Journal of Colloid and Interface Science: Alok Mittal, Dipika Kaur, Arti Malviya, Jyoti Mittal, V.K. Gupta
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science: Alok Mittal, Dipika Kaur, Arti Malviya, Jyoti Mittal, V.K. Gupta
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science: Alok Mittal, Dipika Kaur, Arti Malviya, Jyoti Mittal, V.K. Gupta
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Bottom ash, a waste of thermal power plants, and deoiled soya, an agricultural waste material, were
Received 3 April 2009 employed for successful removal and recovery of hazardous phenol red dye from wastewaters. The
Accepted 12 May 2009 adsorption characteristics and operational parameters were determined by monitoring different param-
Available online 19 May 2009
eters such as effect of pH, effect of concentration of the dye, amount of adsorbents, contact time, and tem-
perature. The equilibrium data were analyzed on the basis of various adsorption isotherm models,
Keywords: namely Langmuir, Freundlich, Tempkin, and Dubinin–Radushkevich. The highest monolayer adsorption
Adsorption
capacity has been obtained for the phenol red-bottom ash system (2.6 105 mol/g) at 50 °C. Different
Bottom ash
Deoiled soya
thermodynamic parameters such as free energy, enthalpy, and entropy have been calculated and it
Phenol red was concluded that with the increase in temperature adsorption increases, indicating the endothermic
Dye nature of the process for both adsorbent materials. Kinetic parameters were derived from pseudo-first-
order and pseudo-second-order kinetics. Differentiation between particle and film diffusion mechanisms
operative in the present study has been carried out. The column regeneration characteristic has been also
investigated and recovery percentage greater than 90% was obtained for both adsorbents by utilizing
acidic eluent.
Ó 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction ity of color removal, concerned industries are required to treat the
dye-bearing effluents before dumping them into the water bodies.
Due to rapid industrial development, pollution of water bodies Thus the scientific community shoulders the responsibility of
by industries is an issue of major concern. It is estimated that a contributing in the waste treatment by developing effective dye-
huge amount of dyes (nearly 20%) of global production is removal techniques.
discharged by textile industries due to incomplete exhaustion of The conventional physicochemical and biological methods such
coloring material and washing operations [1]. The effluents gener- as oxidation and filtration [4–6] are not efficient enough to be uti-
ated by these industries are highly visible even at very low concen- lized for large streams due to their less cost effectiveness and dif-
trations. The disposal of such materials into water bodies not only ficult operational conditions [7]. Among the various available
destructs the esthetic nature but also interferes with the penetra- water treatment techniques adsorption is the most reliable and
tion of sunlight, thus affecting the food web existing in water eco- efficient technique for decoloration, in which the recovery and
systems [2]. The majority of the dyes dumped into the water recycling of the adsorbent materials can be achieved along with
bodies by industries are toxic and even carcinogenic to both ani- the distinct advantages of nonproduction of any toxic sludge and
mals and humans. The problem becomes graver due to the fact that cost effectiveness. This has encouraged the development of adsor-
the complex aromatic structures of the dyes render them ineffec- bents that are abundantly available and economical. Nowadays
tive in the presence of heat, light, microbes, and even oxidizing numerous low cost adsorbents are available including products
agents and degradation of the dyes becomes difficult [3]. Hence of agricultural origin such as wood dust, sugarcane, fruit peel [8],
these pose a serious threat to human health and water quality, wheat straw, and apple pomance [9]. Certain other low cost adsor-
thereby becoming a matter of vital concern. Keeping the essential- bent materials of industrial origin such as activated slag [10] and
bagasse fly ash [11] have also been employed in the recent past.
However, still there arises a great need to explore new low cost
* Corresponding author. Address: Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of
adsorbent materials with high adsorption capacity.
Technology Roorkee, 22/2 Niti Nagar, IIT, Roorkee 247 777, India. Fax: +91 1332
273560. The present research deals with the applicability of adsorption
E-mail address: vinodfcy@gmail.com (V.K. Gupta). techniques in the removal of the dye phenol red from wastewaters.
0021-9797/$ - see front matter Ó 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2009.05.016
346 A. Mittal et al. / Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 337 (2009) 345–354
Phenol red is a highly water-soluble textile dye belonging to the ics, Ahmedabad, India). Philips SEM 501 electron microscope was
class of triphenylmethane dyes. It exists as a red crystal and is sta- employed to obtain scanning electron microscopy while a Philips
ble in air with solubility of 0.77 g/L in water [12]. At 20 °C the pKa X-ray diffractophotometer was used for X-ray measurements.
value has been found to be 8.00. It is frequently used as a reagent Quantasorb Model QS-7 surface analyzer was used to calculate
dye for measuring the pH of water in a range from 6.8 to 8.2. It the surface of the adsorbent particles. The pore properties and spe-
changes color from yellow to purple as the pH goes from 6.7 to cific gravity of the adsorbents were determined by employing a
8.2. It is thus widely employed as a pH indicator in cell biology lab- mercury porosimeter and specific gravity bottles, respectively.
oratories and for water testing applications.
Toxicity data reveal that phenol red inhibits the growth of renal 2.2. Material development
epithelial cells [13]. Direct or indirect contact with the dye leads to
irritation to the eyes, respiratory system, and skin [14]. Phenol red Both adsorbent materials, bottom ash and deoiled soya, were
dye is toxic to muscle fibers [15] and its mutagenic effects are also first washed with distilled water and dried. Then the oxidation of
reported [16]. Thus keeping the toxic effects of the dye in view organic impurities was achieved by dipping the materials in
attempts have been made to develop an efficient and cost effective H2O2 solution for about 24 h followed by washing with double dis-
technique for the removal of dye from wastewaters by employing tilled water. The moisture content of the materials was then
two waste materials, namely bottom ash and deoiled soya. Both removed by heating at 100 °C for about 1 h in an oven. Deoiled
adsorbent materials are easily and abundantly available. Bottom soya was then sieved using various mesh sizes, viz. 36, 100, and
ash is obtained from coal-fired stations, whose disposal is always 170 BSS mesh, while bottom ash was further heated at 500 °C for
a problem for the industrialists and environmentalists. Deoiled 15 min for activation followed by the sieving process. The adsor-
soya is a by-product obtained after complete processing of soya- bents were finally stored in a desiccator.
bean. Its use as animal feed is banned nowadays due to formation
of antimetabolites which block enzymatic activities in living sys- 2.3. Adsorption studies
tems [17]. In the past few years, our laboratory has developed
these materials as efficient adsorbents or removal of various dyes Adsorption characteristics were determined with the help of
from wastewaters [18–24]. primary analysis. To study the effect of important parameters such
as effect of concentration, amount of adsorbent, and pH, batch
2. Experimental studies were performed by taking 25 ml of dye solutions in 100-
ml volumetric flasks at 30, 40, and 50 °C. A suitable mesh size
2.1. Materials and methods was chosen for both adsorbent materials (particle size 100 BSS
mesh for bottom ash and 36 BSS mesh for deoiled soya) and was
0
Phenol red, 4 -(3 H-2,1-benzoxathiol-3-ylidene) bis-phenol, S,S- added into each flask with intermittent shaking. After 24 h these
dioxide, having molecular formula C19H14O5S and molecular solutions were filtered with Whatman filter paper (No. 41) and
weight 354.38 was obtained from M/s Merck. A commonly known the amount of the dye adsorbed was analyzed at kmax 435 nm.
synonym for phenol red is phenol sulfonephthalein. The extended The adsorbent dose, concentration, etc. were altered and variation
conjugation system of the alternate double and single bond in the in the amount of dye taken up was analyzed for both adsorbents.
dye structure gives it an intense color. Some general physicochem-
ical properties of phenol red are presented in Table 1. Dye stock 2.4. Kinetic studies
solution was prepared in doubly distilled water. All solutions were
prepared by diluting the stock with distilled water. Suitable amount of the adsorbents were added to 25 ml of the
O dye solutions taken in an air-tight 100-ml volumetric flasks and
shaking was done periodically. In each case 0.10 g of either acti-
vated bottom ash or activated deoiled soya was taken and studies
were performed at different temperatures (30, 40, and 50 °C).
These solutions were then filtered after a particular time interval
and spectrophotometric analysis was carried out for the amount
C OH of dye uptake.
Table 2 Table 3
Chemical constituents of the adsorbents. Effect of amount of adsorbents on the adsorption of phenol red (dye concentra-
tion = 10 105 M and pH 7.0).
Bottom ash Deoiled soya
Amount of Amount Amount of Amount
Constituents Percentage by weight Constituents Percentage by weight
bottom ash (g) adsorbed 105 (g) deoiled soya (g) adsorbed 105 (g)
Moisture 15.0 Moisture 11.0
30 °C 40 °C 50 °C 30 °C 40 °C 50 °C
SiO2 45.4 SiO2 6.0
Al2O3 10.3 Fiber 7.0 0.1 43.5 46.6 49.3 0.1 15.9 28.4 43.3
Fe2O3 9.7 Ca 0.2 0.15 44.4 47.5 49.9 0.15 17.6 30.9 44.9
CaO 15.3 P 0.7 0.2 45.1 48.1 50.6 0.2 19.0 32.2 46.0
MgO 3.1 Profat 48.0 0.25 45.9 48.3 50.7 0.25 19.7 33.8 46.8
0.3 46.6 48.8 51.1 0.3 22.1 35.3 47.6
for both bottom ash and deoiled soya (Figs. 2 and 3). The figures
20
also reveal that higher temperatures support a greater extent of
adsorption. Greater temperature provides greater mobility to the
15
10 Table 4
Effect of sieve sizes of different adsorbents on the rate of adsorption of phenol red
over bottom ash and deoiled soya (concentration = 10 105 M, pH 7.0, tempera-
5 ture = 30 °C, adsorbent dose = 0.1 g bottom ash and 0.1 g deoiled soya).
60 26
Amount Adsorbed × 10 (gm)
50 24
-5
40
22
30
20
20
18
30 Degree C
10
40 Degree C
16 30 Degree C
50 Degree C
0 40 Degree C
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
-5 50 Degree C
Concentration × 10 (M) 14
0 100 200 300 400
Fig. 2. Effect of concentration on the removal of phenol red by bottom ash at Time (minutes)
different temperatures (adsorbent dose = 0.1 g, particle size = 100 BSS mesh, pH
7.0). Fig. 4. Effect of contact time on the uptake of phenol red by bottom ash at different
temperatures and at a concentration of 10 105 M (adsorbent dose = 0.1 g,
particle size = 100 BSS mesh, pH 7.0).
45
40 24
Amount Adsorbed × 10 (gm)
35 22
Amount Adsorbed × 10 (gm)
-5
30
20
-5
25
18
20
16
15
14
10 30 Degree C
5 40 Degree C 12
50 Degree C
0 10 30 Degree C
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 40 Degree C
-5 50 Degree C
Concentration × 10 (M) 8
0 100 200 300 400
Fig. 3. Effect of concentration on the removal of phenol red by deoiled soya at Time (minutes)
different temperatures (adsorbent dose = 0.1 g, particle size = 36 BSS mesh, pH 7.0).
Fig. 5. Effect of contact time on the uptake of phenol red by deoiled soya at
different temperatures and at a concentration of 10 105 M (adsorbent
dose = 0.1 g, particle size = 36 BSS mesh, pH 7.0).
ionized dye molecules, thereby leading to greater adsorption.
However, on increasing the concentration of the dye solution satu-
ration of the adsorbent sites occurs which does not allow further deals mainly with four different kinds of isotherms, namely Lang-
adsorption of the dye molecules at all temperatures [26]. muir, Freundlich, Tempkin, and D–R isotherms.
450000 -4.6
R2 = 0.985 R2 = 0.9495
400000 R2 = 0.955
-4.8
350000
R2 = 0.9943 -5
1/qe (gm mol )
-1
300000 R2 = 0.9471
-5.2
250000
log qe
200000 -5.4
R2 = 0.9969
150000
-5.6
100000 30 Degree C
30 Degree C -5.8 40 Degree C
50000 40 Degree C
50 Degree C 50 Degree C
-6
0 -6 -5.5 -5 -4.5 -4
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000
log Ce
-1
1/Ce (M )
Fig. 8. Freundlich adsorption isotherms for the phenol red-bottom ash system
Fig. 6. Langmuir adsorption isotherms for the phenol red-bottom ash system (adsorbent dose = 0.1 g, particle size = 100 BSS mesh, pH 7.0).
(adsorbent dose = 0.1 g, particle size = 100 BSS mesh, pH 7.0).
1
r¼ ð2Þ
1 þ bC o
630000
where b denotes the Langmuir constant and Co the initial concentra-
R2 = 0.9352 tion [32]. At all temperatures r values have been found less than
540000
unity (0.74, 0.71, and 0.68 for bottom ash and 0.33, 0.27, and 0.22
for deoiled soya) at 30, 40, and 50 °C, respectively, indicating there-
450000
R2 = 0.9432 by favorable processes for both adsorbents.
1/qe (gm mol )
-1
-5.5
Adsorbent Freundlich constants
-5.7
n KF
30 °C 40 °C 50 °C 30 °C 40 °C 50 °C -5.9
30 Degree C
Bottom ash 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.01 0.01 0.02 -6.1 40 Degree C
Deoiled soya 1.1 1.2 1.4 0.06 0.04 0.01
50 Degree C
Langmuir constants -6.3
-6 -5.5 -5 -4.5 -4 -3.5
Qo 105 (mol/g) b 104 (L/mol) log Ce
Bottom ash 2.1 2.4 2.6 3.4 3.9 4.6
Deoiled soya 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.6 3.5 Fig. 9. Freundlich adsorption isotherms for the phenol red-deoiled soya system
(adsorbent dose = 0.1 g, particle size = 36 BSS mesh, pH 7.0).
350 A. Mittal et al. / Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 337 (2009) 345–354
0.00002 Table 7
Tempkin and D–R constants for phenol red-deoiled soya system.
40 5.1 9.1
50 2.7 105 4 109 4.6 11.2
0.000005
qe ¼ k1 ln k2 þ k1 ln C e : ð4Þ
qe is the amount adsorbed at equilibrium in mol/gm, k1 is the Temp-
kin isotherm energy constant in L/mol, and k2 is the Tempkin 3
R2 = 0.9558 30 Degree C
isotherm constant. The slopes and intercepts obtained from the 2.5 R2 = 0.9651 40 Degree C
graphical plot (Figs. 10 and 11) were used to calculate the Tempkin
2 R2 = 0.963 50 Degree C
constants (Tables 6 and 7).
1.5
3.3.4. Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherm 1
The linear form of the Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherm [36] can
0.5
be given as
ln Cads
-0.5
0.000014
-1
0.000012
-1.5
0.00001 -2
0.000008
6E+08 7E+08 8E+08 9E+08 1E+09 1.1E+0 1.2E+0 1.3E+0
9 9 9
qe (mol g )
0.000006 ε2
-1
0.000004 Fig. 12. D–R isotherms for the phenol red-bottom ash system at different
temperatures.
0.000002
0
R2 = 0.9288 30 Degree C 2.5
-0.000002 30 Degree C
R2 = 0.9654
R2 = 0.943 40 Degree C 2
-0.000004 2
R = 0.9649 40 Degree C
R2 = 0.9786 50 Degree C 1.5 2 50 Degree C
R = 0.9756
-0.000006
-13 -12.5 -12 -11.5 -11 -10.5 -10 -9.5 1
ln C e
0.5
ln Cads
Fig. 11. Tempkin isotherms for the phenol red-deoiled soya system at different 0
temperatures.
-0.5
-1
Table 6 -1.5
Tempkin and D–R constants for phenol red bottom ash system.
-2
Temperature (°C) Bottom ash
-2.5
Tempkin constant D-R constants 5E+08 6E+08 7E+08 8E+08 9E+08 1E+09 1.1E+0 1.2E+0
k2 b (mol2/J2) Xm (lmol/g) E (kJ/mol) 9 9
30 1.6 105 6 109 4.6 10.0 ε2
40 1.6 105 6 109 4.7 11.1
50 1.6 105 4 109 4.8 11.1 Fig. 13. D–R isotherms for the phenol red-deoiled soya system at different
temperatures.
A. Mittal et al. / Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 337 (2009) 345–354 351
Table 8 -4
Thermodynamic parameters for the uptake of phenol red (bottom ash: adsorbent R2 = 0.9141 30 Degree C
dose = 0.1 g, particle size = 100 mesh, pH 7.0; deoiled soya: adsorbent dose = 0.1 g, R2 = 0.9407 40 Degree C
-4.2
particle size = 36 mesh, pH 7.0).
R2 = 0.9123 50 Degree C
Adsorbent DG° 104 (J/mol) DH° (J/mol) DS° (J/K/mol) -4.4
30 °C 40 °C 50 °C
log (qe-qt)
-4.6
Bottom ash 2.6 2.7 2.9 190.9 88.6
Deoiled soya 2.5 2.6 2.8 373.1 85.9
-4.8
The values of E for both phenol red-bottom ash and phenol red- -5.4
deoiled soya system are found to be in the range 8–11 kJ/mol. Thus, 0 50 100 150 200
the calculated values of E suggest that chemisorption is responsible Time (minutes)
for the adsorption process for both systems at all the temperatures
[37]. Fig. 15. Plot of log(qe qt) versus time for the phenol red-deoiled soya system at
different temperatures.
Gibb’s free energy (DG°), change in entropy (DS°), and change in 180
enthalpy (DH°), etc. have been calculated from the following rela- 160
tions [38,39]:
140
DG ¼ RT ln b; ð8Þ
120
T2T 1 b2
t/qt (min g/ mg)
DH ¼ R ln ; ð9Þ
T2 T1 b1 100
DH DG
D S ¼ ; ð10Þ 80
T
where R is a universal gas constant, b, b1, and b2 are the Langmuir 60
constants at 30, 40, and 50 °C, respectively, obtained from slopes 40
and intercepts of Langmuir isotherms. R2 = 0.995 30 Degree C
The R2 values are indicative of the fact that the ongoing reaction
-4.6
proceeds via a pseudo-second-order mechanism rather than pseu-
do-first-order mechanism.
250 3.5
3
200
2.5
t/qt (min g/mg)
150 2
Bt
1.5
100
1
R2 = 0.8834 30 Degree C
0.5 R2 = 0.921 40 Degree C
50 R2 = 0.9954 30 Degree C R2 = 0.9056 50 Degree C
R2 = 0.9981 40 Degree C 0
50 Degree C 0 50 100 150 200
R2 = 0.9971
0 Time (minutes)
0 100 200 300 400
Time (minutes) Fig. 19. Plot of time versus Bt for the phenol red-deoiled soya system at different
temperatures.
Fig. 17. Plot of time versus t/qt for the phenol red-deoiled soya system at different
temperatures.
transport > internal transport) and particle diffusion when trans- Table 9
port of the adsorbate within the pores of the adsorbent takes place Values of effective diffusion coefficient (Di), preexponential constant (Do), activation
(external transport < internal transport). energy (Ea), and entropy of activation (DS#) for the diffusion of phenol red adsorbing
over bottom ash and deoiled soya.
The fractional attainment F of equilibrium at time t was calcu-
lated as follows: Adsorbent Di Do Ea DS#
(J/mol) (J/K/mol)
Qt 30 °C 40 °C 50 °C
F¼ : ð13Þ
Q1 8 8
Bottom ash 5.1 10 5.7 10 8.0 108 6 105 17862.2 284.6
Here Qt and Q1 are amounts adsorbed after time t and after infinite Deoiled soya 3.5 107 4.3 107 6.1 107 3 103 22819.5 252.1
time, respectively.
The F values were used to retrieve the Bt values from the
Reichenberg’s table and a distinction between film diffusion and In the equations given above Do is the preexponential constant,
particle diffusion adsorption rate was made with the help of Bt DS# is the entropy, d gives the average distance between two
graphs obtained [43]. It is seen that the present adsorption process successive sites of the adsorbent, h is Planks constant, k, Boltzmann
proceeds via particle diffusion at 30, 40, and 50 °C for phenol red- constant, Ea, the energy of activation, T, the temperature, and R is
bottom ash system (Fig. 18) and at 50 °C for phenol red-deoiled soya the universal gas constant. Table 9 shows the value obtained from
system whereas it proceeds via film diffusion at 30 and 40 °C for phe- these equations.
nol red-deoiled soya system (Fig. 19). For both adsorbent materials
the values of effective diffusion coefficient Di were calculated with 3.7. Column studies
the help of slopes of time versus Bt graphs at 30, 40, and 50 °C.
Fixed-bed column studies were applied in order to observe the
Ea
Di ¼ Do exp ; ð14Þ adsorptive tendency of the two adsorbent materials [44]. The
RT
! adsorption process in fixed-bed columns appears to have a distinct
DS# 2 advantage over batch-type operations due to the fact that in batch-
Do ¼ ð2:72 d kT=hÞ exp : ð15Þ
R type operations the effectiveness of the adsorbent material for
removing solute from solution decreases as the adsorption pro-
ceeds, whereas in column operations the adsorbent is continuously
4.5 in contact with solution of fixed concentration. As a result the
4 exhaustion capacity of the column is relatively greater than that
of batch capacity [45].
3.5 R2 = 0.9079
12 8
Bottom Ash
7 De-Oiled Soya
10
Concentration × 10 (M)
Concentration × 10 (M)
6
-5
-5
5
6
4
4 3
2
2
Bottom Ash
De- Oiled Soya 1
0
0 50 100 150 200 0
0 50 100 150 200
Volume (ml)
Volume (ml)
Fig. 20. Breakthrough curve for the phenol red-bottom ash and phenol red-deoiled
soya columns. Fig. 21. Desorption of phenol red from bottom ash and deoiled soya columns.
References [22] A. Mittal, J. Mittal, L. Kurup, A.K. Singh, J. Hazard. Mater. 38 (2006) 95.
[23] A. Mittal, J. Mittal, L. Kurup, J. Hazard. Mater. 136 (2006) 567.
[24] V.K. Gupta, A. Mittal, V. Gajbe, J. Mittal, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45 (2006) 1446.
[1] S. Pirillo, M.L. Ferreira, E.H. Rueda, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46 (2007) 8255.
[25] H. Lata, V.K. Garg, R.K. Gupta, Dyes Pigm. 74 (2007) 653.
[2] G. Mishra, M. Tripathy, Colourage 40 (1993) 35.
[26] V.K. Garg, R. Kumar, R. Gupta, Dyes Pigm. 62 (2004) 1.
[3] U.M. Pagga, K. Taeger, Water Resource Res. 28 (1994) 1051.
[27] V.K. Gupta, I. Ali, X. Suhas, D. Mohan, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 265 (2003) 257.
[4] W. Chu, C.W. Ma, Water Res. 34 (2000) 3153.
[28] I. Langmuir, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 38 (1916) 2221.
[5] A.T. Peter, H.S. Freeman, Physico-Chemical Principles of Color Chemistry,
[29] Y. Satyawali, M. Balakrishnan, Biores. Technol. 98 (2007) 2629.
Blackie Academic and Professional, London, 1996.
[30] B.H. Hameed, A.A. Ahmad, N. Aziz, Chem. Eng. J. 133 (2007) 195.
[6] O. Tunay, I. Kabdasli, G. Eremektar, D. Orhon, Water Sci. Technol. 34 (1996) 9.
[31] M.T. Sulak, E. Demirbas, M. Kobya, Biores. Technol. 98 (2007) 2590.
[7] G. Annadurai, R.S. Juang, D.J. Lee, J. Hazard. Mater. 92 (2002) 263.
[32] T.M. Weber, R.K. Chakrabarti, Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 20 (1974) 228.
[8] S. Senthilkumaar, P. Kalaamani, C.V. Subburaam, J. Hazard. Mater. 136 (2006)
[33] N.G. Chilton, J.N. Losso, W.E. Marshall, R.M. Rao, Biores. Technol. 85 (2002)
800.
131.
[9] R. Hana, Y. Wang, P. Hana, J. Shi, J. Yang, Y. Lub, J. Hazard. Mater. 137 (2006)
[34] J.F. Osma, V. Saravia, J.L. Toca-Herrera, S.R. Couto, J. Hazard. Mater. 147 (2007)
550.
900.
[10] S.K. Srivastava, V.K. Gupta, D. Mohan, J. Environ. Eng. (ASCE) 123 (1997) 461.
[35] S.J. Allen, G. Mckay, J.F. Porter, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 280 (2004) 322.
[11] V.K. Gupta, K.T. Park, S. Sharma, D. Mohan, Environmentalist 19 (1998) 129.
[36] T.V.N. Padmesh, K. Vijayaraghavan, G. Sekaran, M. Velan, Bioremediation J. 10
[12] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/phenol_red>.
(2006) 37.
[13] M.M. Walsh-Reitz, F.G. Toback, Am. J. Physiol.-Renal Phys. 262 (1992) F687.
[37] Y.S. Ho, J.F. Porter, G. McKay, Water Air Soil Pollut. 141 (2002) 1.
[14] <http://www.glue.umd.edu/~choi/MSDS/Sigma-Aldrich/PHENOL%20RED.pdf>.
[38] J. Wu, H. Yu, J. Hazard. Mater. 137 (2006) 498.
[15] S.M. Baylor, S. Hollingworth, J. Gen. Physiol. 96 (1990) 449.
[39] T.K. Kim, Y.A. Son, Y.J. Lim, Dyes Pigm. 72 (2007) 246.
[16] K. Chung, G.E. Fulk, A.W. Andrews, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 42 (1981) 641.
[40] Y. Bulut, N. Gozubenli, H. Aydyn, J. Hazard. Mater. 144 (2007) 300.
[17] S.V. RamaRao, A.K. Panda, M.V.L.N.G. Raju, S. Sunder, N.K. Praharaj, Anim. Feed
[41] G. Crini, H.N. Peindy, F. Gimbert, C. Robert, Sep. Purif. Technol. 53 (2007) 97.
Sci. Technol. 106 (2003) 199.
[42] G.E. Boyd, A.W. Adamson, L.S. Meyers, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 69 (1947) 2836.
[18] A. Mittal, D. Kaur, J. Mittal, J. Hazard. Mater. 163 (2009) 568.
[43] G.S. Gupta, G. Prasad, V.N. Singh, Water Res. 24 (1990) 45.
[19] A. Mittal, D. Kaur, J. Mittal, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 326 (2008) 8.
[44] A.A. Attia, B.S. Girgis, N.A. Fathy, Dyes Pigm. 76 (2008) 282.
[20] A. Mittal, V.K. Gupta, A. Malviya, J. Mittal, J. Hazard. Mater. 151 (2008) 821.
[45] A. Adak, M. Bandyopadhyay, A. Pal, Dyes Pigm. 69 (2006) 245.
[21] A. Mittal, A. Malviya, D. Kaur, J. Mittal, L. Kurup, J. Hazard. Mater. 148 (2007) 229.