Scribd
Upload
790 views8 pages

Capex VS Opex CHiller - 27-05-2020 Trane

The document compares the capex and opex of air cooled and water cooled chillers. The air cooled chiller has higher capital and operating costs than the water cooled chiller. Specifically, the operating cost for 10 years of the air cooled chiller is 43.95 million INR compared to 34.4 million INR for the water cooled chiller. Additionally, the air cooled chiller is not feasible for indoor applications as it requires open space for air circulation.

Uploaded by

er_bhavin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
790 views8 pages

Capex VS Opex CHiller - 27-05-2020 Trane

The document compares the capex and opex of air cooled and water cooled chillers. The air cooled chiller has higher capital and operating costs than the water cooled chiller. Specifically, the operating cost for 10 years of the air cooled chiller is 43.95 million INR compared to 34.4 million INR for the water cooled chiller. Additionally, the air cooled chiller is not feasible for indoor applications as it requires open space for air circulation.

Uploaded by

er_bhavin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Capex Vs Opex compariosn for Chiller

Sr No Description Unit
1 Chilled water generation capacity TR
2 Running Hours Hr
3 no of days per year Nos
4 No of years Nos
5 Electrical power unit cost-Rs/KWH Rs
6 No of machine Nos
7 Type of Air compressor
8 Type of control
9 Chilled water generation capacity TR
10 Cooling water flow required M3/Hr
11 Weight Kgs
12 Foot print dimensions mmXmmXmm
13 Model number
14 Capacity as per model offered TR
15 Specific power consumption IKW/TR
Cooling tower fan consumption
16 kw
considering cooling water flowrate

Cooling water pump power consumption


17 kw
considering cooling water flow rate

Chiller power consumption@Full Load&


16 kw
45 degree temperature
Cooling fan Power consumption @Full
17 kw
Load& 45 degree temperature
18 Driver power rating for Chiller kw
19 Driver power rating for cooling fan kw
Total input power for entire unit
20 considering @Full Load& 45 degree kw
temperature
Power cost for 10 years running @Full
21 INR
Load& 45 degree temperature
Cost considering Consumable /
22 replacement required for 10 years INR
operation
Cost considering overhauling for rotating
23 INR
parts considering 10 years operation

24 Capital Cost INR


25 DIfference between capital cost INR

26 Payback period Years

27 Location
28 Available foot print mmXmmXmm

Feasibility for offered model considering


29
free space requirement around the unit
x compariosn for Chiller
Vendor data
100
24
365
10
8.15
1
Air Cooled Water Cooled
With VFD With VFD
100 100
NA 70.97
4646 kg 2365kg
6300x2245x2501 3028x890x1690
CRTAG125PSE CRTWS105
109Tr 100.4TR
1.452 0.704
To be taken from Cooling
NA
tower manufacturer

to be taken from Pump


NA
Supplier

1.452 0.704

12.32 NA

145.98kW 69.2kW
12.32kW NA

158.3KW 69.20 kW

113016702 49404648

800000 630000
1400000 700000

4395000 3440000
955000

Since operating & capital Cost of Air cooled Chiller are on higher
side there is no scope of ROI calculation & payback period.

Indoor
8500Width X 4400Length X 5000Height

Air cooled are not feasible for


indoor application.Air Cooled
chiller requires open atmosphere Yes. Its feasible
space for proper air ciculation &
better heat exchange
Capex Vs Opex compariosn for Chiller
Sr No Description Unit
1 Chilled water generation capacity TR
2 Running Hours Hr
3 no of days per year Nos
4 No of years Nos
5 Electrical power unit cost-Rs/KWH Rs
6 No of machine Nos
7 Type of Air compressor
8 Type of control
9 Chilled water generation capacity TR
10 Cooling water flow required M3/Hr
11 Weight Kgs
12 Foot print dimensions mmXmmXmm
13 Model number
14 Capacity as per model offered TR
15 Specific power consumption IKW/TR
Cooling tower fan consumption
16 kw
considering cooling water flowrate

Cooling water pump power consumption


17 kw
considering cooling water flow rate

Chiller power consumption@Full Load&


16 kw
45 degree temperature
Cooling fan Power consumption @Full
17 kw
Load& 45 degree temperature
18 Driver power rating for Chiller kw
19 Driver power rating for cooling fan kw
Total input power for entire unit
20 considering @Full Load& 45 degree kw
temperature
Power cost for 10 years running @Full
21 INR
Load& 45 degree temperature
Cost considering Consumable /
22 replacement required for 10 years INR
operation
Cost considering overhauling for rotating
23 INR
parts considering 10 years operation

24 Capital Cost INR


25 DIfference between capital cost INR

26 Payback period Years

27 Location
28 Available foot print mmXmmXmm

Feasibility for offered model considering


29
free space requirement around the unit
x compariosn for Chiller
Vendor data
100
24
365
10
8.15
1
Air Cooled Water Cooled
With VFD With VFD
100 100
NA 70.97
4646 kg 2365kg
6300x2245x2501 3028x890x1690
CRTAG125PSE CRTWS105
109Tr 100.4TR
1.452 0.704
To be taken from Cooling
NA
tower manufacturer

to be taken from Pump


NA
Supplier

1.452 0.704

12.32 NA

145.98kW 69.2kW
12.32kW NA

158.3KW 69.20 kW

113016702 49404648

800000 630000
1400000 700000

4395000 3440000
955000

Since operating & capital Cost of Air cooled Chiller are on higher
side there is no scope of ROI calculation & payback period.

Indoor
8500Width X 4400Length X 5000Height

Air cooled are not feasible for


indoor application.Air Cooled
chiller requires open atmosphere Yes. Its feasible
space for proper air ciculation &
better heat exchange

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy