USA V Pereira Walker
USA V Pereira Walker
USA V Pereira Walker
cAsENo . 6
'
4/J-
w md
UNITED STATES OF AM ERICA
V S.
TIPHANIPEREIR A and
RICHARD TM VON W ALK ER,
D efendants.
/
Respectfully submitted,
BY: C<,
CARY 0 .ARONOVITZ
A SSISTAN T LTN ITED STA TES A TTORN EY
FloridaBarNo.86425
99 N .E.4th Street
M iam i,Florida 33132-2111
TEL (305)961-9131
FAX (305)530-7976
Case 1:20-mj-02133-LMR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2020 Page 2 of 11
AO91(Rev.08/09) Crimi
nalComplaint
W Continuedontheattachedsheet.
#
& . '
signat e
SA Joseph Oliver,FBI
Printednameand title
Date: 01/28/2020
Judge'
ssignature
of a variety of violations of federal crim inal law involving hlzman trafticking, the sexual
exploitation ofchildren,and the sexualenticem entofm inors.Ihave been an FBISA since August
2016. Priorto my employm entwith the FBI,lworked asa Police Ofticerand Crimes Against
Children D etective with the Lexington Police D epartm entin K entucky from 2012 to 2016 w here
This affidavit is m ade in supportof probable cause for the arrestof TIPHANI
PEREIRA IûtPEREIRA''I and RICHARD TRAVON W ALKER (ûûW ALKER'') who did
knowingly, in or affecting interstate comm erce, recruit, entice, harbor, transport, advertise,
m aintain,and solicitby any m eansa person,thatis,VICTIM 1,to engage in com m ercialsex acts
1591(a)(1)and(b)(1),andconspiracytocommitsame,inviolationofTitle18,UnitedStatesCode,
Section 1594(c). Further,asto W ALKER,there isprobable cause thathe did make a false
Case 1:20-mj-02133-LMR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2020 Page 4 of 11
1001. Since this affidavitis being submitted forthe limited purpose ofdem onstrating probable
PROBABLE CAUSE
TraffickingTaskForceandthe(
M iami-DadePoliceDepartment(t((
M DPD'')conductedajointttout-
call''operation,utilizingan MDPD undercoverofficer(theûûUC'')attheStadium Hotellocatedat
21485 N W 27thA venue, M iam iGardens,Florida.l
advertisem ent, which was posted on www .megapersonals.com , a website known to law
forfurtherinvestigation.
6. VICTIM 1 wasinterviewed first. She agreed to speak with law enforcem entand
stated that she m et PEREIRA approxim ately 5 years ago on Facebook via m utual Facebook
relationship.
In approxim ately 2014, VICTIM 1 began to prostitute for PEREIRA at the
and VICTIM 1each perfonned comm ercialsex actsand hadto pay Nick $200 perwork day.
8. Eventually,PEREIRA suggested to VICTIM 1thatthey break away on theirOwn.
consistently do m ultiple dates on a daily basis. A fter a couple of m onths of working under
otherw ise engage in com m ercial sex acts. PEREIRA denied V ICTIM 1's request. Upon her
PER EIRA received aphone calland stated to the unlm ow n callerthatlûl'm notselling pussy right
Case 1:20-mj-02133-LMR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2020 Page 6 of 11
n0w.'' Tluough this statem ent, VICTIM realized that PEREIRA was still involved in
prostitution. VICTIM 1 mentioned to PEREIRA she needed to make money and again began
working forPEREIRA.
PEREIRA asked VICTIM 1 to send her pictures for her online advertisement.
V ICTIM 1 sentthe picturesvia textm essage. PER EIRA created the advertisem entand posted it
on EscortAlligator.com ,which isa website known to law enforcem entforthe advertisem entof
w ell as V ICTIM l's cellular telephone. PEREIRA created the account with V ICTIM l's
infonnation, including her nam e and telephone num ber. The purpose of the app was to
com m unicate w ith m ale custom ers,who responded to the posted com m ercialsex advertisem ents.
PEREIRA instructed VICTIM 1 notto answer any Talk-a-tone phone calls or textm essages
14. The applications were installed on both devices and worked sim ultaneously to
appearasifrun by VICTIM 1,when in factthey were being operated by PEREIRA. Every tim e
PEREIRA made any changesto orwithin the application,VICTIM 1 would receive a security
code on her device,and PEREIRA would requestthe security code via textm essages. Itwas
on or aboutJanuary 27,V ICTIM 1 had approxim ately 10 to 15 dates per day. ln those 3 days,
4
Case 1:20-mj-02133-LMR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2020 Page 7 of 11
VICTIM 1 made approximately $1,000 and PEREIRA keptthe remaining funds thathad been
16. M ost dates were itin-calls,''where potential dates came to PEREIRA'S house
then PEREIRA drove VICTIM lto the datesand waited forherto be done,atwhich tim e she
collected the 50% . M ostofthe tim e the transactions were made in cash;however,som etim es
by law enforcem ent as W A LKER. On or about January 24,2020,PER EIRA texted VICTIM 1
infonningherthatûûD''quithisjobasaporteratacardealership.
l8. O n the w ay to the tirstout-callon Janual'
y 27,2020,V ICTIM 1 heard PER EIRA
VICTIM 1to herdates,and shewould givehim $40 from herportion forevery ride hegave her.''
for an tkout-call.'' V ICTIM l norm ally did not do ktout-calls'' in M iam i-D ade County, but
PEREIRA insisted on V ICTIM 1 doing any callsthatcam e through because herlightbillw as due
on January 28,2020 and PEREIR A needed m oney to pay forit. The date would be fora half-hour
Case 1:20-mj-02133-LMR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2020 Page 8 of 11
V ICTIM 1 feared PER EIRA because she had verbally threatened to cause her
physical hann in the past if she did not com ply with PEREIR A 'S dem ands. A dditionally,
PEREIRA ow ned two Taser devices,one black and one pirtk,w hich she keptin her hom e,and
threatened to use on V ICTIM 1. PEREIR A had previously threatened V ICTIM 1 w ith the Taser.
hispocketwhile atthehouse. VICTIM 1 stated she was in fear for herlife ifshe tried to stop
22. D uring the kûin-call''dates,the gun w as keptunder the m attress where V ICTIM 1
conducted the com m ercialsex acts. V ICTIM 1 w as in fear and alw aysnervousbecause she knew
the gun w as there and PEREIR A and/or W A LK ER could easily hurt her. V ICTIM 1 had
repeatedly expressed to PEREIRA that she w anted to quitperform ing com m ercialsex acts,but
ofhercellulartelephone. A prelim inary search ofthe phone revealed num erousm essagesbetween
PEREIR A and V ICTIM 1 w here PEREIRA wastelling V ICTIM 1 she needed to dûw ork,''w hich
yourA ffiant,tllrough training and experience,understands asto engage in sex dates. Cash A pp
that were sent from V ICTIM to PEREIRA for the purposes of online com m ercial sex
advertisem ents.
Case 1:20-mj-02133-LMR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2020 Page 9 of 11
advised that she had been asked to drive VICTIM 1 to the Stadium Hotellocated in M iam i
G ardens. PEREIRA knew V ICTIM 1 for about tive years,butdid not know why she needed a
ride. Herboyfriend,W ALKER,wasin the backseatofthe carand cam e along forthe ride. She
25. PEREIRA was read herM iranda rights,stated she clearly understood them ,and
PER EIRA advised she used the ''Talk-a-tone''app to com m unicate w ith people,butshe had not
fake telephone numberwhen placing calls. PER-EIRA provided consentforlaw enforcem entto
of the phone reveals the follow ing conversation on January 27, 2020 between PEREIRA and
W A LK ER :
2 Your Affiantis aware thatW ALKER'S phone num ber,saved under kcDuke''in PEREIRA'S
phone,is 754-xxx-5800. ln addition,the UC wasscheduled to pay VICTIM 1 $200.Therefore,
W ALKER'Sreferenceto k1160''would indicate $200 minushis$40 payment.
Case 1:20-mj-02133-LMR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2020 Page 10 of 11
Tasergun and m ace,which are located in herhome,and thatshe gota gun permitin December
2019.
29. Lastly,W A LKER w as interview ed by law enforcem ent. W ALKER w as read his
M iranda rightsand agreed to speak to law enforcem ent. He wasadvised by yourA ftiantthatany
had never seen her before this night,which your Affiant understands to be a m aterially false
statement about the investigation. W ALKER denied any knowledge about prostitution.
W ALKER advised thathe liked gunsand shotthem attherange,buthe did notcurrently have a
CO NCLUSIO N
a person,thatis,V ICTIM 1,to engage in com m ercialsex actsby m eans offorce,threats offorce,
LISETTE M .R EID
UN ITED STA TES M AG ISTR ATE JUD G E
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLO RIDA