Case Study - STP
Case Study - STP
Case Study - STP
Please review this article for further information on the background factors that resulted in the
development and launch of New Coke.
During this era, where Pepsi were quite aggressive with their marketing programs, including the
Pepsi Challenge taste test advertising and the “choice of a new generation” positioning, Pepsi
segmented the market on a very simplistic basis, using an attitude and loyalty
segmentation approach.
1. Consumers with a positive attitude to the Coke brand and 100% loyal to Coke
2. Consumers with a positive attitude to the Pepsi brand and 100% loyal to Coke
3. Consumers with a positive attitude to both Coke and Pepsi, with loyalty to both brands,
but switching their purchases between these two brands from time to time
It is in this third market segment that the battle for market leadership in the cola market was
always waged, up to the New Coke decision in 1985. This switching segment were responsive to
sales promotions consisting of point-of-purchase displays, discounts, general advertising, as
well as personal factors such as mood, social situation, taste preference, and so on.
Therefore, the combined promotional budgets of Coke and Pepsi – which at the time were in the
vicinity of $350 million per annum (with Coke spending $200 million and Pepsi spending $150
million) – were essentially targeting the 50% of cola drinkers that would switch between the
Coke and Pepsi brands. There was less expenditure, because there was less marketing return on
investment, on focusing on the brand loyal customers, as they were unlikely to switch their
purchase preferences.
However, following the launch of the New Coke product, Pepsi modified their target market
selection that started targeting loyal Coke drinkers (approximately 25% of the market). This is
because there was dissatisfaction among existing Coke drinkers that the “classic” Coca-Cola
product was no longer available in the marketplace.
As a result of this shift in target market selection, Pepsi positioned their product as the main
reason that Coca-Cola replaced their classic Coca-Cola with New Coke. This positioning
change is demonstrated in the following two TV commercials that Pepsi ran at the time. The first
shows a teenage girl who is virtually discussing a breakup scenario and is emotionally upset that
Coca-Cola has changed. This positioning is consistent somewhat with Pepsi’s youth target
market at the time.
However, the second TV commercial shows an older demographic of very traditional and loyal
Coke drinkers. It is tapping in nicely into the dissatisfaction among Coke drinkers. This is
particularly highlighted in a line in the Pepsi TV commercial where Wilbur says “they changed
my Coke”. The key word here is the word “my”– which demonstrates the mood of the time that
Coca-Cola belonged to the consumer market, not to the company. Following this decision, and
the relaunch of “classic” Coca-Cola, Coca-Cola’s management did recognize that they were
caretakers of an American icon.
You can view both of the Pepsi TV commercials at the bottom of this page.
This change in marketing strategy by Pepsi in response to the competitive action by Coke, clearly
highlights the three steps of segmentation – targeting – positioning. By a change in the
segmentation view, and the selection of a new target market, the company is enabled to
construct a modified market positioning, which should have the effect of increasing market
share.
What is positioning?
Positioning is defined as the target market’s perception of the product’s key benefits and
features, relative to the offerings of competitive products.
IMPORTANCE OF POSITIONING
Tagline or slogan?
But please note that it is common to use the terms tagline and slogan interchangeably in
business discussions.
TAGLINE EXAMPLES
*****