Abdullah Bin Muqaffa
Abdullah Bin Muqaffa
Abdullah Bin Muqaffa
Part-1 (SEM-2)
Paper: 203
By:
Farheen Anis Sadique Ali
Ibn Al-Muqaffa ((ابن المق ّفع
Abū Muhammad ʿAbd Allāh Rūzbih ibn Dādūya ( ابو محمد عبدهللا روزبه
)ابن دادويه, born Rōzbih pūr-i Dādōē ()روزبه پور دادويه, more commonly
known as Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ ()ابن المقفع, (died c. 756/759), was
a Persian translator, author and thinker who wrote in the Arabic
language.
Originally Abdul bin Al-Muqaffa was a Persian and his surname was
Abu Umar. His father was in the service of Taiayyad government when
he was punished severely for corruption in which his land got fractured.
It is an account of this disability of his father that he was called Al-
Muqaffa . Ibnu Al Muqaffa was born in the year 106 A.H.
When he was serving under bin Ali Al Mansur's uncle at Basra he
expressed his desire to embrace Islam as his religion and a gathering was
arranged and he declared Islam as his religion. It was thus that he
celebrated his change of religion. He loved humanity and helped the
needy people generously. There are instances in his life that he could
not see people in trouble and was ready to help them even at the cost
of his life. When Abdul Hamid the great writer of the Umayyad period
and among the greatest among the writers of the Arabic literary prose
was to be arrested after the fall of the Umayyad dynasty incidentally he
was hiding with Ibnu Al Muqaffa who did not divulge his identity. On the
contrary he offered himself as the man who was wanted by caliph
Saffah's men. This spirit of sacrifice for other is a quality rarely found in
human society. In those days when the atmosphere was surcharged with
feeling of eliminating the opposition at every level in respective of moral
justification or human considerations here is a man who honors him
morals values for which he is prepared to risk everything. It is an
established fact that those who are charging Ibnu Al-Muqaffa with the
offence of zindild had political motive behind it attributing to Qim such
work which cannot be his for the author of Al-Fihrist did not mention it.
The record of the Abbasid rule shows that they killed scholars of divinity
men of learning and talented men of letters without any regard to justice
and morality. Abdul Hamid Ibnu Al Muqaffa, Imam Abu Hanifa are the
examples of their merciless killing of great scholars in their own field of
knowledge. It appears that in order to justify their action they fi-amed
baseless charges against Ibnu Al-Muqaffa. His adherence to certain
customs of his forefathers may be due to his weakness in habits but on
that account he can be called zindik as his opponent have done.
Ibnu Al Muqaffa's mother language was Persian but in Arabic also
he was equally fluent and commanded mastery over expression we
would not like to enter into the discussion of his religious beliefs since
they are clouded in the political atmosphere of that period with a
dipodic ruler at the helm of affairs at whose behest anything could be
managed falsely with political motive which was foremost in the minds
of the people. However we would like to refrain from taking sides and
leave it for others to go deep into the matter. No doubt many scholars
have discussed this matter in depth.
His execution:
The circumstances under which Ibnu Al Muqaffa was executed are
of political nature in which Caliph Al Mansur is also involved. He was a
victim of political vengeance. The fact is that Al Mansur had to face so
many revolts not only from outside but also from his own family. His
vmck Abdullah bin AU who had played important role in establishing the
Abbasid rule revolted against and in this struggle for power he was
defeated by Al Mansur. He fled to his brother Isa bin Ali to seek his
protection who was governor of Basra. Ibnu Al Muqaffa was employed
by Musa to draft letters on his behalf Isa bin Ali ordered to prepare a
letter which will contains of reconciliation between Abdullah bin Ali and
the caliph Al Mansur which was so nicely drafted that when Al Mansurs
two others uncles Isa bin Ali and Sulaiman bin Ali went to Al Mansur with
that draft, Al Mansur had no alternative but to accept the proposal
because he could not overlook other powerful members of his family.
But he was not pleased to read the writing and asked as to who had
drafted the letter. When he was told that it was Ibnu Al Muqaffa he was
enraged and that occasion prepared the groimd for his opponent to
manage his execution. They succeeded in their plan in 142 A.H. when he
was brutally murdered and burnt. It was under these circumstance that
the literary world of the early Abbasid rule lost such a great man of
learning and literature at an early age of 38 years. When he had yet to
unfold the extraordinary capabilities in him endowed by God Almighty.
Ibnu Muqaffa was a Persian by birth and Persian language was his
mother tongue but to the astonishment of all and jealousy of many he
was equally good command over Arabic language. He could write Arabic
prose 216 with ease and excellence in expression that was infect a gift
from God. He was not only a prose writer but also a boom poet. But he
did not pay required attention to this art of literature. It will be more
appropriate to say that he directed all his talents in adorning his art of
prose writing. He was a scientific writer. Before actually dressing his
thoughts with appropriate words he would chalk out a plan for the
subject he was dealing with. When his mental preparation is complete
he sits to write engrossed in his job. As he has a wealth of words and
phrases at his disposals it is with ease that he gives shape to his thoughts
with beautiful language. His poetic talent adds poetic beauty to his
prose. In his wisdom vast knowledge and sharp intelligence he was
ahead of all his contemporaries.
1. It is said that after the compassions of prophet (P.B.U.H.) Khalid
was the most intelligent man of learning among the Arabs, while among
the non-Arabs Ibnu Al Muqaffa has no equal as an intelligent man of
learning.
2. The second characteristic is the deep insight into the matter
which he presents in his writings. In the context Umar Farukh writes:
.^:^^
Ibnu Al Muqaffa's original writings as well as his translated works
provide us with the evidence of his deep study of the topics on which he
writes. His style of presentation is simple and clear which does not leave
the meaning ambiguous. His approach is that of a philosopher who sees
things in the light of reason.
3. The third quality of his writings is that his study is not restricted
to a particular field of learning. His translated works as well as his original
works exhibit his vast knowledge and his deep study of various sciences.
He has written on different subjects which are political moral social
educational and also religious and his approach and style presentation
is most attractive.
4. The fourth characteristic of his writings in their charm of
presentation which appeals to the readers and attracts their attention
who feel a new life and new spirit awakened in them. His writings have
a purpose and message who have regard for moral values. The words
and phrases he uses have a sort of magic in them which have their own
effect and which make his writings purposeful.
The brief description of the some of the characteristics of Ibnu Al
Muqaffa's writings provides an ample proof of his being for ahead of his
contemporaries as a man and also as a writer in the golden period of
Islamic rule. He has no equal in many respects Jafar bin Yahya rightly said
that Abdul Haraid and Sahl bin Harun are like branches and Ibnu Al
Muqaffa is like its fruit while Ahmad bin Yusuf is like its flower. We have
already given a short account of the personality of Ibnu Al Muqaffa and
some of the chief characteristics of his writings. Now we shall give in
brief file artistic beauties in his writings. Firstly his selection of
appropriate words is always in accord with the meaning he wants to
convey to his reader’s vrith all their linguistic beauties. Secondly he
connects together small sentences by using relative pronouns and we
find a chain of relative sentences in his expression. It is therefore that
his reader to pause for a moment to folly understand the meaning he
wants to convey. He does not use superfluous words and phrases just
for the sake of beauty of language at the cost of the meaning by using
less words and that is the chief beauty of his literary prose writing.