Kaysville City Council Meeting 6.4.2020

MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA
AMENDED
Notice is hereby given that the Kaysville City Council will hold a regular council meeting on Thursday, June 4,
2020, starting at 7:00 P.M. in the Business Resource Center of the Davis Technical College, 450 South
Simmons Way, Kaysville, UT. Budget Hearings will be held before the meeting beginning at 6:30 P.M. A
Kaysville Business Park Architectural Review Committee Meeting and Municipal Building Authority Board
Meeting will be held following the City Council Meeting.
In consideration of the COVID-19 pandemic, attendance will be monitored by the Kaysville City Police
Department and will be limited to less than 50 individuals, including Council, Staff and Applicants. Because
of the room occupancy limitation, it is encouraged that those wishing to watch the meeting do so by viewing the
meeting online. The meeting will be streamed on YouTube, and the link to the meeting will be posted on
www.KaysvilleLive.com.
Masks are recommended, and all of those in attendance will be required to participate in a socially distant manner.
For those wishing to direct comments to the City Council regarding public hearings or items on the agenda can do
so in-person, or email comments to publiccomment@kaysvillecity.com. Due to coronavirus concerns and in
order to minimize multiple individuals physically touching sign-up sheets and other materials, members
wishing to speak during an Action Item or during Call to the Public MUST sign-up to speak Before 4:00
P.M. on the day of the Council meeting by going to www.kaysvillelive.com. No participation using Zoom will be
available.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
6:30 P.M. - Redevelopment Agency Budget Hearing
6:35 P.M. - Municipal Building Authority Budget Hearing
6:40 P.M. - Kaysville City Council Budget Hearing Fiscal Year 2021 - Enterprise Funds Inter-fund
Services and Transfers
6:45 P.M. - Kaysville City Council Budget Hearing Fiscal Year 2021
CITY COUNCIL MEETING – 7:00 P.M.

The agenda shall be as follows:
1. OPENING
a. Provided by Council Member John Adams.
2. DECLARATION OF ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
3. CONSENT ITEMS
a. Approval of the Minutes of May 7, 2020.
b. Approval of purchase for Ermco transformers – Power Department.
c. Approval of purchase for power poles – Power Department.
d. A Resolution authorizing the City Council to censure Katie Witt, authorizing the Mayor Pro-Tem to
Issue a Public Letter of Censure, and respectfully requesting that Ms. Witt resign.
4. ACTION ITEMS
a. Ordinance amending Title 2, Chapter 2, Section 12 regarding Termination of Electrical Service.
b. Rezone of approximately 2.04 acres of property at 711 East Crestwood Road from the R-1-8 (Single
Family Residential) to the A-1 (Light Agricultural) zoning district – Rustin Jessen.
c. Rezone of approximately 1.47 acres of property at 1413 West Webb Lane from R-1-20 (Single Family
Residential) to the R-1-14 (Single Family Residential) zoning district to include the PRUD overlay
zone – Mike Hardin.
d. Rezone of approximately 23.0 acres of property at 1300 East 1084 North to include the PRUD (Planned
Residential Unit Development) overlay zone and consideration of a development agreement for a
common open space subdivision with private streets – Talbots and Morton Development Group.
5. WORK ITEMS
a. Kaysville Fiber RFP Results Discussion.
6. CALL TO THE PUBLIC (3 MINUTE LIMIT, MUST SIGN UP IN ADVANCE)
7. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
8. CITY MANAGER REPORT
9. ADJOURNMENT
KAYSVILLE BUSINESS PARK ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
1. Consideration of covered parking (carport) structures at 610 North 900 West (Lot 117B) for the Kaysville
Professional Buildings complex.
MUNICIPAL BUILDING AUTHORITY BOARD MEETING
1. Furniture purchase for Kaysville City Municipal Building.
Kaysville City is dedicated to a policy of non-discrimination in admission to, access to, or operations of its programs,
services or activities. If you need special assistance due to a disability, please contact the Kaysville City Offices at
(801) 546-1235 at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting to be held.
I hereby certify that I posted a copy of the foregoing Notice and Agenda and emailed copies to media representatives
on May 29, 2020.
__________________
Annemarie Plaizier
City Recorder
KAYSVILLE CITY
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
FY 2021 BUDGET HEARINGS
Notice is hereby given that the Fiscal Year 2021 Budgets have been adopted and are
available for public inspection. The Kaysville City Council will hold Budget Hearings
on Thursday, June 4, 2020, starting at 6:30 p.m. The Hearings are being held
electronically due to Governor Herbert's "Stay Safe, Stay Home" directive, and in line
with the City's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Council Members and City Staff
will participate live from remote locations, but residents can still view the meeting live
by going to www.kaysvillelive.com. Members of the public wishing to make comments
may do so by going to www.kaysvillelive.com.
Kaysville City will hold Budget Hearings on June 4, 2020 related to the Kaysville
City Fiscal Year 2021 Budgets.
6:30 p.m. Redevelopment Agency Budget Hearing
Notice is hereby given that the Kaysville Redevelopment Agency will hold a Budget
Hearing on June 4, 2020 at 6:30 p.m. The agenda shall be as follows:
1. Opening.
2. Amendments to the Kaysville City Redevelopment Agency Budget for Fiscal
Year 2020.
3. Consideration of the Kaysville City Redevelopment Agency Budget for Fiscal
Year 2021.
4. Adjournment.
6:35 p.m. Municipal Building Authority Budget Hearing
Notice is hereby given that the Kaysville Municipal Building Authority will hold a
Budget Hearing on June 4, 2020 at 6:35 p.m. The Agenda shall be as follows:
1. Opening.
2. Amendments to the Kaysville City Municipal Building Authority Budget Fiscal
Year 2020.
3. Consideration of the Kaysville Municipal Building Authority Budget for Fiscal
Year 2021.
4. Adjournment.
6:40 p.m. Kaysville City Council Budget Hearing Fiscal Year 2021 -
Enterprise Funds Inter-fund Services and Transfers.
Notice is hereby given that the City Council will hold a Budget Hearing on June 4,
2020 at 6:40 p.m. The Agenda shall be as follows:
1. Opening.
2. Enterprise Funds- Inter-fund Services and Transfers.
3. Adjournment.
6:45 p.m. Kaysville City Council Budget Hearing Fiscal Year 2021
Notice is hereby given that the City Council will hold a Budget Hearing on June 4,
2020 at 6:45 p.m. The Agenda shall be as follows:
1. Amendments to the Kaysville City Fiscal Year 2020 Budgets.

2. Consideration of the Kaysville City Fiscal Year 2021 Budgets.
The tentative budgets have been adopted and are available for public inspection on
the City website or at the City Offices during regular business hours.
Kaysville City is dedicated to a policy of non-discrimination in admission to, access

to, or operations of its programs, services or activities. If you need special
assistance due to a disability please contact the Kaysville City office at 801-546-
1235.
I hereby certify that I posted a copy of the foregoing Notice and Agendas at City
Hall, mailed copies to media representatives, and sent a copy to the Davis County
Clipper for publication.
______________________________
Annemarie Plaizier
City Recorder
KAYSVILLE CITY
MUNICIPAL BUILDING AUTHORITY BOARD
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING AND AGENDA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of the Governing Board of the Municipal
Building Authority of Kaysville City, Utah (the “Authority”) will be held on Thursday, June 4,
2020 at 8:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the City Council Meeting adjourns, in the Business
Resource Center of the Davis Technical College, 450 South Simmons Way, Kaysville, UT.
1. Opening.
3. Adjournment.
Kaysville City is dedicated to a policy of non-discrimination in admission to, access to, or

operations of its programs, services or activities. If you need special assistance due to a disability,
please contact the Kaysville City Offices at (801) 546-1235 at least 24 hours in advance of the
meeting to be held.
I hereby certify that I posted a copy of the foregoing Notice and Agenda at City Hall (80 North
Main Street) and emailed copies to media representatives on May 29, 2020.
__________________
Annemarie Plaizier
Agency Secretary
KAYSVILLE CITY COUNCIL
May 7, 2020
Minutes of a regular Kaysville City Council meeting held on May 7, 2020 at 7:00 p.m. The
meeting was held electronically due to Governor Herbert’s “Stay Safe, Stay Home” directive, and
in line with the City’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Council Members and City Staff
participated live from remote locations, and the meeting was streamed live online.
Council Members present: Mayor Katie Witt, Council Member John Swan Adams, Council
Member Michelle Barber, Council Member Andre Lortz, Council Member Tamara Tran, and
Council Member Mike Blackham
Others Present: City Manager Shayne Scott, City Attorney Nic Mills, Finance Director Dean
T
Storey, City Recorder Annemarie Plaizier, Community Development Director Lyle Gibson, Public
Works Superintendent Josh Belnap, Information Systems Manager Ryan Judd, Eric Orton, John
Warnick, Robert Parker
OPENING AF
Council Andre Lortz opened the meeting.
RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
DEPARTMENT PRESENTATION, PUBLIC WORKS
Public Works Director, Josh Belnap presented a report of the Kaysville Public Works Department
for the 2019 year and explained that their department takes care of the streets, storm water, and
water within the city. Much of their funding comes from Class C funds, active transportation
option, road fee, storm water utility fund, water enterprise utility fund, and the general fund. In
DR
2019 they had several road projects, including several miles of repaving and restriping roads,
creating new roads, preventative road treatments, and installing sidewalk. They have also been
working to update their street standards and ordinances. Their storm water staff were able to work
with the Nature Conservancy on a water quality project in 2019, and they’ve also driven their street
sweeper over 500 miles over the year to try to keep our streets clean. They have been working on
updating their storm water standards and ordinances, as well as implementing a low impact
development storm water plan. Their staff has been managing Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plans for all applicable construction sites. In our Water department we have had over 2,400 linear
feet of water main replaced, and have been continuing to work on the design and coordination of
water quality projects within the city. In 2019 they responded to over 50 leak repairs. They have
also been working with UDOT in coordinating the West Davis Corridor and Highway 89 projects.
A new water tank has been designed and will be under construction soon.
The City Council expressed their appreciation for the Public Works Department.
Council Member Barber asked about the automatic metering system update.
1
Josh Belnap responded that they have installed almost all of the meters and it’s given them a much
better efficiency and more accurate billing statements. There are a few meters left to install which
are located in more difficult locations.
DECLARATION OF ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
No conflicts were disclosed.
CONSENT ITEMS
Council Member Barber made a motion to accept the following consent items:
a. Approval of the Minutes of April 10, 2020.
b. A Resolution Authorizing the Sale of the City’s Heavy Rescue Fire Vehicle –
Kaysville Fire Department.
T
c. A Resolution Accepting a Trail Access Easement from The Homestead at Hale
Farms Homeowners Association.
The motion was seconded by Council Member Lortz.
The vote on the motion was as follows:

AF
Council Member Adams, yea
Council Member Barber, yea
Council Member Lortz, yea
Council Member Tran, yea
Council Member Blackham, yea
The motion passed unanimously.
AWARD OF BID FOR SUNSET DRIVE PHASE 2 CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK PROJECT
– PUBLIC WORKS
DR
Josh Belnap explained that Public Works has planned and coordinated the final phase of repaving
and installation of curb and sidewalk for Sunset Drive. Six bids were received for this project and
the low bid was from Post Asphalt and Construction at $1,223,756.25.
Council Member Barber asked about pedestrian access, especially with kids going to the nearby
schools.
Josh Belnap responded that this final phase of the project will run from Western Drive to the sewer
district property to the south. They will not be finishing the area where the connector road is
planned. The contractor is hoping to get started on this project at the end of this month, or the first
part of June. They have a completion date planned for October 1st. The city has specified that we
want the paving completed by the start of the school year. Right now it isn’t warranted to install
a traffic signal at the intersection of Western Drive and Sunset Drive. A traffic signal or
roundabout installed here would also require some property acquisition from adjacent properties.
Also, because of the island already located in Western Drive, the roundabout wouldn’t be centered
in the middle of the intersection and could complicate road movements. They have spoken with
neighbors in the area and discussed installing high-visibility crosswalks, which can be installed at
2
a fairly minimal expense. The city will also continue to monitor the traffic at this intersection.
Council Member Adams suggested that road signs be installed to better direct traffic at that
intersection.
Josh Belnap responded that they might be able to install road signs, but depending on the sign it
might be hard to legally enforce them. Staff feels that when the connector road project is complete
we will likely see a decrease in traffic on some of these streets and it will cause a more even
distribution of traffic.
Council Member Barber said that she would like to see a traffic study which shows what would be
the best solution for this intersection. A traffic study was promised to be given to the neighborhood
for this area years ago. We shouldn’t install a crosswalk just because it’s the easiest solution, but
rather we need to install what is best for the kids in the area to safety get to school. However, we
T
also shouldn’t hold up awarding this bid and risk postponing road construction for when school is
in session. The traffic study should still be reviewed by the City Council. Council Member Barber
asked if a crosswalk was installed if it would be manned by a crossing guard to help students cross.
Josh Belnap responded that this intersection didn’t meet the criteria for a controlled speed crossing
AF
zone with a crossing guard. Crosswalks are easy to install and give pedestrians a designated place
of where to cross, but it also can give them a false sense of security.
Mayor Witt said that a couple of years ago residents asked the City Council to consider having a
crosswalk with a crossing guard at the intersection of Thornfield Road and Crestwood Road. That
intersection also did not meet the criteria to justify one and it was therefore denied. The City needs
to be uniform in our decisions.
Council Member Tran suggested that traffic studies be posted on the website for residents to be
able to view.
Council Member Barber made a motion to approve the award of bid for Sunset Drive Phase 2
DR
Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Project, with the request to have the traffic and pedestrian analysis for
this area presented to the Council at a later date. The motion was seconded by Council Member
Blackham.

ACTION ITEMS
MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT BETWEEN KAYSVILLE CITY AND UTAH
3
WATER/WASTEWATER AGENCY RESPONSE NETWORK
Josh Belnap explained that Staff is recommending that the city enter into a mutual aid agreement
with the Utah Water/Wastewater Agency Response Network (UT-WARN) to help ensure and
safeguard the city’s ability to respond to system needs in an emergency event. UT-WARN
operates with support from the Rural Water Association of Utah (RWAU) and exists to provide
support by way of licensed water operators and other personnel and equipment to its members
when in need, but also to help streamline communication with experience RWAU staff, the State
Department of Environmental Quality and the Division of Drinking Water. Kaysville City Water
is comprised of five staff members, all licensed, who oversee the delivery of nearly one billion
gallons of water to nearly 32,000 people each year. This is all done via a network of nearly 150
miles of pipeline that feed from six storage tanks, connecting with nearly 8,700 water meters at
homes and businesses within and around the city. In case of a disaster, the Water Department
needs to keep this system in service, or restore it as quickly as possible, in order to continue to
T
provide drinking water, fire suppression and necessary support to local businesses. This mutual
aid agreement provides access to additional personnel and equipment to help meet that need. The
agreement provides the City with the sole discretion to determine when our personnel and
equipment can or cannot be spared to help other members. Costs incurred in support of other
members is to be reimbursed as detailed within the agreement.
Adams.
AF
Council Member Tran made a motion to approve the Mutual Aid Agreement between Kaysville
City and Utah Water/Wastewater Agency Response Network, seconded by Council Member

DR
ADOPTION OF THE TENTATIVE BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021
Dean Storey explained that the tentative budgets for Fiscal Year 2021 have been reviewed and
discussed by the City Council at their Council retreat. This item presented tonight is the first step
in approving the budget and will also make it available for the public to review. After the tentative
budget is approved, the Public Hearings will be scheduled and posted.
Council Member Blackham said that he has been very adamant in adding a cost of living increase
for our employees in the budget. We ask so much of our employees and their wages are already
below the market. Our employees work extra hard and they rely on this. A cost of living will just
help our employees enough so they won’t be falling behind. Increases to our health insurance just
adds to their burden. We want to show them that we appreciate them because these types of things
have a big effect on morale. This isn’t including any kind of raise, but just a small increase to
cover the cost of living.
4
Mayor Witt said that she understands and appreciates the passion and care for our employees.
They work hard and deserve the cost of living increase. Mayor Witt added that she feels that we
need to think about the other families within Kaysville who are currently losing or have lost their
jobs as a result of the pandemic. It would be insensitive of us to give our staff a raise at this time.
If we chose to give our employees an increase we need to find the money to accommodate it. Our
budget will likely be decreasing as a result of the pandemic.
Council Member Blackham said that it is important that we adopt this as part of the tentative budget
because of the uncertainty right now.
Shayne Scott said that we really don’t know what will happen from one day to the next because of
COVID. Our budget will definitely be impacted by it. We will have to use our savings just to
adopt the proposed FY 2021 budget. We hope to have more information about how the pandemic
T
has impacted us financially by August, with an even better understanding by the end of the calendar
year.
Dean Storey commented that the numbers being proposed for the next fiscal year budget is almost
exactly what was proposed for the current year because we don’t know where we will be at after
AF
this pandemic is over.
Council Member Tran said that she appreciates what Staff does and for Council Member Blackham
being an advocate for the employees. However, once we get more information, at the end of the
calendar year we might be having to make budget cuts and hard decisions might have to be made
about our employees. It doesn’t seem wise to commit to giving the employees a cost of living
increase now when we don’t know where we sit financially. There might be other ways that we
can show our appreciation to our employees when we don’t have money to give.
Council Member Adams said that its public knowledge what our city employees make and it’s
hard to see how some of our employees make a living. If we aren’t willing to spend the money on
our employees, we should consider putting a freeze on spending money elsewhere until we know
DR
where we are at financially. Council Member Adams added that he doesn’t feel that citizens would
be upset by the Council giving the employees a small cost of living increase, but would rather
would be glad to see that the city is taking care of their employees.
Shayne Scott added that because that money hasn’t been budgeted for it would also be coming out
of the city’s savings to cover the cost.
Council Member Blackham said that the city is in a good financial position and has purposely put
money aside for use in a time or period of unforeseen difficulty or trouble. That is where we are
at today and seems appropriate to use some of that money to take care of our employees.
Council Member Lortz asked about when sales tax numbers are reported back to the city.
Dean Storey responded that there is a two month lag so it will likely be a few months before we
see any trend in our numbers.
Council Member Adams said that he would support a cost of living increase for the employees.
5
The reserved money was saved for such a time as this.
Council Member Blackham made a motion to adopt the tentative budgets for Fiscal Year 2021
with a two-percent cost of living increase for employees, seconded by Council Member Adams.
Council Member Adams asked if approving the cost of living increase now would affect doing a
merit-based raise in the future.
Dean Storey responded that any market adjustments would increase the base salary level, and
shouldn’t affect any merit-based increase in the future.
Council Member Lortz asked if the department directors should be considered exempt from a cost
of living increase. Or maybe we should do a cost of living increase in a stage process where one-
percent would be given at the beginning of the fiscal year, with the possibility of more of an
T
increase later in the year when we see what funds are available.
Council Member Barber asked about why department heads should be exempt.
Council Member Lortz responded that in the private industry, those at the top take the first hit so
AF
that they can take care of those with the lowest wages since they are the ones most impacted.
Council Member Lortz made a motion to adopt the tentative budgets for Fiscal Year 2021 with a
one-percent increase to all employees except the department directors, seconded by Council
Member Barber.
Mayor Witt commented that things could look better or worse financially in a couple of months.
The final budget does not need to be passed until August so we will have time before then to see
where we are at.
The vote on Council Member Lortz’s motion was as follows:

DR
Council Member Tran, nay
Council Member Blackham, nay
Council Member Adams, nay
The motion failed with a vote of two to three.
The vote on Council Member Blackham’s motion was as follows:

Council Member Barber, nay
Council Member Lortz, nay
The motion failed with a vote of two to three.
6
Council Member Barber commented that there are adjustments within the budget that will make a
difference within the FY 2021 budget, such as adjustments for cancelled park activities this year.
Things like this will save money for the city. The Council can commit to come back and revisit
this when we have more certain numbers in front of us and things aren’t in flux anymore.
Council Member Adams commented that he is grateful that the Council will be able to take another
look at this before final approval, as he is hesitant to approve the city spending money in other
areas until we spend money on our employees first.
Council Member Lortz made a motion to adopt the tentative budgets for Fiscal Year 2021 with a
one-percent cost of living increase for all city employees, seconded by Council Member Blackham.
T
AF
The motion passed with a vote of four to one.
Council Member Tran commented that she feels that the Council needs to be more responsible and
wait until we have more solid numbers before making a decision.
Council Member Barber said that she hopes that this discussion will send a message to our city
staff that they are valued and a high priority for the Council.
REZONE OF 0.39 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 890-914 EAST 200 NORTH FROM
R-2 (ONE TO TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) TO THE R-M (RESIDENTIAL
DR
MULTI-FAMILY) ZONING DISTRICT, AND CONSIDERATION OF AN IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT – ERIC ORTON
Lyle Gibson explained that Eric Orton is requesting a rezone of his property at 890-914 East 200
North in order to accommodate a multi-family dwelling. The property is currently zoned R-2 for
the existing duplex dwellings on each lot. Mr. Orton would like to be able to combine the two
existing 0.18 and 0.21 acre lots into one. 0.39 acre lot, and do an addition in order to create one
six-unit dwelling. The requested R-M district is primarily for Multi-Family homes, or single
family dwellings are permitted. Mr. Orton has provided a site plan which indicates how they
anticipate the site to be used. The concept shows how parking could be provided for in the rear of
the property, in response to the request from the Planning Commission, to ensure that parking
would not conflict with future right-of-way improvements. An Improvement Agreement has been
provided that has been reviewed by Mr. Orton and would have him play for their share of future
200 North street improvements now, rather than have them installed since they would not be
connecting into anything currently.
Eric Orton said that he feels that this would be an improvement for the property, but would also
7
help to add higher density moderate income housing within the city along an arterial road. It is a
good location and is close to Highway 89.
Council Member Blackham commented that he doesn’t want to see a gap left between the driveway
and 200 North while we wait until 200 North is improved. If there is no surface installed the cars
could potentially track mud onto the road, which is what we are trying to prevent with our Storm
Water Plan.
Lyle Gibson responded that some type of rocks or temporary road base could be required of the
applicant. It shouldn’t have any effect on the future widening and improvement of 200 North.
Council Member Adams made a motion to approve the request to rezone 0.39 acres of property
located at 890-914 East 200 North from R-2 (One to Two-Family Residential District) to the R-M
(Residential Multi-Family) zoning district and consideration of an Improvement Agreement for
T
Eric Orton, with the condition that Staff work with the applicant to create a road connection from
the driveway to the existing asphalt of 200 North Street so as to eliminate traffic tracking mud or
debris onto the roadway. Council Member Lortz seconded the motion.

AF
REZONE OF 1.17 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 650 NORTH MAIN STREET FROM
GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) TO THE R-M (RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY) ZONING
DISTRICT – DESTINATION HOMES
DR
Lyle Gibson explained that Destination Homes is requesting a rezone of the property located at
650 North Main Street to accommodate future residential development. The existing zoning
district, GC, permits office and retail sales and services, but does not allow for residential uses,
with the exception of single family units needed to support a business function. The property is
abutting commercial property along Main Street to the north and south, and residential
development to the east. There are some R-M zoned properties in the vicinity across the street and
near the corner of Mutton Hollow and Main Street. The R-M zoning district allows for multiple
dwelling structures by permitted use and the zone may have a density of 15.5 units per acre.
Destination Homes has provided a detailed concept of what they envision for the corner property.
The concept includes 16 townhome units. The homes vary from 2-3 stories in height, positioned
around the perimeter of the property, with a central parking area. A memorandum has been
provided by the applicant at the request of the Planning Commission to demonstrate the impact of
traffic on the adjacent roads. The memorandum speaks specifically to traffic counts. For
additional consideration, Staff has researched the city’s ordinances and applicable engineering
standards. Ideally a full traffic study of the intersection would be needed to see what the queue
length would be on Mutton Hollow and then limit the driveway from that distance. If the type of
8
development and residential rezone is desirable, the Council may request this additional
information before granting the rezone or as a requirement of any building or subdivision process.
Specific to access, the concept does meet the minimum requirements of the city’s ordinance and
seems to work with example engineering standards without all the site specific studies. In
consideration of the rezone, the Council should also consider how the use fits with the city’s
General Plan and this specific location. The rezone request would allow for anything permitted
by the R-M zoning district. Should the Council wish to set more specific restrictions to ensure
certain development, such as the proposed concept, a development agreement may be considered.
Ultimately for the proposed project, it would be necessary to have the PRUD overlay zone
approved together with the requested zoning district. After reviewing this proposed rezone, the
Planning Commission voted 5 to 2 to recommend approval of the requested rezone with the caveat
that additional data be provided which addresses the impact of the development to adjacent roads.
The Planning Commission members who voted against the motion cited the need to better
distribute density throughout the city, and a desire to keep commercial properties as a means of
T
providing amenities to the city and a stronger tax base.
John Warnick, with Destination Homes, said that it is their mission to build exceptional homes in
lasting communities which will help to improve the lives of those who live there. They feel that
this development meets the General Plan as the plan states that higher density housing should be
AF
allowed for along major streets. This will provide a place for moderate income housing, which is
something there is a big demand for in the market right now. People want their children to be able
to purchase a home in Kaysville, and this development will give their children that opportunity.
The city will receive about $56,000 in impact fees from this development. Destination Homes will
commit to build great housing options here.
Council Member Lortz asked about parking.
John Warnick responded that each unit will have a two-car garage. There is not a lot of space to
allow for guest parking, but they have planned for about six stalls.
Council Member Tran asked about the pricing of the units.

DR
John Warnick responded that they plan to sell each of these units for about $250-275k.
Council Member Tran made a motion to deny the request to rezone 1.17 acres of property at 650
North Main Street from GC (General Commercial) to the R-M (Residential Multi-Family) zoning
district for Destination Homes, seconded by Council Member Blackham.
Council Member Tran said that Destination Homes build great homes, and the architecture and the
products they provide are a quality product. However, she feels like this project is not the best use
of the property and would like to see that the property remain General Commercial. For several
years the city and the Council have supported the idea that Main Street remain commercial, and
many residents support that. We want to preserve Main Street as it’s the main commuter of the
city.
Council Member Blackham commented that he appreciates what previous City Councils have done
in trying to maintain and keep this as a commercial area. There are a lot of commercial uses across
the street, and there likely will be a traffic signal installed at the intersection of Mutton Hollow
9
and Main Street. If this property doesn’t develop as a commercial use right away, it will
eventually. This intersection has a lot of potential and if we rezone it from General Commercial
we won’t get that back.
Council Member Adams that he used to live in this area and it was already very crowded with
multi-family houses then. There needs to be a better distribution of higher density housing
throughout the city.
Council Member Lortz said that the General Plan seems to contradict itself. We want to keep the
neighborhoods the same use, but also disperse higher density housing. People say that they want
multi-family housing, until it’s being requested to be built next to them. Not all commercially
zoned properties are commercially viable. This is not the best site for a commercial use. Traffic
patterns have changed since the Layton Parkway was built. A higher traffic area is more viable
for a commercial business. If a property is commercially viable, it will be rezoned to a commercial
T
use, if it’s not already zoned as such. The more we deny multifamily requests, the harder it will
be to get any multifamily in the city. There needs to somehow be a balance to allow for
multifamily.
Council Member Barber said that there is a need for more affordable and diverse housing. This
AF
Council and previous Councils have shown that we are embracing that. We see the need for it in
the forefront and have been looking at all options. We have approved other types of housing
developments which would have never been considered years ago. A lot of street improvements
will be done along Mutton Hollow and a light will eventually be installed at Main Street. This
might help to make this property more desirable for a commercial use. We want to see something
developed here but it isn’t the right time for this type of development. Destination Homes is a
great community partner, and there’s a demand for townhomes. But there are other parts of the
city we are open to allowing them to be built.
Mayor Witt commented that we need to take the demand for multi-family housing seriously in the
city.
DR
Council Member Lortz, nay

The motion passed with a vote of four to one.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17-33, SIGN REGULATIONS, OF TITLE 17,

PLANNING AND ZONING, OF THE REVISED ORDINANCES OF KAYSVILLE CITY
Lyle Gibson explained that recently the Planning Commission reviewed several conditional use
permits for development signs, after which they gave Staff direction to work on an ordinance which
would allow for these types of proposals to be reviewed and administered by city Staff rather than
going before the Planning Commission. These signs will still need to be removed within 30 days
10
from when all of the building lots within that development have been sold.
Council Member Lortz made a motion to approve an Ordinance amending Chapter 17-33, Sign
Regulations, of Title 17, Planning and Zoning, of the Revised Ordinances of Kaysville City,
seconded by Council Member Barber.

T
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 17-34-7, COMMON OPEN SPACE SUBDIVISION,

OF CHAPTER 17-34, PRUD PLANNED RESIDENTIAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OF TITLE
17, PLANNING AND ZONING, OF THE REVISED ORDINANCES OF KAYSVILLE CITY
AF
Lyle Gibson explained that this proposed ordinance amendment adds the R-1-6 zoning district to
a table in the PRUD common open space section of the city ordinances. City Staff identified the
zoning district, which was recently created, was not included within this table and felt it
appropriate to suggest adding it as an additional option for types of development to be considered.
This will not change any rules or regulations for existing developments.
Council Member Adams asked how this was discovered.
Lyle Gibson responded that Staff was reviewing a potential development for consideration and
noticed that the R-1-6 zoning was not part of this table within the PRUD ordinance. This
amendment cleans up the language of the ordinance.
DR
Council Member Barber made a motion to approve an Ordinance amending Section 17-34-7,
Common Open Space Subdivision of Chapter 17-34, PRUD Planned Residential Unit
Development, of Title 17, Planning and Zoning, of the Revised Ordinances of Kaysville City. The
motion was seconded by Council Member Adams.
Council Member Blackham commented that the R-1-6 zone is already allowing for small lots, and
once you allow for a PRUD overlay those lots could potentially be reduced even more.
Council Member Barber asked if the PRUD overlay zone requires that it be a private street
development.
Lyle Gibson responded that it does not. It would still be considered a rezone request and therefore
the Council would have to decide if the request is appropriate for that particular location.
11
CALL TO THE PUBLIC
Nothing was brought under this item.
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
T
Council Member Barber said that they recently had to report that the City will be changing our 4th
of July events this year since mass gatherings are not allowed or being permitted by the Davis
County Health Department.
Council Member Tran asked if the city had prepaid for the 4th of July expenses.
AF
Council Member Barber responded that it had been paid for from the previous fiscal year’s budget
but those funds will be rolled over to 2021. Because of that, it will help the city to save some
money and put that money where it will be more beneficial right now. The Recreation Department
has had to cancel their programs through June, and tentatively planned for a few programs starting
in July. These programs will still require social distancing but will be a great opportunity to get
our programs started again. The Request for Proposal bids have come back for the fiber project
and they will be published on the Connect Kaysville website tomorrow.
Council Member Blackham said that he recently sat down with the Community Development and
development in Kaysville hasn’t seemed to have slowed down.
DR
Mayor Witt commented that the most recent update we have received from the Davis County
Health Department showed that our rate of infection of the coronavirus continues to decline in our
area. Kaysville has only had eighteen cases of the coronavirus. We are doing well and want to
keep that going. We are hoping to do a soft opening of the city building by June, but also want to
encourage the public to maintain social distancing.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
Shayne Scott commented that currently Staff is planning to hold another electronic City Council
meeting in May, but hope to transition back into meeting in-person in June depending on how
things are progressing.
Council Member Barber said that she would like to be able to do Q & A sessions before Council
again as soon as we can.
Council Member Lortz commented that when we move into the “yellow” phase we will be limited
to fifty people gathering, which may cause difficulties for Council meetings. The city hall
12
renovation isn’t anticipated to be completed until August.
Shayne Scott commented that they are hoping that things will get back to normal by July.
Mayor Witt added that we might have to get creative, but there are other options in holding
meetings with the public present.
ADJOURNMENT
Council Member Lortz made a motion to adjourn the City Council meeting at 9:42 p.m., seconded
by Council Member Adams and passed unanimously.
T
AF
DR
13
STAFF REPORT
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 21, 2020
TYPE OF ITEM: Consent
SUBJECT/AGENDA TITLE: A Resolution Authorizing the City Council to Censure

Katie Witt, Authorizing the Mayor Pro-tem to Issue a Public Letter of Censure, and
Respectfully Requesting that Ms. Witt Resign.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This is a resolution authorizing the City Council to Censure Katie Witt and take
other punitive actions against her based on her conduct and involvement with an
event planned for May 30, 2020.
Council Options: 1) Approve the Resolution authorizing the City Council to Censure Katie Witt
and take other actions; 2) Approve the Resolution with any modifications that the Council
deems appropriate; 3) Decline to adopt the Resolution and remand to staff with further direction.
Fiscal Impact & Fund Source for Recommended Action: None.
Attachments:
RESOLUTION 20-__-__
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY COUNCIL TO CENSURE KATIE

WITT, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR PRO-TEM TO ISSUE A PUBLIC LETTER
OF CENSURE, AND RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING THAT KATIE WITT
RESIGN FROM OFFICE
WHEREAS, the Kaysville City Council’s Code of Conduct exists “to ensure public confidence in
the integrity of local government”; and
WHEREAS, the Code of Conduct dictates that members of the City Council “must be above
reproach and avoid even the appearance of impropriety”; and
WHEREAS, Katie Witt is a non-voting member of the Kaysville City Council; and
WHEREAS, Katie Witt is running a political campaign; and
WHEREAS, Katie Witt was involved in attempting to bring a concert to Kaysville City during the
COVID-19 pandemic; and
WHEREAS, Katie Witt’s endorsement and advocacy for this event contradicted existing city policies
and procedures; and
WHEREAS, Kaysville City received complaints that Katie Witt’s actions may have violated the
Utah Public Officers’ and Employees’ Ethics Act; and
WHEREAS, the Kaysville City Council would like to be productive and believe the actions taken
by Katie Witt were an unnecessary distraction and were divisive to the City; and
WHEREAS, Katie Witt’s comments during a political campaign may have appeared to be politically
motivated and not in the City’s best interests; and
WHEREAS, the Kaysville City Council is working to cultivate, engender, and maintain trust in
elected officials.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF KAYSVILLE,

UTAH:
1. The Kaysville City Council is authorized to issue an official verbal reprimand to Katie Witt
immediately after this resolution is passed;
2. The Mayor Pro-Tem is authorized to issue a formal public letter of censure, which is attached hereto
and incorporated by this reference; and
3. The Kaysville City Council respectfully requests that Katie Witt resign from office.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of Kaysville, Utah this 4th day of June, 2020.
________________________________________
Michelle Barber, Mayor Pro-Tem
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Annemarie Plaizier, City Recorder
Letter of Censure
June 4, 2020

Mayor Witt,

This letter accompanies your formal censure for your support and endorsement of the proposed
Utah Business Revival protest concert which went against Kaysville City event planning and
permitting processes as well as the Davis County and Utah Governor’s health directives. Our
residents have spoken through hundreds of emails as well as public comments made at the May 21,
2020 city council meeting, which we feel have been sufficient representation from our constituents.
At that meeting, you made a statement that will be the basis for this letter from your council.

You say you did not misuse funds. While there may not have been a transfer of money, you did
misuse the time, energy, and trust of the city staff and your council. Many hours were spent
responding to the announcement of this event and subsequent fallout. Had you been able to
proceed with opening Kaysville at your discretion, it would have certainly used city funds through
the staffing and overtime pay of every police officer that weekend, the impact and cleanup of the
park, the liability brought to the city, and more. Damage to our city both internally and externally
remains even past the concert’s announcement of a new venue.

You say you did not break the law. The proper legal authorities will determine if any laws were
broken and the necessary consequences. But of equal if not more importance, your approach to
this event was a breach of our own Kaysville City Code of Conduct. As outlined in the code, we as
elected officials are to first, “work for the common good of the people of Kaysville and not for any
private or personal interest.” Your support of this concert was inherently tied to your congressional
campaign, a private and personal interest. Your role and respect as mayor should not be
compromised by even the “appearance of impropriety.”

You say that you hurt our feelings. While that may be true, this offense is about more than hurt
feelings. You brought an unnecessary distraction and division to our city by undermining the
processes and manner of governing that we have sworn to uphold. Councilmembers were
misrepresented, city staff threatened, and many residents lost confidence in their elected leader. In
the end, your support of the event never wavered.

We as a city council were accused, among other things, of being “the worst of government”. We
believe the worst of government is forgetting those whom we represent. The office of mayor is one
that demands the highest level of trust and respect from council members, city staff, surrounding
local leaders, and most importantly, the body of residents that elected each of us. The lack of
judgment exhibited in this event and its after-effects demonstrate an inability to fulfill your duties
as mayor and leader in our city. Should you remain in office, assuming we have no legal recourse,
we expect the highest level of commitment and dedication to Kaysville City.

Signed,
________________________________________ ___________________________________ __________________________________
Michelle Barber, Mayor Pro Tempore Tamara Tran, City Council Mike Blackham, City Council
________________________________________ ___________________________________
Andre Lortz, City Council John Adams, City Council

STAFF REPORT
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 4, 2020
TYPE OF ITEM: Action

PRESENTED BY: Bruce Rigby and Nic Mills
SUBJECT/AGENDA TITLE: An Ordinance amending Title 10, Chapter 2,

Section 12 regarding Termination of Electrical Service
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Under the current code, Staff spends a significant amount of time personally
informing power customers prior to the termination of their power service. This
amendment does several things. First, it updates the methods that the Power
Department can use to effectuate notification prior to termination. Second, it
allows, during summer months, for less restrictive notification procedures. Staff
restored the limiter installation requirement. Staff surveyed other power suppliers.
Staff believes that these amendments generally reflect the current policy regarding
shut-off procedures in the market.
Council Options: 1) Approve the Ordinance Amending Title 10-2-12 regarding termination of
Electrical Service; 2) Approve the Ordinance with any modifications that the Council deems
appropriate; 3) Decline to adopt the Resolution and remand to staff with further direction.
Recommended Option: Staff recommends approving the Ordinance Amending Title 10-2-12
regarding termination of Electrical Service.
Fiscal Impact & Fund Source for Recommended Action: City Staff anticipates that these
changes will result in a small cost-savings for the City.
Attachments:
ORDINANCE __-__-__
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10, SECTION 2, CHAPTER 12
REGARDING THE TERMINATION OF ELECTRICAL POWER;
ROVIDING FOR REPEALER; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, Kaysville City is an electrical power supplier; and
WHEREAS, Customers occasionally neglect to pay their bills; and
WHEREAS, the City Code has required a notification left by a power employee at the
Customer’s home prior to shutting off the power service; and
WHEREAS, this “hand-delivery” process is an inefficient, laborious, and time-consuming
process; and
WHEREAS, other effective ways exist to communicate with delinquent power customers;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council of Kaysville City finds it to be in the best interest of its
citizens to amend the method by which the City informs delinquent power customers.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
KAYSVILLE, UTAH:
SECTION I: Repealer. If any provisions of the City's Code previously adopted are
inconsistent herewith they are hereby repealed.
SECTION II: Amendment. Title 10, Chapter 2, Section 12 shall be amended to read as
follows:
10-2-12 Termination of Electrical Service
1. At such time as a utility account is delinquent 30 days, the customer will be notified of the
past due and current charges on the next utility bill. If the past due charges are not paid
within 10 days, a written or emailed notice will be sent to the customer's residence or email
address stating that the electrical service will be disconnected on a date specified in the
notice.
2. Notice of Termination:
a. For terminations occurring between October 1 and March 31, personal notification to
the account holder is required at least 48 hours prior to the scheduled termination.
Personal notification may consist of personal contact, a telephone conversation, a text
message or voicemail left at the account holder’s telephone number, or an email.
b. During all other times of the year, the City should make good faith efforts to notify
the customer or an adult member of the household of the termination at least 48 hours
prior to the scheduled termination. Such notice may be made by email, mail,
telephone, text message to the account holder’s telephone number, or personal visit.
3. After giving proper notice, power will be disconnected until the account is paid in full,
including any applicable fees.
4. For terminations occurring between October 1 and March 31, a limiter shall be installed to
give the customer a small amount of power to run the furnace or small heat source. If the bill
is not paid within 5 days of the limiter being installed, the limiter may be removed and the
electrical service will be disconnected without notice until the account and all applicable fees
are paid in full.
SECTION III: Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance is declared invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, said portion
shall be severed and such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance.
SECTION IV: Effective Date. This ordinance being necessary for the peace, health and
safety of the City, shall become effective immediately upon posting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of Kaysville, Utah, this _____ day of
___________________, 20___.
_______________________________________
_
Katie Witt, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________________
Annemarie Plaizier, City Recorder
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
PRESENTED BY: Community Development Staff
SUBJECT/AGENDA TITLE: Consideration of a rezone of approximately 2.04

acres of property at 711 East Crestwood Road from the R-1-8 (Single Family
Residential) to the A-1 (Light Agricultural) zoning district.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The subject property is approximately 2.04 acres and Jessen has requested to rezone from R-1-8 to
A-1. The rezone is to allow the owner more ability to use the property for agricultural purposes.
The existing R-1-8 zone is primarily for single family residential lots on 8,000 sq. ft. of property or
larger. The requested zone still allows for single family residential use, but has more agricultural
allowances and requires a lot of at least 40,000 sq. ft. in size.
Proposed Zoning: A-1 (KCC Chapter 17-9)
Existing Zoning: R-1-8 (KCC Chapter 17-12)
As a rezone, this decision should be looked at based on its compatibility with the City’s General Plan
and how well the proposed development allowed by the zoning district fits at the specific location.
Council Options: Approve / Disapprove / Table for more information
Recommended Options: The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the
proposed rezone to the city council.
Fiscal impact & Fund Source for Recommended Action: N/A
Attachments: Location Map, Zoning Map, rezone ordinance.

711 East Crestwood
N
900
T ho
rn f
6 25
iel
d
E
Rd
d
nR
Ad
o
nn
am
Dr
a R
Sh d
s
hire
Brooks
5N
77
Ice Pond R
d
700 N Dr
ow
shire H oll
k
B roo
Lis
ton
Rd
700
d
C
oo
ir
tw
es
Cr
± Ice Pond R
d
500
E
711 East Crestwood - Rezone from R-1-8 to A-1
Kin
gsw
720 E
ood
Thornfi
Stone y b
ok Rd Dr
Rd
Rd
We stbro re
ton
hi E
ks
eld
yn
N R-1-14 Br
oo
lli
ro o
Bo
900
Rd
so
n
k Rd
Rd
625
n Rd
no
E
a n
Sh a
R ms
Ad
d
77
5N R-1-10
ksh i re
700 N oo r Elias Rd
Br ollow D
Lis
H
400 E
700
350 E
30 0 E
ton
Ci
Rd
PU
1
E
r
A-
d
oo
Rd
t w n
Po
d
es
N Cr e
PU
600
R-A
Ic
R-1-
320
500
N R-1-8
14
E
400
0 N
45
350
N
400
n
wL
E
llo
Ho
115
Happy
300
0E
N
N 400
500 E
±
E
400
1050
1000
N
300
E
N
800
400 200 N
700 E
950
E
900
Oak
R-2
E
Ln
E
E
ORDINANCE NO. 20-____
AN ORDINANCE REZONING A CERTAIN PORTION OF KAYSVILLE CITY FROM THE

KAYSVILLE CITY R-1-8 ZONE TO THE KAYSVILLE CITY A-1 ZONE, HEREINAFTER
FULLY DESCRIBED; PROVIDING FOR REPEALER; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, the City Council of Kaysville City, State of Utah, has determined in an open
meeting to rezone certain real property by removing it from Kaysville City R-1-8 and placing it
in Kaysville City A-1 zoning district; and
WHEREAS, said meeting was duly and regularly held and the interested parties were given an
opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the Kaysville City Planning Commission has made a recommendation to the City
Council on said rezoning; and
WHEREAS, the City Council after due consideration of said rezoning has concluded that it is in
the best interest of the City and the inhabitants thereof that said rezoning be accomplished;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF KAYSVILLE CITY,
UTAH:
SECTION I: Repealer. If any provisions of the City’s Code previously adopted are inconsistent
herewith they are hereby repealed.
SECTION II:
The real property as shown on the attached map, which is made a part hereof, containing
approximately 2.04 acres, shall be and the same is hereby rezoned and the Zoning Map amended
by removing the same from Kaysville City R-1-8 zone and placing the same in Kaysville A-1
zoning district.
ordinance is declared invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, said
portion shall be severed and such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this
ordinance.
SECTION VI:
This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after final passage by the Kaysville City Council.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of Kaysville City, Utah, this __th day of _____,
2020.
____________________________
Katie Witt
Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Annemarie Plaizier
City Recorder
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Nicholas C. Mills, City Attorney
SUBJECT/AGENDA TITLE: Consideration of a rezone of approximately 1.47

acres of property at 1413 West Webb Lane from the R-1-20 (Single Family
Residential) to the R-1-14 (Single Family Residential) zoning district to include
the PRUD overlay zone.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The subject property exists as a single flag lot currently with one home on nearly 1.5 acres of ground.
The applicant is requesting a rezone to the property to give more flexibility with possible future
development.
The difference between the R-1-20 and requested R-1-14 is the minimum lot size allowed where the R-
1-20 requires lots of at least 20,000 sq. ft. in size and the R-1-14 allows lots to be 14,000 sq. ft. in size or
larger. Both the R-1-20 and R-1-14 have the same allowed uses, same height, and same setbacks.
R-1 Zoning: (KCC Chapter 17-12)
The PRUD overlay zone is being requested in connection with the R-1-14 to allow for flexibility in
developing the property. The concept provided by the applicant indicates a lot on the far south end of the
property which would be accommodated as a flag lot subdivision. This would make the existing single
flag lot into a double flag lot where the access driveway would be encompassed by two 18 foot wide flag
stems to access the lots. If the zoning moves forward and the type of development is desirable the final
details of this would be confirmed through the subdivision process. Final application of the PRUD
overlay zone would take effect only after approval of an acceptable final plat.
As a rezone, this decision should be looked at based on its compatibility with the City’s General Plan
and how well the proposed development allowed by the zoning district fits at the specific location.
During the public hearing there was a lot of concern from the general public as to what may actually be
allowed under the request. Per that discussion and the comments of the Planning Commission a new
exhibit has been prepared to better show what is being requested. The exhibit as shown indicates the new
lot on enough area that it could work under the existing R-1-20 zone, but the PRUD overlay would still
be necessary a flag lot is acceptable to the council. Also, to provide information regarding concerns from
the public for flooding of the property the applicable FEMA flood map has been included which indicates
no flood plain over Hardin’s lot.
Council Options: Approve / Disapprove / Table for more information
Recommended Options: The Planning Commission voted 4 – 3 to recommend approval of the rezone
as requested. Those in opposition to the motion asked for additional information to clarify the details
of the request prior to making a recommendation.
Fiscal impact & Fund Source for Recommended Action: N/A
Attachments: Location Map, Zoning Map, Concept Plat.

1413 West Webb Lane
Ln
b
eb
W
Ct
B
is
's
s
ho
ng
St
p'
Ki
Ln
ola
Le
An
gel
St
Kn
i gh
t 's
y
Wa
Wa
r's
Tyle
y
±
All
i so
nW
K
W ate
ay
ay
1413 West Webb Lane - Rezone from R-1-20 to R-1-14 PRUD
A-1 e Ln 1 0
Shad
GC
A- -14 1-2
ow
On Ramp
R n Vistas
r es
Morning
ll r Center
Mist Ln
Ba D
600 W
97
vi B
1025 W
1 -
n
R-1-20
R- R
e St
R-
5
nn
Off Ram p
D
W
-L
o
re
1-
Co ri n
B a
Sp
Ln
Dr
n
400 W
y
Mou n t
R- Prest
1 g t
ez
S
W
R-
S
R-T
i
d
u C
r
LD
0
ow 75
ow
te
e
1- on
15
s
ad
ry r
Rd
he
ad
h Ln ow
14 St
S Dr ad
C
i
ill
Sh
14 R-
w
d W
ad
o Me M
o
St - hi ing n
m 1-2
400 W
LI
o s p erin g M e r
1 p
Wi
Ln
R-
yw n S L
e o
0
nd
Flin
H s ill
ill
ck kL
n Ct
dM
Ja
R-A
15
oo
t
St Dr
t Ln
Br
St
illo C ir
ng er
Ol
er
Br
R-1-8
p el is l lo dd
Wi
PU
A
ad
o M Lo
wB
Co
Wi
Christin
St g
y
y in
Be
llo
rn
Ln
ro
W
Su
Pi
o
au
wm
t l's ere
Dr
M
Ln
n
nr
C
15
ge
k
m
eC
y
is 1-
An
on
e Wa
e
R-A
R
R
ov
Cir cott
nt
mo Wa
l
tD
A
Jo
20
B ent
-
st -1
eL
10
-5
sh
-1
r
r
D
re Ln
y
00 on
i
-2
LD
1-
End
n a Dr
r nd
Ci C
A
A-
Dese
bb Bra
y
u
y
R-
le Ho e B
1
R-
nt W
W
is
GC
us
Dr
Be
h Dr
ret D
Ct ton op
20
lsie
A
on
' Che
s
-
Ct
St
Ja
1
gt
St
L in
R-
r
's
y
rin
Pe ter Dr
ng
B
0
W
co
A-11-20
ar
-2
Ki
-1
ell
R-
ln
Dr
LI
ay
1
s
in
a y 1-
A - - arle
hi
Ln
Ln R
W
g
Ch
R r's
re
20
to
a Cir
a
n
h dre
ol
W
y tc
LI
Dr
R-
T
Le
Du An
le
All
Te
re
R-1
A
iso
St sa ir
An
yC
Ka
nW
W ay
nd R-2
te
-5
Mi
ge
-LD
R-1
ay
A
0
lS
Su n
-2
Te
t
St
re
-1
try Mill Dr
C oun
-LD
Grain St
a
sa
-1
set
ol
R
St
m
ield
A
13
Ln
Wat e r
ay
Ra
rnf r
D
er
50
W
st
r
b ith o
C Ci
on
nd Mill Ln
W 2
e Sm
Ga
W Ln
R-1
Ri
ns
-1
ld
A-1
R-
Mi
Des
lb
C i ah
h
R-1-LD
R- -A
-
ra
Jo
ll
r ay
1-
An
ith
W
-2
Fr
R-1-LD
ere
0
A
ge
Ln
LD
t Dr
R Cir
an
Wi
A-
M i de
ci
Ln
lS
or C
S
Ka
Co m
g
t
5
ni ir
di n
Roueche Ln
is
ys
Zenyatta Way
ng
h Dr Palomino Drive ea
Ci Tr
Dr
Dr
r Broken B Ln
R-A
R-1-LD
as
Mill
LD
om
R-1-
Vi
R-A
ew
Th
Sun
ntry
S
Pr D
Ha
es uncr wood D r
R- e C
Cr
nli
ea r
tC n Cotton
Cou
cr
es
ir
A ir
kn
tL
es
es
tL
n
s
n
"
'-4
44
35,033 sq. ft.
"
'-7
20
29,000 sq. ft.

ORDINANCE NO. 20-____
AN ORDINANCE REZONING A CERTAIN PORTION OF KAYSVILLE CITY FROM THE

KAYSVILLE CITY R-1-20 ZONE TO THE KAYSVILLE CITY R-1-14 TO INCLUDE THE
PRUD OVERLAY ZONE, HEREINAFTER FULLY DESCRIBED; PROVIDING FOR
REPEALER; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE
meeting to rezone certain real property by removing it from Kaysville City R-1-20 and placing it
in Kaysville City R-1-14 zoning district to include the PRUD (Planned Residential Unit
Development) overlay zone; and
Council on said rezoning; and
WHEREAS, the City Council after due consideration of said rezoning has concluded that it is in
the best interest of the City and the inhabitants thereof that said rezoning be accomplished;
UTAH:
SECTION II:
approximately 1.47 acres, shall be and the same is hereby rezoned and the Zoning Map amended
by removing the same from Kaysville City R-1-20 zone and placing the same in Kaysville R-1-14
zoning district to include the PRUD overlay zone.
ordinance.
SECTION VI:
This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after final passage by the Kaysville City Council.
2020.
____________________________
Katie Witt
Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Annemarie Plaizier
City Recorder
______________________________
MEETING DATE: June 4, 2020
SUBJECT/AGENDA TITLE: Consideration of a development agreement and

rezone of approximately 23 acres of property at approximately 1300 East 1084
North to include the PRUD (Planned Residential Unit Development) overlay
zone.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The subject property was recently rezoned by the Kaysville City Council to the R-1-8 district with a
limitation allowing no more than 82 units to be developed. With that zone and understanding of the
number of units that would be allowed, the developer has put together additional details for the way
the property would develop which is indicated in the attached development agreement. In brief, the
proposal would have single family detached homes on lots abutting private streets. The new private
streets would tie in at 2 locations to the highway 89 frontage road currently under construction. The
larger lots in the subdivision are found along the northern boundary adjacent to the existing
neighborhood as well as to the east against the wilderness park.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing for this item in April of 2020, the commission
unanimously recommended approval of the PRUD with a development agreement that offered an
acceptable solution to protect homes near the wilderness park from wildfire potential and provide a
solution to manage parking to keep clear road access for emergency services, larger easements be
offered to ensure utility providers had sufficient space to serve the development, and that specific
improvements be included within the development agreement to indicate how the open spaces would
be used and benefit the development.
In addition to working to address items brought up by the Planning Commission, based on interest
expressed by the city council during the R-1-8 rezone, the developer has been working with the
secondary water provider in the area and UDOT to determine the feasibility of providing that service
to this development. The potential for providing that service is now better understood. Extending the
system to the area requires a connection to the system on the east and west end of the development
and would likely require individual pumps or a larger pump station to be installed. The ordinance does
not require use of a secondary water system for irrigation east of highway 89, but the council may
request this or other desired items as a condition of the rezone approval within the development
agreement.
The attached development agreement includes the details of the proposed development and the
developer’s attempts to address the concerns identified by the Planning Commission. Section 2 of the
agreement contains multiple key items for consideration together with the included exhibits.
City Council Options:
1) Approve as proposed.
2) Request changes prior to giving approval.
3) Deny the request.
Recommended Option: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the

proposed project as outlined in the summary above. The council should consider whether or not those
items have been adequately addressed. The council may also consider other details of the request and
agreement in its deliberation and may request changes or additional information if needed before
making a decision.
If acceptable the development agreement would lead to a preliminary plat and final plat review
process. The PRUD overlay zone as indicated in the ordinance would not be effective until a final plat
has been approved that is found to be consistent with the terms of an approved development
agreement.
Fiscal Impact: N/A
Attachments: Development Agreement, Rezone Ordinance

When Recorded, Return to:
Kaysville City
Community Development Office
23 East Center Street
Kaysville, UT 84037
Affecting Tax Parcel No.: _______________________
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
FOR A COMMON OPEN SPACE SUBDIVISION
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ____ day of ______________, 2020
by and between Kaysville City, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of
the State of Utah (hereinafter the “City”), and Morton Development Group (hereinafter the
“Developer;”) (“Developer” includes successors and/or assigns of Developer), as follows:
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Developer is desirous of developing a single family subdivision (Talbot

Estates) on certain real property located in the City of Kaysville, County of Davis, State of Utah
and more particularly described on the Property Location Map attached hereto as Exhibit A .
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Agreement is to define the development standards,

conditions and improvements, schedule for development of the Subdivision and other terms and
conditions pursuant to which the Subdivision proposed by Developer is to be developed within
the City; and
WHERAS, the City is willing to grant the PRUD (Planned Residential Unit
Development) overlay upon approval of a final plat and to authorize the development of the
subdivision proposed by Developer in conformance with this Agreement, City Ordinances, and
applicable Utah law;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth
herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1
AGREEMENT
1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION.
A. Area Description. The property upon which the Facility shall be developed (the
“Property”) is located as shown on the Property Location Map, a copy of which is attached as
Exhibit A hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The property is further described as
parcels # 110370044, 110370032, 110370048, 110370050, 110370027, 110370046, 110370042,
110370041, 110370009, 110370023, 110370022
B. Project Description. The project proposed by Developer is a common open space

subdivision, which will consist of up to 82 residential lots.
2. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
A. Adoption of Development Standards. The City hereby adopts, as the development

standards and guidelines for the Facility (the “Development Standards”), the following in
addition to all other applicable City Ordinances, standards and guidelines:
(1) Concept Plan. Plan shown in Exhibit B

The following requirements shall apply.
a. Minimum Open Space – 2.2 Acres
b. Minimum Lot Size - 5,000 SF
c. Final plat shall resemble the lot sizes and overall subdivision layout of
the concept plan shown in Exhibit B
(2) Roads and Parking. All roads within development shall be private and
maintained by community HOA. Road Cross Section shown in Exhibit C.
a. Parking shall only be allowed on one side of the road
b. Additional parking shall be incorporated in the western open space
(3) Yards. The following minimum requirements shall apply in lieu of
standard requirements of the R-1-8 zoning district:
a. Yards abutting a Public Street: 20 feet
2
b. Front Yards abutting the private drive: 20 feet to garage, 15 feet to
building
c. Side Yards: 5 feet – 10 feet between homes within this subdivision.
d. Rear Yards: 15 feet.
(4) Amenities. A playground or tot lot shall be part of the common open space
(5) Fire Break.
a. A minimum of 50’ clearing from homes and vegetation is requires on
the south boundary of project.
i. City consents to grant permission for developer to utilize 30
feet of city property as shown in exhibit D for the purpose of
creating a fire break. This property shall be cleared and
revegetated by developer in accordance with plans and details
to be approved by Kaysville City. City to maintain clearing.
ii. Rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 20’.
b. A minimum of 30’ clearing from homes and vegetation is required on
the east boundary of project
i. Powerline easement will provide 10’ of clearing.
ii. Rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 20’.
(6) Secondary Water
i. Developer is continuing to investigate the viability of including
a secondary water system for irrigation use. If the secondary
water system is determined to be viable by Developer and City,
Developer shall include the secondary water system in the
infrastructure plan,
B. Findings of Compatibility. In adopting the Development Standards identified in

Section 2.A, the City hereby expressly finds that the development of the Subdivision , in
conformance with the Development Standards and this Agreement, promotes the creation of a
desirable residential development in an appropriate location. The City further finds that the
development of the Subdivision, in conformance with the Development Standards and this
Agreement, will not violate the general purpose, goals and objectives of the City Ordinances and
3
any plans adopted by the Planning Commission and City Council of the City.
Subject to the Developer’s performance and compliance with the terms of this Agreement
and City Ordinances in effect on the date of this Agreement, Developer’s rights to develop the
Facility in accordance with the approved site plan, construction drawings and building plans is
vested.
3. ON-SITE PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS
Developer shall construct and install all site improvements, including utilities, required
for the Subdivision, at Developer’s sole cost and expense, in compliance with approvals, and all
applicable ordinances, regulations, standards and status of the City, The Central Davis Sewer
District, other providers and the State of Utah.
4. OFF-SITE PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS
In accordance with applicable standards and subject to the design approval of the City
Engineer, Developer shall construct and install improvement tie-ins needed for two access points
to development which requires stubbing improvements, sidewalks, utilities, and drainage
improvements to the outside of ROW on highway 89 east frontage road as shown in Exhibit E.
Work to be completed prior to UDOT finishing road improvements.
5. REPRESENTATIONS OF DEVELOPER
A. Authority. Developer hereby represents that is has authority to proceed with the
Subdivision.
B. Ability. Developer represents that it has the ability to timely proceed with the
development and construction of the Subdivision.
4
6. ASSIGNMENT
Developer may assign this Agreement to any other third party provided that the City
consents to such assignment, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, upon a showing
to the satisfaction of the City that such third party has the financial ability to perform
Developer’s obligations hereunder.
The City may withhold approval of assignment, without consequence, if the city reasonably
believes that the anticipated assignee will be unable to meet the requirements of this agreement
or any City ordinances.
7. BINDING EFFECT
This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and
their respective successors and assigns.
8. ATTORNEY’S FEES
In the event that this Agreement or any provision hereof shall be enforced by an attorney
retained by a party hereto, whether by suit or otherwise, the fees and costs of such attorney shall
be paid by the party who breaches or defaults hereunder, including fees and costs incurred upon
appeal or in bankruptcy court.
9. SEVERABILITY
If any term or provision of this Agreement shall, to any extent, be determined by a court
of competent jurisdiction to be void, voidable, or unenforceable, such void, voidable or
unenforceable term or provision shall not affect the enforceability of any other term or provision
of this Agreement.
5
10. CAPTIONS
The section and paragraph headings contained in this Agreement are for the purposes of
reference only and shall not limit, expand or otherwise affect the construction of any provisions
hereof.
11. GOVERNING LAW
This Agreement and all matters relating hereto, shall be governed by, construed and
interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Utah.
12. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement, together with the exhibits attached hereto, constitutes the entire
understanding and agreement by and among the parties hereto, and supersedes all prior
agreements, representations or understandings by and among them, whether written or oral,
pertaining to the subject matter hereof.
13. CONSTRUCTION
As used herein, all words in any gender shall be deemed to include the masculine,
feminine, or neuter gender, all singular words shall include the plural, and all plural words shall
include the singular, as the context may require.
14. AUTHORIZATION OF EXECUTION
A. City. The execution of this Agreement by the City has been authorized by the City
Council of Kaysville City at a regularly scheduled meeting of that body, pursuant to the notice.
B. Developer. The execution of this Agreement has been duly authorized by the
Developer.
6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and
year first above written.
DEVELOPER
ATTEST:
By:________________________________
______________
______________________________________ TITLE
TITLE
KAYSVILLE CITY
ATTEST:
By:
____________________________________
______________________________________ Katie Witt
Annemarie Plaizier Mayor
City Recorder
On the _____ day of _________________, 2019, personally appeared before me

KATIE WITT, and ANNEMARIE PLAIZIER, who being by me duly sworn did say,
each for himself and herself that he, the said KATIE WITT, is the Mayor of Kaysville
City, Davis County, State of Utah and that she, the said ANNEMARIE PLAIZIER, is the
City Recorder of Kaysville City, and that the within and foregoing instrument was signed
on behalf of the said Kaysville City by authority of the City Council of Kaysville City
and said KATIE WITT and ANNEMARIE PLAIZIER, each duly acknowledged to me
that the said Kaysville City executed the same and that the seal affixed is the seal of the
said Kaysville City.
______________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
(SEAL)
STATE OF UTAH )
: ss.
COUNTY OF DAVIS )
7
On the _____ day of ____________________, 2020, personally appeared before
me, __________________, the signer of the foregoing Development Agreement for
DEVELOPER, who duly acknowledged to me that he executed the same for and on
behalf of DEVELOPER.
_______________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
(SEAL)
STATE OF UTAH )
: ss.
COUNTY OF DAVIS )
8
Exhibit A
ADDRESS - 1300 East 1084 North Kaysville, Utah
Parcel ID’s – 110370044, 110370032, 110370048, 110370050, 110370027, 110370046,

110370042, 110370041, 110370009, 110370023, 110370022
Location Map
9
Legal Descriptions:
110370044 - BEG AT A PT ON THE E LINE OF PPTY CONV IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED 09/05/2019
AS E# 3184721 BK 7340 PG 754 AT A PT N 143.29 FT & E 612.32 FT & S 84^00' W 256.21 FT & S 00^26' E
171.66 FT & N 84^01'36" E 16.61 FT FR THE W 1/4 COR OF SEC 25-T4N-R1W, SLB&M; & RUN TH N
84^01'36" E 362.89 FT ALG AN EXTENSION OF & ALG THE S'LY BNDRY OF OTT ESTATES (AMD); TH
ALG THE E & S'LY BNDRY OF SD OTT ESTATES (AMD) THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: (1) N
00^26' W 59.20 FT, (2) N 88^13'04" E 579.84 FT TO THE 40 ACRE LINE; TH S 00^18' W 140.06 FT; TH S
82^40' W 321.04 FT; TH N 00^26' W 80.40 FT; TH S 82^40' W 481.80 FT; TH S 00^26' E 60.00 FT; TH S 82^40'
W 142.79 FT TO THE E LINE OF SD WARRANTY DEED; TH N 00^26'00" W 125.80 FT ALG SD E LINE TO
THE POB. CONT 2.457 ACRES (NOTE: THIS REMAINING LEGAL WAS WRITTEN IN THE DAVIS
COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE FOR I.D. PURPOSES. IT DOES NOT REFLECT A SURVEY OF THE
PROPERTY.)
110370032 - BEG AT A PT S 89^46' E 259.6 FT & S 0^26' E 2512.0 FT & N 83^35' E 70.3 FT & S 0^26' E 483.57
FT & N 82^40' E 561.00 FT FT THE NW COR OF SEC 25-T4N-R1W, SLM; RUN TH N 0^26' W 100.00 FT; TH
N 74^41'24" W 154.71 FT; TH S 82^40' W 251.00 FT; TH N 0^26' W 60.00 FT, M/L, TO A PT S 0^26' E 60.00 FT
FR THE S LINE OF OTT ESTATES AMD; TH N 82^40' E 481.80 FT; TH S 0^26' E 220.00 FT TO A PT N 82^40'
E OF THE POB; TH S 82^40' W 80.80 FT TO THE POB. CONT. 1.056 ACRES
110370048 - A PART OF SW 1/4 OF SEC 25-T4N-R1W, SLB&M; BEG AT A PT ON E LINE OF PPTY CONV
IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED 09/05/2019 AS E# 3184720 BK 7340 PG 751 AT A PT 223.91 FT
(RECORD 161.60 FT) S 89^46'00" E ALG THE SEC LINE & 2950.77 FT (RECORD 2959.70 FT) S 00^26'00" E
& 117.40 FT N 82^40'00" E FR NW COR OF SD SEC 25; TH ALG SD E LINE OF PPTY CONV IN SD
WARRANTY DEED THE FOLLOWING COURSE: N 00^26'48" E 110.00 FT; TH N 82^40' E 181.98 FT, M/L;
TH S 0^26' E 110 FT; TH S 82^40' W 181.95 FT TO THE POB. CONT. 0.456 ACRES (NOTE: THIS
REMAINING LEGAL WAS WRITTEN IN THE DAVIS COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE FOR I.D.
PURPOSES. IT DOES NOT REFLECT A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY.)
110370027 - BEG AT A PT ON THE E LINE OF THE FRONTAGE RD, WH IS S 89^46' E 259.6 FT, S 0^26' E
2512 FT, N 83^35' E 70.3 FT (72.52 FT) & S 0^26' E 433.57 FT & S 0^26' E 50 FT ALG THE FRONTAGE RD;
TH N 82^40' E 411 FT FR THE NW COR OF SEC 25-T4N-R1W, SLM; & RUN TH N 82^40' E 150 FT; TH N
0^26'00" W 100 FT; TH N 74^41'24" W 154.718 FT, M/L, TO A PT S 0^26'00" E OF POB; TH S 0^26'00" E 160
FT TO THE POB. CONT. 0.444 ACRES.
110370046 - BEG ON THE E LINE OF HWY 89, AT A PT S 00^11'30" W 971.02 FT ALG THE SEC LINE & S
89^48'30" E 338.34 FT & N'LY ALG THE ARC OF A 22,833.31 FT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT 144.38
FT ALG SD E LINE OF HWY 89 (LC BEARS N 03^05'34" W 144.38 FT) & N'LY 144.38 FT ALG THE ARC OF
A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 22833.31 FT, CHORD BEARS N 03^05'34" W 144.38 FT &
N'LY 166.73 FT ALG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 22833.31 FT, CHORD
BEARS N 01^48'27" W 166.73 FT & N 88^28'00" E 45.00 FT TO A PT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-
TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 22763.31 FT & N'LY ALG THE ARC OF SD
CURVE 319.23 FT, CHORD BEARS N 01^08'10" W 319.23 FT & N 82^40'00" E 37.65 FT FR THE W 1/4 COR
OF SEC 25-T4N-R1W, SLB&M; & RUN TH N 82^40' E 603.842 FT; TH N 00^26' W 139.63 FT; TH N 82^40' E
321.04 FT; TH S 00^18' W 275.07 FT; TH S 82^40' W 269.97 FT; TH S 00^18' W 147.60 FT; TH N 82^40' E 82.69
FT; TH S 00^18' W 200.23 FT; TH S 82^40' W 748.71 FT TO A PT ON THE E LINE OF PPTY CONV IN
WARRANTY DEED RECORDED 09/05/2019 AS E# 3184681 BK 7340 PG 475; TH ALG SD LINE THE
FOLLOWING COURSE: N 00^33'09" W 482.14 FT TO THE POB. CONT. 9.585 ACRES (NOTE: THIS
REMAINING LEGAL WAS WRITTEN IN THE DAVIS COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE FOR I.D.
PURPOSES. IT DOES NOT REFLECT A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY.)
10
110370050 - A PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC 25-T4N-R1W, SLB&M; BEG AT A PT ON THE E LINE OF
PPTY CONV IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED 09/05/2019 AS E# 3184719 BK 7340 PG 748 AT A PT WH
IS S 89^46' E 259.6 FT, S 0^26' E 2512 FT, N 83^35' E 70.3 FT (72.52 FT) & S 0^26' E 433.57 FT & N 82^40'00"
E 17.50 FT FR THE NW COR OF SD SEC 25; & RUN TH ALG SD E LINE S 0^26'48" E 50.00 FT; TH N 82^40'
E 393.49 FT; TH N 0^26' W 160 FT; TH S 82^40' W 211.55 FT; TH S 0^26' E 110 FT; TH S 82^40' W 181.95 FT
TO THE POB. CONT. 0.98 ACRES (NOTE: THIS REMAINING LEGAL WAS WRITTEN IN THE DAVIS
COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE FOR I.D. PURPOSES. IT DOES NOT REFLECT A SURVEY OF THE
PROPERTY.)
110370042 - BEG ON THE E'LY LINE OF PPTY CONV IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED 09/05/2019 AS
E# 3184727 BK 7340 PG 780 AT A PT S 00^11'30" W 971.02 FT ALG THE SEC LINE & S 89^48'30" E 338.34
FT & N'LY 144.38 FT ALG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 22833.31 FT (LC BEARS N
03^05'34" W 144.38 FT & N 82^40'00" E 55.86 FT) FR THE W 1/4 COR OF SEC 25-T4N-R1W, SLB&M, &
RUN TH N 82^40' E 748.71 FT; TH S 00^18' W 133.94 FT; TH S 83^40' W 142.49 FT; TH S 81^28' W 603.82 FT
TO SD E'LY LINE; TH ALG SD PPTY THE FOLLOWING TWO COURSES: N'LY ALG THE ARC OF A
4960.00 FT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT 131.17 FT (LC BEARS N 1^17'23" W 131.07 FT); TH N
00^33'09" W 12.57 FT TO THE POB. CONT 2.322 ACRES (NOTE: THIS REMAINING LEGAL WAS
WRITTEN IN THE DAVIS COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE FOR I.D. PURPOSES. IT DOES NOT REFLECT
A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY.)
110370041 - A PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC 25-T4N-R1W, SLB&M; BEG AT A PT ON THE E LINE OF
PPTY CONV IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED 09/05/2019 AS E# 3184727 BK 7340 PG 780, WH PT IS S
0^11'30" W 971.02 FT ALG THE SEC LINE & S 89^48'30" E 338.34 FT & N 81^28' E 51.31 FT, M/L, FR THE W
1/4 COR OF SD SEC 25; & RUN TH N 81^28' E 603.82 FT; TH S 51^31' W 100.99 FT; TH S 81^28' W 389.00
FT; TH S 8^32' E 224.14 FT; TH S 51^31' W 179.31 FT TO E'LY LINE SD WARRANTY DEED; TH ALG SD
LINE THE FOLLOWING TWO COURSES: N'LY ALG THE ARC OF A 5270.00 FT RADIUS CURVE TO THE
LEFT 39.85 FT (LC BEARS N 05^36'34" W 39.85 FT) TO A PT ON A 4960.00 FT RADIUS CURVE TO RIGHT;
TH ALG THE ARC OF SD CURVE 325.37 FT (LC BEARS N 03^56'48" W 325.31 FT) TO THE POB. CONT.
1.53 ACRES (NOTE: THIS REMAINING LEGAL WAS WRITTEN IN THE DAVIS COUNTY RECORDER'S
OFFICE FOR I.D. PURPOSES. IT DOES NOT REFLECT A SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY.)
110370009 - BEG AT A PT S 0^11'30" W 993.75 FT ALG THE SEC LINE & S 89^48'30" E 522.55 FT FR THE
W 1/4 COR OF SEC 25-T4N-R1W, SLM; TH N 81^28' E 389 FT; TH S 51^31' W 448.95 FT; TH N 8^32' W
224.14 FT TO POB. CONT. 1.00 ACRES TOGETHER WITH A DESC R/W ANNEXED 949-693
110370023 - BEG AT A PT WH IS S 89^46' E 161.1 FT & S 0^26' E 3144.70 FT; TH N 82^46' E 99.9 FT TO E
LINE OF FRONTAGE RD; TH N 82^40' E 699.96 FT FR NW COR OF SEC 25-T4N-R1W, SLM; & RUN TH N
82^40' E 136.67 FT; TH S 0^18' W 147.60 FT; TH S 82^40' W 136.67 FT; TH N 0^18' E 147.60 FT TO THE POB.
CONT. 0.46 ACRES.
110370022 - A PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC 25-T4N-R1W, SLBM; BEG AT A PT ON THE 1/4 SEC LINE,
WH IS S 89^46' E 161.6 FT, S 0^26' E 3144.70 FT & N 82^40' E 1132.40 FT FR THE NW COR OF SD SEC 25; &
RUN TH S 0^18' W 478.2 FT ALG THE 1/4-1/4 SEC LINE; TH S 83^40' W 191.16 FT; TH N 0^18' E 327.23 FT;
TH N 82^40' E 53.98 FT; TH N 0^18' E 147.60 FT; TH N 82^40' E 137.6 FT TO THE POB. CONT. 1.90 ACRES.
11
Exhibit B
CONCEPT PLAN
Open Space
15,000 SF Detached Single Family
12
Exhibit C
ROAD CROSS SECTION
10 10
’ ’
40
’
30
’
13
Exhibit D
Fire Break
14
Exhibit E
Highway 89 Tie-In’s
15
ORDINANCE NO. 20-______
AN ORDINANCE REZONING A CERTAIN PORTION OF KAYSVILLE CITY TO

INCLUDE THE PRUD (PLANNED RESIDENTIAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT) OVERLAY
ZONE, HEREINAFTER FULLY DESCRIBED; PROVIDING FOR REPEALER; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
meeting to include the PRUD overlay zone for the purpose of accommodating a common open
space subdivision with private streets; and
Council on said zoning action; and
WHEREAS, the City Council after due consideration of said overlay zone has concluded that it
is in the best interest of the City and the inhabitants thereof that said zone be implemented;
UTAH:
SECTION II:
approximately 23 acres, shall be and the same is hereby rezoned and the Zoning Map amended by
adding the Kaysville City PRUD (Planned Residential Unit Development) overlay zone.
ordinance.
SECTION VI:
This Ordinance shall take effect upon approval of a final subdivision plat found to be consistent
with the provisions of the approved development agreement for the subject property.
2020
____________________________
Katie Witt
Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Annemarie Plaizier
City Recorder
______________________________
Updated for Cost clarifications from Bidders
Evaluation Criteria and Scoring.
A. Design and Construction of the Network
Criteria Points AEG Corning/ Connext/ Strata Tilson

Graybar
1. The likelihood of the proposed Network to facilitate open access to multiple data and
Internet service providers;
50 43 45 45 40
2. Capacity of proposed Network to provide a minimum of 1 Gbps symmetrical speeds to
residential consumers and between 1 and 10+ Gbps to business and government;
50 45 44 43 41
3. Demonstrated experience of the Vendor in designing similar Networks; 50 45 42 44 42
4. Specifications of Vendor’s proposal align with the City’s technical preferences for the 50 44 44 42 38
Network;
5. Financial solvency of the Vendor or, if applicable, the subcontractor to be engaged for the
design and construction of the network;
50 37 37 34 34
6. Existing contractual or established business relationships with data service providers that
may offer services to City residents over the Network;
25 18 21 20 18
7. Safety plan and demonstrated ability to enforce the safety plan in past work; 25 25 24 24 23
8. Cost. 100 82 88 37 68
Total: 400 338 344 289 304
Network Cost (4,500 home connections) - revised based upon clarifications from bidders $ 20,391,000 $ 20,563,000 $ 58,997,000 $ 32,517,000
B. Continued Operation and Maintenance of the Network
Criteria Points AEG Corning/ Connext/ Strata Tilson

Graybar
1. Existing ability, as demonstrated by work on past
similar networks, to provide ongoing engineering, 75 65 64 66 64
maintenance, replacement, and repair of the Network;
2. Vendor will provide assurances guaranteeing
minimum standards for Network performance 75 63 67 66 64
enforceable by the City through corresponding
3. Specifications and quality of Network security plan; 50 25 37 38 33
4. Demonstrated ability to attract and ensure multiple
service providers have access to city residents through 50 32 40 39 35
the Network;
5. Demonstrated customer service in past similar
50 37 39 38 37
networks as shown through average response and
6. Cost. 100 71 81 60 34
Total: 400 294 327 307 267
5 year est. cost $ 6,175,000 $ 5,450,000 $ 6,269,536 ??
Total Combined Score 632 672 596 571

Kaysville Fiber Bid Highlights
AEG CCG
Construction Score 338 344
Total Construction Cost $ 20,391,000 $ 20,563,000
Guaranteed Maximum Price Yes No
City receives savings from project Yes Yes
Construction timeframe 18‐24 months 18‐24 months
Passed structures 9,500 9,500
Installed Residential premises 4,500 4,500
Miles of fiber plant 160 ??
Aerial fiber 12.0% 20.0%
Pole make ready improvement allowance $ 288,000 Not included
All underground fiber in conduit Yes Yes
All Active Ethernet connections Yes Yes
Fiber Huts/Cabinets 20 4‐5
Outside Plant (Fiber network) Materials and Workmanship warranty in years 3 7 (10)
Redundant paths for fiber Yes Yes
Extra fiber strands to support undeveloped land 20% Yes
Operations & Maintenance Scoring 294 327

5 Year Total Estimated Ops & Maint Cost (3,780 avg annual subscribers) $ 7,430,000 $ 4,586,000
Marketing support from City (annual) $ 200,000
Marketing support from City (one‐time) n/a $ 50,000
Variable Subscriber Ops & Maintenance per month n/a $ 20.00
Annual fixed Ops & Maintenance per year (up to 4,000 subs) $ 770,000 n/a
Annual fixed Ops & Maintenance per year (up to 6,000 subs) $ 1,415,000 n/a
Assumed Ops & Maint for 2,500 subs $ 770,000 $ 600,000
Assumed Ops & Maint for 4,500 subs $ 1,415,000 $ 1,080,000
24/7 Network Operations Yes Yes
Customer Portal COS Custom
Prior Customer References provided Yes Yes
Financial Statements to confirm financial strength Bank comfort ltr Yes
Total Score 632 672

Total Project Cost ‐ Construction + Ops Maint 5 year $ 27,821,000 $ 25,149,000
Enhancement noted in presentation
New Kaysville Fiber ‐ Draft Financial Summary for Council Discussion
Total Monthly
Residential Service Level Cost Business Service Level
25/3 Mbps * TBD
50/10 Mbps $49.95 To be determined with selected vendor
250Mpbs Symmetrical $62.95 Details to be published when available
Gigabit Symmetrical $69.95
10 Gbps Symmetrical $239.95
No connection fee or upfront costs. Includes
fiber modem. WiFi router is optional/extra cost
or use your own WiFi router.
Priorities ‐ pay off bond first, then look to reduce rates
* ‐ only available to eligible low income residents
Residential Subscriber Scenarios
Subscribers by July 2024 (3.5 years) Take Rate @ Bond Payoff
3,500 @@ 32% ‐ 37% 30 years Self‐Sustainting
4,200 38% ‐ 44% 30 years Self‐Sustainting
4,500 41% ‐ 47% 27‐28 years
5,000 45% ‐ 52% 25‐26 years
5,500 50% ‐ 58% 22‐23 years Expected Case
6,000 54% ‐ 63% 19‐20 years
6,500 59% ‐ 68% 17‐18 years
7,000 64% ‐ 74% 15‐16 years Best Case
@ ‐ Take rate range is based on current (9,500) and future premises (11,000) in Kaysville
@@ ‐ Fiber fee raised by $5 in July 2024 to meet bond obligations
Fiber Revenue Bond Parameters
$21M Face Value Bond ($24.5M funding) with 4‐5% coupon rate (true interest cost ‐ 3.15%) for 30 years
Bond secured by Fiber Infrastructure fees and Sales/Franchise taxes
Capitalized Interest for first 2 years
Reserve fund for final year payment
Reimbursement to General fund for all expenses of project through election
Estimated Funding in February 2021
First Bond Interest & Princiapl payment due on April 15, 2023
Prepaid Infrastructure Option (lower monthly fee in exchange for an upfront payment)
Upfront Infrastructure Payment $ 2,700.00
Adjusted Monthly Cost ##
50/10 Mbps $27.95
250Mpbs Symmetrical $40.95
Gigabit Symmetrical $47.95
10Gbps Symmetrical $217.95
## ‐ also represents the anticipated monthly cost after bond is paid off
TYPE OF ITEM: Architectural Review Committee

PRESENTED BY: Lyle Gibson
SUBJECT/AGENDA TITLE: Consideration of new covered parking structures

at 610 North 900 West for the Kaysville Professional complex.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The subject property which contains 1.75 acres is currently nearing completion of a second
office building towards the east end of the property. The current proposal is to build carport
structures over the existing parking area between the new building and the freeway / train tracks.
In addition to the following the regulations of the LI zoning district, property in the Kaysville
Business Park is subject to covenants that have additional requirements and considerations. The
regulations that are applicable to the proposed structures are included below.
Architecture
Buildings shall have a horizontal appearance, be visually reduced to human scale, and not have
radical themes. (I.B.)
Building materials shall convey permanence, substance, and restraint, and blend with those
existing in the adjacent area of the Park. (I.C.)
Walls with metal or painted metal as the outer layer are not allowed. (I.C.)
Buildings
All buildings shall be at least 5,000 square feet in ground floor area, with the exception of public
service buildings.
Building shall mean a structure built for permanent use and all projections or extensions thereof,
including but not limited to garages, outside platforms and docks, storage tanks, canopies,
enclosed malls and porches, but not including landscaping, utility lines and connected
infrastructure. All buildings on Development Parcels shall be at least five thousand square feet
(5,000 sq. ft.) in ground floor area, with the exception of public utility buildings and structures
necessary for public convenience and service.
No building, structure or combination of such shall cover more than 70% of the total lot area.
(17-21-6)
There are 2 proposed structures standing roughly 10 feet in total height one of which will
contain a solar array. The carport with solar is 36 x 101 or 3,636 sq. ft. The other is 18’ x 101’
or 1,818 sq. ft. This makes a total of 5,454 sq. ft. of new structures. The existing buildings on
site are roughly 6,000 sq. ft. in ground floor area each for a total of 17,454 sq. ft. well under the
maximum lot coverage allowance.
4.10 Variances. The Committee may authorize variances from compliance with any of the
Provisions of the Development Standards when circumstances such as
topography, natural obstructions, hardship, aesthetic, or environmental considerations require,
but only in accordance with rules and regulations approved by the Committee. The Declarant
or, if the Association has been created, the Association may, but need not, reject, accept, or
amend such rules and regulations of the Committee. Such variances may only be granted,
however, when unique circumstances dictate and no variance shall (i) be effective unless in
writing, (ii) be contrary to the restrictions set forth in the body of this Master Declaration, or (iii)
estop the Committee from denying a variance in other circumstances. For purposes of this
Section, the inability to obtain approval of any governmental agency, the issuance of any permit
or the terms of financing shall not be considered a hardship warranting a variance.
Committee Options:
1) Approve the architecture and plans for the proposed carports as proposed.
2) Request changes prior to giving approval.
3) Deny the proposed carports.
Recommended Option: It is recommended that the committee approve the request for construction of
the carport structures as proposed based on their location and compatibility with the regulations of the
Kaysville Business Park. These are unique structures to the business park, and based on their location
will have little to no impact on the overall aesthetic of the park and have less impact being broken up
rather than meeting the 5,000 sq. ft. structure standard.
Attachments: Aerial Image of property – Plans for carports

CARPORT
36'
CARPORT
18'
101'
W 270
101'
280
260
290
250
240
300
310
230
320
220
210
330
340 350
200 190
0
N
S
180
170
10 20
160
AZIMUTH
30
150
4O
140
50
130
70
60
110
80
120
100
90 E
DATE: 5/21/2020
INTERMOUNTAIN WIND & SOLAR
SHEET #
Designer M. Telford
1953 WEST 2425 SOUTH Kaysville Professional Building
SCALE:
PROJECT # 2020-132
WOODS CROSS, UT, 84087 610 North Kays Drive
1
SYSTEM SIZE: (2) Carports

16"
P: 801-298-5255
PV02
Kaysville, UT AHJ: Kaysville

F: 801-298-5355
Revision
= 1'
55,100W - (145) Modules
SCOPE OF WORK MODULE AND INVERTER(S)
N
M. Telford
3/22/2020
2020-132
Kaysville
System Size: 55.1kW 0
(145) Trina 380 TallMax
340 350 10 20
330 30
(1) Solaredge 43.2kUS
320 4O
Standard TPO Membrane Roof Carport Mounted Array
(1) P860 SE Optimizer(s) 310 50
300 60
Total Area of Array(s): 2,900ft² NOTES 290 70
SYSTEM SIZE:
PLEASE REFER TO LABEL PLAN FOR WARNINGS PER NEC 690 & IRC 2018 280 80
PROJECT #
Array(s) Azimuth: 180º , 240º WIRING SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED WITHIN 10" OF ROOF DECKING EXCEPT WHERE W 270 AZIMUTH 90 E
Designer
Revision
260 100
DATE:
DIRECTLY BELOW THE ROOF SURFACE COVERED BY PV MODULES AND/OR EQUIPMENT
AHJ:
250 110
Anchored on UL Listed Ecolibrium Ballasted System
240 120
230 130
220 140
Pass Through Boxes Mounted Flush on Installation Surface (5º)
210 200 190 170
160 150
Meter Upgrade: NO
180
S
Kaysville Professional Building

CARPORT 18'
CARPORT
610 North Kays Drive

Kaysville, UT
96 PANELS ON CARPORT 36'
SOLAR EQUIPMENT STRUCTURE

SOLAR AC DISCONNECT
TRENCH
SOLAR PRODUCTION METER
24" DEPTH
SOLAREDGE 43.2KUS INVERTER
2.5 " PVC
101'
101'
UTILITY METER WALL
MAIN SERVICE PANEL
INTERMOUNTAIN WIND & SOLAR
WOODS CROSS, UT, 84087

49 PANELS ON BUILDING
1953 WEST 2425 SOUTH
P: 801-298-5255
F: 801-298-5355
SHEET #
PV02
1
16" = 1'
SCALE:
KAYSVILLE CITY
MUNICIPAL BUILDING AUTHORITY BOARD
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING AND AGENDA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of the Governing Board of the Municipal
Building Authority of Kaysville City, Utah (the “Authority”) will be held on Thursday, June 4,
2020 at 8:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the City Council Meeting adjourns, in the Business
Resource Center of the Davis Technical College, 450 South Simmons Way, Kaysville, UT.
1. Opening.
3. Adjournment.
Kaysville City is dedicated to a policy of non-discrimination in admission to, access to, or

operations of its programs, services or activities. If you need special assistance due to a disability,
please contact the Kaysville City Offices at (801) 546-1235 at least 24 hours in advance of the
meeting to be held.
I hereby certify that I posted a copy of the foregoing Notice and Agenda at City Hall (80 North
Main Street) and emailed copies to media representatives on May 29, 2020.
__________________
Annemarie Plaizier
Agency Secretary
MUNICIPAL BUILDING AUTHORITY
STAFF REPORT
TYPE OF ITEM: Municipal Building Authority - Action
PRESENTED BY: Staff
SUBJECT/AGENDA TITLE: Furniture Purchase for Kaysville City Municipal

Building.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The construction work for the remodel and addition to the Kaysville City Municipal
building is anticipated to be completed early July of this year. This item is for the
approval of the purchase of furnishing for the building such as chairs, tables, desks,
cubicles, etc.
The total purchase price for the furnishing is $213,909.73 between the 2 attached
invoices.
The estimated cost for furnishings at the onset of the project was $202,173. This
represents a roughly 6% increase over the original estimate
Recommended Option: It is recommended that the purchase for furnishings provided in the attached
invoice be approved.
Fiscal Impact: $213,909.73 to the municipal building authority
Attachments: invoices from mbi business designs.

Kaysville 1 of 14
City Hall
Item Alias 1 Mfg Cat Part Number Part Description Qty Sell Ext Sell
1 Break Room A45 Z5SC72 60W EXTERNAL SUPT CHANNEL FOR 72W W/S 1 $ 19.75 $ 19.75
2 Break Room ATA AMPTTMSG STRUCTURE T BASE MEDIUM PAIR SEATED HEIGHT WITH GLIDES 1 $ 198.45 $ 198.45
$(P2) P2 Paint Grade

.PR6 Silver
3 Break Room ALC CWS-PPGANO LYRIC WIRE STKR POLY BACK & SEAT GLIDES ARMLESS NO FC 4 $ 115.07 $ 460.28
.0 Polycarbonate
.PR6 Silver
.TI Titanium
4 Break Room HBO HTK21101R-2042 NEST COFFEE TBL 42 DIA TOP W/ MTL BASE 1 $ 1,411.55 $ 1,411.55
.PL701 Laminate--Bourbon Cherry

.PSS Polished Stainless Steel
5 Break Room ATA AMPTLF3672RE STRUCTURE 36 X 72 RECTANGLE TOP LAMINATE - SQUARE EDGE 1 $ 216.30 $ 216.30
.X Standard Wood
$(L2WDGRN) L2 Woodgrain Lam Opts
.LWBR Lam: Brazilwood
.DB Edg: Brazilwood *Prev EDB*
.C0 No Cutout
6 Break Room AGR RETECLS RETREAT EXEC/CONF LOW-BACK SINGLE UPHOLSTERY 4 $ 726.00 $ 2,904.00
.4 4-Star Return-to-Center
.POL CLR: Polished
$(1) Grade 1 Uph
.UR92 FAB: Contourett--Fab: Marine
sub Subtotal $ 5,210.33
7 City Manager A44 ALED31U60 31IN DAISY CHAIN STARTER W/ POWER SUPPLY 1 $ 234.50 $ 234.50
8 City Manager A44 ALED31UJMP30 31IN DAISY CHAIN LIGHT 1 $ 134.00 $ 134.00
9 City Manager APR WKTKGT4H72-FA APPR TACKZN 30H 72W WRTBL SURF FLL HGT 1 $ 159.80 $ 159.80
10 City Manager A33 YWC36Z Z WALL MOUNT BRACKET FOR 36IN WOOD OVERHEAD 2 $ 21.50 $ 43.00
11 City Manager ATA AMPTXL29G STRUCTURE X BASE LARGE SEATED HEIGHT WITH GLIDES 1 $ 210.70 $ 210.70

.P8R Pebble
12 City Manager APR ATBC2S3L 2-STG CANT BASE-ELEC 1 $ 844.25 $ 844.25
$(P2) P2 Paint Opts

.PR6 CLR: Silver
13 City Manager APR WKST318 APPROACH WORKSURFACE STANCHION 3HX18D 1 $ 63.60 $ 63.60
14 City Manager A45 Z6CLFR FIXED C-LEG RIGHT FOR FLAT/SQ EDGE 1 $ 86.95 $ 86.95
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
15 City Manager AWS T51872SN 18DX72W RECTANGULAR W/S W/FLAT EDGE NO GROMS 1 $ 120.00 $ 120.00

16 City Manager ATA AMPTLF42RND STRUCTURE 42 DIAMETER ROUND TOP LAMINATE - SQUARE EDGE 1 $ 170.80 $ 170.80
.X Standard Wood
17 City Manager AEI K2TP243618A 24HX36WX18D OPEN BINDER 1 $ 344.50 $ 344.50
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
.X Standard Wood
.LWBRDB Brazilwood--Brazilwood *Prev EDB*
18 City Manager A42 SPLA-INV-BCKPA CUSTOM INVOLVE OPEN PLINTH BOOKCASE 1 $ 690.50 $ 690.50
.M504773 Skipped Option

.X Standard Wood
$(L2WDGR) L2 Woodgrain Lam Opts
19 City Manager AEI K6DME1154L 54W END MOUNTING LAMINATE MODESTY 1 $ 143.50 $ 143.50
.X Standard Wood
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts
.P8R CLR: Pebble
20 City Manager AWS T52448S PRIMARY 24DX48W FLAT EG LAM W/GROMMETS 1 $ 94.25 $ 94.25

.P Plastic Grommet
G:\Shared drives\I-Drive\Myranda\Rob\2020\Kaysville\Final\Kaysville Compass Quote BID 439270.sp4 05/22/20 14:18:12

Kaysville 2 of 14
City Hall
21 City Manager AWS T5723ER CORNER COVE 48X72-24L/30R EXTD RH FLAT W/GROM 1 $ 217.75 $ 217.75

.P Plastic Grommet
22 City Manager ALC DSC-MUCONO EVO 4-LEG SIDE FIXED ARMS MESH BACK CASTERS 6 $ 223.50 $ 1,341.00
.P8T Titanium
.L Lustre
.3 Multi-Surface Caster
$(4COM) Grd 4 COM Uph
.S538111ZP ~Undecided~
23 City Manager AEI K2TOC153615N 15HX36WX15D SLIDER BIN OVERHEAD 2 $ 304.25 $ 608.50
.X Standard Wood
.OMT omt Core to Ord key Alike
24 City Manager AEI K2TP243618E 24HX36WX18D B/B/LAT 1 $ 454.75 $ 454.75
.APPR6 Arch Pull--Clr: Silver

.X Standard Wood
.OMT omt 2 Core To Ord key Alike
25 City Manager A42 SPLA-INV-LAMEP CUSTOM INVOLVE END PANEL 1 $ 128.25 $ 128.25
.M504871 Enter Custom "M" Number

.X Standard Wood
26 City Manager APR WKAUMSMM30RH APPROACH METAL SHROUD 30D RH 1 $ 47.17 $ 47.17
27 City Manager ALC DWW-MHHNO EVO TASK MESH HIGH BACK HEIGHT ADJ ARMS NO FC 1 $ 382.88 $ 382.88
.TI Titanium
.D Dusk
.L Yes
.2 Standard
.TI Titanium
.H Black Hard Tread
$(1) Grd 1 Uph
.NR19 Fab: Inertia--CLR: Fog
.TC00 Coordinating
28 City Manager ALF LKFE4MTS LOCK CORE KIT MATTE SILVER -- 4 CORES 2 KEYS 1 $ 18.00 $ 18.00
$(KEYNUM) Key Number

.SEQ/102 Key Number Sequence Start--Key Number 102
.1 Quantity: 1
29 Clerks 158 A44 A871124 PASS-THRU HARNESS W/POWER BLOCK 24W 8 $ 34.25 $ 274.00
.P CLR: Black
.P CLR: Black
.P CLR: Black
32 Clerks 158 A44 A871224 POWER HARNESS 24W 4 $ 55.25 $ 221.00
.P CLR: Black
33 Clerks 158 A47 A873501 TER/2.6/ALIGN DUPLEX RECEPTACLE CIRCUIT 1 4 $ 10.50 $ 42.00
.EV CLR: Loft

.EV CLR: Loft

.EV CLR: Loft

.EV CLR: Loft

37 Clerks 158 APR ABJ3S2L HEIGHT ADJ BASE 2LEG 4 $ 408.00 $ 1,632.00
.P8L Nickel
38 Clerks 158 A44 ATADF3 THREE-PORT FLEX-MODE DATA FACEPLATE 4 $ 5.50 $ 22.00
.E4 CLR: Black

Kaysville 3 of 14
City Hall
39 Clerks 158 A44 EADH TOOL BOX PENCIL & CD HOLDER 4 $ 15.50 $ 62.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
40 Clerks 158 A44 EAPT MAIL BOX 4 $ 19.25 $ 77.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
41 Clerks 158 A44 EASS PAPER WAVE 4 $ 27.25 $ 109.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
42 Clerks 158 A44 EATS PHONE CADDY 4 $ 24.00 $ 96.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
43 Clerks 158 A44 EASR24 24IN W SLAT RAIL ATTACHMENT 4 $ 38.25 $ 153.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
44 Clerks 158 A44 EASR30 30IN W-SLAT RAIL ATTACHMENT 4 $ 40.50 $ 162.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
45 Clerks 158 AVW T6BK WORKSURFACE BRACKET KIT 4 $ 11.50 $ 46.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
46 Clerks 158 A47 TK05024WR STRUCTURAL RACEWAY PNL FR-NO TOP TRIM 50HX24W 5 $ 59.25 $ 296.25
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
47 Clerks 158 A47 TK05036WR STRUCTURAL RACEWAY PNL FR-NO TOP TRIM 50HX36W 7 $ 64.25 $ 449.75
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
48 Clerks 158 A47 TK350TF T 3-WAY FLAT CONNECTOR KIT - 50H BASE PANEL 1 $ 34.75 $ 34.75
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
49 Clerks 158 A47 TK350WF W FLAT WALL MOUNT KIT - 50IN LENGTH 2 $ 32.00 $ 64.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
50 Clerks 158 A47 TKG45024T TER TACKABLE ACOUSTIC TILE 50H X 24W 10 $ 33.25 $ 332.50
$(A) GRD A FAB

.LC922 FAB: Lucy--Dusk
51 Clerks 158 A47 TKG45036T TER TACKABLE ACOUSTIC TILE 50H X 36W 14 $ 44.00 $ 616.00
$(A) GRD A FAB

52 Clerks 158 A47 TK40730TGSF 7-1/2H X 30 W FLAT GLASS PANEL MNTD SCREEN 4 $ 103.75 $ 415.00
.LF Frosted Glass

$(P1) P1 Paint Opts
.P8R CLR: Pebble
53 Clerks 158 A47 TK40778TGSF 7-1/2H X 78 W FLAT GLASS PANEL MNTD SCREEN 4 $ 211.75 $ 847.00
.LF Frosted Glass

$(P1) P1 Paint Opts
.P8R CLR: Pebble
54 Clerks 158 A47 TK40796TGSF 7-1/2H X 96 W FLAT GLASS PANEL MNTD SCREEN 4 $ 256.25 $ 1,025.00
.LF Frosted Glass

$(P1) P1 Paint Opts
.P8R CLR: Pebble
55 Clerks 158 ATA AF5RS7230D RECT LAM FLT SGL SUR 4 $ 153.25 $ 613.00

.GCP Center Grommet--Plastic Grommet
56 Clerks 158 AWS T52454S PRIMARY 24DX54W FLAT EG LAM W/GROMMETS 4 $ 102.00 $ 408.00

.P Plastic Grommet

Kaysville 4 of 14
City Hall
57 Clerks 158 ALC DWW-MHHNO EVO TASK MESH HIGH BACK HEIGHT ADJ ARMS NO FC 4 $ 382.88 $ 1,531.52
.TI Titanium
.D Dusk
.L Yes
.2 Standard
.TI Titanium
.H Black Hard Tread
$(1) Grd 1 Uph
.TC00 Coordinating
58 Conference Rooms A45 Z5SC84 72W EXTERNAL SUPT CHANNEL FOR 84W W/S 2 $ 23.75 $ 47.50
59 Conference Rooms ATA AMPTTMSG STRUCTURE T BASE MEDIUM PAIR SEATED HEIGHT WITH GLIDES 2 $ 198.45 $ 396.90

.PR6 Silver
60 Conference Rooms ATA AMPTXL29G STRUCTURE X BASE LARGE SEATED HEIGHT WITH GLIDES 1 $ 221.20 $ 221.20

.PR6 Silver
61 Conference Rooms ATA AMPTLF3684RE STRUCTURE 36 X 84 RECTANGLE TOP LAMINATE - SQUARE EDGE 2 $ 272.65 $ 545.30
.X Standard Wood
.C0 No Cutout
62 Conference Rooms ATA AMPTLF48RND STRUCTURE 48 DIAMETER ROUND TOP LAMINATE - SQUARE EDGE 1 $ 207.55 $ 207.55
.X Standard Wood
63 Conference Rooms ATA AMPTPL144 STRUCTURE LAMINATE HALLOW PANEL BASE FOR 144 WIDE 1 $ 928.20 $ 928.20
.X Standard Wood
.LWBR Brazilwood
64 Conference Rooms ATA AMPTPL168 STRUCTURE LAMINATE HALLOW PANEL BASE FOR 168 WIDE 1 $ 1,357.30 $ 1,357.30
.X Standard Wood
.LWBR Brazilwood
65 Conference Rooms ATA AMPTPL192 STRUCTURE LAMINATE HALLOW PANEL BASE FOR 192 WIDE 1 $ 1,397.55 $ 1,397.55
.X Standard Wood
.LWBR Brazilwood
66 Conference Rooms ATA AMPTLF60144DIA STRUCTURE 60 X 144 DIAMOND TOP LAMINATE - SQUARE EDGE 1 $ 816.20 $ 816.20
.X Standard Wood
.C2 2 Large Center Cutouts
67 Conference Rooms ATA AMPTLF60168DIA STRUCTURE 60 X 168 DIAMOND TOP LAMINATE - SQUARE EDGE 1 $ 1,003.10 $ 1,003.10
.X Standard Wood
68 Conference Rooms ATA AMPTST96 STRUCTURE EXTERNAL STIFFNER FOR 96 IN WIDE TABLE 2 $ 24.15 $ 48.30
69 Conference Rooms ATA AMPTST962P STRUCTURE EXTERNAL STIFFNER AND HARDWARE FOR 2 PIECE TOPS 2 $ 26.25 $ 52.50
70 Conference Rooms A42 SPLA-MPT-2PCTPF CUSTOM STRUCTURE TBL 2 PIECE TOP FLAT EDGE 1 $ 1,134.70 $ 1,134.70
.L505100 Enter Custom "M" Number

.X Standard Wood
71 Conference Rooms ATA AMPTP2 STRUCTURE 10 FT CORDED POWER INCLUDES 3 POWER/1 EXTRON CUT OUT 6 $ 188.30 $ 1,129.80
.SVR Silver

Kaysville 5 of 14
City Hall
72 Conference Rooms ATA AW4BC7224NG 34HX72WX24D BUFFET CREDENZANO GROMMET 1 $ 2,023.98 $ 2,023.98
.X Standard Wood
$(P2) P2 Paint Opts
.PR6 CLR: Silver
.NL No Lock
73 Conference Rooms ALC DWW-MHHNO EVO TASK MESH HIGH BACK HEIGHT ADJ ARMS NO FC 52 $ 366.00 $ 19,032.00
.TI Titanium
.D Dusk
.N No
.2 Standard
.TI Titanium
.H Black Hard Tread
$(1) Grd 1 Uph
.UR92 Fab: Contourett--Fab: Marine
.TC00 Coordinating
74 Council Room A45 Z5SC66 54W EXTERNAL SUPT CHANNEL FOR 66W W/S 2 $ 18.25 $ 36.50
75 Council Room A45 Z6PTLFPC TABLE FIXED POST LEG PR FLAT/SQ EG CSTR 4 $ 126.94 $ 507.76
$(P2) P2 Paint Opts

.PR6 CLR: Silver
76 Council Room A42 SPLA-A8-3066EOCLE CUST A8 LAM WS 2 $ 114.29 $ 228.58

.X Standard Wood
.LPE1 Lam: Phantom Ecru
.PE Edg: Phantom Ecru
77 Council Room ATA FDSC66U A8 66 IN U SCREEN 2 $ 380.03 $ 760.06
$(A) GRD A Fab

.NBLE14 FAB: Noble--Aspen
.PR6 CLR: Silver
78 Council Room ALC NMBL-CART NIMBLE CART -HOLDS 36 CHAIRS 5 $ 207.25 $ 1,036.25
79 Council Room ALC NMBL-2FC NIMBLE HIGH DENSITY STACKER/PAINTED FRAME/FC 150 $ 70.79 $ 10,618.50
.0 Clear Polycarbonate (Standard)

$(P2) P2 Grd Frame
.PR6 Silver
.GY Clr: Summit
80 Council Room ALC SV2HCNO SVELTE 2.0 UPH HIGH BACK CHAIR CHANNEL STITCH NO FIRECODE 10 $ 494.00 $ 4,940.00
.F FSC Wood
.PAL Polished Aluminum
.S Synchro Seat Slider
.H Height Adjustable Arms
$(1) Grade 1 Uph
.UR92 FAB: Contourett--Fab: Marine
81 Depts at Counter A44 ALED31U 31IN UNDERCABINET LED LIGHT W/ POWER SUPPLY 6 $ 222.50 $ 1,335.00
82 Depts at Counter APR ABJ3S3L HEIGHT ADJ BASE 3LEG 6 $ 641.25 $ 3,847.50
.P8L Nickel
83 Depts at Counter AVW T6CB24L CANTILEVER BRACKET 24D LH TERRACE 3 $ 13.50 $ 40.50
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
84 Depts at Counter AVW T6CB24R CANTILEVER BRACKET 24D RH TERRACE 3 $ 13.50 $ 40.50
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
85 Depts at Counter A47 TK365YEB TER WALL TRACK KIT 65H-PAIR OF ENDS 6 $ 49.00 $ 294.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
86 Depts at Counter A47 TKG43036T TER TACKABLE ACOUSTIC TILE 30H X 36W 1 $ 27.00 $ 27.00
$(A) GRD A FAB

87 Depts at Counter A47 TKG43042T TER TACKABLE ACOUSTIC TILE 30H X 42W 5 $ 30.75 $ 153.75
$(A) GRD A FAB


Kaysville 6 of 14
City Hall
88 Depts at Counter ATA A5622ELS CORNER COVE EXT LH 3 $ 179.25 $ 537.75

.GBP Grommet LH-RH--Plastic Grommet
89 Depts at Counter ATA A5622ERS CORNER COVE EXT RH 3 $ 179.25 $ 537.75

90 Depts at Counter ALF YPPSBX281524FFLA F/F SUPPPED 28HX24D RECESSKP LAM-A-PULL 12 $ 253.25 $ 3,039.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
.X Omit Lock
.LPE1PE Phantom Ecru--Lam: Phantom Ecru
91 Depts at Counter AWS 9120R4824 SPCL SIZE 42-1/8-48WX18-1/8-24D FLAT EG 6 $ 125.50 $ 753.00
.GCP Centered 4-1/2" From Rear--Plastic Grommet

.PE Edge: Phantom Ecru
.480WX240D 48" W--24" Depth
92 Depts at Counter A44 OH1536FDA 15H X36W FLIPPER DOOR OVERHEAD-ARCH PULL 1 $ 154.50 $ 154.50
.YZ Sys:Stride-DNA-Optimize
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts
.P8R Skipped Option
.EL PULL: Matte Silver
93 Depts at Counter A44 OH1542FDA 15H X42W FLIPPER DOOR OVERHEAD-ARCH PULL 5 $ 161.50 $ 807.50
.YZ Sys:Stride-DNA-Optimize
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts
.P8R CLR: Pebble
.EL PULL: Matte Silver
94 Depts at Counter ALC DWW-MHHNO EVO TASK MESH HIGH BACK HEIGHT ADJ ARMS NO FC 6 $ 382.88 $ 2,297.28
.TI Titanium
.D Dusk
.L Yes
.2 Standard
.TI Titanium
.H Black Hard Tread
$(1) Grd 1 Uph
.TC00 Coordinating
95 Depts at Counter ALF LKFE3MTS LOCK CORE KIT MATTE SILVER -- 3 CORES 2 KEYS 1 $ 81.00 $ 81.00

.6 Quantity: 6
96 Foyer AGR CLCTL CL SERIES COFFEE TABLE LAMINATE 2 $ 637.56 $ 1,275.12

.PR6 CLR: Silver
.LWBR Brazilwood
97 Foyer AGR CLSTL CL SERIES SIDE TABLE LAMINATE 3 $ 487.52 $ 1,462.56

.PR6 CLR: Silver
.LWBR Brazilwood
98 Foyer ALC DSC-MUCONO EVO 4-LEG SIDE FIXED ARMS MESH BACK CASTERS 6 $ 290.25 $ 1,741.50
.P8T Titanium
.L Lustre
$(12) Grd 12 Uph
.SCFSSWV27 Fab: Swivel--Amethyst
99 Foyer GL1 GK1111-1W CIJI MID BACK ONE SEAT WITH ARMS WOOD LEG 12 $ 1,281.17 $ 15,374.04
.693 Sumatra Walnut

.SD Stitch Detail Inside Cushion
.U CTB 117 Flammability Rating
$(7GTS) Gr 7 GTS Uph
.S525304XP Undecided FABRIC Option

Kaysville 7 of 14
City Hall
100 Foyer GL1 GK1111-3W CIJI MID BACK THREE SEAT WITH ARMS WOOD LEG 1 $ 3,111.48 $ 3,111.48
.693 Sumatra Walnut

.S503722XP ~Undecided~
.S503722XP ~Undecided~
101 IT Tech A44 ALED31U60 31IN DAISY CHAIN STARTER W/ POWER SUPPLY 4 $ 234.50 $ 938.00
102 IT Tech A44 ALED31UJMP30 31IN DAISY CHAIN LIGHT 4 $ 134.00 $ 536.00
103 IT Tech APR ABJ3S3L HEIGHT ADJ BASE 3LEG 4 $ 641.25 $ 2,565.00
.P8L Nickel
104 IT Tech AOR T624FB FLAT BRACKET 24D 1 $ 11.50 $ 11.50
105 IT Tech ALF EBC236 ESSENTIALS BOOKCASE 28H (2H) 36W 18D OPEN CABINET 4 $ 244.98 $ 979.92
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
106 IT Tech AVW T6CB24L CANTILEVER BRACKET 24D LH TERRACE 3 $ 13.50 $ 40.50
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
107 IT Tech AVW T6CB24R CANTILEVER BRACKET 24D RH TERRACE 1 $ 13.50 $ 13.50
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
108 IT Tech A47 TK05036WR STRUCTURAL RACEWAY PNL FR-NO TOP TRIM 50HX36W 4 $ 64.25 $ 257.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
109 IT Tech A47 TK350EF E END TRIM FLAT CONNKIT - 50H BASE PANEL 2 $ 20.50 $ 41.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
110 IT Tech A47 TK350WF W FLAT WALL MOUNT KIT - 50IN LENGTH 2 $ 32.00 $ 64.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
111 IT Tech A47 TK365YEB TER WALL TRACK KIT 65H-PAIR OF ENDS 4 $ 49.00 $ 196.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
112 IT Tech A47 TK365YM WALL TRACK KIT-MIDDLE UNIT 4 $ 25.75 $ 103.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
113 IT Tech AVW TKEP2429PR DNA PNL MNT RH 24DX29-1/2H END PNL SUPT 1 $ 47.25 $ 47.25
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
114 IT Tech A47 TKG43036T TER TACKABLE ACOUSTIC TILE 30H X 36W 1 $ 27.00 $ 27.00
$(A) GRD A FAB

$(A) GRD A FAB

$(A) GRD A FAB

$(A) GRD A FAB

118 IT Tech A44 ZS36 36W OPEN BOOKSHELF/STRIDE HEIGHT 1 $ 69.00 $ 69.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
121 IT Tech A47 TK40772TGSF 7-1/2H X 72 W FLAT GLASS PANEL MNTD SCREEN 2 $ 196.75 $ 393.50
.LF Frosted Glass

$(P1) P1 Paint Opts
.P8R CLR: Pebble

Kaysville 8 of 14
City Hall
122 IT Tech ALF YPPM211524BFLA B/F MOBILE PED 21HX15WX24D LAM FRONT ARCH PULL 4 $ 218.00 $ 872.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
.L Std Lock
123 IT Tech AWS T52424S PRIMARY 24DX24W FLAT EG LAM W/GROMMET 1 $ 65.50 $ 65.50

.P Plastic Grommet
124 IT Tech AWS T52436S PRIMARY 24DX36W FLAT EG LAM W/GROMMET 1 $ 77.50 $ 77.50

.P Plastic Grommet
125 IT Tech AWS T52442S PRIMARY 24DX42W FLAT EG LAM W/GROMMETS 2 $ 86.75 $ 173.50

.P Plastic Grommet
126 IT Tech AWS T52472S PRIMARY 24DX72W FLAT EG LAM W/GROMMETS 1 $ 131.00 $ 131.00

.P Plastic Grommet
127 IT Tech ATA A5722ELS CORNER COVE EXT LH 2 $ 226.00 $ 452.00

128 IT Tech ATA A5722ERS CORNER COVE EXT RH 2 $ 226.00 $ 452.00

129 IT Tech ALC DWW-MHHNO EVO TASK MESH HIGH BACK HEIGHT ADJ ARMS NO FC 4 $ 382.88 $ 1,531.52
.TI Titanium
.D Dusk
.L Yes
.2 Standard
.TI Titanium
.H Black Hard Tread
$(1) Grd 1 Uph
.TC00 Coordinating
130 Mayor's Office A44 ALED31U60 31IN DAISY CHAIN STARTER W/ POWER SUPPLY 1 $ 234.50 $ 234.50
131 Mayor's Office A44 ALED31UJMP30 31IN DAISY CHAIN LIGHT 1 $ 134.00 $ 134.00
132 Mayor's Office APR WKTKGT4H72-FA APPR TACKZN 30H 72W WRTBL SURF FLL HGT 1 $ 159.80 $ 159.80
133 Mayor's Office A33 YWC36Z Z WALL MOUNT BRACKET FOR 36IN WOOD OVERHEAD 2 $ 21.50 $ 43.00
134 Mayor's Office ATA AMPTXL29G STRUCTURE X BASE LARGE SEATED HEIGHT WITH GLIDES 1 $ 210.70 $ 210.70

.P8R Pebble
135 Mayor's Office APR ATBC2S3L 2-STG CANT BASE-ELEC 1 $ 844.25 $ 844.25
$(P2) P2 Paint Opts

.PR6 CLR: Silver
136 Mayor's Office APR WKST318 APPROACH WORKSURFACE STANCHION 3HX18D 1 $ 63.60 $ 63.60
137 Mayor's Office A45 Z6CLFR FIXED C-LEG RIGHT FOR FLAT/SQ EDGE 1 $ 86.95 $ 86.95
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
138 Mayor's Office AWS T51872SN 18DX72W RECTANGULAR W/S W/FLAT EDGE NO GROMS 1 $ 120.00 $ 120.00

139 Mayor's Office ATA AMPTLF42RND STRUCTURE 42 DIAMETER ROUND TOP LAMINATE - SQUARE EDGE 1 $ 170.80 $ 170.80
.X Standard Wood

Kaysville 9 of 14
City Hall
140 Mayor's Office AEI K2TP243618A 24HX36WX18D OPEN BINDER 1 $ 344.50 $ 344.50
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
.X Standard Wood
141 Mayor's Office A42 SPLA-INV-BCKPA CUSTOM INVOLVE OPEN PLINTH BOOKCASE 1 $ 690.50 $ 690.50

.X Standard Wood
142 Mayor's Office AEI K6DME1154L 54W END MOUNTING LAMINATE MODESTY 1 $ 143.50 $ 143.50
.X Standard Wood
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts
.P8R CLR: Pebble
143 Mayor's Office AWS T52448S PRIMARY 24DX48W FLAT EG LAM W/GROMMETS 1 $ 94.25 $ 94.25

.P Plastic Grommet
144 Mayor's Office AWS T5723ER CORNER COVE 48X72-24L/30R EXTD RH FLAT W/GROM 1 $ 217.75 $ 217.75

.P Plastic Grommet
145 Mayor's Office ALC DSC-MUCONO EVO 4-LEG SIDE FIXED ARMS MESH BACK CASTERS 6 $ 223.50 $ 1,341.00
.P8T Titanium
.L Lustre
146 Mayor's Office AEI K2TOC153615N 15HX36WX15D SLIDER BIN OVERHEAD 2 $ 304.25 $ 608.50
.X Standard Wood
147 Mayor's Office AEI K2TP243618E 24HX36WX18D B/B/LAT 1 $ 454.75 $ 454.75

.X Standard Wood
.OMT omt 2 Core To Ord key Alike
148 Mayor's Office APR WKAUMSMM30RH APPROACH METAL SHROUD 30D RH 1 $ 47.17 $ 47.17
149 Mayor's Office A42 SPLA-INV-LAMEP CUSTOM INVOLVE END PANEL 1 $ 128.25 $ 128.25

.X Standard Wood
150 Mayor's Office ALC DWW-MHHNO EVO TASK MESH HIGH BACK HEIGHT ADJ ARMS NO FC 1 $ 382.88 $ 382.88
.TI Titanium
.D Dusk
.L Yes
.2 Standard
.TI Titanium
.H Black Hard Tread
$(1) Grd 1 Uph
.TC00 Coordinating
151 Mayor's Office ALF LKFE4MTS LOCK CORE KIT MATTE SILVER -- 4 CORES 2 KEYS 1 $ 18.00 $ 18.00

.1 Quantity: 1
152 Mothers Room ATA AMPTPR29M STRUCTURE ROUND PEDESTAL BASE MED. SEATED HEIGHT 1 $ 198.45 $ 198.45

.P8Y Textured Pebble

Kaysville 10 of 14
City Hall
153 Mothers Room ATA AMPTLF24SSQR STRUCTURE 24 X 24 SOFT SQUARE TOP LAMINATE - SQUARE EDGE 1 $ 97.30 $ 97.30
.X Standard Wood
154 Mothers Room GL1 GK1111-1W CIJI MID BACK ONE SEAT WITH ARMS WOOD LEG 1 $ 1,281.17 $ 1,281.17
.693 Sumatra Walnut

155 Office Typical 1 APR WKTKGT4H72-FA APPR TACKZN 30H 72W WRTBL SURF FLL HGT 9 $ 159.80 $ 1,438.20
156 Office Typical 1 APR ATBC2S3L 2-STG CANT BASE-ELEC 9 $ 844.25 $ 7,598.25
$(P2) P2 Paint Opts

.PR6 CLR: Silver
157 Office Typical 1 APR WKST318 APPROACH WORKSURFACE STANCHION 3HX18D 9 $ 63.60 $ 572.40
158 Office Typical 1 A45 Z6CLFL FIXED C-LEG LEFT FOR FLAT/SQ EDGE 3 $ 86.95 $ 260.85
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
159 Office Typical 1 A45 Z6CLFR FIXED C-LEG RIGHT FOR FLAT/SQ EDGE 6 $ 86.95 $ 521.70
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
160 Office Typical 1 AWS T51872SN 18DX72W RECTANGULAR W/S W/FLAT EDGE NO GROMS 9 $ 120.00 $ 1,080.00

161 Office Typical 1 AEI K2TP243618A 24HX36WX18D OPEN BINDER 9 $ 344.50 $ 3,100.50
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
.X Standard Wood
162 Office Typical 1 A42 SPLA-INV-BCKPA CUSTOM INVOLVE OPEN PLINTH BOOKCASE 12 $ 690.50 $ 8,286.00

.X Standard Wood
163 Office Typical 1 AEI K6DME1154L 54W END MOUNTING LAMINATE MODESTY 9 $ 143.50 $ 1,291.50
.X Standard Wood
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts
.P8R CLR: Pebble
164 Office Typical 1 AWS T52448S PRIMARY 24DX48W FLAT EG LAM W/GROMMETS 9 $ 94.25 $ 848.25

.P Plastic Grommet
165 Office Typical 1 AWS T5723EL CORNER COVE 72X48-30L/24R EXTD LH FLAT W/GROMS 3 $ 217.75 $ 653.25

.P Plastic Grommet
166 Office Typical 1 AWS T5723ER CORNER COVE 48X72-24L/30R EXTD RH FLAT W/GROM 6 $ 217.75 $ 1,306.50

.P Plastic Grommet
167 Office Typical 1 ALC DSC-MUCONO EVO 4-LEG SIDE FIXED ARMS MESH BACK CASTERS 18 $ 223.50 $ 4,023.00
.P8T Titanium
.L Lustre

Kaysville 11 of 14
City Hall
168 Office Typical 1 AEI K2TP243618E 24HX36WX18D B/B/LAT 9 $ 463.75 $ 4,173.75

.X Standard Wood
.STDEL Standard Random key--Clr: Matte Silver
169 Office Typical 1 APR WKAUMSMM30LH APPROACH METAL SHROUD 30D LH 6 $ 47.17 $ 283.02
170 Office Typical 1 APR WKAUMSMM30RH APPROACH METAL SHROUD 30D RH 3 $ 47.17 $ 141.51
171 Office Typical 1 A42 SPLA-INV-LAMEP CUSTOM INVOLVE END PANEL 9 $ 128.25 $ 1,154.25

.X Standard Wood
172 Office Typical 1 ALC DWW-MHHNO EVO TASK MESH HIGH BACK HEIGHT ADJ ARMS NO FC 9 $ 382.88 $ 3,445.92
.TI Titanium
.D Dusk
.L Yes
.2 Standard
.TI Titanium
.H Black Hard Tread
$(1) Grd 1 Uph
.TC00 Coordinating
173 Office Typical 2 A44 ALED31U60 31IN DAISY CHAIN STARTER W/ POWER SUPPLY 3 $ 234.50 $ 703.50
174 Office Typical 2 A44 ALED31UJMP30 31IN DAISY CHAIN LIGHT 3 $ 134.00 $ 402.00
175 Office Typical 2 A42 SPLA-ALT-TLEGBASE CUSTOM ALTITUDE ACCESSORY 3 $ 469.75 $ 1,409.25

176 Office Typical 2 A47 TK365YEB TER WALL TRACK KIT 65H-PAIR OF ENDS 3 $ 49.00 $ 147.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
177 Office Typical 2 A47 TK365YM WALL TRACK KIT-MIDDLE UNIT 3 $ 25.75 $ 77.25
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
178 Office Typical 2 AVW TKEP3029PL DNA PNL MNT LH 30DX29-1/2H END PNL SUPT 1 $ 51.50 $ 51.50
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
179 Office Typical 2 AVW TKEP3029PR DNA PNL MNT RH 30DX29-1/2H END PNL SUPT 2 $ 51.50 $ 103.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
180 Office Typical 2 A47 TKG43048T TER TACKABLE ACOUSTIC TILE 30H X 48W 6 $ 32.00 $ 192.00
$(A) GRD A FAB

181 Office Typical 2 AVW TKSL3029P TER DNA SUPPORT LEG 30DX29-1/2H 3 $ 45.50 $ 136.50
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
182 Office Typical 2 A44 ZS48 48W OPEN BOOKSHELF/STRIDE HEIGHT 6 $ 75.75 $ 454.50
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
183 Office Typical 2 A44 CSDC19 CENTER DRAWER 19WX14-3/4DX3H W/LOCK METAL 3 $ 39.50 $ 118.50
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
184 Office Typical 2 ALF YPPSBX281530BBFLA B/B/F SUPPPED 28HX30D RECESSKP LAM-A-PULL 3 $ 270.50 $ 811.50
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
.X Omit Lock
185 Office Typical 2 AWS T53672S PRIMARY 36DX72W FLAT EG LAM W/GROMMETS 3 $ 184.25 $ 552.75

.P Plastic Grommet

Kaysville 12 of 14
City Hall
186 Office Typical 2 ALC DSC-MUCONO EVO 4-LEG SIDE FIXED ARMS MESH BACK CASTERS 3 $ 223.50 $ 670.50
.P8T Titanium
.L Lustre
187 Office Typical 2 ALF 9120R9636 SPCL SIZE 84-1/8-96WX30-1/8-36D FLAT EG 3 $ 337.75 $ 1,013.25
.GCP Centered 4-1/2" From Rear--Plastic Grommet

.960WX360D 96" W--36" Depth
188 Office Typical 2 ALC DWW-MHHNO EVO TASK MESH HIGH BACK HEIGHT ADJ ARMS NO FC 3 $ 382.88 $ 1,148.64
.TI Titanium
.D Dusk
.L Yes
.2 Standard
.TI Titanium
.H Black Hard Tread
$(1) Grd 1 Uph
.TC00 Coordinating
189 Office Typical 2 ALF LKFE2MTS LOCK CORE KIT MATTE SILVER -- 2 CORES 2 KEYS 1 $ 27.00 $ 27.00

.3 Quantity: 3
190 Open Office 117 A44 A871130 PASS-THRU HARNESS W/POWER BLOCK 30W 4 $ 34.25 $ 137.00
.P CLR: Black
191 Open Office 117 A44 A871142 PASS-THRU HARNESS W/POWER BLOCK 42W 3 $ 36.00 $ 108.00
.P CLR: Black
192 Open Office 117 A47 A873501 TER/2.6/ALIGN DUPLEX RECEPTACLE CIRCUIT 1 2 $ 10.50 $ 21.00
.EV CLR: Loft

.EV CLR: Loft

.EV CLR: Loft

.EV CLR: Loft

196 Open Office 117 A44 ATADF3 THREE-PORT FLEX-MODE DATA FACEPLATE 8 $ 5.50 $ 44.00
.E4 CLR: Black

197 Open Office 117 AVW T6CB24L CANTILEVER BRACKET 24D LH TERRACE 1 $ 13.50 $ 13.50
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
198 Open Office 117 AVW T6CB24R CANTILEVER BRACKET 24D RH TERRACE 4 $ 13.50 $ 54.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
199 Open Office 117 A47 TK03524WR STRUCTURAL RACEWAY PANEL FRAME-NO TOP TRIM 35HX24W 2 $ 54.25 $ 108.50
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
203 Open Office 117 A47 TK315HF HIGH/LOW FLAT CONNECTOR KIT - 15H 2 $ 13.75 $ 27.50
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
204 Open Office 117 A47 TK324PTF FLAT TOP TRIM 24W 2 $ 7.25 $ 14.50
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble

Kaysville 13 of 14
City Hall
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
208 Open Office 117 A47 TK335EF E END TRIM FLAT CONNKIT - 35H BASE PANEL 2 $ 17.00 $ 34.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
209 Open Office 117 A47 TK335TF T 3-WAY FLAT CONNECTOR KIT - 35H BASE PANEL 2 $ 29.50 $ 59.00
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
210 Open Office 117 A47 TK350XF X4-WAY FLAT CONNECTOR KIT - 50H BASE PANEL 1 $ 33.25 $ 33.25
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts

.P8R CLR: Pebble
211 Open Office 117 A47 TKG43024T TER TACKABLE ACOUSTIC TILE 30H X 24W 4 $ 22.25 $ 89.00
$(A) GRD A FAB

$(A) GRD A FAB

$(A) GRD A FAB

$(A) GRD A FAB

215 Open Office 117 ALF YPCP283618O ALIGN 28X36X18 OPEN BOOKSHELF PLINTH 1 $ 287.30 $ 287.30
.BX Recessed Plinth

$(P1) P1 Paint Opts
.P8R CLR: Pebble
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts
.NA Match Case
216 Open Office 117 AWS T52424SN PRIMARY 24DX24W FLAT EG LAM W/O GROM 4 $ 62.25 $ 249.00
$(L1CORE) L1 Core Lam Opts

.LDW1 LAM: Designer White 15051
.DW Edg: Designer White
217 Open Office 117 AWS T52442S PRIMARY 24DX42W FLAT EG LAM W/GROMMETS 1 $ 82.75 $ 82.75

.P Plastic Grommet
218 Open Office 117 AWS T52472S PRIMARY 24DX72W FLAT EG LAM W/GROMMETS 2 $ 124.25 $ 248.50

.P Plastic Grommet
219 Open Office 117 ALF YPTSP502424LFFL ALIGN 50X24X24 SIDE ACCESS TWR LAMFRONT PLINTH 1 $ 813.02 $ 813.02
.BX Recessed Plinth

.APR0 Arch--Anodized Silver
$(P1) P1 Paint Opts
.P8R CLR: Pebble
$(L2WDGR) Grd L2 Woodgrain Lam Opts
.L Std Lock
220 Open Office 117 AEI K2TP282424BBF 28HX24WX24D B/B/LAT 4 $ 456.50 $ 1,826.00

.X Standard Wood
.STDEL Standard Random key--Clr: Matte Silver

Kaysville 14 of 14
City Hall
221 Open Office 117 ALC DWW-MHHNO EVO TASK MESH HIGH BACK HEIGHT ADJ ARMS NO FC 8 $ 382.88 $ 3,063.04
.TI Titanium
.D Dusk
.L Yes
.2 Standard
.TI Titanium
.H Black Hard Tread
$(1) Grd 1 Uph
.TC00 Coordinating
Grand Total $ 183,339.82

Kaysville City Council Meeting 6.4.2020

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Kaysville City Council Meeting 6.4.2020

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Kaysville City Council Meeting 6.4.2020

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA

CITY COUNCIL MEETING – 7:00 P.M.

2. DECLARATION OF ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

6. CALL TO THE PUBLIC (3 MINUTE LIMIT, MUST SIGN UP IN ADVANCE)

7. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS

8. CITY MANAGER REPORT

KAYSVILLE BUSINESS PARK ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING

MUNICIPAL BUILDING AUTHORITY BOARD MEETING

1. Furniture purchase for Kaysville City Municipal Building.

6:30 p.m. Redevelopment Agency Budget Hearing

6:35 p.m. Municipal Building Authority Budget Hearing

1. Amendments to the Kaysville City Fiscal Year 2020 Budgets.

Kaysville City is dedicated to a policy of non-discrimination in admission to, access

The agenda shall be as follows:

Kaysville City is dedicated to a policy of non-discrimination in admission to, access to, or

RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

DEPARTMENT PRESENTATION, PUBLIC WORKS

DECLARATION OF ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No conflicts were disclosed.

The vote on the motion was as follows:

The motion passed unanimously.

The vote on the motion was as follows:

Council Member Barber, yea

The motion passed unanimously.

MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT BETWEEN KAYSVILLE CITY AND UTAH

The vote on the motion was as follows:

Council Member Lortz, yea

ADOPTION OF THE TENTATIVE BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021

The vote on Council Member Lortz’s motion was as follows:

The motion failed with a vote of two to three.

The vote on Council Member Blackham’s motion was as follows:

Council Member Blackham, yea

The motion failed with a vote of two to three.

The vote on the motion was as follows:

The motion passed with a vote of four to one.

The vote on the motion was as follows:

The motion passed unanimously.

Council Member Lortz asked about parking.

Council Member Tran asked about the pricing of the units.

Council Member Lortz, nay

The motion passed with a vote of four to one.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17-33, SIGN REGULATIONS, OF TITLE 17,

The vote on the motion was as follows:

Council Member Tran, yea

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 17-34-7, COMMON OPEN SPACE SUBDIVISION,

Council Member Adams asked how this was discovered.

The vote on the motion was as follows:

The motion passed unanimously.

CALL TO THE PUBLIC

Nothing was brought under this item.

COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS

CITY MANAGER REPORT

COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 21, 2020

TYPE OF ITEM: Consent

SUBJECT/AGENDA TITLE: A Resolution Authorizing the City Council to Censure

Fiscal Impact & Fund Source for Recommended Action: None.

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY COUNCIL TO CENSURE KATIE

WHEREAS, Katie Witt is running a political campaign; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF KAYSVILLE,

On the _ day of _____________, 2019, personally appeared before me