Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 34 views

    Reviewer - Serik Khairaliyev, PHD, Associate Professor, Nazarbayev University

    Uploaded by

    Hanxel Zelo
    This document presents a 5-step framework for developing critical thinking skills across elementary, secondary, and tertiary education. The framework includes determining learning objectives focused on higher-order thinking, teaching through questioning to encourage analysis and evaluation, practicing active learning techniques before assessment, reviewing and refining courses based on feedback, and providing targeted feedback to enhance student learning and performance. The document argues that critical thinking is best cultivated early and continuously throughout education, as it takes significant time for students to apply these skills naturally.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Reviewer - Serik Khairaliyev, PHD, Associate Professor, Nazarbayev University

    Uploaded by

    Hanxel Zelo
    34 views6 pages
    This document presents a 5-step framework for developing critical thinking skills across elementary, secondary, and tertiary education. The framework includes determining learning objectives focused on higher-order thinking, teaching through questioning to encourage analysis and evaluation, practicing active learning techniques before assessment, reviewing and refining courses based on feedback, and providing targeted feedback to enhance student learning and performance. The document argues that critical thinking is best cultivated early and continuously throughout education, as it takes significant time for students to apply these skills naturally.

    Original Description:

    soc sc

    Original Title

    zhumabay1 (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document presents a 5-step framework for developing critical thinking skills across elementary, secondary, and tertiary education. The framework includes determining learning objectives focused on higher-order thinking, teaching through questioning to encourage analysis and evaluation, practicing active learning techniques before assessment, reviewing and refining courses based on feedback, and providing targeted feedback to enhance student learning and performance. The document argues that critical thinking is best cultivated early and continuously throughout education, as it takes significant time for students to apply these skills naturally.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    34 views6 pages

    Reviewer - Serik Khairaliyev, PHD, Associate Professor, Nazarbayev University

    Uploaded by

    Hanxel Zelo
    This document presents a 5-step framework for developing critical thinking skills across elementary, secondary, and tertiary education. The framework includes determining learning objectives focused on higher-order thinking, teaching through questioning to encourage analysis and evaluation, practicing active learning techniques before assessment, reviewing and refining courses based on feedback, and providing targeted feedback to enhance student learning and performance. The document argues that critical thinking is best cultivated early and continuously throughout education, as it takes significant time for students to apply these skills naturally.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 6

    A CRITICAL THINKING FRAMEWORK ACROSS THE CURRICULUM

    1
    Desmond Adair, 1Zhumabay Bakenov & 2Martin Jaeger
    1
    School of Engineering, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Republic of
    Kazakhstan
    2
    School of Engineering & ICT, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS7001,
    Australia
    Reviewer - Serik Khairaliyev, PhD, Associate Professor, Nazarbayev University,
    Astana, 010000, Republic of Kazakhstan
    Introduction
    The quality of students’ and engineers thinking, and how they think, determines
    the quality of what they design, produce or make. Critical thinking, it is claimed, in
    engineering education occurs today in a focused context, directed toward fulfilling
    one of several accreditation body learning outcomes [1]. Of course the teaching of
    critical thinking should be more than this, as critical thinking entails much more
    than the conventional practices in engineering, by considering and articulating
    assumptions in problem solving, selecting appropriate hypotheses and methods for
    experimentation, and, structuring open-ended design problems. Just as found in
    many professions, engineers now need, more than ever, strong critical thinking
    skills to deal with a world of increasingly rapid change and complexity.
    The argument in this paper is that students coming to tertiary-level education
    without properly cultivated critical thinking skills are at a great disadvantage. This
    is for two main reasons; first critical thinking cannot be taught in the traditional
    conventional manner over a short time, and secondly it takes a long time for
    students to start using critical thinking in a clear and useful manner. Therefore in
    elementary and secondary schools, critical thinking should be an integral part of
    the curriculum, and, tasks to promote and assess critical thinking should be
    implemented into the normal coursework. In this paper a five-step framework to
    build critical thinking skills teaching around is developed.
    Initial thoughts on critical thinking
    Prior to university programmes, i.e., in the school sector: Passive learning is still
    often practiced at secondary-level, and frequently active learning or critical
    thinking is not encouraged. Reasons for this adherence are many, not least state
    examination pressures. Those new to the teaching profession often adopt this
    model because it is both teacher-centered and comes with a strong academic
    tradition. Unfortunately it is very difficult to increase a student’s critical thinking
    skills with the passive format. Topics are often discussed sequentially rather than
    critically, and students tend to memorize the material. The student is placed in a
    passive rather than an active role, since the teacher does most of the talking, and
    importantly most of the questioning, and hence most of the thinking [2]. Active
    learning can make a course more enjoyable for both the teacher and the student
    and, very importantly, it can make the student think critically. For this to happen,
    educators must give up the belief that students cannot learn a subject unless the
    teacher covers it. While it is useful for students to gain some exposure to the
    material through pre-class readings and overview introductions, students really do
    not understand it until they actively do something with it and reflect on the
    meaning of what they are doing.
    What is critical thinking?
    Different definitions of the term ‘critical thinking’ abound in the literature [3-6]
    and this variability may in fact impede progress on all fronts [7]. Most of the
    definitions share some basic features and probably address some aspect of critical
    thinking [8]. In the face of so many definitions, some authors go for a ‘consensus
    definition’ and others go for one that meets their needs and consistency in applying
    it [9]. Important to critical thinking is how to assess it. With this in mind, a
    definition for critical thinking, and the working one for this paper, based on
    Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives [10] was chosen. Breaking down
    academic skills in this way and to some extent identifying critical thinking
    provides a reasonable breakdown for designing specific assessment designs.
    Five-step model applied at the secondary level
    To provide the greatest benefits to students, teachers should provide as many
    opportunities as possible for students to engage in the upper levels of Bloom’s
    taxonomy where critical thinking takes place. Most teachers do indeed believe that
    developing critical thinking in their students is of great importance, few have an
    idea of what exactly it is, or how it should be taught and importantly how it should
    be assessed [11]. To help with this a five-step model is now discussed which can
    be implemented in most teaching environments whether for elementary, secondary
    or tertiary education to help students gain critical thinking skills. The outline of the
    model is shown on Fig. 1
    Step 1. Determine the learning objectives
    By considering the placement of the course in a programme of study, and its role in
    providing a base of knowledge and skills to be built on by other courses, a teacher
    should first identify the key learning objectives that define what behaviours
    students should exhibit when they finish the course. To make critical thinking
    happen, these learning objectives , as well as the activities and assessments, must
    include those tied to the higher levels of Bloom’s (1956) taxonomy. A well-written
    objective should include a behavior that is appropriate for the chosen level of
    taxonomy. Bloom’s levels are: Knowledge; Comprehension; Application;
    Analysis; Synthesis; Evaluation.

    Fig.1 Five-step model to move students towards critical thinking.


    Step 2. Teach through questioning
    Questioning is a vital part of the teaching and learning process. It allows the
    teacher to establish what is already known and then to extend beyond that to
    develop new ideas and understandings. Questions can also be used to stimulate
    interaction between teacher and learner and to challenge the learner to defend his
    or her position (i.e. to think critically). Clasen and Bonk [12] posited that although
    there are many strategies that can impact student thinking, it is teacher questions
    that have the greatest impact. Convergent questions apply to Bloom’s lower levels
    of Knowledge, Comprehension, and Application. Divergent questions apply to
    Bloom’s higher levels of Analysis, Synthesis and Evaluation, are generally open-
    ended and foster student-centered discussion, thereby encouraging critical
    thinking. To most effectively encourage student participation, teachers must
    become highly skilled questioners. This is reasonably difficult and takes
    commitment.
    Step 3. Practice before you assess
    In the past decade or so, a major shift has taken place in education; that is toward
    active learning. Teachers that have used this approach generally find that the
    students learn more and that the courses are more enjoyable. Fink [13] indicated
    that the concept of active learning supports research which shows that students
    learn more and retain knowledge longer if they acquire it in an active rather than a
    passive manner. Activities should be chosen from each of the following three
    components of active learning, Information and Ideas, Experience and Reflective
    dialog. Information and Ideas include primary and secondary sources assessed in
    class, outside class or online. Experience includes doing, observing and
    simulations. Reflective dialog includes papers, portfolios and journaling.
    Step 4. Review, refine and improve
    Teachers should strive to continually refine their courses to make sure that their
    instructional techniques are in fact helping students develop critical thinking skills.
    Teachers should monitor the classroom activities very closely. Student
    participation should be tracked as well as a record of main activities and how well
    they worked. Student feedback can also be very useful to improving courses.
    Angelo and Cross [14] have provided methods for collecting key information
    related to student learning and response to instructional techniques.
    Step 5. Provide feedback and assessment of learning
    Teacher feedback, like assessment, compares criteria and standards to student
    performance in an effort to evaluate the quality of work. The purpose of feedback
    is to enhance the quality of student learning and performance, rather than to grade
    the performance, and importantly it has the potential to help students learn how to
    assess their own performance in future. Feedback allows the students and teacher
    to engage in a dialogue about what distinguishes successful performance from
    unsuccessful performance as they discuss criteria and standards. When providing
    feedback, teachers should be both thoughtful and purposeful. According to
    Wlodkowski and Ginsberg [15] teachers should provide feedback that is
    informational rather than controlling, based on agreed-upon standards, specific and
    constructive, quantitative, prompt, frequent, positive, personal and differential.
    Conclusions
    The basic message intended in this paper is that critical thing should start as early
    as possible in a student’s learning and extend all the way through the education
    process. Although universities do try to implement critical thinking for their
    students or even try remedial strategies, it is the contention here that it takes a long
    time before a student can apply critical thing skills naturally – more time that they
    spend at university. Therefore, at the elementary and secondary levels of education
    teachers should give serious and thoughtful consideration to adjust their
    instructional methods and course delivery to include critical thinking skills in
    abundance.
    References
    [1] Claris, L. & Riley, D. (2013) Situation critical: Critical theory and critical
    thinking in engineering education. IEE Women in Engineering, June, 32-36.
    [2] Maiorana, V. (1991) The road from rote to critical thinking. Community
    Review,11, 53 - 64.
    [3] Brookfield, S. D. (2012) Teaching for critical thinking: Tools and techniques
    to help students question their assumptions. Jossey-Bass, San Franscisco, CA.
    [4] Facione, P. A. (2015) Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight
    Assessment Update.
    [5] O’Shea, J., Baillie, C. & Armstrong, R. (2012) Developing critical thinking
    skills and an understanding of social justice in engineering education. AAEE 2012
    Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 3rd-5th December.
    [6] Aretz, A. J., Bolen, M. T. & Devereux, K. E. (1997) Critical thinking
    assessment of college students. J. of College Reading and Learning, 28, 12-23.
    [7] Resnick, L. B. (1987) Education and learning to think. National Academy
    Press, Washington (DC).
    [8] Potts, B. (1994) Strategies for teaching critical thinking in education. ERIC
    Clearinghouse, Report No. ED385606, Washington (DC).
    [9] Bissell, A. N. & Lemons, P. R. (2006) A new method for assessing critical
    thinking in the classroom. BioScience, 56(1), 66-72.
    [10] Bloom, B. S. ed. (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives: The
    classification of educational goals. New York.
    [11] Paul, R. W., Elder, L. & Bartell, T. (1997) California teacher preparation for
    instruction in critical thinking: Research findings and policy recommendations.
    Foundations for Critical Thinking, Santa Rosa, CA.
    [12] Clasen, D. R. & Bonk, C. (1990) Teachers tackle thinking. Madison, WI:
    Madison Education Extension Program.
    [13] Fink, L. D. (2003) A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant
    learning, retrieved from http://www.bu.edu/sph/files/2011/06/selfdirected1.pdf.
    [14] Angelo, T. A. & Cross, P. K. (1993) Classroom assessment techniques. (2nd
    ed.), San Franscisco, Jossey-Bass.
    [15] Wlodkowski, R. & Ginsberg, M. (1995) Diversity and motivation. San
    Franscisco, Jossey-Bass.
    Аңдатпа
    Сын тұрғысынан ойлау қабілетін қысқа уақыт ішінде немесе дәстүрлі
    әдістермен қалыптастыру мүмкін емес. Оқушылар университет
    табалдырығын аттамай тұрып,сын тұрғысынан ойлануды үйрену қажет. Бұл
    мақалада мектеп оқушыларына сын тұрғысынан ойлануды тиімді жолдарын
    үйрететін бес сатылы педагогикалық база ұсынылады.

    Аннотация
    Критическое мышление является умением развития, которое не легко
    обучить в течении короткого времени, либо только традиционными
    методами. Школьникам необходимо учиться думать критически до
    поступления в университет. В этой статье предлагается пятиступенчатая
    основа для критического мышления, которая может быть широко
    использована в большинстве школ для эффективного обучения навыков
    критического мышления.

    Abstract
    Critical thinking is a developmental skill which cannot be taught simply by
    traditional methods, or over a short time. Therefore it is necessary for students to
    start thinking critically before they come to university. This paper develops a five-
    step framework for critical thinking, which can be used in most school teaching
    settings to effectively give students some critical thinking skills.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy