Mackey and Gass 2011 Ch. 1 Introduction PDF
Mackey and Gass 2011 Ch. 1 Introduction PDF
Mackey and Gass 2011 Ch. 1 Introduction PDF
Gass
SECOND LANGUAGE
RESEARCH
Alisan Mackey
C;eorgetovvn []niversity
Susan M. Gass
Michigan State []niversity
i~ ~~o~;~~n~~~up
Mackey, Alison.
Second language research : methodology and design I Alison
Mackey, Susan M. Gass.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and indexo
ISBN 0-8058-5602-1 (cloth: alk. paper) ISBN 0-8058-4249-7 (pbk. : alk.
paper)
l. Second language acquisition. 2. Second language acquisition
Research. 1. Gass, Susan M. 11. Title.
P118.2.M232005
--dc22 2004053288
CIP
PREFACE xiü
1 INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH 1
1.2.2. Abstract 7
1.2.3. Introduction 7
1.2.5. Results 13
1.2.7. Notes 15
1.2.8. References 16
1.2.9. Appendixes 16
1.3.1. Feasibility 18
1.3.3. Replication 21
1.4. Conclusion 23
Human Subjects 25
v
vi CONTENTS
2.2. Conclusion 41
of Language 48
Interpretation Tasks 58
3.6.1. Observations 76
3.9.1. CHILDES 97
3.10. Conclusion 98
CONTENTS vii
AND RELIABILITY
Research 146
CONTENTS
Dependability 179
Classrooms 213
CONTENTS ix
8 CODING 221
Statistics 271
x CONTENTS
Research 298
Research 304
CONTENTS xi
GLOSSARY 350
REFERENCES 370
Introduction to Research
There are many approaches to dealing with research. Two of the most com
mon are known as quantitative and qualitative, although this distinction is
somewhat simplistic as the relationship is best thought of as a continuum of
research types. Quantitative research generally starts with an experimental
design in which a hypothesis is followed by the quantification of data and
sorne sort of numerical analysis is carried out (e.g., a study comparing stu
dent test results before and after an instructional trearment). Qualitative stud
ies, on the other hand, generally are not set up as experiments; the data
cannot be easily quantified (e.g., a diary study in which a student keeps track
of her attitudes during a year-long]apanese language course), and the analy
sis is interpretive rather than statistical. As mentioned previously, this is an
overly simplistic view because one can imagine a number of variations on
this theme. In general, however, quantitative and qualitative research can be
characterized as shown in Table 1.1 (based on Reichardt & Cook, 1979).
In this book we attempt to be as inclusive as possible and cover as many
research types as possib1e.
Grotjahn (1987) pointed out that there are many parameters that can be
used to distinguish research types, including the type of data (quantitative
or qualitative), the method of analysis (interpretative or statistical), and the
TABLE 1.1
Characteristics of Quantitative and Qualitative Research
Quantitative Research
Interaction has been argued to promote noticing of L2 form in a context
crucial to learning-when there is a mismatch between the input and the
learner's interlanguage (IL) grammar (Gass & Varonis, 1994; Long, 1996;
Pica, 1994) . This paper investiga tes the extent to which learners may no
tice native speakers' reformulations of their IL grammar in the context
of dyadic interaction. Thirty-three adult ESL learners worked on oral
communieation tasks in NS-NNS pairs. During each of the five sessions
of dyadie task-based interaction, learners received recasts of their
nontargetlike question forms. Accurate immediate recal1 of recasts was
taken as evidence of noticing of recasts by learners. Results indicate that
learners notieed over 60-70% of recasts. However, accurate recall was
constrained by the level of the learner and by the length and number of
changes in the recast. The effect of these variables on notieing is dis
cussed in terms of processing biases. It is suggested that attentional re
sources and processing biases of the learner may modulate the extent to
which learners "notice the gap" between their nontargetlike utterances
and recasts. (Philp, 2003 , p. 99)
Qualitative Research
This ethnographie report "thickly describes" (Geenz, 1973) the partici
pation of ESL children in the daily classroom events of a mainstream
first-grade classroom. Data for this paper come from ayear-long study
of one classroom in an international school on a college campus in the
U.S . Using a language socialization and mieropolitical orientation, the
repon describes how, through social1y significant interactional routines ,
the children and other members of the classroom jointly constructed the
ESL children's identities, social relations, and ideologies as well as their
communicative competence in that setting. The sociocultural ecology
of the community, school, and classroom shaped the kinds of
mierointeractions that occurred and thus the nature of their language
learning over the course of the year. (Willett, 1995, p. 473)
.¡,..
TABLE 1.2
Six Mixed Forms of Research
Experimental-qualitative-interpretative ¿ ¿ ¿
Experimental-qu alita ti ve-sta tistical ¿ ¿ ¿
Experimental-quantitative-interpretative ¿ ¿ ¿
Exploratory-qualitative-statistical ¿ ¿ ¿
Exploratory-quantitative-statistical ¿ ¿ ¿
Exploratory-quantitative-interpretative ¿ ¿ ¿
INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH 5
ABSTRACT
BODY
1. Introduction
A. Statement of topic area
B. Statement of general issues
C. General goal of paper
D. Literature review
l . Historical overview
2. Major contributions to this research area
3. Statement of purpose, including identification of gaps
4 . Hypotheses
n. Method
A. Participants
l. Howmany?
2. Characteristics (male/female, proficiency level, native lan
guage, etc.)
B. Materials