1 Te 4222
1 Te 4222
PMT OPRNS
OSM SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SAUDI ARAMCO. NO REPRODUCTION IN FULL OR IN PART SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ITS OWNER.
AOZ
ENGG CERT
IAD
MSA
ISSUED FOR REVIEW
DESCRIPTION
DISCIPLINE
ENGINEER
MSA
09/10/19
DATE:
PROJECT
ENGINEER
IAD
09/10/19
DATE:
CERTIFIED
AOZ
09/10/19
DATE:
CONSTRUCTION
AGENCY
09/10/19
DATE:
OPERATIONS
OSM
RRF CALCULATION
09/10/19
DATE:
Risk Target Frequency for the SIF will be calculated by dividing the mitigated risk with the
CONTROL NUMBER
VERIFICATION
target Risk (identified in step c) to identify the Risk Reduction Factor (RRF) required by the
EDSD
SIF loop.
DATE:
BY:
REVISIONCERTIFICATION
APPROVAL/CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS,
SIL/PFD CALCULATION
THIS INDICATES THAT REV. NO.__________
CERTIFICATE
Inverse of RRF (i.e. 1/RRF) will lead to PFD of the SIF, against which SIL will be assigned
_____________________
(DCC) NO. 10-0010-09111-0002
` SIL ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT DWG.TYPE PLANT NO. INDEX DRAWING NO. SHT.NO. REV.NO.
REVISION
THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SAUDI ARAMCO. NO REPRODUCTION IN FULL OR IN PART SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ITS OWNER.
AOZ
IAD
a- the HAZOP findings and risk ranking ranked high in the HAZOP recommendations
&
ISSUED FOR REVIEW
• The facility has been designed and engineered properly based on the Saudi Aramco
design/engineering codes, industry standards and good engineering practices.
• CCPS Approach B & IEC-61511-2016 section 9.3.4 was taken as a basis for the
identification of protection layers.
• SIL study has been conducted for the SIFs which are covered under the scope of this
JO/EWO
project 10-09111-0002
10-09111-
0002
• Permissive & Maintenance Bypasses are not covered in the SIL assessment.
DATE
09/29/19
IEC-61511. Such manual initiators in a SIF require operator action that is used for both
EDSD
prevention and mitigation of hazardous events, like total plant shutdown, unit
DATE:
BY:
APPROVAL/CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS,
THIS INDICATES THAT REV. NO.__________
CERTIFICATE
Alarms are considered as an IPL with a PFD of 0.1 provided the operator has clearly
A
•
_____________________
(DCC) NO. 10-0010-09111-0002
understood the alarm, Operator has more than specified time (15 minutes for control
` SIL ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT DWG.TYPE PLANT NO. INDEX DRAWING NO. SHT.NO. REV.NO.
REVISION
THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SAUDI ARAMCO. NO REPRODUCTION IN FULL OR IN PART SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ITS OWNER.
AOZ
room alarm ; 30 minutes for field alarms) to respond in order to prevent the demand
ENGG CERT
IAD
occurring on the SIF. Also, this credit shall only be given if the operator is trained and
regularly completes action as drilled exercise, has access to clear written procedures
MSA
As per HAZOP recommendation, Blanketing gas was changed to sweet fuel gas.
DESCRIPTION
•
Team identified that now blanketing gas is not very toxic (sweet gas) however it is still
flammable. Hence consequences related to toxic gas dispersion were not considered
during LOPA analysis.
“If it is not intended that the BPCS conform to the IEC 61511 series, then:
JO/EWO
10-09111-
• no more than one BPCS protection layer shall be claimed for the same
0002
sequence of event leading to the hazardous event when the BPCS is the
DATE
09/29/19
• no more than two BPCS protection layers shall be claimed for the same
DISCIPLINE
ENGINEER
MSA sequence of event leading to the hazardous event when the BPCS is not the
09/10/19
DATE: initiating source of the demand.
PROJECT
ENGINEER
IAD
DATE:
09/10/19 2. PROBABILITY OF OCCUPANCY
CERTIFIED
AOZ
SIL Committee identified that operator will visit the facility after every 2 hours for the
09/10/19
DATE:
CONSTRUCTION duration of 25 minutes. It was agreed that one operator will be present during the visit.
AGENCY
WORKSHEET
REVISIONCERTIFICATION
The SIL workshop results are depicted in the LOPA Worksheets attached in Appendix D
APPROVAL/CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS,
THIS INDICATES THAT REV. NO.__________
CERTIFICATE
_____________________
(DCC) NO. 10-0010-09111-0002
` SIL ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT DWG.TYPE PLANT NO. INDEX DRAWING NO. SHT.NO. REV.NO.
REVISION
THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SAUDI ARAMCO. NO REPRODUCTION IN FULL OR IN PART SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ITS OWNER.
AOZ
LOPA SUMMARY
The results of the SIL determination /assessment workshop are summarized below:
ENGG CERT
IAD
The following is the list of target SILs for the SIF tags;
MSA
RA-663868.001/NA-
6040 JB-664036.001
DESCRIPTION
J55018.001
NA-J55017.001/NA-
10-09111-
6805 J55018.001
JB-664036.001
0002
DISCIPLINE
ENGINEER SIF-005 LALL-1870 TRIPS G80-G- SIL-2
MSA 51/G-52 NA-J55017.002/NA-
09/10/19 J55017.003
JB-664036.001
DATE:
PROJECT
ENGINEER
SIF-006 LALL-1872 SHUTDOWN ZV- SIL-2
IAD NA-J55017.002/NA-
09/10/19
6807 J55018.001
JB-664036.001
DATE:
CERTIFIED
AOZ POTENTIAL LAHH SHUTDOWNS CPI SIL-2
09/10/19 SIF-C G80-D-21 INLET ZV
DATE: NA-J55017.002 JB-664036.001
CONSTRUCTION
AGENCY
09/10/19
DATE:
OPERATIONS
Table 1: SIF tags SIL assignment
OSM
09/10/19 Note: As the team developed LOPA scenarios, for some SIF tags there was no protection layer except the SIF
DATE:
being studied, hence a PFD value ‘1’ was entered in the IPL column for the LOPA calculation.
CONTROL NUMBER
VERIFICATION
EDSD
GENERAL
REVISIONCERTIFICATION
APPROVAL/CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS,
THIS INDICATES THAT REV. NO.__________
CERTIFICATE
identified that RRF of 230 is required (SIL-2 for Economic consequences) to reach the
` SIL ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT DWG.TYPE PLANT NO. INDEX DRAWING NO. SHT.NO. REV.NO.
REVISION
THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF SAUDI ARAMCO. NO REPRODUCTION IN FULL OR IN PART SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF ITS OWNER.
AOZ
Target consequence frequency. Hence the potential SIF-003 (with SIL-2 rating) shall
ENGG CERT
IAD
will be the case that determines whether the logic solver meets performance
DESCRIPTION
requirements..
4. When the required risk reduction factor (RRF) on LOPA is above 1 but below or equal
to 10 then the interlock may be implemented in BPCS System . However this would
necessitate the use of independent sensor, output relay and separate I/O module
from the original BPCS indication and alarm channel used.
JO/EWO
5. System architecture for each SIF shall be designed in accordance with the
10-09111-
0002
DISCIPLINE
ENGINEER
MSA 5. CONCLUSION
09/10/19
DATE:
PROJECT
ENGINEER
The Risk Reduction required for each SIF for the safety of personal; assets /equipment &
IAD
DATE:
09/10/19 environment shall be implemented in the design to meet the required risk target.
CERTIFIED
AOZ
Recommendations shall be implemented as per section 12 of this document.
09/10/19
DATE:
CONSTRUCTION
AGENCY
6. APPENDICES
09/10/19
DATE:
OPERATIONS
Appendix A: Attendance Sheet
OSM Appendix B: Process & Instrumentation Diagrams.
09/10/19
DATE:
Appendix C : SAEP-250
CONTROL NUMBER
VERIFICATION
APPROVAL/CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS,
THIS INDICATES THAT REV. NO.__________
CERTIFICATE
_____________________
(DCC) NO. 10-0010-09111-0002
` SIL ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT DWG.TYPE PLANT NO. INDEX DRAWING NO. SHT.NO. REV.NO.
REVISION