Sample 4493 PDF
Sample 4493 PDF
Sample 4493 PDF
By
Abhinav Misra
Publishers
UPKAR PRAKASHAN
(An ISO 9001 : 2000 Company)
● The publishers have taken all possible precautions in publishing this book, yet
if any mistake has crept in, the publishers shall not be responsible for the same.
● This book or any part thereof may not be reproduced in any form by
Photographic, Mechanical, or any other method, for any use, without written
permission from the Publishers.
● Only the courts at Agra shall have the jurisdiction for any legal dispute.
ISBN : 978-93-5013-014-8
Price : 55.00
(Rs. Fifty Five Only)
Code No. 932
155. Effect of mixture, without bailor’s consent, 188. Extent of agent’s authority.
of his goods with bailee’s. 189. Agent’s authority in an emergency.
156. Effect of mixture, without bailor’s consent, 190. When agent cannot delegate.
when the goods can be separated. 191. Sub-agent defined.
159. Restoration of goods lent gratuitously.
193. Agent’s responsibility for sub-agent
162. Termination of gratuitous bailment by appointed without authority.
death.
195. Agent’s duty in naming such person.
163. Bailor entitled to increase or profit from
goods bailed. 196. Right of person as to acts done for him
without his authority, effect of ratification.
164. Bailor’s responsibility to bailee.
165. Bailment by several joint owners. 197. Ratification may be expressed or implied.
166. Bailee not responsible on redelivery to 198. Knowledge requisite for valid ractification.
bailor without title. 199. Effect of ratifying unauthorized act form-
167. Right of third person claiming goods ing part of a transaction.
bailed. 201. Termination of agency.
168. Right of finder of goods, may sue for 204. Revocation where authority has been partly
specific reward offered. exercised.
169. When finder of thing commonly on sale
may sell it. 205. Compensation for revocation by principal
or renunciation by agent.
170. Bailee’s particular lien.
172. Pledge, pawnor and pawnee defined. 206. Notice for revocation or renunciation.
173. Pawnee’s right to retainer. 207. Revocation and renunciation may be
175. Pawnee’s right to extraordinary expenses expressed or implied.
incurred. 208. When termination of agent’s authority
176. Pawnee’s right where power makes takes effect as to agent and as to third
default. persons.
177. Defaulting pawnor’s right to redeem. 210. Termination of sub-agent’s authority.
178. Pledge by mercantile agent. 211. Agent’s duty in conducting principal’s
178A. Pledge by person in possession under business.
voidable contract. 212. Skill and diligence required from agent.
179. Pledge where pawnor has only a limited 214. Agent’s duty to communicate with princi-
interest. pal.
182. Agent and principal defined. 217. Agent’s right of retainer out of sums
183. Who may employ agent. received on principal’s account.
184. Who may be an agent. 218. Agent’s duty to pay sums received for
185. Consideration not necessary. principal.
186. Agent’s authority may be expressed or 219. When agent’s remuneration becomes due.
implied. 221. Agent’s lien on principal’s property.
PART–1
General
This Act is known as the Indian Contract Act, finds trace of the boy and brings his home.
1872, it extends to the whole of India except the The plaintiff found the missing boy and
state of Jammu & Kashmir, it came into force on sent a telegram to his father according to
the first day of September, 1872. It contains : advertisement, plaintiff was entitled to
amount offered.
(a) 11 Chapters
(vi) Harvey Vs Facey, 1893 AC 552, in this A
(b) 266 Sections
telegraphed to B, writing “will you sell me
(c) Largest Chapter—Chapter X your Bumper Hall Pen, please telegraph the
(Section 182 to Section 238) lowest cash price.” B replied “the lowest
price for pen 900 Ponds.” Again sent
Main Cases telegram “I agree to buy Bumber Hall Pen.”
(i) Mohta Alloy and Steel Works Vs Mohta It was not a contract, it was only a invita-
Finance and Leasing Co. Ltd., 1987. In this tion to treat.
S. C. held “an agreement is regarded as a (vii) Mcpherson Vs Appana, AIR 1951 S.C. 184.
contract when it is enforceable by law.” This is also a case on invitation to treat.
(ii) Balfour Vs Balfour, 1919, KB in this Lord (viii) Bhagwan Das Vs Girdhari Lal 1966, 1SCR
Atkin explained the principle of intention to 656, it is a case on External manifestation
contract and held “there are agreements in words of Shah Jan agreement does not
between parties which do not result in result from a mere state of mind, there must
contract are not contracts because parties be some external act by speech, writing or
did not intend that they shall be attended by act.
legal consequences.” (ix) Brogden Vs Metropolitan Railway Co.,
(iii) McGregor Vs McGregor, 1888, it is a case 1877. According to this manifestation may
of a binding engagement between a hus- be in form of express words, written or
band and wife. spoken or by signified through conduct.
(iv) Carlill Vs Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. 1893. (x) Adams Vs Lindsell, 1818, K. B., is a case
In this a Smoke Ball Co. offered to pay 100 on “when parties are at a distance and
ponds to any person, whose influenza contracting through post. Then anyone is
caused by cold increased after using ball not bound till any certain period.
according to printed directions. The plain- (xi) Hyde Vs Wrench, 1840, is a case on counter
tiff used the balls but she nevertheless proposals.
subsequently suffered from influenza. She
was held entitled to recover the promised (xii) Currie Vs Misa, 1875 CR in this definition
reward. of contract is given; according to this, a
valuable consideration in the sense of the
(v) Har Bhajan Lal Vs Harcharan Lal, AIR law, may consist either in some right,
1925, All 539—In this a boy ran away from interest or benefit accruing to the one party
his home, his father offered by adver- or some forbearance, loss and detriment
tisement to pay Rs. 500, to the person who given by other.
The Indian Contract Act 1872
30%
OFF