y far, the most familiar individual of ancient Mesopotamian society was a man

named Gilgamesh. According to historical sources, Gilgamesh was the fifth

king of the city of Uruk. He ruled about 2750 B.C. E., and he led his community
in its conflicts with Kish, a nearby city that was the principal rival of Uruk.
Gilgamesh was a figure of Mesopotamian mythology and folklore as well as his-
tory. He was the subject of numerous poems and legends, and Mesopotamian bards
made him the central figure in a cycle of stories known collectively as the Epic of
Gi/gamesh. As a figure of legend, Gilgamesh became the greatest hero figure of
ancient Mesopotamia. According to the stories, the gods granted Gilgamesh a per-
fect body and endowed him with superhuman strength and courage. The legends
declare that he constructed the massive city walls of Uruk as well as several of the
city's magnificent temples to Mesopotamian deities.
The stories that make up the Epic of Gilgamesh recount the adventures of this
hero and his cherished friend Enkidu as they sought fame. They killed an evil mon-
ster, rescued Uruk from a ravaging bull, and matched wits with the gods. In spite of
their heroic deeds, Enkidu offended the gods and fell under a sentence of death.
His loss profoundly affected Gilgamesh, who sought The Epic of Gilgamesh
for some means to cheat death and gain eternal www.mhhe.com/
bentleybrief2e
life. He eventually found a magical plant that had
the power to confer immortality, but a serpent stole the plant and carried it away,
forcing Gilgamesh to recognize that death is the ultimate fate of all human beings.
Thus, while focusing on the activities of Gilgamesh and Enkidu, the stories explored
themes of friendship, loyalty, ambition, fear of death, and longing for immortality.
In doing so they reflected the interests and concerns of the complex, urban-based
society that had recently emerged in Mesopotamia.
Yet such interests and concerns had their foundation deep in the human past.
By the time Mesopotamian society emerged, our own species of human, Homo
sapiens, had existed for about two hundred thousand years. These humans, who
themselves descended from earlier hominids, were already accomplished problem
solvers and thinkers long before urban societies developed. In fact, early human
communities were responsible for laying the social, economic, and cultural founda-
tions on which their descendants built increasingly complex
societies-especially through the domestication of plants and
( A wall relief animals and by establishing agricultural economies.
from an Assyrian Indeed, productive agricultural economies supported the
palace of the
eighth century B.c.E. development of the first known complex societies during the
depicts Gilgamesh
_!!La_herqfc].i.gyg Uruk (00-rook)
~AW-mih-nihd)
holding a lion.
-
 fourth millennium B.C.E. Such societies, in which
sizable numbers of people lived in cities and
extended their political, social, economic, and
4 million-1 million years ago Era of first hominids, cultural influence over large reg ions, emerged
Australopithecus first in southwest Asia, particularly in Mesopota-
2.5 million-200,000 years ago Era of Homo erectus mia. As these complex societies developed and
200,000 years ago Early evolution of Homo sapiens grew, people found that they needed to resolve
40,000 years ago First appearance of Homo sapiens disputes that inevitably arose as individual and
sapiens group interests conflicted. In Mesopotamia,
10,000-8000 B.C.E. Early experimentation with settled agricultural peoples in search of order
agriculture
recognized political authorities and built states.
4000-3500 B.C.E. Appearance of cities in southwest
The establishment of states in turn encouraged
Asia
the creation of empires, as some states sought
3200-2350 B.C.E. Era of Sumerian dominance~
in Mesopotamia to extend their power by imposing their rule on
neighboring lands.
3000 B.C.E.-1000 C.E. Era of Indo-European migrations
Apart from stimulating the establishment
2350-1600 B.C.E. Era of Babylonian dominance
in Mesopotamia of states, urban society in Mesopotamia also

2334-2315 B.C.E. Reign of Sargon of Akkad promoted the emergence of social classes,
thus giving rise to increasingly complex social
1792-1750 B.C.E. Reign of Hammurabi
and economic structures . Cities fostered special-
1450-1200 B.C.E. Era of Hittite dominance
in Anatolia ized labor, and the efficient production of high-

1000-612 B.C.E. Era of Assyrian dominance quality goods in turn stimulated trade . Further-
in Mesopotamia more, early Mesopotamia developed distinctive
1000-970 B.C.E. Reign of Israelite king David cultural traditions as Mesopotamians invented
970-930 B.C.E. Reign of Israelite king Solomon a system of writing and supported organized

722 B.C.E. Assyrian conquest of the kingdom religions.

of Israel Mesopotamian and other peoples regularly
605-562 B.C.E. Reign of Nebuchadnezzar interacted with one another, which helped fur-
600-550 B.C.E. New Babylonian empire ther the geographic reach of Mesopotamian

586 B.C.E. New Babylonian conquest of society. Some Indo-European peoples also had
the kingdom of Judah direct dealings with their Mesopotamian con-
temporaries, with effects crucial for both Indo-
European and Mesopotamian societies . Other
Indo-European peoples never heard of Mesopotamia, but they employed Mesopotamian inventions
such as wheels and metallurgy when undertaking extensive migrations that profoundly influenced his-
torical development throughout much of Eurasia from western Europe to India and beyond. Even in
the earliest days of city life, the world was the site of frequent and intense interaction between peoples
of different societies .

THE TRANSITION
TO AGRICULTURE
Between twelve and six thousand years ago, humans crossed a critical threshold of immense significance
for the species, and the earth more generally, when they began to domesticate plants and animals. That
transition to agriculture led to a population explosion, which enabled human communities to establish
themselves in far greater numbers around the world than ever before. Agriculture also led to new forms
of social organization, which ultimately resulted in the birth of the world's first urban centers.

6 PART I THE EARLY COMPLE X SOCIETIES, 3500 TO 500 s . c . E

The Paleolithic Era
H D MD sAPIENs Homo sapiens ("consciously thinking human")-the direct Spread of the earliest
ancestor of our own subspecies, Homo sapiens sapiens-evolved about two hundred thou- humans
www.mhhe.corn/
sand years ago from a hominid ancestry that originated in east Africa about four to five bentleybrief2e
million years ago. Homo sapiens possessed larger brains and greater intelligence than earlier
hominids-a feature that enabled them to adapt to widely varying environmental condi-
tions and to displace earlier hominid species. More than one hundred thousand years ago,
communities of Homo sapiens began to spread throughout the temperate lands of the east-
ern hemisphere. Using their intelligence to make warm clothes and shelters, Homo sapiens
soon established communities in progressively colder regions. Then, between sixty and
fifteen thousand years ago, Homo sapiens took advantage of land bridges exposed by low-
ered sea levels and spread to Indonesia, New Guinea, Australia, and, finally, the Americas.
Thus by about fifteen thousand years ago, communities of Homo sapiens had appeared in
almost every habitable region of the world.
For most of human existence-indeed, from the evolution of the first hominids until
about twelve thousand years ago-our ancestors foraged for their food. In other words,
they hunted wild animals or gathered edible products of naturally growing plants. That
reliance on foraging characterized what historians and archaeologists call the paleolithic
era, or the "old stone age."
The conditions of foraging economies decisively influenced all dimensions of the hu-
man experience during the paleolithic era. For instance, because of constant mobility in
the search for food, a foraging economy virtually prohibits individuals from accumulating
private property and basing social distinctions on wealth. In the absence of accumulated
wealth, hunters and gatherers of paleolithic times probably lived a relatively egalitarian ex-
istence. Some scholars believe that this relative social equality also extended to relations be-
tween the sexes, because all members of a paleolithic group made important contributions
to the survival of the community. Although meat from the hunt (provided by men) was
the most highly prized item in the paleolithic diet, plant foods (provided by women) were
essential to survival and sustained communities when the hunt did not succeed. Because of
the thorough interdependence of the sexes from the viewpoint of food production, paleo-
lithic society probably did not encourage the domination of one sex by the other.

The Neolithic Era

Between twelve and six thousand years ago, human communities in a variety of loca-
tions underwent profound economic, social, and political changes when they began to
experiment with the domestication of plants and animals. Scientists refer to this period as
the neolithic era, or "new stone age," because of the polished stone tools associated with
peoples who relied on cultivation for subsistence.
Neolithic peoples sought to ensure themselves of more regular food supplies by en-
couraging the growth of edible crops and bringing wild animals into dependence on hu-
man keepers. Many scholars believe that women most likely began the systematic care of
plants. As the principal gatherers in foraging communities, women in neolithic societies
probably began to nurture plants instead of simply collecting available foods in the wild.
Meanwhile, instead of just stalking game with the intention of killing it for meat, neo-
lithic men began to capture animals and domesticate them by providing for their needs
and supervising their breeding. Over a period of decades and centuries, these practices
gradually led to the formation of agricultural economies.

Homo sapiens (HOH-moh SAY-pyans)

Homo sapiens sapiens (HOH-moh SAY-pyans SAY-pyans)
paleolithic (pey-lee-oh-LITH-ik)
neolithic (nee-uh-LITH-ik)

CHAPTER I THE FOUNDATIONS OF COMPLEX SOCIETIES 7

 T H E EARLY S PRE A D 0 F A G R I C U L T U R E The transition to agri-
culture-including both the cultivation of crops and the domestication of animals-
emerged independently in several parts of the world. The earliest evidence of agricultural
activity discovered so far dates to the era after 9000 B.C.E. in southwest Asia (modern-day
Iraq, Syria, and Turkey). Between 9000 and 7000 B.C.E., agriculture also emerged among
African peoples inhabiting the southeastern margin of the Sahara desert (modern-day Su-
dan), and then among the peoples of sub-Saharan west Mrica (in the vicinity of modern
Nigeria) between 8000 and 6000 B.C. E. In east Asia, residents of the Yangzi River valley
began to cultivate crops as early as 6500 B.C.E. , and their neighbors to the north in the
Yellow River valley did the same after 5500 B.C.E. In southeast Asia the cultivation of
crops dates from an indeterminate but very early time, probably 3000 B.C.E. or earlier. In
the western hemisphere, inhabitants of Mesoamerica (central Mexico) cultivated plants as
early as 4000 B.C.E ., and residents of the central Andean region of South America (mod-
ern Peru) followed suit after 3000 B.C.E. It is also possible that the Amazon River valley
was yet another site of independently invented agriculture.
Once established, agriculture spread rapidly. As a result, foods originally cultivated
in only one region also spread widely, as merchants, migrants, or other travelers carried
knowledge of these foods to agricultural lands that previously had relied on different
crops. However, agriculture did not spread rapidly because it was easier than foraging.
On the contrary, agriculture involved long hours of hard physical labor-clearing land,
preparing fields, planting seeds, pulling weeds, and harvesting crops-and thus probably
required more work than paleolithic foraging. Yet agriculture had its own appeal in that
it made possible the production of abundant food supplies, which in turn allowed human
populations to grow to unprecedented levels. For example, historians estimate that before
agriculture, about 10,000 B.C.E., the earth's human population was about four million.
By 500 B.C.E., after agriculture had spread to most world regions, the human population
had risen to about one hundred million.

T H E DE V E L 0 PM EN T 0 F S 0 C I A L D I S T I N C T I 0 N S Such rapidly
increasing populations encouraged neolithic peoples to adopt new forms of social orga-
nization. Because they devoted their time to cultivation rather than to foraging, neolithic
peoples did not continue the migratory life of their paleolithic predecessors but, rather,
settled near their fields in permanent villages. Most people in neolithic villages cultivated
crops or kept animals, and many even continued to hunt and forage for wild plants. But
a surplus of food enabled some individuals to concentrate their time and talents on en-
terprises that had nothing to do with the production of food, especially pottery making,
metallurgy, and textile production. Moreover, the concentration of people into perma-
nent settlements and the increasing specialization of labor provided the first opportunity
for individuals to accumulate considerable wealth. The institutionalization of privately
owned landed property-which occurred at an uncertain date after the introduction of
agriculture-enhanced the significance of accumulated wealth. Because land was (and
remains) the ultimate source of wealth in any agricultural society, ownership of land
carried enormous economic power. When especially successful individuals managed to
consolidate wealth in their families' hands and kept it there for several generations, clearly
defined social classes emerged.

~;=AT A L H 0 Y 0 K Within four thousand years of its introduction, agriculture had

dramatically transformed the face of the earth. Human beings multiplied prodigiously,
congregated in densely populated quarters, placed the surrounding lands under cultiva-
tion, and domesticated several species of animals. Besides altering the physical appearance
of the earth, agriculture transformed the lives of human beings. Even a modest neolithic
village dwarfed a paleolithic band of a few dozen hunters and gatherers. In larger villages
and towns, with their populations of several thousand people, their specialized labor, and

<;:atal Hiiyiik (chat-1-hoo-yook)

8 PART I THE EARLY COMPLEX S OCIETIES, 3500 TO 500 s c E

their craft industries, social relationships became more complex than would have been
conceivable during paleolithic times.
Excavations carried out at <;:atal Hiiyiik, one of the best-known neolithic settlements,
have helped confirm that view. Located in south-central Anatolia (modern Turkey), <;:atal
Hiiyiik grew from a small village to a bustling town of five thousand inhabitants between
its settlement in 7250 B.C.E. and its abandonment in 5400 B.C.E. Archaeological evidence
indicates that because the site was close to large obsidian deposits, <;:atal Hiiyiik became a
center for production and trade in obsidian tools. The wealth generated from such trade
in turn allowed increasing specialization of labor, so that residents eventually manufac-
tured and traded pots, textiles, leather, beads, and jewelry at the site. Gradually, dense
populations, specialized labor, and complex social relations such as those that developed
at <;:atal Hiiyiik gave rise to an altogether new form of social organization-the city.

THE QUEST FOR ORDER

The earliest known cities grew out of agricultural villages and towns in the valleys of the
Tigris and Euphrates rivers in Mesopotamia (modern-day Iraq). During the fourth mil-
lennium B.C.E., human population increased rapidly in the area, which in turn presented
inhabitants with the challenge of keeping order in a large-scale society. Over time, by
experimentation and adaptation, they created states and governmental machinery that
brought political and social order to their territories. Moreover, effective political and
military organization enabled them to build regional empires and extend their authority
to neighboring peoples.

Mesopotamia: "The Land between the Rivers"

The place-name Mesopotamia comes from two Greek words meaning "the land between
the rivers." Mesopotamia receives little rainfall, but the Tigris and the Euphrates brought
large volumes of freshwater to the region. Early cultivators realized that by tapping these

CYPR US Irrigable Land between the

Tigris and Euphrates rivers.
Mediterranean Sea SYRIA
PALEST INE Ba:byltm •
,J~~~;~a
Uruk
.
Sinai ARABI A
EGYPT
Prpi11w/"
A H.4 RA

MAP 1.1 I Early Mesopotamia, 3000-2000 s.c.E. Note the locations of Mesopotamian
cities in relation to the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. In what ways were the rivers important
for Mesopotamian society?

CHAPTER I THE FOUNDATIONS OF COMPLEX SOCIETIES 9

 rivers, building reservoirs, and digging canals, they could irrigate fields of barley, wheat,
and peas. Small-scale irrigation began in Mesopotamia soon after 6000 B.C.E.

s U M E R Artificial irrigation led to increased food supplies, which in turn supported a

rapidly increasing human population and attracted migrants from other regions. Human
numbers grew especially fast in the land of Sumer in the southern half of Mesopotamia.
By about 5000 B.C.E. the Sumerians were constructing elaborate irrigation networks that
helped them realize abundant agricultural harvests. By 3000 B.C.E. the population of
Sumer approached one hundred thousand-an unprecedented concentration of people in
ancient times-and the Sumerians were the dominant people of Mesopotamia.

s E M IT I c: M I G RANTs While supporting a growing population, the wealth of

Sumer also attracted migrants from other regions. Most of the new arrivals were Semitic
peoples-so called because they spoke tongues in the Semitic family oflanguages, includ-
ing Akkadian, Aramaic, Hebrew, and Phoenician. Semitic peoples were nomadic herders
who went to Mesopotamia from the Arabian and Syrian deserts to the south and west.
They often intermarried with the Sumerians, and they largely adapted to Sumerian ways.

The remains of Ur sUMERIAN c: ITY-STATE S Beginningabout4000 B.C.E., as human numbers

www.mhhe .com/ increased in southern Mesopotamia, the Sumerians built the world's first cities. These cit-
bentleybrief2e
ies differed markedly from the neolithic villages that preceded them. Unlike the earlier
settlements, the Sumerian cities were centers of political and military authority, and their
jurisdiction extended into the surrounding regions. Moreover, bustling marketplaces that
drew buyers and sellers from near and far turned the cities into economic centers as well.
Finally, the cities also served as cultural centers where priests maintained organized reli-
gions and scribes developed traditions of writing and formal education. For almost a mil-
lenium, from 3200 to 2350 B.C.E., a dozen Sumerian cities-Eridu, Ur, Uruk, Lagash,
Nippur, Kish, and others-dominated public affairs in Mesopotamia.
These cities all experienced internal and external pressures that prompted them to es-
tablish states-formal governmental institutions that wielded authority throughout their
territories. Internally, the cities needed recognized authorities to maintain order and en-
sure that inhabitants cooperated on community projects. With their expanding popula-
tions, the cities also needed to prevent conflicts between urban residents from escalating
into serious civic disorder. In addition, because agriculture was crucial to the welfare
of urban residents, the cities all became city-states: they not only controlled public life
within the city walls but also oversaw affairs in surrounding agricultural regions.
While preserving the peace, recognized authorities were also needed to organize work
on projects of value to the entire community. Palaces, temples, and defensive walls domi-
nated all the Sumerian cities. Particularly impressive were the ziggurats-distinctive
stepped pyramids that housed temples and altars to the principal local deity. More im-
portant, however, were the irrigation systems that supported productive agriculture and
urban society. As their population grew, the Sumerians expanded their networks of res-
ervoirs and canals, whose construction and maintenance required untold thousands of
laborers and provided precious water for Sumerian crops.

s U M E R IAN K I N G s As the wealth of Sumerian cities grew, they began to face

increasing external problems from raiders outside the cities. The cities responded to that
threat by building defensive walls and organizing military forces. Thus the need to recruit,
train, equip, maintain, and deploy military forces created another demand for recognized
authority. To answer that demand, the earliest Sumerian governments were probably
made up of assemblies of prominent men who made decisions on behalf of the whole

Sumerians (soo-MEHR-ee-uhns)
Semitic (suh-MIHT-ihk)
ziggurats (ZIG-uh-rahts)

10 PART I THE EARLY COMPLEX SOCIETIES, 3500 TO 500 s c E .

SUMERIAN ZIGGURAT. 1 The massive temple of the moon god Nanna-Suen (sometimes known as Sin) dominated the
Sumerian city of Ur. Constructing temples of this size required a huge investment of resources and thousands of laborers.
How might commoners have viewed such massive structures?

community. By about 3000 B.C.E., however, most Sumerian cities were ruled by individ-
ual kings who claimed absolute authority within their realms. By 2500 B.C.E. city-states
ruled by kings dominated public life in Sumer.

The Course of Empire

Conflicts between city-states often led to war between ambitious or aggrieved kings. How-
ever, after 2350 B.C.E. a series of conquerors sought to put an end to these constant conflicts
by building empires that supervised the affairs of numerous subject cities and peoples.

sA R G D N D F A K K A D The first of these conquerors was Sargon of Akkad. A

talented administrator and brilliant warrior, Sargon (2370-2315 B.C.E.) began his career
as a minister to the king of Kish. About 2334 B.C.E. he organized a coup against the king,
recruited an army, and went on the offensive against the Sumerian city-states. He con-
quered the cities one by one, destroyed their defensive walls, and placed them under his
own governors and administrators. Sargon financed his empire by seizing control of trade
routes and taxing the goods that traveled along them, which allowed him to transform his
capital at Akkad into the wealthiest and most powerful city in the world. At the high point
of his reign, his empire embraced all of Mesopotamia, and his armies had ventured as far
afield as the Mediterranean and the Black Sea.
By about 2150 B.C.E. Sargon' s empire had collapsed in the midst of rebellion from
within and invasion from outsiders. Yet the memory of his deeds, recorded in legends and
histories as well as in his own works of propaganda, inspired later conquerors to follow
his example. Most prominent of these later conquerors was the Babylonian Hammurabi

Hammurabi (hahm-uh-RAH -bee)

CHAPTER I THE FOUNDATIONS OF COMPLEX SOCIETIES 11

 (reigned 1792-1750 B.C.E.), who styled himself "king of the four
quarters of the world." Hammurabi improved on Sargon's ad-
ministrative techniques by relying on centralized bureaucratic rule
and regular taxation rather than on suppression and plunder.

HAM M U R A B I' s LAWs By these means Hammurabi

developed a more efficient and predictable government than his
predecessors and also spread its costs more evenly over the popula-
tion. Hammurabi also sought to maintain his empire by providing
it with a code of law, which became the most extensive and com-
plete Mesopotamian law code up to that point. In the prologue to
his laws, Hammurabi proclaimed that the gods had chosen him "to
promote the welfare of the people, ... to cause justice to prevail in
the land, to destroy the wicked and evil, [so] that the strong might
not oppress the weak, to rise like the sun over the people, and to
light up the land." Hammurabi's laws established high standards
of behavior and stern punishments for violators. They prescribed
death penalties for murder, theft, fraud, false accusations, shelter-
ing of runaway slaves, failure to obey royal orders, adultery, and
incest. Civil laws regulated prices, wages, commercial dealings,
marital relationships, and the conditions of slavery.
The code relied heavily on the principle that offenders should
suffer punishments resembling their violations. However, the
code did not treat all social classes equally and demanded lesser
punishments for those of higher classes who committed crimes
against those of lower classes. In addition, local judges did not al-
ways follow the prescriptions ofHammurabi's code: indeed, they
frequently relied on their own judgment when deciding cases that
came before them. Nevertheless, Hammurabi's laws established a
set of common standards that lent some degree of cultural unity
to the far-flung Babylonian empire.
Eventually, the wealth of the Babylonian empire attracted in-
vaders. Foremost among them were the Hittites, who had built
HAMMURABI's LAws. I This handsome basalt a powerful empire in Anatolia (modern-day Turkey). By about
stele shows Hammurabi receiving his royal authority from 1595 B.C.E. the Babylonian empire had crumbled before Hittite
the sun god, Shamash. Some four thousand lines of Ham- assaults. For several centuries after the fall of Babylon, southwest
murabi's laws are inscribed below. Why would it have Asia was a land of considerable turmoil, as regional states com-
been important to emphasize Hammurabi's connection peted for power and position while migrants and invaders strug-
to divinity? gled to establish footholds for themselves in Mesopotamia and
neighboring regions.

Drawing of Khorsabad, T H E AS S Y R IAN E M PI R E Imperial rule returned to Mesopotamia with the

an Assyrian city
Assyrians, a people from northern Mesopotamia who had built a compact state in the Ti-
www.mhhe.com/
bentleybrief2e gris River valley during the nineteenth century B.C.E. Taking advantage of their location
on trade routes running both north-south and east-west, the Assyrians built flourishing
cities at Assur and Nineveh. They built a powerful and intimidating army by organizing
their forces into standardized units and placing them under the command of professional
officers chosen on the basis of merit and skill. They supplemented infantry with cavalry
forces and light, swift, horse-drawn chariots, which they borrowed from the Hittites.
These chariots were devastating instruments of war that allowed archers to attack their
enemies from rapidly moving platforms.
Many states jockeyed for power following the collapse of the Babylonian empire, but
after about 1300 B.C.E. the Assyrians gradually extended their authority to much of south-

Assyrians (uh-SEER-ee-uhns)

12 PART I THE EARLY COMPLEX SOCIETIES. 3500 TO 500 s.c . E

 • Nineveh

• Assur
CRETE

CYPRUS M E SO POTA MIA

Mediterranean Sea
,.;;;-~ Ba bylon •
,::: • Jericho
;{ Nippur•
0 ~ " ARABIA

Hittite empire
Sinai Hammurabi's empire
Peninsula
Assyrian empire
SAHARA Area of Mesopotamia
DESERT conquered by Hittites

· • Thebes

MAP 1.2 I Mesopotamian empires, 1800-600 s.c.E. Mesopotamian empires facilitated

interactions between peoples from different societies. Consider the various land, river, and sea
The distinctive shape of the
routes by which peoples of Mesopotamia, Anatolia, and Egypt were able to communicate with
Assyrian empire closely correlates
one another in the second and first millennia s.c.E. to areas that could be irrigated
by large rivers.

west Asia. At its high point, during the eighth and seventh centuries B.C.E., the Assyrian
empire embraced not only Mesopotamia but also Syria, Palestine, much of Anatolia, and
most of Egypt.
Like most other Mesopotamian peoples, the Assyrians relied on the administrative Mesopotamian empires
WINW.n1hhe.com/
techniques pioneered by their Babylonian predecessors, and they followed laws much like buro\lc•ybnef2"
those enshrined in the code of Hammurabi. They also preserved a great deal of Mesopo-
tamian literature in huge libraries maintained at their large and lavish courts. Yet Assyrian
domination was extremely unpopular and proved impossible to maintain. In 612 B.C.E. a
combination of internal unrest and external assault brought the empire down.

THE NEW BABY L 0 N IAN EMPIRE For half a century, from 600 to 550
B.C.E., Babylon once again dominated Mesopotamia during the New Babylonian empire,
sometimes called the Chaldean empire. King Nebuchadnezzar (reigned 605-562 B.C.E.)
lavished wealth and resources on his capital city. Babylon occupied some 850 hectares
(more than 2,100 acres), and the city's defensive walls were reportedly so thick that a four-
horse chariot could turn around on top of them. Within the walls there were enormous
palaces and 1,179 temples, some of them faced with gold and decorated with thousands
of statues. When one of the king's wives longed for flowering shrubs from her mountain

Nebuchadnezzar (neb-uh-kud-NEZ-er)

CHAPTER I THE FOUNDATIONS OF COMPLEX SOCIETIES

 homeland, Nebuchadnezzar had them planted in terraces above the city walls, and the
hanging gardens of Babylon have symbolized the city's luxuriousness ever since.
By this time, however, peoples beyond Mesopotamia had acquired advanced weapons
and were experimenting with techniques of administering large territories. As a result,
in the mid-sixth century B.C.E. Mesopotamians largely lost control of their affairs, and
foreign conquerors absorbed them into their own empires.

THE FORMATION OF
A COMPLEX SOCIETY
AND SOPHISTICATED
CULTURAL TRADITIONS
With the emergence of cities and the congregation of dense populations in urban spaces,
specialized labor proliferated. The Mesopotamian economy became increasingly diverse,
and trade linked the region with distant peoples. Clearly defined social classes emerged,
as small groups of people concentrated wealth and power in their own hands, and Meso-
potamia developed into a patriarchal society that vested authority largely in adult males.
Mesopotamians also allocated some of their resources to individuals who worked to de-
velop sophisticated cultural traditions, including the invention of writing, which enabled
them to record information for future retrieval. Indeed, writing soon became a founda-
tion for education, science, literature, and religious reflection.

Economic Specialization and Trade

When large numbers of people began to congregate in cities and work at tasks other than
agriculture, they vastly expanded the stock of human skills. Craftsmen refined techniques
inherited from earlier generations and experimented with new ways of doing things. Pot-
tery making, textile manufacture, woodworking, leather production, brick making, stone-
cutting, and masonry all became distinct occupations in the world's earliest cities.

B R D N Z E MET ALL U R G Y Metallurgical innovations ranked among the most

important developments that came about because of specialized labor. About 3500 B.C.E.
experimentation with copper metallurgy led to the invention of bronze when Mesopota-
mian metalworkers learned to alloy copper with tin. Unlike pure copper, bronze is both
hard and strong, and it quickly became the preferred metal for military weaponry as crafts-
men turned out swords, spears, axes, shields, and armor made of the recently invented
metal. And although bronze was expensive, over a long period Mesopotamian farmers
also began to use bronze knives and bronze-tipped plows instead of tools made of bone,
wood, stone, or obsidian.

I R D N M ETA L L U R G Y After about 1000 B.C.E. Mesopotamian craftsmen began

to manufacture effective tools and weapons with iron as well as bronze. Whereas early
experimentation with iron metallurgy resulted in products that were too brittle for heavy-
duty uses, by about 1300 B.C.E. craftsmen from Hittite society in Anatolia (discussed
later in this chapter) developed techniques of forging exceptionally strong iron tools and
weapons. As knowledge of those techniques spread, Assyrian conquerors made particu-
larly effective use of them by forging iron weapons to build their empire. Iron also had the
advantage of being less expensive than bronze, which quickly made it the metal of choice
for weapons and tools.

T H E WHEE L Other craftsmen focused on devising efficient means of transporta-

tion based on wheeled vehicles and sailing ships, both of which facilitated long-distance
trade. Sumerians first invented the wheel in about 3500 B.C.E., and they were building
wheeled carts by 3000 B.C .E. Wheeled carts and wagons enabled people to haul heavy

14 PART I T H E EARLY COMPLEX SOCI ET I E S, 3500 TO 500 s . c . E.

 SUMERIAN SHIP-
B U ILDING. I A silver model
of a boat discovered in a royal
tomb at Ur throws light on Sume-
rian transportation of grain and
other goods on the rivers, canals,
and marshes of southern Mesopo-
tamia about 2700 s.c.E.

loads of bulk goods over much longer distances than human porters or draft animals could
manage. The wheel rapidly diffused from Sumer to neighboring lands, and within a few
centuries it had become a standard means of overland transportation.

SHIPBUILDING Sumerians also experimented with technologies of maritime

transportation. By 3500 B.C.E. they had built watercraft that allowed them to venture into
the Persian Gulf and beyond. By 2300 B.C.E. they were trading regularly with merchants
of Harappan society in the Indus River valley of northern India (discussed in chapter 3),
which they reached by sailing through the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea. During the
time of the Babylonian empire, Mesopotamians traded extensively with peoples in all
directions: they imported silver from Anatolia, cedarwood from Lebanon, copper from
Arabia, gold from Egypt, tin from Persia, lapis lazuli from Mghanistan, and semiprecious
stones from northern India.

The Emergence of a Stratified

Patriarchal Society
With their increasingly specialized labor and long-distance trade, cities provided many more
opportunities for the accumulation of wealth than ever before. As a result, social distinc-
tions in Mesopotamia became much more sharply defined than those in neolithic villages.

S D c I A L c LAS S E S In early Mesopotamia the ruling classes originally consisted

of kings and nobles who were elected to their positions because of their valor and success
as warriors. However, royal status soon became hereditary, as kings arranged for their sons
to succeed them. Nobles were mostly members of royal families and other close support-
ers of the kings and thus controlled significant wealth and power. Members of the ruling
class displayed their high status through large-scale construction projects and by lavishly
decorating their capital cities.

T E M P L E c D M M U N IT I E S Closely allied with the ruling elites were priests and

priestesses, many of whom were younger relatives of the rulers. The principal role of the
priestly elites was to intervene with the gods to ensure good fortune for their communities.
In exchange for those services, priests and priestesses lived in temple communities and re-
ceived offerings of food, drink, and clothing from city inhabitants. Temples also generated
income from the vast tracts of land that they owned and large workshops that they main-
tained. Because of their wealth, temples provided comfortable livings for their inhabitants,
and they also served the needs of the larger community. For instance, temples functioned as
banks where individuals could store wealth, and they helped underwrite trading ventures to

CHAPTER I THE FOUNDATIONS OF COMPLEX SOCIETIES 15

 distant lands. They also helped those in need by taking in orphans, supplying grain in times
of famine, and providing ransoms for community members captured in battle.
Apart from the ruling and priestly elites, Mesopotamian society included less privileged
classes of free commoners, dependent clients, and slaves. Free commoners mostly worked
as peasant cultivators in the countryside on land owned by their families, although some
also worked in the cities as builders, craftsmen, or professionals. D ependent clients pos-
sessed no property and usually worked as agricultural laborers on estates owned by others.
Free commoners and dependent clients all paid taxes-usually in the form of surplus ag-
ricultural production-that supported the ruling classes, military forces, and temple com-
munities. In addition, free commoners and dependent clients were subject to conscription
by ruling authorities to provide labor services for large-scale construction projects such as
roads, ciry walls, irrigation systems, temples, and public buildings.

SLAVES Slaves came from three main sources: prisoners of war, convicted criminals,
and heavily indebted individuals who sold themselves into slavery to satisfY their obliga-
COMMONERS IN MESOPO- tions. Some slaves worked as agricultural laborers on the estates of nobles or temple com-
TAMIA. I Gypsum carving of munities, but most were domestic servants in wealthy households. Many masters granted
an elderly couple from the city of
slaves their freedom, often with a financial bequest, after several years of good service.
Nippur about 2500 s.c.E. How does
In addition to recognizing differences of rank, wealth, and social status, Mesopota-
this figure give us insight into
daily life among the Sumerians? mians built a patriarchal society that vested authority over public and private affairs in
adult men. Men made most of the important decisions within households and dominated
public life as well. In effect, men ruled as kings, and decisions about policies and public
affairs rested almost entirely in their hands.

G E N D E R R 0 L E S Hammurabi' slaws throw considerable light on sex and gender

relations in ancient Mesopotamia. The laws recognized men as heads of their households
and entrusted all major family decisions to their judgment. Men even had the power to
sell their wives and children into slavery to satisfY their debts. In the interests of protect-
ing the reputations of husbands and the legitimacy of offspring, the laws prescribed death
by drowning as the punishment for adulterous wives, as well as for their partners, while
permitting men to engage in consensual sexual relations with concubines, slaves, or pros-
titutes without penalty.
In spite of their subordinate legal status, women made their influence felt in Mesopo-
tamian society. At ruling courts women sometimes advised kings and their governments.
A few women wielded great power as high priestesses who managed the enormous estates
belonging to their temples. Others obtained a formal education and worked as scribes-
literate individuals who prepared administrative and legal documents for governments
and private parties. Women also pursued careers as midwives, shopkeepers, brewers, bak-
ers, tavern keepers, and textile manufacturers.
During the second millennium B.C.E., however, Mesopotamian men progressively
tightened their control over the social and sexual behavior of women. To protect family
fortunes and guarantee the legitimacy of heirs, Mesopotamians insisted on the virginity of
brides at marriage, and they forbade casual socializing between married women and men
outside their family. By 1500 B.C.E. and probably even earlier, married women in Meso-
potamian cities had begun to wear veils when they ventured beyond their own households
in order to discourage the attention of men from other families. This concern to control
women's social and sexual behavior spread throughout much of southwest Asia and the
Mediterranean basin, where it reinforced patriarchal social structures.

The Development of Written

Cultural Traditions
The world's earliest known writing came from Mesopotamia. Sumerians invented a sys-
tem of writing about the middle of the fourth millennium B.C.E. to keep track of commer-
cial transactions and tax collections. They first experimented with pictographs represent-
ing animals, agricultural products, and trade items that figured prominently in tax and

1.6 PART I THE EARLY COMPLEX SOCIETIES. 3500 TO 500 B c E

SOURCES FROM THE PAST

The Flood Story from the Epic of Gilgamesh

The Epic of Gilgamesh is the oldest surviving epic poem in history, dating from about The Epic of Gilgamesh
www.rnhho.corn/
2500 B. C. E. As part ofhis adventures, Gilgamesh seeks the secret ofimmortality from a bentleybn~f2e

wise man named Ut-napishtim. During the visit, Ut-napishtim tells him how the god
Ea alerted him to a plot by the gods to destroy humankind by a massive flood. Here,
Ut-napishtim recounts the story to Gilgamesh.

This is the message: Which had struggled like a woman in labor, blew them-
"Man of Shuruppak, son of Ubara-Tutu,* selves out.
Dismantle your house, build a boat. The sea became calm, the wind grew quiet, the flood
Leave possessions, search out living things. held back.
Reject chattels' and save lives! [S]ilence reigned, for all mankind had returned to clay.. ..
Put aboard the seed of all living things, into the boat. The boat came to rest on Mount Nimush." ...
The boat that you are to build When the seventh day arrived,
Shall have her dimensions in proportion, I put out and released a dove.
Her width and length should be in harmony, The dove went; it came back,
Roof her like the Apsu."** For no perching place was visible to it; and it turned
I realized and spoke to my master Ea, round .
"I have paid attention to the words that you spoke I put out and released a swallow.
in this way, The swallow went; it came back,
My master, and I shall act upon them .... For no perching place was visible to it, and it turned
I loaded her with everything there was, round.
Loaded her with all the silver, I put out and released a raven.
Loaded her with all the gold The raven went, and saw the waters receding.
Loaded her with all the seed of living things, all of them. And it ate, preened, lifted its tail and did not turn round.
I put on board the boat all my kith and kin.
*This refers to Uc-napishcim
Put on board cattle from open country, wild beasts from + Propeny
open country, all kinds of craftsmen .... •• The realm of freshwater under the earth
That hour arrived; ... ++A mountain in modern Iraq
I saw the shape of the storm,
The srorm was terrifying to see. • Discuss the similarities between the flood story above
I went aboard the boat and closed the door. ... and the story of Noah's Ark from the Old Testament. Why
For six days and seven nights are these stories so similar?
The wind blew, flood and tempest overwhelmed the land;
When the seventh day arrived the tempest, flood and SOURCE: Thomas Sanders eta!. Encounters in World History: Sources and
onslaught Themes from the Global Past, Vol. I. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2006, pp. 40-41.

commercial transactions. By 3100 B.C.E. conventional signs representing specific words

had spread throughout Mesopotamia.
A writing system that depends on pictures is useful for purposes such as keeping re-
cords, but it is a cumbersome way to communicate abstract ideas. Beginning about 2900
B.C. E. the Sumerians developed a more flexible system of writing that used graphic sym-
bols to represent sounds, syllables, and ideas as well as physical objects. By combining
pictographs and other symbols, the Sumerians created a powerful writing system.

cuNEIFoRM wRIT 1N G When writing, a Sumerian scribe used a stylus fash-

ioned from a reed to impress symbols on wet clay. Because the stylus left lines and wedge-
shaped marks, Sumerian writing is known as cuneiform, a term that comes from two Latin

CHAPTER I THE FOUNDATIONS OF COMPLEX SOCIETIES 17

 words meani ng "wedge- haped.'' When dried in the sun or baked in an oven, the clay
hardened and preserved a permanen t record of the scribe's message. Babylonians, Assyr-
ians, and o.ther peoples later adapted the Sumerians' script to their own languages, and the
tradition of cuneiform writing continued for more than three thousand years.
Though originally invented for purposes of keeping records, writing clearly had po-
tential that went far beyond the purely practical matter of storing information. Meso-
potamians relied on writing to communicate complex ideas about the world, the gods,
human beings, and their relationships with one another. Indeed, writing made possible
the emergence of a distinctive cultural tradition that shaped Mesopotamian values for
almost three millennia.

ASTRONOMY AND MATHEMATICS Literacy led to a rapid expansion

of knowledge. Mesopotamian scholars devoted themselves to the study of astronomy and
mathematics-both important sciences for agricultural societies. Knowledge of astron-
omy helped them prepare accurate calendars, which in turn enabled them to chart the
rhythms of the seasons and determine the appropriate times for planting and harvesting
crops. They used their mathematical skills to survey agricultural lands and allocate them
to the proper owners or tenants. Some Mesopotamian conventions persist to the present
day: Mesopotamian scientists divided the year into twelve months, for example, and they
divided the hour into sixty minutes, each composed of sixty seconds.

THE E PI c oF G I L GAM E s H Mesopotamians also used writing to commu-

nicate absrract idea ·, investigate intellectual problems, and reflect on human beings and
their place in the world. Bes known of the reflective literature from Mesopotamia is
the epicI{{ GiLgmrJ.eJb, completed frer 2000 B.C.E. In recounting the experiences of Gil-
gamesh and Enkidu, the epic explored themes of friendship, relations between humans
and the gods, and especially the meaning of life and death. The stories of Gilgamesh and
Enkidu resonated so widely that for some two thousand years-from the time of the
Sumerian city-states to the fall of the Assyrian empire-they were the principal vehicles
for Mesopotamian reflections on moral issues.

THE BROADER INFLUENCE

OF MESOPOTAMIAN SOCIETY
While building cities and regional states, Mesopotamians deeply influenced the develop-
ment and experiences of peoples living far beyond their own lands. Often their wealth and
power attracted the attention of neighboring peoples. Sometimes Mesopotamians pro-
jected their power to foreign lands and imposed their ways by force. Occasionally migrants
left Mesopotamia and carried their inherited traditions to new lands. Mesopotamian influ-
ence did not completely transform other peoples and turn them into carbon copies of Mes-
opotamians. On the contrary, other peoples adopted Mesopotamian ways selectively and
adapted them to their own needs and interests. Yet the broader impact of Mesopotamian
society shows that, even in early times, complex agricultural societies organized around cit-
ies had strong potential to influence the development of distant human communities.

Hebrews, Israelites, and jews

The best-known cases of early Mesopotamian influence involved Hebrews, Israelites, and
Jews, who preserved memories of their historical experiences in an extensive collection of
sacred writings. Hebrews were speakers of the ancient Hebrew language. Israelites formed
a branch of Hebrews who settled in Palestine (modern-day Israel) after 1300 B.c.E. Jews
descended from southern Israelites who inhabited the kingdom of Judah. For more than
two thousand years, Hebrews, Israelites, and Jews interacted constantly with Mesopo-
tamians and other peoples as well, with profound consequences for the development of
their own societies.

18 PART I THE E A RLY COMPLE X SOCIETIES, 3500 TO 500 e c . E

T H E E A R LY H E B R E W S The earliest Hebrews were pastoral nomads who
inhabited lands between Mesopotamia and Egypt during the second millennium B.C.E. As
Mesopotamia prospered, some of the Hebrews settled in the region 's cities. According to
the Hebrew scriptures (the Old Testament of the Christian Bible), the Hebrew patriarch
Abraham came from the Sumerian city ofUr, but he migrated to northern Mesopotamia
about 1850 B.C.E. Abraham's descendants continued to recognize many of the deities,
values, and customs common to Mesopotamian peoples. Hebrew law, for example, bor-
rowed heavily from H ammurabi's code. The Hebrews also told the story of a devastating
flood that had destroyed all early human society, which was a variation on similar flood
stories related from the earliest days of Sumerian society. One early version of the story
made its way into the Epic oJGilgamesh. The Hebrews altered the story and adapted it to
their own interests and purposes, bur their familiarity with the flood story shows that they
participated fully in the larger society of Mesopotamia.

MIGRATIONS AND SETTLEMENT IN PALEST! NE According to

their scriptures, some Hebrews migrated from Palestine to Egypt during the eighteenth
century B.C.E. About 1300 B.C.E., however, this branch of the Hebrews departed under
the leadership of Moses and returned to Palestine. Organized into a loose federation
of twelve tribes, those Hebrews, known as the Israelites, fought bitterly with other in-
habitants of Palestine and carved out a territory for themselves. Eventually the Israelites
abandoned their inherited tribal structure in favor of a Mesopotamian-style monarchy
that brought all their twelve tribes under unified rule. During the reigns of King David
(1000-970 B.C.E.) and King Solomon (970-930 B.C. E.), Israelites dominated the ter-
ri tory berween Syria and the Sinai peninsula. They built an elaborate and cosmopoli-
tan capi tal city at Jerusalem and entered into diplomatic and commercial relations with
Mesopo tamia ns, Egyptians, and Arabian peoples. Like other peoples of southwest Asia,
the IsraeL res made use of iron technology to strengthen their military forces and produce
tough agricultural implements.

MosES AND M 0 N 0 THEIsM After the time of Moses, however, the religious
beliefs of the Israelites developed along increasingly distinctive lines. Whereas the early
H ebrews had recognized many or rhe same gods as their Me opotami:~ n neighbors Moses
emb raced monotheism: he raughr rhar there was only on e god known: as Yahweh, who was
a supremely powerful deity, the crearor and ustainer of the world. Ya hweh expected his
foll owers ro worshi p him alone and he demanded that they observe high moral and ethical
standards. In the Ten Commandments, a set of religious and ethical principles that Moses
announced to the Israelites, Yahweh warned his followers against destructive and antisocial
behavior such as lying, theft, adultery, and murder. Between about 1000 and 400 B.C.E.,
the Israelites' religious leaders compiled their teachings in a set of holy scriptures known
as the Torah (Hebrew for "doctrine" or "teaching"), which laid down Yahweh's laws and
outlined his role in creating the world and guiding human affairs. The Torah taught that
Yahweh would reward those who obeyed his will and punish those who did not.

ASSYRIAN AND BABYLONIAN CONQUESTS The Israelites

placed increasing emphasis on devotion to Yahweh as they experienced a series of political
and military setbacks. Following King Solomon's reign, tribal tensions led to the division
of the community into a large kingdom of Israel in the north and a smaller kingdom of
Judah in the land known as Judea to the south. In 722 B.C.E. Assyrian forces conquered
the northern kingdom and deported many of its inhabitants to other regions, causing
many of the depmred to lose rh eir identity as Israelites. In 586 B.C.E., the ew Babylonian
empire mppled the kingdom of Judah and destroyed Jerusalem, forcing many residents
Lmo exi le. Un li ke tb ·ir c usim to the north, however, most of these l sraelires maintained

monotheism (mah-noh-THEE-iz'm)
Yahweh (YAH-way)

CH A PTER I THE FOUNDATI O NS O F COMPLE X SO CI ETIES 19

 their religious identity, and many of the deportees eventually returned to Judea, where
they became known as Jews.
Ironically, perhaps, the Israelites' devotion to Yahweh intensified during this era of tur-
moil. Between the ninth and sixth centuries B. C .E., a series of prophets urged the Israelites
to rededicate themselves to their faith and obey Yahweh's commandments. Failure to do
so, they warned, would be punished by Yahweh in the form of conquest by foreigners.
M any Israeli tes mok d1e As ycian and Baby! nian conquests as proof that the prophets
accurately rep resented Ya.hweh's mind and will.
The exiles who returned to Judea after the Babylonian conquest did not abandon hope
for a state of their own, and even organized several small Jewish states as tributaries to the
larger empires that dominated the area. But the returnees also built a distinctive religious
community based on meir conviction that they had a special relationship with Yahweh.
This conviction enabled the Jews to maintain a strong sense of identity as a people distinct
from others, even as they participated fully in the development of a larger complex society
in southwest Asia. Over the longer term, Jewish monotheism, scriptures, and moral con-
cerns also profoundly influenced the development of Christianity and Islam.

The Phoenicians
Ph oe nici a n art ifa cts PH [J EN I CIA N TRADE N ETWD R K S North of the Israelites' kingdom in
www.mhhe.com/
bentleybrief2e Palestine, the Phoenicians occupied a narrow coastal plain between the Mediterranean
Sea and the Lebanon Mountains. They spoke a Semitic language, referring to themselves
as Canaani tes and rheir land, as anaan . (The term Phoenician comes from early G reek
references.) ometime after 3000 B. C.£., the Phoenicians established a eries of dry-states
m led by local kings, me most im po1·tant of which wereTyre,, ido n, Beirut, and Byblos.
Though not a numerous or mili tar ily powetfu l peop le, me Phoenicians infl uence I o-
cledes thro ugho ut the Mediterranean basi11 because oF rheir trade and commun ication
networks. Their meager lands did not permit development of a large agricultural society,
so after about 2500 B.C .E. the Phoenicians turned increasingly to industry and trade. Al-
though the Phoenicians traded overland, they were also excellent sailors, and they built the
best ships of their times. Between 1200 and 800 B. C.E., they dominated Mediterranean
trade. They established commercial colonies in Rhodes, Cyprus, Sicily, Sardinia, Spain,
and north Mrica. They sailed far and wide in search of raw materials, which took them
well beyond the Mediterranean: Phoenician merchant ships visited the
Canary Islands, coastal ports in Portugal and France, and even the dis-
tant British Isles, and adventurous Phoenician mariners made explor-
atory voyages to the Azores Islands and down the west coast of Mrica as
THINKING AB 0 U T far as the Gulf of Guinea.

ALP H A B E T I C WRIT I N G Like the Hebrews, the Phoeni-

cians largely adapted Mesopotamian cultural traditions to their own
TRADITIONS IN EARLY COMPLEX SOCI- needs. Their gods, fo r example, were mosdy adap ted from Mesopo ta-
ETIES . In the period between 3500 and 500 mian gods. The Phoenicians als creatively adapted the Mesoporam ian
B.C.E.,peoples such as the Sumerians, As- practice of wri ting by exp erimenting with impler alternative to cunei-
syrians, Hittites, and Phoenicians indepen- form . By 1500 B.C.E.l'hoenician cribesJ1ad d~ised an early alp habetic
dently developed distinctive characteristics crip t co nsisting of rwenty-two symbols rep resenting consonarrrs (the
in terms of architecture, economic pursuits, Phoenician alphabet had no sym bol fo r vowel ). Learn ing twemy-two
and technology. What were some of the de- lerrers and building word with mem was much easier d1an mem rizing
fining characteristics that marked these soci- he hw1d red of ymbols employed in cuneifor m. Becau e :alphabetic
eties as different from one another, and why writing required m u.ch less invesrmenr in education than did cw1eiform
might these differences have arisen? Think writing, more people were able to become literate than ever before.
carefully here about geographical location, Alphabetic writing spread widely as the Phoenicians traveled and
the presence or absence of plants and ani- traded throughout rhe Mediterranean basin. About the ninth century
mals, and the availability of resources.

Phoenicians (fi-NEE-shins)

20 PART I THE E A RLY COMPLE X S O CIETI E S , 35 0 0 TO 5 00 s c . E.

 Kingdom of Israel ~~
~ Kingdom ofjudah
- Phoenicia
Byblos Phoen ician city
• Phoenician colony SINA l
- Phonecian trade route
EGYPT
>SO""

"""
MAP 1. 3 1 Israel and Phoenicia, 1500-600 B.c. E. Note the location of Israel and Phoe-
nicia with respect to Mesopotamia, Egypt, and the Mediterranean Sea. How might geographic
location have influenced communications and exchanges between Israel, Phoenicia, and other
The coastal position of Phoenician
lands of the region? cities was conducive to trade by sea.

for example, reeks modified che l)hoenidan alphabet and :\dded symbols rep-
B.C.E. ,
resenting v wels. Romans la ter adapred the reek aJp bab t ro th eir own language and
passed it along w their cultural heir in Europe. In later cen.ruries alphabeci writing
spread to cenual A ia, soud1 Asia, and outheasr Asia, and uh imarely rhroughoul most of
the world.

THE INDO-EUROPEAN
MIGRATIONS
Mter 3000 B.C.E. Mesopotamia was a prosperous, productive region where peoples from
many different communities mixed and mingled. But Mesoporamia was only one region
in a much larger world of interaction and exchange. Mesopotamians and their neighbors
all dealt frequently with peoples from _regi ns 1m beyond sourhwest Asia. Among the mosr
influential of these peoples in the third an d ccond millennia B.CE. were those who b'po ke
various Indo-European languages. Their migrations throughout much of Eurasia pro-
foundly influenced historical development in both southwest Asia and the larger world.

Indo-European Origins
I N 0 0 • E U R 0 PEA N LA N G U A G E S During the eighteenth and nineteenth
ceo u ries, linguists n tked char many langu ages of Europe, southwest Asia, and India fea-
lU red remarkable si.mi l ~r i des in vocabul::uy and grammatical structure. Ancient languag-
es displaying these similari ties in Juded anslair (the sacred language of ancient India),
l. d Persian, Greek, and l arin . Beca use of the geographic regions where these tongues
are found, scholars refer to them as Indo-European languages. Major subgroups of the
Indo-European family oflanguages include Indo-Iranian, Greek, Balto-Slavic, Germanic,

CHAPTER I THE FOUNDATIONS OF COMPLEX SOCIETIES 21

Phoenician, Greek, Hebrew, NORTH SEMITIC GREEK ETRUSCAN LATIN I
and Roman letters. EARLY EARLY
PHOENICIAN HEBREW PHOENICIAN EARLY CLASSICAL EARLY EARLY CLASSICAL

i< ~ 2(. A A ,A- A A I

g j s CZ1 B s 8
I
I
1 \ 1 1 r I c I
I

L:) ~ ~ !J 6 (l 0 D I
Italic, and Celtic. English belongs to the Germanic subgroup of the Indo-European fam-
ily of languages.
Mter noticing linguistic similarities, scholars sought a way to explain the close relation-
sh ip berweeu rhe Indo-Europe<U1 languages. The only persuasive explanation for the high
degree of linguisric coincidence wm that speakers of Indo-European languages were all
descendams of ancestor who . poke a omrnon tongue and migrated from their original
homeland. As migrants esrabli hed separate communities and lost touch with one an-
other, their languageS evolved al ng different lines, adding new words, pronunciations,
and pell ings bur retaining rbe ba ic grammatical structure of their original speech.

THE IN D 0- E U R 0 PEA N H 0 MEL AN D The original homeland of Indo-

European speakers was probably the steppe region of modern-day Ukraine and southern
Russia, where the earliest of them built a society between about 4500 and 2500 B.C.E. A
central feature of Indo-European society was the domestication of wild horses from the
Eurasian steppe about 4000 B.C.E. Horses were initially used for food and soon thereafter
for riding as well. When Sumerian knowledge of bronze metallurgy spread to the Indo-
European homeland about 3000 B.C.E., Indo-European speakers devised ways to hitch
hor to cans wagons, and chariots. The possession of domesticated horses vastly mag-
n.ined rhe power of the Indo-Europeans. Horses enabled them to develop transportation
technologic · rhar were much faster and more efficient than other alternatives. Further-
more, because of their strength and speed, horses provided Indo-European speakers with
a tremendous military advantage over peoples they encountered. It is perhaps significant
that many groups of Indo-European peakeJ·s considered themselves superior to other
peoples: the terms A1yatt, lmn, and Eire (th official name of the modern Republic of
Ireland) all derive from the Indo-European word aryo, meaning "nobleman" or "lord."

Indo-European Expansion and Its Effects

T H E N AT U R E 0 F I N 0 0- E U R 0 PEA N M I G RAT I 0 N Horses also
provided Indo-European speakers with a means oF expand ing Far beyo nd r.h eir original
homeland. As they flourished in southern Russia, fndo -Eur pean speakers exp cienced
a population explosion, which prompted som e of them tO move in to the sparsely inhab-
ited eastern steppe or even beyond the grasslands alrogerhcJ. The earliest [ndo-European
migrations began about 3000 B.C.E. and continued undl about 1000 !l .C.E . Like ear ly
movements of other peoples, these were not mass migrations so much as gradual and
incremental processes that resulted in the spread oflndo-European languages and ethnic
communities, as small groups of people established settlements in new lands, which then
became foundations for further expansion.

THE HITTITES The most influential Indo-European migrants in ancient times

were the Hittites. About 1900 B.C.E. the Hittites migrated to the central plain of Anato-
lia, where they imposed their language and rule on the region's inhabitants. During the

22 PART I THE EARLY COMPLEX SOCIETIES, 3500 TO 500 s c , E,

I R 0 N AND MIG RAT I 0 N After about 1000 B.C. E., the pace of Bantu migra-
tions quickened, as Bantu peoples began to produce iron L ols and weapons. Iron tools
enabled Bantu cultivators to clear land and expand the z ne of agri ulrUJe more effectively
than before, while iron weapons strengthened the hand ofBanru groups, gainst adversar-
ies and competitors for land or other resources. Thus iron metallurgy supported rapid
population growth among the Bantu while also lending increased momentum to their
continuing migrations.

Early Agricultural Societies

of Sub-Saharan Africa
Several smaller migrations took place alongside the spread of Bantu peoples in sub-Saharan
Africa. Between 3500 and 1000 B.C.E., southern Kushite herders pushed into parts of east
Africa (modern-day Kenya and Tanzania), while Sudanese cultivators and herders moved
into the upper reaches of the Nile River (now southern Sudan and northern Uganda).
Meanwhile, Mande-speaking peoples who cultivated Afric.,111 rice established ommu-
nities along the Atlantic estuaries of west Afr.ica, and orher peoples speaking N iger-
Congo languages spread the cultivation of olaa from forest regio ns rhroughout much of
west Africa.

sPREAD 0 F A G R 1cULTURE Among the most importan t effi:ct ·of Ban tu

and rhcr mlgrari ns wa tbe establishment of agricultural societies th roughout most of
sub-Saharan Africa. Berween 1000 aJ1d 500 B.C.E., cultivators extended t.he cul tivation of
yams and grains de p imo east ru1d ·ou.th Africa (modern-day Kenya, Malawi, Mozam-
bique, Zimbabwe, and urh Africa), while herders introduced sheep and cattle to the
regi n. About the ~a me time, Bantu and oth er peoples speaking Niger-Congo languages
spl't.-"1 I the intensive cultivation of yams, oil palms, millet, and sorghum throughout west
and enna l Afri a whUe also intwducing sheep, pigs, and cattle to the region. By the
late centuries B.C.E., agriculture had reached almost all of sub-Saharan Africa except for
densely forested regions and deserts.
As cultivation and herding spread throughout sub-Saharan Africa, agricultural peoples
built distinctive societies and cultural traditions. Most Bantu and other peoples lived in
communities of a few hundred individuals led by chiefs. Many peoples recognized groups
known as age sets, or age grades, consisting of individuals born within a few years of one
another. Members of each age set jointly assume<;! re:>pon ibiliry fo r casks appropriate to
rheir levels of strength, energy, mawriry, and expe rience. Ow-ing their early years, for
example, members of an age et migh r perfo rm light publi chores. At maturity, member
jo! ndy underwent elnbo rate initiation rites that i.ntroduced rhem ro adul t ociety. Old er
men LJ.rivared Helds and pr vidcd m.ili tary service, and women tended to domestic chores
and sometimes traded at markets. In later years, members of age sets served as community
leaders and military officers.

A F R I cAN c U L T IV AT 0 R S African cultivators and herders also developed

distinctive cultural and religious traditions. Both Sudanic and Niger-Congo peoples (in-
cluding Banru speaker), for example, held mon otheistic religious beliefs by 5000 B.C.E.
Suclanic peop le~ recognized a si ngle, impersonal divine force that they regarded as the
sourc of both good and evil. They b ·lieved that this divine force could take the form of
in div idual sp iJ·i.rs, and they often adcf.ressed che divine force through prayers to intermedi-
ary spmts. he divine ~ rce itsd f. however, was ultimately responsible for rewards and
pun ishments meted our to h Lun:~ n beings. For their part, Niger-Congo peoples recog-
nize I a. single god origi..ll rtlly calltXI Nyamba who created the world and established the
p rin cip l •s hal wo uld govern irs develo pment rhen tepped ba k and allowed the world ro
proceed o n irs own. Ind.ivi luals did nor generally address rhis distant crearor god directly
but, rather, offered their prayers to ancesto r spirits and local tcrrirorial !>l )irits believed to
inhabit the world and influence the fortunes of living h wna ns. Pro per atte ntion ~o Lhcse

CHAPTER 2 EARLY AFRICAN SOCIETIES AND THE BANTU MIGRATIONS 43

 spirits would ensure rhem good fortune, they believed, whereas their neglect would bring
punishmenr or adversity from disgruntled spirits.
Individual communities frequemly borrowed religious elements from other communi-
ies 311d adapted rbei.r beliefs co ehwging circurnsr311ces or fres h undeman dings of the
world:. Migration of Ban tu and other peoples in parti ular resulted in a great deal of
cu lrural mixing and mingling, and religious beliefs often spre-ad to new communities in
the wake of po_pularion rnovem ms. After 1000 B.C.E., for example, as they encountered
Sudanic peoples and their reverence of a single divine force that was the source of good
and evil, many Bantu peoples associated the god Nyamba with goodness. As a result, this
formerly distant creator god took on a new moral dimension that brought him closer to
the lives of individuals. Thus changing religious beliefs sometimes reflected widespread
interactions among Mrican societies.

SUMMARY

Like other world regions , Africa was a land in which peoples of different societies regu-
larly traded, communicated, and interacted with one another from ancient times. African
agriculture and herding first emerged in rhe S uda~n . then pread both to the Nile River
valley and to arable lands throughout sub- aharan Afr.ica. Agriculrural crops and domes-
ticated animals from southwest Asia s on made their way Into the ile valley. With its
broad floodplains, Egypr became-an especi;d ly productive land, while Nubia supported
a smaller but flourishing society. Throughour the ile valley, abundant agricultural sur-
pluses supported dense populations and the construction of prosperous societies with
sophisticated cultural traditions. Elsewhere in sub-Saharan Africa, population were
less dense, but the migrations of Bantu and ocher peoples facilitated the spread of agri-
culture, and later iron metallurgy as well, throughout most of the region . Meanwhile,
the Nile River served as a route of trade and commu nication Linking Egypt and the
Mediterranean basin to the north with the Sudan and ub-Sabaran Africa to the south.
Only in the context of migration, trade, communication, and interaction is it possible to
understand the early development of African societies.

STUDY TERMS

Akhenaton (40) hieratic script (39) New Kingdom (32)

Amon-Re (39) hieroglyphics (39) Nile River (29)
Archaic Period (31) Hyksos (32) Nubia (27)
Aten (40) Kush (32) Old Kingdom (31)
Bantu (28) Menes (31) pharaoh (31)
Bantu migrations (42) Meroitic writing (39) pyramids (31)
cult of Osiris (40) Middle Kingdom (32) Sebiumeker (41)
Egypt (29) mummification (27) Turhmosis III (33)
Hatshepsut (37)

44 PART I THE EARLY COMPLEX SOCIETIES, 3500 TO 500 s c E

 F"CJR FURTHER READING

Cyril Aldred. The Egyptians. Rev. ed. New York, 1984. A popular, well-illustrated, and reliable survey
of ancient Egyptian history.
Christopher Ehret. An African Classical Age: Eastern and Southern Africa in World History, 1000 B.C.
to A.D. 400. Charlottesville, Va., 1998. A pathbreaking volume focusing on eastern and southern
Africa and drawing on both linguistic and archaeological evidence.
- - - . The Civilizations ofAfrica: A History to 1800. Charlottesville, Va., 2001. An important contri-
bution that views Africa in the context of world history.
Zahi Hawass. Silent Images: Women in Pharaonic Egypt. New York, 2000. A prominent archaeologist
draws on both textual and artifactual evidence in throwing light on women's experiences in an-
cient Egypt.
Miriam Lichtheim, ed. Ancient Egyptian Literature. 3 vols. Berkeley, 1973-80. An important collection
of primary sources in translation that reflect rhe resui i:S of rc em scholars.hip.
Roderick James Mcintosh. The Peoples ofthe Mirldl~ Niger: Tlu· M,wd ojG11ld. Oxfurd, 1998. Fascinating
or
volume emphasizing the environmental context wesr Africa n history.
Jan Vansina. Paths in the Rainforests: Toward a History of Political Tradition in Equatorial Africa.
Madison, 1990. A brilliant synthesis concentrating on central Africa by one of the world's fore-
most historians of Africa.
Derek A. Welsby. The Kingdom ofKush: The Napatan and Meroitic Empires. London, 1996. Draws on
both written and archaeological sources in tracing the development of ancient Nubia and charting
its relationship with Egypt.

CHAPTER 2 EARLY AFRICAN SOCIETIES AND THE BANTU MIGRATIONS 45