Comparative Investigation Using Gaas (950Nm), Gaaias (940Nm) and Ingaasp (1450Nm) Sensors For Development of Non-Invasive Optical Blood Glucose Measurement System
Comparative Investigation Using Gaas (950Nm), Gaaias (940Nm) and Ingaasp (1450Nm) Sensors For Development of Non-Invasive Optical Blood Glucose Measurement System
of the IEEE International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Applications (ICSIMA)
25-27 November 2014, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Figure 2.1 Flow chart of the overall process in construct this project.
Where:
VPOWER = DC power supply voltage
VLED = forward voltage drop of the LED
VSAT = drive transistor saturation voltage
R3 = series LED current limiting resistor
ILED = peak LED current
Figure 3.4 Optical Outputs vs. Current in LED (Picture courtesy from fiber-
optics.info [53]). Experiment and testing had been done in controlled
environment since LED is sensitive to ambient light condition
LEDs have voltage drop about 1.1 to 1.5 Volts. [7]. All experiments had been done in same laboratory with
Shorter wavelength diodes have largest voltage drops [7] of fixed position of devices in the experiment setup.
the LED. For all LEDs used in this work, voltage drop of LED
940nm is 1.35V, LED 950nm is 1.3V while LED1450nm is
B. REFINEMENT OF NEAR- INFRARED TESTING
1.2V. From that, the pattern can be seen where as the
wavelength increases, the voltage drop decreases. This is due
As the same signal conditioning circuit used with the
to the bandgap energy, Eg which higher wavelength have
near-infrared, the result of output voltage during human finger
smaller energy gap and resulting smaller voltage drop.
test shows no changes. The circuit was redesigned for the
near-infrared testing. And did the re-test to test either the
Eg = hc/l = 1240eV-nm/l …(1)
sensor can give better output or not. The linearization circuit
had been removed from the design since output from low pass
Where:
filter was not exceeding 5V.
h = Plank’s constant = 4.13 x 10-15 eV.s
c = speed of light = 2.998 x 108 m/s
1) Test Tube Experimental
l = wavelength in nm
Experiment had been done using the difference of
From equation above, the energy gap of LED based
glucose concentration and the output readings from the test are
on its emission wavelength had been predicted as in TABLE
as below:
IV.
TABLE V Output Voltage of 1450nm Vary Glucose Concentration
TABLE IV Common Light Emitter Materials and Characteristics. Test
Glucose Glucose Output
Material Formula Energy Gap Wavelength Percentage Concentration Voltage
Gallium (%) (mg/dL) (V)
GaP 2.24 eV 550 nm
Phosphide 100 200 3.4174
Aluminum 90 180 3.2009
AIAs 2.09 eV 590 nm
Arsenide 80 160 2.9830
Gallium 70 140 2.8120
GaAs 1.42 eV 870 nm
Arsenide 60 120 2.4763
Indium 50 100 2.2880
InP 1.33 Ev 930 nm
Phosphide 40 80 2.1062
Aluminum- 30 60 1.5711
Gallium AIGaAs 1.42-1.61 Ev 770-870 nm 20 40 1.1660
Arsenide 10 20 0.8730
Indium- 0 0 0.6000
Gallium- 1100-
InGaAsP 0.74-1.13 Ev
Arsenide- 1670nm
Phosphide
Figure 3.5 shows the output pattern of the output
voltage from the test of different glucose concentrations.
From TABLE IV, shows that there are variation of
Graph shows that the voltage is nearly direct proportional to
material used in LED. In this work, three variation of
the percentage of glucose concentrations. From the pattern, it
materials had been used which are GaAlAs (940nm), GaAs
shows that when the percentage of glucose concentration is
(950nm) and InGaAsP (1450nm). Voltage drop which also
high, voltage output also high and vice versa.
called as forward voltage is indicated the energy gap that
corresponds to the energy of the emitted photons. LED current
can be calculated from the known voltage drop and saturation
TABLE VI Overall Results of Near-Infrared Human Testing.
Output Voltage vs. Percentage of
Glucose Concentration
Output Voltage (V