Psychiatry Research: A B A B
Psychiatry Research: A B A B
Psychiatry Research: A B A B
Psychiatry Research
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/psychres
a
The 6th Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Nanshan Hospital Affiliated to Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518052, People's Republic of
China
b
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518052, People's Republic of China
Keywords: China has been severely affected by Coronavirus Disease 2019(COVID-19) since December, 2019. We aimed to
COVID-19 assess the mental health burden of Chinese public during the outbreak, and to explore the potential influence
Mental health factors. Using a web-based cross-sectional survey, we collected data from 7,236 self-selected volunteers assessed
Anxiety with demographic information, COVID-19 related knowledge, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), depressive
Depressive symptoms
symptoms, and sleep quality. The overall prevalence of GAD, depressive symptoms, and sleep quality of the
Sleep
public were 35.1%, 20.1%, and 18.2%, respectively. Younger people reported a significantly higher prevalence
of GAD and depressive symptoms than older people. Compared with other occupational group, healthcare
workers were more likely to have poor sleep quality. Multivariate logistic regression showed that age (< 35
years) and time spent focusing on the COVID-19 (≥ 3 hours per day) were associated with GAD, and healthcare
workers were at high risk for poor sleep quality. Our study identified a major mental health burden of the public
during the COVID-19 outbreak. Younger people, people spending too much time thinking about the outbreak,
and healthcare workers were at high risk of mental illness. Continuous surveillance of the psychological con-
sequences for outbreaks should become routine as part of preparedness efforts worldwide.
⁎
Corresponding author: The 6th Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Nanshan Hospital Affiliated to Shenzhen University, Shenzhen,
518052, People's Republic of China.
E-mail address: zhaoning2018@email.szu.edu.cn (N. Zhao).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112954
Received 20 March 2020; Received in revised form 26 March 2020; Accepted 26 March 2020
Available online 12 April 2020
0165-1781/ © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Y. Huang and N. Zhao Psychiatry Research 288 (2020) 112954
traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depressive disorders were the 2.4.2. COVID-19 related knowledge
most prevalent long-term psychological condition (Mak et al., 2009). This section was evaluated by two items: (1) Time spent focusing on
Similar results have been reported in the previous study of MERS the COVID-19, which measured the average time spent focusing on the
(Lee et al., 2018). Based on the above research evidence, we have COVID-19 outbreak information every day; (2) Knowledge of the
reason to speculate that the psychological condition of the public may COVID-19, which was assessed based on the following six judgment
also be affected during COVID-19 outbreak. questions about COVID-19 related knowledge: a. Inhalation of droplets
Therefore, using a web-based cross-sectional study, we aimed to from sneezing, coughing, or talking to an infected person could cause
assess the mental health burden of Chinese public during COVID-19 infection; b. Contact with something contaminated by an infected
outbreak, and to explore the potential influence factors. We hope that person could lead to infection; c. The incubation period of the virus
our study findings will provide data support for the targeted interven- does not exceed 14 days; d. Contact with an asymptomatic person might
tions on psychological health in Chinese public during the outbreak. also lead to infection; e. There are already targeted drugs that could
cure the disease; f. Taking “Shuanghuanglian Oral Liquid” could pre-
2. Methods vent infection of this disease. Of the above six questions, one point was
given for each correct answer, and no points were given for each in-
2.1. Study design and participants correct or uncertain answer. Participants with scores ≥5 points, equal
to 4 points, and ≤3 points were considered to quite understand, gen-
To prevent the spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome erally understand, and do not understand.
Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) through droplets or contact, we used a web-
based cross-sectional survey based on the National Internet Survey on 2.4.3. Generalized anxiety disorder
Emotional and Mental Health (NISEMH), an ongoing, online health-re- We used Chinese version of GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7)
lated behavior survey of Chinese population, to collected data. This web- scale to assess subject's anxiety symptoms. The GAD-7 has been pre-
based survey of the COVID-19 was sent on the Internet through the viously used in Chinese populations, and found to have good reliability
WeChat public platform and the mainstream media. All Chinese people (Cronbach's alpha=0.90) (Tong et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2018). Seven
using WeChat or other social tools may see this survey, and answered the items assessed the frequency of anxiety symptoms over the past two
questionnaire by scanning the Quick Response code (QR code) of the weeks on a 4-point Likert-scale ranging from 0 (never) to 3 (nearly
questionnaire address or clicking the relevant link. To encourage the re- every day). The total score of GAD-7 ranged from 0 to 21, with in-
cruitment of potential participants, all participants in the survey can re- creasing scores indicating more severe functional impairments as a
ceive a report on their mental health after completing the evaluation. This result of anxiety (Spitzer et al., 2006). For the purpose of this study, we
web-based questionnaire was completely voluntary and non-commercial. defined a GAD-total score of 9 points or greater as the presence of an-
xiety symptoms (Wang et al., 2018).
2.2. Data collection
2
Y. Huang and N. Zhao Psychiatry Research 288 (2020) 112954
Table 2 sleep quality stratified by gender, age, and occupation were reported,
Prevalence of GAD, depressive symptoms, and sleep quality during COVID-19 and Chi-square test (χ2) was used to compare the differences between
outbreak in Chinese population stratified by gender (N=7,236). groups. Third, univariate and multivariate logistic regression models
Variables Total Male Female χ2 P-value were performed to explore potential influence factors for GAD, de-
(N=7236) (N=3284) (N=3952) pressive symptoms, and sleep quality during COVID-19 outbreak. Odds
n (%) n (%) n (%) ratio (OR), adjusted odds ratio (AOR), and 95% confidence interval
(95% CI) were obtained from logistic regression models. All data were
GADa 2.89 0.089
No 4696 (64.9) 2092 (63.7) 2394 (65.9) analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version
Yes 2540 (35.1) 1192 (36.3) 1348 (34.1) 24.0. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant
Depressive 3.67 0.055 (2-sided tests).
symptomsb
No 5782 (79.9) 2625 (80.0) 3155 (79.8)
Yes 1454 (20.1) 657 (20.0) 797 (20.2) 3. Results
Sleep qualityc 2.59 0.108
Good 5919 (81.8) 2660 (81.0) 3259 (82.5)
3.1. Demographic characteristics
Poor 1317 (18.2) 624 (19.0) 693 (17.5)
Abbreviations: n, number, GAD, generalized anxiety disorder. The characteristics of participants were shown in Table 1. Of the
a
GAD was defined as individuals who scored ≥ 9 points. 7,236 samples analyzed, 3,284 (45.4%) were males and 3,952 (54.6%)
b
Depressive symptoms included individuals who scored > 28 points. were females, and the mean (standard deviation) age of the participants
c
Poor sleep quality was defined as individuals who scored > 7 points. was 35.3 ± 5.6 years. Among these samples, 2,250 (31.1%) of partici-
pants were healthcare workers, 3,155 (43.6%) of participants spent 3
depressive symptoms (Zhang et al., 2010), and the Chinese version of hours or more a day focusing on the COVID-19 outbreak, and 5,702
this scale has been validated and extensively utilized in Chinese po- (78.8%) of participants quite understand knowledge of the COVID-19.
pulation (Zhang et al., 2010; Zhang and Li, 2011). Twenty items as-
sessed the frequency of depressive symptoms over the past two weeks
3.2. Prevalence of GAD, depressive symptoms, and sleep quality during
on a 4-point Likert-scale ranging from 0 (rarely or none of the time) to 3
COVID-19 outbreak stratified by gender, age, and occupations
(most or all of the time). The score range of the CES-D was 0-60 points,
and higher scores indicated more severe depressive symptomatology
The prevalence of GAD, depressive symptoms, and sleep quality
(Radloff, 1977). In our study, CES-D scores greater than 28 points in-
stratified by gender, age, and occupations were shown in Table 2,
dicated depressive symptoms.
Table 3, and Table 4, respectively. The overall prevalence of GAD,
depressive symptoms, and sleep quality were 35.1%, 20.1%, and
2.4.5. Sleep quality 18.2%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in
The Chinese version of the PSQI (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) the prevalence of GAD, depressive symptoms, and sleep quality by
scale was used to assess the subject's sleep quality over the past two gender (P>0.05, as shown in Table 2). The prevalence of GAD and
week (Liu et al., 1996). The PSQI scale contains seven components depressive symptoms was significantly higher in participants younger
(subjective sleep quality, sleep duration, sleep latency, habitual sleep than 35 years than in participants aged 35 years or older (P<0.001, as
efficiency, use of sleep medications, sleep disturbance, and daytime shown in Table 3). Compared with other occupational groups, health-
dysfunction), and the score for each component rangs from 0 to 3 care workers (23.6%) reported the highest rate of poor sleep quality
points. The global PSQI score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores (P<0.001, as shown in Table 4).
indicating more severe sleep disorder (Buysse et al., 1989). The Chinese
version of PSQI has been demonstrated to be reliable and valid in 3.3. Association of influence factors with GAD, depressive symptoms, and
Chinese population (Liu et al., 1996), and a global PSQI score greater sleep quality during COVID-19 outbreak
than 7 points indicates poor sleep quality.
The associations of potential influence factors with GAD, depressive
2.4.6. Statistical analysis symptoms, and sleep quality during COVID-19 outbreak were presented
First, descriptive analyses were conducted to describe the demo- in Table 5. In the univariate logistic regression models, age (OR=1.77,
graphic characteristics and COVID-19 related knowledge in Chinese 95% CI: 1.38-1.95) and time spent focusing on the COVID-19
population. Second, the prevalence of GAD, depressive symptoms, and (OR=1.91, 95% CI: 1.77-2.15) were significantly associated with GAD
Table 3
Prevalence of GAD, depressive symptoms, and sleep quality during COVID-19 outbreak in Chinese population stratified by age (N=7,236).
Variables Total (N=7236) Age < 35 year (N=3155) Age ≥ 35 year (N=4081) χ2 P-value
n (%) n (%) n (%)
3
Y. Huang and N. Zhao Psychiatry Research 288 (2020) 112954
Table 4
Prevalence of GAD, depressive symptoms, and sleep quality during COVID-19 outbreak in Chinese population stratified by Occupations (N=7,236).
Variables Total (N=7236) Healthcare workers Enterprise or institution workers Teachers or students Others (N=1773) χ2 P-value
(N=2250) (N=1809) (N=1404)
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
a
GAD 2.36 0.501
No 4696 (64.9) 1448 (64.4) 1179 (65.2) 911 (64.9) 1158 (65.3)
Yes 2540 (35.1) 802 (35.6) 630 (34.8) 493 (35.1) 615 (34.7)
Depressive symptomsb 2.71 0.439
No 5782 (79.9) 1804 (80.2) 1445 (79.9) 1109 (79.0) 1424 (80.3)
Yes 1454 (20.1) 446 (19.8) 364 (20.1) 295 (21.0) 349 (19.7)
Sleep qualityc 98.82 <0.001
Good 5919 (81.8) 1719 (76.4) 1579 (87.3) 1203 (85.7) 1418 (80.5)
Poor 1317 (18.2) 531 (23.6) 230 (12.7) 201 (14.3) 355 (20.0)
Table 5
Results of univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses (N=7,236).
Variables GAD Depressive symptoms Sleep quality
OR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI)
Gender
Male 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Female 1.32 (0.90-1.69) 1.22 (0.86-1.64) 1.30 (0.82-2.07) 1.24 (0.77-1.99) 0.89 (0.57-1.39) 0.82 (0.52-1.29)
Age
< 35 years 1.77 (1.38-1.95)* 1.65 (1.49-2.02)* 1.80 (1.35-2.01)* 1.77 (1.58-2.07)* 0.69 (0.35-1.05) 0.68 (0.42-1.11)
≥ 35 years 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Occupations
Healthcare workersa 1.30 (0.83-2.04) 1.30 (0.82-2.08) 1.15 (0.67-1.99) 1.02 (0.58-1.81) 1.48 (1.15-1.95)* 1.32 (1.18-1.88)*
Enterprise or institution workersb 0.85 (0.52-1.38) 0.91 (0.55-1.49) 0.80 (0.44-1.47) 0.80 (0.44-1.49) 0.60 (0.33-1.11) 0.59 (0.32-1.10)
Teachers or studentsc 1.51 (0.91-2.53) 1.41 (0.80-2.50) 1.24 (0.67-2.31) 0.94 (0.47-1.88) 0.69 (0.35-1.35) 0.87 (0.42-1.82)
Othersd 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Time spent focusing on the COVID-19e
<1 hour 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1-2 hours 0.96 (0.59-1.57) 1.01 (0.61-1.64) 0.71 (0.40-1.27) 0.74 (0.41-1.32) 0.90 (0.50-1.62) 0.81 (0.44-1.49)
≥3 hours 1.91 (1.77-2.15)* 1.83 (1.53-2.19)* 0.98 (0.57-1.68) 1.11 (0.63-1.93) 1.18 (0.68-2.07) 1.02 (0.57-1.82)
Knowledge of the COVID-19
Do not understand 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
General understand 0.73 (0.32-1.71) 0.68 (0.29-1.60) 0.97 (0.32-2.97) 0.90 (0.29-2.76) 1.06 (0.35-3.21) 0.92 (0.30-2.82)
Quite understand 0.93 (0.45-1.93) 0.80 (0.38-1.69) 1.30 (0.49-3.47) 1.12 (0.42-3.02) 1.29 (0.48-3.42) 1.15 (0.42-3.14)
Abbreviations: GAD, generalized anxiety disorder; OR, odds ratio; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; COVID-19, 2019 Corona Virus Disease.
a
Included doctors, nurses and health administrators.
b
Included enterprise employees, national/provincial/municipal institution workers and other relevant staff.
c
Included teachers or students from universities, middle schools, or elementary schools.
d
Includer freelancers, retiree, social worker and other relevant staff.
e
Average time spent focusing on the COVID-19 outbreak information every day.
⁎
P<0.001.
4
Y. Huang and N. Zhao Psychiatry Research 288 (2020) 112954
5
Y. Huang and N. Zhao Psychiatry Research 288 (2020) 112954
Wong, P.C., Tsang, K.W., Chua, S.E., 2007. Stress and psychological distress among of psychiatric morbidity and psychological adaptation of the nurses in a structured
SARS survivors 1 year after the outbreak. Can J Psychiatry 52, 233–240. https://doi. SARS caring unit during outbreak: a prospective and periodic assessment study in
org/10.1177/070674370705200405. Taiwan. J Psychiatr Res 41, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2005.12.
Lee, S.M., Kang, W.S., Cho, A.R., Kim, T., Park, J.K., 2018. Psychological impact of the 006.
2015 MERS outbreak on hospital workers and quarantined hemodialysis patients. The Japan Times, 2020. Japanese official looking after Wuhan returnees found dead.
Compr Psychiatry 87, 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.10.003. Accessed February 3, 2020. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/02/02/
Liu, X.C., Tang, M.Q, Hu, L., Wang, A.Y., Wu, H.X., Zhao, G.F., Gao, C.N., Li, W.S., 1996. national/crime-legal/japanese-official-looking-wuhan-returnees-found-dead/.
Reliability and Validity of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. J Chin Psychiatry 29, Tong, X., An, D., McGonigal, A., Park, S.P., Zhou, D., 2016. Validation of the Generalized
103–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02951625. Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) among Chinese people with epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 120,
Lu, Y.C., Shu, B.C., Chang, Y.Y., Lung, F.W., 2006. The mental health of hospital workers 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2015.11.019.
dealing with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Psychother Psychosom 75, 370–375. Wang, D., Hu, B., Hu, C., Zhu, F., Liu, X., Zhang, J., Wang, B., Xiang, H., Cheng, Z., Xiong,
https://doi.org/10.1159/000095443. Y., Zhao, Y., Li, Y., Wang, X., Peng, Z., 2020. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospi-
Mak, I.W., Chu, M.C., Pan, P.C., Yiu, M.G., Chan, V.L., 2009. Long-term psychiatric talized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China.
morbidities among SARS survivors. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 31, 318–326. https://doi. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1585. Published online February 7,
org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.001. 2020.
Maunder, R., Hunter, J., Vincent, L., Bennett, J., Peladeau, N., Leszcz, M., Sadavoy, J., World Health Organization, 2020a. Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV): situation report.
Verhaeghe, L.M., Steinberg, R., Mazzulli, T., 2003. The immediate psychological and Accessed February 15, 2020. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/
occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital. CMAJ 168, coronaviruse/situationreports.
1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.18.2432. World Health Organization, 2020b. Current novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak.
McAlonan, G.M., Lee, A.M., Cheung, V., Cheung, C., Tsang, K.W., Sham, P.C., Chua, S.E., Accessed January 30, 2020. https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus.
Wong, J.G., 2007. Immediate and sustained psychological impact of an emerging Wang, Y., Chen, R., Zhang, L., 2018. Reliability and validity of generalized anxiety scale-7
infectious disease outbreak on health care workers. Can J Psychiatry 52, 241–247. in inpatients in Chinese general hospital. J Clin Psychiatr 28, 168–171. https://doi.
https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370705200406. org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-3220.2018.03.007.
National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, 2020, News: 21,569 Wuhan Municipal Health Commission, 2020. Report of novel coronavirus-infected
medical staff have been sent to support Hubei. Accessed February 17, 2020. http:// pneumonia in China. Published January 20, 2020. Accessed January 31, 2020.
www.nhc.gov.cn/wjw/xinw/xwzx.shtml. http://wjw.wuhan.gov.cn/front/web/showDetail/2020012009077.
Paules, C.I., Marston, H.D., Fauci, A.S., 2020. Coronavirus infections-more than just the XINHUANET, 2020. The Latest: China confirms human-to-human transmission of 2019-
common cold: JAMA. Published online January 23, 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020. nCoV, infections among medical staff. Accessed January 21, 2020. http://www.
0757. xinhuanet.com/english/2020-01/21/c_138722888.htm.
People's daily of China, 2020. The novel coronavirus can be inhibited by Chinese patent Zhang, B.S, Li, J., 2011. Reliability and validity of the simplified version of the Center for
medicine Shuanghuanglian oral liquid. Accessed January 31, 2020. http://search. Epidemiology Scale for Depression in the national adult population. Chin Ment
people.com.cn/cnpeople/news/getNewsResult.jsp. Health J 25, 506–511. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2011.07.007.
Radloff, L.S., 1977. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the Zhang, J., Wu, Z.Y, Fang, G., Li, J., Han, B.X, Chen, Z.Y, 2010. Establishing a national
general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1, 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/ urban norm for the Center for Epidemiology Scale for Depression. Chin Ment Health J
014662167700100306. 24, 139–143. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2010.02.015.
Spitzer, R.L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J.B., Lowe, B., 2006. A brief measure for assessing Zhu, N., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Li, X., Yang, B., Song, J., Zhao, X., Huang, B., Shi, W., Lu,
generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 166, 1092–1097. https:// R., Niu, P., Zhan, F., Ma, X., Wang, D., Xu, W., Wu, G., Gao, G.F., Tan, W., 2020. A
doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med.
Su, T.P., Lien, T.C., Yang, C.Y., Su, Y.L., Wang, J.H., Tsai, S.L., Yin, J.C., 2007. Prevalence https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017. Published online January 24, 2020.