Passive and Active Voices

Verbs are also said to be either active (The executive committee approved the new
policy) or passive (The new policy was approved by the executive committee) in voice.
In the active voice, the subject and verb relationship is straightforward: the subject is a
be-er or a do-er and the verb moves the sentence along. In the passive voice, the subject
of the sentence is neither a do-er or a be-er, but is acted upon by some other agent or by
something unnamed (The new policy was approved). Computerized grammar checkers
can pick out a passive voice construction from miles away and ask you to revise it to a
more active construction. There is nothing inherently wrong with the passive voice, but if
you can say the same thing in the active mode, do so (see exceptions below). Your text
will have more pizzazz as a result, since passive verb constructions tend to lie about in
their pajamas and avoid actual work.

We find an overabundance of the passive voice in sentences created by self-protective

business interests, magniloquent educators, and bombastic military writers (who must get
weary of this accusation), who use the passive voice to avoid responsibility for actions
taken. Thus "Cigarette ads were designed to appeal especially to children" places the
burden on the ads — as opposed to "We designed the cigarette ads to appeal especially to
children," in which "we" accepts responsibility. At a White House press briefing we
might hear that "The President was advised that certain members of Congress were being
audited" rather than "The Head of the Internal Revenue service advised the President that
her agency was auditing certain members of Congress" because the passive construction
avoids responsibility for advising and for auditing. One further caution about the passive
voice: we should not mix active and passive constructions in the same sentence: "The
executive committee approved the new policy, and the calendar for next year's meetings
was revised" should be recast as "The executive committee approved the new policy and
revised the calendar for next year's meeting."

Take the quiz (below) as an exercise in recognizing and changing passive verbs.

The passive voice does exist for a reason, however, and its presence is not always to be
despised. The passive is particularly useful (even recommended) in two situations:

• When it is more important to draw our attention to the person or thing acted
upon: The unidentified victim was apparently struck during the early morning
hours.
• When the actor in the situation is not important: The aurora borealis can be
observed in the early morning hours.

The passive voice is especially helpful (and even regarded as mandatory) in scientific or
technical writing or lab reports, where the actor is not really important but the process or
principle being described is of ultimate importance. Instead of writing "I poured 20 cc of
acid into the beaker," we would write "Twenty cc of acid is/was poured into the beaker."
The passive voice is also useful when describing, say, a mechanical process in which the
details of process are much more important than anyone's taking responsibility for the
action: "The first coat of primer paint is applied immediately after the acid rinse."

We use the passive voice to good effect in a paragraph in which we wish to shift
emphasis from what was the object in a first sentence to what becomes the subject in
subsequent sentences.

The executive committee approved an entirely new policy for dealing with academic
suspension and withdrawal. The policy had been written by a subcommittee on student
behavior. If students withdraw from course work before suspension can take effect, the
policy states, a mark of "IW" . . . .

The paragraph is clearly about this new policy so it is appropriate that policy move from
being the object in the first sentence to being the subject of the second sentence. The
passive voice allows for this transition.†

Passive Verb Formation

The passive forms of a verb are created by combining a form of the "to be verb" with the
past participle of the main verb. Other helping verbs are also sometimes present: "The
measure could have been killed in committee." The passive can be used, also, in various
tenses. Let's take a look at the passive forms of "design."

Auxiliary Past
Tense Subject
Singular Plural Participle
Present The car/cars is are designed.
Present perfect The car/cars has been have been designed.
Past The car/cars was were designed.
Past perfect The car/cars had been had been designed.
Future The car/cars will be will be designed.
Future perfect The car/cars will have been will have been designed.
Present progressive The car/cars is being are being designed.
Past progressive The car/cars was being were being designed.

A sentence cast in the passive voice will not always include an agent of the action. For
instance if a gorilla crushes a tin can, we could say "The tin can was crushed by the
gorilla." But a perfectly good sentence would leave out the gorilla: "The tin can was
crushed." Also, when an active sentence with an indirect object is recast in the passive,
the indirect object can take on the role of subject in the passive sentence:

Active Professor Villa gave Jorge an A.

Passive An A was given to Jorge by Professor Villa.
Passive Jorge was given an A.

Only transitive verbs (those that take objects) can be transformed into passive
constructions. Furthermore, active sentences containing certain verbs cannot be
transformed into passive structures. To have is the most important of these verbs. We can
say "He has a new car," but we cannot say "A new car is had by him." We can say
"Josefina lacked finesse," but we cannot say "Finesse was lacked." Here is a brief list of
such verbs*:

resemble look like equal agree with

mean contain hold comprise
lack suit fit become

Verbals in Passive Structures

Verbals or verb forms can also take on features of the passive voice. An infinitive
phrase in the passive voice, for instance, can perform various functions within a
sentence (just like the active forms of the infinitive).

• Subject: To be elected by my peers is a great honor.

• Object: That child really likes to be read to by her mother.
• Modifier: Grasso was the first woman to be elected governor in her own right.

The same is true of passive gerunds.

• Subject: Being elected by my peers was a great thrill.

• Object: I really don't like being lectured to by my boss.
• Object of preposition: I am so tired of being lectured to by my boss.

With passive participles, part of the passive construction is often omitted, the result
being a simple modifying participial phrase.

• [Having been] designed for off-road performance, the Pathseeker does not always
behave well on paved highways.
Use of Passive
Passive voice is used when the focus is on the action. It is not important or not known,
however, who or what is performing the action.

Example: My bike was stolen.

In the example above, the focus is on the fact that my bike was stolen. I do not know,
however, who did it.

Sometimes a statement in passive is more polite than active voice, as the following
example shows:

Example: A mistake was made.

In this case, I focus on the fact that a mistake was made, but I do not blame anyone (e.g.
You have made a mistake.).

Form of Passive
Subject + finite form of to be + Past Participle (3rd column of irregular verbs)

Example: A letter was written.

When rewriting active sentences in passive voice, note the following:

• the object of the active sentence becomes the subject of the passive sentence
• the finite form of the verb is changed (to be + past participle)
• the subject of the active sentence becomes the object of the passive sentence (or is
dropped)

Examples of Passive Level: lower intermediate

Tense Subject Verb Object
Active: Rita writes a letter.
Simple Present
Passive: A letter is written by Rita.
Active: Rita wrote a letter.
Simple Past
Passive: A letter was written by Rita.
Active: Rita has written a letter.
Present Perfect
Passive: A letter has been written by Rita.
Active: Rita will write a letter.
Future I
Passive: A letter will be written by Rita.
Active: Rita can write a letter.
Hilfsverben
Passive: A letter can be written by Rita.
Examples of Passive Level: upper intermediate
Tense Subject Verb Object
Active: Rita is writing a letter.
Present
Passive
Progressive A letter is being written by Rita.
:
Active: Rita was writing a letter.
Past Progressive Passive
A letter was being written by Rita.
:
Active: Rita had written a letter.
Past Perfect Passive
A letter had been written by Rita.
:
Active: Rita will have written a letter.
Future II Passive
A letter will have been written by Rita.
:
Active: Rita would write a letter.
Conditional I Passive
A letter would be written by Rita.
:
Active: Rita would have written a letter.
Conditional II Passive
A letter would have been written by Rita.
:

Passive Sentences with Two Objects Level: intermediate

Rewriting an active sentence with two objects in passive voice means that one of the two
objects becomes the subject, the other one remains an object. Which object to transform
into a subject depends on what you want to put the focus on.

Subject Verb Object 1 Object 2

Active: Rita wrote a letter to me.
Passive: A letter was written to me by Rita.
Passive: I was written a letter by Rita.
.

As you can see in the examples, adding by Rita does not sound very elegant. That’s why
it is usually dropped.

Personal and Impersonal Passive

Personal Passive simply means that the object of the active sentence becomes the subject
of the passive sentence. So every verb that needs an object (transitive verb) can form a
personal passive.
Example: They build houses. – Houses are built.

Verbs without an object (intransitive verb) normally cannot form a personal passive
sentence (as there is no object that can become the subject of the passive sentence). If you
want to use an intransitive verb in passive voice, you need an impersonal construction –
therefore this passive is called Impersonal Passive.

Example: he says – it is said

Impersonal Passive is not as common in English as in some other languages (e.g.

German, Latin). In English, Impersonal Passive is only possible with verbs of perception
(e. g. say, think, know).

Example: They say that women live longer than men. – It is said that women live longer
than men.

Although Impersonal Passive is possible here, Personal Passive is more common.

Example: They say that women live longer than men. – Women are said to live longer
than men.

The subject of the subordinate clause (women) goes to the beginning of the sentence; the
verb of perception is put into passive voice. The rest of the sentence is added using an
infinitive construction with 'to' (certain auxiliary verbs and that are dropped).

Sometimes the term Personal Passive is used in English lessons if the indirect object of
an active sentence is to become the subject of the passive sentence.

Passive Voice
The passive voice is less usual than the active voice. The active voice is the "normal"
voice. But sometimes we need the passive voice. In this lesson we look at how to
construct the passive voice, when to use it and how to conjugate it.

Construction of the Passive Voice

The structure of the passive voice is very simple:

subject + auxiliary verb (be) + main verb (past participle)

The main verb is always in its past participle form.

Look at these examples:

 auxiliary verb (to main verb (past
subject
be) participle)

Water is drunk by everyone.

100 people are employed by this company.

I am paid in euro.

We are not paid in dollars.

Are they paid in yen?

Use of the Passive Voice

We use the passive when:

• we want to make the active object more important

• we do not know the active subject

subject verb object

give importance to active object President by Lee Harvey

was killed
(President Kennedy) Kennedy Oswald.

has been
active subject unknown My wallet ?
stolen.

Note that we always use by to introduce the passive object (Fish are eaten by cats).

Look at this sentence:

• He was killed with a gun.

Normally we use by to introduce the passive

object. But the gun is not the active subject.
The gun did not kill him. He was killed by
somebody with a gun. In the active voice, it
would be: Somebody killed him with a gun.
The gun is the instrument. Somebody is the
"agent" or "doer".
Conjugation for the Passive Voice
We can form the passive in any tense. In fact, conjugation of verbs in the passive tense is
rather easy, as the main verb is always in past participle form and the auxiliary verb is
always be. To form the required tense, we conjugate the auxiliary verb. So, for example:

• present simple: It is made

• present continuous: It is being made
• present perfect: It has been made

Here are some examples with most of the possible tenses:

infinitive to be washed

present It is washed.

past It was washed.

simple
future It will be washed.

conditional It would be washed.

present It is being washed.

past It was being washed.

continuous
future It will be being washed.

conditional It would be being washed.

present It has been washed.

past It had been washed.

perfect simple
future It will have been washed.

conditional It would have been washed.

present It has been being washed.

past It had been being washed.

perfect continuous
future It will have been being washed.

conditional It would have been being washed.

The passive voice is used when focusing on the person or thing affected by an action.

• The Passive is formed: Passive Subject + To Be + Past Particple

The house was built in 1989.

• It is often used in business when the object of the action is more important than
those who perform the action.

For Example:

We have produced over 20 different models in the past two years. Changes to:
Over 20 different models have been produced in the past two years.

• If the agent is important (the person, company or thing that does the action) , use
"by"

For Example: Tim Wilson wrote "The Flight to Brunnswick" in 1987. Changes
to:"The Flight to Brunnswick" was written in 1987 by Tim Wilson.

• Only verbs that take an object can be used in the passive voice.

Passive Voice Structure

Active Passive Time Reference
They make Fords in Cologne. Fords are made in Cologne. Present Simple
Susan is cooking dinner. Dinner is being cooked by Susan Present Continuous
"Dubliners" was written by
James Joyce wrote "Dubliners". Past Simple
James Joyces.
They were painting the house The house was being painted
Past Continuous
when I arrived. when I arrived.
They have produced over 20 Over 20 models have been
Present Perfect
models in the past two years. produced in the past two years.
They are going to build a new A new factory is going to be built Future Intention
factory in Portland. in Portland. with Going to
I will finish it tomorrow. It will be finished tomorrow. Future Simple

English passive voice

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the passive voice in English. For the passive voice generally,
including its use in other languages, see Passive voice.
English grammar series
English grammar
 • Contraction
• Disputes in English grammar
• English compound
• English honorifics
• English personal pronouns
• English plural
• English relative clauses
• English verbs
o English conjugation tables
o English irregular verbs
o English modal verb

• Gender in English
This box: view • talk • edit

In the English language, the passive voice is a grammatical voice wherein a transitive
verb acts upon the subject, emphasizing the action rather than the actor or actrix.
Generally, the terms passive and passive verb denote verbs using this construction and
the passive-voice passages using them;[1] a passive verb is periphrastic, composed of an
auxiliary verb plus the past participle of the transitive verb; the auxiliary verb usually is a
form of to be or to get. The passive voice is applicable to many tenses; transforming an
active verb into a passive verb is passivization, a valence-decreasing process
(“detranzitivizing process”), because it transforms transitive verbs into Intransitive verbs.
[2]

Functional comparison — in this excerpt from the 18th-century United States

Declaration of Independence (1776), the bold text identifies the passive verbs; italicized
text identifies the active verb hold and the copulative verb are:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are
endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life,
Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

In this case, the actor (“the Creator”) of a passive verb can be identified with a by phrase.
When such a phrase is missing, the construction is an agentless passive; this construction
is used in official writing for being less confrontational, e.g. when an employee is
dismissed (fired) from his or her job.

Scientific writing also uses agentless passives to achieve the objective, detached
description of processes, thus:

The mixture was heated to 300°C.

without identifying the actor or actrix. Nonetheless, this style of passive scientific writing
is not universal, US organizations such as The Council of Biology Editors, advocate
direct, active-voice scientific writing.[3] Elsewhere, an entrenched use is the double
passive construction used in American court reporting.[1] The active voice is the dominant
usage in written and spoken English, and writers, such as George Orwell, in the essay
“Politics and the English Language” (1946), and William Strunk, Jr. and E.B. White, in
The Elements of Style (1919), recommend minimal usage of the passive voice; however,
the passive voice is useful when the object (receiver of the action) is more important than
the subject (actor).[4]

Contents
[hide]

• 1 Usage and style

o 1.1 Against the passive voice
o 1.2 For the passive voice
• 2 Passive constructions
o 2.1 Canonical passives
o 2.2 Promotion of other objects
o 2.3 Promotion of content clauses
o 2.4 Stative passives
o 2.5 Adjectival passives
o 2.6 Passives without active counterparts
o 2.7 Double passives
o 2.8 Other passive constructions
 2.8.1 Past participle alone
 2.8.2 Ergative verbs
 2.8.3 Reflexive verbs
 2.8.4 Gerunds and nominalization
• 3 Misapplication of the term

• 4 Notes

[edit] Usage and style

[edit] Against the passive voice

Most language critics and language usage manuals discourage the passive voice,[4] advice
usually not in older guides, but the recommendation emerged in the first half of the
twentieth century.[5] In 1916, the British writer Arthur Quiller-Couch, criticized this
grammatical voice:

Generally, use transitive verbs, that strike their object; and use them in the active voice,
eschewing the stationary passive, with its little auxiliary its’s and was’s, and its
participles getting into the light of your adjectives, which should be few. For, as a rough
law, by his use of the straight verb and by his economy of adjectives you can tell a man’s
style, if it be masculine or neuter, writing or ‘composition’. [6]

Two years later, in 1918, in The Elements of Style Cornell University Professor of
English William Strunk, Jr. recommended against excessive use of the passive voice:

The active voice is usually more direct and vigorous than the passive . . . This rule does
not, of course, mean that the writer should entirely discard the passive voice, which is
frequently convenient and sometimes necessary . . . The need to make a particular word
the subject of the sentence will often . . . determine which voice is to be used. The
habitual use of the active voice, however, makes for forcible writing. This is true not only
in narrative concerned principally with action, but in writing of any kind. Many a tame
sentence of description or exposition can be made lively and emphatic by substituting a
transitive in the active voice for some such perfunctory expression as there is or could be
heard.[7]

In 1926, in the authoritative A Dictionary of Modern English Usage (1926), Henry W.

Fowler recommended against transforming active voice forms into passive voice forms,
because doing so “sometimes leads to bad grammar, false idiom, or clumsiness”.[8][9]

In 1946, in the essay “Politics and the English Language” (1946), George Orwell
recommended the active voice as an elementary principle of composition: “Never use the
passive where you can use the active”. In 1993, the The Columbia Guide to Standard
American English (1993) states that the:

Active voice makes subjects do something (to something); passive voice permits subjects
to have something done to them (by someone or something). Some argue that active
voice is more muscular, direct, and succinct, passive voice flabbier, more indirect, and
wordier. If you want your words to seem impersonal, indirect, and noncommittal, passive
is the choice, but otherwise, active voice is almost invariably likely to prove more
effective.[10]

[edit] For the passive voice

Jan Freeman, a reporter for The Boston Globe, said that the passive voice does its uses,
that “all good writers use the passive voice”.[11] “Politics and the English Language”
(1946) is an example of minimal passive voice writing, because only about 20 per cent is
passive;[4] passive writing is not necessarily slack and indirect:

• Every valley shall be exalted, and every mountain and hill shall be made low; and
the crooked shall be made straight, and the rough places plain. (King James Bible,
Isaiah 40:4)
• Now is the winter of our discontent / Made glorious summer by this sun of York.
(Richard III, I.1, ll. 1–2)
• For of those to whom much is given, much is required. (John F. Kennedy's
address to the Massachusetts legislature, 9 January 1961.)[12]
 • Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.
(Winston Churchill addressing the House of Commons, 20 August 1940.)

Merriam–Webster's Dictionary of English Usage (1994) recommends the passive voice

when identifying the object (receiver) of the action is more important than the subject
(actor, actrix), and when the actor is unknown, unimportant, or not worth mentioning:

• The child was struck by the car.

• The store was robbed last night.
• Plows should not be kept in the garage.
• Kennedy was elected president.[4]

The passive voice also changes the emphasis of a sentence, such as modifying an adverb
or the actor: “The breakthrough was achieved by Burlingame and Evans, two researchers
in the university’s genetic engineering lab.”[13] The passive voice is anonymous: “We had
hoped to report on this problem, but the data were inadvertently deleted from our files”;
hence the principal criticism against the passive voice is its evasion of responsibility; see
weasel words.[13][4][13]

[edit] Passive constructions

This section needs additional citations for verification.
Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be
challenged and removed. (September 2009)

In general, the passive voice is used to place focus on the grammatical patient, rather than
the agent. This often occurs when the patient is the topic of the sentence. However, the
passive voice can also be used when the focus is on the agent.

[edit] Canonical passives

Passive constructions have a range of meanings and uses. The canonical use is to map a
clause with a direct object to a corresponding clause where the direct object has become
the subject. For example:

• John threw the ball.

Here threw is a transitive verb with John as its subject and the ball as its direct object. If
we recast the verb in the passive voice (was thrown), then the ball becomes the subject (it
is "promoted" to the subject position) and John disappears:

• The ball was thrown.

The original "demoted" subject can typically be re-inserted using the preposition by.

• The ball was thrown by John.

[edit] Promotion of other objects

One non-canonical use of English's passive is to promote an object other than a direct
object. It is usually possible in English to promote indirect objects as well. For example:

• John gave Mary a book. → Mary was given a book.

• John gave Mary a book. → Mary was given a book by John.

In the active form, gave is the verb; John is its subject, Mary its indirect object, and a
book its direct object. In the passive forms, the indirect object has been promoted and the
direct object has been left in place. (In "A book was given to Mary", the direct object is
promoted and the indirect object left in place. In this respect, English resembles
dechticaetiative languages.)

It is also possible, in some cases, to promote the object of a preposition:

• They talked about the problem. → The problem was talked about.

In the passive form here, the preposition is "stranded"; that is, it is not followed by an
object. (See Preposition stranding.)

[edit] Promotion of content clauses

It is possible to promote a content clause that serves as a direct object. In this case,
however, it typically does not change its position in the sentence, and an expletive it takes
the normal subject position:

• They say that he left. → It is said that he left.

[edit] Stative passives

The passives described above are all eventive (or dynamic) passives. Stative (or static, or
resultative) passives also exist in English; rather than describing an action, they describe
the result of an action. English does not usually distinguish between the two. For
example:

• The window was broken.

This sentence has two different meanings, roughly the following:

• [Someone] broke the window.

• The window was not intact.

The former meaning represents the canonical, eventive passive; the latter, the stative
passive. (The terms eventive and stative/resultative refer to the tendencies of these forms
to describe events and resultant states, respectively. The terms can be misleading,
however, as the canonical passive of a stative verb is not a stative passive, even though it
describes a state.)

Some verbs do not form stative passives. In some cases, this is because distinct adjectives
exist for this purpose, such as with the verb open:

• The door was opened. → [Someone] opened the door.

• The door was open. → The door was in the open state.

[edit] Adjectival passives

Adjectival passives are not true passives; they occur when a participial adjective (an
adjective derived from a participle) is used predicatively (see Adjective). For example:

• She was relieved to find her car undamaged.

Here, relieved is an ordinary adjective, though it derives from the past participle of
relieve,[14] and that past participle may be used in canonical passives:

• He was relieved of duty.

In some cases, the line between an adjectival passive and a stative passive may be
unclear.

[edit] Passives without active counterparts

In a few cases, passive constructions retain all the sense of the passive voice, but do not
have immediate active counterparts. For example:

• He was rumored to be a war veteran. ← *[Someone] rumored him to be a war

veteran.

(The asterisk here denotes an ungrammatical construction.) Similarly:

• It was rumored that he was a war veteran. ← *[Someone] rumored that he was a
war veteran.

In both of these examples, the active counterpart was once possible, but has fallen out of
use.

[edit] Double passives

It is possible for a verb in the passive voice—especially an object-raising verb—to take

an infinitive complement that is also in the passive voice:

• The project is expected to be completed in the next year.

Commonly, either or both verbs may be moved into the active voice:

• [Someone] expects the project to be completed in the next year.

• [Someone] is expected to complete the project in the next year.
• [Someone] expects [someone] to complete the project in the next year.

In some cases, a similar construction may occur with a verb that is not object-raising in
the active voice:

• ?The project will be attempted to be completed in the next year. ← *[Someone]

will attempt the project to be completed in the next year. ← [Someone] will
attempt to complete the project in the next year.

(The question mark here denotes a questionably-grammatical construction.) In this

example, the object of the infinitive has been promoted to the subject of the main verb,
and both the infinitive and the main verb have been moved to the passive voice. The
American Heritage Book of English Usage declares this unacceptable,[15] but it is
nonetheless attested in a variety of contexts.[16]

[edit] Other passive constructions

[edit] Past participle alone

Although the passive voice, when used in the predicate verb of a complete sentence,
requires the past participle to be accompanied by a form of be or another auxiliary verb,
the past participle alone usually carries passive force; the auxiliary verb can therefore be
omitted in certain circumstances:

• Couple found slain; Murder-suicide suspected.[17]

• The problem, unless dealt with, will only get worse.
• A person struck by lightning has a high chance of survival.

[edit] Ergative verbs

Main article: Ergative verb

An ergative verb is a verb that may be either transitive or intransitive, and whose subject
when it is intransitive plays the same semantic role as its direct object when it is
transitive. For example, fly is an ergative verb, such that the following sentences are
roughly synonymous:

• The airplane flew.

• The airplane was flown.
• [Someone] flew the airplane.

One major difference is that the intransitive construction does not permit an agent to be
mentioned, and indeed can imply that no agent is present, that the subject is performing
the action on itself. For this reason, the intransitive construction of an ergative verb is
often said to be in a middle voice, between active and passive, or in a mediopassive voice,
between active and passive but closer to passive.

[edit] Reflexive verbs

A reflexive verb is a transitive verb one of whose object is a reflexive pronoun (myself,
yourself, etc.) referring back to its subject. In some languages, reflexive verbs are a
special class of verbs with special semantics and syntax, but in English, they typically
represent ordinary uses of transitive verbs. For example, with the verb see:

• He sees her as a writer.

• She sees herself as a writer.

Nonetheless, sometimes English reflexive verbs have a passive sense, expressing an

agentless action. Consider the verb solve, as in the following sentences:

• He solved the problem.

• The problem solved itself.

One could not say that the problem truly solved anything; rather, what is meant is that the
problem was solved without anyone's solving it.

Similarly, certain transitive verbs can take a subject referring to a person and an object
referring to the same person or to one of his body parts, again with a passive sense.[18]
Consider the verb break:

• Her leg was broken in a car accident.

• She broke her leg in a car accident.

The two sentences are almost synonymous, but the explicit passive construction is less
idiomatic.

[edit] Gerunds and nominalization

Gerunds and nominalized verbs (nouns derived from verbs and referring to the actions or
states expressed by them), unlike finite verbs, do not require explicit subjects. This allows
an object to be expressed while omitting a subject. For example:

• The proof of the pudding is in the eating.

• Generating electricity typically requires a magnet and a solenoid.

The same applies to infinitive constructions:

• The easiest way to make more space would be to install more shelving.
• The first step is to read the manual.
[edit] Misapplication of the term
Occasionally, the passive voice term is misapplied to sentences that do not identify the
actor.[19] For example, this extract from The New Yorker magazine refers to the American
embezzler Bernard Madoff; bold text identifies the mis-identified passive voice verbs:

Two sentences later, Madoff said, “When I began the Ponzi scheme, I believed it would
end shortly, and I would be able to extricate myself, and my clients, from the scheme.”
As he read this, he betrayed no sense of how absurd it was to use the passive voice in
regard to his scheme, as if it were a spell of bad weather that had descended on him . . . In
most of the rest of the statement, one not only heard the aggrieved passive voice, but felt
the hand of a lawyer: “To the best of my recollection, my fraud began in the early
nineteen-nineties.”[20]

The intransitive verbs would end and began are in the active voice; however, how the
speaker utters the words subtly diverts responsibility from him.[21] In The Elements of
Style, Strunk and White mis-apply the passive voice term to several active voice
constructions; Prof. Geoffrey Pullum writes:

Of the four pairs of examples offered to show readers what to avoid and how to correct it,
a staggering three out of the four are mistaken diagnoses. “At dawn the crowing of a
rooster could be heard” is correctly identified as a passive clause, but the other three are
all errors:

• “There were a great number of dead leaves lying on the ground” has no sign of
the passive in it anywhere.

• “It was not long before she was very sorry that she had said what she had”, also
contains nothing that is even reminiscent of the passive construction.

• “The reason that he left college was that his health became impaired”, is
presumably fingered as passive because of impaired, but that’s a mistake. It’s an
adjective here.[22]

Passive Voice

What this handout is about

This handout will help you understand what the passive voice is, why many professors
and writing instructors frown upon it, and how you can revise your paper to achieve
greater clarity. Some things here may surprise you. We hope this handout will help you to
understand the passive voice and allow you to make more informed choices as you write.

Myths
So what is the passive voice? First, let's be clear on what the passive voice isn't. Below,
we'll list some common myths about the passive voice:

1. Use of the passive voice constitutes a grammatical error.

Use of the passive voice is not a grammatical error. It's a stylistic issue that pertains to
clarity—that is, there are times when using the passive voice can prevent a reader from
understanding what you mean.

2. Any use of "to be" (in any form) constitutes the passive voice.

The passive voice entails more than just using a being verb. Using "to be" can weaken the
impact of your writing, but it is occasionally necessary and does not by itself constitute
the passive voice.

3. The passive voice always avoids the first person; if something is in

first person ("I" or "we") it's also in the active voice.

On the contrary, you can very easily use the passive voice in the first person. Here's an
example: "I was hit by the dodgeball."

4. You should never use the passive voice.

While the passive voice can weaken the clarity of your writing, there are times when the
passive voice is OK and even preferable.

5. I can rely on my grammar checker to catch the passive voice.

See Myth #1. Since the passive voice isn't a grammar error, it's not always caught.
Typically, grammar checkers catch only a fraction of passive voice usage.

Do any of these misunderstandings sound familiar? If so, you're not alone. That's why we
wrote this handout. It discusses how to recognize the passive voice, when you should
avoid it, and when it's OK.

top

Defining the passive voice

A passive construction occurs when you make the object of an action into the subject of a
sentence. That is, whoever or whatever is performing the action is not the grammatical
subject of the sentence. Take a look at this passive rephrasing of a familiar joke:

Why was the road crossed by the chicken?

Who is doing the action in this sentence? The chicken is the one doing the action in this
sentence, but the chicken is not in the spot where you would expect the grammatical
subject to be. Instead, the road is the grammatical subject. The more familiar phrasing
(why did the chicken cross the road?) puts the actor in the subject position, the position of
doing something—the chicken (the actor/doer) crosses the road (the object). We use
active verbs to represent that "doing," whether it be crossing roads, proposing ideas,
making arguments, or invading houses (more on that shortly).

Once you know what to look for, passive constructions are easy to spot. Look for a form
of "to be" (is, are, am , was, were, has been, have been, had been, will be, will have been,
being) followed by a past participle. (The past participle is a form of the verb that
typically, but not always, ends in "-ed." Some exceptions to the "-ed" rule are words like
"paid" (not "payed") and "driven." (not "drived"). Here's a sure-fire formula for
identifying the passive voice:

form of "to be" + past participle = passive voice

For example:

The metropolis has been scorched by the dragon's fiery breath.

When her house was invaded, Penelope had to think of ways to delay her remarriage.

NOTE: forms of the word "have" can do several different things in English. For example,
in the sentence "John has to study all afternoon," "had" is not part of a past-tense verb. It's
a modal verb, like "must," "can," or "may"—these verbs tell how necessary it is to do
something (compare "I have to study" versus "I may study"). And forms of "be" are not
always passive, either—"be" can be the main verb of a sentence that describes a state of
being, rather than an action. For example, the sentence "John is a good student" is not
passive; "is" is simply describing John's state of being. The moral of the story: don't
assume that any time you see a form of "have" and a form of "to be" together, you are
looking at a passive sentence. "I have to be on time for the concert," for example, is not
passive. Ask yourself whether there is an action going on in the sentence and, if so,
whether whoever or whatever is doing that action is the subject of the sentence. In a
passive sentence, the object of the action (e.g., the road) will be in the subject position at
the front of the sentence. There will be a form of be and a past participle. If the subject
appears at all, it will usually be at the end of the sentence, often in a phrase that starts
with "by" (e.g., "by the chicken").

Let's briefly look at how to change passive constructions into active ones. You can
usually just switch the word order, making the actor and subject one by putting the actor
up front:

The metropolis has been scorched by the dragon's fiery breath.

becomes
The dragon scorched the metropolis with his fiery breath.

When her house was invaded, Penelope had to think of ways to delay her remarriage.

becomes

After suitors invaded her house, Penelope had to think of ways to delay her remarriage.

To repeat, the key to identifying the passive voice is to look for both a form of "to be"
and a past participle, which usually, but not always, ends in "-ed."

top

Clarity and meaning

The primary reason why your instructors frown on the passive voice is that they often
have to guess what you mean. Sometimes, the confusion is minor. Let's look again at that
sentence from a student's paper on Homer's The Odyssey:

When her house was invaded, Penelope had to think of ways to delay her remarriage.

Like many passive constructions, this sentence lacks explicit reference to the actor—it
doesn't tell the reader who or what invaded Penelope's house. The active voice clarifies
things:

After suitors invaded Penelope's house, she had to think of ways to fend them off.

Thus many instructors—the readers making sense of your writing—prefer that you use
the active voice. They want you to specify who or what is doing the action. Compare the
following two examples from an anthropology paper on a Laotian village to see if you
agree.

(passive) A new system of drug control laws was set up. (By whom?)
(active) The Lao People's Revolutionary Party set up a new system of drug control laws.

Here's another example, from the same paper, that illustrates the lack of precision that can
accompany the passive voice:

Gender training was conducted in six villages, thus affecting social relationships.

And a few pages later:

Plus, marketing links were being established.

In both paragraphs, the writer never specifies the actors for those two actions (Who did
the gender training? Who established marketing links?). Thus the reader has trouble
appreciating the dynamics of these social interactions, which depend upon the actors
conducting and establishing these things.

The following example, once again from that paper on The Odyssey, typifies another
instance where an instructor might desire more precision and clarity:

Although Penelope shares heroic characteristics with her husband, Odysseus, she
is not considered a hero.

Who does not consider Penelope a hero? It's difficult to tell, but the rest of that paragraph
suggests that the student does not consider Penelope a hero (the topic of the paper). The
reader might also conceivably think that the student is referring to critics, scholars, or
modern readers of The Odyssey. One might argue that the meaning comes through here—
the problem is merely stylistic. Yet style affects how your reader understands your
argument and content. Awkward or unclear style prevents your reader from appreciating
the ideas that are so clear to you when you write. Thus knowing how your reader might
react enables you to make more effective choices when you revise. So after you identify
instances of the passive, you should consider whether your use of the passive inhibits
clear understanding of what you mean.

top

Summarizing history or literary plots with the passive

voice: don't be a lazy thinker or writer!
With the previous section in mind, you should also know that some instructors proclaim
that the passive voice signals sloppy, lazy thinking. These instructors argue that writers
who overuse the passive voice have not fully thought through what they are discussing
and that this makes for imprecise arguments. Consider these sentences from papers on
American history:

The working class was marginalized.

African Americans were discriminated against.
Women were not treated as equals.

Such sentences lack the precision and connection to context and causes that mark
rigorous thinking. The reader learns little about the systems, conditions, human decisions,
and contradictions that produced these groups' experiences of oppression. And so the
reader—the instructor—questions the writer's understanding of these things.

It is especially important to be sure that your thesis statement is clear and precise, so
think twice before using the passive voice in your thesis.
In papers where you discuss the work of an author—e.g., a historian or writer of literature
—you can also strengthen your writing by not relying on the passive as a crutch when
summarizing plots or arguments. Instead of writing

It is argued that…
or Tom and Huck are portrayed as…
or And then the link between X and Y is made, showing that…

you can heighten the level of your analysis by explicitly connecting an author with these
statements:

Anderson argues that…

Twain portrays Tom and Huck as…
Ishiguro draws a link between X and Y to show that…

By avoiding passive constructions in these situations, you can demonstrate a more

thorough understanding of the material you discuss. You show that you're not a lazy,
sloppy thinker.

top

Scientific writing
All this advice works for papers in the humanities, you might note—but what about
technical or scientific papers, including lab reports? Many instructors recommend or even
require the passive voice in such writing. The rationale for using the passive voice in
scientific writing is that it achieves "an objective tone"—for example, by avoiding the
first person. To consider scientific writing, let's break it up into two main types: lab
reports and writing about a scientific topic or literature.

Lab reports

Although more and more scientific journals accept or even prefer first-person active
voice (e.g., "then we sequenced the human genome"), some of your instructors may want
you to remove yourself from your lab report by using the passive voice (e.g., "then the
human genome was sequenced" rather than "then we sequenced the human genome").
Such advice particularly applies to the section on Materials and Methods, where a
procedure "is followed." (For a fuller discussion on writing lab reports, see our handout
on writing lab reports.)

While you might employ the passive voice to retain objectivity, you can still use active
constructions in some instances and retain your objective stance. Thus it's useful to keep
in mind the sort of active verbs you might use in lab reports. Examples include: support,
indicate, suggest, correspond, challenge, yield, show.
Thus instead of writing
A number of things are indicated by these results.

you could write

These results indicate a number of things.
or Further analysis showed/suggested/yielded…

Ultimately, you should find out your instructor's preference regarding your use of the
passive in lab reports.

Writing about scientific topics

In some assignments, rather than reporting the results of your own scientific work, you
will be writing about the work of other scientists. Such assignments might include
literature reviews and research reports on scientific topics. You have two main possible
tasks in these assignments: reporting what other people have done (their research or
experiments) or indicating general scientific knowledge (the body of knowledge coming
out of others' research). Often the two go together. In both instances, you can easily use
active constructions even though you might be tempted by the passive—especially if
you're used to writing your own lab reports in the passive.

You decide: Which of these two examples is clearer?

Heart disease is considered the leading cause of death in the United States. (passive)
or Research points to heart disease as the leading cause of death in the United States.
(active)

Alternatively, you could write this sentence with human actors:

Researchers have concluded that heart disease is the leading cause of death in the
United States.

The last two sentences illustrate a relationship that the first one lacks. The first example
does not tell who or what leads us to accept this conclusion about heart disease.

Here's one last example from a report that describes angioplasty. Which sounds better to
you?

The balloon is positioned in an area of blockage and is inflated.

or The surgeon positions the balloon in an area of blockage and inflates it.

You can improve your scientific writing by relying less on the passive. The advice we've
given for papers on history or literature equally applies to papers in more "scientific"
courses. No matter what field you're writing in, when you use the passive voice, you risk
conveying to your reader a sense of uncertainty and imprecision regarding your writing
and thinking. The key is to know when your instructor wants you to use the passive
voice. For a more general discussion of writing in the sciences, see our handout.

top

"Swindles and perversions"

Before we discuss a few instances when the passive might be preferable, we should
mention one of the more political uses of the passive: to hide blame or obscure
responsibility. You wouldn't do this, but you can learn how to become a critic of those
who exhibit what George Orwell included among the "swindles and perversions" of
writing. For example:

Mistakes were made.

The Exxon Company accepts that a few gallons might have been spilled.

By becoming critically aware of how others use language to shape clarity and meaning,
you can learn how better to revise your own work. Keep Orwell's swindles and
perversions in mind as you read other writers. Because it's easy to leave the actor out of
passive sentences, some people use the passive voice to avoid mentioning who is
responsible for certain actions.

top

So when is it OK to use the passive?

Sometimes the passive voice is the best choice. Here are a few instances when the passive
voice is quite useful:

1. To emphasize an object.Take a look at this example:

100 votes are required to pass the bill.

This passive sentence emphasizes the number of votes required. An active version of the
sentence ("The bill requires 100 votes to pass") would put the emphasis on the bill, which
may be less dramatic.

2. To de-emphasize an unknown subject/actor. Consider this example:

Over 120 different contaminants have been dumped into the river.

If you don't know who the actor is—in this case, if you don't actually know who dumped
all of those contaminants in the river—then you may need to write in the passive. But
remember, if you do know the actor, and if the clarity and meaning of your writing would
benefit from indicating him/her/it/them, then use an active construction. Yet consider the
third case.

3. If your readers don't need to know who's responsible for the action.

Here's where your choice can be difficult; some instances are less clear than others. Try
to put yourself in your reader's position to anticipate how he/she will react to the way you
have phrased your thoughts. Here are two examples:

Baby Sophia was delivered at 3:30 a.m. yesterday.(passive)

and

Dr. Susan Jones delivered baby Sophia at 3:30 a.m. yesterday.(active)

The first sentence might be more appropriate in a birth announcement sent to family and
friends—they are not likely to know Dr. Jones and are much more interested in the
"object"(the baby) than in the actor (the doctor). A hospital report of yesterday's events
might be more likely to focus on Dr. Jones' role.

top

Summary of strategies
Identify

• Look for the passive voice: "to be" + a past participle (usually, but not always,
ending in "-ed")
• If you don't see both components, move on.
• Does the sentence describe an action? If so, where is the actor? Is he/she/it in the
grammatical subject position (at the front of the sentence) or in the object position
(at the end of the sentence, or missing entirely)?
• Does the sentence end with "by..."? Many passive sentences include the actor at
the end of the sentence in a "by" phrase, like "The ball was hit by the player" or
"The shoe was chewed up by the dog." "By" by itself isn't a conclusive sign of
the passive voice, but it can prompt you to take a closer look.

Evaluate

• Is the doer/actor indicated? Should you indicate him/her/it?

• Does it really matter who's responsible for the action?
• Would your reader ask you to clarify a sentence because of an issue related to
your use of the passive?
• Do you use a passive construction in your thesis statement?
• Do you use the passive as a crutch in summarizing a plot or history, or in
describing something?
 • Do you want to emphasize the object?

Revise

• If you decide that your sentence would be clearer in the active voice, switch the
sentence around to make the subject and actor one. Put the actor (the one doing
the action of the sentence) in front of the verb.

top

Towards active thinking and writing

We encourage you to keep these tips in mind as you revise. While you may be able to
employ this advice as you write your first draft, that's not necessarily always possible. In
writing, clarity often comes when you revise, not on your first try. Don't worry about the
passive if that stress inhibits you in getting your ideas down on paper. But do look for it
when you revise. Actively make choices about its proper place in your writing. There is
nothing grammatically or otherwise "wrong" about using the passive voice. The key is to
recognize when you should, when you shouldn't, and when your instructor just doesn't
want you to. These choices are yours. We hope this handout helps you to make them.

Dalam bahasa Indonesia, ada bentuk kalimat aktif dan kalimat pasif. Kalimat aktif lebih
berfokus pada subjek kalimat, sedangkan kalimat pasif lebih berfokus pada objek
kalimat.

Kalimat pasif mempunyai beberapa bentuk.

1. Kalimat pasif dengan afiks di-

2. Kalimat pasif dengan persona.
3. Kalimat pasif dengan afiks ter-
4. Kalimat pasif dengan afiks ke-an.

Pada edisi ini kita akan belajar bentuk kalimat pasif 1 dan 2.

1. Kalimat Pasif dengan Afiks di-

Dalam kalimat pasif, me(N)- berubah menjadi di-. Sufiks -kan atau -i tidak hilang. Hanya
kalimat transitif yang bisa menjadi kalimat pasif. (In passive sentences me(N)- is
replaced by di-. Suffix -kan or -i do not drop. Only transitive verbs may be used in
passive sentences)

Contoh:
- membeli –> dibeli
- mengirimkan –> dikirimkan
- memasuki –> dimasuki
Subjek (agent) dalam kalimat aktif adalah nama orang, nama negara, lembaga atau kata
ganti orang ketiga (dia, mereka). (The subject (agent) in active sentence are the third
person or name of person, state, office, etc). “oleh dia” bisa digantikan dengan -nya di
akhir kata kerja pasif. (“oleh dia” (by him/her) is allowed when replaced by -nya at the
end of the verb).

Kalimat Aktif :
Subjek (actor) + me (N) – verb + Objek (patient)

Kalimat Pasif
Subjek (patient) + di – verb + Agent (actor)

Contoh:
Aktif : Gilles akan menyewa sepeda motor ini.
Pasif : Sepeda motor ini akan disewa (oleh) Gilles.

Aktif : Saminah mengirimi anaknya uang

Pasif : Anaknya dikirimi uang oleh Saminah.

Aktif ; Dia harus membersihkan rumah itu

Pasif : Rumah itu harus dibersihkannya. (oleh -nya)

2. Kalimat Pasif dengan Persona

- Subjek (agent) dalam kalimat aktif adalah bentuk persona : Anda, kamu, kalian, saya,
aku, kami, kita, mereka, dan dia. (The subject (agent) in active sentence are the personal
pronoun: you, I, we, they, he and she)

Kalimat aktif
Subjek (actor) + (Adverb) + me (N) – verb + Objek (patient)

Kalimat Pasif
Subjek (patient) + (Adverb) + [Actor+verb tanpa me(N)+(kan/i)]

Contoh:
Aktif : Dia akan mendatangi tempat-tempat wisata di Jawa Barat.
Pasif : Tempat-tempat wisata di Jawa Barat akan dia datangi.

Aktif : Kita belum membicarakan masalah ini.

Pasif : Masalah ini belum kita bicarakan.

Aktif : Saya memasukkan buku itu ke dalam tas.

Pasif : Buku itu saya masukkan ke dalam tas.

Aktif : Saya sudah mengirimkan obat kepada Saminah.

Pasif : Obat sudah saya kirimkan kepada Saminah.
Purposive sampling

Techniques > Research > Sampling > Purposive sampling

Use | Method | Example | Discussion | See also

Use
Use when you want to access a particular subset of people.

Method
When taking the sample, reject people who do not fit a particular profile.

Example
A researcher wants to get opinions from non-working mothers. They go around an area
knocking on doors during the day when children are likely to be at school. They ask to
speak to the 'woman of the house. Their first questions are then about whether there are
children and whether the woman has a day job.

Discussion
Purposive sampling starts with a purpose in mind and the sample is thus selected to
include people of interest and exclude those who do not suit the purpose.

This method is popular with newspapers and magazines which want to make a particular
point. This is also true for marketing researchers who are seeking support for their
product. They typically start with people in the street, first approaching only 'likely
suspects' and then starting with questions that reject people who do not suit.

Purposive sampling is non-probability and hence can be subject to bias and error.

 Sampling is the use of a subset of the population to represent the whole population.
Probability sampling, or random sampling, is a sampling technique in which the
probability of getting any particular sample may be calculated. ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purposive_sampling
 This process is the selection of a particular sample on purpose. Popular with
qualitative research, the variables to which the sample is drawn up are analytically and
theoretically linked to the research questions.
www.marketresearchterms.com/p.php
 researcher uses special knowledge or expertise about specific group to select subjects
who represent this population. (Berg, 2004)
ori.dhhs.gov/education/products/n_illinois_u/datamanagement/dmglossary.html
 Form of nonprobability sampling; depends on the judgment of the researcher who
hand-picks the cases to be included in the sample; used when researcher wants to select
cases that are typical of the population of interest and when sensitive topics are of
research interest or when very specialized ...
highered.mcgraw-hill.com/sites/0073049506/student_view0/glossary.html
 means purposefully selecting your sample group to allow for a focused review to
identify patterns or trends.
www.douglasgpratt.com/charts/glossary.htm

Pengertian non probability sampling dan probability

Perbedaana dari non probability dan probability sampling adalah bahwa non probability
sampling adalah tidak memilih unit sample secara acak (random)
Dalam purposive sampling dilakukan pengambilan sample dengan sudah ada tujuannya
dan sudah tersedia rencana sebelumnya, biasanya sudah ada predefinisi terhadap
kelompok kelompok dan kekhususan khas yang dicari.

Nonprobability Sampling Strategies < back 29 of next >

Purposive Sampling 36

Purposive sampling targets a particular group of people. When the desired population for
the study is rare or very difficult to locate and recruit for a study, purposive sampling may
be the only option. For example, you are interested in studying cognitive processing
speed of young adults who have suffered closed head brain injuries in automobile
accidents. This would be a difficult population to find.

Your city has a well-established rehabilitation hospital and you contact the director to ask
permission to recruit from this population. The major problem with purposive sampling is
that the type of people who are available for study may be different from those in the
population who can't be located and this might introduce a source of bias. For example,
those available for study through the rehabilitation hospital may have more serious
injuries requiring longer rehabilitation, and their families may have greater education and
financial resources (which resulted in their choosing this hospital for care).

PASSIVE WIKIPEDIA

The passive voice is a grammatical construction (a "voice") in which the subject of a

sentence or clause denotes the entity undergoing an action or having its state changed. In
the English language, the English passive voice is formed with an auxiliary verb (usually
be or get) plus a participle (usually the past participle) of a transitive verb. For example,
"Caesar was stabbed by Brutus" uses the passive voice. The subject denotes the
individual (Caesar) affected by the action of the verb. The active counterpart to this
sentence is, "Brutus stabbed Caesar," in which the subject denotes the doer, or agent,
Brutus.

A sentence featuring the passive voice is sometimes called a passive sentence, and a verb
phrase in passive voice is sometimes called a passive verb.[1] English differs with
languages in which voice is indicated through a simple inflection, since the English
passive is periphrastic, composed of an auxiliary verb plus the past participle of the
transitive verb.

Use of the English passive varies with writing style and field. Some style sheets
discourage use of passive voice,[2] while others encourage it.[3] Although some purveyors
of usage advice, including George Orwell (see Politics and the English Language, 1946)
and William Strunk, Jr. and E.B. White (see The Elements of Style, 1919) deplore the
English passive, its usefulness is recognized in cases where the theme (receiver of the
action) is more important than the agent.[4]

Contents
[hide]

• 1 Identifying the English passive

• 2 Usage and style
o 2.1 Against the passive voice
o 2.2 For the passive voice
• 3 Passive constructions
o 3.1 Canonical passives
o 3.2 Promotion of other objects
o 3.3 Promotion of content clauses
o 3.4 Stative passives
o 3.5 Adjectival passives
o 3.6 Passives without active counterparts
o 3.7 Double passives
• 4 Misapplication of the term
• 5 See also

• 6 Notes

[edit] Identifying the English passive

In the following excerpt from the 18th-century United States Declaration of
Independence (1776), the bold text identifies the passive verbs; italicized text identifies
the one active verb (hold ) and the copulative verb are:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are
endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life,
Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

In this case, the agent ("the Creator") of the passive construction can be identified with a
by phrase. When such a phrase is missing, the construction is an agentless passive. For
example, "Caesar was stabbed" is a perfectly grammatical full sentence, in a way that
"stabbed Caesar" and "Brutus stabbed" are not. Agentless passives are common in
scientific writing, where the agent may be irrelevant (e.g. "The mixture was heated to
300°C").

It is not the case, however, that any sentence in which the agent is unmentioned or
marginalised is an example of the passive voice. Sentences like "There was a stabbing" or
"A stabbing occurred" are not passive. See "Misapplication of the term," below for more
discussion of this misconception.

[edit] Usage and style

[edit] Against the passive voice

Many language critics and language usage manuals discourage the passive voice.[4]
Although this advice not usually found in older guides, the recommendation emerged in
the first half of the twentieth century.[5] In 1916, the British writer Arthur Quiller-Couch,
criticized this grammatical voice:

Generally, use transitive verbs, that strike their object; and use them in the active voice,
eschewing the stationary passive, with its little auxiliary its’s and was’s, and its
participles getting into the light of your adjectives, which should be few. For, as a rough
law, by his use of the straight verb and by his economy of adjectives you can tell a man’s
style, if it be masculine or neuter, writing or ‘composition’. [6]

Two years later, in 1918, in The Elements of Style Cornell University Professor of
English William Strunk, Jr. recommended against excessive use of the passive voice:

The active voice is usually more direct and vigorous than the passive . . . This rule does
not, of course, mean that the writer should entirely discard the passive voice, which is
frequently convenient and sometimes necessary . . . The need to make a particular word
the subject of the sentence will often . . . determine which voice is to be used. The
habitual use of the active voice, however, makes for forcible writing. This is true not only
in narrative concerned principally with action, but in writing of any kind. Many a tame
sentence of description or exposition can be made lively and emphatic by substituting a
transitive in the active voice for some such perfunctory expression as there is or could be
heard.[7]

In 1926, in the authoritative A Dictionary of Modern English Usage (1926), Henry W.

Fowler recommended against transforming active voice forms into passive voice forms,
because doing so “sometimes leads to bad grammar, false idiom, or clumsiness”.[8][9]

In 1946, in the essay "Politics and the English Language" (1946), George Orwell
recommended the active voice as an elementary principle of composition: "Never use the
passive where you can use the active." In 1993, the The Columbia Guide to Standard
American English (1993) states that the:

Active voice makes subjects do something (to something); passive voice permits subjects
to have something done to them (by someone or something). Some argue that active
voice is more muscular, direct, and succinct, passive voice flabbier, more indirect, and
wordier. If you want your words to seem impersonal, indirect, and noncommittal, passive
is the choice, but otherwise, active voice is almost invariably likely to prove more
effective.[10]

[edit] For the passive voice

Jan Freeman, a reporter for The Boston Globe, said that the passive voice does its uses,
and that "all good writers use the passive voice".[11] "Politics and the English Language"
(1946) is an example of minimal passive voice writing, because only about 20 per cent is
passive;[4] passive writing is not necessarily slack and indirect:

• Every valley shall be exalted, and every mountain and hill shall be made low; and
the crooked shall be made straight, and the rough places plain. (King James Bible,
Isaiah 40:4)
• Now is the winter of our discontent / Made glorious summer by this sun of York.
(Richard III, I.1, ll. 1–2)
• For of those to whom much is given, much is required. (John F. Kennedy's
address to the Massachusetts legislature, 9 January 1961.)[12]
• Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.
(Winston Churchill addressing the House of Commons, 20 August 1940.)

Merriam–Webster's Dictionary of English Usage (1994) recommends the passive voice

when identifying the object (receiver) of the action is more important than the subject
(actor, actrix), and when the actor is unknown, unimportant, or not worth mentioning:

• The child was struck by the car.

• The store was robbed last night.
• Plows should not be kept in the garage.
• Kennedy was elected president.[4]
The passive voice also changes the emphasis of a sentence, such as modifying an adverb
or the actor: “The breakthrough was achieved by Burlingame and Evans, two researchers
in the university’s genetic engineering lab.”[13] The passive voice is anonymous: “We had
hoped to report on this problem, but the data were inadvertently deleted from our files”;
hence the principal criticism against the passive voice is its evasion of responsibility; see
weasel words.[13][4][13]

[edit] Passive constructions

This section needs additional citations for verification.
Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be
challenged and removed. (September 2009)

In general, the passive voice is used to place focus on the grammatical patient, rather than
the agent. This often occurs when the patient is the topic of the sentence. However, the
passive voice can also be used when the focus is on the agent.

[edit] Canonical passives

Passive constructions have a range of meanings and uses. The canonical use is to map a
clause with a direct object to a corresponding clause where the direct object has become
the subject. For example:

• John threw the ball.

Here threw is a transitive verb with John as its subject and the ball as its direct object. If
we recast the verb in the passive voice (was thrown), then the ball becomes the subject (it
is "promoted" to the subject position) and John disappears:

• The ball was thrown.

The original "demoted" subject can typically be re-inserted using the preposition by.

• The ball was thrown by John.

[edit] Promotion of other objects

One non-canonical use of English's passive is to promote an object other than a direct
object. It is usually possible in English to promote indirect objects as well. For example:

• John gave Mary a book. → Mary was given a book.

• John gave Mary a book. → Mary was given a book by John.

In the active form, gave is the verb; John is its subject, Mary its indirect object, and a
book its direct object. In the passive forms, the indirect object has been promoted and the
direct object has been left in place. (In "A book was given to Mary", the direct object is
promoted and the indirect object left in place. In this respect, English resembles
dechticaetiative languages.)

It is also possible, in some cases, to promote the object of a preposition:

• They talked about the problem. → The problem was talked about.

In the passive form here, the preposition is "stranded"; that is, it is not followed by an
object. (See Preposition stranding.)

[edit] Promotion of content clauses

It is possible to promote a content clause that serves as a direct object. In this case,
however, it typically does not change its position in the sentence, and an expletive it takes
the normal subject position:

• They say that he left. → It is said that he left.

[edit] Stative passives

The passives described above are all eventive (or dynamic) passives. Stative (or static, or
resultative) passives also exist in English; rather than describing an action, they describe
the result of an action. English does not usually distinguish between the two. For
example:

• The window was broken.

This sentence has two different meanings, roughly the following:

• [Someone] broke the window.

• The window was not intact.

The former meaning represents the canonical, eventive passive; the latter, the stative
passive. (The terms eventive and stative/resultative refer to the tendencies of these forms
to describe events and resultant states, respectively. The terms can be misleading,
however, as the canonical passive of a stative verb is not a stative passive, even though it
describes a state.)

Some verbs do not form stative passives. In some cases, this is because distinct adjectives
exist for this purpose, such as with the verb open:

• The door was opened. → [Someone] opened the door.

• The door was open. → The door was in the open state.
[edit] Adjectival passives

Adjectival passives are not true passives; they occur when a participial adjective (an
adjective derived from a participle) is used predicatively (see Adjective). For example:

• She was relieved to find her car undamaged.

Here, relieved is an ordinary adjective, though it derives from the past participle of
relieve,[14] and that past participle may be used in canonical passives:

• He was relieved of duty.

In some cases, the line between an adjectival passive and a stative passive may be
unclear.

[edit] Passives without active counterparts

In a few cases, passive constructions retain all the sense of the passive voice, but do not
have immediate active counterparts. For example:

• He was rumored to be a war veteran. ← *[Someone] rumored him to be a war

veteran.

(The asterisk here denotes an ungrammatical construction.) Similarly:

• It was rumored that he was a war veteran. ← *[Someone] rumored that he was a
war veteran.

In both of these examples, the active counterpart was once possible, but has fallen out of
use.

[edit] Double passives

It is possible for a verb in the passive voice—especially an object-raising verb—to take

an infinitive complement that is also in the passive voice:

• The project is expected to be completed in the next year.

Commonly, either or both verbs may be moved into the active voice:

• [Someone] expects the project to be completed in the next year.

• [Someone] is expected to complete the project in the next year.
• [Someone] expects [someone] to complete the project in the next year.

In some cases, a similar construction may occur with a verb that is not object-raising in
the active voice:
 • ?The project will be attempted to be completed in the next year. ← *[Someone]
will attempt the project to be completed in the next year. ← [Someone] will
attempt to complete the project in the next year.

(The question mark here denotes a questionably-grammatical construction.) In this

example, the object of the infinitive has been promoted to the subject of the main verb,
and both the infinitive and the main verb have been moved to the passive voice. The
American Heritage Book of English Usage declares this unacceptable,[15] but it is
nonetheless attested in a variety of contexts.[16]

[edit] Misapplication of the term

Occasionally, the passive voice term is misapplied to sentences that do not identify the
actor.[17] For example, this extract from The New Yorker magazine refers to the American
embezzler Bernard Madoff; bold text identifies the mis-identified passive voice verbs:

Two sentences later, Madoff said, “When I began the Ponzi scheme, I believed it would
end shortly, and I would be able to extricate myself, and my clients, from the scheme.”
As he read this, he betrayed no sense of how absurd it was to use the passive voice in
regard to his scheme, as if it were a spell of bad weather that had descended on him . . . In
most of the rest of the statement, one not only heard the aggrieved passive voice, but felt
the hand of a lawyer: “To the best of my recollection, my fraud began in the early
nineteen-nineties.”[18]

The intransitive verbs would end and began are in the active voice; however, how the
speaker utters the words subtly diverts responsibility from him.[19] In The Elements of
Style, Strunk and White mis-apply the passive voice term to several active voice
constructions; Prof. Geoffrey Pullum writes:

Of the four pairs of examples offered to show readers what to avoid and how to correct it,
a staggering three out of the four are mistaken diagnoses. “At dawn the crowing of a
rooster could be heard” is correctly identified as a passive clause, but the other three are
all errors:

• “There were a great number of dead leaves lying on the ground” has no sign of
the passive in it anywhere.

• “It was not long before she was very sorry that she had said what she had”, also
contains nothing that is even reminiscent of the passive construction.

• “The reason that he left college was that his health became impaired”, is
presumably fingered as passive because of impaired, but that’s a mistake. It’s an
adjective here.[20]
Active and Passive Verbs
Active verbs form more efficient and more
powerful sentences than passive verbs. This
document will teach you why and how to prefer
active verbs.

• The subject of an active sentence

performs the action of the verb: "I throw
the ball."

• The subject of a passive sentence is still

the main character of the sentence, but
Troy Sterling and the
Active & Passive Verbs
something else performs the action: "The
ball is thrown by me."

Contents

1. How to Recognize Active and Passive Sentences

2. Basic Examples
3. Difference between Passive Voice and Past Tense
4. Imperatives: Active Commands
5. Sloppy Passive Construction
6. Linking Verbs: Neither Active nor Passive
7. Passive Voice is not Wrong
8. Tricky Examples
9. Links to Active & Passive Verb Resources
10. Works Cited

1. How to Recognize Active and Passive Sentences ^

1. Find the subject (the main character of the sentence).

2. Find the main verb (the action that the sentence identifies).
3. Examine the relationship between the subject and main verb.
o Does the subject perform the action of the main verb? (If so, the
sentence is active.)
o Does the subject sit there while something else -- named or unnamed --
performs an action on it? (If so, the sentence is passive.)
o Can't tell? If the main verb is a linking verb ("is," "was," "are," "seems
(to be)," "becomes" etc.), then the verb functions like an equals sign; there
is no action involved -- it merely describes a state of being.

2. Basic Examples ^
I love you.
 1. subject: "I"
2. action: "loving"
3. relationship: The subject ("I") is the one performing the action
("loving").

The sentence is active.

You are loved by me.

1. subject: "you"
2. action: "loving"
3. relationship: The subject ("You") sits passively while the action
("loving") is performed by somebody else ("me").

This sentence is passive.

3. Difference between Passive Voice and Past Tense ^

Many people confuse the passive voice with the past tense. The most common passive
constructions also happen to be past tense (e.g. "I've been framed"), but "voice" has to do
with who, while "tense" has to do with when.

Active Voice Passive Voice

I was (have been) taught [by someone];
Past Tense I taught; I learned.
It was (has been) learned [by someone].
I am [being] taught [by someone];
Present Tense I teach; I learn.
It is [being] learned [by someone].
I will be taught [by someone];
Future Tense I will teach; I will learn.
It will be learned [by someone].

4. Imperatives: Active Commands ^

A command (or "imperative") is a kind of active sentence, in which "you" (the one being
addressed) are being ordered to perform the action. (If you refuse to obey, the sentence is
still active.)

• Get to work on time.

• Insert tab A into slot B.
• Take me to your leader.
• Ladies and gentlement, let us consider, for a moment, the effect of the rafting
sequences on our understanding of the rest of the novel.
5. Sloppy Passive Constructions ^

Because passive sentences do not need to identify the performer of an action, they can
lead to sloppy or misleading statements (especially in technical writing). Compare how
clear and direct these passive sentences become, when they are rephrased as imperative
sentences

To drain the tank, the grill should be removed, or the

storage compartment can be flooded.
Because they do not specify the actors, the passive verbs ("should be
removed" and "can be flooded") contribute to the confusing structure
of this sentence.

Does the sentence

1) offer two different ways to drain the tank ("you may either remove the
grill or flood the compartment")?

...or does it

2) warn of an undesirable causal result ("if you drain the tank without
removing the grill, the result will be that the storage compartment is
flooded")?
Revision 1:

Drain the tank in one of the following ways:

• remove the grill

• flood the storage compartment

Revision 2:

1) Remove the grill.

2) Drain the tank.

Warning: If you fail to remove the grill first, you may

flood the storage compartment (which is where you are
standing right now).

6. Linking Verbs: Neither Active nor Passive ^

When the verb performs the function of an equals sign, the verb is said to be a linking
verb. Linking verbs describe no action -- they merely state an existing condition or
relationship; hence, they are neither passive nor active.
 Subject = Description
The door is blue.
The door was closed.
This could be the first day of the rest of my life.
She might have been very nice.

7. The Passive Voice Is not Wrong ^

Passive verbs are not automatically wrong. When used rarely and deliberately, the
passive voice serves an important purpose.

• When you wish to downplay the action:

Mistakes will be made, and lives will be lost; the sad truth is learned anew by
each generation.

• When you wish to downplay the actor:

Three grams of reagent 'A' were added to a beaker of 10% saline solution.

(In the scientific world, the actions of a researcher are ideally not supposed to
affect the outcome of an experiment; the experiment is supposed to be the same
no matter who carries it out. I will leave it to you and your chemistry professor to
figure out whether that's actually true, but in the meantime, don't use excessive
passive verbs simply to avoid using "I" in a science paper.)

• When the actor is unknown:

The victim was approached from behind and hit over the head with a salami.

8. Tricky Examples ^
Punctuality seems important.

1. subject: the phrase "punctuality"

2. action: "being" ("seems" is short for "seems to be")
3. relationship: The subject does nothing at all; the verb "is" functions as
an equals sign: "punctuality = important".

This sentence describes a state of being (neither active nor passive).

(If you replace the single word "punctuality" with the phrase "Getting to work on
time" or "The sum total of the knowledge of tribes of prehistoric America
collected by amateur archeologists during the latter half of the nineteenth
century," the grammar of the sentence does not change.)
Remember to brush your teeth.
 1. subject: (You) This is an order; the subject is the person being ordered.
2. action: "remember" (not "brushing")
3. relationship: The subject is supposed to do the remembering. Whether
the subject actually obeys the command is irrelevant to the grammar of
the sentence.

This sentence gives an order. Active.

(It may be grammatically possible to give an order with a passive verb, such as a
Shakespearean curse like "Be damned!" But most commands you encounter will
be active.)

9. Links to Active & Passive Verb Resources ^

Looking for more help?

• An online quiz: Revising Passive Constructions.

• The graphics on Purdue's Active and Passive Verbs page aren't good HTML
(visually impaired readers would be left out), but the content is good.

10. Works Cited ^

Orwell, George. "Politics and the English Language." A Collection
of Essays. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books, 1954. 167-177.

Strunk, William. Elements of Style. Ithaca, N.Y.: Priv print,

1918. <http://www.bartleby.com/141/> 03 Jul 2004.

United States. Securities and Exchange Commission. A Plain

English Handbook. Draft. Washington D.C. 1977.
<http://www.sec.gov/consumer/plaine.htm>. 12 Apr 1999.

Tense Subject Auxiliary Past

Singular Plural
Participle
Present The car/cars Is Are designed.
Present perfect The car/cars Has been Have been designed.
Past The car/cars was were designed.
Past perfect The car/cars Had been Had been designed.
Future The car/cars Will be Will be designed.
Future perfect The car/cars Will have been Will have been designed.
Present The car/cars Is being Are being designed.
progressive
Past The car/cars Was being Were being designed.
progressive

A. Technique of Collecting Data

The data in this research are taken from novel Eldest by Christopher Paolini and

Its Indonesian Version. To obtain the data the researcher applies the content analysis

method. The steps of collecting the data are: reading both of the books as the source

data, identifying the passive voice sentences and the last is classifying the English

passive voice sentences and their translation.