Vonn - FM
Vonn - FM
Vonn - FM
College Department
Nueno Avenue, City of Imus, Cavite
A Case Analysis
Submitted to:
Mr. Nelson Tablizo, CPA, MBA
Submitted by:
Jovi Vonn Balcita
Nuestra Senora del Carmen Sugar Central, owned by Carmen Yu, defaulted her
monthly payments with Prosperity Bank starting from July 30, 2014.
The problem that needs to be addressed is how the account could be restructured
or foreclosed entirely.
IV. OBJECTIVES
MUST OBJECTIVE
To properly remedy the account of Nuestra Senora del Carmen Sugar Central.
WANT OBJECTIVE
To make sure that both the Bank and Sugar Central arrives at a reasonable
STRENGTH
Prosperity Bank’s strengths includes the interest of 10% per annum payable in
arrears, the penalty of 24% on the unpaid principal to run on the fourth month of non-
payment, and the collateral held by the bank with a total appraised value of 37,500,000.
WEAKNESSES
policy as shown by the 10% past due ratio of the bank as against the industry average of
8%.
OPPORTUNITIES
Prosperity Bank can now improve their collection policy to be on par with
industry standards.
THREATS
Prosperity Bank has the risk of having losses due to the bankruptcy or
delinquency of the debtor. Current inflation also plays a large role in the economic
Date Principal Repayment Interest Received Interest Income Amortization Present Value
8/1/2016 ₱ 22,574,110.86
8/1/2016 3,958,333.25 18,615,777.61
ACA I-A offers a net gain for the bank of 1.6 million after considering the reversal of
loss provision. Overall, the potential impact of ACA I-A is approximately 3.8 million. It offers a
larger interest rate of 12%. The 36 monthly amortization and the full waiver of penalty and
interest on interest is an advantage for the debtor because she is more likely to pay these rather
The full waiver of penalty and interest on interest is indeed a large amount of money to
aive as it amounts to almost 7.3 million. In addition, the increased interest rate of 12% from 10%
This alternative offers a net gain for the bank amounting to at most 3 million after
considering the reversal of loss provision and a potential impact of approximately 5.4 million.
Higher interest rate of 12%. 25% of the penalty will be recovered and the 75% waiver of penalty
and full waiver of interest will create good relationship between the bank and Ms. Yu.
Disadvantages of Alternative Course of Action I-B:
This alternative will take 3 years to be collected and the collection of the amounts cannot
be reasonably assured. There would be a lost collection due to the 75% waiver of penalty and full
If the bank elects to apply ACA I-C for the disposition of Sugar Central’s account, the
bank could take advantage of the total potential impact 5.5 million. The potential impact was the
result of adding into consideration the potential earning from installments collected until the last
payment of new restructured debt. In addition to that, the consideration of gain on reversal of
loan loss provision which is equal to 50% of unpaid balance resulted to a lower loss. This is if
This alternative course of action would be a disadvantage to the bank because if the gain
in reversal of loan provision of 9 million was not taken into consideration, the bank would incur
a loss of almost 10 million. This is because the bank would only have an almost 20 million
present value on new loan as a result of full waiver of penalty and interest on interest as well as
the 50% waiver on interest. Therefore, it would not be convenient for the bank to waive fully
It is advantageous to the bank that the account of Sugar Central be foreclosed. The
First, in foreclosing the bank account of the debtor, there will be a great opportunity for
the bank to use the collateral as a source of cash inflow by putting it up for rent while waiting for
Lastly, there will also be a gain on the reversal of loan loss provisions as well as
It is disadvantage to the bank that the account of Nuestra Senora del Carmen Sugar
First, there will be a cost incurred such as professional expenses of hiring lawyer for
trials, title search of the real property, and other marketing and administrative expenses that are
Secondly, if in case the property will be used for rental purposes, there will be additional
cost incurred also such as insurance premium or property taxes that will be shoulder by the bank.
Aside from these, there will be a possibility that the asset can be recovered by the debtor which
Lastly, it is not practical to wait for five (5) years just to sell the property. There will also
be a possibility of inflation which may have a negative effect on the value of the property.
VII. RECOMMENDATION
Restructure 1-C provides the highest gain among the alternatives with ₱
5,500,951.42 compare with alternatives 1-A, and 1-B which have a gain of ₱
1,682,583.17, and ₱ 3,046,805.56, respectively. Restructure 1-C has the highest gain
because it includes one-time payment of the principal, but it looks unrealistic considering
the financial standing of the debtor. On the other hand, if we look into what will be
convenient to the debtor, Restructure 1-A is the most recommended. Restructure 1-A will
form good relationship between the bank and its debtor. Although, it provides the least
gain among all the restructuring alternatives. The most balanced alternative that will
benefit both parties is Restructuring 1-B because it provides a gain of ₱ 3,046,805.56 and
it considers the ability to pay of the debtor. Furthermore, Restructure 1-B is more realistic
than Restructure 1-C and will gain more income than Restructure 1-A.
to the bank however, it will give the bank an immediate asset that it can use as soon as
possible. Also, considering the fact that the debtor already defaulted on his payments, it is
more practical to just foreclose his account compare to restructuring to his debt which has
1. Nuestra Senora del Carmen Sugar Central’s account should be foreclosed. Considering
their ability to pay the rest of the loan, an immediate source of cash is most advantageous
2. The collateral property should be put up for rent as soon as possible so that the bank
could have a reliable source of income while they are waiting for the property to be sold.
3. The collection practices and standards of the bank should be reassessed and improved.
4. Debtors should be carefully assessed in order to check their capability to pay a large loan.