Eastman PDF
Eastman PDF
Eastman PDF
Dr Iyad Al-Omari
Written by: Jumana Qussad
Cephalometry
(note: For whoever didn't attend the lecture, the lecture was less than an outline and barely anything
was explained in it. This sheet was written using the lecture outline and by referring to the laboratory
manual and Laura Mitchell only as needed.
The main reference of this lecture is the manual, you can refer to it as recommended by the Doctor. Good
luck, and I hope you hold a grasp of this topic =D)
We dont take a cephalogram for each orthodontic patient; since you are exposing the
patient to extra radiation. Only after clinical examination, you decide if its indicated or
not. What's more important is to be able to interpret the cephalogram if you decide to
take one.
We have an Anterior-posterior Cephalogram and a Lateral Cephalogram.
cephalogram is not used to asses local dental factors, we'd rather use panoramic
radiographs or CBCT.
1-First thing you have to do is check that the cephalogram is taken properly and that it's
taken in the standardized position and posture
1
X-ray must be examined systematically and look for any disease or pathology before
tracing
ANB angle is the most important angle for assessing the skeletal problem. It relates
the maxilla and the mandible to the
cranium -through the nasion- which is
considered a stable reference point.
>>If the ANB was greater than the normal
range, then the A point is way in front of
the B-point and the patient has a class 2
relation.
>>If the ANB was less than the normal
range, then the A point coincides or is
behind the B-point and the patent has a
class 3 relation. *we are not asked to memorize the normal values
After knowing the skeletal problem, we can assess the cause of this problem
through the SNA and SNB angles.
SNA shows the relative position of the maxilla in relation to the cranial base
SNB shows the relative position of mandible in relation to the cranial base
FOR EXAMPLE:
> If the ANB is large then as we said this is a class 2 relation:
this can be due to:-prognathic maxilla (large SNA)
- retrognathic mandible (small SNB)
- or BOTH
3
> If the ANB is small then this is a class 3 relation
which can be due to:-retrognathic maxilla (small SNA)
- prognathic mandible (large SNB)
- or BOTH
This can be done, given that the nasion is in its correct stable position!
Sometimes the position of the nasion is variable, and this would affect the value of
ANB and give us inaccurate results.
To compensate for this error we apply EASTMAN CORRECTION. YET, to be able to
apply Eastman correction the angle between SN and Maxillary plane should be
within normal range 5-11˚
keep in mind that we are using this method to compensate for the inaccuracy in the ANB
angle due to the variable position of the nasion. (so we will correct the ANB)
> As we said we first make sure that the SN-MxP angle is within normal range (5-11˚)
> IF SNA is increased: for every degree above the normal range we SUBTRACT 0.5˚
from the ANB angle
IF SNA is decreased: for every degree below the normal range we ADD 0.5˚ to the
ANB angle
FOR EXAMPLE:
if the measured SNA is 89˚, and the measured ANB is 8˚.
When we apply Eastman correction: SNA is 8˚ above the normal range (normal SNA=81˚)
Therefore we are going to subtract 4˚ from the measured ANB.
Corrected ANB= 4˚
(note that before correction, the ANB angle showed that the skeletal relation is class 2,
but after correction the ANB angle is within normal range = skeletal class 1)
this is done by comparing the Maxillary mandibular plane angle MMPA and the Anterior
Lower facial height percentage ALFH% to the normal values.
4
These values will enable us to assess if the lower facial height proportions are increased
or decreased, also will give us an idea about anterior/posterior growth rotations
By assessing the relation between the 1) Incisors and their skeletal base
and 2)between the upper and lower incisors
5
must be in the normal range.
Its mainly a treatment target to get it in normal range, and not used in diagnosis.
What we do here is try to simulate and visualize our upcoming treatment, to see if its
applicable or not before actually doing it. For example, you want to move the incisors to
class 1 relation, you simulate that on a tracing paper to see what type of movement is
required to achieve this relation and whether it's feasible or not. This is done by
comparing the incisal inclination before and after.
Prognosis tracing for removable appliances is only applicable in class 2 division 1 skeletal
malocclusion with increased overjet; in which we are planning to change the incisal
pattern to class 1 by decreasing the overjet. In this case we do prognosis tracing to see if
its APPLICABLE TO USE A REMOVABLE APPLIANCE OR NOT for this case.
The laboratory steps of doing prognosis tracing are mentioned in the manual. (if you
didn't already do it)
If the resultant Interincisal angle, after Simulation or prognosis tracing is >150˚ (not stable)
AND the resultant Upper incisor to maxillary plane Angle is <95˚ (incisors will appear
retroclined- not esthetic)
THEN, treatment using a removable appliance is NOT applicable
6
SO, to be able to use a removable appliance, the final angles after tracing/treatment must
be:
IIA <150˚ to provide a stable relation
and UIMxP >95˚ to provide an esthetic appearance (not to appear retroclined)
You can use: 1- De Coster's line ( from Sella to a point on the middle part of the
anterior cranial base)
2- Sella-nasion line (which is usually stable after a range of 6 years)
3- another stable points at maxilla or mandible