Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 138 views

    Anti-Winawer Gambit PDF

    Uploaded by

    sevenhunt
    The document provides statistics and analysis on 10 games that followed the opening moves 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 e5 4.e4 in chess. It summarizes the key points of each section, including the oldest and newest games, average ratings, popular moves from the position, and endgame results. The analysis found that in most games, Black was able to win after White played dxe4 or dxc4 on move 4.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Anti-Winawer Gambit PDF

    Uploaded by

    sevenhunt
    138 views5 pages
    The document provides statistics and analysis on 10 games that followed the opening moves 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 e5 4.e4 in chess. It summarizes the key points of each section, including the oldest and newest games, average ratings, popular moves from the position, and endgame results. The analysis found that in most games, Black was able to win after White played dxe4 or dxc4 on move 4.

    Original Title

    Anti-Winawer Gambit.pdf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides statistics and analysis on 10 games that followed the opening moves 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 e5 4.e4 in chess. It summarizes the key points of each section, including the oldest and newest games, average ratings, popular moves from the position, and endgame results. The analysis found that in most games, Black was able to win after White played dxe4 or dxc4 on move 4.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    138 views5 pages

    Anti-Winawer Gambit PDF

    Uploaded by

    sevenhunt
    The document provides statistics and analysis on 10 games that followed the opening moves 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 e5 4.e4 in chess. It summarizes the key points of each section, including the oldest and newest games, average ratings, popular moves from the position, and endgame results. The analysis found that in most games, Black was able to win after White played dxe4 or dxc4 on move 4.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 5

    Anti-Winawer Gambit

    N
    Database: 31-XII-2010 (4,399,153 games)
    Report: 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3. c3 e5 4.e4 (10 games)
    ECO: D10j [Slav: Winawer Countergambit]
    Generated by Scid 4.2.2, 2011.02.15

    rmblkans
    opZ0Zpop
    0ZpZ0Z0Z
    Z0Zpo0Z0
    0ZPOPZ0Z
    Z0M0Z0Z0
    PO0Z0OPO
    S0AQJBMR
    0.1 Statistics and History
    0.1.1 Statistics
    1 1
    Games 1:0 :
    2 2
    0:1 Score
    All report games 10 1 3 6 25.0%

    0.1.2 Oldest games


    1: 0:1(34) Jordan – Drummond, Toronto 1936 1
    2: : (44) Khalilbeili – Pimenov, Yerevan 1955 9
    1 1
    2 2
    3: 0:1(29) Ruotanen Hannu – Sihvonen, 1990 7
    4: 1:0(16) Vass – Keskowski, 1992 8
    5: 0:1(35) Turp P – Hoad PC, 1992 6
    6: 0:1(56) Mouzakioti I – Fanouraki, 1995 4
    7: : (36) Termes Canals Jordi – Escudero Sebastian, 1997 2
    1 1
    2 2
    8: 0:1(24) Becker – Bruchmann, 1998 10

    0.1.3 Newest games


    1: 0:1(58) Pospisil 1742 – Kral, 2007 3
    2: : (25) Ceylan – Semcesen 2212, 2004 5
    1 1
    2 2
    3: 0:1(24) Becker – Bruchmann, 1998 10
    4: : (36) Termes Canals Jordi – Escudero Sebastian, 1997 2
    1 1
    2 2
    5: 0:1(56) Mouzakioti I – Fanouraki, 1995 4
    6: 1:0(16) Vass – Keskowski, 1992 8
    7: 0:1(35) Turp P – Hoad PC, 1992 6
    8: 0:1(29) Ruotanen Hannu – Sihvonen, 1990 7
    0.1.4 Current popularity

    Year 1800-99 1900-49 1950-69 1970-79 1980-89 1990-99 2000-09


    Once every X games — 75809 159448 — — 265779 961965
    Frequency in all years: once every 439915 games
    In the 10 years to today: once every 784576 games (down 43% from all years)
    In the 5 years to today: once every 653172 games (down 32% from all years)
    In the 1 year to today: once every 0 games (no change from all years)

    0.1.5 Most frequent players (White)

    1: 1 2007 0% 1742 Pospisil, Petr 3


    2: 1 1936 0% Jordan, HW. 1
    3: 1 1955 50% Khalilbeili, Sultan 9
    4: 1 1998 0% Becker, Johnny 10
    5: 1 1992 100% Vass, Attila 8
    6: 1 1990 0% Ruotanen Hannu 7

    0.1.6 Most frequent players (Black)

    1: 1 2004 50% 2212 Semcesen, Daniel 5


    2: 1 1936 100% Drummond, Redpath 1
    3: 1 1955 50% Pimenov, Sergey Ivanovich 9
    4: 1 1992 100% Hoad PC 6
    5: 1 1992 0% Keskowski, Thilo 8
    6: 1 1990 100% Sihvonen, Tero 7

    0.2 Ratings and Performance

    0.2.1 Average ratings and performance

    White rating: 1742 (1 games); White performance: 2212 (50% vs 2212)


    Black rating: 2212 (1 games); Black performance: 2741 (100% vs 1742)

    0.2.2 Games with highest average rating

    1: 1:0(16) Vass – Keskowski, 1992 8


    2: 0:1(24) Becker – Bruchmann, 1998 10
    3: : (25) Ceylan – Semcesen 2212, 2004 5
    1 1
    2 2
    4: 0:1(58) Pospisil 1742 – Kral, 2007 3
    5: : (44) Khalilbeili – Pimenov, Yerevan 1955 9
    1 1
    2 2
    6: 0:1(29) Ruotanen Hannu – Sihvonen, 1990 7
    7: 0:1(56) Mouzakioti I – Fanouraki, 1995 4
    8: : (36) Termes Canals Jordi – Escudero Sebastian, 1997 2
    1 1
    2 2
    0.3 Result Trends
    0.3.1 Result lengths and frequencies
    Score Game length Frequency
    1:0 12 : 12 0:1 1:0 1 1
    :
    2 2
    0:1
    Report games 25.0% 16 35 39 10.0% 30.0% 60.0%
    All games 53.9% 39 35 40 38.6% 30.5% 30.7%

    0.3.2 Shortest wins (White)


    1: 1:0(16) Vass – Keskowski, 1992 8

    0.3.3 Shortest wins (Black)


    1: 0:1(24) Becker – Bruchmann, 1998 10
    2: 0:1(29) Ruotanen Hannu – Sihvonen, 1990 7
    3: 0:1(34) Jordan – Drummond, Toronto 1936 1
    4: 0:1(35) Turp P – Hoad PC, 1992 6
    5: 0:1(56) Mouzakioti I – Fanouraki, 1995 4

    0.4 Moves and Themes


    0.4.1 Move orders reaching the report position

    N
    There were 2 move orders reaching this position:

    N
    1: 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3. c3 e5 4.e4 (9)
    2: 1.c4 c6 2. c3 d5 3.d4 e5 4.e4 (1)

    0.4.2 Moves from the report position


    Move ECO Frequency Score µElo Perf µYear % Draws
    1 dxe4 9: 90.0% 27.7% 1992 33%
    2 dxc4 1: 10.0% 0.0% 1936 0%
    Total 10:100.0% 25.0% 1987 30%

    0.4.3 Positional Themes


    Frequency of themes in the first 20 moves of each game:
    Same-side castling: 20% White Isolated Queen Pawn: 0%
    Opposite castling: 10% Black Isolated Queen Pawn: 0%
    Kingside pawn storm: 90% White Pawn on 5/6/7th rank: 100%
    Queens exchanged: 20% Black Pawn on 2/3/4th rank: 100%
    Only one side has Bishop pair: 20% Open c/d/e file: 100%

    0.4.4 Endgames
    Material at the end of each game:
    R Q QR
    p BN R BN Q BN QR BN
    Report games 0% 20% 20% 50% 0% 10% 0% 0%
    All games 3% 9% 9% 25% 2% 4% 4% 43%
    0.5 Theory Table
    N
    1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3. c3 e5 4.e4: +1 =3 –6 (2.5/10: 25%)
    4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    B R B Nxe4 Qxd2 Qe3 2: 25%
    Q B Q Q Bxd2+ Qxe5 Ne7
    1 e4 dxe5 f4 c1 d2
    dxe41 a5 b4 xa2 a5 2

    K 3
    B Be3 f4
    Q B B B Nd7 exf3
    2 ... ... xd1 e2 g4 h4 3: 17%
    ... xd1+ g4+ f54 g6 h6 5

    N ge26 B Ng3 Ngxe4 Ke1 2: 0%


    B B N Bg6 OOO f6
    3 ... ... ... d2
    7
    ... ... f5 b4 a6
    N g38 Kc2 Ncxe4 f4
    N B Nxe5 Be7 Ng6
    4 ... ... ... ... 2: 75%
    9
    ... ... ... d7 g4+
    Be2 Kxe2 b3
    Bxe2+ Nxe5 Nf6
    5 ... ... ... ... ... 1: 0%
    10
    ... ... ... ... ...

    1
    Q K B N b6 16.c5 b5 17.g3 Kb7 18.Bg2 Nc7 19.a4 a6
    B K N B R B 20.axb5 axb5 21.f3 Rd3 0:1(29) Ruotanen
    4...dxc4 5.dxe5 xd1+ 6. xd1 e6 7. f3

    K N N B N
    c5 8. e2 d7 9. e3 OOO 10. d1 xe3

    N B K
    11. xe3 e7 12. d2 b5 13.f4 g4 14. f3 g5 Hannu – Sihvonen, 1990.
    8.Bf4 OOO 9.Kc1 Bb4 10.Nd4 Bxc3 11.bxc3
    N B N K N B
    15.g3 gxf4+ 16.gxf4 g6 17.h3 xf3 18. xf3 8

    K
    c5 19. e2 e6 20. e3 exf4 21. g4+ Ne7 12.g3 Nc5 13.Bg5 e3 14.Bxe7 Be4 15.f3
    c7 0:1(34) Jordan – Drummond, Toronto 1936. Rxd4 16.cxd4 Bxf3 1:0 Vass – Keskowski,
    2
    12.b4 OO 13.Nf3 Qb2 14.b5 Nf5 15.Qf4 Re8
    16.Bd3 Qb4+ 17.Nd2 Qa3 18.Ke2 Nd4+
    1992.
    12.h3 Bd7 13.Nh5 OOO 14.Bd3 Nh4
    19.Ke3 Nf5+ 20.Ke2 Be6 21.Rc3 Qe7
    9

    15.Nxg7 Nxg2 16.f5 Nh4 17.Rf1 h5 18.Bg5


    1 1
    : (36) Termes Canals Jordi – Escudero Bxg5 19.Nxg5 Nh6 20.Rae1 f6 21.N5e6
    Rdg8 : (44) Khalilbeili – Pimenov, Yerevan
    2 2
    Sebastian, 1997. 1 1

    3
    N B B B K B 2 2

    N N N K
    6. xd1 b4+ 7. d2 xd2+ 8. xd2 f5 1955.
    12.Ncxe4 Nxe4 13.Nxe4 OOO 14.Be3 Re8
    R K N R N K
    9. c3 d7 10.f4 exf3 11. xf3 OOO 12. e1 10

    15.Nc3 Ng4 16.Nd1 f5 17.h3 Nxe3 18.fxe3 f4


    R N N N K N
    e8 13. f2 xe5 14. e1 g4+ 15. g3
    19.Kd3 Rd8+ 20.Kc2 Bb4 21.Nc3 fxe3
    R R B K N
    xe1 16. xe1 8f6 17.h3 e3 18. f3 xf1
    19. xf1 e8 20.g4 g6 21. f4 e4 0:1(58) 0:1(24) Becker – Bruchmann, 1998.
    Pospisil 1742 – Kral, 2007.
    4
    B K N B N N
    R B
    7... xe2+ 8. xe2 d7 9. f4 c5 10. h3 h6

    N B R B R
    11. hd1 f5 12. g3 g5 13.f4 exf3+ 14.gxf3 f4

    R K R R R
    15. xf4 gxf4 16. xf4 h7 17. g3 d8

    K K K
    18. xd8+ xd8 19. d1+ d7 20. xd7+
    xd7 21. e3 e6 0:1(56) Mouzakioti I –
    Fanouraki, 1995.
    5
    N K B K N
    N K B N B
    12. xf3 OOO 13. e1 b4 14. f2 e7

    N R B R
    15. a4 b8 16.a3 a5 17. c5 b6

    R R K
    18. xd7+ xd7 19. xb6 axb6 20. ad1
    xd1 21. xd1 c7 21 : 12 (25) Ceylan –
    Semcesen 2212, 2004.
    6
    N N B B
    B R N N N
    7.f3 exf3 8. xf3 d7 9. e2 OOO 10. d2

    B K B N K
    b4 11. c1 e7 12. d5 xd5 13.cxd5

    N K K B B
    xd2 14. xd2 e4 15.dxc6 xe5+ 16. e3

    R K R B R
    xc6 17. f2 b8 18. c4 xf3 19.gxf3
    d2+ 20. e3 xb2 21. xf7 f8 0:1(35)
    Turp P – Hoad PC, 1992.
    7
    B N N B
    12.a3 xc3 13. xc3 fxe5 14.b4 f6 15. e3

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy