MGB MC 2000-33

March 24, 2000
MGB MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR NO. 2000 – 33
TO : All Division Chiefs, MGB Central Office and

Regional Directors, Mines and Geosciences
Bureau
FROM : The Director
SUBJECT : Guidelines and Outline/Checklist for the

Preparation of an Engineering Geological
and Geohazard Assessment Report (EGGAR)
as per DAO No. 2000-28
Pursuant to DAO No. 2000-28 – “Implementing Guidelines

on Engineering Geological and Geohazard Assessment as
Additional Requirement for ECC Applications covering
Subdivision, Housing and other Land Development and
Infrastructure Projects” the following guidelines and checklist for
the preparation of an Engineering Geological and Geohazard
Assessment Report (EGGAR) are hereby implemented:
1.0 General Guidelines
As a general rule, the EGGAR must be a product of

independent geologic mapping of the project area at an
appropriate scale and in sufficient detail to yield a maximum return
of pertinent data. In connection with this objective, it may be
necessary for the private geologist or engineer conducting the
Engineering Geological and Geohazard Assessment (EGGA) to
extend his mapping into adjacent areas. Index /Location Maps are
thus always required.
All mapping should be done on a base with sufficient and

satisfactory horizontal and vertical control, such as, in general, a
detailed Topographic Map (with a Bathymetric Map for
coastal/foreshore areas). The nature and source of the base map
used should be specifically indicated. For subdivisions and other
land development projects, the base map should as much as
1
possible be the same as that to be used for the tentative site
development map or the grading plan map.
Mapping should give careful attention to the lithology, structural

elements, and three-dimensional distribution of the earth materials
exposed or inferred within the area. In most hillside areas and
sloping terrain, these materials shall include both bedrock and
surficial deposits. A clear distinction should be made between
observed and inferred geologic features and relationships.
A detailed large-scale map (1:10 scale or better) normally shall

be required for an EGGAR covering a small area (less that five
hectares), especially when the geologic relationships are not
simple. Where three- dimensional relationships are significant but
cannot be described satisfactorily in words alone, the report should
always be accompanied by several appropriately positioned
geologic/structural cross sections.
In case no sufficient exposures or outcrops within or near the

vicinity of the project site are available, geologic characterization of
the soil profile and underlying bedrock may be done thru
representative test pits or test boreholes for stratigraphic/lithologic
sampling and observations only, and not for geotechnical
foundation design purposes. The locations of any test pits or
stratigraphic holes and other specific sources of subsurface
information should be indicated in the text of the report and, on the
maps and the representative cross-sections that are submitted
with the EGGAR.
For projects located within sloping terrain that shall require a

significant alteration of the existing slopes and local
topography/drainage, the proposed Grading Plan and Map should
be submitted as part of the EGGAR. The Grading Plan and Map
should at least conform with that as required under the
Engineering Geology Report (Geologic Grading Report) as per
Chapter 8 - Grading and Earthworks of the National Structural
Code of the Philippines (1992).
For projects located along or within the coastal or foreshore

areas that shall require a significant alteration of the morphology of
the coastline/beach or the bathymetry of the foreshore area, a
more detailed EGGA checklist and guidelines should be referred to
the Marine Geological Survey Division of the MGB Central Office.
2
The results of any such detailed assessment should be
incorporated in the EGGAR.
All materials presented in the EGGAR should be relevant to the

purpose of the study. All statements should be documented by
references and by accurate field observations. Aerial photographs
and other remotely sensed imageries (original prints or suitable
copies), if available, should be included to document any
discussion. Finally, the method(s) of field analysis should be
discussed in a clear manner.
2.0 EGGAR Outline and Checklist
The EGGAR should specifically contain the following

information:
2.1 General Information

A. Project Description (with site plan that is properly located on
a topographic map)
B. Location with inclusive coordinates (longitude, latitude), size
of project area and its general setting with respect to major
landmarks (e.g., major highway, volcano, lake, etc.)
C. Methodology
D. Nature and source of information. Suitable explanations
should provide any technical reviewer with the means for
assessing the probable reliability of such data.
2.2 Regional Setting

A. Geologic setting (with map of 1:50,000 scale and
representative cross-sections passing through the project
site)
1. Tectonic setting (with map of appropriate scale showing
all relevant tectonic features)
2. Stratigraphy
3. Structural Geology
B. Geomorphology
C. Climate (including rainfall data) and vegetation
D. Abundance, distribution and general nature of exposures
within the area
2.3 Site Geology

(with geologic map of project site and immediate vicinity in the
scale range of 1:100 to 1:10,000 showing all the features that
3
can have impact on the project, with corresponding cross-
sections, drawn to scale)
A. Topography
(with appropriate index map and base map showing existing
topography, slopes, elevation, drainages, roads, etc.)
B. Hydrology
1. Distribution and occurrence
2. Relationship to topography
3. Relationship to geologic features (e.g., pervious strata,
fractures, faults)
4. Sources and permanence of water (e,g., permanent
streams and rivers, canals, floods)
5. Evidence for previous occurrence of water at the site
(e.g., buried stream channel, diverted channel)
6. Effect of water on the materials
7. Depth to water table
C. Bedrock lithology
1. Identification as to rock type
2. Relative age, and where possible, formational name
3. Distribution
4. Dimension features, where applicable (e.g., thickness,
outcrop breadth, vertical extent)
5. Physical characteristics (e.g., color, grain size*, nature of
stratification, hardness*, coherence*, calcareous or
siliceous cement, concretions, mineral deposits, alteration
other than weathering)
6. Degree of weathering*
7. Response to surface and near surface processes (e.g.,
gullying, erosion, mass movement)
D. Surficial deposits (e.g., topsoil, artificial fill, stream-laid

alluvium, swamp accumulations, etc.)
1. Identification of material as to general type
2. Distribution, occurrence and stratigraphic position
3. Relationship with present topography
4. Dimensional characteristics, where applicable (e.g.,
thickness, variations in thickness)
5. Physical characteristics* (e.g., color, alteration, presence
of moisture, cracks and fissures, mineral deposits,
evidence of expansible clays and/or free draining soil)
4
6. Response to surface and near surface processes (e.g.,
gullying, erosion, mass movement)
E. Structural features
1. Types of structures
2. Occurrence and distribution
3. Relative ages (where pertinent)
4. Characteristics* (e.g., orientation, dimension, spacing,
continuity, persistency, roughness, thickness and nature
of in-fill)
5. Specific features of faults (e.g., nature and timing of
movement, zones of gouge and breccia, activity)
* Based on ASTM/AASHTO/USCS standards
2.4 Hazard Assessment

A. Geologic Hazard
1. Fault related/Seismic hazards
a. ground acceleration
b. ground rupture
c. liquefaction
d. differential settlement
e. landslides
f. fault creep
g. lateral spread
h. tsunami
i. seiche
2. Mass Movements
a. Landslides
a.l. Fall
a.2. Topple
a.3. Slump
a.4. Slide
a.5. Spread
a.6. Flow
a.7. Complex
b. Creep
c. Subsidence
d. Settlement
3. Volcanic Hazards
a. Lava flow
b. Debris flow
c. Pyroclastic flow
5
d. Debris avalanche
e. Lahar
f. Lateral blast and pyroclastic surge
g. Bombs and ballistic projectiles
h. Ash fall
i. Tsunami
j. Flooding
k. Volcanic gases
l. Volcanic earthquakes
B. Hydrological Hazard
1. Fluvial
a. Flooding (Overflow)
b. Flooding (Sheetflow, concentrated run-off)
c. Scouring of riverbed
d. Channel erosion and migration
e. Rill erosion
f. Gully erosion
g. Sedimentation
2. Coastal Hazards (to be referred to the Marine geological
Survey Division – C.O. in cases of major infrastructure
and coastal projects)
a. Flooding
b. Coastal erosion
c. Tsunami
d. Storm surge
e. Coastal subsidence/sea level rise
f. Submarine landslide
2.5 Conclusions and Recommendations

A. Further assessment work or specialized studies needed
(such as, geophysical characterization of bedrock for
sinkholes/caverns, microseismic zoning or seismic risk
assessment, flood frequency assessment, slope
stability/liquefaction potential studies, geotechnical
evaluation & engineering tests, erosion and sediment
transport/budget studies, hydrogeologic modelling, etc.);
B. Mitigating measures (for site planning/realignment of
structures, during construction excavation/earthworks, for the
design of engineered structure, drainage and slope
stabilization controls, selection and rehabilitation of spoils
disposal/dump sites, etc.);
6
C. Monitoring (such as regular inspection or measurements
during the construction stage-excavation/earthworks and
grading activities to detect any soil creep, slumping,
subsidence, differential settlement, erosion, siltation,
sedimentation, flooding, landsliding, etc.)
Maps and Documents to be part of the EGGAR (minimum

requirements):
1. Regional Geologic Map (with regional cross section)

2. Site Geologic Map (with representative cross sections and
Index Map)
3. Stratigraphic Column
4. Relevant Hazard Map (see Section IV)
5. Engineering Geologic Map
Recommended References:
“Recommended Guidelines for Preparing Engineering Geologic
Reports” (1972) by the California Division of Mines and Geology in
The Resources Agency.
“Chapter 8 - Grading and Earthworks”, National Structural

Code of the Philippines (1992) by the Association of Structural
Engineers of the Philippines (ASEP).
“Supporting Volume A – Hazards”, Baguio (URBAN-BLIST)

Urban Planning Project (1994) by the National Economic and
Development Authority (NEDA).
The above guidelines and outline/checklist are to be generally

followed in geological site scoping by MGB, in the preparation of
an EGGAR by private licensed geologists or engineers and in the
review/verification of EGGAR or an equivalent engineering
geological technical report submitted to MGB.
For immediate compliance upon the effectivity of DAO No.

2000-28.
(Sgd.) HORACIO C. RAMOS

Director

MGB MC 2000-33

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MGB MC 2000-33

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

MGB MC 2000-33

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

March 24, 2000

MGB MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR NO. 2000 – 33

TO : All Division Chiefs, MGB Central Office and

FROM : The Director

SUBJECT : Guidelines and Outline/Checklist for the

Pursuant to DAO No. 2000-28 – “Implementing Guidelines

1.0 General Guidelines

As a general rule, the EGGAR must be a product of

All mapping should be done on a base with sufficient and

Mapping should give careful attention to the lithology, structural

A detailed large-scale map (1:10 scale or better) normally shall

In case no sufficient exposures or outcrops within or near the

For projects located within sloping terrain that shall require a

For projects located along or within the coastal or foreshore

All materials presented in the EGGAR should be relevant to the

2.0 EGGAR Outline and Checklist

The EGGAR should specifically contain the following

2.1 General Information

2.2 Regional Setting

2.3 Site Geology

D. Surficial deposits (e.g., topsoil, artificial fill, stream-laid

* Based on ASTM/AASHTO/USCS standards

2.4 Hazard Assessment

2.5 Conclusions and Recommendations

Maps and Documents to be part of the EGGAR (minimum

1. Regional Geologic Map (with regional cross section)

“Chapter 8 - Grading and Earthworks”, National Structural

“Supporting Volume A – Hazards”, Baguio (URBAN-BLIST)

The above guidelines and outline/checklist are to be generally

For immediate compliance upon the effectivity of DAO No.

(Sgd.) HORACIO C. RAMOS

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.