Trade and Investment Development Corp. vs. Civil Service Commission G.R. No. 182249 March 5, 2013
Trade and Investment Development Corp. vs. Civil Service Commission G.R. No. 182249 March 5, 2013
Trade and Investment Development Corp. vs. Civil Service Commission G.R. No. 182249 March 5, 2013
ISSUE:
Whether or not the wording in RA 8494 command TIDCORP to follow the said
requirements despite its exemption from laws involving position classification
RULING:
NO. Under the principles of statutory construction, if a statute is clear, plain and free
from ambiguity, it must be given its literal meaning and applied without attempted interpretation.
The plain-meaning rule or verba legis came from the maxim index animi sermo est (speech is the
index of intention) and rests on the valid presumption that the words employed by the legislature
in a statute correctly express its intent and preclude the court from construing it differently. The
legislature is presumed to know the meaning of the words, to have used words advisedly, and to
have expressed its intent by the use of such words as are found in the statute. Verba legis non est
recedendum, or from the words of a statute there should be no departure.”
In the case at bar, the phrase “to endeavor” means to “to devote serious and sustained
effort” and “to make an effort to do” which is synonymous with the words to strive, to struggle
and to seek. The use of “to endeavor” in the context of Section 7 of RA 8494 means that despite
TIDCORP’s exemption from laws involving compensation, position classification and
qualification standards, it should still strive to conform as closely as possible with the principles
and modes provided in RA 6758. The phrase “as closely as possible,” which qualifies
TIDCORP’s duty “to endeavor to conform,” recognizes that the law allows TIDCORP to deviate
from RA 6758, but it should still try to hew closely with its principles and modes. Had the intent
of Congress been to require TIDCORP to fully, exactly and strictly comply with RA 6758, it
would have so stated in unequivocal terms. Instead, the mandate it gave TIDCORP was to
endeavor to conform to the principles and modes of RA 6758, and not to the entirety of this law.