Rubrics For Research

DR. ARSENIO C.
NICOLAS INTEGRATED NATIONAL

HIGH SCHOOL
S.Y. 2019-2020
RESEARCH RUBRICS FOR FINAL ORAL DEFENSE

Title of the Study: __________________________________________________________________
Researchers: _________________________ _________________________ _______________
__________________________________________________________________
Research Adviser: _______________________________________________
Date of Completion: ___________________________
Directions: Analyze the research output based on the following criteria

below. Check the appropriate column (5 as the highest and 1 as the
lowest) indicating your evaluation.
INTRODUCTION
Indicators 5
1. The introduction consists of an adequate introductory discussion of the problem
2. Factors that led to the problem are well-discussed in paragraph 1
3. The in-text citations are properly and clearly presented in the literature review.
4. The Literature Review is comprehensively done by the researchers and they only stated
researches relevant to their study.
5. Conceptual framework adequately supports the main problem or the title of the study
6. The gap of knowledge of the study is clearly and specifically stated in paragraph 3 to convince
the readers of the need to conduct such study
7. The research paradigm is able to provide the direction and skeletal framework of the study.
8. The aims/ purposes or objectives were thoroughly presented.
9. In general, the manuscript is scholarly written and has global impact in educational context as a
whole.
LITERATURE REVIEW AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Indicators 5
1. Cited literature and studies are adequate and relevant to the research problem.
2. Related literature and studies are recent (five years ago to present year of the study)
3. Foreign literature, studies, literature and local studies are present.
4. Synthesis of the reviewed literature and studies is well-organized, concise (not too long nor too
short) and is based on the researchers’ logical analysis of the cited materials.
5. The sources of the cited literatures and studies are appropriately acknowledged and or
credited.
6. The researchers were able to determine the construct and variable of their study from the
theory presented.
7. The framework presented conceptualizes the concepts of the theory appropriately.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD
Indicators 5
1. The research methodology is well-described and is suitable or fitting to the research problem.
2. The participants of the study are well-described in terms of the sample profile, sample size and
sampling technique and or procedure.
3. The research locale is described in terms of its location, historical background, purposes and
objectives and or mission and vision of the instruction or organization
4. The procedure and or techniques of gathering data are explained in complete detail beginning
from the time the researches sought permission to conduct the study.
5. The research instrument is presented and discussed in terms of its validity and reliability (in case
of self-made instrument)
6. The research design and method employed by the researchers are correct and relevant to the
fulfillment of the accurate results of the study.
7. The statistical tool selected is appropriate to gather the needed data and answer the problem of
the study.
8. The statistical tool is brief and accurately used to answer the queries or objectives of the study.
Form 5b – Rubrics for Final Oral Defense
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Indicators 5
1. Tables and figures are scholarly presented
2. Drawing implications from the discovery of the study were done properly.
3. Analysis of datasets is well-written and done.
4. Interpretation of the results is objectively and subjectively presented.
5. Datasets are treated with appropriate statistical tool
6. Results are verifiable as implied from the datasets.
7. Statistical results are analyzed correctly.
8. The way the results are presented addressed the gap of the study or the title of their research
CONCLUSION
Indicators 5
1. Conclusion is written in one paragraph only.
2. Conclusion is drawn appropriately from the findings of the study through a generalization.
3. The conclusion of the study is logically presented and written by the researches.
4. The conclusion capsulate the entire research endeavors and answers the aims of the study.
5. The conclusion follows parsimony and law of syllogism.
6. Conclusion is not just mere repetition of their findings.
7. Conclusion is correctly crafted and stated based on the guidelines of journal publication.
REFERENCES
Indicators 5
1. The references cited in the manuscript are complete.
2. The referencing follows an APA format.
3. It follows an alphabetical order.
4. It follows accurately and correctly the format in referencing all authors (bold, italics, etc.)
OVER-ALL TOTAL: _________________
REMARKS
Passed _______ without revision
Failed _______ with minor revision
_______ with major revision
_______ rejected
Name and Signature
of Panel:
_________________
______________
Date:
_________________
Noted by: ____________________________
Research Teacher

Rubrics For Research

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rubrics For Research

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rubrics For Research

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DR. ARSENIO C.

NICOLAS INTEGRATED NATIONAL

RESEARCH RUBRICS FOR FINAL ORAL DEFENSE

Directions: Analyze the research output based on the following criteria

Form 5b – Rubrics for Final Oral Defense

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

OVER-ALL TOTAL: _________________

Passed _______ without revision

Failed _______ with minor revision

_______ with major revision

Name and Signature

Noted by: ____________________________

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.