MS Act 1958 PDF
MS Act 1958 PDF
MS Act 1958 PDF
Commentary
by
Vivek Joy.Kaliyadan
LL B., LL M., M. Phil
Maritime Lawyer - Corpus Droit
2013
BHANDARKAR PUBLICATIONS
MUMBAI
i
© copyright Bhandarkar Publications
www.bhandarkarpub.com
Tel: 91-022-2444 4248
January 2008
Reprint January 2009
Reprint June 2009
Reprint November 2009
Reprint December 2010
Reprint August 2011
Reprint August 2012
Edition October 2013
ii
© copyright Bhandarkar Publications
www.bhandarkarpub.com
Tel: 91-022-2444 4248
LIST OF AMENDING ACTS
w.e.f
1. The Repealing and Amending Act, 1960 (58 of 1960). (by notification)
2. The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1966 (21 of 1966). 28/05/66
3. The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1970 (25 of 1970). (various dates)
4. The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1976 (69 of 1976). 01/12/76
5. The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1978 (1 of 1978).
6. The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1979 (20 of 1979).
7. The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1981 (43 of 1981).
8. The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1983 (12 of 1983).
9. The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1984 (41 of 1984). (by notification)
10. The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1986 (33 of 1986).
11. The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1986 (66 of 1986). 03/04/87
12. The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1987 (13 of 1987).
13. The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1988 (55 of 1988).
14. The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1993 (68 of 1993). 27/10/93
15. The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1997 (9 of 1998). 26/09/97
16. The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2002 (63 of 2002). (different dates)
17. The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2003 (59 of 2003). 01/03/04
18. The Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 2007 (40 of 2007). 24/09/07
iii
© copyright Bhandarkar Publications
www.bhandarkarpub.com
Tel: 91-022-2444 4248
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED
Amend. for Amendment.
Cls. “ Clauses.
Expn. “ Expression
foll. “ following
incl. “ inclusive
Ins. “ Inserted.
Sec. “ Section.
Subs. “ Substituted.
MS “ Merchant Shipping
w.e.f. “ with effect from
iv
© copyright Bhandarkar Publications
www.bhandarkarpub.com
Tel: 91-022-2444 4248
PUBLISHERS’ NOTE
In our book Maritime Law of India, published in 1979, the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 was reproduced ad
verbatim with a preface by Dr. Nagendra Singh at one time Director General of Shipping and then Judge of
the International Court of Justice, and Commentary by Mr. Gopalan Nair, Deputy Director General of Shipping
(retired). We have now the pleasure of making a new effort to project Maritime Law exclusively as limited by
the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958.
The Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 was at first modelled after the U.K Merchant Shiping Act, 1894 which was
replaced by Indian Merchant Shipping Act of 1923. After Independance, the new conditions were carefully
taken note of, and though late, a comprehensive piece of legislation was passed by the Indian Parliament in
1958. However, International shipping was itself in doldrums of technological, political and economic changes
in the world and made the “Inter Governmental Maritime Consultative Organisation” an effective body to
regulate world shipping. Today, under the new name “International Maritime Organisation” known as IMO. It is
an organ of the United Nations and regulates Global Maritime Law.
India being a Maritime Nation, and a member of the IMO has to ratify the changes approved by IMO and
incorporate the same subsequently in its National Legislation. Therefore, the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958
has been modified 18 times till date and all the amendments have been incorporated in this volume. Currently
India being a signatory to the Standards of Training, Certification and Watch-keeping of the IMO, has made
new Rules for examination of Deck Officers. Consequently, Part VI, of the Present Act has been amended in
this edition.
The most important changes that have been incorporated since 1980 pertain to ownership of the shares of a
ship which can now be held by a Co-operative Society which is dpuly registered in any of the States of India
under appropriate law made under the Central Act No. 12 of 1912. Similarly the Fishing vessels and Sailing
vessels have been given their due place in the Act. Marine pollution and its prevention has taken an important
place and fines have been very heavy in cases of violation of laws.
The 1981 Amendment Act enables the ownership to be shared by members of a Co-operative Society and
hence modifies Sections 21(b), 29, 45, 406, 407, 415, 431 and 441 suitably, 1983 Amendment Act mainly
fixes Civil Liability for oil pollution damage in terms of the international currency of the gold franc and sections
352G to R have been formulated. Similarly prevention and containment of pollution of the sea by oil has been
defined by new sections 356A to O. Certain protection is given to Indian ships by the new section 411A. In
view of the importance of fishing to the economic life of India, New part XVA has been formed (new sections
435A to X). Fines for violating provisions of the Act in terms of oil pollution have been heavy and deterrent. (see
Penalties Serial No. 115B etc.) The authority for trial for violations of sections of the MSA has now been vested
in “any Judicial Magistrate of the First Class or any Metropolitan Magistrate” by modifying sections 35, 132,
145, 146, 184, 187, 189, 233, 279, etc.1984 Amendment Act defines the concept of “family” of the seaman
and/or an apprentice and their nominees entitled to receive compensation by modifying Section 11, 102, 105,
108, 130, 132, 137, 141, 159, etc. However, the most significant change is to include the sailing vessel under
the preview of the MSA in terms of insurance and compensation of the Crew.
The views, if any, expressed in the Introduction and Interpretation of this book are of Shri J. S. Gill
were made during his tenure as Sr. Dy. Director of Shipping but do not necessarily represent those of the
Govt. of India or the department in which he was working. Similarly, Commentary and Case study by Vivek
Joy Kaliyadan, Maritime lawyer - Corpus Droit, has been provided for guidance of practicing Lawyers or
students alike.
Though every care is taken to ensure accuracy of the content of the matter, inadvertent errors may creep in.
If such errors are noticed, kindly advise us of the same. We are open to suggestions or even constructive
criticism.We will give due credit to whoever provides us with suggestions.
v
© copyright Bhandarkar Publications
www.bhandarkarpub.com
Tel: 91-022-2444 4248
INTRODUCTION
THE EVOLUTION OF THE INDIAN LAW OF MERCHANT SHIPPING
AND ITS CODIFICATION
The development of the Merchant Shipping Law in India has had a long history of over a century.
The first Act on the subject, passed by the British Parliament, was the Lascars Act, 1823 (4 Geo. 4,
c.80). This Act, which was partly repealed later, enabled rules to be made by the Indian Legislature
to be observed by Masters and Officers, Owners of ships and vessels trading under the authority of
the Act. There was further legislation enacted by the British Parliament e.g. 3 and 4 Vict. c. 56, under
the authority of which the Indian Registration of Ships Act of 1841 was passed in India. Similarly, in
1855, by virtue of a British Act (18 and 19 Vict. c.119), the Indian Sea Passengers Act of 1855 was
enacted. The next Statute, the Merchant Shipping Act, 1894 (57 & 58 Vict. c. 60) has been the most
important Act of the British Parliament relating to Merchant Shipping and this Act has consolidated
all the earlier Parliamentary legislation and also defined the application of the British Acts to India
and other parts of the British Empire. There is a long string of Acts passed subsequently now
constructed as part of the 1894 Act. It is noteworthy that legislation in India was only possible under
the authority conferred by the English Parliamentary Statutes. The U.K. Merchant Shipping Act,
1894 expressly states the various parts of the Empire to which the Act was made applicable. For
example, in Section 91 of the said Act where the application of Part I is considered, it is laid down
that it would apply to the whole of Her Majesty’s dominion and to all places where Her Majesty has
jurisdiction. The U.K. Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, therefore, applied to India ipso facto. It is for this
reason that the said Act has been described as an Imperial Statute. In accordance with Section
735(1) of the U.K. Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, no Act or Ordinance passed by the legislature of
any British possession overseas could take effect until the approval of Her Majesty had been proclaimed
in the possession and until such time thereafter as may be fixed by the Act or ordinance for this
purpose. These provisions did not apply to the Parliament of a Dominion in accordance with the
Statute of Westminster 1931 (22 Geo. 5, c.4). However, they were applicable to India and though in
the Government of India Act,1935, which prescribed a Federal Constitution, the federal legislature
was empowered to legislate on merchant shipping, it was unfortunate that as Part II of the Act never
came into force, the Central legislature did not have powers to enact merchant shipping laws as a
sovereign independent State until India’s independence in 1947. But it was not until 1958 that the first
genuine national enactment on merchant shipping was forthcoming.
However, among the several Acts passed in India under the authority conferred by the British
Parliamentary Statutes, the first enactment in India relating to Merchant Shipping was the Bombay
Coasting Vessels Act, 1838, which provided for a system of identification and registration of vessels
belonging to residents of the Presidency of Bombay and which were employed on the coasts of the
Presidency. The next Act was the Indian Registration of Ships Act, 1841, which provides for registration
of vessels built and trading within the limits of the East India Company’s charter. The Act conferred
the status of British ships on such ships but only as long as the ships were within the limits of the
charter. This Act was subsequently amended in 1850 so as to extend the privileges of British ships
to Indian ship which were on voyage from one part of the possessions of the East India Company to
another part. There were numerous other enactments in India in subsequent years, the most important
of which were : the Indian Merchant Shipping Act, 1859, which dealt with examinations for Certificates
of Competency, engagement of seamen and their wages, etc.; the Indian Merchants Shipping Act,
1880, which dealt with detention of unseaworthy and unsafe ships; the Indian Merchant Shipping Act
of 1883 which dealt with casualties affecting ships, enquiries into casualties and charges against
ship’s officers; the Native Passenger Ships Act, 1887, which dealt with unberthed passenger traffic,
and the Pilgrim Ships Act of 1895 which dealt with the Haj Pilgrim traffic.
vii
viii
ix
xii
xiii
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
7. Director-General of Shipping --------------------------------------------------------------------- 15
8. Mercantile Marine Department ------------------------------------------------------------------ 15
9. Surveyors -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15
10. Radio inspectors. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16
11. Shipping offices. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 16
12. Seamen’s employment offices. ----------------------------------------------------------------- 16
13. Seamen’s welfare officers. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 17
PART III - Commentary --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18
Section Nos. 14 to 19 referring to Shipping Development Fund is
omitted as per MS (Amend.) Act 1986.
PART IV
SHIPPING DEVELOPMENT FUND
Part IV – Commentary --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 21
xv
PART VI
CERTIFICATES OF OFFICERS
Masters, mates, engineers, skippers, etc.
75. Application of Part. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 44
xvii
PART VIII
PASSENGER SHIPS
Survey of passenger ships.
219. Application of part. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 116
220. No ship to carry passengers without a certificate of survey. ------------------------------ 116
221. Power of surveyor. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 116
222. Fees in respect of survey. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 117
223. Declaration of survey. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 117
224. Sending of declaration. by owner, agent or master to Central Government. ---------- 117
225. Grant of certificate of survey by Central Government. -------------------------------------- 118
226. Power of Central Government to order a second survey. ---------------------------------- 118
227. Duration of certificates of survey. --------------------------------------------------------------- 118
228. Cancellation or suspension of certificate of survey by Central Government. ---------- 119
229. Alteration in ships subsequent to grant of certificate of survey,
and additional surveys. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 119
230. Power to require delivery of expired or cancelled certificate of survey. ----------------- 120
231. Certificate of survey to be affixed in conspicuous part of ship. -------------------------- 120
232. Ship not to carry passengers in contravention of Act. ------------------------------------- 120
Keeping order in passenger ships
233. Offences in connection with passenger ships. ---------------------------------------------- 120
234 Power to exclude drunken passengers from passenger ships --------------------------- 121
235. Ships with certificates of survey or certificates of partial survey
granted outside India. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 121
xxiii
PART IX
SAFETY
283. Countries to which Load Line Convention or Safety Convention applies. -------------- 147
283A. Definitions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 147
Construction of ships
284. Construction of rules ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 147
Prevention of collisions
285. Collision regulations ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 148
286. Observance of collision regulations. ----------------------------------------------------------- 148
287. Inspectors of light and shapes and fog and distress signals. ---------------------------- 148
Life saving appliances and fire appliances.
288. Power to make rules as to life saving appliances. ------------------------------------------ 149
289. Rules relating to fire appliances. ---------------------------------------------------------------- 150
xxv
xxvii
NUCLEAR SHIPS
344A. Application of Act to nuclear ships. ------------------------------------------------------------ 188
344B. Nuclear passenger ship safety certificates and nuclear cargo
ship safety certificates. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 188
344C. Prohibition of proceeding to sea without certificates. -------------------------------------- 188
344D. Safety assessment and operating manual. -------------------------------------------------- 189
344E. Foreign Nuclear ships to give free advance notice of arrival. ------------------------------ 189
344F. Control on arrival of nuclear ships. ------------------------------------------------------------- 189
344G. Notice of accidents to nuclear ships. ---------------------------------------------------------- 190
344H. Application of nuclear sections to or in relation to certain certificates
under section 344B. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 190
344I. Power to make rules. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 190
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
352. Definitions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 201
352A. Limitation of liability for damages in respect of section claims. ------------------------- 201
352B. Limitation of liability. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 203
352C. Limitation Fund and consolidation of claims against owners. ---------------------------- 203
352D. Release of ship, etc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 204
352E. Scope of application. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 206
352F. Application of this Part to charterer, manager, etc., of a vessel. ------------------------ 207
352FA Power to make rules. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 207
PART X A - Commentary ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 208
PART XB
PART XC
NAVIGATION
353. Method of giving helm orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------- 222
354. Duty to report dangers to navigation. ---------------------------------------------------------- 222
354A. Communication of intelligence regarding dangers to navigation. ------------------------ 222
355. Obligation to render assistance on receiving signal of distress. ------------------------- 222
355A. Obligation to render assistance to persons in danger. ------------------------------------- 223
356. Power to make rules as to signals. ------------------------------------------------------------ 223
PART XI – Commentary --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 225
PART XIA
PREVENTION OF POLLUTION OF THE SEA BY OIL
356A. Application. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 226
356B. Definitions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 226
356C. Issue of Pollution Prevention Certificate. ------------------------------------------------------ 227
356D. Issue of Certificates for foreign ships in India and Indian ships in foreign countries. 228
356E. Requirement for construction and equipment in ships to prevent pollution. ----------- 228
356F. Record book. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 229
356G. Inspection and control of oil tankers and other ships to which this Part applies. ---- 229
356H. Information regarding contravention of the provisions of the convention. --------------- 229
356I. Reception facilitiesat ports in India. ------------------------------------------------------------ 230
PART XII
xxx
xxxi
PART XIV
xxxii
PART XV
SAILING VESSELS
415. Application of Part. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 265
416. Decision of question whether a vessel is a sailing vessel. -------------------------------- 265
417. Certificate of registry. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 265
418. Particulars relating to sailing vessel to be painted. ----------------------------------------- 266
419. Change of name of sailing vessel. -------------------------------------------------------------- 266
420. Prevention of overloading. or overcrowding. --------------------------------------------------- 266
421. Certificate of inspection. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 266
422. Cancellation, re-issue, etc., of certificate of inspection. ----------------------------------- 267
423. Registry of alterations. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 267
424. Transfer of registry. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 268
425. Closure of registry. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 268
426. Restrictions on transfer of sailing vessels. --------------------------------------------------- 268
427. Mortgages of sailing vessels. -------------------------------------------------------------------- 268
428. Fraudulent use of certificate of registry or certificate of inspection, etc., prohibited. 268
429. Statement relating to crew of sailing vessel to be maintained. --------------------------- 269
430. Inquiry into jettisoning of cargo. ----------------------------------------------------------------- 269
431. Non-Indian sailing vessels not to engage in coasting trade
without permission. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 269
432. Detention of overload non Indian sailing vessels. ------------------------------------------- 270
433. Power of courts to rescind contracts between owner and Tindal. ----------------------- 270
434. Applications to sailing vessels of other provisions relating to ships. -------------------- 270
434A. Insurance of members of crew of sailing vessels. ------------------------------------------- 270
434B. Policy of insurance. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 272
435. Power to make rules respecting sailing vessels. ------------------------------------------- 272
PART XV – Commentary ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 274
xxxiii
FISHING BOATS
435A-435X. Fishing boats. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 275
PART XV-A – Commentary ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 282
PART XVI
PART XVII
MISCELLANEOUS
449. Power to appoint examiners and to make rules as to qualifications
of ship surveyors. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 304
450. No person to practise as ship surveyor unless qualified. ---------------------------------- 304
451. Power of ship surveyor to inspect ship. ------------------------------------------------------- 304
452. Inquiry into cause of death on board Indian ship. ------------------------------------------- 304
453. Certain persons deemed to be public servants. --------------------------------------------- 305
454. Powers of persons authorised to investigate, etc. ------------------------------------------ 305
454A. Power to prescribe alternative fitting, etc. ---------------------------------------------------- 306
xxxiv
PART XVIII
xxxv
Preamble - Commentary
The preamble of an Act is a key to open the mind of legislators in cases where any doubt or
there is any possibility of ambiguity1. If the words of the substantive provisions are clear, the preamble
cannot control the language used in the Act.2 In the event of doubt or ambiguity, the Court should
approach the substantive provisions of the Bill in the light of the policy and purpose deductible from
the terms of the preamble and thus construe the clauses of the said enactment as will subserve the
said policy and purpose.3 The preamble may not exactly correspond with the enactment and the
enactment or the statute may go beyond the preamble.4
The preamble of the Merchant Shipping Act 19585 envisages the intention behind the legislation
which is to foster the development and ensure efficient maintenance of the maritime industry of India.
The preamble also clarifies the intention behind the formation of the National Shipping Board and the
Shipping Development Fund. It is also stated that the MS Act 1958 is legislated to facilitate for
registration of Indian ships. The construction of the preamble provides for treatment of vessels6 /
ships7 registered in India with measures for special privileges and protection. Further, the Act is also
meant to provide provisions for amendments and consolidation of law regulating/governing merchant
shipping.
1
Bhinka v. Charan Singh, AIR 1959 SC 960
2
Tribhuban Prakash Nayar v. The Union of India AIR 1970 SC 540; Manju v. State of Kerala and Ors. 2011 (3) KHC 57,
2011 (3) KLT 150
3
M/s. Burrakur Coal Co. Ltd. v. The Union of India AIR 1961 SC 954 at p. 956, In re The Kerala Education Bill, 1957 AIR
1958 SC 956
4
M/s. Purbanchal Cables and Conductors Pvt. Ltd. And Ors. V. Assam State Electricity Board and Anr. 2012 (7) SCC
462; AIR 2012 SC 3167.
5
Merchant Shipping Act 1958 (44 of 1958) hereinafter referred to as MS Act 1958.
6
See Section 3(55) which defines the term “vessel” to include “any ship, boat, sailing vessel, or other description of
vessel used in navigation”.
7
Section 3(45) defines the term ship to not include sailing vessel.
PART I
PRELIMINARY
Short title and 1. (1) This Act may be called the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958.
commencement
(2) It shall come into force on such date as the Central
Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette,
appoint, and different dates may be appointed for different
provisions of this Act.
1
Application of Act [2. (1) Unless otherwise expressly provided, the provisions of this
Act which apply to-
(a) any vessel which is registered in India; or
(b) any vessel which is required by this Act to be so
registered; or
(c) any other vessel which is owned wholly by persons to
each of whom any of the descriptions specified in clause
(a) or in clause (b) or in clause (c), as the case may
be, of section 21 applies, shall so apply wherever the
vessel may be.
(2) Unless otherwise expressly provided, the provisions of this
Act which apply to vessels other than those referred to in
sub-section (1) shall so apply only while any such vessel is
within India, including the territorial waters thereof.]
Definitions 3. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,
2
[(1) “cargo ship” means a ship which is not a passenger ship;
(1A) “coasting ship” means a ship exclusively employed in trading
between any port or place in India and any other port or
place on the continent of India or between ports or places in
India and ports or places in Ceylon or Burma;]
(2) “coasting trade of India” means the carriage by sea of
passengers or goods from any port or place in India to any
other port or place on the continent of India;
(3) “collision regulations” means the regulations made under
section 285 for the prevention of collisions at sea;
(4) “company means a company as defined in section 3 of the
Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956).
H
Expn. “or is deemed to have been declared”
1 Subs. by MS (Amend.) Act 1970
1
[(11A) “family” means,-
(i) in the case of male, his wife, his children, whether
married or unmarried, his dependent parents and his
deceased son’s widow and children:
Provided that if a person proves that his wife has ceased
under the personal law governing him or the customary
law of the community to which the spouses belong, to
be entitled to maintenance she shall no longer be
deemed to be a part of such person’s family for the
purpose of this Act, unless such person subsequently
intimates by express notice, in writing, to the Central
Government that she shall continue to be so regarded;
and
(ii) in the case of female, her husband, her children,
whether married or unmarried, her dependent parents,
her husband’s dependent parents and her deceased
son’s widow and children:
Provided that if a person by notice in writing to the
Central Government expresses her desire to exclude
her husband from the family, the husband and his
dependent parents shall no longer be deemed to be a
part of such person’s family for the purpose of this Act,
unless such person subsequently cancels in writing
any such notice.
Explanation: In either of the above two cases, if the
child, or, as the case may be, the child of a deceased
son of a person has been adopted by another person
and if under the personal law of the adopter adoption is
legally recognised, such a child shall be considered as
excluded from the family of the first mentioned person.]
(12) “fishing vessel” means a ship fitted with mechanical means
of propulsion, which is exclusively engaged in sea fishing for
profit;
(13) “foreign-going ship” means a ship, not being a home-trade
ship, employed in trading between any port or place in India
and any other port or place or between ports or places, outside
India;
2
(14) [“free board” means the distance measured vertically
downwards, amidships, from the upper edge of the deck line
to the upper edge of the related load line;]
(15) High Court, in relation to a vessel, means the High Court
within the limits of whose appellate jurisdiction-
PART I- Commentary
The MS Act 1958 is enacted for governing merchant shipping in India.1 Part I of the MS Act
1958 envisages three preliminary ingredients, which are (a) the coming into effect, (b) application,
and (c) definitions of the terms and phrases used in the Act. The short title provides for the exact title
of the statute, which remains unchanged until specifically amended. Additionally, the MS Act 1958
mandates the necessity of notification for the statute to come into effect, in the official gazette by the
Ministry of Shipping, the Central Government, which is the maritime administrative authority of the
Government of India.
The admissibility of a claim under the MS Act 1958, against a foreign vessel before the
appropriate judicial forum in India is tested primarily with respect to the applicability of the Act under
Part I. The application of the MS Act 1958 in terms of categories of vessels depends on their nationality,
flag, registration of ownership, and territorial limits in which the vessels ply. Further, under Section
2(2), Part I enables the enhancement of the application of the MS Act 1958 to any vessel other than
that provided under Section 2 (1), unless otherwise expressly provided. In other words the vessels
within India, that which are not covered under Section 2(1) can be made subject to application of MS
Act 1958, even without an amendment or a specific separate legislation, unless such application of
the Act is specifically and in clear terms barred/ excluded by the provisions of the Act.
Section 2(2) of SM Act 1958 is not a non-obstante Section. It provides for provisions to the
contrary and hence, even if vessel involved in collision is outside the jurisdiction of Indian territory, in
matters of suit for limiting the liability under the PART X-A2 of the MS Act 1958, jurisdiction can be
entertained by the court.3 Again it has been laid down by the Court that High Court has no jurisdiction
to try foreign ships and personnel unless they submit to jurisdiction of the Court by means of their
presence4, the limits within which India can exercise her sovereign rights. The territorial limits and
threshold of jurisdiction are expressly stipulated under the respective Indian Law5 and international
obligations6.
1
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Indo Oceanic shipping Co. Ltd. & Ors (2001) 165 CTR (Bom) 404, (2001) 114
TAXMAN 722 (Bom)
2
Part X-A deals with Limitation of Liability for Maritime claims. For detailed discussion see Commentary to Part X-A
3
Snp Shipping Services Pvt. Ltd. And Ors. Vs. Kara Mara Shipping Co. Ltd. And Ors. 1997(4) ALLMR 590, 1997 (99)
BOM LR 651.
4
World Tanker Carrier Corporation v S. N. Shipping Services, AIR 1998 SCC 330
5
See General Clauses Act, 1897, Section 3 (29), which defines the term “Indian Law”. For territorial limits, see Territorial
Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and other Maritime Zones Act, 1976. “Scope of Application of
Statutes” of respective statutes also stipulates the application and limits. See Section 2 of MS Act 1958
6
India also has undertaken obligations by becoming party to Conventions administered and convened under the
auspices of International Maritime Organisation, which may prescribe different jurisdiction for different subject matters
that they cover. For instance the International Convention for Removal of Wrecks, 2007 enables the member States to
apply jurisdiction right from the Exclusive Economic Zone. Also see the limits and exercise of jurisdiction and powers
as mentioned in United Nations Convention on Law of Treaties 1982.
Under Section 3 of the MS Act 1958, the definition of the words and phrases used in the Act
is provided. The application of definitions under Section 3 is limited when different specific definitions
are given with respect to specific provisions , elsewhere in the Act. The necessity for a duplication of
the definition and a solution of interpretation of possible conflicts of the same with those mentioned
under Section 3 is thus avoided. The language used in Section 3 enables the legislators to bring in
amendments so as to incorporate provisions which were unforeseen at the time of drafting of the
parent Act and also enhances application and effectiveness of the MS Act 1958 on new topics/
challenges/changes.7 Further, the words that are used in the Act, but are not defined else where in
the Act, shall be read with the definition provided under the General Clauses Act 1897.8 Thus the
effectiveness of the statute is preserved and ensured, which in turn enables the MS Act 1958 to
adapt / grow with time.
7
M.V. Elizabeth and Ors. V. Harwan Investment and Trading Pvt. Ltd. AIR 1993 SC 1014
8
Also note that as laid down by the honourable Supreme Court in M.V. Elizabeth and Ors. V. Harwan
Investment and Trading Pvt. Ltd. AIR 1993 SC 1014, unless not conflicting with domestic law/statutes
the lacunae in the domestic legislation can be filled in by relying on law prescribed under the international
convention and treaties.
PART II
NATIONAL SHIPPING BOARD
4. (1) With effect from such date as the Central Government may, Establishment of
by notification in the Official Gazette, specify in his behalf, National Shipping
there shall be established a Board to be called the National Board
Shipping Board (hereinafter in this Part referred to as the
Board)
(2) The Board shall consist of the following members, namely:-
(a) six members elected by Parliament, four by the House
of the People from among its members and the other
two by the Council of States from among its members;
(b) such numbers of other members, not exceeding sixteen
as the Central Government may think fit to appoint to
the Board, to represent
(i) the Central Government,
(ii) ship owners,
(iii) seaman, and
(iv) such other interests as, in the opinion of the Central
Government, ought to be represented on the Board;
Provided that the Board shall include an equal number of
persons representing the ship owners and seamen.
(3) The Central Government shall nominate one of the members
of the Board to be the Chairman of the Board.
(4) The Board shall have power to regulate its own procedure.
5. The Board shall advise the Central Government Functions of National
(a) on matters relating to Indian shipping, including the Shipping Board
development thereof; and
(b) on such other matters arising out of this Act as the Central
Government may refer to it for advice.
6. (1) The Central Government may make rules to carry out the Power to make rules in
purposes of this Part. respect of matters in
this Part
(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the
foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the
following matters, namely :-
(a) the term of office of members of the Board and the
manner of filling casual vacancies in the Board;
(b) the appointment of officers and other employees to
enable the Board to discharge its functions under
section 5 and the terms and conditions of their service;
(c) the travelling and other allowances payable to members
of the Board.
PART II - Commentary
The purpose of Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 is to ensure the efficient maintenance of an
Indian Mercantile Marine and for that purpose a National Shipping Board was created with an aim to
provide for the registration, certification, safety and security of Indian ships. Part II of the MS Act
1958 deals with establishment of National Shipping Board for providing advice to the Central
Government on matters of shipping and maritime trade, primarily focusing on development aspects
of Shipping in India. The Board is entrusted with the power to regulate its own procedure to implement
Part II of the MS Act 1958. The Central Government under Section 6 has the discretion to make rules
on both technical and non technical aspects of the National Shipping Board.
PART III
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
7. (1) The Central Government may, by notification in the official Director-General of
Gazette, appoint a person to be the Director-General of Shipping
shipping for the purpose of exercising or discharging the
powers, authority or duties conferred or imposed upon the
Director-General by or under this Act.
(2) The Central Government may, by general or special order,
direct that any power, authority or jurisdiction exercisable
by it under or in relation to any such provisions of this Act
as may be specified in the order shall, subject to such
conditions and restrictions as may be so specified, be
exercisable also by the Director-General or by such other
officer as may be specified in the order.
(3) The Director-General may, by general or special order, and
with the previous approval of the Central Government, direct
that any power or authority conferred upon or delegated to,
and any duty imposed upon, the Director-General by or under
this Act may, subject to such conditions and restrictions
as he may think fit to impose, be exercised or discharge
also by such officer or other authority as he may specify in
this behalf.
8. (1) The Central Government may establish and maintain at each Mercantile Marine
of the ports of Bombay, Calcutta and Madras and at such Deartment
other port in India as it may consider necessary an office of
the Mercantile Marine Department for the administration of
this Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.
(2) The office of the Mercantile Marine Department at the port
of Bombay, Calcutta or Madras shall be in the charge of
principal officer, and the office at any other port shall be in
the charge of such officer as the Central Government may
appoint in this behalf.
(3) In the discharge of their duties, the principal officer and other
officers shall be subject to the control of the Director-General.
9. (1) The Central Government may, by notification in the official Surveyors
Gazette, appoint at such ports as it may consider necessary
as many persons as it may think fit to be surveyors for the
purposes of this Act.
1
[(1A) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (1), the
Central Government, in the case of cargo ships, may, by
notification in the Official Gazette authorise any person or
Part III deals with the General Administration under the MS Act 1958. This part details the
appointment/ constitution of the Director General of Shipping1, Mercantile Marine Department ,
Surveyors, Radio Inspectors, Shipping Officers, Seamens’ Employment Office and Seamens’ Welfare
officers.
The DGS is the statutory authority appointed under Section 7 of the MS Act 1958. The
appointment is for the purpose of exercising and /or discharging the powers, authority or duties
conferred or imposed upon the DGS by the Act or under the Act. As per Section 7 (1), the powers of
DGS extends from authorities or duties conferred or imposed upon by or under the MS Act 1958 by
the Central Government. By using the phrase “by the Act or under the Act”, it is elucidated that the
source of powers of the DGS is either from the existing provisions of the Act2 that specifically confers
such powers on DGS and/or duties that are conferred by the Central Government by means of
notification or order. This process of delegation of powers to the DGS, thus empowers him to also
exercise those powers like the Central Government, as enumerated under the Act.3
Under Section 7 (2) of the MS Act 1958; the Central Government by general or special order,
can delegate any power, authority or jurisdiction exercisable by it under or in relation to any such
provisions of MS Act 1958.4 However, such an allocation will be done by stipulating necessary
conditions and restrictions. The status of delegation hold the powers so delegated “be also exercisable”
by the Director General of Shipping.5 The implication of the phrase “be also exercisable” is that the
powers once delegated does not seclude Central Government from exercising it. For instance, by
virtue of power vested under the section 7 (2) of the MS Act 1958, the Central Government vide order
S.O. 3144 dated 17th December 1960, has delegated authority to the DGS, which is to be “also”
exercised at par with the jurisdiction, power and authority exercisable by the Central Government.
Accordingly, the DGS can exercise the powers that pertains to the list of provisions that are mentioned
there-under. .
Section 7 (3) of the MS Act 1958 refers to the subdelegation of powers conferred upon DGS
under Section 7 (1) and Section 7 (2) of the Act. In such an event of special / general order of sub-
delegation, the DG is duty bound to take prior permission/previous approval from the Central
Government. It may also be noted that similar to the delegation of power by the Central Government
under Section 7 (2), the powers that are subdelegated to such officer or any other authority shall also
1
Director General of Shipping hereinafter referred as DGS or DG or Director General of Shipping.
2
See, for instance Section 406 and Section 407 of the MS Act 1958.
3
Merchant Shipping Order, S.O. 3144 dated December 17, 1960 issued by Government of India, Ministry of Transport
& Communication. The Shipping Order provides for delegation of powers enshrined in the provisions listed in the order
to the Director General of Shipping
4
Ibid
5
Section 7(2) of MS Act 1958
be exercisable by such officer or authorities by fully complying with the conditions stipulated in the
general/special order of subdelegation.
At present there are 146 Mercantile Departments in India constituted by virtue of Section 8 of
MS Act 1958. As provided under Section 8 (3) of the MS Act 1958 the Principal Officer and other
officers so appointed under Section 8 shall be subject to control of DG Shipping. Government of India
has ratified various international conventions pertaining to shipping regulations and has undertaken
obligations to implement them. In fulfilling these international obligations by implementing the same
through MS Act 1958, the MMDs conduct surveys and inspections to assure compliance of Indian
and foreign ships. The surveys and inspections include ensuring of compliance to international
conventions.
The Principal Officer of MMDs issues Statutory Certificates to the Indian ships for their safe
operation either for Coastal Voyages or Overseas Voyages. Moreover, MMDs also investigates shipping
casualties and render assistance during Search & Rescue, holds examinations for Certificates of
Competency for various grades, survey Passenger Ships, inspect and approve construction and
functioning of safety equipments including Life Saving Appliances (LSA), Radio Equipments and
other Navigational aids. Ships violating these rules are liable to be punished through detention and
penalties.
As per Section 8 (3), the Principal Officers are subject to the control of Director General of
Shipping. He is concerned with the administration of Merchant Shipping Act and Rules / Regulations
there-under on matters such as registration and certification of Fishing/Sailing Vessels with reference
to their safety and seaworthiness; investigation into maritime casualties at high seas; administering
the functioning of the maritime training institutes by way of inspections; inspection and certification
pertaining to safety of the vessel including requirements such as a LSA / FRA / Radio / LLSS,
prototype approvals of safety equipments; supervision of new construction of ships, fishing vessels,
sailing vessels; examinations of engineer & deck officers to man merchant ships and fishing vessels;
administering the functioning of the Mercantile Marine Departments at various ports. inspection of
foreign-going and Indian-going ships for meeting port state control and flag state control obligations;
rendering maritime technical advice to specific organizations as advised by the Directorate General
of Shipping, Mumbai and the like.7
Surveyors as mentioned in the MS Act 1958, may be categorised into three types depending
on their functionalities; which are 1) Nautical Surveyors; 2) Engineers and 3) Ship Surveyors. Under
Section 9, the Central Government is empowered to appoint any person or body of persons as
“surveyor” to perform the functions designated8 under the MS Act 1958. While considering the question
6
Number as provided in the website of DGS, which is www.dgshipping.com
7
For detailed powers see the circulars, orders, notices and notifications issued by Director General of Shipping at
www.dgshipping.com
8
For Instance See DG Shipping Order no 6 of 2013, Eng/Misc/29(73)/09 dated 18th March 2013, on“Statutory Certification
and Services of Indian Ships by Recognised Organisations (ROs)”.
as to the liability in damaging the international cable of the appellants, the Court reiterated that for
the port of Bombay, the officers appointed under Section 9 (1) of the MS Act 1958 are Nautical
Surveyor, Engineer and Ship Surveyor, and Ship Surveyor attached to the Mercantile Marine
Department and to the Director General of Shipping.9 Yet another example of the same is the
appointment of Recognised Organizations (ROs) including Indian Register of Ships, the Classification
society of India, as surveyors to carry out survey of Indian ships below 5000 GRT.10
Similarly by notification, the Central Government establishes Shipping Offices at every port
and appoints shipping master and deputy shipping masters as it deems fit. MS Act 1958 under
Section 3(46) defines the term “shipping master” and the same has to be read with its complementary
provisions in other Parts of the MS Act 1958. 11
9
Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs. M.V. Kapitan Kud and others 1996 AIR 516, 1996 SCC (7) 127
10
Merchant shipping Law Branch Circular No: MSL-11(19)/95-III dated 14.03.2011 pertaining to the Delegation of
powers to Recognized Organizations (ROs) to carry out statutory surveys of Indian ships below 5000 GT,
irrespective of their location.
11
For instance see MS Act 1958 Section 3(46) read with Section 89 provides for the ambit of powers and duties of
shipping master with respect to seamen and apprentices.
1
[PART IV]
Section Nos. 14 to 19 referring to Shipping Development Fund are omitted as per MS (Amend.) Act
1986.
Part IV – Commentary
Part IV of the Act containing Section 14-19, which deals with Shipping Development Fund
has been omitted by the Act of 1986 amendment with effect from 3rd of April 1987.
PART V
REGISTRATION OF Indian SHIPS
Application of Part 20. This Part applies only to sea-going ships fitted with mechanical
Indian ships means of propulsion.
Indian ships 21. For the purposes of this Act, a ship shall not be deemed to be an
Indian ship unless owned wholly by persons to each of whom 1[any]
of the following descriptions applies:
(a) a citizen of India; or
[(b)
2
a company or a body established by or under any Central or
State Act which has its principal place of business in India; or
(c) a co-operative society which is registered or deemed to be
registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1912, or
any other law relating to co-operative societies for the time
being in force in any State.]
Obligation to register 22. (1) Every Indian ship, unless it is a ship which does not exceed
fifteen tons net and is employed solely in navigation on the
coasts of India, shall be registered under this Act.
(2) No ship required by sub-section (1) to be registered shall be
recognised as an Indian ship unless she has been registered
under this Act.
Provided that any ship registered at the commencement of
this Act at any port in India under any enactment repealed
by this Act, shall be deemed to have been registered under
this Act and shall be recognised as an Indian ship.
(3) A ship required by this Act to be registered may be detained
until the master of the ship, if so required, produces a
certificate of registry in respect of the ship.
[Explanation: For the purposes of this section, “ship” does
3
24. At each of the ports of Bombay, Calcutta and Madras, the principal Registrar of Indian
officer of the Mercantile Marine Department, and at any other port ships
such authority as the Central Government may, by notification in
the Official Gazette, appoint, shall be the registrar of Indian ships
at that port:
1
[Provided that subject to such order as the Central Government
may issue in this behalf, when the office of registrar of Indian ships
at any port is vacant or the holder of such office is on, leave or is
not available, for any reason, at the port to exercise and discharge
the powers, duties and functions of the office, the senior most
surveyor at that port may act as, and exercise and discharge the
powers, duties and functions of, the registrar of Indian ships at
that port.]
25. Every registrar shall keep a book to be called the register book Register book
and entries in that book shall be made in accordance with the
following provisions
(a) the property in a ship shall be divided into ten shares;
(b) subject to the provisions of this Act with respect to joint
owners or owners by transmission, not more than ten
individuals shall be entitled to registered at the same time
as owners of any one ship; but this rule shall not affect the
beneficial interest of any number of persons represented by
or claiming under or through any registered owner or joint
owner;
(c) a person shall not be entitled to be registered as owner of a
fractional part of a share in a ship; but any number of persons
not exceeding five may be registered as joint owners of a
ship or of any share or shares therein;
(d) joint owners shall be considered as constituting one person
and shall not be entitled to dispose in severalty of any interest
in a ship or any share therein in respect of which they are
registered;
(e) a company 2[or a co-operative society] may be registered
as owner by its name.
26. An application for the registry of an Indian ship shall be made Application for
registry
(a) in the case of an individual, by the person requiring to be
registered as owner or by his agent;
(b) in the case of more than one individual requiring to be
registered, by some one or more of the persons so requiring
or by his or their agent; and
(b) a statement of the time when and the place where the ship
was built of if the ship is built outside India and the time and
place of building is not known, a statement to that effect;
and in addition, in the case of a ship previously registered
outside India, a statement of the name by which she was
so registered;
(c) the name of her master;
(d) the number of shares in the ship in respect of which he or
the company 1[or the co-operative society] as the case may
be, claims to be registered as owner; and
(e) a declaration that the particulars stated are true to the best
of his knowledge and belief.
Explanation: In respect of a ship or share owned by more than one
person, a declaration may be made by such one of them as may
be authorised by them.
30. On the first registry of an Indian ship, the following evidence shall Evidence on first
be produced in addition to the declaration of ownership- registry
(a) in the case of a ship built in India, a builder’s certificate,
that is to say, a certificate signed by the builder of the ship
and containing a true account of the proper denomination
and the tonnage of the ship as estimated by him and the
time when and the place where she was built, and the name
of the person, if any, on whose account the ship was built;
and if there has been any sale, the instrument of sale under
which the ship or the share therein has become vested in
the applicant for registry;
(b) in the case of a ship built outside India, the same evidence
as in the case of a ship built in India unless the declarant
who makes the declaration of ownership declares that the
time and place of her building are not known to him, or that
the builder’s certificate cannot be procured, in which case
there shall be required only the instrument of sale under
which the ship or a share therein has become vested in the
applicant for registry.
31. As soon as the requirements of this Act preliminary to registry Entry of particulars in
have been complied with, the registrar shall enter in the register register book
book the following particulars in respect of the ship
(a) the name of the ship and the name of the port to which she
belongs;
2
(aa) the ship identification number,
(b) the details contained in the surveyor’s certificate;
(c) the particulars respecting her origin stated in the declaration
of ownership; and
1 Ins. by MS (Amend.) Act 1981
2 Ins. by MS (Amend.) Act 40 of 2007
Certificate of registry
Grant of certificate of 34. On completion of the registry of an Indian ship, the registrar shall
registry grant a certificate of registry containing the particulars respecting
her as entered in the register book with the name of her master.
Custody and use of 35. (1) The certificate of registry shall be used only for the lawful
certificate navigation of the ship, and shall not be subject to detention
by reason of any title, lien, charge or interest whatever, has
or claimed by any owner, mortgagee or other person to, on
or in the ship.
(2) No person, whether interested in the ship or not, who has in
his possession or under his control the certificate of registry
of a ship, shall refuse or omit without reasonable cause to
deliver such certificate on demand to the person entitled to
the custody thereof for the purposes of the lawful navigation
of the ship or to any registrar, customs collector or other
person entitled by law to require such delivery.
(3) Any person refusing or omitting to deliver the certificate as
required by sub-section (2), may, by order, be summoned
by 1[any Judicial Magistrate of the first class or any
Metropolitan Magistrate, as the case may be,] to appear
Name of ship
Rules as to name of 55. (1) An Indian ship shall not be described by any name other
ship than that by which she is for the time being registered.
(2) The registrar may refuse the registry of any Indian ship by
the name by which it is proposed to register the ship if that
name is already borne by another ship or if the name be so
similar as it calculated or likely to deceive.
(3) A change shall not be made in the name of an Indian ship
except in the prescribed manner.
(4) If any person acts or suffers any person under his control to
act in contravention of this section or omits to do or suffers
any person under his control to omit to do anything required
under this section, the ship may be detained until the
provisions of this section are complied with:
Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall apply to a foreign
ship which has become, and is sought to be registered as, an
Indian ship.
Registry of alterations, registry anew and transfer of registry
Registry of alterations 56. When a registered ship is so altered as not to correspond with the
particulars relating to her tonnage or description contained in the
register book, then, if the alteration is made at any port having a
registrar, that registrar, or if it is made elsewhere, the registrar of
the first port having a registrar at which the ship arrives after the
alteration, shall, on application being made to him stating the
particulars of the alteration, either cause the alteration to be
registered or direct that the ship be registered anew.
Regulations for 57. (1) For the purpose of registry of an alteration in a ship the
registry of alterations ship’s certificate of registry shall be produced to the registrar,
and the registrar shall, in his discretion, either retain the
certificate of registry and grant a new certificate of registry
containing a description of the ship as altered or endorse
and sign on the existing certificate a memorandum of the
alteration.
(2) The particulars of the alteration so made, and the fact of the
new certificate having been granted, or endorsement having
been made, shall be entered by the registrar of the ship’s
port of registry in his register book; and for that purpose the
registrar to whom the application for the registry of the
been made (the burden of proving which shall lie on him) for the
purpose of escaping capture by the enemy or by a foreign ship or
war in the exercise of some belligerent right.
65. No owner or master of an Indian ship shall knowingly do anything Concealment of
or permit anything to be done, or carry or permit to be carried any Indian, or assumption
papers or documents, with intent to conceal the Indian character of foreign, character
of the ship from any person entitled by any law for the time being
in force to inquire into the same, or with intent to assume a foreign
character for the ship, or with intent to deceive any person so
entitled as aforesaid.
66. An Indian ship shall hoist the proper national colours Concealment of
(a) on a signal being made to her by any vessel of the Indian Indian, or assumption
Navy; of foreign, character
(b) on entering or leaving any foreign port;
(c) if of fifty tons gross tonnage or more, on entering or leaving
any Indian port.
67. (1) A customs collector shall not grant a clearance for any ship National character of
until the master of such ship has declared to that officer the ship to be declared
name of the country to which he claims that she belongs, before clearance
and that officer shall thereupon inscribe that name on the
clearance.
(2) If a ship attempts to proceed to sea without such clearance,
she may be detained by any customs collector until the
declaration is made.
Miscellaneous
68. Where it is declared by this Act that an Indian ship shall not be Liabilities of ships
recognised as such, that ship shall not be entitled to any privileges, not recognised as
benefits, advantages or protection usually enjoyed by Indian ships Indian ships
or to use the Indian national colours for Indian ships or to assume
the Indian national character, but so far as regards the payment of
dues, the liability to fine and forfeiture and the punishment of
offences committed on board such ship, or by any persons
belonging to her, such ship shall be dealt with in the same manner
in all respects as if she were a recognised Indian ship.
69. Where any ship has either wholly or as to any share therein become Proceedings on
subject to forfeiture under this part, any commissioned officer of forfeiture of ship
the Indian Navy, any customs collector or any Indian consular officer
or any other officer authorised by the Central Government, may
seize and detain the ship, and bring her for adjudication before the
High Court, and the High Court may thereupon adjudge the ship
with her equipment to be forfeited to the Government, and make
such order in the case as to the High Court seems just and may
award to the officer bringing in the ship for adjudication such portion
of the proceeds of the sale of the ship or any share therein as the
High Court thinks fit.
Notice of trust not 70. No notice of any trust, express, implied or constructive, shall be
received entered in the register book or be receivable by he registrar, and
subject to any rights and powers appearing by the register book to
be vested in any other person, the registered owner of a ship or of
a share therein shall have power to dispose of the ship or share in
the manner provided in this Act and to give effectual receipts for
any money paid or advanced by way of consideration.
Liability of owners 71. Where any person is beneficially interested otherwise than by way of
mortgage in any ship or share in a ship registered in the name of
some other person as owner, the person so interested shall, as well
as the registered owner, be subject to all the pecuniary penalties
imposed by this or any other Act on the owners of ships or shares
therein, so nevertheless that proceedings for the enforcement of any
such penalties may be taken against both or either of the said parties
with or without joining the other of them.
Evidence of register 72. (1) On application to the registrar and on payment of the
book, certificate of prescribed fee, a person may, at any time during office hours,
registry and other inspect any register book, and may obtain a certified copy
documents of any entry in the register book.
(2) The following documents shall be admissible in evidence in
any court in manner provided by this Act, namely-
(a) any register book on its production from the custody
of the registrar or other person having the lawful custody
thereof;
(b) a certificate of registry under this Act purporting to be
signed by the registrar or any other officer authorised
in this behalf by the Central Government;
(c) an endorsement on a certificate of registry purporting
to be signed by the registrar or any other officer
authorised in this behalf by the Central Government;
(d) every declaration made in pursuance of this Part in
respect of an Indian ship.
(3) A certified copy of an entry in a register book shall be
admissible in evidence in any court and have the same effect
to all intents as the original entry in the register book of
which it is a copy.
Power to register 73. The Central Government may, by notification in the official Gazette’
Government ships direct that, subject to such rules as may be made in this behalf,
under this Part ships belonging to the Government other than ships of the Indian
Navy may be registered as Indian ships under this Act and
thereupon this Act, subject to any exceptions and modifications
which may be made in the notification either generally or with
respect to any class of ships belonging to Government, shall apply
to ships belonging to Government registered in accordance with
those rules as they apply to Indian ships registered in manner
provided by this Act.
74. (1) The Central Government may make rules to carry out the Power to make rules
purposes of this Part. in respect of matters
(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the in this Part
foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the
following matters, namely-
(a) the manner in which the tonnage of any ship shall be
ascertained, whether for the purpose of registration or
otherwise, including the mode of measurement;
(b) the recognition for the purpose of ascertaining the
tonnage of any ship or for any other purpose, of any
tonnage certificate granted in respect of any ship in
any country outside India, the tonnage regulations of
which are substantially the same as the tonnage rules
made by the Central Government, including the
conditions and restrictions subject to which such
recognition may be granted;
(c) the manner in which surveys of ships shall be conducted
and the form of certificates of surveying officers;
(d) the manner in which ships shall be marked;
(e) the form in which any document required by this Part
shall be prepared and the particulars which it should
contain;
(f) the persons by whom and the authorities before which
any declaration required by this Part shall be made
and the circumstances in which any such declaration
may be waived and other evidence accepted;
(g) the form of the instrument creating a mortgage on a
ship or share or transferring a mortgage;
(h) the returns that shall be made by registrars to the Director-
General or to such other authority as the Central
Government may appoint and the form in which and the
intervals within which such returns shall be made;
(i) the procedure for the registration, marking or alteration
of the names of Indian ships;
1
[(j) the fees that may be levied for the survey or inspection
of any ship for the purposes of registration and the
manner in which such fees may be collected;]
(k) the manner in which registrars and other authorities
may exercise their powers under this Part or maintain
their books and other registers;
(l) the manner in which ships belonging to the Government,
to which the provisions of this Act may be made applicable
under section 73 may be registered;
(m) any other matter, which may be or is to be prescribed.
Part V1 - Commentary
Part V of the Act deals with India ships, its/obligation for registration, procedure of issuance
of certificate of registration transfers naming of ships, alteration registry requirements of National
character and flag the liability aspects of ships/owners’ and the rule making power. The
application of this part is limited to seagoing ships fitted with mechanical means of propulsion. As
mentioned the word ship provided under Part V refers to Indian ship, which as defined under Section
3 (18) reads “Indian ship” means a “ship registered as such under this Act which is recognized as
an Indian ship under the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 22”. Further, the ship as defined
above should comply with Section 21 and 22 of M.S. Act.
The Act in a strict sense categorically classifies ship owners into Indian shipowners and
foreign shipowners. The evidence to this accord could be obtained from the words ‘deemed’ and
‘unless’ as used in the provision. The legal definition of the term ‘deemed’ is ‘to hold; consider;
adjudge; believe; condemn; determine; treat as if; construe’2. “To deem” is to consider something as
having certain characteristics. If an act is deemed as a crime by law, then it is held to be a crime. If
someone is deemed liable for damages, then he or she will have to pay them. Likewise, by using the
word “deemed”, the legislators have strived to give an authoritative - taken for granted tone to the word
“shall”. The other word used under the provision is ‘unless’, which portrays a rigid but negative
construction eliminating chances of any other interpretation to the term “vessel”. Thus one can
easily identify the intent of legislation behind using the word ‘shall be’ as mandatory and not
discretionary.
Section 21 clearly lays down the necessity of Indian ownership and Section 22 deals with
the obligation of an Indian ship, which doesn’t exceed 15 tons and employed solely along and within
Indian coasts to register in India in accordance with the Act. By virtue of Section 22, the MS Act 1958
postulates the duty and obligation of all the shipowners to register under the Act. Section 22 consists
of 3 sub clauses. Under Section 22 (1), which attributes continuity to Section 21 and Section 3 (18)
mandates the obligation on the part of Indian ships that are above 15 tons and that which is not only
used for coastal navigation in India; to be registered under the Act. Here, as mentioned earlier the
Section being a continuity regarding obligation for ships that fall under Section 3 (18), usage of the
word “shall” will have to be construed in harmony with the same meaning attributed to the word “shall”
in Section 21.
Indeed, Section 22 (2) emphasises the duty and mandatory obligation on the part of ship
owners to register under the Act. This provision clearly states that as mentioned under Section 22
(1), once a vessel has obligation to register, it will only be recognised as Indian ship as mentioned
1
For punishments for violations of provisions see Part XVI, Section 436 on Penalties. Also see, Serial number 1 to 16 of
the table of penalties under Section 436 (2).
2
West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. 2008 edition.
under Section 3 (18) only after compliance to Section 22 (1). Till then the status is that the Act never
considers it as an Indian vessel. And, that there is a breach on the part of Indian ship owner, as
defined under Section 21; for non-compliance to his / her obligation under Section 22 of the Act.
Further, Section 22 (3) of the MS Act 1958 clearly provides for invoking of remedial deterrent
measures to such a statutory breach of obligation on the part of an Indian ship owner defined under
Section 21. The action as mentioned under sub clause (3) is that “A ship required by this Act to
be registered may be detained until the master of the ship, if so required, produces a certificate
of registry in respect of the ship.” The detention is to ensure enforcement of obligations.
The Certificate of Registry as entered in the register book, is to be used for lawful navigation
of ships and has to strictly abide by the stipulations provided under Section 35. Further, it is mandatory
that a person in possession of certificate of registry has to deliver the certificate to the entitled person
or authorities appointed under law. Under Section 36, if a certificate of registry of an Indian ship is
defaced/mutilated/lost/mislaid/destroyed/ is in a custody of any other person other than the
entitled person, the concerned Registrar of Port is empowered to grant a new certificate in lieu of the
Indian ships original certificate. Provisional Certificates containing a statement as to the circumstances
under which this has been granted is issued by an Indian Consular Officer on the application by a
master or a concerned person along with a declaration as to the reason regarding the circumstances,
distribution of facts, names and details of the registered owner is furnished.
The master of an Indian ship to whom the provisional certificate is issued has to ensure that
the certificate is submitted to the Registrar of her port of registry within 10 days of the first arrival of
the Indian ship at a port in India. Failure of compliance to submit the provisional certificate will entail
the certificate issued as invalid. Further, if the certificate which mislaid / lost or destroyed is found
afterwards, the same shall be delivered to the Registrar for cancellation from registry. Section 37 and
Section 38 deals with endorsement of certificate of registration in the event of change of master or
ownership respectively. In the event where a ship is actually or constructively lost, Section 39
stipulates that the owner of the ship shall send notice of such loss to the concerned registrar; and
the registrar shall enter the same in the respective registry. An Indian ship against which such an
entry is made shall be considered closed in the registry, with regard to all matters except for unsatisfied
mortgages.
The ship shall be registered by a name which does not already exist as name of any other
ship and a ship once named in the registry shall not be described by any other name. The stipulations
as to name and its observance is to avoid deception that might be caused by similarity of names.
Along with penalty, failure of the obligation would entail the ship so described by another name to be
detained until compliance to Section 55 is made.4 An alteration of the name of the ship shall be
entered into the registry by the registrar.5
Section 63 to Section 67 of the Act deals with duty of the Indian ships to be coloured6 with
the national colours and to hoist Indian flag as designated by the competent authority. Further, it is
also provided that unlawful assumption7/concealment or assumption as Indian ship or foreign, character
by any ship8 or Indian ship not hoisting proper national colours 9other than the Indian tricolour is an
offence.
Liability under this part spreads over any/all person(s) who have beneficial interest in the
ship or any share thereof, with an exception of mortgagee who has(ve) an interest/lien by way of
mortgage10 In order to check the compliance of the aforementioned requirements, the Act empowers
customs authorities to grant clearance or to detain any ship until the master of the ship declares the
identity of the vessel and its compliance to the procedures mentioned in the Act.
3
Dallah Albaraka Investment Co. ... vs Mt “Symphony 1” Ex. Mt “Arabian ...2005 (5) BomCR 589. Also see Dimitrios Paizis
And Ors. vs Motor Vessel “Nicos” And Ors.AIR 1983 Bom 178
4
See Section 55
5
See Section 56
6
See Section 63 (1)
7
See Section 64
8
See Section 65
9
See Section 66
10
See Section 71
PART VI
CERTIFICATES OF OFFICERS
[Masters, mates, engineers, skippers, etc.]
1
Part VI - Commentary
At the international level, the standards of training, certification and watchkeeping of officers
and ratings were stipulated by sovereign governments and the same lacked uniformity in observance
and acceptance. Further, the standards so stipulated were usually without reference to practices
that were observed by other maritime states. Shipping involves international transportation and
employment. Thus the standards of training, certification and watchkeeping of officers and ratings
have to be brought under a uniform legal regime. After immense negotiations and in-depth study, the
International Maritime Organisation adopted the International Convention on Standards of Training,
Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 19781 and the same underwent amendment in the
year 1995.
The STCW 78 sets obligation to effect and accept uniform qualifications and standards for
masters, officers and watch personnel on seagoing merchant ships. India is a party to the International
Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watch keeping for Seafarers, 1978, popularly
known as (STCW, 1978) and the 2010 revision of the STCW Convention entered into force on January
01, 2012. The revised version makes it mandatory that all sea-farers should comply with the training
provided in the latest version at different levels latest by December 31, 2013. Substituted with a new
title “Masters, mates, engineers and shippers, etc” in the year 1987, Part VI deals with certification
of officers. Under Section 75 of the MS Act 1958 the application of Part VI is limited to seagoing
ships fitted with mechanical means of propulsion. The ships covered by this part are (a) “Indian
ships” within or outside India and (b) “foreign ships” when they are in any port or place in India.
The Part is enacted so as to implement the internationally observed uniform norms / criteria
within India2. The certification requirements are complimentary and in compliance with the Conventions
promulgated by the International Maritime Organisation and those which India has ratified. The
Convention as defined under Section 75 - A refers to the International Convention on Standards of
Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978.3 It may be noted that while defining the
phrase “Convention”, the Act mentions the phrase “as amended from time to time”. The said phrase
is a tool to incorporate future amendments into the realm of the Act even without waiting for the
Parliament to enact a specific legislation or amendment to any part therein.
1
Hereinafter referred as STCW 1978. Entered into force in 1984.
2
Naresh Kumar and Another Vs. Union of India and Others 2004 (4) SCC 540, AIR SC 2026.
3
Referred to as STCW Convention of 1978. Also see The Merchant Shipping (Standards of Training, Certification and
Watchkeeping for Seafarers) Rules, 1998 dated 01st August 1998
Further, by virtue of the powers conferred upon it under Section 76, the Central Government
prescribes different manning scales for different types of ships, which enables India as a flag state to
perform the obligations4 that it has undertaken by becoming party to the international convention and
to ensure that all Indian ships going to sea from any port or place in India, engages officers who have
secured adequate/necessary and relevant competency certificates. Under Section 78 of MS Act
1958, as far as grades of certificates of competency are concerned, the Director General of Shipping
is the authority for the purpose of examining the qualifications of persons desirous of obtaining the
certificates of competency there-under, and has the authority to do all that is needful in respect of
grant of these qualifications.5
Under the MS Act 1958, the Certificate of Competency issued for manning of a foreign ship
is deemed to be of higher grade than the corresponding certificate of a home trade ship and thus the
person who has secured the COC of a foreign going ship can be appointed as master of Home trade
ship, but not vice-versa. MS Act 1958 provides that the Central Government shall conduct examinations
and on evidence that applicant who has passed examination, possesses sobriety, experience, ability
and good conduct on board ship, shall issue the certificate of competency in the prescribed form and
manner. The Act ensures that the provisions are strictly complied with6 and it provides the responsibility
of verification of certificates by the shipping master and the Customs Collector for the same. The
shipping master after verification of compliance to the provisions of MS Act 1958, issues a certificate
to the master of ship to the effect that the ship has engaged officers who holds relevant and adequate
competency certificates7. Before commencing the voyage the master of foreign going ship is under
the obligation to submit the list of crew members to the respective Mercantile Marine Department
having jurisdiction.
The Act under Section 86 provides for recognition of certificates of competency (COC) or
certificate of service (COS)8 granted in other countries. Further, to recognise/accept certificates that
are issued by other countries two conditions have to be fulfilled which are, (a) the conditions under
which the certificates are granted are not lower than those stipulated and required in India and that
(b) the certificates issued under this Act are accepted in that country in lieu of corresponding certificates
granted under the laws of that country. Indeed, the master of ship is duty bound to submit the
certificates for the verification of customs collector, who has the power to clear the ship once the
certificate issued by shipping master is produced or otherwise to detain the ship till such a certificate
is actually made by the master.
4
Principle of Pacta Sunt Servanda as enumerated under the Vienna Convention of Law of Treaties 1969.
5
The Secretary vs Maritime Institutes Association, Honourable High Court of Madras, in Writ Petition Nos. 10912, 10913,
13687 and 13688 of 2009 judgment dated November 2009
6
One of such instance is the Merchant Shipping (Examination of Masters and Mates) Rules, 1985 dated 03rd September
1985
7
Also see Capt. Karan Vaswani Vs. Union of India and Others, AIR 2000 SC 1446, 2000 (3) SCC 602.
8
Certificate of Service of naval officers dealt under Section 80 has been omitted by MS (Amendment) Act, 1986 (33 of
1986)
By virtue of powers provided under Section 87 of the MS Act 1958, the Central Government
has, from time to time issued rules, circulars and notifications to categorise and prescribe the
certification requirements.9 While examining a writ petition challenging MS Notice 2 of 2000 and 4, 5,
and 6 of 2001 as unconstitutional and ultravires of MS Act 1958; the Court held that the contention of
the petitioners that the Certificate of Service has to be equated with Certificate of Competency is
wrong and that the COS holders to be qualified to possess COC need to undergo and complete
approved training assessment.10 Further the Court held that since the MS Notices conform to Rule 11
and Rule 15 of MS (STCW) Rules 1998, which are framed as per the International Convention (STCW
1978/95), the classification of COS and COC are based on intelligible differentia and hence is
reasonable.11
9
Please see MS Notification, The Merchant Shipping (Certificates of Competency) Rules,
1989 dated 02nd June 1989.
10
Nareshkumar and Anr. V. Union of India AIR 2004 SC 2026; (2004) 4 SCC 540
11
Ibid.
[PART VIA
1
PART VI A –Commentary
The aforementioned applicant of exemption, can prefer an appeal to the Central Government
if his application is refused by the Director General of Shipping, within the specified time period.2 An
appeal shall only be disposed of by giving an adequate opportunity to the appellant.
1
As pre Section 87 (C)(5), if within 45 days, the Director General of Shipping does not refuse or doesnot communicate
refusal to the applicant of exemption, law presumes that the DGS has issued such an exemption to the applicant.
2
Under Section 87 (C)(6) the time period fixed for filing an appeal before the Central Government is 30 days. Also note
that delay in filing an appeal can be condoned by the Central Government on furnishing sufficient reason for the delay.
PART VII
SEAMEN AND APPRENTICES
Classification of Seamen and prescription of
minimum manning scale
88. The Central Government may make rules for the classification of Power to classify
seamen other than ship’s officers into different categories and for seamen
the prescription of the minimum manning scale of seamen of such
categories for ships; and different scales may be prescribed for
different classes of ships.
Shipping masters
89. It shall be the duty of shipping masters- Duties of shipping
(a) To superintend and facilitate the engagement and discharge masters
of seamen in the manner provided in this Act;
(b) to provide means for securing the presence on board at the
proper times of the seamen who are so engaged;
(c) to facilitate the making of apprenticeship to the sea service;
(d) to hear and decide disputes under section 132 between a
master, owner or agent of a ship and any of the crew of the
ship;
1
[(dd) to transmit the complaint of any dispute of a foreign seaman
of a vessel, registered in a country other than India, in Indian
territorial waters, with the master, owner or agent, to the
competent authority of the country of registration and a copy
of such complaint shall be forwarded to the Director General,
International Labour Organisation office.]
(e) to perform such other duties relating to seamen apprentices
and merchant ships as are for the time being committed to
them by or under this Act.
90. (1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Fees to be paid
Gazette, fix the fees which shall be payable upon all
engagements and discharges effected before a shipping
master.
(2) Scales of the fees payable for the time being shall be
conspicuously placed in the shipping office, and a shipping
master may refuse to proceed with any engagement or
discharge unless the fees payable thereon are first paid.
(3) Every owner or master of a ship engaging or discharging
any seaman in a shipping office or before a shipping master,
shall pay to the shipping master the whole of the fees hereby
made payable in respect of such engagement or discharge,
and may, for the purpose of reimbursing himself in part,
deduct in respect of each such engagement or discharge
from the wages of all persons (except apprentices) so
engaged or discharged, and retain any sums not exceeding
1 Ins. by MS (Amend.) Act 1998
2
[97A. There shall be no discrimination between seamen,- Prohibition against dis-
crimination
(a) on the ground of their membership or lack of membership in
any particular union purporting to represent the interests of
seamen and membership in such union shall not be pre-
requisite condition;
(b) on the basis of training institute from where they obtained training
or place of issue of their continuous discharge certificates, for
their recruitment and engagement on board any ship.]
Engagement of seamen
Qualifications for, and
98. (1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official medical examination
Gazette, direct that, with effect from such date as may be of, seamen
specified in the notification, seamen generally or any
category of seamen in particular shall not be engaged or
carried to sea to work in any capacity in any ship or in any
class of ships so specified, unless each one of them
possesses the prescribed qualifications.
(2) Except as otherwise provided under the rules made under
sub-section (3), no person shall engage or carry to sea any
seaman to work in any capacity in any ship or in any class
1 Subs. by MS (Amend.) Act 2002
2 Ins. by MS (Amend.) Act 2002
100. The master of every Indian ship, except a home-trade ship of less Agreements with crew
than two hundred tons gross, shall enter into an agreement (in this
Act called the agreement with the crew) in accordance with this
Act with every seaman whom he engages, in, and carries to sea
as one of his crew from, any port in India.
101. (1) An agreement with the crew shall be in the prescribed form, Form and contents of
and shall be dated at the time of the first signature thereof, the agreements
and shall be 1[signed by the owner or agent and the master]
before any seamen signs the same.
(2) The agreement with the crew shall contain as terms thereof
the following particulars, namely:-
(a) the name of the ship or ships on board which the
seaman undertakes to serve;
(b) either the nature and, as far as practicable, the duration
of the intended voyage or engagement or the maximum
period of the voyage or engagement, and the places or
parts of the world, if any, to which the voyage or
engagement is not to extend;
(c) the number and description of the crew of different
categories in each department;
(d) the time at which each seaman is to be on board or to
begin work;
(e) the capacity in which each seaman is to serve;
(f) the amount of wages which each seaman is to receive;
(g) a scale of the provisions which are to be furnished to
each seaman, such scale being not less than the scale
fixed by the Central Government and published in the
Official Gazette;
(h) a scale of warm clothing and a scale of additional
provisions to be issued to each seaman during periods
of employment in specified cold regions;
(i) any regulations as to conduct on board and as to fines
or other lawful punishments for misconduct, which have
been sanctioned by the Central Government as
regulations proper to be adopted, and which the parties
agree to adopt;
(j) payment of compensation for personal injury or death
caused by accident arising out of and in the course of
employment;
(k) where it is agreed that the services of any seaman
shall end at any port not in India, a stipulation to provide
him either fit employment on board some other ship
bound to the port at which he was shipped or to such
other port in India as may be agreed upon, or a passage
to some port in India free of charge or on such other
terms as may be agreed upon;
1 Subs. by MS (Amend.) Act 1984
seaman where Act, the master of a ship registered at a port outside India who has
agreement is made an agreement with the crew made in due form according to the law
out of India of that port or of the port in which her crew were engaged, may
engage in any port in India -
(a) a seaman who is not a citizen of India and who holds a
continuous discharge certificate or any other similar document
of identity issued by the competent authority of the country in
which the ship is registered or, as the case may be, of the
country in which the said agreement was made; or
(b) a seaman who is a citizen of India and who holds a certificate
of discharge or a continuous certificate of discharge issued
under this Act, and any seaman so engaged under clause
(a) or clause (b) may sign the agreement aforesaid and it
shall not be necessary for him to sign an agreement under
this Act.]
Special provisions 103. (1) The following provisions shall have effect with respect to
with regard to agree- every agreement made in India with the crew of an Indian
ments with crew of ship, namely-
Indian ships (a) the agreement shall, subject to the provision of this
Act as to substitutes, be signed by each seaman in
the presence of a shipping master;
(b) the shipping master shall cause the agreement to be
read over and explained to each seaman, in a language
understood by him or shall otherwise ascertain that
each seaman understands the same before he signs
it, and shall at least each signature;
ship leaves port, or that all those made have been made
as required by law;
(d) the master shall deliver the running agreement so
endorsed to the shipping master, and the shipping
master shall, if the provisions of this Act relating to
agreements have been complied with, sign the
endorsement and return the agreement to the master.
(3) In the case of an agreement made in India with the crew of
a hometrade Indian ship of two hundreds tons gross or more,
the following provisions shall have effect in addition to the
provisions specified in sub-section (1) namely:-
(a) the agreement shall not be for a period longer than six
months, but if the period for which the agreement was
entered into expires while the ship is not in an Indian
port, the agreement shall continue in force until the
ship is again in an Indian port:
Provided that, except with the consent in writing of the
seaman concerned, the agreement shall not continue
in force for more than three months after the expiration
of the period for which it was entered into;
(b) an agreement for service in two or more ships belonging
to the same owner may be made by the owner instead
of by the master, and the provisions of this Act with
respect to the making of the agreement shall apply
accordingly.
Renewal of running 104. (1) When a running agreement has been made with the crew of
agreements in certain a foreign-going Indian ship and the ship arrives after the
cases expiration of a period of six months from the date on which
it was executed at a port of destination in Indian which is
not the port at which the crew have agreed to be discharged,
the master may, with the previous sanction of the shipping
master, renew the agreement with the crew, or may be
required by the shipping master so to renew the agreement
for the voyage from such port of destination to the port in
India at which the crew have agreed to be discharged.
(2) If the master of the ship is required by the shipping master
to renew the agreement as aforesaid and refuses so to renew
it, any expenses which may be incurred by the Government
for the subsistence of the crew and their conveyance to the
port at which they have agreed to be discharged shall be a
charge upon the ship, and shall be recoverable as if they
were expenses incurred in respect of distressed seaman
under the provisions of this Act.
Changes in crew to 105. 1
[(1)] The master of every foreign-going Indian ship and of every home-
be reported trade Indian ship of two hundred tons gross or more, the crew
of which has been engaged before a shipping master, shall,
1 Sec. 105 renumbered as sub-sec. (1) and Ins new sub-sec. (2) & its contents by MS (Amend.) Act 1984
before finally leaving the port where the engagement took place,
sign and send to the nearest shipping master a full and accurate
statement in the prescribed form, of every change which has
taken place in his crew, and that statement shall be admissible
in evidence.
1
[(2) A copy of the statement referred to in sub-section (1) shall
also be sent to the seamen’s employment office concerned.]
106. (1) In the case of a foreign-going Indian ship or a home-trade Certificate as to
Indian ship of two hundred tons gross or more, on the due agreement with crew
execution of an agreement with the crew in accordance with
this Act, and also when, in the case of a foreign-going Indian
ship, the agreement is a running agreement, on compliance
by the master before the second and every subsequent
voyage made after the first commencement of the agreement
with the provisions of this Act respecting that agreement,
the shipping master shall grant the master of the ship a
certificate to that effect.
(2) The master of every such ship shall, before proceeding to
sea, produce that certificate to the customs collector whose
duty it is to grant a port clearance.
(3) No customs collector shall clear any such ship outwards
without the production of such certificate, and, if any such
ship attempts to go to sea without a clearance, the customs
collector may detain her until such certificate as aforesaid
is produced.
(4) The master of every such ship shall, within forty-eight hours
after the ship’s arrival at the port in India at which the crew
is to be discharged, deliver such agreement to a shipping
master at the port; and such shipping master shall thereupon
give to the master a certificate of such delivery; and no
customs collector shall clear any such ship inwards without
the production of such certificate.
107. The master shall, at the commencement of every voyage or Copy of agreement to
engagement, cause a legible copy of the agreement and, if necessary, be made accessible
a certified translation thereof in a language understood by the majority to the crew
of the crew (omitting the signatures), to be placed or posted up in
such part of the ship as to be accessible to the crew.
108. Every erasure, interlineation or alteration in any agreement with Alteration in agree-
the crew (except additions made for the purpose of shipping ment with the crew
substitutes or persons engaged subsequently to the first departure
of the ship) shall be wholly in operative, 2[unless proved to have
been made with the consent of all the persons interested in the
erasure, interlineation or alteration by the written attestation
(a) if in India, of some shipping master or customs collector; or
1 Sec. 105 renumbered as sub-sec. (1) and Ins new sub-sec. (2) & its contents by MS (Amend.) Act 1984
2 Subs. by MS (Amend.) Act 1984
(2) All the provisions of this Act respecting the form of such
agreements and the stipulations to be contained in them
and the making and signing of the same, shall be applicable
to the engagement of such seaman.
(3) The master of a ship other than an Indian ship shall give to
the shipping master a bond with the security of some
approved person resident in India for such amount as may
be fixed by the Central Government in respect of each
seaman engaged by him at any port in India and conditioned
for the due performance of such agreement and stipulations,
and for the repayment to the Central Government of all
expenses which may be incurred by it in respect of any
such seaman who is discharged or left behind at any port
out of India and becomes distressed and is relieved under
the provisions of this Act :
Provided that the shipping master may waive the execution
of a bond under this section where the owner of the ship
has an agent at any port in India and such agent accepts
liability in respect of all matters for which the master of the
ship would be liable if he were to execute a bond under this
section or may accept from the agent such security as may
be approved by the Central Government.
(4) The fees fixed under section 90 shall be payable in respect
of every such engagement, and deductions from the wages
of seamen so engaged may be made to the extent and in
the manner allowed under the said section 90.
Power to prohibit 115. The Central Government or any officer authorised by it in this behalf,
engagement of if satisfied that in the national interest or in the interests of seaman
persons as seamen generally it is necessary so to do, may, by order in writing, prohibit
the owner, master or agent of any ship other than an Indian ship
specified in the order from engaging in India or in any specified part of
India, any person to serve as a seaman on such ship.
Engagement of 116. With respect to the engagement of seamen outside India, the
seamen outside India following provisions shall have effect -
for Indian ships
When the master of an Indian ship engages a seaman at any port
outside India, the provisions of this Act respecting agreements
with the crew made in India shall apply subject to the following
modifications
(a) at any such port having an Indian consular officer, the master
shall, before carrying the seaman to sea, procure the
sanction of the consular officer, and shall, if not contrary to
any law in force in that port, engage the seaman before that
officer;
(b) the master shall respect the Indian consular officer to endorse
upon the agreement an attestation to the effect that it has
been signed in his presence and otherwise made as required
by this Act, and that it has his sanction, and if the attestation
is not made, the burden of proving that the engagement
was made as required by this Act shall lie upon the master.
117. For the purpose of preventing seamen from being taken on board Power to board ships
any ship at any port in India contrary to the provisions of this Act, and muster seamen
any shipping master or deputy or assistant shipping master or
any director, deputy director or assistant director of the seamen’s
employment office, may enter at any time on board any such ship
upon which he has reason to believe that seamen have been
shipped, and may muster and examine the several seamen
employed therein.
Discharge of seamen
118. (1) When a seaman serving in a foreign-going ship is, on the Discharge before
termination of his engagement, discharged in India, he shall, shipping master
whether the agreement with the crew be an agreement for
the voyage or a running agreement, be discharged in the
manner provided by this Act in the presence of a shipping
master.
(2) The provisions of sub-section (1) shall apply in relation to
the discharge of seamen serving in a home-trade Indian ship
of two hundred tons gross or more as they apply in relation
to the discharge of seamen serving in a foreign-going ship:
Provided that this sub-section shall not apply where a
seaman is discharged from a ship under an agreement made
in accordance with section 103 for service in two or more
ships, for the purpose of being engaged in another ship to
which the agreement relates.
(3) If the master, owner or agent of a home-trade ship, other
than a ship to which the last preceding sub-section applies,
so desires, the seamen of that ship may be discharged in
the same manner as seaman discharged from a foreign-
going ship.
119. (1) The master shall sign and give to a seaman discharged Certificate of dis-
from his ship in India, either on his discharge or on payment charge
of his wages, a certificate of his discharge in the prescribed
form specifying the period of his service and the time and
place of his discharge.
(2) The master shall also, upon the discharge of every
certificated officer, whose certificate of competency has
been delivered to and retained by him, return the certificate
to the officer.
120. (1) When a seaman is discharged from a ship in India, the master Certificate as to work
shall furnish to the shipping master before whom the discharge of seamen
is made a report in the prescribed form stating-
(b) been absent from his ship without leave, either at the
commencement or during the progress of a voyage for
a period of more than forty-eight hours.
(3) The officer aforesaid shall keep a record of all seamen or
apprentices discharged or left behind with his authority; and
whenever any charge is made against a seaman or apprentice
under section 191, the fact that no such authority is so recorded
shall be prima facie evidence that it was not granted.
122. (1) If a seaman or apprentice is left behind, the master shall Wages and other
enter in the official log book a statement of the amount due property of seamen or
to the seaman or apprentice in respect of wages at the time apprentice left behind
when he was left behind and of all property left on board by
him, and shall take such property into his charge.
(2) Within forty-eight hours after the arrival of the ship at the
port in India at which the voyage terminates, the master
shall deliver to the shipping master -
(a) a statement of the amount due to the seaman or
apprentice in respect of wages, and of all property left
on board by him; and
(b) a statement, with full particulars, of any expenses that
may have been caused to the master or owner of the
ship by the absence of the seaman or apprentice, where
the absence is due to a contravention by the seaman
or apprentice of section 191;
and, if required by the shipping master to do so, shall furnish
such vouchers as are reasonably required to verify the
statements.
(3) The master shall at the time when he delivers the statements
referred to in sub-section (2) to the shipping master also deliver
to him the amount due to the seaman or apprentice in respect
of wages and the property that was left on board by him, and
the shipping master shall give to the master a receipt therefore
in the prescribed form.
(4) The master shall be entitled to be reimbursed out of the
wages or property referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (2)
such expenses shown in the statement referred to in clause
(b) of that sub-section as appear to the shipping master to
be property chargeable.
123. (1) When the service of a seaman or apprentice terminates without Repatriation of
the consent of the said seaman or apprentice at a port outside seamen on termina-
India, and before the expiration of the period for which the tion of service at
seaman was engaged or the apprentice was bound, the master foreign port
or owner of the ship shall, in addition to any other relative
obligation imposed on either of them by this Act, make adequate
provision for the maintenance of the seaman or apprentice
according to his rank or rating, and for the return of that seaman
or apprentice to a proper return port.
(2) If the master or owner fails without reasonable cause to
comply with sub-section (1), the expenses of maintenance
and of the journey to the proper return port shall, if defrayed
by the seaman or apprentice, be recoverable as wages due
to him, and if defrayed by an Indian consular officer, be
regarded as expenses falling within the provisions of sub-
sections (3) and (4) of section 161.
Explanation: Inability to provide the said expenses shall not,
for the purposes of this sub-section, be regarded as
reasonable cause.
Discharge of seamen 124. (1) If an Indian ship is transferred or disposed of while she is at
of change of owner- or on a voyage to any port outside India, every seaman or
ship apprentice belonging to that ship shall be discharged at
that port, unless he consents in writing in the presence of
the Indian consular officer to complete the voyage in the
ship if continued.
(2) If a seaman or apprentice is discharged from an Indian ship
in terms of sub-section (1), the provisions of section 123
shall apply as if the service of the seaman or apprentice
had terminated without his consent and before the expiration
of the period for which the seaman was engaged or the
apprentice was bound.
(3) Every seaman or apprentice discharged in terms of sub-
section (1) shall, if the voyage for which he was engaged is
not continued, be entitled to the wages to which he would
have been entitled if his service had been wrongfully
terminated by the owner before the expiration of the period
for which the seaman was engaged or the apprentice was
bound.
Payment of wages
Master to deliver 125. (1) The master of every ship shall, before paying off or discharging
account of wages a seaman under this Act, deliver at the time and in the manner
provided by this Act a full and true account in the form prescribed
of the seaman’s wages and of all deductions to be made
therefrom on any account whatever.
(2) The said account shall be delivered, either to the seaman
himself, at or before the time of his leaving the ship, or to
the shipping master not less than twenty-four hours before
the discharge or payment off.
Disrating of seamen 126. (1) Where the master of a ship disrates a seaman, he shall
forthwith enter or cause to be entered in the official log book
a statement of the disrating, and furnish the seaman with a
copy of the entry; and any reduction of wages consequent
on the disrating shall not take effect until the entry has been
so made and the copy so furnished.
(2) Any reduction of wages consequent on the disrating of a
seaman shall be deemed to be a deduction from wages
within the meaning of sections 125 and 127.
127. (1) A deduction from the wages of a seaman shall not be allowed Deductions from
unless it is included in the account delivered in pursuance wages of seamen
of this Act except in respect of a matter happening after
such deliver.
(2) The master shall during the voyage enter the various matters
in respect of which the deductions are made, with the amount
of the respective deductions as they occur, in a book to be
kept for that purpose, and shall, if required, produce the
book at the time of the payment of wages and also upon the
hearing before any competent authority of any complaint or
question relating to that payment.
128. (1) Where a seaman is discharged in India before a shipping Payment of wages
master, he shall receive his wages through, or in the presence before shipping
of, the shipping master unless a competent court otherwise master
directs.
(2) If the master or owner of a home-trade ship of less than two
hundred tons gross so desires, the seaman of that ship
may receive their wages in the same manner as seaman
discharged from a foreign-going ship, or from a home-trade
ship of two hundred tons gross or more.
129. (1) The master, owner or agent of every ship shall pay to every Time of payment of
seaman his wages within four days after the seaman’s wages
discharge, and the seaman shall at the time of his discharge
be entitled to be paid on account a sum equal to one-fourth
part of the balance due to him.
(2) If a master, owner or agent fails without reasonable cause
to make payment at that time, he shall pay to the seaman
such sum not exceeding the amount of two days’ pay for
each of the days commencing from the day of discharge
during which payment is delayed as the shipping master
may in each case decide, but the sum so payable shall not
exceed ten days’ double pay.
(3) Any sum payable under this section may be recovered as
wages.
130. (1) Where a seaman is discharged and the settlement of his Settlement of wages
wages completed before a shipping master, the seaman
shall sign in the presence of the shipping master a release
in the form prescribed of all claims in respect of the past
voyage or engagement, and the release shall also be signed
by the master, owner or agent of the ship and attested by
the shipping master.
Working hours of [138A. The ordinary hours of work for all seamen shall not exceed forty-
2
Right to recover 139. (1) A seaman shall not by any agreement forfeit his lien on the
wages and salvage ship or be deprived of any remedy for the recovery of his
not to be forfeited wages to which, in the absence of the agreement, he would
be entitled, and shall not by any agreement abandon his
right to wages in case of he loss of the ship or abandon any
right that he may have or obtain in the nature of salvage,
and every stipulation in any agreement inconsistent with
any provisions of this Act shall be void.
(2) Nothing in this section shall apply to a stipulation made by
the seaman belonging to any ship which according to the
terms of the agreement is to be employed on salvage service
with respect to the remuneration to be paid to them for
salvage service to be rendered by that ship to any other
ship.
Wages not to depend 140. (1) The right to wages shall not depend on the earning of freight,
on freight and every seaman and apprentice who would be entitled to
demand and recover any wages if the ship in which he has
served had earned freight, shall, subject to all other rules of
law and conditions applicable to the case, be entitled to
demand and recover the same notwithstanding that freight
has not been earned, but in all cases of wreck or loss of the
ship, proof that the seaman has not exerted himself to the
utmost to save the ship, cargo and stores shall bar his claim
to wages.
(2) Where a seaman or apprentice who would but for death be
entitled by virtue of this section to demand and recover any
wages dies before the wages are paid, they shall be paid
and applied in manner provided by this Act with respect to
the wages of a seaman who dies during a voyage.
Wages on termina- 141. (1) Where the service of any seaman engaged under this Act
tion of service by terminates before the date contemplated in the agreement
wreck, illness, etc. by reason of the wreck, loss or abandonment of the ship or
by reason of his being left on shore at any place outside
Indian under a certificate granted under this Act of his
unfitness or inability to proceed on the voyage, the seaman
shall be entitled to receive -
(a) in the case of wreck, loss or abandonment of the ship
(i) wages at the rate to which he was entitled at the
date of termination of his service for the period from
the date his service is so terminated until he is returned
to and arrives at a proper return port;
Provided that the period for which he shall be entitled to
receive wages shall be not less than one month; and
Dealing with and 153. (1) If any seaman or apprentice engaged on any ship, the voyage
account of property of of which is to terminate in India, dies during that voyage and
seamen who die the ship before coming to a port in India touches and remains
during voyage for forty-eight hours at some port elsewhere, the master
shall report the case to the Indian consular officer at such
port and shall give to the officer any information he requires
as to the destination of the ship and probable length of the
voyage.
(2) The Indian consular officer may, if he thinks it expedient,
require the property of the seaman or apprentice to be
delivered and paid to him and shall thereupon give to the
master a receipt there fore and endorse under his hand upon
the agreement with the crew such particulars with respect
thereto as the Central Government may require.
(3) The receipt shall be produced by the master to the shipping
master within forty-eight hours after his arrival at his port of
destination in India.
(4) Where a seaman or apprentice dies as aforesaid and the
ship proceeds at once to a port in India without touching
and remaining as aforesaid at a port elsewhere or the Indian
consular officer does not require the delivery and payment
of the property as aforesaid, the master shall, within forty-
eight hours after his arrival at his port of destination in India,
pay and deliver the property to the shipping master at that
port.
(5) A deduction claimed by the master in such account shall
not be allowed unless verified by an entry in the official log
book, and also by such other vouchers, if any, as may be
reasonably required by the shipping master.
(6) A shipping master in India shall grant to a master upon due
compliance with such provisions of this section as relate to
acts to be done at the port of destination a certificate to that
effect.
Master to pay and 154. (1) If the master of a ship fails to comply with the provisions of
deliver property of this Act with respect to taking charge of the property of a
deceased seamen deceased seaman or apprentice, or to making in the official
log book the proper entries relating thereto, or to the payment
or delivery of such property, he shall be accountable for
Property seamen 158. If a seaman or apprentice dies in India and is at the time of his
drying in India death entitled to claim from the master or owner of the ship in
which he has served any effects or unpaid wages, the master,
owner or agent shall pay and deliver or account for such property
to the shipping master at the port where the seaman or apprentice
was discharged or was to have been discharged or to such other
officer as the Central Government may direct.
Payment over or 159. Where any property of a deceased seaman or apprentice is paid
property of deceased or delivered to a shipping master, the shipping master, after
seamen by shipping deducting for expenses incurred in respect of that seaman or
master apprentice or of his property 1[such sums as he thinks proper to
allow, shall pay and deliver the residue to the person nominated by
the seaman or apprentice in this behalf under section 159A and if
he has not made any such nomination or the nomination made by
him is or has become void, the shipping master may.-]
(a) pay and deliver the residue to any claimants who can prove
themselves to the satisfaction of the said shipping master
to be entitled thereto, and the said shipping master shall be
thereby discharged from all further liability in respect of the
residue so paid or delivered; or
(b) if he thinks fit so to do, require probate or letters of
administration or a certificate under the Indian Succession
Act, 1925 [39 of 1925] 2[or a certificate under section 29 of
the Administrators General Act, 1963] to be taken out, and
thereupon pay and deliver the residue to the legal
representatives of the deceased.
Nomination [159A. (1)
2
A seaman may, for the purposes of sub-section (3) of section
141 and clause (b) of section 159 and an apprentice may,
for the purposes of clause (b) of section 159, nominate any
person or persons:
Provided that if the seaman or the apprentice has a family,
he may nominate for the purposes aforesaid any one or
more members of his family only and if a seaman or an
apprentice acquires a family after he has made any such
nomination, the nomination shall become void.
(2) The form in which any nomination may be made under sub-
section (1), the cancellation or variation of any such
nomination (including the making of a fresh nomination) and
all other matters connected with such nominations shall be
such as may be prescribed.]
Disposal of un- 160. (1) Where no claim to the property of a deceased seaman or
claimed property of apprentice received by a shipping master is substantiated
deceased seamen within one year from the receipt thereof by such shipping
master, the shipping master shall cause such property to
be sold and pay the proceeds of the sale into the public
1 Subs. by MS (Amend.) Act 1984
account of India.
2 Ins. by MS (Amend.) Act 1984
(2) If, after the proceeds of the sale having been so paid, any
claim is made thereto, then, if the claim is established to
the satisfaction of the shipping master, the amount or so
much thereof as shall appear to him to be due to the claimant,
shall be paid to him, and if the claim is not so established,
the claimant may apply by petition to the High Court, and
such Court, after taking evidence either orally or on affidavit,
shall make such order on the petition as shall seem just:
Provided that, after the expiration of six years from the receipt
of such property by the shipping master, no claim to such
property shall be entertained without the sanction of the
Central Government.
1
[Provided further that if, before the expiration of six years
after the proceeds of the sale have been so paid, no claim
is made thereto the amount or any part thereof may be
utilised for the welfare of seamen in such manner as the
Central Government may direct.]
161. (1) The Indian consular officer at or near the place where a Mode or providing for
seaman is in distress shall, on application being made to return of seamen to
him by the distressed seaman, provide in accordance with proper return port
the rules made under this Act for the return of that seaman
to a proper return port, and also for the said seaman’s
necessary clothing and maintenance until his arrival at such
port.
(2) A distressed seaman shall not have any right to be
maintained or sent to a proper return port except to the
extent and on the conditions provided for in the rules.
(3) All repatriation expenses, other than excepted expenses,
incurred by or on behalf of the Central Government in
accordance with the provisions of this Act shall constitute a
debt due to the Central Government for which the owner or
agent of the ship to which the seaman in respect of whom
they were incurred belonged at the time of his discharge or
other event which resulted in his becoming a distressed
seaman shall be liable; and the owner or agent shall not be
entitled to recover from the seaman any amount paid by
him to the Central Government in settlement or part
settlement of such debt.
(4) All excepted expenses incurred by or on behalf of the Central
Government in accordance with the provisions of this Act
shall constitute a debt due to the Central Government for
which the seaman in respect of whom they were incurred
and the owner or agent of the ship to which that seaman
belonged at the time of his discharge or other event which
resulted in his becoming a distressed seaman shall be jointly
Certain ships to carry 173. (1) Every foreign-going ship carrying more than the prescribed
medical officer number of persons (including the crew), shall have on boards
part of her complement a medical officer possessing such
qualifications as may be prescribed.
(2) Nothing in this section shall apply to a special trade
passenger ship or a pilgrim ship.
Expenses of medical 174. (1) If the master of an Indian ship, or a seaman or apprentice,
attendance in case of receives any hurt or injury or suffers from any illness (not
illness being a hurt, injury or illness due to his own willful act or
default or to his own misbehavior), resulting in his being
discharged or left behind at a place other than his proper
return port, the expenses of providing the necessary surgical
and medical advice, attendance and treatment and medicine,
and also the expenses of the maintenance of the master,
seaman or apprentice until he is cured, or dies, or is brought
back to the port from which he was shipped or other port
agreed upon after receiving the necessary medical
treatment, and of his conveyance to that port, and in case
of death, the expenses, if any, of his burial or cremation
shall be defrayed by the owner of the ship without any
deduction on that account from his wages.
(2) If the master, seaman or apprentice is on account of any
illness or injury temporarily removed from his ship, at a port
other than his proper return port, for the purpose of preventing
infection, or otherwise for the convenience of the ship, and
subsequently returns to his duty, the expenses of removal
and of providing the necessary surgical and medical advice,
attendance and treatment and medicine and of his
maintenance while away from the ship, shall be defrayed in
like manner.
(3) The expenses of all medicines, and surgical and medical
advice, attendance and treatment, given to a master, seaman
or apprentice while on board his ship, shall be defrayed in
like manner.
(4) In all other cases any reasonable expenses duly incurred
by the owner for any master, seaman or apprentice in respect
of illness, shall, if proved to the satisfaction of the Indian
consular officer or a shipping master, be deducted from the
wages of the master, seaman or apprentice.
(5) Where any expenses referred to in this section have been
paid by the master, seaman or apprentice himself, the same
may be recovered as if they were wages duly earned, and,
if any such expenses are paid by the Government, the
amount shall be a charge upon the ship and may be
recovered with full costs of suit by the Central Government.
175 (1) The Central Government may, subject to the condition of Accommodation for
previous publication, make rules with respect to the crew seamen
accommodation to be provided in ships of any class specified
in the rules.
(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the
foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the
following matters, namely:
(a) the minimum space for each person which must be
provided in any ship to which the rules apply by way of
sleeping accommodation for seamen and apprentices
and the maximum number of persons by whom any
specified part of such sleeping accommodation may
be used;
(b) the position in any such ship in which the crew
accommodation or any part thereof may be located
and the standards to be observed in the construction,
equipment and furnishing of any such accommodation;
(c) the submission to such authority as may be specified in
this behalf of plans and specifications of any works
proposed to be carried out for the provision or alteration
of any such accommodation and the authorisation of that
authority to inspect any such works;
(d) the maintenance and repair of any such accommodation
and the prohibition or restriction of the use of any such
accommodation for purposes other than those for which
it is designed;
(e) the manner as to how ships registered or under
construction at the commencement of any rules made
under this section may be dealt with after such
commencement;
1
[(f) the fees that may be levied for the survey or inspection
of crew spaces and for scrutiny of plans of crew
accommodation spaces and the manner in which such
fees may be collected;]
and such rules may make different provisions in respect of
different classes of ships and in respect of crew
accommodation provided for different classes of persons.
(3) If any person making an inspection under section 176 finds
that the crew accommodation is insanitary or is not in
accordance with the provisions of this Act, he shall signify it
in writing to the master of the ship and may, if he thinks fit,
detain the ship until the defects are remedied to his
satisfaction.
thereof shall not bind the person making the same, and a power-
of-attorney or authority for the receipt of any such salvage shall
not be irrevocable.
Not debt revocerable 186. A debt incurred by any seaman after he has engaged to serve
till end of voyage shall not be recoverable until the service agreed for is concluded.
Seamen’s property 187. (1) Any person who receives or takes into his possession or
not to be detained under his control any money or other property of a seaman
or apprentice shall return the same or pay the value thereof
when required by the seaman or appren tice subject to
deduction of such amounts as may be justly due to him
from the seaman or apprentice in respect of board or lodging
or otherwise.
(2) Where 1[a Judicial Magistrate of the first class or a Metropolitan
Magistrate, as the case may be,] imposes a fine for a
contravention of this section, he may direct the amount of such
money or the value of the property subject to such deduction
as aforesaid, if any, or the property itself to be forthwith paid or
delivered to the seaman or apprentice.
Prohibition against 188. No person shall, while a ship is at any port or place in India -
Solicitation by
(a) solicit a seaman or apprentice to become a lodger at the
lodging house
house of any person letting lodging for hire; or
keepers
(b) take out of ship any property of the seaman or apprentice
except under the direction of the seaman or apprentice and
sit the permission of the master.
Ship not to be 189. Where a ship has arrived at a port or place in India at the end of a
boarded without voyage and any person, not being in the service of the Government or
permission before not being duly authorised by law for the purpose, goes on board the
seamen leave ship without the permission of the master before the seamen lawfully
leave the ship at the end of their engagement or are discharged
(whichever happens last), the master of the ship may take such person
into custody and deliver him up forthwith to a police officer to be taken
before 1[a Judicial Magistrate of the first class or a Metropolitan
Magistrate, as the case may be,] to be dealt with according to the
provisions of this Act.
Provisions as to discipline
Misconduct endan- 190. No master, seaman or app rentice belonging to an Indian ship
gering life or ship wherever it may be, or to any other ship, while in India, shall
knowingly -
(a) do anything tending to the immediate loss or destruction of,
or serious damage to, the ship, or tending immediately to
endanger the life of, or to cause injury to any person
belonging to or on board the ship; or
and so far as the laws in force in the place will permit, arrest
him without first procuring warrant.
(3) No person shall convey on board or arrest a seaman or
apprentice on improper or insufficient grounds.
(4) Where a seaman or apprentice is brought before a court on
the ground of desertion or of absence without leave or of
any offence against discipline, and the master or the owner,
or his agent, so requires, the court, may, in lieu of committing
and sentencing him for the offence, cause him to be conveyed
on board his ship for the purpose of proceeding on the
voyage, or deliver him to the master or any mate of the ship
or the owner or his agent, to be by them so conveyed, and
may in such case order any costs and expenses properly
incurred by or on behalf of the master or owner by reason of
the conveyance to be paid by the offender and, if necessary,
to be deducted from any wages which he has then earned
or by virtue of his then existing engagements may afterwards
be earned.
General offences 194. A seaman lawfully engaged or an apprentice shall be guilty of an
against discipline offence against discipline if he commits any of the following acts,
namely:
(a) if he quits the ship without leave after her arrival at her port
of delivery and before she is placed in security;
(b) if he is guilty of willful disobedience to any lawful command
or neglect of duty;
(c) if he is guilty of continued willful disobedience to lawful
commands or continued willful neglect of duty;
(d) if he assaults the master or any other 1[officer of, or a seaman
or an apprentice belonging to the ship];
(e) if he combines with any of the crew to disobey lawful
commands or to neglect duty or to impede the navigation of
the ship or retard the progress of the voyage;
(f) if he willfully damages his ship or commits criminal
misappropriation or breach of trust in respect of, or willfully
damages any of, her stores or cargo.
Smuggling of goods 195. (1) If a seaman lawfully engaged or an apprentice is convicted
by seamen or of an offence of smuggling any goods whereby loss or
apprentices damage is occasioned to the master or owner of the ship,
he shall be liable to pay to that master or owner a sum
sufficient to reimburse the loss or damage and the whole or
a part of his wages may be retained in satisfaction on account
of that liability without prejudice to any other remedy.
(2) If a seaman lawfully engaged is convicted of an offence of
smuggling opium, hemp or any other narcotic drug or
Facilities for proving 199. (1) Whenever a question arises whether the wages of any
desertion in seaman or apprentice are forfeited for desertion from a ship,
proceedings for it shall be sufficient for the person insisting on the forfeiture
forfeiture of wages to show that the seaman or apprentice was duly engaged in
or belonged to the ship, and either that he left the ship before
the completion of the voyage or engagement or, if the voyage
was to terminate in India and the ship has not returned, that
he is absent from her and that an entry of his desertion has
been duly made in the official log book
(2) The desertion shall thereupon, so far as relates to any forfeiture
of wages under this part, be deemed to be proved, unless the
seaman or apprentice can produce a proper certificate of
discharge or can otherwise show to the satisfaction of the
court that he had sufficient reasons for leaving his ship.
Application of 200. (1) Where any wages or other property are under this Act forfeited
forfeitures for desertion from a ship, they shall be applied towards
reimbursing the expenses caused by the desertion to the
master or the owner of the ship, and subject to that
reimbursement, shall be paid to the Central Government.
(2) For the purposes of such reimbursement the master or the
owner or his agent may, if the wages are earned subsequent
to the desertion, recover them in the same manner as the
deserter could have recovered them if not forfeited; and the
court in any legal proceeding relating to such wages may
order them to be paid accordingly.
Decision of questions 201. Any question concerning the forfeiture of or deductions from the
of forfeiture and wages of a seaman or apprentice may be determined in any
deduction in suits for proceeding lawfully instituted with respect to those wages,
wages notwithstanding that the offence in respect of which the question
arises, though by this Act made punishable by imprisonment as
well as forfeiture. has not been made the subject of any criminal
proceeding.
Payment of fines 202. (1) Every fine imposed on a seaman for any act of misconduct
imposed under under his agreement shall be deducted and paid over as
agreement to ship- follows, namely: -
ping master
(a) if the offender is discharged at any port or place in
India and the offence and such entries in respect thereof
as aforesaid are proved to the satisfaction of the
shipping master before whom the offender is
discharged, the master or owner shall deduct such
fine from the wages of the offender and pay the same
over to such shipping master; and
(b) if the seaman is discharged at any port or place outside
India and the offence and such entries as aforesaid
are proved to the satisfaction of the Indian consular
officer, by whose sanction he is so discharged, the
Procedure where 206. If any seaman engaged outside India is imprisoned on complaint
seaman not shipped made by or on behalf of the master or owner of the ship or for any
in India is imprisoned offence for which he has been sentenced to imprisonment for a
on complaint of term not exceeding one month, then -
master or owner (a) While such imprisonment lasts, no person shall, without
the previous sanction in writing of the Central Government
or of such officer as it may specify in this behalf, engage in
India any person to serve as a substitute for such seaman
on board the ship; and
(b) the Central Government or such officer as it may specify in
this behalf may tender such seaman to the master or owner
of the ship in which he is engaged to serve, and if such
master or owner, without assigning reasons satisfactory to
the Central Government or to such officer as aforesaid,
refuses to receive him on board, may require such master
or owner to deposit in the local shipping office
(i) the wages due to such seaman and his money and
other property; and
(ii) such sum as may, in the opinion of the Central
Government or such officer as aforesaid, be sufficient
to defray the cost of the passage of such seaman to
the port at which he was shipped according to the
scale of costs usual in the case distressed seamen.
Power to send on 207. If any seaman engaged outside India is imprisoned for any offence
board seaman not for which he has been sentenced to imprisonment for a term not
shipped in India who exceeding three months, and if during such imprisonment and before
is under going his engagement is at an end his services are required on board his
imprisonment ship, any magistrate may, at the request of the master or owner or
his agent, cause the seaman to be conveyed on board the ship for
the purpose of proceeding on the voyage or to be delivered to the
master or any mate of the ship or to the owner or his agent to be by
them so conveyed, notwithstanding that the period for which he
was sentenced to imprisonment has not terminated.
On change of master, 208. (1) If during the progress of a voyage the master of any Indian
documents to be ship is removed or superseded or for any other reason quits
handed over to the ship and is succeeded in the command by some other
successor person, he shall, deliver to his successor the various
documents relating to the navigation of the ship and the
crew thereof which are in his custody.
(2) Such successor shall immediately on assuming the
command of the ship enter in the official log book a list of
the documents so delivered to him.
Transmission of 209. Where a seaman is transferred under his agreement from one ship
documents on to another, the master of the ship from which the seaman is
transfer of seaman transferred shall, as soon as practicable, transmit to the master of
from one ship to the other ship all documents in his possession relating to the
another seaman.
210. (1) The master of a ship shall not discharge at any place in Leaving behind in
India, a seaman or apprentice engaged outside India unless India of seaman or
he previously obtains the sanction in writing of such officer apprentice engaged
as the Central Government appoints in this behalf; but such abroad
sanction shall not be refused when the seaman or apprentice
is discharged on the termination of his service.
(2) Subject to the provisions contained in sub-section (1), the
sanction under that sub-section shall be given or withheld
at the discretion of the officer so appointed, but whenever it
is withheld, the reasons for so withholding it shall be recorded
by him.
211. (1) Where it appears to the Central Government that due Deserters from
facilities are or will be given by the Government of any country foreign ships
outside India for recovering and apprehending seamen who
desert from Indian ships in that country, the Central
Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette,
stating that such facilities are or will be given, declare that
this section shall apply to seamen belonging to ships of
such country, subject to such limitations or conditions as
may be specified in the notification.
(2) Where this section applies to seamen belonging to ships of
any country and a seaman deserts from any such ship,
when within India, any court that would have had cognizance
of the matter if the seaman or apprentice had deserted from
an Indian ship shall, on the application of a consular officer
of that country, aid in apprehending the deserter and for that
purpose may, on information given on oath, issue a warrant
for his apprehension and on proof of the desertion order him
to be conveyed on board his ship or delivered to the master
or mate of his ship or to the owner of the ship or his agent to
be so conveyed and any such warrant or order may be
executed accordingly.
Official Logs
212. (1) An official log shall be kept in the prescribed form in every Official logs to be
Indian ship except a home-trade ship of less than two hundred kept and to be dated
tons gross.
(2) The official log may, at the discretion of the master or owner,
be kept distinct from or united with the ordinary ship’s log
so that in all cases the spaces in the official log book be
duly filled up.
213. (1) An entry required by this Act in the official log book shall be Entries in official log
made as soon as possible after the occurrence to which it books how and when
relates, and, if not made on the same day as that occurrence, to be made
shall be made and dated so as to show the date of the
occurrence and of the entry respecting it and if made in
respect of an occurrence happening before the arrival of the
Part VII extending from Section 88 to Section 218 deals with seamen and apprentices
especially with respect to the classification of seamen; prescription1 of minimum manning scale;
education, training and issuance of certificate to seamen, forms, contents and terms of the engagement
and discharge of crew including, payment of wages, their right to wages, dispute between seamen
and employers, provisions for property of deceased seamen and apprentices, distressed seamen,
provisions for health and accommodation, protection of seamen in case of litigation and other matters,
provision regarding matters of discipline, duties of Shipping Master, business of Seamen’s employment
offices and function of National Welfare Board for seafarers, provisions for rule making powers for
imposition of the Board, term of office of members, procedure for conduct of business, levy of fee for
providing amenities to seamen and procedure for collection and recovery of levied fee.
Further, where agreement is made outside Indian territory, the MS Act 1958 also covers
recognition of seamen who are not Indian nationals or seamen who are citizens of India and who hold
a Certificate of Discharge or Continuous Certificate of Discharge issued under this Act.2 In the course
of time, shipowners focussing on earning more profit and incurring lesser expenses devised
competitiveness of employment pivoting around lesser wages and low quality conditions of employment
on board the vessel. This led to the employment process becoming more flexible and with lesser
accountability.
In order to bring in accountability and responsibility with regard to the recruitment and
placement service providers, the MS Act 1958 has specifically laid down that right from the appointment
of apprentices in sea service to the recruitment of seamen, it is mandatory that contracts must be
awarded to authorised persons before voyage of ship to sea from port in India. The seamen’s
1
Ziyad Ali Vs. Commissioner of Police and Others, 2012 (4) KHC 350, ILR 2012 (4) Ker.371
2
Section 102 of the MS Act 1958 makes it non-mandatory for the seaman to sign an agreement that “shall not be
necessary”.
3
For instance see the report of International Labour Organization and International Maritime Organization Sectoral
Activities Programme ILO//IMO/JMS/2011 on proposals to Revised Guidelines on the medical examination of seafarers
and ships medicine chests. WHO recommendations have also played vital consideration in concluding the proposals.
4
See Merchant Shipping (Recruitment and Placement of Seafarers) Rules, 2005; vide gazette notification G.S.R. 182 (E)
dated March 18, 2005. Also see Sabeeha Faikage & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. (2013) 1 SCC 262
employment office is mandated to issue the license and to, regulate and control the recruitment and
placement service. Whereas, the Central Government has the power to classify and govern seamen
for prescription of minimum and divergent manning scale in accordance with the different categories
of ships on which the seamen are employed.
The fees involved in the process of certification are to be paid by the owner or master to the
shipping master5. And the same is prohibited6 from being levied from the recruited seamen. Further
the Act also prohibits supply of seamen by the recruitment and placement services or engagement
of seamen by the shipowner/master in contravention to the provisions of the MS Act 1958 or the
Rules made there-under.
The welfare of the seamen/seafarer being one of the important reasons behind the enactment
of MS Act 1958, caution and care is exercised in incorporating provisions on the agreement of
employment of crew. It describes the form and content of the agreement with crew, detailing all
aspects of employment including ship, employer / owner / master / recruitment / placement service
provider / agent; employee appointment; wages; conditions of employment and duration of work /
work in hours; capacity in which seamen are appointed; payment of compensation in the event of
accident amounting to personal injury / death arising out of and in the course of employment; list of
misconduct and regulations as to fines and lawful punishments; dispute settlement clauses; referral
of disputes to Indian Consular Officer and the like.
Further, special provision with regard to agreement with crew of Indian ships; renewal of
running agreements with the crew of a foreign going Indian ship; necessity of reporting changes in
crew and returned attestation of alterations with respect to crew agreement, are also dealt with under
the Act. In order to ensure/enforce compliance to the form, manner and contents of crew agreement
as prescribed under PART VII, the Act prescribes issuance of Certificate of Compliance by the
shipping master. Further, the Customs Collector will permit/clear any ship outwards only when the
aforementioned Certificate of Compliance is produced by the master requesting such clearance. The
master of every foreign going Indian ship is duty bound to submit the crew agreement to a shipping
master at the port of arrival in India, within 48 hours, where the crew is to be discharged. The Act also
deals with employment of children/young person7 including medical examination, maintenance of
register and rule making power.
5
For the powers of shipping master see ft note 2 of the commentary.
6
Section 96 read with S. 97 of the MS Act 1958
7
Section 3(59) defines “young person” as a person under eighteen years of age.
The Certificate of Discharge or the Continuous Discharge Certificate8 and the Seafarer’s
Identity Document9 are the other important documents that a seaman10/seafarer11 should possess12
as an eligibility document for qualifying them to be engaged on board the vessel. The Certificate of
Discharge shall be in prescribed form and manner specifying the details as to the period of service,
the time and place of discharge. Moreover, a report as to the quality of work and performance of
obligations under the agreement or the decision to decline from expressing the opinion in the report
and the reasons thereof are to be furnished by master to the shipping master.
The Act postulates that the right to wages and provisions commences from the point in time
from which seamen starts working or that time specified in the agreement. Crewmen are entitled to
claim lien on vessel for wages. Wage lien arises from services rendered to ship from the date of
engagement till deportation. Thus, even if a vessel carrying smuggled goods was caught and
confiscated, the wage lien of the crewmen on the ship is held to be claimable.13 The yardstick to
determine wages is nothing but employment agreement and employment conditions stipulated therein
and shall not depend on freight14 See Section 140 Saba International Shipping & Project Investment
Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Owners and Parties interested in the vessel M.V. Brave Eagle (previously known as
M.V. Lima –I) and Ors (2002) 1 CALLT 207 (HC), 2002 (2) CHN 280.; unforeseen events; premature
discharge from the employment contract and the like. While deciding the question of computing
compensation with regard to the premature discharge of seamen, the Court held that the contract
clause which stipulated the 2 months minimum wages was held to be not in compliance with the 3
months minimum wages requirement as stipulated under the Act.15
8
The engagement of seamen without Continuous Discharge Certificate is prohibited in Indian port.
9
Section 99 – A of MS Act 1958. International Labour Organisation Convention - Seafarers’ Identity Documents Convention,
1958 (No. 108) Date of entry into force – February 19, 1961. Ratified by India on January 17, 2005, amendment came
into effect by virtue of Section 5 of MS Act 1958 (Amendment) Act, 2007. Total ratifications 66, denounced by 7.
10
Section 3(42) defines “seaman” as persons employed or engaged as a member of the crew of a ship except master,
pilot or apprentice, but in relation to S. 178, S. 179, S. 180, S. 181, S. 182, and S. 183 includes master.
11
Explanation (b) to Section 95 (3) defines “seafarer” as any person who is qualified to be employed or engaged in their
relevant competent capacities on board a sea-going ship other than a government ship used for military or non-
commercial purposes. Whereas the term “seafarer”, defined for purpose of Section 99 A by virtue of Explanation to
Section 99 A of MS Act 1958, only excludes the mandatory requirement in case of employment on board ships of war.
All other sea going ships including government ships used for non-commercial purpose will have to comply with
Section 99A
12
Section 99 A of the MS Act 1958 clearly stipulates prohibition of engagement of seafarer without seafarer’s identity
document
13
See Section 144. Decision in O. Konavalov v. Commander, Coast Guard Region & Ors. (2006) 4 SCC 620;
14
See Section 140 Saba International Shipping & Project Investment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Owners and Parties interested in
the vessel M.V. Brave Eagle (previously known as M.V. Lima – I) and Ors (2002) 1 CALLT 207 (HC), 2002 (2) CHN 280.
15
See Section 143. Steel Industries Kerala Ltd. V. Capt. S.M. Rebello & Ors 1985 AIR 760, 1985 SCR (2) 998
The Act provides elaborate mode for recovery and disbursement of wages16 and remedies of
master for claiming wages. In the event of a dispute arising between seamen and their employees,
the same is referred to a tribunal constituted under Sec. 150 of MS Act 1958 as summary proceedings.
Further, the Act stipulates that as prescribed under the crew agreement, the conditions of the service
and employment shall remain unaffected. Section 152 to Section 160 deal with property of deceased
seamen and apprentices. The provisions includes reporting of death of seamen to his next of kin;
taking charge of property of the effects17 of deceased seamen and entry into the Official Log Book on
particulars of property; and reporting to the concerned Indian Consular Officer, if the ship remains for
48 hours at a foreign port before coming to India, and the like.
This Part under Section 157 of the MS Act 1958 also lays down that in case if the seamen
are lost with the ship, their wages can be recovered by the Central Government or by an officer
appointed by the owner, master of agent of the ship. The claim period stipulated under the Act,
depends on the official records or on other evidence that the ship left any port before 12 months or
more and that a ship that has not been heard of within twelve months after the departure is deemed
to have been lost with all hands on board. The Court has held that Section 157 (2) is not an
exception contemplated under Section 4 to Section 24 of the Limitation Act, 1963.18 Section 4 to
Section 24 of the Limitation Act, 196319 will arise when the suit is filed after the prescribed period of
2 years from the date on which cause of action arouse.20
As mentioned earlier in this Part, distressed seamen are to be given all facilities of safe
return to a proper port of return. To understand that a seaman is a distressed seaman, a certificate
issued by the Central Government specifying the name of seamen as distressed seamen is conclusive
proof under the Act to grant him all the privileges and protection under the Act. Apart from the
capacity to inspect the provisions, water, weights and measures and accommodation, in accordance
with Section 176, the MS Act 1958 stipulates requirement of the ship to carry sufficient provisions
including water of good quality ensuring good health, safe accommodation and sufficient medical
facilities to meet emergencies and inspection of the compliance to Section 176 is carried out by
concerned authority appointed by Central Government.
16
See Section 145 Fithaly Fernando Vs. Principal Officer and Shipping Master 2010 (3) KLT 741. The power vested in
the Central Government under Section 145 (2) of MS Act 1958 is delegated to Director General of Shipping by virtue
of Merchant Shipping Order, S.O. 3144 dated December 17, 1960 issued by Government of India, Ministry of Transport
& Communication
17
Section 3(10) defines “effects” as in relation to a seamen, includes clothes and documents
18
Leena Mathew Vs. Kerala Shipping Corporation 1988(1) KLT 98, ILR 1988(2) Ker.180
19
Limitation Act 1963 is the legislation enacted for prescribing the time period within which a claim can be successfully
instituted before a court of law in India. Condoning the delay is the discretion of the court and the discretion will be
applied on the basis of the validity and rationale behind the reason for delay in filing or instituting the claim before the
court.
20
Ibid
The Central Government is also empowered to make rules in accordance with the Convention
Concerning the Prevention of Occupational Accidents to Seafarers adopted by the General Conference
of the International Labour Organization, 197021 on ensuring safe working conditions for Indian ships
of different classes and circumstances. Part VII also deals with provisions ensuring, protection of
seamen, and access to legal/judicial forum, recovery of debt till end of voyage, detention of property,
solicitation by lodging house keepers, boarding the ship before seamen leave the ship; and the like.
While prescribing privileges and protection of rights of seamen, the Act under Part VII also deals with
strict rules of discipline to be observed by seamen, including, avoidance of misconduct; desertion
and absence without leave; smuggling of goods; payment of fines and the like; proven non compliance
with regard to disciplinary provisions by seaman, would make him liable to be punishable under law.
The excuse that ratings abandoned the vessel and that they were not available at the schedule time
of departure solely because of the denial of certain additional amount was held to be not a reasonable
excuse under Section 191 (1)(b) and the ratings were held liable for desertion.22
Under the Act the Central Government is empowered to order for suspension of Certificate of
Discharge, imposition of fine; forfeiture of wages or property of seamen etc; as consequence for
proven non-compliances. Further, under Part VII an advisory board called the National Welfare Board
has been constituted for the purpose of advising the Central Government on adoption of measures
for promoting the welfare of seamen.23 Under the auspices of International Labour Organisation, the
Maritime Labour Convention 200624, provides for comprehensive rights and protection at work of
seafarers.25 The Convention is considered to be the “Fourth pillar26 of international maritime law”. The
MLC 2006 encompasses and harmoniously collates the existing standards stipulated in the
international maritime labour conventions and recommendations made by International Labour
Organisation. Further, Part VII is expected to undergo improvisation in the near future.
21
The ILO convention, Year of adoption is 1970.
22
Ibrahim & Ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and Anr. AIR 1968 SC 731
23
National Welfare Board for Seafarers Rules, 1963
24
Hereinafter referred as MLC.2006
25
Also see F. No.16 (5)/CR/2010-Vol-I, M.S. Notice No. 11 of 2013, dated 17.04.13 (Corrigendum to the M.S.
Notice No. 7 of 2013) on Implementation of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 – voluntary inspection of
Indian flag ships.
26
The other conventions that are accounted as three pillars are (a) International Convention for the SOLAS
1974, (b) STCW 1978 and (c) MARPOL 73/78.
PART VIII
PASSENGER SHIPS
Survey of passenger ships
Application of Part 219. This Part applies only to sea-going passenger ships fitted with
mechanical means of propulsion, but the provisions of this Part
relating to special trade passenger ships shall not apply -
(a) to any such ship not carrying more than thirty special trade
passengers; or
(b) to any such ship not intended to carry special trade
passengers to or from any port or place in India.
No ship to carry 220. (1) No ship shall carry more than twelve passengers between
passengers without a ports or places in India or to or from any port or place in
certificate of survey India from or to any port or place outside India, unless she
has a certificate of survey under this Part in force and
applicable to the voyage on which she is about to proceed
or the service on which she is about to be employed:
Provided that nothing in this section shall apply to any ship
which has been granted a certificate under section 235,
unless it appears from the certificate that it is inapplicable
to the voyage on which the ship is about to proceed on the
service on which she is about to be employed, or unless
there is reason to believe that the ship has, since the grant
of the certificate, sustained injury or damage or been found
unseaworthy or otherwise inefficient.
(2) No customs collector shall granted a port clearance, nor
shall any pilot be assigned, to any ship for which a certificate
of survey is required by this Part until after the production
by the owner, agent or master thereof of a certificate under
this Part in force and applicable to the voyage on which she
is about to proceed or the service on which she is about to
be employed.
(3) If any ship which a certificate of survey is required by this
Part leaves or attempts to leave any port of survey without a
certificate, any customs collector or any pilot on board the
ship may detain her until she obtains a certificate.
Power of surveyor 221. (1) The owner or agent of every passenger ship for which a
certificate of survey is required under this Part shall cause
it to be surveyed in the prescribed manner.
(2) For the purposes of a survey under this Part, a surveyor
may, at any reasonable time, go on board a ship, and may
inspect the ship and any part thereof, and the machinery,
equipment or articles on board thereof:
Provided that he does not unnecessarily hinder the loading
Power to require 230. Every certificate of survey granted under this Part which has
delivery of expired or expired, or has been cancelled or suspended, shall be delivered to
cancelled certificate such person as the Central Government may direct.
of survey
231. The owner or master of every ship for which a certificate of survey
Certificate of survey has been granted under this Part shall forthwith, on the receipt of
to be affixed in the certificate, cause one of the duplicates thereof to be affixed,
conspicuous part of and kept affixed so long as the certificate remains in force and the
ship ship is in use on some conspicuous part of the ship where it may
be easily read by all persons on board thereof.
Ship not to carry 232. (1) No ship on any voyage shall carry or attempt to carry
passengers in passengers in contravention of section 220 or shall have on
contravention of Act board or in any part thereof a number of passengers which
is greater than the number set forth in the certificate of survey
as the number of passengers which the ship or the part
thereof is fit to carry on that voyage.
(2) If the master or any other officer of any ship which carries or
attempts to carry passengers in contravention of section
220 is a licensed pilot, he shall be liable to have his license
as a pilot cancelled or suspended for such period as the
Central Government may, by order, specify.
Offences in 233. (1) If, in the case of a ship for which a certificate of survey has
connection with been granted under this Part, -
passenger ship (a) any person being drunk or disorderly has been on that
account refused admission thereto by the owner or any
person in his employ and, after having the amount of his
fare (if he has paid it) returned or tendered to him,
nevertheless persists in attempting to enter the ship;
(b) any person being drunk or disorderly on board the ship
is requested by the owner or any person in his employ
to leave the ship at any place in India at which he can
conveniently do so, and after having the amount of his
fare (if he has paid it) returned or tendered to him,
does not comply with the request;
(c) any person on board the ship after warning by the
master or other officer thereof, molests or continues
to molest any passenger;
(d) any person having gone on board the ship at any place
and being requested, on account of the ship being full,
by the owner or any person in his employ to leave the
ship, before it has departed from that place, and having
had the amount of his fare (if he has paid it) returned or
tendered to him, does not comply with that request;
(e) any person travels or attempts to travel in the ship
Contents of certifi- 242. The second of the certificates (hereinafter called certificate B) shall
cate B be in the prescribed form and shall state-
(a) the voyage which the ship is to make, and the intermediate
ports (if any) at which she is to touch;
(b) that she has proper complement of officers and seamen;
1
[(c) that the master holds-
(i) a certificate of survey and certificate A; or
Discretion as to grant 245. (1) The certifying officer shall not grant a certificate B if he has
of certificates B reason to believe that the weather conditions are likely to
be adverse or that the ship has on board any cargo likely
from its quality, quantity or mode of stowage to prejudice
the health or safety of the special trade passengers or
pilgrims.
(2) Save as aforesaid, and subject to the provision of sub-section
(3), it shall be in the discretion of the certifying officer to
grant or withhold the certificate, and when he withholds the
certificate, the reasons for so doing shall be communicated
to the person concerned.
(3) In the exercise of that discretion that officer shall be subject
to the control of the Central Government or of such authority
as the Central Government may appoint in this behalf.
Copy of certificate A 246. The master or owner shall post up in a conspicuous part of the
to be exhibited ship, so as to be visible to the persons on board thereof, a copy of
certificate A granted under this Part in respect of the ship and
shall keep that copy so posted up as long as it is in force.
Special trade passen- 247. (1) The master of a special trade passenger ship or any
gers or pilgrims to be contractor employed by him for the purpose shall not, without
supplied with pre- reasonable excuse, the burden of proving which shall lie
scribed provisions upon him, omit to supply to any special trade passenger
the prescribed allowance of food, fuel and water, and the
master of a pilgrim ship, or any contractor employed by him
for the purpose shall not, without reasonable excuse, the
burden of proving which shall lie upon him, omit to supply to
any pilgrim the prescribed allowances of food and of water
as required by the provisions of this Part.
(2) Where, under the terms of the ticket issued to a special
trade passenger he is not entitled to the supply of food by
the master or owner or agent of the ship, sub-section (1)
shall, in the case of such passenger, have effect as if the
reference to “food” in that sub-section were omitted.
Number of passen- 248. (1) A special trade passenger ship or a pilgrim ship shall not
gers on board not to carry a number of special trade passengers or pilgrims,
exceed that allowed which is greater that the number allowed for the ship by or
by or under this part under this Part.
(2) Any officer authorised in this behalf by the Central Government
may cause all special trade passengers or pilgrims over and
above the number allowed by or under this Part to disembark,
and may forward them to any port at which they may have
contracted to land, and recover the cost of so forwarding them
from the master, owner or agent of the ship as if the cost were
a fine imposed under this part, and a certificate under the hand
of that officer shall be conclusive proof of the amount of the
cost aforesaid.
249. No master, owner or agent of special trade passenger ship or a Special trade passen-
pilgrim ship shall land any special trade passenger or pilgrim at ger or pilgrim not to
any port or place other than the port or place at which the special be landed at a place
trade passenger or pilgrim may have contracted to land, unless other than that at
with his previous consent, or unless the landing is made necessary which he has con-
by perils of the sea or other unavoidable accident. tracted to land
250. (1) If any special trade passenger from a ship which is on a Forwarding of pas-
voyage from any port or place in India finds himself without sengers by Indian
any neglect or default of his own at any port or place outside consular officers
India other than the port or place for which the ship was
originally bound or at which he has contracted that he should
land, the Indian consular officer at or near that port or place
may forward the passenger to his intended destination,
unless the master, owner or agent of the ship within forty-
eight hours of the arrival of the passenger gives to that officer
a written undertaking to forward the passenger within six
weeks thereafter to his original destination and forwards him
accordingly within that period.
(2) A passenger so forwarded by or by the authority of an Indian
consular officer shall not be entitled to the return of his
passage money or to any compensation for loss of passage.
251. (1) All expenses incurred under section 250 by an Indian Recovery of expenses
consular officer in respect of the forwarding of a passenger incurred in forwarding
to his destination including the cost of maintaining the passengers
passenger until forwarded to his destination shall be a debt
due to the Central Government jointly and severally from
the owner, charterer, agent and master of the ship on board
which the passenger had embarked.
(2) In any proceeding for the recovery of that debt a certificate
purporting to be under the hand of the Indian consular officer
and stating the circumstances of the case and the total
amount of the expenses shall be prima facie evidence of
the amount of the expenses and of the fact that the same
were duly incurred.
252. The master, owner or agent of a special trade passenger ship or a Ship not to make
pilgrim ship shall not, otherwise than by reason of perils of the sea voyage in contraven-
or other unavoidable accident, allow the ship to touch at any port tion of contract
or place in contravention of any express or implied contract or
engagement with the special trade passengers or pilgrims with
respect to the voyage which the ship was to make and the time
which that voyage was to occupy, whether the contract or
engagement was made by public advertisement or otherwise.
253. (1) The officer appointed by the Central Government in this behalf Information to be
at any port or place within India at which a special trade sent to ports of
passenger ship or a pilgrim ship touches or arrives, shall embarkation and
send any particulars which he may deem important discharge
respecting the special trade passenger ship or pilgrim ship
(4) The master, owner or agent of the ship shall supply to the
pilgrim officer, within three days from the date of demand,
such further information in regard to the matters mentioned
in sub-section (3) as that officer may in writing demand from
him.
(5) (a) The master, owner or agent of the ship shall advertise
at such port or place and in such manner as may be
prescribed -
(i) the place of destination of the ship,
(ii) the price of each class of passage tickets which
shall not be in excess of the price communicated to
the pilgrim officer under sub-section (3), and
(iii) the provisional date of sailing from that port or
place.
(b) The master, owner or agent of the ship shall also
advertise the final date of sailing not less than fifteen
days before such date.
(6) No master, owner or agent shall -
(a) without reasonable cause, the burden of proving which
shall lie upon him, fail or refuse to supply any particulars
or information which he is by or under this section
required to supply or supply false particulars or
information; or
(b) advertise any ship for the conveyance of pilgrims, or
offer to convey pilgrims by any ship, or sell or promise
or permit any person to sell passage tickets to pilgrims
for conveyance by any ship, without having first
supplied the particulars required by sub-section (3) and
in accordance with the provisions of that sub-section;
or
(c) advertise a price for passage tickets at the port or place
in excess of the price communicated to the pilgrim
officer under sub-section (3); or
(d) offer to convey pilgrims by any ship from any port or
place in India or sell or promise or permit any person
to sell passage tickets to pilgrims for conveyance by
a ship from any such port or place without having
advertised as required by clause (a) of sub-section (5),
the matters specified in that clause; or
(e) sell or permit any person to sell to any pilgrim any
passage ticket at a price in excess of the price
communicated to the pilgrim officer under sub-section
(3).]
Ship taking additional 256. [(1)] If any special trade passenger ship performing a voyage
1
Death of special 258. (1) The master of any special trade passenger ship performing
trade passengers on a voyage between port or places in India, shall, on arrival at
voyage her port of destination, notify to the certifying officer or such
other officer as the Central Government may appoint in this
behalf the date and supposed cause of death of every special
trade passenger who may die on the voyage.
(2) The master of any special trade passenger ship performing
a voyage between a port or place in India and a port or place
outside India, shall note in writing on the statement or the
additional statement referred to in section 257 the date and
supposed cause of death of any special trade passenger
who may die on the voyage, and shall, when the ship arrives
at her port or place of destination or at any port or place
where it may be intended to land special trade passengers,
and before any passenger leaves the ship, produce the
statement with any additions made thereto-
(a) where such port or place is in India, to the certifying
officer or such other officer as the Central Government
may appoint in this behalf;
(b) where such port or place is outside India, to the Indian
consular officer.
(3) 1
[The master of every pilgrim ship shall note in writing on
the copy of the additional statement referred to in sub-section
(2) of section 256 or of the statement referred to in sub-
sections (3) and (4) of section 257, the date and supposed
cause of death of any pilgrim who may die on the voyage,
and shall, when the pilgrim ship arrives at her port or place
of destination or at any port or place where it may be
intended to discharge pilgrims, and before any pilgrims
disembark, produce the statement, with any additions made
thereto,
(a) where such port or place is in India, to the certifying
officer or such other officer as the Central Government
may appoint in this behalf;
(b) where such port or place is outside, to the Indian
consular officer.]
Certain ships to carry 259. (1) Every ship carrying special trade passengers and crew not
medical officer and exceeding one thousand in number, shall have one board
attendants as part of her complement at least on medical officer
possessing such qualifications as may be prescribed.
(2) Every ship carrying special trade passenger and crew
exceeding one thousand in number shall, in addition to a
medical officer, have on board as part of her complement
such number of medical attendants as may be prescribed.
271. (1) No pilgrim shall be received on board any pilgrim ship at Medical inspection
any port or place in India unless and until he has been and permission
medically inspected, at such time and place, and in such required before
manner, as the Central Government may fix in this behalf, embarkation of
nor until the certifying officer has given permission for the pilgrims
embarkation of pilgrims to commence.
(2) The medical inspection of female pilgrims shall, subject to
any rules which may be made under this Act and as far as
may be practicable, be carried out by women.
(3) No pilgrim shall be received on board any pilgrim ship unless
he produces a medical certificate signed by a person who
is duly qualified to grant such certificate, showing that such
pilgrim -
(a) has been inoculated against cholera within such period
before the inspection, as may be prescribed: and
(b) has been vaccinated against small-pox within such
period before the inspection as may be prescribed:
Provided that the officer making the inspection may dispense
with the certificate of vaccination, if in his opinion the pilgrim
has marks showing that he has had small-pox.
(4) If, in the opinion of the officer making an inspection under
this section, any pilgrim is suffering from cholera or choleraic
indisposition, or any dangerously infectious or contagious
disease, or shows any signs of the same or any other
suspicious symptoms, such pilgrim shall not be permitted
to embark.
(5) All articles which have been contaminated by persons
suffering from cholera or choleraic indisposition, or any
dangerously infectious or contagious disease, or are
suspected of having been so contaminated shall, before
being taken on board a pilgrim ship, be disinfected, under
the supervision of a medical officer appointed by the Central
Government for the purpose, in such manner as may be
prescribed.
272. (1) If in any case a pilgrim ship does not proceed on her voyage Medical inspection
within forty-eight hours after all the pilgrims have been after embarkation in
received on board, and there is reason to suspect that any certain cases
person on board is suffering from cholera or choleric
indisposition or any person on board is suffering from cholera
or choleric indisposition or any dangerously infectious or
contagious disease, a medical inspection of all persons on
board may be held in such manner as the Central
Government may direct.
(2) If on such inspection any person is found to be suffering
from cholera or choleric indisposition or any dangerously
infectious or contagious disease, or shows any signs of the
(2) Where any such pilgrim who has notified to the prescribed
authority in the prescribed manner his desire to embark for
the return voyage is, owing to his inability to obtain
accommodation within the period of ninety days aforesaid
in a ship for which the return ticket is available, detained at
Jeddah beyond the said period, the master, owner or agent
of the ship in which such pilgrim was carried to the Hedjaz
shall pay to the Central Government in respect of such pilgrim
such sum not exceeding double the sum received by the
master, owner or agent in respect of the return ticket as the
Central Government claims as the cost of repatriating the
pilgrim together with a sum of rupees five for each day after
the expiry of the period aforesaid during which the pilgrim
has been detained at Jeddah.
(3) A certificate of such detention purporting to be made signed
by the Indian consular officer at Jeddah shall be received in
evidence in any court in India without proof of the signature
or of the official character of the person who has signed the
same.
[278. Notice of sailing of Pilgrim ship. omitted by the Merchant Shipping
1
(2) In the event of such failure, the master, owner or agent shall
be bound forthwith to inform the pilgrim officer at the port or
place at which the delay occurs of the number of passage
tickets of each class which have been issued for the voyage
on or before the advertised final date of sailing.
(3) Any sum payable as compensation under sub-section (1)
shall be paid on behalf of the pilgrims entitled thereto to the
pilgrim officer at the port or place at which the delay occurs
on receipt by the master, owner or agent of a notice from
that officer specifying the sum payable, and that officer shall,
in such manner as may be prescribed, pay to each such
pilgrim the compensation paid in respect of his detention:
Provided that, if an objection is made by the master, owner
or agent that the sum specified in any such notice or any
part of such sum is not payable by him, the sum paid or, as
the case may be, the balance thereof remaining after
payment to the pilgrims entitled thereto of compensations
the right to which is not in dispute, shall be held in deposit
until the objection has been decided:
Provided further that, if for any reason the compensation
due to any pilgrim cannot be paid to him at the time of
embarkation or at or before the time of his disembarkation
at the port of his destination, the sum so remaining unpaid
shall be made over to such authority administering any fund
maintained for the assistance of pilgrims as the Central
Government may, by general or special order, designate in
this behalf.
(4) If the master, owner or agent objects that the sum specified
in the notice issued under sub-section (3) or any part thereof
is not payable by him, he may, at the time of payment of
such sum, give to the pilgrim officer notice of his objection,
together with a statement of the grounds thereof, and the
pilgrim officer shall thereupon either cancel or modify the
aforesaid notice in accordance with the objection and refund
the sum held in deposit under sub-section (3), or refer the
objection for decision to a 1[Metropolitan Magistrate or a
Judicial Magistrate of the first class] exercising jurisdiction
at the port or place at which the ship is delayed, whose
decision on such reference shall be final; and there shall be
refunded to the master, owner or agent any amount allowed
to him by such decision.
(5) On the failure of any pilgrim ship to proceed from any port or
place on the date advertised under 2[clause (b) of sub-section
(5) of Section 255] as the date of final sailing therefrom, the
(u) the local limits within which, and the time and mode at and
in which, pilgrims shall be embarked or discharged at any
port or place appointed under this Part in that behalf;
(v) the time within which a pilgrim ship shall depart or proceed
on her voyage after commencing to take pilgrims on board;
(w) providing that a pilgrim shall not be received on board any
pilgrim ship, unless he is in possession of a passport or a
pilgrim’s pass, regulating the issue of pilgrims, passes, and
prescribing the form of and fees which may be charged for
such passes; H
1
[(ww) the fees that may be levied for the survey or inspection of
pilgrim ships with respect to sanitary conditions, provision
of stores, medical facilities available on such ships and such
other purposes that may be relevant for compliance with
the provisions of this Part relating to pilgrim ships and the
manner in which such fees may be collected;]
(x) generally, to carry out the provisions of this Part relating to
pilgrim ships.
PART VIII-Commentary
The MS Act 1958 under Part VIII limits its application to the sea-going1 passenger ship2
fitted with mechanical means of propulsion. In case of special trade passenger ships Part VIII applies
to passenger ships that is carrying more than 30 unberthed passengers3 or to any ship which is
intended to carry special trade passengers to or from any port or place in India. Part VIII exclusively
deals with various aspects of passenger ships, their survey, Certificate of survey4, powers of surveyor5,
fee6, duration of survey and the like. An exception to the mandatory requirement of possession of
Certificate of Survey is provided to the ships with certificate of survey or certificates of partial survey
granted outside India7, but the certificate should specifically be applicable to the voyage that the ship
intends to undertake or about to be employed or that the ship should not have sustained/found
injured or damaged or unseaworthy or inefficient. Further, the MS Act 1958 also stipulates the
detention of passenger ship which does not possess valid certificate of survey issued under the Act.8
The Act under Part VIII also stipulates the power given to the master and any other officer to
whom the master prescribes, to detain the offenders, who are found to have committed offenses
under Section 233, and to produce them before the nearest judicial forum having jurisdiction to be
dealt with under the law 9. Similarly, the master has the power to refuse to receive and exclude
drunken passengers or those who misconducts themselves from entering the passenger ship.10
Further, the MS Act 1958 provides for power of the Central Government in framing Rules with respect
to the surveys, time, place, manner of survey, requirements of compliances by ships, construction,
machinery, equipment, and marking of loadline, number of surveyors, declaration of surveys, fees
payable, operations of mechanisms of contrivances, schedule of operation and making entries in the
official log book.
1
Section 3(41) of the MS Act 1958 defines the term “seagoing”, which determines application of the Part VIII.
2
Section 3 (25) defines “passenger ship” as “ship carrying more than twelve passengers”
3
Section 3 (24) defines “passenger” as any person except employed or engaged in any capacity on board the ship in
the course of business of ship or in pursuance of obligations laid upon the master to carry shipwrecked, distressed
or other persons or by reason of circumstances which the neither the master nor the charterer could have foreseen
OR child under one years of age.
4
Section 220 of the MS Act 1958 makes it mandatory that the Certificate of Survey should be valid and voyage specific.
5
Powers include to go on board the ship, inspect the ship, machinery and equipment without unnecessarily/unreasonably
delaying/hindering/detaining the ship
6
The power vested in the Central Government under Section 222 of MS Act 1958 is delegated to Director General of
Shipping by virtue of Merchant Shipping Order, S.O. 3144 dated December 17, 1960 issued by Government of India,
Ministry of Transport & Communication.
7
Section 235 of the MS Act 1958
8
Section 220 (3) empowers, the Customs Collector or the pilot on board the passenger ship to detain the ship until the
ship obtains valid certificate of survey.
9
In 1983, the judicial forum as “Judicial Magistrate of the first class or the Metropolitan Magistrate” has been inserted in
Section 233 (3).
10
Section 234 of the MS Act 1958.
This part also contains provision for special trade passenger ships and pilgrim ships11,
including certification, survey, embarkation and discharge, statements, death on board, necessity of
medical officers and attendants, comfort and conveniences and the power to the Central Government
to make Rules. This Part and the Rules made there-under will witness more changes in the near
future. At the international level, the Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and
their Luggage by Sea 197412 and the Protocol of 200213 is expected to come into force14 on 23rd April
2014. India has not yet ratified the convention or the protocol. But, in the light of innovations and
technologies introduced, the sea transportation of passengers could gain more importance and
hence, to adopt uniform measures and applicable standards, India too, is expected to reconsider the
decision and might adopt the convention and related Protocol.
11
Section 237 to Section 282 of the MS Act 1958.
12
PAL Convention 1974, which was adopted on December 13, 1974 entered into force on April 28, 1987
13
2002 Protocol to PAL Convention was adopted on November 01, 2002.
14
2002 Protocol mandates that the entry into force is 12 months after being accepted by 10 States
PART IX
SAFETY
283*. The Central Government, if satisfied, Countries to which
(a) that the Government of any country has accepted or Load Line Convention
denounced the Load Line Convention, or, as the case may or Safety Convention
be, the Safety Convention; or applies
(b) that the Load Line Convention or, as the case may be, the
Safety Convention extends, or has ceased to extend to any
territory.
may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make a
declaration to that effect.
1
[283A. (1) In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires, Definitions
(a) “existing ship” or “existing vessel” means a ship or
vessel which in not a new ship or a new vessel,
(b) “new ship” or “new vessel” means a ship or vessel
whose keel is laid or which is at a similar stage of
construction on or after the material date as defined
in sub-section (2).
(2) For the purposes of sub-section (1) “material date”
(i) in relation to an Indian ship, means the 21st July, 1968;
(ii) in relation to a foreign ship belonging to a country to which
the Load Line Convention applies, means the date as
from which it is declared under section 283 that the
Government of such country has accepted the Load Line
Convention or, as the case may be, that the said
Convention has been applied to such country.]
Construction of ships
284. (1) The Central Government may make rules (in this Act called Construction rules
the construction rules), prescribing the requirements that
the hull, equipment and machinery of Indian 2[passenger or
cargo ships] shall comply with.
(2) The rules made under sub-section (1) shall include such
requirements as appear to the Central Government to
implement the provisions of the Safety Convention prescribing
the requirements that the hull, equipment and machinery of
passenger or cargo ships shall comply with, except so far
as those provisions are implemented by rules for life saving
appliances, the radio rules, the rules for direction finders or
the collision regulations:
3
[Provided that different requirements may be specified for
special trade passenger ships.]
1 Ins. by MS (Amend.) Act 1970
2 Subs. by MS (Amend.) Act 1966
3 Ins. by MS (Amend.) Act 1976
* Sub. Section (2) omitted by MS (Amend.) Act 1970
H
The words “and watchers” omitted by MS (Amend.) Act 1966
295. The provisions of this Part relating to radio telegraphy, radio telephony Application of this
and direction finders shall apply to ships other than Indian ships while Part to ships other
they are within any port in India in like manner as they apply to Indian than Indian ships
ships
296. (1) The Central Government may make rules to carry out the Power to make rules
purposes of this Part relating to radio telegraphy or radio
telephony 2[or radio direction finders.]
(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the
foregoing power, such rules may prescribe -
(a) the nature of the radio telegraph or radio telephone
installation and radio direction finding apparatus to be
provided and of the service to be maintained, the form
of the radio log and the particulars to be entered therein,
and the number, grades and qualifications of certified
operators to be carried;
1
[(aa) the nature of radio telegraph installation to be provided
on motor life-boats and survival craft;]
(b) the manner in which a notice given under section 294
shall be communicated to the customs collector;
(c) the charging of fees for the grant of the certificate
referred to in sub-section (3) of section 294, the amount
of such fees and the manner in which they shall be
recoverable.
Signaling lamps
297. Every Indian ship exceeding one hundred and fifty tons gross shall, Signalling lamps
when proceeding to sea from any port or place in India to any port
or place outside India, be provided with a 2[signalling lamp which
shall not be solely dependent upon the ship’s main source of
electrical power and which shall be of the type approved] by the
Central Government.
Stability information
298. (1) There shall be carried on board every Indian ship whose Information about
keel was laid after the 15th day of June, 1953, such ship’s stability
information in writing 2[as is necessary to enable the master
by rapid and simple processes to obtain accurate guidance
as to the stability of the ship under varying conditions of
service.]
2
[(2) The information shall be in such form as may be approved
by the Central Government (which may approve the provision
of the information in the form of a diagram or drawing only)
and shall be suitably amended whenever any alterations
are made to the ship so as to materially affect such
information.
1
[Provided further that when the survey for the purpose of
issue of certificate under sub-section (1) of section 316 is
completed within three months before the expiry date of the
existing certificate, the new certificate may be valid from
the date of completion of such survey to a date not exceeding
five years from the date of expiry of the existing certificate.]
(2) Every certificate issued under clause (aa) of sub-section (1)
of section 316 to a ship referred to in clause (f) of sub-
section (3) of section 310 shall cease to be valid upon the
completion of the voyage in respect of which such certificate
was issued.
(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing
provisions of this section, any certificate issued in respect
of a ship under sub-section (1) of section 316 2[shall cease
to be valid when-
(a) the ship ceases to be an Indian ship;
(b) material alterations such as would necessitate the
assignment of an increased free board have taken place
in the hull or superstructure of the ship;
(c) the fittings and appliances for the protection of
openings, the guard rails, freeing ports, or the means
of access to the crew’s quarters are not maintained in
an effective condition;
(d) the structural strength of the ship is lowered to such
an extent as to render the ship unsafe;
(e) the certificate is not endorsed to prove that the ship has
been surveyed as required under sub-section (5); or
(f) the marking of the deck line and load lines on the ship
have not been properly maintained;]
*[(4) The Central Government may, by order in writing, cancel any
certificate issued in respect of a ship under sub-section (1)
of section 316 if it is satisfied that-
(a) material alterations such as would necessitate assignment
of an increased free board have taken place in the hull or
superstructure of the ship,
(b) the fittings and appliances for the protection of openings,
the guard rails, freeing ports, or the means of access to the
crew’s quarters are not maintained in an effective condition,
(c) the structural strength of the ship is lowered to such an
extent as to render the ship unsafe,
(d) the markings of the deck line and load lines on the ship
have not been properly maintained :
Provided that no such order shall be made unless the person
1 Ins. by MS (Amend.) Act 2002 concerned has been given a reasonable opportunity to
2 Subs MS (Amend.) Act 2002 represent his case.]
* Subsection (4) Omitted by MS (Amend.) Act 2002
Marking of deck line 325. The provisions of section 312 shall apply to ships other than Indian
and load lines of ships proceeding or attempting to proceed to sea from ports in
ships other than India as they apply to Indian ships subject to the following
Indian ships modifications, namely:
(a) the said section shall not apply to a ship other than an
Indian ship if a valid international load line certificate is
produced in respect of the ship; and
(b) subject to the provisions of clause (a), a ship other than an
Indian ship which does not comply with the conditions of
assignment to the extent required in her case by section 323
shall be deemed to be unsafe for the purpose of section 342.
Submersion of load 326. The provisions of section 313 shall apply to ships other than Indian
line of ships other ships, while they are within any port in India as they apply to
than Indian ships Indian ships subject to the following modifications, namely:
1
[(a) no ship belonging to a country to which the Load Line
Convention applies being an existing ship of one hundred
and fifty tons gross or more or being a new ship of twenty-
four metres or more in length shall be detained and no
proceedings shall be taken against the owner or master
thereof by virtue of the said section except after an inspection
by a surveyor as provided by section 323; and]
(b) the expression the appropriate load line in relation to any
ship other than an Indian ship shall mean
(i) in the case of a ship in respect of which there is
produced on such an inspection as aforesaid a valid
international load line certificate, 1[or, as the case may
be, an international load line exemption certificate] the
load line appearing by the certificate to indicate the
maximum depth to which the ship is for the time being
entitled under the Load Line Convention, to be loaded;
(ii) in any other case, the load line which corresponds with
the load line indicating the maximum depth to which the
ship is for the time being entitled under the load line rules
to be loaded, or, if no load line on the ship corresponds
Inspection of ships as aforesaid, the lowest load line thereon.
other than Indian 327. The provisions of section 315 shall apply, in the same manner as
ships belonging to they apply to Indian ships, to all ships registered in a country to
non-convention which the Load Line Convention does not apply while they are
countries within Indian jurisdiction.
Load line certificates 328. (1) The provision of this Part relating to the issue, effect, duration
and international load 1
[and cancellation of Indian load line certificates or, as the
line exemption case may be, international load line exemption certificates]
certificates of ships shall apply to ships other than Indian ships as they apply to
other than Indian Indian ships subject to the following modifications, namely:
ships (a) any such certificate may be issued in respect of any
such ship as in respect of an Indian ship provided that
1 Subs. by MS (Amend.) Act 1970
Loading of timber
Power to make rules 330. (1) The Central Government shall, subject to the condition of
as to timber cargo previous publication, make rules (hereafter in this section
referred to as the timber cargo rules) as to the conditions
on which timber may be carried as cargo in any uncovered
space on the deck of any Indian ship.
(2) The timber cargo rules may prescribe a special load line to
be used only when the ship is carrying timber as cargo on
deck and the conditions on which such special load line
may be assigned, and may further prescribe either generally
or with reference to particular voyages and seasons the
manner and position in which such timber is to be stowed
and the provisions which are to be made for the safety of
the crew.
(3) Any surveyor may at any reasonable time, inspect any Indian
ship carrying timber as cargo in any uncovered space on
her deck for the purpose of seeing whether the timber cargo
rules have been complied with.
(4) The foregoing provisions of this section and the timber cargo
rules shall apply to ships other than Indian ships while they
are within Indian jurisdiction as they apply to Indian ships.
Dangerous goods and grain cargoes
Carriage of danger- 331. (1) The Central Government may make rules for regulating in
ous goods the interests of safety the carriage of dangerous goods in
ships.
[(2)
1
In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the
foregoing power, such rules may provide for the classification,
packing, labelling and marking of such goods or any class
of such goods, stowing of such goods (whether with or
without other cargo) including plans for stowing, the fixing
of the maximum quantity of any such class of goods which
may be carried in different ships or classes of ships, and
such other matters relating to dangerous goods as require
to be provided for implementing the provisions of the Safety
Convention.]
(3) The owner, master or agent of a ship carrying or intending
to carry any dangerous goods as cargo and about to make
a voyage from a port in India shall furnish in advance the
prescribed particulars of the ship and the cargo to such
authority as may be prescribed for the purpose.
(4) A surveyor may inspect the ship for the purpose of securing
that any rules under this section are complied with.
(5) If any of rules made in pursuance of this section is not
Unseaworthy ships
Unseaworthy ship not 334. (1) Every person who sends or attempts to send an Indian ship
to be sent to sea to sea from any port in India in such an unseaworthy state
that the life of any person is likely to be thereby endangered
shall, unless he proves that he used all reasonable means
to insure her being sent to sea in a seaworthy state or that
her going to sea in such unseaworthy state was under the
circumstances reasonable and justifiable, be guilty of an
offence under this sub-section.
(2) Every master of an Indian ship who knowingly takes such
ship to sea in such unseaworthy state that the life of any
person is likely to be thereby endangered shall, unless he
proves that her going to sea in such unseaworthy state was,
under the circumstances, reasonable and justifiable, be
guilty of an offence under this sub-section.
(3) For the purpose of giving such proof, every person charged
under this section may give evidence in the same manner
as any other witness.
(4) No prosecution under this section shall be instituted except
by, or with the consent of, the Central Government.
(5) A ship is unseaworthy within the meaning of this Act when
the materials of which she is made, her construction, the
qualifications of the master, the number, description and
qualifications of the crew including officers, the weight,
description and stowage of the cargo and ballast, the
condition of her hull and equipment, boilers and machinery
are not such a to render her in every respect fit for the
proposed voyage or service.
Obligation of owner to 335. (1) In every contract of service, express or implied between the
crew with respect to owner of an Indian ship and the master or any seaman
sea worthiness thereof, and in every contract of apprenticeship whereby
any person is bound to serve as an apprentice on board any
such ship, there shall be implied, notwithstanding any
agreement to the contrary, an obligation on the owner that
such owner and the master, and every agent charged with
the loading of such ship or the preparing thereof for sea, or
the sending thereof to sea, shall use all reasonable means
to ensure the seaworthiness of such ship for the voyage at
the time when such voyage commences, and to keep her in
a seaworthy state during the voyage.
(2) For the purpose of seeing that the provisions of this section
have been complied with, the Central Government may, either
at the request of the owner or otherwise, arrange for a survey
of the hull, equipment or machinery of any sea-going ship
by a surveyor.
340. When a complaint is made to the Central Government or a detaining Power to require from
officer that an Indian ship is unsafe, it shall be in the discretion of complainant security
the Central Government or the detaining officer, as the case may for costs, etc.
be, to require the complainant to give security to the satisfaction
of the Central Government or the detaining officer for the costs and
compensation which such complainant may become liable to pay
as hereinafter mentioned:
Provided that, where the complaint is made by one-fourth, being not
less than three, of the seamen belonging to the ship, and is not in the
opinion of the Central Government or the detaining officer frivolous or
vexatious, such security shall not be required; and the Central
Government or the detaining officer shall, if the complaint is made in
sufficient time before the sailing of the ship, take proper steps to
ascertain whether the ship ought to be detained under this Part.
341. Where a ship is detained in consequence of any complaint and the Costs, etc., payable
circumstances are such that the Central Government is liable under by Central
this Part to pay to the owner of the ship any costs or compensation, Government
the complainant shall be liable to pay to the Central Government all recoverable from
such costs and compensation as the Central Government incurs, or complainant
is liable to pay, in respect of the detention and survey of the ship.
342. When a ship other than an Indian ship is in a port in India and is, Application to ships
whilst at that port, unsafe by reason of the defective condition of other than Indian
her hull, equipment or machinery, or by reason of overloading or ships of provisions as
improper loading, the provisions of this Part with respect to the to detention
detention of ships shall apply to that ship as if she were an Indian
ship with the following modifications, namely:
(a) a copy of the order for the provisional detention of the ship
shall forthwith be served on the consular officer for the country
to which the ship belongs at or nearest to the port in which
such ship is detained;
(b) the consular officer, at the request of the owner or master of
the ship, may require that the person appointed by the
Central Government to survey the ship shall be accompanied
by such person as the consular officer may select, and in
that case, if the surveyor and that person agree, the Central
Government shall cause the ship, to be detained or released
accordingly; but, if they differ the Central Government may
act as if the requisition had not been made, and the owner
and master shall have the like right of appeal to a court of
survey touching the report of the surveyor as is hereinbefore
provided in the case of an Indian ship; and
(c) where the owner or master of the ship appeals to the court of
survey, the consular officer, at the request of the owner or
master, may appoint a competent person to be assessor in
the case in lieu of the assessor who, if the ship were an Indian
ship, would be appointed otherwise than by the Central
Government.
PART IX – Commentary
Safety of ship and life at sea, including that of seafarers, passengers etc are primary concerns
of the International Maritime Organisation, which ensures that the flag states assures that the vessels
flying their flag are safe and seaworthy and the port states ensures that they will not permit unseaworthy
ships from entering its waters. At the international level various Conventions touching the divergent
dimensions of vessel, which includes engineering, nautical and life on board the ship, were convened
to bring about uniformity of observance and compliance. Under the auspices of IMO, the International
Convention on Safety of Life at Sea, 19741 touches the aspects of different standards of construction,
equipment and operation, with primary focus on safety.
SOLAS 1974 in its present form is considered to be one of the most important legal
instruments governing safety of ships, which specifies minimum standards for the construction,
equipment and operation of ships. The convention makes it obligatory for the member States to
monitor and to ensure compliance by means of certification and on board inspections. In other
words, requisite certificates are required to be carried on board ship to show that they have been
inspected and have met the required standards. In other words these certificates carried on board the
vessel are normally accepted as proof by authorities from other States that the vessel concerned has
reached the required standard, but in some cases further action can be taken. Amended from time to
time, the present form of the Convention, which has the tacit acceptance procedure for amendment
implementation, had its previous versions adopted in the 1914, 1929, 1948 and 1960. Maritime
Safety Committee (MSC) of IMO has played a vital role in improvising the Convention SOLAS, 1974.
Further, the International Convention on Load Lines 1966, which stipulates marking of load
line as mandatory to indicate the draft of the ship and the limit to which a ship may be loaded in order
to assure safe navigation. The determination of the freeboard2 of ships are verified by classification
societies International Convention on Load Lines 1966 provides for ship’s surveys and the issuance,
duration, validity and acceptance of International Load Line Certificates. It also stipulates for relevant
State control measures subject to agreed exemptions and exceptions. Later, a Protocol to amend
the International Convention on Load Lines 1966 was adopted in the year 1988. The adoption of the
1998 Protocol is to harmonise the survey and certification requirement of the International Convention
on Load Lines 19663 with requirements contained in the SOLAS 1974 and the International Convention
for the Prevention of Pollution From Ships, 1973/19784.
1
Hereinafter referred to as SOLAS 1974
2
Section 3(14) defines “free board” as the distance measured vertically downwards, amidships from the upper edge
of the deckline to the upper edge of the related loadline.
3
See Section 3(20) which defines Load Line Convention 1966, “as amended from time to time”. The International
Convention on Load Lines, signed in London on 5 April 1966 and further revised in 2003; hereinafter referred as CLL
66/88.
4
Popularly known as MARPOL 73/78.
India notified adoption of SOLAS 1974, by accession5, on 16 June 1976 and the same
entered into force on 25 May 1980. Part IX of the Merchant Shipping Act 1958 stipulates the duty of
Central Government to notify in the official gazette, the list of States, where the conventions of CLL
66/88 and the Safety Convention6 are inapplicable. As mentioned earlier, the Central Government is
empowered to prescribe requirements of issuance of Safety Convention Certificates7 pertaining to
safety of hull, equipment and machinery of Indian ships through Rules, whereby which the obligations
that India has undertaken by ratification of the international conventions. Further, the technical
requirements as provided under the COLREGS,8 as ratified by India,9 are implemented by in the MS
Act 1958 provisions10 by means of Rules11 and executive orders12.
MS Act 1958 ensures that India as a flag-State should ensure that the Indian ships/vessels
should comply with COLREGS 1972 and India as a port-State has mandated that foreign ships and
vessels sailing within Indian jurisdiction should also comply with the same. Also as a condition
precedent the ships/vessels have to possess relevant and applicable statutory certificates failing
which the port clearance will be denied and detained.
The Central Government is also entrusted with the power to make Rules and Regulations
pertaining to Life Saving Appliances (LSA) and Fire Appliances, Radio /communication, direction
finders, signalling lamp and stability information requirements and the like. MS Act 1958 assures the
compliance of the statutory requirements through inspections on board the vessel by surveyors.
Further, the inspectors are also entrusted with the duty to inspect the ship as and when the same is
decided to be conducted.
The Part also deals with the provisions relating to Safety Certificates, Safety equipment
certificates, Safety radio telegraphy Certificates, exemption certificates, issuance of load lines
certificates, and provisions relating to ships other than Indian ships, issuance of certificates both
5
See Article 15 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969.
6
Section 3(37) of the MS Act 1958 of 1958 defines “Safety Convention” as convention for the Safety of Life at Sea
signed at London on the 01st day of November, 1974 as amended from time to time.
7
MS Act 1958 under Section 3 (38) defines “safety convention certificates” as certificates issued under PART IX or
PART IX A, which are to mean passenger ship safety certificate, special trade passenger ship safety certificates,
special trade passenger ship space certificate, qualified passenger ship safety certificate, cargo safety construction
certificate, qualified cargo ship safety construction certificate, cargo ship safety equipment certificate, qualified cargo
ship safety equipment certificate, cargo ship safety radio telegraphy certificates, cargo ship safety radio telephony
certificate, exemption certificates, nuclear passenger ship safety certificate, and nuclear cargo ship safety certificate
8
COLREGS is the short form for the International Regulations for Preventing Collision at Sea, 1972.
9
Ratified COLREGS on 30th May 1973 and entered into force on 15th July 1977.
10
Section 285 to Section 287. On liability aspects of collision and / or accidents at Sea is dealt with under Part X of the
MS Act 1958.
11
Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Collision at Sea) Regulations 1975 conforms with COLREG 1972; Merchant Shipping
(Prevention of Collision at Sea) Regulations 1975 CORRIGENDA; Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Collision at Sea)
Amendment Regulations, 1986 conforming to the 1981 amendments; Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Collision at
Sea) Amendment Regulations, 1990 conforming to the 1987 amendments; Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Collision
at Sea) Amendment Regulations, 1990- corrigendum; and Merchant Shipping Notice No. 9 of 1998 on the Contravention
of International Regulations for Preventing Collision at Sea (IRPCs) 1972.
12
Merchant Shipping Notice 17 of 2010, no: 70-NT(1)/2008-pt, dated 08.11.2010, Prevention of Collision of Ships in Ports
and at High Seas
inside and outside India. Under this Part, the Act also focuses on nature of cargo such as timber
cargo, carriage of dangerous goods, grain loading plan and carriage of grain and safe handling
and carriage of such cargoes. Further, it vests powers with the Central Government to make Rules
pertaining to the provisions of the Act.
Part IX also extends to the sub division load lines, liability for cost of detention and certain
ships that are exempted from application of this Part, either due to the nature of its functions or due
to the purpose of use. Further, as provided in all other Parts, the Central Government is empowered
to issue certificates and formulate Rules under this Part. This of MS Act 1958 is very dynamic in its
improvisation. For instance, it is very evident that the Director General of Shipping along with the
legislative body is acting at a good pace in adopting the amendments that have been brought to the
SOLAS 1974. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) adopted SOLAS Protocol, 198815, which
dealt with a harmonised survey system for ships, in order to lessen the problems caused by survey
dates and intervals between surveys which do not coincide, covering international shipping regulations
including the codes and conventions.
The SOLAS Protocol 1988 replaces and abrogates the earlier Protocol of 1978 rooted in
the Convention 1974. The parties to the Convention undertake to bring into effect the Protocol and its
Annex, which modifies and adds provisions to the Annex of the Convention concerning, inter alia,
definition of terms, inspection, surveys and control of ships, and issuance, endorsement and duration
of certificates. The parties agree to communicate to the Secretary-General of the IMO, inter alia the
measures they have adopted on the various matters within the scope of the Protocol (art. III). The
1988 Protocol relating to harmonized surveys and certification were not adopted by India earlier.
Later by virtue of Merchant Shipping notice No. 14 of 2001, it has been made clear that in cases
where any extension of surveys including inspection of the outside of the ships bottom or dry-dock
etc. are granted due to some unavoidable circumstances, harmonized surveys and certification is to
be implemented.
13
Sealand shipping and Export Pvt. Ltd. ……Vs. Kin Ship Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. …… 2011(5) Bom CR 572, 2011 (7)
ALL M R 19, 2011(113) BOM LR 2142.
14
In case of an Indian ship the power to detain is provided under Section 336 of the MS Act 1958 and in the case of
foreign flag ship, the detention will be carried out as provided under Section 342 of the MS Act 1958
15
Entered into force on 3rd February, 2000.
1 [PART IXA
NUCLEAR SHIPS
Application of Act to 344A. (1) This part applies only to nuclear ships.
nuclear ships
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, a nuclear ship
shall not be required to obtain or produce any certificate referred
to in sub-clauses (i) to (ix) of cause (38) of section 3 or, as the
case may be, any like valid safety convention certificate.
(3) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official
Gazette, direct that any of the provisions of this Act (other
than the provisions of this Part and the provisions of section
456) specified in the notification
(a) shall not apply to nuclear ships; or
(b) shall apply to nuclear ships, only with such exceptions,
modification and adaptations as may be specified in
the notification.
(4) A copy of every notification proposed to be issued under
sub-section (3) shall be laid in draft before both Houses of
Parliament for a period of not less than thirty days while
they are in session and it shall not be issued until it has
been approved, whether with or without modification, by each
House of Parliament.
Nuclear passenger 344B. (1) If in respect of any Indian nuclear passenger or cargo ship
ship safety certifi- the Central Government is satisfied that the ship has been
cates and nuclear surveyed in accordance with this Act and has been
cargo ship safety inspected by a person appointed in this behalf by the Central
certificates Government and has complied with such special
requirements, if any, as that person has, after such
inspection, specified, the Central Government may issue-
(a) in the case of a passenger ship, a nuclear passenger
ship safety certificate;
(b) in the case of a cargo ship, a nuclear cargo ship safety
certificate;
(2) A certificate issued under sub-section (1) shall be in force
for a period of twelve months from the date of issue or for
such shorter period as may be specified in the certificate.
Prohibition of pro- 344C. (1) No Indian nuclear ship shall proceed on a voyage from any
ceeding to sea port or place in India to any port or place outside India unless
without certificates there is in force in respect of the ship-
(a) a nuclear passenger ship safety certificate, if she is a
passenger ship;
(b) a nuclear cargo ship safety certificate, if she is a cargo
ship.
Notice of accidents 344G. (1) Where an Indian nuclear ship meets with an accident and
to nuclear ships such accident is likely to lead to environmental hazards, the
master of the ship shall forthwith give notice of the accident
(a) to such officer or authority as may be specified in this
behalf by the Central Government; and
(b) if the ship is in or intends to enter the territorial waters
of a foreign State, also to the appropriate Governmental
authority of the State.
(2) Where a nuclear ship other than an Indian ship meets with an
accident of the nature specified in sub-section (1) while she is
in the territorial waters of, or at a port in, India, the master of
the ship shall forthwith give notice of the accident to the officer
or authority specified under clause (a) of sub-section (1).
(3) On receipt of notice under sub-section (1) or sub-section
(2), the officer or authority specified under clause (a) of sub-
section (1) shall issue such directions as he thinks
necessary and expedient in the circumstances of the case
and investigate into the causes of the accident in such manner
as may be prescribed.
(4) A copy of the directions issued under sub-section (3) and a
report of the findings of the investigation shall be sent to the
Central Government within such time as may be prescribed.
(5) Where a nuclear ship other than an Indian ship meets with
an accident of the nature specified in sub-section (1) at any
port or place outside India and intends to enter the territorial
waters of India in a damaged condition, the master of such
ship shall give notice of the nature of the accident and the
condition of the ship in such form as may be prescribed to
the officer or authority specified under clause (a) of sub-
section (1) and shall comply with such directions as that
officer or authority may give.
(6) The provisions of this section are in addition to and not in
derogation of the provisions of Part XII of this Act.
Application of certain 344H. (1) The provisions of sections 228 to 231 (inclusive) shall, so far
sections to or in as may be, apply to and in relation to every certificate issued
relation to certain by the Central Government under section 344B in the same
certificates under manner as they apply to and in relation to a certificate of survey.
section 344B (2) The provisions of section 309A shall apply to and in relation
to a nuclear ship surveyed for the purpose of issue of a
certificate under section 344B as they apply to and in relation
to a ship surveyed for the purpose of issue of a safety
convention certificate under Part IX.
Power to make rules 344I. (1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official
Gazette, make rules to carry out the purposes of this Part.
PART IX – A - Commentary
Part IX A deals with nuclear ships, its design, construction and standards of inspection,
standards of safety, manner of survey, certification and forms of certifications, investigations and
precautions and safety measures for crew against unreasonable radiation and health hazards, disposal
of radioactive wastes, special training and qualifications of master and seamen, and anything and
everything related to certifications including Nuclear Passenger Certificate and Nuclear Cargo Ship
Safety Certificate. This Part is in compliance with the Chapter VIII of SOLAS, 1974, which refers to
Safety of Nuclear Merchant Ships as adopted by General Assembly of International Maritime
Organisation.
The safety certification requirements and possession of the updated Safety Assessment
Operating Manual on board are mandatory under the MS Act 1958, and hence, the same is a
condition precedent for any Indian nuclear ship to proceed on any voyage from any port or place in
India. Further, the Act also stipulates the foreign nuclear ships to give advance notice of arrival, failing
which the nuclear ship will be refused permission to enter Indian territorial waters. Further, the Act
vests the Central Government with the power to make Rules with respect to the provisions mentioned
in Part IX – A and on allied matters such as inspection fees, survey or certification. Although the
application of safety regulations is quite negligible due to lack of existence of nuclear powered
commercial ships that fall within the ambit of MS Act 1958; in the long run, India expected to
transform the usage of fuel in sea transportation from the conventional resources to the usage of
nuclear fuel.
PART IXB*
SECURITY OF SHIPS AND PORT FACILITIES
344J. (1) Subject to sub-section (2), this Part shall apply to- Application
(a) the following types of ships engaged on international voyages,
namely-
(i) passenger ships Including high speed passenger craft;
(ii) cargo ships including high speed craft of five hundred
gross tonnage and above;
(iii) mobile offshore drilling units:
Provided that the Central Government may extend the application
of this Part to those ships which are exclusively engaged on coastal
voyages;
(b) the port facilities serving ships referred to in clause (a):
Provided that the Central Government may, after taking decision,
on the basis of port facility security assessment having carried out under
this Part, extend the application of this Part to those port facilities which,
although used primarily by ships not engaged on international voyages, are
occasionally required, to serve ships arriving or departing on international
voyages.
(2) This Part shall not apply to war ships, naval auxiliaries, or
other ships owned or operated by the Central Government
and used only for non-commercial service by that Government.
344K. In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires,- Definitions
(a) “company” means the owner of the ship who, or any organization
which has assumed the responsibility of operation of the ship from
the owner of such ship and who or which has agreed to take over all
the duties and responsibilities imposed by the International Safety
Management Code;
(b) “declaration of security” means an agreement between ships or a
ship and a port facility specifying therein the security measures to
be complied with;
(c) “designated authority” means such authority as the Central
Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify;
(d) “International Ship and Port Facility Security Code” means the
code for the security of ships and port facilities provided in the
Safety Convention;
(e) “port facility” means any location or area including anchorages or
waiting berths or approaches from seaward and determined by the
Central Government or the designated authority, as the case may
be, where interface between ships or a ship and a port takes place;
* Ins. by MS (Amend.) Act 40 of 2007
344S. Every ship to which this Part applies shall be subject To such control Control Measures.
measures as may be prescribed.
344T. (1) The Central Government may, having regard to the provisions Power to make
of the Safety Convention, make rules to carry out the purposes
of this Part.
(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the
provisions of sub-section (I), such rules may provide-
(a) for alternative or equivalent security levels;
(b) fee to be levied for any service rendered;
(c) any other matter which by this Part is to be, or may be,
prescribed’
PART IX – B - Commentary
With a view to enhance maritime security of ships and port facilities, the International Ship
and Port Facility Security Code1 was adopted. ISPS Code provides for the mandatory requirements
regarding the provisions of Chapter XI – 2 of the SOLAS, 1974 as amended. The comprehensive set
of measures involves international cooperation between member States and respective authorities to
detect security threats and to take preventive measures against security incidents affecting ships or
port facilities used in international trade; to delegate roles and responsibilities to local government to
ensure maritime security, collection and exchange of information; design effective response plans
and to ensure adequate and proportionate security measure ready for immediate response.2
The ISPS Code provides for a standardized, comprehensive and uniform frame work of
measures to enhance, the security and ship and port facilities. The said frame work includes among
others, risk evaluation and recommendations to State-Parties regarding adoption of measures in
events of vulnerability of ships and port facilities, as a direct or indirect consequence of threat and
determination of appropriate security3 levels and measures. This Code applies to the ships engaged
on international voyages including passenger ships, high-speed passenger craft; cargo ships, including
high-speed craft of 500 gross tonnage and upwards and mobile offshore drilling units; and port facilities
serving such ships engaged on international voyages. Further, the ISPS code also provides for
exemptions that can be exercised by member States is in excluding a particular class or category of
vessel or port facility from its application.
Adopting ISPS Code into the Indian legal regime and incorporating the same into the MS Act
1958 falls under Part IX, Section 344 J to Section 344 T. The statute limits its applicability to the
category of measures mentioned in Section 344 J. Under its provisions the MS Act 1958 empowers
the Central Government to prescribe Rules4 pertaining to security measures, alternative or equivalent
security levels, fees to be levied for services rendered, ship security alert system, obligations of
shipping companies and port facilities5, control measures to be adopted by ships, and any other
1
Hereinafter referred as ISPS Code. The Code was brought into force on July 01st, 2004.
2
See ISPS Code Clause 1.2 “Objectives”, SOLAS/CONF.5/34 ANNEX 1
3
See ISPS Code Clause 3.1 on “Application”
4
See NT Branch Circular No.NT/ISPS/SHIP/09/2004 ISPS Circular NO: 44 on “Guidelines on application of security
provisions under SOLAS and the ISPS Code to Trans-Shippers and Port Service Vessels” NT/ISPS/04/2004, -NT(4)/
ISPS/SHIP-PLAN/2003 dated April 19, 2004
5
See Section 344 K which defines “port facility” as any “location or area including anchorages or waiting berths or
approaches from seaward and determined by the Central Government or the designated authority, as the case may
be, where interface between ships or ship and a port take place”.
measures to implement Part IX B6. Further the Act prescribes the duty of the Central Government to
implement “ship identification number and International Ship Security Certificate”.7
In order to ensure compliance with the ISPS Code, complementary provisions in the Indian
Ports Act 19088 had undergone amendments. Section 68 D bridges the gap between Merchant
Shipping Act 1958 and Indian Ports act 1908, with respect to implementation of ISPS Code in the
port facilities.9
6
See Section 344 T of MS Act 1958. Amendment to NT Branch Circular No.NT/ISPS/SHIP/09/2004, Guide on preparation/
Minor amendments to ship security plan (superseded vide ISPS Cir. 1 of 2007), Reporting security incidents by port
facilities, amendment to NT branch Circular No. NT/ISPS/SHIP/02/2006-Guide lines on preparation/Minor amendments to
ship security plan, instructions to ship owners on ISPS verification audits for foreign going and coastal vessels,
instructions to port facility security officers on ISPS verification audits for major ports, non major ports and shipyards.
7
See Section 344 L and Section 344 M of MS Act 1958.
8
Indian Ports Act 1908 (Act 15 of 1908)
9
Section 68 D of the Indian Ports Act reads that “A port facility in India shall comply with all the requirements contained
in Chapter IX – B of the Merchant Shipping Act 1958 (44 of 1958) or the rules made there under so far as they are not
inconsistent with this Act”. Also see Explanation to Section 68 -D.
PART X
COLLISION, ACCIDENTS AT SEA ANDH LIABILITY
Division of loss in 345. (1) Whenever by the fault of two or more ships damage or loss
case of collision is caused to one or more of them or to the cargo of one or
more of them or to any property on board one or more of
them, the liability to make good the damage or loss shall be
in proportion to the degree in which each ship was at fault:
Provided that -
(a) if, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, it
is not possible to establish different degrees of fault,
the liability shall be apportioned equally;
(b) nothing in this section shall operate so as to render
any ship liable for any loss or damage to which her
fault has not contributed;
(c) nothing in this section shall affect the liability of any
person under any contract, or shall be construed as
imposing any liability upon any person from which he
is exempted by any contract or by any provision of law,
or as affecting the right of any person to limit his liability
in the manner provided by law.
(2) For the purposes of this Part, references to damage or loss
caused by the fault of a ship shall be construed as including
references to any salvage or other expenses, consequent
upon that fault, recoverable in law by way of damages.
Damages for per- 346. (1) Whenever loss of life or personal injuries are suffered by any
sonal injury person on board a ship owing to the fault of that ship and of
any other ship or ships, the liability of the owners of the
ships concerned shall be joint and several.
(2) Nothing in this section shall be construed as depriving any
person of any right of defence on which, independently of
this section, he might have relied in an action brought against
him by the person injured, or any person entitled to sue in
respect of such loss of life, or shall affected the right of any
person to limit his liability in cases to which this section
relates in the manner provided by law.
Right of contribution 347. (1) Whenever loss of life or personal injuries are suffered by a
person on board a ship owing to the fault of that ship and of
any other ship or ships and a proportion of the damages is
recovered from the owner of one of the ships which exceeds
the proportion in which she was in fault, the said owner may
recover by way of contribution the amount of the excess
from the owners of the other ship or ships to the extent to
which those ships were respectively in fault:
* The words “Limitation of” omitted by MS (Amend.) Act 1970
PART X – Commentary
Despite each and every measure of safety and security being adopted, accidents that may
extend from collision to personal injury to loss of life to loss of ship herself, might happen at sea.
Under Part X, the MS Act 1958 is equipped to tackle similar situations as mentioned above. The Act
prescribes disbursement/fixation/allocation of liability in the event of incident of collision and/or accident
and the consequences arising thereof. Part X-C prescribes the joint liability of ships involved in
collision and thereby causing damage to cargo or property on board the ship. The standard of
fixation of liability mentioned in the Act is “fault based” and the degree of fault determines contribution
towards damages. Under Part X, the word “damage” encompasses a wider definition and includes
“salvage or a consequence of a proven fault recoverable in law by way of damages”.
For loss of life or personal injury suffered by person on board the ship arising out of fault of
two or more ships, the owners are held jointly and severally liable,1 unless ousted by special contractual
arrangement or exemption by application of statute. If the damages recovered from the ship owner
exceeds his proportion of fault, the ship owner who has made the excess payment can recover the
same from other shipowner(s).2
The master or person in charge of the ship(s) involved in collision is/are duty bound to render
assistance as much as is practical (without danger to his on crew and passengers) and necessary
to save the master, crew and passengers of the other ship involved in the accident. Moreover, the
identity of the ship and her port of registry/ports included in the voyage has to be disclosed. The Act
under Part X speaks about the entry of requirement of statement pertaining to collision in the official
log and reporting to the Central Government within 24 hours by means of notice. In the event of or
apprehension of non appearance of ship, the owner or agent of any Indian Ship should send notice in
writing on loss and reasons to the Central Government. MS Act 1958 provides for specialised provisions
pertaining to shipping casualties and reporting under Part XII.3
1
See Section 345 (2) of the MS Act 1958.
2
Section 347 (1)
3
Detailed commentary available under Part XII.
352F. (1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), the provisions Application of this
of this Part relating to limitation of liability of an owner of a Part to charterer
vessel in respect of claims arising out of an occurrence manager, etc., of a
shall apply to the charterer, manager and operator of the vessel
vessel and to the master, member of the crew and other
servants of the owner, charterer, manager or operator acting
in the course of their employment in the same manner as
they apply in relation to the owner.
Provided that the total limits of liability of the owner and all
other persons referred to in this sub-section in respect of
personal claims and property claims arising on a distinct
occasion shall not exceed the amounts determined in
accordance with the provisions of section 352B.
(2) The master or a member of the crew of a vessel may limit
his liability under sub-section (1) even if the occurrence which
gives rise to a claim against him resulted from the actual
fault or privity of the master and the members of the crew or
any one or more of them:
Provided that where the master or a member of the crew is
at the same time the owner co-owner, charterer, manager
or operator of a vessel, the provisions of this sub-section
shall only apply where such occurrence resulted from any
act, neglect or default committed by the master or, as the
case may, be the member of the crew in his capacity as
master, or, as the case may be, as a member of the crew.
1
[352FA. The Central Government may make rules to carry out the purposes Power to make rules.
of this Part:
Provided that the rules under this Part shall be made having regard
to the provisions of the Convention.
PART X A - Commentary
Shipping is considered to be a privileged industry, where in, the players involved invest huge
amounts of money and the stakes involved are very high. The investment, be it ship as an asset or
the cargo carried, and the like are exposed to high risks. Hence the players involve are granted the
privilege to limit their liability. The limitation of liability for maritime claim is an inevitable part of rule
making by IMO, and is particularly applicable to liability conventions. The International Convention
on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 19761, in its present form, was adopted in the year 1977.
The intention behind the adoption of the convention is to bring about uniformity in the discretion of the
persons entitled to limit their liability. A protocol to the LLMC, 1976 was adopted in the year 1996
and is in force.
However, member states are given the freedom to adopt different conventions presently in
force including the predecessor of LLMC 1976, which is the LLMC, 1956. Unlike other international
conventions, the limits prescribed under the prevailing LLMC 1976 and 1996 Protocol are procedural
in nature and hence, it is up to the State-Parties, where the petition for constituting the Limitation
Fund is heard, to decide the applicability of limits. In other words, persons who hold the statutory
right to limit their liability can exercise their discretion in opting/selecting the country or jurisdiction
which is most favourable to them in terms of lower limits.
India became party to the LLMC 1976 and has also ratified and adopted the 1996 protocol.
The major change in 1996 Protocol is with respect to the hike in the limits wherein the persons
entitled to limit their liability will have to bear a cost higher than that could have been done under the
LLMC 1976. Under Part X-A the Act prescribes that the limitation of liability for damages can be
instituted in respect of claims arising from loss of life or property 2or personal injury or damage to
property occurring on board the vessel or due to operation of the ship or salvage operations or
consequential losses or claims due to loss resulting from delay in carriage.
The MS Act 1958 clearly lays down that the shipowner, salvor, charterer, manager, operator
of the vessel, or the insurer of liability for claims or any person for whose act the ship owner or the
salvor, charterer, manager or operator is held liable and they include master, members of the crew,
can limit his/their liability in accordance with the provisions of LLMC 1976.3 In the happening of an
event as mentioned in Part X A, the person(s) mentioned above can apply to the Court for constitution
of limitation fund. Even if a vessel involved in collision is outside the jurisdiction of Indian territory, the
1
Hereinafter referred as LLMC 1976
2
See Section 352 A. The “property” includes damage to harbour works, basins and waterways and aids to navigation.
Also see Section 116 of Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 which enables port to claim damages for the damage caused to/
losses incurred by its properties.
3
See Section 352 A and Section 352 B read with Section 352 F of the MS Act 1958 1976. Right to limit reiterated in Berner
Shipping inc. Bombay and Anr. Vs. Ms. Kala Ramachandran , AIR 2002 Bom 432, 2002(3) ALLMR 356
jurisdiction enacted by PART XA in matters of suit for limiting the liability, can be entertained by the
court. Part XA is a self contained Code.4
As stipulated under the convention, constitution of the fund or claiming limitation will not
constitute an admission of liability on the part of the person who claims limitation.5 The Act states
that where the provisions of the conventions are not applicable, the limit shall be in accordance with
the Rules made by virtue of powers conferred under Section 352 FA of the MS Act 1958. Further, as
mentioned in the Convention, the MS Act 1958 provides for provisions for constituting of fund under
Section 352 C. The Convention also provides for the discretion of State Parties in exempting the
application of the Convention on certain categories of claims and vessels.
In India claims to which the Convention does not apply are that of the salvage, or contribution
in general average, oil pollution damage6, claims by servants of the ship owner or salvor whose
duties are connected with the ship7, if law prohibits application on nuclear ships, that against shipowner
of nuclear ship in case of nuclear damage.8 Similarly, vessels to which Part X - A do not apply are
(a) ships intended for coastal navigation on or around the coast of India and registered as coastal
vessels under the MS Act 1958.; (b) ships less than 300 tons; (c) air cushion vessels and (d) floating
platforms constructed for exploring or exploiting natural resources of the sea-bed or the subsoil there
of.9
Part X A provides that the High Court shall order for release of a detained ship or property or
security, of which the limitation fund is constituted either in India or in any port of any country which
is a party to the LLMC, 1976.10 It may be noted that the elaborate measures in bringing into force the
Rules are made by the Central Government. The same is believed to be an attempt to revamp Part X
A and in effectively implementing the provisions. It is understood that changes would extend from
amendments on application of LLMC 1976 limits to claims and vessels that are presently exempted
to the amendments to enforce the recently adopted 1996 Protocol to the LLMC 1976. Whereas it
may be noted that on international plane, attempts are being made for countries to adopt newer
limits which are higher as far as in terms of value are concerned.
4
Snp Shipping Services Pvt. Ltd. And Ors. Vs. Kara Mara Shipping Co. Ltd. And Ors. 1997(4) ALLMR 590, 1997 (99)
BOMLR 651
5
Explanation 1 to Section 352 A.
6
Separate limits are provided in the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 1992. Hence in
order to avoid duplication and for the convenience of uniformity, the limits prescribed under LLMC 1976 are excluded
from its application on claims pertaining to oil pollution damage
7
Section 352 A (3)(c) provides for additional conditions.
8
Section 352 (Ä)(3)
9
Section 352 E of the MS Act 1958.
10
Gujarat Ambuja Cement Ltd. Vs. Sealand Shipping and Exports Pvt Ltd. And Anr. 2003(4) ALL MR 644, 2003(6) Bom CR
647
1 [PART XB
CIVIL LIABILITY FOR OIL POLLUTION DAMAGE
Application 352G. This Part applies to-
(a) every Indian ship wherever it is; and
(b) every foreign ship while it is at a port or place in India or
within the territorial waters of India or any marine areas
adjacent thereto over which India has, or may hereafter have,
exclusive jurisdiction in regard to control of marine pollution
under the Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive
Economic Zone and other Maritime Zones Act, 1976, or
any other law for the time being in force.
Definitions 2
[352H. In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires,-
(a) “incident” means any occurrence, or series of occurrences
having the same origin, which causes pollution damage or
creates a grave and imminent threat of causing such
damage;
(b) “Liability Convention” means the International Convention
on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 1992 as amended
from time to time;
(c) “oil” means any persistent hydro carbon mineral oil such as
crude oil, fuel oil, heavy diesel oil, lubricating oil whether
carried on board a ship as cargo or in the bunker of such
ship;
(d) “owner” means-
(i) the person registered as owner of the ship;
(ii) in the absence of registration, the person owning the
ship; or
(iii) in the case of a ship owned by a foreign State, the
person registered in that State as operator of the ship;
(e) “person” means any individual or partnership or any public
or private body, whether corporate or not, including a State
or any of its constituent sub-divisions;
(f) “pollution damage” means-
(i) loss or damage caused outside the ship by
contamination resulting from escape or discharge of
oil from the ship, wherever such escape or discharge
occurs, provided that compensation for impairment of
the environment other than losses or profit from such
impairment shall be limited to costs of reasonable
measures of reinstatement actually undertaken or to
1 Ins. by MS (Amend.) Act 1983 be undertaken;
2 Subs. by MS (Amend.) Act 2002
(5) No claim for pollution damage shall be made against any owner
otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of this section.
[(6)
1
Without prejudice to any right of recourse of the owner
against third parties, no claim for compensation for pollution
damage may be made against-
(a) the servants or agents of the owner or the members of
the crew;
(b) the pilot or any other person who, without being a
member of the crew, renders services for the ship;
(c) any charterer (howsoever described, including a bare-
boat charterer), manager or operator of the ship;
(d) any person performing salvage operations with the
consent of the owner or on the instructions of a
competent public authority;
(e) any person taking preventive measures;
(f) all servants or agents of persons mentioned in clauses
(c), (d) and (e), unless the incident causing such
damage occurred as a result of their personal act or
omission committed or made with the intent to cause
such damage, or recklessly and with knowledge that
such damage would probably result.]
Limitation of liability. 352J. [(1)
1
The owner shall be entitled to limit his liability under this
Part, in respect of any one or more incident, as may be
prescribed.
(2) The owner shall not be entitled to limit his liability if it is
proved that the incident causing pollution damage occurred
as a result of his personal act or omission committed or
made with the intent to cause such damage, or recklessly
and with knowledge that such damage would probably result.]
Consolidation of 352K. (1) (a) Any owner desiring to avail of the benefit of limitation
limitation fund of his liability under sub-section (1) of section 352J
shall make an application to the High Court for
constitution of a limitation fund (hereafter in this Part
referred to as fund).
(b) Such fund may be constituted either by depositing the
sum with the High Court or by furnishing bank guarantee
or such other security as, in the opinion of the High
Court, is satisfactory.
(2) (a) The insurer or any other person providing financial
security to the owner may apply to the High Court for
constitution of the fund under sub-section (1) and any
fund so constituted shall have the same effect as if it
were constituted by the owner.
1 Subs. by MS (Amend.) Act 2002
352R. The Central Government may make rules prescribing - Power to make rules
(a) the form of certificate to be issued by the Director-General
under sub-section (2) of section 352N and the particulars
which it may contain;
(b) fees which may be charged for issue of certificates under
section 352N.
1
[(c) the limits of liability of owner in respect of one or more incident
of pollution damage or other requirements having regard to
the provisions of the Liability Convention.]
PART X – B -Commentary
Oil Pollution has been considered as one of the consequences in unfortunate events of
collision and accidents caused by ship at sea. The liability for the damage caused due to oil pollution
is rooted in respect to jurisdiction as stipulated under United Nations Convention on the Law of the
Sea 19821. In compliance with the obligations undertaken by ratification of UNCLOS 1982, India has
amended and incorporated territorial limits and jurisdiction, within the Territorial Waters, Continental
Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and other Maritime Zones Act 1976 or any other law in force.
Though classified previously as oil pollution in general, distinctly classified liability regimes for
pollution by oil according to its source were developed.2
Succeeding its predecessor3, the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution
Damage, 19924, was adopted to ensure adequate compensation is made available, in cases where
damage due to oil pollution is caused by maritime causalities involving ships carrying oil as cargo.
The CLC 1992 provides for strict liability as the basis for fixation of liability.
Part X- B provides for exclusive jurisdiction for civil liability with regard to damage due to oil
pollution caused by every Indian ship, irrespective of the location of the oil pollution damage as well as
foreign ships that are within the territorial waters of India or any marine areas adjacent thereto. The
Convention covers both pollution by oil spillage from cargo and bunker carried as fuel of the ship from
seagoing vessel and sea borne craft constructed or adapted for the carriage of oil in bulk as cargo.
The Act makes it mandatory that every Indian ship carrying 2000 tons or more oil in bulk as
cargo shall be covered with adequate insurance or other financial security. Accordingly the Director
General of Shipping shall issue certificates of valid insurance cover or financial security to Indian
ships and the same can be issued to foreign ships on production of satisfactory evidence relating to
maintenance of insurance or financial security. To this effect an unpaid insurance premium was held
to be enforceable in India by a Protection and Indemnity club incorporated in a foreign jurisdiction.5 It
further, embodies provisions for limitation of liability6, subrogation of rights to compensation, constitution
of limitation fund, consolidation of claims & disbursement of fund/damages amongst claimants, and
rule77 making powers for implementation.
1
Hereinafter referred to as UNCLOS 1982. India ratified the UNCLOS 1982 on June 29, 1995.
2
For instance International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, 2001, adopted in March 23,
2001, Entry inforce November 21, 2008. Popularly known as Bunker Convention 2001. India is not yet a party to Bunker
Convention 2001.
3
India has denunciated of the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 1969.
4
Hereinafter referred to as CLC 1992
5
Liverpool and London SP and I Asson Ltd. vs. M.V. Sea Success I and Anr. (2004) 9 SCC 512.
6
Part X – A has no application on Part X-B
7
See Merchant Shipping (Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage) Rules, 2008.
Part X C provides for implementation of International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution
Damage 1992 as amended from time to time. Further, the MS Act 1958 stipulates a direct link to the
Fund 1992 throughout its provisions mentioned under Part X-B. It encompasses the persons liable to
make contributions to the fund, amount to be paid, power of the Central Government to account the
payment and promptness of payment by persons, liability of fund, jurisdiction of High Court,
extinguishment of claims, subrogation of rights to compensation and above all for the powers of
Central Government to make Rules3 pertaining to the provisions under Part X-C and in turn the
purposes of 1992 Fund Convention.
1
Hereinafter referred to as Fund 1992
2
Although India was a party to the Fund Convention 1971, the same was later denounced and India became party to the
Fund Protocol
3
See Merchant Shipping (International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage) Rules, 2008
PART XI
NAVIGATION
Method of giving helm 353. No person on any Indian ship shall, when the ship is going ahead,
orders give a helm or steering order containing the word starboard or right or
any equivalent of “Starboard” or “right” unless he intends that the
head of the ship shall move to the “right” or give a helm or steering
order containing the word port of “left” or any equivalent of “port” or
“left” unless he intends that the head of the ship shall move to the left.
Duty to report dan- 354. The master of any Indian ship on meeting with dangerous ice, a
gers to navigation dangerous derelict, a tropical storm or any other direct danger to
navigation 1[or on encountering sub-freezing air temperatures
associated with gale force winds, causing severe ice accretions
on super-structures or strong gale for which no storm warning has
been received by him] shall send information accordingly by all
means of communication at his disposal and in accordance with
such rules as the Central Government may make in this behalf to
ships in the vicinity and to such authorities on shore as may be
prescribed by those rules.
Explanation: For the purpose of this section the expression “tropical
storm” means a hurricane, typhoon, cyclone or other storm of a
similar nature, and the master of a ship shall be deemed to have
met with a tropical storm if he has reason to believe that there is
such a storm in the vicinity.
Communication of 1
[354A. (1) Where an authority prescribed under section 354 receives
intelligence regarding intelligence from any source of any danger to navigation
dangers to navigation mentioned in that section, that authority shall, as soon as
possible, communicate such intelligence to such ships and
authorities as he may deem proper.
(2) The intelligence shall be communicated in such manner and
subject to such terms and conditions as may be prescribed:
Provided that no fees shall be levied for communicating any
intelligence under this section to a ship.]
Obligation to render 355. (1) The master of an Indian ship on receiving at sea a signal of
assistance on distress or information from any source that a vessel or aircraft
reveiving signal of is in distress shall proceed with all speed to the assistance of
distress the persons in distress (informing them if possible that he is
doing so) unless he is unable or in the special circumstances
of the case considers it unreasonable or unnecessary to do so
or unless he is released from such obligation under the
provisions of sub-section (3) or sub-section (4).
(2) Where the master of any ship in distress has requisitioned
any Indian ship that has answered his call, it shall be the
duty of the master of the requisitioned ship to comply with
PART XI – Commentary
At the international level, IMO has taken a lead role in adopting the International Convention
on Maritime Search and Rescue, 19791. India is a party to the SAR 1979. Like any other member
State, India also has the obligation to implement the SAR 1979 within its domestic regime. The
“performance of distress monitoring, communication, coordination of SAR functions, including provision
of medical advice, initial medical assistance or medical evacuation, through the use of public and
private resources including co-operating aircraft, vessels and other craft and installations”2 are some
of the obligations under the provisions of the SAR 1979 that requires implementation by India.
Part XI deals with navigational aspects of ships. Primarily, it focuses on the mode of
operation, giving orders including helm orders, communication, reporting danger and the like; pertaining
to navigation of ships. Reporting and communicating dangers to navigation has thus been made an
obligation on the part of master of an Indian ship and the authority under Section 354.
The officer appointed by the Central Government, under Part XI, also has the obligation to
convey the information so received regarding presence of danger to navigation to such ships and
authorities as it may deem proper. Further, on receiving a signal of distress or information that a
vessel or Air Craft is in distress, master of an Indian ship is duty bound to render assistance to a
vessel or Air Craft which is in distress. As provided under Section 355 and Section 355-A, unless
found impossible to help due to apprehension of danger to his own ship or passengers, master of
every Indian ship is duty bound to render assistance to every person, who is in danger of being last
found at sea.3 A deviation from the aforementioned duties of the master has to be entered in the log
book.
1
Hereinafter referred to as SAR 1979.
2
See “NATIONAL MARITIME SEARCH AND RESCUE PLAN – 2013", a publication by National Maritime Search and
Rescue Board, India which entered into force from April 05, 2013
3
See MS Notice no 07 of 2010 on “Ship Reporting System in Indian waters – INDSAR/INSPIRES”, No 10-NT(4)/1995 –
NCSO dated September 03, 2010.
PART XIA
PREVENTION AND CONTAINMENT OF POLLUTION OF THE SEA BY OIL
1
Application [356A. (1) Save as otherwise provided, this Part shall apply to-
(a) oil tankers of one hundred and fifty tons gross or more,
other ships of four hundred tons gross or more and off-
shore installations; and
(b) incidents of marine casualty or acts relating to such
casualty occurring with grave and imminent danger to
Indian coast line or related interests from pollution or
threat of pollution in the sea by deliberate, negligent or
accidental release of oil, ballast water, noxious liquid
and other harmful substances into sea including such
incidents occurring on the high seas.
(2) This Part shall not apply to any war ship or other ships owned
or operated by the Government and used for the time being
on Government non-commercial service.
Definitions 356B. In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires,-
(a) “ballast” means any solid or liquid placed in a ship to increase
the draft to change the trim, to regulate the stability, or to
maintain stress load within such limits as may be prescribed;
(b) “cargo” includes ballast and ship’s stores and fuel;
(c) “coasts” has the meaning assigned to it in section 357;
(d) “coastal waters” means any part of the territorial waters of
India, or any marine areas adjacent thereto over which India
has, or, may hereafter have, exclusive jurisdiction in regard
to control of marine pollution under the Territorial Waters,
Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and other
Maritime Zones Act, 1976, or any other law for the time being
in force;
(e) “Convention” means the International Convention for the
Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973 including its Protocol
of 1978, as amended from time to time in the manner
specified therein;
(f) “international pollution prevention certificate” means any
Certificate issued in accordance with the provisions of
Pollution Prevention Conventions and Protocols thereto which
are acceded to by India;
(g) “mile” means a nautical mile of 1,852 metres;
(h) “noxious liquid substance” means any substance which has
been designated as such by rules made under this Part;
(i) drainage and other waste from any form of toilets, urinals
and Water Closet scuppers;
(ii) drainage from medical premises (dispensary, sick bay
and other like places) via wash basins, wash tubs and
scuppers located in such premises;
(iii) drainage from spaces containing living animals; or
(iv) other waste water when mixed with the drainages
specified above;
(4) A valid international pollution prevention certificate issued in
respect of an oil tanker or a ship, other than an Indian ship,
by the Government of the country to which the ship belongs
shall, subject to such rules as the Central Government may
make in this behalf, have the same effect in India as the
corresponding certificate issued in respect of an Indian ship
has under this Part.
Issue of Certificates 356D. (1) The Central Government may, at the request of the
for foreign ships in Government of a country to which the Convention applies,
India and Indian cause any international pollution prevention certificate to be
ships in foreign issued in accordance with the Convention in respect of an
countries oil tanker or other ship in that country, if it is satisfied that
such certificate can properly be issued, and where a
certificate is so issued, it shall contain a statement that it
has been issued on request.
(2) The Central Government may request the Government of a
country to which the Convention applies, to issue any
international pollution prevention certificate in accordance
with the Convention in respect of a ship and the certificate
issued in pursuance of such a request containing a statement
that it has been so issued shall have the same effect as if it
had been issued by the Central Government under this Act.
Requirement for 356E. For the purpose of preventing or reducing discharges of harmful
construction and substances or mixtures containing such substances from the oil
equipment in ships to tankers or other ships, the Central Government may make rules
prevent pollution requiring Indian Oil tankers and other Indian ships to be fitted with
such equipment and to comply with such requirements for
construction, survey of equipments and structure of such oil tankers
or other ships and specifying conditions for making of surveys of all
oil tankers or other ships, as may be prescribed, prior to issuing of
international pollution prevention certificates.
Explanation.- For the purposes of this section, “harmful substance”
means any substance which, if introduced into the sea, is liable to
create hazards to human health, harm living resources and marine
life, damage amenities or interfere with other legitimate uses of the
sea, and includes any substance subject to control by the
Convention.
356F. (1) Every Indian oil tanker or other Indian ship which carries Record books
substancea subject to control by the Convention shall
maintain, as may be required, record books in the prescribed
forms, on board the oil tanker or other ship.
(2) The manner in which record books shall be maintained, the
nature of entries to be made therein, the custody and disposal
thereof, and all other matters relating thereto shall be such
as may be prescribed having regard to the provisions of the
Convention.
356G. (1) A surveyor or any person authorized in this behalf may go, Inspection and
at any reasonable time, on board an oil tanker or other ship control of oil tankers
to which any of the provisions of this Part applies, for the and other ships to
purposes of- which this Part
applies.
(a) ensuring that the prohibitions, restrictions and
obligations imposed by or under this Part are complied
with;
(b) satisfying himself about the adequacy of the measures
taken to prevent pollution;
(c) ascertaining the circumstances relating to an alleged
discharge of a substance which is subject to control
by the Convention from the oil tanker or other ship in
contravention of the provisions of this Part;
(d) inspecting any record required to be maintained on
board; and
(e) checking the validity of the international pollution
prevention certificate.
(2) The surveyor or any such person may, if necessary, make,
without unduly delaying the oil tanker or the other ship, a
true copy of any record of the oil tanker or the other ship and
may require the master of such tanker of ship to certify the
copy to be a true copy and such copy shall be admissible
as evidence of the facts stated therein.
356H. (1) If, on report from a surveyor or other person authorized to Information regarding
inspect an oil tanker or other ship under section 356 G, the contravention of the
Director-General is satisfied that any provision of the provisions of the
Convention has been contravened by such oil tanker or other Convention.
ship within the coastal waters, the Director-General or any
officer authorized by him in this behalf, may-
(a) detain the oil tanker or other ship until the causes of
such contravention are removed to the satisfaction of
the Director-General or the officer authorized by him;
and
(b) proceed against such oil tanker or other ship for recovery
of cost of pollution damage, if any, and the cost of
PART XI A – Commentary
The International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973 as modified by
the protocol of 19781, is concluded to tackle marine pollution arising from ships. As mentioned in the
previous parts, MARPOL 73/78 is one of the pillars of international conventions governing maritime
law. The convention is unique due to its existence prior to UNCLOS 1982. However provisions of
UNCLOS 1982 are wide enough to encompass and accommodate provisions of MARPOL73/782 as
obligations cast upon member states. MARPOL 73/78 contains six annexes, which deal with prevention
of six different forms of marine pollution from ships.3 MARPOL 73/78, makes it obligatory for member
states to accept Annex I and II as preconditions for membership and acceptance of Annexes III to VI
is voluntary. The Convention and its Annexes prescribe requisites of, survey and inspection, design
and construction and issuance of certificates by maritime administrations to ships; with an objective
to prevent marine pollution by oil and other harmful substances from ships.
India is a party to MARPOL73/78 and its Annexes I to VI. Implementation of MARPOL 73/
78 and its Annexes is effected through Part XI-A of the MS Act 1958 and the Rules and byelaws4
made there-under. Part XI A deals with prevention and containment of pollution of sea. The part limits
its application to Oil Tankers of 150 tons gross or more, other ships of 400 tons gross or more and
offshore installations. In order to ensure the implementation of the purpose of provisions, Part XI A,
extends its application to incidents of marine casualty and imminent threat/danger of pollution, to
Indian coast line. Further, this part is applicable only when the cause of pollution is by deliberate,
negligent or accidental RELEASE of Oil, the ballast water, noxious liquid and other harmful substances
into sea, including such incidents occurring on the high seas.
In compliance with the requirements of Convention For Prevention Of Pollution From Ships,
1973 and its protocol of 1978, popularly known as MARPOL 73/78; it has been made mandatory for an
Indian oil tanker or other Indian ship to possess the International Oil Pollution Prevention Certificate
issued by the Central Government along with the International Sewage Pollution Prevention Certificate.
1
Herein after referred to as MARPOL73/78.
2
MARPOL 73/78 in its present form entered into force on October 02,1982. 99.2% of the world’s shipping tonnage are
parties to MARPOL 73/78. See status of Conventions in the IMO website;www.imo.org.
3
Annex I – Fuel, Annex II – Noxious liquid substances carried in bulk, Annex III – Harmful substances carried in packaged
form, Annex IV – Sewage, Annex V – Garbage and Annex VI – Air pollution.
4
See Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Pollution by Oil from Ships) Rules, 2010; Merchant Shipping (Prevention of
Pollution of Merchant Shipping (Control of Pollution by Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk), 2010, which implements
Annex II of MARPOL 73/78; Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Pollution by Harmful Substances Carried by Sea in
Packaged Form) Rules, 2010, which implements Annex III of MARPOL 73/78; Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Pollution
by Sewage from Ships) rules 2010 which deals with implementation of Annex IV of MARPOL 73/78; Merchant Shipping
(Prevention of Pollution by Garbage from Ships) 2009, which deals with implementation of Annex V of the MARPOL
73/78; Engineering Circular no 1 of 2012 on “Ratification and Enforcement of Annex VI of MARPOL 73/78, Regulations
for the Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships”, circular no ENGG/OPP/MARPOL – 38(5)/2004 – Annex VI dated January
30, 2012. Also see www.dgshipping.com
Further, Section 366 C makes it mandatory that the Indian Oil Tanker or any other Indian ship carrying
noxious liquid substances in bulk shall possess the International Pollution Prevention Certificate issued
by the Central Government along with the International Sewage Pollution Prevention Certificate.
MS Act 1958 also considers a valid certificate of an Oil Tanker registered outside India at par
with the certificate issued to an Indian ship under Part XI A. Under this Part, the Central Government
is empowered to prescribe permissible limits of the ballast and noxious liquid substances. Further,
the Act also stipulates the manner and the conditions of survey of oil tanker or other ships, the
inspection and control of ships to which MARPOL 73/78 applies; as a condition precedent for
issuing certificates under Part XI A. It prescribes the necessity for maintenance of oil record book
and creation of oil reception facilities at ports in India.
The Central Government is empowered to levy the pollution cess and to prescribe fees for
inspection survey and issuance of certificates. The MS Act also provides for the power of the Central
Government to issue directions to ships for the purpose of initiating and implementing measures for
preventing or containing pollution of sea by release of oil or noxious liquid substance. Further, the Act
under Section 356 – O, empowers Central Government to make Rules on any of the provisions
covered under Part XI – A.5
5
Ibid
PART XII
INVESTIGATIONS AND INQUIRIES
Definition of “coasts” 357. In this Part, the word coasts includes the coasts of creeks and
tidal rivers.
Shipping casualties 358. (1) For the purpose of investigations and inquiries under this
and report thereof Part, a shipping casualty shall be deemed to occur when
(a) on or near the coasts of India, any ship is lost,
abandoned, stranded or materially damaged;
(b) on or near the coasts of India, any ship causes loss or
material damage to any other ship;
(c) any loss of life ensues by reason of any casualty
happening to or onboard any ship on or near the coasts
of India;
(d) in any place, any such loss, abandonment, stranding,
material damage or casualty as above mentioned
occurs to or on board any Indian ship, and any
competent witness thereof is found in India;
(e) any Indian ship is lost or is supposed to have been
lost, and any evidence is obtainable in India as to the
circumstances under which she proceeded to sea or
was last heard of.
(2) In the cases mentioned in clauses (a), (b) and (c) of sub-
section (1), the master, pilot, harbour master or other person
incharge of the ship, or (where two ships are concerned) in
charge of each ship at the time of the shipping casualty,
and in the cases mentioned in clauses (d) of sub-section
(1), where the master of the ship concerned or (except in
the case of a loss) where the ship concerned proceeds to
any place in India from the place where the shipping casualty
has occurred, the master of the ship, shall, on arriving in
India, give immediate notice of the shipping casualty to the
officer appointed in this behalf by the Central Government.
Report of shipping 359. (1) Whenever any such officer as is referred to in sub-section
casualties to Central (2) of section 358 receives credible information that a shipping
Government casualty has occurred, he shall forthwith report in writing
the information to the Central Government; and may proceed
to make a preliminary inquiry into the casualty.
(2) An officer making a preliminary inquiry under sub-section
(1) shall send a report thereof to the Central Government or
such other authority as may be appointed by it in this behalf.
Application to court 360. The officer appointed under sub-section (2) of section, 358, whether
for formal investiga- he has made a preliminary inquiry or not, may, and, where the
tion Central Government so directs, shall make an application to a
court empowered under section 361, requesting it to make a formal
1 Sec. 365 renumbered as sub-sec. (1) and Ins. sub-sec. (2) by MS (Amend.) Act 1984
369. (1) The court shall, in the case of all investigations or inquiries Report by court to
under this Part, transmit to the Central Government a full Central Government
report of the conclusions at which it has arrived together
with the evidence.
(2) Where the investigation or inquiry affects a master or an officer
of a ship other than an Indian ship who holds a certificate
under the law of any country outside India, the Central
Government may transmit a copy of the report together with
the evidence to the proper authority in that country.
1
[(3) The Central Government shall, on receipt of the investigation
report from the court, cause it to be published in the Official
Gazette.
370. (1) A certificate of a master, mate or engineer which has been Powers of court as to
granted by the Central Government under this Act may be certificates granted
cancelled or suspended by Central
(a) by a court holding a formal investigation into a shipping Government
casualty under this Part if the court finds that the loss,
standing or abandonment of, or damage to, any ship,
or loss of life, has been caused by the wrongful act or
default of such master, mate or engineer;
(b) by a court holding an inquiry under this Part into the
conduct of the master, mate or engineer if the court finds
that he is incompetent or has been guilty of any gross
act of drunkenness, tyranny or other misconduct or in a
case of collision has failed to render such assistance or
give such information as is required by section 348.
(2) At the conclusion of the investigation or inquiry, or as soon
thereafter as possible, the court shall state in open sitting
the decision to which it may have come with respect to the
cancellation or suspension of any certificate and, if
suspension is ordered, the period for which the certificate is
suspended.
(3) Where the court cancels or suspends a certificate, the court
shall forward it to the Central Government together with the
report which it is required by this Part to transmit to it.
371. Where it appears to the court holding an investigation or inquiry Power of court to
that having regard to the circumstances of the case an order of censure master, mate
cancellation or suspension under section 370 is not justified, the or engineer
court may pass an order censuring the master, mate or engineer
in respect of his conduct.
372. (1) 2
[Judicial Magistrate of the first class] specially empowered Power of court to
in this behalf by the Central Government or a 2[Metropolitan remove master and
appoint new master
Part XII provides for investigation and inquiries in shipping casualties. Events amounting to
casualty to be covered under Part XII of the Act include any ship being lost or abandoned or stranded
or materially damaged; or any ship causing loss or material damage to any other ship; or by reason
of any casualty or any loss of life happening to or on board any ship; all the events happening on or
near coasts of India.
Further, the casualty that takes place in any place other than “on or near coast of India” will
be treated as a shipping casualty if there occurs loss/abandonment stranding/material damage to or
on board Indian ship and any competent witness is found (in India). The casualty caused due to any
ship, which is lost or supposed to be lost and that the evidence is obtainable in India as to the
circumstances under which, she proceeded to sea or was last heard about will also be considered
as “shipping casualty” under the MS Act 1958.
The Director General of Shipping has constituted a specialized investigation which will be
headed by the Deputy Director General, who on the receipt of such an information on casualty takes
immediate steps for investigation. Meanwhile, master of the concerned ship to report the shipping
casualty to the officer appointed by the Central Government. Upon application made by the Central
Government through the Designated Officer, the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class and a Metropolitan
Magistrate will make a formal investigation into the shipping casualties including inquiry into charges
against master, mates and/or engineers.
The Act clearly prescribes the constitution, procedure and powers of the Marine Board. In
addition to the aforementioned capacities, the Central Government also has the power to cancel and
suspend the certificates of master, mate or engineers which would amount to be effective on all
ships, if the certificates that are suspended were issued under the MS Act 1958. As far as the
certificate issued outside India is concerned, the effect of cancellation will only be applicable within
India and as far as Indian ships are concerned, the cancellation of foreign certificates will be effected
on Indian ships irrespective of the area in which the ships ply.
Furthermore, the Central Government is also entrusted with wide powers for cancellation or
suspension of certificates without formal investigation, re-hearing/appeal from the court of survey or
reference to scientific persons. The Central Government also has the power to frame rules pertaining
to the procedure of court, fees, fixation of cost against security amount, etc. The Central Government
also has the power to direct an investigation into explosions or fires happening on board the ships
located on or near the coasts of India apart from the reported casualties.
PART XIII
WRECK AND SALVAGE
Wreck
390. In this Part, the word “coasts” includes the coast of creeks and Definition of “coasts”
tidal rivers.
391. (1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Receivers of Wreck
Gazette, appoint any person to be a receiver of wreck (in
this Part referred to as receiver of wreck) to receive and
take possession of wreck and to perform such duties
connected therewith as are hereinafter mentioned, within
such local limits as may be specified in the notification.
(2) A receiver of wreck may, by order in writing, direct that all or
any of his functions under this Part shall, in such
circumstances and subject to such conditions, if any, as
may be specified in the order, be discharged by such person
as may be specified therein and any person while
discharging any such functions shall be deemed to be a
receiver of wreck for the purposes of this Act.
392. Where any vessel is wrecked, stranded or in distress at any place Duty of receiver
on or near the coasts of India, the receiver of wreck, within the where vessel is in
limits of whose jurisdiction the place is situate shall, upon being distress
made acquainted with the circumstance, forthwith proceed there,
and upon his arrival shall take command of all persons present and
shall assign such duties and give such directions to each person
as he thinks fit for the preservation of the vessel and of the lives of
the persons belonging to the vessel and of its cargo and equipment:
Provided that the receiver shall not interfere between the master
and the crew of the vessel in reference to the management thereof
unless he is requested to do so by the master.
393. (1) Whenever a vessel is wrecked, stranded or in distress as Power to pass over
aforesaid, all person may, for the purpose of rendering adjoining lands
assistance to the vessel or of saving the lives of the
shipwrecked persons, or of saving the cargo or equipment
of the vessel, unless there is some public road equally
convenient, pass and repass, either with or without vehicles
or animals, over any adjoining lands without being subject
to interruption by the owner or occupier, so that they do as
little damage as possible and may also on the like condition,
deposit on these lands any cargo or other article recovered
from the ship.
(2) Any damage sustained by an owner or occupier in
consequence of the exercise of the rights given by this
section, shall be a charge on the vessel, cargo or articles in
respect of or by which the damage is occasioned and the
and the proceeds of the sale shall, after defraying the expenses thereof, be
held by the receiver for the same purposes and subject to the same claims,
rights and liabilities as if the wreck had remained unsold.
399. (1) The owner of any wreck in the possession of the receiver Claims of owners to
upon establishing his claim to the same to the satisfaction wreck
of the receiver within one year from the time at which the
wreck came into the possession of the receiver shall, upon
paying the salvage and other charges, be entitled to have
the wreck or the proceeds thereof delivered to him.
(2) Where any articles belonging to or forming part of a vessel
other than an Indian vessel which has been wrecked or
belonging to and forming part of the cargo of such vessel, are
found on or near the coasts of India or are brought into any
port in India, the consular officer of the country in which the
vessel is registered or, in the case of cargo, the country to
which the owners of the cargo may have belonged shall, in the
absence of the owner and of the master or other agent of the
owner, be deemed to be the agent of the owner, with respect
to the custody and disposal of the articles.
(3) Where the owner of the wreck does not appear and claim
the balance of the proceeds of sale within one year from the
date of sale, the said balance shall become the property of
the Central Government.
400. No person shall- Prohibition of certain
(a) without the leave of the master board or attempt to board acts in respect of
any vessel which is wrecked, stranded or in distress as wreck
aforesaid, unless the person is, or acts by command of, the
receiver of wreck; or
(b) impede or hinder or attempt in any way to impede or hinder
the saving of any vessel stranded or in danger of being
stranded or otherwise in distress on or near the coasts of
India or of any part of the cargo or equipment of the vessel,
or of any wreck; or
(c) secrete any wreck or deface or obliterate any marks thereon;
or
(d) wrongfully carry away or remove any part of a vessel stranded
or in danger of being stranded or otherwise in distress, on
or near the coasts of India, or any part of the cargo or
equipment of the vessel or any wreck.
401. Where a receiver of wreck suspects or reveives information that Search warrants
any wreck is secreted or is in the possession of some person who where wreck is
is not the owner thereof or that any wreck is otherwise improperly concealed
dealt with, he may apply to the nearest 1[Judicial Magistrate of the
first class or Metropolitan Magistrate, as the case may be,] for a
search warrant, and that magistrate shall have power to grant such
warrant and the receiver of wreck by virtue thereof may enter any
house or other place wherever situate and also any vessel and
search for, seize and detain any such wreck there found.
Salvage
Salvage payable for 402. (1) Where services are rendered
saving life, cargo or (a) wholly or in part within the territorial waters of India in
wreck saving life from any vessel, or elsewhere in saving life
from a vessel registered in India; or
(b) in assisting a vessel or saving the cargo or equipment
of a vessel which is wrecked, stranded or in distress
at any place on or near the coasts of Indian; or
(c) by any person other than the receiver of wreck in saving
any wreck;
there shall be payable to the salvor by the owner of the
vessel, cargo, equipment or wreck, a reasonable sum for
salvage having regard to all the circumstances of the case.
(2) Salvage in respect of the preservation of life when payable
by the owner of the vessel shall be payable in priority to all
other claims for salvage.
(3) Where salvage services are rendered by or on behalf of the
Government or by a vessel of the Indian Navy 1[or of the Coast
Guard] or the commander or crew of any such vessel, the
Government, the commander or the crew, as the case may
be, shall be entitled to salvage and shall have the same rights
and remedies in respect of those services as any other salvor.
1
[‘Explanation: “Coast Guard” means the Coast Guard
constituted under section 3 of the Coast Guard Act, 1978.’]
(4) Any dispute arising concerning the amount due under this
section shall be determined upon application made by either
of the disputing parties:
(a) to 2[Judicial Magistrate of the first class or a Metropolitan
Magistrate, as the case may be,] where the amount
claimed does not exceed ten thousand rupees; or
(b) to the High Court where the amount claimed exceeds
ten thousand rupees.
(5) Where there is dispute as to the persons who are entitled
to the salvage amount under this section, 2[theJudicial
magistrate of the first class or the Metropolitan Magistrate
or the High Court, as the case may be,] shall decide the
dispute and if there are more persons than one entitled to
such amount, 2[such magistrate] or the High court shall
apportion the amount thereof among such persons.
(6) The costs of and incidental to all proceedings before 1[a Judicial
Magistrate of the first class or a Metropolitan Magistrate] or the
High Court under this section shall be in the discretion of 1[such
magistrate] or the High Court shall have full power to determine by
whom or out of what property and to what extent such costs are to
be paid and to give all necessary directions for the purpose aforesaid.
403. Nothing in this Part shall- Savings
(a) affect any treaty or arrangement with any foreign country to
which India is a party with reference to the disposal of the
proceeds of wrecks on their respective coasts; or
(b) affect the provisions of section 29 of the Indian Ports Act,
1908, or entitle any person to salvage in respect of any
property recovered by creeping or sweeping in contravention
of that section.
404. (1) The Central Government may make rules to carry out the Power to make rules
purposes of this Part. respecting wreck and
salvage
(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the
foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the
following matters, namely:
(a) the procedure to be followed by receiver of wreck in
respect of the taking possession of wrecks and their
disposal;
(b) the fees payable to receivers in respect of the work
done by them;
(c) the procedure to be followed for dealing with claims
relating to ownership of wrecks;
(d) the appointment of valuers in salvage cases;
(e) the principles to be followed in awarding salvage and
the apportioning of salvage;
(f) the procedure to be followed for dealing with claims for
salvage;
(g) the detention of property in the custody of a receiver of
wreck for the purpose of enforcing payment of salvage.
With respect to wreckage, the international maritime community has witnessed both
intentional/deliberate wrecks or a wreck arising out of accidents. An unseaworthy ship or a seaworthy
ship due to unforeseen circumstances, involved in an accident may lead to wreckage. The laws
pertaining to removal of wreck and salvage of wreck primarily fell within the jurisdiction of the conventions
propounded by IMO. However, two specific conventions were adopted under the auspices of IMO
which are the International Convention on Salvage, 19891 and the International Convention on Removal
of Wreck 20072.
The Salvage Convention 1989 replaced its predecessor which was the Brussels Convention
on Assistance and Salvage at Sea, 1910.3While Brussels 1910 introduced the principle of salvage
reward as a right to a salvor only on successful salvage operations rescuing ship, cargo; the Salvage
Convention 1989 enhanced the concept of salvage reward. The Salvage Convention 1989 stipulated
enhanced salvage award, i.e. “special compensation” which is to be awarded to a salvor who has
taken effective action to prevent or minimise environmental damage and has succeeded in salvage of
ship or its cargo.
India is a party to both Salvage Convention 19894 and WRC 20075.The Merchant Shipping
Act 1958 provides under Part XIII, the provisions pertaining to wreck and salvage. The law pertaining
to wreck is covered under three main schemes of laws; which are Merchant Shipping Act 1958,
Indian Ports Act 1908, and the Rules and byelaws made there-under. The MS Act 1958 defines
wreck with respect to the place where the same is found in sea or in tidal waters or on shores. The
categorisation of goods as wreck is more of a comparative analysis of its location than the damage
that it might cause to environment or safe navigation or health. As per the MS Act 1958, wreck
includes goods, which have been cast into the sea and sunk, or that which remains under water, or
that without sinking remain floating in sea or that which are attached to a floating object; goods that
are thrown away or abandoned or a vessel abandoned without hope or intention to recovery.6 Prompt
and appropriate removal of wreck which, otherwise could affect and risk safe navigation / environmental
pollution/ life and trade of people depending on sea as their chief source of living, becomes inevitable.
The Act under Part XIII, equips the designated authorities with powers to deal with aspects
of removal of wreck, including appointment, powers and duties of receiver of wreck and the like. In the
1
Herein after referred to as Salvage Convention. Concluded in London on April 28,1989. Entered into force on July 14,
1996.
2
Herein after referred to as WRC, 2007. Adopted on May 18,2007. Not entered into force yet. See Article 18 of WRC
2007.
3
Herein after referred to as Brussels 1910. Adopted on September 23,1910 in Brussels, Belgium.
4
By accession. Date of deposit of instrument is October 18,1995 and date of entry into force October 18, 1996.
5
By accession. Date of deposit of instrument is March 23, 2011.
6
Section 3 (58) of the MS Act 1958.
event of a wreck, any persons in the course of rendering assistance to a person or vessel in distress
is not accountable for any unavoidable damage sustained by owner or occupier of adjoining land and
the same can be claimed by them as charge on the vessel involved in wreck. Under the MS Act 1958,
the powers entrusted with the receiver of the wreck includes power of sub-delegation; to suppress
any plundering, disorder or obstruction to wreck or its removal; investigation into the matters pertaining
to wreckage of vessel; immediate sale of wreck or its remnants; and issuance of search warrant
where wreck is suspected to have been secreted or in the possession of any person other than
owner.
Part XIII, also ensures the right of the owner to establish his claim before the receiver. The
owner, however, is liable and duty bound to make the payment against charges such as that of
salvage, which are incurred in the process of saving the wreck and possessing the same under the
custody of the receiver of wreck. Further, if the wreck is one which belongs to vessels other than an
Indian vessel, the consular officer of the country in which the vessel is registered or the country to
which the owners of the cargo belong are presumed to be the agent(s) of the wreck with respect to its
custody and disposal. The claim of ownership of the wreck shall be made within a period of 1(one)
year from the date of possession of the wreck by the receiver. After the prescribed period of one year,
the remnants of the wreck retaining in possession of the receiver will be deemed to be the property
of the Central Government and no claims will be entertained henceforth.
The possibilities of a third party interference to board or attempt to board any vessel without
permission of the master or secrete/deface/obliterate or wrongfully carry away or remove any wrecked/
stranded vessel, or to impede/hinder attempt to save stranded/distressed vessel the wreck as a
whole or part thereof, is considered to be unlawful and the same is prohibited by law.
A wreck, life or cargo of ship involved in wreck may be saved by an appropriately rendered
help or assistance. Such an assistance rendered by offering services are called salvage services.
The salvage services include saving the vessel as a wreck or cargo or life of people onboard the ship.
As mentioned earlier in the Commentary to Part XIII, the MS Act 1958 provides that the salvage
services are entitled to salvage7. The only exception to entitlement for salvage is the case of receiver
appointed under the MS Act 1958. Where salvage was denied to the petitioner on the ground that it
was the bounden duty under Section 14 of the Coast Guard Act to render assistance to the ship in
distress, the Court clearly laid down that considering Section 402, the commander of the Coast
Guard is also treated as a salvor and that the petitioners claim for salvage was allowed.8 Salvage
claims can be made before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class or Metropolitan Magistrate9 or
before the High Court10.
7
Section 3 (40) defines “salvage” to include “all expenses properly incurred by the salvor in the performances of the
salvage services”
8
Shashidharan Vs. Union of India AIR 2002 Ker. 388, 2002 (3) KLT SN 47.
9
Section 402 (4)(a) prescribes limit for claiming before JFCM or Metropolitan Court as claimed amount not to exceed Rs.
10,000.
10
Section 402 (4)(b) prescribes that claims exceeding INR. 10,000 are claimable before High Court exercising respective
jurisdiction.
Besides, the Act also empowers the Central Government to make rules as to the procedure
to be followed by a receiver of wreck in taking possession and its disposal; fees payable to receiver;
on claims relating to ownership of wreck and salvage; detention of wreck; appointment of valuers in
salvage cases; awarding and apportionment of salvage; enforcing payment of salvage by detention of
wreck and to give effect to all other provisions enshrined under Part XIII.
The latest ratification of the 2007 Wreck removal Convention by India, makes it obligatory to
amend MS Act 1958 and incorporate the international obligations in to Indian laws. Amendments
extend from expansion of definition of wreck to the jurisdiction of countries where the wreck is found
and the like. The new amendments have been placed before the Parliament and passed, The
amendments would enable India to exercise jurisdiction to order for removal of wreck amounting to
hazard from the Exclusive Economic Zone, which at present is limited to territorial sea. Compulsory
insurance coverage is yet another feature of the Nairobi International Convention on Removal of
Wreck 2007, once implemented within the realm of Merchant Shipping Act Part XIII, Indian Ports Act
and allied rules and regulations.
PART XIV
CONTROL OF INDIAN SHIPS AND SHIPS ENGAGED IN COASTING TRADE
405. This Part applies only to sea-going ships fitted with mechanical Application of Part
means of propulsion of not less than one hundred and fifty tons
gross; but the Central Government may, by notification in the Official
Gazette, fix any lower tonnage for the purposes of this Part.
As per Amendment No. 55 of 1988 the following paragraph applies
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 405 of the Merchant
Shipping Act, 1958 (44 of 1958), the Central Government hereby fixes fifteen
tons gross as the tonnage for the purposes of the above section.
406. (1) No Indian ship and not other ship chartered by a citizen of Indian ships and
India or a company 1[or a co-operative society] shall be taken chartered ships to be
to sea from a port or place within or outside India except licensed
under a licence granted by the Director-General under this
section:
Provided that the Central Government, if it is of opinion that
it is necessary or expedient in the public interest so to do,
may, by notification in the Official Gazette, exempt any class
of ships chartered by a citizen of India or a company 1[or a
co-operative society] from the provisions of this sub-section.
(2) A licence granted under this section may be-
(a) a general licence;
(b) a licence for the whole or any part of the coasting trade
of India; or
(c) a licence for a specified period or voyage.
(3) A licence granted under this section shall be in such form
and shall be valid for such period as may be prescribed,
and shall be subject to such conditions as may be specified
by the Director-General.
407. (1) No ship other than an Indian ship or a ship chartered by a Licensing of ships for
citizen of India 1[or a company or a co-operative society coasting trade
which satisfies the requirements specified in clause (b) or,
as the case may be, clause (c) of section 21] shall engage
in the coasting-trade of India except under a licence granted
by the Director-General under this section.
(2) A licence granted under this section may be for a specified
period or voyage and shall be subject to such conditions as
may be specified by the Director-General.
(3) The Central Government may, by general or special order,
direct that the provisions of sub-section (1) shall not apply
in respect of any part of the coasting trade of India or shall
Power to give 411. The Director-General may, if he is satisfied that in the public interest
or in the interests of Indian shipping it is necessary so to do, give,
by order in writing, such directions as he thinks fit
(a) in the case of a ship which has been granted a licence
under section 406, with respect to all or any of the following
matters:
(i) the ports or places, whether in or outside India, to
which, and the routes by which, the ship shall proceed
for any particular purpose;
(ii) the diversion of any ship from one route to another for
any particular purpose;
(iii) the classes of passengers or cargo which may be
carried in the ship;
(iv) the order of priority in which passengers or cargo may
be taken on or put off the ship at any port or place,
whether in or outside India;
(b) in the case of a ship which has been granted a licence under
section 407 with respect to the order of priority in which
passengers or cargo may be taken on the ship at any port or
place in India from which she is about to proceed for any
port or place on on the continent of India at which she is to
call in the course of her voyage.
Power of the Central
[411A. (1)
1
If it appears to the Central Government-
Government to
protect interests of (a) that measures have been taken by or under the law of
Indian shipping from any foreign country for regulating or controlling the terms
undue foreign or conditions upon which goods or passengers may
intervention be carried by sea, or the terms or conditions of contracts
or arrangements relating to such carriage; and
1 Ins. by MS (Amend.) Act 1983
Part XIV can be considered the teeth of the MS Act 1958 in controlling and regulating ships
engaged in coasting trade1. The fact that Indian shipowners have to be extended the support to
develop Indian Merchant Marine, which again is the purpose of enactment of MS Act 19582. The Act
limits the application of this Part to ships of not less than 150 tons gross, fitted with mechanical
means of propulsion. The Act covers both Indian ships and foreign flag vessels, with the perception to
provide Indian ships the privilege in conducting coasting trade.
Section 406 mandates that Indian ships and, vessels chartered by a citizen of India shall be
taken to sea from a port or place within or outside India only by possessing a license3 obtained from
/ granted by the DGS. The proviso to this Section stipulates that, the Central Government has the
power to exempt any class of ships chartered by a citizen of India or a company or a cooperative
society on grounds of public interest, through a notification in the official gazette. Furthermore, the
Director General is also empowered to state conditions as a prerequisite for issuance of licence
under Section 406.
Whereas, MS Act 1958 under Section 407 stipulates that Indian Ships or ships chartered by
a citizen of India, which satisfies the requirements under Section 21 (b) or (c) shall engage in coasting
trade of India without license granted by the Director General of Shipping. All other vessels can only
engage in such a trade by obtaining license from DGS. Further, under subsection (3) the Central
Government by general or special order, can direct that provision of subsection (1), i.e. mandatory
license requirement for coasting trade, shall not apply in any part of coasting trade of India or shall
apply subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be specified in the order. While the MS Act
1958 Section 406 (1) speaks about licensing for the voyage(s) involving at least one Indian port,
under Section 407 (1) the Act deals with coasting trade, which involves voyage from one port or place
in India to another port or place in India.
The Central Government has the power to revoke or modify any licence issued under this
Part provided an opportunity of making representation against revocation or modification has been
provided to the person concerned.4 In order to effectively implement the licence requirement as a
precondition under Section 406 and Section 407; the customs collector is equipped with the power
to deny port clearance until the requisite licence is produced. Further in public interest or in a view to
promote Indian shipping, the Director General of Shipping has the discretion to give order in writing,
1
Section 3(2) of the MS Act 1958 defines “coasting trade of India” as the carriage by sea of passengers or goods from
any port or place in India to any other port or place on the continent of India.
2
See preamble of the MS Act 1958.
3
Section 405 (2) of MS Act 1958 provides for category of license issued are a) general license; b) license for the whole
or part of the coasting trade of India or (c) a license for specified period or voyage
4
Section 408.
which directs the holder of licence under Section 406 on matters of voyage routes; requisite diversions;
categories of cargo and passengers to be carried; priority of loading/entry and discharge/boarding of
cargo or unboarding. The DGS is also vested with the powers to issue directions, in writing to the
ships holding licence under Section 407 on matters such as priority of loading/entry and discharge/
exit of cargo or passengers or to call particular port or place in India.
Apart from the wide rule making power to implement provisions under Part XIV, the Central
Government is authorised to take such steps by issuing orders in writing so as to protect the interests
of Indian shipping from undue foreign intervention. Here it may be noted that, like many other maritime
states, India has exercised jurisdiction to treat shipping as an exemption from obligations undertaken
under the agreements of the World Trade Organisation. The Director General of Shipping has the
power to call for information pertaining to, owner, master or agent; classes of passengers or cargo,
which the ship is about to carry during the specified period; rates of passenger fares and freight
applicable; and the like.
PART XV
SAILING VESSELS
415. Save as otherwise provided, this Part applies to every sea-going Application of Part
sailing vessel owned by a citizen of India 1[or a company or a co-
operative society which satisfies the requirements specified in
clause (b) or, as the case may be, clause (c) of section 21.]
416. If any question arises whether a vessel is a sailing vessel or not for Decision of question
the purposes of this Part, it shall be decided by the Director-General whether a vessel is a
and his decision thereon shall be final. sailing vessel
417. (1) Every sailing vessel 2[(other than a sailing vessel solely Certificate of registry
engaged in fishing for profit)] shall be registered in
accordance with the provisions of this section.
(2) The owner of every sailing vessel shall make an application
in the prescribed form to a registrar for the grant to him of a
certificate of registry in respect of the vessel.
(3) The owner of every sailing vessel in respect of which an
application under sub-section (2) is made, shall cause the
tonnage of the vessel to be ascertained in the prescribed
manner.
(4) The registrar may make such inquiry as he thinks fit with
respect to the particulars contained in such application and
shall enter in a register to be kept for the purpose (hereinafter
referred to as sailing vessels register) the following particulars
in respect of the vessel, namely:
(a) the name of the sailing vessel, the place where she
was built, and the port to which she belongs;
(b) the rig, type and tonnage of the vessel;
(c) the name, occupation and residence of the owner of
the vessel;
(d) the number assigned to the vessel;
(e) the mortgages, if any, effected by the owner in respect
of the vessel;
(f) such other particulars as may be prescribed.
(5) After the particulars in respect of the vessel have been
entered in the sailing vessels register under sub-section
(4), the registrar shall grant to the applicant a certificate of
registry in the prescribed form.
(6) The owner of every sailing vessel shall pay for each certificate
of registry a fee according to such scale as may be prescribed
by the Central Government, having regard to the tonnage of
the vessel, but in no case exceeding one rupee per ton of its
gross tonnage.
(7) A sailing vessel requiring to be registered under this Part
but not so registered may be detained by a proper officer
until the owner or tindal produces a certificate of registry in
respect of the vessel.
Particulars relating to 418. The owner of every sailing vessel so registered shall, before the
sailing vessel to be vessel begins to take any cargo or passengers, paint or cause to
painted be painted permanently in the prescribed manner on some
conspicuous part of the sailing vessel, the name by which the vessel
has been registered, the number assigned to the vessel by the
registrar and the port to which she belongs, and shall take all steps
to ensure that the vessel remains painted as required by this section.
Change of name of 419. A change shall not be made in the name of a sailing vessel registered
sailing vessel under this Part except in accordance with the rules made in this
behalf.
Prevention of 420. (1) The Central Government may make rules regulating the
overloading or carriage of cargo or passengers in sailing vessels and the
overcrowding protection of life and property on board such vessels.
(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the
foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the
following matters, namely:
(a) the assignment of free board to sailing vessels;
(b) the marking of such free board on such vessels and
the maintenance of such markings;
(c) the survey of the space allotted to passengers on board
such vessels;
(d) the scale and type of accommodation to be provided
for each passenger.
(3) Any sailing vessel attempting to ply or proceed to sea without
free board markings or any sailing vessel which has been
so loaded as to submerge such markings may be detained
by a proper officer until free board markings are made in
accordance with the rules made in this behalf or the vessel
is so loaded that such markings are not submerged.
(4) Nothing in this section relating to free board, shall apply to
any sailing vessel in respect of which a load line has been
assigned under Part IX.
Certificate of 421. (1) No sailing vessel shall ply or proceed to sea unless there is
inspection in force in respect of that vessel a certificate of inspection
granted under this Part, the same being applicable to the
voyage on which she is about to ply or proceed.
(2) A certificate of inspection in respect of a sailing vessel shall
specify:
PART XV – Commentary
Part XV deals with sea going1 sailing vessel2 other than fishing vessel3, owned by an Indian
citizen. The Act under this Part deals with registry, naming, inspection/survey and certifications of
sailing vessel. The Act empowers the Director General of Shipping to make the decision as to
whether a vessel is a sailing vessel or not. The provisions enshrined under Part XV covers the
obligation to register, maintenance of registry, particulars and format of registry, payment of fee,
issuance of Certificate of Registry and above all the detention of sailing vessel which does not
comply with the MS Act 1958. The Central Government is empowered to make rules pertaining to
transfer of registry, authorities to inspect, criteria for classification of sailing vessel, fixation of chargeable
rates of freight, equipments relating to life saving and fire appliances, lights shapes and signals as
required by collision regulations, qualifications to be possessed by tindals and crew of sailing vessels,
charter-party and its form, reservation of specified commodities for transport and any other matter
dealt under Part XV.
The Act provides that the Certificate of Inspection, which is valid for one year, shall be
possessed by every sailing vessel registered under the Part XV. However, if the sailing vessel is
found to be unfit to ply or proceed to sea, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the owner, the said
Certificate of Inspection can be cancelled. In such circumstances, the owner after making material
changes necessary for making the vessel fit to ply, can apply to the registrar for reissuance of
Certificate of Inspection. The authority shall re-issue the Certificate of Inspection after inspections to
the satisfaction of the inspector.
The Registrar on receiving information from owner of a sailing vessel that the vessel is lost,
destroyed or rendered permanently unfit for service, shall enter the same into the registry and shall
close the registry with respect to the registration of sailing vessel. Considerably similar to the provisions
of Section 407 of MS Act 1958 applicable to the non- Indian ships, Part XV also provides for prohibition
on non Indian sailing vessel to engage in coasting trade without permission from DG Shipping.
Likewise, entry and cancellation of mortgage, detention of overloaded vessel (irrespective of its
registration), power of Court to interfere and rescind the contract between master and tindal, mandatory
insurance requirement to the crew, are also applicable to sailing vessels. Further, the MS Act 1958
by virtue of Section 434, empowers the Central Government to apply any provision applicable to
ships to the sailing vessels covered by the Act, subject to such conditions, exceptions and
modifications.
1
Section 3 (41) defines “sea going” as vessel proceeding to sea beyond internal waters or beyond waters declared to
be smooth or partially smooth waters by the Central Government by notification in Official Gazette.
2
Section 3(39) defines “sailing vessel” to mean “any description of vessel provided with sufficient sail area for
navigation under sails alone, whether or not fitted with mechanical means of propulsion, and includes rowing boat or
canoe but does not include a pleasure craft”.
3
Section 3(12) defines “fishing vessel” as a ship fitted with mechanical means of propulsion which is exclusively
engaged in sea fishing for profit.
Cancellation, reissue, 435L. (1) Where at any time subsequent to the issue of a certificate
etc., of certificate of of inspection in respect of an Indian fishing boat, the registrar
inspection has reason to believe that the fishing boat is not fit to proceed
to sea, he may, after giving the owner an opportunity of
making a representation, cancel such certificate.
(2) Where at any time subsequent to the issue of a certificate
of inspection an Indian fishing boat has undergone material
alteration or has met with accident or, where the certificate
of inspection has been cancelled under sub-section (1) and
the application is made for the re-issue of such certificate
or for the grant of a fresh certificate, the registrar may, before
re-issuing the certificate or issuing a fresh certificate, as
the case may be, cause such fishing boat to be inspected;
and if the authority inspecting the fishing boat reports that
she is not fit to proceed to sea or that her hull, rigging or
equipment are defective, such certificate shall not be re-
issued or issued until the fishing boat is, in the opinion of
such authority, fit to proceed to sea or the defect is rectified
to the satisfaction of that authority.
Inspection of safety 435M. (1) Any surveyor appointed under section 9, any registrar
equipments and appointed under section 435E or any other officer appointed
appliances by the Central Government in this behalf by notification in
the Official Gazette may at any reasonable time inspect
any Indian fishing boat for the purpose of seeing that she is
properly provided with safety equipments and appliances in
conformity with the rules referred to in section 435J.
(2) If the surveyor, or, as the case may be, the registrar or other
officer appointed under sub-section (1) finds that the Indian
fishing boat is not provided with the aforesaid equipments
and appliances, he shall give to the owner, skipper or tindal
or any other person in charge of the fishing boat a notice in
writing pointing out the deficiency and also what in his
opinion is requisite to the remedy and said deficiency.
(3) No Indian fishing boat served with a notice under sub-section
(2) shall proceed to sea until it obtains a certificate signed
by the surveyor, registrar or other officer appointed under
sub-section (1) to the effect that it is properly provided with
safety equipments and appliances in conformity with the
aforesaid rules.
Registration of 435N. When an Indian fishing boat is so altered as not to correspond
alteration with the particulars relating to her entered in the certificate of
registry, the owner of such fishing boat shall make a report of such
alterations to the registrar of the port or place where the fishing
boat is registered, and the registrar shall either cause the alterations
to be registered, or direct the fishing boat may be registered anew,
in accordance with such rules as may be made in this behalf.
435O. The registry of an Indian fishing boat may be transferred from one Transfer of registry
port or place to another port or place in India on the application of
the owner of the fishing boat, in accordance with such rules as
may be made in this behalf.
435P. If an Indian fishing boat is lost, destroyed or rendered permanently Closure of
unfit for service, the owner of such fishing boat shall with the least registration
possible delay, report the fact to the registrar of the port or place
where the fishing boat is registered and also forward to him
certificate of registry in respect of the fishing boat; and thereupon
the registrar shall have registry of the fishing boat closed.
435Q. No person shall transfer or acquire any Indian fishing boat registered Restriction on
under this Part or any interest therein without the previous approval transfer of Indian
of the Central Government; and any transaction effected in fishing boats
contravention of this section shall be void and unenforceable.
435R. (1) Every mortgage of an Indian fishing boat or any interest Mortgage of Indian
therein effected after the date on which this Part comes into fishing boats
force shall on that date be registered with the registrar.
(2) Every mortage of an Indian fishing boat or any interest therein
effected before the date on which this Part comes into force
shall, if subsisting on that date, be registered with the
registrar within three months from that date.
(3) The registrar shall enter every such mortgage in the fishing
boats register in the order in which it is registered with him.
(4) If there are more mortgages than one recorded in respect of
the same Indian fishing boat or interest therein, the mortgages
shall, notwithstanding any express, implied or constructive
notice, have priority according to the date on which each
mortgage is registered with the registrar and not according
to the date of each mortage itself.
Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall
affect the relative priorities as they existed immediately before
the date on which this Part comes into force as between
mortgages of the same fishing boat or interest therein
effected before such date which are registered in accordance
with the provisions of sub-section (2).
435S. (1) No person shall use or attempt to use the certificate of Fraudulent use of
registry or the certificate of inspection granted in respect of certificate of registry
an Indian fishing boat for any purpose other than the lawful or certificate of
operation of that fishing boat. inspection, etc.,
prohibited
(2) No person shall use or attempt to use for the operation of
an Indian fishing boat, a certificate of registry or a certificate
of inspection not granted in respect of that fishing boat.
(3) No person who has in his possession or under his control
the certificate of registry or the certificate of inspection of
an Indian fishing boat shall refuse or omit without reasonable
Inspection as required under Part XV-A, includes inspection of safety equipments and
appliances including life saving appliances and fire appliances. Additionally, the surveyor who is
designated to issue Certificates of Inspection that are valid for one year, also issues Notice of Deficiency
in the event of detection of deficiencies to owner, skipper or tindal or any person in charge of the
fishing boat. Unless and until the surveyor reissues Certificate of Inspection based on the rectification
of the deficiencies identified in the Notice of Deficiency the fishing boat is not authorised to be taken
to sea.
Further, it is made mandatory that the transfer of Indian fishing boats shall be done only with
prior approval of Central Government. The Registrar of Indian fishing boats is duty bound to enter into
the registry any mortgage or charge created on the Indian fishing boat. The priority of lien on the
fishing boat is decided by the order in which the entry is made in the registry. Like in any other ship/
vessel covered under different parts of the Act, the fraudulent use of Certificate of Registry or Certificate
of Inspection with respect to fishing boat is prohibited. The Act also vests the Central Government
with the power to formulate rules pertaining to form, particulars and issue and reissue of registration
and Certificate of Registry and inspection; ascertainment of tonnage of an Indian fishing boat; exemption2
from mandatory certification requirements; reporting of alterations of registry and material facts;
maintenance of statement of crew and on any other provisions as mentioned in Part XV – A.
At the international level, as part of the comprehensive revisions to STCW 78, IMO has
developed the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for
Fishing Vessel Personnel, 19953. STCW-F applies the principles of STCW to fishing vessels that are
24 metres in length and above. India is not a party to the STCW-F 1995. However, in the near future,
as a part of attempts to apply uniform regulations in fishing sector, India is expected to ratify/accede
the STCW-F 1995. Accordingly changes will be brought in to the provisions of Part XV-A of MS Act
1958 and the Rules/byelaws made there under.
1
See Section 435 – C “Obligation to register” Republic of Italy thr, Ambassador and Ors. V. Union of India ILR 2013 (1)
Kerala 719, 2013 (1) SCALE 462.
2
Section 435 – X of the MS Act 1958 refers to the power of the Central Government to impose exemption on any fishing
boat or class of fishing boat or crew or tindal or skipper of Indian fishing boat.
3
Hereinafter referred to as STCW –F 1995. Date of adoption is July 7, 1995 and it entered into force on September 29,
2012.
PART XVI
PENALTIES AND PROCEDURE
Penalties
436. (1) Any person who contravenes any provision of this Act or Penalties
fails to comply with any provision thereof which it was his
duty to any such offence no penalty is specially provided in
sub-section (2), he shall be punishable with fine which may
extend to two hundred rupees.
(2) The offence mentioned in the second column of the following
table shall be punishable to the extent mentioned in the fourth
column of the same with reference to such offences
respectively.
1 If the owner or master of an Indian ship fails to 28(2) Fine which may extend to one thousand rupees.
comply with or contravenes sub-section (2) of
section 28.
2 If a person wilfully makes a false statement in 30 Fine which may extend to one thousand rupees.
the builder’s certificate referred to in section 30.
3 If a person contravenes sub-section (2) of 35(2) Fine which may extend to one thousand rupees.
section 35.
4 If the owner or master of an Indian ship commits 35(4) Fine which may extend to five hundred rupees.
an offence under sub-section (4) of section 35.
5 If a master, without reasonable cause, fails to 36(4) Fine which may extend to five hundred rupees.
comply with sub-section (4) of section 36.
6 If a person makes illegal use of a certificate of 36(5) Fine which may extend to one thousand rupees.
registry stated to have been mislaid, lost or
destroyed or if a person entitled to the certificate
of registry obtains it at any time afterwards by
fails to deliver the said certificate to the registrar
as required by sub- section (5) of section 36.
7 If a master fails to deliver to the registrar the 38(2), 38(3) Fine which may extend to one thousand rupees.
certificate of registry as required by sub-section
(2) of sub-section (3) of section 38.
8 If an owner fails to comply with sub-section (1) 39(1), 39(2) Fine which may extend to one thousand rupees.
of section 39 or if a master fails to comply with
sub-section (2) of that section.
9 If an person contravenes sub-section (1) of 42(1) Fine which may extend to one thousand rupees.
section 42.
10 If any person acts or suffers any person under 55 Fine which may extend to one thousand rupees;
his control to act in contravention of section but nothing herein shall affect the power to
55 or omits to do or suffers any person under detain the ship under sub-section (4) of that
his control to omit to do anything required under section.
that section.
12 If any distinctive national colours except those 63(1) The master, owner and every other person
declared under sub-section (1) of section 63 hoisting the colours shall be liable to fine which
are hoisted on board any Indian ship. may extend to five thousand rupees.
13 If a person contravenes section 64. 64 imprisonment, which may extend to two years,
or fine which may extend to five thousand
rupees, or both.
14 If an owner or master contravenes section 65. 65 imprisonment, which may extend to two years,
or fine which may extend to five thousand
rupees, or both.
15 If default is made in complying with section 66. 66 The master shall be liable to fine, which may
extend to one thousand rupees.
16 If any person in the case of any declaration General Imprisonment, which may extend to six months,
made in the presence of or produced to a or fine which may extend to one thousand
registrar under Part V or in any document or rupees, or both.
other evidence produced to such registrar-
(a) wilfully makes or assists in making or
procures to be made, any false statement
concerning the title to or ownership of or
the interest existing in any ship or any share
in a ship; or
(b) utters, produces or makes use of any
declaration or document containing any
such false statement knowing the same to
be false.
1
[17 If-
(a) any person causes a ship or fishing vessel General Imprisonment, which may extend to six months
to proceed to sea without the required or fine, which may extend to ten thousand
certificated personnel. rupees, or both.
(b) any person having been engaged as one 76 Imprisonment, which may extend to six months
of the officers referred to in section 76 goes or fine, which may extend to five thousand
to sea as such officer without being duly rupees, or both.
certificated.
(c) any master fails to submit the required crew
list or fails to report the changes made in
the list before commencing the relevant
voyage. 84 (i) (c) Fine which may extend to five thousand rupees
and in addition, a fine, which may extend to
18 If a master or owner fails to comply with any of one thousand rupees for every day during
the requirements of section 93. which the offence continues after conviction].
19 If a master fails without reasonable cause to
comply with any of the requirements of section 93 Fine which may extend to two hundred rupees.
94.
94 Fine which may extend to one hundred rupees.
21 If a person engages or carries any seaman to 98(2), 99 Fine which may extend to one hundred rupees
sea in contravention of sub-section (2) of for every seaman in respect of whom the
section 98 or section 99. offence is committed.
22 If a master carries any seaman to sea without 100 Fine which may extend to one hundred rupees
entering into an agreement with him in for every seaman in respect of whom the
accordance with this Act. offence is committed.
23 If a master enters into an agreement with any 101(2)(g) Fine which may extend to two hundred rupees.
seaman for a scale of provisions less than the
scale fixed under clause (g) of sub-section (2)
of section 101.
24 If a master fails, without reasonable cause, to 105, 106(4), Fine which may extend to fifty rupees.
comply with any of the requirements of section 107
105, sub-section (4) of section 106 or section
107.
25 If any person- 109, 110, 111 The master shall be liable to a fine, which may
extend to fifty rupees.
(a) is carried to sea to work in contravention
of section 109, section 110 or section 111;
or
(b) is engaged to work in any capacity in a The parent or guardian shall be liable to a fine,
ship in contravention of section 109, section which may extend to fifty rupees.
110 or section 111 on a false representation
by his parent or guardian that the young
person is of an age at which such
engagement is not in contravention of those
sections.
26 If a master refuses of neglects to produce for General Fine which may extend to fifty rupees.
inspection any certificate of physical fitness
delivered to him under section 111 when
required to do so by a shipping master.
27 If the master of a ship, where there is no General Fine which may extend to two hundred rupees.
agreement with the crew, fails to keep the
register of young persons required to be kept
under section 112 or refuses or neglects to
produce such register for inspection when
required so to do by a shipping master.
28 If the master of a ship other than an Indian ship 114 Fine, which may extend to one hundred
engages a seaman in India otherwise than in rupees for every seaman so engaged.
accordance with section 114.
29 If any owner, master or agent wilfully disobeys 115 Imprisonment, which may extend to three
any order under section 115. months, or fine which may extend to one
thousand rupees, or both.
30 If a master fails to comply with section 116. 116 Fine which may extend to one hundred rupees.
31 If any person obstructs any officer referred to General Fine which may extend to one hundred rupees.
in section 117 in the exercise of his powers
under that section.
36 If any person acts in contravention of sub- 121(1) Fine which may extend to one thousand
section (1) of section 121. rupees.
37 If a master 122(1), 122(3) Fine which may extend to two hundred rupees.
(a) fails without reasonable cause to comply
with sub-section (1) or sub-section (3) of
section 122; or
(b) delivers a false statement for the purpose 122(2)
of sub-section (2) of section 122.
38 If a master fails, without reasonable cause, to 125 Fine which may extend to fifty rupees.
comply with section 125.
39 if a master or owner pays the wages of a 128(1) Fine which may extend to one hundred rupees.
seaman in a manner contrary to sub-section
(1) of section 128.
40 If a master fails to comply with section 131. 131 Fine which may extend to one hundred rupees
41 If any person fails, without reasonable cause, 133 Fine which may extend to fifty rupees
to comply with any requisition under section 133.
42 If a seaman contravenes sub-section (3) of 135(3) Imprisonment which may extend to one month,
section 135. or fine which may extend to one hundred
rupees, or both, but nothing herein shall take
away or limit any other remedy which any
person would otherwise have for breach of
contract or refund of the money advanced or
otherwise.
1
[42A If the master or owner contravenes the 138A Fine which may extend to double the average
provisions of section 138A. wages per hour payable to the seaman for
working beyond forty-eight hours.]
45 If a master fails to comply with the provisions of 154(1) Fine which may extend to three times the value
this Act with respect to taking charge of the of the property not accounted for or if such
property of a deceased seaman or apprentice value is not ascertained, to five hundred
or to making in the official log book the proper rupees, but nothing herein shall affect his
entries relating thereto or to the payment or liability under sub-section (1) of section 154
delivery of such property as required by sub- to account for the property not accounted for.
section (1) of section 154.
46 If a master of an Indian ship fails or refuses 163(1) Fine which may extent to one thousand rupees
without reasonable cause to receive on board in respect of each such seaman.
his ship or to give a passage or subsistence to,
or to provide for, any seaman contrary to sub-
section (1) of section 163.
47 (a) If a master fails to comply with, or 168(3) Fine which may extend to two hundred rupees,
contravenes any provision of, sub-section but nothing herein shall affect the power to
(3) of section 168 detain the ship under sub-section (2) of section
168;
(b) if a master or any other person having 168(6) Fine which may extend to two hundred rupees.
charge of any provisions or water on board
a ship liable to inspection under section 168
refuses or fails to give the person making
the inspection reasonable facility for the
purposes.
48 If a master fails to furnish provisions to a seaman General Fine which may extend to five hundred rupees,
in accordance with the agreement entered into but nothing herein shall affect the claim for
by him and the court considers the failure to be compensation under sub-section (1) of
due to the neglect or default of the master, or if section 169.
a master furnishes to a seaman provisions
which are bad in quality or unfit for use.
49 If a master fails without reasonable cause to 171 Fine which may extend to one hundred rupees.
comply with section 171.
50 (a) If any requirement of section 172 is not 172 The owner shall be liable to fine which may
complied with in the case of any ship; or extend to two hundred rupees unless he can
prove that the non-compliance was not caused
by his inattention, neglect or wilful default;
(b) If obstruction is caused to the port health The owner or master shall be liable to fine,
officer in the discharge of his duty. which may extend to two hundred rupees
unless he can prove that the obstruction was
caused without his knowledge or connivance.
51 If any foreign-going ship referred to in sub- 173(1) The owner shall be liable for each voyage of
section (1) of section 173 does not carry on the ship made without having on board a duly
board a duly qualified medical officer. qualified medical officer, a fine that may extend
to two hundred rupees.
52 If a master fails, without reasonable cause, to 184 Fine which may extend to one hundred rupees.
comply with section 184.
(b) contravenes clauses (b) of sub-section (1) 191(1)(b) He shall, if the contravention does not amount
of section 191. to desertion, be liable to forfeit out of his
wages a sum not exceeding two days’ pay
and in addition for every twenty four hours of
absence either a sum not exceeding six days’
pay or any expenses properly incurred in hiring
a substitute and also to imprisonment which
may extend to two months.
58 If any person contravenes sub-section (3) of 193(3) Fine which may extend to two hundred rupees.
section 193.
59 If a seaman or apprentice is guilty of the offence 194 Forfeiture out of his wages of a sum not
specified in- exceeding one month’s pay; forfeiture out of
his wages of a sum not exceeding two days’
pay; imprisonment which may extend to one
month and also for every twenty four hours
of continuance of such disobedience or
neglect, forfeiture out of his wages of a sum
not exceeding six days’ pay or any expenses
which may have been properly incurred in
hiring a substitute;
60 If any master fails to comply with section 197. 197 Imprisonment which may extend to one
months, or fine which may extend to one
hundred rupees, or both.
61 If a seaman on or before being engaged wilfully General Fine Which may extend to fifty rupees.
and fraudulently makes a false statement of
the name of his last ship or alleged last ship or
wilfully and fraudulently makes a false
statement of his own name.
62 If a master or owner neglects or refuses to pay 202 Fine which may extend to six times the amount
over the fine under sub-section (1) of section of the fine retained by him.
202.
63 If any person contravenes section 203. 203 Fine which may extend to one hundred rupees.
64 If any person contravenes section 204. 204 Fine which may extend to one hundred
rupees.
65 If any person goes to sea in a ship contrary to 205(1) Imprisonment which may extend to one month,
sub-section (1) of section 205. or fine which may extend to two hundred
rupees, or both,
66 (a) if any person wilfully disobeys the 206(a) Imprisonment which may extend to three
prohibition contained in clause(a) of section months, or fine which may extend to one
206; or thousand rupees, or both;
(b) if any master or owner refuses or neglects 206(b) Fine which may extend to five hundred rupees.
to deposit any wages, money or other
property or sum in the manner required by
clause (b) of section 206.
67 If a master fails to deliver or transmit the 208(1), 209 Fine which may extend to five hundred rupees.
documents referred to in sub-section (1) of
section 208 or section 209 as provided therein.
68 If a master contravenes sub-section (1) of 210(2) Imprisonment which may extend to three
section 210. months, or fine which may extend to one
thousand rupees, or both.
69 If any person harbours or secretes any deserter General Fine which may extend to one hundred
knowing or having reason to believe that he rupees.
has deserted.
70 If a master fails to comply with sub-section (2) 214(2) Fine which may extend to one hundred rupees.
of section 214.
71 (a)If sub-section (1) of section 215 is not 215(1) The master shall be liable to fine which may
complied with; extend to fifty rupees, if no other penalty is
provided in this Act:
(b) if any person contravenes sub-section (2) 215(2) Fine which may extend to three hundred
of section 215. rupees.
103 If master proceeds or attempts to proceed to 318(1) Fine which may extend to one thousand
sea in contravention of sub-section (1) of rupees.
section 318
104 (a) If the owner of an Indian ship fails to comply 319(1)(a)
with clause (a) to sub-section (1) of section
319; or
(b) If a master fails to comply with clause (b) 319(1)(b), Fine which may extend to two hundred rupees.
of sub-section (1), or clause (a) or clause 319(2)
(b) of sub-section (2) of section 319
1 Ins. by MS (Amend.) Act 1966
2 Subs. by MS (Amend.) Act 1983
3 Subs. by MS (Amend.) Act 1970
(b) if the master of a nuclear ship fails to comply 344G(3) Imprisonment, which may extend to one year
with any directions issued under sub- and(5) or fine, which may extend to ten thousand
section (3) or sub-section (5) of section rupees, or both].
344G.
111 If the owner or master fails without reasonable 350 Fine which may extend to five hundred rupees.
cause, to comply with section 350.
112 If the owner or agent fails, without reasonable 351 Fine which may extend to five hundred rupees.
cause, to comply with section 351.
113 If any person contravenes section 353. 353 Fine which may extend to five hundred rupees.
114 If a mater fails to comply with section 354 354 Fine which may extend to five hundred rupees.
115 (a) If a master fails to comply with sub-section 355(1), 355(2) Imprisonment which may extend to six months,
(1) or sub-section (2) of section 355; or or fine which may extend to one thousand
rupees, or both;
(b) If a master fails to comply with sub-section 355 (5) Fine which may extend to one thousand
(5) of section 355. rupees.
1
[115A If a master fails to comply with section 355A. 355A Imprisonment which may extend to six months
or fine, which may extend to one thousand
rupees or both.]
2
[115B (a) If oil or oily mixture is discharge in
contravention of sub-section (1) of section
356C-
(i) Where such discharge is made from an 356C(1) The master of the tanker shall be liable to fine,
Indian tanker anywhere into the sea; which may extend to five lakh rupees.
(ii) Where such discharge is made from a 356C(1) The master of the tanker, or if the tanker is
foreign tanker anywhere within the unmanned, the person in charge of its
coastal waters of India. operation shall be liable to fine which may
extend to five lakh rupees.
(b) If oil or oily mixture is discharged in
contravention of sub-section (2) of section
356C-
(i) where such discharge is made by an 356C(2) The master of the ship shall be liable to fine
Indian ship other than a tanker which may extend to five lakh rupees.
anywhere into the sea;
(ii) Where such discharge is made from a 356C(2) The master, or if the ship is unmanned, the
foreign ship other than a tanker person in charge of its operation shall be liable
anywhere within the coastal waters of to fine which may extend to five lakh rupees.
India.
(c) If oil or oily mixture is discharged in 356C(3) The master of the off-shore installation if it be
contravention of sub-section (3) of section a mobile craft or the owner, operator, lessee
356C. or licencee of an off-shore installation of any
other type shall be liable to fine which may
extend to five lakh rupees.
118 If any person wilfully disobeys any direction of 392 Fine which may extend to five hundred rupees.
the receiver of wreck under section 392.
119 If the owner or occupier of any land impedes or 393 Fine which may extend to five hundred rupees.
in any way hinders any person in the exercise
of the rights given by section 393.
120 (a) If any person omits to give notice of the 395(a) Fine which may extend to one thousand
finding of any wreck to the receiver of rupees.
wreck as required by clause (a) of section
395; or
(b) if any person omits to deliver any wreck as 395(b) Fine which may extend to one thousand rupees
required by clause (b) of section 395. and in addition forfeiture of all claims to
salvage and payment to the owner of such
wreck, if the same is claimed, or if the same is
unclaimed, to the Government, a penalty, not
exceeding twice the value of such wreck.
126 If a sailing vessel required to be registered under 417 The owner or tindal shall be liable to fine, which
section 417 is not registered in accordance with may extend to five hundred rupees.
the provisions of that section.
127 If the owner fails to comply with section 418 418 Fine which may extend to two hundred rupees.
128 If the provisions of section 419 are contravened. 419 The owner or tindal shall be liable to fine, which
may extend to two hundred rupees.
129 If any sailing vessel attempts to ply or proceed 420(3), 421 The owner or tindal shall be liable to
to sea without free board markings or is so imprisonment, which may extend to six months,
loaded as to submerge such markings, or plies or to fine, which may extend to five hundred
or proceeds to sea without a certificate of rupees, or both.
inspection as required by sub-section (1) of
section 421, or if any of the terms and
conditions specified in such certificate are
contravened.
130 If the owner fails to comply with section 423. 423 Fine which may extend to two hundred rupees
and in addition a fine which may extend to
twenty rupees for every day during which
the offence continues after conviction.
131 If the owner fails to comply with section 425. 425 Fine which may extend to two hundred rupees.
132 If any person contravenes section 426. 426 Fine which may extend to five hundred rupees.
1
[136A If any person is guilty of any offence under 432(1) Imprisonment, which may extend to six months,
sub-section (1) of section 432. or fine which may extend to five hundred
rupees, or both].
1
[137 If the owner fails to comply with sub-section 434A(1) Imprisonment, which may extend to six months,
(1) of section 434A. or fine which may extend to five thousand
rupees, or both].
2
[137A If an Indian fishing boat required to be registered 435C The owner shall be liable to fine which may
under section 435C is not registered in extend to one thousand rupees.
accordance with the provisions of that section.
137B If the owner of an Indian fishing boat fails to 435H The owner shall be liable to fine which may
comply with the provisions of section 435H. extend to two hundred rupees.
137C If provisions of section 435I are contravened. 435I The owner shall be liable to fine, which may
extend two hundred rupees.
137D If provisions of section 435J are contravened. 435J The owner, skipper, tindal or any other person
in charge of the Indian fishing boat shall be
liable to fine which may extend to one
thousand rupees and in addition to fine which
may extend to fifty rupees for every day during
which the offence continues after conviction.
137E If provisions of section 435K are contravened. 435K The owner, skipper, tindal or any other person
in charge of the Indian fishing boat shall be
liable to fine which may extend to one
thousand rupees and in addition to fine which
may extend to fifty rupees for every day
during which the offence continues after
conviction.
137F If provisions of section 435M are contravened 435M The owner shall be liable to fine which may
extend to one thousand rupees and in addition
to fine, which may extend to fifty rupees for
every day during which the offence continues
after conviction.
1 Sec. 137 renumbered to Sec. 136A and Ins. Sec. 137 by MS (Amend.) Act 1984
2 Ins. by sec. 137A to 137K (both incl.) by MS (Amend.) Act 1983
137K If provisions of section 435T are contravened. 435T The owner, skipper, tindal or any other person
in charge of the Indian fishing boat shall be
liable to fine, which may extend to two
hundred rupees].
138 (a) If the master is guilty of an offence under 442(2) Fine which may extend to one thousand
sub-section (2) of section 444; or rupees.
140 If any person does any act in contravention of 454(2) Fine which may extend to two hundred rupees.
sub-section (2) of section 454 in respect of
which no other penalty is provided.
141 If any person is guilty of an offence under sub- 456(2) Fine which may extend to five hundred rupees.
section (2) of section 456
Procedure
437. Any person committing any offence under this Act or any rule or Place of trial
regulation thereunder may be tried for the offence in any place in
which he may be found or which the Central Government may, by
notification in the official Gazette, direct in this behalf, or in any
other place in which he might be tried under any other law for the
time being in force.
438. The penalties to which masters and owners of special trade Cognizance of
passenger and pilgrims ships are made liable by section 436 shall offences
be enforced only on information laid at the instance of the certifying
officer, or, at any port or place where there is no such officer at the
instance of such other officer as the Central Government may specify
in this behalf.
439. No court inferior to that of a 1[Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Jurisdiction of
Magistrate of the first class] shall try any offence under this Act or magistrates
any rule or regulation thereunder.
440. Notwithstanding anything contained in 1[section 29 of the Code of Special provision
Criminal Procedure, 1973], it shall be lawful for a 1[Metropolitan regarding punishment
Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the first class] to pass any
sentence authorised by or under this Act on any person convicted
of an offence under this Act or any rule or regulation thereunder.
441. (1) If the person committing an offence under this Act is a Offences by
company, every person who, at the time the offence was companies
committed, was in charge of, and was responsible to, the
company for the conduct of the business of the company,
as well as the company, shall be deemed to be guilty of the
offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and
punished accordingly:
Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall render any
such person liable to any punishment provided in this Act, if
he proves that the offence was committed without his
knowledge or that he exercised all due diligence to prevent
the commission of such offence.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where
an offence under this Act has been committed by a company,
and it is proved that the offence was committed with the
consent of connivance of or is attributable to any neglect on
the part of, any director, manager secretary or other officer
of the company, such director, manager, secretary or other
officer shall also be deemed to be guilty of that offence and
shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished
accordingly.
association of individuals;
(b) director in relation to a firm means a partner in the firm.
Depositions to be 442. (1) Whenever, in the course of any legal proceeding under this
received in evidence Act instituted at any place in India before any 2[court or
when witness cannot Judicial Magistrate of the first class or Metropolitan
be produced Magistrate] or before any person authorised by law or by
consent of parties to receive evidence, the testimony of any
witness is required in relation to the subject-matter, and the
defendant or the person accused (as the case may be),
after being allowed a reasonable opportunity for so doing,
does not produce the witness before the 2[court or Judicial
Magistrate of the first class or Metropolitan Magistrate] or
person so authorised, any deposition previously made by
the witness in relation to the same subject-matter before
any court, 1[or justice or Judicial Magistrate of the first class
or Metropolitan Magistrate] in any other place in India or, if
elsewhere, before a Marine Board or before any Indian
consular officer, shall be admissible in evidence :
(a) if the deposition is authenticated by the signature of
the presiding officer of the court or of the 2[justice or
Judicial Magistrate of the first class or Metropolitan
Magistrate] or Marine Board or consular officer, before
whom it is made;
(b) if the defendant or the person accused had an
opportunity by himself or his agent of cross examining
the witness;
(c) if the proceeding is criminal, on proof that the deposition
was made in the presence of the person accused.
(2) It shall both be necessary in any case to prove the signature
or official character of the person appearing to have signed
such deposition; and a certificate by such person that the
defendant or person accused had an opportunity of cross
examining the witness, and that the deposition, if made in a
criminal proceeding, was made in the presence of the person
accused, shall, unless the contrary is proved, be sufficient
evidence that he had that opportunity and that it was so
made.
Power to detain 443. (1) Whenever any damage has in any part of the world been
foreign ship that has caused to property belonging to the Government or to any
occasioned damage citizen of India or a company by a ship other than an Indian
ship and at any time thereafter that ship is found within Indian
jurisdiction, the High Court may, upon the application of any
Levy of wages, etc., 445. (1) When an order under this Act for the payment of any wages
by distress of or other sums of money is made by a 1[court or Judicial
movable property or Magistrate of the first class or Metropolitan Magistrate] of
ship other officer or authority, and the money is not paid at the
time or in the manner directed, the sum mentioned in the
order with such further sum as may be thereby awarded for
costs, may be levied by distress and sale of the movable
property of the person directed to pay the same under a
warrant to be issued for that purpose by 1[such a magistrate].
(2) Where any 1[court of Judicial Magistrate of the first class or
Metropolitan, Magistrate or other officer] or authority has
power under this Act to make an order directing payment to
be made of any seaman’s wages, fines or other sums of
money, then if the person so directed to pay the same is
the master, owner or agent of a ship and the same is not
paid at the time or in the manner directed by the order,
1
[Court or Judicial Magistrate of the first class or Metropolitan
Magistrate or officer] or authority may, in addition to any
other power it or he may have for the purpose of compelling
payment by warrant, direct the amount remaining unpaid to
be levied by distress and sale of the ship and her equipment.
Notice to be given to 446. If any ship other than an Indian ship is detained under this Act or if
consular any proceedings are taken under this Act against the master, owner
representative of or agent of any such ship, notice shall forthwith be served on the
proceedings taken in consular officer of the country in which the ship is registered, at or
respect of foreign nearest to the port where the ship is for the time being, and such
ship notice shall specify the grounds on which the ship has been
detained or the proceedings have been taken.
1
Application of fines 447. [A Judicial Magistrate of the first class or Metropolitan Magistrate
as the case may be], imposing a fine under this Act may, if he
thinks fit, direct the whole or any part thereof to be applied in
compensating any person for any detriment which he may have
sustained by the act or default in respect of which the fine is imposed
or in or towards payment of the expenses of the prosecution.
Service of documents 448. Where for the purposes of this Act, any document is to be served
on any person, that document may be served-
(a) in any case by delivering a copy thereof personally to the
person to be served, or by leaving the same at his last place
of abode, or by post; and
(b) if the document is to be served on the master of a ship, where
there is one, or on a person belonging to a ship, by leaving the
same for him on board that ship, with the person being or
appearing to be in command or charge of the ship; and
(c) if the document is to be served on the master of a ship where
there is no master and the ship is in India, on the owner of the
ship, or, if such owner is not in India, on some agent of the
owner residing in India, or, where no such agent is known or
1 Subs. by MS (Amend.) Act 1983, Schedule can be found by affixing a copy thereof to the mast of the ship.
Part XVI1 extending from 436 to 448 deals with penalties for violation of provisions under the
MS Act 1958 and procedure for establishing liability and enforcing penalty. This Part is under scrutiny
for change and updating process, due to redundancy of pecuniary aspects of penalty. Further, it may
be noted that, the MS Act 1958 also prescribes penalties under Section 458 in Part XVII for violation
of rules or regulations. The penalty prescribed in Section 436 (2) almost covers all the infringements/
non-compliance/violation of provisions stipulated in the MS Act 1958 or Rules thereof. Further this
Part clearly lays down that, if penalty is not specified in the table mentioned under Section 436 (2),
then the offence is fixed to the pecuniary liability of two hundred rupees.
With regard to procedural aspects of liability fixation and penalisation including trial,
cognizance, jurisdiction, cognizance, service of notices and documents etc. the details are dealt
with Part XVI of the MS Act 1958. Particular provisions concerning with power to detain foreign ship
in Indian jurisdiction and to enforce detention of Indian ships/vessels; levy of wages, etc. by distress
of movable property or ship; application of fines and offences by companies make this Part dynamic
in operation. Accurate interpretation of the provisions enshrined in Part XVI is possible when the
same is read with complementary provisions of other Parts of the MS Act 1958, which are violated.
The MS Act 1958 under Section 433, refers to detention of foreign vessel as a measure for
enforcing the obligation of possession of relevant and applicable certificates by concerned ships/
vessels/fishing boats, in different provisions grouped in different Parts. The application of Section 444
provides that if a ship, which is ordered to be detained by the concerned authority, violates the
detention order and proceeds to sea, then the master of the ship is guilty of such offence as enumerated
under the Act. Thus concerned provisions, which stipulate detention as an administrative or judicial
act has to be read together with Section 444 for the effective enforcement and implementation of
statutory/punitive measure of detention.
The Honourable Supreme Court in M.V. Elizabeth and Ors. V. Harwan Investment and Trading
2
Pvt. Ltd , while examining powers for detention of foreign ship under Section 443 and Section 444
read with Section 3, had clearly laid down that all foreign ships entering into India is presumed to
possess the knowledge that they fell within the jurisdiction of India. With respect to the jurisdiction of
Metropolitan Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of First Class to pass sentence on offender convicted
for violation of the Act or its rules and regulations, the Section 29 of Criminal Procedure Code is made
inapplicable by means of notwithstanding clause.3
1
Corresponding penalties are mentioned in respective commentaries applicable to specific provisions.
2
AIR 1993 SC 1014
3
Section 440 of MS Act 1958.
PART XVII
MISCELLANEOUS
Power to appoint 449. The Central Government may appoint persons for the purpose of
examiners and to examining the qualifications of persons desirous of practising the
make rules as to profession of a ship surveyor at any port in India and may make
qualifications of ship rules-
surveyors (a) for the conduct of such examinations and the qualification
to be required;
(b) for the grant of certificates to qualified persons;
(c) for the fees to be paid for such examinations and certificates;
(d) for holding inquires into charges of incompetency and
misconduct on the part of holders of such certificates; and
(e) for the cancellation and suspension of such certificates.
No person to practise 450. No person shall in any port in which there is a person exercising
as ship surveyor the profession of a ship surveyor and holding a certificate granted
unless qualified under section 449 exercise such profession in such port unless he
holds a certificate granted under that section:
Provided that nothing herein contained shall prevent any person
employed exclusively by Lloyd’s Register of Shipping or Bureau
Vertical or any other classification society specified by the Central
Government in the Official Gazette in this behalf from discharging
any of the duties of such employment or apply to any person
specially exempted by the Central Government from the operation
of this section.
Power of ship 451. Any person holding a certificate granted under section 449 and
surveyor to inspect exercising the profession of a ship surveyor at any port in India
ship may in the execution of his duties go on board a ship and inspect
the same and every part thereof and the machinery, equipment and
cargo and may require the unloading or removal of any cargo, ballast
or tackle.
Inquiry into cause of 452. (1) If any person dies on board a foreign-going Indian ship, the
death on board Indian proper officer at the port where the crew of the ship is
ship discharged, or the proper officer at any earlier port of call in
India, shall, on the arrival of the ship at that port, inquire into
the cause of death, and shall make in the official log book
an endorsement to the effect, either that the statement of
the cause of death in the book is in his opinion true, or the
contrary, according to the result of the inquiry.
(2) If, in the course of any such inquiry, it appears to the proper
officer that a death has been caused on board the ship by
violence or other improper means, he shall either report the
matter to the Director-General or, if the emergency of the
case so requires, shall take immediate steps for bringing
the offender to trial.
453. The following persons shall be deemed to be public servants within Certain persons
the meaning of section 21 of the Indian Penal Code, namely- deemed to be public
(a) ever surveyor; servants
(b) every judge, assessor or other person acting under Part XIII;
(c) every person appointed under this Act to report information
as to shipping casualties;
(d) every person authorised under this Act to make any
investigation or inquiry under Part X and all persons whom
he calls to his aid;
(e) every person directed to make an investigation into an
explosion or fire on a ship under section 388;
(f) every other officer or person appointed under this Act to
perform any functions thereunder.
454. (1) Every judge, assessor, officer or other person who is Powers of persons
empowered by this Act to make an investigation or inquiry authorised to
or to board, survey, inspect or detain a ship- investigate, etc.
(a) may go on board any ship and inspect the same or
any part thereof, or any of the machinery, equipment
or articles on board thereof, or any certificates of the
master or other officer to which the provisions of this
Act or any of the rules or regulations thereunder apply,
not unnecessarily detaining or delaying the ship from
proceeding on any voyage, and if in consequence of
any accident to the ship or for any other reason it is
considered necessary so to do, may require the ship to
be taken into dock for the purpose of inspection or survey;
(b) may enter and inspect any premises, the entry and
inspection of which appear to be requisite for the
purpose aforesaid;
(c) may, by summons under his hand, require the
attendance of all such persons as he thinks fit to call
before him and examine them for the purpose aforesaid,
and may require answers or returns to any enquiries
he thinks fit to make;
(d) may require and enforce the production of all relevant
books papers, or documents;
(e) may administer oaths or may in lieu of requiring or
administering an oath, require every person examined by
him to make and subscribe a declaration of the truth of
the statements made by him in his examination; and
(f) may muster the crew of any such ship.
(2) No person shall hinder or obstruct any officer or person
referred to in sub-section (1) from going on board any ship or
otherwise impedes him in the execution of his duties or the
exercise of his powers under this Act.
alternative fitting, etc. or apparatus or any type thereof shall be fitted or provided for in a
ship or that any particular provision shall be made in a ship, the
Central Government after satisfying itself by trials or otherwise
that any other fitting, material, appliance or apparatus or type thereof
or provision is as effective as that so required, may permit, by
general or special order, such other fitting, material, appliance or
apparatus or type thereof or provision to be used or provided.]
Exemption of public 455. (1) This Act shall not, except where specially provided, apply
ship, foreign and to ships belonging to any foreign prince or State and
Indian employed otherwise than for profit in the public service of
the foreign prince or State.
(2) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official
Gazette, direct that the provisions of this Act or any of them
shall not apply to ships belonging to the Government or to
any class such ships.
Power to exempt 456. (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the Central
Government may, by order in writing an upon such conditions,
if any, as it may think fit to impose, exempt any ship or
sailing vessel or any master, tindal or seaman from any
specified requirement contained in or prescribed in
pursuance of this Act or dispense with the observance of
any such requirement in the case of any ship or sailing
vessel or any master, tindal or seaman, if it is satisfied that
that requirement has been substantially complied with or
that compliance with the requirement is or ought to be
dispensed with in the circumstances of the case :
[Provided that no exemption, which is prohibited by the
2
1
Removal of difficulties [460A. (1) If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of this
Act, in so far as they relate to the Safety Convention or to
the Load Line Convention or to the Convention referred to in
clause (a) of section 356B, the Central Government may,
by order published in the Official Gazette, make such
provisions not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act,
as appear to it to be necessary or expedient for removing
the difficulty and giving effect to the provisions of such
Convention :
Provided that no order shall be made under this Section
after the expiry of three years from the date of publication of
the Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1970 in the Official
Gazette.
(2) Every order made under this section shall be laid as soon
as may be after it is made before each House of Parliament
while it is in session for a total period of thirty days which
may be comprised in one session or in two successive
sessions.]
Similar to the Part XVI on Penalties and Procedure, Part XVII on Miscellaneous Provisions
are specific in nature but general in application. The application has to be understood when the same
is read with other provisions under the Act. For instance, the “power to exempt” mentioned under
Section 456 of the MS Act 1958 is a precise power that can be generally applied through a non
arbitrary executive order in writing. This discretion and leverage is kept for ensuring the efficiency of
the Act in rising to the necessities that are unforeseen by the lawmakers through the existing provisions.
Further, the Rule making power entrusted with the Central Government under various Parts of the Act
has to be read with the enactment procedures mentioned in Section 458 of the MS Act 1958, which
otherwise would amount to non compliance of procedures laid down in the statute and hence will be
declared arbitrary and unconstitutional.
PART XVIII
REPEALS AND SAVINGS
Repeals and savings 461. (1) The enactments specified in Part I of the Schedule are hereby
repealed to the extend specified in the fourth column thereof.
(2) The enactments specified in Part II of the Schedule, in so
far as they extend to and operate as part of the law of India,
are hereby repeals.
(3) Notwithstanding the repeal of any enactment by sub-section
(1) or sub-section (2):
(a) any notification, rule, regulation, bye-law, order or
exemption issued, made or granted under any
enactment hereby repealed shall, until revoked, have
effect as if it had been issued, made or granted under
the corresponding provision of this Act;
(b) any officer appointed and any body elected or
constituted under any enactment hereby repealed shall
continue and shall be deemed to have been appointed,
elected or constituted, as the case may be, under this
Act;
(c) any document referring to any enactment hereby
repealed shall be constructed as referring to this Act
or to the corresponding provision of this Act;
(d) any fine levied under any enactment hereby repealed
may be recovered as if it had been levied under this
Act;
(e) any offence committed under any enactment hereby
repealed may be prosecuted and punished as if it had
been committed under this Act;
(f) sailing vessels registered under any enactment hereby
repealed shall be deemed to have been registered under
the Act;
(g) mortgages of ships recorded in any register book
maintained at any port in Indian under any enactment
hereby repealed shall be deemed to have been recorded
in the register book under the corresponding provision
of this Act;
(h) any licence, certificate of competency or service,
certificate of survey, A or B certificate, safety certificate,
qualified safety certificate, radio telegraphy certificate,
radio telephony certificate, safety equipment certificate,
exemption certificate, international or Indian load line
certificate or any other certificate or document issued,
made or granted under any enactment hereby repealed
1
Black’s Law Dictionary (8th ed. 2004) , Page 4056. Also see Gammon India Ltd. vs. Special Chief Secretary and Ors.
2006 (3) SCC 354
2
Ibid see page 4184.
THE SCHEDULE
ENACTMENTS REPEALED
PART I
[See section 461 (1)]
Year Number Short title Extent of repeal
1838 19 The Coasting Vessels Act, 1838 In so far as it applies to seagoing
ships fitted with mechanical means
of propulsion and to sailing vessels.
1841 10 The Indian Registration of Ships Act, 1841 The whole.
1850 11 The Indian Registration of Ships Act (1841)
Amendment Act, 1850 The whole.
1923 21 The Indian Merchant Shipping Act, 1923 The whole.
1946 21 The Merchant Seamen (Litigation) Act, 1946 The whole.
1947 26 The Control of Shipping Act, 1947 The whole.
1949 18 The Merchant Shipping Laws (Extension to
Acceding States and Amendment) Act, 1949 The whole.
PART II
[See section 461 (2)]
Year Short title
1823 Lascars Act (4 Geo. 4, c.80).
1894 Merchant Shipping Act (57 & 58 Vict., c.60).
1897 Merchant Shipping Act (60 & 61 Vict., c.59).
1898 Merchant Shipping (Liability of Shipowners) Act (61 & 62 Vict,. c.14).
1898 Merchant Shipping (Mercantile Marine Fund) Act (61 & 62 Vict., c.44).
1900 Merchant Shipping (Liability of Shipowners and Others) Act (63 & 64 Vict., c.32).
1906 Merchant Shipping Act (6 Edw. 7, c.48).
1907 Merchant Shipping Act (7. Edw. 7, c.52).
1911 Merchant Shipping (Seamen’s Allotment) Act (1 & 2 Geo. 5, c.8).
1911 Merchant Shipping Act (1 & 2 Geo. 5, c.42).
1911 Maritime Conventions Act (1 & 2 Geo. 5, c.57).
1914 Merchant Shipping (Certificates) Act (4 &5 Geo. 5, c.42).
1916 Merchant Shipping (Salvage) Act (6 & 7 Geo. 5, c.41).
1919 Merchant Shipping (Wireless Telegraphy) Act (9 & 10 Geo. 5, c.38).
1921 Merchant Shipping Act (11 & 12 Geo. 5, c.28).
1923 Merchant Shipping Acts (Amendment) Act (13 & 14 Geo. 5, c.40).
1925 Merchant Shipping (Equivalent Provisions) Act (15 & 16 Geo. 5, c.37).
1932 Merchant Shipping (Safety and Load Line Conventions) Act (22 & 23 Geo. 5, c.9).
1936 Merchant Shipping (Carriage of Munitions to Spain) Act (1 Edw. 8 & 1 Geo. 6, c.1).
1937 Merchant Shipping (Spanish Frontiers Observation) Act (1 Edw. 8 & 1 Geo. 6. c.19).
1937 Merchant Shipping Act (1 Edw. 8 & 1 Geo. 6, c.23).
1937 Merchant Shipping (Superannuation Contributions) Act (1 Geo. 6, c.4).
1940 Merchant Shipping (Salvage) Act (3 & 4 Geo. 6, c.43).
Occasionally, the legislature has been slow in rising to the global industry standards and
regulations. This has proved to be both a boon and a curse for the Indian mercantile marine. It can be
a boon to the mercantile marine, because under circumstances where India fails to adopt the standards
warranted by time, slower will be the efforts to improve compliance with standards and thereby
expenditure so incurred will be much lower. It is also a curse to the Indian maritime industry. The
shipping industry in India including shipowners, who do not comply with the prescribed international
standards, have been declined opportunities to involve in trade by shipping giants; whereby the non
availability of market space due to lower levels of competency would hinder the growth of Indian
mercantile marine.
M.V. Elizabeth a foreign flag vessel, after loading cargo belonging to plaintiff - shipper, a
private limited company; left the Port of Marmagao without issuing bills of lading or other documents
for the goods shipped as required by the plaintiff. The plaintiff had also directed the owners/master
that the goods shall not be delivered to the consignee since the buyer had not made the payment of
the same, at the agreed price. But without complying with the direction of the plaintiff to not deliver
the goods to the consignee, the goods of the plaintiff were discharged and handed over to the
consignee, at the port of destination at Ras-Al-Khaimah, United Arab Emirates.
By virtue of the suit instituted at the High Court of Andhra Pradesh and the subsequent order
of the Court for arresting the vessel, the vessel M.V. Elizabeth was arrested when she entered the
port of Vishakapatanam in India. The main claims of the plaintiff were that of (a) breach of duty and
(b) conversion of goods entrusted to the defendants. Only when the owner furnished a bank guarantee
for an amount to the tune of INR 14,25,000/; was the vessel allowed to be removed from detention by
the Court. Among the major objections raised by the defendants, the main objection included dispute
as to jurisdiction. While addressing the question as to jurisdiction to arrest a foreign vessel, the
Honourable Supreme Court had clearly laid down in the following paragraphs that,
1
Opinion mentioned and emphasis made, i.e. other than that has been placed under quote/unquote; are the views of the
author. It has nothing to do with interpretation and conclusion made by the Honourable Supreme Court.
Analyzing the principles of admiralty jurisdiction, the apex court reiterated in paragraph 47 of the
judgment that,
“The foundation of an action in rem, which is a peculiarity of the Anglo-American law, arises
from a maritime lien or claim imposing a personal liability upon the owner of the vessel. A
defendant in an admiralty action in personam is liable for the full amount of the plaintiffs
established claim. Likewise, a defendant acknowledging service in an action in rem is liable to
be saddled with full liability even when the amount of the judgment exceeds the value of the res
or of the bail provided. An action in rem lies in the English High Court in respect of matters
regulated by the Supreme Court Act, 1981, and in relation to a number of claims the jurisdiction
can be invoked not only against the offending ship in question but also against a ‘sistership’
i.e., a ship in the same beneficial ownership as the ship in regard to which the claim arose.
The vessel which commits the aggression is treated as the offender, as the guilty instrument
or thing to which the forfeiture attaches, without any reference whatsoever to the character or
conduct of the owner...”.
Under Paragraph 48: Court reaffirmed the purpose of arrest of ships by analyzing the nature
of maritime trade that the “Merchant ships of different nationalities travel from port to port
carrying goods or passengers. They incur liabilities in the course of their voyage and they
subject themselves to the jurisdiction of foreign States when they enter the waters of those
States. They are liable to be arrested for the enforcement of maritime claims, or seized in
execution or satisfaction of judgments in legal actions arising out of collisions, salvage, loss of
life .or personal injury, loss of or damage to goods and the like. They are liable to be detained
or confiscated by the authorities of foreign States for violating their customs regulations, safety
measures, rules of road, health regulations and for other causes. The coastal State may
exercise its criminal jurisdiction on board the vessel for the purpose of arrest or investigation in
connection with certain serious crimes. In the course of an international voyage, a vessel thus
subjects itself to the public and private laws of various countries. A ship travelling from port to
port stays very briefly in any one port. A plaintiff seeking to enforce his maritime claim against
a foreign Ship has no effective remedy once it has sailed away and if the foreign owner has
neither property nor residence within jurisdiction. The plaintiff may therefore detain the ship by
obtaining an order of attachment whenever it is feared that the ship is likely to slip out of
jurisdiction, thus leaving the plaintiff without any security.”
In paragraph 65: Court laid down that “where statutes are silent and remedy has to be
sought by recourse to basic principles, it is the duty of the court to devise procedural rules by
analogy and expediency. Actions in rem, as seen above, were resorted to by courts as a
device to overcome the difficulty of personal service on the defendant by compelling him to
enter appearance and accept service of summons with a view to furnishing security for the
release of the res’, or, in his absence, proceed against the res itself, by attributing to it a
personality for the purpose of entering a decree and executing the same by sale of the res.
This is a practical procedural device developed by the courts with a view to rendering justice in
accordance with substantive law not only in cases of collision and salvage, but also in cases
of other maritime liens and claims arising by reason of breach of contract for the hire of vessels
or the carriage of goods or other maritime transactions, or tortious acts, such as conversion or
negligence occurring in connection with the carriage of goods. Where substantive law demands
justice for the party aggrieved, and the statute has not provided the remedy, it is the duty of the
court to devise procedure by drawing analogy from other systems of law and practice. To the
courts of the “civil law countries” in Europe and other places, like problems seldom arise, for
all persons and things within their territories (including their waters) fall within their competence
to deal with. They do not have to draw any distinction between an action in rem and an action
in personam”.
In Paragraph 66: Court laid down that “It is likewise within the competence of the appropriate
Indian Courts to deal, in accordance with the general principles of maritime law and the applicable
provisions of statutory law, with all persons and things found within their jurisdiction. The
power of the court is plenary and unlimited unless it is expressly or by necessary implication
curtailed. Absent such curtailment of jurisdiction, all remedies which are available to the courts
to administer justice are available to a claimant against a foreign ship and its owner found
within the jurisdiction of the concerned High Court. This power of the court to render justice
must necessarily include the power to make interlocutory orders for arrest and attachment
before judgment”.
Under Paragraph 67: Court reiterated that the “High Courts in India are superior courts of
record. They have original and appellate jurisdiction. They have inherent and plenary powers.
Unless expressly or impliedly barred, and subject to the appellate or discretionary jurisdiction
of this Court, the High Courts have unlimited jurisdiction, including the jurisdiction to determine
their own powers. ….. Prima facie, no matter is deemed to be beyond the jurisdiction of a
superior court unless it is expressly shown to be so, while nothing is within the jurisdiction of
an inferior court unless it is expressly shown on the face of the proceedings that the particular
matter is within the cognizance of the particular court.”
In paragraph 76: listing out the enactments in India, which are applicable to maritime trade/
merchant shipping, Court reiterated that, “In India, carriage of goods by sea is governed by the
Indian Bills of Lading Act, 1856, the Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925, the Merchant
Shipping Act, 1958, and general statutes, such as the Marine Insurance Act, 1963, the Contract
Act, 1872, the Evidence Act, 1872, the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the Transfer of Property Act,
1882, the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, the Companies
Act, 1956, etc. etc. as well as the general principles of law such as the law of tort, public and
private international law etc. In this connection, reference may also be made to the Indian
Ports Act, 1908 and the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 concerning the administration of the port
and the jurisdiction over ships in port, the Customs Act, 1962 containing various regulatory
measures affecting ships, goods and persons in connection with importation or exportation of
goods, as well as the provisions governing employment of labour. The Indian Bills of Lading
Act, 1856 emphasises the negotiable and other characteristics of a bill of lading. The Carriage
of Goods by Sea Act, 1925, contains the Hague Rules regulating the respective rights and
liabilities of the parties to a contract governed by bills of lading or similar documents of title for
carriage of goods by sea “from any port in India to any other port whether in India or outside
India”.
Referring to the delay on the part of legislature of India, Court mentioned that “It is true that
Indian statutes lag behind the development of international law in comparison to
contemporaneous statutes in England and other maritime countries. Although the Hague Rules
are embodied in the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925, India never became a party to the
International Convention laying down those rules (International Convention for the Unification of
Certain Rules of Law relating to Bills of Lading, Brussels 1924). The Carriage of Goods by Sea
Act, 1925 merely followed the (United Kingdom) Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1924. The
United Kingdom repealed the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1924 with a view to incorporating
the Visby Rules adopted by the Brussels Protocol of 1968. The Hague-Visby Rules were
accordingly adopted by the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1971 (United Kingdom). Indian
legislation has not, however, progressed, notwithstanding the Brussels Protocol of 1968 adopting
the Visby Rules or the United Nations Convention on the Carriage of Goods by Sea, 1978
adopting the Hamburg Rules. The Hamburg Rules prescribe the minimum liabilities of the
carrier far more justly and equitably than the Hague Rules so as to correct the tilt in the latter
in favour of the carriers. The Hamburg Rules are acclaimed to be a great improvement on the
Hague Rules and far more beneficial from the point of view of the cargo owners. India has also
not adopted the International Convention relating to the Arrest of Sea-going Ships, Brussels,
1952. Nor has India adopted the Brussels Conventions of 1952 on civil and penal jurisdiction in
matters of collision; nor the Brussels Conventions of 1926 and 1967 relating to maritime liens
and mortgages13. India seems to be lagging behind many other countries in ratifying and
adopting the beneficial provisions of various conventions intended to facilitate international
trade. Although these conventions have not been adopted by legislation, the principles
incorporated in the conventions are themselves derived from the common law of nations as
embodying the felt necessities of international trade and arc as such part of the common law
of India and applicable for the enforcement of maritime claims against foreign ships.
And the Court on the applicability of Merchant Shipping Act 1958 (Act 44 of 1958), had laid
down that Paragraph 76: “…………………The Merchant Shipping Act embodies rules regarding
registration of Indian ships; transfers or mortgages of ships or shares; national character and
flag; employment of seamen; safety, nuclear ships; collisions, accidents at sea and liability;
limitation of liability; navigation; prevention of pollution; investigation and enquiries; wreck and
salvage; coasting trade; sailing vessels; penalties and procedure, etc. May of these provisions
have been adopted from rules formulated by various international conventions.”
Paragraph 77: “The Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 contains various provisions to enforce
territorial jurisdiction. The Act being essentially regulatory in character, the various authorities,
tribunals and Courts entrusted with the administration and enforcement of its provisions are
specifically stated. The High Court is defined under Section 3(15) as follows:
3(15). ‘High Court’, in relation to a vessel, means the High Court within the limits of whose
appellate jurisdiction-
Accordingly, a foreign ship falls within the jurisdiction of the High Court where the vessel
happens to be at the relevant time - i.e., at the time when the jurisdiction of the High Court is
invoked, or, where the cause of action wholly or in part arises.”
Paragraph 78: “The detention of a foreign ship is authorised in terms of sections 443 and
444. ………………………….. These provisions relate to detention by reason of damage caused
in any part of the world by a foreign ship to property belonging to the Government of India or to
an Indian citizen or company. The sections are wide in terms and the expression ‘damage’ is
not necessarily confined to physical damage. Ordinarily damage is caused by physical contact
of the ship, such as in collision. But damage can also be caused to property by breach of
contract or acts of commission or omission on the part of the carrier or his agents or servants
by reason of the negligent operation and management of the vessel, as, for example, when
cargo is damaged by exposure to weather or by negligent stowage; or, by the misconduct of
those in charge of the ship, like when cargo is disposed of contrary to the instructions of the
owner or by reason of theft and other misdeeds. In all these cases, damage arises by reason
of loss caused by what is done by the snip or by the breach, negligence or misdeeds of those
in charge of the ship. It must however be noticed that the expression ‘damage done by any
ship’ has been construed by the English Courts as not to apply to claims against the carrying
ship for damage done to cargo. In the Victoria 1887 12 PD 105, the Court so construed
Section 7 of the Admiralty Court Act, 1861 (24 Victorine c.10).14 It has been held to apply only
to physical damage done by a ship by reason of its coming into contact with something. See
The Vera Cruz, (1884) 9 PD 96; Currie v. M. Knight (1897) AC 97 and The Jade (1976)1 All.E.R.
920. In view of the specific provisions of the English statutes of 1920, 1925, 1956 and 1981, it
was unnecessary for the English Courts to construe the expression broadly so as to include
cargo claims and the like. The last two enactments contain an exhaustive list of maritime
claims and questions in regard to which the High Court can exercise jurisdiction over any
merchant ship by arresting it as it enters the waters of Britain. This power, as already noticed,
is available, whatever be the nationality of the ship or its owner or the domicile or place of
residence or business of the owner, or wherever the cause of action has arisen. About the
words ‘damage done by a ship’ in Section 7 of the Admiralty Court Act, 1861 and the decision
in The Victoria (1887) 12 PD 105 to the effect that the section had no application to claims
against the carrying ship for damage to cargo, the following observation significantly appears
in Halsbury’s Laws of England, 4th ed, Vol. 1(1), para 319 N. 12.
... but this question is academic in the light of the fact that jurisdiction in respect of claims for
damage to cargo carried in a ship is now expressly given by the Supreme Court Act, 1981
Section 20(2)(g).”
Paragraph 79: In the absence of any statute in India comparable to the English statutes on
admiralty jurisdiction, there is no reason why the words “damage caused by a ship” appearing
in Section 443 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 should be so narrowly construe as to limit
them to physical damage and exclude any other damage arising by reason of the operation of
the vessel in connection with the carnage of goods. The expression is wide enough to include
all maritime questions or claims. If goods or other property are lost or damaged, whether by
physical contact or otherwise, by reason of unauthorised acts or negligent conduct on the part
of the shipowner or his agents or servants, wherever the cause of action has arisen, or wherever
the ship is registered, or wherever the owner has his residence or domicile or place of business,
such a ship, at the request of the person aggrieved, is liable to be detained when found within
Indian jurisdiction by recourse to sections 443 and 444 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958
read with the appropriate rules of practice and procedure of the High Court. These procedural
provisions are but tools for enforcement of substantive rights which are rooted in general
principles of law, apart from statutes, and for the enforcement of which a party aggrieved has
a right to invoke the inherent jurisdiction of a superior court.”
Paragraph 80: “The Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925 applies to carriage of goods
by sea under bills of lading or similar documents of title from a port in India to any other port
whether in or outside India. (See Section 2). The Act imposes certain responsibilities and
liabilities and confers certain rights and immunities upon the carrier (see Articles III & IV). In
respect of a claim relating to an outward cargo, the cargo owner has a right to bring a suit
against a shipowner subject to the period of limitation specified under the Act, namely, one
year [Article III (6)]. The substantive rights recognised by the statute are of equal application to
foreign merchant ships as they are to Indian merchant ships. The Carriage of Goods by Sea
Act does not, however, contain any provision for the enforcement of the right by arresting the
foreign vessel found in Indian waters. In the absence of arrest, no effective remedy against a
foreign owner may be available to the cargo owner. The same is the position with regard to
claims relating to cargo carried under a charterparty. It is, therefore, necessary that he should
have recourse to the remedy available to him under the Merchant Shipping Act. That Act, as
stated earlier, confers a right to arrest a vessel in respect of any damage caused by a ship. If
that. expression, in the absence of any other more appropriate statute, is understood sufficiently
broadly as an enabling provision to effectively assume jurisdiction over a foreign ship for the
Paragraph 81: “The Merchant Shipping Act empowers the concerned High Court to arrest a
ship in respect of a substantive right. A right conferred by the Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea
Act, 1925 in respect of outward cargo is one of those rights which can be enforced by arrest
and detention of the foreign ship in order to found jurisdiction over the vessel and its owners,
just as it can be done in respect of inward cargo by reason of the substantive rights conferred
by the Admiralty Court Act, 1961 read with the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890, and
other rules of law. The same principle must hold good for carriage under a charterparty. These
and other laws, such as a the law of contract, tort, crime, mortgage, marine insurance, customs,
port operations, etc., and the Civil and Criminal Procedure Codes as well as the relevant rules
of court regulating procedure and practice together constitute the body of substantive and
procedural laws governing claims relating to inward and outward cargo, and such claims are
enforceable against foreign ships by recourse to arrest and detention when found within
jurisdiction. Viewed in this light, and by this reasoning, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, as a
successor to the Madras High Court, does not lack admiralty jurisdiction in respect of claims
relating to outward cargo.”
Paragraph 82: “The admiralty jurisdiction of the High Court is dependent on the presence of
the foreign ship in Indian waters and founded on the arrest of that ship. This jurisdiction can be
assumed by the concerned High Court, whether or not the defendant resides or carries on
business, or the cause of action arose wholly or in part, within the local limits of its jurisdiction.
Once a foreign ship is arrested within the local limits of the jurisdiction of the High Court, and
the owner of the ship has entered appearance and furnished security to the satisfaction of the
High Court for the release of the ship, the proceedings continue as a personal action.”
Paragraph 83: The Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 provides a detailed code of substantive and
procedural rules regulating shipping as an industry and the control exercised over it by the
competent authorities in conformity with various international conventions which have, under
the auspices of International Organisations such as the IMO or the ILO, unified and developed
various aspects of snipping laws. Conventions regulating sea traffic, safety of life at sea,
employment of seamen, wages, hours of work, social security, etc. are cases in point. Likewise,
the substantive rules concerning transport of goods are contained in the Indian Bills of Lading
Act, 1856 and the Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925. But the jurisdictional questions
concerning arrest of foreign ships for enforcement of claims against the shipowner as a
transporter of goods, which in England are regulated by The Supreme Court Act, 1981, are in
many respects left unregulated by Indian legislation. While the provisions of various international
conventions concerning arrest of ships, civil and penal jurisdiction in matters of collision,
maritime liens and mortgages etc. have been incorporated into the municipal laws of many
maritime States, India, as stated above, lags behind them in adopting these unified rules. By
reason of this void, doubts about jurisdiction often arise, as in the present case, when substantive
rights, such as those recognised by the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, are sought to be
enforced. The remedy lies, apart from enlightened judicial construction, in prompt legislative
action to codify and clarify the admiralty laws of this country. This requires thorough research
and investigation by a team of experts in admiralty law, comparative law, and public and private
international law. Any attempt to codify without such investigation is bound to be futile.”
Paragraph 86: “The judicial power of this country, which is an aspect of national sovereignty,
is vested in the people and is articulated in the provisions of the Constitution and the laws and
is exercised by courts empowered to exercise it. It is absurd to confine that power to the
provisions of imperial statutes of a bygone age. Access to court which is an important right
vested in every citizen implies the existence of the power of the Court to render justice according
to law. Where statute is silent and judicial intervention is required, Courts strive to redress
grievances according to what is perceived to be principles of justice, equity and good
conscience.”
The case of M. V. Elizabeth is thus an eye – opener with regard to the need for the development and
updation of the existing legal regime.