0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views45 pages

2050 Master Plan

The document summarizes the results of a citizen survey conducted across 6 wards in a city. It finds that while citizens are generally satisfied with quality of life, cost of living, and safety are the most important factors for living in or leaving the city. Satisfaction levels vary slightly by ward, but place to live and work are the top reasons for satisfaction overall. Crime and cost of living are the most cited factors that could cause residents to consider relocating.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views45 pages

2050 Master Plan

The document summarizes the results of a citizen survey conducted across 6 wards in a city. It finds that while citizens are generally satisfied with quality of life, cost of living, and safety are the most important factors for living in or leaving the city. Satisfaction levels vary slightly by ward, but place to live and work are the top reasons for satisfaction overall. Crime and cost of living are the most cited factors that could cause residents to consider relocating.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 45

Page 0

Page 1

Part I Part II Part III


General Approach What What Citizens
and High-level Constituents Think the City’s
Results Want the City to Priorities Should
Look Like in the Be Overall
Future
Page 2

Part I Part II Part III


General Approach What What Citizens
and High-level Constituents Think the City’s
Results Want the City to Priorities Should
Look Like in the Be Overall
Future
Page 3

RESPONDENTS COUNTS BY WARD


Number of
Survey Component Respondents
Ward 1 215

Ward 2 222

Ward 3 218

Ward 4 221

Ward 5 210

Ward 6 211

Ward-Specific Total 1,297

Initial Survey in April 2019 (Wards Not Identified) 420

City-Wide Total 1,717


Page 4

General Public Openness &


Satisfaction Safety Inclusivity

Part I
General Approach
and High-level
Results
Sense of Infrastructure Goals &
Community & Amenities Concerns
Page 5

General Public Openness &


Satisfaction Safety Inclusivity

Part I
General Approach
and High-level
Results
Sense of Infrastructure Goals &
Community & Amenities Concerns
Page 6

Which of the following most closely matches your satisfaction with the
quality of life in the City of Las Vegas?

Ward 2 26% 56% 9% 7% 2%

Ward 4 38% 42% 9% 10% 1%

City of Las Vegas 28% 47% 12% 10% 2%

Ward 6 27% 48% 14% 8% 3%

Ward 3 26% 49% 16% 8% 1%

Ward 5 23% 51% 13% 10% 3%

Ward 1 24% 42% 13% 19% 2%

Extremely satisfied Somewhat satisfied Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied Somewhat dissatisfied Extremely dissatisfied

CLV = 1,717; W1 = 215; W2 = 222; W3 = 218; W4 = 221; W5 = 210; W6 = 211


Page 7

Please tell us about the reasons you live in the City of Las Vegas.

Cost of Living 47% Cost of Living 2%

Safety/Crime 45% Safety/Crime 5%

Family 45% Health Care 5%

Employment 42% Climate 7%

Health Care 38% Amenities 8%

Climate 27% Family 11%

Education 24% Employment 12%

Amenities 21% Destinations 14%

Destinations 18% Education 20%

N = 1,717
Page 8

Please tell us about the reasons you live in the City of Las Vegas.

Top 3 reasons that are “extremely important” to live in the City of Las Vegas by Ward

Ward #1 Reason #2 Reason #3 Reason


Ward 1 Family Cost of Living Employment
Ward 2 Cost of Living Safety/Crime Family
Ward 3 Cost of Living Safety/Crime Employment
Ward 4 Family Employment Safety/Crime
Ward 5 Safety/Crime Cost of Living Family
Ward 6 Family Safety/Crime Cost of Living
Page 9

What factors might cause you to consider relocating to another city?

Top 3 reasons that are “extremely likely” or “somewhat likely” to consider relocation by Ward

Ward #1 Reason #2 Reason #3 Reason


Ward 1 Cost of Living Safety/Crime Employment
Ward 2 Safety/Crime Cost of Living Employment
Ward 3 Safety/Crime Cost of Living Health Care
Ward 4 Safety/Crime Cost of Living Health Care
Ward 5 Safety/Crime Cost of Living Employment
Ward 6 Safety/Crime Cost of Living Employment
Page 10

Please select which most closely matches your satisfaction with the
quality of life in the City of Las Vegas.

Place to live 39% 39% 11% 7% 4%

Place to work 32% 39% 20% 6% 3%

Place to retire 39% 31% 19% 6% 5%

Place to raise children 14% 26% 31% 15% 14%

Extremely satisfied Somewhat satisfied Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied Somewhat dissatisfied Extremely dissatisfied

N = 1,717 City-wide
Page 11

Please select which most closely matches your satisfaction with the
quality of life in the City of Las Vegas.

Ranking of “extremely satisfied” or “somewhat satisfied” with the quality of life in the City of Las Vegas by Ward

Ward #1 #2 #3 #4
Ward 1 Place to Live Place to Work Place to Retire Place to Raise Children
Ward 2 Place to Live Place to Work Place to Retire Place to Raise Children
Ward 3 Place to Live Place to Work Place to Retire Place to Raise Children
Ward 4 Place to Live Place to Retire Place to Work Place to Raise Children
Ward 5 Place to Work Place to Live Place to Retire Place to Raise Children
Ward 6 Place to Live Place to Work Place to Retire Place to Raise Children
Page 12

Why would you not recommend an out-of-state friend or relative move


to the City?

N = 1,245; Multiple responses allowed.


Page 13

General Public Openness &


Satisfaction Safety Inclusivity

Part I
General Approach
and High-level
Results
Sense of Infrastructure Goals &
Community & Amenities Concerns
Page 14

How often do you participate in community organizations (e.g., non-


profits, interest groups, clubs, etc.)?

Ward 3 18% 4% 25% 53%

Ward 1 18% 7% 19% 56%

Ward 2 15% 10% 23% 52%

City of Las Vegas 15% 9% 24% 53%

Ward 5 12% 9% 27% 53%

Ward 4 12% 14% 24% 51%

Ward 6 11% 6% 28% 55%

Once a week Multiple times a month Once a month Never

CLV = 1,717; W1 = 215; W2 = 222; W3 = 218; W4 = 221; W5 = 210; W6 = 211


Page 15

What community organizations (e.g., non-profits, interest groups, clubs,


etc.) do you participate in?

N = 1,245; Multiple responses allowed.


Page 16

How often do you talk with your neighbors?

Ward 5 31% 15% 16% 21% 17%

Ward 3 20% 11% 22% 27% 20%

City of Las Vegas 16% 12% 16% 33% 22%

Ward 1 16% 7% 18% 27% 32%

Ward 4 14% 15% 12% 35% 23%

Ward 2 14% 16% 16% 33% 22%

Ward 6 7% 10% 14% 45% 24%

Daily 4-6 times a week 2-3 times a week Once a week Never

CLV = 1,717; W1 = 215; W2 = 222; W3 = 218; W4 = 221; W5 = 210; W6 = 211


Page 17

One thing missing from my neighborhood is…

N = 1,245; Multiple responses allowed.


Page 18

General Public Openness &


Satisfaction Safety Inclusivity

Part I
General Approach
and High-level
Results
Sense of Infrastructure Goals &
Community & Amenities Concerns
Page 19

How safe do you feel in the City of Las Vegas?

Ward 6 13% 61% 15% 10%

Ward 2 13% 57% 13% 12% 4%

City of Las Vegas 18% 49% 19% 11% 4%

Ward 5 21% 46% 20% 12% 1%

Ward 4 24% 41% 17% 9% 9%

Ward 3 17% 47% 25% 7% 3%

Ward 1 20% 39% 23% 14% 4%

Very safe Moderately safe Neither safe nor unsafe Moderately unsafe Very unsafe

CLV = 1,717; W1 = 215; W2 = 222; W3 = 218; W4 = 221; W5 = 210; W6 = 211


Page 20

How safe do you feel in your neighborhood?

Ward 6 48% 43% 6% 2%

Ward 4 48% 39% 6% 4% 3%

Ward 2 36% 49% 8% 5% 2%

City of Las Vegas 37% 42% 12% 5% 3%

Ward 3 29% 43% 20% 5% 2%

Ward 1 29% 41% 18% 7% 5%

Ward 5 33% 36% 13% 13% 5%

Very safe Moderately safe Neither safe nor unsafe Moderately unsafe Very unsafe

CLV = 1,717; W1 = 215; W2 = 222; W3 = 218; W4 = 221; W5 = 210; W6 = 211


Page 21

Do you consider your neighborhood a high, medium or low crime area?

Low Crime by Ward High Crime by Ward


Medium
34% Ward 6 79% Ward 6 1%

Ward 4 72% Ward 2 6%


High
9%
City-wide Ward 2 62% Ward 4 7%

Ward 1 45% Ward 3 9%

Low Ward 5 Ward 1


41% 11%
57%

Ward 3 41% Ward 5 15%

CLV = 1,717; W1 = 215; W2 = 222; W3 = 218; W4 = 221; W5 = 210; W6 = 211


Page 22

How confident are you in the capability of police to protect you from
crime?
Confident by Ward Not Confident by Ward
Confident
55% Ward 4 62% Ward 6 21%

Ward 2 58% Ward 4 23%

City-wide Ward 6 57% Ward 2 26%

Don't Ward 3 53% Ward 5 33%


know/refuse Not
d confident
16% 29% Ward 1 51% Ward 1 35%

Ward 5 49% Ward 3 36%

CLV = 1,717; W1 = 215; W2 = 222; W3 = 218; W4 = 221; W5 = 210; W6 = 211


Page 23

How confident are you in the police to respond quickly to a phone call
(emergency or non-emergency)?
Confident by Ward Not Confident by Ward
Confident
57% Ward 4 63% Ward 6 23%

Ward 6 62% Ward 4 24%

City-wide Ward 2 60% Ward 2 31%

Don't Ward 3 54% Ward 3 37%


know/refuse Not
d confident
13% 31% Ward 1 53% Ward 5 38%

Ward 5 48% Ward 1 39%

CLV = 1,717; W1 = 215; W2 = 222; W3 = 218; W4 = 221; W5 = 210; W6 = 211


Page 24

How confident are you in fire or other emergency services to respond


quickly to an emergency phone call?
Confident by Ward Not Confident by Ward

Ward 4 84% Ward 4 5%


Confident
81% Ward 6 83% Ward 6 6%

City-wide Ward 5 83% Ward 2 9%


Not
confident
Ward 2 80% Ward 5 10%
Don't 10%
know/refuse
d Ward 3 79% Ward 3 12%
9%

Ward 1 79% Ward 1 17%

CLV = 1,717; W1 = 215; W2 = 222; W3 = 218; W4 = 221; W5 = 210; W6 = 211


Page 25

General Public Openness &


Satisfaction Safety Inclusivity

Part I
General Approach
and High-level
Results
Sense of Infrastructure Goals &
Community & Amenities Concerns
Page 26

Please assess the quality of the following in the City of Las Vegas.

Parks & Recreation 28% 39% 26% 5% 2%

Housing 21% 40% 30% 7% 2%

Utilities 18% 35% 37% 8% 2%

Transportation 18% 31% 38% 11% 2%

Health Care 15% 31% 35% 14% 5%

Education 10% 19% 34% 24% 14%

Excellent Good Average Poor Terrible

N = 1,717 City-wide
Page 27

Please assess the quality of the following in the City of Las Vegas.

Ranking of “excellent” or “good” quality in the City of Las Vegas by Ward

Good/Services Ward 1 Ward 2 Ward 3 Ward 4 Ward 5 Ward 6


Parks and Recreation #1 #1 #1 #1 #1 #1
Housing #2 #2 #2 #2 #2 #2
Transportation #3 #4 #4 #5 #3 #4
Utilities #4 #3 #3 #3 #4 #3
Health Care #5 #5 #5 #4 #5 #5
Education #6 #6 #6 #6 #6 #6
Page 28

Please tell us if you have used any of the following park amenities –
other than sports fields – during the past year.

Walking trails 65% 25% 11%

Open Spaces 60% 30% 11%

Picnic areas 51% 38% 11%

Playgrounds 41% 49% 11%

Lakes 37% 52% 11%

Use Do Not Use Don't know/refused

N = 1,717; Top five responses only. City-wide


Page 29

Overall, would you rate the condition of the City parks as excellent,
good, average, fair or poor?

Ward 4 26% 51% 18% 3% 2%

Ward 2 31% 42% 23% 3%

Ward 6 24% 48% 24% 3%1%

City of Las Vegas 25% 46% 25% 3%1%

Ward 1 24% 46% 24% 4% 2%

Ward 3 25% 40% 30% 5%

Ward 5 21% 41% 35% 3%

Excellent Good Average Poor Terrible

CLV = 1,717; W1 = 215; W2 = 222; W3 = 218; W4 = 221; W5 = 210; W6 = 211


Page 30

How safe do you feel in City of Las Vegas parks?

Ward 2 26% 52% 17% 4% 2%

City of Las Vegas 28% 45% 20% 5% 2%

Ward 6 28% 44% 22% 4% 1%

Ward 3 24% 47% 21% 6% 2%

Ward 5 26% 43% 28% 2%

Ward 1 28% 41% 20% 8% 2%

Ward 4 34% 35% 17% 9% 5%

Very safe Moderately safe Neither safe nor unsafe Moderately unsafe Very unsafe

CLV = 1,717; W1 = 215; W2 = 222; W3 = 218; W4 = 221; W5 = 210; W6 = 211


Page 31

General Public Openness &


Satisfaction Safety Inclusivity

Part I
General Approach
and High-level
Results
Sense of Infrastructure Goals &
Community & Amenities Concerns
Page 32

In the last 12 months, did you or a member of your immediate household


experience discrimination, or were you or a member of your immediate family
refused services or treated unfairly because of:

None of these 61%

Race or Color 9%

Age 5%

Credit history 5%

Gender 3%

N = 2,084; Multiple responses allowed. Top five responses only. City-wide


Page 33

If you said "Yes" to at least one item in the previous question, please check the box
for each area that you or a member of your immediate household experienced
discrimination or unfair treatment with:

Employment 17%

Private business 13%

Law enforcement and policing 10%

Financial services and credit 9%

Consumer 9%

N = 2,218; Multiple responses allowed. Top five responses only. City-wide


Page 34
How would you rate the City of Las Vegas as an open and inclusive
place for people of different race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender
or gender identity?
Ward 4 42% 39% 14% 2%2%

Ward 2 35% 46% 17% 1%

Ward 6 44% 35% 20% 1%

City of Las Vegas 37% 40% 19% 3%1%

Ward 1 35% 39% 19% 5% 2%

Ward 5 36% 37% 20% 7% 1%

Ward 3 37% 34% 24% 5%

Extremely good Somewhat good Neither good nor bad Somewhat bad Extremely bad

CLV = 1,717; W1 = 215; W2 = 222; W3 = 218; W4 = 221; W5 = 210; W6 = 211


Page 35

General Public Openness &


Satisfaction Safety Inclusivity

Part I
General Approach
and High-level
Results
Sense of Infrastructure Goals &
Community & Amenities Concerns
Page 36

Please rank the issues the City of Las Vegas should prioritize over the
next 30 years.

Public Safety #1
Health Care #2
Education & Youth Development #3 City residents ranked public
Housing #4 safety as the highest priority
Community Services #5 issue that the City should
Transportation/Public Works #6 address in the next 30 years
Economic & Urban Development #7
Parks & Recreation #8
Cultural Affairs #9
N = 1,717 City-wide
Page 37

Please rank the issues the City of Las Vegas should prioritize over the
next 30 years.
Public Safety #1 Education & Youth Development #1 Public Safety #1
Education & Youth Development #2 Health Care #2 Health Care #2
Health Care #3 Public Safety #3 Education & Youth Development #3
Housing #4 Housing #4 Housing #4
Community Services #5 Community Services #5 Community Services #5
Transportation/Public Works #6 Transportation/Public Works #6 Transportation/Public Works #6
Economic & Urban Development #7 Economic & Urban Development #7 Economic & Urban Development #7
Parks & Recreation #8 Parks & Recreation #8 Parks & Recreation #8
Cultural Affairs #9 Cultural Affairs #9 Cultural Affairs #9
Ward 1 Ward 2 Ward 3
N = 215 N = 222 N = 218
Page 38

Please rank the issues the City of Las Vegas should prioritize over the
next 30 years.
Public Safety #1 Public Safety #1 Education & Youth Development #1
Education & Youth Development #2 Education & Youth Development #2 Health Care #2
Health Care #3 Health Care #3 Public Safety #3
Housing #4 Housing #4 Housing #4
Community Services #5 Community Services #5 Community Services #5
Transportation/Public Works #6 Economic & Urban Development #6 Transportation/Public Works #6
Economic & Urban Development #7 Transportation/Public Works #7 Economic & Urban Development #7
Parks & Recreation #8 Parks & Recreation #8 Parks & Recreation #8
Cultural Affairs #9 Cultural Affairs #9 Cultural Affairs #9
Ward 4 Ward 5 Ward 6
N = 221 N = 210 N = 211
Page 39

If I could change one thing about the City it would be…

N = 1,245; Multiple responses allowed.


Page 40

Part I Part II Part III


General Approach What What Citizens
and High-level Constituents Think the City’s
Results Want the City to Priorities Should
Look Like in the Be Overall
Future
Page 41

1. Less about progress; more about preservation


Part II 2. The future is tomorrow, not 30 years from now
What 3. Cognitive dissonance, progress absent cost
Constituents 4. This is the community they have chosen, remember why
Want the City to
Look Like in the 5. Need to justify the benefits of growth, progress or pain
Future 6. Seeking a sense of community, sense of pride
7. A city that is both opportunistic and strategic
8. The City and its residents are not one thing
Page 42

Part I Part II Part III


General Approach What What Citizens
and High-level Constituents Think the City’s
Results Want the City to Priorities Should
Look Like in the Be Overall
Future
Page 43

1. Preserve quality of life; hold the line


2. Create opportunities for all residents to thrive
Part III 3. Make Las Vegas among the safest cities in America
What Citizens 4. Increase accessibility to quality health care
Think the City’s
5. Expect equality, inclusion and acceptance
Priorities Should
Be Overall 6. War on poverty
7. Maintain financial responsibility; ensure asset maximization
8. Partnership; a can-do, will-do city
Page 44

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy