GUIRY - 2014 - AlgaeBase
GUIRY - 2014 - AlgaeBase
GUIRY - 2014 - AlgaeBase
net/publication/263442148
CITATIONS READS
33 1,913
13 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
AREST - Antimicrobial Resistance and the Environment – Sources, Persistence, Transmission and Risk Management View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Salvador Valenzuela on 20 September 2019.
doi/10.7872/crya.v35.iss2.2014.105
106 M. D. Guiry et al.
obtain. The data are searchable at all taxonomic levels from kingdom to species (and
infraspecific names), and AlgaeBase strives to provide citations of the original publications
of all taxa. For any of the 145,000 taxa (names of genera and above included), all
subordinate taxa at the next lowest rank are indicated along with the number of species for
each. Within each genus the species and infraspecies taxa are listed along with the current
taxonomic status of each name. Nearly 17,000 images are provided for downloading and use
in teaching or research, with copyright and other rights being retained by the original
contributors or by AlgaeBase. This database is being used by 2,000-3,000 individual visitors
each day with nearly 100,000 requests a day and receives over 7 million “hits” each year,
increasing at about 20% per annum. A brief description of other main on-line algal
resources such as Index Nominum Algarum, the Catalogue of Diatoms Names, CyanoDB,
and AlgaTerra is provided.
INTRODUCTION
The starting point for the cataloguing of algal names, like fungal and
plant names (International Code of Nomenclature for algae fungi and plants
[ICNafp]; McNeill et al., 2012), is Carl Linnaeus’s Species plantarum (1753)1. This
1. Art. 13.1(e) of the ICNafp Code, however, specifies later-starting-point dates for certain algal groups.
AlgaeBase: an on-line resource for Algae 107
monumental work included all known plants of the day, listing 61 algae in
the genera Chara, Fucus, Ulva and Conferva (see Spencer, Irvine & Jarvis, 2009).
This innovative summation was followed by a period of intensive description of
species and genera, culminating in the first encyclopedic treatment specifically for
algae compiled by Carl Adolph Agardh (1785-1859), Species algarum, published
in parts between 1820 and 1824, in which he listed and described most of the then-
known algae in two relatively small volumes.
As the 19th century progressed, an explosion of taxonomic studies, partly
fuelled by extensive extra-European explorations by colonial powers with
competing ambitions, resulted in exponential increases in species and other taxon
descriptions. C. Agardh’s Species plantarum was trumped by works of Friedrich
Traugott Kützing (1807-1893), notably Synopsis diatomearum (1833), Phycologia
generalis (1843), Species algarum (1849), and Tabulae phycologicae (1846-1866).
During this time, Jacob Georg Agardh (1813-1901), son of C. Agardh, published
Species, genera et ordines algarum from 1848-1901, amongst other monographs,
but the vast majority of the taxa were marine green, red and brown algae, and the
freshwater and terrestrial algae so meticulously described by Kützing were not on
J. Agardh’s agenda. The development of high-quality microscopes by the mid-19th
century led to a huge increase in descriptions of unicellular and colonial algae,
particularly by Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg (1795-1876), whose astonishing
meticulousness and productivity are exemplified by Die Infusionsthierchen
(Ehrenberg, 1838).
By the end of the 19th century the huge numbers of additional names and
a greater formalization of higher level taxonomy required a truly encyclopedic
treatment. This was achieved by Giovanni Batista De Toni (1864-1924) in a series
of comprehensive volumes entitled Sylloge algarum omnium hucusque cognitarum
[Gathering of all algae hitherto known] published from 1889 to 1924 [including an
account of the blue-green algae by Achille Italo Forti (1878-1937)]. Giuseppe De
Toni (1907-1950), son of Giovanni, published Bibliographia algologica universalis
in three fascicles (1931-1932), intended to supplement the Sylloge.
No publication comparable to De Toni’s Sylloge has since appeared
(Silva & Moe, 1999), with a few group-specific exceptions. Dawson (1962)
compiled a list of new taxa published subsequent to De Toni; however, his list
primarily treated marine algae and contained little information other than the new
name and its publication source.
For desmids, Carl Fredrik Otto Nordstedt (1838-1924) published an
Index desmidiacearum (1896, 1908), and Gerald Weber Prescott (1899-1988)
supplemented it with his Bibliographia desmidiacearum universalis (1984), a
comprehensive list of desmid publications.
For diatoms, Frederick William Mills (1868-1949) compiled An Index to
the Genera and Species of the Diatomaceae and their Synonyms (1932-1935). Sam
L. VanLandingham (1935-) published a Catalogue of the Fossil and Recent Genera
and Species of Diatoms and their Synonyms in 8 volumes (1969-1979), treating
diatom names known up to 1964. Intended as a revision of Mills’s Index,
VanLandingham’s Catalogue contains 44,000 entries (18,000 more than Mills),
including 4,000 entries published before 1935, which were omitted by Mills’s
Index.
For seaweeds, the Catalogue of the Benthic Marine Algae of the Indian
Ocean by Silva, Basson & Moe (1996), was a work of global significance that
provided the most detailed and accurate nomenclatural and taxonomic account of
benthic marine blue-green, red, brown and green seaweeds of a major global
ocean in the 20th century.
108 M. D. Guiry et al.
The above is an extremely brief account of the work of centuries, and the
reader may wish to look elsewhere for a more comprehensive history.
The days of all-encompassing, paper-based works by dedicated authors
are probably over, especially as the cost of publishing books and maintaining
libraries to shelve them has soared. Our modern systems of employing
taxonomists and nomenclaturalists, and publishing, certainly militate against such
paper-based publication of large indices. Nonetheless, all is not lost as the
invention and current pervasiveness of the Internet have provided in the last
25 years an opportunity to make the detailed information required by
nomenclaturalists and taxonomists both instantly available and correctable.
Here we describe the history, programming, objectives and current status
of AlgaeBase, an on-line, searchable database for phycology established in 1996
to take advantage of the proliferation of the Internet. We describe AlgaeBase in
the context of other principal on-line resources for algae.
Literature
Page
ID ID
Family PDF
Taxonomy Order ...
Browser Class ID
Authors PDF
Phylum
... Year
Ref
Hierarchy
PDF ID Common Name
PDF Genus
ID
Species
Hierarchy ID Literature
Biblio ID
Biblio ID
Genus Type Species ID ID ...
Page Genus Genus ID
Common Names
Authorities Biblio ID
Year Common Name
Biblio ID Epithet
...
Genus Meaning
Genus Species Language
Subspecies Type
Genus Variety Gender
Species Formae ...
Use of Use
Compounds Authorities
Type of Use Etymology
Page Year
Compounds Distribution
... Etymology
Uses of Compounds Uses of Compounds Image ID
Reference Species ID
PDF Image
Geography ID ID
Image ID Location
Country/State Biblio ID
Images Date
Nation Species ID
Region Geography ID Photgraph
Geography Distribution ...
Geography Distribution Species Images
Page
Fig. 1. Data schema of a part of AlgaeBase showing database (named below each table). Some of
the page output to browsers is shown as large circles. Each of these pages is composed on request
by relationships (indicated by lines with an “equals” sign, mostly by means of sequential
identification numbers “IDs”) between data elements in the tables. Only some tables and some
fields are shown.
database (Fig. 1). The AlgaeBase name was registered for on-line access (http://
www.algaebase.org), giving the database a corporate identity. This version of the
database, the programming for which was organised by one of us (PK), came on-
line in September 2004. About this time, the benefits of including other algae
became clear, and while the database at that time emphasized marine benthic
algae (mainly seaweeds), freshwater and terrestrial algae, marine and freshwater
phytoplankton were added as time and funding allowed.
WHAT IS ALGAEBASE?
Lawson, Robert Wilkes, Andy Taylor, Róisín Nash and Liz Moran, who spent many hours
organizing and entering data. We are particularly grateful to Professor Colin Brown,
Professor Mark Johnson and Dr Richard Fitzgerald of the Ryan Institute for their generous
support and encouragement over the past 5 years.
REFERENCES
MILLS F.W., 1932-1935 — An Index to the Genera and Species of the Diatomaceae and their
Synonyms. London, Wheldon & Wesley, 1726 p.
NORDSTEDT C.F.O., 1896 — Index desmidiacearum citationibus locupletissimus atque bibliographia.
Lundæ & Berolini [Lund & Berlin]: Typis Berlingiani; Fratres Borntræger, 310 p.
NORDSTEDT C.F.O., 1908 — Index desmidiacearum citationibus locupletissimus atque bibliographia.
Supplementum, Lundæ & Berolini, Typis Berlingiani; Fratres Borntræge, [3]-18 p.
PRESCOTT G.W., 1984 — Bibliographia Desmidiacearum universalis a contribution to a bibliography
of Desmid systematics, biology, and ecology from 1774-1982. Königstein, Koeltz Scientific
Books, i-vii, 612 p.
SILVA P.C., BASSON P.W. & MOE R.L., 1996 — Catalogue of the benthic marine algae of the
Indian Ocean. University of California publications in botany 79: 1-1259.
SILVA P.C. & MOE R.L., 1999 — The Index Nominum Algarum. Taxon 48: 351-353.
SPENCER M.A., IRVINE L.M. & JARVIS C.E., 2009 — Typification of Linnaean names relevant
to algal nomenclature. Taxon 58: 237-260.
VANLANDINGHAM S.L., 1969-1979 — Catalogue of the Fossil and Recent Genera and Species of
Diatoms and their Synonyms, Vols 1-8. Berlin: J. Cramer.
View publication stats