Coaching Philosophy
Coaching Philosophy
Coaching Philosophy
PHILOSOPHY
Your success as a coach will depend more on your
coaching philosophy than on any other factor.
By philosophy is meant the beliefs or principles
that guide the actions you take.
It is the foundation on which all your knowledge about
sports science, sports management, and techniques and
tactics will be built.
Your coaching philosophy will determine how wisely
you use this knowledge.
COACHING OBJECTIVES
To have a winning team
To help young people have fun
To help young people develop . . .
– physically, by learning sports skills, improving physical
conditioning, developing good health habits, and avoiding
injuries;
– psychologically, by learning to control their emotions and
developing self-worth;
– socially, by learning cooperation in a competitive context and
appropriate standards of behavior (sportsmanship).
SPORTSMANSHIP
STRIVING
TO WIN
Athletes First, Winning Second
• Command Style
• Submissive Style
• Cooperative Style
Command Style
• The coach makes all the decisions. The role of
the athlete is to respond to the coach’s
command.
• Assumes that the coach has the knowledge and
experience, it is his or her job to tell the athlete
what to do. The athlete’s role is to listen, to
absorb and to comply.
Advantages of Command Style
• Appears effective because teams need
organization.
• Team members don’t have to vote on every
decision that has to be made.
• This style is effective if winning is the primary
objective.
Disadvantages of Command Style
• Might stifle the athlete’s motivation because they play
for the praise of the coach or to avoid his wrath.
• Prevents the athletes from fully enjoying the sport.
• The accomplishments are the coach’s, not the
athletes’.
• Treats the athletes as robots or slaves, not as thinking
human beings.
• The style alienates all but the highly gifted athletes and
diminishes the coach’s own satisfaction in relating to
athletes.
• Not compatible with the objective of “Athletes First,
Winning Second.”
Submissive Style