Trade and Investment Development Corp. vs. Civil Service Commission G.R. No. 182249 March 5, 2013

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Topic: Verba Legis under Literal Interpretation

Trade and Investment Development Corp. vs. Civil Service Commission


G.R. No. 182249 March 5, 2013
FACTS:
In August 2001, Arsenio de Guzman was appointed on a permanent status as Financial
Management Specialist IV of TIDCORP, a government-owned and controlled corporation. His
appointment was included in TIDCORP’s Report on Personnel Actions for August 2001, which
was submitted to the CSC – Department of Budget and Management (DBM) Field Office.
Months later, Director Leticia M. Bugtong disallowed De Guzman’s appointment because the
position of Financial Management Specialist IV was not included in the DBM’s Index of
Occupational Service. TIDCORP’s Executive Vice President Jane U. Tambanillo then appealed
the invalidation of De Guzman’s appointment to Director IV Agnes Padilla of the CSC- NCR.
Tambanillo argues that Republic Act No. 8494, which amended TIDCORP’s charter, empowers
its Board of Directors to create its own organizational structure and staffing pattern, and to
approve its own compensation and position classification system and qualification standards.
CSC-NCR Director Agnes Padilla denied her appeal because De Guzman’s appointment failed to
comply with Section 1, Rule III of CSC Memorandum Circular No. 40, which requires that the
position title of an appointment submitted to the CSC must conform with the approved Position
Allocation List and must be found in the Index of Occupational Service. Since the position of
Financial Management Specialist IV is not included in the Index of Occupational Service, de
Guzman’s appointment to this position must be invalid. Hence, this petition for review on
certiorari with TIDCORP claiming that the CSC’s interpretation of RA 8494 is misplaced.

ISSUE:
Whether or not the wording in RA 8494 command TIDCORP to follow the said
requirements despite its exemption from laws involving position classification

RULING:
NO. Under the principles of statutory construction, if a statute is clear, plain and free
from ambiguity, it must be given its literal meaning and applied without attempted interpretation.
The plain-meaning rule or verba legis came from the maxim index animi sermo est (speech is the
index of intention) and rests on the valid presumption that the words employed by the legislature
in a statute correctly express its intent and preclude the court from construing it differently. The
legislature is presumed to know the meaning of the words, to have used words advisedly, and to
have expressed its intent by the use of such words as are found in the statute. Verba legis non est
recedendum, or from the words of a statute there should be no departure.”
In the case at bar, the phrase “to endeavor” means to “to devote serious and sustained
effort” and “to make an effort to do” which is synonymous with the words to strive, to struggle
and to seek. The use of “to endeavor” in the context of Section 7 of RA 8494 means that despite
TIDCORP’s exemption from laws involving compensation, position classification and
qualification standards, it should still strive to conform as closely as possible with the principles
and modes provided in RA 6758. The phrase “as closely as possible,” which qualifies
TIDCORP’s duty “to endeavor to conform,” recognizes that the law allows TIDCORP to deviate
from RA 6758, but it should still try to hew closely with its principles and modes. Had the intent
of Congress been to require TIDCORP to fully, exactly and strictly comply with RA 6758, it
would have so stated in unequivocal terms. Instead, the mandate it gave TIDCORP was to
endeavor to conform to the principles and modes of RA 6758, and not to the entirety of this law.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy