Scribd
Upload
141 views4 pages

Unit 6 Case PDF

This document discusses capital budgeting and introduces two potential projects - Project L and Project S - being considered by Allied Components Company. Project L involves adding a new ignition system product and has cash inflows that increase over 3 years, while Project S adds to an existing line and has decreasing cash flows. Both projects have estimated net cash flows over 3 years. The company's weighted average cost of capital is 10%. The document asks a series of questions about capital budgeting techniques like net present value, internal rate of return, modified internal rate of return, and payback period and how they would be applied to evaluate Projects L and S. It also introduces a potential third project, Project P, involving sponsoring a pavilion at the

Uploaded by

rk vamsi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
141 views4 pages

Unit 6 Case PDF

This document discusses capital budgeting and introduces two potential projects - Project L and Project S - being considered by Allied Components Company. Project L involves adding a new ignition system product and has cash inflows that increase over 3 years, while Project S adds to an existing line and has decreasing cash flows. Both projects have estimated net cash flows over 3 years. The company's weighted average cost of capital is 10%. The document asks a series of questions about capital budgeting techniques like net present value, internal rate of return, modified internal rate of return, and payback period and how they would be applied to evaluate Projects L and S. It also introduces a potential third project, Project P, involving sponsoring a pavilion at the

Uploaded by

rk vamsi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Case Unit 6

The Basics of Capital Budgeting

Allied Components Company


Basics of Capital Budgeting
You recently went to work for Allied Components Company, a supplier of auto
repair parts used in the after-market with products from Daimler, Chrysler,
Ford, and other automakers. Your boss, the chief financial officer (CFO), has
just handed you the estimated cash flows for two proposed projects. Project L
involves adding a new item to the firm’s ignition system line; it would take
some time to build up the market for this product, so the cash inflows would
increase over time. Project S involves an add-on to an existing line, and its cash
flows would decrease over time. Both projects have 3-year lives, because Allied
is planning to introduce entirely new models after 3 years.
Here are the projects’ net cash flows (in thousands of dollars):

0 1 2 3
| | | |
Project L -100 10 60 80
Project S -100 70 50 20

Depreciation, salvage values, net working capital requirements, and tax


effects are all included in these cash flows.
The CFO also made subjective risk assessments of each project, and he
concluded that both projects have risk characteristics that are similar to the
firm’s average project. Allied’s WACC is 10%. You must determine whether
one or both of the projects should be accepted.

A. What is capital budgeting? Are there any similarities between a firm’s


capital budgeting decisions and an individual’s investment decisions?

The Basics of Capital Budgeting Integrated Case 1


B. What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive
projects? Between projects with normal and nonnormal cash flows?

C. (1) Define the term net present value (NPV). What is each project’s NPV?

C. (2) What is the rationale behind the NPV method? According to NPV,
which project(s) should be accepted if they are independent?
Mutually exclusive?

C. (3) Would the NPVs change if the WACC changed? Explain.

D. (1) Define the term internal rate of return (IRR). What is each project’s
IRR?

D. (2) How is the IRR on a project related to the YTM on a bond?

D. (3) What is the logic behind the IRR method? According to IRR, which
projects should be accepted if they are independent? Mutually
exclusive?

D. (4) Would the projects’ IRRs change if the WACC changed?

E. (1) Draw NPV profiles for Projects L and S. At what discount rate do
the profiles cross?

E. (2) Look at your NPV profile graph without referring to the actual NPVs
and IRRs. Which project(s) should be accepted if they are
independent? Mutually exclusive? Explain. Are your answers
correct at any WACC less than 23.6%?

F. (1) What is the underlying cause of ranking conflicts between NPV and IRR?

2 Integrated Case The Basics of Capital Budgeting


F. (2) What is the reinvestment rate assumption, and how does it affect
the NPV versus IRR conflict?

F. (3) Which method is the best? Why?

G. (1) Define the term modified IRR (MIRR). Find the MIRRs for Projects L
and S.

G. (2) What are the MIRR’s advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis the
NPV?

H. (1) What is the payback period? Find the paybacks for Projects L and S.

H. (2) What is the rationale for the payback method? According to the
payback criterion, which project(s) should be accepted if the firm’s
maximum acceptable payback is 2 years, if Projects L and S are
independent, if Projects L and S are mutually exclusive?

H. (3) What is the difference between the regular and discounted payback
methods?

H. (4) What are the two main disadvantages of discounted payback? Is the
payback method of any real usefulness in capital budgeting decisions?
Explain.

I. As a separate project (Project P), the firm is considering sponsoring


a pavilion at the upcoming World’s Fair. The pavilion would cost
$800,000, and it is expected to result in $5 million of incremental
cash inflows during its 1 year of operation. However, it would then
take another year, and $5 million of costs, to demolish the site and
return it to its original condition. Thus, Project P’s expected net
cash flows look like this (in millions of dollars):

The Basics of Capital Budgeting Integrated Case 3


0 1 2
| | |
-0.8 5.0 -5.0

The project is estimated to be of average risk, so its WACC is 10%.

I. (1) What is Project P’s NPV? What is its IRR? Its MIRR?

I. (2) Draw Project P’s NPV profile. Does Project P have normal or
nonnormal cash flows? Should this project be accepted? Explain.

4 Integrated Case The Basics of Capital Budgeting

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy