How Languages Are Learned
How Languages Are Learned
How Languages Are Learned
Title
How Languages are Learned
Permalink
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/95n3d84b
Journal
Issues in Applied Linguistics, 15(2)
ISSN
1050-4273
Author
So, Youngsoon
Publication Date
2007
Peer reviewed
Reviewed by Youngsoon So
8QLYHUVLW\RI&DOLIRUQLD/RV$QJHOHV
,VVXHVLQ$SSOLHG/LQJXLVWLFV ,661
5HJHQWVRIWKH8QLYHUVLW\RI&DOLIRUQLD 9RO1R
So
&KDSWHUWKHFKDUDFWHULVWLFVRIVHFRQGODQJXDJHOHDUQHUV·GHYHORSLQJODQJXDJH
&KDSWHUDQGWKHHIIHFWs of language learning contexts on SLA (Chapter 6).
Even though all four chapters are important in understanding SLA as a quite intri-
cate process, Chapter 2 is of particular importance in that it provides a foundation
for better understanding different but related aspects of SLA, which become the
topics of the next three chapters&KDSWHUVAdditionally, the updates from
WKHSUHYLRXVHGLWLRQ/LJKWERZQ 6SDGDDUHSDUWLFXODUO\QRWHZRUWK\LQ
Chapter 2 including more useful discussion on psychological and sociocultural
perspectives of SLA.
In discussing the four perspectives – the behaviorist, innatist, psychological,
and sociocultural perspectives – proposed to explain SLA, the authors highlight
WKDW6/$LVDFRPSOH[SKHQRPHQRQGLIÀFXOWWRDFFRXQWIRUE\DVLQJOHSHUVSHFWLYH
The complexity of SLA explains why even researchers sharing a general perspec-
tive have differing opinions. That is, it is understandable for researchers to have
proposed different perspectives to explain SLA, depending on which aspect(s)
they believe most important to successful language learning. In addition, the
complex nature of SLA is also related to why SLA studies have found mixed or
inconclusive results about the effects of individual learner variables on SLA, the
topic of the next chapter.
,Q&KDSWHU´,QGLYLGXDOGLIIHUHQFHVLQVHFRQGODQJXDJHOHDUQLQJµWKHDX-
thors summarize the mixed results of research focusing on the effects of learner
variables such as personality. The interaction among individual variables and the
interaction between individual and contextual variables is suggested as an explana-
tion for the inconclusive results. In other words, a variable’s interaction with other
FRQWH[WXDODQGLQGLYLGXDOYDULDEOHVPDNHVLWYHU\GLIÀFXOWRUXQUHDOLVWLFWRVHSDUDWH
out its ‘independent’ effect on SLA. At this point, a reader may question whether
it is worthwhile to strive for ‘one’ general SLA theory, despite variable effects of
LQGLYLGXDOYDULDEOHVLQGLIIHUHQWFRQWH[WV7KHQH[WFKDSWHU&KDSWHUDGGUHVVHV
such skepticism by stressing the ‘commonality’ of SLA processes.
Reviewing studies on the development of second language knowledge and
the ability to use the knowledge, the authors underscore that learner language has
been found to develop following a similar sequence, regardless of native language
or learning context, especially at the earlier stage of development. This common
pattern, although surprising considering the numerous variables discussed in
&KDSWHUVDQGPLJKWEHWKHPDLQLPSHWXVIRU6/$UHVHDUFKHUVWRNHHSVHDUFK-
ing for one satisfactory SLA theory. I would like to point out, however, that this
common pattern is primarily reported in studies focusing on morpho-syntax. To
ÀOOWKLVUHVHDUFKJDSUHVHDUFKHUVKDYHVWDUWHGORRNLQJDWUHODWLYHO\OHVVUHVHDUFKHG
DUHDV7KLVLPSRUWDQWVKLIWLQWKHÀHOGLVUHÁHFWHGLQWKHQHZHGLWLRQRIHow Lan-
guages are Learned which has added a section on the development of vocabulary,
pragmatics, and phonology.
&KDSWHU DGGUHVVHV WKH LVVXH RI OHDUQLQJ FRQWH[W IRFXVLQJ ÀUVW RQ WKH
similarities and differences between learning in natural and instructional settings,
Book Review
and then on the research methods used to study language classrooms. Although
noting that the term ‘instructional setting’ is problematic because it can conceal non-
negligible differences across classrooms, as argued by Watson-Gegeo and Nielson
WKHDXWKRUVQHYHUWKHOHVVDGRSWWKHWHUP7KH\VXJJHVWWKDWLQYHVWLJDWLQJWKH
differences across classrooms is needed to avoid a misleadingly simplistic interpre-
tation of the term, and they note two ways in which a classroom can be examined: by
using an observation scheme or by ethnographic observation. The main difference
between the two approaches is whether an observer starts a study with or without
a ‘predetermined’ set of observation points. Whichever method is chosen to study
the language classroom, the bottom line is the assumption that instruction plays a
‘certain’ role in SLA, which naturally leads to the last part of the book.
In the last part of the book, Chapter 6, the authors present six second language
teaching methods/approaches along with empirical studies researching the effec-
tiveness of each method. The reader is guided to critically evaluate the strengths
and weaknesses of each teaching method by following the three steps the authors
take in their discussion: an explanation of the characteristics of a teaching method,
presentation of selected empirical studies examining its effectiveness, and inter-
pretation of these studies. Through these three steps, a reader can develop critical
eyes for reading literature in SLA and evaluate its implications for her own teaching
context. In short, this chapter succeeds in helping the reader build an evaluative
position in determining the applicability/adaptability of each teaching method to
her own teaching and therefore how likely it would be for her and her students to
gain outcomes similar to those reported in the study.
One strength of this book is its focus on instructed SLA, as seen in the al-
location of space to classroom language teaching (Chapters 5 and 6). Given that
language teachers will be the major audience of the book and many SLA contexts
LQYROYHVRPHIRUPRILQVWUXFWLRQLWLVDSSURSULDWHWKDWWKLVUHVRXUFHVXIÀFLHQWO\
emphasize instruction. A weakness, however, is the lack of qualitative studies used
to examine the effectiveness of teaching methods in Chapter 6. As the authors point
RXWSWKHLUGLVFXVVLRQLVPDLQO\IRFXVHGRQH[SHULPHQWDOVWXGLHVKRZHYHU
WKHUHDUHPDQ\FRPSOH[LWLHVLQ6/$DVVKRZQLQ&KDSWHUVDQGWKDWDUHGLI-
ÀFXOWWRWKRURXJKO\LQYHVWLJDWHE\H[SHULPHQWDODSSURDFKHVDORQH7KHUHIRUHD
more balanced discussion of experimental/quantitative and qualitative studies
ZRXOGEHEHQHÀFLDO
Overall, I found this book useful for readers with different purposes and
various levels of teaching experience and background knowledge in SLA. For
readers with relatively little teaching experience and background, it is a solid in-
troduction to SLA theories and teaching methods. For more experienced teachers
and researchers, this book contains valuable updates of the current studies and
discussions in SLA. It may also serve as a useful reminder about which areas are
being currently debated and are therefore in need of further research. To this end,
´6RXUFHVDQGVXJJHVWLRQVIRUIXUWKHUUHDGLQJµSURYLGHGDWWKHHQGRIHDFKFKDSWHU
will be a good supplement.
So
REFERENCES