The document provides a standard marking grid for assessing student work. It outlines seven criteria for evaluation on a scale of A through F. Criteria include the executive summary, problem statement, analysis and evaluation, recommendations, structure, writing and presentation, and referencing. Higher scores are given for clear and persuasive writing, incorporation of relevant theories and evidence, logical argument progression, and accurate referencing in APA style. Lower scores reflect insufficient analysis, poor structure, grammatical errors, and failure to engage with course materials.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views
Rubrics For Grading
The document provides a standard marking grid for assessing student work. It outlines seven criteria for evaluation on a scale of A through F. Criteria include the executive summary, problem statement, analysis and evaluation, recommendations, structure, writing and presentation, and referencing. Higher scores are given for clear and persuasive writing, incorporation of relevant theories and evidence, logical argument progression, and accurate referencing in APA style. Lower scores reflect insufficient analysis, poor structure, grammatical errors, and failure to engage with course materials.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
Marking & Feedback Standard Grid
Criteria A (80-100) B (80-70) C (70-60) D (60-50) E/F (<50)
1. Executive Clear evidence of Evidence of wider Some effective use of Limited use has been Insufficient Summary wide reading and a reading, beyond course materials, made of the course evidence of willingness to draw course materials, some evidence of material and/or there reading and /or on and effectively and an ability to reading although not is a lack of understanding use a range of draw on this to always used understanding in of the literature. academic sources construct a effectively and/or places. Very limited Over-reliance construct a generally wider reading needed. wider reading and/or on balanced, convincing Case. inappropriate sources inappropriate persuasive Case. drawn upon. sources. 2. Problem Excellent attempt to Relevant theories Some theoretical Theoretical insights Little or no Statement incorporate a range are used to discuss explanations have are very limited and evidence of of relevant the issues raised by been described but need to be developed. engagement theoretical insights the question. may not have been with theoretical as a means for fully applied or explanations. analysing the issues evaluated. The Case is raised by the overly question. descriptive. 3. Analysis and The analytical The Case draws on Some attempt has The Case includes Insufficient use Evaluation content is clearly some relevant been made to relevant examples but made of informed by examples /practices incorporate these are theoretical evidence and well- and these are examples/evidence insufficiently linked explanations or constructed explained by and to use theories to to theoretical insights. evidence to arguments. reference to explain them. This Conversely, the Case support points Excellent links are relevant theories. aspect of the Case includes references to raised. made between needed further relevant theories but theory and relevant development. no attempt has been examples /practice. made to apply to practice. 4. There is a clear There is a There is limited Some attempt has No clear Recommendatio recommendation of recommendation of recommendation been made to give distinctive n the findings from the findings from which doesn’t clearly recommendation but recommendatio the case that clearly the case, but the recommend all the doesn’t clearly n which don’t addresses the (final) recommendation issues in the case analyse the case. evolve out of overall case. misses some issues. through analysis. analysis. 5. Structure The Case has a The Case follows a There is an Structure is muddled Case does not clear, informative clear structure with introduction and and /or introduction follow a introduction and an introduction, concluding remarks and conclusions have structure or is conclusion. Ideas main arguments but there may be been omitted. not written in are marshalled and concluding some structural Case style. coherently, with remarks. weaknesses in the arguments logically Case. progressed throughout the Case. 6. Writing and The writing style is Writing style is Writing style is Writing style is The Case is presentation fluent and clear with few generally clear unclear in places and poorly written persuasive. No grammatical/spellin although there may be this detracts from the and /or unclear. major g errors. Limited grammatical /spelling Case content. Case is poorly grammatical/spellin errors in errors that detract Presentation may be presented with g errors. Work is presentation. from the meaning in poor. multiple errors well-presented in places. Broadly or mistakes. the required format. adequate presentation. 7. Good Referencing is The referencing is Referencing does not Referencing does not Major errors in academic complete, accurate accurate and always follow APA follow APA style referencing or a practice and follows the complete for the style and/or there are and/or there are major complete lack APA protocol most part and some inaccuracies/omission of reference to follows the APA inaccuracies/omission s. source material. protocol. s.