DOJ Indictment Against Chinese Military (Equifax)

Case 1:20-cr-00046-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 1 of 24
I.
FILED IN CHAMBERS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT U.S.D.C. - Atlanta
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA JAN 282020
ATLANTA DIVISION By: James N. Ha~ Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v. Criminal Indictment
WUZHIYONG, No. 1:20 .d11046
WANG QIAN,
Vri Tf~
.txtj flU,.
Under Seal
Lw LEI
THE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT:
INTRODUCTION
1. Equifax Inc. is a consumer credit reporting agency headquartered in
Atlanta, Georgia (“Equifax”). In its ordinary course of business, Equifax
compiles and stores a vast collection of consumer information, which it
sells to other businesses and organizations seeking to use the information
to assess creditworthiness or verify identity. Equifax thus holds a colossal

repository of sensitive personally identifiable information, including full
names, addresses, social security numbers, birth dates, and driver’s license
numbers, belonging to hundreds of millions of individuals in the United
States and abroad. This data compilation was confidential, proprietary

business information for Equifax, and the company stored the information
on restricted, nonpublic servers located in Alpharetta, Georgia and
elsewhere.
2. Beginning on an unknown date, but at least by on or about May 13,

2017, and continuing through on or about July 30, 2017, members of the
People’s Liberation Army (“PLA”), the armed forces of the People’s
Republic of China (“China”), conspired with each other to hack into the
protected computers of Equifax located in the Northern District of Georgia,
to maintain unauthorized access to those computers, and to steal sensitive

personally identifiable information of 145 million Americans.
3. The PLA hackers obtained names, birth dates, and social security
numbers for the 145 million American victims, in addition to driver’s
license numbers for at least 10 million Americans stored on Equifax’s
databases. The hackers also collected credit card numbers and other
personally identifiable information belonging to approximately 200,000
American consumers. Accordingly, in a single breach, the PLA obtained

sensitive personally identifiable information for nearly half of all American
citizens.
4. Tn addition, the PLA hackers obtained personally identifiable

information belonging to nearly a million citizens of the United Kingdom
and Canada.
BACKGROUND
5. At all times relevant to this Indictment:
a. Equifax hosted an online dispute portal that permitted users
to research and dispute potential inaccuracies in their Equifax credit

reports on servers located in Alpharetta, Georgia. The online dispute
portal used the Apache Struts Web Framework, an open-source software

package for developing web-based applications.
2
b. In connection with the management and protection of its
databases, Equifax developed and maintained proprietary compilations,

designs, processes, and codes that constituted trade secrets, for which it
had taken reasonable measures to keep secret and which derived

independent economic value from not being generally known to, and not
being readily ascertainable through proper means by, another person who
could obtain economic value from the disclosure and use of the
information. This trade secret information included the above-described
personally identifiable information Equifax had acquired at great effort
and expense and that enabled it to operate its business and compete in the
marketplace — that is, its data compilations — as well as the means by which
Equifax accessed and analyzed that information, that is, its database
schemas.
c. On or about March 7, 2017, Apache announced a vulnerability
in certain versions of Apache Struts software that permitted unauthorized

users to access the Apache Struts Web Framework and perform a remote
code execution attack on a target web application. The United States

Computer Emergency Readiness Team issued a threat warning notice
about the vulnerability on or about the following day. The vulnerability

was not patched on Equifax’s online dispute portal.
d. Defendants WU ZHIYONG, whose photograph is attached as
Exhibit A; WANG QIAN, whose photograph is attached as Exhibit B; XU

KE, whose photograph is attached as Exhibit C; and LIU LET were
3
residents of Beijing, China and members of the 54th Research Institute,

which was a component of the PLA.
e. A web shell was a script that can be uploaded to a web server
to enable remote administration of the server. A web shell can be used by

an attacker to gain access to functions on the server and to maintain
persistent access to a compromised server.
COUNT ONE
(Computer Fraud Conspiracy)
2017, and continuing through on or about July 30, 2017, the exact dates
being unknown to the Grand Jury, in the Northern District of Georgia and
elsewhere, the defendants, WU ZHIYONG, WANG QIAN, XU KE, and
LIU LET, did knowingly and willfully combine, conspire, confederate,

agree, and have a tacit understanding with each other and other persons
known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to commit offenses against the
United States, namely:

a. to intentionally access protected computers without
authorization and thereby obtain information from protected
computers in furtherance of the criminal act of economic
espionage in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section
1831(a)(2), with the value of such information exceeding
$5,000, all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections

1030(a) (2) (C) and 1030(c)(2)(B) (ii)—(iii); and
4
b. to knowingly cause the transmission of a program,

information, code, and command, and as a result of such
conduct, to intentionally cause damage without authorization

to a protected computer, and where the offense did cause loss
aggregating at least $5,000 in value to at least one person
during a one-year period from a related course of conduct
affecting a protected computer, and damage affecting at least

ten protected computers during a one-year period, in violation
of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1030(a) (5) (A) and
1030(c)(4)(B).
MANNER AND MEANS OF THE CONSPIRACY
7. It was part of the conspiracy that the defendants, WU ZHIYONG,

WANG QIAN, XU KE, and LIU LEI, and others hacked into Equifax’s
computer networks, maintained unauthorized access to those networks,
and stole login credentials and sensitive personally identifiable

information that were stored on databases within those networks, as well
as protected trade secrets.
8. The conspirators exploited the Apache Struts vulnerability to upload
to an Equifax web server multiple unauthorized web shells and began

reconnaissance of Equffax’s online dispute portal. After gaining access to
the web server, the conspirators interacted with Equffax’s badk-end

databases by installing web shells created through Apache Struts and
issuing commands using Structured Query Language (“SQL”), a database
management language commonly used to query and manipulate data. The
5
conspirators also located and used Equifax database service credentials

and thereby falsely represented that they were authorized users of
Equifax’s network, which permitted them to access additional back-end
databases.
9. The conspirators ran a series of queries to search for sensitive

personally identifiable information within Equifax’s databases. After
locating a repository of names, addresses, social security numbers, and
birth dates, the conspirators ran additional queries to extract this data. In
total, the attackers ran approximately 9,000 queries on Equifax’s system

while masking this activity through encrypted communication channels.
The majority of these queries were issued by conspirators using two
China-based IP addresses that connected directly to Equifax’s network.
10. The conspirators stored the stolen information in temporary files,

compressed and divided the large data files into more manageable file
sizes for transmission, and executed Hypertext Transfer Protocol (“HTTP”)

commands to download the data files.
11. The conspirators attempted to hide the origin and location of their
internet traffic and reduce the likelihood of detection by using
approximately thirty-four servers located in nearly twenty countries to
infiltrate Equifax’s network. The conspirators also employed a variety of

encrypted login protocols, including Remote Desktop Protocol and Secure
Shell software, which permitted them to connect to servers over network

connections from other servers they controlled. To further disguise their
infrastructure, the conspirators obtained access to the servers located
6
outside of China from reseller hosting services, who purchase remote

computing services from other providers and then lease those remote
computing services to others.

12. Additionally, the conspirators attempted to disguise their
unauthorized access to Equifax’s online dispute portal by using existing
encrypted communication channels within Equifax’s network to send

queries and commands, which allowed them to blend in with normal
network activity. By compressing and dividing the data files, the
conspirators also disguised the exfiltration of sensitive personally

identifiable information.
13. To further conceal their activity, the conspirators deleted the
compressed files after exfiltrating the sensitive data. In addition, the
conspirators configured settings on at least one of their leased servers that

wiped log files on a daily basis in an effort to eliminate records of their
activity.
OVERT ACTS
14. In furtherance of the conspiracy, and to effect the purpose and

objects thereof, the defendants, WU ZHIYONG, WANG QIAN, XU KE,
and LIU LEI, and others committed various overt acts in the Northern
District of Georgia and elsewhere, including, but not limited to, the
following:
a. On or about May 13, 2017, a conspirator began exploiting the
Apache Struts vulnerability within Equifax’s online dispute portal and

created a web shell to grant back door access to the portal. Through this
7
initial access, the conspirators obtained database service login credentials
that could be used to navigate to databases within Equifax’s network.

b. After exploiting the vulnerability, the conspirators conducted
reconnaissance on Equifax’s online dispute portal over several weeks by
running a series of queries to identify Equifax’s database structure and the
number of records within it. The conspirators reviewed database records
in small segments through a combination of Apache Struts commands,

malicious web shells created through Apache Struts, and SQL commands.
c. For example, on or about May 13, 2017, a conspirator ran SQL
commands to identify table names and column names for an Equifax
database table. The conspirator then sampled a select number of records
from the database.

d. Between on or about May 13, 2017, and on or about July 24,
2017, the conspirators accessed a file containing sensitive personally

identifiable information. After querying database tables, the conspirators
stored results in output files, which were then split into smaller segments
to facilitate a quicker download while attempting to lessen the risk of
detection.
e. On or about June 16, 2017, a conspirator using a China-based
IP address (“China Server #1”), which was repeatedly accessed during the
intrusion by WANG QIAN, logged into a Taiwanese IP address (“the
Taiwan Server”) via Remote Desktop Protocol software and copied the
malicious file “jndi.txt.” A substantively identical web shell, “Jquery
1.3.2.min.jsp,” was then uploaded to the Equifax network.
8
f. On or about July 5, 2017, a conspirator who was using a Swiss
IF address (“the Swiss Server”) connected to the Equifax network and

accessed a database by using the username and password for one of the
compromised database service accounts. After gaining access to the
database, the conspirator queried the database table for social security
numbers.
g. On or about July 6, 2017, a conspirator who was logged into

the Swiss Server connected to the Equifax network and queried a database
for social security numbers, full names, and address information and
placed the results in output files. After creating the output files, the
conspirators created a compressed file archive of the results and copied it
to a different directory prior to downloading the archive. Following the.

download of the personally identifiable information, the conspirators
deleted the archive in an effort to conceal their activity.

h. On or about the same day, a conspirator who was logged into
the Swiss Server connected to the Equifax network, accessed a different

back-end database by using the username and password for another
compromised database service account, and queried the database.
i. On or about July 7, 2017, a conspirator who was logged into
the Swiss Server connected to the Equifax network, accessed a third back
end database by using the username and password for yet another
compromised database service account, and queried the database.
j. On or about the same day, another China-based IP address

(“China Server #2”), which was also repeatedly accessed during the
9
intrusion by WANG QIAN, exploited the Apache Struts vulnerability on

Equifax’s online dispute portal.
k. On or about the same day and July 9, 2017, XU KE used a
different China-based IF address (“China Server #3”) to conduct

reconnaissance on Equifax’s online dispute portal.
1. On or about July 10, 2017, a conspirator using another China-
based IP address (“China Server #4”) logged into the Taiwan Server and
copied the malicious file “abc.txt” to the Taiwan Server. A conspirator
using another China-based IP address (“China Server #5”) then utilized

the malicious web shell “css.jsp,” which was previously installed on
Equifax’s network, to issue a command to download the “abc.txt” file from
the Taiwan Server. Minutes later, a conspirator using China Server #5

uploaded a substantively identical web shell, “ss.jsp,” to the Equifax
network.
m. On or about the same day, a conspirator logged into the Swiss
Server, connected to the Equifax network, and issued a command to create
an archive containing 49 directories. Once the &rchive was created, a

conspirator split it into 600 megabyte segments, which were then
downloaded from the Equifax network to a Dutch server via HTTP
commands.
n. On or about the same day, a conspirator who was logged into
another China-based IF address (“China Server #6”) utilized the malicious
web shell “boxover.jsp” to query an Equifax database table and store the
results in output files. Using China Server #6, the conspirator then
10
compressed the output file into an archive file and downloaded the
archive using HTTP commands. Following the download, the conspirator
then used the “css.jsp” web shell to delete the archive from Equifax’s
network in an effort to conceal the theft.
o. On or about July 20, 2017 through on or about July 22, 2017,
WANG QIAN, using China Server #2, remotely accessed the malicious
web shell “six.jsp” on an Equifax server, which permitted WANG to issue
unauthoriz~d SQL commands to one of Equifax’s back-end databases. On
or about July 22, 2017, a Singapore-based IP address (“the Singapore

Server”) connected to an Equifax server and accessed the same “six.jsp”
web shell to run additional queries on Equifax’s databases.
p. The conspirators continued to perform queries to compress,

download, and delete output files containing personally identifiable
information stolen from Equifax’s back-end databases until on or about
July 30, 2017.
q. On or about July 30, 2017, LTU LET, using the Singapore

Server, remotely accessed the malicious web shell “ss.jsp” on an Equifax
server.
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371.

COUNT TWO
(Computer Fraud and Abuse: Intentional Damage)
15. The Grand Jury re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs
1 through 5 and 7 through 14 of this Indictment as if fully set forth herein.
16. From on or about May 13, 2017, through on or about July 30, 2017, in
the Northern District of Georgia and elsewhere, the defendants, WU
11
ZHTYONG, WANG QIAN, XU KE, and LIU LEI, aided and abetted by
each other and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, knowingly
caused the transmission of a program, information, code, and command,
namely, malicious web shells and SQL and HTTP commands, and as a
result of such conduct, intentionally caused damage without authorization
to a protected computer with the offense loss aggregating at least $5,000 in

value to at least one person during a one-year period from a related course
of conduct affecting a protected computer, and damage affecting at least
ten protected computers during a one-year period, all in violation of Title
18, United States Code, Sections 1030(a)(5)(A) and 1030(c)(4)(B) and

Section 2.
COUNT THREE
(Computer Fraud and Abuse: Unauthorized Access)
18. From on or about May 13, 2017, through on or about July 30, 2017, in
the Northern District of Georgia and elsewhere, the defendants, WU
ZHIYONG, WANG QIAN, XU KE, and LIU LET, aided and abetted by
each other and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, did
intentionally access a computer, namely the private, internal networks of
Equifax, without authorization and thereby obtained and attempted to

obtain information from a protected computer in furtherance of the
criminal act of economic espionage in violation of Title 18, United States
Code, Section 1831(a)(2), with the value of such information exceeding
12
$5,000, all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections

1030(a)(2)(C) and 1030(c)(2)(B)(ii)—(iii) and Section 2.
COUNT FOUR
(Conspiracy to Commit Economic Espionage)

2017, and continuing through on or about July 30, 2017, in the Northern
District of Georgia and elsewhere, the defendants, WU ZHIYONG, WANG
QIAN, XU KE, and LIU LEI, knowingly and willfully combined,

conspired, confederated, agreed, and had a tacit understanding, with each
other and others known and unknown to the Grand jury, to:
a. knowingly steal and without authorization appropriate, take,
and by fraud, artifice, and deception obtain trade secrets

belonging to Equifax;
b. knowingly and without authorization copy, duplicate,

download, upload, replicate, transmit, deliver, send, mail,
communicate, and convey trade secrets belonging to Equifax;
and
c. knowingly receive, buy, and possess trade secrets belonging

to Equifax, knowing the same to have been stolen,
appropriated, obtained, and converted without authorization;
with said trade secrets including the compilation of confidential,

personally identifiable data collected from a variety of sources at
13
significant effort and expense and the proprietary database schema

designed to store and manipulate that data, intending and knowing that
the offense would benefit a foreign government, instrumentality, and

agent, namely China and the People’s Liberation Army, in violation of
Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1831(a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3).
OVERT ACTS
21. In furtherance of the conspiracy, and to effect the purpose and

objects thereof, the defendants, WU ZHIYONG, WANG QIAN, XU KE,
and LIU LEI, and others committed various overt acts in the Northern
District of Georgia and elsewhere, including, but not limited to, the overt
acts identified in paragraph 14 of the Indictment.
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1831(a) (5).
COUNT FIVE
(Economic Espionage)

QIAN, XU KE, and LIU LET, aided and abetted by each other and others
known and unknown to the Grand Jury, intending and knowing that the
offense would benefit a foreign government, instrumentality, and agent,
namely China and the People’s Liberation Army, did knowingly and
14
without authorization copy, duplicate, download, upload, replicate,

transmit, deliver, send, mail, communicate, and convey a trade secret, and
did attempt to do so, specifically database schemas and the compilation of

data within those databases owned by Equifax, in violation of Title 18,
United States Code, Sections 1831(a)(2) and 1831(a)(4) and Section 2.
COUNT SIX
(Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud)
QIAN, XU KE, and LIU LEI, knowingly and willfully combined,

conspired, confederated, agreed, and had a tacit understanding, with each
other and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to devise and
intend to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud Equifax, and to obtain
money and property from Equifax by means of materially false and

fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, as well as by
omissions of material facts, and for the purpose of executing such scheme
and artifice and to obtain money and property, and attempting to do so,
did knowingly transmit and cause to be transmitted, by means of wire

communication in interstate and foreign commerce, certain writings, signs,
signals, pictures, and sounds, namely malicious computer code and
15
misappropriated user credentials, in violation of Title 18, United States
Code, Section 1343.

MANNER AND MEANS OF THE CONSPIRACY
26. It was part of the conspiracy that the defendants, WU ZHIYONG,
WANG QIAN, XU KE, and LIU LEI, and others known and unknown
employed the manner and means set forth in paragraphs 7 through 13 of
the Indictment to gain unauthorized access to the computer networks of

Equifax and steal confidential, sensitive personally identifiable
information from Equifax’s databases.
27. After infiltrating Equifax’s network, WU ZHIYONG, WANG QIAN,

XU KE, and LIU LEI, and their co-conspirators gained unauthorized access
to an Equifax data repository containing database service credentials and

stole the credentials.
28. WU ZHIYONG, WANG QIAN, XU KE, and LIU LEI, and their co
conspirators then logged into additional Equifax databases using those

credentials, thereby misrepresenting that they were authorized users of
those databases.
29. After gaining access to these additional databases with stolen
credentials, WU ZHIYONG, WANG QIAN, XU KE, and LIU LEI, and their
co-conspirators searched for and stole sensitive and proprietary personally

identifiable information stored in the databases.
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349.
16
COUNTS SEVEN THROUGH NINE

(Wire Fraud)
1 through 5, 7 through 14, and 26 through 29 of this Indictment as if fully
set forth herein.

31. On or about the dates listed in Column A of the table below, in the
Northern District of Georgia and elsewhere, the defendants, WU
ZHI7YONG, WANG QIAN, XU KE, and LIU LET, aided and abetted by
each other and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, having
knowingly devised and intending to devise the aforementioned scheme

and artifice to defraud and to obtain money and property by means of
materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises as
set forth in Count Six of this Indictment, did with intent to defraud cause
the transmission by means of wire communication in interstate and foreign
commerce of certain writings, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds, that is,
the commands specified in Column B issued from the Swiss Server to an
Equifax server located in the Northern District of Georgia, after accessing
an Equifax database through the use of misappropriated login credentials,
for the purpose of executing such scheme and artifice:
A B
Count Date Computer Command

7 7/5/2017 Select SSN from [REDACTED] where rownum<1000
8 7/6/2017 Select 1 from [REDACTED]
9 7/7/2017 Select * from [REDACTED]
17
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343 and Section
2.
FORFEITURE PROVISION
32. Upon conviction of the offense alleged in Count One of this
Indictment, the defendants, WU ZHIYONG, WANG QIAN, XU KE, and
LIU LEI, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United
States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code,
Section 2461, the defendants’ interest in any and all property constituting,
or derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of said

violations.
33. Upon conviction of one or more of the offenses alleged in Counts

Two and Three of this Indictment, the defendants, WU ZHIYONG, WANG
QIAN, XU KB, and LIU LEI, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to
Title 18, United States Code, Sections 982(a)(2)(B) and 1030(i), the
defendants’ interest in any and all p’ersopal property that was used or
intended to be use44o’~ommit or to facilitate the commission of such
violations, as well as any pdØn?dp~rty constituting, or derived from,

proceeds ol~taine~Cdirectly or incUxectty’~Y result of said violations.
34. Upon conv~pon ‘6? one or more of the offenses alleged in Counts
Four and Five of this Indictment, the defendants, WU ZHIYONG, WANG

QIAN, XU KE, and LIU LEI, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to
Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1834 and 2323(b), any and all
property that was used or intended to be used to commit or to facilitate the

commission of such violations, as well as any and all property constituting,
18
or derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of said

violations.
35. Upon conviction of one or more of the offenses alleged in Counts Six
through Nine of this Indictment, the defendants, WU ZHIYONG, WANG
QIAN, XU KE, and LIU LEI, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to
Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United
States Code, Section 2461(c), any and all property constituting, or derived
from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of said violations.
36. If any of the above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any

act or omission of the defendants:
a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;
b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;

c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;
d. has been substantially diminished in value; or
e. has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided

without difficulty;
it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States
Code, Section 853(p), as incorporated by Title 18, United States Code,
Section 982(b), to seek forfeiture of any other property of said defendant
up to the value of the forfeitable property described above; all pursuant to
19
Title 18, United States Code, Sections 981(a)(1)(C) and 982(a)(2)(A) & (B),
and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c).
A — BILL
F
FOREPERSON
BYUNG J. PAK
United States Attorney
NATHAN P. KITCHENS
Assistant United States Attorney
Georgia Bar No. 263930
SAMIR KAUSHAL
Georgia Bar No. 935285
THOMAS J REPP
Georgia Bar No,346781
BE1~’A1AIN FITZPATRICK
Senior Counsel
Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section
DC Bar No. 501806
j~ ~~(~;<
SCOTT MCCULLOCH
Trial Attorney
Counterintelligence and Export Control Section
DC Bar No. 1020608
20
600 U.S. Courthouse

75 Ted Turner Drive SW
Atlanta, GA 30303
404-581-6000; Fax: 404-581-6185
21
Exhibit A
4.
Wu Zhiyonçj (fl~)
Exhibit B
- tr ~
4 ..
—I —
‘p
‘a
a
-F
Wang Qian (1St)

Exhibit C
Xu Ke (i’F~J)

DOJ Indictment Against Chinese Military (Equifax)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DOJ Indictment Against Chinese Military (Equifax)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

DOJ Indictment Against Chinese Military (Equifax)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case 1:20-cr-00046-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/28/20 Page 1 of 24

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

THE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT:

sells to other businesses and organizations seeking to use the information

to assess creditworthiness or verify identity. Equifax thus holds a colossal

States and abroad. This data compilation was confidential, proprietary

2. Beginning on an unknown date, but at least by on or about May 13,

protected computers of Equifax located in the Northern District of Georgia,

to maintain unauthorized access to those computers, and to steal sensitive

American consumers. Accordingly, in a single breach, the PLA obtained

4. Tn addition, the PLA hackers obtained personally identifiable

to research and dispute potential inaccuracies in their Equifax credit

portal used the Apache Struts Web Framework, an open-source software

b. In connection with the management and protection of its

databases, Equifax developed and maintained proprietary compilations,

had taken reasonable measures to keep secret and which derived

in certain versions of Apache Struts software that permitted unauthorized

code execution attack on a target web application. The United States

about the vulnerability on or about the following day. The vulnerability

d. Defendants WU ZHIYONG, whose photograph is attached as

Exhibit A; WANG QIAN, whose photograph is attached as Exhibit B; XU

residents of Beijing, China and members of the 54th Research Institute,

to enable remote administration of the server. A web shell can be used by

LIU LET, did knowingly and willfully combine, conspire, confederate,

United States, namely:

espionage in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section

1831(a)(2), with the value of such information exceeding

$5,000, all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections

b. to knowingly cause the transmission of a program,

conduct, to intentionally cause damage without authorization

affecting a protected computer, and damage affecting at least

MANNER AND MEANS OF THE CONSPIRACY

7. It was part of the conspiracy that the defendants, WU ZHIYONG,

and stole login credentials and sensitive personally identifiable

as protected trade secrets.

8. The conspirators exploited the Apache Struts vulnerability to upload

to an Equifax web server multiple unauthorized web shells and began

the web server, the conspirators interacted with Equffax’s badk-end

conspirators also located and used Equifax database service credentials

9. The conspirators ran a series of queries to search for sensitive

total, the attackers ran approximately 9,000 queries on Equifax’s system

10. The conspirators stored the stolen information in temporary files,

sizes for transmission, and executed Hypertext Transfer Protocol (“HTTP”)

infiltrate Equifax’s network. The conspirators also employed a variety of

Shell software, which permitted them to connect to servers over network

infrastructure, the conspirators obtained access to the servers located

outside of China from reseller hosting services, who purchase remote

computing services to others.

encrypted communication channels within Equifax’s network to send

conspirators also disguised the exfiltration of sensitive personally

conspirators configured settings on at least one of their leased servers that

14. In furtherance of the conspiracy, and to effect the purpose and

Apache Struts vulnerability within Equifax’s online dispute portal and

initial access, the conspirators obtained database service login credentials

that could be used to navigate to databases within Equifax’s network.

in small segments through a combination of Apache Struts commands,

from the database.

2017, the conspirators accessed a file containing sensitive personally