Drug War
Drug War
Drug War
Yes, there is a legitimate college inside Bilibid Prisons. It offers BS Entrepreneurship to those inmates who are willing to earn a
college degree. I have been given the privilege to teach inside this prison camp.
Nevertheless, official figures suggest that killing is not the campaign’s key objective. From July 2016 to
December 2018, 117,385 anti-drug operations were conducted, resulting in the arrest of 167,135 and the death of
5,104 people suspected to be involved in the drug trade. In that period, 285 drug dens and laboratories were
dismantled, 1,954 children rescued and 25.62 billion Philippine pesos (US$490 million) worth of drugs and
laboratory equipment seized. Meanwhile, 87 police officers were killed and 227 wounded in the line of duty.
While every life is sacred and every person deserves due process under the law, the figures demonstrate that the
arrest of suspects, rescue of minors and seizure of drugs are the primary aims of the operations. The government
objects to the practice of lumping fatalities with the 23,518 deaths under investigation (DUIs), which inflates the
drug war toll. Only 2,668 DUIs were found to be drug-related.
Philippine police will wear body cameras in drugs raids
The drug war has revealed how the illicit trade had infected the country’s governance and security apparatus.
Hence, “internal cleansing” became integral to the campaign – 316 law enforcers were dismissed from the
service for drug use, while 145 were removed for other drug-related offences. In addition, 292 government
employees, 262 elected officials and 67 uniformed personnel were arrested in anti-drug operations. The counter-
intelligence task force, a special police unit, was formed to go after erring law-enforcers.
The government recently released a list of
“narco-officials”
and warned them to desist from taking part in the drug trade. In November 2018,
three police officers
were convicted of murdering a minor in an anti-drug operation that drew a popular outcry.
Duterte has taken radical measures to implement his war on drugs. When reports surfaced that high-profile
inmates of the country’s main penitentiary live in luxury and were even able to carry on their drug business while
incarcerated, he had jail guards replaced by the elite police Special Action Force. Personnel were frequently
rotated to avoid the possibility of them getting familiar with inmates and thus becoming susceptible to
corruption.
Following the controversial deaths of minors in anti-drug operations in Caloocan in October 2017, the Philippine
Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) took over the reins of the drug war from the Philippine National Police
(PNP). Duterte would later recall the PNP to the front line after realising the constraints of the understaffed
PDEA.
When a shipment containing drugs entered the country last year, Duterte had the
commissioner and department heads of the Customs Bureau removed and temporarily put
the military in command. A previous customs commissioner had been replaced in 2017 for
failing to thwart the entry of a drug shipment.
Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency agents and police secure part of a street as they search a house looking for a drug
dealer during a raid in Maharlika village, south of Manila, on February 28, 2018. Photo: AFP
Overemphasis on a single aspect of the Philippines’ war on drugs –
the death toll
– clouds international perceptions of President Rodrigo Duterte’s signature campaign. Less publicised by the media is the
health dimension of the campaign. Five months after commencing the crackdown, the government opened the country’s
biggest drug rehabilitation facility. By the end of 2018, three more regional rehabilitation centres had been built, with
plans to construct more. Developing and running effective rehabilitation programmes also present opportunities to work
with local and international partners.
Duterte framed his drug war as an existential challenge – a fight to preserve peace and order and a crusade to save the
country’s youth. “If you destroy the youth of my land, I will kill you” has been a recurring threat in his pronouncements
on the subject. Since his time as mayor of Davao, Duterte’s campaign against crime and the illegal drug trade has been
unrelenting, catapulting him to national prominence.
However, for all the hype that it has attracted, Duterte’s attitude to drugs is no regional exception. Many of the country’s
neighbours, including China, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore, have waged crackdowns to eradicate drugs and
impose the death penalty for drug-related crimes.
Duterte’s concerns are not unfounded. With porous maritime borders, the presence of
non-state armed groups
, collusion of corrupt officials and a climate conducive to the cultivation of opium, the country runs the risk of sliding into
a narco-state. The drug trade sustains the proliferation of rebel, terrorist and criminal outfits. The Philippines is also
located near the
Golden Triangle
, the area where the borders of Myanmar, Laos and Thailand meet and where a substantial global supply of opium is
sourced.
Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte (centre) looks on as the new chief of the Philippine National Police
Director-General Oscar Albayalde (right) and outgoing chief General Ronald “Bato” Dela Rosa salute each
other at a ceremony on April 19, 2018, at Camp Crame in Quezon City, Philippines. Duterte, in his address,
said he would not stop his war on drugs until his last day in office. Photo: AP
Share:
Rights groups have long contested official drug war death figures, accusing the police of engaging in
extrajudicial killings,
of condoning vigilante-style attacks and deliberately targeting poor,
small-time drug peddlers
. Concerns about collateral damage and the slow progress of cases against police officers suspected of abuses have also
been raised.
Nevertheless, official figures suggest that killing is not the campaign’s key objective. From July 2016 to December 2018,
117,385 anti-drug operations were conducted, resulting in the arrest of 167,135 and the death of 5,104 people suspected to
be involved in the drug trade. In that period, 285 drug dens and laboratories were dismantled, 1,954 children rescued and
25.62 billion Philippine pesos (US$490 million) worth of drugs and laboratory equipment seized. Meanwhile, 87 police
officers were killed and 227 wounded in the line of duty.
SUBSCRIBE TO OPINION
Get updates direct to your inbox
SUBMIT
By registering, you agree to our T&C and Privacy Policy
While every life is sacred and every person deserves due process under the law, the figures demonstrate that the arrest of
suspects, rescue of minors and seizure of drugs are the primary aims of the operations. The government objects to the
practice of lumping fatalities with the 23,518 deaths under investigation (DUIs), which inflates the drug war toll. Only
2,668 DUIs were found to be drug-related.
The drug war has revealed how the illicit trade had infected the country’s governance and security apparatus. Hence,
“internal cleansing” became integral to the campaign – 316 law enforcers were dismissed from the service for drug use,
while 145 were removed for other drug-related offences. In addition, 292 government employees, 262 elected officials and
67 uniformed personnel were arrested in anti-drug operations. The counter-intelligence task force, a special police unit,
was formed to go after erring law-enforcers.
Supporters of 17-year-old Kian delos Santos, who was killed by the police as part of the anti-drug campaign,
attend a vigil at a police station in Manila on November 29, 2018. Three policemen were sentenced on
November 29 to decades in prison for their role in the murder. Photo: AFP
Share:
The government recently released a list of
“narco-officials”
and warned them to desist from taking part in the drug trade. In November 2018,
three police officers
were convicted of murdering a minor in an anti-drug operation that drew a popular outcry.
Duterte has taken radical measures to implement his war on drugs. When reports surfaced that high-profile inmates of the
country’s main penitentiary live in luxury and were even able to carry on their drug business while incarcerated, he had
jail guards replaced by the elite police Special Action Force. Personnel were frequently rotated to avoid the possibility of
them getting familiar with inmates and thus becoming susceptible to corruption.
Following the controversial deaths of minors in anti-drug operations in Caloocan in October 2017, the Philippine Drug
Enforcement Agency (PDEA) took over the reins of the drug war from the Philippine National Police (PNP). Duterte
would later recall the PNP to the front line after realising the constraints of the understaffed PDEA.
When a shipment containing drugs entered the country last year, Duterte had the commissioner and department heads of
the Customs Bureau removed and temporarily put the military in command. A previous customs commissioner had been
replaced in 2017 for failing to thwart the entry of a drug shipment.
Rehabilitation remains an underappreciated component of Duterte’s drug war. More than 1.2 million drug users and
pushers surrendered from 2016 to early 2017. Police commanders were tasked with monitoring their whereabouts to
ensure they do not resume their old ways. Some underwent
rehabilitation
– 316,494 graduated from recovery and wellness programmes.
In 2016, the country’s biggest drug rehabilitation centre, a 10,000-bed facility, opened in Nueva Ecija. Three drug
rehabilitation centres in Mindanao followed – the 60-bed Agusan facility opened in September 2016, while the 576-bed
Bukidnon and 150-bed Saranggani centres were completed late last year. Davao will soon have its second drug
rehabilitation centre. The health department announced that 11 more such centres are scheduled for completion late this
year. Twenty-three reformation centres were also established. Drug rehabilitation also opened a new facet in Philippine-
China cooperation, with China helping to build the three new large rehabilitation centres.
Despite negative publicity, 2017 and 2018 opinion polls show a high level of public support for the drug war. Colombia,
Mexico, the Dominican Republic and Indonesia have
expressed interest
in replicating the PNP’s Oplan Tokhang (“knock and plead” strategy) to convince drug users and pushers to cease their
drug-related activities and reform. The country also
won a seat
in the United Nations Human Rights Council last year.
As the drug war enters its third year, the front line may shift to rehabilitation. While calling out law enforcement for
excesses, church, civil society and foreign partners should expand on ways to contribute to this end.
UNHRC RESOLUTION ONE-SIDED
THE FACT IS THAT THERE ARE POLICE OPERATIONS THESE PEOPLE ARE SUBJECT OF ARREST AND THEY
RESIST
UNDER THE LAW, PEOPLE ENFORCING THE LAW ARE ENTITLED TO SELF DEFENSE
YOU CAN’T JUST SIT IDLY WHILE BEING SHOT BY THIS PEOPLE
TJHERE’S ONLY ONE PROTOCOL IN SAVING YOURSELF: WHEN YOUR LIFE IS IN DANGER, YOU SAVE IT
IN EVERY POLICE OPERATION WHEN THERE ARE DEATHS, AUTOMATICALLY CHARGES ARE FILED WITH
RESPECT TO THOSE WHO WERE INVOLVED IN OTHER WORDS THESE ARE DOCUMENTED CRIMINALS. The
circumstances surrounding the death are there for everyone to see, so what are they complaining
about?
27,000 deaths coming up from accidents, deaths coming up from personal motivations of killing them
adding up
Teddy Boy Locsin: “We helped create the UN to honor the universal values of respect for sovereignty
and non-interference in the internal affairs of state which were brazenly and brutally violated on a
global scale by those who censured us today.” (re: Iceland resolution)
The nation is in gratitude to the late Senator Rene Espina for his contributions in achieving a #DrugFreePH.
Among the laws he had authored was the Dangerous Drugs Act of 1972, which paved the way for the government to create policies to help
in eradicating illegal drugs problem in the country.
#Rehabinasyon
#DrugFreePH - In his meeting with the Filipino community in Tokyo, Japan, President Rodrigo Roa Duterte
announced the significant improvement in eradicating illegal drugs in the country. He says, a family will suffer
and collapse if, even only the father falls into drug use. It may result to social dysfunction and fights within the
family may arise, he added.
PDEA
RA 9165
Section 21 states the procedural of how to handle evidences that were seized during the anti-drug war
operation. Guilty or not, the evidence stands. Ammended by RA 064, evidences will be burned or destroyed in
the legal parlands. That’s why it’s seldom.
Information only from the community. It depends on the cooperation. Strengthen the community’s
cooperation in giving information to law enforcement forces. Calling active participation to be part of
anti-drug operation by providing significant information. Whole-nation approach to combat illegal drug
menace.
REHABINASYON
Go to your BADAC, has its own program, way back 2018 the DILG has been continuously training the
BADAC what to do for the CBRP and the after care program. Coordinated with TESDA for livelihood
trainings, recommend to business establishments
This movement, this fight against the drug problem. Cleared of drugs because of active participation.
Given intervention. Comfortable and safe for Filipinos, crimes that stem from these drug uses.
RA 9165 – Strike out by SC. Not mandatory drug testing because it violates human rights. National and
local government officials do drug test before being employed.
Drugs – root cause of suffering. It will not be sidelined, as relentless. Drugs will not be crushed unless we
continue to eliminate corruption that allows the social monster to survive. Not mutually exclusive
(abolished)
SONA – Under the parameters of the law. Dream of glowing days for every Filipino. PH better than the
one I grew up with. Duty to serve and protect the PH.
Incidents are under investigation. Unidentified people / masked assailants / vigilante killings. Part of
mandate of the PNP to conduct the operations. It is the responsibility of the State to minimize these
killings
Philippine police will wear body cameras in
drugs raids to counter accusations of
extrajudicial killings
Police data shows nearly 4,000 drug suspects have been killed since President Duterte
came to power and launched the crackdown in June 2016
Philippine police will soon have to wear body cameras during anti-narcotics operations and visit suspects’ homes only in
the daytime, in an effort to erase doubts about the conduct of those on the front lines of a bloody war on drugs.
Police chief Ronald dela Rosa said police would wear body cameras to record arrests, under a January 19 memorandum
made public on Wednesday that takes effect once the devices are procured.
The police are making a comeback in President Rodrigo Duterte’s ferocious anti-narcotics campaign, a few months after
he suspended them amid unprecedented scrutiny of their conduct.
“Once they are available, we will require them to wear that,” Dela Rosa said of the cameras. “We would have a policy
where there will be no anti-drug operations without body-worn cameras.”
He did not specify a date by which the cameras are expected to be made available to police, however.
Police data shows nearly 4,000 drug suspects were killed since Duterte came to power and launched the crackdown in
June 2016, but police insist all died because they violently resisted arrest.
Philippine police will soon have to wear body cameras during anti-narcotics operations and visit suspects’ homes only in
the daytime, in an effort to erase doubts about the conduct of those on the front lines of a bloody war on drugs.
Police chief Ronald dela Rosa said police would wear body cameras to record arrests, under a January 19 memorandum
made public on Wednesday that takes effect once the devices are procured.
The police are making a comeback in President Rodrigo Duterte’s ferocious anti-narcotics campaign, a few months after
he suspended them amid unprecedented scrutiny of their conduct.
“Once they are available, we will require them to wear that,” Dela Rosa said of the cameras. “We would have a policy
where there will be no anti-drug operations without body-worn cameras.”
He did not specify a date by which the cameras are expected to be made available to police, however.
Police data shows nearly 4,000 drug suspects were killed since Duterte came to power and launched the crackdown in
June 2016, but police insist all died because they violently resisted arrest.
Police reject activists’ allegations that they are executing suspected drug users and dealers in a systematic campaign of
abuses and cover-ups. In his war on drugs, Duterte has been accused of allowing a culture of impunity to flourish.
In the same memorandum, Dela Rosa ordered police to immediately take injured suspects to hospital, and establish a
database of those who died in police operations.
In June, Reuters revealed that police have shot hundreds of people during anti-drug
operations, before taking them to hospitals where they are declared dead on arrival. Police
say they’re trying to save lives. Bereaved relatives and other witnesses say police are
sending corpses to hospitals to disrupt crime scenes and cover up extrajudicial killings.
Police were also ordered to limit the feared “Oplan Tokhang” operations, when they visit
homes of users and dealers and seek their surrender, to between 8am and 5pm on
weekdays, police spokesman Dionardo Carlos told a separate media briefing.
“It has to be daytime, so as to erase the impression that if you have been the subject of Tokhang, you would be killed,”
Carlos said, adding police would be required to wear their uniforms during such operations.
The Philippines has hit back at New York-based Human Rights Watch for what it called a misleading death toll of more
than 12,000 in the drugs war, putting the number at half that.
THE GOOD – HIGHLIGHTING THE DRUG PROBLEM
The first legacy of the war on drugs has been to shine a national spotlight on the Philippines’
drug problem.
To Duterte’s credit, his government has not shied away from inconvenient truths like the fact
that the Philippines is becoming a trans-shipment point for the global drug trade, and the high
number of 1.8 million drug users in the Philippines.
Duterte has also courageously and rightfully identified the involvement of politicians in the drug
trade. Long before his arrival in the national scene, government officials have been implicated in
participating or protecting the drug trade, but previous presidents have turned a blind eye.
Duterte’s attention on drugs has also challenged health officials to offer rehabilitation services
and even consider targeted and sustained community-based interventions. In 2016, Philippine
Health Secretary Paulyn Ubial declared drug use a “public health concern”.
Though these efforts have not born significant fruit, they at least hint at openness on the part of
Philippine government agencies to approach drugs in a comprehensive and open way.
A recognition of the severity of the situation in turn, is going some way in progressing the
Philippine government's response to an undeniably major problem for the Philippines. Police
officers have gone around communities in the Philippines with high levels of drug users and
traffickers, and millions have signed up for drug rehabilitation programmes.
Despite the intensely polarised debates, however, there is actually common ground and strong
agreement within the Philippines that the drug problem needs to be addressed.
This common ground needs to be highlighted to counter the binary choices presented to people
that they are either for the war on drugs or for the drug trade.
The Duterte government should also consider ramping up softer best practices that have been
effective - such as Bogo City achieving "drug-free" status with zero deaths through multi-
sectoral cooperation and community-based rehabilitation.
War on Drugs is a good idea even if not "winnable" John Hawkins. "In defense of the drug war." Human
Events. January 25th, 2007: "While it's true that we may not ever win the war against drugs -- i.e. never entirely
eradicate the use of illegal drugs -- we're not ever going to win the war against murder, robbery and rape either.
But our moral code rejects each of them, so none -- including drugs -- can be legalized if we still adhere to that
code."
ro
Drug War enables governments to crack-down on cartels Bret Stephens. "In Praise of Mexico's War
on Drugs." Wall Street Journal. March 3, 2009: "The problem is Mexico's record of corrupt, weak and
incompetent governance, which has created the environment in which the cartels have hitherto operated with
impunity. The same might be said about other countries in Latin America: These states did not become basket
cases on account of the drug trade. It is the fact that they were basket cases to begin with that allowed the
drug trade to flourish. [...] The government has managed to spark power struggles within and among cartels,
and the vast majority of Mexico's murder victims are themselves involved in the drug trade. More important,
Mr. Calderón has sent the signal that his government will not repeat the patterns of complacency and collusion
that typified Mexico for decades. Whatever else might be said about his government, it's a serious one."
War on Drugs helps combat drug-related crimes The US Drug Enforcement Administration claims: "Crime,
violence and drug use go hand in hand. Six times as many homicides are committed by people under the influence
of drugs, as by those who are looking for money to buy drugs. Most drug crimes aren’t committed by people trying
to pay for drugs; they’re committed by people on drugs.— US Drug Enforcement Administration (2003). "Speaking
Out Against Drug Legalization" DUF research indicates that: Frequent use of hard drugs is one of the strongest
indicators of a criminal career. Offenders who use drugs are among the most serious and active criminals,
engaging in both property and violent crime. Early and persistent use of cocaine or heroin in the juvenile years is
an indicator of serious, persistent criminal behavior in adulthood. Those arrested who are drug users are more
likely than those not using drugs to be rearrested on pretrial release or fail to appear at trial
State justified in protecting individuals from own drug abuse. The state has the authority vested in
it by the people to protect individuals from doing harm to themselves and others. The need to assume this
responsibility is especially heightened if the individual is not aware of the risks, or is addicted and thus not
The state is justified in protecting society from drug-users. Drug-use affects the user, their
families, children, communities and society at large, and the state must legislate to protect these wider
interests.