participant, it would conclude that a market participant would use all of the
following inputs, probability weighted as appropriate, when estimating the price it would expect to
receive:
692
10: Basic groups
(a) Labour costs

(b) Allocated overhead costs
(c) The compensation that a market participant would generally receive for undertaking the activity,
including profit on labour and overhead costs and the risk that the actual cash outflows might
differ from those expected
(d) The effect of inflation
(e) The time value of money (risk-free rate)
(f) Non-performance risk, including Deacon's own credit risk
As an example of how the probability adjustment might work, Deacon values labour costs on the
basis of current marketplace wages adjusted for expected future wage increases. It determines that
there is a 20% probability that the wage bill will be $15 million, a 30% probability that it will be
$25 million and a 50% probability that it will be $20 million. Expected cash flows will then be
(20% × $15m) + (30% × $25m) + (50% × $20m) = $20.5m. The probability assessments will be
developed on the basis of Deacon's knowledge of the market and experience of fulfilling obligations
of this type.
3.2.2 Restructuring and future losses

An acquirer should not recognise liabilities for future losses or other costs expected to be
incurred as a result of the business combination.
IFRS 3 explains (para. 23) that a plan to restructure a subsidiary following an acquisition is not a
present obligation of the acquiree at the acquisition date. Neither does it meet the definition of a
contingent liability. Therefore, an acquirer should not recognise a liability for such a
restructuring plan as part of allocating the cost of the combination unless the subsidiary was
already committed to the plan before the acquisition.
This prevents creative accounting. An acquirer cannot set up a provision for restructuring or
future losses of a subsidiary and then release this to profit or loss in subsequent periods in order to
reduce losses or smooth profits.
3.2.3 Intangible assets

The acquiree may have intangible assets, such as development expenditure. These can be
recognised separately from goodwill only if they are identifiable. An intangible asset is identifiable
only if it (IFRS 3: para. 29):
(a) Is separable, ie capable of being separated or divided from the entity and sold, transferred, or
exchanged, either individually or together with a related contract, asset or liability; or
(b) Arises from contractual or other legal rights.
3.2.4 Contingent liabilities

Contingent liabilities of the acquiree are recognised if their fair value can be measured
reliably. A contingent liability must be recognised even if the outflow is not probable, provided
there is a present obligation.
This is a departure from the normal rules in IAS 37; contingent liabilities are not normally recognised,
but only disclosed.
After their initial recognition, the acquirer should measure contingent liabilities that are recognised
separately at the higher of (IFRS 3: para. 56):
(a) The amount that would be recognised in accordance with IAS 37; or
(b) The amount initially recognised.
693
Activity 2: Fair value of assets and liabilities

Ergo acquired 750,000 of Rower's 1,000,000 $1 ordinary shares on 1 January 20X2
for $3,800,000 when Rower's retained earnings were $3,200,000. It is group policy to value
non-controlling interest at fair value at the date of acquisition. The fair value of the non-controlling
interest at 1 January 20X2 was $1,600,000. As at 31 December 20X3, there had been no
impairment of goodwill.
At 1 January 20X2, the fair value of the net assets acquired was the same as the book value with the
following exceptions:
 The fair value of property, plant and equipment was $800,000 higher than book value.
These assets were assessed to have a remaining useful life of 16 years from the date of
acquisition.
 The fair value of inventories was estimated to be $200,000 higher than the book value. All of
these inventories were sold by 31 December 20X2.
 Rower had a customer list which it had not recognised as an intangible asset because it was
internally generated. However, on acquisition, external experts managed to establish a fair
value for the list of $150,000. Customers are typically retained for an average of 5 years.
 A contingent liability, which had a fair value of $220,000 at the date of acquisition. This
liability was settled in the year ended 31 December 20X2.
At 31 December 20X3, the retained earnings of Ergo and Rower were $7,500,000 and
$4,000,000 respectively. Rower's profit for the year and total comprehensive income for the year
ended 31 December 20X3 was $500,000.
Required
(a) Calculate the amounts that will appear in the consolidated statement of financial position of
the Ergo group as at 31 December 20X3 for:
(i) Goodwill
(iii) Non-controlling interest
(b) Calculate the non-controlling interest in the profit of Rower for inclusion in the consolidated
statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December
20X3.
694
10: Basic groups
Activity answers
Activity 1: Fair value of consideration

$
Cash 250,000
Deferred consideration (100,000  0.935) 93,500
Contingent consideration (measure at fair value) 30,750
Shares in Berry (400,000/4  $7.35) 735,000
1,109,250
Activity 2: Fair values of assets and liabilities

(a) (i) Goodwill
$'000 $'000
Non-controlling interests (at fair value) 1,600
Less fair value of identifiable net assets at acquisition:
Share capital 1,000
Retained earnings 3,200
Fair value adjustment (W2) 930
(5,130)
270

Ergo Rower
$'000 $'000
At acquisition (3,200)
660
Share of Rower's post-acquisition retained
earnings (75%  660) 495
7,995
(iii) Non-controlling interests (NCI) (in statement of financial position)

$'000
NCI at acquisition (fair value) 1,600
NCI share of post-acq'n reserves (25%  660 [(a)(ii)]) 165
1,765
695
(b) Non-controlling interests (in profit or loss)

PFY
$'000
Per question 500
Fair value depreciation on property, plant & equipment (50)
for the year (W2)
Fair value amortisation on intangible asset for the year (W2) (30)
420
NCI share  25%
= 105
Tutorial note
As the inventory was sold and the contingent liability settled in the prior year (20X2), they
have no impact on the NCI for the year ended 31 December 20X3.
Workings
1 Group structure
Ergo
1.1.X2 750/1,000 = 75%
Rower
Pre-acquisition retained earnings = $3.2m
2 Fair value adjustment
Acq'n
date Movement Year end
1.1.X2 X2, X3 31.12.X3

$'000 $'000 $'000
Adjust
Inventories 200 (200) –
figures
Property, plant and equipment (PPE) 800 (100)* 700 in SOFP
Intangible assets 150 (60)** 90
Contingent liabilities (220) 220 -- -–

930 (140) 790
Goodwill Retained
earnings
*extra depreciation on PPE = 800  1/16 = 50 per annum  2 years = 100
**amortisation of intangibles = 150  1/5 = 30 per annum  2 years = 60
696
Changes in group
structures: step
acquisitions
697
1 Investment to associate step acquisitions

This scenario is not specifically covered under any of IFRS 3 Business Combinations, IFRS 10
Consolidated Financial Statements or IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures.
Interpretative guidance from Deloitte (2008: p99) suggests that there are two possible treatments in
the group accounts:
(a) Follow the IFRS 3 principles for step acquisitions achieving control
Remeasure the existing investment to fair value on the date significant influence is achieved
with any corresponding gain or loss recognised in profit or loss or other comprehensive
income (OCI) (depending on whether the investment was previously measured per IFRS 9
Financial Instruments [para. 4.1.4] at fair value through profit or loss, or at fair value through
OCI under the irrevocable election).
(b) Follow the IAS 28 principles for equity accounting
Record both the original investment and the new investment at cost on the basis that IAS 28
(para. 10) states, ‘under the equity method, on initial recognition the investment in an
associate or a joint venture is recognised at cost’.
Illustration 1: Investment to associate step acquisition

Bravado has two subsidiaries. It also has an investment in a third company, Clarity. Bravado
acquired a 10% interest in Clarity on 1 June 20X7 for $8 million. The investment was accounted for
as an investment in equity instruments and the irrevocable election was made to take changes in fair
value through other comprehensive income. At 31 May 20X8, 10% investment in Clarity was
revalued to its fair value of $9 million. On 1 June 20X8, Bravado acquired an additional 15%
interest in Clarity for $11 million and achieved significant influence. Clarity made profits after
dividends of $6 million and $10 million for the years to 31 May 20X8 and 31 May 20X9. Clarity’s
only reserves are retained earnings.
Required
Calculate the investment in associate for inclusion in the Bravado consolidated statement of financial
position as at 31 May 20X9 under the following assumptions:
(a) Following the IFRS 3 principles for business combinations where control is achieved
(b) Following the IAS 28 principles for equity accounting
698
Solution
(a) Following the IFRS 3 principles for business combinations where control is achieved
The investment in associate is calculated as follows:
Do not record the initial 10% investment at its 1 June 20X7
The new 15% investment is
cost of $8m. Instead, record it at its fair value of $9m at the
recorded at its cost on the date
date significant influence is achieved (1 June 20X8), as in
significant influence is achieved
substance, a 25% associate was ‘purchased’ on 1 June
(1 June 20X8). In substance, it is
20X7. No gain on remeasurement of the 10% investment is
as if Bravado ‘purchased’ a 25%
recognised in this Illustration because the investment had
associate on 1 June 20X8.
already been remeasured to fair value at 31 May 20X8 in
the parent’s (Bravado’s) individual accounts.
$m
Cost = fair value at date significant influence is achieved ($9m + $11m) 20
Share of post-acquisition reserves ($10m  25%) 2.5
Investment in associate 22.5

Post-acquisition reserves should only be included
from the date Clarity becomes an associate (1 June On the date significant influence is
20X8). By the year end of 31 May 20X9, Clarity achieved (1 June 20X8), Bravado
has only been associate for a year and given that has a 25% stake (10% + 15%) in
Clarity’s only reserves are retained earnings, the Clarity. In substance, Bravado has
profit after dividends for the year ended 31 May ‘sold’ a 10% investment and
20X9 represents the post-acquisition reserves. The ‘purchased’ a 25% associate.
profit after dividends for the year ended 31 May
20X8 is ignored because Clarity was only a simple
investment at that stage.
(b) Following the IAS 28 principles for equity accounting

The investment in associate is calculated as follows:
Under this method, the 10% is recorded at its original cost

The new 15% investment is
on 1 June 20X7 of $8m which means the revaluation gain
recorded at its cost on the
of $1m recognised to date ($9m fair value at 31 May
date significant influence is
20X8 less $8m cost) would have to be reversed as a
achieved (1 June 20X8).
consolidation adjustment.
$m
Cost = fair value at date significant influence is achieved ($8m + $11m) 19
Share of post-acquisition reserves ($10m  25%) 2.5
Investment in associate 21.5
As for part (a)

As for part (a)
699
700
Changes in group
structures: disposals
and group
reorganisations
701
1 Group profit or loss on disposal

1.1 Group profit or loss on disposal where significant influence
is lost
Calculation of group profit or loss on disposal where significant infuence is lost
$ $
Fair value of any investment retained X
Less: Carrying amount of investment in associate at date
significant influence lost:
Cost of associate X
Share of associate’s post-acquisition reserves X
Less impairment of investment in associate (X)
(X)
Group profit/(loss) (recognise in SPL) X/(X)
(IAS 28: para. 22(b))
1.2 Treatment of amounts previously recognised in other

IFRS 10 states that:
'if a parent loses control of a subsidiary, the parent shall account for all amounts previously
recognised in other comprehensive income in relation to that subsidiary on the same basis as
would be required if the parent had directly disposed of the related assets or liabilities' (IFRS
10: B99).
IAS 28 (para. 22c) requires the same treatment when an entity ceases to have significant influence
over an entity.
Examples are shown below.
Treatment if the parent Example Treatment in group

had disposed of related financial statements
assets and liabilities on loss of control of
subsidiary
Items that are reclassified from Investment in debt instruments Reclassify previous
OCI to profit or loss (P/L) held to collect cash flows and remeasurement gains or losses
sell where the cash flows are on the investment in debt
solely the principal and interest instruments from OCI to P/L
(see Chapter 7 Financial (as part of the group profit on
instruments) disposal)
Items that will never be Revaluation surplus on Reclassify revaluation surplus to

reclassified to P/L but where a property, plant and equipment retained earnings (this is purely
transfer within equity is where the parent elects to a consolidated statement of
permitted on disposal transfer the revaluation surplus financial position adjustment
to equity to retained earnings and will have no impact on the
on disposal (see Chapter 13 group profit or loss on disposal)
Non-current assets held for sale
and discontinued operations)
(IAS 16: para. 41)
702
2 Deemed disposals
A ‘deemed’ disposal occurs when a subsidiary issues new shares and the parent does not take
up all of its rights such that its holding is reduced.
In substance this is a disposal and is therefore accounted for as such. The percentages owned by the
parent before and after the subsidiary issues shares must be calculated, and, where control is lost, a
group profit on disposal must be calculated.
Illustration 1
Deemed disposal
At 1 January 20X2 Rey, a public limited company, had a direct holding of shares giving 75% of the
voting rights in a subsidiary Mago.
The consolidated carrying amount of Mago’s net assets on 1 September 20X2 was $14 million.
Goodwill of $2 million was recognised upon the initial acquisition of Mago, and has not
subsequently been impaired. Rey elected to measure the non-controlling interests in Mago at fair
value at acquisition. At 1 September 20X2, non-controlling interests (based on the original
shareholding in Mago) amounted to $3.9 million.
On 1 September 20X2, Mago then issued new shares for $5 million, which were all purchased by a
new investor unrelated to Rey. The fair value of Mago at that date (before the share issue) was
$18 million.
After the share issue, Rey retained an interest of 40% of the voting rights of Mago and retained two
of the six seats on the board of directors (previously Rey held five of the six seats).
Required
Explain the accounting treatment for Mago in the consolidated financial statements of the Rey group
for the year ended 31 December 20X2.
Solution
Rey loses control of Mago on 1 September 20X2. Mago is consolidated as a subsidiary for the first
eight months of the year until that date.
A profit or loss is calculated on the loss of control:
$m $m
Fair value of 30% investment retained ((18 + 5)  40%) 9.2
Less: share of consolidated carrying amount when control lost:
net assets 14
goodwill 2
Less non-controlling interests (3.9)
(12.1)
Loss on disposal (2.9)
For the final four months of 20X2, Mago will be equity accounted as an associate.
703
3 Group reorganisations
A group may restructure itself internally to achieve a desired effect. Companies move around within
the group but typically:
 The ultimate parent remains the same
 No cash leaves the group
 There is no change in non-controlling interests.
In substance, the group has remained the same so there is no impact on the consolidated financial
statements. However, the accounts of the individual entities within the group will be affected.
Illustration 2
Group reorganisation
A Group is made up of a parent, A and two wholly-owned subsidiaries, B and C. The investments in
B and C are carried at their cost in A's separate financial statements.
The separate and group financial statements as at 31 December 20X1 (before the restructuring) are
as follows:
A B C Group
$m $m $m $m
Property, plant and equipment 1,000 500 100 1,600
Goodwill (re B) 50
Investment in B 450
Investment in C 20
Current assets 600 300 50 950
2,070 800 150 2,600
Share capital 200 100 20 200

Reserves 1,470 500 90 1,760
1,670 600 110 1,960
Liabilities 400 200 40 640

2,070 800 150 2,600
On 31 December 20X1 A decides to transfer its investment in C to B and therefore create a

sub-group. The transfer is to be effected by B acquiring C for $120m, with the balance to remain
outstanding on the intercompany account until such point as A decides it should be settled. The fair
value of C's net assets is equivalent to its book value.
A acquired B for $450m when the fair value of its net assets (equivalent to book value at the time)
was $400m (share capital $100m + reserves $300m). A originally set up C, contributing $20m of
share capital.
Required
Show the financial statements of A, B and C immediately after the reconstruction, showing the
calculation of group reserves.
704
Solution
Group structure
Before After
A A
100% 100% 100%
B C B
100%
After the restructuring

B has
purchased Consideration
investment in transferred of 450
A has sold C from A less net assets of 400
investment in C
so investment of
20 removed A B C Group
$m $m $m $m Investments
Property, plant and equipment 1,000 + 500 + 100 = 1,600 in group
companies
Goodwill (re B) 50 cancel on
Investment in B 450 consolidation
Investment in C – 120 720 +

Current assets (A: 600 + 120) 720 300 50 950 300 + 50
2,170 920 150 2,600 – 120
Intragroup receivable in A’s intragroup
books for sales proceeds of
120 owed by B
Parent only
Share capital 200 100 20 200

See
Reserves (A: 1,470 + (120 – 20) profit) 1,570 500 90 1,760 consolidated
1,770 600 110 1,960 reserves
working
Liabilities (B: 200 + 120) 400 320 40 640
2,170 920 150 2,600 400 + 320 +
40 – 120
intragroup
Intragroup payable in Profit is calculated as
B’s books for sales sales proceeds of 120
proceeds owed to A less carrying amount of
investment of 20
705
Double entries are:

In A's financial statements: In B's financial statements
$m $m $m $m
DEBIT Current assets (intragroup) 120 DEBIT Investment in C 120
CREDIT Investment in C 20 CREDIT Liabilities (intragroup) 120
CREDIT Profit or loss 100
Calculation of consolidated reserves:
A B C
$m $m $m
Per separate financial statements 1,570 500 90
Unrealised profit on transfer of C (120 – 20) (100)
Reserves at acquisition (300) (0)
200 90
Share of post-acquisition reserves:
B (200  100%) 200
C (90  100%) 90
1,760
In the consolidated financial statements the unrealised profit on transfer of C must be eliminated.
The intragroup balance of $120m must also be eliminated from consolidated current assets and
liabilities.
706
707
708
Non-current assets held
for sale and
709
1 Discontinued operations
Activity 1: Comprehensive example Exam standard for 30 marks
Balboa, a public limited company, has acquired two subsidiaries during the accounting period. The
details of the acquisitions are as follows:
Ordinary Fair value Ordinary
share Reserves of net share capital
capital at assets at Cost of of $1
Company Date of acquisition of $1 acquisition acquisition investment acquired
$m $m $m $m $m
Borbon 1 May 20X4 500 750 1,400 1,332 450
Carbonell 1 October 20X4 300 180 640 476 210
The draft statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended
31 December 20X4 are:
Balboa Borbon Carbonell
$m $m $m
Revenue 4,700 3,300 1,800
Cost of sales (3,700) (2,400) (1,400)
Gross profit 1,000 900 400
Other income 150 30 –
Distribution costs (270) (210) (180)
Administrative expenses (350) (270) (130)
Finance costs (110) (60) (30)
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax 90 60 40
The following information is relevant to the preparation of the group financial statements.
(a) The investment in Borbon was acquired as part of a growth strategy of the group. The
difference between fair value and book value on acquisition relates to properties, with an
average remaining useful life of 10 years at the date of acquisition. Borbon made a dividend
payment of $50m on 20 October 20X4 out of post acquisition profits and this is included in
Balboa's 'other income'.
(b) Carbonell was acquired exclusively with a view to sale and at 31 December 20X4 meets the
criteria of being a disposal group. The fair value of Carbonell at 31 December 20X4 is
$710m and the estimated selling costs of the shareholding in Carbonell are $14m.
The difference between fair value and book value at acquisition related to land held by
Carbonell. Carbonell did not pay any dividends in the post-acquisition period.
(c) At 1 January 20X4, Balboa held an investment in the quoted loan notes of another company,
correctly carried at amortised cost of $113m, which it intended to hold to its maturity date,
31 December 20X4, when they were to be redeemed at $115m. The loan notes had an
effective interest rate of 5.5%. In previous years, no allowance for credit losses had been
recognised as the credit risk of the holder of the loan notes was considered negligible.
However, on 1 January 20X4 the company received a letter indicating the investee was
suffering financial difficulties and was expected to enter liquidation. The directors believed
this to be objective evidence of impairment. The letter indicated that the bond would be repaid
710
on its original repayment date 31 December 20X4, but that no further interest would be paid.
This is indeed what happened. Lifetime credit losses on the loan notes at 1 January 20X4 were
estimated to be $4 million. Other than recording the cash received on 31 December 20X4, no
further adjustments have been made. The letter was not considered an adjusting event after the
reporting period affecting the 20X3 financial statements.
(d) No adjustments have yet been made for Balboa's defined benefit pension plan; details as
follows:
$m
Present value of obligation at 31 December 20X3 150
Fair value of plan assets at 31 December 20X3 175
Market yield on high quality corporate bonds 4%
On 31 December 20X4, given the surplus on the plan, the plan rules were changed to
improve benefits. This resulted in an additional liability of $3m from that date.
The net pension cost is treated as a cost of sale.
Remeasurement of the defined benefit plan obligation and assets at the year end generated a
net gain $5m.
(e) Calculations conducted at the year end showed the recoverable amount (based on continuing
use) of Borbon to be $1,610m at 31 December 20X4. Impairment losses on goodwill are
charged to cost of sales.
Balboa elected to measure the non-controlling interests of both subsidiaries at the date of
acquisition at the proportionate share of the fair value of the acquiree's identifiable assets
acquired and liabilities assumed.
(f) Assume that profits accrue evenly throughout the year and ignore any taxation effects.
Required
Prepare a consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the Balboa
Group for the year ended 31 December 20X4 in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards.
Notes to the financial statements are not required.
The profit and total comprehensive income figures attributable to owners of the parent and
attributable to non-controlling interests need not be subdivided into continuing and discontinued
operations.
Ignore the time value of money in part (c).
711
Solution
BALBOA GROUP
$m
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Other income
Distribution costs
Administrative expenses
Finance income
Finance costs
Profit before tax
Income tax expense
Profit for the year from continuing operations
Profit for the year from discontinued operations
PROFIT FOR THE YEAR
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax


712
Workings
Timeline
1.1.X4 1.5.X4 1.10.X4 31.12.X4

Profit for the year Total comp. income
Borbon Carbonell Borbon Carbonell
$m $m $m $m
PFY/TCI per question
 %  %  %  %
3 Dividend payment by Borbon
713
4 Loan note asset held by Balboa
5 Defined benefit pension plan
6 Fair value adjustments – Borbon

At Additional At year
acquisition depreciation end
$m $m $m
Properties
7 Goodwill
Borbon Carbonell
$m $m
Fair value of net assets at acq'n
714
8 Impairment losses
Borbon Carbonell
$m $m
'Notional' goodwill
Carrying amount of net assets (W9)/(W10)
Recoverable amount
Fair value less costs to sell
Impairment loss: gross
9 Carrying amount of net assets at 31 December 20X4 (Borbon)

$m
10 Carrying amount of net assets at 31 December 20X4 (Carbonell)

$m
715
Activity answer
Activity 1: Comprehensive example

BALBOA GROUP
$m
Revenue (4,700 + (3,300  8/12)) 66,900
Cost of sales (3,700 + (2,400  8/12) + (W5) 14 + (W6) 10 + (W8) 27) (5,351)
Gross profit 1,549
Other income (150 + (30  8/12) – (W3) 45) 125
Distribution costs (270 + (210  8/12)) (410)
Administrative expenses (350 + (270  8/12)) (530)
Finance income (W4) 6
Finance costs (110 + (60  8/12) + (W4) 4) (154)
Income tax expense (140 + (120  8/12)) (220)
Profit for the year from continuing operations 366
Profit for the year from discontinued operations (40  3/12) – (W8) 7) 3
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax (90 + (60  8/12) + (40  145
3/12) + (W5) 5)

369
514
716
Workings
1 Group structure
Balboa
1.5.X4 1.10.X4
450 210
= 90% = 70%
500 300
Borbon Carbonell
Carbonell is a discontinued operation (IFRS 5).
Timeline
1.1.X4 1.5.X4 1.10.X4 31.12.X4
SPLOCI
Balboa (parent) – all year
Borbon – owned for 8/12 of year
Carbonell  3/12
(discontinued)
Profit for the year Total comp. income
Borbon Carbonell Borbon Carbonell
$m $m $m $m
PFY/TCI per question 180 220
(270  8/12)/(330  8/12)
(40  3/12)/(80  3/12) 10 20
Less fair value depreciation (W6) (10) (10)
170 10 210 20
 10%  30%  10%  30%

17 3 21 6
20 27
3 Dividend payment by Borbon
Amount received by Balboa = $50m  90% = $45m.
Not included in consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
4 Loan note asset held by Balboa
At 1.1.X4
Stage 3 has now been reached as there is objective evidence of impairment. Therefore, an
allowance for lifetime credit losses of $4 million needs to be made in the statement of financial
position with a corresponding expense in profit or loss (finance costs).
717
$m
Carrying amount of loan at 1.1.X4 (amortised cost) 113
Allowance for credit losses at 1.1.X4 (4)
Net carrying amount of loan at 1.1.X4 109
At 31.12.X4
As Stage 3 has been reached, IFRS 9 requires effective interest to be calculated on the
carrying amount net of the allowance for credit losses; ie $109 million.
The net carrying amount at 31.12.X4 will then be cleared to zero through the repayment of
the principal by the loan note holder.
$m
Gross carrying amount of loan 1.1.X4 113
Effective interest income (109  5.5%) 6
Gross carrying amount at 31.12.X4 119
Allowance for credit losses at 31.12.X4 (4)
Net carrying amount at 31.12.X4 115
5 Defined benefit pension plan

Amount to record in cost of sales: $m
Past service cost 3
Net interest income ($175m – $150m)  4%) (1)
14
The net remeasurements of $5m are recognised in other comprehensive income.
6 Fair value adjustments – Borbon
At Additional At year
acquisition depreciation* end
$m $m $m
Properties (1,400 – 500 – 750) 150 (10) 140
150 (10) 140
*Additional depreciation = $150m/10 = $15m per annum  8/12 = $10m
7 Goodwill
Borbon Carbonell
$m $m
Consideration transferred 1,332 476
Non-controlling interests (1,400  10%) 140
(640  30%) 192
Fair value of net assets at acq'n (1,400) (640)

72 28
718
8 Impairment losses As only partial goodwill is recognised, it

must be grossed up for the impairment test to
compare correctly fair value less costs to sell
(which is 100%) with 100% of the subsidiary Borbon Carbonell
$m $m
'Notional'* goodwill ((W7) 72  100%/90%) ((W7) 28  80 40
100%/70%)
Carrying amount of net assets (W9)/(W10) 1,560 660
1,640 700

Fair value less costs to sell (710 – (14  100%/70%)) (690)
Impairment loss: gross Grossed up as 14 relates to 30 10

70% share of Carbonell

Grossed down (30  90%)/(10  70%) 27 7
again as
elected to show * Where non-controlling interests are measured at the date of acquisition at the
only partial proportionate share of the fair value of the acquiree's identifiable assets acquired and
goodwill
liabilities assumed (ie not at fair value), part of the calculation of the recoverable
amount of the CGU relates to the unrecognised non-controlling interest share of the
goodwill.
For the purpose of calculating the impairment loss, the carrying amount of the CGU is
therefore notionally adjusted to include the non-controlling interests in the goodwill
by grossing it up.
The resulting impairment loss calculated is only recognised to the extent of the
parent's share.
This adjustment is not required where non-controlling interests are measured at fair
value at acquisition.
9 Carrying amount of net assets at 31 December 20X4 (Borbon)
$m
Fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities at acquisition (1 May 20X4) 1,400
Post acquisition TCI (330  8/12) 220
Post acquisition dividends paid (note (a)) (50)
Less depreciation of fair value adjustment (W6) (10)
1,560
10 Carrying amount of net assets at 31 December 20X4 (Carbonell)

$m
Fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities at acquisition (1 October 20X4) 640
Post acquisition TCI (80  3/12) 20
660
719
720
Joint arrangements
and group disclosures
721
1 Joint arrangements
1.1 Contractual arrangements
The existence of a contractual agreement distinguishes a joint arrangement from an investment in an
associate. If there is no contractual arrangement, then a joint arrangement does not
exist.
It is the contractual arrangement which establishes joint control over the joint venture, so that
no single party can control the activity of the joint venture on its own.
Contractual arrangements can be evidenced in several ways. An enforceable contractual
arrangement is often, but not always, in writing, usually in the form of a contract or
documented discussions between the parties. Statutory mechanisms can also create enforceable
arrangements, either on their own or in conjunction with contracts between the parties (IFRS 11:
para. B2).
The contractual arrangement sets out the terms upon which the parties participate in the activity that
is the subject of the arrangement (IFRS 11: para. B4).
The contractual arrangement generally deals with such matters as (IFRS 11: para. B4):
(a) The purpose, activity and duration of the joint arrangement;
(b) How the members of the board of directors, or equivalent governing body, of the joint
arrangement, are appointed;
(c) The decision-making process: the matters requiring decisions from the parties, the
voting rights of the parties and the required level of support for those matters;
(d) The capital or other contributions required of the parties; and
(e) How the parties share assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses or profit or loss
relating to the joint arrangement.
The terms of the contractual arrangement are key to deciding whether the arrangement is a joint
venture or joint operation. IFRS 11 includes a table of issues to consider, and explains the influence
of a range of points that could be included in the contract (IFRS 11: para. B27). The table is
summarised below.
Joint operation Joint venture
The terms of The parties to the joint arrangement have The parties to the joint
the contractual rights to the assets, and obligations for the arrangement have rights to the
arrangement liabilities, relating to the arrangement. net assets of the arrangement
(ie it is the separate vehicle, not
the parties, that has rights to the
assets, and obligations for the
liabilities).
Rights to assets The parties to the joint arrangement share The assets brought into the
all interests (eg rights, title or ownership) in arrangement or subsequently
the assets relating to the arrangement in a acquired by the joint
specified proportion (eg in proportion to arrangement are the
the parties' ownership interest in the arrangement's assets. The
arrangement or in proportion to the activity parties have no interests (ie no
carried out through the arrangement that is rights, title or ownership) in the
directly attributed to them). assets of the arrangement.
722
Obligations for The parties share all liabilities, obligations, The joint arrangement is liable
liabilities costs and expenses in a specified for the debts and obligations of
proportion (eg in proportion to their the arrangement.
ownership interest in the arrangement
or in proportion to the activity carried out The parties are liable to the
through the arrangement that is directly arrangement only to the extent
attributed to them). of:
 Their respective investments
in the arrangement;
 Their respective obligations
to contribute any unpaid or
additional capital to the
arrangement; or
 Both.
The parties to the joint arrangement are Creditors of the joint

liable for claims by third parties. arrangement do not have rights
of recourse against any party.
Revenues, The contractual arrangement establishes The contractual arrangement

expenses, the allocation of revenues and expenses on establishes each party's share in
profit or loss the basis of the relative performance of the profit or loss relating to the
each party to the joint arrangement. For activities of the arrangement.
example, the contractual arrangement
might establish that revenues and expenses
are allocated on the basis of the capacity
that each party uses in a plant operated
jointly.
Guarantees The parties to joint arrangements are often required to provide guarantees to
third parties that, for example, receive a service from, or provide financing
to, the joint arrangement. The provision of guarantees to third parties, or the
commitment by the parties to provide them, does not, by itself, determine that
the joint arrangement is a joint operation.
723
724
Foreign transactions
and entities
725
1 Functional currency
1.1 Changes in an entity's functional currency
The functional currency of an entity reflects the underlying transactions, events and conditions that
are relevant to the entity. Accordingly, once the functional currency is determined, it cannot be
changed unless there is a change to those underlying transactions, events and
conditions. (IAS 21: para. 36)
For example, a change in the currency that mainly influences the sales prices of goods and services
may lead to a change in an entity’s functional currency.
The effect of a change in functional currency is accounted for prospectively (IAS 21:
para. 37):
 The entity translates all items into the new functional currency using the exchange rate
at the date of the change.
 The resulting translated amounts for non-monetary items are treated as their
historical cost.
 Exchange differences arising from the translation of a foreign operation previously
recognised in other comprehensive income are not reclassified from equity to profit or loss
until the disposal of the operation.
726
Group statements of
cash flows
727
1 Revision – statement of cash flows

You should be familiar with the format of single entity statements of cash flows and the approach to
preparing them. It is essential that you are comfortable with single entity cash flows before you move
on to groups. This section provides revision of single entity statements of cash flows.
1.1 Importance of cash flows

Cash flows are often easier to understand as a concept than accounting profits and can provide
useful information to various user groups to aid their understanding of a group.
Several user groups benefit from information relating to group cash flows, for example:
Management
• Cash flow provides more relevant information on which decisions should be taken.
• Cash flow accounting can be both retrospective and include a forecast for the future.
This is of great information value to all users of accounting information.
• Forecasts can subsequently be monitored by the use of variance statements which
compare actual cash flows against the forecast.
Users of cash
flow information
Shareholders
• Creditors (long- and short-term) are more
• Survival of a company depends on its ability to interested in an entity's ability to repay them than
generate cash. Cash flow accounting directs attention in its profitability.
towards this critical issue.
• Could be misled by profit accounting; eg creditors
• Cash flow accounting can be better for stewardship might consider that a profitable company is a
as cash flows are objective and not subject to manipulation. going concern
• Cash flow reporting provides a better means of comparing For example, if a company builds up large amounts
the results of different companies than traditional profit of unsold inventories of goods, their cost would
reporting. not be chargeable against profits, but cash would
• It helps manage expectations about potential dividend have been used up in making them, thus weakening
payments. Shareholders might believe that a company the company's liquid resources.
could pay all its profits as a dividend. The statement of
cash flows helps them understand the impact of cash
payments.
Cash: both cash on hand and demand deposits.

Key term Cash equivalents: short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known
amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
Cash flows: inflows and outflows of cash and cash equivalents.
Operating activities: the principal revenue-producing activities of the entity and other activities
that are not investing or financing activities.
Investing activities: the acquisition and disposal of long-term assets and other investments not
included in cash equivalents.
Financing activities: activities that result in changes in the size and composition of the equity
capital and borrowings of the entity.
(IAS 7: para. 6)
728
1.2 Presentation of a statement of cash flows

IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows requires statements of cash flows to report cash flows during the
period classified by operating, investing and financing activities (IAS 7: para. 10).
1.2.1 Operating activities

This is perhaps the key part of the statement of cash flows because it shows whether, and to what
extent, companies can generate cash from their principal revenue-producing activities.
Most of the components of cash flows from operating activities will be those items which determine
the net profit or loss of the entity. The standard gives the following as examples of cash flows
from operating activities (IAS 7: para. 14):
 Cash receipts from the sale of goods and the rendering of services
 Cash receipts from royalties, fees, commissions and other revenue
 Cash payments to suppliers for goods and services
 Cash payments to and on behalf of employees
 Cash payments/refunds of income taxes unless they can be specifically identified with
financing or investing activities
 Cash receipts and payments from contracts held for dealing or trading purposes
Certain items may be included in the net profit or loss for the period which do not relate to
operational cash flows; for example the profit or loss on the sale of a piece of plant will be included
in net profit or loss, but the cash flows (proceeds from sale) will be classed as investing.
1.2.2 Investing activities

The cash flows classified under this heading show the extent of new investment in assets which
will generate future profit and cash flows. The standard gives the following examples of
cash flows arising from investing activities (IAS 7: para. 16).
 Cash payments to acquire property, plant and equipment, intangibles and other long-term
assets, including those relating to capitalised development costs and self-constructed property,
plant and equipment
 Cash receipts from sales of property, plant and equipment, intangibles and other long-term
assets
 Cash payments to acquire shares or debentures of other entities
 Cash receipts from sales of shares or debentures of other entities
 Cash advances and loans made to other parties
 Cash receipts from the repayment of advances and loans made to other parties
 Cash payments for or receipts from futures/forward/option/swap contracts except where the
contracts are held for dealing purposes, or the payments/receipts are classified as financing
activities
729
729
1.2.3 Financing activities

This section of the statement of cash flows shows the share of cash which the entity's capital
providers have claimed during the period. The separate disclosure of cash flows arising from
financing activities is important because it is useful in predicting claims on future cash flows by
providers of capital to the entity (IAS 7: para. 17). The standard gives the following examples of
cash flows which might arise under these headings (IAS 7: para. 17):
 Cash proceeds from issuing shares
 Cash payments to owners to acquire or redeem the entity's shares
 Cash proceeds from issuing debentures, loans, notes, bonds, mortgages and other short or
long-term borrowings
 Cash repayments of amounts borrowed
 Cash payments by a lessee for the reduction of the outstanding liability relating to a lease
1.3 Taxes on income

Cash flows arising from taxes on income should be separately disclosed and should be classified
as cash flows from operating activities unless they can be specifically identified with financing and
investing activities.
Taxation cash flows are often difficult to match to the originating underlying transaction, so most
of the time all tax cash flows are classified as arising from operating activities (IAS 7: para. 35).
1.4 Reporting cash flows from operating activities

The standard offers a choice of method for this part of the statement of cash flows (IAS 7: para. 18).
(a) Direct method: disclose major classes of gross cash receipts and gross cash payments.
(b) Indirect method: net profit or loss is adjusted for the effects of transactions of a non-cash
nature, any deferrals or accruals of past or future operating cash receipts or payments, and
items of income or expense associated with investing or financing cash flows.
The direct method is the preferred method because it discloses information not available
elsewhere in the financial statements, which could be of use in estimating future cash flows. Both
methods are shown in the following example.
Illustration 1
Preparation of a statement of cash flows for a single entity
Below are the statements of financial position for Raglan at 31 December 20X7 and 31 December
20X8, and the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended
31 December 20X8.
730
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 DECEMBER

20X8 20X7
$'000 $'000
Assets
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 798 638
Development costs 110 92
908 730
Current assets
Inventories 313 280
Trade receivables 208 186
Cash 111 4
632 470
Total assets 1,540 1,200

Equity
$1 ordinary shares 220 200
Share premium 140 80
Revaluation surplus 42 –
1,001 850
4% loan notes 250 100
Deferred tax 76 54
Provision for warranties 30 26
356 180
Current liabilities
Trade payables 152 146
Current tax payable 26 24
Interest payable 5 –
183 170
Total equity and liabilities 1,540 1,200
731
731

$'000
Revenue 1,100
Cost of sales (750)
Gross profit 350
Expenses (247)
Finance costs (10)
Profit on sale of equipment 7
Gain on property revaluation 60
Income tax relating to gain on property revaluation (18)
Notes:
(1) Depreciation of property, plant and equipment during 20X8 was $54,000 and capitalised
development expenditure amortised was $25,000.
(2) Proceeds from the sale of equipment were $58,000, giving rise to a profit of $7,000. No
other items of property, plant and equipment were disposed of during the year.
(3) Finance costs represent interest paid on the loan notes. New loan notes were issued on
1 January 20X8.
(4) The company revalued its property at the year end. Company policy is to treat revaluations as
realised profits when the asset is retired or disposed of.
(5) Expenses include wages paid of $44,000 and bad debts of $12,000.
Required
(a) Prepare a statement of cash flows for Raglan for the year ended 31 December 20X8, using
the indirect method in accordance with IAS 7.
(b) Prepare the 'cash flows from operating activities' section using the direct method.
732
Solution
(a) RAGLAN STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X8
(INDIRECT METHOD)
$'000 $'000
Adjustments for:
Depreciation 54
Amortisation 25
Interest expense 10
Profit on disposal of equipment (7)
182
Increase in provisions (W4) 4
Cash generated from operations 137
Interest paid (W3) (5)
Income taxes paid (W3) (24)
Net cash from operating activities 108

Development expenditure (W1) (43)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (W1) (205)

Proceeds from issue of share capital (W2) 80
Proceeds from issue of loan notes (W3) 150
Dividends paid (W2) (41)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of year 4
Cash and cash equivalent at end of year 111
Workings
1 Assets
Property, plant Development
and equipment costs
$'000 $'000
Opening balance (b/d) 638 92
Depreciation (54) (25)
OCI 60
Non-cash additions – –
Disposals (58 – 7) (51) –
Cash paid/(rec'd) β 205 43
Closing balance (c/d) 798 110
733
733
2 Equity
Share capital/ Retained
share premium earnings
$'000 $'000
(200 + 80) 280 570
Non-cash items – –
Cash (paid)/rec'd β 80 (41)
Closing balance (c/d) (220 + 140) 360 599
3 Liabilities
Loan Income tax Interest
notes payable payable
$'000 $'000 $'000
Opening balance (b/d) 100 (54 + 24) 78 –
SPLOCI* – P/L 30 10
– OCI 18
Non-cash items – – –
Cash (paid)/rec'd β 150 (24) (5)
Closing balance (c/d) 250 (76 + 26) 102 5
* SPLOCI = statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income

Inventories Trade Trade Provisions
receivables payables
$'000 $'000 $'000 $'000
Opening balance (b/d) 280 186 146 26
 Increase/(decrease) 33 22 6 4
Closing balance (c/d) 313 208 152 30
(b) RAGLAN
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES (DIRECT METHOD)
$'000 $'000
Cash receipts from customers (W1) 1,066
Cash paid to suppliers and employees (W2) (929)
Interest paid (from part (a)) (5)
Income taxes paid (from part (a)) (24)
734
Workings
1 Cash received from customers
Trade
receivables
$'000
Opening balance (b/d) 186
Revenue 1,100
Non-cash (bad debt) (12)
Cash received β (1,066)
Closing balance (c/d) 208
2 Cash paid to suppliers and employees
Trade
payables
$'000
Opening balance (b/d) 146
Purchases and other 935
expenses (W3)
Cash (paid) β (929)
Closing balance (c/d) 152
3 Purchases and other expenses

$'000
Cost of sales and expenses (750 + 247) 997
Inventory adjustments:
Opening inventories (280)
Closing inventories 313
Non-cash expenses:
Depreciation (54)
Amortisation (25)
Bad debts (12)
Increase in provision (4)
935
2 Group statement of cash flows

2.1 Preparing a group statement of cash flows
The illustration below shows how a group statement of cash flows is prepared using the consolidated
735
735
Illustration 2
Preparation of a consolidated statement of cash flows
On 1 October 20X8 P acquired 90% of S by issuing 100 million shares at an agreed value of
$1.60 per share and $140m in cash. At that time the statement of financial position of S (equivalent
to the fair value of the assets and liabilities) was as follows:
$m
Inventories 70
Trade payables (40)
260
Group policy is to measure non-controlling interests at the date of acquisition at the proportionate
share of net assets.
The consolidated statements of financial position of P as at 31 December were as follows:
20X8 20X7
$m $m
Non-current assets
Goodwill 60 –
2,702 2,300
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents 2 50
2,822 2,350
5,524 4,650
Share capital ($1 ordinary shares) 1,150 1,000
Share premium account 590 500
Revaluation surplus 74 –
3,592 3,030
Non-controlling interests 32 –
3,624 3,030
Deferred tax 80 40
Current liabilities
Current tax 110 60
1,820 1,580
5,524 4,650
736
The consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended
31 December 20X8 was as follows:
$m
Revenue 10,000
Gross profit 2,500
Administrative expenses (2,083)

267
342
You are also given the following information:

(1) All other subsidiaries are wholly owned.
(2) Depreciation charged to the consolidated profit or loss amounted to $210m.
(3) There were no disposals of property, plant and equipment during the year.
Required
Prepare a consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended 31 December 20X8 under the
indirect method in accordance with IAS 7.
737
737
Solution
P GROUP
$m $m
Adjustments for:
Depreciation 210
Impairment of goodwill (W2) 6
633

Acquisition of subsidiary net of cash acquired (140 – 10) (130)

Proceeds from issue of share capital (W4) 80
Dividends paid to owners of the parent (W5) (10)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (48)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year 50
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year 2
2
Workings
1 Property, plant and equipment
$m
b/d 2,300
Revaluation 115
Depreciation (210)
Acquisition of subsidiary 190
2,395
Additions (balancing figure) 247
c/d 2,642
738
2 Goodwill
$m
b/d –
Acquisition of subsidiary* 66
66
Impairment loss (balancing figure) (6)
c/d 60
*Goodwill on acquisition of subsidiary:
$m
Consideration transferred (140 + (100  $1.60)) 300
NCI (260  10%) 26
Less net assets at acquisition (260)

66
3 Inventories, trade receivables and trade payables

Trade Trade
Inventories receivables payables
$m $m $m
b/d 1,200 1,100 1,520
Add acquisition of subsidiary 70 30 40
1,270 1,130 1,560
Increase (balancing figure) 180 240 150
c/d 1,450 1,370 1,710
4 Share capital and share premium

$m
b/d (1,000 + 500) 1,500
Issued on acquisition of subsidiary (100  $1.60) 160
1,660
Issue for cash (balancing figure) 80
c/d (1,150 + 590) 1,740
5 Retained earnings (to find dividends paid to owners of the parent)

$m
b/d 1,530
SPLOCI – profit attributable to owners of parent 258
1,788
Dividends paid to owners of the parent (balancing figure) (10)
c/d 1,778
739
739
$m
b/d –
NCI share of total comprehensive income 10
Acquisition of subsidiary (W2) 26
36
Dividends paid to NCI (balancing figure) (4)
c/d 32
7 Current and deferred tax

$m
b/d (40 + 60) 100
SPLOCI – P/L 150
SPLOCI – OCI 40
290
Tax paid (balancing figure) (100)
c/d (80 + 110) 190
2.2 Foreign currency translation

The value of assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency will be subject to exchange rate
fluctuations. These are non-cash movements and should be factored into workings when calculating
the actual cash movement in the year.
The exception to this is if cash balances are denominated in a foreign currency. In this case, the
effect of the exchange rate movement should be included in the reconciliation of opening to closing
cash and cash equivalents.
For the group consolidated statement of cash flows, IAS 7 requires that all cash flows relating to an
overseas subsidiary be translated at the exchange rates between the functional currency and the
foreign currency at the date of the cash flows (IAS 7: para. 26). Where the average rate has been
used to translate the subsidiary's statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, then
this rate is also used to translate the subsidiary's cash flows prior to consolidation.
If the average rate is used, then using the statements of financial position to derive the figures is not
appropriate as the resulting statement of cash flows would not comply with IAS 7, with some items
being translated at the closing rate. The practical answer to this problem is to produce a statement of
cash flows for each subsidiary and then translate each of these into the reporting currency using the
average rate. Each translated statement of cash flows can then be consolidated.
2.3 Disposal of subsidiaries in group statements of cash flows

The approach is very similar to that of acquisition of a subsidiary.
Recall that when a group disposes of a subsidiary:
 The investing activities section will include the line 'Disposal of subsidiary X net of cash
disposed'.
 The relevant assets and liabilities of the subsidiary should be deducted from the asset and
liability calculations.
740
Activity 1: Group statement of cash flows – disposal of subsidiary

Below is the consolidated statement of financial position of Columbus Group as at 30 June 20X5 and
the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended on
that date:
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 30 JUNE
20X5 20X4
$m $m
Non-current assets
Goodwill (re New World) – 40
4,067 3,949
Current assets
Inventories 736 535
1,635 1,190
5,702 5,139
4,637 4,117
5,119 4,629
Current liabilities
Income tax payable 203 102
583 510
5,702 5,139

THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 20X5
$m
Profit before interest and tax 878
Profit on disposal of shares in subsidiary 36

624
You are given the following information:

1 Columbus, a public limited company, sold its entire interest in New World, a limited company,
on 31 March 20X5 for $420m. Columbus had acquired an 80% interest in New World a
number of years ago when New World's reserves stood at $80m.
741
741
The statement of financial position of New World at the date of disposal showed:
$m
Inventories 46
478
Share capital 100
Reserves 340
440
Trade payables 38
478
The non-controlling interests in New World were measured at fair value at the date of
acquisition of $44m.
Impairment tests conducted annually since the date of acquisition did not reveal any
impairment losses in respect of the consolidated investment in New World.
All other subsidiaries were set up by Columbus and did not have any goodwill.
2 Depreciation charge for the year was $800m.
There were no disposals of non-current assets other than on the disposal of the subsidiary.
Required
Using the proformas given below, work to the nearest $'m and answer the following questions:
(a) How will the disposal appear in the statement of cash flows?
(b) What are the additions to property, plant and equipment?
(c) What is the dividend paid to non-controlling interests?
(d) Prepare the reconciliation of profit before tax to cash generated from operations, as at the top
of the indirect method statement of cash flows.
Solution $m
(a) Cash flows from investing activities
Disposal of subsidiary net of cash disposed of
(b) Cash flows from investing activities

Purchase of property, plant and equipment (W1)
(c) Cash flows from financing activities

Dividend paid to non-controlling interests (W2)
742
$m
(d) Cash flows from operating activities
Profit before tax
Adjustments for:
Increase in inventories (W3)

Increase in trade receivables (W3)
Increase in trade payables (W3)
Workings
1 Purchase of property, plant and equipment
Property, plant
& equipment
$m
b/d
SPLOCI –
Depreciation
Non-cash additions –
Cash paid β
c/d
2 Dividends paid to non-controlling interests

Non-controlling
interests
$m
b/d
SPLOCI
Non-cash –
Cash (paid) β
c/d

Trade Trade
$m $m $m
b/d
Increase/(decrease) β
c/d
743
743
3 Disclosure
There are additional disclosure requirements in respect of acquisitions and disposals of subsidiaries
or other business units during the period. The following amounts should be disclosed (in aggregate):
 Total purchase/disposal consideration
 Portion of purchase/disposal consideration discharged by means of cash/cash equivalents
 Amount of cash/cash equivalents in the subsidiary or business unit disposed of
 Amount of assets and liabilities other than cash/cash equivalents in the subsidiary or business
unit acquired or disposed of, summarised by major category (IAS 7: paras. 39–40, 42)
3.1 Disclosure amendments

In January 2016, the IASB published amendments to IAS 7 intended to improve information provided
to users of financial statements about changes in liabilities arising from an entity's
financing activities. They are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2017.
3.1.1 Improved information about an entity's financing activities

The amendments are a result of investor requests for entities to provide disclosures that allow them to
better understand changes in the entity's net debt and management of financing activities.
Entities must disclose the following changes in liabilities arising from financing activities (IAS 7:
para. 44B):
(a) Changes from financing cash flows;
(b) Changes arising from obtaining or losing control of subsidiaries or other businesses;
(c) The effect of changes in foreign exchange rates;
(d) Changes in fair values; and
(e) Other changes.
'Liabilities arising from financing activities' could include long-term and short-term borrowings and
lease liabilities.
The disclosures also apply to changes in financial assets if cash flows arising from those
financial assets are classified as 'cash flows from financing activities'; for example assets held to
hedge long-term borrowings (IAS 7: para. 44C).
One way to fulfil the new disclosure requirement is to provide a reconciliation of cash flows
arising from financing activities (as reported in the statement of cash flows excluding
contributed equity) to the corresponding liabilities in the opening and closing statement
of financial position (IAS 7: para. 44C).
The reconciliation could include:
(a) Opening balances in the statement of financial position
(b) Movements in the period
(c) Closing balances in the statement of financial position
However, this reconciliation is not obligatory.
Lastly, the amendments state that changes in liabilities arising from financing activities must be
disclosed separately from changes in other assets and liabilities (IAS 7: para. 44E).
744
Activity answer
$m
(a) Cash flows from investing activities
Disposal of subsidiary net of cash disposed of (420 – 20) 400
(b) Cash flows from investing activities

Purchase of property, plant and equipment (W1) (1,328)
(c) Cash flows from financing activities

Dividend paid to non-controlling interests (W2) (38)
(d) Cash flows from operating activities $m

Adjustments for:
Depreciation 800
Profit on disposal of subsidiary (36)
1,678
Workings
1 Purchase of property, plant and equipment
PPE
$m
b/d 3,909
SPLOCI –
Depreciation (800)
Non-cash additions –
Disposal of subsidiary (370)
Cash paid β 1,328
c/d 4,067
2 Dividends paid to non-controlling interests

Non-controlling
interests
$m
b/d 512
SPLOCI (TCI) 104
Non-cash –
Disposal of subsidiary* (96)
Cash (paid) β (38)
c/d 482
*NCI at acquisition 44
NCI share of post acq'n reserves ((340 – 80)  20%) 52
96
745
745
Trade Trade
$m $m $m
b/d 535 417 408
Disposal of subsidiary (46) (42) (38)
Increase/(decrease) β 247 230 10
c/d 736 605 380
746
Interpreting financial
statements for different
stakeholders
747
1 Ratio calculations
The broad categories of ratios
Financial performance (focus on statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income):
 Profitability
 Efficiency
 Investor
Financial position (focus on statement of financial position):
 Liquidity
 Working capital management (activity)
 Financial leverage
1.1 Profitability
Return on capital employed (ROCE)
Profit before Interest and Tax (PBIT) PBIT
ROCE = 
Capital employed Total assets less current liabilities
Return on capital employed measures how efficiently a company uses its capital to
generate profits. A potential investor or lender should compare the return to a target return or a
return on other investments/loans.
Return on equity (ROE)
Profit after tax and pref div

ROE = %
Ordinary share capital + reserves
While the return on capital employed looks at the overall return on the long-term sources of finance,
return on equity focuses on the return for the ordinary shareholders.
Gross profit margin
Gross profit
Gross profit margin =  100%
Revenue
The gross profit margin measures how well a company is running its core operations.
Operating profit margin
Profit before interest and tax

Operating profit margin =  100%
Revenue
Profit before interest and taxation (PBIT) is used because it avoids distortion when comparisons are
made between two different companies where one is heavily financed by means of loans, and the
other is financed entirely by ordinary share capital. The extra consideration for the operating margin
over the gross margin is how well the company is controlling its non-production
overheads.
Net profit margin
Profit for year

Net profit margin =  100%
Revenue
The extra considerations for the net margin over the operating margins are interest and tax.
748
Activity 1: Preparation question to test your understanding of

profitability ratios
The following information is available for two potential acquisition targets. The entities have similar
capital structures and both operate in the manufacturing sector.
FG HI
Revenue $460m $420m
Gross profit margin 25% 14%
Net profit margin 10% 9%
Required
Which of the following statements give realistic conclusions that could be drawn from the above
information?
Tick all relevant statements.
Tick Statements
HI's management exercises better cost control of the entity's non-production overheads.
HI has sourced cheaper raw materials.
FG operates its production process more efficiently with less wastage and more goods
produced per machine hour.
HI operates in the low price end of the market but incurs similar manufacturing costs
to FG.
FG's management exercises better cost control of the entity's non-production overheads.
HI has access to cheaper interest rates on its borrowings than FG.
1.2 Efficiency
Asset turnover
Revenue Revenue
Asset turnover = 
Capital employed Total assets less current liabilitie s
This ratio shows how much revenue is produced per unit of capital invested. Therefore, it is a
measure of how efficiently the entity is using its capital to generate revenue.
Total asset turnover
Revenue
Total asset turnover =
Total assets
Total asset turnover is an indication of how efficiently the entity is using its assets to
generate revenue.
Non-current asset turnover
Revenue
Non-current asset turnover =
Non- current assets
This ratio specifically examines the productivity of non-current assets in generating sales. It is
suitable for a capital-intensive entity, for example, a manufacturing company.
749
Making sense of profitability and efficiency ratios

Listed below are possible reasons for changes in the above ratios year on year or differences
between two entities.
Return on capital employed (ROCE) and asset turnover ratios
(a) Type of industry (eg a manufacturing company will typically have higher assets and therefore
lower ROCE/asset turnover than a services or knowledge based company)
(b) Age of assets (eg old asset = low carrying amount (CA) = low capital employed and high
ROCE/asset turnover)
(c) Leased versus owned assets
(d) Revaluations (increased capital employed = lower ROCE/asset turnover, increased
depreciation = lower ROCE)
(e) Timing of purchase (eg at year end = increased capital employed but no time to affect
PBIT/revenue and also a full year's depreciation may be charged depending on the
accounting policy)
Gross profit margin
(a) Change in sales price
(b) Change in sales mix (eg silver cutlery (high mark-up) versus plastic cutlery (low mark up))
(c) Change in purchase price and/or production costs (eg due to discounts/efficiencies)
(d) Inventory obsolescence (written off through cost of sales)
Operating profit margin
(a) One-off non-recurring expenses
(b) Rapid expansion
(c) Relocation
(d) Efficiency savings (economies of scale)
Link between ROCE, operating profit margin and asset turnover
Return on capital employed is a useful primary ratio in analysing profitability and
efficiency together. However, to sub-analyse ROCE, two secondary ratios can be used to consider
profitability and efficiency separately:
 Profitability – operating profit margin
 Efficiency – asset turnover ratio
This is because when the operating profit margin is multiplied by the asset turnover ratio, this results
in the ROCE ratio:
Operating profit margin  Asset turnover ratio = Return on capital employed
PBIT Revenue PBIT
 
Revenue Capital employed Capital employed
1.3 Investor ratios

Investors may either be seeking:
 Income (in the form of dividends); and/or
 Capital growth (in the form of an increase in the share price).
Which investor ratios they are interested in depends on whether they are seeking income or capital
growth.
750
Earnings per share (EPS)

Earnings
Earnings per share =
Weighted average no. of shares
This is a measure of the amount of profit available for each share held.
Earnings per share is considered in more detail in Section 2 as it has its own accounting standard
(IAS 33 Earnings per Share).
Price/earnings (P/E ratio)
Current market price per share
P/E ratio =
EPS
The P/E ratio is a measure of the market's confidence in the future of an entity.
Profit retention ratio
Profit after dividends
Profit retention ratio =  100%
Profit before dividends
This is a useful ratio for an investor seeking capital growth and it shows the portion of the profit
to be reinvested into the business for future growth (rather than being paid out as dividends).
Dividend payout rate
Cash dividend per share
Dividend payout rate =  100%
EPS
This ratio is useful for an income-seeking investor as it shows portion of profit paid out to
investors in the form of a dividend.
Dividend yield
Dividend per share
Dividend yield =  100%
Market price per share
This ratio gives the cash return on the investment (valued at current market value). It is useful
for an income-seeking investor.
Dividend cover
EPS
Dividend cover =
Dividend per share
This ratio shows how easily an entity can allocate dividends out of its profits. It does not
consider whether there is cash available to pay dividends.

investor ratios
The following information is available for two listed entities of a similar size operating in the retail
sector:
PQ SR
EPS 25 cents per share 20 cents per share
P/E ratio 15 20
Dividend payout ratio 90% 50%
751
Required
Identify which THREE of the following statements give realistic conclusions that could be drawn
from the above information?
Tick Statements
An investor seeking to maximise their short-term return will be more attracted to PQ

than SR.
The dividend policy of SR is more generous than that of PQ.
The current return per share of SR is better than that of PQ.
SR has reinvested a greater proportion of its profit than PQ.
The market has greater confidence in the future of PQ than SR.
An investor seeking long-term capital growth will be more attracted to SR than PQ.
1.4 Liquidity
Current ratio
Current assets
Current ratio =
Current liabilities
This ratio measures a company's ability to pay its current liabilities out of its current
assets. The industry the company operates in should be taken into consideration. For example, a
supermarket has low receivables (mainly cash sales), low inventory (as perishable) and high
payables (superior bargaining power) so overall will have a low current ratio.
Quick ratio
Current assets – Inventory
Quick ratio (acid test) =
Current liabilities
This is similar to the current ratio except that it omits the inventories figure from current assets.
This is because inventories are the least liquid current asset that a company has, as it has to be
sold, turned into receivables and then the cash has to be collected. This is a more reliable measure
as businesses will not be able to use inventories to pay off payables quickly.
1.5 Working capital management

Receivables days
Trade receivables
Receivables days =  365 days
Credit sales
This ratio shows, on average, how long it takes for the trade receivables to settle their
account with the company. The average credit term granted to customers should be taken into
account as well as the efficiency of the credit control function within the company.
Inventory days
Inventories
Inventory days =  365 days*
Cost of sales
This ratio measures the number of days inventories are held by a company on average.
This figure will depend on the type of goods sold by the company. A company selling fresh fruit and
752
vegetables should have low inventory holding periods as these goods will quickly become inedible.
A manufacturer of aged wine will by default have very long inventory holding periods. It is important
for a company to keep its inventory days as low as possible, subject of course to being able to meet
its customers' demands.
Payables days
Trade payables
Payables days =  365
Purchases
Use cost of sales if purchases are not disclosed.
This ratio is measuring the time it takes the company to settle its trade payable
balances. Trade payables provide the company with a valuable source of short-term finance, but
delaying payment for too long a period of time can cause operational problems as suppliers may
stop providing goods and services until payment is received.
Working capital cycle
The working capital cycle (also known as the 'cash operating cycle') includes cash, receivables,
inventories and payables. It effectively represents the time between payment of cash for inventories
and eventual receipt of cash from sale of the inventories.
It shows the number of days for which finance is required. Therefore, ideally the shorter it is, the
better. However, it will vary from industry to industry.
The length of the cycle is determined using the working capital management ratios:
Buy Inventory days Sell Receivable days Receive

inventories inventories cash from
receivables
Payable
Working capital
days
cycle
Pay
payables
The working capital cycle can be therefore be calculated as:

Inventory days + Receivable days – Payable days

working capital ratios
FC is a mobile phone manufacturer, selling to both network providers and independent retailers. FC
has the following working capital ratios for the years ended 31 December 20X4 and 20X5.
20X5 20X4
Inventory days 93 98
Receivables days 54 52
Payables days 97 91
753
Required
Identify which TWO of the following statements give realistic conclusions that could be drawn
from the above information?
Tick Statements
The risk of inventory obsolescence has increased year on year.
The working capital cycle has decreased year on year.
The number of days' finance required to fund working capital is greater in 20X5 than
20X4.
Overall, FC's working capital management has deteriorated year on year.
There is a slightly higher possibility of bad debts arising in 20X5 than 20X4.
1.6 Financial leverage

Gearing
Long-term debt
Debt/Equity =  100% or
Equity
Long-term debt
Debt/(Debt + Equity) =  100%
Long-term debt  Equity
Note. What to include in 'long-term debt' is subjective and will often vary from company to
company. Typically, interest-bearing borrowings such as bank loans and lease liabilities are
included. An overdraft should also be included if it is being used as a source of long-term finance.
Pension liabilities and preference shares classified as a financial liability may also be included.
Gearing is concerned with the long-term financial stability of the company. It looks at how
much the company is financed by debt. The advantage of debt is that it is a cheaper source of
finance than equity as interest is tax deductible. However, the higher the gearing ratio, the less
secure will be the financing of the company and possibly the company's future.
Interest cover
PBIT
Interest cover =
Interest expense
The interest cover ratio considers the number of times a company could pay its interest
payments using its profit from operations. The main concern is that a company should not
have so much debt finance that it risks not being able to settle the debt as it falls due.
754

RST Co is considering a potential investment in its competitor XYZ Co. The managing director of
RST Co has obtained the three most recent statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive
income and statements of financial position of XYZ Co as shown below.
XYZ CO
FOR YEARS ENDED 31 DECEMBER
20X6 20X7 20X8
$'000 $'000 $'000
Revenue 18,000 18,900 19,845
Cost of sales 10,440 10,340 11,890
Gross profit 7,560 8,560 7,955
Distribution costs 1,565 1,670 1,405
Administrative expenses 1,409 1,503 1,591
Operating profit 4,586 5,387 4,959
Interest payable on bank overdraft 104 215 450
Interest payable on 12% debentures 600 600 600
Profit before tax 3,882 4,572 3,909
Income tax 1,380 2,000 1,838
Profit after tax 2,502 2,572 2,071
XYZ CO
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 DECEMBER
20X6 20X7 20X8
$'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000 $'000
Assets
Non-current assets
Land and buildings 11,460 12,121 11,081
Plant and machinery 8,896 9,020 9,130
20,356 21,141 20,211
Current assets
Inventory 1,775 2,663 3,995
Trade receivables 1,440 2,260 3,164
Cash 50 53 55
3,265 4,976 7,214
23,621 26,117 27,425
Equity
Share capital 8,000 8,000 8,000
Retained earnings 6,434 7,313 7,584
14,434 15,313 15,584
12% debentures 20Y1 – 20Y4 5,000 5,000 5,000
Current liabilities
Trade payables 390 388 446
Bank 1,300 2,300 3,400
Tax 897 1,420 1,195
Dividend payable 1,600 1,696 1,800
4,187 5,804 6,841
23,621 26,117 27,425
755
Required
Prepare a brief report for the Managing Director of RST Co commenting on the financial
performance and financial leverage of XYZ Co from the perspective of making the potential
investment. You should highlight any areas that require further investigation.
2 Problems with ratio analysis

The lack of detailed information available to the outsider is a potential problem in undertaking
ratio analysis, as:
 There may simply be insufficient data to calculate all of the required ratios; and
 A suitable 'yardstick' with which the calculated ratios may be compared may not be readily
available.
Limitations of year-on-year comparisons
When undertaking trend analysis (comparisons for the same business over time), it is important to
consider the following limitations:
Limitation Example
Change in nature of the business or The launch of a new product or entry into a new
geographical areas in which the entity geographical market
operates
Increasing costs or a change in the Rising energy costs, agreeing to pay staff the living
value of the currency wage or a weakening of the home currency making
foreign imports more expensive. Can make a simple
comparison difficult as these factors would mean that
inconsistencies would exist between periods
Changes in accounting policies A change from using the FIFO method to the average
cost method under IAS 2. Is likely to reduce the cost of
closing inventories and increase cost of sales which has
an impact on gross and net profit margins and the
inventory holding period
Limitations of intersegment comparisons

When undertaking 'cross-sectional' analysis (making comparisons with other companies) the position
is even more difficult because of the problem of identifying companies that are comparable.
Comparability between companies may be impaired due to the following reasons.
Limitation Example
Different accounting policies An entity that revalues PPE will have higher depreciation
than one that does not revalue, reducing its margins
and return on capital employed
Operating at different ends of the Low price/high volume versus luxury items with high
sector sales prices resulting in different profit margins
Slightly different range of activities Supermarkets now often operate in food, retail clothing
within the business and financial services. The product mix and therefore
margins will vary from entity to entity
Difference in size of entities Larger entities may benefit from economies of scale and
better margins
756
Limitation Example
Different classification of costs Different classification between cost of sales, distribution

costs and administrative expenses will impact margins
Different business decisions Whether to purchase assets under finance or operating

leases will reduce comparability. Finance leases
increase capital employed and gearing whereas
operating leases have no SOFP impact
The age of the business This could impact the P/E ratio. A new entity may have
a lower P/E ratio than an established entity as it may
be perceived to be higher risk
Age of assets The older the assets, the lower the capital employed
and the lower the depreciation which could result in a
higher ROCE for an entity with older assets
P/E ratio often impacted by factors Some entities might be impacted more than others by
outside the control of the entity factors influencing the market generally (eg recession)
or macro-economic factors (eg interest rate changes)
Limitations of international comparisons
Limitation Example
Different accounting standards Different countries will potentially be following different

GAAPs. Different measurement rules for major elements
(eg PPE, inventories, provisions) are likely to impact
profit margins and ROCE
Different economic environments with Examples: minimum wage, quotas, local taxes on goods
different cultural pressures shipped in or out of country, environmental legislation
Listed on stock markets with different A small illiquid market may have lower share prices as
levels of liquidity there is less activity in the market, causing a lower P/E
ratio
The major intragroup comparison organisations (whose results are intended for the use of
participating companies and are not generally available) go to considerable length to adjust
accounts to comparable bases.
The external user will rarely be in a position to make such adjustments. Although the position is
improved by increases in disclosure requirements, direct comparisons between companies will
inevitably, on occasion, continue to give rise to misleading results.
757
3 Earnings per share

3.1 Definitions
The following definitions are given in IAS 33 Earnings per Share (IAS 33: para. 5– 7). It is necessary
to be familiar with these:
Ordinary share: an equity instrument that is subordinate to all other classes of equity instruments.
Key term Potential ordinary share: a financial instrument or other contract that may entitle its holder to
ordinary shares.
Options, warrants and their equivalents: financial instruments that give the holder the right
to purchase ordinary shares.
Contingently issuable ordinary shares: ordinary shares issuable for little or no cash or other
consideration upon the satisfaction of certain conditions in a contingent share agreement.
Contingent share agreement: an agreement to issue shares that is dependent on the
satisfaction of specified conditions.
Dilution: a reduction in earnings per share or an increase in loss per share resulting from the
assumption that convertible instruments are converted, that options or warrants are exercised, or that
ordinary shares are issued upon the satisfaction of certain conditions.
Antidilution: an increase in earnings per share or a reduction in loss per share resulting from the
assumption that convertible instruments are converted, that options or warrants are exercised, or that
ordinary shares are issued upon the satisfaction of certain conditions.
(IAS 33: para. 5 – 7)
3.2 Basic EPS

Basic EPS should be calculated for profit or loss attributable to ordinary equity holders of
the parent entity and profit or loss from continuing operations attributable to those equity
holders (if this is presented) (IAS 33: para. 9).
Basic EPS should be calculated by dividing the net profit or loss for the period attributable to
ordinary equity holders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding
during the period (IAS 33: para. 10).
Net profit or loss attributable to ordinary equity holders of the patent entity
EPS = cents
Weighed average no. of ordinary equity shares outstanding during the period
Earnings
The net profit or loss attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent is the consolidated profit
after:
 Income taxes
 Non-controlling interests
 Preference dividends (on preference shares which have been classified as equity)
Note. Preference dividends on preference shares which have been classified as a financial liability
do not need to be deducted as they will already have been reported in the profit figure as a finance
cost.
(IAS 33: para. 12–14).
758
Number of shares
The number of ordinary shares used should be the weighted average number of ordinary shares
during the period. This figure (for all periods presented) should be adjusted for events, other than
the conversion of potential ordinary shares, that have changed the number of shares outstanding
without a corresponding change in resources (IAS 33: para. 19).
3.3 Diluted EPS

At the end of an accounting period, a company may have in issue some securities which do not (at
present) have any 'claim' to a share of equity earnings, but may give rise to such a claim in
the future. These may include:
(a) A separate class of equity shares which at present is not entitled to any dividend, but
will be entitled after some future date
(b) Convertible loan stock or convertible preferred shares which give their holders the
right at some future date to exchange their securities for ordinary shares of the company, at a
pre-determined conversion rate
(c) Options or warrants
In such circumstances, the future number of shares ranking for dividend might increase, which in turn
results in a fall in the EPS. In other words, a future increase in the number of equity shares
will cause a dilution or 'watering down' of equity, and it is possible to calculate a diluted
earnings per share (ie the EPS that would have been obtained during the financial period if the
dilution had already taken place). This will indicate to investors the possible effects of a future
dilution.
Diluted earnings
The earnings calculated for basic EPS should be adjusted by the post-tax (including deferred tax)
effect of the following (IAS 33: para. 33):
(a) Any dividends on dilutive potential ordinary shares that were deducted to arrive at earnings
for basic EPS
(b) Interest recognised in the period for the dilutive potential ordinary shares
(c) Any other changes in income or expenses (fees and discount, premium accounted for
as yield adjustments) that would result from the conversion of the dilutive potential ordinary
shares, or changes in for example employee bonuses if linked to profit.
Diluted number of shares
The number of ordinary shares is the weighted average number of ordinary shares calculated for
basic EPS plus the weighted average number of ordinary shares that would be issued on the
conversion of all the dilutive potential ordinary shares into ordinary shares (IAS 33:
para. 36).
It should be assumed that dilutive ordinary shares were converted into ordinary shares at the
beginning of the period or, if later, at the actual date of issue.
The computation assumes the most advantageous conversion rate or exercise rate from the
standpoint of the holder of the potential ordinary shares.
An EPS question in the SBR exam is unlikely to focus on detailed IAS 33 calculations. Instead, the
question could ask to you to explain the impact of certain accounting treatments on EPS or to correct
errors in accounting treatment then recalculate EPS. It could also focus on the importance of EPS to
stakeholders.
759
3.4 Presentation
An entity should present (with equal prominence) on the face of the statement of profit or loss and
other comprehensive income basic and diluted EPS for:
(a) Profit or loss from continuing operations; and
(b) Profit or loss for the period
for each class of ordinary share that has a different right to share in the net profit for the period.
Basic and diluted EPS for any discontinuing operations must also be presented.
Disclosure must still be made where the EPS figures (basic and/or diluted) are negative (ie a loss
per share).
(IAS 33: para. 66–69)
3.5 Alternative EPS figures

An entity may present alternative EPS figures if it wishes. However, IAS 33 lays out certain
rules where this takes place (IAS 33: para. 73).
(a) The weighted average number of shares as calculated under IAS 33 must be used.
(b) A reconciliation must be given between the component of profit used in the alternative EPS
(if it is not a line item in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income) and
the line item for profit reported in profit or loss.
(c) The entity must indicate the basis on which the numerator is determined.
(d) Basic and diluted EPS must be shown with equal prominence.
If comparing the EPS of two entities, you should be aware of the basis on which the EPS is
calculated. If an alternative approach is used, it may not be possible to easily compare the figures.
3.6 Significance of earnings per share

Earnings per share (EPS) is one of the most frequently quoted statistics in financial analysis. It is easily
accessible to investors because it is presented on the face of the financial statements, and basic EPS
is fairly easily understood.
Because of its interaction with the price earnings (P/E ratio) and the widespread use of the P/E
ratio as a yardstick for investment decisions, EPS can, through the P/E ratio, have a significant
effect on a company's share price. Therefore, a share price might fall if it looks as if EPS is
going to be low. This is not very rational, as EPS can depend on many, often subjective, assumptions
used in preparing a historical statement, namely the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income. It does not necessarily bear any relation to the value of a company, and of
its shares. Nevertheless, the market is sensitive to EPS.
760
4 Problems with financial performance indicators

It is increasingly the case that financial performance measures do not fully report all the factors that
an entity nor its stakeholders consider important. Some of the common problems with financial
performance indicators include:
 They do not identify the causes of performance, only the effects of it.
 They focus only on variables which can be expressed in monetary terms, ignoring other
important variables which cannot be expressed in monetary terms.
 They focus on the past.
 They do not convey the full picture of a company's performance in a modern business
environment eg quality, customer satisfaction.
 They focus on the short term.
5 Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)

The GRI published its sustainability reporting standards, the GRI Standards, in 2016. These
replace the previous GRI guidelines and are effective for reports or other material published from July
2018, though earlier adoption is encouraged. The GRI Standards are designed to be used by
organisations to report about their impacts on the economy, the environment, and/or society.
There are two basic approaches for using the GRI Standards:
(a) Using the GRI Standards as a set to prepare a sustainability report in accordance with the
Standards.
(b) Using selected Standards, or parts of their content, to report specific information.
There are three universal standards (known as the '100 series'), followed by a series of topic-specific
standards. The universal standards are:
Standard Description
GRI 101: Foundation 'Sets out the reporting principles for defining report content and
quality. It includes requirements for preparing a sustainability report
in accordance with the GRI Standards, and describes how the GRI
Standards can be used and referenced' (GRI 101: Foundation, p4).
GRI 102: General 'Used to report contextual information about an organization and
Disclosures its sustainability reporting practices. This includes information about
an organisation's profile, strategy, ethics and integrity, governance,
stakeholder engagement practices, and reporting process' (GRI
101: Foundation, p4).
GRI 103: Management 'Used to report information about how an organization manages a
Approach material topic. It is designed to be used for each material topic in a
sustainability report, including those covered by the topic-specific
GRI Standards (series 200, 300, and 400) and other material
topics.
Applying GRI 103 with each material topic allows the organization
to provide a narrative explanation of why the topic is material,
where the impacts occur (the topic Boundary), and how the
organisation manages the impacts' (GRI 101: Foundation, p4).
A high level description of GRI 101: Foundation is given in Section 5.1 below.
761
Exercise 1: GRI Standards

The GRI standards are available to download from the GRI website: www.globalreporting.org.
Take a look at the GRI Standards and think about how a company you know might apply these
standards to its reporting. Do you think it would be difficult/expensive to apply the standards?
5.1 GRI 101 Reporting principles

GRI 101 Section 1 provides four reporting principles. GRI believes these principles are fundamental
to achieving high quality sustainability reporting. In order to claim that a report has been prepared in
accordance with the GRI Standards, an entity must comply with the reporting principles of GRI 101.
Reporting principle Definition
Stakeholder 'The reporting organisation shall identify its stakeholders, and explain
inclusiveness how it has responded to their reasonable expectations and interests.'
Sustainability context 'The report shall present the reporting organisation's performance in
the wider context of sustainability.' (GRI 101: Foundation, p9)
Materiality 'The report shall cover topics that:

reflect the reporting organisation's significant economic,
environmental, and social impacts; or
substantively influence the assessments and decisions of stakeholders.'
Completeness 'The report shall include coverage of material topics and their
Boundaries, sufficient to reflect significant economic, environmental,
and social impacts, and to enable stakeholders to assess the reporting
organisation's performance in the reporting period.' (GRI 101:
Foundation, p12)
It also sets out principles for defining reporting quality:
Principle Description
Accuracy 'The reported information shall be sufficiently accurate and detailed for
stakeholders to assess the reporting organisation's performance.' (GRI
101: Foundation, p13)
Balance 'The reported information shall reflect positive and negative aspects of
the reporting organisation's performance to enable a reasoned
assessment of overall performance.' (GRI 101: Foundation, p13)
Clarity 'The reporting organisation shall make information available in a

manner that is understandable and accessible to stakeholders using
that information.' (GRI 101: Foundation, p14)
Comparability 'The reporting organisation shall select, compile, and report

information consistently. The reported information shall be presented in
a manner that enables stakeholders to analyse changes in the
organisation's performance over time, and that could support analysis
relative to other organisations.' (GRI 101: Foundation, p14)
762
Principle Description
Reliability 'The reporting organisation shall gather, record, compile, analyse, and
report information and processes used in the preparation of the report
in a way that they can be subject to examination, and that establishes
the quality and materiality of the information.' (GRI 101: Foundation,
p15)
Timeliness 'The reporting organisation shall report on a regular schedule so that

information is available in time for stakeholders to make informed
decisions.' (GRI 101: Foundation, p16)
6 Environmental and social reporting

6.1 Benefits of environmental and social reporting
Companies which voluntarily publish environmental and social reports have identified the following
benefits:
 It demonstrates coherence of overall management strategy to important external stakeholders.
 It strengthens stakeholder relations.
 It increases competitive advantages (the 'first mover' effect).
 It increases public recognition for corporate accountability and responsibility.
 Target setting and external reporting drive continual environmental and social improvement.
 Effective self-regulation minimises risk of regulatory intervention.
 It may improve access to lists of 'preferred suppliers' of buyers with green procurement
policies.
 It reduces corporate risk, which may reduce financing costs and broaden the range of
investors.
 It enhances employee morale.
 It leads to improved profitability.
6.2 Human capital accounting

Human capital accounting has at its core the principle that employees are assets. Competitive
advantage is largely gained by effective use of people.
Implications of regarding people as organisational assets
(a) People are a resource which needs to be carefully and efficiently managed with overriding
concern for organisational objectives.
(b) The organisation needs to protect its investment by retaining, safeguarding and developing its
human assets.
(c) Deterioration in the attitudes and motivation of employees, increases in labour turnover
(followed by costs of hiring and training replacements) are costs to the company – even
though a 'liquidation' of human assets, brought about by certain managerial styles, may
produce short-term increases in profit.
(d) A concept developed some time ago was that of human asset accounting (the inclusion of
human assets in the financial reporting system of the organisation).
763
Intellectual assets
Because of the difficulties found in both theory and practice, the concept of human assets was
broadened and became intellectual assets. Intellectual assets, or 'intellectual capital' as they are
sometimes called can be divided into three main types:
(a) External assets. These include the reputation of brands and franchises and the strength of
customer relationships.
(b) Internal assets. These include patents, trademarks and information held in customer
databases.
(c) Competencies. These reflect the capabilities and skills of individuals.
'Intellectual assets' thus includes 'human assets'.
The value of intellectual assets will continue to rise and will represent an increasing proportion of the
value of most companies. Whether or not traditional accounting will be able to measure them
remains to be seen.
7 Management commentary
7.1 Elements of management commentary
The IFRS Practice Statement: Management Commentary has provided a table relating the five
elements (given in Chapter 17 section 3.4.2) to its assessments of the needs of the primary users of a
management commentary (existing and potential investors, lenders and creditors).
Element User needs
Nature of the The knowledge of the business in which an entity is engaged and the
business external environment in which it operates
Objectives and To assess the strategies adopted by the entity and the likelihood that
strategies those strategies will be successful in meeting management's stated
objectives
Resources, risks and A basis for determining the resources available to the entity as well as
relationships obligations to transfer resources to others; the ability of the entity to
generate long-term sustainable net inflows of resources; and the risks to
which those resource-generating activities are exposed, both in the near
term and in the long term
Results and prospects The ability to understand whether an entity has delivered results in line
with expectations and, implicitly, how well management has understood
the entity's market, executed its strategy and managed the entity's
resources, risks and relationships
Performance The ability to focus on the critical performance measures and indicators
measures and that management uses to assess and manage the entity's performance
indicators against stated objectives and strategies
(IFRS Practice Statement: para. BC48)
764
7.2 Advantages and disadvantages of a compulsory management

commentary
Entity Entity
 Promotes the entity, and attracts investors,  Costs may outweigh benefits
lenders, customers and suppliers  Risk that investors may ignore the financial
 Communicates management plans and statements
outlook
Users Users
 Financial statements not enough to make  Subjective
decisions (financial information only)  Not normally audited
 Financial statements backward looking  Could encourage companies to de-list
(need forward looking information) (to avoid requirement to produce MC)
 Highlights risks  Different countries have different needs
 Useful for comparability to other entities
8 Segment reporting
8.1 Aggregation of segments
Two or more operating segments may be aggregated if the segments have similar economic
characteristics, and the segments are similar in each of the following respects (IFRS 8: para. 12):
 The nature of the products or services
 The nature of the production process
 The type or class of customer for their products or services
 The methods used to distribute their products or provide their services
 If applicable, the nature of the regulatory environment
8.2 Illustrative example of disclosure under IFRS 8

The following example is adapted from the IFRS 8 Implementation Guidance (para. IG3), which
emphasises that this is for illustrative purposes only and that the information must be presented in the
most understandable manner in the specific circumstances.
The hypothetical company does not allocate tax expense (tax income) or non-recurring gains and
losses to reportable segments. In addition, not all reportable segments have material non-cash items
other than depreciation and amortisation in profit or loss. The amounts in this illustration,
denominated as dollars, are assumed to be the amounts in reports used by the chief operating
decision maker.
Motor
Car parts vessel Software Electronics Finance All other Totals
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
Revenues from external 3,000 5,000 9,500 12,000 5,000 1,000
(a) 35,500
customers
Intersegment revenues – – 3,000 1,500 – – 4,500
Interest revenue 450 800 1,000 1,500 – – 3,750
Interest expense 350 600 700 1,100 – – 2,750
Net interest revenue
(b)
– – – – 1,000 – 1,000
765
Motor
Car parts vessel Software Electronics Finance All other Totals
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
Depreciation and 200 100 50 1,500 1,100 – 2,950
amortisation
Reportable segment profit 200 70 900 2,300 500 100 4,070
Other material non-cash items:
Impairment of assets – 200 – – – – 200
Reportable segment assets 2,000 5,000 3,000 12,000 57,000 2,000 81,000
Expenditure for reportable 300 700 500 800 600 – 2,900
segment non-current assets
Reportable segment liabilities 1,050 3,000 1,800 8,000 30,000 – 43,850
(a) Revenues from segments below the quantitative thresholds are attributable to four operating
segments of the company. These segments include a small property business, an electronics
equipment rental business, a software consulting practice and a warehouse leasing operation.
None of these segments has ever met any of the quantitative thresholds for determining
reportable segments.
(b) The finance segment derives a majority of its revenue from interest. Management primarily
relies on net interest revenue, not the gross revenue and expense amounts, in managing that
segment. Therefore, as permitted by IFRS 8, only the net amount is disclosed.
8.3 Advantages and disadvantages of IFRS 8

There are some commonly cited advantages and disadvantages of IFRS 8.
The managerial approach used by IFRS 8 is Segment determination is the responsibility of

cost effective because the marginal cost of directors and is subjective.
reporting segmental data will be low.
Users can be sure that the segment data Management may report segments which are
reflects the operational strategy of the not consistent for internal reporting
business. and control purposes making its usefulness
questionable.
Management's selection of operating segments The management approach may mean that
helps avoid releasing commercially financial statements of different entities are not
sensitive information. comparable; eg there is no defined
measure of segment profit or loss.
The segment report helps users of accounts Segment reporting does not help the user to
better understand an entity's past fully understand profitability, risks and returns of
performance and it enables them to assess operations
the effectiveness of management
strategy, allowing them to make informed
decisions.
766
Activity answers
Activity 1
The statements ticked below give realistic conclusions:
Tick Statements
HI's management exercises better cost control of the entity's non-production overheads.
HI has a smaller difference between its gross margin and net margin
 (5%) than FG (15%) which means that HI is controlling the entity's
non-production overheads better. One of the differences between
gross and net margin is non-production overheads (distribution costs
and administrative expense).
HI has sourced cheaper raw materials.

This is incorrect as it would make HI's gross margin higher than FG's
(whereas FG's is higher).
FG operates its production process more efficiently with less wastage and more goods
produced per machine hour.

This is correct as FG has a higher gross margin than HI and a more
efficient production process would cause this.
HI operates in the low price end of the market but incurs similar manufacturing costs
 to FG.
This is correct as it would cause HI to have a lower gross margin than FG.
FG's management exercises better cost control of the entity's non-production overheads.
This is incorrect as it would make the difference between FG's gross and
net margins less than HI's whereas the opposite is the case.
HI has access to cheaper interest rates on its borrowings than FG.
 One of the differences between gross and net margin is interest and, as
HI has a smaller difference between gross and net margins, this could be
explained by HI having lower finance costs than FG.
767
Activity 2
The statements ticked below give realistic conclusions:
Tick Statements
An investor seeking to maximise their short-term return will be more attracted to PQ

than SR.

PQ has a higher dividend payout ratio than SR suggesting a more
generous dividend policy which would appeal to a short-term investor.
The dividend policy of SR is more generous than that of PQ.

This is incorrect because SR has a lower dividend payout ratio than PQ,
indicating a less generous dividend policy as they are paying a lower
proportion of their profits out as dividends.
The current return per share of SR is better than that of PQ.

This is incorrect because SR has a lower EPS than PQ.
SR has reinvested a greater proportion of its profit than PQ.

 This is correct because SR has a lower dividend payout ratio and has
therefore retained a greater proportion of profits for reinvestment.
The market has greater confidence in the future of PQ than SR.

This is incorrect because the P/E ratio is an indication of market
confidence in an entity and PQ has a lower P/E ratio and SR.
An investor seeking long-term capital growth will be more attracted to SR than PQ.
This is correct because SR has a higher P/E ratio than PQ indicating
 greater market confidence in the future of SR. Also, SR is retaining more
profits for reinvestment which, if successful, will have a positive impact
on the future share price of SR.
Activity 3
The correct answers are:
Tick Statements
The risk of inventory obsolescence has increased year on year.
 The working capital cycle has decreased year on year.
The number of days' finance required to fund working capital is greater in 20X5
than 20X4.
Overall, FC's working capital management has deteriorated year on year.
 There is a slightly higher possibility of bad debts arising in 20X5 than 20X4.
The working capital cycle is calculated as:

Inventory days + Receivables days – Payable days
In 20X5 = 93 + 54 – 97 = 50 days
In 20X4 = 98 + 52 – 91 = 59 days
768
Therefore, the working capital cycle has decreased by nine days year on year, meaning that the
number of days' finance required to fund working capital is less (not greater) in 20X5 than 20X4.
The risk of inventory obsolescence has decreased year on year because inventory days have fallen
by five days meaning that FC is selling its mobile phones faster in 20X5 than 20X4.
Overall, working capital management has improved (not deteriorated) year on year with the working
capital cycle decreasing by nine days. There has been a five-day improvement in inventory days and
a six day improvement in payables days (although this is partly offset by a two-day deterioration in
receivables days).
The increase in receivables days from 52 to 54 days implies that the credit control function has been
less effective in 20X5 compared to 20X4, thereby increasing the risk of bad debts.
Activity 4
To: MD of RST Co
From: An Accountant
Date: XX.XX.XX
Subject: The financial position and performance of XYZ Co
Introduction
This report has been prepared on the basis of the three most recent statements of profit or loss and
other comprehensive income and statement of financial position of XYZ Co covering the years 20X6
to 20X8 inclusive. Ratio analysis used in this report is based on the calculations shown in the
appendix attached.
Financial performance
Sales have increased at a steady 5% per annum over the three-year period.
In contrast, the gross profit percentage has increased from 42% in 20X6 to 45% in 20X7 before
dropping back to 40% in 20X8. Similarly, operating profit as a percentage of sales was 25.5% in
20X6, 28.5% in 20X7 and 25.0% in 20X8. This may indicate some misallocation of costs between
20X7 and 20X8 and should be investigated, or it may be indicative of a longer downward trend in
profitability.
Return on capital employed, as one would expect, has shown a similar pattern with an increase in
20X7 followed by a subsequent fall in 20X8 to a level below that of 20X6.
Financial leverage
The debt ratio measures the ratio of a company's total debt to its total assets. Although we have no
information as to the norm for the industry as a whole, the debt ratios appear reasonable. However,
it should be noted that debt has risen steadily over the three year period. We should obtain more
information relating to the reason for the increase in debt as it does not appear to be used to fund
any significant investments. The bank overdraft in particular has risen sharply and perhaps gives
concerns about the working capital management of the company. Further analysis of the liquidity
position should also be undertaken.
Conclusion
The review of the three-year financial statements for XYZ Co has given rise to a number of queries
which need to be resolved before a useful conclusion can be reached on the financial position of
XYZ Co. It may also be useful to compare XYZ Co's ratios to those of other companies in the same
industry in order to obtain some idea of the industry norms.
769
APPENDIX TO MEMORANDUM
20X6 20X7 20X8
% sales increase 5% 5%
Gross profit % 42% 45% 40%
Operating profit % 25.5% 28.5% 25.0%
Return on capital employed
Profit before interest and tax 4,586  104 5,387  215 4,959  450
=
Capital employed 14,434  5,000 15,313  5,000 15,584  5,000
 100% = 23% = 25.5% = 21.9%
Debt ratio
Total debt 4,187  5,000 5,804  5,000 6,841  5,000
=
Total assets 20,356  3,265 21,141 4,976 20,211  7,214
 100% = 38.9% = 41.4% = 43.2%
770
Reporting requirements
of small and medium-
sized entities
771
1 Background
1.1 Big GAAP/little GAAP divide
In most countries the majority of companies or other types of entity are very small. The owners
have invested their own money in the business and there are no outside shareholders to protect.
Large entities, by contrast, particularly companies listed on a stock exchange, may have
shareholders who have invested their money, possibly through a pension fund, with no knowledge
whatsoever of the company. These shareholders need protection, and the regulations for such
companies need to be more stringent.
It could therefore be argued that company accounts should be of two types:
(a) 'Simple' ones for small companies with fewer regulations and disclosure requirements; and
(b) 'Complicated' ones for larger companies with extensive and detailed requirements.
This is sometimes called the big GAAP/little GAAP divide.
1.2 Possible solutions

There are two approaches to overcoming the big GAAP/little GAAP divide:
(a) Differential reporting, ie producing new reduced standards specifically for smaller companies,
such as IFRS for SMEs; or
(b) Providing exemptions for smaller companies from some of the requirements of existing
standards.
1.3 Differential reporting

A one-size-fits-all framework does not generate relevant, and useful information, even if this
information is reliable – this is because:
(a) The costs may not be justified for the more limited needs of users of SME accounts.
(b) The purpose of the financial statements and the use to which they are put will not be the same
as for listed companies.
Differential reporting overcomes this by tailoring the reporting requirements to the entity. The main
characteristic that distinguishes SMEs from other entities is the degree of public accountability.
Differential reporting may have drawbacks in terms of reducing comparability between small and
larger company accounts.
Furthermore, problems may arise where entities no longer meet the criteria to be classified as small.
2 Consequences, good and bad

2.1 Likely effect
Because there is no supporting guidance in the IFRS for SMEs, it is likely that differences will arise
from full IFRSs, even where the principles are the same. Most of the exemptions in the IFRS for SMEs
are on grounds of cost or undue effort. However, despite the practical advantages of a simpler
reporting framework, there will be costs involved for those moving to IFRSs – even a simplified IFRS –
for the first time.
772
2.2 Advantages and disadvantages of the IFRS for SMEs

2.2.1 Advantages
(a) It is virtually a 'one stop shop'.
(b) It is structured according to topics, which should make it practical to use.
(c) It is written in an accessible style.
(d) There is considerable reduction in disclosure requirements.
(e) Guidance not relevant to private entities is excluded.
2.2.2 Disadvantages
(a) It does not focus on the smallest companies.
(b) The scope extends to 'non-publicly accountable' entities. Potentially, the scope is too wide.
(c) The standard is still onerous for small companies.
Further simplifications could be made. These might include:
(i) No requirement to value intangibles separately from goodwill on a business
combination;
(ii) No recognition of deferred tax;
(iii) No measurement rules for equity-settled share-based payment;
(iv) No requirement for consolidated accounts (as for EU-based small and medium-sized
entities currently); and
(v) Fair value measurement when readily determinable without undue cost or effort.
773
774
The impact of changes
and potential changes
in accounting regulation
775
1 Managing the transition to IFRS: practical issues

1.1 General issues
The implementation of the change to IFRS is likely to entail careful management in most companies.
Here are some of the change management considerations that should be addressed.
(a) Accurate assessment of the task involved. Underestimation or wishful thinking may
hamper the effectiveness of the conversion and may ultimately prove inefficient.
(b) Proper planning. This should take place at the overall project level, but a detailed task
analysis could be drawn up to control work performed.
(c) Human resource management. The project must be properly structured and staffed.
(d) Training. Where there are skills gaps, remedial training should be provided.
(e) Monitoring and accountability. A relaxed 'it will be all right on the night' attitude could
spell danger. Implementation progress should be monitored and regular meetings set
up so that participants can personally account for what they are doing as well as
flag up any problems as early as possible. Project drift should be avoided.
(f) Achieving milestones. Successful completion of key steps and tasks should be
appropriately acknowledged, ie what managers call 'celebrating success', so as to sustain
motivation and performance.
(g) Physical resourcing. The need for IT equipment and office space should be properly
assessed.
(h) Process review. Care should be taken not to perceive the change as a one-off quick fix.
Any change in future systems and processes should be assessed and properly
implemented.
(i) Follow-up procedures. As with general good management practice, the follow-up
procedures should be planned in to make sure that the changes stick and that any
further changes are identified and addressed.
1.2 Financial reporting infrastructure

As well as sound management judgement, implementation of IFRS requires a sound financial
reporting infrastructure. Key aspects of this include the following:
(a) A robust regulatory framework. For IFRS to be successful, they must be rigorously
enforced.
(b) Trained and qualified staff. Many preparers of financial statements will have been
trained in local GAAP and not be familiar with the principles underlying IFRS, let alone the
detail. Some professional bodies provide conversion qualifications – for example, the ACCA's
Diploma in International Financial Reporting – but the availability of such qualifications and
courses may vary from country to country.
(c) Availability and transparency of market information. This is particularly important
in the determination of fair values, which are such a key component of many IFRSs.
(d) High standards of corporate governance and audit. This is all the more important in
the transition period, especially where there is resistance to change.
Overall, there are significant advantages to the widespread adoption of IFRS, but if the transition is
to go well, there must be a realistic assessment of potential challenges.
776
2 Disclosure Initiative: amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 7

2.1 Amendments to IAS 1
These amendments were published in 2014 and took effect from January 2016. Their purpose is to
address perceived obstacles that prevent preparers from exercising their judgement in presenting
financial reports.
2.1.1 Materiality
Entities should avoid aggregating or disaggregating information in a manner that obscures useful
information, for example, by aggregating items that have different characteristics or disclosing a
large amount of immaterial detail. This reduces understandability.
When management determines an item is material, IAS 1 requires assessment of which specific
disclosures (set out in the relevant standard) should be presented. An assessment is also required of
whether additional information is necessary to meet the needs of users or the disclosure objectives of
the standard in question.
(IAS 1: paras. 29, 55A)
2.1.2 Disaggregation and subtotals

IAS 1 allows subtotals additional to the ones required by IAS 1 in the statement of financial position
or the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income. The amendments to IAS 1 specify
which additional subtotals are acceptable and how they are presented.
Additional subtotals should meet the following requirements (IAS 1: para. 55A):
(a) They must comprise items recognised and measured in accordance with IFRSs.
(b) They must be presented and labelled in a manner that makes the components of the subtotal
clear and understandable.
(c) They must be consistent from period to period.
(d) They must not be displayed with more prominence than the subtotals and totals specified in
IAS 1.
(e) Any additional subtotals must be reconciled to the subtotals and totals required by IAS 1.
2.1.3 Notes
IAS 1 does not require entities to present the notes to the financial statements in a particular order.
There is scope, therefore, for management to consider understandability and comparability when it
determines the order of the notes. For example, an entity might present more significant notes first, or
present linked areas sequentially. IAS 1 already permits this flexibility, which may enable
management to provide further insight about the entity.
2.1.4 Disclosure of accounting policies

These amendments remove guidance and examples with regard to the identification of significant
accounting policies that were perceived as being potentially unhelpful.
2.1.5 Other comprehensive income arising from investments accounted for under
the equity method
The amendments clarify that the share of other comprehensive income arising from investments
accounted for under the equity method is grouped based on whether the items will or will not
subsequently be reclassified as profit or loss. Each group should then be presented as a single line
item in the statement of other comprehensive income.
777
2.2 Amendments to IAS 7

In January 2016, the IASB published amendments to IAS 7 intended to improve information provided
to users of financial statements about an entity's financing activities. They are effective for annual
periods beginning on or after 1 January 2017.
The objective of the amendments is that IAS 7 should provide disclosures that enable users of
financial statements to evaluate changes in liabilities arising from financing activities (IAS 7:
para. 44A).
To achieve this objective, entities reporting cash flows under IAS 7 must disclose the following
changes in liabilities arising from financing activities (IAS 7: para. 44B):
(a) Changes from financing cash flows;
(b) Changes arising from obtaining or losing control of subsidiaries or other businesses;
(c) The effect of changes in foreign exchange rates;
(d) Changes in fair values; and
(e) Other changes.
Liabilities arising from financing activities are defined by the IASB as liabilities 'for which cash flows
were, or future cash flows will be, classified in the statement of cash flows as cash flows from
financing activities'. If financial assets meet the same definition, then the new disclosure requirements
will also relate to financial assets (IAS 7: para. 44C).
One way to fulfil the new disclosure requirement is to provide a reconciliation of cash flows
arising from financing activities (as reported in the statement of cash flows excluding
contributed equity) to the corresponding liabilities in the opening and closing statement
of financial position (IAS 7: para. 44D).
The reconciliation could include:
(a) Opening balances in the statement of financial position
(b) Movements in the period
(c) Closing balances in the statement of financial position
However, this reconciliation is not obligatory, as it was proposed in the 2014 ED on the subject.
Lastly, the amendments state that changes in liabilities arising from financing activities must be
disclosed separately from changes in other assets and liabilities (IAS 7: para. 44E).
3 Classification issues
3.1 Profit or loss versus other comprehensive income
3.1.1 The classification issue
The statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income aims to present the financial
performance of an entity to a wide variety of users in a way that is understandable and comparable
for the purpose of assessing the net cash inflows of the entity. The manner in which the information in
the statement is classified and aggregated plays a key role in fulfilling this aim.
Since the 2011 revision of IAS 1, entities have been required to show separately in other
comprehensive income those items that may be reclassified to profit or loss (recycled) and those
which may never be reclassified (together with the related tax effects).
There has been disagreement as to which items should appear in profit or loss, and
which in other comprehensive income (OCI). The issue of reclassification has also been
controversial.
778
3.1.2 Profit or loss items

Generally, changes resulting from or related to an entity's primary performance or main
revenue-producing activities are reported in profit or loss. Examples include sales revenue,
administration expenses and gains on disposal of property, plant and equipment. Reclassification
adjustments, that is when items are recycled from other comprehensive income, are also included.
Investors tend to focus on profit or loss rather than OCI, and many accounting ratios are calculated
using profit or loss for the year, rather than total comprehensive income.
3.1.3 Other comprehensive income

Generally, these are items of income and expense arising from other, non-primary or non-
revenue producing activities of the company that are not reported in profit or loss as
required or permitted by other IFRSs.
3.1.4 Profit or loss v OCI ≠ realised v unrealised

A common misconception in considering the classification of items is that profit or loss is for realised
gains and losses, and OCI for unrealised. However, this distinction is itself controversial and
therefore of limited use in determining the P/L versus OCI classification.
3.1.5 OCI as the 'dumping ground'

It could be argued that OCI is defined in opposition to profit or loss – that is, items that are not profit
or loss – or even that it has been used as a 'dumping ground' for items that entities do not wish to
report in profit or loss. Reclassification from OCI has been said to compromise the reliability of both
profit or loss and OCI.
3.1.6 Approach in Conceptual Framework

Part of the problem is conceptual – the current Conceptual Framework does not contain principles to
determine:
(a) What items are recognised in profit or loss;
(b) What items are recognised in other comprehensive income; or
(c) Whether, and when, items can be reclassified from other comprehensive income to profit or
loss.
ED/2015/3 Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting proposes that all income and expense
should be shown in profit or loss unless relating to the remeasurement of assets and liabilities – these
would normally be shown in OCI. The ED presumes that items recognised in OCI will be reclassified
to profit or loss in a later period. The 'later period' is based on when that reclassification will provide
relevant information to users (ED/2015/3 paras. 7.27–7.27).
(The Conceptual Framework and the related ED are covered in Chapter 1 of this Workbook.)
3.2 Debt versus equity

3.2.1 Classification differences
It is not always easy to distinguish between debt and equity in an entity's statement of
financial position, partly because many financial instruments have elements of both. IAS 32 Financial
Instruments: Presentation brings clarity and consistency to this matter, so that the classification is
based on principles rather than being driven by perceptions of users.
IAS 32 defines an equity instrument as 'any contract that evidences a residual interest in the
assets of an entity after deducting all of its liabilities' (IAS 32: para. 11). It must first be established
that an instrument is not a financial liability before it can be classified as equity.
779
A key feature of the IAS 32 definition of a financial liability is that it is a contractual

obligation to deliver cash or another financial asset to another entity (IAS 32:
para. 11). The contractual obligation may arise from a requirement to make payments of principal,
interest or dividends. The contractual obligation may be explicit, but it could also be implied
indirectly in the terms of the contract. An example of a debt instrument is a bond which requires the
issuer to make interest payments and redeem the bond for cash.
A financial instrument is an equity instrument only if there is no obligation to deliver cash or
other financial assets to another entity and if the instrument will or may be settled in the issuer's own
equity instruments. An example of an equity instrument is ordinary shares, on which
dividends are payable at the discretion of the issuer. A less obvious example is
preference shares required to be converted into a fixed number of ordinary shares on a fixed date or
on the occurrence of an event which is certain to occur.
An instrument may be classified as an equity instrument if it contains a contingent settlement
provision requiring settlement in cash or a variable number of the entity's own shares only on the
occurrence of an event which is very unlikely to occur – such a provision is not
considered to be genuine. If the contingent payment condition is beyond the control
of both the entity and the holder of the instrument, then the instrument is classified as a financial
liability.
A contract resulting in the receipt or delivery of an entity's own shares is not
automatically an equity instrument. The classification depends on the so-called 'fixed test'
in IAS 32. A contract which will be settled by the entity receiving or delivering a fixed number of
its own equity instruments in exchange for a fixed amount of cash is an equity
instrument. The reasoning behind this is that by fixing upfront the number of shares to be received
or delivered on settlement of the instrument in question, the holder is exposed to the upside and
downside risk of movements in the entity's share price.
In contrast, if the amount of cash or own equity shares to be delivered or received is
variable, then the contract is a financial liability or asset. The reasoning behind this is that
using a variable number of own equity instruments to settle a contract can be similar to using own
shares as 'currency' to settle what in substance is a financial liability. Such a contract does not
evidence a residual interest in the entity's net assets. Equity classification is therefore inappropriate.
IAS 32 gives two examples of contracts where the number of own equity instruments to be
received or delivered varies so that their fair value equals the amount of the contractual right or
obligation.
(a) A contract to deliver a variable number of own equity instruments equal in value to a fixed
monetary amount on the settlement date is classified as a financial liability.
(b) A contract to deliver as many of the entity's own equity instruments as are equal in value to the
value of 100 ounces of a commodity results in liability classification of the instrument.
(IAS 32: para. AG 27)
There are other factors which might result in an instrument being classified as debt.
(a) Dividends are non-discretionary.
(b) Redemption is at the option of the instrument holder.
(c) The instrument has a limited life.
(d) Redemption is triggered by a future uncertain event which is beyond the control of both the
issuer and the holder of the instrument.
780
Other factors which might result in an instrument being classified as equity include the
following.
(a) Dividends are discretionary.
(b) The shares are non-redeemable.
(c) There is no liquidation date.
(IAS 32: para. AG 16C)
3.2.2 Significance of the classification

The distinction between debt and equity is very important, since the classification of a financial
instrument as either debt or equity can have a significant impact on the entity's reported
earnings and gearing ratio, which in turn can affect debt covenants. Companies may wish to
classify a financial instrument as equity, in order to give a favourable impression of gearing,
but this may in turn have a negative effect on the perceptions of existing shareholders if it is seen
as diluting existing equity interests.
The distinction is also relevant in the context of a business combination where an entity issues
financial instruments as part consideration, or to raise funds to settle a business
combination in cash. Management is often called upon to evaluate different financing
options, and in order to do so must understand the classification rules and their
potential effects. For example, classification as a liability generally means that payments
are treated as interest and charged to profit or loss, and this may, in turn, affect the entity's
ability to pay dividends on equity shares.
4 Definition of a business and accounting for previously

held interests
4.1 Background
Following a post-implementation review of IFRS 3 Business Combinations, it emerged that entities
sometimes find it difficult to determine whether they have acquired a business or acquired a group of
assets. The distinction is important because the accounting treatment is very different for the
acquisition of a business compared to the acquisition of a group of assets. The differences relate to
goodwill, deferred tax and acquisition costs. To resolve these difficulties, the IASB decided to issue
some narrow scope amendments.
Meanwhile, the IFRS Interpretations Committee had entered into discussions relating to transactions
involving previously held interests in joint operations. There is diversity in practice when an entity
acquires sole control over a joint operation in which it previously had an interest.
The IASB decided to bring these two aspects together, and in June 2016 issued ED/2016/1 Definition
of a Business and Accounting for Previously Held Interests (Proposed amendments to IFRS 3 and
IFRS 11).
4.2 Definition of a business

The IASB has proposed changes to the Application Guidance of IFRS 3 to clarify the definition of a
business.
The current Application Guidance of IFRS 3 defines a business as follows:
'A business consists of inputs and processes applied to those inputs that have the ability to
create outputs. Although businesses usually have outputs, outputs are not required for an
integrated set to qualify as a business.' (IFRS 3: IG para. B7)
The ED proposes that rather than 'create' outputs, a business should have the ability to 'contribute to
the creation of outputs' (ED/2016/1: para. B7).
781
Furthermore, the ED states that:

'To constitute a business, an integrated set of activities and assets must include, at a
minimum, an input and a substantive process that together have the ability to
contribute to the creation of outputs. However, a business need not include all of the
inputs or processes that the seller used in operating that business.' (ED/2016/1: para. B8)
The ED details a series of steps to assess whether a business has been acquired. The first step in the
assessment is to determine 'whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired are
concentrated either in a single asset or group of similar assets' (ED/2016/1: para. B8A). If this is
the case, then the acquisition is not a business.
If the fair value of assets acquired is not concentrated in this way, then the next step in the
assessment is to determine whether the acquired process is substantive. The ED states how this
should be carried out, depending on whether the acquired process has outputs or not.
If there are no outputs (eg a new entity that hasn't started trading), then the acquisition is only a
business if the process acquired is critical to transforming acquired inputs into outputs and if the
acquisition includes a workforce who are able to perform the acquired process (ED/2016/1: para.
B12A).
The ED also proposes to add new material to the Illustrative Examples of IFRS 3 to show how the new
guidance should be applied.
4.3 Accounting for previously held interests

ED/2016/1 proposes to clarify that when an entity obtains sole control of a joint operation in
which it currently participates, the entity should remeasure its previously held interest in the assets
and liabilities of that joint operation at fair value. This only applies if the joint operation meets the
definition of a business, as discussed above. The clarification will mean that this kind of transaction is
treated like any other step acquisition under IFRS 3.
782
Further question practice and solutions
1 Conceptual Framework
(a) Explain the main purposes of the International Accounting Standards Board's Conceptual
Framework for Financial Reporting.
(b) Identify any four user groups of financial statements and explain what information they are
likely to want from them.
2 Fundamental principles
Fundamental principles require that a member of a professional accountancy body should behave
with integrity in all professional, business and financial relationships and should strive for objectivity
in all professional and business judgements. Objectivity can only be assured if the member is and is
seen to be independent. Conflicts of interest have an important bearing on independence and hence
also on the public's perception of the integrity, objectivity and independence of the accounting
profession.
The following scenario is an example of press reports in recent years which deal with issues of
objectivity and independence within a multinational firm of accountants:
'A partner in the firm was told by the regulatory body that he must resign because he was in breach
of the regulatory body's independence rules, as his brother-in-law was financial controller of an audit
client. He was told that the alternative was that he could move his home and place of work at least
400 miles from the offices of the client, even though he was not the reporting partner. This made his
job untenable. The regulatory body was seen as 'taking its rules to absurd lengths' by the accounting
firm. Shortly after this comment, the multinational firm announced proposals to split the firm into three
areas between audit, tax and business advisory services; management consultancy; and investment
advisory services'.
Required
Discuss the impact that the above events may have on the public perception of the integrity,
objectivity and independence of the multinational firm of accountants.
3 Ace
On 1 April 20X1, Ace Co owned 75% of the equity share capital of Deuce Co and 80% of the
equity share capital of Trey Co. On 1 April 20X2, Ace Co purchased the remaining 25% of the
equity shares of Deuce Co. In the two years ended 31 March 20X3, the following transactions
occurred between the three companies:
(a) On 30 June 20X1 Ace Co manufactured a machine for use by Deuce Co. The cost of
manufacture was $20,000. The machine was delivered to Deuce Co for an invoiced price of
$25,000. Deuce Co paid the invoice on 31 August 20X1. Deuce Co depreciated the machine
over its anticipated useful life of five years, charging a full year's depreciation in the year of
purchase.
(b) On 30 September 20X2, Deuce Co sold some goods to Trey Co at an invoiced price of
$15,000. Trey Co paid the invoice on 30 November 20X2. The goods had cost Deuce Co
$12,000 to manufacture. By 31 March 20X3, Trey Co had sold all the goods outside the
group.
(c) For each of the two years ended 31 March 20X3, Ace Co provided management services to
Deuce Co and Trey Co. Ace Co did not charge for these services in the year ended 31 March
20X2 but in the year ended 31 March 20X3 decided to impose a charge of $10,000 per
annum to Trey Co. The amount of $10,000 is due to be paid by Trey Co on 31 May 20X3.
783
Required
Summarise the related party disclosures which will be required in respect of transactions (a) to (c)
above for both of the years ended 31 March 20X2 and 31 March 20X3 in the financial statements
of Ace Co, Deuce Co and Trey Co.
Note. You may assume that Ace Co presents consolidated financial statements for both of the years
dealt with in the question.
4 Camel Telecom 49 mins

Camel Telecom (Camel) operates in the telecommunications industry under the name Mobistar which
it developed itself. Camel has entered into a number of transactions relating to non-current assets on
which it would like accounting advice.
(a) Camel won a government tender to be awarded a licence to operate 5G mobile phone
services. Only four such licences were available in the country. Under the terms of the
agreement, Camel can operate 5G services for a period of 10 years from the commencement
of the licence which was 1 July 20X7. During that period Camel can, if it chooses, sell the
licence to another operator meeting certain government criteria, sharing any profits made
equally with the government.
Camel paid $344m for the licence on 1 July 20X7. Its market value was estimated at
$370 million at that date.
Due to lower take up than expected of 5G services, the fair value of the licence was valued at
$335 million at the company's year end 30 June 20X8, by Valyou, a professional services
firm.
(6 marks)
(b) In September 20X7, Camel purchased a plot of land on which it intends to build its new head
office and service centre in 2 years' time. In the meantime the land is rented out to a local
farm. The land cost $10.4 million. It has been valued at the year end by Valyou and has a
value of $10.6 million as farmland and $14.3 million as land for development. Planning
permission is in process at the year end, but Camel's lawyer expects it to be granted by
mid-20X9. (4 marks)
(c) Camel purchased a number of hilltop sites a number of years ago on which (after receiving
planning permission), it erects mobile phone transmitter masts.
Because of the prime location of the sites, their market value has increased substantially since
the original purchase. Camel is also able to lease part of the sites to other mobile
communication companies. (4 marks)
(d) During the year, Camel did a deal with a mobile operator in another country whereby Camel
sold its fixed line ADSL business to another company, Purple, for an agreed market value of
$320 million and in return acquired Purple's mobile phone business in the other country.
Camel paid $980 million to Purple in addition to the legal transfer of its fixed line ADSL
business. Purple did not make any payment other than the transfer of its mobile business.
Under the terms of the agreement, the mobile phone business will remain under the name
Purple for up to one year, after which Camel time intends to re-brand the business under its
own national and international mobile brand Mobistar. (5 marks)
784
(e) An embarrassing incident occurred in February 20X8 where a laptop containing details of all
of Camel's national customers and the expiry date of their contracts was stolen. The details
subsequently fell into the hands of competitors who have been contacting Camel's clients
when their Mobistar contracts are up for renewal.
As a result of this Camel has realised that the value of the client details is significant and
proposes to recognise a value determined by Valyou in its financial statements. This valuation
of $44 million takes into account business expected to be lost as a result of the incident.
(4 marks)
Required
Discuss, with suitable computations, how the above transactions should be accounted for in the
financial statements of the Camel Telecom Group under IFRSs for the year ended 30 June 20X8.
All amounts are considered material to the group financial statements.
Professional marks for clarity and expression (2 marks)
(Total = 25 marks)
5 Acquirer 49 mins
Acquirer is an entity that regularly purchases new subsidiaries. On 30 June 20X0, the entity acquired
all the equity shares of Prospects for a cash payment of $260 million. The net assets of Prospects on
30 June 20X0 were $180 million and no fair value adjustments were necessary upon consolidation
of Prospects for the first time.
On 31 December 20X0, Acquirer carried out a review of the goodwill on consolidation of Prospects
for evidence of impairment. The review was carried out despite the fact that there were no obvious
indications of adverse trading conditions for Prospects. The review involved allocating the net asset
of Prospects into three cash-generating units and computing the value in use of each unit. The
carrying values of the individual units before any impairment adjustments are given below.
Unit A Unit B Unit C
$m $m $m
Patents 5 – –
Property, plant and equipment 60 30 40
Net current assets 20 25 20
85 55 60
Value in use of unit 72 60 65
It was not possible to meaningfully allocate the goodwill on consolidation to the individual cash-
generating units, but all other net assets of Prospects are allocated in the table shown above. The
patents of Prospects have no ascertainable market value but all the current assets have a market
value that is above carrying value. The value in use of Prospects as a single cash-generating unit at
31 December 20X1 is £205 million.
Required
(a) Explain what is meant by a cash-generating unit. (5 marks)
(b) Explain why it was necessary to review the goodwill on consolidation of Prospects for
impairment at 31 December 20X0. (3 marks)
(c) Explain briefly the purpose of an impairment review and why the net assets of Prospects were
allocated into cash-generating units as part of the review of goodwill for impairment.
(5 marks)
(d) Demonstrate how the impairment loss in unit A will affect the carrying value of the net assets of
unit A in the consolidated financial statements of Acquirer. (5 marks)
785
(e) Explain and calculate the effect of the impairment review on the carrying value of the goodwill
on consolidation of Prospects at 31 December 20X0. (7 marks)
(Total = 25 marks)
6 Radost 23 mins
Radost, a public limited company, has a defined benefit pension plan for its staff. Staff are eligible
for an annual pension between the date of their retirement and the date of their death equal to:
Final salary per year
Annual pension =  years' service.
50
You are given the following data relating to the year ended 31 December 20X3:
(a) Yield on high quality corporate bonds: 10% pa.
(b) Contributions paid by Radost to pension plan: $12 million
(c) Pensions paid to former employees: $8 million
(d) Current service cost: $3.75 million
(e) After consultation with employees, an amendment was agreed to the terms of the plan,
reducing the benefits payable. The amendment takes effect from 31 December 20X3 and the
actuary has calculated that the resulting reduction in the pension obligation is $6 million.
(f) NPV of the pension obligation at:
1.1.X3 – $45 million
31.12.X3 – $44 million (as given by the actuary, after adjusting for the plan amendment)
(g) Fair value of the plan assets, as valued by the actuary:
1.1.X3 – $52 million
31.12.X3 – $64.17 million
Required
(a) Produce the notes to the statement of financial position and statement of profit or loss and
other comprehensive income in accordance with IAS 19. (8 marks)
(b) Explain why the pension plan assets are recognised in the financial statements of Radost, even
though they are held in a separate legal trust for Radost's employees. (4 marks)
Notes
1 Work to the nearest $1,000 throughout.
2 You should assume contributions and benefits were paid on the last day of the year.
(Total = 12 marks)
7 Cleanex 49 mins
Cleanex prepares its financial statements in accordance with IFRS. On 25 June 20X0, Cleanex made
a public announcement of its decision to reduce the level of emissions of harmful chemicals from its
factories. The average useful lives of the factories on 30 June 20X0 was 20 years. The depreciation
of the factories is computed on a straight-line basis and charged to cost of sales. The directors
formulated the proposals for emission reduction following agreement in principle earlier in the year.
The directors prepared detailed estimates of the costs of their proposals and these showed that the
following expenditure would be required.
786
 $30 million on 30 June 20X1

All estimates were for the actual anticipated cash payments. No contracts were entered into until
after 1 July 20X0. The estimate proved accurate as far as the expenditure due on 30 June 20X1 was
concerned. When the directors decided to proceed with this project, they used discounted cash flow
techniques to appraise the proposed investment. The annual discount rate they used was 8%. The
entity has a reputation of fulfilling its financial commitments after it has publicly announced them.
Cleanex included a provision for the expected costs of its proposal in its financial statements for the
year ended 30 June 20X0.
Required
(a) Explain why there was a need for an accounting standard dealing with provisions, and
summarise the criteria that need to be satisfied before a provision is recognised. (10 marks)
(b) Explain the decision of the directors of Cleanex to recognise the provision in the statement of
financial position at 30 June 20X0. (5 marks)
(c) Compute the appropriate provision in the statements of financial position in respect of the
proposed expenditure at 30 June 20X0 and 30 June 20X1. (4 marks)
(d) Compute the two components of the charge to profit or loss in respect of the proposal for the
year ended 30 June 20X1. You should explain how each component arises and identify
where in the statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income each component is
reported. (6 marks)
(Total = 25 marks)
8 DT Group 49 mins
(a) IAS 12 Income Taxes focuses on the statement of financial position in accounting for deferred
taxation, which is calculated on the basis of temporary differences. The methods used in
IAS 12 can lead to accumulation of large tax assets or liabilities over a prolonged period and
this could be remedied by discounting these assets or liabilities. There is currently international
disagreement over the discounting of deferred tax balances.
Required
(i) Explain what the terms 'focus on the statement of financial position' and 'temporary
differences' mean in relation to deferred taxation. (6 marks)
(ii) Discuss the arguments for and against discounting long-term deferred tax balances.
(6 marks)
(b) DT, a public limited company, has decided to adopt IFRSs for the first time in its financial
statements for the year ending 30 November 20X1. The amounts of deferred tax provided as
set out in the notes of the group financial statements for the year ending 30 November 20X0
were as follows:
$m
Tax depreciation in excess of accounting depreciation 38
Other temporary differences 11
Liabilities for health care benefits (12)
Losses available for offset against future taxable profits (34)
3
787
The following notes are relevant to the calculation of the deferred tax liability as at
30 November 20X1:
(i) DT acquired a 100% holding in a foreign company on 30 November 20X1. The
subsidiary does not plan to pay any dividends for the financial year to 30 November
20X1 or in the foreseeable future. The carrying amount in DT's consolidated financial
statements of its investment in the subsidiary at 30 November 20X1 is made up as
follows:
$m
Carrying value of net assets acquired excluding deferred tax 76
Goodwill (before deferred tax and impairment losses) 14
Carrying amount/cost of investment 90
The tax base of the net assets of the subsidiary at acquisition was $60 million. No
deduction is available in the subsidiary's tax jurisdiction for the cost of the goodwill.
Immediately after acquisition on 30 November 20X1, DT had supplied the subsidiary
with inventories amounting to $30 million at a profit of 20% on selling price. The
inventories had not been sold by the year end and the tax rate applied to the
subsidiary's profit is 25%. There was no significant difference between the fair values
and carrying values on the acquisition of the subsidiary.
(ii) The carrying amount of the property, plant and equipment (excluding that of the
subsidiary) is $2,600 million and their tax base is $1,920 million. Tax arising on the
revaluation of properties of $140 million, if disposed of at their revalued amounts, is the
same at 30 November 20X1 as at the beginning of the year. The revaluation of the
properties is included in the carrying amount above.
Other taxable temporary differences (excluding the subsidiary) amount to $90 million as
at 30 November 20X1.
(iii) The liability for health care benefits in the statement of financial position had risen to
$100 million as at 30 November 20X1 and the tax base is zero. Health care benefits
are deductible for tax purposes when payments are made to retirees. No payments
were made during the year to 30 November 20X1.
(iv) DT Group incurred $300 million of tax losses in the year ended 30 November 20X0.
Under the tax law of the country, tax losses can be carried forward for three years only.
The taxable profit for the year ending 30 November 20X1 was $110 million. In the
years ending 30 November, taxable profits were anticipated to be:
20X2 20X3
$m $m
100 130
The auditors are unsure about the availability of taxable profits in 20X3 as the amount
is based upon the projected acquisition of a profitable company. It is anticipated that
there will be no future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences until after
30 November 20X3.
(v) Income tax of $165 million on a property disposed of in 20X0 becomes payable on
30 November 20X4 under the deferral relief provisions of the tax laws of the country.
There had been no sales or revaluations of property during the year to 30 November
20X1.
(vi) Income tax is assumed to be 30% for the foreseeable future in DT's jurisdiction and the
company wishes to discount any deferred tax liabilities at a rate of 4% if allowed by
IAS 12.
788
(vii) There are no other temporary differences other than those set out above. The directors
of DT have calculated the opening balance of deferred tax using IAS 12 to be
$280 million.
Required
Calculate the liability for deferred tax required by the DT Group at 30 November 20X1 and
the deferred tax expense in profit or loss for the year ending 30 November 20X1 using
IAS 12, commenting on the effect that the application of IAS 12 will have on the financial
statements of the DT Group. (13 marks)
(Total = 25 marks)
9 PQR 20 mins
PQR has the following financial instruments in its financial statements for the year ended
31 December 20X5:
(a) An investment in the debentures of STU, nominal value $40,000, purchased on their issue on
1 January 20X5 at a discount of $6,000 and carrying a 4% coupon. PQR plans to hold these
until their redemption on 31 December 20X8. The internal rate of return of the debentures is
8.6%.
(b) A foreign currency forward contract purchased to hedge the commitment to purchase a
machine in foreign currency six months after the year end.
(c) 100,000 redeemable preference shares issued in 20X0 at $1 per share with an annual
dividend payment of 6 cents per share, redeemable in 20X8 at their nominal value.
Required
Advise the directors (insofar as the information permits) about the accounting for the financial
instruments stating the effect of each on the gearing of the company. Your answer should be
accompanied by calculations where appropriate.
(Total = 10 marks)
10 Sirus 49 mins
Sirus is a large national public limited company (plc). The directors' service agreements require each
director to purchase 'B' ordinary shares on becoming a director and this capital is returned to the
director on leaving the company. Any decision to pay a dividend on the 'B' shares must be
approved in a general meeting by a majority of all of the shareholders in the company. Directors are
the only holders of 'B' shares.
Sirus would like advice on how to account under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs)
for the following events in its financial statements for the year ended 30 April 20X8.
(a) The capital subscribed to Sirus by the directors and shareholders is shown as follows in the
statement of financial position as at 30 April 20X8:
Equity $m
Ordinary 'A' shares 100
Ordinary 'B' shares 20
Retained earnings 30
Total equity 150
On 30 April 20X8 the directors had recommended that $3 million of the profits should be
paid to the holders of the ordinary 'B' shares, in addition to the $10 million paid to directors
under their employment contracts. The payment of $3 million had not been approved in a
general meeting. The directors would like advice as to whether the capital subscribed by the
789
directors (the ordinary 'B' shares) is equity or a liability and how to treat the payments out of
profits to them. (6 marks)
(b) When a director retires, amounts become payable to the director as a form of retirement
benefit as an annuity. These amounts are not based on salaries paid to the director under an
employment contract. Sirus has contractual or constructive obligations to make payments to
former directors as at 30 April 20X8 as follows:
(i) Certain former directors are paid a fixed annual amount for a fixed term beginning on
the first anniversary of the director's retirement. If the director dies, an amount
representing the present value of the future payment is paid to the director's estate.
(ii) In the case of other former directors, they are paid a fixed annual amount which ceases
on death.
The rights to the annuities are determined by the length of service of the former directors
and are set out in the former directors' service contracts. (6 marks)
(c) On 1 May 20X7 Sirus acquired another company, Marne plc. The directors of Marne, who
were the only shareholders, were offered an increased profit share in the enlarged business
for a period of two years after the date of acquisition as an incentive to accept the purchase
offer. After this period, normal remuneration levels will be resumed. Sirus estimated that this
would cost them $5 million at 30 April 20X8, and a further $6 million at 30 April 20X9.
These amounts will be paid in cash shortly after the respective year ends. (6 marks)
(d) Sirus raised a loan with a bank of $2 million on 1 May 20X7. The market interest rate of 8%
per annum is to be paid annually in arrears and the principal is to be repaid in 10 years'
time. The terms of the loan allow Sirus to redeem the loan after seven years by paying the
interest to be charged over the seven year period, plus a penalty of $200,000 and the
principal of $2 million. The effective interest rate of the repayment option is 9.1%. The
directors of Sirus are currently restructuring the funding of the company and are in initial
discussions with the bank about the possibility of repaying the loan within the next financial
year. Sirus is uncertain about the accounting treatment for the current loan agreement and
whether the loan can be shown as a current liability because of the discussions with the bank.
(7 marks)
Required
Draft a report to the directors of Sirus which discusses the principles and nature of the accounting
treatment of the above elements under International Financial Reporting Standards in the financial
statements for the year ended 30 April 20X8.
(Total = 25 marks)
11 Lambda 39 mins
In recent years it has become increasingly common for entities to enter into transactions with third
parties that are settled by means of a share-based payment. IFRS 2 Share-based Payment was issued
in order to provide a basis of accounting for such transactions. Share-based payments can be equity
settled or cash settled.
Required
(a) Explain the accounting treatment of both equity and cash settled share based payment
transactions with employees. (8 marks)
790
Lambda prepares financial statements to 30 September each year. Lambda has a number of highly
skilled employees that it wishes to retain and has put two schemes in place to discourage employees
from leaving:
Scheme A
On 1 October 20X7 Lambda granted share options to 200 employees. Each employee was entitled
to 500 options to purchase equity shares at $10 per share. The options vest on 30 September 20Y0
if the employees continue to work for Lambda throughout the three-year period. Relevant data is as
follows:
Expected number of
employees for whom
Share price Fair value of option 500 options will vest
$ $
1 October 20X7 10 2.40 190
30 September 20X8 11 2.60 185
30 September 20X9 12 2.80 188
Scheme B
On 1 October 20X6 Lambda granted two share appreciation rights to 250 employees. Each right
gave the holder a cash payment of $100 for every 50 cent increase in the share price from the
1 October 20X6 value to the date the rights vest. The rights vest on 30 September 20X9 for those
employees who continue to work for Lambda throughout the three-year period. Payment is due on
31 January 20Y0. Relevant data is as follows:
Expected number of
employees for whom
Share price Fair value of option two rights will vest
$ $
1 October 20X6 9 500 240
30 September 20X7 10 520 235
30 September 20X8 11 540 240
30 September 20X9 12 600 238*
*actual number for
whom two rights vested
Required
(b) (i) For both schemes, compute the charge to the statement or profit or loss for the year
ended 30 September 20X9. (8 marks)
(ii) For both schemes, compute the amount that will appear in the statement of financial
position of Lambda at 30 September 20X9 and state where in the statement the relevant
amount will appear.
(4 marks)
(Total = 20 marks)
12 Highland 35 mins
Highland owns two subsidiaries, acquired as follows:
1 July 20X1 80% of Aviemore for $5 million when the book value of the net assets of
Aviemore was $4 million.
30 November 20X7 65% of Buchan for $2.6 million when the book value of the net assets of
Buchan was $3.35 million.
791
The companies' statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the year ended
31 March 20X8 were:
Highland Aviemore Buchan
$'000 $'000 $'000
Revenue 5,000 3,000 2,910
Cost of sales (3,000) (2,300) (2,820)
Gross profit 2,000 700 90
Administrative expenses (1,000) (500) (150)
Other income 230 – –
Finance costs (50) (210)
Profit/(loss) before tax 1,230 150 (270)
Income tax expense (300) (50) –
Profit/(loss) for the year 930 100 (270)
Other comprehensive income that will not be
reclassified to profit or loss, net of tax 130 40 120
Total comprehensive income for the year 1,060 140 (150)
Dividends paid during the year 200 50 –
(a) On 1 April 20X7, Buchan issued $2.1 million 10% loan stock to Highland. Interest is payable
twice yearly on 1 October and 1 April. Highland has accounted for the interest received on
1 October 20X7 only.
(b) On 1 July 20X7, Aviemore sold a freehold property to Highland for $800,000 (land element
– $300,000). The property originally cost $900,000 (land element – $100,000) on 1 July
20W7. The property's total useful life was 50 years on 1 July 20W7 and there has been no
change in the useful life since. Aviemore has credited the profit on disposal to 'Administrative
expenses'.
(c) The property, plant and equipment of Buchan on 30 November 20X7 was valued at
$500,000 (book value $350,000) and was acquired in April 20X7. The property, plant and
equipment has a total useful life of ten years. Buchan has not adjusted its accounting records
to reflect fair values. The group accounting policy to measure non-controlling interests at the
proportionate share of the fair value of net identifiable assets at acquisition.
(d) All companies use the straight-line method of depreciation and charge a full year's
depreciation in the year of acquisition and none in the year of disposal. Depreciation on fair
value adjustments is time apportioned from the date of acquisition.
(e) Highland charges Aviemore an annual fee of $85,000 for management services and this has
been included in 'Other income'.
(f) Highland has accounted for its dividend received from Aviemore in 'Other income'.
(g) Impairment tests conducted at the year end revealed recoverable amounts of $7.04 million for
Aviemore and $3.7 million for Buchan versus book values of net assets of $4.45 million and
$3.3 million in the separate financial statements of Aviemore and Buchan respectively
(adjusted for the effects of group fair value adjustments). No impairment losses had previously
been recognised.
Required
Prepare the consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for
Highland for the year ended 31 March 20X8. (Total = 18 marks)
792
13 Investor 49 mins
Investor is a listed company with a number of subsidiaries located throughout the UK. Investor
currently appraises investment opportunities using a cost of capital of 10%.
On 1 April 20X9 Investor purchased 80 per cent of the equity share capital of Cornwall for a total
cash price of $60 million. Half the price was payable on 1 April 20X9; the balance was payable on
1 April 20Y1. The net identifiable assets that were actually included in the statement of financial
position of Cornwall had a carrying value totalling $55 million at 1 April 20X9. With the exception
of the pension provision (see below), you discover that the fair values of the net identifiable assets of
Cornwall at 1 April 20X9 are the same as their carrying values. When performing the fair value
exercise at 1 April 20X9, you discover that Cornwall has a defined benefit pension scheme that was
actuarially valued three years ago and found to be in deficit. As a result of that valuation, a
provision of $6 million has been built up in the statement of financial position. The fair value exercise
indicates that on 1 April 20X9, the pension scheme was in deficit by $11 million. This information
became available on 31 July 20X9.
Assume that today's date is 31 October 20X9. You are in the process of preparing the consolidated
financial statements of the group for the year ended 30 September 20X9. Intangible assets are
normally written off on a pro-rata basis over 20 years. Your Financial Director is concerned that
profits for the year will be lower than originally anticipated. She is therefore wondering about
changing the accounting policy used by the group, so that all intangible assets are treated as having
an indefinite useful life.
Required
(a) Calculate the value of goodwill on acquisition of Cornwall in the consolidated accounts of
Investor for the year ended 30 September 20X9. You should fully explain and justify all parts
of the calculation. (10 marks)
(b) Write a memorandum to your Financial Director.
(i) Evaluate the policy of writing off all intangible assets over 20 years.
(ii) Explain whether it is ever permissible to select a longer write-off period for intangible
assets, and describe the future implications of selecting such a period. (10 marks)
(c) Cornwall has purchased some valuable brands, which are included in the statement of
financial position. Explain the justification for including purchased brands in the statement of
financial position and how non-purchased brands should be treated. (5 marks)
(Total = 25 marks)
14 ROB Group 49 mins

The statements of financial position for ROB and PER as at 30 September 20X3 are provided below:
ROB PER
Assets $'000 $'000
Non-current assets
Investment in PER 3,850 –
25,850 5,000
Current assets
Inventories 6,200 800
Receivables 6,600 1,900
Cash and cash equivalents 1,200 300
14,000 3,000
Total assets 39,850 8,000
793
Equity
Share capital ($1 equity shares) 20,000 1,000
Total equity 27,850 6,000
5% bonds 20X6 (note 2) 3,900 –
Total liabilities 12,000 2,000
Total equity and liabilities 39,850 8,000
(a) ROB acquired a 15% investment in PER on 1 May 20X2 for $600,000. ROB treated this
investment at fair value through profit or loss in the financial statements to 30 September
20X2, remeasuring it to $650,000. However, ROB has not recognised any remeasurement
gains or losses on the investment in the year ended 30 September 20X3. The fair value of the
15% investment at 1 April 20X3 was $800,000.
On 1 April 20X3, ROB acquired an additional 60% of the equity share capital of PER at a
cost of $3.2 million. At that date, the fair value of PER's net assets was equivalent to their book
value.
(b) ROB issued 4 million $1 5% redeemable bonds on 1 October 20X2 at par. The associated
costs of issue were $100,000 and the net proceeds of $3.9 million have been recorded
within non-current liabilities. The bonds are redeemable at $4.4 million on 30 September
20X6 and the effective interest rate associated with them is approximately 8%. The interest on
the bonds is payable annually in arrears and the amount due has been paid in the year to
30 September 20X3 and charged to the statement of profit or loss.
(c) An impairment review conducted at the year end revealed an impairment of the goodwill of
PER of $60,000.
(d) ROB wishes to measure non-controlling interests at fair value at the date of acquisition. The fair
value of the non-controlling interests in PER at 1 April 20X3 was $1 million.
(e) The profit for the year of PER was $3 million, and profits are assumed to accrue evenly
throughout the year.
(f) PER sold goods to ROB on 5 August 20X3 for $400,000. Half of these goods remained in
inventories at 30 September 20X3. PER makes 20% margin on all sales.
(g) No dividends were paid by either entity in the year to 30 September 20X3.
Required
(a) Explain how the investment in PER should be accounted for in the consolidated financial
statements of ROB, following the acquisition of the additional 60% shareholding. (5 marks)
(b) Prepare the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 September 20X3 for the ROB
Group. (20 marks)
(Total = 25 marks)
794
15 Holmes and Deakin 43 mins

Holmes, a public limited company, has owned 85% of the ordinary share capital of Deakin, a public
limited company, for some years. The shares were bought for $255 million and Deakin's reserves at
the time of purchase were $20 million.
On 28 February 20X3 Holmes sold 40m of the Deakin shares for $160 million. The only entry made
in respect of this transaction has been the receipt of the cash, which was credited to the 'investment
in subsidiary' account. No dividends were paid by either entity in the period.
The following draft summarised financial statements are available:
FOR THE YEAR TO 31 MAY 20X3
Holmes Deakin
$m $m
Other comprehensive income, net of tax 20 10
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 MAY 20X3

$m $m
Non-current assets
Investment in Deakin 95 –
630 178
Current assets
Inventories 320 190
Cash 80 89
650 454
1,280 632
Equity
Share capital $1 ordinary shares 500 200
Reserves 310 170
810 370
Current liabilities
Income tax payable 80 60
Provisions 95 31
470 262
1,280 632
No impairment losses have been necessary in the group financial statements to date.
Assume that the gain as calculated in the parent's separate financial statements will be subject to
corporate income tax at a rate of 30% and that profit and other comprehensive income accrue
evenly throughout the year.
Holmes elected to measure the non-controlling interests in Deakin at fair value at the date of
acquisition. The fair value of the non-controlling interests in Deakin was $45 million at the date of
acquisition. No control premium was paid on acquisition.
795
Required
Prepare:
(a) The statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income and a statement of changes in
equity (total) of Holmes for the year ended 31 May 20X3; (5 marks)
(b) The consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income of Holmes for the
same period; (6 marks)
(c) A consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 May 20X3; and (9 marks)
(d) A consolidated statement of changes in equity (total) for the year ended 31 May 20X3.
(2 marks)
(Total = 22 marks)
16 Burley (P2 December 2009 Q3) 49 mins

Burley, a public limited company, operates in the energy industry. It has entered into several
arrangements with other entities as follows:
(a) Burley and Slite, a public limited company, jointly control an oilfield. Burley has a 60%
interest and Slite a 40% interest, and the companies are entitled to extract oil in these
proportions. An agreement was signed on 1 December 20X8, which allowed for the net cash
settlement of any over/under extraction by one company. The net cash settlement would be at
the market price of oil at the date of settlement. Both parties have used this method of
settlement before. 200,000 barrels of oil were produced up to 1 October 20X9 but none
were produced after this up to 30 November 20X9 due to production difficulties. The oil was
all sold to third parties at $100 per barrel. Burley has extracted 10,000 barrels more than the
company's quota and Slite has under extracted by the same amount. The market price of oil at
the year end of 30 November 20X9 was $105 per barrel. The excess oil extracted by Burley
was settled on 12 December 20X9 under the terms of the agreement at $95 per barrel.
Burley had purchased oil from another supplier because of the production difficulties at $98
per barrel and has oil inventory of 5,000 barrels at the year end, purchased from this source.
Slite had no inventory of oil. Neither company had oil inventory at 1 December 20X8. Selling
costs are $2 per barrel.
Burley wishes to know how to account for the recognition of revenue, the excess oil extracted
and the oil inventory at the year end. (9 marks)
(b) Burley also entered into an agreement with Jorge, a public limited company, on 1 December
20X8. Each of the companies holds one half of the equity in an entity, Wells, a public limited
company, which operates offshore oil rigs. The contractual arrangement between Burley and
Jorge establishes joint control of the activities that are conducted in Wells. The main feature of
Wells's legal form is that Wells, not Burley or Jorge, has rights to the assets, and obligations
for the liabilities, relating to the arrangement.
The terms of the contractual arrangement are such that:
(i) Wells owns the oil rigs. The contractual arrangement does not specify that Burley and
Jorge have rights to the oil rigs.
(ii) Burley and Jorge are not liable in respect of the debts, liabilities or obligations of Wells.
If Wells is unable to pay any of its debts or other liabilities or to discharge its
obligations to third parties, the liability of each party to any third party will be limited to
the unpaid amount of that party's capital contribution.
(iii) Burley and Jorge have the right to sell or pledge their interests in Wells.
(iv) Each party receives a share of the income from operating the oil rig in accordance with
its interest in Wells.
796
Burley wants to account for the interest in Wells by using the equity method, and wishes for
advice on the matter.
The oil rigs of Wells started operating on 1 December 20W8, ie ten years before the
agreement was signed, and are measured under the cost model. The useful life of the rigs is
40 years. The initial cost of the rigs was $240 million, which included decommissioning costs
(discounted) of $20 million. At 1 December 20X8, the carrying amount of the
decommissioning liability has grown to $32.6 million, but the net present value of
decommissioning liability has decreased to $18.5 million as a result of the increase in the risk-
adjusted discount rate from 5% to 7%. Burley is unsure how to account for the oil rigs in the
financial statements of Wells for the year ended 30 November 20X9.
Burley owns a 10% interest in a pipeline, which is used to transport the oil from the offshore
oilrig to a refinery on the land. Burley has joint control over the pipeline and has to pay its
share of the maintenance costs. Burley has the right to use 10% of the capacity of the
pipeline. Burley wishes to show the pipeline as an investment in its financial statements to
30 November 20X9. (10 marks)
(c) Burley has purchased a transferable interest in an oil exploration licence. Initial surveys of the
region designated for exploration indicate that there are substantial oil deposits present, but
further surveys will be required in order to establish the nature and extent of the deposits.
Burley also has to determine whether the extraction of the oil is commercially viable. Past
experience has shown that the licence can increase substantially in value if further information
becomes available as to the viability of the extraction of the oil. Burley wishes to capitalise the
cost of the licence but is unsure whether the accounting policy is compliant with International
Financial Reporting Standards. (4 marks)
Required
Discuss, with suitable computations where necessary, how the above arrangements and events would
be accounted for in the financial statements of Burley.
Professional marks will be awarded in this question for clarity and expression. (2 marks)
(Total = 25 marks)
17 Harvard 35 mins
The draft financial statements of Harvard, a public limited company, and its subsidiary, Krakow
Sp. zo.o. are set out below.
Harvard Krakow
$'000 PLN'000
Non-current assets
Investment in Krakow 840 –
3,710 4,860
Current assets
Cash 240 2,016
3,860 14,904
7,570 19,764
797
Harvard Krakow
$'000 PLN'000
Equity
Share capital ($1/PLN1) 118 1,348
Retained reserves 502 14,060
620 15,408
Loans 1,920 –
Current liabilities
7,570 19,764
STATEMENTS OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Revenue 40,425 97,125
Cost of sales (35,500) (77,550)
Distribution and administrative expenses (4,400) (5,850)
Investment income 720 –
Income tax expense (300) (4,725)
Profit/total comprehensive income for the year 945 9,000
Dividends paid during the period 700 3,744
The following additional information is given:

(a) Exchange rates
Złoty (PLN) to $
15 May 20X5 3.90
Average for 20X5 3.75
(b) Harvard acquired 1,011,000 shares in Krakow for $840,000 on 31 December 20X2 when
Krakow's retained reserves stood at PLN 2,876,000. Krakow operates as an autonomous
subsidiary. Its functional currency is the Polish złoty.
The fair value of the identifiable net assets of Krakow were equivalent to their book values at
the acquisition date. Group policy is to measure non-controlling interests at fair value at the
acquisition date. The fair value of the non-controlling interests in Krakow was measured at
$270,000 on 31 December 20X2.
(c) Krakow paid an interim dividend of PLN 3,744,000 on 15 May 20X5. No other dividends
were paid or declared in the period.
(d) No impairment losses were necessary in the consolidated financial statements by
31 December 20X5.
798
Required
(a) Prepare the consolidated statement of financial position at 31 December 20X5. (6 marks)
(b) Prepare the consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income and an
extract from the statement of changes in equity for retained reserves for the year ended
31 December 20X5. (12 marks)
Ignore deferred tax on translation differences.
(Total = 18 marks)
18 Porter 49 mins
The following consolidated financial statements relate to Porter, a public limited company:
PORTER GROUP
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 MAY 20X6
20X6 20X5
$m $m
Non-current assets
Goodwill 15 10
Investment in associate 48 39
1,021 861
Current assets
Inventories 154 168
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss 16 0
460 328
1,481 1,189
Share capital ($1 ordinary 332 300
shares)
Share premium account 212 172
Revaluation surplus 101 54
833 691
917 719
Long-term borrowings 380 320
Deferred tax liability 38 26
418 346
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 110 98
Interest payable 8 4
Current tax payable 28 22
146 124
1,481 1,189
799
PORTER GROUP
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MAY 20X6
$m
Revenue 956
Cost of sales (634)
Gross profit 322
Other income 6
Distribution costs (97)
Administrative expenses (115)
Finance costs (16)
Share of profit of associate 12
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss:
Share of gain on property revaluation of associate 8

78
127
The following information relates to the consolidated financial statements of Porter:

1 During the period, Porter acquired 60% of a subsidiary. The purchase was effected by issuing
shares of Porter on a one for two basis, at their market value on that date of $2.25 per share,
plus $26 million in cash.
A statement of financial position of the subsidiary, prepared at the acquisition date for
consolidation purposes, showed the following position:
$m
Inventories 20
136
800
$m
Share capital ($1 shares) 80
Reserves 40
120
Trade payables 12
Income taxes payable 4
136
An impairment test conducted at the year end resulted in a write-down of goodwill relating to
another wholly owned subsidiary. This was charged to cost of sales.
Group policy is to value non-controlling interests at the date of acquisition at the proportionate
share of the fair value of the acquiree's identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
2 Depreciation charged to the consolidated profit or loss amounted to $44 million. There were
no disposals of property, plant and equipment during the year.
3 Other income represents gains on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss. The
financial assets are investments in quoted shares. They were purchased shortly before the year
end with surplus cash, and were designated at fair through profit or loss as they are expected
to be sold after the year end. No dividends have yet been received.
4 Included in 'trade and other payables' is the $ equivalent of an invoice for 102 million
shillings for some equipment purchased from a foreign supplier. The asset was invoiced on 5
March 20X6, but had not been paid for at the year end, 31 May 20X6.
Exchange gains or losses on the transaction have been included in administrative expenses.
Relevant exchange rates were as follows:
Shillings to $1
5 March 20X6 6.8
31 May 20X6 6.0
5 Movement on retained earnings was as follows:
$m
At 31 May 20X5 165
Total comprehensive income 68
Dividends paid (45)
At 31 May 20X6 188
Required
Prepare a consolidated statement of cash flows for Porter for the year ended 31 May 20X6 in
accordance with IAS 7 Statements of Cash Flows, using the indirect method.
Notes to the statement of cash flows are not required.
(Total = 25 marks)
801
19 Grow by acquisition 49 mins
Expand is a large group that seeks to grow by acquisition. The directors of Expand have identified
two potential target entities (A and B) and obtained copies of their financial statements. Extracts from
these financial statements, together with notes providing additional information, are given below.
YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X1
A B
$'000 $'000
Revenue 68,000 66,000
Cost of sales (42,000) (45,950)
Other operating expenses (18,000) (14,000)
Profit from operations 8,000 6,050
Finance cost (3,000) (4,000)
Income tax expense (1,500) (1,000)
Other comprehensive income (items that will not be reclassified Nil 6,000
to profit or loss)
Surplus on revaluation of properties
Total comprehensive income 3,500 7,050
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X1

A B
$'000 $'000
Balance at 1 January 20X1 22,000 16,000
Total comprehensive income for the year 3,500 7,050
Dividends paid (2,000) (1,000)
Balance at 31 December 20X1 23,500 22,050

A B
$'000 $'000 $'000 $'000
Non-current assets
32,000 35,050
Current assets
18,000 17,000
50,000 52,050
Equity
Issued capital ($1 shares) 16,000 12,000
Revaluation reserve Nil 5,000
23,500 22,050
802
A B
$'000 $'000 $'000 $'000
Interest bearing borrowings 16,000 18,000
Current liabilities
Income tax 1,500 1,000
Short-term borrowings 4,000 6,000
10,500 12,000
50,000 52,050
Notes
1 Sale by A to X
On 31 December 20X1, A supplied goods, at the normal selling price of $2.4 million, to
another entity, X. A's normal selling price is at a mark-up of 60% on cost. X paid for the goods
in cash on the same day. The terms of the selling agreement were that A repurchase these
goods on 30 June 20X2 for $2.5 million. A has accounted for the transaction as a sale. The
amount payable reflects the capital repayment plus market interest rates for the six-month
period.
2 Revaluation of non-current assets by B
B revalued its non-current assets for the first time on 1 January 20X1. The non-current assets of
A are very similar in age and type to the non-current assets of B. However, A has a policy of
maintaining all its non-current assets at depreciated historical cost. Both entities charge
depreciation of non-current assets to cost of sales. B has transferred the excess depreciation on
the revalued assets from the revaluation reserve to retained earnings as permitted in IAS 16
Property, Plant and Equipment.
Expand uses ratio analysis to appraise potential investment opportunities. It is normal practice to
base the appraisal on four key ratios:
 Return on capital employed  Asset turnover
 Gross profit margin  Debt/Equity
For the purposes of the ratio analysis, Expand computes:
(a) Capital employed as capital and reserves plus borrowings
(b) Borrowings as interest–bearing borrowings plus short-term borrowings
Your assistant has computed the four key ratios for the two entities from the financial statements
provided and the results are summarised below.
Ratio A B
Return on capital employed 18.4% 13.1%
Gross profit margin 38.2% 30.4%
Asset turnover 1.72 1.65
Debt/Equity 0.85:1 1.09:1
Your assistant has informed you that, on the basis of the ratios calculated, the performance of A is
superior to that of B in all respects and is therefore a more attractive investment. Therefore, Expand
should carry out a more detailed review of A with a view to making a bid to acquire it. However,
you are unsure whether this is necessarily the correct conclusion given the information provided in
notes 1 and 2.
803
Required
(a) Explain and compute the adjustments that would be appropriate in respect of notes 1 and 2 so
as to make the financial statements of A and B comparable for analysis.
(b) Recalculate the four key ratios mentioned in the question for both A and B after making the
adjustments you have recommended in your answer to part (a). You should provide
appropriate workings to support your calculations.
(c) In the light of the work that you have carried out in answer to parts (a) and (b), evaluate your
assistant's conclusion that A appears to be the more attractive investment. Comment on any
additional financial and non-financial information that may be useful in considering the
investment.
(Total = 25 marks)
20 Ghorse 49 mins
Ghorse, a public limited company, operates in the fashion sector and had undertaken a group
re-organisation during the current financial year to 30 September 20X7. As a result the following
events occurred.
(a) Ghorse identified two manufacturing units, Cee and Gee, which it had decided to dispose of
in a single transaction. These units comprised non-current assets only. One of the units, Cee,
had been impaired prior to the financial year end on 30 September 20X7 and it had been
written down to its recoverable amount of $35 million. The criteria in IFRS 5 Non-current
Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, for classification as held for sale had been
met for Cee and Gee at 30 September 20X7. The following information related to the assets
of the cash generating units at 30 September 20X7:
Fair value less
costs of disposal
Depreciated and recoverable Carrying value
historical cost amount under IFRS
$m $m $m
Cee 50 35 35
Gee 70 90 70
120 125 105
The fair value less costs of disposal had risen at the year end to $40 million for Cee and
$95 million for Gee. The increase in the fair value less costs of disposal had not been taken
into account by Ghorse. (6 marks)
(b) As a consequence of the re-organisation, and a change in government legislation, the tax
authorities have allowed a revaluation of the non-current assets of the holding company for tax
purposes to market value at 31 October 20X7. There has been no change in the carrying
values of the non-current assets in the financial statements. The tax base and the carrying
values after the revaluation are as follows:
Carrying amount Tax base at Tax base at

at 31 October 31 October 20X7 31 October 20X7
20X7 after revaluation before revaluation
$m $m $m
Property 50 65 48
Vehicles 30 35 28
Other taxable temporary differences amounted to $5 million at 31 October 20X7. Assume
income tax is paid at 30%. The deferred tax provision at 31 October 20X7 had been
calculated using the tax values before revaluation. (5 marks)
804
(c) A subsidiary company had purchased computerised equipment for $4 million on 31 October
20X6 to improve the manufacturing process. Whilst re-organising the group, Ghorse had
discovered that the manufacturer of the computerised equipment was now selling the same
system for $2.5 million. The projected cash flows from the equipment are:
Cash flows
$m
Year ended 31 October 20X8 1.3
20X9 2.2
20Y0 2.3
The residual value of the equipment is assumed to be zero. The company uses a discount rate
of 10%. The directors think that the fair value less costs of disposal of the equipment is
$2 million. The directors of Ghorse propose to write down the non-current asset to the new
selling price of $2.5 million. The company's policy is to depreciate its computer equipment by
25% per annum on the straight line basis. (5 marks)
(d) The manufacturing property of the group, other than the head office, was held on an
operating lease over eight years in accordance with IAS 17, the predecessor of IFRS 16
Leases. On re-organisation on 31 October 20X7, the lease has been renegotiated and is held
for 12 years at a rent of $5 million per annum paid in arrears. IFRS 16 has also come into
force. The fair value of the property is $35 million and its remaining economic life is 13
years. The lease relates to the buildings and not the land. The factor to be used for an annuity
at 10% for 12 years is 6.8137. (4 marks)
The directors are worried about the impact that the above changes will have on the value of its non-
current assets and its key performance indicator which is 'return on capital employed' (ROCE). ROCE
is defined as operating profit before interest and tax divided by share capital, other reserves and
retained earnings. The directors have calculated ROCE as $30 million divided by $220 million, ie
13.6% before any adjustments required by the above.
Marks will be awarded in this question for your formation of opinion on the impact on ROCE.
(2 marks)
Required
(i) Discuss the accounting treatment of the above transactions and the impact that the resulting
adjustments to the financial statements would have on ROCE.
Note. Your answer should include appropriate calculations where necessary and a discussion
of the accounting principles involved.
(ii) The directors of Ghorse have historically focused on financial performance indicators. They are
under pressure from stakeholder groups to measure non-financial performance. Recommend
three relevant non-financial performance indicators that Ghorse could use.
(3 marks)
(Total = 25 marks)
805
21 German competitor
You are the chief accountant of Tone plc, a UK company. The Managing Director has provided you
with the financial statements of Tone plc's main competitor, Hilde GmbH, a German company. He
finds difficulty in reviewing these statements in their non-UK format, presented below.
HILDE GmbH
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 MARCH 20X5 (in € million)
31.3.X5 31.3.X4 31.3.X5 31.3.X4

Assets Capital and liabilities
Tangible non-current assets Capital and reserves
Land 1,000 750 Share capital 850 750
Buildings 750 500 Share premium 100 –
Plant 200 150 Legal reserve 200 200
1,950 1,400 Profit & loss b/fwd 590 300
Profit & loss for year 185 290
Current assets Net worth 1,925 1,540
Inventory 150 120
Trade receivables 180 100 Payables
Cash 20 200 Trade payables 170 150
350 420 Taxation 180 150
Other payables 75 50
Prepayments and 425 350
accrued income
prepayments 50 70
2,350 1,890 2,350 1,890
HILDE GmbH
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 20X5 (in € million)
20X5 20X4 20X5 20X4
Expenses Income
Operating expenses Operating income
Purchase of raw materials 740 400 Sale of goods produced 1,890 1,270
Variation in inventories Variation in inventory of
thereof 90 40 finished goods and WIP 120 80
Taxation 190 125 Other operating income 75 50
Wages 500 285 Total operating income 2,085 1,400
Valuation adjustment
on non-current assets
Depreciation 200 150
Valuation adjustment
on current assets
Amounts written off 30 20
Other operating
expenses 50 40
Total operating
expenses 1,800 1,060
806
20X5 20X4 20X5 20X4

Financial expenses
Interest 100 50
Total financial expenses
100 50
Total expenses 1,900 1,110 Total income 2,085 1,400
Balance: PROFIT 185 290

Sum total 2,085 1,400 2,085 1,400
Required
Prepare a report for the Managing Director:
(a) Analysing the performance of Hilde GmbH using the financial statements provided.
(b) Explaining why a direct comparison of the results of Tone plc and Hilde GmbH may be
misleading.
(c) Hilde GmbH reports on its commitment to be carbon neutral within the next 10 years and
discloses information relating to its carbon footprint, emissions from its delivery vehicles and its
recycling targets. Tone plc has similar commitments but does not publicly report on them.
Briefly explain to the directors of Tone plc the potential benefits of reporting social and
environmental information.
22 Peter Holdings
Peter Holdings is a large investment conglomerate.
Required
Explain how divisional performance should be measured in the interest of the group's shareholders.
23 Jay 29 mins
(a) Jay is a public limited company which is preparing its financial statements for the year ended
31 May 20X6. Jay purchased goods from a foreign supplier for €8 million on 28 February
20X6. At 31 May 20X6, the trade payable was still outstanding and the goods were still held
by Jay. Similarly Jay has sold goods to a foreign customer for €4 million on 28 February 20X6
and it received payment for the goods in euros on 31 May 20X6.
Jay had purchased an investment property on 1 June 20X5 for €28 million. At 31 May 20X6,
the investment property had a fair value of €24 million. The company uses the fair value model
in accounting for investment properties.
Jay's functional and presentation currency is the dollar.
Average rate (€: $)
Exchange rates €: $ for year to
1 June 20X5 1.4
28 February 20X6 1.6
31 May 20X6 1.3 1.5
Required
Advise Jay on how to treat these transactions in the financial statements for the year ended 31
May 20X6.
(8 marks)
(b) Jay has a reputation for responsible corporate behaviour and sees the workforce as the key
factor in the profitable growth of the business. The company is also keen to provide detailed
disclosures relating to environmental matters and sustainability.
807
Required
Discuss what matters should be disclosed in Jay's annual report in relation to the nature of
corporate citizenship, in order that there might be a better assessment of the performance of
the company. (7 marks)
(Total = 15 marks)
24 Small and medium-sized entities 49 mins

In July 2009, the IASB issued its IFRS for SMEs. The aim of the standard is to provide a simplified,
self-contained set of accounting principles for companies which are not publicly accountable. The
IFRS reduces the volume of accounting guidance applicable to SMEs by more than 90% when
compared to a full set of IFRSs.
The IFRS for SMEs removes choices of accounting treatment, eliminates topics that are not generally
relevant to SMEs, simplifies methods for recognition and measurement and reduces the disclosure
requirements of full IFRSs.
Required
(a) Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of SMEs following a separate IFRS for SMEs as
opposed to full IFRSs. (10 marks)
(b) Give some examples from full IFRSs with choice or complex recognition and measurement
requirements. Explain how the IFRS for SMEs removes this choice or simplifies the recognition
and measurement requirements. (15 marks)
(Total = 25 marks)
25 Taupe 49 mins
One of your colleagues has recently inherited investments in several listed entities and she frequently
asks for your advice on accounting issues. She has recently received the consolidated financial
statements of Taupe, an entity that provides haulage and freight services in several countries. She has
noticed that Note 3 to the financial statements is headed 'Segment information'.
Note 3 explains that Taupe's primary segment reporting format is business segments of which there
are three: in addition to road and air freight, the entity provides secure transportation services for
smaller items of high value. Taupe's Operating and Financial Review provides further background
information: the secure transport services segment was established only three years ago. This new
operation required a sizeable investment in infrastructure which was principally funded through
borrowing. However, the segment has experienced rapid revenue growth in that time, and has
become a significant competitor in the industry sector.
Extracts from Taupe's segment report for the year ended 31 August 20X5 are as follows:
Secure
Road haulage Air freight transport Group
20X5 20X4 20X5 20X4 20X5 20X4 20X5 20X4
Km Km Km Km Km Km Km Km
Revenue 653 642 208 199 98 63 959 904
Segment result 169 168 68 62 6 (16) 243 214
Unallocated corporate expenses (35) (37)
Operating profit 208 177
Interest expense (22) (21)
Share of profits of associates 16 12 16 12
808
Secure
Road haulage Air freight transport Group
20X5 20X4 20X5 20X4 20X5 20X4 20X5 20X4
Km Km Km Km Km Km Km Km
Income tax (65) (49)
Profit 137 119
Other information
Segment assets 805 796 306 287 437 422 1,54 1,505
8
Investment in equity method
associates 85 84 85 84
Unallocated corporate assets 573 522
Consolidated total assets 2,206 2,111
Segment liabilities 345 349 176 178 197 184 718 711
Unallocated corporate
liabilities 37 12
Consolidated total liabilities 755 723
Your colleague finds several aspects of this note confusing:

'I thought I'd understood what you told me about consolidated financial statements; the idea of
aggregating several pieces of information to provide an overall view of the activities of the group
makes sense. But the segment report seems to be trying to disaggregate the information all over
again. What is the point of doing this? Does this information actually tell me anything useful about
Taupe? I know from talking to you previously that financial information does not always tell us
everything we need to know. So, what are the limitations in this statement?'
Required
(a) Analyse and interpret Taupe's segment disclosures for the benefit of your colleague,
explaining your findings in a brief report. (8 marks)
(b) Explain the general limitations of segment reporting, illustrating your answer where applicable
with references to Taupe's segment report. (8 marks)
(c) Outline how the IASB has addressed the weaknesses of the current standard on segment
reporting. (7 marks)
Professional marks will be awarded in this question for the clarity and quality of the presentation and
discussion. (2 marks)
(Total = 25 marks)
809
810
SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
1 Conceptual Framework
(a) The stated purposes of the Conceptual Framework are as follows.
(i) To assist the Board in the development of future IFRSs and in its review of existing IFRSs.
(ii) To assist the Board in promoting harmonisation of regulations, accounting standards
and procedures by reducing the number of alternative accounting treatment permitted
by IFRSs.
(iii) To assist national standard-setting bodies in developing national standards.
(iv) To assist preparers of financial statements in applying IFRSs and in dealing with topics
that have yet to form the subject of an IFRS.
(v) To assist auditors in forming an opinion on whether financial statements comply with
IFRSs.
(vi) To assist users of financial statements in interpreting the information contained in
financial statements prepared in compliance with IFRSs.
(vii) To provide those who are interested in the work of the IASB with information about its
approach to the formulation of IFRSs.
(b) The people who might be interested in financial information about the company may be
classified as follows.
(i) Shareholders in the company. They will be interested in the company's
profitability and its ability to pay dividends. They will also be interested in the
company's long term prospects.
(ii) Managers of the company. These are people appointed by the company's owners
to supervise the day-to-day activities of the company. They need information about the
company's financial situation as it is currently and as it is expected to be in the future.
This is to enable them to manage the business efficiently and to take effective control
and planning decisions.
(iii) Trade contacts, including suppliers who provide goods to the company on credit and
customers who purchase the goods or services provided by the company. Suppliers will
want to know about the company's ability to pay its debts; customers need to know that
the company is a secure source of supply and is in no danger of having to close down.
(iv) Providers of finance to the company. These might include a bank which permits
the company to operate an overdraft, or provides longer-term finance by granting a
loan. The bank will want to ensure that the company is able to keep up with interest
payments, and eventually to repay the amounts advanced.
(v) The taxation authorities, who will want to know about business profits in order to
assess the tax payable by the company on its profits and any sales taxes.
(vi) Employees of the company. These should have a right to information about the
company's financial situation, because their future careers and the size of their wages
and salaries depend on it.
811
2 Fundamental principles
Tutorial note
Don't let this scenario panic you in the long list of details it gives you. Deal with each point as it
arises. Also, don't be afraid to draw a conclusion about the facts given to you, but remember to back
your opinions up with justification. Consider what the fundamental principles and general guidance
of the ACCA say, but also think about practical issues, such as ease of modern communication. Deal
with the two issues raised in the scenario (the individual partner issue and the firm split) separately,
there is no need to assume any connection between them. However, you may feel there is a point to
be made about the juxtaposition of the two events.
Independence
It is important that auditors are, and are seen to be, independent. Independence is at the heart of the
auditing profession as auditors claim to give an impartial, objective opinion on the truth and fairness
of the financial statements.
Objectivity
A family relationship between an auditor and the client can substantially affect the
objectivity of the audit, so auditors are advised not to build close personal relationships with audit
clients and should not audit a company where family are employed in a capacity which is sensitive
to the accounts, for example, in the finance department, although this is not prohibited by law.
In this instance, the partner was not the reporting partner for the audit client in which his
brother-in-law was a financial controller. According to generally accepted ethical practice then, the
firm appeared to be independent of the audit client if the related partner did not have anything to do
with the audit.
Resolution?
The regulatory body required the audit partner to move 400 miles. This presumably implies that the
partner was requested to change offices within the firm by which he was employed. Given current
levels of computer networking and other communications common in business, this would appear
to be an arbitrary distinction, as a partner in an office 400 miles away could have similar
access and influence over a single audit carried out by the firm as a partner in the locality.
Independence in appearance
However, in this situation, the regulatory body appear to be concerned about the appearance of
independence. They appear to be concerned that the public will not perceive the distinction between
a partner and a partner who reports on a specific engagement. This may or may not be fair.
Arguably, it is only in publicising the problem that the public are likely to have a perception at all.
Also, given the comments made about modern communications above, the public are unlikely to be
convinced that moving a member of staff to a different office will solve this independence problem, if
they perceive that there is one.
Split of audit firm
The decision of the firm to split into three divisions could enhance the public perception of the
independence of the audit department. While there might be underlying scepticism
relating to the reasons behind the split (which could merely be for marketing purposes or to enable
non-audit divisions to raise capital more easily), the underlying benefit for objectivity still
exists.
However, some audit clients will be unhappy with the move of the firm as it will entail their
appointing several different service providers to gain the services they previously got from the one
audit firm.
812
3 Ace
Year ended 31 March 20X2
Relationship
Ace Co has a 75% subsidiary (Deuce Co) and an 80% subsidiary (Trey Co).
Ace is a related party of Deuce and Trey and vice versa.
Deuce and Trey are also related parties because they are subject to 'common control'. Any
transactions between Ace, Deuce and Trey need not be disclosed in Ace's consolidated accounts as
they are eliminated.
Disclosures
Ace Co
 Intragroup sale of machine for $25,000 at profit of $5,000. No balances outstanding.
 Management services provided to Deuce (nil charge) and Trey (nil charge)
No disclosure is required in the group accounts of Ace of these items as they are eliminated.
Deuce
 Parent (and ultimate controlling party) is Ace Co
 Machine purchased from parent $25,000 (original cost $20,000) and depreciation charge
$5,000. No amounts outstanding at year end.
 Purchase of management services from Ace (nil charge)
Trey
For all transactions the nature of the related party relationship (ie parent, subsidiary, fellow
subsidiary) should be disclosed.
Year ended 31 March 20X3
Relationship
Ace Co has a 100% subsidiary (Deuce Co) and an 80% subsidiary (Trey Co).
Ace is a related party of Deuce and Trey and vice versa. Deuce and Trey are related because they
remain under common control. Any transactions between Ace, Deuce and Trey need not be
disclosed in Ace's consolidated accounts as they are eliminated.
Disclosures
Ace Co
 Management services provided to Deuce (nil charge) and Trey ($10,000 outstanding)
No disclosure is required in the group accounts of Ace of these items as they are eliminated.
Deuce
Disclosures of intragroup transactions is still required even though Deuce is a wholly-owned
subsidiary:
 Sale of inventories to Trey for $15,000 (original cost $12,000) all sold on, no amounts
outstanding at year end
813
Trey
 Purchase of inventories from Deuce $15,000 (original cost $12,000) all sold, no amounts
outstanding at year end
 Purchase of management services from Ace costing $10,000. All outstanding at year end
For all transactions the nature of the related party relationship (ie parent, subsidiary, fellow
subsidiary) should be disclosed.
4 Camel Telecom
(a) The licence is an intangible asset accounted for under IAS 38 Intangible Assets.
Given that the market value on the date of acquisition was more than the amount paid by
Camel, a government grant has been given.
Two accounting treatments are acceptable under IAS 20.
(i) The asset is recognised initially at its market value of $370m, and the government grant
of $26m (being the difference between the market value and the cost of the asset) is
recognised as deferred income.
(ii) Alternatively the government grant can be deducted from the market value of the asset
to give a carrying amount of $344m.
The licence should be amortised over the 10 year licence period to a zero residual value.
Any deferred income will be amortised over the same period and presented as a current and
non-current liability in the statement of financial position.
Either way the annual effect on profit or loss is a charge of $34.4m (either $344m/10 or
$370m/10 less a credit of $26m/10).
The lower take up of 5G services is an impairment indicator and so an impairment test must
be undertaken at the year end. However, after taking into account amortisation for the period,
the carrying amount of the asset at the year end is either $309.6m ($344m – $34.4m) if the
grant is deducted from the asset value or $333m ($370m – $37m) if the asset is initially
measured at market value and the grant is recognised separately. Therefore the asset is not
impaired.
The asset cannot be revalued upwards to $335m because IAS 38 requires an active market to
exist for revaluation of intangible assets and, despite the fact that the licence can be sold,
there is no active market in these four licences due to their nature. An active market is defined
as a market in which transactions for the particular asset take place with sufficient frequency
and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. This is not the case as there
are only four licences.
(b) Camel's intention is to use the land for its new head office. Therefore it does not meet the
definition of investment property under IAS 40 Investment Property:
'property held to earn rentals or for capital appreciation or both, rather than for:
 Use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative purposes, or
 Sale in the ordinary course of business.' (IAS 40: para. 5)
Therefore the land is held under IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment and is initially recorded
at its cost of $10.4m. Being land, ordinarily it would not be depreciated.
The land can either be held under the cost model or revaluation model depending on Camel's
accounting policy which applies to all of its land as a class.
814
If revalued, the fair value measurement of the land should take into account a market
participant's ability to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best
use or by selling it to another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and
best use. The highest and best use of an asset takes into account the use that is physically
possible, legally permissible and financially feasible. At the current year end, as planning
permission has not been granted, use for development is not legally permissible so the value of
$14.3m cannot be used. If Camel's policy is to revalue its land, it can be revalued to $10.6m
at the year end, ie its value as farmland. The gain of $0.2m ($10.6m – $10.4m) would be
reported in other comprehensive income.
(c) The land is also used for the supply of services and therefore meets the definition of property,
plant and equipment. However, if the portion leased to other parties is separate and could be
sold separately, that portion could be treated separately as investment property.
Camel therefore has the option of using the cost model (for both property, plant and
equipment and investment property portions) or the revaluation model (for the property, plant
and equipment portion) or the fair value model (for the investment property portion). This
depends on Camel's underlying accounting policy.
Given that the sites have increased substantially in value, this would result in gains in other
comprehensive income (for the property, plant and equipment portion) or profit or loss (for the
investment property portion) if the revaluation/fair value models are used. Any rental income
is credited to profit or loss (assuming that they are operating leases under IFRS 16 Leases as it
applies to lessors).
(d) An exchange transaction has occurred here. Under IAS 16 and IAS 38 which cover
exchanges of tangible and intangible assets, the cost of the new asset is measured at fair
value, unless the transaction lacks commercial substance, which does not appear to be the
case here, as the assets given up relate to different products to those acquired, ie landline vs
mobile businesses.
The best indication of the fair value of the assets acquired is the fair value of the non-monetary
assets given up ($320m) plus the monetary consideration of $980m. A gain or loss is
therefore reported in Camel's financial statements on derecognition of its fixed line ADSL
business comparing the selling price ($320m) with its carrying amount.
Part of the $980m paid to Purple includes the value of the Purple brand (ie its customer base
and their loyalty and the brand recognition in the market). The brand must be given up after
one year it will have no value to Camel in that country at that time. However, during the
period of re-branding from Purple to Mobistar, the brand still has a value.
Consequently a fair value should be attributed to the brand during the acquisition accounting
and the brand should be amortised to a residual value of zero over the next year.
(e) The Mobistar brand is internally generated as it developed the brand itself. Therefore, under
IAS 38, the brand cannot be recognised in the financial statements of Camel as its value is
deemed not to be able to be measured on a reliable basis.
Camel should analyse further the impact of the stolen customer details. An impairment test
may be necessary on Camel's national business if customers are leaving beyond what had
been expected in normal market conditions. Further, a provision may be necessary for a fine
over the loss of private data under national law since the event occurred before the year end,
which would be considered the obligating event for fines under IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent
Liabilities and Contingent Assets. Disclosure would also need to be made of the nature of the
incident/provision and uncertainty over the amount of any fine accrued.
815
5 Acquirer
Top tips. This question tests students' ability to apply the principles of IFRS 3 and IAS 36. In Part (d)
you should have computed the value in use of the relevant net assets. This involved allocating assets
into cash generating units. In Part (e) you needed to allocate this impairment loss by computing the
carrying value of the goodwill and therefore of the total carrying value of the individual subsidiary.
The whole impairment loss was allocated to goodwill. Remember that the impairment review has to
be done in two stages.
(a) To determine whether impairment of a non-current asset has occurred, it is necessary to

compare the carrying amount of the asset with its recoverable amount. The recoverable
amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. It is not always
easy to estimate value in use. In particular, it is not always practicable to identify cash flows
arising from an individual non-current asset. If this is the case, value in use should be
calculated at the level of cash generating units.
A cash-generating unit is defined as a group of assets, liabilities and associated goodwill
that generates income that is largely independent of the reporting entity's other
income streams. The assets and liabilities include those already involved in generating the
income and an appropriate portion of those used to generate more than one income stream.
(b) IAS 36 Impairment of assets requires that there should be some indication of impairment of a
non-current asset before an impairment review is carried out. However, IFRS 3 Business
combinations sets out different requirements for the special case of goodwill.
IFRS 3 states that goodwill resulting from a business combination should be recognised in the
statement of financial position and measured at cost. Goodwill is not amortised. Instead, it
should be reviewed for impairment annually and written down to its recoverable
amount where necessary. Where goodwill is acquired in a business combination during the
current annual period, it should be tested for impairment before the end of the current annual
period. Prospects was acquired on 30 June 20X0, so the impairment review should be carried
out by 31 December 20X0.
(c) An impairment review involves a comparison of the carrying value of a non-current
asset or goodwill with its recoverable amount. To the extent that the carrying amount
exceeds the recoverable amount, the non-current asset or goodwill is impaired and needs to
be written down.
Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in
use. Generally, recoverable amount is taken to be value in use. This is because fair value
less costs to sell may be difficult to determine, and may in any case be very low, because the
asset is only of use in the business rather than of value in the open market. This means that an
impairment review usually involves computing value in use, particularly in the case of
goodwill.
It is not always easy to estimate value in use. In particular, it is not always practicable to
identify cash flows arising from an individual non-current asset. This is certainly true of
goodwill, which cannot generate cash flows in isolation from other assets. If this is the case,
value in use should be calculated at the level of cash generating units. A cash generating
unit is the smallest grouping of assets that can be said to generate cash flows that are
independent of those generated by other units. To calculate value in use, we therefore need to
identify the cash generating units and the cash flows attributable to them.
(d) The value in use of the assets of Unit A is $72m, which is less than the carrying value of
$85m. There is therefore an impairment loss of $13m. This must be allocated as follows.
816
(i) To any assets which have suffered obvious impairment. We are not given any
indication that there are any such assets here.
(ii) To goodwill in the unit. We are not told that there is any.
(iii) To other assets in the unit, ie the patents of $5 and tangible non-current assets of
$60m.
(iv) Therefore the $13m is written off in proportion against patents (5/65  $13m = $1m)
and tangible non-current assets (60/65  $13m = $12m).
(e) The goodwill on consolidation is:
$m
Cost of investment 260
Net assets acquired 180
80
This goodwill cannot be allocated to individual units, so the impairment review must be carried
out in two stages:
Stage 1: Review individual units for impairment.
It is clear that the assets of unit A have suffered impairment, since the value in use of $72m is
less than the carrying value of $85m. The assets of unit A must therefore be written down to
$72m.
Stage 2: Compare the adjusted carrying value of the net assets of Prospects,
including goodwill, with the value in use of the whole business.
The carrying value is as follows.
$m
Goodwill 80
Unit A 72
Unit B 55
Unit C 60
Total 267
The value in use of the whole business is $205m, so an additional impairment loss of $267m
– $205m = $62m must be provided for. This is allocated first to goodwill, reducing the
goodwill to $80m – $62m = $18m.
6 Radost
(a) Notes to the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
Defined benefit expense recognised in profit or loss
$'m
Past service cost – plan amendment (6.00)
Net interest income (from SOFP: 4.5 – 5.2) (0.70)
Profit or loss expense/(credit) (2.95)
Other comprehensive income (items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss):
$'m
Actuarial gain/(loss) on defined benefit obligation (4.75)
Return on plan assets (excluding amounts included in net interest) 2.97
(1.78)
817
Net defined benefit asset recognised in the statement of financial position
$'m
Fair value of plan assets 64.17
Present value of defined benefit obligation (44.00)
Net asset 20.17

$'m
Opening defined benefit obligation 45.00
Interest on obligation (45  10%) 4.50
Past service cost (6.00)
Benefits paid (8.00)
Loss on remeasurement recognised in OCI (balancing figure) 4.75
Closing defined benefit obligation – per actuary 44.00

$'m
Opening fair value of plan assets 52.00
Interest on plan assets (52  10%) 5.20
Contributions 12.00
Benefits paid (8.00)
Gain on remeasurement recognised in OCI (balancing figure) 2.97
Closing fair value of plan assets – per actuary 64.17
(b) Legally the assets of the Radost pension plan do not belong to Radost once the contributions
are made. This is because to meet the definition of plan assets of a post-employment benefit
plan under IAS 19 Employee Benefits they must be held by an entity/fund that is legally
separate from the reporting entity. This provides the employees with a measure of protection
should the entity go bankrupt or should the directors fraudulently attempt to plunder the assets
of the pension plan. Nevertheless, the substance of the arrangement is that the assets are held
exclusively to pay the company's future defined benefit obligation and it is therefore logical
that they should be shown in the company's statement of financial position reducing that
liability. In the case of plan assets that exceed the value of the associated obligation (as in
Radost's case), a net asset would normally be recognised in the company's statement of
financial position on the grounds that the definition of an asset ('a resource controlled by the
entity as a result of past events and from which future economic benefits are expected to flow
to the entity') is met. In this case the 'benefits' are reduced future contributions as the plan is in
surplus.
7 Cleanex
(a) Why there was a need for an accounting standard dealing with provisions
IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets was issued to prevent entities
from using provisions for creative accounting. It was common for entities to recognise material
provisions for items such as future losses, restructuring costs or even expected future
expenditure on repairs and maintenance of assets. These could be combined in one large
provision (sometimes known as the 'big bath'). Although these provisions reduced profits in the
period in which they were recognised (and were often separately disclosed on grounds of
materiality), they were then released to enhance profits in subsequent periods. To make
818
matters worse, provisions were often recognised where there was no firm commitment to incur
expenditure. For example, an entity might set up a provision for restructuring costs and then
withdraw from the plan, leaving the provision available for profit smoothing.
Criteria for recognition
IAS 37 states that a provision shall be recognised when:
 An entity has a present obligation to transfer economic benefits as a result of a past
transaction or event; and
 It is probable that a transfer of economic benefits will be required to settle the
obligation; and
 A reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
An obligation can be legal or constructive. An entity has a constructive obligation if:
 It has indicated to other parties that it will accept certain responsibilities (by an
established pattern of past practice or published policies); and
 As a result, it has created a valid expectation on the part of those other parties that it
will discharge those responsibilities.
(b) Two of the three conditions in IAS 37 are very clearly met. Cleanex will incur expenditure
(transfer of economic benefits is virtually certain) and the directors have prepared detailed
estimates of the amount.
Although Cleanex is not legally obliged to carry out the project, it appears that it has a
constructive obligation to do so. IAS 37 states that an entity has a constructive obligation
if both of the following apply.
(i) It has indicated to other parties that it will accept certain responsibilities (by an
established pattern of past practice or published policies).
(ii) As a result, it has created a valid expectation on the part of those other parties that
it will discharge those responsibilities.
Cleanex has a reputation of fulfilling its financial commitments once they have been publicly
announced. Therefore the obligating event is the announcement of the proposal on 25 June
20X0, the obligation exists at 30 June 20X0 (the year-end) and Cleanex is required to
recognise a provision.
(c) Provision at 30 June 20X0:
$'000
Expenditure on:
30 June 20X1 30,000  0.926 27,780
30 June 20X2 30,000  0.857 25,710
30 June 20X3 40,000  0.794 31,760
85,250
Provision at 30 June 20X1:
$'000
Expenditure on:
30 June 20X2 30,000  0.926 27,780
30 June 20X3 40,000  0.857 34,280
62,060
819
(d) The charge to profit or loss for the year ended 30 June 20X1 consists of:
(i) Depreciation (85,250,000/20) $ 4,262,500
This is reported in cost of sales.

The provision of $85,250,000 also represents an asset as it gives access to future
economic benefits (it enhances the performance of the factories). This is capitalised
and depreciated over 20 years (the average useful life of the factories).
(ii) Unwinding of the discount (see working) $ 6,810,000
This is reported as a finance cost.

Working
$'000
Provision at 1 July 20X0 85,250
Expenditure on 30 June 20X1 (30,000)
Unwinding of discount (balancing figure) 6,810
Provision at 30 June 20X1 62,060
Alternative calculation
$'000
Expenditure on:
30 June 20X1 (30,000 – 27,780) 2,220
30 June 20X2 (27,780 – 25,710) 2,070
30 June 20X3 (34,280 – 31,760) 2,520
6,810
8 DT Group
(a) (i) IAS 12 focuses on the statement of financial position in accounting for deferred
taxation. It is based on the principle that a deferred tax liability or asset should be
recognised if the recovery of the carrying amount of the asset or the settlement of the
liability will result in higher or lower tax payments in the future than would be the case if
that recovery or settlement were to have no tax consequences. Future tax consequences
of past events determine the deferred tax liabilities or assets. (IAS 12 gives certain
exceptions to this general rule, eg deferred tax is not provided on goodwill.) The
calculation of deferred tax balances is determined by looking at the difference between
the tax base of an asset and its statement of financial position carrying value. Thus the
calculation is focused on the statement of financial position.
Differences between the carrying amount of the asset and liability and its tax base are
called 'temporary differences'. The word 'temporary' is used because the IASB's
Conceptual Framework assumes that an enterprise will realise its assets and settle its
liabilities over time at which point the tax consequences will crystallise.
The objective of the temporary difference approach is to recognise the future tax
consequences inherent in the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the statement
of financial position. The approach looks at the tax payable if the assets and liabilities
were realised for the pre tax amounts recorded in the statement of financial position.
The presumption is that there will be recovery of statement of financial position items out
of future revenues and tax needs to be provided in relation to such a recovery. This
involves looking at temporary differences between the carrying values of the assets and
liabilities and the tax base of the elements. The standard recognises two types of
temporary differences, which are described as 'taxable' and 'deductible' temporary
differences.
820
(ii) By definition, deferred tax involves the postponement of the tax liability and it is
possible, therefore, to regard the deferred liability as equivalent to an interest free loan
from the tax authorities. Thus it could be argued that it is appropriate to reflect this
benefit of postponement by discounting the liability and recording a lower tax charge.
This discount is then amortised over the period of deferment. The purpose of discounting
is to measure future cash flows at their present value and, therefore, deferred tax
balances can only be discounted if they can be viewed as future cash flows that are not
already measured at their present value.
Some temporary differences clearly represent future tax cash flows. For example, where
there is an accrual for an expense that is to be paid in the future and tax relief will only
be given when the expense is paid. Some expenses are already measured on a
discounted basis (eg retirement benefits), and it is not appropriate to discount the
resulting deferred tax. However, there is controversy over whether it is valid to discount
deferred tax when tax cash flows have already occurred as in the case of accelerated
tax depreciation. It is argued that this temporary difference does not give rise to a future
cash flow and there is no basis for discounting. An alternative view is that accelerated
tax depreciation is a liability that will be repaid in the form of higher tax assessments in
the future. It can be argued that there are two cash flows, with the second cash flow
occurring on the reversal of the temporary difference, as the tax payment will be higher.
Discounting, however, makes the deferred tax computation more difficult to calculate
and more subjective. Also there will be an additional cost in scheduling and calculating
deferred taxation, as well as the problem of the determination of the discount rate. IAS
12 specifically prohibits discounting.
(b) Calculation of deferred tax liability
Carrying Tax Temporary
amount base differences
$m $m $m
Goodwill (note 1) 14 – –
Subsidiary (note 1) 76 60 16
Inventories (note 2) 24 30 (6)
Property, plant and equipment (note 3) 2,600 1,920 680
Liability for health care benefits (100) 0 (100)
Unrelieved tax losses (note 4) (100)
Property sold – tax due 30.11.20X4 (165/30%) 550
Temporary differences 1,130
Deferred tax liability 1,320 at 30% 396
(680 + 90 + 550)
Deferred tax liability 16 at 25% 4
Deferred tax asset (200) at 30% (60)
Deferred tax asset (6) at 25% (1.5)
1,130 338.5
Deferred tax liability b/d (given) 280

Deferred tax attributable to subsidiary to goodwill (76 – 60)  25% 4
 Deferred tax expense for the year charged to P/L (balance) 54.5
Deferred tax liability c/d (from above) 338.5
821
Notes
1 As no deduction is available for the cost of goodwill in the subsidiary's tax jurisdiction,
then the tax base of goodwill is zero. Paragraph 15(a) of IAS 12, states that DT Group
should not recognise a deferred tax liability of the temporary difference associated in
B's jurisdiction with the goodwill. Goodwill will be increased by the amount of the
deferred tax liability of the subsidiary ie $4 million.
2 Unrealised group profit eliminated on consolidation are provided for at the receiving
company's rate of tax (ie at 25%).
3 The tax that would arise if the properties were disposed of at their revalued amounts
which was provided at the beginning of the year will be included in the temporary
difference arising on the property, plant and equipment at 30 November 20X1.
4 DT Group has unrelieved tax losses of $300m. This will be available for offset against
current year's profits ($110m) and against profits for the year ending 30 November
20X2 ($100m). Because of the uncertainty about the availability of taxable profits in
20X3, no deferred tax asset can be recognised for any losses which may be offset
against this amount. Therefore, a deferred tax asset may be recognised for the losses to
be offset against taxable profits in 20X2. That is $100m  30% ie $30m.
Comment
The deferred tax liability of DT Group will rise in total by $335.5 million ($338.5m – $3m),
thus reducing net assets, distributable profits, and post-tax earnings. The profit for the year will
be reduced by $54.5 million which would probably be substantially more under IAS 12 than
the old method of accounting for deferred tax. A prior period adjustment will occur of $280m
– $3m as IAS are being applied for the first time (IFRS 1) ie $277m. The borrowing position of
the company may be affected and the directors may decide to cut dividend payments.
However, the amount of any unprovided deferred tax may have been disclosed under the
previous GAAP standard used. IAS 12 brings this liability into the statement of financial
position but if the bulk of the liability had already been disclosed the impact on the share price
should be minimal.
9 PQR
Investment in debentures
Given that these debentures are planned to be held until redemption, under IFRS 9 Financial
instruments they would be held at amortised cost, on the assumption that:
(a) The objective of the business model within which the asset is held is to hold assets in order to
collect contractual cash flows, and
solely payments of principal and interest on the principal outstanding.
This means that they are initially shown at their cost (including any transaction costs) and their value
increased over time to the redemption value by applying a constant effective interest rate which takes
into account not only the annual income due from the coupon, but also amortisation of the
redemption premium. Their value is reduced by distributions received, ie the coupon.
Consequently the amortised cost valuation of these debentures at the year end would be:
Cost (40,000 – 6,000) 34,000
Effective interest at 8.6% 2,924 shown as finance income
Coupon received (4%  40,000) (1,600) Debited to cash
35,324
822
The debentures are an asset belonging to the equity holders and so as the increase in value is
recognised until redemption, the equity of the business will increase, marginally reducing gearing.
Forward contract
Providing the forward meets the following criteria it qualifies for hedge accounting:
(a) the hedging relationship consists only of eligible hedging instruments and eligible
hedged items.
(b) it was designated at its inception as a hedge with full documentation of how this
hedge fits into the company's strategy.
(c) the hedging relationship meets all of the following hedge effectiveness requirements:
(i) there is an economic relationship between the hedged item and the hedging
instrument, i.e. the hedging instrument and the hedged item have values that generally
move in the opposite direction because of the same risk, which is the hedged risk;
(ii) the effect of credit risk does not dominate the value changes that result from
that economic relationship, i.e. the gain or loss from credit risk does not frustrate the
effect of changes in the underlyings on the value of the hedging instrument or the
hedged item, even if those changes were significant; and
(iii) the hedge ratio of the hedging relationship (quantity of hedging instrument vs
quantity of hedged item) is the same as that resulting from the quantity of the hedged
item that the entity actually hedges and the quantity of the hedging instrument that
the entity actually uses to hedge that quantity of hedged item.
A foreign currency forward contract can be argued to be either a hedge of the future cash flow or a
hedge of the fair value of the machine to be purchased. IFRS 9 Financial Instruments therefore allows
foreign currency hedges of firm commitments to be classed as either a cash flow hedge or a fair
value hedge.
If the contract is classed as a cash flow hedge, given that the machine is not yet recognised in the
books, any gain or loss on the hedging instrument is split into two components:
 The effective portion of the hedge (which matches the change in expected cash flow) is
recognised initially in other comprehensive income (and in the cash flow hedge reserve). It is
transferred out of the cash flow hedge reserve when the asset is recognised (adjusting the
asset base and future depreciation). This applies the accruals concept.
 The ineffective portion of the hedge is recognised in profit or loss immediately as it has not
hedged anything.
If the contract is classed as a fair value hedge, all gains and losses on the hedging instrument must
be recognised immediately in profit or loss. However, in order to match those against the asset
hedged, the gain or loss on the fair value of the asset hedged is also recognised in profit or loss (and
as an asset or liability in the statement of financial position). This is arguably less transparent as it
results in part of the asset value (the change in fair value) being recognised in the statement of
financial position until the purchase actually occurs – consequently, IFRS 9 allows the option to treat
foreign currency forward contracts as a cash flow hedge.
Gearing will be different depending on whether the forward contract is accounted for as a cash flow
hedge or a fair value hedge (and whether a gain or loss on the hedging instrument occurs). Gearing
will be less volatile if a fair value hedge is used as the change in fair value of the hedged asset is
also recognised offsetting gains or losses on the hedging instrument, whereas this is not the case until
the asset is purchased (and recognised) for the cash flow hedge.
Redeemable preference shares
Redeemable preference shares, although called shares, are not, in substance, equity, they are a debt
instrument, ie a loan made to the company which receives interest and is paid back at a later date.
823
Consequently, IAS 32 requires them to be classed as such, ie as a non-current liability in the
statement of financial position. The 'dividends' paid will be shown in profit or loss as finance costs
and accrued at the end of the year if outstanding, whether declared or not.
The shares are consequently a financial liability held at amortised cost. In this case, given that the
shares are issued and redeemed at the same value, the effective interest rate and nominal coupon
rate will be the same (6%) and each year $6,000 will be shown as a finance cost in profit or loss
and the balance outstanding under non-current liabilities at each year end will be $100,000 as
follows:
$
Cash received/ b/d value 100,000
Effective interest at 6% 6,000 shown as finance cost
Coupon paid (6%  100,000) (6,000) credited to cash
100,000
In the financial statements for the year ending 31 December 20X7, the shares will need to be
reclassified as a current liability given that they will be repaid within one year.
Given that these shares are classed as a financial liability, gearing will be higher (as they are treated
as debt) than if they were ordinary shares (which would be treated as equity).
10 Sirus
Marking scheme
Marks
(a) Definition of financial liability and equity 3
Principle in IAS 32 1
Discussion 2
(b) IAS 19 1
Financial liability 2
Provision 1
Build up over service period 1
Recalculate annually 1
(c) Purchase method 1
Cost of business combinations 2
Future payment 1
Remuneration versus cost of acquisition 2
(d) Not exercised 2
Expected exercise 2
IFRS 9 1
Current v non-current 2
Maximum 25
Report
To: The Directors, Sirus
From: Accountant
Date: 15 June 20X8
Accounting treatment of items in the financial statements
824
(a) Directors' ordinary 'B' shares

The capital of Sirus must be shown either as a liability or as equity. The criteria for
distinguishing between financial liabilities and equity are found in IAS 32 Financial
instruments: presentation. Equity and liabilities must be classified according to their
substance, not just their legal form,
A financial liability is defined as any liability that is:
(i) A contractual obligation:
– To deliver cash or another financial asset to another entity, or
– To exchange financial instruments with another entity under conditions that are
potentially unfavourable; or
(ii) A contract that will or may be settled in the entity's own equity instruments.
An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of
an entity after deducting all of its liabilities
The ordinary 'B' shares, the capital subscribed by the directors must, according to the
directors' service agreements, be returned to any director on leaving the company. There is
thus a contractual obligation to deliver cash. The redemption is not discretionary, and
Sirus has no right to avoid it. The mandatory nature of the repayment makes this capital a
liability (if it were discretionary, it would be equity). On initial recognition, that is when the
'B' shares are purchased, the financial liability must be stated at the present value of the
amount due on redemption, discounted over the life of the service contract. In
subsequent periods, the financial liability may be carried at fair value through profit or loss, or
at amortised cost under IFRS 9.
In contrast, the payment of $3 million to holders of 'B' shares, is discretionary in that it
must be approved in a general meeting by a majority of all shareholders. This approval may
be refused, and so it would not be correct to show the $3 million as a liability in the statement
of financial position at 30 April 20X8. Instead, it should be recognised when approved. The
dividend when recognised will be treated as interest expense. This is because IAS 32
(para 35-36) requires the treatment of dividends to follow the treatment of the instrument, ie
because the instrument is treated as a liability, the dividends are treated as an expense.
(b) Directors' retirement benefits
These are unfunded defined benefit plans, which are likely to be governed by IAS 19
Employee benefits, but IAS 32 and IFRS 9 on financial instruments, and IAS 37 Provisions,
contingent liabilities and contingent assets also apply.
Sirus has contractual or constructive obligations to make payments to former directors. The
treatment and applicable standard depends on the obligation.
(i) Fixed annuity with payment to director's estate on death. This meets the
definition of a financial liability under IAS 32, because there is a contractual
obligation to deliver cash or a financial asset. The firm does not have the option to
withhold the payment. The rights to these annuities are earned over the directors' period
of service, so it follows that the costs should also be recognised over this service period.
(ii) Fixed annuity ceasing on death
The timing of the death is clearly uncertain, which means that the annuities have a
contingent element with a mortality risk to be calculated by an actuary. It meets the
definition of an insurance contract, which is outside the scope of IFRS 9, as are
employers' obligations under IAS 19. However, insofar as there is a constructive
obligation, these annuities fall within the scope of IAS 37, because these are liabilities
of uncertain timing or amount. The amount of the obligation should be measured in a
manner similar to a warranty provision: that is the probability of the future cash
outflow of the present obligation should be measured for the class of all such
825
obligations. An estimate of the costs should include any liability for post retirement
payments that directors have earned so far. The liability should be built up over the
service period and will in practice be calculated on an actuarial basis as under IAS
19 Employee benefits. If the effect is material, the liability will be discounted. It should
be re-calculated every year to take account of directors joining or leaving, or any
other changes.
(c) Acquisition of Marne
An increased profit share is payable to the directors of Marne if the purchase offer is
accepted. The question arises of whether this additional payment constitutes remuneration
or consideration for the business acquired. Because the payment is for two years only, after
which time remuneration falls back to normal levels, the payment should be seen as part of the
purchase consideration.
The second issue is the treatment of this consideration. IFRS 3 (revised January 2008) Business
combinations requires that an acquirer must be identified for all business combinations. In this
case Sirus is the acquirer. The cost of the combination must be measured as the sum of the fair
values, at the date of exchange, of assets given or liabilities assumed in exchange for control.
IFRS 3 recognises that, by entering into an acquisition, the acquirer becomes obliged to make
additional payments. Not recognising that obligation means that the consideration recognised
at the acquisition date is not fairly stated.
The revised IFRS 3 requires recognition of contingent consideration, measured at
fair value, at the acquisition date. This is, arguably, consistent with how other forms of
consideration are fair valued.
The acquirer may be required to pay contingent consideration in the form of equity or of a
debt instrument or cash. In this case, it is in the form of cash, or increased remuneration.
Accordingly, the cost of the combination must include the full $11m, measured at
net present value at 1 May 20X7. The payment of $5 million would be discounted for one
year and the payment of $6 million for two years.
(d) Repayment of bank loan
The bank loan is to be repaid in ten years' time, but the terms of the loan state that Sirus can
pay it off in seven years. The issue arises as to whether the early repayment option is
likely to be exercised.
If, when the loan was taken out on 1 May 20X7 the option of early repayment was not
expected to be exercised, then at 30 April 20X8 the normal terms apply. The loan would
be stated at $2 million in the statement of financial position, and the effective interest would be
8%  $2 million = $160,000, the interest paid.
If at 1 May 20X7 it was expected that the early repayment option would be
exercised, then the effective interest rate would be 9.1%, and the effective interest
9.1%  $2 million = $182,000. The cash paid would still be $160,000, and the difference of
$22,000 would be added to the carrying amount of the financial liability in the statement of
financial position, giving $2,022,000.
IFRS 9 Financial instruments requires that the carrying amount of a financial asset or liability
should be adjusted to reflect actual cash flows or revised estimates of cash flows. This means
that, even if it was thought at the outset that early repayment would not take place, if
expectations then change, the carrying amount must be revised to reflect future
estimated cash flows using the effective interest rate.
The directors of Sirus are currently in discussion with the bank regarding repayment in the next
financial year. However, these discussions do not create a legal obligation to repay the loan
in twelve months, and Sirus has an unconditional right to defer settlement for longer than
826
twelve months. Accordingly, it would not be correct to show the loan as a current
liability on the basis of the discussions with the bank.
I hope that this report is helpful to you.
Signed, Accountant
11 Lambda
(a) Equity-settled
In this case, the fair value of the share-based payment to be recognised is the fair value of the
equity instruments at the grant date.
This is not all recognised in the financial statements at once, however, but is built up gradually
over the vesting period. This is the period between the grant date and the vesting date (the
vesting date is when the employee is entitled to receive the equity instruments).
Therefore each year the statement of profit or loss shows the amount of fair value that has
been built up during the year – the difference between the fair value of the SBP recognised in
the opening and closing statements of financial position.
The statement of financial position shows the fair value of the SBP that has been recognised to
date, within equity.
One complication is that the vesting may be subject to certain conditions, so it is not certain
what the fair value of the SBP will be. In this case, an estimate should be made based on the
information available.
Cash-settled
The liability should be measured at its fair value at the end of the reporting period. The liability
should be recognised as the employees render their service.
(b) Scheme A – equity-settled
The vesting period is three years (1 October 20X7 – 30 September 20Y0).
The fair value of the scheme brought forward is 500  185  $2.40 = $222,000. The amount
that would have been recognised in the statement of financial position for 20X8 was therefore
$222,000  1/3 = $74,000.
The fair value of the scheme carried forward at 30 September 20X9 is 500  188  $2.40 =
$225,600.
The amount recognised in the statement of financial position for 20X9 was therefore
$225,600  2/3 = $150,400. This is recognised within equity.
The statement of profit or loss charge for 20X9 is therefore $150,400 – $74,000 = $76,400.
Scheme B – cash-settled
The employees render their services over the period from 1 October 20X6 to 30 September
20X9 – 3 years.
The fair value of the final liability as at 30 September 20X8 would have been 2  240 
$540 = $259,200. The amount that would have been recognised in the statement of financial
position for 20X8 was therefore $259,200  2/3 = $172,800.
The fair value of the final liability as at 30 September 20X9 would have been 2  238 
$600 = $285,600.
This is recognised in the statement of financial position for 20X9 as a current liability, as it is
payable within one year of the period end, on 31 January 20Y0.
827
The statement of profit or loss charge for 20X9 is therefore $285,600 – $172,800 =
$112,800.
12 Highland
HIGHLAND GROUP
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 20X8
$'000
Revenue (5,000 + 3,000 + (2,910  4 )) 8,970
12
Cost of sales (3,000 + 2,300 + (2,820  4 )) (6,240)
12
Gross profit 2,730
Administrative expenses (1,000 + 500 + (150  412 ) + (W4) 63.5 + (W5) 5 – (1,599)
(W6) 85 + (W8) 65)
Finance income* (230 + (W3) 35 – (W6) 85 – (W6) 40) 140
Finance costs (50 + (210  4 ) – (W3) 70) (50)
12
Other comprehensive income, net of tax (130 + 40 + (120  4 )) 210
12
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR 1,081

Owners of the parent (871 + 26) 897
Non-controlling interests (W2) (26)
871
Owners of the parent (1,081 + 4) 1,085
Non-controlling interests (W2) (4)
1,081
* Other income becomes finance income as only interest income from Buchan remains
Workings
1 Group structure
Highland
Aviemore Buchan
80% 65% (owned for 4 months)
$'000 $'000 $'000 $'000
Aviemore Buchan Aviemore Buchan
Profit/(loss) for the year
4 100 (90)
(B: 270 loss × )
12
Total comp income for the year
828
4
(B: 150 loss × )
140 (50)
12
Unrealised profit on disposal (W4) (63.5) (63.5)
FV depreciation (W5) (5) (5)
36.5 (95) 76.5 (55)
NCI share 7.3 DR (33.3) CR 15.3 DR (19.3) CR

(20%/35%/20%/35%)
(26.0) CR (4.0) CR
Hence, rounding to nearest $'000, NCI increases profit/total comprehensive income
attributable to owners of the parent.
3 Interest income/payable
$'000
Interest income: $2,100,000  10%  6/12 105 recorded on 1 October 20X7
 6/12 105 to be recorded
210
Pre-acquisition Post-acquisition
210  812 = 140 (210  412 ) = 70
Genuine finance income Cancel on consolidation:

DR Finance income 70
CR Finance costs 70
Overall adjustment to interest income:
$'000
Interest income from Buchan not yet recorded (210  6/12) 105
4 (70)
Less: post acquisition intragroup element (210  12 )
35
829
4 Unrealised profit on disposal of freehold property
$'000 $'000
Land Proceeds 300
Net book value (100)
Profit on disposal (in Aviemore) 200
Buildings Proceeds (800 – 300) 500

Net book value (800  40 ) (640)
50
Loss on disposal (in Aviemore) (140)
Proportion of loss depreciated (1/40) 3.5
63.5
5 Fair value depreciation
At acquisition Additional
depreciation* At year end
$'000 $'000 $'000
Property, plant and equipment (500 – 350) 150 (5) 145
150 (5) 145
4
* Additional depreciation = 150 = 15 per annum  = $5,000
10 12
6 Intragroup cancellations
Cancel management services:
DEBIT Other income $85,000
CREDIT Administrative expenses $85,000
Cancel dividend income from Aviemore:
DEBIT Other income (50  80%) $40,000
CREDIT Aviemore's retained earnings $40,000
7 Goodwill
Aviemore Buchan
$'000 $'000 $'000 $'000
Consideration transferred 5,000 2,600
Non-controlling interests (4,000  80%) 800 (3,500  35%) 1,225
FV net assets at acq'n:

Net book value per Q 4,000 3,350
Fair value adjustment (W5) – 150
(4,000) (3,500)
1,800 325
830
8 Impairment losses
Aviemore Buchan
$'000 $'000
Goodwill (W7) 1,800 325
'Notional' goodwill ( 100%/80%) ( 100%/65%) 2,250 500

Net assets at 31 March 20X7 4,450 3,300
6,700 3,800
Recoverable amount 7,040 3,700
Impairment loss 0 100
Allocated to:
'Notional' goodwill – 100
Other assets – –
0 100
Recognised impairment loss:
Recognised goodwill (100  65%) – 65
Other assets (100%) – –
13 Investor
(a) The recognition and measurement of goodwill on acquisition is governed by IFRS 3. Where
the purchase price is paid in instalments, the cost of the investment is calculated on a
discounted cash basis and the fair value is based on present values.
Goodwill arising on acquisitions
$m $m
 30 m  54.793
Cost of Cornwall  30 m  2 
 1.10 
Net assets 55
Add back pension provision 6
Deduct pension scheme deficit (11)
50
Fair value of assets acquired (80%  $50m) 40.000
Goodwill 14.793
Goodwill recognised in a business acquisition is not amortised, but reviewed for impairment
annually.
(b) MEMORANDUM
To: The financial director
From: The accountant
Subject: Intangible assets
1 Introduction
It is group policy to write off all intangible assets over twenty years. This complies with
the requirements of IAS 38.
However it is possible to select a longer period.
2 Determining the useful life of an intangible asset
IAS 38 states that an entity should assess the useful life of its intangible assets. Assets
with a finite useful life are amortised over that useful life.
831
The useful life of an intangible asset depends on many factors. For example, many
computer related assets have short lives because they are susceptible to technological
obsolescence. Where an asset arises from contractual or legal rights, the period of the
rights normally determines the useful life. However, some types of asset, such as brand
names, may have very long lives or indefinite lives.
An intangible asset has an indefinite useful life when there is no foreseeable limit to
the period over which the asset is expected to generate net cash inflows for the entity.
IAS 38 allows intangible assets to be treated as having indefinite lives. An intangible
asset with an indefinite life is not amortised.
However, it is clearly not appropriate to treat assets as having an indefinite useful life
unless this can be demonstrated to be the case. IAS 38 requires that the useful life of an
asset should be realistic; it is not acceptable to select a useful life simply on the basis of
practical simplicity or expediency.
Therefore, it is possible to avoid amortising intangible assets in theory; but the
intangible assets needs to be able to be continually measured, so that impairment
reviews can be carried out.
3 Future implications
Where an intangible asset is assessed as having an indefinite useful life, IAS 38
requires an impairment review to be carried out annually. In addition, the useful life of
the asset should be reviewed each period to determine whether events and
circumstances continue to support this assessment.
If an asset is assessed as having a finite useful life, then an impairment review is only
required if there are indications that the carrying value is not recoverable.
Therefore adopting your proposals would mean carrying out an annual impairment
review, which could be costly both in time and staff.
(c) Arguments for capitalisation
(i) The statement of financial position reflects commercial reality if brands are included,
provided they meet fully the IAS 38 definition of a purchased intangible asset.
(ii) IAS 38 does not permit non purchased or internally generated brands to be recognised.
This may be unfair since predator entities could acquire entities with valuable brand
names at less than true value.
(iii) Many entities would argue that the inclusion of non-purchased brands might provide
valuable information to users. However, the difficulties associated with revaluation and
assigning an appropriate amortisation period may negate these benefits.
14 ROB Group
(a) Treatment of PER in the consolidated financial statements of ROB
The acquisition of the additional 60% shareholding on 1 April 20X3 brings ROB's total
investment in PER to 75% (15% + 60%), giving ROB control of PER, making PER a subsidiary.
Therefore, PER must be consolidated.
This is a mid-year acquisition so the results of PER would have to be pro-rated and only
the post-acquisition 6 months' results included in the consolidated statement of profit or loss
and other comprehensive income and in group retained earnings.
In the consolidated statement of financial position, 100% of PER's assets and liabilities
must be consolidated with a 25% non-controlling interest.
832
This step acquisition involves a change in status for PER from an investment (where ROB
had no significant influence or control) to a subsidiary. The change in investment from 15%
to 75% crosses the 50% control boundary, so:
 The substance of the transaction is that the 15% investment has been "sold", so it must
be remeasured to its fair value at the date of the change in status. Since the investment
has been treated at fair value through profit or loss, this gain or loss must be recognised
in profit or loss.
 In substance, ROB has "purchased" a 75% subsidiary on 1 April 20X3. Goodwill
should be calculated as if the full 75% were acquired on that date.
(b) ROB GROUP CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT
30 SEPTEMBER 20X3
$'000 $'000
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment (22,000 + 5,000) 27,000

Goodwill (W2) 440
27,440
Current assets
Inventories (6,200 + 800 – 40 (W7)) 6,960
Trade receivables (6,600 + 1,900) 8,500
Cash (1,200 + 300) 1,500
16,960
44,400
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES

Equity
Share capital ($1 ordinary shares) 20,000
28,938
Non-controlling interest (W4) 1,350
30,288
5% bonds 20X6 (3,900 + 112 (W6)) 4,012
44,400
Workings
1 Group structure
ROB
1.5.X2 15% Financial asset

1.4.X3 60%
PER 75% Subsidiary
833
Pre acquisition retained earnings:
$'000
At 30.9.X3 5,000
Less: 6 months' profit (1.4.X3 – 30.9.X3) ($3m  6/12) (1,500)
At 1.4.X3 3,500
2 Goodwill
$'000 $'000
Consideration transferred (for 60%) 3,200
Non-controlling interest (at fair value) 1,000
Fair value of previously held investment (for 15%) 800
Less: fair value of net assets
Share capital 1,000
(4,500)
500
Impairment (60)
440

ROB PER
$'000 $'000
Gain on remeasurement of investment (W5) 150
Finance cost on bond (W6) (112)
Less: unrealised profit on inventory (W7) (40)
At acquisition (W1) (3,500)
1,460
Share of PER post acquisition (75%  1,460) 1,095
Share of impairment loss (75%  60 (W2)) (45)
8,938
4 Non-controlling interest
$'000
NCI share of post acquisition reserves (25%  1,460 (W3)) 365
NCI share of impairment loss (25%  60 (W2)) (15)
1,350
5 Gain on remeasurement of investment

$'000
Fair value at date control was achieved (1 April 20X3) 800
Less: Carrying amount (fair value at 30 September 20X2) (650)
Gain on remeasurement 150
Note: Prior to PER becoming a subsidiary, the 15% investment was treated at fair value
through profit or loss. Therefore, the original cost of $600,000 was revalued to a fair
value of $650,000 at the previous year end of 30 September 20X2. On achieving
control on 1 April 20X3, in substance, ROB has "sold" a 15% investment and
"purchased" a 75% subsidiary. The 15% investment is therefore remeasured to its fair
value of $800,000 on 1 April 20X3 and then derecognised. As it had a carrying
amount of $650,000 at that date, this results in a remeasurement gain of $150,000
834
and since ROB has been treating the investment at fair value through profit or loss, this
gain of $150,000 must be recognised in profit or loss (P/L). This will then feed through
to retained earnings. (If ROB had taken up the irrevocable election under IFRS 9 to
measure the investment at fair value through other comprehensive income (OCI), the
gain would have been recognised in OCI rather than P/L).
6 Bonds
$'000
1.10.X2 Net proceeds 3,900
Finance cost (3,900  8%) 312
Interest paid (4,000  5%) (200)
30.9.X3 Balance c/d 4,012
The adjustment required to recognise the full effective finance cost (312,000 −
200,000) is:
DEBIT (↑ ) Finance costs ((↓ ) Retained earnings) $112,000
CREDIT (↑ ) Non-current liability $112,000
Note: These bonds are a financial liability. As they are neither 'held for trading' nor
derivatives, they should be initially be measured at fair value less transaction costs of
$3.9 million ($4 million less $100,000 issue costs) and subsequently measured at
amortised cost.
7 Provision for unrealised profit
PER (subsidiary) sold to ROB (parent).
Unrealised profit = $400,000  20% margin  ½ in inventory = $40,000
The adjustment required is:
DEBIT (↓ ) PER's retained earnings $40,000
CREDIT (↓ ) Inventories $40,000
15 Holmes & Deakin

(a) HOLMES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MAY 20X3
$'000
Profit before gain on disposal of shares in subsidiary 130
Gain on disposal of shares in subsidiary (W5) 100
Income tax expense (40 + (W5) 30) (70)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax 20
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR 180
Statement of changes in equity (Total) $m

Balance at 1 June 20X2 (810 – 110) 700
Balance at 31 May 20X3 880
835
(b) HOLMES GROUP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MAY 20X3
$m
Profit before tax (130 + 60) 190
PROFIT/ FOR THE YEAR 130
Other comprehensive income, net of tax (20 + 10) 30
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR 160

9 3
Non-controlling interests [(40   15%) + (40   35%)]
8
12 12
130
9 3
Non-controlling interests [(50   15%) + (50   35%)]
10
12 12
160
(c) HOLMES GROUP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 MAY 20X3
$m
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment (535 + 178) 713
Goodwill (W2) 80
793
Current assets
Inventories (320 + 190) 510
Trade receivables (250 + 175) 425
Cash (80 + 89) 169
1,104
1,897

Share capital $1 ordinary shares 500
Reserves (W3) 477.5
977.5
1,135.0
Current liabilities
Trade payables (295 + 171) 466
Income tax payable (80 + 60 + (W5) 30) 170
Provisions (95 + 31) 126
762
1,897
836
(d) STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (TOTAL COLUMN)

Group NCI Total
$m $m $m
Balance at 1 June 20X2 (500 + (W7) 285)/ (45 + ((W7) 785 60 845
100  15%))
Adjustment to parent's equity on sale of non-controlling
interests 42.5 42.5
((W6) 72.5 – (W5) 30)
Increase in non-controlling interests ((W6) 71.5 + 16) 87.5 87.5
Total comprehensive income for the year 150 10 160.0
Balance at 31 May 20X3 (from SOFP) 977.5 157.5 1,135.0
Shown for clarity

(not required)
Workings
1 Timeline
1.6.X2 28.2.X3 31.5.X3
SPLOCI
Subsidiary – all year
15% NCI  9/12 35% NCI  3/12
Held 85% of Sells 40m shares Consol in

Deakin = 20% of B SOFP
Retain control (65%)
 adjust parent's equity
2 Goodwill
$m $m
Share capital 200
Pre-acquisition reserves 20
(220)
80
3 Group reserves at 31 May 20X3
Holmes Deakin Deakin
85% 65% ret'd
$m $m $m
Per question/at date of disposal (170 – (50 
3
)) 310 157.5 170
12
Adjustment to parent's equity on disposal (W6) 72.5

Tax on parent's gain (W5) (30)*
Reserves at acquisition (W2)/date of disposal (as (20) (157.5)
above)
137.5 12.5
Group share of post acquisition reserves:
Deakin – 85% (137.5  85%) 116.9
Deakin – 65% (12.5  65%) 8.1
477.5
837
* Tax recognised directly in reserves in the consolidated financial statements as the
item it relates to is recognised in reserves (matching concept and IAS 12 para
61A(b)).
$m
NCI share of post acquisition reserves:
Deakin (137.5  15%) 20.6
65.6
Deakin (12.5  35%) 4.4
Increase in NCI (W6) 20.6 87.5
20.6 157.5
5 Gain on disposal of shares in parent's separate financial statements
$m
Less original cost of shares (255  20%/85%) (60)
Parent gain 100
Less tax on parent's gain (30%) (30)
70
6 Adjustment to parent's equity on disposal of shares in group financial statements

$m
Fair value of consideration received 160.0
Increase in NCI in net assets and goodwill at disposal ((W4) 65.6  (87.5)
20%/15%)
72.5
OR (as a double entry):

$m $m
DEBIT Cash 160
CREDIT Non-controlling interests ((W4) 65.6  20%/15%) 87.5
CREDIT Parent's equity (balancing figure) 72.5
7 Reserves brought forward
Holmes Deakin
$m $m
Per question (31.5.X3) 310 170
Less comprehensive income for the year (110) (50)
Reserves at acquisition (20)
100
Group share of post acquisition reserves:
Deakin (100  85%) 85
285
838
16 Burley
Marking scheme
Marks
(a) Revenue recognition 3
Inventory 3
Events after reporting period 3
9
(b) Jointly controlled 3

Accounting for entity 2
Decommissioning 5
10
(c) Asset definition/IAS 38/IAS 36 4

Professional marks 2
25
(a) Revenue from the sale of goods should only be recognised when all the following
conditions are satisfied.
(i) The entity has transferred the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the
goods to the buyer
(ii) The entity has no continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually
associated with ownership, and no longer has effective control over the goods sold
(iii) The amount of revenue can be measured reliably
(iv) It is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to
the enterprise
(v) The costs incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably
The transfer of risks and rewards can only be decided by examining each transaction. In the
case of the oil sold to third parties, all the revenue should be recognised as all the criteria
have been met.
IFRS 15 Revenue from contracts with customers requires revenue to be recognised when (or as)
a performance obligation is satisfied i.e. when an entity transfers a promised good or service
to a customer. The good or service is considered transferred when (or as) the customer
obtains control of that good or service (ie the ability to direct the use of, and obtain
substantially all of the remaining benefits from, the asset).
The sale of oil results in satisfaction of an obligation at a point in time. To determine the point
in time when a customer obtains control of a promised asset and an entity satisfies a
performance obligation, the entity would consider indicators of the transfer of control that
include, but are not limited to, the following.
(i) The entity has a present right to payment for the asset.
(ii) The customer has legal title to the asset.
(iii) The entity has transferred physical possession of the asset.
(iv) The customer has the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the asset.
(v) The customer has accepted the asset.
These criteria need to be assessed on a transaction by transaction basis. In the case of the oil
sold to third parties, revenue should be recognised as the performance obligation is the
delivery of the oil to the customers which took place prior to the year end. Control has been
transferred as the customers can now obtain the benefits of the oil either through use or resale.
839
Revenue up to 1 October 20X9
The arrangement between Burley and Slite is a joint arrangement under IFRS 11 Joint
arrangements, since both entities jointly control an asset – the oilfield. However, the
arrangement is not structured as a separate entity, so it is a joint operation not a joint
venture. This means that each company accounts for its share of revenue in respect
of oil produced up to 1 October 20X9, calculated, using the selling price to third parties of
$100 per barrel, as:
Burley: 60%
Slite: 40%
Excess oil extracted
Burley has over-extracted and Slite under-extracted by 10,000 barrels of oil. The substance
of the transaction is that Burley has purchased the oil from Slite at the point of
production at the market value ruling at that point, namely $100 per barrel. Burley should
therefore recognise a purchase from Slite in the amount of 10,000 × $100 = $1m.
The accounting entries would be:
DEBIT Purchases $1m
CREDIT Slite – financial liability $1m
The amount payable to Slite at the year-end will change with the movement in
the price of oil and therefore the financial liability recorded at the year-end should reflect
the best estimate of the cash payable. By the year end the price of oil has risen to $105 per
barrel, so the financial liability will be 10,000  $105 = $1,050,000, an increase of
$50,000. The accounting entries to reflect this increase in liability and expense to profit or
loss at the year-end will be:
DEBIT Expense (P/L) $50,000
CREDIT Slite – financial liability $50,000
After the year end the price of oil changes again, and the transaction is settled at $95 per
barrel. The cash paid by Burley to Slite on 12 December 20X9 is 10,000  $95 = $950,000.
This means that a gain arises after the year-end of $1,050,000 - $950,000 =
$100,000. This gain will be taken to profit or loss in the following accounting
period:
DEBIT Slite – financial liability $100,000
CREDIT Profit or loss $100,000
The gain arising is an event after the reporting period. These are defined by IAS 10
Events after the reporting period as events, both favourable and unfavourable, that occur
between the end of the reporting period and the date that the financial statements are
authorised for issue.
The question arises of whether this is an adjusting or non-adjusting event. An adjusting
event is an event after the reporting period that provides further evidence of conditions that
existed at the end of the reporting period. A non-adjusting event is an event after the
reporting period that is indicative of a condition that arose after the end of the
reporting period. The price of oil changes frequently in response to a number of factors,
reflecting events that arose after the year end. It would therefore not be appropriate to adjust
the financial statements in response to the decline in the price of oil. The gain is therefore a
non-adjusting event after the reporting period.
Inventory
IAS 2 Inventories requires that inventories should be stated at the lower of cost and net
realisable value. Net realisable value (NRV) is the estimated selling price in the ordinary
840
course of business less the estimated cost of completion and the estimated costs of making the
sale.
In estimating NRV, entities must use reliable evidence of the market price available at the
time. Such evidence includes any movements in price that reflect conditions at the year end,
including prices recorded after the year end to the extent that they confirm these conditions. In
the case of Burley, the appropriate market price to use is that recorded at the year end,
namely $105 per barrel, since the decline to $95 results from conditions arising after the
year end. Selling costs are $2 per barrel, so the amount to be used for NRV in valuing the
inventory is $105 – $2 = $103 per barrel.
Net realisable value, in this instance, is higher than cost, which was $98 per
barrel. The inventory should be stated at the lower of the two, that is at $98 per barrel, giving
a total inventory value of $98  5,000 = $490,000. No loss is recorded as no write-down to
NRV has been made.
(b) Arrangement with Jorge
Burley wishes to account for its arrangement with Jorge using the equity method. It can only do
so if the arrangement meets the criteria in IFRS 11 Joint arrangements for a joint venture.
A joint arrangement is an arrangement, as here, of which two or more parties have joint
control. A joint venture is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that have control of the
arrangement have rights to the net assets of the arrangement.
Wells is a separate vehicle. As such, it could be either a joint operation or joint venture, so
other facts must be considered.
There are no facts that suggest that Burley and Jorge have rights to substantially all the benefits
of the assets of Wells nor an obligation for its liabilities.
Each party's liability is limited to any unpaid capital contribution.
As a result, each party has an interest in the net assets of Wells and should account for it as
a joint venture using the equity method.
Decommissioning costs
Decommissioning costs are not payable until some future date, therefore the amount of
costs that will be incurred is generally uncertain. IAS 16 Property, plant and equipment
requires that management should record its best estimate of the entity's obligations. Since
the cash flows are delayed, discounting is used. The estimate of the amount payable is
discounted to the date of initial recognition and the discounted amount is capitalised. A
corresponding credit is recorded in provisions. Changes in the liability and resulting from
changes in the discount rate adjust the cost of the related asset in the current period.
The decommissioning costs of Wells are accounted for as follows:
$m
Cost ten years ago 240.0
Depreciation: 240  10/40 (60.0)
Decrease in decommissioning costs: (14.1)
32.6 – 18.5
Carrying value at 1 December 20X8 165.9
Less depreciation: 165.9 ÷ 30 years (5.5)
Carrying amount at 30 November 20X9 160.4
841
The provision as restated at 1 December 20X8 would be increased at 30 November 20X9 by
the unwinding of the discount of the new rate of 7%.
$m
Decommissioning liability: 32.6 – 14.1 18.5
Finance costs: 18.5  7% 1.3
Decommissioning liability at 30 19.8
November 20X9
Pipeline
Since Burley has joint control over the pipeline, even though its interest is only 10%, it would
not be appropriate to show the pipeline as an investment. This is a joint arrangement
under IFRS 11.
The pipeline is a jointly controlled asset, and it is not structured through a
separate vehicle. Accordingly, the arrangement is a joint operation.
IFRS 11 Joint arrangements requires that a joint operator recognises line-by-line
the following in relation to its interest in a joint operation:
(i) Its assets, including its share of any jointly held assets
(ii) Its liabilities, including its share of any jointly incurred liabilities
(iii) Its revenue from the sale of its share of the output arising from the joint operation
(iv) Its share of the revenue from the sale of the output by the joint operation,
and
(v) Its expenses, including its share of any expenses incurred jointly.
This treatment is applicable in both the separate and consolidated financial statements of the
joint operator.
(c) Intangible asset
The relevant standard here is IAS 38 Intangible assets. An intangible asset may be recognised
if it meets the identifiability criteria in IAS 38, if it is probable that future economic
benefits attributable to the asset will flow to the entity and if its fair value can be
measured reliably. For an intangible asset to be identifiable, the asset must be separable,
or it must arise from contractual or other legal rights.
It appears that these criteria have been met. The licence has been acquired separately,
and its value can be measured reliably at the purchase price.
Burley does not yet know if the extraction of oil is commercially viable, and does not know for
sure whether oil will be discovered in the region. If, on further exploration, some or all
activities must be discontinued, then the licence must be tested for impairment following
IAS 36 Impairment of assets. (IAS 36 has a number of impairment indicators, both internal
and external.)
It is possible that the licence may increase in value if commercial viability is proven.
However, IAS 38 does not allow revaluation unless there is an active market for the asset.
842
17 Harvard
(a) HARVARD GROUP
$'000
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment (2,870 + (W2) 1,350) 4,220.0
Goodwill (W4) 183.3
4,403.3
Current assets
Inventories (1,990 + (W2) 2,310) 4,300.0
Trade receivables (1,630 + (W2) 1,270) 2,900.0
Cash at bank and in hand (240 + (W2) 560) 800.0
8,000.0
12,403.3
Share capital ($1) 118.0
Retained reserves (W5) 3,017.0
3,135.0
Non-controlling interests (W6) 1,108.3
4,243.3
Loans 1,920
Current liabilities
Trade payables (5,030 + (W2) 1,210) 6,240
12,403.3
(b) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE

INCOME FOR YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X5
$'000
Revenue (40,425 + (W3) 25,900) 66,325
Cost of sales (35,500 + (W3) 20,680) (56,180)
Gross profit 10,145
Distribution and administrative expenses (4,400 + (W3) 1,560) (5,960)
Income tax expense (300 + (W3) 1,260) (1,560)
PROFIT FOR THE YEAR 2,625
Other comprehensive income:
Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss:
Exchange differences on translating foreign operations (W7) 320.3
Other comprehensive income for the year 320.3
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR 2,945.3

Owners of the parent (2,625 – 600) 2,025
Non-controlling interests ((W3) 2,400  25%) 600
2,625
Owners of the parent (2,945.3 – 680.1) 2,265.2
Non-controlling interests [((W3) 2,400 + (W7) 320.3)  25%] 680.1
2,945.3
843
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 20X5 (EXTRACT)
$'000
Retained
reserves
Balance at 1 January 20X5 (W5) 1,451.8
Dividends (700)
Total comprehensive income for the year (per SPLOCI) 2,265.2
Balance at 31 December 20X5 (W5) 3,017.0
Workings
1 Group structure
Harvard
31.12.X2 1,011 = 75%

1,348
Pre-acq'n ret'd reserves = PLN 2,876,000
Krakow
2 Translation of Krakow – statement of financial position
PLN Rate $'000
'000
Property, plant and equipment 4,860 3.6 1,350
Inventories 8,316 3.6 2,310
Trade receivables 4,572 3.6 1,270
Cash 2,016 3.6 560
19,764 5,490
Share capital 1,348 4.4 306.4

Retained reserves
– pre-acquisition 2,876 4.4 653.6
– post-acquisition (14,060 – 11,184  3,320
2,876)
15,408 4,280
Trade payables 4,356 3.6 1,210
19,764 5,490
3 Translation of Krakow – statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income

PLN Rate $'000
'000
Revenue 97,125 3.75 25,900
Cost of sales (77,550) 3.75 (20,680)
Distribution and administrative expenses (5,850) 3.75 (1,560)
Income tax expense (4,725) 3.75 (1,260)
844
4 Goodwill
PLN PLN Rate $'000
'000 '000
Consideration transferred (840  4.4) 3,696 840
Non-controlling interests (at FV: 270  4.4) 1,188 270
Less share of net assets at acquisition: 4.4

Share capital 1,348
Retained reserves 2,876
(4,224) (960)
Goodwill at acquisition 660 150
Exchange gain 20X3 – 20X4 – ß 15
Goodwill at 31 December 20X4 660 4.0 165
Exchange gain 20X5 – ß 18.3
Goodwill at year end 660 3.6 183.3
5 Proof of retained reserves

$'000
(i) At 31 December 20X5
Harvard 502
Add group share of post-acquisition retained reserves of Krakow 2,490
((W2) 3,320  75%)
Group share of impairment losses to date (0)
Group share of exchange differences on goodwill ((W4) 15 + 25.0
18.3)  75%)
3,017.0
$'000
(ii) At 31 December 20X4
Harvard (502 – (945 – 700)) 257
Add group share of post-acquisition retained reserves of Krakow * 1,183.5
((PLN15,408 – 9,000 + 3,744)/4) –
(PLN (W2) (1,348 + 2,876)/4.4)  75%)
Group share of impairment losses to 31.12.X4 (0)
Group share of exchange differences on goodwill ((W4) 15  11.3
75%)
1,451.8
* Note. This is calculated by comparing the net assets at the two dates.
$'000
Add NCI share of post-acquisition retained reserves of Krakow ((W2) 830
3,320  25%)
NCI share of impairment losses to date (0)
NCI share of exchange differences on goodwill (((W4) 15 + 18.3)  8.3
25%)
1,108.3
845
SPLOCI
$'000
On translation of net assets of Krakow:
Closing NA at CR (W2) 4,280
Opening NA @ OR [(15,408 – 9,000 + 3,744)/4.0] (2,538)
1,742
Less retained profit as translated ((W3) 2,400 – 3,744/3.90) (1,440)
302
On goodwill (W4) 18.3
320.3
18 Porter
PORTER GROUP
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MAY 20X6
$'m $'m
Profit before taxation 112
Adjustments for:
Depreciation 44
Impairment losses on goodwill (W1) 3
Foreign exchange loss (W7) 2
Investment income – share of profit of associate (12)
Investment income – gains on financial assets at fair value through (6)
profit or loss
Interest expense 16
159
Decrease in inventories (W4) 34
Decrease in trade payables (W4) (17)
Interest paid (W5) (12)

Acquisition of subsidiary, net of cash acquired (W6) (18)
Purchase of financial assets (W1) (10)
Dividend received from associate (W1) 11

Proceeds from issuance of share capital (W2) 18
Proceeds from long-term borrowings (W3) 60
Dividend paid (45)
846
$'m $'m

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year 48
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year 158
Workings
1 Assets
Property,
plant and Financial
equipment Goodwill Associate asset
$m $m $m $m
b/d 812 10 39 –
P/L 12 6
OCI 58 8
Depreciation/ Impairment (44) (3) β
Acquisition of sub/assoc 92 8 (W6)
Additions on credit (W7) 15
Cash paid/(rec'd) β 25 – (11) 10
c/d 958 15 48 16
Note. The share of the associate's profit, recognised in the consolidated statement of profit or
loss and other comprehensive income, is not a cash item so is added back on the face of the
statement of cash flows in the section that calculates the cash generated from operations. The
dividend received from the associate is the cash item and appears in the investing activities
section.
2 Equity
Non-
Share Share Retained controlling
capital premium earnings interest
$m $m $m $m
b/d 300 172 165 28
TCI 68 12
Acquisition of subsidiary 24 30 48 (W6)
Cash (paid)/rec'd β 8 10 (45)* (4)*
c/d 332 212 188 84
*80  60%/2 SC, 80  60%/2  1.25 SP
**Dividend paid is given in question but working shown for clarity.
3 Liabilities
Loans Tax
payable
$m $m
(22 + 26)
b/d 320 48
P/L 34
OCI 17
Acquisition of subsidiary 4
Cash (paid)/rec'd 60 (37) β
c/d 380 66
(28 + 38)
847
Inventories Receivables Payables
$m $m $m
Balance b/d 168 112 98
PPE payable (W7) 17
Acquisition of subsidiary 20 16 12
188 128 127
Increase/(decrease) (balancing figure) (34) 4 (17)
Balance c/d 154 132 110
5 Interest paid
$m
Balance b/d 4
Profit or loss 16
 Interest paid β (12)
Balance c/d 8
6 Purchase of subsidiary
$m
Cash received on acquisition of subsidiary 8
Less cash consideration (26)
Cash outflow 18
Note. Only the cash consideration is included in the figure reported in the statement of cash
flows. The shares issued as part of the consideration are reflected in the share capital working
(W2) above.
Goodwill on acquisition (to calculate impairment):
$m
Consideration: 26 + (80  60%/2  2.25) 80
Non-controlling interest: 120  40% 48
Net assets acquired (120)
Goodwill 8
7 Foreign currency transaction
Transactions recorded on: $m $m
(1) 5 March DEBIT Property, plant and equipment (102m/6.8) 15
CREDIT Payables 15
(2) 31 May Payable = 102m/6.0 = $17m
DEBIT P/L (Admin expenses) 2
CREDIT Payables (17 – 15) 2
19 Grow by acquisition
(a) Note 1
The substance of this transaction is that X has made a loan of $2.4m to A. All aspects of the
'sale' should be eliminated, as follows.
(i) Reduce revenue by $2,400,000.
(ii) Reduce cost of sales by $2,400,000  100/160 = $1,500,000.
(iii) Reduce gross profit by ($2,400,000 – $1,500,000) = $900,000.
(iv) Increase loans by $2,400,000.
848
Note 2
To be comparable, the non-current assets of A and B should either both be shown at cost or
both at a revalued amount, with the revaluation done on the same basis. It is not feasible to
'revalue' A's non-current assets for purposes of comparison. However, B's non-current assets
can be shown at cost by reversing out the revaluation, as follows.
(i) Reduce non-current assets by $5,000,000.
(ii) Reduce the revaluation reserve to nil.
(iii) Reduce cost of sales by $1,000,000. This is the excess depreciation no longer required
(being the $6,000,000 revaluation less the $5,000,000 remaining in the reserve at
year end).
(iv) Increase gross profit, operating profit, profit for the year and profit before tax by
$1,000,000.
Summary
A
Item Per original Adjustment New figure

f/s
$'000 $'000 $'000
Revenue 68,000 (2,400) 65,600
Cost of sales 42,000 (1,500) 40,500
Gross profit 26,000 (900) 25,100
Profit from operations 8,000 (900) 7,100
Inventory 6,000 1,500 7,500
Short term borrowing 4,000 2,400 6,400
Total borrowings (4,000 + 16,000) 20,000 2,400 22,400
Shareholders' funds 23,500 (900) 22,600
B
Item Per original Adjustment New figure

f/s
$'000 $'000 $'000
Non-current assets 35,050 (5,000) 30,050
Revaluation reserve 5,000 (5,000) Nil
Cost of sales 45,950 (1,000) 44,950
Gross profit 20,050 1,000 21,050
Profit from operations 6,050 1,000 7,050
Profit before tax 2,050 1,000 3,050
Profit for the year 1,050 1,000 2,050
Shareholders' funds 22,050 (5,000) 17,050
(b) All monetary amounts in $'000
Ratio A B
Return on capital 7,100 7, 050
employed = 15.8% = 17.2%
22, 600 + 22, 400 17,050 + 6,000 +18, 000
Gross profit 25,100 21, 050
margin = 38.3% = 31.9%
65, 600 66, 000
Asset turnover 65, 600 66, 000

50,000 +1, 500 – 10, 500 + 2, 400  = 1.7 = 1.9
52, 050 – 5, 000 – 12, 000
22, 400 24, 000

Debt/Equity = 1:1 = 1.4:1
22,600 17, 050
849
BPP note. The effective loan of $2.4m could arguably be excluded from borrowings as it is short
term.
(c) The adjustments carried out to make the financial statements of the two entities comparable
make it far less easy to decide which entity to target. A has a higher gross profit and
gross profit margin. However, the return on capital employed is lower. The main
reason for this is that A's other operating expenses are higher than B's. The revenue figures
are not significantly different following the elimination of the 'sale' from the accounts of A.
The asset turnover ratio is slightly in favour of company B but there is not significant difference
between the two companies
Where A has an advantage over B is in the adjusted debt/equity ratio. Whether this
influences the directors' decision depends on whether they intend to change the financial
structure of the company.
As it is very difficult to make a decision based purely on the ratios, it is important to consider
additional factors that may help the directors to decide. They should consider the reputation of
each company, researching media publications may give insight into any public matters the
directors need to be aware of. Reviewing non-financial elements of A and B's annual report
may help to reveal for example each company's environmental policies, the importance it
places on staff wellbeing, the commitments it has to reducing emissions. The directors may
wish to consider the management structure of A and B and the personalities in place in order
to assess how easy it will be to integrate the investment into Expand. It is highly likely the
directors of Expand will want to look at the statements of cash flows of each company in order
to understand how they generate and use cash and whether cash injections are likely to be
needed. Using four ratios for investment appraisal is very narrow and a wider set of
information should be considered.
20 Ghorse
Marking scheme
Marks
(a) Discontinuance 6
(b) Deferred tax asset 5
(c) Impairment 5
(d) Lease 4
Formation of opinion of impact on ROCE 2
Non-financial performance indicators 3
Maximum 25
(a) The criteria in IFRS 5 Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations have been
met for Cee and Gee. As the assets are to be disposed of in a single transaction, Cee and
Gee together are deemed to be a disposal group under IFRS 5.
The disposal group as a whole is measured on the basis required for non-current
assets held for sale. Any impairment loss reduces the carrying amount of the non-current
assets in the disposal group, the loss being allocated in the order required by IAS 36
Impairment of assets. Before the manufacturing units are classified as held for sale, impairment
is tested for on an individual cash generating unit basis. Once classified as held for sale, the
impairment testing is done on a disposal group basis.
A disposal group that is held for sale should be measured at the lower of its carrying
amount and fair value less costs to sell. Immediately before classification of a disposal
group as held for sale, the entity must recognise impairment in accordance with applicable
IFRS. Any impairment loss is generally recognised in profit or loss, but if the asset has been
850
measured at a revalued amount under IAS 16 Property, plant and equipment or IAS 38
Intangible assets, the impairment will be treated as a revaluation decrease. Once the disposal
group has been classified as held for sale, any impairment loss will be based on the
difference between the adjusted carrying amounts and the fair value less cost
to sell. The impairment loss (if any) will be recognised in profit or loss.
A subsequent increase in fair value less costs to sell may be recognised in profit or loss
only to the extent of any impairment previously recognised. To summarise:
Step 1 Calculate carrying value under the individual standard, here given as $105m.
Step 2 Classified as held for sale. Compare the carrying amount ($105m) with fair value
less costs to sell ($125m). Measure at the lower of carrying value and fair value
less costs to sell, here $105m.
Step 3 Determine fair value less costs to sell at the year-end (see below) and compare
with carrying value of $105m.
Ghorse has not taken account of the increase in fair value less cost to sell, but
only part of this increase can be recognised, calculated as follows.
$m
Fair value less costs to sell: Cee 40
Fair value less costs to sell: Gee 95
135
Carrying value (105)
Increase 30
Impairment previously recognised in Cee: $15m ($50m – $35m)
Step 4 The change in fair value less cost to sell is recognised but the gain recognised
cannot exceed any impairment losses to date. Here the gain recognised is $50m
– $35m = $15m
Therefore carrying value can increase by $15m to $120m as loss reversals are limited to
impairment losses previously recognised (under IFRS 5 or IAS 36).
These adjustments will affect ROCE.
(b) IAS 12 Income Taxes requires that deferred tax liabilities must be recognised for all taxable
temporary differences. Deferred tax assets should be recognised for deductible temporary
differences but only to the extent that taxable profits will be available against which the
deductible temporary differences may be utilised.
The differences between the carrying amounts and the tax base represent temporary
differences. These temporary differences are revised in the light of the revaluation for
tax purposes to market value permitted by the government.
Deferred tax liability before revaluation
Carrying Temporary
amount Tax base difference
$m $m $m
Property 50 48 2
Vehicles 30 28 2
4
9
Provision: 30%  $9m = $2.7m
851
Deferred tax asset after revaluation
Carrying Temporary
amount Tax base difference
$m $m $m
Property 50 65 15
Vehicles 30 35 5
Other temporary differences (5)
15
Deferred tax asset: $15m  30% = $4.5m
This will have a considerable impact on ROCE. While the release of the provision of
$2.7m and the creation of the asset of $4.5m will not affect the numerator, profit before
interest and tax (although it will affect profit or loss for the year), it will significantly affect
the capital employed figure.
(c) IAS 36 Impairment of assets requires that no asset should be carried at more than its
recoverable amount. At each reporting date, Ghorse must review all assets for
indications of impairment, that is indications that the carrying value may be higher than
the recoverable amount. Such indications include fall in the market value of an asset or
adverse changes in the technological, economic or legal environment of the business. (IAS 36
has an extensive list of criteria.) If impairment is indicated, then the asset's recoverable
amount must be calculated. The manufacturer has reduced the selling price, but this does not
automatically mean that the asset is impaired.
The recoverable amount is defined as the higher of the asset's fair value less
disposal of disposal and its value in use. If the recoverable amount is less than the
carrying amount, then the resulting impairment loss should be charged to profit or loss as an
expense.
Value in use is the discounted present value of estimated future cash flows expected to arise
from the continuing use of an asset and from its disposal at the end of its useful life. The value
in use of the equipment is calculated as follows:
Year ended 31 October Cash flows Discounted (10%)
$m $m
20X8 1.3 1.2
20X9 2.2 1.8
20Y0 2.3 1.7
Value in use 4.7
The fair value less disposal costs of the asset is estimated at $2m. The recoverable amount
must be the value in use of $4.7m, as this is higher. Since the recoverable amount is
higher than the carrying value of $3m, the asset is not impaired. Consequently
there will be no effect on ROCE.
(d) The manufacturing property was held under an operating lease. IAS 17 Leases required that
operating lease payments are charged to profit or loss over the term of the lease, generally on
straight line basis.
The renegotiation of the lease means that its terms have changed significantly. In
addition, IFRS 16 now requires that all leases of more than twelve months (other
than leases of low-value assets) must be recognised in the statement of financial
position.
Since the IFRS 16 is now in force, it will be shown in the statement of financial position. The
entity must measure the lease liability at present value of the remaining lease
852
payments ($(5 × 6.8137)m = $34.1m), ie at $34.1m. The entity must also recognise a
right-of-use asset of $34.1m.
However, since both assets and liabilities would increase, this reclassification would not
affect ROCE.
Recalculation of ROCE
$m
Profit before interest and tax 30.0
Add increase in value of disposal group 15.0
45.0
Capital employed 220.0

Add increase in value of disposal group 15.0
Add release of deferred tax provision and
deferred tax asset: 4.5 + 2.7 7.2
242.2
 ROCE is 45/242.2 = 13.6%
The directors were concerned that the above changes would adversely affect ROCE. In fact, the
effect has been favourable, as ROCE has risen from 13.6% to 18.6%, so the directors'
fears were misplaced.
Non-financial performance indicators
The fashion industry has had a negative reputation in the past due to treatment of staff, particularly if
there are overseas factories in which garments are made. Ghorse could consider employee
wellbeing as a non-financial metric. There are many components that could be included here –
wages is likely to be key so Ghorse could consider eg ensuring all staff are paid living wage by a
certain date, or closing the gap between highest and lowest paid employees.
Ghorse will purchase materials from suppliers. It could consider indicators such as having 20% of its
materials being ethically sourced, or reporting what proportion of materials come from fair trade
regions.
Manufacturing companies often have high energy usage due to operating manufacturing sites and
having high levels of deliveries in and out of the business. Commitments to cutting carbon emissions
and reducing the carbon footprint would be good non-financial indicators.
The non-financial indicators need to have a measurement basis in order that success or otherwise can
be measured and analysed.
21 German competitor
Tutorial note
You do not need to know about German accounting practice to answer this question, just a basic
knowledge of the differences between the European and UK models and your common sense! Think
of this as an interpretation of accounts questions.
To: Managing Director

From: An Accountant
Date: xx.xx.xx
Re: Hilde GmbH
853
(a) Analysis of performance plus commentary (€ million)
%
Increase
Statement of profit or loss and other 20X4 20X5 (decrease)
Sales 1,270 1,890 49
Cost of sales
Material purchased 400 740
De-stocking of materials 40 90
Material cost 440 830 89
Labour cost 285 500 75
Depreciation 150 200 33
Current assets written off 20 30 50
Other operating expenses 40 50 25
Finished goods inventory increase (80) (120) 50
855 1,490
Operating profit before other income 415 400 (4)
Profit rate on revenue 32% 21%
Other operating income 50 75 50
Cash flows
€ million
Share capital issued 200
Increased payables 75
Increased accruals 20
Profit ploughed back (185 + 200) 385
680
These flows were used to finance:
Purchases of plant (550 + 200) 750
Net inventory 30
More credit to customers 80
860
Difference: reduction in cash reserves 180
Other relevant performance measures

20X4 20X5
Receivables turnover
Trade receivable s 100 180
=  365  365  365
Sales 1, 270 1,890
= 29 days = 35 days
Current ratio
Current assets 420 + 70 350 + 50
=
Current liabilities
350 425
= 1.4 = 0.94
Quick ratio
Current assets  Inventory 100 + 200 + 70 180 + 20 + 50
=
Current liabilities 350 425
= 1.06 = 0.59
854
Commentary
(i) Material costs and labour costs have risen at an alarming rate in 20X5 and to a certain
extent other costs have also increased substantially. These increases are far greater than
the increase in revenue. A lack of co-ordination of production to sales has created a
substantial build up of finished goods in inventory.
(ii) Interest costs and other operating income have both increased substantially, but
because debt and investments (respectively) are not shown on the statement of financial
position it is not possible to judge why these rises have taken place. One possibility is
that the increases in the value of land and buildings represent additions which are
being rented out.
(iii) Payables have increased only slightly considering the increases in purchases during the
year. This may indicate that the company's trade payables are taking a very firm line
with the company and thus the trade payables balance is being held firm.
(iv) Although shares were issued during the year, at a premium of 100%, the fact that
appropriations are not disclosed in the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income makes it very difficult to determine what type of dividend policy
the company is following, and hence what kind of return shareholders have received
over the two years.
(v) The length of credit period given to customers has increased (if all sales are on credit).
While trading conditions may make this slip in credit control a necessity, it is regrettable
that the company cannot obtain the same more relaxed terms from its suppliers; this
would balance out working capital requirements, at least to some extent.
(vi) The inventory situation is what has changed most dramatically between 20X4 and
20X5. The rise in position statement inventories of € 30m may appear moderate, but it
represents a rise of € 120m in finished goods and a fall of € 90 m in raw materials. It
may be the case that the company is manufacturing less and buying in more finished
goods, but the increase in labour costs would tend to negate this. It seems more likely
that the company has greatly over-estimated the level of sales for 20X5, and has
therefore ended 20X5 with an anomalous inventory position.
(vii) The cash levels held by the business, while perhaps on the high side at the beginning of
the year, now appear far too low. The company is verging on an overdraft situation, in
spite of receiving cash from a share issue during the year. The working capital situation,
and in particular the inventory levels, must be resolved in order to recover the liquidity
position of the business. If not, then there will be some difficulty in paying suppliers and
taxes in the near future.
(b) A direct comparison of the results of Tone and Hilde GmbH may be misleading for the
following reasons.
(i) It is unlikely that the two companies follow the same, or even similar, accounting
policies, for example on inventory valuation, depreciation, valuation of land and
buildings etc. Also, the general approach to receivables recoverability may be more or
less prudent in the UK than under Tone's approach. These policies would have to be
investigated to discover whether comparison is really feasible.
(ii) Hilde GmbH's payables are not split between short and long term, ie those due within
one year and in more than one year (if any). Gearing ratios cannot be calculated, and
the current and quick ratios calculated in (a) are of limited value.
(iii) There may be local or country-specific types of relationships between customers and
suppliers which are different from the UK methods of doing business.
(iv) There is an interest charge shown in the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income but the statement of financial position shows no separate
855
disclosure of loans. The explanation may be that an interest charge is payable on the
share capital in place of dividends.
(v) A legal reserve is shown. There is no indication of what type of reserve this may be
comparable with (if any) in UK financial statements.
(vi) The statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income does not show a figure
of gross profit making it difficult to compare margins.
(vii) The expenses include valuation adjustments for depreciation and current assets. It is not
clear how these arise. They may simply comprise the normal depreciation charge and,
say, a provision against doubtful receivables and obsolete inventory. It is true of many
of the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income figures, that a lack of
knowledge about how, say, 'cost of sales' is computed, prevents comparison with UK
accounts.
(c) Reporting social and environmental information is voluntary. There is an increasing trend
towards reporting non-financial information. Companies who do so can experience the
following benefits:
 It can help to demonstrate elements of management strategy to important external
stakeholders, and help to avoid adverse political or media pressure to 'do the right
thing'..
 It can strengthen stakeholder relations and create a positive reputation amongst
stakeholder groups.
 The company will receive public recognition for corporate accountability and
responsibility.
 Target setting and external reporting drives continual environmental and social
improvement and may help keep the company ahead of the curve when it comes to
environmental matters..
 Effective self-regulation minimises risk of regulatory intervention and can ensure that if for
example the government made cutting emissions mandatory, the company would be well
placed to demonstrate commitment to this.
 It may improve access to lists of 'preferred suppliers' of buyers with green procurement
policies.
The benefits should however always be weighed up against the additional costs of preparing the
information and the potential loss of competitive advantage that can come from additional
disclosure.
22 Peter Holdings
Divisional performance should be measured, in the interests of the group's shareholders, in such
a way as to indicate what sort of return each subsidiary is making on the shareholder's
investment. Shareholders themselves are likely to be interested in the performance of the group as
a whole, measured in terms of return on shareholders' capital, earnings per share, dividend yield,
and growth in earnings and dividends. These performance ratios cannot be used for subsidiaries in
the group, and so an alternative measure has to be selected, which compares the return from the
subsidiary with the value of the investment in the subsidiary.
Two performance measures could be used. Both would provide a suitable indication of performance
from the point of view of the group's shareholders.
(a) Return on capital employed, which from the shareholders' point of view would be:
Profit after interest

Net assets at current valuation minus non - current liabilities (eg long - term borrowings)
856
(b) Alternatively, residual income could be used. This might be:

Profit after debt interest
Minus A notional interest charge on the value of assets financed by shareholders' capital
Equals Residual income.
Residual income might be measured instead as:
Profit before interest (controllable by the subsidiary's management)
Minus A notional interest charge on the controllable investments of the subsidiary
Equals Residual income.
Each subsidiary would be able to increase its residual income if it earned an incremental profit in
excess of the notional interest charges on its incremental investments – ie in effect, if it added to the
value of the group's equity.
23 Jay
Marking scheme
(a) Inventory 4
Investment property 4
(b) Corporate citizenship:

Corporate governance 2
Ethics 2
Employee reports 2
Environment 1
Maximum 15
(a) The initial transaction of the purchase of goods from the foreign supplier would be recorded
in the ledger accounts at $5 million (€8/1.6). Both the purchase and the payables
balance would be recorded at this amount. At the year end the payables balance is
restated to the closing rate as it is a monetary liability, but the inventories are non-
monetary and therefore remain at $5 million. Therefore the payable is restated to $6.2
million (€8m/1.3) and an exchange loss is taken to profit or loss of $1.2 million ($6.2m –
5m).
On the sale, the original transaction is recorded at $2.5 million (€4m/1.6) as both a sale
and a receivable. When payment is made the amount actually received is $3.1 million
(€4m/1.3) and an exchange gain is recognised in profit or loss of $0.6 million ($3.1 –
2.5m).
When the investment property was first purchased it should have been recognised in the
statement of financial position at $20 million (€28m/1.4). At the year end the investment
property has fallen in value to €24 million and the exchange rate has changed to 1.3.
Therefore at 31 May 20X6 the property would be valued at $18.5 million (€24m/1.3).
The fall in value of $1.5 million ($20 – 18.5m) is recognised in profit or loss. The loss is
a mixture of a fall in value of the property and a gain due to the exchange rate movement.
However, as the investment property is a non-monetary asset the foreign currency
element is not recognised separately.
(b) Nature of corporate citizenship
Increasingly businesses are expected to be socially responsible as well as profitable.
Strategic decisions by businesses, particularly global businesses nearly always have wider
social consequences. It could be argued, as Henry Mintzburg does, that a company produces
857
two outputs: goods and services, and the social consequences of its activities, such as
pollution.
One major development in the area of corporate citizenship is the environmental report.
While this is not a legal requirement, a large number of major companies produce them.
Worldwide there are around 20 award schemes for environmental reporting, notably the
ACCA's.
Jay might be advised to adopt the guidelines on sustainability given in the Global
Reporting Initiative. These guidelines cover a number of areas (economic, environmental
and social). The GRI specifies key performance indicators for each area. For environmental
reporting, the indicators are:
(i) Energy
(ii) Water
(iii) Biodiversity
(iv) Emissions
(v) Energy and waste
(vi) Products and services
(vii) Compliance
(viii) Transport
Another environmental issue which the company could consider is emission levels from
factories. Many companies now include details of this in their environmental report.
The other main aspect of corporate citizenship where Jay scores highly is in its treatment of
its workforce. The company sees the workforce as the key factor in the growth of its
business. The car industry had a reputation in the past for restrictive practices, and the
annual report could usefully discuss the extent to which these have been eliminated.
Employees of a businesses are stakeholders in that business, along with shareholders and
customers. A company wishing to demonstrate good corporate citizenship will therefore be
concerned with employee welfare. Accordingly, the annual report might usefully contain
information on details of working hours, industrial accidents and sickness of employees.
In conclusion, it can be seen that the annual report can, and should go far beyond the
financial statements and traditional ratio analysis.
24 Small and medium-sized entities

(a) Advantages
Although International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board (IASB) were originally designed to be suitable for all types of
entity, in recent years IFRSs have come increasingly complex. They are now designed
primarily to meet the information needs of institutional investors in large listed
entities.
Shareholders of SMEs are often also directors. Therefore, through managing the
company and maintaining the financial records, they are already aware of the company's
financial performance and position and so do not need the level of detail in financial
statements required by external institutional investors of larger companies.
The main external users of SMEs tend to be lenders, trade suppliers and the tax
authorities. They have different needs from institutional investors and are more likely to
focus on shorter-term cash flows, liquidity and solvency.
Full IFRSs cover a wide range of issues, contain a sizeable amount of implementation
guidance and include disclosure requirements appropriate for public companies. This can
make them too complex for users of SMEs to understand.
858
Many SMEs feel that following full IFRSs places an unacceptable burden on preparers of SME
accounts – a burden that has been growing as IFRSs become more detailed and more
countries adopt them. The cost of following full IFRSs often appears to outweigh
the benefits.
The disclosure requirements of full IFRSs are very extensive and as such, can result in
information overload for the users of SME accounts, reducing the understandability of
Some IFRSs still offer choice of accounting treatments, leading to lack of
comparability between different companies adopting different accounting standards.
Disadvantages
If SMEs follow their own simplified IFRSs, their accounts are no longer be comparable
with larger companies following full IFRSs or with SMEs choosing to follow full IFRSs. This may
make it harder to attract investors.
The changeover from full IFRSs to the simplified IFRS for SMEs, will require training and
possible changes in systems. This will place both a time and cost burden on the company.
Full IFRSs are now well established and respected and act as a form of quality control on
financial statements which comply with them. It could be argued therefore that financial
statements which no longer comply with full IFRSs will lose their credibility. This is often
called the 'Big GAAP, Little GAAP divide'.
The IFRS for SMEs reduce disclosures required by full IFRSs substantially. Omission of
certain key information might actually make the financial statements harder to understand.
Conclusion
The IASB believes that the advantages for SMEs of having a separate simplified set of IFRSs
outweigh the disadvantages. They believe that both preparers and users of SME accounts will
benefit.
(b) Examples of full IFRSs with choice
(i) Under IAS 40 Investment property, either the cost model or fair value model (through
profit or loss) are permitted. The IFRS for SMEs requires the fair value model (through
profit or loss) to be used as long as fair value can be measure without undue cost or
effort. This promotes consistency in the treatment of investment properties between SMEs
(ii) IAS 38 Intangible assets allows either the cost model or revaluation model (where there
is an active market). The IFRS for SMEs does not permit the revaluation model to be
used. This eliminates the use of other comprehensive income, simplifying financial
reporting and the need for costly revaluations.
(iii) IFRS 3 Business combinations allows an entity to adopt the full or partial goodwill
method in its consolidated financial statements. The IFRS for SMEs only allows the
partial goodwill method, ie excluding non-controlling interests in goodwill. This avoids
the need for SMEs to determine the fair value of the non-controlling interests not
purchased when undertaking a business combination.
The IFRS for SMEs does not eliminate choice completely but disallows the third of the
above options. It is one of the rare uses of other comprehensive income under the IFRS
for SMEs.
Examples of IFRSs with complex recognition and measurement requirements
(iv) IAS 38 Intangible assets requires internally generated assets to be capitalised if certain
criteria (proving future economic benefits) are met. In reality, it is an onerous exercise to
859
test these criteria for each type of internally generated asset and leads to inconsistency
with some items being expensed and some capitalised.
The IFRS for SMEs removes these capitalisation criteria and requires all internally
generated research and development expenditure to be expensed through profit or loss.
(v) IFRS 3 Business combinations requires goodwill to be tested annually for impairment. In
reality, it is very difficult to ascertain the recoverable amount for goodwill so instead the
assets of the business need to be combined into cash-generating units or even a group
of cash-generating units in order to determine any impairment loss. The impairment then
needs to be allocated to goodwill and the other individual assets. This is a complex
exercise.
The IFRS for SMEs requires goodwill to be amortised instead. This is a much simpler
approach and the IFRS for SMEs specifies that if an entity is unable to make a reliable
estimate of the useful life, it is presumed to be ten years, simplifying things even further.
(vi) IAS 20 Accounting for government grants and disclosure of government assistance
requires grants to be recognised only when it is reasonably certain that the entity will
comply with the conditions attached to the grant and the grants will be received. Grants
relating to income are recognised in profit or loss over the period the related costs are
recognised in profit or loss. Grants relating to assets are either netted off the cost of the
asset (reducing depreciation by the amount of the grant over the asset's useful life) or
presented as deferred income (and released to profit or loss as income over the useful
life of the asset).
The IFRS for SMEs simplifies this and specifies that where there are no specified future
performance conditions, the grant should be recognised as income when it is
receivable. Otherwise, it should be recognised as income when the performance
conditions are met. This is more consistent with the IASB Framework's definition of
income than the IAS 20 approach.
(vii) IAS 23 Borrowing costs requires borrowing costs to be capitalised for qualifying assets
for the period of construction. This involves a complex calculation particularly where
funds are borrowed generally as a weighted average rate on loans outstanding has to
be calculated in order to determine the amount of interest to be capitalised.
The IFRS for SMEs requires borrowing costs to be expensed, removing the need for such
a complex calculation.
(viii) IAS 36 Impairment of assets requires annual impairment tests for indefinite life
intangibles, intangibles not yet available for use and goodwill. This is a complex, time-
consuming and expensive test.
The IFRS for SMEs only requires impairment tests where there are indicators of
impairment.
The full IFRS requires impairment losses to be charged firstly to other comprehensive income
for revalued assets then to profit or loss. The IFRS for SMEs requires all impairment losses to be
recognised in profit or loss, given that tangible and intangible assets cannot be revalued under
the IFRS for SMEs.
860
25 Taupe
(a) REPORT
To: Investor
From: Accountant
Date: November 20X5
Subject: Segment analysis of Taupe
I have looked at the segment analysis note from Taupe's financial statements and have made
the following analysis of the figures shown which may be of use to you. The detailed
calculations upon which this analysis has been based are included in the appendix to this
report.
From the segment analysis we can add more information to our overview of the results of the
organisation.
Profit margin
The overall profit margin of the group has increased slightly from 24% in 20X4 to
25% in 20X5. We can also see that this is nothing to do with road haulage as its profit
margin has stayed the same but is in fact due to a 2% increase from 31% to 33% for airfreight
and the change from an operating loss in 20X4 of 25% for the new secure transport business
to an operating profit in 20X5 of 6%.
ROCE
Similarly with return on capital employed the overall figure is an increase from 27% in
20X4 in 29% in 20X5. However, this is solely due to the performance of the secure
transport activities. Road haulage shows a slight decrease in ROCE but air freight shows a
decrease from 57% to 52%.
Summary
Although the figures for the secure transport business are still small with low profit margins it is
clearly improving as the investment in the infrastructure starts to feed through to the profits.
However for the other two divisions the position is either only slightly better than last year or
worse.
I hope that this additional information has been of use to you.
APPENDIX
Key Ratios
20X5 20X4
Profit margin
Road haulage 169/653 26%
168/642 26%
Air freight 68/208 33%
62/199 31%
Secure transport 6/98 6%
(16)/63 -25%
Group 243/959 25%
214/904 24%
861
20X5 20X4
Return on capital employed
Road haulage 169/(805 – 345) 37%
168/(796 – 349) 38%
Air freight 68/(306 – 176) 52%
62/(287 – 178) 57%
Secure transport 6/(437 – 197) 2.5%
(16)/(422 – 184) -6.7%
Group 243/(1,548 – 718) 29%
214/(1,505 – 711) 27%
Note. When the group ratios were calculated the figures did not include unallocated
expenses or assets/liabilities in order to be able to compare directly with the segmental
figures.
(b) Even though segment reporting can be very useful to investors it does also have some
limitations.
Defining segments
IFRS 8 Operating segments does not define segment revenue and expense, segment results or
segment assets and liabilities. It does, however, require an explanation of how segment profit
or loss, segment assets and segment liabilities are measured for each operating segment.
IFRS 8 requires operating segments to be identified on the basis of internal reports about
components of the entity that are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in
order to allocate resources to the segment or assess performance.
Consequently, entities have discretion in determining what is included under segment results,
which is limited only by their reporting practices.
Although this should mean that the analysis is comparable over time, it is unlikely to be
comparable with that of another business.
Common costs
In many cases it will not be possible to allocate an expense to a segment and therefore they
will be shown as unallocated expenses as in Taupe's segmental analysis. If these unallocated
costs are material it can distort the segment results and make comparison with the overall
group results misleading. Also if costs are allocated to segments on an arbitrary basis then this
can distort the segment results.
Unallocated assets/liabilities
In a similar way to common costs it may be that some of the entity's assets and/or liabilities
cannot be allocated to a particular segment and must be shown as unallocated
assets/liabilities as in Taupe. Again this can make the results and comparisons misleading.
Finance costs
Finance is normally raised centrally and allocated to divisions as required therefore the normal
treatment for finance costs is to show them as an unallocated expense. However if some areas
of the business rely more heavily on debt finance than others then this exclusion of finance
costs could be misleading.
Tax costs
As with finance costs the effects of tax are normally shown as a total rather than split between
the segments. If however a segment had a significantly different tax profile to other segments
again this information would be lost.
862
(c) In March 2017, the IASB published an exposure draft Improvements to IFRS 8 Operating
Segments (Proposed amendments to IFRS 8 and IAS 34). This was driven by an
implementation review, which concluded that, while IFRS 8 was working satisfactorily in
general, certain improvements were needed.
(i) Description of the chief operating decision maker. The IASB proposes to
clarify IFRS 8 by:
 Stressing that the chief operating decision maker is the function that makes
operating decisions and decisions about allocating resources to operating
segments and assesses their performance;
 Noting that the chief operating decision maker can be an individual or a group;
 Stating that a group identified as a chief operating decision maker can have non-
executive members; and
 Requiring that an entity discloses the title and description of the role of the
individual or the group identified as the chief operating decision maker.
(ii) Identification of reportable segments. Proposed amendments to IFRS 8

regarding this issue include:
 Requiring that an explanation of the reasons is disclosed if segments identified in
the financial statements differ from segments identified in other parts of the
entity's reporting; and
 adding further examples to the aggregation criteria for operating segments with
similar economic characteristics.
(iii) Additional segment information. The IASB believes that IFRS 8 should be clarified
by:
 noting that under certain circumstances an entity may disclose segment
information that goes beyond the information regularly provided to and reviewed
by the chief operating decision maker.
(iv) Description of reconciling items. Regarding this issue IFRS 8 would be amended
by:
 clarifying that sufficiently detailed explanations are required for the reconciling
items so that users can understand their nature.
(v) Change in the composition of an entity's reportable segments. This

proposed amendment affects IAS 34 where the IASB suggests requiring that the first
interim report after a change in the composition of an entity's reportable segments must
contain restated segment information for all interim periods presented
863
864
Glossary
Glossary
Chapter 1 The financial reporting framework

 Contract – An agreement between two or more parties that creates enforceable rights and
obligations.
 Contract asset – An entity's right to consideration in exchange for goods or services that the entity
has transferred to a customer when that right is conditioned on something other than the passage of
time (for example the entity's future performance).
 Contract liability – An entity's obligation to transfer goods or services to a customer for which the
entity has received consideration (or the amount is due) from the customer.
 Customer – A party that has contracted with an entity to obtain goods or services that are an output
of the entity's ordinary activities in exchange for consideration.
 Income – Increases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form of inflows or
enhancements of assets or decreases of liabilities that result in an increase in equity, other than those
relating to contributions from equity participants.
 Interim financial report (IAS 34)

A financial report containing either a complete set of financial statements (as described in IAS 1)
or a set of condensed financial statements (as described in IAS 34) for an interim period.
 Performance obligation – A promise in a contract with a customer to transfer to the customer
either:
(a) A good or service (or a bundle of goods or services) that is distinct; or
(b) A series of distinct goods or services that are substantially the same and that have the same
pattern of transfer to the customer.
 Revenue – Income arising in the course of an entity's ordinary activities.
 Receivable – An entity's right to consideration that is unconditional – ie only the passage of time is
required before payment is due.
 Stand-alone selling price – The price at which an entity would sell a promised good or service
separately to a customer.
 Transaction price – The amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in
exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer, excluding amounts collected on
behalf of third parties.
Chapter 2 Professional and ethical duty of the accountant

 Accounting policies (IAS 8)
Accounting policies are the specific principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices applied by an
entity in preparing and presenting financial statements. (IAS 8: para. 5)
 Change in accounting estimate (IAS 8)
A change in accounting estimate is an adjustment of the carrying amount of an asset or a
liability, or the amount of periodic consumption of an asset, that results from the assessment of the
present status of, and expected future benefits and obligations associated with assets and liabilities.'
(IAS 8: para. 5)
865
 Prior period errors (IAS 8)
Prior period errors are omissions from, and misstatements in, the entity's financial statements for
one or more prior periods arising from a failure to use, or misuse of, reliable information that:
(a) Was available when the financial statements for those periods were authorised for issue; and
(b) Could reasonably be expected to have been obtained and taken into account in the
preparation and presentation of those financial statements.
 Related party (IAS 24)
A related party is a person or entity that is related to the entity that is preparing its financial
statements (the 'reporting entity').
Chapter 3 Non-current assets

 Active market
An active market is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability take place with
sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
 Agricultural produce is the harvested product of an entity's biological assets.
 Biological assets are living animals or plants.
 Biological transformation compromises the processes of growth, degeneration, production and
procreation that cause qualitative and quantitative changes in a biological asset.
 Cash-generating unit (IAS 36)
A cash-generating unit is the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates cash inflows that
are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets.
 Fair value (IFRS 13)
The price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
 Fair value less costs of disposal is the price that would be received to sell the asset in
an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (IFRS 13 definition of
fair value), less the direct incremental costs attributable to the disposal of the asset (IAS 36:
para. 6).
 An intangible asset is an identifiable non-monetary asset without physical substance. The asset
must be:
(a) Controlled by the entity as a result of events in the past, and
 Investment property (IAS 40)
Investment property is property (land or building – or part of a building – or both) held (by the owner
or by the lessee as a right-of-use asset) to earn rentals or for capital appreciation or both,
rather than for:
(a) use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative purposes; or
(b) sale in the ordinary course of business.
 Value in use
The value in use of an asset is measured as the present value of estimated future cash flows
(inflows minus outflows) generated by the asset, including its estimated net disposal value (if any) at
the end of its expected useful life.
866
Glossary
Chapter 4 Employee benefits

 Defined benefit plans: Post-employment benefit plans other than defined contribution plans.
 Defined contribution plans: Post-employment benefit plans under which an entity pays fixed
 Employee benefits: All forms of consideration given by an entity in exchange for service
rendered by employees or for the termination of employment.
 Short-term benefits: Employee benefits (other than termination benefits) that are expected to be
settled wholly before twelve months after the end of the annual reporting period in which the
employees render the related service.
Chapter 5 Provisions, contingencies and events after the

reporting period
 Contingent asset (IAS 37)
A contingent asset is a possible asset that arises from past events and whose existence will be
confirmed by the occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the entity's
control.
 Contingent liability (IAS 37)
A contingent liability is either:
(a) A possible obligation arising from past events whose existence will be confirmed only by
the occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the
entity; or
(b) A present obligation that arises from past events but is not recognised because:
(i) it is not probable that an outflow of economic benefit will be required to settle the
obligation; or
(ii) the amount of the obligation cannot be measured with sufficient reliability.
 A provision is a liability of uncertain timing or amount
Chapter 6 Income taxes

 Current tax is the amount of income taxes payable (or recoverable) in respect of taxable profit (or
loss) for a period.
 The tax base of an asset or liability is the amount attributed to that asset or liability for tax purposes
(IAS 12: para. 5).
 Temporary differences are differences between the carrying amount of an asset or liability in the
statement of financial position (eg value from an accounting perspective) and its tax base (eg value
from a tax perspective).
Chapter 7 Financial instruments

 Amortised cost. The amount at which the financial asset or financial liability is measured at initial
recognition minus the principal repayments, plus or minus the cumulative amortisation using the
effective interest method of any difference between that initial amount and the maturity amount and,
for financial assets, adjusted for any loss allowance.
867
 Credit loss. The difference between all contractual cash flows that are due to an entity…and all the
cash flows that the entity expects to receive, discounted.
 Derivative. A derivative has three characteristics (IFRS 9: Appendix A):
(a) its value changes in response to an underlying variable (eg share price, commodity price,
foreign exchange rate or interest rate)
(b) it requires no initial net investment or an initial net investment that is smaller than would be
required for other types of contracts that would be expected to have a similar response to
changes in market factors
(c) it is settled at a future date.
Examples:
 foreign currency forward contracts;
 interest rate swaps;
 options.
 Effective interest rate. The rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts
through the expected life of the financial asset or financial liability to the gross carrying amount of a
financial asset or to the amortised cost of a financial liability.
 Equity instrument. Any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of an entity after
deducting all of its liabilities.
Examples:
 an entity's own ordinary shares;
 warrants;
 non-cumulative irredeemable preference shares.
 Expected credit losses. The weighted average of credit losses with the respective risks of a
default occurring as the weights.
 Financial asset.
Any asset that is:
(a) cash;
(b) an equity instrument of another entity;
(c) a contractual right:
(i) to receive cash or another financial asset from another entity; or
(ii) to exchange financial assets or financial liabilities with another entity under conditions
that are potentially favourable to the entity; or
(d) a contract that will or may be settled in the entity's own equity instruments.
Examples:
 trade receivables;
 options;
 shares (as an investment).
 Financial guarantee contract. A contract that requires the issuer to make specified payments to
reimburse the holder for a loss it incurs because a specified debtor fails to make payment when due
in accordance with the original or modified terms of the debt instrument.
 Financial instrument. Any contract that gives rise to both a financial asset of one entity and a
financial liability or equity instrument of another entity.
868
Glossary
 Financial liability.
Any liability that is:
(a) A contractual obligation:
(i) to deliver cash or another financial asset to another entity; or
(ii) to exchange financial assets or financial liabilities with another entity under conditions
that are potentially unfavourable to the entity; or
(b) A contract that will or may be settled in an entity's own equity instruments.
Examples:
 trade payables;
 debenture loans (payable);
 mandatorily redeemable preference shares;
 forward contracts standing at a loss.
 Held for trading. A financial asset or financial liability that:
(a) is acquired or incurred principally for the purpose of selling or repurchasing it in the near
term;
(b) on initial recognition is part of a portfolio of identified financial instruments that are managed
together and for which there is evidence of a recent actual pattern of short-term profit-taking;
or
(c) is a derivative (except for a derivative that is a financial guarantee contract or a designated
and effective hedging instrument).
 Lifetime expected credit losses. The expected credit losses that result from all possible default
events over the expected life of a financial instrument.
 Past due. A financial asset is past due when a counterparty has failed to make a payment when
that payment was contractually due.
 12-month expected credit losses. The portion of the lifetime expected credit losses that
represent the expected credit losses that result from default events on a financial instrument that are
possible within the 12 months after the reporting date.
Chapter 8 Leases
 Finance lease
A lease that transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an
underlying asset.
 Lease
A contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to use an asset (the underlying asset) for
a period of time in exchange for consideration.
 Lease term
The lease term is 'the non-cancellable period for which a lessee has the right to use an
underlying asset, together with both:
(a) periods covered by an option to extend the lease if the lessee is reasonably certain to
exercise that option; and
(b) periods covered by an option to terminate the lease if the lessee is reasonably certain
not to exercise that option.'
869
 Operating lease
A lease that does not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an
underlying asset.
Chapter 9 Share-based payment

 Equity instrument granted. The right (conditional or unconditional) to an equity instrument of the
entity conferred by the entity on another party, under a share-based payment arrangement.
 Fair value. The amount for which an asset could be exchanged, a liability settled, or an equity
instrument granted could be exchanged, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's length
transaction.
 Grant date. The date at which the entity and another party (including an employee) agree to a
share-based payment arrangement. At grant date the entity confers on the other party (the
counterparty) the right to cash, other assets, or equity instruments of the entity, provided the specified
vesting conditions, if any, are met.
 Share-based payment arrangement. An agreement between the entity and another party
(including an employee) to enter into a share-based payment transaction.
 Share-based payment transaction. A transaction in which the entity receives goods or
services as consideration for equity instruments of the entity (including shares or share options), or
acquires goods or services by incurring liabilities to the supplier of those goods or services for
amounts that are based on the price of the entity's shares or other equity instruments of the entity.
 Share option. A contract that gives the holder the right, but not the obligation, to subscribe to the
entity's shares at a fixed or determinable price for a specified period of time.
 Vest. To become an entitlement. Under a share-based payment arrangement, a counterparty's right
to receive cash, other assets, or equity instruments of the entity vests upon satisfaction of any
specified vesting conditions.
 Vesting conditions. The conditions that must be satisfied for the counterparty to become entitled to
receive cash, other assets or equity instruments of the entity, under a share-based payment
arrangement.
 Vesting period. The period during which all the specified vesting conditions of a share-based
payment arrangement are to be satisfied.
Chapter 10 Basic groups

 An associate is an entity over which the investor has significant influence (IAS 28: para. 3).
 Control. The power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain
benefits from its activities.
 Power. Existing rights that give the current ability to direct the relevant activities of the investee.
 Subsidiary. An entity that is controlled by another entity.
Chapter 11 Changes in group structures: step acquisitions

 A step acquisition where control is retained occurs when there is an increase in the parent's
shareholding in an existing subsidiary through the purchase of additional shares. It is sometimes
known as 'an increase in a controlling interest'
 When there is an increase in a shareholding in a subsidiary, an adjustment to equity is
calculated as the difference between the consideration paid and the decrease in non-
controlling interests. The entity shall recognise this adjustment directly in equity and attribute it to
the owners of the parent.
870
Glossary
 Where a controlling interest in a subsidiary is built up over a period of time, IFRS 3 Business
Combinations refers to this 'business combination achieved in stages'. This may be also be
known as a 'step acquisition' or 'piecemeal acquisition'.
Chapter 12 Changes in group structures: disposals and group

reorganisations
 A 'deemed' disposal occurs when a subsidiary issues new shares and the parent does not take
up all of its rights such that its holding is reduced.
 Disposals occur when the parent company sells some or all of its shareholding in a group
company. When the full shareholding is sold, this is known as a full disposal. When only some
of the shareholding is sold, this is referred to as a partial disposal.
Chapter 13 Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued

operations
 Component of an entity
A component of an entity is a part that has operations and cash flows that can be clearly
distinguished, operationally and for financial reporting purposes, from the rest of the entity.
 Discontinued operation
A discontinued operation is a component of an entity that either has been disposed of or is
classified as held for sale and:
(a) represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations,
(b) is part of a single coordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of business or
geographical area of operations, or
(c) is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale.
 Disposal group – definition
A disposal group is a group of assets to be disposed of, by sale or otherwise, together as a group in
a single transaction, and liabilities directly associated with those assets that will be transferred in the
transaction.
871
Chapter 14 Joint arrangements and group disclosures
 Joint arrangement
An arrangement of which two or more parties have joint control.
 Joint control
The contractually agreed sharing of control of an arrangement, which exists only when decisions
about the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control.
 Joint operation
A joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to
the assets, and obligations for the liabilities, relating to the arrangement
 Joint venture
A joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to
the net assets of the arrangement.
 Structured entity
An entity that has been designed so that voting or similar rights are not the dominant
factor in deciding who controls the entity, such as when any voting rights relate to
administrative tasks only and the relevant activities are directed by means of contractual
arrangements.
Chapter 15 Foreign transactions and entities

 Closing rate. The spot exchange rate at the end of the reporting period.
 Foreign operation
An entity that is a subsidiary, associate, joint arrangement or branch of a reporting entity, the
activities of which are based or conducted in a country or currency other than those of the reporting
entity.
 Functional currency. The currency of the primary economic environment in which the
entity operates.
 Monetary items. Units of currency held and assets and liabilities to be received or
paid in a fixed or determinable number of units of currency.
 Net investment in a foreign operation
The amount of the reporting entity's interest in the net assets of a foreign operation.
 Presentation currency
The currency in which the financial statements are presented.
 Spot exchange rate. The exchange rate for immediate delivery.
Chapter 16 Group statements of cash flows

 Cash comprises cash on hand and demand deposits.
 Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible into known
amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
 Cash flows are inflows and outflows of cash and cash equivalents.
872
Glossary
Chapter 17 Interpret financial statements for different

stakeholders
 Integrated report
A concise communication about how an organisation's strategy, governance, performance and
prospects, in the context of its external environment, lead to the creation of value over the short,
medium and long term.
 Integrated reporting <IR>
A process founded on integrated thinking that results in a periodic integrated report by an
organisation about value creation over time and related communications regarding aspects of
value creation.
 A narrative report that relates to financial statements that have been prepared in accordance
with IFRSs. Management commentary provides users with historical explanations of the
amounts presented in the financial statements, specifically the entity's financial position, financial
performance and cash flows. It also provides commentary on an entity's prospects and other
information not presented in the financial statements. Management commentary also serves as a
basis for understanding management's objectives and its strategies for achieving those
objectives.
 An operating segment is a component of an entity:
(a) that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses
(including revenues and expenses relating to transactions with other components of the same
entity),
(b) whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the entity's chief operating decision maker
to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance,
and
(c) for which discrete financial information is available.
 A stakeholder is anyone with an interest in a business, and can either affect or be affected by the
business.
Chapter 18 Reporting requirements of small and medium-sized

entities
 Small and medium-sized entities are defined as entities that do not have public accountability
and they do not publish general purpose financial statements. Small and medium-sized entities may
apply IFRS for SMEs rather than full IFRS.
Chapter 19 The impact of changes and potential changes in

 Material (IAS 1)
Omissions or misstatements of items are material if they could, individually or collectively,
influence the economic decisions that users make on the basis of financial statements.
Materiality depends on the size and nature of the omission or misstatement judged in the
surrounding circumstances. The size or nature of the item, or a combination of both, could be the
determining factor.
873
874
Bibliography
Bibliography
Accounting Standards Board (1999) Statement of Principles for Financial Reporting. [Online].
Available from: https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Publications/ASB/Statement-Statement-of-
Principles-for-Financial-Re.pdf [Accessed 14 January 2018].
ACCA (2018) Rulebook. [Online]. Available from:
http://www.accaglobal.com/uk/en/member/standards/rules-and-standards/rulebook.html
[Accessed 14 January 2018].
ACCA (2017) Strategic Business Reporting Syllabus and Study Guide. [Online]. Available from
http://future.accaglobal.com/changes-to-the-qualification/the-qualification-journey/strategic-
professional/strategic-business-reporting [Accessed 4 February 2018]
Cambridge English Dictionary (n.d.) [Online] Available from:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/show [Accessed 4 February 2018]
Deloitte (2008) Business combinations and changes in ownership interests. [Online]. Available from:
http://www.iasplus.com/en-gb/publications/global/guides/pub2690/at_download/file/
[Accessed 31 January 2018].
ESMA (2015) ESMA Guidelines on Alternative Performance Measures. [Online]. Available from:
https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/esma-publishes-final-guidelines-alternative-
performance-measures [Accessed 30 January 2018].
English Oxford Living Dictionary (n.d). [Online] Available from: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/
[accessed 2 February 2018]
Ernst & Young (2015) Accounting for share-based payments under IFRS 2: the essential guide.
[Online] Available from:
http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Applying_IFRS:_Accounting_for_share-
based_payments_under_IFRS_2_-_the_essential_guide./$File/Applying-SBP-April2015.pdf [Accessed
5 February 2018]
FASB (2017) Project update: Conceptual Framework – Elements [Online]. Available from
http://www.fasb.org/jsp/FASB/FASBContent_C/ProjectUpdatePage&cid=1176169004963
[Accessed 1 February 2018]
Global Reporting Initiative (2016) GRI 101: Foundation. [Online] Available from
https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-download-center/[Accessed 24 January
2018].
IFRS Foundation (2017) IFRS [Online]. Available at: http://eifrs.ifrs.org [Accessed 24 January
2018].
IFRS Foundation (2015) Summary Report of the EFRAG, EFFAS, AIAF and IASB Joint Investor
Outreach Event on profit or loss and the role of other comprehensive income. [Online]. Available
from: http://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/2015/12/summary-report-joint-investor-outreach-event/
[Accessed 19 December 2017]
IIRC (2013) The International <IR> Framework. [Online] Available from:
http://integratedreporting.org/resource/international-ir-framework/[Accessed 24 January 2018].
International Accounting Standards Board (2010) Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting.
[Online]. Available from: http://eifrs.ifrs.org [Accessed 24 January 2018].
International Accounting Standards Board (1989) Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of
Financial Statements. [Online]. Available from: http://eifrs.ifrs.org [Accessed 24 January 2018].
International Accounting Standards Board (2010) Practice Statement: Management Commentary.
[Online]. Available from: http://eifrs.ifrs.org [Accessed 24 January 2018].
875
International Accounting Standards Board (2016) Exposure Draft: Definition of a Business and
Accounting for Previously Held Interests (Proposed amendments to IFRS 3 and IFRS 11). [Online].
Available from: http://eifrs.ifrs.org [Accessed 1 February 2018].
International Accounting Standards Board (2015) Exposure Draft: Conceptual Framework for
Financial Reporting. [Online]. Available from: http://eifrs.ifrs.org [Accessed 24 January 2018].
International Accounting Standards Board (2015) IFRS Practice Statement: Application of Materiality
in Financial Statements. [Online]. Available from: http://eifrs.ifrs.org [Accessed 24 January 2018].
International Accounting Standards Board (2015) Snapshot: Conceptual Framework for Financial
Reporting [Online]. Available from: http://eifrs.ifrs.org [Accessed 24 January 2018].
Kohlberg, L. (1981) The Philosophy of Moral Development. New York, Harper and Row
Mintzberg, H. (1983) Power In and Around Organizations. New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
Paine, L. (1994) Managing for Organizational Integrity, Harvard Business Review [Online] Available
from: https://hbr.org/1994/03/managing-for-organizational-integrity [Accessed 6 February 2018]
Virgin Atlantic (2016) Annual Report 2016. [Online] Available from:
https://www.virginatlantic.com/content/dam/vaa/documents/footer/mediacentre/VAL_FY16_Ann
ual_Report.pdf [Accessed 29 December 2017]
Walton, C. (1977) The Ethics of Corporate Conduct. Oxford, Prentice- Hall
876
Mathematical tables
Mathematical tables
Present value table

Present value of £1 = (1+r) where r = interest rate, n = number of periods until payment or receipt.
-n
Periods Discount rates (r)

(n) 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%
1 0.990 0.980 0.971 0.962 0.952 0.943 0.935 0.926 0.917 0.909
2 0.980 0.961 0.943 0.925 0.907 0.890 0.873 0.857 0.842 0.826
3 0.971 0.942 0.915 0.889 0.864 0.840 0.816 0.794 0.772 0.751
4 0.961 0.924 0.888 0.855 0.823 0.792 0.763 0.735 0.708 0.683
5 0.951 0.906 0.863 0.822 0.784 0.747 0.713 0.681 0.650 0.621
6 0.942 0.888 0.837 0.790 0.746 0.705 0.666 0.630 0.596 0.564
7 0.933 0.871 0.813 0.760 0.711 0.665 0.623 0.583 0.547 0.513
8 0.923 0.853 0.789 0.731 0.677 0.627 0.582 0.540 0.502 0.467
9 0.914 0.837 0.766 0.703 0.645 0.592 0.544 0.500 0.460 0.424
10 0.905 0.820 0.744 0.676 0.614 0.558 0.508 0.463 0.422 0.386
11 0.896 0.804 0.722 0.650 0.585 0.527 0.475 0.429 0.388 0.350
12 0.887 0.788 0.701 0.625 0.557 0.497 0.444 0.397 0.356 0.319
13 0.879 0.773 0.681 0.601 0.530 0.469 0.415 0.368 0.326 0.290
14 0.870 0.758 0.661 0.577 0.505 0.442 0.388 0.340 0.299 0.263
15 0.861 0.743 0.642 0.555 0.481 0.417 0.362 0.315 0.275 0.239
16 0.853 0.728 0.623 0.534 0.458 0.394 0.339 0.292 0.252 0.218
17 0.844 0.714 0.605 0.513 0.436 0.371 0.317 0.270 0.231 0.198
18 0.836 0.700 0.587 0.494 0.416 0.350 0.296 0.250 0.212 0.180
19 0.828 0.686 0.570 0.475 0.396 0.331 0.277 0.232 0.194 0.164
20 0.820 0.673 0.554 0.456 0.377 0.312 0.258 0.215 0.178 0.149

(n) 11% 12% 13% 14% 15% 16% 17% 18% 19% 20%
1 0.901 0.893 0.885 0.877 0.870 0.862 0.855 0.847 0.840 0.833
2 0.812 0.797 0.783 0.769 0.756 0.743 0.731 0.718 0.706 0.694
3 0.731 0.712 0.693 0.675 0.658 0.641 0.624 0.609 0.593 0.579
4 0.659 0.636 0.613 0.592 0.572 0.552 0.534 0.516 0.499 0.482
5 0.593 0.567 0.543 0.519 0.497 0.476 0.456 0.437 0.419 0.402
6 0.535 0.507 0.480 0.456 0.432 0.410 0.390 0.370 0.352 0.335
7 0.482 0.452 0.425 0.400 0.376 0.354 0.333 0.314 0.296 0.279
8 0.434 0.404 0.376 0.351 0.327 0.305 0.285 0.266 0.249 0.233
9 0.391 0.361 0.333 0.308 0.284 0.263 0.243 0.225 0.209 0.194
10 0.352 0.322 0.295 0.270 0.247 0.227 0.208 0.191 0.176 0.162
11 0.317 0.287 0.261 0.237 0.215 0.195 0.178 0.162 0.148 0.135
12 0.286 0.257 0.231 0.208 0.187 0.168 0.152 0.137 0.124 0.112
13 0.258 0.229 0.204 0.182 0.163 0.145 0.130 0.116 0.104 0.093
14 0.232 0.205 0.181 0.160 0.141 0.125 0.111 0.099 0.088 0.078
15 0.209 0.183 0.160 0.140 0.123 0.108 0.095 0.084 0.074 0.065
16 0.188 0.163 0.141 0.123 0.107 0.093 0.081 0.071 0.062 0.054
17 0.170 0.146 0.125 0.108 0.093 0.080 0.069 0.060 0.052 0.045
18 0.153 0.130 0.111 0.095 0.081 0.069 0.059 0.051 0.044 0.038
19 0.138 0.116 0.098 0.083 0.070 0.060 0.051 0.043 0.037 0.031
20 0.124 0.104 0.087 0.073 0.061 0.051 0.043 0.037 0.031 0.026
877
Cumulative present value table
This table shows the present value of £1 per annum, receivable or payable at the end of each year
for n years.
(n) 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%
1 0.990 0.980 0.971 0.962 0.952 0.943 0.935 0.926 0.917 0.909
2 1.970 1.942 1.913 1.886 1.859 1.833 1.808 1.783 1.759 1.736
3 2.941 2.884 2.829 2.775 2.723 2.673 2.624 2.577 2.531 2.487
4 3.902 3.808 3.717 3.630 3.546 3.465 3.387 3.312 3.240 3.170
5 4.853 4.713 4.580 4.452 4.329 4.212 4.100 3.993 3.890 3.791
6 5.795 5.601 5.417 5.242 5.076 4.917 4.767 4.623 4.486 4.355
7 6.728 6.472 6.230 6.002 5.786 5.582 5.389 5.206 5.033 4.868
8 7.652 7.325 7.020 6.733 6.463 6.210 5.971 5.747 5.535 5.335
9 8.566 8.162 7.786 7.435 7.108 6.802 6.515 6.247 5.995 5.759
10 9.471 8.983 8.530 8.111 7.722 7.360 7.024 6.710 6.418 6.145
11 10.37 9.787 9.253 8.760 8.306 7.887 7.499 7.139 6.805 6.495
12 11.26 10.58 9.954 9.385 8.863 8.384 7.943 7.536 7.161 6.814
13 12.13 11.35 10.63 9.986 9.394 8.853 8.358 7.904 7.487 7.103
14 13.00 12.11 11.30 10.56 9.899 9.295 8.745 8.244 7.786 7.367
15 13.87 12.85 11.94 11.12 10.38 9.712 9.108 8.559 8.061 7.606
16 14.71 13.578 12.561 11.652 10.838 10.106 9.447 8.851 8.313 7.824
8
17 15.56 14.292 13.166 12.166 11.274 10.477 9.763 9.122 8.544 8.022
2
18 16.39 14.992 13.754 12.659 11.690 10.828 10.059 9.372 8.756 8.201
8
19 17.22 15.678 14.324 13.134 12.085 11.158 10.336 9.604 8.950 8.365
6
20 18.04 16.351 14.877 13.590 12.462 11.470 10.594 9.818 9.129 8.514
6

(n) 11% 12% 13% 14% 15% 16% 17% 18% 19% 20%
1 0.901 0.893 0.885 0.877 0.870 0.862 0.855 0.847 0.840 0.833
2 1.713 1.690 1.668 1.647 1.626 1.605 1.585 1.566 1.547 1.528
3 2.444 2.402 2.361 2.322 2.283 2.246 2.210 2.174 2.140 2.106
4 3.102 3.037 2.974 2.914 2.855 2.798 2.743 2.690 2.639 2.589
5 3.696 3.605 3.517 3.433 3.352 3.274 3.199 3.127 3.058 2.991
6 4.231 4.111 3.998 3.889 3.784 3.685 3.589 3.498 3.410 3.326
7 4.712 4.564 4.423 4.288 4.160 4.039 3.922 3.812 3.706 3.605
8 5.146 4.968 4.799 4.639 4.487 4.344 4.207 4.078 3.954 3.837
9 5.537 5.328 5.132 4.946 4.772 4.607 4.451 4.303 4.163 4.031
10 5.889 5.650 5.426 5.216 5.019 4.833 4.659 4.494 4.339 4.192
11 6.207 5.938 5.687 5.453 5.234 5.029 4.836 4.656 4.486 4.327
12 6.492 6.194 5.918 5.660 5.421 5.197 4.988 4.793 4.611 4.439
13 6.750 6.424 6.122 5.842 5.583 5.342 5.118 4.910 4.715 4.533
14 6.982 6.628 6.302 6.002 5.724 5.468 5.229 5.008 4.802 4.611
15 7.191 6.811 6.462 6.142 5.847 5.575 5.324 5.092 4.876 4.675
16 7.379 6.974 6.604 6.265 5.954 5.668 5.405 5.162 4.938 4.730
17 7.549 7.120 6.729 6.373 6.047 5.749 5.475 5.222 4.990 4.775
18 7.702 7.250 6.840 6.467 6.128 5.818 5.534 5.273 5.033 4.812
19 7.839 7.366 6.938 6.550 6.198 5.877 5.584 5.316 5.070 4.843
20 7.963 7.469 7.025 6.623 6.259 5.929 5.628 5.353 5.101 4.870
878
Index
Index
12-month expected credit losses, 161, Business model approach, 155
162
C
A Calculating deferred tax, 131
Absences, 80 Cancellation
ACCA Code of Ethics and Conduct, 25, 26 (share-based payment), 208, 210
Accounting estimates, 35 Cancellation of share options, 211
Accounting mismatch, 155, 157, 158 Capital appreciation, 66
Accounting policies (IAS 8), 34 Capital maintenance, 6, 9
Accounting under IFRS for SMEs, 460 Cash, 357
Accrual accounting, 4 Cash equivalents, 357
Acquisition method, 244 Cash flow hedge, 166
Acquisitions where control is retained, 287 Cash flows, 357
Acquisitions where significant influence or Cash flows on acquisition or disposal of a
control is achieved, 265 subsidiary, 365
Active market, 60, 64 Cash receipts basis, 130
Actuarial assumptions, 83 Cash-generating unit (IAS 36), 52
Actuary, 83 Cash-generating units, 52
Adjustment to equity, 274, 275 Change in accounting estimate (IAS 8),
Adjustment to parent’s equity, 299 35
Agricultural produce, 70 Change in use, 67
Agriculture (IAS 41), 70 Classification of Liabilities – Proposed
Alternative performance measures amendments to IAS 1, 469
(APMs), 409 Closing rate, 337
Amortisation, 64 Commitments to provide a loan at a below
Amortised cost, 154, 155, 157, 160 market interest rate, 158, 161
'Asset Ceiling' test, 90 Common stakeholders, 402
Assets, 7 Component of an entity, 315
retirements and disposals, 48 Compound financial instruments, 151
Assets held for sale, 455 Conceptual framework, 4
Associate, 248 Conceptual Framework ED, 475
Associate to investment, 289 Consoldiated cash flow
Associate to subsidiary, 266 approach, 367
Available for use, 65 dividends paid to non-controlling interests,
361
B dividends received from associates and
Balanced scorecard, 413 joint ventures, 363
Bargain purchase, 252 effect of assets/liabilities of subsidiaries
Basic EPS, 407 acquired/disposed, 366
Bearer plants, 70 indirect method, 357
Benchmarking, 411 Consolidated financial statements, 459
Best estimate, 115 Consolidated retained earnings, 245
Consolidated statement of cash flows, 360
Biological assets, 70
Consolidated statement of financial position,
Biological transformation, 70
244
Borrowing costs, 69, 455
Consolidated statement of profit or loss and
commencement of capitalisation, 69
other comprehensive income, 247, 248
Borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation, 69
Business combination achieved in
stages, 265
879
Consolidation Derivative, 150
consideration transferred, 252 Development costs, 455
contingent consideration, 252 Development phase, 63
deferred consideration, 252 Diluted EPS, 407
Fair value of the identifiable assets acquired Disclosure Initiative, 471
and liabilities assumed, 253 Disclosure Initiative – Principles of Disclosure,
Consolidation technique, 243, 245, 247 472
Contingent asset, 119 Discontinued operation, 315, 316, 319
Contingent consideration, 252 Discounting, 83
Contingent liabilities, 118 Discounting of provisions, 116
Contract, 10 Disposals, 287
Contract asset, 10 Disposal group, 311, 313
Contract costs, 13 Disposal of foreign operations, 349
Contract liability, 10 Disposal where control is retained,
Control, 12, 13, 241 298
Control achieved in stages, 266 Disposals where control or significant
Control lost, 288 influence is lost, 287
Corporate assets, 53 Distinct, 11
Cost, 453
Costs versus benefits, 453
Credit loss, 161
E
Earnings per share, 406, 454
Credit risk, 158
EBITDA, 410
Credit-impaired financial assets, 164
Economic resource, 7
Crossing an accounting boundary, 265, 287
Economic value added (EVA), 410
Current cost, 6
ED/2015/3 Conceptual Framework for
Current developments, 6, 191
Financial Reporting, 6
Current service cost, 83
ED/2016/1 Definition of a Business and
Current tax, 127
Accounting for Previously Held Interests
Current value, 8
(Proposed amendments to IFRS 3 and IFRS
Curtailment, 85
11), 469
Customer, 10
Effective interest rate, 154
Elements of financial statements, 5, 7
D Embedded derivatives
Debt versus equity distinction, 475 Derivatives, 159
Deemed disposals, 301 Employee benefits, 79
Deferred consideration, 252 Enhancing qualitative characteristics
Deferred tax Qualitative characteristics, 5
calculation, 130, 131 Environmental and social reporting, 415
group financial statements, 136 EPS Earnings manipulation, 408
measurement, 136 Equity instrument, 150
presentation, 142 Equity instrument granted, 199
principles, 128 Equity method, 240, 241, 249
recognition, 135 Ethical theories, 29
on leases, 184 Ethics, 25
share-based payment, 211 Ethics in organisations, 30
undistributed profits, 137 Events after the reporting period, 119
unrealised profits on intragroup trading, Exchange differences, 338, 342
138 Exchanges of assets, 48
Defined benefit plans, 83 Exclusion of a subsidiary from the
Defined contribution plans, 82 consolidated financial statements, 242
Depreciation, 48
880
Index
Exemption from presenting consolidated Hedged items, 165

financial statements, 240 Hedging, 164
Expected credit losses, 161, 163 Hedging instruments, 165
Expected loss, 161 Held for sale, 311, 312, 319
Held for trading, 154
Highest and best use, 61
F Highly probable, 311
Fair presentation
Historical cost, 6, 8
true and fair view, 4
holiday pay, 80
Fair value, 8, 59, 199
hedge, 166
hierarchy, 60 I
less costs of disposal, 50 IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements, 6
measurement, 59 IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows, 357
of a liability, 61 IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in
of the identifiable assets acquired and Accounting Estimates and Errors, 23, 68,
liabilities assumed, 253 409
Finance lease, 185, 186 IAS 12 Income Taxes, 128
Financial asset, 150, 155 IAS 19 Employee Benefits, 79
Financial guarantee contract, 154, IAS 20 Government Grants and Disclosure of
158, 161 Government Assistance, 68
Financial instrument, 150, 161, 456 IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign
Financial liability, 150, 157 Exchange Rates, 337
Financial performance measures, 403 IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures, 32
Finite useful life, 64 IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements, 240
Foreign operation, 340, 349 IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint
Framework for the Preparation and Ventures, 240
Presentation of Financial Statements, 5 IAS 32 Presentation of Financial Instruments,
FRS 102 The Financial Reporting Standard 149
applicable in the UK and Republic of IAS 33 Earnings Per Share, 406
Ireland, 467 IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting, 15
FRS 104 Interim Financial Reporting, 467 IAS 36 Impairment of Assets, 49
FRS 105 The Financial Reporting Standard IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and
applicable to the Micro-entities Regime, Contingent Assets, 115
467 IAS 38 Intangible Assets, 62
Full disposal, 287, 288 IAS 40 Investment Property, 66
Functional currency, 337, 338, 340 IAS 41 Agriculture, 70
Fundamental qualitative characteristics Identifiable, 62
Qualitative characteristics, 5 IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International
Future operating losses, 116 Financial Reporting Standards, 477
IFRS 2 Share-based Payment, 199
IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and
G Discontinued Operations, 311
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), 415 IFRS 8 Operating Segments, 423
Going concern, 5, 7, 119 IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, 153, 154, 159,
Goodwill, 251 160, 164, 240
Government grants, 68, 455 IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements,
Grant date, 199, 200 240
Group reorganisations, 301 IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other
Entities, 330
H IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement, 59
Hedge effectiveness, 165
881
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Lease term, 181
Customers, 10 Lessee accounting, 179
IFRS 16 Leases, 179, 185, 188 Lessor accounting, 185
IFRS for SMEs, 453 Liability, 7
omissions, 454 Lifetime expected credit losses, 161,
transitional rules, 453 162, 163, 164
IFRS for SMEs transition, 454 Linkage, 7
IFRS Practice Statement, 417 Liquidity analysis, 405
Impairment evidence of, 49 Low-value assets, 183
Impairment loss, 50
recognition, 53
Impairment of assets, 49
M
Management commentary, 417, 471
Impairment of financial assets
Manufacturer or dealer lessors, 187
Impairment, 160
Market conditions (share-based payment),
Impairment reversal of, 58
207
Income, 10
Market-based measure, 60
Indefinite useful life, 65
Material, 453
Influences on ethics, 30
Material (IAS 1), 470
Intangible asset, 62, 455, 458
Materiality, 470
Integrated report, 418
Measurement period, 252
Integrated reporting <IR>, 418
Modifications, 208
Interim financial report, 15
Modifications (share-based payment), 208
Interim financial statements, 15
Monetary items, 337
Interim reporting, 455
Monetary items forming part of a net
Internally generated intangible assets, 63, 64
investment in a foreign operation, 349
International convergence, 467
Moral philosophy, 29
Intragroup transactions, 243
Most advantageous market, 60
associates, 249
Investment entities, 242
Investment property, 68, 66, 455 N
Investment to associate, 266 Net investment in a foreign operation,
Investment to subsidiary, 266 349
Investments in associates, 249 Non-controlling interests, 244
Investments in debt instruments, 155, 160 measuring, 244
Investments in equity instruments, 155, 157, Non-current assets
166 depreciation, 48
Irrevocable election, 155, 157 measurement at recognition, 47
recognition, 47
J revaluations, 48
to be abandoned, 314
Joint arrangement, 327
Non-current assets classified as held for sale,
Joint control, 327
312
Joint operations, 327, 328
Non-current assets held for sale, 311, 313
Joint ventures, 327, 328
Non-financial performance indicators (NFPIs),
412
K Non-financial reporting, 414
Key management personnel, 32 Non-refundable upfront fees, 15
L O
Lease, 160, 163, 179 Offsetting, 159
Lease liability, 181 Onerous contracts, 116
882
Index
Operating lease, 185, 188 Reportable segments, 423

Operating segment, 423 Reporting entity, 7
Other comprehensive income, 9 Research and development, 63
Research phase, 63
Restructuring, 117
P Revaluations, 48
Partial disposal, 287
Revenue, 10, 160, 458
Past due, 161
Revenue recognition, 10
Past service cost, 85
Reversal of past impairments, 58
Pension actuarial gains and losses, 456
Right-of-use asset, 182
Performance conditions
share-based payment, 207
Performance measures, 403 S
Performance obligation, 10, 11, 13 Safeguard, 26
Piecemeal acquisition, 265 Sale and leaseback transactions, 188
Plan assets, 84 Sale with right of return, 14
Possible obligation, 118 Segment reporting, 423
Power, 241 Segmental reporting, 455
Present obligation, 115, 118 Separate financial statements of investor, 458
Present value, 6 Service conditions (share-based payment),
Presentation & disclosure, 458 207
Presentation currency, 339 Settlement, 89
Presentation of deferred tax, 142 Settlement (share-based payment), 208, 210
Principal market, 60 Share appreciation rights, 203
Principal versus agent, 15 Share option, 199
Prior period adjustment, 454 Share-based payment, 199
Prior period errors (IAS 8), 36 arrangement, 199
Probable future economic benefits, 6 cancellation or settlement, 210
Profitability ratios, 457 deferred tax implications, 211
Profit-sharing, 80 modifications, 208
Projected unit credit method, 83 modifications, cancellations and settlements,
Property, plant and equipment, 47 208
Provision, 115 recognition, 200
transaction, 199
Share-based payment with a choice of
Q settlement, 206
Qualifying asset, 69 Short-term benefits, 79
Qualitative characteristics, 5, 6 Short-term leases, 183
Significant influence, 248
R Significant influence achieved in stages, 266
Ratio analysis, 403, 406 Significant influence lost, 289
Ratio analysis points to consider, 404, 405 simplifications under IFRS for SMEs, 458
Realisable value, 6 Single economic entity, 240
Rebuttable presumption, 9 Small and medium-sized entities (SMEs), 453
Receivable, 10 relevance of IFRS, 453
Reclassification of financial assets, 157 Social responsibility, 30
Recoverable amount, 50 Spot exchange rate, 337
Reimbursements, 116 Stakeholder, 402
Reliable estimate, 115 Stand-alone selling price, 10, 11
Remeasurement gains or losses, 84 Step acquisition, 265
Remeasurement of lease liability, 183 where control is retained, 274
Replacement (share-based payment), 211 Stewardship and management, 407
883
Structured entity, 331 Translation rules, 338, 339, 340
Subsidiaries, 241 Transparency, 414
Subsidiaries held for sale, 319 Treasury shares, 152
Subsidiary, 241
to associate, 288
U
to investment, 289
Unconsolidated structured entities, 330
to subsidiary, 274, 299
Underlying assumption, 5
Subsubsidiary moved across, 302
Unit of account, 7
Subsubsidiary moved down, 302
Unused tax credits, 140
Subsubsidiary moved up, 301
Unused tax losses, 140
Sustainability reporting, 415
T V
Value in use, 8, 50
Tax base, 128
Variable consideration, 11
tax computation, 128
Vest, 199
Tax jurisdiction, 128
Vesting conditions, 199, 201, 207
Tax written down value, 129, 132
Vesting period, 199
Taxable temporary difference, 132
Temporary differences, 131
Threats to the fundamental principles, 25 W
Transaction price, 10 Warranties, 14
Transfers to or from investment property, 67
Translation methods, 340
884
Review Form – Strategic Business Reporting (International and United
Kingdom) (02/18)
Name: Address:
How have you used this Workbook? During the past six months do you recall
(Tick one box only) seeing/receiving any of the following?
(Tick as many boxes as are relevant)
 Home study (book only)
 Our advertisement in Student Accountant
 On a course: college
 Our advertisement in Pass
 With 'correspondence' package
 Our advertisement in PQ
 Other
 Our brochure with a letter through the post
Why did you decide to purchase this
Workbook?  Our website www.bpp.com
(Tick one box only) Which (if any) aspects of our advertising
 Have used other BPP products in the past do you find useful?
(Tick as many boxes as are relevant)
 Recommendation by friend/colleague
 Prices and publication dates of new editions
 Recommendation by a lecturer at college
 Information on product content
 Saw advertising
 Facility to order books off-the-page
 Other
 None of the above
Which BPP products have you used?

Workbook Other
Kit
Your ratings, comments and suggestions would be appreciated on the following areas.
Very useful Useful Not useful
Passing SBR   
Skills Checkpoints   
Activities   
Supplementary Reading   
Overall opinion of this Workbook Excellent  Good  Adequate  Poor 
Do you intend to continue using BPP

Yes  No 
products?
The BPP author of this edition can be e-mailed at: accaqueries@bpp.com

Review Form (continued)
TELL US WHAT YOU THINK
Please note any further comments and suggestions/errors below.

Acca SBR

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Acca SBR

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Acca SBR

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the purpose of the document?

What is the purpose of the document?

What information is provided about copyright?

What information is provided about copyright?

Strategic Business Reporting

ISBN 9781 5097 1648 7 A note about copyright

Introduction to Strategic Business Reporting iv

Overall aim of the syllabus

A Fundamental ethical and professional principles

Links with other exams

Strategic Business Advanced Audit

Achieving ACCA's Study Guide Learning Outcomes

A Fundamental ethical and professional principles

A1 Professional behaviour and compliance with accounting standards Chapter 2

A2 Ethical requirements of corporate reporting and the consequences of Chapter 2

B The financial reporting framework

B1 The applications, strengths and weaknesses of an accounting Chapter 1

C Reporting the financial performance of a range of entities

C2 Non-current assets Chapter 3

C3 Financial instruments Chapter 7

C5 Employee benefits Chapter 4

C6 Income taxes Chapter 6

C7 Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period Chapter 5

C8 Share-based payment Chapter 9

C9 Fair value measurement Chapters 3, 7

C10 Reporting requirements of small and medium-sized entities (SMEs) Chapter 18

C11 Other reporting issues Chapters 1, 3, 8,

D1 Group accounting including statements of cash flows Chapters 10, 13–

D2 Associates and joint arrangements Chapters 10, 14

D3 Changes in group structures Chapters 11, 12

D4 Foreign transactions and entities Chapter 15

E Interpreting financial statements for different stakeholders

E1 Analysis and interpretation of financial information and measurement Chapter 17

F The impact of changes and potential changes in accounting regulation

F1 Discussion of solutions to current issues in financial reporting Chapter 19

Approach to examining the syllabus

Format of the exam Marks

Section Two compulsory scenario-based questions, totalling 50 marks 50

Section Two compulsory 25-mark questions 50

Specific SBR skills

Skill 1: Approaching ethical issues

STEP 2 Read the requirement and analyse it.

Skill 2: Resolving financial reporting issues

STEP 2 Read the requirement and analyse it, identifying sub-requirements.

Skill 3: Applying good consolidation techniques

STEP 2 Read and analyse the requirement.

STEP 3 Read and analyse the scenario.

STEP 4 Prepare an answer plan.

STEP 5 Write up your answer.

Skill 5: Creating effective discussion

Exam success skills

Exam success skill 1

Advice on developing Managing information

Correct interpretation of the requirements

Advice on developing correct interpretation of the requirements

Step 2 Read the rest of the question

Exam success skill 3

Answer planning: Priorities, structure and logic

Advice on developing Answer planning: Priorities, structure and logic