Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 8 (21) Special 2014, Pages: 7-14
Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 8 (21) Special 2014, Pages: 7-14
Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 8 (21) Special 2014, Pages: 7-14
AENSI Journals
INTRODUCTION
One of the most important processes in power electronics is to convert electric power in to different forms.
One of the most interesting members of the converter family is matrix converter (MC). A Matrix converter is a
device used for direct ac-ac power conversion without the need for an intermediate dc link circuit. It converts ac
input voltage into variable ac voltage with unlimited output frequency. The actual progress in the construction
Matrix converter started with the work of Venturini and Alesina, in 1980. They presented the power circuit of
matrix converter as matrix of power switches. Another major development of their work is the mathematical
modeling to describe the low frequency behavior of the converter. In their modulation method, also known as
the direct transfer function approach, the output voltages profile is obtained by the multiplication of the
modulation matrix with the input voltages.
In thorough the attractive characteristics of matrix converter are
simple and compact power circuit
sinusoidal output and input currents
operation with unity input power factor for any load
Regenerative capability.
generation of load voltage with variable amplitude and frequency
In this work, an effective model of the MC is developed by using Matlab code. The basic concepts of
matrix converter are explained and the mathematical model of matrix converter is briefly given in a clear form.
Optimum Amplitude-Venturini Modulation (OAVM) method is used to produce the gate signals driving
bidirectional power semiconductors, and a maximum voltage transfer ratio (0.866) was obtained.
Mathematical model:
Fig 1. shows an array of 9 bi-directional switches coupled in 3x3 matrix structure. The converter is
proficient of achieving unlimited frequency changing and be able to produce output frequency greater or lesser
than input frequency. Each switch is characterized by switching function which can connect the L of the input
phase to m of the load. The three phase source and load voltages are expressed as vectors in Eq. (2,3).
Corresponding Author: P. Gajalakshmi, Department of EEE, University College of Engineering, Tindivanam, Tamil Nadu
-604001 India
E-mail: gajalakshmip23@gmail.com
8 P. Gajalakshmi et al,2014
Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 8(21) Special 2014, Pages: 7-14
𝑉𝑃 (𝑡) 𝑉𝑝 (𝑡)
𝑉𝑖/𝑝 = 𝑉𝑄 (𝑡) 𝑉𝑜/𝑝 = 𝑉𝑞 (𝑡) (1)
𝑉𝑅 (𝑡) 𝑉𝑟 (𝑡)
The three input phases are given by
𝑉𝑖𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑠(𝜔𝑖 𝑡)
𝑉𝑃 (𝑡) 2𝜋
𝑉𝑄 (𝑡) = 𝑉𝑖𝑚 cos (𝜔𝑖 𝑡 + )
3 ` (2)
𝑉𝑅 (𝑡) 4𝜋
𝑉𝑖𝑚 cos
(𝜔𝑖 𝑡 + )
3
Output voltages of matrix converter is given by
𝑉 (𝑡) 𝑉𝑜𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑠(𝜔𝑜 𝑡)
𝑝 2𝜋
𝑉𝑞 (𝑡) = 𝑉𝑜𝑚 cos
(𝜔𝑜 𝑡 + )
3 (3)
4𝜋
𝑉𝑟 (𝑡) 𝑉𝑜𝑚 cos
(𝜔𝑜 𝑡 + )
3
According to Venturini algorithm there are two solutions, one is the input and output displacement angles
which are same ie φi = φ0 and second is the input and output displacement angles which are dissimilar or
reversed ie φi = -φ0. By the grouping of two solutions input displacement control is obtained.
Switching function of the matrix converter is given by Eq. (4)
0 𝑠𝑤𝑖𝑡𝑐ℎ 𝑆𝐿𝑚 𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑛
SLm = (4)
1 𝑠𝑤𝑖𝑡𝑐ℎ 𝑆𝐿𝑚 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑑
L= { P,Q,R} and m ={p,q,r}
Duty cycles must assure the following condition
𝑠𝑃𝑝 𝑡 + 𝑠𝑄𝑝 𝑡 + 𝑠𝑅𝑝 𝑡 = 1 (5)
𝑠𝑃𝑞 𝑡 + 𝑠𝑄𝑞 𝑡 + 𝑠𝑅𝑞 𝑡 = 1 (6)
𝑠𝑃𝑟 𝑡 + 𝑠𝑄𝑟 𝑡 + 𝑠𝑅𝑟 𝑡 = 1 (7)
Combining the above two solutions given by Venturini input displacement factor control is obtained. S(t) =
α1[S1(t)]+ α2[S2(t)] if α1= α2 unity displacement factor is obtained then the loss of energy transfer gets reduced.
In this method the average value of output voltage is equal to target output voltage discussed by (Casadei et al.
2002).Here the target output is restricted to the voltage transfer ratio N. In order to obtain the highest possible
output Venturini modified the above method by the insertion of third harmonics of input and output frequencies
into the output waveform provided it will not have an effect on the load operation. Generalized high frequency
switching strategy is limited to input to output voltage ratio of 0.5. A third harmonic zero sequence voltage
components can be added to the direct ac output voltage to increase the transfer ratio to 0.866. It will generate
the sinusoidal input currents, unity power factor of the output load current (Imayavaramban et al 2004).
2𝜋 4𝜋
1 + 2qcos 𝜔𝑚 𝑡 1 + 2qcos 𝜔𝑚 𝑡 − 1 + 2qcos 𝜔𝑚 𝑡 −
3 3
2𝜋 4𝜋
1 + 2qcos 𝜔𝑚 𝑡 − 1 + 2qcos 𝜔𝑚 𝑡 − 1 + 2qcos 𝜔𝑚 𝑡 (9)
3 3
4𝜋 2𝜋
1 + 2 qcos 𝜔𝑚 𝑡 − 1 + 2qcos 𝜔𝑚 𝑡 1+ 2qcos 𝜔𝑚 𝑡 −
3 3
1 cos 3𝜔 0 𝑡 1 cos 3𝜔 𝑖 𝑡
cos 𝜔0 𝑡 − +
6 2√3
2𝜋 1 cos 3𝜔 0 𝑡 1 cos 3𝜔 𝑖 𝑡
V0(t)=q.Vim cos 𝜔0 𝑡 + − + (10)
3 6 2√3
4𝜋 1 cos 3𝜔 0 𝑡 1 cos 3𝜔 𝑖 𝑡
cos 𝜔0 𝑡 + − +
3 6 2√3
An improvement in the voltage ratio 87% is possible by adding the common mode voltage to the target
output. It allows the target output to fit within the input voltage. Input displacement factor control can be
introduced by inserting a phase shift between the measured input voltages and the voltage inserted to the system.
Maximum voltage is increased to 87% of the added triple harmonics cancel in the output line to line voltages.
where α, β are adjacent voltage and γ, δ are adjacent current switching vectors. As there are six output
voltage sectors and six input current sectors, the converter can assume 36 different vectorial states. The
corresponding duty cycles Eq. (20-22)
d γα = dγ . dα , d γβ = dγ . dβ , (20)
d δβ = dδ . dβ , d δα = dδ . dα (21)
d0 = 1-( d γα + d γβ + d δβ + d δα ) (22)
The duration of each sequence is calculated by multiplying the corresponding duty cycle by one sampling
period. In principle, the SVM algorithm is based on the selection of four active configurations that are applied
for suitable time intervals within each cycle period.
Each output phase of a cyclo converter originates from a bridge connection while matrix converter is
resultant from a midpoint connected converter circuit. In SVM approach usually there are three at least three
modes that reduces the output current error. If the control of output current be the only goal this might be simply
satisfied each time. In reality input current is to be controlled concurrently. In order to determine the input
current spectrum, it is necessary to know the input voltage spectrum. On the other hand the input voltage
depends on the current absorbed by the converter due to voltage drop on the impedance of the line. In Xing Li,
et al.(2014) two modulation strategies of input current reference angle have been studied.
Simulation results:
The simulation was carried out in MATLAB. Assuming ideal switches Matlab code was written for the
mathematical investigation of matrix converter. The entire matrix converter is modeled as equations and the
solution was carried out in matlab. Fig 2. shows the pulse pattern of matrix converter direct control using
Venturini algorithm. Fig 3. and Fig 5. shows the solution of direct matrix converter for the output frequency of
25 Hz and 100 Hz correspondingly. The code was developed for any input and any output frequencies. The
switching frequency is preferred as 1 KHz on because of improving better harmonic spectrum.
The simulated outputs for the mathematical representation of modified Venturini solution of matrix
converter are specified. Fig 7. shows the pulse model of modified algorithm. The mathematical study was
carried out for the input voltage of 100V and the input frequency of 50 Hz .The output voltage analysis is done
for various output frequencies such as 25Hz and 100Hz and switching frequency of 1000Hz. Harmonic
spectrum of outputs also derived and compared with different methods of study.
Fig. 2: Pulse patterns of Direct Matrix Converter fi=50 Hz and f0= 20Hz Fs=1000Hz
Fig. 3: Output voltage and current of DMC for fi=50 Hz and f0= 25 Hz Fs=1000 Hz Vim=100 V and q=0.566
11 P. Gajalakshmi et al,2014
Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 8(21) Special 2014, Pages: 7-14
The harmonic analysis of output voltage, output current and input current was carried out with the help of
Fast Fourier Transform. The spectrum of outputs of direct matrix converter for the output frequency of 25 Hz is
shown in Fig 4.
Fig. 5: Output voltage and current of DMC for fi=50 Hz and f0= 100Hz Fs=1000Hz Vim=100V and q=0.866
Fig. 7: Pulse patterns of Modified Direct Matrix Converter fi=50 Hz and f0= 25Hz Fs=1000Hz.
Fig. 8: Output voltage and current of modified DMC for fi=50 Hz and f0= 25Hz Fs=1000Hz Vim=100V and
q=0.566
12 P. Gajalakshmi et al,2014
Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 8(21) Special 2014, Pages: 7-14
Fig. 9: Output voltage and current of modified DMC for fi=50 Hz and f0= 100Hz Fs=1000Hz Vim=100V and
q=0.6.
Fig. 10: Harmonics spectrum of output current of modified direct matrix converter f 0=100Hz
Fig. 11: Output voltage and current of ITF SVM matrix converter for fi=50 Hz and f0= 30Hz Fs=1000Hz
Fig. 12: Output voltage and current of ITF SVM matrix converter for fi=50 Hz and f0= 100Hz Fs=1000Hz.
13 P. Gajalakshmi et al,2014
Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 8(21) Special 2014, Pages: 7-14
Commencing the above consequences it is clear that SVM algorithm reduces the harmonics present in the
output as well as inputs and also the voltage profile is improved. At the fundamental frequency level of
harmonics is very high and it settles down as the frequency increases. Harmonics level is considerably reduced
and it is almost zero in the case of modified algorithm.
Fig. 13: Input voltage and current of ITF SVM matrix converter for fi=50 Hz.
Fig. 14: Harmonics spectrum of output current of ITF SVM matrix converter when the output frequency is
100Hz.
To reduce the level of harmonics filters must be used in the input and output side of the converter. Since
this paper is the mathematical model and all the switches are ideal, filter design is not discussed. By appropriate
design of filters the harmonics can be reduced to significant value( Xing Li et al 2014).
Conclusion:
The area of MC has shown incessant growth in latest years in terms of innovative topologies, new control
methods, and applications. This paper has presented a basic mathematical analysis method that is greatly
investigated in the present day. These methods have diverse hypothetical principles and different degrees of
intricacy. On the other hand, with the results reported to date in the literature, it is not feasible to establish which
method is the best. The complete mathematical solution has arrived and moreover the spectral investigation is
prepared. This has to incorporate further better-quality aspects such as detailed evaluation of losses, system
integration, electromagnetic compatibility, design of filters etc for upcoming developments.
REFERENCES
Alesina and M.G.B. Venturini, 1989. “Analysis and design of optimum amplitude nine-switch direct AC-
AC converters”, IEEE Trans. Power Electron, 4: 101-112.
Blaabjerg, F., D. Casadei, C. Klumpner, M. Matteini, 2002. “Comparison of two current modulation
strategies for matrix converter under unbalanced input voltage conditions” IEEE Trans on Industrial.
Electronics, 49(3): 289-296.
14 P. Gajalakshmi et al,2014
Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 8(21) Special 2014, Pages: 7-14
Casadei, D., G. Serra, A. Tani and L. Zarri, 2002. “Matrix converter modulation strategies: A new general
approach based on space-vector representation of the switch state,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron,49: 370–381.
François Gruson, Philippe Le Moigne, Philippe Delarue, Arnaud Videt, Xavier Cimetiére, and Michel
Arpillière, 2013.“A Simple Carrier-Based Modulation for the SVM of the Matrix Converter”, IEEE Industrial
informatics, 9: 947-956.
Imayavaramban, M., K. Latha and G. Uma, 2004. “Analysis of different schemes of matrix converter with
maximum voltage conversion ratio”, IEEE MELECON, PP: 1137-1140.
Imayavaramban, M., K. Latha, G. Uma and S. Sunter, 2004. “Matlab/Simulink Implementation for reducing
the motor derating and torque pulsation of Induction motor using Matrix Converter”, IEEE Power Engineering
Society, PSCE.
Venturini, M. and A. Alesina, 1980. “The Generalized Transformer: A New Bidirectional Sinusoidal
Waveform Frequency Converter with Continuously Adjustable Input Power Factor,” IEEE PESC’, 80: 242-252.
Venturini, M., 1980. “A New Sine Wave in Sine Wave out, Conversion Technique Which Eliminates
Reactive Elements,” in Proceedings of Powercon 7,
Wheeler, P.W., J. Clare and A. Weinstein, 2002. “Matrix Converters: A Technology Review”, IEEE
Industrial Electronics, 49: 276-287.
Xing, Li., Su. Mei, Sun. Yao, 2014. “Modulation Strategy Based on Mathematical Construction for Matrix
Converter Extending the Input Reactive Power Range” IEEE Transactions ON Power Electronics, 29: 654-664.