Ayni-Panjakent-Uzbekistan Border Road

PageList
1 of of
102Test Form
Form No.
WORKSHEETS FO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38

40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48

50
51
52
53
54
Ayni-Panjakent-Uzbekistan Border Road
PageList
2 of of
102Test Form
Form No.

SHEETS FOR REPORTING

R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
R10
R11
R12
R13
R14
R15

WORKSHEETS FOR C

C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
C13
C14
C15
 Ayni-Panjakent-Uzbekistan Border Road
List of Test Forms Page 3 of 102
Description of the Form
WORKSHEETS FOR TESTING
Material Source
Particle Size Analysis of Fills
Chart for Determining Values of 'K' Used in Particle Size Analysis of Fills
Atterberg Limits
Dry Density vs. Moisture Content Relationship Using 2.5 kg Rammer
Dry Density vs. Moisture Content Relationship Using 4.54 kg Rammer
Field Density Test of Fill Materials by Sand Replacement Method
Laboratory C.B.R. Test (Determination of Unit Weight)
Laboratory C.B.R. Test (Penetration Test and Determination of Swelling)
Laboratory C.B.R. Test (Soaked CBR Results)
Specific Gravity Test on Soils
Determination of Moisture Content of Soil by Oven Drying
Calibration of Sand and Sand Cone Apparatus
Particle Size Analysis of Aggregates for Subbase
Particle Size Analysis of Aggregates for Lower Base(Crushed Rock or Boulder or Crushed Over Burnt Bricks)
Particle Size Analysis of Crushed Gravel Aggregates for Lower Base
Particle size Analysis of Aggregates for Upper Base
Specific Gravity & Water Absorption of Aggregates
Abrasion Test on Small Size Coarse Aggregate by Use of Los Angeles Machine
Density Correction Chart for Coarse Particles in the Soil Compaction Test
Field Density Test for Subbase and Bases by Sand Replacement Method
Determination of Total Moisture Content of Aggregate by Drying
Materials Finer Than # 200 Sieve by Washing
Sieve Analysis of Filler
Particle Size Analysis of Combined Aggregates for Binder Course
Particle Size Analysis of Combined Aggregates for Wearing Course
Soundness of Aggregates by Use of Sodium Sulphate
Sand Equivalent Test
Stripping Test by AASHTO Method: T 182
Quantities of Bituminous Prime & Tack Coats
Crushed Aggregates of (>2) Fractured Faces (+ 4.75mm, visual)
Penetration Test on Bituminous Materials
Specific Gravity of Semi-Solid Bituminous Materials
Bituminous Extraction & Gradation of Hot Mix
Field Density Test of Cored Asphalt Concrete
Maximum Specdific Gravity of Bituminous Paving Mixtures
Asphalt Concrete Hot Mix Design by Marshall Method
Determination of the Presence of Organic Impurities in Fine Aggregate

Determination of Compressive Strength of Concrete Cubes

Sieve Analysis of Fine Aggregate for Cement Concrete
Sieve Analysis of 20mm Coarse Aggregate for Cement Concrete
Determination of Flakiness Index
Aggregate Crushing Value (ACV) of Coarse Aggregate
Clay Lumps and Friable Particles
Determination of Slump of Fresh Concrete
Normal Consistency and Setting Time of Cement
Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortar

Deflection Test by Benkelman Beam Method

Concrete Pouring Record
Request for Inspection / Survey / Quality Test
MDD vs. Location
Sample Record Card
 Ayni-Panjakent-Uzbekistan Border Road
List of Test Forms Page 4 of 102
Description of the Form

SHEETS FOR REPORTING TEST RESULTS

Test Report of Ordinary Fill Material

Test Report of Selected Fill (Improved Subgrade) Material
Test Report of Aggregate Subbase Material
Test Report of Aggregate Lower Base Material
Test Report of Aggregate Upper Base Material
Test Report of Fine Aggregate for Asphalt Concrete
Test Report of Coarse Aggregate for Asphalt Concrete
Test Report of Combined Aggregate for Asphalt Concrete Binder & Wearing Courses
Test Report of Asphalt Concrete Binder Course Mixture
Test Report of Asphalt Concrete Wearing Course Mixture
Test Report of Fine Aggregate for Cement Concrete
Test Report of Coarse Aggregate for Cement Concrete
Test Report of Compressive Strength of Concrete
Test Report of Bitumen
Test Report of Portland Cement

WORKSHEETS FOR CALIBRATION

One Monthly Balance Scale Value Check

Six Monthly Balance Repeatability Check
Balance Check Departure from Nominal Value
Balance Check For The Effect of Off-Centre Loading
Clibration of Thermometers
Speedy/Oven Dry Moisture Content Comparison
Batch Plant Calibration Departure from Nominal Value
Batch Plant Calibration Repeatability Check
Calibration of Liquid Limit Apparatus
Calibration of Moulds
Calibration of Tamping Rod
Calibration of Compaction Rammer
Calibration of Sieves of Openings > 2mm
Calibration of Dial Gauges
Calibration of Slump Cones
Ayni-Panjakent-Uzbekistan Border Road
Page 5 of 102

* 1

* 2
* 3
* 4
* 5
* 6

* 7
* 8
* 9

* 10
* 11

7A
* 12
* 13

* 14

* 15
* 16
* 17
* 18
*
* 19
*
*
*
*

* 24

* 25

* 26
* 27
* 28

* 29
* 30
Ayni-Panjakent-Uzbekistan Border Road
Page 6 of 102

WS -
 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

MATERIAL SOURCE
Date :

Material Type

Brand Name/ Frog Mark

Source Location

Storage Location

Approx. Quantity

Purpose of Use

Location of Use

Tests Performed

Name of Tests Lab. Ref.No. Date Results Remarks

Conclusion on Tests:

Manufacturer's Test Certificates:

Remarks:

Sample Collected / Inspected By:

Form No. 1 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

NJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

MATERIAL SOURCE

Remarks

Form No. 1 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

WS - 1 ATTERBERG LIMITS
Lab Ref. No.:

Location:..……........................ Date of Sampling…............

Material Type: ………………….. Date of Testing: ……………

LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT

Determination Number

Container Number
Number of Blows

1 Wt. of Can & Wet Soil (gm)

2 Wt. of Can & Dry Soil (gm)

3 Wt. of Water (1-2 = 3) (gm)

4 Wt. of Can (gm)

5 Wt. of Dry Soil (2-4=5) (gm)

6 Moisture Content (3/5)x100%

Results:

Liquid Limit % Plastic Limit % Plasticity Index %

Remarks:

Tested By: Witnessed by:

Form No. WS-1 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-1 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 ZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

BERG LIMITS

PLASTIC LIMIT

Form No. WS-1 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 WS - 2 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

DRY DENSITY vs. MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP USING 4.54 KG RAMMER

Lab Ref. No.:

Description of Material: Date of Testing:

Blows / Layer: ________ No. of Layers: _______ Wt. of Rammer: …………... kg. Drop ht.: ………. mm
Mould Dia: __________ mm Mould Height: ___________ mm Vol. of Mould: _______ x 10-6 m3

Density Determination
Determination No. 1 2 3 4 5 6
Initial weight g
Initial moisture content %
Water added g
Target moisture content %
Weight of mould + wet mat'l g
Weight of mould g
Weight of wet mat'l g
Bulk density g/cm3
Dry density g/cm3
Determination of Moisture Content
Moisture container No.
Container + wet mat'l g
Container + dry mat'l g
Water g
Container g
Dry mat'l g
Moisture content %
Dry density / moisture content relationship curve

Max. dry density =

Optimum MC =
Oversize fraction (+19mm) =
Dry density, t/m3

Moisture content, %
Tested by: Witnessed by:

Form No. WS-2 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-2 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

NT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

TENT RELATIONSHIP USING 4.54 KG RAMMER

Drop ht.: ………. mm

g/cm3

%
%

Form No. WS-2 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

WS - 3 FIELD DENSITY TEST OF FILL MATERIALS BY SAND REPLACEMENT METHOD

TEST INFORMATION :

Chainage: Lab Ref. No.:

Elevation: Date Requested:

Layer Thickness: Request No.:

Width: Date of Testing:
PREVIOUS LAYER INFORMATION : Lab Ref. No.:
Elevation:
Location of Test Done:
RESULTS:
FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION
Test Hole Location: Chainage
Offset
Weight of wet sample from hole, mw g

Depth of test hole g

Weight of sand + cylinder before test, m1 g

Weight of sand + cylinder after test, m4 g

Weight of sand in hole + cone, m1 - m4 g

Weight of sand in cone, m2 g
Weight of sand in hole, mb = (m1 - m4 - m2) g
Bulk density of sand, ga g/cm3
Ratio, R = mw / mb
Bulk density of sample, gb = R x ga g/cm3
Dry density, gd =100gb / (100 + W) g/cm3
MOISTURE CONTENT DETERMINATION
Can No.
Weight of can + wet sample, P g

Weight of can + dry sample, Q g

Weight of water, R = P - Q g

Weight of can, C g
Weight of dry sample, Md = Q - C g
Water content, W = 100 R / Md %
DETERMINATION OF DEGREE OF COMPACTION
Maximum dry density (MDD) g/cm3
OMC (lab value) %
MDD Test Reference (Lab Ref. No.)
% Compaction, 100 gd / MDD %
Specified compaction %
Results
Remarks :

Tested by : Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-3 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

NJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

FILL MATERIALS BY SAND REPLACEMENT METHOD

FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION

STURE CONTENT DETERMINATION

MINATION OF DEGREE OF COMPACTION

Form No. WS-3 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

WS - 4 LABORATORY C.B.R. TEST (DETERMINATION OF UNIT WEIGHT)

Lab Ref. No.:

Location:

Description of Material: Date of Testing:

MDD: OMC:

Data for Unit Weight (before soaking) :

Mould No.
No. of layers
No. of blows per layer
Wt. of Wet soil + Mould (g)
Wt. of Mould (g)
Wt. of Wet Soil (g)
Volume of Mould ml
Wet Unit Weight g/cm3
Dry Unit Weight t/m3
Compaction Achieved %

Data for Moisture content

Mould No.
Container No.
Wt. of Container + Wet Soil (g)
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil (g)
Wt. of Moisture (g)
Wt. of Container (g)
Wt. of Dry Soil (g)
Moisture Content (%)

Remarks:

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-4 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

KENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

TEST (DETERMINATION OF UNIT WEIGHT)

Form No. WS-4 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WS - 5
LABORATORY C.B.R. TEST (PENETRATION TEST AND DETERMINATION OF SWELLING)

Lab Ref. No.:

Description of Material: Date of Testing:

SWELL DATA :

Time Mould No…….. Ht. …… mm Mould No…….. Ht. …… mm Mould No…….. Ht. ……
Day &
Time & Day Elapsed Gauge Swell Gauge Swell Gauge Swell
Month % Swell % Swell
(Days) Reading (mm) Reading (mm) Reading (mm)
0
1
2
3
4
SOAKING DATA
Mould No.
Wt. of soil + mould + base- plate (before
soaking)
Wt. of soil + mould + base- plate (after
soaking)
Water absorbed
Wt. of dry soil in mould
% Water absorbed
MOISTURE CONTENT (AFTER SOAKING)
Mould No.
Specimen location T M B T M B T M
Can No
Wt. of wet soil + Can
Wt. of dry soil + Can
Wt. of Water
Wt. of Can
Wt. of dry soil
Moisture Content %
Av. Moisture Content %
PENETRATION TEST DATA Ring No. __________
Mould No. Mould No. Mould No.
Penetration
Load Dial Div. Load, kN Load Dial Div. Load, kN Load Dial Div.
0.025 in (0.64mm)
0.050 in (1.27mm)
0.075 in (1.91mm)
0.100 in (2.54mm)
0.150 in (3.81mm)
0.200 in (5.08mm)
0.300 in (7.62mm)
0.400 in (10.16mm)
0.500 in (12.70mm)
Proving Ring Factor :

Tested by : Witnessed by:

(Contractor)

Form No. WS-5 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

ENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

ETRATION TEST AND DETERMINATION OF SWELLING)

Mould No…….. Ht. …… mm

Swell
% Swell
(mm)

M B

Ring No. __________

Mould No.
Load, kN

Form No. WS-5 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WS - 6
LABORATORY C.B.R. TEST (SOAKED CBR RESULTS)

Lab Ref. No.:

Material Type: Date of testing:

10 Blows/Layer 30 Blows/Layer
Load, kN

Load, kN

Penetration, mm Penetration, mm

65 Blows/Layer Dry Density vs. Soaked CBR

Soaked CBR %
Load, kN

Penetration, mm Dry Density, g/cm3

Result:

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-6 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

WS - 7 DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT OF SOIL BY OVEN

Lab Ref. Nos:

Location: Date of Sampling:

Description of Material: Date of Testing:

Lab Ref. No.

Can No.

Weight of Can + Wet Soil, W 1 g

Weight of Can + Dry Soil, W2 g

Weight of Moisture, W3 = W1 - W2 g

Weight of Can, W4 g

Weight of dry soil, W 5 = W2 - W4 g

Moisture content, 100(W3 / W5 ) %

Average Moisture Content %

Lab Ref. No.

Can No.

Weight of Can + Wet Soil, W 1 g

Weight of Can + Dry Soil, W2 g

Weight of Moisture, W3 = W1 - W2 g

Weight of Can, W4 g

Weight of dry soil, W 5 = W2 - W4 g

Moisture content, 100(W3 / W5 ) %

Average Moisture Content %

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-7 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

NJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

ION OF MOISTURE CONTENT OF SOIL BY OVEN DRYING

Form No. WS-7 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WS - 7A
DETERMINATION OF TOTAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF AGGREGATE BY DRYING

Lab Ref. No.:

Location: Date of Sampling:

Description of Material: Date of Testing:

Representative Area: Dry Weight:

Mode of Drying (Oven dry / Fry pan):

Sample ID / Lab Ref. No.

Container No.

Weight of wet aggregate + container g

Weight of dry aggregate + container g

Weight of water in aggregate g

Drying started: h-m

Drying finished: h-m

Period of drying h-m

Weight of container g

Weight of dry aggregate g

Water content %

Remarks:

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. 7A Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WS - 8
CALIBRATION OF SAND AND SAND CONE APPARATUS

Calibration Ref.No.:

Description of Sand: Date of Calibration:

Dimension of Mould(mm): Diam. = Ht. =

Room Temparature: = °C Ambient Temp.= °C Relative Humidity =

Volume of Mould

Determination No.: 1 2 3

1 Weight of Empty Mould + Glass Plate

2 Weight of Mould Filled with Water + Glass Plate

3 Weight of Water (2-1)

4 Temparature of Filling Water, °C

5 Temparature Correction

6 Volume of Mould, cm3

7 Average Volume of mould, cm3

Sand in Cone with Base Plate

7 Weight of Apparatus + Sand before Pouring, g

8 Weight of Apparatus + Sand after Pouring, g

9 Weight of Sand in Cone + Base Plate, g

10 Average Weight of Sand in Cone + Base Plate, g

Unit Weight of Sand

11 Weight of Apparatus + Sand before Pouring, g

12 Weight of Apparatus + Sand after Pouring, g

13 Weight of Sand in Cone + Base Plate, g

14 Weight of Sand in Mould, g

15 Unit Weight of Sand, g/cm 3

16 Average Unit Weight of Sand, g/cm 3

Form No. WS-8 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-8 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

NT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

AND AND SAND CONE APPARATUS

Form No. WS-8 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WS - 9
WORKSHEET FOR PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
Lab Ref. No.:

Location: Date of Sampling:

Description of Material: Date of Testing:

Initial Dry Weight:

Reduction of Test Weights

Stages of subdivision 1 2 3
Material passed through test sieve :

Weight before reduction gm Mb1 = Mb2 = Mb3 =

Weight after reduction gm Ma1 = Ma2 = Ma3 =

Correction factor C1 = Mb1 / Ma1 = C2 = C1.Mb2 / Ma2 = C3 =

Sieving Test Data

Corrected Cumulative Cumul.
Sieve Size, Invidual Weight Correction Percent
Weight Weight Percent
mm Retained, g Factor Passing
Retained, g Retained, g Retained

Pan

Total

Remarks:

Form No. WS-9 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 Tested by: Witnessed by:
Contractor Consultant

Form No. WS-9 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

ENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

R PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

Mb3 =

Ma3 =

C3 =

Spec.
Limit

Form No. WS-9 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WS - 10
SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND WATER ABSORPTION OF AGGREGATES
Lab Ref. No.:
Stockpile Location: Date of Sampling:

Description of Material: Date of Test:

Purpose of Use:

Determination No. 1
1. Weight of oven dry specimen in air A (g)

2. Weight of saturated surface dry specimen in air B (g)

3. Weight of saturated specimen under water C (g)

4. Water Absorbed B-A (g)

5. Water Absorption 100(B - A) / A %

6. Specific Gravity

a) Oven dry basis (bulk) A / (B - C)

b) Saturated surface dry (SSD) basis B / (B - C)

c) Apparent A / (A - C)

FINE (Coarse Sand/Fine Sand/Filler)

Determination No. 1
1. Weight of oven dry specimen A (g)

2. Weight of saturated surface dry specimen S (g)

3. Weight of bottle + water B (g)

4. Weight of bottle + saturated specimen + water C (g)

5. Water Absobed S-A (g)

6. Water Absorption 100(S - A) / A %

7. Specific Gravity
a) Oven-dry basis (bulk) A / (S + A - C)

b) Saturated surface dry (SSD) basis S / (S + B - C)

c) Apparent A / (A + B - C)

Results :

The Average Specific Gravity = (Bulk / On SSD basis / Apparent)

Water Absorption = %

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-10 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

KENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

AND WATER ABSORPTION OF AGGREGATES

Date of Sampling:

Form No. WS-10 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

Form No. WS-10 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WS - 11
ABRASION TEST ON SMALL SIZE COARSE AGGREGATE BY USE OF LOS ANGELES MACHINE

Lab Ref No.:

Material Source: Location: Date of Sampling:

Description of Material: Representative Quantity: Date of Testing:

Weight in grams after test

Weight
Sample Loss in Weight,
Test No. No. of Charges No. of Revolutions Before Test, g Retained on Passing Through Total Quantity Percent Wear
Identification g
1.7mm Sieve 1.7mm Sieve Available, g

Remarks : Specified Values :

Subbase
Road Base
Asphaltic Concrete Coarse Agg.
Concrete Aggregates

Tested By: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. 11 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

AD

LOS ANGELES MACHINE

Mean Wear
%

Max. %
Max. %
Max. %
Max. %

Form No. 11 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

WS - 3 WORKSHEET FOR FIELD DENSITY TEST BY SAND REPLACEMENT METHOD

TEST INFORMATION :
Chainage: Lab Ref. No.:
Material: Date Requested:
Layer Thickness: Request No.:
Width: Date of Testing:
SAND CALIBRATION: Lab Ref. No.:
Date of Calibration:
Wt. of sand in cone, g
Bulk density of sand, g/cm3

DETERMINATION OF FIELD DENSITY

Test Hole Location: KM
Offset
Weight of wet sample from hole, mw g
Depth of test hole mm
Weight of sand + cylinder before test, m 1 g
Weight of sand + cylinder after test, m4 g
Weight of sand in hole + cone, m1 - m4 g
Weight of sand in cone, m2 g
Weight of sand in hole, mb = (m1 - m4 - m2) g
Bulk density of the material, gb g/cm3
Dry density, gd=100gb / (100 + W) g/cm3
DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT
Can No.
Weight of can + wet sample, P g
Weight of can + dry sample, Q g
Weight of water, R = P - Q g
Weight of can, C g
Weight of dry sample, Md = Q - C g
Water content, W = 100 R / Md %

OVERSIZE FRACTION & DETERMINATION OF DEGREE OF COMPACTION

Weight of oversized material g
% oversize (dry basis) %
Optimum Moisture Content (lab value) %
Maximum Dry Density (lab value) g/cm3
MDD Test Reference (Lab Ref. No.)
% Compaction, 100 gd / MDD %
Specified compaction %
Results

Remarks

Tested by : Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-3 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

AKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

DENSITY TEST BY SAND REPLACEMENT METHOD

TERMINATION OF FIELD DENSITY

RMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT

N & DETERMINATION OF DEGREE OF COMPACTION

Form No. WS-3 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WS - 12
WORKSHEET FOR MATERIALS FINER THAN 0.075MM SIEVE BY WASHING

Lab Ref. No.:

Stock Pile Location: Date of Sampling:

Material: Date of Testing:

Determination No. / Sample Ref. 1 2

Initial Oven Dry Weight of Specimen, W1 gm

Final Oven Dry Weight after Washing on # 200 Sieve, W 2 gm

Material Passed Through # 200 Sieve (W1 - W2) gm

% Passing = 100(W1 - W2) / W1

Average % Passing

Specification

Remarks:

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-12 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

KENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

RIALS FINER THAN 0.075MM SIEVE BY WASHING

Form No. WS-12 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

WS - 13 WORKSHEET FOR SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FILLER

Lab Ref. No.:

Source: Date of Sampling:

Description: Date of Testing:

Original Weight: Oven Dry Weight:

Sieving Test Data

Cumulative Cumulative
Sieve Size, Invidual Weight Specificatio
Weight Percent Percent Passing
mm Retained, g Limit
Retained, g Retained

0.600

0.300

0.150

0.075

Pan

Total

Remarks:

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-13 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

ENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

FOR SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FILLER

Specification
Limit

Form No. WS-13 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF COMBINED AGGREGATES FOR BINDER COURSE

Lab Ref. No.:

Location: Date of Sampling:

Description of Material: Date of Testing:

Initial Oven Dry Weight:
Reduction of Test Weights
Stages of subdivision 1 2
Material passed through test sieve :

Weight before reduction gm Mb1 = Mb2 =

Weight after reduction gm Ma1 = Ma2 =

Correction factor C1 = Mb1 / Ma1 = C2 = C1.Mb2 / Ma2 =

Sieving Test Data

Corrected Cumulative Cumul.
Sieve Size, Invidual Weight Correction Percent
Weight Weight Percent
mm Retained, g Factor Passing
Retained, g Retained, g Retained
28
20
14
10
4.75
2.36
1.18
0.600
0.300
0.150
0.075
Pan
Total

Remarks:

Tested by:

Form No. 25 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

NT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

OF COMBINED AGGREGATES FOR BINDER COURSE

Initial Oven Dry Weight:

Mb3 =

Ma3 =

C3 =

Percent Spec.
Passing Limit

100
80 ~ 100
60 ~ 80
48 ~ 70
36 ~ 56
28 ~ 44
20 ~ 34
15 ~ 27
10 ~ 20
5 ~ 13
2~6

Form No. 25 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF COMBINED AGGREGATES FOR WEARING COURSE

Lab Ref. No.:

Location: Date of Sampling:

Description of Material: Date of Testing:

Initial Oven Dry Weight:
Reduction of Test Weights
Stages of subdivision 1 2
Material passed through test sieve :

Weight before reduction gm Mb1 = Mb2 =

Weight after reduction gm Ma1 = Ma2 =

Correction factor C1 = Mb1 / Ma1 = C2 = C1.Mb2 / Ma2 =

Sieving Test Data

Corrected Cumulative Cumul.
Sieve Size, Invidual Weight Correction Percent
Weight Weight Percent
mm Retained, g Factor Passing
Retained, g Retained, g Retained
20
14
10
4.75
2.36
1.18
0.600
0.300
0.150
0.075
Pan
Total

Remarks:

Tested by:

Form No. 26 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

NT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

F COMBINED AGGREGATES FOR WEARING COURSE

Initial Oven Dry Weight:

Mb3 =

Ma3 =

C3 =

Percent Spec.
Passing Limit

100
90 ~ 100
70 ~ 85
52 ~ 72
40 ~ 62
30 ~ 50
20 ~ 40
14 ~ 30
8 ~ 20
6 ~ 10

Form No. 26 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WS - 14
WORKSHEET FOR SOUNDNESS TEST OF AGGREGATES BY USE OF SODIUM SULPHATE
(5-CYCLES)
Lab Ref. No.:

Source: Date Sampled:

Description: Date of Testing:

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) Actual

Grading Weight of Weight of Loss in Loss After
Original Test Test Weight After Test %
Sieve Size
Sample % Fraction Fraction Test (gram)
Retained Before Test After Test
(gram) (gram)

Passing Retained on

150 micron
300 micron 150 micron
Fine Aggregate

600 micron 300 micron 100

1.18mm 600 micron 100
2.36mm 1.18mm 100
4.75mm 2.36mm 100
9.5mm 4.75mm 100
Total

9.5mm 4.75mm 300

Coarse Aggregate

19mm 9.5mm 1000

37.5mm 19mm 1500
75mm 37.5mm 3000

Total

Notes :
D=B-C 9.5 to 19mm consists of 33% of 9.5 ~ 13.2mm and 67% of 13.2 ~ 19mm.
E = D / B x100 19 to 37.5mm consists of 33% of 19 ~ 26.5mm and 67% of 26.5 ~ 37.5mm
F = A x E/100 37.5 to 75mm consists of 50% of 37.5 ~ 50mm and 50% of 50 ~ 75mm

Remarks:

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-14 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

JAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

SS TEST OF AGGREGATES BY USE OF SODIUM SULPHATE

(5-CYCLES)

(F)
Corrected
Avg. Weight
Loss %

Form No. WS-14 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

SAND EQUIVALENT TEST

Lab Ref. No.:

Location: Date of Sampling:

Description of Material: Date of Testing:

Test Data

Trial Nos. 1 2

Clay Reading

Sand Reading

Sand Equivalent, %

Average Sand Equivalent, %

Remarks:

Tested by:

Form No. 28 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

DER ROAD

Form No. 28 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

WS - 15
WORKSHEET FOR STRIPPING TEST BY AASHTO METHOD: T 182

Lab Ref. No.:

Location:

Weight of Aggregate: Size:

Weight of Asphalt: Type:

Visual Quality of Mix: Date of Testing:

Visual estimation after 16 -18 hours of immersion in water % Area Coated

Above 95 % Below 95 %

Remarks:

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-15 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

ENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

RIPPING TEST BY AASHTO METHOD: T 182

% Area Coated

Below 95 %

Form No. WS-15 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WS - 16

WORKSHEET FOR QUANTITIES OF BITUMINOUS PRIME & TACK COATS

Lab Ref. No.:

Area (KM): Date of Testing:

Description of Material:

Station Number

Tray Number

Weight of Tray + Bituminous Material (g)

Weight of Tray (g)

Weight of Bituminous Material (g)

Area of Tray (m2)

Quantity of Bituminous Material (g/m2)

Unit weight of Bituminous Material at 0°C (g/l)

Spraying Rate (l/m2)

Average Spraying Rate (l/m2)

Temperature at Application 0
C

Temperature Correction Factor

Corrected Average Rate of Application (l/m2)

Remarks:

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-16 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

JAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

ANTITIES OF BITUMINOUS PRIME & TACK COATS

Form No. WS-16 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

WS - 17

WORKSHEET FOR CRUSHED AGGREGATE OF (>or =2) FRACTURED FACES (+ 4.75MM, VISUAL)

Material: Lab Ref. No.:

Source: Date of Sampling:

Stockpile: Date of Testing:

Description:

Test No. 1

a)Total Weight of + 4.75 mm Material A g

b) Weight of (2) Fractured Faces Material (g) B g

c) Percentage of (2) Fractured Faces Material 100(B / A) %

d) Average (2) Fractured Faces Material %

e) Specification Limit %

Remarks

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-17 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

JAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

GREGATE OF (>or =2) FRACTURED FACES (+ 4.75MM, VISUAL)

Form No. WS-17 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WS - 18
WORKSHEET FOR PENETRATION TEST ON BITUMINOUS MATERIALS
Lab Ref. No.:

Location(KM): Date of Sampling:

Origin: Date of Testing:

Description of Material:

Specimen No. 1 REMARKS

Description of the Test Specimen:

Container No.
Initial Dial Reading
Final Dial Reading
Penetration, mm
Average Penetration

Specimen No. 2 REMARKS

Description of the Test Specimen:

Container No.
Initial Dial Reading
Final Dial Reading
Penetration, mm
Average Penetration

Specimen No. 3 REMARKS

Description of the Test Specimen:

Container No.
Initial Dial Reading
Final Dial Reading
Penetration, mm
Average Penetration

Remarks:

Tested by: Witnessed by:

Form No. WS-18 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
 (Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-18 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

D

TERIALS

REMARKS

REMARKS

REMARKS

Form No. WS-18 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

WORKSHEET FOR SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF SEMI SOLID BITUMINOUS MATERIALS

Lab. Ref:

Location: Date of Sampling:

Description of Material:

Origin: Date of Testing:

Determination No. 1 2

Temperature of water during test °C

Weight of clean dry pycnometer & stopper (nearest 1 mg) A g

Weight of pycnometer, stopper plus water (nearest 1 mg) B g

Weight of pycnometer, stopper plus sample (nearest 1 mg) C g

Weight of pycnometer, stopper, sample plus water (nearest 1 mg) D g

Weight of sample C-A g

Volume of pycnometer B-A g

Specific Gravity (C - A) / [(B - A) - (D - C)]

Average Specific Gravity

Temperature correction

Corrected Specific Gravity ( at 25°C)

Note
A pycnometer calibrated at one temperature cannot be used at a different temperature without recalibration at that temperature

Remarks:

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

ENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

GRAVITY OF SEMI SOLID BITUMINOUS MATERIALS

Form No. Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WS - 19
WORKSHEET FOR BITUMEN EXTRACTION & GRADATION OF HOT MIX

Lab Ref. No:

Sample: Date Sampled:

Chainage: Date of Testing:

Material:

(A) BITUMEN EXTRACTION

DESCRIPTION VALUE DESCRIPTION

1. Weight of pan + Sample 7. Weight of filter paper after test

8. Weight of dust accumulated in filter

2. Weight of pan
paper (7 - 6)

3. Weight of Mix. + Sample (1 - 2) 9. Weight of total extracted Agg. (5 + 8)

4. Weight of pan + Extracted Agg. 10. Weight of bitumen (3 - 9)

11. Percent of bitumen by weight of Mix.
5. Weight of extracted Agg. (4 - 2)
100(10) / (3)

6. Wt. of filter paper before test 12. Specified percent of bitumen

(B) GRADATION OF EXTRACTED AGGREGATE

Cumulative
Standard Sieve Weight Retained Cumulative Weight
Percentage % Passing
size (mm) (gram) Retained
Retained
25
19
12.5
9.5
4.75
2.36
1.18
0.600
0.300
0.150
0.075
Pan

Remarks:

Tested by : Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-19 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

KENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

UMEN EXTRACTION & GRADATION OF HOT MIX

VALUE

Specification Limit

Form No. WS-19 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

WORKSHEET FOR FIELD DENSITY TEST OF CORED ASPHALT CONCRETE

Lab Ref. Nos.:

Material: Date Sampled :

Description: Date Tested :

Field Cored Sample

Bulk Density
Specimen (Lab)
Specimen Idn. Station Thickness Wt. in Air Wt. in water Volume Density % Compaction
No.
mm g g ml g/ml g/ml

Test Performed by:

Form No. 35 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

T - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

DENSITY TEST OF CORED ASPHALT CONCRETE

Remarks

Form No. 35 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

WS - 29 MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF BITUMINOUS PAVING MIXTURES

Lab Ref. No.:

Sample Location: Date sampled :

Type of Materials: Date tested :

Percentage of Bitumen in the Mixture:

Determination No. 1

Mass of Dry Sample in Air A g

Mass of Jar + Lid + Water B g

Mass of Jar + Lid + Sample + Water C g

Temparature of Water °C

K factor :

Corrected Mass of Jar + Lid + Water to Fill at 25°C: D = B.K g

Corrected Mass of Jar + Lid + Sample + Water to Fill at

E = C.K g
25°C:

Maximum Specific Gravity F = A / (A + D - E)

Average Maximum Specific Gravity ( Gmm)

Remarks:

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-29 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

KENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

FIC GRAVITY OF BITUMINOUS PAVING MIXTURES

Form No. WS-29 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

ASPHALT CONCRETE HOT MIX DESIGN BY MARSHALL METHOD

Lab Ref. No.:

Date of sampling : Date of Testing :

Wt. of Specimen Volume % Total Voids % Stability

Asphalt
Maximum
Specimen Content Height of Bulk Bulk
Theoritical
No. by Wt. of Sample Volume Density Dial Gauge Reading in Correl
In Air In Water Density Asphalt Aggregate Voids V.M.A VFA Total Mix.
Mix Reading kN Ratio.

% gm gm mm cc gm/cc gm/cc
bxg (100-b)xg i x 100 100(h-g)
ASTM D Gasp Gagg from
c-d c/f 100-i - j 100-j j h ox factor
-2041 Table

a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q
1
2
3
Av.
1
2
3
Av.
1
2
3
Av.
Specified Values :
Specific Gravity of Bitumen (G asp) = Minimum Stability ( kN at 60° C) 7.0 ( Binder & Wearing
Bulk Specific Gravity of Aggregate ( G agg) = Minimum Flow ( mm) 2.0 ( Binder & Wearing
Air Voids in Total Mix (%) 3-5 ( Binder & Wearing
Voids in Mineral Aggregate Filled with Bitumen (%) 70 - 85 ( Binder & Wearing
Marshall Quotient ( kN / mm) 1.8 - 5.0 ( Binder Course)
Tested By: Marshall Quotient ( kN / mm) 1.0 - 4.0 ( Wearing Course)
(Contractor) Filler to Binder Ratio 0.6 - 1.2 ( Wearing Course)

Witnessed by:
(Consultant)

Form No. Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

T - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

OT MIX DESIGN BY MARSHALL METHOD

Stability
Marshall
Flow
Quotient.
Adjusted

mm kN/mm

pxq r/s

r s t

( Binder & Wearing Courses)

( Binder & Wearing Courses)
( Binder & Wearing Courses)
( Binder & Wearing Courses)
( Binder Course)
( Wearing Course)
( Wearing Course)

Form No. Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

DETERMINATION OF THE PRESENCE OF ORGANIC IMPURITIES IN FINE AGGREGATE

Lab. Ref. No.:

Material
Description
Location
Test mass
Date of testing Time of addition of NaOH to sample :
Use SECTION A OR SECTION B
Section A
Prepared liquid colour standard method
Time of preparation of colour standard
Time of comparison of colour
Observation
The colour of the supernatant liquid above the test sample was found to be:

lighter than the same as darker than

the standard colour
Section B
Glass colour standard method
Time of comparison of colour
Observation
The colour of the supernatant liquid above the test sample was similar to:
Gardner Colour Standard No. 5 8 11 14 16

Inference

The fine aggregate does/does not contain organic impurities

Remarks:

Form No. 38 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

AD

GREGATE

to be:

ar to:

Form No. 38 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

DETERMINATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE CYLINDERS

Lab Ref. No.:

Pouring No.: Date of Pouring:

Concrete Grade: Structure:

Location: No. of Cylinders:

Age of concrete hr/day

Cylinder No.

Time of testing h-min

Variation in age from the target hr

Specimen condition: moist or dry

Diameter at mid height of the specimen 1) mm

2) mm

Average diameter at mid height mm

Cross sectional area (rounded to 10 mm2) mm2

Diameter at top mm

Diameter at bottom mm

Height of the specimen mm

Whether the specimen was capped with sulphur compound

Whether the specimen was properly placed on the platen

Pace rate (should be 2.6 ~ 6.2 kN / sec ) kN / sec

Whether attempt was made to keep the pace rate constant at failure

Failure type(cone/ cone and split/ cone and shear/ shear/ columnar)

Maximum load on dial gauge kN

Compressive strength (upto 2nd place of decimal)

Compressive strength (rounded to 0.05 Mpa) MPa

Average compressive strength (test result, rounded to 0.05 MPa) MPa

Remarks:

Tested by:

Form No. 39 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

JAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE CYLINDERS

Form No. 39 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WS - 24
DETERMINATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE CUBES
Lab. Ref. No.:

Cube No.
Date of casting
Date of testing
Age day
Time of testing h-m
Variation in age from the target
Received specimen immersed in laboratory for 5 min. before testing
Whether the specimen was wet during testing
Whether "go / no go" gauge was used for checking dimensions
Whether the test gauge fitted with the specimen
Height of specimen: top face : 1) mm
2) mm
Height of specimen: bottom face 1) mm
2) mm
Average height of specimen mm
Width of specimen: top face : 1) mm
2) mm
Width of specimen: bottom face 1) mm
2) mm
Average width of specimen mm
Area of specimen (rounded to 10mm2) mm2
Machine platens were cleaned before crushing specimen
Whether surfaces of the cube were cleaned before crushing
Whether centering of the cube was made before application of load
Pace rate (should be 4.5 to 9.0 kN / sec.) kN / sec
Whether attempt was made to keep the pace rate constant at failure
Maximum load on dial gauge kN
Compressive strength (upto 2nd place of decimal) N / mm2
Cube strength (rounded to 0.5 N/mm2) N / mm2
Normal or abnormal failure
Test result N / mm2

Remarks:

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-24 Revision No.: Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

T - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

ESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE CUBES

Form No. WS-24 Revision No.: Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AGGREGATE FOR CEMENT CONCRETE

Lab Ref. No.:

Stock Pile Location:

Date Requested: Oven Dry Weight:

Date of sampling: Date of Testing :

Sieving Test Data Dry Sieving / Wet sieving

Cumulative Weight Cumulative %

Sieve Size, mm Weight Retained % Passing
Retained Retained

9.5

4.75

2.36

1.18

0.600

0.300

0.150

0.075

Pan

Remarks :

Tested By :

Form No. 41 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

NJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

YSIS OF FINE AGGREGATE FOR CEMENT CONCRETE

Spec. Limit

100

Form No. 41 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

SIEVE ANALYSIS OF 20 MM COARSE AGGREGATE FOR CEMENT CONCRETE

Lab Ref. No.:

Stock Pile Location:

Date Requested: Oven Dry Weight:

Date of sampling: Date of Testing :

Sieving Test Data Dry Sieving / Wet sieving

Weight Cumulative Cumulative % AASHTO Limits

Sieve Size, mm % Passing
Retained Weight Retained Retained (Size No.67)

25 100

19 90 ~ 100

9.5 20 ~ 55

4.75 0 ~ 10

2.36 0~5

1.18 -

0.075 -

Pan

Remarks :

Tested By :

Form No. 42 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

ANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

S OF 20 MM COARSE AGGREGATE FOR CEMENT CONCRETE

AASHTO Limits
(Size No.68)

100

90 ~ 100

30 ~ 65

5 ~ 25

0 ~ 10

0~5

Form No. 42 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

WS - 25 DETERMINATION OF FLAKINESS INDEX

Lab Ref. No:

Stock Pile Location: Date Requested:

Representative Quantity: Date of Sampling:

Type of Material: Date of Testing:

INFORMATION ON SIEVE ANALYSIS TEST ON FLAKINESS

Sieve Size, mm Wt.Retained Test Weight Passing Flaky Particles

% Retained
Passing Retained g Weight, g (Gauge), g %

63 50

50 37.5

37.5 28

28 20

20 14

14 10

10 6.3

Total

Note 1. It retained % of any fraction is equal to or less than 5, then the fraction is not considered for test.

Note 2. If any fraction does not satisfy the test quantity then achieve the required quantity and calculate the flakiness index based on
weighted average of the material retained

Flakiness Index =

Remarks:

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-25 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

AKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

MINATION OF FLAKINESS INDEX

TEST ON FLAKINESS

Specified Max.
Flakiness Index

Form No. WS-25 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

AGGREGATE CRUSHING VALUE (ACV) OF COARSE AGGREGATE

Lab Ref. No.:

Location: Date of Sampling:

Description of Material: Date of Testing:

Representative Area: Dry Weight:

Preparation of Test Specimen

Size fraction mm-mm
Quantity of sample kg
Test sieves used for separating test portion mm
Quantity of test portion kg
Period of drying the sample h-m
Specimen compacted in the cylinder Y/N
No. of layers
No. of strokes/layer
Drop height for compaction mm

Test Data
Determination No. 1 2 3
Initial mass of compacted specimen M g

Loading started h-m-s

Loading finished h-m-s

Period of application of force m-s

Maximum force applied kN

Mass of crushed specimen M1 g

Sieve used for separating fines mm

Mass retained on the separating sieve M3 g

Mass passed through the separating sieve M2 g

Sum* M2 + M3 g
Fines, 100(M2 / M1) %

ACV**
* if the sum differs from M1 by more than 10g, discard the result and test other specimens

** The ACV value to be reported is the mean of two results unless any single result differs by more than 0.07 times the mean
in which case the test shall be repeated on two further specimens.

Test Result: %

Form No. 44 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

ROAD

ATE

3 4

Form No. 44 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

CLAY LUMPS AND FRIABLE PARTICLES

(For Coarse Aggregate / A Mixture of Fine and Coarse Aggregates)

Lab Ref No.:

Type of Material : Purpose of Use: Date of Sampling:

Representative Quantity : Location: Date of Testing:

Designated Grading of Mass of Test Designated Mass Retained on % Weighted %

Sieve Size, mm
Fractional Original Fraction before Sieve Size, Designated Sieve Passing, P Loss

Fraction Passing Retained Wt, g (min) Sample, %, G Wash, g, W mm after Wash, g, R (P x G) / 100

1) 37.5 19 3000 4.75

2) 19 9.5 2000 4.75

3) 9.5 4.75 1000 2.36

4) 4.75 1.18 25 0.850

Total

Note.
Include fraction 4) for a material which is a mixture of fine and coarse aggregates otherwise ignore

Tested by : Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

T - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

PS AND FRIABLE PARTICLES

e / A Mixture of Fine and Coarse Aggregates)

Maximum

Specified

% Loss

Form No. Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

WS - 26 DETERMINATION OF SLUMP OF FRESH CONCRETE

Lab. Ref. No.:

Pouring No.: Method of sampling: Standard/Alternate Date and Time of sampling:

Batch identification Nos. of specimens taken

Place of sampling Place of test

Concrete type Source of concrete

Time elapsed from sampling to commencement of test

Period from the start of filling to removal of cone

Time to lift the slump cone

Graphical Representation

Slump = mm

Form : true / shear / collapse

Thermometer No.:

Thermometer Type:

Temperature = °C

Remarks:

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-26 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WS - 27
NORMAL CONSISTENCY AND SETTING TIME OF CEMENT
Date of Sampling: Lab Ref. No.:

Storage Location: Sample Idn.: Date of Testing:

Date of Consignment: Description of Sample:

Test for Normal Cosistency

Observed:
Test No. Wt.of Cement Wt.of Water % Water Observed Pen., mm Required Penetration, mm

Temparature: =

10 ± 1 in 30 sec
Relative Humidity =

Normal Consistency :

Test for Initial Setting Time

Penetration, mm
Elapsed Scale Reading, Elapsed Scale Reading,
Clock Hrs. Clock Hrs.
Time, min mm Time, min mm 50

El. T Pen.,mm
40 10 50
20 45
30 444
30 40 43
50 42
60 41
70 38
20 80 35
90 32
100 30
130 28
10### 26
260 22
290
0 18 50 100 150
300 15
Elapsed time, min

Test for Final Setting Time

Elapsed
Time, min
Clock Hrs. Observation Notes on Observation

Initial Setting Time:

When penetration of the needle is 25 mm.

Final Setting Time:

When the needle does not sink visibly into the cement paste.

Test Results: Initial Setting Time:

Final Setting Time:

Remarks:

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-27 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

ENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

TENCY AND SETTING TIME OF CEMENT

°C

%
Penetration, mm

50

40

30

20

10
0 50 100 150 200
Elapsed time, min

Notes on Observation

Initial Setting Time:

When penetration of the needle is 25 mm.

Final Setting Time:

When the needle does not sink visibly into the cement paste.

Form No. WS-27 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

WS - 28
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF HYDRAULIC CEMENT MORTAR

Structure Location: Date of Sampling: Lab Ref. No.:

Storage Location: Sample Idn.:

Date of Consignment: Description of Sample:

Other Ref.: Date of Adding Water:

Average
Comp. Specified
Mortar Cube Area, Test Load, Comp.
Testing Date Age, days Dimensions, mm Strength, Compressive
no. mm2 kN Strength,
MPa Strength, MPa
MPa

Remarks:

Tested by: Witnessed by:

(Contractor) (Consultant)

Form No. WS-28 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

AKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

ENGTH OF HYDRAULIC CEMENT MORTAR

Remarks

Form No. WS-28 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

DEFLECTION TEST BY BENKELMAN BEAM METHOD

Lab Ref. No:

Station: Temperature: ..…………. °C Date of Testing:

FIELD TEST DATA

Initial of First Rebound

0.5m 2nd 1.0m 3rd Final Reading
Chainage Reading Deflection Remarks
1 2 3 4 5

Tested by:

Form No. 50 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

ENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

TEST BY BENKELMAN BEAM METHOD

Remarks

Form No. 50 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

Concrete Pouring Record

Supplementary Sheet(s): Yes / No

Contract No.: __________ Structure: _______________________ Concrete Class: __________ Pumping Stages(Nos.): _____ Target volume: ___________ m3 Checked by

Trial Mix Ref.: ___________ Slump Range: ___________________ Pouring No. _____________ Batch Plant No.: _______ Weather Condition: _____________ Date

Sl. Truck / Batching Discharge Delivery Slump Visual Concrete Cylinders / Cubes
Engineer
No. Date Batch No. Time Time Time Slip No. Test Value slump Temp, °C Mould Ref. Prepared 7 day 28 day Lab Ref. No. Quantity
Attended
Started Finished mm check 7 day 28 day by Specimen No. Specimen No. m3

Batch Counted by : 1) __________________

Reviewed by: ___________________ _____________________

2) __________________ Date

Form No. 51 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
Page …….. of …………

Pouring Record
Checked by

Action
Thermometer
Taken by
No.
Contractor

_____________________

Date

Form No. 51 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

REQUEST FOR ISPECTION / SURVEY / QUALITY TEST

TO: Resident Engineer Request for checking and / or Ref. No.

JOC-BCL inspection as per Clause 37 and 38
Consultants of the Condition of Contract
DESCRIPTION OF WORKS:

LOCATION:

Estimated time that the work will be ready ……….. AM/PM Date: ………………………..

Following Operation:

_______________
Signed Time: …………………...…
For the Contractor Date: ………..…………….

Received Time: …………………...…

_______________
For Consultants Date: ………..…………….

FIELD OBSERVATIONS:

RE …………………………………………………… Date: ………..……………. Time: …………...…

Bridge Engineer ……………………………………. Date: ………..……………. Time: …………...…

Survey Engineer …………………………………… Date: ………..……………. Time: …………...…

Materials Engineer ………………………………… Date: ………..……………. Time: …………...…

APPROVAL TO PROCEED

Approval is / is not given to proceed as requested.

Remarks:

______________
Signed: Time: …………………...…
For Consultants Date: ………..…………….

Form No. 52 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

ENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

ISPECTION / SURVEY / QUALITY TEST

Ref. No.

Date: ………………………..

Time: …………………...…
Date: ………..…………….

Time: …………………...…

Date: ………..…………….

Time: …………...…

Time: …………...…

Time: …………...…

Time: …………...…

Time: …………………...…
Date: ………..…………….

Form No. 52 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

MDD vs. LOCATION

Lab Ref. Nos.:

Compactio
Description of
Station Lab Ref. No. Cut / Fill Depth, m 4.54kg Ram
Material
MDD, t/m3

Prepared by: __________________ Reviewed by: ___________________

Form No. 53 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

Date: ____________________ Date: _______________________

Form No. 53 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 Compaction,
4.54kg Rammer
MDD, t/m3 OMC, %

___________

Form No. 53 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

WS - 30 DETERMINATION OF WATER ABSORPTION OF STONE

Lab Ref. Nos:

Sampling Location: Km 24 + 500 Date of Sampling: 09 August, 2014

Purpose of Use: Construction of Date of Testing: 11 August, 2014

Masonry Wall Engineer's Test/Joint Test:

Specimen No. 1 2 3

Marking No No No

Stained brown Stained brown

Description Deep grey
surface surface

Weight after oven drying g 4373 6339 8045

Period of drying hr 24 24 24

Weight of SSD specimen g 4402 6354 8061

Period of soaking under water hr 24 24 24

Weight of absorbed water g 29 15 16

Water Absorption % 0.66 0.24 0.20

Specimen No. 5 6 7

Marking No. No. No.

Stained brown
Description Grey Grey
surface

Weight after oven drying g 5779 6380 6567

Period of drying hr 24 24 24

Weight of SSD specimen g 5818 6388 6581

Period of soaking under water hr 24 24 24

Weight of absorbed water g 39 8 14

Water Absorption % 0.67 0.13 0.21

Form No. WS-30 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

ENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

OF WATER ABSORPTION OF STONE

Engineer's

No

Gray

9238

24

9269

24

31

0.34

Form No. WS-30 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

 AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

CONSULTANTS CONTRACTOR

SAMPLE RECORD CARD

Sample ID.......................................................... Contract No.:

Location:.............................................. Date: ....................................................

Sampled by: ……………………………………. Material Type: .................................................…

Lab Ref.
Description of Sample Source Rep. Qty Quantity/No. Tests Required
No.

Form No. 54 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx

ENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

SAMPLE RECORD CARD

Remarks

Form No. 54 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx