Application of Micro Fossil in Paleo Climate
Application of Micro Fossil in Paleo Climate
Application of Micro Fossil in Paleo Climate
1. They are abundant and have a wide geographic as well as geologic distribution.
2. Being small in size they are very easy to recover in large numbers in very small
amount of sample.
3. As smaller organisms, they are very sensitive to changing environments and thus
evolve fast
.
Plants and animals possessing hard parts (exoskeletons or endoskeletons) are capable
of being preserved as fossils, unaltered for a large periods of time. Marine environments
characterised by undisturbed and uninterrupted sedimentation provide the best
environment for preservation of diverse microfossils, and thus serve as the longest
archives of past climate
Sediments collected from almost all marine environments i.e. from coastal inter-
tidal / beach environments to deep sea, have been exploited to obtain information about
modern and past oceanographic processes. Beach sand, if examined through a
microscope shows the presence of many biogenic sediments viz. skeletal remains of
organisms amongst the mineral grains.
This component of the sediment may include the juveniles/fragments of larger
animals like molluscs, echinoids, arthropods, etc.
But the shells of microscopic organisms such as carapace of microscopic
arthropods (ostracoda), the coiled chambered shells of protozoans (foraminifera),
fragments of coralline algae, and many other skeletal kinds, predominate.
In the deeper regions like continental shelf and slope such biogenic sediments
are also accompanied by palynological fossils such as pollen and spores and land
plants, transported and deposited by wind.
The deepest regions of the ocean are characterised by the accumulation of grey,
sticky ooze, composed almost entirely of the remains of planktonic unicellular plants
and protozoans, which can be recovered to a tune of thousands of specimens
preserved in per gram sediment. Such deep-water deposits comprising nearly 100%
biogenic sediments are termed “ooze” (e.g. foraminiferal ooze, nanno-ooze,
radiolarian ooze, Pteropod ooze etc.).
All of these serve as potential microfossils. Based on the composition of shells,
microfossils can be subdivided as following:
Calcareous microfossils:
Foraminifera, Cocolithophores or Nannoplankton, Ostracods, Pteropods,
Calpionellids, Calcareous Algae and Bryozoa.
Siliceous microfossils:
Radiolaria, Marine diatoms, Silicoflagellates and Ebridians
Phosphatic microfossils:
Conodonts and other phosphatic microfossils
Organic-walled microfossils:
Dinoflagellates, Acritarchs and Tasmanitids, Spores and pollen in the marine realm and
Chitinozoa
Each group of organisms has a different habit and habitat and thus has its own
significance. Eg. Calcareous microfossils prevail in the lower latitudes, at warmer
temperatures and/or shallower depths, whereas siliceous microfossils prevail in higher
latitudes and/or deeper depths.
Similarly some organisms are benthic in habit and provide information of sea-
bottom conditions whereas the planktonic ones provide information about the water
column.
Thus, depending upon the objectives and area of interest one needs to choose
the right microfossil. Different groups of microfossils when used in combination could
give a wholistic picture within a sedimentary regime and thus cover up for shortcomings
of one another.
3. They are omnipresent in the marine regime and thus can be recovered from
every marine environment from the lowest to the highest latitude.
5. They are both- planktonic and benthic in habit and thus provide information of
bottom and water column conditions.
6. Their diversity is a function of changing environment thus different environments are
characterised by different and typical assemblages.
7. Their test i.e. exoskeleton which is capable of being preserved, is the basis of its
classification.
Thus, every change in environment is visible in the form of a morphological
manifestation such as: change in coiling direction, change in size, deformation of the
test, varied calcification of the test, etc.
8. Recent technological advancements allow geochemical studies of its test which give
precise isotopic and chemical concentrations over the past.
Palaeo-monsoons
The original idea of using dimorphic ratios or mean proloculus size (MPS) in
palaeoclimatic reconstruction was based on sediments from the North Sea. Further,
significance of correspondence between river (Kali in Karwar) discharge and mean
proloculus size of benthic foraminifera exhibited the use of MPS in palaeomonsoonal
studies.
Similarly, while studying surface and subsurface sediments off central west coast
of India, it was noticed that morphological (coarser morphogroups) variations of benthic
foraminifera’s response to salinity can be used as additional tool in palaeomonsoonal
studies.
These techniques are simple, less expensive, time saving in sorting out samples
and adaptable to computer image processing. Development of these techniques
helped to generate high-resolution records of palaeomonsoon.
The results showed the clear signals of marked high rainfall around 4000 and
3500 years BP and reversals of rainfall condition since 3500 years B.P. with a marked
low at 2000 years BP
These findings gathered support from palynological investigations of the same
core. A cyclicity of approximately 77 years in concentration of drought years was also
deciphered and possibilities of correlation between inferred cycle and Gleissberg cycle
in variation of radius of the sun were pointed out.
Through a recently concluded study from the shallow water areas off Kachchh, it
was discovered that a storm(s) had hit this region - 8000 years BP. They also exhibited
how foraminifera can be used to decipher palaeostorms(s).
Attempts are also being made to decipher migration / extinction of fishes through
study of Otoliths [fossilized fish remains] in Holocene sediments. This study will be
useful for evaluating the consequences of global warming on fisheries.