0% found this document useful (0 votes)
67 views

Case Law Selection PDF

This document provides a selection of case law from the European Court of Justice, European Human Rights Court, and Spanish Constitutional Court relevant to European integration, fundamental rights protection, and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. It lists numerous cases from the ECJ that established principles such as direct effect of EU law, primacy of EU law, preliminary rulings, and fundamental rights protection. It also lists a few notable cases from the ECHR and Spanish Constitutional Court on related issues.

Uploaded by

Miguel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
67 views

Case Law Selection PDF

This document provides a selection of case law from the European Court of Justice, European Human Rights Court, and Spanish Constitutional Court relevant to European integration, fundamental rights protection, and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. It lists numerous cases from the ECJ that established principles such as direct effect of EU law, primacy of EU law, preliminary rulings, and fundamental rights protection. It also lists a few notable cases from the ECHR and Spanish Constitutional Court on related issues.

Uploaded by

Miguel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Master in European Union, Multilevel European integration and fundamental rights

COURT OF JUSTICE. EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS.

CASE LAW SELECTION

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE CASE LAW


(ECJ case law is available on
http://curia.europa.eu/juris/recherche.jsf?language=en )

1) On the direct effect of EU Law.


 CJ 5 February 1963, Van Gend en Loos, C-26/62.

2) On the primacy of EU Law in relation to National Law.


 CJ 15 de july 1964, Costa v. Enel, C-6/64;
 CJ 22 june 1965, St. Michele Auto de C- 9 and C-58/65;
 CJ 17 December 1970, Internationale Handelgesellchaft, C-11/70;
 CJ 14 December 1971, Politi c. Italia, C-43/71;
 CJ 11 January 2000, Kreil, C-285/98;
 CJ 11 March 2003, Dory, C-186/01.

3) On the preliminary ruling


 CJ 27 March 1963, Da Costa en Schaake, C-28 to 30/62.
 CJ 1 December 1965, Schwarze, C-16/65
 CJ 30 June 1966, Vaassen-Göbbels, C-61/64.
 CJ 16 January 1974, Rheinmühlen, C-166/73.
 CJ 16 December 1976, Rewe-Zentralfinanz, C-33/76.
 CJ 9 March 1978, Simmenthal III, C-106/77
 CJ 6 October 1982, Cilfit, C-283/81.
 CJ 22 October 1987, FotoFrost, C-314/85.
 CJ 19 November 1991, Francovich, Bonifaci and others, C-6 and 9/90.
Kühne, C-453/00
Benedeti v. Munari, C-52/76
4) On fundamental rights protection
Master in European Union, Multilevel European integration and fundamental rights

COURT OF JUSTICE. EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS.

 CJ 15 June 1978, Defrenne, C-149/77;


 CJ 11 July 1985, Cinéthèque,C-60/84;
 CJ 30 September 1987, Meryem Demirel, C-12/86;
 CJ 13 July 1989, Wachauf, C-5/88;
 CJ 18 June 1991, Ellinki, C-260/89;
 CJ 16 June 1997, Familiapress, C-368/95;
 CJ 29 May 1997, Kremzow, C-299/95;
 CJ 18 December 1997, Annibaldi, C-309/96;
 CJ 11 January 2000, Tanja Kreil, C-285/98;
 CJ 11 March 2003, Dory, C-186/01;
 CJ 12 June 2003, Schmidberger, C-112/00;
 CJ 14 October 2004, Omega, C-36/02;
 GC 21 September 2005, Ahmed Ali Yusuf and others, T-306/701;
 GC 12 July 2006, Chafiq Ayadi, T-253/02;
 GC, 12 December 2006, Organisation des Modjahedines du peuple d’Iran v.
Council, T-228/02;
 CJ 3 Setember 2008, Kadi et Al Barakaat International Foundation, C-402/05,
and C-415/05.
 GC, 23 October 2008, People’s Mojahedin organization of Iran v. Council, T-
256/07.
 GC, 30 September 2010, Kadi v. European Comision, T-85/09.
 CJ 14 october 2008, Grunkin and Paul, C-353/08.
 CJ 22 December 2010, Inlonka Sayn-Wittgenstein v. Landeshauptman von Wien,
C-208/09.
 CJ 2 March 2010, Janko Rottman v. Freistaat Bayern, C-135/08.
 CJ 8 september 2011, European Air Transport SA, C-120/10.
 CJ 26 February 2013, Melloni, C-399/11.
 CJ 26 February 2013, Aklagaren, C-617/10.

5) On limits of ECJ jurisdiction


 CJ 16 June 2005, Pupino, C-105/03;
Master in European Union, Multilevel European integration and fundamental rights

COURT OF JUSTICE. EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS.

 CJ 27 February 2007, Gestoras Pro Amnistía, C-354/04 P;


 CJ 27 February 2007, Segi and others, C-355/04 P.
 Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villalón delivered on 12 June 2012,
Aklagaren, C-617/10.

EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS COURT CASE LAW


(EHRC case law is avaliable on http://hudoc.echr.coe.int)

 EHRC 30 June 2005, Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi
v. Ireland, 45036/1998.

SPANISH CONSTITUTIONAL COURT CASE LAW.


(Spanish Constitutional Court Case Law is avalaible on
http://hj.tribunalconstitucional.es/en )

 STC 21/1991, of 31 January;


 STC 64/1991, of 22 March;
 DTC 1/1992; of 1 July;
 STC 111/1992, of 14 September;
 STC 130/95, of 11 September;
 STC 146/1996, of 19 September;
 STC 201/1996, of 9 December;
 STC 58/2004, of 19 April;
 DTC 1/2004, of 13 December.
 STC194/2006, of 19 June;
 STC 78/2010, of 20 October;
 ATC 86/2011, of 9 June.
 STC 26/2014, of 13 February.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy