Product Thinking vs. Project Thinking
Product Thinking vs. Project Thinking
Product Thinking vs. Project Thinking
Project Thinking
Kyle Evans Following
Oct 22, 2018 · 8 min read
Project Thinking
This kind of thinking can be quite the shift, especially for folks who
have spent a lot of time focused on projects and project management.
Many people are uncomfortable with the uncertainty of not having
structured timelines and schedules that they can monitor on a regular
basis.
The Benefits
That is where project thinking gets us into all sorts of trouble. Once we
set a plan in motion, it can be very difficult, especially in larger
organizations, to pivot and change. Once dates have been put in place
and everyone has agreed on a plan, that is usually what sticks in
everyone’s minds, despite our best efforts to learn and adapt. And if we
end up missing a date, it can cause incredible issues for teams and
businesses.
But with a product mindset, we are able to learn and adapt as we go. We
aren’t set on dates and milestones, but rather are focused on learning
and achieving the outcome. If something doesn’t work out or customers
don’t respond well to one thing, we can take that into account, adapt,
and still work toward the outcome we had intended without blowing
up a beautiful plan that is everyone’s focus.
Crucially, when problems arise (and don’t kid yourself, they always will
arise), product thinking allows us to learn and adapt, and stay focused
on the outcome we’re trying to achieve. In contrast, when problems
arise and we’re stuck in project thinking with its focus on the timeline,
we will often get sucked into endless meetings trying to determine why
our initial guesses were wrong and how do we get back on schedule.
This ultimately leads to sacrifices in quality, work-life balance, and the
outcome since we need to stay focused on delivering the output we
initially agreed on (regardless if that is still the right thing to do).
A Project Example
We’ve been talking about a lot of concepts, so let’s take a look at some
examples to better illustrate these points.
Our house was off by about a week, which feels like a bulls-eye in my
opinion. One of the trades was delayed in getting their work done, so
that set things back a few days, which had some ripple effects. But that
is fine. It’s expected.
A Product Example
No, it doesn’t.
We would have never come to this solution with project thinking. This
solution came about because I was focused on the problem and the
outcome (getting additional users on our application) rather than
building the next feature.
The key is to make commitments and project plans only at a point when
we can do it with a high degree of confidence. So rather than
committing to a specific path beforehand, we commit once we’ve
validated what we’re doing and have had a chance to really understand
what it will take. Often that is a sprint or two into the work. That may
feel really late in the process, but it is at the point when estimates and
plans can actually mean something. Marty Cagan, in his book Inspired:
How to Create Tech Products People Love, calls this type of commitment a
“high-integrity commitment.” We allow teams time to do proper
discovery and research before asking for commitments.
And we also need to help others realize the benefit of product thinking.
There is a reason many folks ask for dates and timelines. Part of it is
because of old habits. But there are times when it is necessary for
business and budgets. So we need to understand what the job of the
timeline is in those cases. If it is to help sell the product, we should turn
the focus from specific features to the higher level story. If it is to
manage risk, maybe we need to help folks understand that the real risk
isn’t missing a date, it’s missing the mark completely on what value
we’re trying to deliver.
. . .